TITLE 18. PROFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING
            Title of Regulation: 18VAC105-20. Regulations  Governing the Practice of Optometry (amending 18VAC105-20-70).
    Statutory Authority: § 54.1-2400 of the Code of  Virginia.
    Public Hearing Information:
    July 22, 2009 - 9 a.m. - Department of Health Professions,  9960 Mayland Drive, 2nd Floor, Richmond, VA
    Public Comments: Public comments may be submitted until  5 p.m. on August 7, 2009.
    Agency Contact: Elizabeth A. Carter, Ph.D., Executive  Director, Board of Optometry, 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 300, Richmond, VA  23233, telephone (804) 367-4426, FAX (804) 527-4466, or email  elizabeth.carter@dhp.virginia.gov.
    Basis: Section 54.1-2400 of the Code of Virginia provides  the Board of Optometry the authority to promulgate regulations to administer  the regulatory system.
    There is a statutory mandate for the Board of Optometry to  require continuing education for renewal of licensure provided in  § 54.1-3219 of the Code of Virginia.
    Purpose: Issues relating to the validity and value of  continuing education for the optometrist have been apparent to the board  through audits of continuing education, disciplinary cases and personal  observation by members. For example, the current regulation allows courses that  are primarily a sales pitch for a manufacturer product, so long as the course  offers a miniscule segment relating to patient care. The board has determined  that such courses should not be counted toward a practitioner’s renewal  requirement. Likewise, prescribing and treating with therapeutic pharmaceutical  agents privileges has been expanded with many more classes of drugs available  to optometrists, so the subject of required continuing education in treatment  with pharmaceutical agents has been clarified. By adding value and substance to  the continuing education requirements, the board intends to address the need to  ensure continuing competency for the health and safety of consumers of  optometric services.
    Substance: The following substantive changes are  proposed:
    1. Affirmatively state in regulation that falsifying the  attestation or failure to comply with continuing education requirements may  subject a licensee to disciplinary action by the board, consistent with § 54.1-3215 of the Code of Virginia. Currently, falsifying an application is  grounds for disciplinary action, so this change is a clarification that makes  it clear that falsifying or failure to comply with requirements for a renewal  application may provide grounds.
    2. Specify that an approved continuing education sponsor must  provide a certificate of attendance that shows the date, location, lecturer,  content hours of the course, and contact information of the provider/sponsor.  The certificate of attendance must be based on verification by the sponsor of  the attendee’s presence throughout the course – either provided by a post-test  or by an independent monitor. The proposal also adds a requirement for an  approved continuing education provider/sponsor to maintain documentation about  the course and attendance for at least three years following its completion.  Specifying the provision and content of a certificate of attendance and the  length of time that records must be maintained by a continuing education  sponsor/provider is consistent with current expectations and practices and should  not represent any change or increased burden.
    Issues: The advantage to the public may be that  optometrists will take continuing education more closely related to patient  care and to the treatment of the eye with prescription drugs. Further specification  of requirements for approved sponsors will necessitate closer monitoring of  participation. Optometrists will benefit from assuring that sponsors are able  to verify continuing education attendance during a board audit.
    There are no disadvantages to the agency or the Commonwealth.  Clarification of the board’s intent and policies relating to continuing  education should alleviate some misunderstanding by licensee relating to  approval of sponsors and filing for extensions.
    The Department of Planning and Budget's Economic Impact  Analysis:
    Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. The Board of  Optometry (Board) proposes to make amendments to the regulations that include:  (1) requiring that in order to maintain approval for continuing education  courses, providers or sponsors provide a certificate of attendance that shows  the date, location, presenter or lecturer, content hours of the course, and  contact information of the provider/sponsor for verification, and maintain  documentation about the course and attendance for at least three years  following its completion, (2) requiring that requests for the extension or  waiver for the fulfillment of continuing education hours must be received by  the Continuing Education Committee prior to December 31 of each year, and 3)  changing the requirement that optometrists who are certified in the use of  therapeutic pharmaceutical agents have at least two hours of continuing  education "directly related to the prescribing and administration of such  drugs" to "directly related to the treatment of the human eye and its  adnexa with pharmaceutical agents,"
    Result of Analysis. The benefits likely exceed the costs for  one or more proposed changes. There is insufficient data to accurately compare  the magnitude of the benefits versus the costs for other changes. 
    Estimated Economic Impact. The proposed regulation includes  language that requires providers or sponsors to do two things in order to  maintain approval for continuing education courses. First, providers or  sponsors must provide a certificate of attendance that shows the date,  location, presenter or lecturer, content hours of the course, and contact  information of the provider/sponsor for verification. This certificate of  attendance must be based on verification by the sponsor of the attendee’s  presence throughout the course, either provided by a post-test or by an  independent monitor. Second, providers or sponsors must maintain documentation  about the course and attendance for at least three years following its  completion. This amendment is being proposed because by observation and  experience with audits of continuing education, the Board is concerned that  some sponsors do not provide a certificate of completion that gives sufficient  information about the course, nor do they provide verification of attendance.  These requirements will ensure that the certificate of attendance and all  necessary information can be verified. The requirement that continuing  education providers/sponsors maintain documentation about the course and attendance  for at least three years following its completion came about because in  conducting an audit of a licensee continuing education, it is often necessary  to contact a sponsor or provider to request additional information about a  course or about the licensee’s attendance.
