TITLE 2. AGRICULTURE
BOARD OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES
Final Regulation
    Titles of Regulations: 2VAC5-140. Health Requirements  Governing the Admission of Livestock, Poultry, Companion Animals, and Other  Animals or Birds into Virginia (repealing 2VAC5-140-10 through  2VAC5-140-140).
    2VAC5-141. Health Requirements Governing the Admission of  Agricultural Animals, Companion Animals, and Other Animals or Birds into  Virginia (adding 2VAC5-141-10 through 2VAC5-141-130).
    Statutory Authority: § 3.2-6002 of the Code of  Virginia.
    Effective Date: January 18, 2012. 
    Agency Contact: Dr. Dan Kovich, Staff  Veterinarian/Animal Care and Health Policy, Department of Agriculture and  Consumer Services, P.O. Box 1163, Richmond, VA 23218, telephone (804) 786-2483,  FAX (804) 371-2380, TTY (800) 828-1120, or email dan.kovich@vdacs.virginia.gov.
    Summary: 
    This regulatory action repeals the current regulation (2VAC5-140)  concerning the requirements for entry of agricultural, companion, and other  animals into Virginia, and replaces it with a regulatory framework (2VAC5-141)  that is consistent with the current status of interstate animal disease control  and eradication programs. Substantive changes include the creation of animal  identification requirements for certain classes of imported animals,  strengthening of tuberculosis testing requirements for cattle, alignment of  sheep and goat entry requirements with current scrapie control programs,  elimination of certain testing requirements for llamas and alpacas, and  provision for free movement of agricultural animals from neighboring states to  facilitate marketing. Changes made since the proposed stage clarify definitions  and avian entry requirements and modify certain testing and identification  requirements for cattle, goats, and sheep. The current regulation has not been  amended since 1989.
    Summary of Public Comments and Agency's Response: A  summary of comments made by the public and the agency's response may be  obtained from the promulgating agency or viewed at the office of the Registrar  of Regulations. 
    CHAPTER 141
  HEALTH REQUIREMENTS GOVERNING THE ADMISSION OF AGRICULTURAL ANIMALS, COMPANION  ANIMALS, AND OTHER ANIMALS OR BIRDS INTO VIRGINIA
    2VAC5-141-10. Definitions.
    The following words and terms when used in these  regulations shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly  indicates otherwise:
    "Agricultural animals" means livestock and  poultry.
    "Approved livestock market" means a livestock  market [ approved by the United States Department of Agriculture in  accordance with 9 CFR 71.20 and ] under inspection by the State  Veterinarian.
    "Avian" means all domestic and wild members of  the class Aves.
    "Cats" means all domestic and wild members of  the family Felidae.
    "Cattle" means all domestic and wild members of  the genera bos, bison, and bubalus to include domestic cattle, yak, bison, and  water buffalo.
    "Certificate of veterinary inspection" means an  official health certificate endorsed by a state, federal, or international  government.
    "Commercial swine" means swine that are  continuously managed; are intended for the production of meat or breeding for  such purposes; and have adequate facilities and practices to prevent exposure  to feral swine, captive feral swine, or other swine that may have been exposed  to feral or captive feral swine.
    "Companion animal" means any vertebrate animal  excluding ornamental fish not otherwise defined herein as avian, cattle, goat,  horse, other ruminant, sheep, swine, or primate. 
    [ "Dairy type" means all cattle of or  primarily of a dairy or dual-purpose breed of cattle including but not limited  to cattle of the Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, Holstein, Jersey, Milking  Shorthorn, or similar breeds to include castrated males of such breeds. ]  
    "Dairying purposes" means the production of milk  or milk products, or the production of breeding stock whose progeny are to be  used for the production of milk, milk products, or breeding stock.
    "Dogs" means all domestic and wild members of  the family Canidae.
    "Exhibition purposes" means display at a  scheduled event. Exhibition purposes shall not include rodeos and similar  events where cattle, goats, sheep, and other ruminants are congregated for entertainment  purposes. 
    "Goat" means all domestic and wild members of  the genus capra.
    "Hatching eggs" means all poultry eggs that are  intended to be hatched.
    "Horse" means all domestic and wild members of  the family Equidae (horses, asses, zebras, and any hybrids of horses, asses, or  zebras).
    "Noncommercial swine" means all swine not  otherwise herein defined as commercial or slaughter swine, including but not  limited to wild hogs, feral swine, exhibition swine, or swine kept as pets.
    "Other ruminants" means all members of the order  Artiodactyla not otherwise defined herein as cattle, goats, sheep, or swine to  include camelidae and cervidae [ imported for exhibition  purposes ].
    "Permit" means an official document issued for  and prior to the interstate shipment of certain classes of livestock, poultry,  companion animals, and other animals or birds into Virginia.  This permit  is issued at the discretion of the State Veterinarian.
    "Poultry" means all domestic fowl [ ,  and game birds and ] ratites [ , and game birds ]  raised in captivity to include, but not be limited to, chickens, turkeys,  ducks, geese, ratites, and game birds such as quail or partridge.
    "Primate" means all nonhuman members of the  order Primates.
    "Region" means any premise, political  subdivision of a state, country, or other defined geographic area.
    "Sheep" means all domestic and wild members of  the genus ovis.
    "Slaughter establishment" means a livestock  slaughter facility that is under inspection by the USDA or the Virginia  Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
    "Slaughter swine" means all swine brought into  Virginia solely for the purpose of slaughter.
    "State Veterinarian" means the State  Veterinarian of the Commonwealth of Virginia or his designee.
    "Swine" means all domestic and wild members of  the family Suidae.
    "USDA" means the United States Department of  Agriculture.
    "USDA-approved market" means a livestock market  approved by the United States Department of Agriculture where livestock sold  only for slaughter purposes can be identified and segregated in accordance with  applicable state and federal regulations, and from which no such livestock  intended for slaughter may be released except directly to another approved USDA  market, or to a recognized slaughter establishment for immediate slaughter.
    2VAC5-141-20. Certificates of veterinary inspection.
    A. No agricultural animals, companion animals, or any  other animals or birds of any species that are affected with or that have been  exposed to any infectious or contagious disease shall be imported into Virginia  except by special written permit of the State Veterinarian.
    B. All agricultural animals, companion animals, or any  other animals or birds of any species imported into Virginia, except  [ livestock for immediate slaughter as otherwise exempted  by this chapter ], shall be accompanied by a certificate of  veterinary inspection, that shall be attached to the bill of lading or shall be  in the possession of the person in charge of such animals or birds, and a copy  of such certificate shall be forwarded promptly to the State Veterinarian.
    C. A certificate of veterinary inspection shall be a  written record meeting the requirements of Virginia and executed on an approved  form of the state of origin. It shall contain the names and street addresses or  premise identification numbers of the consignor and consignee, and premises of  origin and destination if different. It shall indicate the health status of the  animals or birds, and include the dates and results of all required tests.
    D. After physical examination of the animal and completion  of all required tests, the certificate of veterinary inspection shall be issued  within 30 days before the date of entry for cattle, goats, horses, other  ruminants, poultry, sheep, and swine. 
    E. After physical examination of the animal and completion  of all required tests, the certificate of veterinary inspection shall be issued  within 10 days before the date of entry for avian species not considered  poultry, companion animals, and primates.
    F. The certificate shall be issued by an accredited  veterinarian approved by the animal health official of the state of origin; a  veterinarian in the employ of the state of origin; or a veterinarian in the  employ of the Veterinary Services Division, Animal and Plant Health Inspection  Services, United States Department of Agriculture.
    G. All testing required by [ these  regulations this chapter ] shall be considered official  if conducted by an accredited veterinarian or collected by an accredited  veterinarian and conducted by an official animal health laboratory approved by  a state or federal animal health agency as dictated by testing protocol.
    2VAC5-141-30. Animal identification.
    A. All shipments of poultry and hatching eggs entering  Virginia must be accompanied by an approval number issued by the State  Veterinarian.
    B. Official identification for cattle can be: 
    1. Ear tag or other permanently affixed device bearing a  unique identification number issued by an official state or federal program;
    [ 2. Ear tag or other permanently affixed device  bearing a unique identification number issued by a performance registry, animal  identification registry, producer cooperative, or other marketing association  provided record of the issuance is available to the State Veterinarian; or
    2. USDA back tag only for cattle consigned directly to  slaughter; or ]
    3. Other forms of [ permanent ]  identification approved by [ the USDA or ] the  State Veterinarian.
    C. Official identification for goats and sheep can be: 
    1. Official ear tags that are approved by the USDA for use  in the Scrapie Eradication Program or the Scrapie Flock Certification Program;
    2. For goats exempt from identification required by the  Scrapie Eradication Program, an ear tag or other affixed device bearing a  unique identification number issued by an official state or federal program,  [ or a breed, performance, or marketing association that allows the  State Veterinarian access to records or a USDA back tag only for  such goats consigned directly to slaughter ];
    3. Legible official registry tattoo if accompanied by a  registration certificate; and
    4. [ Devices approved by the State  Veterinarian that contain a premises identification issued by the state of  origin in combination with a unique animal number Other forms of  identification approved by the State Veterinarian ].
    D. Official identification for horses can be: 
    1. A thorough written or photographic record of the horse's  appearance directly noted on or affixed to the official health certificate and  endorsed by the issuing veterinarian;
    2. Legible breed association tattoo number;
    3. Affixed or implanted device bearing a unique  identification number issued by a state or federal program, or a breed or  performance association that allows the State Veterinarian access to records;  and
    4. Other forms of identification considered official by the  USDA or the State Veterinarian.
    E. Official identification for swine can be:
    1. Ear tag, ear notch, or tattoo recorded by a purebred  registry;
    2. Ear tag or other affixed device bearing a unique  individual or group identification number issued by an official state or  federal program;
    3. Official premise identification tattoo including state  of origin; and
    4. Other forms of identification considered official by the  USDA or the State Veterinarian. 
    2VAC5-141-40. Entry by permit only.
    A. When the State Veterinarian is informed of any unusual  or serious outbreak of disease among livestock or poultry in any other region  that, in his opinion, constitutes a threat to livestock and poultry in  Virginia, he shall by proclamation prohibit the entrance of any livestock or  poultry that originate either directly or indirectly from that region at his  discretion, except by permit. He may also prohibit the entrance of any products  as defined in the meat or poultry inspection regulations of the USDA, or in the  Virginia Meat and Poultry Products Inspection Act, the Virginia Milk and Cream  Law, or any other applicable or related Virginia statutes and regulations,  except by permit. Specific classes of animals as listed in [ these  regulations this chapter ] also require a permit for  entry into Virginia.
    B. Agricultural animals, companion animals, or any other  animals or birds of any species imported into Virginia for bona fide scientific  research by a recognized agricultural institution or institution licensed by  the USDA, and for which compliance with the requirements of [ these  regulations this chapter ] would be a detriment to the  research, may be excused from the [ regulatory ] requirements  at the discretion of the State Veterinarian by the issuance of a permit.
    C. All requests for permits must be directed to the State  Veterinarian in writing and must give all information as he may require.
    2VAC5-141-50. Common carriers; trucks.
    A. Owners and operators of common carriers, trucks, or other  conveyances are forbidden to move any agricultural animals, companion animals,  or any other animals or birds of any species into Virginia except in compliance  with the provisions set forth in this [ regulation  chapter ]. 
    B. All railway cars, trucks, and other conveyances used  for transportation of livestock or poultry must be kept in a sanitary  condition. The State Veterinarian may require the cleaning and disinfecting of  any conveyance at any time to prevent the spread of infectious or contagious  diseases.
    2VAC5-141-60. Avian entry requirements.
