TITLE 12. HEALTH
STATE BOARD OF HEALTH
Final Regulation
Titles of Regulations: 12VAC5-230. State Medical
Facilities Plan (amending 12VAC5-230-10, 12VAC5-230-30; adding 12VAC5-230-40
through 12VAC5-230-1000; repealing 12VAC5-230-20).
12VAC5-240. General Acute Care Services (repealing
12VAC5-240-10 through 12VAC5-240-60).
12VAC5-250. Perinatal Services (repealing 12VAC5-250-10
through 12VAC5-250-120).
12VAC5-260. Cardiac Services (repealing 12VAC5-260-10
through 12VAC5-260-130).
12VAC5-270. General Surgical Services (repealing
12VAC5-270-10 through 12VAC5-270-60).
12VAC5-280. Organ Transplantation Services (repealing
12VAC5-280-10 through 12VAC5-280-70).
12VAC5-290. Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Treatment
Services (repealing 12VAC5-290-10 through 12VAC5-290-70).
12VAC5-300. Mental Retardation Services (repealing
12VAC5-300-10 through 12VAC5-300-70).
12VAC5-310. Medical Rehabilitation Services (repealing
12VAC5-310-10 through 12VAC5-310-70).
12VAC5-320. Diagnostic Imaging Services (repealing
12VAC5-320-10 through 12VAC5-320-480).
12VAC5-330. Lithotripsy Services (repealing 12VAC5-330-10
through 12VAC5-330-70).
12VAC5-340. Radiation Therapy Services (repealing
12VAC5-340-10 through 12VAC5-340-120).
12VAC5-350. Miscellaneous Capital Expenditures (repealing
12VAC5-350-10 through 12VAC5-350-60).
12VAC5-360. Nursing Home Services (repealing 12VAC5-360-10 through 12VAC5-360-70).
Statutory Authority: § 32.1-102.2 of the Code of Virginia.
Effective Date: February 15, 2009.
Agency Contact: Carrie Eddy, Policy Analyst, Department of Health, 3600 West Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23230, telephone (804) 367-2157, or email carrie.eddy@vdh.virginia.gov.
Summary:
Except for changes required by legislative mandate, the State Medical Facilities Plan (SMFP) has not been reviewed and updated since it was first promulgated in 1993. The intent of the revision project is to update the criteria and standards to reflect industry standards, remove archaic language and ambiguities, and consolidate all portions of the SMFP into one comprehensive document. As a result of the consolidation, 12VAC5-240 through 12VAC5-360 are repealed and 12VAC5-230 is amended.
Because of stakeholder concerns regarding the initial proposed draft, the Board of Health directed staff to reconvene the work group and consider additional amendments to the draft. Substantive changes were made as a result of the reconvened advisory group including, but not limited to, additional section breakouts to facilitate identification of specific topics, further clarification to definitions, adjusting the CT volume criteria from 10,000 procedures to 7,500 procedures, creating a section for long-term acute care hospitals, and establishing a separate formula to prorating mobile services.
Summary of Public Comments and Agency's Response: A summary of comments made by the public and the agency's response may be obtained from the promulgating agency or viewed at the office of the Registrar of Regulations.
Part I
Definitions and General Information
12VAC5-230-10. Definitions.
The following words and terms when used in Chapters 230
(12VAC5-230) through 360 (12VAC5-360) this chapter shall have the
following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
"Acceptability" means to the level of
satisfaction expressed by consumers with the availability, accessibility, cost,
quality, continuity and degree of courtesy and consideration afforded them by
the health care system.
"Accessibility" means the ability of a
population or segment of the population to obtain appropriate, available
services. This ability is determined by economic, temporal, locational,
architectural, cultural, psychological, organizational and informational
factors which may be barriers or facilitators to obtaining services.
"Acute psychiatric services" means hospital-based inpatient psychiatric services provided in distinct inpatient units in general hospitals or freestanding psychiatric hospitals.
"Acute substance abuse disorder treatment services" means short-term hospital-based inpatient treatment services with access to the resources of (i) a general hospital, (ii) a psychiatric unit in a general hospital, (iii) an acute care addiction treatment unit in a general hospital licensed by the Department of Health, or (iv) a chemical dependency specialty hospital with acute care medical and nursing staff and life support equipment licensed by the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services.
"Applicant" means any individual,
corporation, partnership, association, trust, or other legal entity, whether
governmental or private, submitting an application for a Certificate of Public
Need.
"Availability" means the quantity and types of
health services that can be produced in a certain area, given the supply of
resources to produce those services.
"Bassinet" means an infant care station,
including warming stations and isolettes [ , whether located in
a hospital nursery or labor and delivery unit ].
"Bed" means that unit, within the complement of
a medical are facility, subject to COPN review as required by § 32.1-102.1 of
the Code of Virginia and designated for use by patients of the facility or
service. For the purposes of this chapter, bed [ includes
does include ] cribs and bassinets used for pediatric patients
[ outside the, but does not include cribs and bassinets
in the newborn ] nursery or [ labor and delivery
neonatal special care ] setting.
"Cardiac catheterization" means a procedure
where a flexible tube is inserted into the patient through an extremity blood
vessel and advanced under fluoroscopic guidance into the heart chambers to
perform (i) a hemodynamic, electrophysiologic or angiographic examination of
the left or right heart chamber or the coronary arteries; (ii) aortic root
injections to examine the degree of aortic root regurgitation or deformity of
the aortic valve; or (iii) angiographic procedures to evaluate the coronary
arteries. Therapeutic intervention in a coronary artery may also be performed
using cardiac catheterization. Cardiac catheterization may include
therapeutic intervention, but does not include a simple right heart
catheterization for monitoring purposes as might be performed in an
electrophysiology laboratory, pulmonary angiography as an isolated procedure,
or cardiac pacing through a right electrode catheter.
"Certificate of Public Need" or
"COPN" means the orderly administrative process used to make medical
care facilities and services needs decisions.
"Charges" means all expenses incurred by the
provider in the production and delivery of health services.
"Commissioner" means the State Health Commissioner.
"Competing applications" means applications for the same or similar services and facilities that are proposed for the same [ health ] planning district, or same [ health ] planning region for projects reviewed on a regional basis, and are in the same batch review cycle.
"Computed tomography" or "CT" means a
noninvasive diagnostic technology that uses computer analysis of a series of
cross-sectional scans made along a single axis of a bodily structure or tissue
to construct a three-dimensional an image of that structure.
"Condition" means the agreed upon
qualifications placed on a project by the commissioner when granting a
Certificate of Public Need. Such conditions shall direct an applicant to
provide a level of care to indigents, accept patients requiring specialized
needs, or facilitate the development and operation of primary care services in
designated medically underserved areas of the applicant's service area.
"Continuing care retirement community" or
"CCRC" means a retirement community consistent with the requirements
of Chapter 49 (§ 38.2-4900 et seq.) of Title 38.2 of the Code of Virginia.
[ CCRCs can have nursing home services available on site or at
licensed facilities off site. ]
"COPN" means [ the a ]
Medical Care Facilities Certificate of Public Need [ Program
as contained for a project as required ] in Article 1.1
(§ 32.1-102.1 et seq.) of Chapter 4 of Title 32.1 of the Code of Virginia
[ , used to make medical care facilities and services needs decisions ].
[ "COPN program" means the Medical Care Facilities Certificate of Public Need Program implementing Article 1.1 (§ 32.1-102.1 et seq.) of Chapter 4 of Title 32.1 of the Code of Virginia. ]
"Continuity of care" means the extent of
effective coordination of services provided to individuals and the community
over time, within and among health care settings.
"Cost" means all expenses incurred in the
production and delivery of health services.
"Department" means the Virginia Department of
Health.
"DEP" means diagnostic equivalent procedure, a method for weighing the relative value of various cardiac catheterization procedures as follows: a diagnostic procedure equals 1 DEP, a therapeutic procedure equals 2 DEPs, a same session procedure (diagnostic and therapeutic) equals 3 DEPs, and a pediatric procedure equals 2 DEPs.
"Direction" means guidance, supervision or management of a function or activity.
"General inpatient hospital beds" means beds
located in the following units or categories:
1. Medical/surgical units available for the care and
treatment of adults not requiring specialized services; and
2. Pediatric units that are maintained and operated as a
distinct unit for use by patients younger than 21. Newborn cribs and bassinets
are excluded from this definition.
[ "Gamma knife®" means the name of a specific instrument used in stereotactic radiosurgery.
"Health planning district" means the same contiguous areas designated as planning districts by the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development or its successor. ]
"Health planning region" means a contiguous
geographic area of the Commonwealth as designated by the department
Board of Health with a population base of at least 500,000 persons,
characterized by the availability of multiple levels of medical care services,
reasonable travel time for tertiary care, and congruence with planning
districts.
"Health system" means an organization of two or more medical care facilities, including but not limited to hospitals, that are under common ownership or control and are located within the same [ health ] planning district, or [ health ] planning region for projects reviewed on a regional basis.
"Hospital" means a medical care facility
licensed as a general, community, or special hospital licensed an inpatient
hospital or outpatient surgical center by the Department of Health or as a
psychiatric hospital licensed by the Department of Mental Health, Mental
Retardation, and Substance Abuse Services.
"Hospital-based" means a service operating
physically within, connected to a hospital, or on the hospital campus, and
legally associated with a hospital.
"ICF/MR" means an intermediate care facility for the mentally retarded.
"Indigent or uninsured" means persons
eligible to receive reduced rate or uncompensated care at or below Income Level
E as defined in 12VAC5-200-10 of the Virginia Administrative Code any
person whose gross family income is equal to or less than 200% of the federal
Nonfarm Poverty Level or income levels A through E of 12VAC5-200-10 and who is
uninsured.
"Inpatient beds" means accommodations
in a medical care facility with [ continuous support
services, such as food, laundry, housekeeping, and staff to provide health or
health-related services to patients who generally remain in the a
medical care facility in excess of 24 hours or
longer a patient who is hospitalized longer than 24 hours for health
or health related services ]. Such accommodations are known by
various nomenclatures including but not limited to: nursing facility, intensive
care, minimal or self care, isolation, hospice, observation beds equipped and
staffed for overnight use, obstetric, medical/surgical, psychiatric, substance
abuse disorder, medical rehabilitation, and pediatric. Bassinets and incubators
and beds in labor and birthing rooms, emergency rooms, preparation or
anesthesia induction rooms, diagnostic or treatment procedure rooms, or on-call
staff rooms are excluded from this definition.
"Intensive care beds" or "ICU" means acute
care inpatient beds located in the following units or categories:
1. General intensive care units are those units where patients are concentrated by reason of serious illness or injury regardless of diagnosis. Special lifesaving techniques and equipment are immediately available and patients are under continuous observation by nursing staff;
2. Cardiac care units, also known as Coronary Care Units or CCUs, are units staffed and equipped solely for the intensive care of cardiac patients; and
3. Specialized intensive care units are any units with specialized
staff and equipment for the purpose of providing care to seriously ill or
injured patients for based on age selected categories of diagnoses,
including units established for burn care, trauma care, neurological care,
pediatric care, and cardiac surgery recovery . This category of beds,
but does not include bassinets in neonatal [ intensive
special ] care units.
"Intermediate care substance abuse disorder
treatment services" means long-term hospital-based inpatient treatment
services that provide structured programs of assessment, counseling, vocational
rehabilitation, and social rehabilitation.
"Lithotripsy" means a noninvasive therapeutic
procedure of crushing kidney, to (i) crush renal and biliary stones
using shock waves. Lithotripsy can also be used to fragment matter such as
calcifications or bone, i.e., renal lithotripsy or (ii) [ to ]
treat certain musculoskeletal conditions and to relieve the pain associated
with tendonitis [ , ] i.e., orthopedic lithotripsy.
"Long-term acute care hospital" or
"LTACH" means an inpatient hospital that provides care for patients
who require a length of stay greater than 25 days and is, or proposes to be,
certified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as a long-term care
inpatient hospital pursuant to 42 CFR Part 412. [ For the
purpose of granting a COPN, the Board of Health pursuant to § 32.1-102.2 A 6 of
the Code of Virginia has designated LTACH as a type of extended care facility. ]
An LTACH may be either a free standing facility or located within an
existing or host hospital.
"Magnetic resonance imaging" or "MRI" means a noninvasive diagnostic technology using a nuclear spectrometer to produce electronic images of specific atoms and molecular structures in solids, especially human cells, tissues and organs.
[ "Medical rehabilitation" means those services provided consistent with 42 CFR 412.23 and 412.24. ]
"Medical/surgical" [ or
"med/surge" ] means those services available for the
care and treatment of patients not requiring specialized services.
"Minimum survival rates" means the [ lowest
base ] percentage of [ those receiving organ
transplants transplant recipients ] who survive at least
one year or for such other period of time as specified by the United Network
for Organ Sharing [ (UNOS) ].
"MRI relevant patients" means the sum of:
0.55 times the number of patients with a principal diagnosis involving
neoplasms (ICD-9-CM codes 140-239); 0.70 times the number of patients with a
principal diagnosis involving diseases of the central nervous system (ICD-9-CM
codes 320-349); 0.40 times the number of patients with a principal diagnosis
involving cerebrovascular disease (ICD-9-CM codes 430-438); 0.40 times the
number of patients with a principal diagnosis involving chronic renal failure
(ICD-9-CM code 585); 0.19 times the number of patients with a principal
diagnosis involving dorsopathies (ICD-9-CM codes 720-724); 0.40 times the
number of patients with a principal diagnosis involving diseases of the
prostate (ICD-9-CM codes 600-602); and 0.40 times the number of patients with a
principal diagnosis involving inflammatory disease of the ovary, fallopian
tube, pelvic cellular tissue or peritoneum (ICD-9-CM code 614). The applicant
shall have discharged all patients in these categories during the most recent
12-month reporting period.
"Neonatal special care" means care for infants
in one or more of the three higher service levels designated in 12VAC5-410-440
D 2 12VAC5-410-443 of the Rules and Regulations for the Licensure of
Hospitals [ , i.e., a hospital elevates its services from
general level normal newborn to intermediate level newborn
services, specialty level newborn services, or subspecialty level newborn
services ].
"Network" means a group of medical care
facilities, including hospitals, or health care systems, legally or
operationally associated with one or more hospitals in a planning region.
"Nursing facility" means those facilities or components thereof licensed to provide long-term nursing care.
"Nursing facility beds" means inpatient beds
that are located in distinct units of general hospitals that are licensed as
long-term care units by the department. Beds in these long-term units are not
included in the calculations of inpatient bed need.
"Obstetrical services" means the distinct organized program, equipment and care related to pregnancy and the delivery of newborns in inpatient facilities.
"Off-site replacement" means the relocation of existing beds or services from an existing medical care facility site to another location within the same [ health ] planning district.
"Open heart surgery" means a set of surgical
procedures using a heart-lung bypass machine or pump to perform extracorporeal
circulation and oxygenation during surgery. This technique is used when the
heart must be slowed down to correct congenital and acquired cardiac and
coronary artery disease. a surgical procedure requiring the use or
immediate availability of a heart-lung bypass machine or "pump." The
use of the pump during the procedure distinguishes "open heart" from
"closed heart" surgery.
"Operating room" means a room, meeting the
requirements of 12VAC5-410-820, in a licensed general or outpatient surgical
hospital used solely or principally for the provision of surgical
procedures [ , ] excluding endoscopic and
cystscopic procedures [ especially those ]
involving the administration of anesthesia, multiple personnel, recovery
room access, and a fully controlled environment. [ This does not
include rooms designated as procedure rooms or rooms dedicated exclusively for
the performance of cesarean sections. ]
"Operating room use" means the amount of time a
patient occupies an operating room, plus the estimated or actual and
includes room preparation and cleanup time.
"Operating room visit" means one session in one
operating room in a licensed general an inpatient hospital or outpatient
surgical hospital center, which may involve several procedures.
Operating room visit may be used interchangeably with "operation" or
"case."
[ "Outpatient surgery"
"Outpatient" ] means services [ those
surgical procedures provided to individuals who are not expected to require
overnight hospitalization but who require treatment in a medical care facility
exceeding the normal capability found in a physician's office a
patient who visits a hospital, clinic, or associated medical care facility for
diagnosis or treatment, but is not hospitalized 24 hours or longer ].
[ For the purposes of this chapter, outpatient services surgery
refers only to surgical services provided in operating rooms in licensed general
inpatient hospitals or licensed outpatient surgical hospitals centers, and does
not include surgical services provided in outpatient departments, emergency
rooms, or treatment procedure rooms of hospitals, or physicians' offices. ]
"Pediatric" means patients [ younger
than ] 18 years of age [ and younger ].
Newborns in nurseries are excluded from this definition.