    The cost of these amendments will most likely be born by the  continuing education provider. Since most providers offer a certificate of  completion—the Board’s concern is that the certificates do not give sufficient  information—this amendment should not impose prohibitively high costs. For  those who do not currently provide certificates, it does not seem that the cost  need exceed $0.50 per participant, which is a cost that will probably be born  either by the provider, or passed on to the participant. For those course  providers who do not provide a post-test, the proposed amendment would require  them to verify the attendee’s presence in the course through an independent  monitor. The cost of the monitor is difficult to ascertain since, according to  the Department of Health Professions (Department), the cost of the monitor is  likely to vary widely depending upon how different vendors work out staffing  across the different kinds of venues. Some vendors might pay an independent  monitor, while some may ask staff members to monitor as a part of their regular  duties. The costs associated with the certificate and the three years of  recordkeeping are likely to be outweighed by the benefits of being able to  conduct an accurate audit of continuing education acquisition, especially since  many providers and sponsors already provide certificates and maintain  documentation. Many courses already provide post-tests and independent monitors  and for those courses, the benefits of this amendment are likely to outweigh  the costs. For those courses that, under this proposal, will have to provide an  independent monitor for each course delivered, however, it is not clear if the  benefits of this particular amendment will outweigh the costs. 
    The proposed regulation includes language that “A request for  an extension or a waiver [for meeting continuing education requirements] shall  be received prior to December 31 of each year.” This change is being proposed  because the Board has had instances in which licensees realize that they are  missing continuing education hours at the time of renewal and request an  extension after the renewal date has passed. The license renewal period is  January 1 to December 31, so this amendment ensures that the hours be  completed, or an extension be granted, before the renewal deadline. This  proposal should not impose any cost on licensees. Therefore, the benefit of  this amendment outweighs the cost.
    Under current regulation, for optometrists who are certified in  the use of therapeutic pharmaceutical agents, at least two of the 16 required  continuing education hours must be "directly related to the prescribing  and administration of such drugs." The Board proposes to amend "prescribing  and administration of such drugs" to "treatment of the human  eye and its adnexa with pharmaceutical agents." The Board feels  that the new language of "treatment of the human eye and its adnexa…"  is more inclusive and descriptive of the types of courses related to patient  care. The proposed language is more inclusive and remains directly relevant to  patient care, this proposed amendment likely provides a net benefit.
    Businesses and Entities Affected. There are 1444 optometrists1  and 470 offices of optometrists2 in Virginia who would be affected  by these amendments. Of those optometrists, 1194 are TPA-certified (i.e., who  are certified for treatment of diseases or abnormal conditions with therapeutic  pharmaceutical agents) and therefore would be subject to all of the amendments.  All 470 offices of optometrists qualify as small businesses.
    Localities Particularly Affected. The proposals do not  disproportionately affect specific localities.
    Projected Impact on Employment. The proposed amendments are not  anticipated to have any significant impact on employment.
    Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The cost of  providing an independent monitor could increase costs for certain course  providers, thereby moderately decreasing the value of their business. 
    Small Businesses: Costs and Other Effects. The proposal to  require continuing education course providers to provide either a post-test or  an independent monitor will increase costs for those providers who do not  already do so.  The requirement is reasonable though, so as to ensure  actual course attendance by the licensee claiming continuing education credits.
    Small Businesses: Alternative Method that Minimizes Adverse  Impact. No alternative methods would reduce cost while still achieving the  desired policy goals. 
    Real Estate Development Costs. The proposed amendments do not  create additional costs related to the development of real estate for  commercial or residential purposes.
    Legal Mandate. The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has  analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with  § 2.2-4007.04 of the Administrative Process Act and Executive Order Number  36 (06).  Section 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses  include, but need not be limited to, the projected number of businesses or  other entities to whom the regulation would apply, the identity of any  localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, the  projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, the  projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with  the regulation, and the impact on the use and value of private property.   Further, if the proposed regulation has adverse effect on small businesses,  § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include (i) an  identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the  regulation; (ii) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other  administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the  regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing  required reports and other documents; (iii) a statement of the probable effect  of the regulation on affected small businesses; and (iv) a description of any  less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of  the regulation. The analysis presented above represents DPB’s best estimate of  these economic impacts.