    A. All entry of birds into Virginia must be in compliance  with the testing and all other requirements of the State Veterinarian's Avian  Influenza (H5 and H7) Proclamation dated [ December 2009  January 18, 2012, unless temporarily superseded by a valid proclamation issued  pursuant to § 3.2-6010 of the Code of Virginia, published in the Virginia  Register of Regulations, and posted on the Virginia Regulatory Town Hall ].  Certificates of veterinary inspection [ as required  or reports issued by a laboratory approved by any state or federal animal  health authority ] must be dated in accordance with said  proclamation.
    B. All birds in commerce not classified as poultry must be  accompanied by a health certificate issued within 10 days prior to entry into  Virginia. Any poultry in commerce that by its nature is fit only as a pet must  be accompanied by an official health certificate issued within 10 days prior to  entry into Virginia.
    C. Approval numbers required for shipments of poultry and  hatching eggs.
    1. Each shipper of poultry or hatching eggs shall first  secure an approval number from the State Veterinarian. This approval number  must appear on each shipment of poultry or hatching eggs shipped into Virginia.
    2. Applications for approval numbers must be made on forms  provided by the State Veterinarian. Each application shall require the  following information on each premises from which the poultry or hatching eggs  originate:
    a. The name and address of each premises owner;
    b. The species and the number of birds for each on each  premise, or for hatcheries hatching capacity;
    c. For chickens and turkeys, and the parent flock of the  hatching eggs of chickens and turkeys, the date of the most recent  Pullorum-typhoid test, the total number or the percentage of positive reactions  to said test, and the Pullorum-typhoid status attained; and
    d. Any additional information the State Veterinarian may  require.
    3. Applications, when completed, must be forwarded to the  official state agency, the state livestock health official, or other competent  and recognized authority of the state of origin for verification, approval, and  signature and then forwarded to the State Veterinarian for final approval. 
    4. Poultry and hatching eggs shall not be shipped into  Virginia until final approval has been granted and the [ permit  approval number ] is received. 
    D. Chickens, turkeys, and hatching eggs of chickens and  turkeys shall not be imported into Virginia unless originating exclusively from  flocks or hatcheries participating in the National Poultry Improvement Plan  (NPIP) or issued a permit and negative to a Pullorum-typhoid test within 30  days prior to entry.
    E. Exemptions for hatching eggs and poultry, providing the  hatching eggs or poultry remain subject to the State Veterinarian's Avian  influenza (H5 and H7) Proclamation dated [ December 2009  January 18, 2012, unless temporarily superseded by a valid proclamation issued  pursuant to § 3.2-6010 of the Code of Virginia, published in the Virginia  Register of Regulations, and posted on the Virginia Regulatory Town Hall ].
    1. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to hatching eggs or poultry passing directly through the  Commonwealth of Virginia in interstate commerce.
    2. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to poultry imported into the Commonwealth of Virginia for  immediate slaughter and consigned directly to a poultry processing  establishment that is approved and inspected by the USDA or by the Virginia  Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
    F. Exemptions for birds other than poultry, providing the  birds remain subject to the State Veterinarian's Avian Influenza (H5 and H7)  Proclamation dated [ December 2009 January 18, 2012,  unless temporarily superseded by a valid proclamation issued pursuant to  § 3.2-6010 of the Code of Virginia, published in the Virginia Register of  Regulations, and posted on the Virginia Regulatory Town Hall ].
    1. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to birds other than poultry that are passing directly  through Virginia to another state in interstate commerce.
    2. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to birds other than poultry when the birds are kept properly  under control by their owner or custodian when passing through Virginia to  another state.
    3. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to birds other than poultry brought into Virginia by a  resident or by a resident of another state who intends to make his residence in  Virginia except if brought into the Commonwealth with the intent of offering it  for public adoption, transfer, sale, trade, or promotional incentive.
    4. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to birds other than poultry brought into Virginia for less  than 10 days for the purpose of hunting or legal exhibition with no change of  ownership.
    G. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not be construed to (i) permit the entry into Virginia of any avian  species otherwise prohibited or restricted by any state or federal law,  regulation, or directive; or (ii) contravene additional entry requirements  imposed by any state or federal law, regulation, or directive.
    2VAC5-141-70. Cattle entry requirements.
    A. All cattle entering Virginia must bear official  identification and the official identification number must be noted on the  certificate of veterinary inspection. If multiple cattle of similar breed, age  and sex are listed on the certificate of veterinary inspection, sequential  identification numbers may be summarized. [ This requirement shall  not apply to cattle 18 months of age or younger provided such cattle are not of  a dairy type and are imported into Virginia for feeding purposes only. ]  
    B. All cattle [ 12 18 ]  months of age or older require a negative caudal fold or comparative  cervical tuberculin test within 60 days prior to entry into Virginia. This  requirement shall not apply to:
    1. Cattle consigned directly from an accredited  tuberculosis-free herd provided the accreditation number and date of the last  herd test are listed on the certificate of veterinary inspection;
    2. Cattle that originate from a region considered free of  tuberculosis for cattle by the USDA and consigned directly to a slaughter  establishment or to a USDA-approved market and from there directly to a  slaughter establishment; or
    3. Cattle entering Virginia for a period of 10 days or less  for exhibition purposes provided they originate from a region considered free  of tuberculosis for cattle by the USDA and no change of ownership occurs.
    C. All cattle originating from a region not considered  free of tuberculosis for cattle by the USDA require a permit and a negative  caudal or comparative cervical tuberculin test within 60 days prior to entry  into Virginia. This requirement shall not apply to:
    1. Cattle consigned directly from an accredited  tuberculosis-free herd provided the accreditation number and date of the last  herd test are listed on the certificate of veterinary inspection; and
    2. Cattle consigned directly to a slaughter establishment.
    D. All sexually intact cattle originating from a region  not considered free of brucellosis by the USDA require a permit and an  individual brucellosis test within 30 days prior to entry into Virginia.  Animals allowed entry under a permit will be quarantined on the premises of the  consignee until retested at the consignee’s expense and found negative to  brucellosis no less than 45 days and no more than 120 days after entry as  indicated by the permit. This requirement shall not apply to:
    1. Cattle consigned directly from a certified  brucellosis-free herd provided the certification number and date of the last  herd test are listed on the official health certificate; and 
    2. Cattle consigned directly to a slaughter establishment.
    E. Cattle may be imported for immediate slaughter into  Virginia without a certificate of veterinary inspection provided they are  consigned directly to a slaughter establishment. Official identification for  all cattle under this subsection must be listed on the waybill.
    F. Cattle from a [ farm of origin in a  state adjoining Virginia and from a ] region [ therein ]  considered free of tuberculosis and brucellosis for cattle by the USDA may  enter Virginia for the purpose of sale at an approved livestock market without  a certificate of veterinary inspection and without tuberculosis testing if  otherwise required provided:
    1. [ The All ] cattle  [ offered for sale at the approved livestock market excepting cattle 18  months of age or younger not of a dairy type and intended for feeding purposes ]  bear [ required official ] individual  identification [ upon entry to the approved livestock market or  have such applied at the approved livestock market ]; and
    2. The approved livestock market maintains for at least  [ two five ] years and makes available to the  State Veterinarian a record of the consignor of the cattle, the identification  numbers [ as required ] of the cattle he consigns, and  the buyer of the cattle.
    2VAC5-141-80. Companion animal entry requirements.
    A. Companion animals must be accompanied by a certificate  of veterinary inspection issued within 10 days prior to entry into Virginia.
    B. No dog or cat less than eight weeks of age may be  imported into Virginia unless accompanied by its dam.
    C. Any dog or cat greater than four months of age  entering Virginia shall be currently vaccinated for rabies.
    D. Exemptions.
    1. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to companion animals that are passing directly through  Virginia to another state in interstate commerce. 
    2. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to companion animals that are kept properly under control by  their owner or custodian when passing through Virginia to another state. 
    3. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to companion animals brought into Virginia by a resident or  by a resident of another state who intends to make his residence in Virginia  except if brought into the Commonwealth with the intent of offering it for  public adoption, transfer, sale, trade, or promotional incentive.
    4. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to companion animals brought into Virginia for less than 10  days for the purpose of hunting or legal exhibition with no change of  ownership.
    E. This [ regulation  chapter ] shall not be construed to (i) permit the entry into  Virginia of any species of animal otherwise prohibited or restricted by any  state or federal law, regulation, or directive; or (ii) contravene additional  entry requirements imposed by any state or federal law, regulation, or  directive.
    2 VAC5-141-90. Goat and sheep entry requirements.
    A. All goats and sheep entering Virginia must be  officially identified and the official identification number must be noted on  the certificate of veterinary inspection. If multiple goats or sheep of similar  breed, age, and sex are listed on the certificate of veterinary inspection,  sequential identification numbers may be summarized. [ The  requirement shall not apply to castrated male goats that are not subject to the  Scrapie Eradication Program. ] 
    B. Scrapie control.
    1. No sheep or goat may be imported into Virginia that does  not originate from a scrapie consistent state unless originating from a flock  enrolled in the complete monitored or export monitored category of the USDA  Scrapie Flock Certification Program. 
    2. No goat or sheep infected with scrapie, or the offspring  of a goat or sheep infected with scrapie, may enter Virginia.
    C. All goats and sheep [ 12 18 ]  months of age or older imported into Virginia for dairying purposes shall be  negative to a tuberculosis test within 60 days prior to entry. [ All  other goats and sheep originating from a region considered free of tuberculosis  for cattle by the USDA may enter Virginia without tuberculosis testing.  This requirement shall not apply to:
    1. Goats and sheep 18 months of age or older imported into  Virginia for dairying purposes consigned directly from an accredited  tuberculosis-free herd provided the accreditation number and date of the last  herd test are listed on the certificate of veterinary inspection; or 
    2. Goats and sheep 18 months of age or older intended for  dairying purposes entering Virginia for a period of 10 days or less for  exhibition purposes provided they originate from a region considered free of  tuberculosis for cattle by the USDA and no change of ownership occurs. ]  
    D. All goats and sheep originating from a region not  considered free of tuberculosis for cattle by the USDA shall be negative to a  tuberculosis test within 60 days prior to entry unless consigned directly to a  livestock slaughter establishment. This requirement shall not apply to animals  less than six months of age accompanied by their tested dam.
    E. All sexually intact goats and sheep originating from a  region not considered free of brucellosis for cattle by the USDA shall be  negative to a brucellosis test within 30 days prior to entry unless consigned  directly to a livestock slaughter establishment. This requirement shall not  apply to animals less than six months of age accompanied by their tested dam.
    F. Goats and sheep may be imported for immediate slaughter  into Virginia without a certificate of veterinary inspection provided they are  consigned directly to a livestock slaughter establishment or to a USDA-approved  market and from there directly to a livestock slaughter establishment.
    G. Goats and sheep from a [ farm of origin  in a state adjoining Virginia and from a ] region [ therein ]  considered free of tuberculosis and brucellosis for cattle by the USDA may  enter Virginia for the purpose of sale at an approved livestock market without  a certificate of veterinary inspection and without tuberculosis testing if  otherwise required provided:
    1. The goats and sheep bear [ any ] required  individual identification [ upon entry to the approved livestock  market or have such applied at the approved livestock market ]; and
    2. The approved livestock market maintains for at least  [ two five ] years and makes available to the  State Veterinarian a record of the consignor of the goats and sheep, the  identification numbers [ as required ] of the goats and  sheep he consigns, and the buyer of the goats and sheep.
    2VAC5-141-100. Horse entry requirements.
    A. All horses entering Virginia must be officially  identified, and the official identification must be noted on the official  health certificate. 
    B. Equine infectious anemia testing.
    1. All horses imported into Virginia shall have been  officially tested and found negative for equine infectious anemia within the  past 12 months and be accompanied by an official certificate stating this  information.