[ "Pediatric cardiac catheterization"
means the cardiac catheterization of patients ] less than 21
years of age [ 18 years of age and younger. ]
"Perinatal services" means those resources and
capabilities that all hospitals offering general level newborn services as
described in 12VAC5-410-440 D 2 a (1) 12VAC5-410-443 of the Rules and
Regulations for the Licensure of Hospitals must provide routinely to newborns.
"PET/CT scanner" means a single machine capable
of producing a PET image with a concurrently produced CT image overlay to
provide anatomic definition to the PET image. For the purpose of [ grating
granting ] a COPN, the Board of Health pursuant to § 32.1-102.2
A 6 of the Code of Virginia has designated PET/CT as a specialty clinical
services. A PET/CT scanner shall be reviewed under the PET criteria as an
enhanced PET scanner unless the CT unit will be used independently. In such cases,
a PET/CT scanner that will be used to take independent PET and CT images will
be reviewed under the applicable PET and CT services criteria.
"Physician" means a person licensed by the
Board of Medicine to practice medicine or osteopathy in Virginia.
[ "Planning district" means a contiguous
area within the boundaries established by the Virginia Department of Housing
and Community Development or its successor. ]
"Planning horizon year" means the particular year for which bed or service needs are projected.
"Population" means the census figures shown in
the most current series of projections published by the Virginia Employment
Commission a demographic entity as determined by the commissioner.
"Positron emission tomography" or
"PET" means a noninvasive diagnostic or imaging modality using the
computer-generated image of local metabolic and physiological functions in
tissues produced through the detection of gamma rays emitted when introduced
radio-nuclids decay and release positrons. A PET system includes two major
elements: (i) a cyclotron that produces radio-pharmaceuticals and (ii) a
scanner that includes a data acquisition system and a computer A PET device
or scanner may include an integrated CT to provide anatomic structure
definition.
"Primary service area" means the geographic territory from which 75% of the patients of an existing medical care facility originate with respect to a particular service being sought in an application.
"Procedure" means a study or treatment or a
combination of studies and treatments identified by a distinct [ ICD9
ICD-9 ] or CPT code performed in a single session on a single
patient.
"Quality of care" means to the degree to which
services provided are properly matched to the needs of the population, are
technically correct, and achieve beneficial impact. Quality of care can include
consideration of the appropriateness of physical resources, the process of
producing and delivering services, and the outcomes of services on health
status, the environment, and/or behavior.
"Qualified" means meeting current legal requirements of licensure, registration or certification in Virginia or having appropriate training, including competency testing, and experience commensurate with assigned responsibilities.
"Radiation therapy" means the treatment of
disease with radiation, especially by selective irradiation with x-rays or
other ionizing radiation and by ingestion of radioisotopes [ a
clinical specialty, including radioisotope therapy, in which ionizing radiation
is used for treatment of cancer or other diseases, often in conjunction with
surgery or chemotherapy or both. The predominant form of radiation therapy
involves an external source of radiation whose energy is focused on the
diseased area treatment using ionizing radiation to destroy diseased
cells and for the relief of symptoms ]. [ Radioisotope
therapy is a process involving the direct application of a radioactive
substance to the diseased tissue and usually requires surgical implantation
Radiation therapy may be used alone or in combination with surgery or
chemotherapy ].
"Relevant reporting period" means the most
recent 12-month period, prior to the beginning of the applicable batch review
cycle, for which data is available from the Virginia Employment Commission,
Virginia Health Information, or other source identified by the department
VHI or a demographic entity as determined by the commissioner.
"Rural" means territory, population, and housing units that are classified as "rural" by the Bureau of the Census of the United States Department of Commerce, Economic and Statistics Administration.
"State medical facilities plan" or
"SMFP" means the planning document adopted by the Board of Health
that includes, but is not limited to (i) methodologies for projecting need for
medical facility beds and services; (ii) statistical information on the
availability of medical facility beds and services; and (iii) procedures,
criteria and standards for the review of applications for projects for medical
care facilities and services "SMFP" means the state
medical facilities plan as contained in Article 1.1 (§ 32.1-102.1 et seq.)
of Chapter 4 of Title 32.1 of the Code of Virginia used to make medical care
facilities and services needs decisions.
"Stereotactic radiosurgery" or "SRS"
means [ a noninvasive one session therapeutic
procedure for precisely locating diseased points within the body using an
external, a 3-dimensional frame of reference the use of external radiation
in conjunction with a stereotactic guidance device to very precisely deliver a therapeutic
dose to a tissue volume ]. A stereotactic instrument is attached
to the body and used to localize precisely an area in the body by means of
coordinates related to anatomical structures. [ An example
of a stereotactic radiosurgery instrument is a Gamma Knife® unit. Stereotactic
radiotherapy means more than one session is required. One SRS procedure equals
three standard radiation therapy procedures SRS may be delivered in
a single session or in a fractionated course of treatment up to five sessions ].
[ "Stereotactic radiotherapy" or "SRT" means more than one session of stereotactic radiosurgery. ]
"Study" or "scan" means the
gathering of data during a single patient visit from which one or more images
may be constructed for the purpose of reaching a definitive clinical diagnosis.
"Substance abuse disorder treatment services" means services provided to individuals for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, or palliation of chemical dependency, which may include attendant medical and psychiatric complications of chemical dependency. Substance abuse disorder treatment services are licensed by the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services.
"Supervision" means to direct and watch over the work and performance of others.
"The center" means the Center for Quality
Health Care Services and Consumer Protection.
"Use rate" means the rate at which an age cohort or the population uses medical facilities and services. The rates are determined from periodic patient origin surveys conducted for the department by the regional health planning agencies, or other health statistical reports authorized by Chapter 7.2 (§ 32.1-276.2 et seq.) of Title 32.1 of the Code of Virginia.
"VHI" means the health data organization defined in § 32.1-276.4 of the Code of Virginia and under contract with the Virginia Department of Health.
12VAC5-230-20. Preface. Responsibility of the department.
(Repealed.)
Virginia's Certificate of Public Need law defines the
State Medical Facilities Plan as the "planning document adopted by the
Board of Health which shall include, but not be limited to, (i) methodologies
for projecting need for medical facility beds and services; (ii) statistical
information on the availability of medical facility beds and services; and
(iii) procedures, criteria and standards for the review of applications for
projects for medical care facilities and services." (§ 32.1-102.1 of the
Code of Virginia.)
Section 32.1-102.3 of the Code of Virginia states that,
"Any decision to issue or approve the issuance of a certificate (of public
need) shall be consistent with the most recent applicable provisions of the
State Medical Facilities Plan; provided, however, if the commissioner finds,
upon presentation of appropriate evidence, that the provisions of such plan are
not relevant to a rural locality's needs, inaccurate, outdated, inadequate or
otherwise inapplicable, the commissioner, consistent with such finding, may
issue or approve the issuance of a certificate and shall initiate procedures to
make appropriate amendments to such plan."
Subsection B of § 32.1-102.3 of the Code of Virginia
requires the commissioner to consider "the relationship" of a project
"to the applicable health plans of the board" in "determining
whether a public need for a project has been demonstrated."
This State Medical Facilities Plan is a comprehensive
revision of the criteria and standards for COPN reviewable medical care
facilities and services contained in the Virginia State Health Plan established
from 1982 through 1987, and the Virginia State Medical Facilities Plan, last
updated in July, 1988. This Plan supersedes the State Health Plan 1980‑‑1984
and all subsequent amendments thereto save those governing facilities or
services not presently addressed in this Plan.
A. Sections 32.1-102.1 and 32.1-102.3 of the Code of
Virginia requires the Board of Health to adopt a planning document for review
of COPN applications and that decisions to issue a COPN shall be consistent
with the most recent provisions of the State Medical Facilities Plan.
B. The commissioner is the designated decision maker in
the process of determining public need.
C. The center is a unit of the department responsible
for administering the COPN program under the direction of the commissioner.
D. The regional health planning agencies assist the
department in determining whether a certificate should be granted.
E. The center's COPN staff is available to answer
questions and provide technical assistance throughout the application process.
F. In developing or revising standards for the COPN
program, the board adheres to the requirements of the Administrative Process
Act and the public participation process. The department, acting for the board,
solicits input from applicants, applicant representatives, industry
associations, and the general public in the development or revision of these
criteria through informal and formal comment periods and may hold public
hearings, as appropriate.
G. If, upon presentation of appropriate evidence, the
commissioner finds that the provisions of this chapter are not relevant to a
rural locality's needs, or are inaccurate, outdated, inadequate or otherwise
inapplicable, he may issue or approve the issuance of a certificate and shall
initiate procedures to make appropriate amendments to this chapter.
12VAC5-230-30. Guiding principles in certificate of public
need the development of project review criteria and standards.
[ A. ] The following general
principles will be used in guiding the implementation of the Virginia
Medical Care Facilities Certificate of Public Need (COPN) Program and have
served serve as the basis for the development of the review
criteria and standards for specific medical care facilities and services
contained in this document:
1. The COPN program will give preference to requests
that encourage medical care facility and service development
approaches which can document improvement in that improve
the cost-effectiveness of health care delivery. Providers should strive to
develop new facilities and equipment and use already available facilities and
equipment to deliver needed services at the same or higher levels of quality
and effectiveness, as demonstrated in patient outcomes, at lower costs is
based on the understanding that excess capacity [ and
or ] underutilization of medical facilities are detrimental to both
cost effectiveness and quality of medical services in Virginia.
2. The COPN program will seek seeks to
achieve a balance between appropriate the levels of availability and
access to medical care facilities and services for all the citizens of Virginia
of Virginia's citizens and the need to constrain excess facility and
service capacity the geographical [ dispersion
distribution ] of medical facilities and to promote the
availability and accessibility of proven technologies.
3. The COPN program will seek [ seeks ]
to achieve economies of scale in development and operation, and optimal
quality of care, through establishing limits on the development of
specialized medical care facilities and services, on a statewide, regional, or
planning district basis [ promotes to promote ]
the development and maintenance of services and access to those services by
every person who needs them without respect to their ability to pay.
4. The COPN program will give preference to [ seeks ]
to promote the development and maintenance of needed services which
are accessible to every person who can benefit from the services regardless of their
ability to pay [ encourages to encourage ] the
conversion of facilities to new and efficient uses and the reallocation of
resources to meet evolving community needs.
5. The COPN program will promote the elimination of excess
facility and service capacity. The COPN program will promote the promotes
the elimination and conversion of excess facility and service capacity to
meet identified needs discourages the proliferation of services that
would undermine the ability of essential community providers to maintain their
financial viability. The COPN program will not facilitate the survival
of medical care facilities and services which have rendered superfluous by
changes in health care delivery and financing.
12VAC5-230-40. General application filing criteria.
A. In addition to meeting the applicable requirements of the
State Medical Facilities Plan this chapter, applicants for a Certificate of
Public Need shall provide include documentation in their application
that their proposal project addresses the applicable 20
considerations requirements listed in § 32.1-102.3 of the Code of Virginia.
B. Facilities and services shall be provided in
locations that meet established zoning regulations, as applicable The
burden of proof shall be on the applicant to produce information and evidence
that the project is consistent with the applicable requirements and review
policies as required under Article 1.1 (§ 32.1-102.1 et seq.) of Chapter 4 of
Title 32.1 of the Code of Virginia.
C. The department shall consider an application
complete when all requested information, and the application fee, is submitted
on the form required. If the department finds the application incomplete, the
applicant will be notified in writing and the application may be held for
possible review in the next available applicable batch review cycle The
commissioner may condition the approval of a COPN by requiring an applicant to:
(i) provide a level of care at a reduced rate to indigents, (ii) accept
patients requiring specialized care, or (iii) facilitate the development and
operation of primary medical care services in designated medically underserved
areas of the applicant's service area. The applicant must actively seek to
comply with the conditions place on any granted COPN.
12VAC5-230-50. Project costs.
The capital development and operating costs for
providing services should be comparable to similar services in the health
planning region The capital development costs of a facility and the
operating expenses of providing the authorized services should be comparable to
the costs and expenses of similar facilities with the health planning region.
12VAC5-230-60. Preferences When competing
applications received.
In the review of reviewing competing applications, preference
[ consideration will preference may ] be
given [ to ] applicants [ the
when an ] applicant who:
1. Who have Has an established performance record in
completing projects on time and within the authorized operating expenses and
capital costs;
2. Whose proposals have Has both lower direct
construction costs and cost of equipment capital costs and operating
expenses than their his competitors and can demonstrate that their
cost his estimates are credible;
3. Who can demonstrate a commitment to facilitate the
transport of patients residing in rural areas or medically underserved areas of
urban localities to needed services, directly or through coordinated efforts
with other organizations;
4. Who can 3. Can demonstrate a consistent
compliance with state licensure and federal certification regulations and a
consistent history of few documented complaints, where applicable; or
5. Who can 4. Can demonstrate a commitment to
enhancing financial accessibility to services through the provision of
documented charity care, exclusive of bad debts and disallowances from payers,
and services to Medicaid beneficiaries serving [ their
his ] community or service area as evidenced by unreimbursed
services to the indigent and providing needed but unprofitable services, taking
into account the demands of the particular service area.
12VAC5-230-70. Emerging technologies [ Prorating
of mobile service volume requirements Calculation of utilization of
services provided with mobile equipment ].
Inasmuch as the SMFP cannot contemplate all possible
future applications and advances in the regulated technologies, these future
applications and technological advances will be evaluated based on emerging
national trends and evidence in the peer review literature. Until such time as
the SMFP can be updated to reflect changes, emerging technologies should be
registered with the center following 12VAC5-220-110 of the Virginia
Administrative Code.
[ A. The required minimum service volumes
for the establishment of services and the addition of capacity for mobile
services shall be prorated on a "site by site" basis based on the
amount of time the mobile services will be operational at each site using the
following formula:
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. The minimum service
volume of a mobile unit shall be prorated on a site-by-site basis reflecting
the amount of time that proposed mobile units will be used, and existing mobile
units have been used, during the relevant reporting period, at each site using
the following formula:
Required full-time
minimum service volume |
X |
Number of days the service
will be on site each week |
X |
Prorated minimum services
volume (not to exceed the required full-time minimum service volume) ] |
B. [ This section does not prohibit an
applicant from seeking to obtain a COPN for a fixed site service provided
capacity for the service has been achieved as described in the applicable
service section The average annual utilization of existing and
approved CT, MRI, PET, lithotripsy, and catheterization services in a health
planning district shall be calculated for such services as follows:
( |
Total volume of all units
of the relevant service in the reporting period |
) |
X |
100 |
= |
% Average Utilization |
||||||
( |
# of existing or approved
fixed units |
X |
Fixed unit minimum service
volume |
) |
+ |
Y Utilization |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y = the sum of the minimum service volume of each mobile site in the health planning district with the minimum services volume for each such site prorated according to subsection A of this section.
C. This section does not prohibit an applicant from seeking to obtain a COPN for a fixed site service provided capacity for the services has been achieved as described in the applicable service section. ]
D. Applicants shall not use this section to justify a need to establish new services.
12VAC5-230-80. Institutional need When institutional
expansion needed.
A. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, consideration
will be given to the commissioner may grant approval for the expansion of
services at an existing medical care facilities facility in a
[ health ] planning districts district with an
excess supply of such services when the proposed expansion can be justified on
the basis of facility-specific utilization a facility's need having
exceeded its current service capacity to provide such service or on the
geographic remoteness of the facility.
B. If a facility with an institutional need to expand is
part of a network health system, the underutilized services at other
facilities within the network should be relocated health system should
be reallocated, when appropriate, to the facility within the planning
district with the institutional need when possible to expand before
additional services are approved for the applicant. However, underutilized
services located at a health system's geographically remote facility may be
disregarded when determining institutional need for the proposed project.
C. This section is not applicable to nursing facilities pursuant to § 32.1-102.3:2 of the Code of Virginia.
12VAC5-230-90. Compliance with the terms of a condition.
A. The commissioner may condition the approval of a
COPN to provide care to Virginia's indigent population, patients with
specialized needs, or the medically underserved.
B. The applicant shall actively seek to provide
opportunities to offer the conditioned service directly to indigent or
uninsured persons at a reduced rate or free of charge to patients with
specialized needs, or by the facilitation of primary care services in
designated medically underserved areas.
C. If the direct provision of the conditioned services
does not fulfill the terms of the condition, the center may determine the
applicant to be in compliance with the terms of the condition when:
1. The applicant is part of a facility or provider
network and the facility or provider network has provided reduced rate or
uncompensated care at or above the regional standard; or
2. The applicant provides direct financial support for
community based health care services at a value equal to or greater than the
difference between the terms of the condition and the amount of direct care
provided.
Such direct financial support shall be in addition to,
and not a substitute for, other charitable giving chosen by the applicant.