    ______________________________
    1 Source: Department of Health Professions
    2 Source: Virginia Employment Commission
    Agency's Response to the Department of Planning and Budget's  Economic Impact Analysis: The Board of Optometry concurs with the analysis  of the Department of Planning and Budget on proposed regulations for  18VAC105-20, Regulations Governing the Practice of Optometry, relating to  continuing education requirements.
    Summary: 
    The proposed amendments (i) require that, in order to  maintain approval for continuing education courses, providers or sponsors  provide a certificate of attendance that shows the date, location, presenter or  lecturer, content hours of the course, and contact information of the  provider/sponsor for verification, and maintain documentation about the course  and attendance for at least three years following its completion; (ii) require  that requests for the extension or waiver for the fulfillment of continuing  education hours must be received by the Continuing Education Committee prior to  December 31 of each year; and (iii) require that optometrists who are certified  in the use of therapeutic pharmaceutical agents have at least two hours of continuing  education "directly related to the treatment of the human eye and its  adnexa with pharmaceutical agents."
    18VAC105-20-70. Requirements for continuing education.
    A. Each license renewal shall be conditioned upon submission  of evidence to the board of 16 hours of continuing education taken by the  applicant during the previous license period. 
    1. Fourteen of the 16 hours shall pertain directly to the care  of the patient. The 16 hours may include up to two hours of recordkeeping for  patient care and up to two hours of training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation  (CPR). 
    2. For optometrists who are certified in the use of  therapeutic pharmaceutical agents, at least two of the required continuing  education hours shall be directly related to the prescribing and  administration of such drugs treatment of the human eye and its adnexa  with pharmaceutical agents. 
    3. Courses that are solely designed for which the  primary purpose is to promote the sale of specific instruments or products  and courses offering instruction on augmenting income are excluded and will not  receive credit by the board. 
    B. Each licensee shall attest to fulfillment of continuing  education hours on the required annual renewal form. All continuing education  shall be completed prior to December 31 unless an extension or waiver has been  granted by the Continuing Education Committee. A request for an extension or  waiver shall be received prior to December 31 of each year.
    C. All continuing education courses shall be offered by an  approved sponsor listed in subsection G or accredited as provided in  subsection H of this section. Courses that are not approved by a  board-recognized sponsor in advance shall not be accepted for continuing  education credit. For those courses that have a post-test requirement, credit  will only be given if the optometrist receives a passing grade as indicated on  the certificate. 
    D. Licensees shall maintain continuing education  documentation for a period of not less than three years. A random audit of  licensees may be conducted by the board which will require that the licensee  provide evidence substantiating participation in required continuing education  courses within 14 days of the renewal date. 
    E. Documentation of hours shall clearly indicate the name of  the continuing education provider and its affiliation with an approved sponsor  as listed in subsection G or accredited as provided in subsection H of  this section. Documents that do not have the required information shall not be  accepted by the board for determining compliance. Correspondence courses shall  be credited according to the date on which the post-test was graded as  indicated on the continuing education certificate. 
    F. A licensee shall be exempt from the continuing competency  requirements for the first renewal following the date of initial licensure by  examination in Virginia. 
    G. An approved continuing education course or program,  whether offered by correspondence, electronically or in person, shall be  sponsored or approved by one of the following: 
    1. The American Optometric Association and its constituent  organizations. 
    2. Regional optometric organizations. 
    3. State optometric associations and their affiliate local  societies. 
    4. Accredited colleges and universities providing optometric  or medical courses. 
    5. The American Academy of Optometry and its affiliate  organizations. 
    6. The American Academy of Ophthalmology and its affiliate  organizations. 
    7. The Virginia Academy of Optometry. 
    8. Council on Optometric Practitioner Education (C.O.P.E.).  
    9. 8. State or federal governmental agencies. 
    10. 9. College of Optometrists in Vision  Development. 
    11. The Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical  Education of the American Medical Association for Category 1 or Category 2  credit. 
    12. 10. Providers of training in cardiopulmonary  resuscitation (CPR).
    13. 11. Optometric Extension Program.
    H. Courses accredited by the Council on Optometric  Practitioner Education (COPE) or the Accreditation Council for Continuing  Medical Education (ACCME) of the American Medical Association for Category 1 or  Category 2 credit shall be approved.
    I. In order to maintain approval for continuing education  courses, providers or sponsors shall:
    1. Provide a certificate of attendance that shows the date,  location, presenter or lecturer, content hours of the course, and contact  information of the provider/sponsor for verification. The certificate of  attendance shall be based on verification by the sponsor of the attendee's  presence throughout the course, either provided by a post-test or by an  independent monitor.
    2. Maintain documentation about the course and attendance  for at least three years following its completion.
    J. Falsifying the attestation of compliance with  continuing education on a renewal form or failure to comply with continuing  education requirements may subject a licensee to disciplinary action by the  board, consistent with § 54.1-3215 of the Code of Virginia. 
    
        VA.R. Doc. No. R07-238; Filed May 20, 2009, 11:16 a.m.