    2. Horses that originate from infected premises in other  states are not eligible for entry into Virginia except by permit at the State  Veterinarian's discretion.
    3. Foals six months of age or under accompanying a tested  negative dam are exempt from testing.
    C. Contagious equine metritis control.
    1. No horse over two years of age that either originated in  or has passed through premises or a country where contagious equine metritis is  known to exist may enter the Commonwealth of Virginia except by permit.
    2. Horses that are issued a permit immediately will be  placed under quarantine and assigned a testing protocol at the consignee's  expense until the State Veterinarian is satisfied that they pose no danger to  the Virginia equine population.
    D. Horses may enter Virginia with an official equine  interstate event permit issued by another state in lieu of certificate of  veterinary inspection provided the permit is not expired.
    2VAC5-141-110. Other ruminant entry requirements.
    A. All other ruminants entering Virginia must bear an  individual identification number, and such identification number must be noted  on the certificate of veterinary inspection. Identification can be a tattoo,  microchip, ear tag issued by a state or federal entity, or other form of  identification approved by the State Veterinarian.
    B. All other ruminants originating from a region not  considered free of tuberculosis for cattle by the USDA shall be negative to a  tuberculosis test within 60 days prior to entry. This requirement shall not  apply to animals less than six months of age accompanied by their tested dam.
    C. All sexually intact other ruminants originating from a  region not considered free of brucellosis for cattle by the USDA shall be  negative to a brucellosis test within 30 days prior to entry. This requirement  shall not apply to animals less than six months of age accompanied by their  tested dam.
    D. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not be construed to (i) permit the entry into Virginia of any species  of animal otherwise prohibited or restricted by any state or federal law,  regulation, or directive; or (ii) contravene additional entry requirements  imposed by any state or federal law, regulation, or directive.
    2VAC5-141-120. Swine entry requirements.
    A. All swine entering Virginia must bear an identification  number, and the identification number must be noted on the certificate of  veterinary inspection.
    B. Commercial swine entry requirements.
    1. Commercial swine originating from a herd or region that  is considered free from brucellosis and pseudorabies by a federal program or a  state program approved by the State Veterinarian may enter Virginia without  further testing requirements provided a statement indicating the region is  considered free from brucellosis by a federal or state program or verification  of herd participation in the federal or state program is indicated on the  certificate of veterinary inspection.
    2. Sexually intact commercial swine over four months of age  not originating from a herd or region considered free of brucellosis by a  federal program or a state program approved by the State Veterinarian must be  negative to a brucellosis test within 30 days prior to entry into Virginia.
    3. Commercial swine not originating from herd or region  that is considered free from pseudorabies by a federal program or a state  program approved by the State Veterinarian shall be individually tested and  negative to a pseudorabies test within 30 days prior to entry into Virginia.  Sexually intact swine shall be quarantined at the premises of destination until  retested between 30 and 60 days after importation at the consignee's expense. 
    4. No commercial swine vaccinated for pseudorabies shall be  imported into Virginia unless under permit for direct slaughter.
    C. Noncommercial swine entry requirements.
    1. Noncommercial swine originating from herds considered  free from brucellosis and pseudorabies by a federal program or a state program  approved by the State Veterinarian may enter Virginia without further testing  requirements provided verification of herd participation in the federal or  state program is indicated on the certificate of veterinary inspection and the  commercial swine have not had contact with feral swine.
    2. Sexually intact noncommercial swine over four months of  age not from a herd considered free from brucellosis by a federal program or a  state program approved by the State Veterinarian must be negative to a  brucellosis test within 30 days prior to entry into Virginia.
    3. Noncommercial swine not from a herd considered free from  pseudorabies by a federal program or a state program approved by the State  Veterinarian shall be negative to a pseudorabies test within 30 days prior to  entry into Virginia. Sexually intact swine shall be quarantined at the premises  of destination until retested between 30 and 60 days after importation at the  consignee's expense.
    4. No noncommercial swine vaccinated for pseudorabies shall  be imported into Virginia unless under permit at the discretion of the State  Veterinarian and subject to any restrictions he deems necessary.
    D. Slaughter swine entry requirements.
    1. No slaughter swine known to be infected with or exposed  to pseudorabies and no swine vaccinated for pseudorabies may enter Virginia  unless:
    a. It is shipped directly to a slaughter establishment that  is approved and inspected by the USDA or by the Virginia Department of  Agriculture and Consumer Services under permit;
    b. It is shipped in a sealed vehicle or individually  identified on the permit; and
    c. The conveyance transporting the swine into Virginia is  cleaned and disinfected after the swine is off-loaded but prior to the  conveyance leaving the slaughter establishment. 
    2. Any slaughter swine not known to be infected with or  exposed to pseudorabies may enter Virginia without a certificate of veterinary  inspection, but only if it is accompanied by a waybill, bill of lading, bill of  sale, or other document that identifies the swine to the farm of origin and  only if it is sent directly to:
    a. A slaughter establishment that is approved and inspected  by the USDA or by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services;  or
    b. A USDA-approved market and from there directly to a  recognized slaughter establishment.
    E. Commercial swine intended for feeding purposes and not  intended for breeding purposes from a farm of origin in a state adjoining  Virginia and from a region therein considered free of pseudorabies by a federal  or state program approved by the State Veterinarian may enter Virginia without  a certificate of veterinary inspection.
    2VAC5-141-130. Primate entry requirements.
    A. All primates imported into Virginia require a  certificate of veterinary inspection issued within 10 days prior to entry.
    B. All primates imported into Virginia must be  microchipped, and such microchip number must be noted on the certificate of  veterinary inspection.
    C. The official health certificate shall include a  statement attesting to the fact that the veterinarian has carefully examined  the oral mucosa of the primate and has found no evidence of disease lesions or  inflammatory processes.
    D. Tuberculosis testing requirements.
    1. Primates imported into Virginia shall have a negative  tuberculosis test performed by an accredited veterinarian within 30 days prior  to entry. The official health certificate must indicate the kind and amount of  tuberculin used, the date and hour of injection, and the date and hour of  reading.
    2. Primates that have been associated with a colony where  there have been other primates showing response to the tuberculin test shall  not be eligible for entry into Virginia unless and until all primates in the  colony shall have passed two consecutive tuberculosis tests not less than 30  days apart.
    E. Exceptions.
    1. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to primates that are passing directly through Virginia to  another state in interstate commerce.
    2. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to primates that are kept properly under control by their  owner or custodian when passing through Virginia to another state. 
    3. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to primates brought into Virginia by a resident or by a  resident of another state who intends to make his residence in Virginia, except  if brought into the Commonwealth with the intent of offering it for public  adoption, transfer, sale, trade, or promotional incentive.
    4. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to primates brought into Virginia for less than 10 days for  the purpose of legal exhibition with no change of ownership.
        NOTICE: The following  form used in administering the regulation was filed by the agency. The form is  not being published; however, online users of this issue of the Virginia  Register of Regulations may click on the name to access a form. The form is  also available through the agency contact or at the Office of the Registrar of  Regulations, General Assembly Building, 2nd Floor, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
         FORMS (2VAC5-141)
    [ Poultry  Permit Packet (eff. 01/11).
    Application  for Approval Number for the Importation of Poultry, Form OVS1201 (eff. 1/12). ]
    DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (2VAC5-141)
    [ Avian  Influenza (H5 and H7) Proclamation, eff. December 4, 2009, Department of  Agriculture and Consumer Services, State Veterinarian's Office, P.O. Box 1163,  Richmond, VA 23218.
    Avian  Influenza (H5 and H7) Proclamation, eff. January 18, 2012, Department of  Agriculture and Consumer Services, State Veterinarian's Office, P.O. Box 1163,  Richmond, VA 23218. ]
    VA.R. Doc. No. R09-1891; Filed November 16, 2011, 3:47 p.m. 
TITLE 2. AGRICULTURE
BOARD OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES
Final Regulation
    Titles of Regulations: 2VAC5-140. Health Requirements  Governing the Admission of Livestock, Poultry, Companion Animals, and Other  Animals or Birds into Virginia (repealing 2VAC5-140-10 through  2VAC5-140-140).
    2VAC5-141. Health Requirements Governing the Admission of  Agricultural Animals, Companion Animals, and Other Animals or Birds into  Virginia (adding 2VAC5-141-10 through 2VAC5-141-130).
    Statutory Authority: § 3.2-6002 of the Code of  Virginia.
    Effective Date: January 18, 2012. 
    Agency Contact: Dr. Dan Kovich, Staff  Veterinarian/Animal Care and Health Policy, Department of Agriculture and  Consumer Services, P.O. Box 1163, Richmond, VA 23218, telephone (804) 786-2483,  FAX (804) 371-2380, TTY (800) 828-1120, or email dan.kovich@vdacs.virginia.gov.
    Summary: 
    This regulatory action repeals the current regulation (2VAC5-140)  concerning the requirements for entry of agricultural, companion, and other  animals into Virginia, and replaces it with a regulatory framework (2VAC5-141)  that is consistent with the current status of interstate animal disease control  and eradication programs. Substantive changes include the creation of animal  identification requirements for certain classes of imported animals,  strengthening of tuberculosis testing requirements for cattle, alignment of  sheep and goat entry requirements with current scrapie control programs,  elimination of certain testing requirements for llamas and alpacas, and  provision for free movement of agricultural animals from neighboring states to  facilitate marketing. Changes made since the proposed stage clarify definitions  and avian entry requirements and modify certain testing and identification  requirements for cattle, goats, and sheep. The current regulation has not been  amended since 1989.
    Summary of Public Comments and Agency's Response: A  summary of comments made by the public and the agency's response may be  obtained from the promulgating agency or viewed at the office of the Registrar  of Regulations. 
    CHAPTER 141
  HEALTH REQUIREMENTS GOVERNING THE ADMISSION OF AGRICULTURAL ANIMALS, COMPANION  ANIMALS, AND OTHER ANIMALS OR BIRDS INTO VIRGINIA
    2VAC5-141-10. Definitions.
    The following words and terms when used in these  regulations shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly  indicates otherwise:
    "Agricultural animals" means livestock and  poultry.
    "Approved livestock market" means a livestock  market [ approved by the United States Department of Agriculture in  accordance with 9 CFR 71.20 and ] under inspection by the State  Veterinarian.
    "Avian" means all domestic and wild members of  the class Aves.
    "Cats" means all domestic and wild members of  the family Felidae.
    "Cattle" means all domestic and wild members of  the genera bos, bison, and bubalus to include domestic cattle, yak, bison, and  water buffalo.
    "Certificate of veterinary inspection" means an  official health certificate endorsed by a state, federal, or international  government.
    "Commercial swine" means swine that are  continuously managed; are intended for the production of meat or breeding for  such purposes; and have adequate facilities and practices to prevent exposure  to feral swine, captive feral swine, or other swine that may have been exposed  to feral or captive feral swine.
    "Companion animal" means any vertebrate animal  excluding ornamental fish not otherwise defined herein as avian, cattle, goat,  horse, other ruminant, sheep, swine, or primate. 
    [ "Dairy type" means all cattle of or  primarily of a dairy or dual-purpose breed of cattle including but not limited  to cattle of the Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, Holstein, Jersey, Milking  Shorthorn, or similar breeds to include castrated males of such breeds. ]  
    "Dairying purposes" means the production of milk  or milk products, or the production of breeding stock whose progeny are to be  used for the production of milk, milk products, or breeding stock.
    "Dogs" means all domestic and wild members of  the family Canidae.
    "Exhibition purposes" means display at a  scheduled event. Exhibition purposes shall not include rodeos and similar  events where cattle, goats, sheep, and other ruminants are congregated for entertainment  purposes. 