D. Acceptable proof for direct financial support is a
signed receipt indicating the number or amount of services or other support
provided and dollar value of that service or support. Applicants providing
direct financial support for community based health care services should render
that support through one of the following organizations:
1. The Virginia Association of Free Clinics;
2. The Virginia Health Care Foundation; or
3. The Virginia Primary Care Association.
E. Applicants shall demonstrate compliance with the
terms of a condition for the previous 12-month period. The written condition
report shall be certified or affirmed by the applicants and filed with the
center. Such report shall include, but is not limited to, the:
1. Facility or service name and address;
2. Certificate number;
3. Facility or service gross patient revenues;
4. Dollar value of the charity care provided, excluding
bad debts and disallowances from payers; and
5. Number of individuals served by the direct provision
of care or a receipt from one of the allowable organizations listed in
subsection D of this section.
Part II
Diagnostic Imaging Services
Article 1
Criteria and Standards for Computed Tomography
12VAC5-230-100. Accessibility 12VAC5-230-90.
Travel time.
CT services should be within 30 minutes driving time one
way, under normal conditions, of 95% of the population of the
[ health ] planning district [ using a mapping
software as determined by the commissioner ].
12VAC5-230-110 12VAC5-230-100. Need for new
fixed site [ or mobile ] service.
A. No CT service should be approved at a location that
is within 30 minutes driving time one way of:
1. A service that is not yet operational; or
2. An existing CT unit that has performed fewer than
3,000 scans during the relevant reporting period.
B. A. No new fixed site [ or
mobile ] CT service or network shall should be approved
unless all existing fixed site CT services or networks in the
[ health ] planning district performed an average of 4,500
CT scans per machine during the relevant reporting period. [ 10,000
7,400 ] procedures per existing and approved CT scanner during the
relevant reporting period and the proposed new service would not significantly
reduce the utilization of existing [ fixed site ] providers
in the [ health ] planning district [ below
10,000 procedures ]. The utilization of existing scanners
operated by a hospital and serving an area distinct from the proposed new
service site may be disregarded in computing the average utilization of CT
scanners in such [ health ] planning district.
C. Consideration may be given to new CT services
proposed for sites located beyond 30 minutes driving time one way of existing
facilities that do not meet the 4,500 scans per machine criterion if the
proposed sites are in rural areas B. [ Existing ]
CT scanners [ to be ] used solely for
simulation with radiation therapy treatment shall be exempt from [ the
utilization criteria of ] this article [ when applying
for a COPN. In addition, existing CT scanners used solely for simulation with
radiation therapy treatment may be disregarded in computing the average
utilization of CT scanners in such health planning district ].
12VAC5-230-120 12VAC5-230-110. Expansion of existing
fixed site service.
Proposals to increase the number of CT scanners in
expand an existing medical care facility's CT service or network may
through the addition of a CT scanner should be approved only if when the
existing service or network services performed an average of 3,000 CT
scans [ 10,000 7,400 ] procedures per
scanner for the relevant reporting period. The commissioner may authorize
placement of a new unit at the applicant's existing medical care facility or at
a separate location within the applicant's primary service area for CT
services, provided the proposed expansion is not likely to significantly reduce
the utilization of existing providers in the [ health ] planning
district [ below 10,000 procedures ].
12VAC5-230-120. Adding or expanding mobile CT services.
A. Proposals for mobile CT scanners shall demonstrate
that, for the relevant reporting period, at least 4,800 procedures were
performed and that the proposed mobile unit will not significantly reduce the
utilization of existing CT providers in the [ health ] planning
district [ below 10,000 procedures for fixed site scanners or
4,800 procedures for mobile scanners ].
B. Proposals to convert [ authorized ]
mobile CT scanners to fixed site scanners shall demonstrate that, for the
relevant reporting period, at least 6,000 procedures were performed [ by
the mobile scanner ] and that the proposed conversion will not
significantly reduce the utilization of existing CT providers in the
[ health ] planning district [ below 10,000
procedures for fixed site scanners or 4,800 procedures for mobile scanners ].
12VAC5-230-130. Staffing.
Providers of CT services should be under the
direct supervision of one or more board-certified diagnostic radiologists
direction or supervision of one or more qualified physicians.
12VAC5-230-140. Space.
Applicants shall provide documentation that:
1. A suitable environment will be provided for the
proposed CT services, including protection against known hazards; and
2. Space will be provided for patient waiting, patient
preparation, staff and patient bathrooms, staff activities, storage of records
and supplies, and other space necessary to accommodate the needs of handicapped
persons.
Article 2
Criteria and Standards for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
12VAC5-230-150. Accessibility. 12VAC5-230-140.
Travel time.
MRI services should be within 30 minutes driving time one
way, under normal conditions, of 95% of the population of the
[ health ] planning district [ using a mapping
software as determined by the commissioner ].
Article 2
Criteria and Standards for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
12VAC5-230-160 12VAC5-230-150. Need for new
fixed site service.
A. No new fixed site MRI services shall
should be approved unless all existing fixed site MRI services in the
[ health ] planning district performed an average of 4,000
scans per machine 5,000 procedures per existing and approved fixed site MRI
scanner during the relevant reporting period and the proposed new service would
not significantly reduce the utilization of existing fixed site MRI providers
in the [ health ] planning district [ below
5,000 procedures ]. The utilization of existing scanners
operated by a hospital and serving an area distinct from the proposed new
service site may be disregarded in computing the average utilization of MRI
scanners in such [ health ] planning district.
B. Consideration may be given to new MRI services
proposed for sites located beyond 30 minutes driving time one way of existing
facilities that do not meet the 4,000 scans per machine criterion of the
prospered sites are in rural areas.
12VAC5-230-170 12VAC5-230-160. Expansion
of services fixed site service.
Proposals to expand an existing medical care facility's
MRI services through the addition of a new scanning unit of an MRI
scanner may be approved if when the existing service performed at
least 4,000 scans an average of 5,000 MRI procedures per existing unit
scanner during the relevant reporting period. The commissioner may authorize
placement of the new unit at the applicant's existing medical care facility, or
at a separate location within the applicant's primary service area for MRI
services, provided the proposed expansion is not likely to significantly reduce
the utilization of existing providers in the [ health ] planning
district [ below 5,000 procedures ].
12VAC5-230-170. Adding or expanding mobile MRI services.
A. Proposals for mobile MRI scanners shall demonstrate
that, for the relevant reporting period, at least 2,400 procedures were
performed and that the proposed mobile unit will not significantly reduce the
utilization of existing MRI providers in the [ health ] planning
district [ below 2,400 procedures for mobile scanners ].
B. Proposals to convert [ authorized ]
mobile MRI scanners to fixed site scanners shall demonstrate that, for the
relevant reporting period, 3,000 procedures were performed [ by the
mobile scanner ] and that the proposed conversion will not
significantly reduce the utilization of existing MRI providers in the
[ health ] planning district [ below 5,000
procedures for fixed site scanners and 2,400 procedures for mobile scanners ].
12VAC5-230-180. Staffing.
MRI machines services should be under the direct,
on-site supervision of one or more board-certified diagnostic radiologists
direct supervision of one or more qualified physicians.
12VAC5-230-190. Space.
Applicants should provide documentation that:
1. A suitable environment will be provided for the
proposed MRI services, including shielding and protection against known
hazards; and
2. Space will be provided for patient waiting, patient
preparation, staff and patient bathrooms, staff activities, storage of records
and supplies, and other space necessary to accommodate the needs of handicapped
persons.
Article 3
Magnetic Source Imaging
12VAC5-230-200 12VAC5-230-190. Policy for the
development of MSI services.
Because Magnetic Source Imaging (MSI) scanning systems are still in the clinical research stage of development with no third-party payment available for clinical applications, and because it is uncertain as to how rapidly this technology will reach a point where it is shown to be clinically suitable for widespread use and distribution on a cost-effective basis, it is preferred that the entry and development of this technology in Virginia should initially occur at or in affiliation with, the academic medical centers in the state.
Article 4
Positron Emission Tomography
12VAC5-230-210 12VAC5-230-200. Accessibility
Travel time.
The service area for each proposed PET service shall be
an entire planning district PET services should be within 60 minutes
driving time one way under normal conditions of 95% of the [ health ]
planning district [ using a mapping software as determined by
the commissioner ].
Article 4
Positron Emission Tomography
12VAC5-230-220 12VAC5-230-210. Need for new
fixed site service.
A. Whether the applicant is a consortium of hospitals,
a hospital network, or a single general hospital, at least 850 new PET
appropriate cases should have been diagnosed in the planning district. If
the applicant is a hospital, whether free-standing or within a hospital system,
850 new PET appropriate cases shall have been diagnosed and the hospital shall
have provided radiation therapy services with specific ancillary services
suitable for the equipment before a new fixed site PET service should be
approved for the [ health ] planning district.
B. If the applicant is a general hospital, the facility
shall provide radiation therapy services and specific ancillary services
suitable for the equipment, and have reported at least 500 new courses of
treatment or at least 8,000 treatment visits in the most recent reporting
period No new fixed site PET services should be approved unless an average
of 6,000 procedures [ preexisting per existing ]
and approved fixed site PET scanner were performed in the [ health ]
planning district during the relevant reporting period and the proposed new
service would not significantly reduce the utilization of existing fixed site
PET providers in the [ health ] planning district
[ below 6,000 procedures ]. The utilization of
existing scanners operated by a hospital and serving an area distinct from the
proposed new service site may be disregarded in computing the average
utilization of PET units in such [ panning health
planning ] district.
Note: For the purposes of tracking volume utilization, an image taken with a PET/CT scanner that takes concurrent PET/CT images shall be counted as one PET procedure. Images made with PET/CT scanners that can take PET or CT images independently shall be counted as individual PET procedures and CT procedures respectively, unless those images are made concurrently.
C. If the applicant is a consortium of general
hospitals or a hospital network, at least one of the consortium or network
members shall provide radiation therapy services and specific ancillary
services suitable for the equipment, and have reported at least 500 new PET
appropriate patients.
D. Future applications of PET equipment shall be
evaluated based on review of national literature.
12VAC5-230-230. Additional scanners.
12VAC5-230-220. Expansion of fixed site services.
No additional PET scanners shall be added in a planning
district unless the applicant can demonstrate that the utilization of the
existing PET service was at least 1,200 PET scans for a fixed site unit and
that the proposed new or expanded service would not reduce the utilization
after for existing services below 850 PET scans for a fixed site unit. The
applicant shall also provide documentation that he project complies with
12VAC50-230-240. Proposals to increase the number of PET scanners in
an existing PET service should be approved only when the existing scanners
performed an average of 6,000 procedures for the relevant reporting period and
the proposed expansion would not significantly reduce the utilization of
existing fixed site providers in the [ health ] planning
district [ below 6,000 procedures ].
12VAC5-230-230. Adding or expanding mobile PET or PET/CT services.
A. Proposals for mobile PET or PET/CT scanners [ shall
should ] demonstrate that, for the relevant reporting period, at
least 230 [ procedures were performed PET or PET/CT
appropriate patients were seen ] and that the proposed mobile unit
will not significantly reduce the utilization of existing providers in the
[ health ] planning district [ below 6,000
procedures for the fixed site PET providers or 230 procedures for the mobile
PET providers ].
B. Proposals to convert [ authorized ]
mobile PET or PET/CT scanners to fixed site scanners should demonstrate
that, for the relevant reporting period, at least 1,400 procedures were
performed [ by the mobile scanner ] and that the
proposed conversion will not significantly reduce the utilization of existing
providers in the [ health ] planning district
[ below 6,000 procedures for the fixed site PET or 230 procedures of
the mobile PET providers ].
12VAC5-230-240. Staffing.
PET services should be under the direction of a
physician who is a board certified radiologist or supervision of one or
more qualified physicians. Such physician physicians shall be a
designated [ or ] authorized user [ users
of isotopes used for PET ] by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
or licensed by the Office Division of Radiologic Health of the Virginia
Department of Health, as applicable.
Article 5
Noncardiac Nuclear Imaging Criteria and Standards
12VAC5-230-250. Accessibility Travel time.
Noncardiac nuclear imaging services should be available
within 30 minutes driving time one way, under normal driving conditions,
of 95% of the population of the [ health ] planning
district [ using a mapping software as determined by the
commissioner ].
12VAC5-230-260. Introduction of a service Need for
new service.
Any applicant proposing to establish a medical care
facility for the provision of noncardiac nuclear imaging, or introducing
nuclear imaging as a new service at an existing medical care facility, shall
provide documentation that No new noncardiac imaging services should
be approved unless the service can achieve a minimum utilization level of:
(i) 650 scans 1. 650 procedures in the first
12 months of operation, ;
(ii) 1,000 scans 2. 1,000 procedures in the
second 12 months of services, and (iii) 1,250 scans service in the second 12
months of operation service; and
3. The proposed new service would not significantly reduce the utilization of existing providers in the [ health ] planning district.
Note: The utilization of an existing service operated by a hospital and serving an area distinct from the proposed new service site may be disregarded in computing the average utilization of noncardiac nuclear imaging services in such [ health ] planning district.
12VAC5-230-270. Staffing.
The proposed new or expanded noncardiac nuclear imaging
service shall should be under the direction of a board certified
physician or supervision of one or more qualified physicians a
designated [ or ] authorized user [ users
of isotopes licensed ] by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or
the Office Division of Radiologic Health of the Virginia Department of
Health, as applicable.
Part III
Radiation Therapy Services
Article 1
Radiation Therapy Services
12VAC5-230-280. Accessibility Travel time.
Radiation therapy services should be available within 60
minutes driving time one way, under normal conditions, for of 95%
of the population of the [ health ] planning district
[ using a mapping software as determined by the commissioner ].
12VAC5-230-290. Availability Need for new
service.
A. No new radiation therapy service [ shall
should ] be approved unless:
(i) existing 1. Existing radiation therapy
machines located in the [ health ] planning district were
used for at least 320 cancer cases and at least performed an average of
8,000 [ treatment visits procedures per existing and
approved radiation therapy machine ] for in the
relevant reporting period; and
(ii) it can be reasonably projected that the
2. The new service will perform at least 6,000 5,000 procedures by
the third second year of operation without significantly reducing the
utilization of existing radiation therapy machines within 60 minutes drive
time one way, under normal conditions, such that less than 8,000 procedures
will be performed by an existing machine providers in the [ health ]
planning district.
B. The number of radiation therapy machines needed in a primary
service area [ health ] planning district will be
determined as follows:
|
Population x Cancer Incidence Rate x 60% |
|
320 |
where:
1. The population is projected to be at least 75,000
150,000 people three years from the current year as reported in the most
current projections of the Virginia Employment Commission a demographic
entity as determined by the commissioner;
2. The "cancer incidence rate" is based
on as determined by data from the Statewide Cancer Registry;
3. 60% is the estimated number of new cancer cases in a [ health ] planning district that are treatable with radiation therapy; and
4. 320 is 100% utilization of a radiation therapy machine
based upon an anticipated average of 25 [ treatment visits
procedures ] per case.
C. Consideration will be given to the approval of
Proposals for new radiation therapy services located at a general hospital
at least less than 60 minutes driving time one way, under normal
conditions, from any site that radiation therapy services are available if
the applicant can shall demonstrate that the proposed new services will
perform at least an average of 4,500 [ treatment ]
procedures annually by the second year of operation, without significantly
reducing the utilization of existing machines located within 60 minutes
driving time one way, under normal conditions, from the proposed new service
location [ providers services ] in
the [ health ] planning [ region
district ].
D. Proposals for the expansion of radiation therapy
services should not be approved unless all existing radiation therapy machines
operated by the applicant in the planning district have performed at least
8,000 procedures for the relevant reporting period.
12VAC5-230-300. Statewide Cancer Registry Expansion
of service.
Facilities with radiation therapy services shall
participate in the Statewide Cancer Registry as required by Article 9 (§
32.1-70 et seq.) of Chapter 2 of Title 32.1 of the Code of Virginia
Proposals to [ increase expand ]
radiation therapy services should be approved only when all existing
radiation therapy [ machines services ] operated
by the applicant in the [ health ] planning district
have performed an average of 8,000 procedures for the relevant reporting period
and the proposed expansion would not significantly reduce the utilization of
existing providers [ below 8,000 procedures ].
12VAC5-230-310. Staffing Statewide Cancer Registry.
Radiation therapy services shall be under the direction
of a physician board-certified in radiation oncology Facilities with
radiation therapy services shall participate in the Statewide Cancer Registry
as required by Article 9 (§ 32.1-70 et seq.) of Chapter 2 of Title 32.1 of the
Code of Virginia.
12VAC5-230-320. Equipment, patient care; support services
Staffing.
In addition to the radiation therapy machine, the
service should have direct access to:
1. Simulation equipment capable of precisely producing
the geometric relations of the equipment to be used for treatment of the
patient;
2. A computerized treatment planning system;
3. A custom block design and cutting system; and
4. Diagnostic, laboratory oncology services
Radiation therapy services should be under the direction
or supervision of one or more qualified physicians [ . Such
physicians shall be ] designated [ or ] authorized
[ users of isotopes licensed ] by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission or the Division of Radiologic Health of the Virginia
Department of Health, as applicable.
Article 2
Criteria and Standards for Stereotactic Radiosurgery
12VAC5-230-330. Availability; need for new service
Travel time.
No new services should be approved unless (i) the
number of procedures performed with existing units in the planning region
average more than 350 per year and (ii) it can be reasonably projected that the
proposed new service will perform at least 250 procedures in the second year of
operation without reducing patient volumes to existing providers to less than
350 procedures Stereotactic radiosurgery services should be
available within 60 minutes driving time one way under normal conditions of 95%
of the population of a [ health ] planning [ district
region using a mapping software as determined by the commissioner ].
12VAC5-230-340. Statewide Cancer Registry Need for
new service.
Facilities shall participate in the Statewide Cancer
Registry as required by Article 9 (§ 32.1-70 et seq.) of Chapter 2 of Title
32.1 of the Code of Virginia.
A. No new stereotactic radiosurgery services should be approved unless:
1. The number of procedures performed with existing units in the [ health ] planning region averaged more than 350 per year [ in the relevant reporting period ]; and
2. The proposed new service will perform at least 250
procedures in the second year of operation without significantly reducing the
utilization of existing providers in the [ health ] planning
region [ below 350 treatments ].
B. [ Consideration Preference ]
may be given to a [ project that incorporates ] tereotactic
radiosurgery service incorporated within an existing standard radiation therapy
service using a linear accelerator when an average of 8,000 [ treatments
procedures ] during the relevant reporting period [ were
performed and the applicant can demonstrate that the volume and cost of the
service is justified and utilization of existing services in the
health planning region will not be significantly reduced ].
C. [ Consideration Preference ]
may be given to a [ project that incorporates a ] dedicated
Gamma Knife® [ incorporated ] within an existing
radiation therapy service when:
1. At least 350 Gamma Knife® appropriate cases were referred out of the region in the relevant reporting period; and
2. The applicant can demonstrate that:
a. An average of 250 procedures will be preformed in the second year of operation; [ and ]
b. Utilization of existing services in the [ health ]
planning region will not be significantly reduced [ below 350
treatments per year; and. ]
[ c. The cost is justified. ]
D. [ Consideration Preference ]
may be given to [ a project that incorporates ] non-Gamma
Knife® [ SRS ] technology [ incorporated ]
within an existing radiation therapy service when:
1. The unit is not part of a linear accelerator;
2. An average of 8,000 radiation [ treatments
procedures ] per year were performed by the existing radiation
therapy services;
3. At least 250 procedures will be performed within the second year of operation; and
4. Utilization of existing services in the [ health ]
planning region will not be significantly reduced [ below 350
treatments ].
12VAC5-230-350. Staffing Expansion of service.
The proposed new or expanded stereotactic radiosurgery
services shall be under the direction of a physician who is board-certified in
neurosurgery and a radiation oncologist with training in stereotactic
radiosurgery
Proposals to increase the number of stereotactic
radiosurgery services should be approved only when all existing stereotactic
radiosurgery machines in the [ health ] planning region
have performed an average of 350 procedures [ per existing and
approved unit ] for the relevant reporting period and the proposed
expansion would not significantly reduce the utilization of existing providers
in the [ health ] planning region [ below
350 procedures ].
Part IV
Cardiac Services
Article 1
Criteria and Standards for Cardiac Catheterization Services
12VAC5-230-360. Accessibility Statewide Cancer
Registry.
Adult cardiac catheterization services should be
accessible within 60 minutes driving time one way, under normal conditions, for
95% of the population of the planning district Facilities
[ with stereotactic radiosurgery services ] shall
participate in the Statewide Cancer Registry as required by Article 9 (§
32.1-70 et seq.) of Chapter 2 of Title 32.1 of the Code of Virginia.
12VAC5-230-370. Availability Staffing.
A. No new fixed site cardiac catheterization laboratory
should be approved unless:
1. All existing fixed site cardiac catheterization
laboratories located in the planning district were used for at least 960
diagnostic-equivalent cardiac catheterization procedures for the relevant
reporting period; and
2. It can be reasonably projected that the proposed new
service will perform at least 200 diagnostic equivalent procedures in the first
year of operation, 500 diagnostic equivalent procedures in the second year of
operation without reducing the utilization of existing laboratories in the
planning district to less than 960 diagnostic equivalent procedures at any of
those existing laboratories.
B. Proposals for the use of freestanding or mobile
cardiac catheterization laboratories shall be approved only if such
laboratories will be provided at a site located on the campus of a general or
community hospital. Additionally, applicants for proposed mobile cardiac
catheterization laboratories shall be able to project that they will perform
200 diagnostic equivalent procedures in the first year of operation, 350
diagnostic equivalent procedures in the second year of operation without reducing
the utilization of existing laboratories in the planning district to less than
960 diagnostic equivalent procedures at any of those existing laboratories.
C. Consideration may be given for the approval of new
cardiac catheterization services located at a general hospital located 60
minutes or more driving time one way, under normal conditions, from existing
laboratories, if it can be projected that the proposed new laboratory will
perform at least 200 diagnostic-equivalent procedures in the first year of
operation, 400 diagnostic-equivalent procedures in the second year of operation
without reducing the utilization of existing laboratories located within 60
minutes driving time one way, under normal conditions, of the proposed new
service location.
D. Proposals for the addition of cardiac
catheterization laboratories shall not be approved unless all existing cardiac
catheterization laboratories operated in the planning district by the applicant
have performed at least 1,200 diagnostic-equivalent procedures for the relevant
reporting period, and the applicant can demonstrate that the expanded service
will achieve a minimum of 200 diagnostic equivalent procedures per laboratory
in the first 12 months of operation, 400 diagnostic equivalent procedures in
the second 12 months of operation without reducing the utilization of existing
cardiac catheterization laboratories in the planning district below 960
diagnostic equivalent procedures.
E. Emergency cardiac catheterization services shall be
available within 30 minutes of admission to the facility.
F. No new or expanded pediatric cardiac catheterization
services should be approved unless the proposed service will be provided at a
hospital that:
1. Provides open heart surgery services, provides
pediatric tertiary care services, has a pediatric intensive care unit and
provides neonatal special care or has a cardiac intensive care unit and
provides pediatric open heart surgery services; and
2. The applicant can demonstrate that each proposed
laboratory will perform at least 100 pediatric cardiac catheterization
procedures in the first year of operation and 200 pediatric cardiac
catheterization procedures in the second year of operation.
G. Applications for new or expanded cardiac
catheterization services that include nonemergent interventional cardiology
services should not be approved unless emergency open heart surgery services
are available within 15 minutes drive time in the hospital where the proposed
cardiac catheterization service will be located.
Stereotactic radiosurgery services should be under the direction or supervision of one or more qualified physicians.
Part IV
Cardiac Services
Article 1
Criteria and Standards for Cardiac Catheterization Services
12VAC5-230-380. Staffing Travel time.
A. Cardiac catheterization services should have a
medical director who is board-certified in cardiology and clinical experience
in the performing physiologic and angiographic procedures.
In the case of pediatric cardiac catheterization
services, the medical director should be board-certified in pediatric
cardiology and have clinical experience in performing physiologic and
angiographic procedures.
B. All physicians who will be performing cardiac
catheterization procedures should be board-certified or board-eligible in
cardiology and clinical experience in performing physiologic and angiographic
procedures.
In the case of pediatric catheterization services, each
physician performing pediatric procedures should be board-certified or
board-eligible in pediatric cardiology, and have clinical experience in
performing physiologic and angiographic procedures.
C. All anesthesia services should be provided by or
supervised by a board-certified anesthesiologist.
In the case of pediatric catheterization services, the
anesthesiologist should be experienced and trained in pediatric anesthesiology.
Cardiac catheterization services should be within 60 minutes driving time one way under normal conditions of 95% of the population of the [ health ] planning district [ using mapping software as determined by the commissioner ].
Article 2
Criteria and Standards for Open Heart Surgery
12VAC5-230-390. Accessibility Need for new service.
Open heart surgery services should be available 24
hours per day 7 days per week and accessible within a 60 minutes driving time
one way, under normal conditions, for 95% of the population of the planning
district.
A. No new fixed site cardiac catheterization [ laboratory
service ] should be approved for a [ health ] planning
district unless:
1. Existing fixed site cardiac catheterization [ laboratories
services ] located in the [ health ] planning
district performed an average of 1,200 cardiac catheterization DEPs [ per
existing and approved laboratory ] for the relevant reporting
period; [ and ]
2. The proposed new service will perform an average of 200 DEPs in the first year of operation and 500 DEPs in the second year of operation; and
3. The utilization of existing services in the [ health ] planning district will not be significantly reduced.
B. Proposals for mobile cardiac catheterization laboratories should be approved only if such laboratories will be provided at a site located on the campus of an inpatient hospital. Additionally, applicants for proposed mobile cardiac catheterization laboratories shall be able to project that they will perform an average of 200 DEPs in the first year of operation and 350 DEPs in the second year of operation without significantly reducing the utilization of existing laboratories in the [ health ] planning district below 1,200 procedures.
C. [ Consideration Preference ]
may be given [ for to a project that locates ]
new cardiac catheterization services [ located ]
at an inpatient hospital that is 60 minutes or more driving time one way
under normal conditions from existing [ laboratories
services ] if the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed new
laboratory will perform an average of 200 DEPs in the first year of operation
and 400 DEPs in the second year of operation without significantly reducing the
utilization of existing laboratories in the [ health ] planning
district.
12VAC5-230-400. Availability Expansion of services.
A. No new open heart services should be approved
unless:
1. The service will be made available in a general
hospital with established cardiac catheterization services that have been used
for at least 960 diagnostic equivalent procedures for the relevant reporting
period and have been in operation for at least 30 months;
2. All existing open heart surgery rooms located in the
planning district have been used for at least 400 open heart surgical
procedures for the relevant reporting period; and
3. It can be reasonably projected that the proposed new
service will perform at least 150 procedures per room in the first year of
operation and 250 procedures per room in the second year of operation without
reducing the utilization of existing open heart surgery programs in the
planning district to less than 400 open heart procedures performed at those
existing services.
B. Notwithstanding subsection A of this subsection,
consideration will be given to the approval of new open heart surgery services
located at a general hospital more than 60 minutes driving time one way, under
normal conditions, from any site in which open heart surgery services are currently
available if it can be projected that the proposed new service will perform at
least 150 open heart procedures in the first year of operation; and 200
procedures in the second year of operation without reducing the utilization of
existing open heart surgery rooms to less than 400 procedures per room within 2
hours driving time one way, under normal conditions, from the proposed new
service location.
Such hospitals should also have provided at least 960
diagnostic-equivalent cardiac catheterization procedures during the relevant
reporting period on equipment that has been in operation at least 30 months.
C. Proposals for the expansion of open heart surgery
services should not be approved unless all existing open heart surgery rooms
operated by the applicant have performed at least:
1. 400 adult-equivalent open heart surgery procedures in
the relevant reporting period when the proposed facility is within two hours
driving time one way, under normal conditions, of an existing open heart
surgery service; or
2. 300 adult-equivalent open heart surgery procedures in
the relevant reporting period when the applicant proposes expanding services in
excess of two hours driving time, under normal conditions, of an existing open
heart surgery service.
D. No new or expanded pediatric open heart surgery
services should be approved unless the proposed new or expanded service is
provided at a hospital that:
1. Has pediatric cardiac catheterization services that
have been in operation for 30 months and have performed at least 200 pediatric
cardiac catheterization procedures for the relevant reporting period; and
2. Has pediatric intensive care services and provides
neonatal special care.
Proposals to increase cardiac catheterization services should be approved only when:
1. All existing cardiac catheterization laboratories operated by the applicant's facilities where the proposed expansion is to occur have performed an average of 1,200 DEPs [ per existing and approved laboratory ] for the relevant reporting period; and
2. The applicant can demonstrate that the expanded service will achieve an average of 200 DEPs per laboratory in the first 12 months of operation and 400 DEPs in the second 12 months of operation without significantly reducing the utilization of existing cardiac catheterization laboratories in the [ health ] planning district.
12VAC5-230-410. Staffing Pediatric cardiac
catheterization.
A. Open heart surgery services should have a medical
director certified by the American Board of Thoracic Surgery in cardiovascular
surgery with special qualifications and experience in cardiac surgery.
In the case of pediatric open heart surgery, the
medical director shall be certified by the American Board of Thoracic Surgery
in cardiovascular surgery and experience in pediatric cardiovascular surgery
and congenital heart disease.
B. All physicians performing open heart surgery
procedures should be board-certified or board-eligible in cardiovascular
surgery, with experience in cardiac surgery. In addition to the cardiovascular
surgeon who performs the procedure, there should be a suitably trained
board-certified or board-eligible cardiovascular surgeon acting as an assistant
during the open heart surgical procedure. There should also be present at least
one board-certified or board-eligible anesthesiologist with experience in open
heart surgery.
In the case of pediatric open heart surgery services,
each physician performing and assisting with pediatric procedures should be
board-certified or board-eligible in cardiovascular surgery with experience in
pediatric cardiovascular surgery. In addition to the cardiovascular surgeon who
performs the procedure, there should be a suitably trained board-certified or
board-eligible cardiovascular surgeon acting as an assistant during the open heart
surgical procedure. All pediatric procedures should include a board-certified
anesthesiologist with experience in pediatric anesthesiology and pediatric open
heart surgery.
No new or expanded pediatric cardiac catheterization services should be approved unless:
1. The proposed service will be provided at an inpatient hospital with open heart surgery services, pediatric tertiary care services or specialty or subspecialty level neonatal special care;
2. The applicant can demonstrate that the proposed laboratory will perform at least 100 pediatric cardiac catheterization procedures in the first year of operation and 200 pediatric cardiac catheterization procedures in the second year of operation; and
3. The utilization of existing pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratories in the [ health ] planning district will not be reduced below 100 procedures per year.
Part V
General Surgical Services
12VAC5-230-420. Accessibility Nonemergent cardiac
catheterization.
Surgical services should be available within 30 minutes
driving time one way, under normal conditions, for 95% of the population of the
planning district.
Proposals to provide elective interventional cardiac procedures such as PTCA, transseptal puncture, transthoracic left ventricle puncture, myocardial biopsy or any valvuoplasty procedures, diagnostic pericardiocentesis or therapeutic procedures should be approved only when open heart surgery services are available on-site in the same hospital in which the proposed non-emergent cardiac service will be located.
12VAC5-230-430. Availability Staffing.
A. The combined number of inpatient and outpatient
general purpose surgical operating rooms needed in a planning district,
exclusive of Level I and Level II Trauma Centers dedicated to the needs of the
trauma service, dedicated cesarean section rooms, or operating rooms designated
exclusively for open heart surgery, will be determined as follows:
|
|
ORV = the sum of total operating room visits (inpatient
and outpatient) in the planning district in the most recent five years for
which operating room utilization data has been reported by Virginia Health
Information; and
POP = the sum of total population in the planning
district in the most recent five years for which operating room utilization
data has been reported by Virginia Health Information, as found in the most
current projections of the Virginia Employment Commission.
PROPOP = the projected population of the planning
district five years from the current year as reported in the most current
projections of the Virginia Employment Commission.
AHORV = the average hours per general purpose operating
room visit in the planning district for the most recent year for which average
hours per general purpose operating room visit has been calculated from
information collected by Virginia Health Information.
FOR = future general purpose operating rooms needed in
the planning district five years from the current year.
1600 = available service hours per operating room per
year based on 80% utilization of an operating room that is available 40 hours
per week, 50 weeks per year.
B. Projects involving the relocation of existing
general purpose operating rooms within a planning district may be authorized
when it can be reasonably documented that such relocation will improve the
distribution of surgical services within a planning district by making services
available within 30 minutes driving time one way, under normal conditions, of
95% of the planning district's population.
A. Cardiac catheterization services should have a medical director who is board certified in cardiology and has clinical experience in performing physiologic and angiographic procedures.
In the case of pediatric cardiac catheterization services, the medical director should be board-certified in pediatric cardiology and have clinical experience in performing physiologic and angiographic procedures.
B. Cardiac catheterization services should be under the direct supervision or one or more qualified physicians. Such physicians should have clinical experience in performing physiologic and angiographic procedures.
Pediatric catheterization services should be under the direct supervision of one or more qualified physicians. Such physicians should have clinical experience in performing pediatric physiologic and angiographic procedures.