    "Goat" means all domestic and wild members of  the genus capra.
    "Hatching eggs" means all poultry eggs that are  intended to be hatched.
    "Horse" means all domestic and wild members of  the family Equidae (horses, asses, zebras, and any hybrids of horses, asses, or  zebras).
    "Noncommercial swine" means all swine not  otherwise herein defined as commercial or slaughter swine, including but not  limited to wild hogs, feral swine, exhibition swine, or swine kept as pets.
    "Other ruminants" means all members of the order  Artiodactyla not otherwise defined herein as cattle, goats, sheep, or swine to  include camelidae and cervidae [ imported for exhibition  purposes ].
    "Permit" means an official document issued for  and prior to the interstate shipment of certain classes of livestock, poultry,  companion animals, and other animals or birds into Virginia.  This permit  is issued at the discretion of the State Veterinarian.
    "Poultry" means all domestic fowl [ ,  and game birds and ] ratites [ , and game birds ]  raised in captivity to include, but not be limited to, chickens, turkeys,  ducks, geese, ratites, and game birds such as quail or partridge.
    "Primate" means all nonhuman members of the  order Primates.
    "Region" means any premise, political  subdivision of a state, country, or other defined geographic area.
    "Sheep" means all domestic and wild members of  the genus ovis.
    "Slaughter establishment" means a livestock  slaughter facility that is under inspection by the USDA or the Virginia  Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
    "Slaughter swine" means all swine brought into  Virginia solely for the purpose of slaughter.
    "State Veterinarian" means the State  Veterinarian of the Commonwealth of Virginia or his designee.
    "Swine" means all domestic and wild members of  the family Suidae.
    "USDA" means the United States Department of  Agriculture.
    "USDA-approved market" means a livestock market  approved by the United States Department of Agriculture where livestock sold  only for slaughter purposes can be identified and segregated in accordance with  applicable state and federal regulations, and from which no such livestock  intended for slaughter may be released except directly to another approved USDA  market, or to a recognized slaughter establishment for immediate slaughter.
    2VAC5-141-20. Certificates of veterinary inspection.
    A. No agricultural animals, companion animals, or any  other animals or birds of any species that are affected with or that have been  exposed to any infectious or contagious disease shall be imported into Virginia  except by special written permit of the State Veterinarian.
    B. All agricultural animals, companion animals, or any  other animals or birds of any species imported into Virginia, except  [ livestock for immediate slaughter as otherwise exempted  by this chapter ], shall be accompanied by a certificate of  veterinary inspection, that shall be attached to the bill of lading or shall be  in the possession of the person in charge of such animals or birds, and a copy  of such certificate shall be forwarded promptly to the State Veterinarian.
    C. A certificate of veterinary inspection shall be a  written record meeting the requirements of Virginia and executed on an approved  form of the state of origin. It shall contain the names and street addresses or  premise identification numbers of the consignor and consignee, and premises of  origin and destination if different. It shall indicate the health status of the  animals or birds, and include the dates and results of all required tests.
    D. After physical examination of the animal and completion  of all required tests, the certificate of veterinary inspection shall be issued  within 30 days before the date of entry for cattle, goats, horses, other  ruminants, poultry, sheep, and swine. 
    E. After physical examination of the animal and completion  of all required tests, the certificate of veterinary inspection shall be issued  within 10 days before the date of entry for avian species not considered  poultry, companion animals, and primates.
    F. The certificate shall be issued by an accredited  veterinarian approved by the animal health official of the state of origin; a  veterinarian in the employ of the state of origin; or a veterinarian in the  employ of the Veterinary Services Division, Animal and Plant Health Inspection  Services, United States Department of Agriculture.
    G. All testing required by [ these  regulations this chapter ] shall be considered official  if conducted by an accredited veterinarian or collected by an accredited  veterinarian and conducted by an official animal health laboratory approved by  a state or federal animal health agency as dictated by testing protocol.
    2VAC5-141-30. Animal identification.
    A. All shipments of poultry and hatching eggs entering  Virginia must be accompanied by an approval number issued by the State  Veterinarian.
    B. Official identification for cattle can be: 
    1. Ear tag or other permanently affixed device bearing a  unique identification number issued by an official state or federal program;
    [ 2. Ear tag or other permanently affixed device  bearing a unique identification number issued by a performance registry, animal  identification registry, producer cooperative, or other marketing association  provided record of the issuance is available to the State Veterinarian; or
    2. USDA back tag only for cattle consigned directly to  slaughter; or ]
    3. Other forms of [ permanent ]  identification approved by [ the USDA or ] the  State Veterinarian.
    C. Official identification for goats and sheep can be: 
    1. Official ear tags that are approved by the USDA for use  in the Scrapie Eradication Program or the Scrapie Flock Certification Program;
    2. For goats exempt from identification required by the  Scrapie Eradication Program, an ear tag or other affixed device bearing a  unique identification number issued by an official state or federal program,  [ or a breed, performance, or marketing association that allows the  State Veterinarian access to records or a USDA back tag only for  such goats consigned directly to slaughter ];
    3. Legible official registry tattoo if accompanied by a  registration certificate; and
    4. [ Devices approved by the State  Veterinarian that contain a premises identification issued by the state of  origin in combination with a unique animal number Other forms of  identification approved by the State Veterinarian ].
    D. Official identification for horses can be: 
    1. A thorough written or photographic record of the horse's  appearance directly noted on or affixed to the official health certificate and  endorsed by the issuing veterinarian;
    2. Legible breed association tattoo number;
    3. Affixed or implanted device bearing a unique  identification number issued by a state or federal program, or a breed or  performance association that allows the State Veterinarian access to records;  and
    4. Other forms of identification considered official by the  USDA or the State Veterinarian.
    E. Official identification for swine can be:
    1. Ear tag, ear notch, or tattoo recorded by a purebred  registry;
    2. Ear tag or other affixed device bearing a unique  individual or group identification number issued by an official state or  federal program;
    3. Official premise identification tattoo including state  of origin; and
    4. Other forms of identification considered official by the  USDA or the State Veterinarian. 
    2VAC5-141-40. Entry by permit only.
    A. When the State Veterinarian is informed of any unusual  or serious outbreak of disease among livestock or poultry in any other region  that, in his opinion, constitutes a threat to livestock and poultry in  Virginia, he shall by proclamation prohibit the entrance of any livestock or  poultry that originate either directly or indirectly from that region at his  discretion, except by permit. He may also prohibit the entrance of any products  as defined in the meat or poultry inspection regulations of the USDA, or in the  Virginia Meat and Poultry Products Inspection Act, the Virginia Milk and Cream  Law, or any other applicable or related Virginia statutes and regulations,  except by permit. Specific classes of animals as listed in [ these  regulations this chapter ] also require a permit for  entry into Virginia.
    B. Agricultural animals, companion animals, or any other  animals or birds of any species imported into Virginia for bona fide scientific  research by a recognized agricultural institution or institution licensed by  the USDA, and for which compliance with the requirements of [ these  regulations this chapter ] would be a detriment to the  research, may be excused from the [ regulatory ] requirements  at the discretion of the State Veterinarian by the issuance of a permit.
    C. All requests for permits must be directed to the State  Veterinarian in writing and must give all information as he may require.
    2VAC5-141-50. Common carriers; trucks.
    A. Owners and operators of common carriers, trucks, or other  conveyances are forbidden to move any agricultural animals, companion animals,  or any other animals or birds of any species into Virginia except in compliance  with the provisions set forth in this [ regulation  chapter ]. 
    B. All railway cars, trucks, and other conveyances used  for transportation of livestock or poultry must be kept in a sanitary  condition. The State Veterinarian may require the cleaning and disinfecting of  any conveyance at any time to prevent the spread of infectious or contagious  diseases.
    2VAC5-141-60. Avian entry requirements.
    A. All entry of birds into Virginia must be in compliance  with the testing and all other requirements of the State Veterinarian's Avian  Influenza (H5 and H7) Proclamation dated [ December 2009  January 18, 2012, unless temporarily superseded by a valid proclamation issued  pursuant to § 3.2-6010 of the Code of Virginia, published in the Virginia  Register of Regulations, and posted on the Virginia Regulatory Town Hall ].  Certificates of veterinary inspection [ as required  or reports issued by a laboratory approved by any state or federal animal  health authority ] must be dated in accordance with said  proclamation.
    B. All birds in commerce not classified as poultry must be  accompanied by a health certificate issued within 10 days prior to entry into  Virginia. Any poultry in commerce that by its nature is fit only as a pet must  be accompanied by an official health certificate issued within 10 days prior to  entry into Virginia.
    C. Approval numbers required for shipments of poultry and  hatching eggs.
    1. Each shipper of poultry or hatching eggs shall first  secure an approval number from the State Veterinarian. This approval number  must appear on each shipment of poultry or hatching eggs shipped into Virginia.
    2. Applications for approval numbers must be made on forms  provided by the State Veterinarian. Each application shall require the  following information on each premises from which the poultry or hatching eggs  originate:
    a. The name and address of each premises owner;
    b. The species and the number of birds for each on each  premise, or for hatcheries hatching capacity;
    c. For chickens and turkeys, and the parent flock of the  hatching eggs of chickens and turkeys, the date of the most recent  Pullorum-typhoid test, the total number or the percentage of positive reactions  to said test, and the Pullorum-typhoid status attained; and
    d. Any additional information the State Veterinarian may  require.
    3. Applications, when completed, must be forwarded to the  official state agency, the state livestock health official, or other competent  and recognized authority of the state of origin for verification, approval, and  signature and then forwarded to the State Veterinarian for final approval. 
    4. Poultry and hatching eggs shall not be shipped into  Virginia until final approval has been granted and the [ permit  approval number ] is received. 
    D. Chickens, turkeys, and hatching eggs of chickens and  turkeys shall not be imported into Virginia unless originating exclusively from  flocks or hatcheries participating in the National Poultry Improvement Plan  (NPIP) or issued a permit and negative to a Pullorum-typhoid test within 30  days prior to entry.
    E. Exemptions for hatching eggs and poultry, providing the  hatching eggs or poultry remain subject to the State Veterinarian's Avian  influenza (H5 and H7) Proclamation dated [ December 2009  January 18, 2012, unless temporarily superseded by a valid proclamation issued  pursuant to § 3.2-6010 of the Code of Virginia, published in the Virginia  Register of Regulations, and posted on the Virginia Regulatory Town Hall ].
    1. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to hatching eggs or poultry passing directly through the  Commonwealth of Virginia in interstate commerce.
    2. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to poultry imported into the Commonwealth of Virginia for  immediate slaughter and consigned directly to a poultry processing  establishment that is approved and inspected by the USDA or by the Virginia  Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
    F. Exemptions for birds other than poultry, providing the  birds remain subject to the State Veterinarian's Avian Influenza (H5 and H7)  Proclamation dated [ December 2009 January 18, 2012,  unless temporarily superseded by a valid proclamation issued pursuant to  § 3.2-6010 of the Code of Virginia, published in the Virginia Register of  Regulations, and posted on the Virginia Regulatory Town Hall ].
    1. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to birds other than poultry that are passing directly  through Virginia to another state in interstate commerce.
    2. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to birds other than poultry when the birds are kept properly  under control by their owner or custodian when passing through Virginia to  another state.
    3. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to birds other than poultry brought into Virginia by a  resident or by a resident of another state who intends to make his residence in  Virginia except if brought into the Commonwealth with the intent of offering it  for public adoption, transfer, sale, trade, or promotional incentive.
    4. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to birds other than poultry brought into Virginia for less  than 10 days for the purpose of hunting or legal exhibition with no change of  ownership.