Part VI
General Inpatient Services
Article 2
Criteria and Standards for Open Heart Surgery
12VAC5-230-440. Accessibility Travel time.
Acute care inpatient facility beds A. Open
heart surgery services should be within 30 60 minutes driving time one
way, under normal conditions, of 95% of the population of a
the [ health ] planning district [ using
mapping software as determined by the commissioner ].
B. Such services shall be available 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
12VAC5-230-450. Availability Need for new service.
A. Subject to the provisions of 12VAC5-230-80, no new
inpatient beds should be approved in any planning district unless:
1. The resulting number of beds does not exceed the
number of beds projected to be needed, for each inpatient bed category, for
that planning district for the fifth planning horizon year;
2. The average annual occupancy, based on the number of
beds, is at least 70% (midnight census) for the relevant reporting period; or
3. The intensive care bed capacity has an average annual
occupancy of at least 65% for the relevant reporting period, based on the
number of beds.
A. No new open heart services should be approved unless:
1. The service will be available in an inpatient hospital with an established cardiac catheterization service that has performed an average of 1,200 DEPs for the relevant reporting period and has been in operation for at least 30 months;
2. Open heart surgery [ programs
services ] located in the [ health ] planning
district performed an average of 400 open heart and closed heart surgical
procedures for the relevant reporting period; and
3. The proposed new service will perform at least 150
procedures per room in the first year of operation and 250 procedures per room
in the second year of operation without significantly reducing the utilization
of existing open heart surgery [ programs services ]
in the [ health ] planning district [ below
400 open and closed heart procedures ].
B. No proposal to replace or relocate inpatient beds to
a location not contiguous to the existing site should be approved unless:
1. Off-site replacement is necessary to correct life
safety or building code deficiencies;
2. The population currently served by the beds to be
moved will have reasonable access to the beds at the new site, or to
neighboring inpatient facilities;
3. The beds to be replaced experienced an average annual
utilization of 70% (midnight census) for general inpatient beds and 65% for
intensive care beds in the relevant reporting period;
4. The number of beds to be moved off site is taken out
of service at the existing facility; and
5. The off-site replacement of beds results in: (i) a
decrease in the licensed bed capacity; (ii) a substantial cost savings, cost
avoidance, or consolidation of underutilized facilities; or (iii) generally
improved operating efficiency in the applicant's facility or facilities.
B. [ Consideration Preference ]
may be given to [ a project that locates ] new open
heart surgery services [ located ] at an
inpatient hospital more than 60 minutes driving time one way under normal
condition from any site in which open heart surgery services are currently
available [ when and ]:
1. The proposed new service will perform an average of 150 open heart procedures in the first year of operation and 200 procedures in the second year of operation without significantly reducing the utilization of existing open heart surgery rooms within two hours driving time one way under normal conditions from the proposed new service location below 400 procedures per room; and
2. The hospital provided an average of 1,200 cardiac catheterization DEPs during the relevant reporting period in a service that has been in operation at least 30 months.
C. For proposals involving a capital expenditure of $5
million or more, and involving the conversion of underutilized beds to
medical/surgical, pediatric or intensive care, consideration will be given to a
proposal if: (i) there is a projected need in the category of inpatient beds
that would result from the conversion; and (ii) it can be demonstrated that the
average annual occupancy of the beds to be converted would reach the standard
in subdivisions B 1, 2 and 3 for the bed category that would result from the
conversion, by the first year of operation.
D. In addition to the terms of 12VAC5-230-80, a need
for additional general inpatient beds may be demonstrated if the total number
of beds in a given category in the planning district is less than the number of
such beds projected as necessary to meet demand in the fifth planning horizon
year for which the application is submitted.
E. The number of medical/surgical beds projected to be
needed in a planning district shall be computed as follows:
1. Determine the projected total number of
medical/surgical and pediatric inpatient days for the fifth planning horizon
year as follows:
a. Add the medical/surgical and pediatric inpatient days
for the past three years for all acute care inpatient facilities in the
planning district as reported in the Annual Survey of Hospitals;
b. Add the projected planning district population for
the same three year period as reported by the Virginia Employment Commission;
c. Divide the total of the medical/surgical and
pediatric inpatient days by the total of the population and express the
resulting rate in days per 1,000 population;
d. Multiply the days per 1,000 population rate by the
projected population for the planning district (expressed in thousands) for the
fifth planning horizon year.
2. Determine the projected number of medical/surgical
and pediatric beds that may be needed in the planning district for the planning
horizon year as follows:
a. Divide the result in subdivision E 1 d of this
subsection by 365;
b. Divide the quotient obtained by 0.80 in planning
districts in which 50% or more of the population resides in nonrural areas or
0.75 in planning districts in which less than 50% of the population resides in
nonrural areas.
3. Determine the projected number of medical/surgical
and pediatric beds that may be established or relocated within the planning
district for the fifth planning horizon year as follows:
a. Determine the number of medical/surgical and
pediatric beds as reported in the inventory;
b. Subtract the number of beds identified in subdivision
E 1 from the number of beds needed as determined in subdivision E 2 b of this
subsection. If the difference indicated is positive, then a need may exist for
additional medical/surgical or pediatric beds. If the difference is negative,
then no need for additional beds exists.
F. The projected need for intensive care beds shall be
computed as follows:
1. Determine the projected total number of intensive
care inpatient days for the fifth planning horizon year as follows:
a. Add the intensive care inpatient days for the past
three years for all inpatient facilities in the planning district as reported
in the annual survey of hospitals;
b. Add the planning district's projected population for
the same three-year period as reported by the Virginia Employment Commission;
c. Divide the total of the intensive care days by the
total of the population to obtain the rate in days per 1,000 population;
d. Multiply the days per 1,000 population rate by the
projected population for the planning district (expressed in thousands) for the
fifth planning horizon year to yield the expected intensive care patient days.
2. Determine the projected number of intensive care beds
that may be needed in the planning district for the planning horizon year as
follows:
a. Divide the number of days projected in subdivision F
1 d of this subsection by 365 to yield the projected average daily census;
b. Calculate the beds needed to assure with 99%
probability that an intensive care bed will be available for unscheduled
admissions.
3. Determine the projected number of intensive care beds
that may be established or relocated within the planning district for the fifth
planning horizon year as follows:
a. Determine the number of intensive care beds as
reported in the inventory.
b. Subtract the number of beds identified in subdivision
F 3 a of this subsection from the number of beds needed as determined in
subdivision F 2 b of this subsection. If the difference is positive, then a
need may exist for additional intensive care beds. If the difference is
negative, then no need for additional beds exists.
G. No hospital should relocate beds to a new location
if underutilized beds (less than 85% average annual occupancy for
medical/surgical and pediatric beds), when the relocation involves such beds,
and less than 65% average annual occupancy for intensive care beds when
relocation involves such beds, are available within 30 minutes of the site of
the proposed hospital.
Part VII
Nursing Facilities
12VAC5-230-460. Accessibility Expansion of service.
A. Nursing facility beds should be accessible within 60
minutes driving time one way, under normal conditions, to 95% of the population
in a planning region.
B. Nursing facilities should be accessible by public
transportation when such systems exist in an area.
C. Preference will be given to proposals that improve
geographic access and reduce travel time to nursing facilities within a
planning district
Proposals to [ increase expand ]
open heart surgery services shall demonstrate that existing open heart
surgery rooms operated by the applicant have performed an average of:
1. 400 adult equivalent open heart surgery procedures in
the relevant reporting period [ of if ] the
proposed increase is within one hour driving time one way under normal conditions
of an existing open heart surgery service, or
2. 300 adult equivalent open heart surgery procedures in the relevant reporting period if the proposed service is in excess of one hour driving time one way under normal conditions of an existing open heart surgery service in the [ health ] planning district.
12VAC5-230-470. Availability Pediatric open heart
surgery services.
A. No planning district shall be considered to have a
need for additional nursing facility beds unless (i) the bed need forecast in
that planning district (see subsection D of this section) exceeds the current
inventory of beds in that planning district and (ii) the estimated average
annual occupancy of all existing Medicaid-certified nursing facility beds in
the planning district was at least 93% for the most recent two years following
the first year of operation of new beds, excluding the bed inventory and
utilization of the Virginia Veterans Care Center.
B. No planning district shall be considered to have a
need for additional beds if there are unconstructed beds designated as
Medicaid-certified.
C. Proposals for expanding existing nursing facilities
should not be approved unless the facility has operated for at least two years
and the average annual occupancy of the facility's existing beds was at least
93% in the most recent year for which bed utilization has been reported to the
department.
Exceptions will be considered for facilities that
operated at less than 93% average annual occupancy in the most recent year for
which bed utilization has been reported when the facility has a rehabilitative
or other specialized care focus that results in a relatively short average
length of stay, causing an average annual occupancy lower than 93% for the
facility.
D. The bed need forecast will be computed as follows:
PDBN = (UR64 x PP64) + (UR69 x PP69) + (UR74 x PP74) +
(UR79 x PP79) + (UR84 x PP84) + (UR85 x PP85) where:
PDBN = Planning district bed need.
UR64 = The nursing home bed use rate of the population
aged 0 to 64 in the planning district as determined in the most recent nursing
home patient origin study authorized by the department.
PP64 = The population aged 0 to 64 projected for the
planning district three years from the current year as most recently published
by the Virginia Employment Commission.
UR69 = The nursing home bed use rate of the population
aged 65 to 69 in the planning district as determined in the most recent nursing
home patient origin study authorized by the department.
PP69 = The population aged 65 to 69 projected for the
planning district three years from the current year as most recently published
by the Virginia Employment Commission.
UR74 = The nursing home bed use rate of the population
aged 70 to 74 in the planning district as determined in the most recent nursing
home patient origin study authorized by the department.
PP74 = The population aged 70 to 74 projected for the
planning district three years from the current year as most recently published
by the Virginia Employment Commission.
UR79 = The nursing home bed use rate of the population
aged 75 to 79 in the planning district as determined in the most recent nursing
home patient origin study authorized by the department.
PP79 = The population aged 75 to 79 projected for the
planning district three years from the current year as most recently published
by the Virginia Employment Commission.
UR84 = The nursing home bed use rate of the population
aged 80 to 84 in the planning district as determined in the most recent nursing
home patient origin study authorized by the department.
PP84 = The population aged 80 to 84 projected for the
planning district three years from the current year as most recently published
by the Virginia Employment Commission.
UR85+ = The nursing home bed use rate of the population
aged 85 and older in the planning district as determined in the most recent
nursing home patient origin study authorized by the department.
PP85+ = The population aged 85 and older projected for
the planning district three years from the current year as most recently published
by the Virginia Employment Commission.
Planning district bed need forecasts will be rounded as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above applies, except in the case of a planning
district that has two or more nursing facilities, has had an average annual
occupancy rate in excess of 93% for the most recent two years for which bed
utilization has been reported to the department, and has a forecasted bed need
of 15 to 29 beds. In such a case, the bed need for this planning district will
be rounded to 30.
E. No new freestanding nursing facilities of less than
90 beds should be authorized. Consideration will be given to new freestanding
facilities with fewer than 90 nursing facility beds when such facilities can be
justified on the basis of a lack of local demand for a larger facility and a
maldistribution of nursing facility beds within a planning district.
F. Proposals for the development of new nursing
facilities or the expansion of existing facilities by continuing care
retirement communities will be considered when:
1. The total number of new or additional beds plus any
existing nursing facility beds operated by the continuing care provider does
not exceed 10% of the continuing care provider's total existing or planned
independent living and adult care residence;
2. The proposed beds are necessary to meet existing or
reasonably anticipated obligations to provide care to present or prospective
residents of the continuing care facility;
3. The applicant agrees in writing not to seek
certification for the use of such new or additional beds by persons eligible to
receive Medicaid;
4. The applicant agrees in writing to obtain the resident's
written acknowledgement, prior to admission, that the applicant does not serve
Medicaid recipients and that, in the event such resident becomes a Medicaid
recipient and is eligible for nursing facility placement, the resident will not
be eligible for placement in the CCRC's nursing facility unit;
5. The applicant agrees in writing that only continuing
care contract holders who have resided in the CCRC as independent living
residents or adult care residents will be admitted to the nursing facility unit
after the first three years of operation.
G. The construction cost of proposed nursing facilities
should be comparable to the most recent cost for similar facilities in the same
health planning region. Consideration should be given to the current capital
cost reimbursement methodology utilized by the Department of Medical Assistance
Services.
H. Consideration should be given to applicants
proposing to replace outdated and functionally obsolete facilities with modern
nursing facilities that will result in the more cost efficient delivery of
health care services to residents in a more aesthetically pleasing and
comfortable environment. Proponents of the replacement and relocation of
nursing facility beds should demonstrate that the replacement and relocation
are reasonable and could result in savings in other cost centers, such as
realized operational economies of scale and lower maintenance costs.
No new [ or expanded ] pediatric
open heart surgery service should be approved unless the proposed new
[ or expended ] service is provided at an inpatient
hospital that:
1. Has pediatric cardiac catheterization services that have been in operation for 30 months and have performed an average of 200 pediatric cardiac catheterization procedures for the relevant reporting period; and
2. Has pediatric intensive care services and provides specialty or subspecialty neonatal special care.
Part VIII
Lithotripsy Services
12VAC5-230-480. Accessibility Staffing.
A. The waiting time for lithotripsy services should be
no more than one week Open heart surgery services should have a medical
director who is board certified in cardiovascular or cardiothoracic surgery by
the appropriate board of the American Board of Medical Specialists.
In the case of pediatric cardiac surgery, the medical director should be board certified in cardiovascular or cardiothoracic surgery, with special qualifications and experience in pediatric cardiac surgery and congenital heart disease, by the appropriate board of the American Board of Medical Specialists.
B. Lithotripsy services should be available within 30
minutes driving time in urban areas and 45 minutes driving time one way, under
normal conditions, for 95% of the population of the health planning region
Cardiac surgery should be under the direct supervision of one or more qualified
physicians.
Pediatric cardiac surgery services should be under the direct supervision of one or more qualified physicians.
Part V
General Surgical Services
12VAC5-230-490. Availability Travel time.
A. Consideration will be given to new lithotripsy
services established at a general hospital through contract with, or by lease
of equipment from, an existing service provider authorized to operate in
Virginia, provided the hospital has referred at least two patients per week, or
100 patients annually, for the relevant reporting period to other facilities
for lithotripsy services.
B. A new service may be approved at the site of any
general hospital or hospital-based clinic or licensed outpatient surgical
hospital provided the service is provided by:
1. A vendor currently providing services in Virginia;
2. A vendor not currently providing services who can
demonstrate that the proposed unit can provide at least 750 procedures annually
at all sites served; or
3. An applicant who can demonstrate that the proposed
unit can provide at least 750 procedures annually at all sites to be served.
C. Proposals for the expansion of services by existing
vendors or providers of such services may be approved if it can be demonstrated
that each existing unit owned or operated by that vendor or provider has
provided a minimum of 750 procedures annually at all sites served by the vendor
or provider.
D. A new or expanded lithotripsy service may be
approved when the applicant is a consortium of hospitals or a hospital network,
when a majority of procedures will be provided at sites or facilities owned or
operated by the hospital consortium or by the hospital network.
Surgical services should be available within 30 minutes driving time one way under normal conditions for 95% of the population of the [ health ] planning district [ using mapping software as determined by the commissioner ].
Part IX
Organ Transplant
12VAC5-230-500. Accessibility Need for new service.
A. Organ transplantation services should be accessible
within two hours driving time one way, under normal conditions, of 95% of
Virginia's population. The combined number of inpatient and outpatient
general purpose surgical operating rooms needed in a [ health ]
planning district, exclusive of [ procedure rooms, ] dedicated
cesarean section rooms, operating rooms designated exclusively for cardiac
surgery, procedures rooms or VDH-designated trauma services, shall be
determined as follows:
|
FOR = ((ORV/POP) x (PROPOP)) x AHORV |
|
1600 |
Where:
ORV = the sum of total inpatient and outpatient general
purpose operating room visits in the [ health ] planning
district in the most recent [ three five ] years
for which general purpose operating room utilization data has been reported by
VHI; and
POP = the sum of total population in the [ health ]
planning district as reported by a demographic entity as determined by the
commissioner, for the same [ three year five-year ]
period as used in determining ORV.
PROPOP = the projected population of the [ health ] planning district five years from the current year as reported by a demographic program as determined by the commissioner.
AHORV = the average hours per general purpose operating room visit in the [ health ] planning district for the most recent year for which average hours per general purpose operating room visits have been calculated as reported by VHI.
FOR = future general purpose operating rooms needed in the [ health ] planning district five years from the current year.
1600 = available service hours per operating room per year based on 80% utilization of an operating room available 40 hours per week, 50 weeks per year.