    G. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not be construed to (i) permit the entry into Virginia of any avian  species otherwise prohibited or restricted by any state or federal law,  regulation, or directive; or (ii) contravene additional entry requirements  imposed by any state or federal law, regulation, or directive.
    2VAC5-141-70. Cattle entry requirements.
    A. All cattle entering Virginia must bear official  identification and the official identification number must be noted on the  certificate of veterinary inspection. If multiple cattle of similar breed, age  and sex are listed on the certificate of veterinary inspection, sequential  identification numbers may be summarized. [ This requirement shall  not apply to cattle 18 months of age or younger provided such cattle are not of  a dairy type and are imported into Virginia for feeding purposes only. ]  
    B. All cattle [ 12 18 ]  months of age or older require a negative caudal fold or comparative  cervical tuberculin test within 60 days prior to entry into Virginia. This  requirement shall not apply to:
    1. Cattle consigned directly from an accredited  tuberculosis-free herd provided the accreditation number and date of the last  herd test are listed on the certificate of veterinary inspection;
    2. Cattle that originate from a region considered free of  tuberculosis for cattle by the USDA and consigned directly to a slaughter  establishment or to a USDA-approved market and from there directly to a  slaughter establishment; or
    3. Cattle entering Virginia for a period of 10 days or less  for exhibition purposes provided they originate from a region considered free  of tuberculosis for cattle by the USDA and no change of ownership occurs.
    C. All cattle originating from a region not considered  free of tuberculosis for cattle by the USDA require a permit and a negative  caudal or comparative cervical tuberculin test within 60 days prior to entry  into Virginia. This requirement shall not apply to:
    1. Cattle consigned directly from an accredited  tuberculosis-free herd provided the accreditation number and date of the last  herd test are listed on the certificate of veterinary inspection; and
    2. Cattle consigned directly to a slaughter establishment.
    D. All sexually intact cattle originating from a region  not considered free of brucellosis by the USDA require a permit and an  individual brucellosis test within 30 days prior to entry into Virginia.  Animals allowed entry under a permit will be quarantined on the premises of the  consignee until retested at the consignee’s expense and found negative to  brucellosis no less than 45 days and no more than 120 days after entry as  indicated by the permit. This requirement shall not apply to:
    1. Cattle consigned directly from a certified  brucellosis-free herd provided the certification number and date of the last  herd test are listed on the official health certificate; and 
    2. Cattle consigned directly to a slaughter establishment.
    E. Cattle may be imported for immediate slaughter into  Virginia without a certificate of veterinary inspection provided they are  consigned directly to a slaughter establishment. Official identification for  all cattle under this subsection must be listed on the waybill.
    F. Cattle from a [ farm of origin in a  state adjoining Virginia and from a ] region [ therein ]  considered free of tuberculosis and brucellosis for cattle by the USDA may  enter Virginia for the purpose of sale at an approved livestock market without  a certificate of veterinary inspection and without tuberculosis testing if  otherwise required provided:
    1. [ The All ] cattle  [ offered for sale at the approved livestock market excepting cattle 18  months of age or younger not of a dairy type and intended for feeding purposes ]  bear [ required official ] individual  identification [ upon entry to the approved livestock market or  have such applied at the approved livestock market ]; and
    2. The approved livestock market maintains for at least  [ two five ] years and makes available to the  State Veterinarian a record of the consignor of the cattle, the identification  numbers [ as required ] of the cattle he consigns, and  the buyer of the cattle.
    2VAC5-141-80. Companion animal entry requirements.
    A. Companion animals must be accompanied by a certificate  of veterinary inspection issued within 10 days prior to entry into Virginia.
    B. No dog or cat less than eight weeks of age may be  imported into Virginia unless accompanied by its dam.
    C. Any dog or cat greater than four months of age  entering Virginia shall be currently vaccinated for rabies.
    D. Exemptions.
    1. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to companion animals that are passing directly through  Virginia to another state in interstate commerce. 
    2. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to companion animals that are kept properly under control by  their owner or custodian when passing through Virginia to another state. 
    3. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to companion animals brought into Virginia by a resident or  by a resident of another state who intends to make his residence in Virginia  except if brought into the Commonwealth with the intent of offering it for  public adoption, transfer, sale, trade, or promotional incentive.
    4. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to companion animals brought into Virginia for less than 10  days for the purpose of hunting or legal exhibition with no change of  ownership.
    E. This [ regulation  chapter ] shall not be construed to (i) permit the entry into  Virginia of any species of animal otherwise prohibited or restricted by any  state or federal law, regulation, or directive; or (ii) contravene additional  entry requirements imposed by any state or federal law, regulation, or  directive.
    2 VAC5-141-90. Goat and sheep entry requirements.
    A. All goats and sheep entering Virginia must be  officially identified and the official identification number must be noted on  the certificate of veterinary inspection. If multiple goats or sheep of similar  breed, age, and sex are listed on the certificate of veterinary inspection,  sequential identification numbers may be summarized. [ The  requirement shall not apply to castrated male goats that are not subject to the  Scrapie Eradication Program. ] 
    B. Scrapie control.
    1. No sheep or goat may be imported into Virginia that does  not originate from a scrapie consistent state unless originating from a flock  enrolled in the complete monitored or export monitored category of the USDA  Scrapie Flock Certification Program. 
    2. No goat or sheep infected with scrapie, or the offspring  of a goat or sheep infected with scrapie, may enter Virginia.
    C. All goats and sheep [ 12 18 ]  months of age or older imported into Virginia for dairying purposes shall be  negative to a tuberculosis test within 60 days prior to entry. [ All  other goats and sheep originating from a region considered free of tuberculosis  for cattle by the USDA may enter Virginia without tuberculosis testing.  This requirement shall not apply to:
    1. Goats and sheep 18 months of age or older imported into  Virginia for dairying purposes consigned directly from an accredited  tuberculosis-free herd provided the accreditation number and date of the last  herd test are listed on the certificate of veterinary inspection; or 
    2. Goats and sheep 18 months of age or older intended for  dairying purposes entering Virginia for a period of 10 days or less for  exhibition purposes provided they originate from a region considered free of  tuberculosis for cattle by the USDA and no change of ownership occurs. ]  
    D. All goats and sheep originating from a region not  considered free of tuberculosis for cattle by the USDA shall be negative to a  tuberculosis test within 60 days prior to entry unless consigned directly to a  livestock slaughter establishment. This requirement shall not apply to animals  less than six months of age accompanied by their tested dam.
    E. All sexually intact goats and sheep originating from a  region not considered free of brucellosis for cattle by the USDA shall be  negative to a brucellosis test within 30 days prior to entry unless consigned  directly to a livestock slaughter establishment. This requirement shall not  apply to animals less than six months of age accompanied by their tested dam.
    F. Goats and sheep may be imported for immediate slaughter  into Virginia without a certificate of veterinary inspection provided they are  consigned directly to a livestock slaughter establishment or to a USDA-approved  market and from there directly to a livestock slaughter establishment.
    G. Goats and sheep from a [ farm of origin  in a state adjoining Virginia and from a ] region [ therein ]  considered free of tuberculosis and brucellosis for cattle by the USDA may  enter Virginia for the purpose of sale at an approved livestock market without  a certificate of veterinary inspection and without tuberculosis testing if  otherwise required provided:
    1. The goats and sheep bear [ any ] required  individual identification [ upon entry to the approved livestock  market or have such applied at the approved livestock market ]; and
    2. The approved livestock market maintains for at least  [ two five ] years and makes available to the  State Veterinarian a record of the consignor of the goats and sheep, the  identification numbers [ as required ] of the goats and  sheep he consigns, and the buyer of the goats and sheep.
    2VAC5-141-100. Horse entry requirements.
    A. All horses entering Virginia must be officially  identified, and the official identification must be noted on the official  health certificate. 
    B. Equine infectious anemia testing.
    1. All horses imported into Virginia shall have been  officially tested and found negative for equine infectious anemia within the  past 12 months and be accompanied by an official certificate stating this  information.
    2. Horses that originate from infected premises in other  states are not eligible for entry into Virginia except by permit at the State  Veterinarian's discretion.
    3. Foals six months of age or under accompanying a tested  negative dam are exempt from testing.
    C. Contagious equine metritis control.
    1. No horse over two years of age that either originated in  or has passed through premises or a country where contagious equine metritis is  known to exist may enter the Commonwealth of Virginia except by permit.
    2. Horses that are issued a permit immediately will be  placed under quarantine and assigned a testing protocol at the consignee's  expense until the State Veterinarian is satisfied that they pose no danger to  the Virginia equine population.
    D. Horses may enter Virginia with an official equine  interstate event permit issued by another state in lieu of certificate of  veterinary inspection provided the permit is not expired.
    2VAC5-141-110. Other ruminant entry requirements.
    A. All other ruminants entering Virginia must bear an  individual identification number, and such identification number must be noted  on the certificate of veterinary inspection. Identification can be a tattoo,  microchip, ear tag issued by a state or federal entity, or other form of  identification approved by the State Veterinarian.
    B. All other ruminants originating from a region not  considered free of tuberculosis for cattle by the USDA shall be negative to a  tuberculosis test within 60 days prior to entry. This requirement shall not  apply to animals less than six months of age accompanied by their tested dam.
    C. All sexually intact other ruminants originating from a  region not considered free of brucellosis for cattle by the USDA shall be  negative to a brucellosis test within 30 days prior to entry. This requirement  shall not apply to animals less than six months of age accompanied by their  tested dam.
    D. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not be construed to (i) permit the entry into Virginia of any species  of animal otherwise prohibited or restricted by any state or federal law,  regulation, or directive; or (ii) contravene additional entry requirements  imposed by any state or federal law, regulation, or directive.
    2VAC5-141-120. Swine entry requirements.
    A. All swine entering Virginia must bear an identification  number, and the identification number must be noted on the certificate of  veterinary inspection.
    B. Commercial swine entry requirements.
    1. Commercial swine originating from a herd or region that  is considered free from brucellosis and pseudorabies by a federal program or a  state program approved by the State Veterinarian may enter Virginia without  further testing requirements provided a statement indicating the region is  considered free from brucellosis by a federal or state program or verification  of herd participation in the federal or state program is indicated on the  certificate of veterinary inspection.
    2. Sexually intact commercial swine over four months of age  not originating from a herd or region considered free of brucellosis by a  federal program or a state program approved by the State Veterinarian must be  negative to a brucellosis test within 30 days prior to entry into Virginia.
    3. Commercial swine not originating from herd or region  that is considered free from pseudorabies by a federal program or a state  program approved by the State Veterinarian shall be individually tested and  negative to a pseudorabies test within 30 days prior to entry into Virginia.  Sexually intact swine shall be quarantined at the premises of destination until  retested between 30 and 60 days after importation at the consignee's expense. 
    4. No commercial swine vaccinated for pseudorabies shall be  imported into Virginia unless under permit for direct slaughter.
    C. Noncommercial swine entry requirements.
    1. Noncommercial swine originating from herds considered  free from brucellosis and pseudorabies by a federal program or a state program  approved by the State Veterinarian may enter Virginia without further testing  requirements provided verification of herd participation in the federal or  state program is indicated on the certificate of veterinary inspection and the  commercial swine have not had contact with feral swine.
    2. Sexually intact noncommercial swine over four months of  age not from a herd considered free from brucellosis by a federal program or a  state program approved by the State Veterinarian must be negative to a  brucellosis test within 30 days prior to entry into Virginia.
    3. Noncommercial swine not from a herd considered free from  pseudorabies by a federal program or a state program approved by the State  Veterinarian shall be negative to a pseudorabies test within 30 days prior to  entry into Virginia. Sexually intact swine shall be quarantined at the premises  of destination until retested between 30 and 60 days after importation at the  consignee's expense.