B. Providers of organ transplantation services should
facilitate access to pre- and post-transplantation services needed by patients residing
in rural locations by establishing part-time satellite clinics Projects
involving the relocation of existing [ general purpose ]
operating rooms within a [ health ] planning
district may be authorized when it can be reasonably documented that such
relocation will [ : (i) ] improve the distribution of
surgical services within a [ health ] planning district
by making services available within 30 minutes driving time one way under
normal conditions of 95% of the planning district's population; (ii) result
in the provision of the same surgical services at a lower cost to surgical
patients in the health planning district; or (iii) optimize the number of
operations in the health planning district that are performed on an outpatient
basis ].
12VAC5-230-510. Availability Staffing.
A. There should be no more than one program for each
transplantable organ in a health planning region.
B. Proposals to expand existing transplantation
programs shall demonstrate that existing organ transplantation services comply with
all applicable Medicare program coverage criteria. Surgical services
should be under the direction or supervision of one or more qualified
physicians.
Part VI
Inpatient Bed Requirements
12VAC5-230-520. Minimum utilization; minimum survival
rate; service proficiency; systems operations Travel time.
A. Proposals to establish or expand organ
transplantation services should demonstrate that the minimum number of
transplants would be performed annually. The minimum number of transplants
required by organ system is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance of minimum transplantation volumes does not
indicate a need for additional transplantation capacity or programs.
B. Preference will be given to expansion of successful
existing services, either by enabling necessary increases in the number of
organ systems being transplanted or by adding transplantation capability for
additional organ systems, rather than developing additional programs that could
reduce average program volume.
C. Facilities should demonstrate that they will achieve
and maintain minimum transplant patient survival rates. Minimum one-year
survival rates, listed by organ system, are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Proposals to add additional organ transplantation
services should demonstrate at least two years successful experience with all
existing organ transplantation systems.
E. All physicians that perform transplants should be
board-certified by the appropriate professional examining board, and should
have a minimum of one year of formal training and two years of experience in
transplant surgery and post-operative care.
Inpatient beds should be within 30 minutes driving time one way under normal conditions of 95% of the population of a [ health ] planning district [ using a mapping software as determined by the commissioner ].
Part X
Miscellaneous Capital Expenditures
12VAC5-230-530. Purpose Need for new service.
This part of the SMFP is intended to provide general
guidance in the review of projects that require COPN authorization by virtue of
their expense but do not involve changes in the bed or service capacity of a
medical care facility addressed elsewhere in this chapter. This part may be
used in coordination with other parts of the SMFP addressing changes in bed or
service capacity used in the COPN review process.
A. No new inpatient beds should be approved in any [ health ] planning district unless:
1. The resulting number of beds for each bed category contained in this article does not exceed the number of beds projected to be needed for that [ health ] planning district for the fifth planning horizon year; and
2. The average annual occupancy based on the number of beds in the [ health ] planning district for the relevant reporting period is:
a. 80% at midnight census for medical/surgical or pediatric beds;
b. 65% at midnight census for intensive care beds.
B. For proposals to convert under-utilized beds that require a capital expenditure of $15 million or more, consideration may be given to such proposal if:
1. There is a projected need in the applicable category of inpatient beds; and
2. The applicant can demonstrate that the average annual occupancy of the converted beds would meet the utilization standard for the applicable bed category by the first year of operation.
For the purposes of this part, "underutilized" means less than 80% average annual occupancy for medical/surgical or pediatric beds, when the relocation involves such beds and less than 65% average annual occupancy for intensive care beds when relocation involves such beds.
12VAC5-230-540. Project need Need for
medical/surgical beds.
All applications involving the expenditure of $5
million dollars or more by a medical care facility should include documentation
that the expenditure is necessary in order for the facility to meet the
identified medical care needs of the public it serves. Such documentation
should clearly identify that the expenditure:
1. Represents the most cost-effective approach to
meeting the identified need; and
2. The ongoing operational costs will not result in
unreasonable increases in the cost of delivering the services provided.
The number of medical/surgical beds projected to be needed in a [ health ] planning district shall be computed as follows:
1. Determine the use rate for the medical/surgical beds for the [ health ] planning district using the formula:
BUR = (IPD/PoP) x 1,000
Where:
BUR = the bed use rate for the [ health ] planning district.
IPD = the sum of total inpatient days in the [ health ]
planning district for the most recent [ three five ]
years for which inpatient day data has been reported by VHI; and
PoP = the sum of total population [ greater
than ] 18 years of age [ and older ] in
the [ health ] planning district for the same
[ three five ] years used to determine IPD as
reported by a demographic program as determined by the commissioner.
2. Determine the total number of medical/surgical beds needed for the [ health ] planning district in five years from the current year using the formula:
ProBed = ((BUR x ProPop)/365)/0.80
Where:
ProBed = The projected number of medical/surgical beds needed in the [ health ] planning district for five years from the current year.
BUR = the bed use rate for the [ health ] planning district determined in subdivision 1 of this section.
ProPop = the projected population [ greater
than ] 18 years of age [ and older ] of
the [ health ] planning district five years from the
current year as reported by a demographic program as determined by the
commissioner.
3. Determine the number of medical/surgical beds that are needed in the [ health ] planning district for the five planning horizon years as follows:
NewBed = ProBed – CurrentBed
Where:
NewBed = the number of new medical/surgical beds that can be established in a [ health ] planning district, if the number is positive. If NewBed is a negative number, no additional medical/surgical beds should be authorized for the [ health ] planning district.
ProBed = the projected number of medical/surgical beds needed in the [ health ] planning district for five years from the current year determined in subdivision 2 of this section.
CurrentBed = the current inventory of licensed and authorized medical/surgical beds in the [ health ] planning district.
12VAC5-230-550. Facilities expansion Need for
pediatric beds.
Applications for the expansion of medical care
facilities should document that the current space provided in the facility for
the areas or departments proposed for expansion are inadequate. Such
documentation should include:
1. An analysis of the historical volume of work activity
or other activity performed in the area or department;
2. The projected volume of work activity or other
activity to be performed in the area or department; and
3. Evidence that contemporary design guidelines for
space in the relevant areas or departments, based on levels of work activity or
other activity, are consistent with the proposal.
The number of pediatric beds projected to be needed in a [ health ] planning district shall be computed as follows:
1. Determine the use rate for pediatric beds for the [ health ] planning district using the formula:
PBUR = (PIPD/PedPop) x 1,000
Where:
PBUR = The pediatric bed use rate for the [ health ] planning district.
PIPD = The sum of total pediatric inpatient days in the
[ health ] planning district for the most recent
[ three five ] years for which inpatient days
data has been reported by VHI; and
PedPop = The sum of population under [ 19
18 ] years of age in the [ health ] planning
district for the same [ three five ] years
used to determine PIPD as reported by a demographic program as determined by
the commissioner.
2. Determine the total number of pediatric beds needed to the [ health ] planning district in five years from the current year using the formula:
ProPedBed = ((PBUR x ProPedPop)/365)/0.80
Where:
ProPedBed = The projected number of pediatric beds needed in the [ health ] planning district for five years from the current year.
PBUR = The pediatric bed use rate for the [ health ] planning district determined in subdivision 1 of this section.
ProPedPop = The projected population under [ 19
18 ] years of age of the [ health ]
planning district five years from the current year as reported by a
demographic program as determined by the commissioner.
3. Determine the number of pediatric beds needed within the [ health ] planning district for the fifth planning horizon year as follows:
NewPedBed – ProPedBed – CurrentPedBed
Where:
NewPedBed = the number of new pediatric beds that can be established in a [ health ] planning district, if the number is positive. If NewPedBed is a negative number, no additional pediatric beds should be authorized for the [ health ] planning district.
ProPedBed = the projected number of pediatric beds needed in the [ health ] planning district for five years from the current year determined in subdivision 2 of this section.
CurrentPedBed = the current inventory of licensed and authorized pediatric beds in the [ health ] planning district.
12VAC5-230-560. Renovation or modernization Need for
intensive care beds.
A. Applications for the renovation or modernization of
medical care facilities should provide documentation that:
1. The timing of the renovation or modernization
expenditure is appropriate within the life cycle of the affected building or
buildings; and
2. The benefits of the proposed renovation or
modernization will exceed the costs of the renovation or modernization over the
life cycle of the affected building or buildings to be renovated or modernized.
B. Such documentation should include a history of the
affected building or buildings, including a chronology of major renovation and
modernization expenses.
C. Applications for the general renovation or
modernization of medical care facilities should include downsizing of beds or
other service capacity when such capacity has not operated at a reasonable
level of efficiency as identified in the relevant sections of this chapter
during the most recent three-year period.
The projected need for intensive care beds in a [ health ] planning district shall be computed as follows:
1. Determine the use rate for ICU beds for the [ health ] planning district using the formula:
ICUBUR = (ICUPD/Pop) x 1,000
Where:
ICUBUR = The ICU bed use rate for the [ health ] planning district.
ICUPD = The sum of total ICU inpatient days in the
[ health ] planning district for the most recent
[ three five ] years for which inpatient day
data has been reported by VHI; and
Pop = The sum of population [ greater than ]
18 years of age [ or older for adults or under 18 for pediatric
patients ] in the [ health ] planning
district for the same [ three five ] years
used to determine ICUPD as reported by a demographic program as determined by
the commissioner.
2. Determine the total number of ICU beds needed for the [ health ] planning district, including bed availability for unscheduled admissions, five years from the current year using the formula:
ProICUBed = ((ICUBUR x ProPop)/365)/0.65
Where:
ProICUBed = The projected number of ICU beds needed in the [ health ] planning district for five years from the current year;
ICUBUR = The ICU bed use rate for the [ health ] planning district as determine in subdivision 1 of this section;
ProPop = The projected population [ greater
than ] 18 years of age [ or older for adults or
under 18 for pediatric patients ] of the [ health ]
planning district five years from the current year as reported by a
demographic program as determined by the commissioner.
3. Determine the number of ICU beds that may be established or relocated within the [ health ] planning district for the fifth planning horizon planning year as follows:
NewICUB = ProICUBed – CurrentICUBed
Where:
NewICUBed = The number of new ICU beds that can be established in a [ health ] planning district, if the number is positive. If NewICUBed is a negative number, no additional ICU beds should be authorized for the [ health ] planning district.
ProICUBed = The projected number of ICU beds needed in the [ health ] planning district for five years from the current year as determined in subdivision 2 of this section.
CurrentICUBed = The current inventory of licensed and authorized ICU beds in the [ health ] planning district.
12VAC5-230-570. Equipment Expansion or relocation of
services.
Applications for the purchase and installation of
equipment by medical care facilities that are not addressed elsewhere in this
chapter should document that the equipment is needed. Such documentation should
clearly indicate that the (i) proposed equipment is needed to maintain the
current level of service provided, or (ii) benefits of the change in service
resulting from the new equipment exceed the costs of purchasing or leasing and
operating the equipment over its useful life.
A. Proposals to relocate beds to a location not contiguous to the existing site should be approved only when:
1. Off-site replacement is necessary to correct life safety or building code deficiencies;
2. The population currently served by the beds to be moved will have reasonable access to the beds at the new site, or to neighboring inpatient facilities;
3. The number of beds to be moved off-site is taken out of service at the existing facility;
4. The off-site replacement of beds results in:
a. A decrease in the licensed bed capacity;
b. A substantial cost savings, cost avoidance, or consolidation of underutilized facilities; or
c. Generally improved operating efficiency in the applicant's facility or facilities; and
5. The relocation results in improved distribution of existing resources to meet community needs.
B. Proposals to relocate beds within a [ health ] planning district where underutilized beds are within 30 minutes driving time one way under normal conditions of the site of the proposed relocation should be approved only when the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed relocation will not materially harm existing providers.
Part XI
Medical Rehabilitation
12VAC5-230-580. Accessibility Long-term acute care
hospitals (LTACHs).
Comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation services should
be available within 60 minutes driving time one way, under normal conditions,
of 95% of the population of the planning region.
A. LTACHs will not be considered as a separate category for planning or licensing purposes. All LTACH beds remain part of the inventory of inpatient hospital beds.
B. A LTACH shall only be approved if an existing hospital converts existing medical/surgical beds to LTACH beds or if there is an identified need for LTACH beds within a [ health ] planning district. New LTACH beds that would result in an increase in total licensed beds above 165% of the average daily census for the [ health ] planning district will not be approved. Excess inpatient beds within an applicant's existing acute care facilities must be converted to fill any unmet need for additional LTACH beds.
C. If an existing or host hospital converts existing beds for use as LTACH beds, those beds must be delicensed from the bed inventory of the existing hospital. If the LTACH ceases to exist, terminates its services, or does not offer services for a period of 12 months within its first year of operation, the beds delicensed by the host hospital to establish the LTACH shall revert back to that host hospital.
If the LTACH ceases operation in subsequent years of operation, the host hospital may reacquire the LTACH beds by obtaining a COPN, provided the beds are to be used exclusively for their original intended purpose and the application meets all other applicable project delivery requirements. Such an application shall not be subject to the standard batch review cycle and shall be processed as allowed under Part VI (12VAC5-220-280 et seq.) of the Virginia Medical Care Facilities Certificate of Public Need Rules and Regulations.
D. The application shall delineate the service area for the LTACH by documenting the expected areas from which it is expected to draw patients.
E. A LTACH shall be established for 10 or more beds.
F. A LTACH shall become certified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as a long-term acute care hospital and shall not convert to a hospital for patients needing a length of stay of less than 25 days without obtaining a certificate of public need.
1. If the LTACH fails to meet the CMS requirements as a LTACH within 12 months after beginning operation, it may apply for a six-month extension of its COPN.
2. If the LTACH fails to meet the CMS requirements as a LTACH within the extension period, then the COPN granted pursuant to this section shall expire automatically.
12VAC5-230-590. Availability Staffing.
A. The number of comprehensive and specialized
rehabilitation beds needed in a health planning region will be projected as
follows:
((UR x PROJ. POP.)/365)/.90
Where UR = the use rate expressed as rehabilitation
patient days per population in the health planning region as reported in the
most recent "Industry Report for Virginia Hospitals and Nursing
Facilities" published by Virginia Health Information; and
PROJ.POP. = the most recent projected population of the
health planning region three years from the current year as published by the
Virginia Employment Commission.
B. No additional rehabilitation beds should be
authorized for a health planning region in which existing rehabilitation beds
were utilized at an average annual occupancy of less than 90% in the most
recently reported year.
Preference will be given to the development of needed
rehabilitation beds through the conversion of underutilized medical/surgical
beds.
C. Notwithstanding subsection A of this section, the
need for proposed inpatient rehabilitation beds will be given consideration
when:
1. The rehabilitation specialty proposed is not
currently offered in the health planning region; and
2. A documented basis for recognizing a need for the
service or beds is provided by the applicant.
Inpatient services should be under the direction or supervision of one or more qualified physicians.
Part VII
Nursing Facilities
12VAC5-230-600. Staffing Travel time.
Medical rehabilitation facilities should have full-time
medical direction by a physiatrist or other physician with a minimum of two
years experience in the proposed specialized inpatient medical rehabilitation
program.
A. Nursing facility beds should be accessible within 30 minutes driving time one way under normal conditions to 95% of the population in a [ health ] planning district [ using mapping software as determined by the commissioner ].
B. Nursing facilities should be accessible by public transportation when such systems exist in an area.
C. [ Consideration will
Preference may ] be given to proposals that improve geographic
access and reduce travel time to nursing facilities within a [ health ]
planning district.
Part XII
Mental Health Services
Article 1
Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Disorder Treatment Services
12VAC5-230-610. Accessibility Need for new service.
A. Acute psychiatric, acute substance abuse disorder
treatment services, and intermediate care substance abuse disorder treatment
services should be available within 60 minutes driving time one way, under
normal conditions, of 95% of the population.
B. Existing and proposed acute psychiatric, acute
substance abuse disorder treatment, and intermediate care substance abuse
disorder treatment service providers shall have established plans for the
provision of services to indigent patients which include, at a minimum: (i) the
minimum number of unreimbursed patient days to be provided to indigent patients
who are not Medicaid recipients; (ii) the minimum number of Medicaid-reimbursed
patient days to be provided, unless the existing or proposed facility is
ineligible for Medicaid participation; (iii) the minimum number of unreimbursed
patient days to be provided to local community services boards; and (iv) a
description of the methods to be utilized in implementing the indigent patient
service plan and assuring the provision of the projected levels of unreimbursed
and Medicaid-reimbursed patient days.
C. Proposed acute psychiatric, acute substance abuse
disorder treatment, and intermediate care substance abuse disorder treatment
service providers shall have formal agreements with their identified community
services boards that: (i) specify the number of charity care patient days that
will be provided to the community service board; (ii) describe the mechanisms
to monitor compliance with charity care provisions; (iii) provide for effective
discharge planning for all patients, including return to the patients place of
origin or home state if not Virginia; and (iv) consider admission priorities
based on relative medical necessity.
D. Providers of acute psychiatric, acute substance
abuse disorder treatment, and intermediate care substance abuse disorder
treatment services serving large geographic areas should establish satellite
outpatient facilities to improve patient access, where appropriate and
feasible.
A. A [ health ] planning district should be considered to have a need for additional nursing facility beds when:
1. The bed need forecast exceeds the current inventory of beds for the [ health ] planning district; and
2. The average annual occupancy of all existing and authorized Medicaid-certified nursing facility beds in the [ health ] planning district was at least 93%, excluding the bed inventory and utilization of the Virginia Veterans Care Centers.
Exception: When there are facilities that have been in
operation less than three years in the [ health ] planning
district, their occupancy can be excluded from the calculation of average
occupancy if the facilities [ has had ] an
annual occupancy of at least 93% in one of its first three years of operation.
B. No [ health ] planning district
should be considered in need of additional beds if there are unconstructed beds
designated as Medicaid-certified. This presumption of ‘no need' for additional
beds extends for three years [ or the date on the certificate,
whichever is longer, for the unconstructed beds from the issuance
date of the certificate ].
C. The bed need forecast will be computed as follows:
PDBN = (UR64 x PP64) + (UR69 x PP69) + (UR74 x PP74) + (UR79 x PP79) + (UR84 x PP84) + (UR85 x PP85)
Where:
PDBN = Planning district bed need.
UR64 = The nursing home bed use rate of the population aged 0 to 64 in the [ health ] planning district as determined in the most recent nursing home patient origin study authorized by VHI.
PP64 = The population aged 0 to 64 projected for the [ health ] planning district three years from the current year as most recently published by a demographic program as determined by the commissioner.
UR69 = The nursing home bed use rate of the population aged 65 to 69 in the [ health ] planning district as determined in the most recent nursing home patient origin study authorized by VHI.
PP69 = The population aged 65 to 69 projected for the [ health ] planning district three years from the current year as most recently published by the a demographic program as determined by the commissioner.
UR74 = The nursing home bed use rate of the population aged 70 to 74 in the [ health ] planning district as determined in the most recent nursing home patient origin study authorized by VHI.
PP74 = The population aged 70 to 74 projected for the [ health ] planning district three years from the current year as most recently published by a demographic program as determined by the commissioner.
UR79 = The nursing home bed use rate of the population aged 75 to 79 in the [ health ] planning district as determined in the most recent nursing home patient origin study authorized by VHI.
PP79 = The population aged 75 to 79 projected for the [ health ] planning district three years from the current year as most recently published by a demographic program as determined by the commissioner.
UR84 = The nursing home bed use rate of the population aged 80 to 84 in the [ health ] planning district as determined in the most recent nursing home patient origin study authorized by VHI.
PP84 = The population aged 80 to 84 projected for the [ health ] planning district three years from the current year as most recently published by a demographic program as determined by the commissioner.
UR85+ = The nursing home bed use rate of the population aged 85 and older in the [ health ] planning district as determined in the most recent nursing home patient origin study authorized by VHI.
PP85+ = The population aged 85 and older projected for the [ health ] planning district three years from the current year as most recently published by a demographic program as determined by the commissioner.
[ Planning Health planning ] district
bed need forecasts will be rounded as follows:
[ |
Rounded Bed Need |
1-29 |
0 |
30-44 |
30 |
45-84 |
60 |
85-104 |
90 |
105-134 |
120 |
135-164 |
150 |
165-194 |
180 |
195-224 |
210 |
225+ |
240 |
Exception: When a [ health ] planning district has:
1. Two or more nursing facilities;
2. Had an average annual occupancy rate in excess of 93% for the most recent two years for which bed utilization has been reported to VHI; and
3. Has a forecasted bed need of 15 to 29 beds, then the bed need for this [ health ] planning district will be rounded to 30.
D. No new freestanding nursing facilities of less than 90 beds should be authorized. However, consideration may be given to a new freestanding facility with fewer than 90 nursing facility beds when the applicant can demonstrate that such a facility is justified based on a locality's preference for such smaller facility and there is a documented poor distribution of nursing facility beds within the [ health ] planning district.
E. When evaluating the [ capital ] cost of a project, consideration may be given to projects that use the current methodology as determined by the Department of Medical Assistance Services.
F. [ Consideration Preference ]
may be given to [ proposals to projects that ]
replace outdated and functionally obsolete facilities with modern facilities
that result in the more cost-efficient resident services in a more
aesthetically pleasing and comfortable environment.
12VAC5-230-620. Availability Expansion of services.
A. The combined number of acute psychiatric and acute
substance abuse disorder treatment beds needed in a planning district with
existing acute psychiatric or acute substance abuse disorder treatment beds or
both will be determined as follows:
((UR x PROJ.POP.)/365)/.75
Where UR = the use rate of the planning district
expressed as the average acute psychiatric and acute substance abuse disorder
treatment patient days per population reported for the most recent five-year
period; and
PROJ.POP. = the projected population of the planning
district five years from the current year as reported in the most recent
published projections of the Virginia Employment Commission.
For purposes of this methodology, no beds shall be
included in the inventory of psychiatric or substance abuse disorder beds when
these beds (i) are in facilities operated by the Department of Mental Health,
Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services; (ii) have been converted to
other uses; (iii) have been vacant for six months or more; or (iv) are not
currently staffed and cannot be staffed for acute psychiatric or substance
abuse disorder patient admissions within 24 hours.
B. Subject to the provisions of 12VAC5-230-80, no
additional acute psychiatric or acute substance abuse disorder treatment beds
should be authorized for a planning district with existing acute psychiatric or
acute substance abuse disorder treatment beds or both if the existing inventory
of such beds is greater than the need identified using the above methodology.
However, consideration will be given to the addition of
acute psychiatric or acute substance abuse disorder beds by existing medical
care facilities in planning districts with an excess supply of beds when such
additions can be justified on the basis of facility-specific utilization or
geographic remoteness, i.e., driving time of 60 minutes or more, one way under
normal conditions, to alternate acute care facilities. If the facility with the
institutional need for beds is part of a hospital network, underutilized beds at
the other facilities within the network should be relocated to the facility
with the institutional need if possible.
C. No existing acute psychiatric or acute substance
disorder abuse treatment beds should be relocated unless it can be reasonably
projected that the relocation will not have a negative impact on the ability of
existing acute psychiatric or substance abuse disorder treatment providers or
both to continue to provide historic levels of service to Medicaid or other
indigent patients.
D. The combined number of acute psychiatric and acute
substance abuse disorder treatment beds needed in a planning district without
existing acute psychiatric or acute substance abuse disorder treatment beds
will be determined as follows:
((UR x PROJ.POP.)/365)/.80
Where UR = the use rate of the health planning region in
which the planning district is located expressed as the average acute
psychiatric and acute substance abuse disorder treatment patient days per
population reported for the most recent five-year period;
PROJ.POP. = the projected population of the planning
district five years from the current year as reported in the most recent
published projections of the Virginia Employment Commission.
E. Preference will be given to the development of
needed acute psychiatric and intermediate substance abuse disorder treatment
beds through the conversion of unused general hospital beds. Preference will
also be given to proposals for acute psychiatric and substance abuse beds
demonstrating a willingness to accept persons under temporary detention orders
(TDO) and to have contractual agreements to serve populations served by
Community Services Boards, whether through conversion of underutilized general
hospital beds or development of new beds.
F. The number of intermediate care substance disorder
abuse treatment beds needed in a planning district with existing intermediate
care substance abuse disorder treatment beds will be determined as follows:
((UR x PROJ.POP.)/365)/.75
Where UR = the use rate of the planning district
expressed as the average intermediate care substance abuse disorder treatment
patient days per population reported for the most recent three-year period; and
PROJ.POP. = the projected population of the planning
district three years from the current year as reported in the most recent
published projections of the Virginia Employment Commission.
G. Subject to the provisions of 12VAC5-230-80, no
additional intermediate care substance abuse disorder treatment beds should be
authorized for a planning district with existing intermediate care substance
abuse disorder treatment beds if the existing inventory of such beds is greater
than the need identified. No beds in facilities operated by DMHMRSAS will be
included in the inventory of intermediate care substance abuse disorder beds.
However, consideration will be given to the addition of
intermediate care substance abuse disorder treatment beds by existing medical
care facilities in planning districts with an excess supply of beds when such
addition can be justified on the basis of facility-specific utilization or
geographic remoteness, i.e., driving time of 60 minutes or more one way under
normal conditions, to alternate acute care facilities. If the facility with the
institutional need for beds is part of a hospital network, underutilized beds
at the other facilities within the network should be relocated to the facility
with the institutional need if possible.
H. No existing intermediate care substance abuse
disorder treatment beds should be relocated from one site to another unless it
can be reasonably projected that the relocation will not have a negative impact
on the ability of existing intermediate care substance abuse disorder treatment
providers to continue to provide historic levels of service to indigent patients.
I. The number of intermediate care substance abuse
disorder treatment beds needed in a planning district without existing
intermediate care substance abuse disorder treatment beds will be determined as
follows:
((UR x PROJ.POP.)/365)/.75
Where UR = the use rate of the health planning region in
which the planning district is located expressed as the average intermediate
care substance abuse disorder treatment patient days per population reported
for the most recent three-year period;
PROJ.POP. = the projected population of the planning
district three years from the current year as reported in the most recent
published projections of the Virginia Employment Commission.
J. Preference will be given to the development of
needed intermediate care substance abuse disorder treatment beds through the
conversion of underutilized general hospital beds.
Proposals to increase existing nursing facility bed capacity should not be approved unless the facility has operated for at least two years and the average annual occupancy of the facility's existing beds was at least 93% in the relevant reporting period as reported to VHI.
Note: Exceptions will be considered for facilities that
operated at less than 93% average annual occupancy in the most recent year for
which bed utilization has been reported when the facility [ has
a rehabilitative or other specialized care program causing a short average
length of stay resulting in offers short stay services causing ]
an average annual occupancy lower than 93% for the facility.
Article 2
Mental Retardation
12VAC5-230-630. Availability Continuing care
retirement communities.
The establishment of new ICF/MR facilities should not
be authorized unless the following conditions are met:
1. Alternatives to the proposed service are not
available in the area to be served by the new facility;
2. There is a documented source of referrals for the
proposed new facility;
3. The manner in which the proposed new facility fits
into the continuum of care for the mentally retarded is identified;
4. There are distinct and unique geographic,
socioeconomic, cultural, transportation, or other factors affecting access to
care that require development of a new ICF/MR;
5. Alternatives to the development of a new ICF/MR
consistent with the Medicaid waiver program have been considered and can be
reasonably discounted in evaluating the need for the new facility.
6. The proposed new facility is consistent with the
current DMHMRSAS Comprehensive Plan and the mental retardation service
priorities for the catchment area identified in the plan;
7. Ancillary and supportive services needed for the new
facility are available; and
8. Service alternatives for residents of the proposed
new facility who are ready for discharge from the ICF/MR setting are available.
Proposals for the development of new nursing facilities or the expansion of existing facilities by continuing care retirement communities (CCRC) will be considered when:
[ 1. The facility is registered with the State Corporation Commission as a continuing care provider pursuant to Chapter 49 (§ 38.2-4900 et seq.) of Title 38.2 of the Code of Virginia; ]
[ 1. 2. ] The [ total ]
number of [ new or additional beds plus any existing ]
nursing facility beds [ operated by the continuing care
provider does not exceed 20% of the continuing care provider's total existing
or planned independent living and adult care residence requested in
the initial application does not exceed the lesser of 20% of the continuing
care retirement community's total number of beds that are not nursing home beds
or 60 beds ];
[ 2. 3. ] The [ proposed
beds are necessary to meet existing or reasonably anticipated obligations to
provide care to present or prospective residents of the continuing care
facility number of new nursing facility beds requested in any
subsequent application does not cause the continuing care retirement
community's total number of nursing home beds to exceed 20% of its total number
of beds that are not nursing facility beds ]; and
[ 3. The applicant certifies that :
a. The CCRC has, or will have, a qualified resident
assistance fund and that the facility will not rely on federal and state public
assistance funds for reimbursement of the proposed beds;
b. The continuing care contract or disclosure statement,
as required by § 38.2-4902 of the Code of Virginia, has been filed with the
State Corporation Commission and that the commission has deemed the contract or
disclosure statement in compliance with applicable law; and
c. Only continuing care contract holders residing in the
CCRC as independent living residents or adult care residents or who is a family
member of a contract holder residing in a non-nursing facility portion of the
CCRC will be admitted to the nursing facility unit after the first three years
of operation.
4. The continuing care retirement community has established a qualified resident assistance policy. ]
12VAC5-230-640. Continuity; integration Staffing.
Each facility should have a written transfer agreement
with one or more hospitals for the transfer of emergency cases if such
hospitalization becomes necessary. Nursing facilities shall be under
the direction or supervision of a licensed nursing home administrator and
staffed by licensed and certified nursing personnel qualified as required by
law.
Part VIII
Lithotripsy Service
12VAC5-230-650. Acceptability Travel time.
Mental retardation facilities should meet all
applicable licensure standards as specified in 12VAC35-105, Rules and
Regulations of the Licensing of Providers of Mental Health, Mental Retardation
and Substance Abuse Services. Lithotripsy services should be
available within 30 minutes driving time one way under normal conditions for
95% of the population of the health planning region [ using mapping
software as determined by the commissioner ].
Part XIII
Perinatal Services
Article 1
Criteria and Standards for Obstetrical Services
12VAC5-230-660. Accessibility Need for new service.
Obstetrical services should be located within 30
minutes driving time one way, under normal conditions, of 95% of the population
in rural areas and within 30 minutes driving time one way, under normal
conditions, in urban and suburban areas.
A. [ Consideration Preference ]
may be given to [ a project that establishes ] new
renal or orthopedic lithotripsy services [ established ]
at a new facility through contract with, or by lease of equipment from, an
existing service provider authorized to operate in Virginia, [ provided
and ] the facility has referred at least two appropriate patients
per week, or 100 appropriate patients annually, for the relevant reporting
period to other facilities for either renal or orthopedic lithotripsy services.
B. A new renal lithotripsy service may be approved if the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed service can provide at least 750 renal lithotripsy procedures annually.
C. A new orthopedic lithotripsy service may be approved if the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed service can provide at least 500 orthopedic lithotripsy procedures annually.
12VAC5-230-670. Availability Expansion of services.
A. Proposals to establish new obstetrical services in
rural areas should demonstrate that obstetrical volumes within the travel times
listed in 12VAC5-230-660 will not be negatively affected.
B. Proposals to establish new obstetrical services in
urban and suburban areas should demonstrate that a minimum of 2,500 deliveries
will be performed annually by the second year of operation and that obstetrical
volumes of existing providers located within the travel times listed in
12VAC5-230-660 will not be negatively affected.
C. Applications to improve existing obstetrical
services, and to reduce costs through consolidation of two obstetrical services
into a larger, more efficient service will be given preference over the
addition of new services or the expansion of single service providers.
A. Proposals to [ increase
expand ] renal lithotripsy services should demonstrate that each
existing unit owned or operated by that vendor or provider has provided at
least 750 procedures annually at all sites served by the vendor or provider.
B. Proposals to [ increase
expand ] orthopedic lithotripsy services should demonstrate that
each existing unit owned or operated by that vendor or provider has provided at
least 500 procedures annually at all sites served by the vendor or provider.
12VAC5-230-680. Continuity Adding or expanding mobile
lithotripsy services.
A. Perinatal service capacity should be developed and
sized to provide routine newborn care to infants delivered in the associated
obstetrics service, and shall have the capability to stabilize and prepare for
transport those infants requiring the care of a neonatal special care services
unit.
B. The application should identify the primary and
secondary neonatal special care center nearest the proposed service and provide
travel time one way, under normal conditions, to those centers.
A. Proposals for mobile lithotripsy services should demonstrate that, for the relevant reporting period, at least 125 procedures were performed and that the proposed mobile unit will not reduce the utilization of existing machines in the [ health ] planning region.
B. Proposals to convert a mobile lithotripsy service to a fixed site lithotripsy service should demonstrate that, for the relevant reporting period, at least 430 procedures were performed and the proposed conversion will not reduce the utilization of existing providers in the [ health ] planning district.
Article 2
Neonatal Special Care Services
12VAC5-230-690. Accessibility Staffing.
Neonatal special care services should be located within
an average of 45 minutes driving time one way, under normal conditions, in
urban and suburban areas of hospitals providing general-level newborn services.
Lithotripsy services should be under the direction or supervision of one or
more qualified physicians.