    4. No noncommercial swine vaccinated for pseudorabies shall  be imported into Virginia unless under permit at the discretion of the State  Veterinarian and subject to any restrictions he deems necessary.
    D. Slaughter swine entry requirements.
    1. No slaughter swine known to be infected with or exposed  to pseudorabies and no swine vaccinated for pseudorabies may enter Virginia  unless:
    a. It is shipped directly to a slaughter establishment that  is approved and inspected by the USDA or by the Virginia Department of  Agriculture and Consumer Services under permit;
    b. It is shipped in a sealed vehicle or individually  identified on the permit; and
    c. The conveyance transporting the swine into Virginia is  cleaned and disinfected after the swine is off-loaded but prior to the  conveyance leaving the slaughter establishment. 
    2. Any slaughter swine not known to be infected with or  exposed to pseudorabies may enter Virginia without a certificate of veterinary  inspection, but only if it is accompanied by a waybill, bill of lading, bill of  sale, or other document that identifies the swine to the farm of origin and  only if it is sent directly to:
    a. A slaughter establishment that is approved and inspected  by the USDA or by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services;  or
    b. A USDA-approved market and from there directly to a  recognized slaughter establishment.
    E. Commercial swine intended for feeding purposes and not  intended for breeding purposes from a farm of origin in a state adjoining  Virginia and from a region therein considered free of pseudorabies by a federal  or state program approved by the State Veterinarian may enter Virginia without  a certificate of veterinary inspection.
    2VAC5-141-130. Primate entry requirements.
    A. All primates imported into Virginia require a  certificate of veterinary inspection issued within 10 days prior to entry.
    B. All primates imported into Virginia must be  microchipped, and such microchip number must be noted on the certificate of  veterinary inspection.
    C. The official health certificate shall include a  statement attesting to the fact that the veterinarian has carefully examined  the oral mucosa of the primate and has found no evidence of disease lesions or  inflammatory processes.
    D. Tuberculosis testing requirements.
    1. Primates imported into Virginia shall have a negative  tuberculosis test performed by an accredited veterinarian within 30 days prior  to entry. The official health certificate must indicate the kind and amount of  tuberculin used, the date and hour of injection, and the date and hour of  reading.
    2. Primates that have been associated with a colony where  there have been other primates showing response to the tuberculin test shall  not be eligible for entry into Virginia unless and until all primates in the  colony shall have passed two consecutive tuberculosis tests not less than 30  days apart.
    E. Exceptions.
    1. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to primates that are passing directly through Virginia to  another state in interstate commerce.
    2. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to primates that are kept properly under control by their  owner or custodian when passing through Virginia to another state. 
    3. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to primates brought into Virginia by a resident or by a  resident of another state who intends to make his residence in Virginia, except  if brought into the Commonwealth with the intent of offering it for public  adoption, transfer, sale, trade, or promotional incentive.
    4. This [ regulation chapter ]  shall not apply to primates brought into Virginia for less than 10 days for  the purpose of legal exhibition with no change of ownership.
        NOTICE: The following  form used in administering the regulation was filed by the agency. The form is  not being published; however, online users of this issue of the Virginia  Register of Regulations may click on the name to access a form. The form is  also available through the agency contact or at the Office of the Registrar of  Regulations, General Assembly Building, 2nd Floor, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
         FORMS (2VAC5-141)
    [ Poultry  Permit Packet (eff. 01/11).
    Application  for Approval Number for the Importation of Poultry, Form OVS1201 (eff. 1/12). ]
    DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (2VAC5-141)
    [ Avian  Influenza (H5 and H7) Proclamation, eff. December 4, 2009, Department of  Agriculture and Consumer Services, State Veterinarian's Office, P.O. Box 1163,  Richmond, VA 23218.
    Avian  Influenza (H5 and H7) Proclamation, eff. January 18, 2012, Department of  Agriculture and Consumer Services, State Veterinarian's Office, P.O. Box 1163,  Richmond, VA 23218. ]
    VA.R. Doc. No. R09-1891; Filed November 16, 2011, 3:47 p.m. 
TITLE 2. AGRICULTURE
BOARD OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES
Final Regulation
    Title of Regulation: 2VAC5-420. Regulations for the  Enforcement of the Virginia Gasoline and Motor Fuel Law (repealing 2VAC5-420-10 through 2VAC5-420-80).  
    Statutory Authority: § 59.1-156 of the Code of  Virginia.
    Effective Date: January 18, 2012. 
    Agency Contact: Erin Williams, Policy and Planning  Coordinator, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, P.O. Box 1163,  Richmond, VA 23218, telephone (804) 786-1308, FAX (804) 371-7479, TTY (800)  828-1120, or email erin.williams@vdacs.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    This regulatory action repeals 2VAC5-420, Regulations for  the Enforcement of the Virginia Gasoline and Motor Fuel Law. The regulation  prescribes certain requirements for the enforcement of the Virginia Motor Fuels  and Lubricating Oils Law (Chapter 12 (§ 59.1-149 et seq.) of Title 59.1 of the  Code of Virginia), including specifications for the inspection and testing of  motor fuels. Chapter 650 of the 2009 Acts of Assembly amended the Motor Fuels  and Lubricating Oils Law by incorporating by reference certain national  inspection and testing specifications for motor fuels. Given that the essential  elements of the regulation have now been incorporated by reference into the  Virginia Motor Fuels and Lubricating Oils Law, the regulation is no longer  needed and is repealed.
    Summary of Public Comments and Agency's Response: No  public comments were received by the promulgating agency. 
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-2120; Filed November 18, 2011, 11:41 a.m. 
TITLE 4. CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MARINE RESOURCES COMMISSION
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The  following regulation filed by the Marine Resources Commission is exempt from  the Administrative Process Act in accordance with § 2.2-4006 A 11 of the  Code of Virginia; however, the commission is required to publish the full text  of final regulations.
         Title of Regulation: 4VAC20-960. Pertaining to Tautog (amending 4VAC20-960-30, 4VAC20-960-45,  4VAC20-960-47). 
    Statutory Authority: § 28.2-201 of the Code of  Virginia.
    Effective Date: January 1, 2012. 
    Agency Contact: Jane Warren, Agency Regulatory  Coordinator, Marine Resources Commission, 2600 Washington Ave., 3rd Floor,  Newport News, VA 23607, telephone (757) 247-2248, FAX (757) 247-2002, or email  betty.warren@mrc.virginia.gov.
    Summary: 
    The amendments establish (i) a commercial minimum size  limit for tautog of 15 inches total length, and a closed fishing season from  January 18 through March 15 and May 1 through November 12; and (ii) a  recreational minimum size limit  for tautog of 16 inches total length, a possession  limit of three tautog per person, and a closed fishing season from April 16  through September 23. 
    4VAC20-960-30. Minimum size limits. 
    A. The minimum size limit of tautog harvested for  commercial purposes shall be 14 15 inches total length. 
    B. It shall be unlawful for any person to possess any  tautog less than 14 inches total length. The minimum size of tautog  harvested for recreational purposes shall be 16 inches total length.
    C. It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, trade, or  barter, or offer to sell, trade, or barter any tautog less than 14 inches total  length possess any tautog smaller than the designated minimum size  limit.
    D. Total length shall be measured in a straight line from tip  of nose to tip of tail. 
    4VAC20-960-45. Recreational fishing season and possession  limits. 
    A. It shall be unlawful for any person fishing with hook and  line, rod and reel, spear, gig or other recreational gear to possess more than four  three tautog. When fishing is from a boat or vessel where the entire  catch is held in a common hold or container, the possession limit shall be for  the boat or vessel and shall be equal to the number of persons on board legally  eligible to fish multiplied by four three. The captain or  operator of the boat or vessel shall be responsible for any boat or vessel  possession limit. Any tautog taken after the possession limit has been reached  shall be returned to the water immediately. 
    B. Possession of any quantity of tautog which exceeds the  possession limit described in subsection A of this section shall be presumed to  be for commercial purposes. 
    C. The recreational fishing season shall be closed from May  1 April 16 through June 24 September 23.
    D. It shall be unlawful for any person fishing recreationally  to take, catch, or possess any tautog during any closed recreational fishing  season. 
    4VAC20-960-47. Commercial fishing season and possession limits.
    The commercial fishing season shall be closed from January  18 through March 15 and May 1 through November 12, and it shall be unlawful  for any person to possess tautog for commercial purposes during this period. 
    VA.R. Doc. No. R12-3060; Filed December 7, 2011, 10:21 a.m. 
TITLE 10. FINANCE AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
Proposed Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S  NOTICE: The State Corporation Commission is exempt from the Administrative  Process Act in accordance with § 2.2-4002 A 2 of the Code of Virginia,  which exempts courts, any agency of the Supreme Court, and any agency that by  the Constitution is expressly granted any of the powers of a court of record.
         Title of Regulation:  10VAC5-40. Credit Unions (adding 10VAC5-40-70). 
    Statutory Authority: §§ 6.2-1303 and 12.1-13 of the  Code of Virginia.
    Public Hearing Information: A public hearing will be  scheduled upon request.
    Public Comment Deadline: January 6, 2012.
    Agency Contact: Werner Paul, Deputy Commissioner, Bureau  of Financial Institutions, State Corporation Commission, P.O. Box 640, Richmond,  VA 23218, telephone (804) 371-9698, FAX (804) 371-9416, or email  werner.paul@scc.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    The State Corporation Commission is proposing a regulation  to enable state-chartered credit unions that predominantly serve low-income  members as defined in 12 CFR 701.34 to obtain a low-income designation. A  low-income designated credit union would have the following additional powers  to the same extent, and subject to the same terms and conditions, as is  authorized for federal credit unions that have obtained a low-income  designation to: (i) accept nonmember deposits in accordance with 12 CFR 701.32  and 12 CFR 741.204; (ii) accept secondary capital in accordance with 12 CFR  701.34 and 12 CFR 741.204; (iii) participate in the Community Development Revolving  Loan Program in accordance with 12 CFR Part 705; (iv) be eligible for an  exception to the aggregate loan limit on member business loans in accordance  with 12 CFR 723.17 and 12 CFR 723.18; and (v) obtain funds from the Community  Development Financial Institutions Fund operated by the United States  Department of the Treasury.
    AT RICHMOND, NOVEMBER 28, 2011
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, ex rel.
    STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
    CASE NO. BFI-2011-00235
    Ex Parte: In re: low-income
  designated credit unions
    ORDER TO TAKE NOTICE
    Section 6.2-1303 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State  Corporation Commission ("Commission") to adopt such regulations as  may be necessary to permit state-chartered credit unions to have powers at  least comparable with those of federal credit unions, regardless of any  existing statute, regulation, or court decision limiting or denying such powers  to state-chartered credit unions. Federal credit unions that predominantly  serve low-income members as defined in 12 CFR § 701.34 may obtain a low-income  designation. Low-income designated credit unions are eligible under federal law  to accept nonmember deposits and secondary capital, participate in the  Community Development Revolving Loan Program, and obtain funds from the  Community Development Financial Institutions Fund operated by the United States  Department of the Treasury. Low-income designated credit unions are also  eligible for an exception to the aggregate loan limit on member business loans.
    The Commission is informed that certain state-chartered  credit unions wish to have the power to obtain a low-income designation so that  they can also take advantage of the aforementioned benefits and resources, and  the Bureau of Financial Institutions ("Bureau") has submitted to the  Commission a proposed parity regulation.
    NOW THE COMMISSION, based on the information supplied by the  Bureau, is of the opinion and finds that the proposed regulation should be  considered for adoption.
    Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The proposed regulation is appended hereto and made  a part of the record herein.
    (2) Comments or requests for a hearing on the proposed  regulation must be submitted in writing to Joel H. Peck, Clerk, State  Corporation Commission, c/o Document Control Center, P.O. Box 2118,  Richmond, Virginia 23218, on or before January 6, 2012. Requests for a hearing  shall state why a hearing is necessary and why the issues cannot be adequately  addressed in written comments. All correspondence shall contain a reference to  Case No. BFI-2011-00235. Interested persons desiring to submit comments or  request a hearing electronically may do so by following the instructions  available on the Commission's website: http://www.scc.virginia.gov/case.
    (3) This Order and the attached proposed regulation  shall be posted on the Commission's website: http://www.scc.virginia.gov/case.
    (4) The Commission's Division of Information Resources  shall send a copy of this Order, including a copy of the attached proposed  regulation, to the Virginia Registrar of Regulations for publication in the  Virginia Register of Regulations.
    AN ATTESTED COPY hereof, together with a copy of the proposed  regulation, shall be sent by the Clerk of the Commission to the Commission's  Office of General Counsel and the Commissioner of Financial Institutions, who  shall send a copy of this Order, together with a copy of the proposed  regulation, to all state-chartered credit unions as well as other interested  parties designated by the Bureau.
    10VAC5-40-70. Low-income designated credit unions.
    A. Upon the filing and investigation of a written  application, the Commissioner of Financial Institutions (commissioner) shall  designate a state-chartered credit union as a low-income credit union if (i)  the commissioner finds that a majority of the credit union's members qualify as  low-income members as defined in 12 CFR 701.34 and (ii) the National Credit  Union Administration concurs with the designation. If the application filed by  a credit union is denied, the commissioner shall notify the credit union of the  denial and the reasons for the denial.
    B. A low-income designated credit union shall have the  following additional powers to the same extent, and subject to the same terms  and conditions, as is authorized for federal credit unions that have obtained a  low-income designation pursuant to 12 CFR 701.34 to:
    1. Accept nonmember deposits in accordance with 12 CFR  701.32 and 12 CFR 741.204.
    2. Accept secondary capital in accordance with 12 CFR  701.34 and 12 CFR 741.204.
    3. Participate in the Community Development Revolving Loan  Program in accordance with 12 CFR Part 705.
    4. Be eligible for an exception to the aggregate loan limit  on member business loans in accordance with 12 CFR 723.17 and 12 CFR 723.18.
    5. Obtain funds from the Community Development Financial  Institutions Fund operated by the United States Department of the Treasury.
    Whenever any of the federal regulations referenced in this  subsection require a credit union to submit a written request, plan,  application, or other documents to the National Credit Union Administration,  the credit union shall send a copy of such written request, plan, application,  or other documents to the commissioner.
    C. The commissioner may at any time, based upon  supervisory, legal, or safety and soundness considerations, impose additional  terms or conditions upon a low-income designated credit union in conjunction  with its exercise of any of the powers enumerated in subsection B of this  section.
    D. A low-income designated credit union shall submit  written reports to the commissioner containing any information that the  commissioner may require concerning the credit union's services to low-income  members.
    E. 1. If the commissioner determines that a low-income  designated credit union no longer meets the criteria for the low-income  designation, the commissioner shall notify the credit union in writing. The  credit union shall, within five years, meet the criteria for the designation or  comply with the regulatory requirements applicable to state-chartered credit  unions that do not have a low-income designation. The designation shall remain  in effect during the five-year period.
    2. If a credit union is unable to qualify again for the  designation but has secondary capital or nonmember deposits with a maturity  beyond the five-year period, the commissioner may extend the time for the  credit union to comply with regulatory requirements to allow the credit union  to satisfy the terms of any account agreements.
    3. Within 60 days of the date of the notice from the  commissioner, a credit union may appeal the commissioner's determination that  the credit union no longer meets the criteria for a low-income designation to  the State Corporation Commission by filing a petition in accordance with its  Rules of Practice and Procedure (5VAC5-20).
    4. A low-income designation shall be removed by the  commissioner with the concurrence of the National Credit Union Administration.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R12-3061; Filed November 28, 2011, 4:32 p.m. 
TITLE 14. INSURANCE
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The  State Corporation Commission is exempt from the Administrative Process Act in  accordance with § 2.2-4002 A 2 of the Code of Virginia, which exempts  courts, any agency of the Supreme Court, and any agency that by the  Constitution is expressly granted any of the powers of a court of record.
         Titles of Regulations: 14VAC5-215. Rules Governing  Independent External Review of Final Adverse Utilization Review Decisions (repealing 14VAC5-215-10 through 14VAC5-215-130).
    14VAC5-216. Rules Governing Internal Appeal and External  Review (amending 14VAC5-216-20, 14VAC5-216-40,  14VAC5-216-70; adding 14VAC5-216-45). 
    Statutory Authority: §§ 12.1-13 and 38.2-223 of the  Code of Virginia.
    Effective Date: January 1, 2012, for 14VAC5-216 and May  16, 2012, for repeal of 14VAC5-215.
    Agency Contact: Julie Blauvelt, Senior Insurance Market  Examiner, State Corporation Commission, Bureau of Insurance, P.O. Box 1157,  Richmond, VA 23218, telephone (804) 371-9865, FAX (804) 371-9944, or email  julie.blauvelt@scc.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    This action repeals 14VAC5-215, which is necessary because  pertinent provisions § 38.2-5900 of the Code of Virginia and  §§ 38.2-5901 through 38.2-5905 of the Code of Virginia were repealed by  the General Assembly in 2011 and the external review process was replaced with  a new process found in Chapter 35.1 (§§ 38.2-3556 through 38.2-3571) of  Title 38.2 of the Code of Virginia. External review under 14VAC5-215 will not  be available after May 15, 2012. Amendments and an added section to 14VAC5-216  are necessary because on June 22, 2011, the federal government issued  amendments to its "Rules Relating to Internal Claims and Appeals and  External Review Process" (amending 26 CFR Part 54, 29 CFR Part 2590, and  45 CFR Part 147) addressing exhaustion and notice issues. The amendments also  added a section to 14VAC5-216 to conform to these federal requirements. The  amendments to 4CAC5-216 are required to be effective by January 1, 2012. 
    AT RICHMOND, DECEMBER 1, 2011
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
    At the relation of the
    STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
    CASE NO. INS-2011-00200
    Ex Parte: In the matter of Repealing the 
  Rules Governing Independent External Review
  of Final Adverse Utilization Review Decisions
  and Amending the Rules Governing 
  Internal Appeal and External Review
    ORDER REPEALING AND ADOPTING RULES
    By Order entered herein September 27, 2011 ("Order to  Take Notice"), all interested persons were ordered to take notice that  subsequent to November 21, 2011, the State Corporation Commission  ("Commission") would consider the entry of an order to repeal the  "Rules Governing Independent External Review of Final Adverse Utilization  Review Decisions" at Chapter 215 of Title 14 of the Virginia Adminstrative  Code (14 VAC 5-215-10 through 14 VAC 5-215-130 and Forms) to be effective  on May 16, 2012, and amend certain sections in Chapter 216 of Title 14 of the  Virginia Administrative Code entitled "Rules Governing Internal Appeal and  External Review," specifically set forth at 14 VAC 5-216-20, 14 VAC  5-216-40, and 14 VAC 5-216-70, as well as add a new section at 14 VAC  5-216-45. These amendments were proposed by the Bureau of Insurance  ("Bureau"). The Order to Take Notice required that on or before  November 21, 2011, any person objecting to the repeal of Chapter 215 or  the amendments to Chapter 216 shall have filed a request for hearing with the  Clerk of the Commission ("Clerk"). 
    The Order to Take Notice also required all interested persons  to file their comments in support of or in opposition to the repeal of Chapter  215 and the amendments to Chapter 216 on or before November 21, 2011. 
    No comments were filed with the Clerk. No request for a  hearing was filed with the Clerk. 
    The Bureau recommends the repeal of Chapter 215 and the  adoption of the amendments to Chapter 216 as proposed.
    The repeal of Chapter 215 is necessary because pertinent  provisions of § 38.2-5900 and §§ 38.2-5901 through 38.2-5905 of the  Code of Virginia ("Code") were repealed by the General Assembly in  2011, and the external review process was replaced with a new process found in  Chapter 35.1 (§§ 38.2-3556 through 38.2-3571) of the Code. External review  under Chapter 215 will not be available after May 15, 2012. Amendments,  including a new section in Chapter 216, are necessary because the federal  government has issued amendments to its regulations relating to internal appeal  and external review, addressing exhaustion and notice issues. The amendments  and new section in Chapter 216 conform to the federal requirements. These  amendments are required to be effective by January 1, 2012.
    NOW THE COMMISSION, having considered the Bureau's  recommendation to repeal Chapter 215 effective on May 16, 2012, and amend as  well as add a new section to Chapter 216, is of the opinion that Chapter 215  should be repealed effective May 16, 2012, and the amendments to 14 VAC  5-216-20, 14 VAC 5-216-40, and 14 VAC 5-216-70, as well as a new section  at 14 VAC 5-216-45, should be adopted effective January 1, 2012. 
    Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    (1) Chapter 215 of Title 14 of the Virginia Administrative  Code entitled "Rules Governing Independent External Review of Final  Adverse Utilization Review Decisions" at 14 VAC 5-215-10 through 14 VAC  5-215-130 and Forms used in the administration of the Chapter, which are  attached hereto and made a part hereof, should be, and they are hereby,  REPEALED effective on May 16, 2012;
    (2) The amendments to certain sections in Chapter 216 of  Title 14 of the Virginia Administrative Code entitled "Rules Governing  Internal Appeal and External Review" specifically set forth at 14 VAC  5-216-20, 14 VAC 5-216-40, and 14 VAC 5-216-70, as well as a new  section at 14 VAC 5-216-45, which are attached hereto and made a part hereof,  should be, and they are hereby, ADOPTED effective on January 1, 2012;
    (3) AN ATTESTED COPY hereof, together with a copy of the  repealed Chapter 215 and adopted amendments to Chapter 216 shall be sent by the  Clerk of the Commission to Althelia Battle, Deputy Commissioner, Bureau of  Insurance, State Corporation Commission, who forthwith shall give further  notice of the repeal of Chapter 215 and the adopted amendments to Chapter 216  by mailing a copy of this Order, including a clean copy of the repeal of  Chapter 215 and the amendments to Chapter 216, to all companies, health  maintenance organizations and health service plans licensed by the Commission  to write accident and sickness insurance in the Commonwealth of Virginia, as  well as all interested parties;
    (4) The Commission's Division of Information Resources shall  cause a copy of this Order, together with the repealed Chapter 215 and adopted  amendments to Chapter 216, to be forwarded to the Virginia Registrar of the  Regulations for appropriate publication in the Virginia Register of  Regulations;
    (5) The Commission's Division of Information Resources shall  make available this Order and the attached repealed Chapter 215 and adopted  amendments to Chapter 216 on the Commission's website:  http://www.scc.virginia.gov/case; and
    (6) The Bureau of Insurance shall file with the Clerk of the  Commission an affidavit of compliance with the notice requirements of paragraph  (3) above. 
    14VAC5-216-20. Definitions.
    The following words and terms when used in this chapter shall  have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
    "Adverse benefit determination" in the context of  the internal appeals process means (i) a determination by a health carrier or  its designee utilization review entity that, based on the information provided,  a request for, a benefit under the health carrier's health benefit plan upon  application of any utilization review technique does not meet the health  carrier's requirements for medical necessity, appropriateness, health care  setting, level of care, or effectiveness or is determined to be experimental or  investigational and the requested benefit is therefore denied, reduced, or  terminated or payment is not provided or made, in whole or in part, for the  requested benefit; (ii) the denial, reduction, or termination of, or failure to  provide or make payment in whole or in part for, a benefit based on a  determination by a health carrier or its designee utilization review entity of  a covered person's eligibility to participate in the health carrier's health  benefit plan; (iii) any review determination that denies, reduces, or  terminates or fails to provide or make payment, in whole or in part, for a  benefit; (iv) a rescission of coverage determination as defined in § 38.2-3438  of the Code of Virginia; or (v) any decision to deny individual coverage in an  initial eligibility determination. 