Part IX
Organ Transplant
12VAC5-230-700. Availability Travel time.
A. Existing neonatal special care units located
within the travel times listed in 12VAC5-230-660 should achieve 65% average
annual occupancy before new services can be added to the planning region
Organ transplantation services should be accessible within two hours driving
time one way under normal conditions of 95% of Virginia's population
[ using mapping software as determined by the commissioner ].
B. Preference will be given to the expansion of
existing services rather than the creation of new services Providers
of organ transplantation services should facilitate access to pre and post
transplantation services needed by patients residing in rural locations be
establishing part-time satellite clinics.
12VAC5-230-710. Neonatal services Need for new
service.
The application should identify the service area,
levels of service, and capacity of the current general-level newborn service
hospitals to be served within the identified area.
A. There should be no more than one program for each transplantable organ in a health planning region.
B. Performance of minimum transplantation volumes as cited in 12VAC5-230-720 does not indicate a need for additional transplantation capacity or programs.
12VAC5-230-720. Transplant volumes; survival rates; service proficiency; systems operations.
A. Proposals to establish organ transplantation services should demonstrate that the minimum number of transplants would be performed annually. The minimum number transplants of required by organ system is:
Kidney |
30 |
Pancreas or kidney/pancreas |
12 |
Heart |
17 |
Heart/Lung |
12 |
Lung |
12 |
Liver |
21 |
Intestine |
2 |
Note: Any proposed pancreas transplant program must be a part of a kidney transplant program that has achieved a minimum volume standard of 30 cases per year for kidney transplants as well as the minimum transplant survival rates stated in subsection B of this section.
B. Applicants shall demonstrate that they will achieve and maintain at least the minimum transplant patient survival rates. Minimum one-year survival rates listed by organ system are:
Kidney |
95% |
Pancreas or kidney/pancreas |
90% |
Heart |
85% |
Heart/Lung |
70% |
Lung |
77% |
Liver |
86% |
Intestine |
77% |
12VAC5-230-730. Expansion of transplant services.
A. Proposals to [ increase
expand ] organ transplantation services shall demonstrate at least
two years successful experience with all existing organ transplantation systems
at the hospital.
B. [ Consideration will
Preference may ] be given to [ expanding successful
existing services through increases in a project expanding ]
the number of organ systems being transplanted [ at a successful
existing service ] rather than developing new programs that could
reduce existing program volumes.
12VAC5-230-740. Staffing.
Organ transplant services should be under the direct supervision of one or more qualified physicians.
Part X
Miscellaneous Capital Expenditures
12VAC5-230-750. Purpose.
This part of the SMFP is intended to provide general guidance in the review of projects that require COPN authorization by virtue of their expense but do not involve changes in the bed or service capacity of a medical care facility addressed elsewhere in this chapter. This part may be used in coordination with other service specific parts addressed elsewhere in this chapter.
12VAC5-230-760. Project need.
All applications involving the expenditure of $15 million or more by a medical care facility should include documentation that the expenditure is necessary in order for the facility to meet the identified medical care needs of the public it serves. Such documentation should clearly identify that the expenditure:
1. Represents the most cost-effective approach to meeting the identified need; and
2. The ongoing operational costs will not result in unreasonable increases in the cost of delivering the services provided.
12VAC5-230-770. Facilities expansion.
Applications for the expansion of medical care facilities should document that the current space provided in the facility for the areas or departments proposed for expansion is inadequate. Such documentation should include:
1. An analysis of the historical volume of work activity or other activity performed in the area or department;
2. The projected volume of work activity or other activity to be performed in the area or department; and
3. Evidence that contemporary design guidelines for space in the relevant areas or departments, based on levels of work activity or other activity, are consistent with the proposal.
12VAC5-230-780. Renovation or modernization.
A. Applications for the renovation or modernization of medical care facilities should provide documentation that:
1. The timing of the renovation or modernization expenditure is appropriate within the life cycle of the affected building or buildings; and
2. The benefits of the proposed renovation or modernization will exceed the costs of the renovation or modernization over the life cycle of the affected building or buildings to be renovated or modernized.
B. Such documentation should include a history of the affected building or buildings, including a chronology of major renovation and modernization expenses.
C. Applications for the general renovation or modernization of medical care facilities should include downsizing of beds or other service capacity when such capacity has not operated at a reasonable level of efficiency as identified in the relevant sections of this chapter during the most recent five-year period.
12VAC5-230-790. Equipment.
Applications for the purchase and installation of equipment by medical care facilities that are not addressed elsewhere in this chapter should document that the equipment is needed. Such documentation should clearly indicate that the (i) proposed equipment is needed to maintain the current level of service provided, or (ii) benefits of the change in service resulting from the new equipment exceed the costs of purchasing or leasing and operating the equipment over its useful life.
Part XI
Medical Rehabilitation
12VAC5-230-800. Travel time.
Medical rehabilitation services should be available within 60 minutes driving time one way under normal conditions of 95% of the population of the [ health ] planning district [ using mapping software as determined by the commissioner ].
12VAC5-230-810. Need for new service.
A. The number of comprehensive and specialized rehabilitation beds shall be determined as follows:
((UR x PROPOP)/365)/ [ .85 .80 ]
Where:
UR = the use rate expressed as rehabilitation patient days per population in the [ health ] planning district as reported by VHI; and
PROPOP = the most recent projected population of the [ health ] planning district five years from the current year as published by a demographic entity as determined by the commissioner.
B. Proposals for new medical rehabilitation beds should be considered when the applicant can demonstrate that:
1. The rehabilitation specialty proposed is not currently offered in the [ health ] planning district; and
2. There is a documented need for the service or beds in the [ health ] planning district.
12VAC5-230-820. Expansion of services.
No additional rehabilitation beds should be authorized for
a [ health ] planning district in which existing
rehabilitation beds were utilized with an average annual occupancy of less than
[ 85% 80% ] in the most recently reported
year.
[ Exception: Consideration Preference ]
may be given to [ expanding a project to expand ]
rehabilitation beds [ through the conversion of by
converting ] underutilized medical/surgical beds.
12VAC5-230-830. Staffing.
Medical rehabilitation facilities should be under the direction or supervision of one or more qualified physicians.
Part XII
Mental Health Services
Article 1
Acute Psychiatric and Acute Substance Abuse Disorder Treatment Services
12VAC5-230-840. Travel time.
Acute psychiatric and acute substance abuse disorder treatment services should be available within 60 minutes driving time one way under normal conditions of 95% of the population [ using mapping software as determined by the commissioner ].
12VAC5-230-850. Continuity; integration.
A. Existing and proposed acute psychiatric and acute substance abuse disorder treatment providers shall have established plans for the provision of services to indigent patients that include:
1. The minimum number of unreimbursed patient days to be provided to indigent patients who are not Medicaid recipients;
2. The minimum number of Medicaid-reimbursed patient days to be provided, unless the existing or proposed facility is ineligible for Medicaid participation;
3. The minimum number of unreimbursed patient days to be provided to local community services boards; and
4. A description of the methods to be utilized in implementing the indigent patient service plan and assuring the provision of the projected levels of unreimbursed and Medicaid-reimbursed patient days.
B. Proposed acute psychiatric and acute substance abuse disorder treatment providers shall have formal agreements with the appropriate local community services boards or behavioral health authority that:
1. Specify the number of patient days that will be provided to the community service board;
2. Describe the mechanisms to monitor compliance with charity care provisions;
3. Provide for effective discharge planning for all patients, including return to the patient's place of origin or home state if not Virginia; and
4. Consider admission priorities based on relative medical necessity.
C. Providers of acute psychiatric and acute substance abuse disorder treatment serving large geographic areas should establish satellite outpatient facilities to improve patient access where appropriate and feasible.
12VAC5-230-860. Need for new service.
A. The combined number of acute psychiatric and acute substance abuse disorder treatment beds needed in a [ health ] planning district with existing acute psychiatric or acute substance abuse disorder treatment beds or both will be determined as follows:
((UR x PROPOP)/365)/.75
Where:
UR = the use rate of the [ health ] planning district expressed as the average acute psychiatric and acute substance abuse disorder treatment patient days per population reported for the most recent five-year period; and
PROPOP = the projected population of the [ health ] planning district five years from the current year as reported in the most recent published projections by a demographic entity as determined by the Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services.
For purposes of this methodology, no beds shall be included in the inventory of psychiatric or substance abuse disorder beds when these beds (i) are in facilities operated by the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services; (ii) have been converted to other uses; (iii) have been vacant for six months or more; or (iv) are not currently staffed and cannot be staffed for acute psychiatric or substance abuse disorder patient admissions within 24 hours.
B. Subject to the provisions of 12VAC5-230-70, no additional acute psychiatric or acute substance abuse disorder treatment beds should be authorized for a [ health ] planning district with existing acute psychiatric or acute substance abuse disorder treatment beds or both if the existing inventory of such beds is greater than the need identified using the above methodology.
[ Consideration Preference ] may
also be given to the addition of acute psychiatric or acute substance abuse
beds dedicated for the treatment of geriatric patients in [ health ]
planning districts with an excess supply of beds when such additions are
justified on the basis of the specialized treatment needs of geriatric
patients.
C. No existing acute psychiatric or acute substance disorder abuse treatment beds should be relocated unless it can be reasonably projected that the relocation will not have a negative impact on the ability of existing acute psychiatric or substance abuse disorder treatment providers or both to continue to provide historic levels of service to Medicaid or other indigent patients.
D. The combined number of acute psychiatric and acute substance abuse disorder treatment beds needed in a [ health ] planning district without existing acute psychiatric or acute substance abuse disorder treatment beds will be determined as follows:
((UR x PROPOP)/365)/.75
Where:
UR = the use rate of the health planning region in which the [ health ] planning district is located expressed as the average acute psychiatric and acute substance abuse disorder treatment patient days per population reported for the most recent five-year period;
PROPOP = the projected population of the [ health ] planning district five years from the current year as reported in the most recent published projections by a demographic entity as determined by the Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services.
E. Preference [ will may ]
be given to the development of needed acute psychiatric beds through the
conversion of unused general hospital beds. Preference will also be given to
proposals for acute psychiatric and substance abuse beds demonstrating a
willingness to accept persons under temporary detention orders (TDO) and that
have contractual agreements to serve populations served by community services
boards, whether through conversion of underutilized general hospital beds or
development of new beds.
Article 2
Mental Retardation
12VAC5-230-870. Need for new service.
The establishment of new ICF/MR facilities with more than 12 beds shall not be authorized unless the following conditions are met:
1. Alternatives to the proposed service are not available in the area to be served by the new facility;
2. There is a documented source of referrals for the proposed new facility;
3. The manner in which the proposed new facility fits into the continuum of care for the mentally retarded is identified;
4. There are distinct and unique geographic, socioeconomic, cultural, transportation, or other factors affecting access to care that require development of a new ICF/MR;
5. Alternatives to the development of a new ICF/MR consistent with the Medicaid waiver program have been considered and can be reasonably discounted in evaluating the need for the new facility;
6. The proposed new facility will have a maximum of 20 beds and is consistent with any plan of the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Sservices and the mental retardation service priorities for the catchment area identified in the plan;
7. Ancillary and supportive services needed for the new facility are available; and
8. Service alternatives for residents of the proposed new facility who are ready for discharge from the ICF/MR setting are available.
12VAC5-230-880. Continuity; integration.
Each facility should have a written transfer agreement with one or more hospitals for the transfer of emergency cases if such hospitalization becomes necessary.
12VAC5-230-890. Compliance with licensure standards.
Mental retardation facilities should meet all applicable licensure standards as specified in 12VAC35-105, Rules and Regulations for the Licensing of Providers of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services.
Part XIII
Perinatal [ and Obstetrical ] Services
Article 1
Criteria and Standards for Obstetrical Services
12VAC5-230-900. Travel time.
Obstetrical services should be located within 30 minutes driving time one way under normal conditions of 95% of the population of the [ health ] planning district [ using mapping software as determined by the commissioner ].
12VAC5-230-910. Need for new service.
[ A. ] No new obstetrical services
should be approved unless the applicant can demonstrate that, based on the
population and utilization of current services, there is a need for such
services in the [ health ] planning district without
[ significantly ] reducing the utilization of existing
providers in the [ panning health planning ]
district.
[ B. Applications to improve existing obstetrical
services, and to reduce costs through consolidation of two obstetrical services
into a larger, more efficient service should be given preference over
establishing new services or expanding single service providers. ]
12VAC5-230-920. Continuity.
A. Perinatal service capacity, including service availability for unscheduled admissions, should be developed to provide routine newborn care to infants delivered in the associated obstetrics service, and shall be able to stabilize and prepare for transport those infants requiring the care of a neonatal special care services unit.
B. The proposal shall identify the primary and secondary neonatal special care center nearest the proposed service shall provide transport one-way to those centers.
12VAC5-230-930. Staffing.
Obstetric services should be under the direction or supervision of one or more qualified physicians.
Article 2
Neonatal Special Care Services
12VAC5-230-940. Travel time.
A. Intermediate level neonatal special care services should be located within 30 minutes driving time one way under normal conditions of hospitals providing general level new born services [ using mapping software as determined by the commissioner ].
B. Specialty and subspecialty neonatal special care services should be located within 90 minutes driving time one way under normal conditions of hospitals providing general or intermediate level newborn services [ using mapping software as determined by the commissioner ].
12VAC5-230-950. Need for new service.
[ A. ] No new level of neonatal
service shall be offered by a hospital unless that hospital has first obtained
a COPN granting approval to provide each such level of service.
[ B. Preference will be given to the expansion of
existing services, rather than to the creation of new services. ]
12VAC5-230-960. Intermediate level newborn services.
A. Existing [ neonatal special care units
providing ] intermediate level newborn services as designated
in 12VAC5-410-443 [ , located within 30 minutes driving time one
way under normal conditions ] should achieve 85% average annual
occupancy before new intermediate level newborn services can be added to the
[ health ] planning region.
B. [ Neonatal special care units providing
intermediate Intermediate ] level newborn services as
designated in 12VAC5-410-443 should contain a minimum of six bassinets
[ , stations or beds ].
C. No more than four bassinets [ , stations
and beds ] for intermediate level newborn services as
designated in 12VAC5-410-443 per 1,000 live births should be established in
each [ health ] planning region [ , with
a bassinet or station counting as the equivalent of one bed ].
12VAC5-230-970. Specialty level newborn services.
A. Existing [ neonatal special care units
providing ] specialty level newborn services as designated in
12VAC5-410-443 [ located within 90 minutes driving time one way
under normal conditions ] should achieve 85% average annual
occupancy before new specialty level newborn services can be added to the
[ health ] planning region.
B. [ Neonatal special care units providing
specialty Specialty ] level newborn services as
designated in 12VAC5-410-443 should contain a minimum of 18 bassinets
[ , stations or beds. A station shall equal one bed ].
C. No more than four bassinets [ , stations
and beds ] for specialty level newborn services as designated
in 12VAC5-410-443 per 1,000 live births should be established in each [ health ]
planning region [ , with a bassinet or station counting as
the equivalent of one bed ].
D. Proposals to establish specialty level [ neonatal
special care ] services as designated in 12VAC5-410-443 shall
demonstrate that service volumes of existing specialty level [ neonatal
special care newborn service ] providers located within
the travel time listed in 12VAC5-230-940 will not be [ significantly ]
reduced.
12VAC5-230-980. Subspecialty level newborn services.
A. Existing [ neonatal special care units
providing ] subspecialty level newborn services as designated
in 12VAC5-410-443 [ located within 90 minutes driving time one
way under normal conditions ] should achieve 85% average annual
occupancy before new subspecialty level newborn services can be added to the
[ health ] planning region.
B. [ Neonatal special care units providing
subspecialty Subspecialty ] level newborn services as
designated in 12VAC5-410-443 should contain a minimum of 18 bassinets
[ , stations or beds. A station shall equal one bed ].
C. No more than four bassinets [ , stations
and beds ] for subspecialty level newborn services as
designated in 12VAC5-410-443 per 1,000 live births should be established in
each [ health ] planning region [ , with
a bassinet or station counting as the equivalent of one bed ].
D. Proposals to establish subspecialty level [ neonatal
special care newborn ] services as designated in
12VAC5-410-443 shall demonstrate that service volumes of existing subspecialty
level [ neonatal special care newborn ] providers
located within the travel time listed in 12VAC5-230-940 will not be [ significantly ]
reduced.
12VAC5-230-990. Neonatal services.
The application shall identify the service area and the levels of service of all the hospitals to be served by the proposed service.
12VAC5-230-1000. Staffing.
All levels of neonatal special care services should be under the direction or supervision of one or more qualified physicians as described in 12VAC5-410-443.
VA.R. Doc. No. R03-117; Filed December 16, 2008, 12:01 p.m.