    "Adverse determination" in the context of external  review means a determination by a health carrier or its designee utilization  review entity that an admission, availability of care, continued stay, or other  health care service that is a covered benefit has been reviewed and, based upon  the information provided, does not meet the health carrier's requirements for  medical necessity, appropriateness, health care setting, level of care, or  effectiveness or is determined to be experimental or investigational and the requested  service or payment for the service is therefore denied, reduced, or terminated.
    "Authorized representative" means (i) a person to  whom a covered person has given express written consent to represent the  covered person; (ii) a person authorized by law to provide substituted consent  for a covered person; (iii) a family member of a covered person or the covered  person's treating health care professional when the covered person is unable to  provide consent; (iv) a health care professional when the covered person's  health benefit plan requires that a request for a benefit under the plan be  initiated by the health care professional; or (v) in the case of an urgent care  internal appeal, a health care professional with knowledge of the covered  person's medical condition.
    "Clinical peer reviewer" means a practicing health  care professional who holds a nonrestricted license in a state, district, or  territory of the United States and in the same or similar specialty as  typically manages the medical condition, procedure, or treatment under appeal. 
    "Commission" means the State Corporation  Commission.
    "Concurrent review" means utilization review  conducted during a patient's stay or course of treatment in a facility, the  office of a health care professional, or other inpatient or outpatient health  care setting.
    "Covered person" means a policyholder, subscriber,  enrollee, or other individual participating in a health benefit plan. For  purposes of this chapter with respect to the administration of appeals,  references to a covered person include a covered person's authorized  representative, if any. 
    "Emergency services" means those health care  services that are rendered after the sudden onset of a medical condition that  manifests itself by symptoms of sufficient severity, including severe pain,  that the absence of immediate medical attention could reasonably be expected by  a prudent layperson who possesses an average knowledge of health and medicine  to result in (i) serious jeopardy to the mental or physical health of the individual,  (ii) danger of serious impairment of the individual's bodily functions, (iii)  serious dysfunction of any of the individual's bodily organs, or (iv) in the  case of a pregnant woman, serious jeopardy to the health of the fetus.
    "Final adverse determination" means an adverse  determination involving a covered benefit that has been upheld by a health  carrier, or its designee utilization review entity, at the completion of the  health carrier's internal appeal process. 
    "Group health plan" means an employee welfare  benefit plan (as defined in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974  (29 USC § 1002(1)), to the extent that the plan provides medical care and  including items and services paid for as medical care to employees or their  dependents (as defined under the terms of the plan) directly or through  insurance, reimbursement, or otherwise. 
    "Health benefit plan" means a policy, contract,  certificate, or agreement offered or issued by a health carrier to provide,  deliver, arrange for, pay for, or reimburse any of the costs of health care  services. "Health benefit plan" does not include accident only,  credit, or disability insurance; coverage of Medicare services or federal  employee health plans pursuant to contracts with the United States government;  Medicare supplement or long-term care insurance; Medicaid coverage; dental only  or vision only insurance; specified disease insurance; hospital indemnity  coverage; limited benefit health coverage; coverage issued as a supplement to  liability insurance; insurance arising out of a workers' compensation or  similar law; automobile medical payment insurance; medical expense and loss of  income benefits; or insurance under which benefits are payable with or without  regard to fault and that is statutorily required to be contained in any  liability insurance policy or equivalent self-insurance. 
    "Health care professional" means a physician or  other health care practitioner licensed, accredited, or certified to perform  specified health care services consistent with the laws of the Commonwealth. 
    "Health carrier" means an entity, subject to the  insurance laws and regulations of the Commonwealth or subject to the  jurisdiction of the commission, that contracts or offers to contract to  provide, deliver, arrange for, pay for, or reimburse any of the costs of health  care services, including an accident and sickness insurance company, a health  maintenance organization, a nonprofit hospital and health service corporation,  or a nonstock corporation offering or administering a health services plan, a  hospital services plan, or a medical or surgical services plan, or any other  entity providing a plan of health insurance, health benefits, or health care  services except as excluded under § 38.2-3557 of the Code of Virginia. 
    "Independent review organization" means an entity  that conducts independent external reviews of adverse determinations and final  adverse determinations, as well as alleged violations of 14VAC5-216-30  through 14VAC5-216-70 pertaining to internal appeal.
    "PPACA" means the Patient Protection and Affordable  Care Act (P.L. 111-148), as amended by the Health Care and Education  Reconciliation Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-152).
    "Pre-service claim" means a claim for a benefit  under a health benefit plan that requires approval of the benefit in whole or  in part, in advance of obtaining the service or treatment.
    "Post-service claim" means a claim for a benefit  under a health benefit plan that is not a pre-service claim, or the service or  treatment has been provided to the covered person.
    "Self-insured plan" means an "employee welfare  benefit plan" that has the meaning set forth in the Employee Retirement  Income Security Act of 1974, 29 USC § 1002(1).
    "Urgent care appeal" means an appeal for medical  care or treatment with respect to which the application of the time periods for  making non-urgent care determinations (i) could seriously jeopardize the life  or health of the covered person or the ability of the covered person to regain  maximum function; or (ii) in the opinion of the treating health care  professional with knowledge of the covered person's medical condition, would  subject the covered person to severe pain that cannot be adequately managed  without the care or treatment that is the subject of the appeal. An urgent care  appeal shall not be available for any post-service claim or retrospective  adverse benefit determination.
    "Utilization review" means a set of formal  techniques designed to monitor the use of or evaluate the clinical necessity,  appropriateness, efficacy, or efficiency of health care services, procedures or  settings. Techniques may include ambulatory review, prospective review, second  opinion, certification, concurrent review, case management, discharge planning,  or retrospective review. 
    14VAC5-216-40. Minimum appeal requirements.
    A. Each covered person shall be entitled to a full and fair  review of an adverse benefit determination. Within 180 days after the date of  receipt of a notice of an adverse benefit determination, a covered person may  file an appeal with the health carrier. A health carrier may designate a  utilization review entity to coordinate the review. For purposes of this  chapter, "health carrier" may also mean its designated utilization  review entity.
    B. The health carrier shall conduct the appeal in a manner to  ensure the independence and impartiality of the individuals involved in  reviewing the appeal. In ensuring the independence and impartiality of such  individuals, the health carrier shall not make decisions regarding hiring,  compensation, termination, promotion, or other similar matters based upon the  likelihood that an individual will support the denial of benefits.
    C. 1. In deciding an appeal of any adverse benefit  determination that is based in whole or in part on a medical judgment,  including determinations with regard to whether a particular treatment, drug,  or other service is experimental, investigational, or not medically necessary  or appropriate, the health carrier shall designate a clinical peer reviewer to  review the appeal. The clinical peer reviewer shall not have been involved in  any previous adverse benefit determination with respect to the claim. 
    2. A reviewer of any other type of adverse benefit  determination shall be an appropriate person designated by the health carrier.  The reviewer of the appeal shall not be the individual who made any previous  adverse benefit determination of the subject appeal nor the subordinate of such  individual and shall not defer to any prior adverse benefit determination.
    D. A full and fair review shall also provide for:
    1. The covered person to have an opportunity to submit written  comments, documents, records, and other information relating to the appeal for  the reviewer or reviewers to consider when reviewing the appeal;.
    2. Upon request to the health carrier, the covered person to  have reasonable access to and free of charge copies of all documents, records,  and other information relevant to the covered person's request for benefits (note  that any request for diagnosis and treatment codes, in itself, should not be  considered to be a request for an internal appeal);. This information  shall be provided to the covered person as soon as practicable.
    3. An appeal process that takes into account all comments,  documents, records, and other information submitted by the covered person  relating to the appeal, without regard to whether such information was  submitted or considered in the initial benefit determination. 
    4. The identification of medical or vocational experts whose  advice was obtained on behalf of the health benefit plan in connection with a  covered person's adverse benefit determination, without regard to whether the  advice was relied upon in making the benefit determination. 
    5. An urgent care appeal process.
    6. Prior to issuing a final adverse benefit determination, the  health carrier to provide free of charge to the covered person any new or  additional evidence relied upon or generated by the health carrier or at the  direction of the health carrier, in connection with the internal appeal  sufficiently in advance of the date the determination is required to be  provided to permit the covered person a reasonable opportunity to respond prior  to that date.
    E. A health carrier shall notify the covered person of the  final benefit determination within a reasonable period of time appropriate to  the medical circumstances, but not later than the timeframes established in  subdivisions 1 and 2 of this subsection.
    1. If an internal appeal involves a pre-service claim review  request, the health carrier shall notify the covered person of its decision  within 30 days after receipt of the appeal. A health carrier may provide a  second level of internal appeal for group health plans only, provided that a  maximum of 15 days is allowed for a benefit determination and notification from  each level of the appeal.
    2. If an internal appeal involves a post-service claim review  request, the health carrier shall notify the covered person of its decision  within 60 days after receipt of the appeal. A health carrier may provide a  second level of internal appeal for group health plans only, provided that a  maximum of 30 days is allowed for a benefit determination and notification from  each level of the appeal.
    14VAC5-216-45. Exhaustion.
    A. In addition to the provisions of § 38.2-3560 of the  Code of Virginia, the internal appeal process may be deemed exhausted based on  a violation of any of the provisions of 14VAC5-216-30 through 14VAC5-216-70.  The internal appeal process shall not be deemed exhausted based on a de minimis  violation that does not cause, and is not likely to cause, prejudice or harm to  the covered person so long as the health carrier demonstrates that the  violation was for good cause or due to matters beyond the control of the health  carrier and that the violation occurred in the context of an ongoing, good  faith exchange of information between the health carrier and the covered  person. If the violation is part of a pattern or practice of violations by the  health carrier, the violation shall not be considered de minimis.
    B. The covered person may request a written explanation of  the violation from the health carrier, and the health carrier shall provide the  written explanation within 10 days, including a specific description of its  basis, if any, for asserting that the violation should not cause the internal  appeal process to be deemed exhausted, along with a notification of the right  to review this matter by an independent review organization. A review by an  independent review organization may be requested by the covered person to the  commission to determine if the health carrier has met the standard under this  section. The covered person must include, as part of the request for review,  the written explanation of the violation by the health carrier. The independent  review organization shall have a maximum of 10 days to conduct this review and  provide a written response to the covered person, the health carrier, and the  commission. If rejected, within five days the health carrier shall provide the  covered person with a notice of the opportunity to resubmit and pursue an  internal appeal of the claim.
    C. The health carrier shall pay the independent review  organization costs incurred for this review.
    14VAC5-216-70. Notification requirements.
    A. A health carrier shall provide a covered person with  written or electronic notification of its benefit determination on appeal. The  notification of an adverse benefit determination shall be written in easily  understandable language and shall set forth the following:
    1. Information sufficient to identify the claim involved with  respect to the appeal, including the date of service, the health care provider,  and the claim amount, and a statement describing the availability,  upon request, of the diagnosis code and its corresponding meaning, and the treatment  code and its corresponding meaning.  The health carrier may not consider a  request for diagnosis or treatment information, in itself, to be a request for  internal appeal; 
    2. The specific reason or reasons for the adverse benefit  determination; 
    3. Reference to the specific plan provisions on which the  adverse benefit determination is made; 
    4. A statement that the covered person is entitled to receive,  upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to and copies of all  documents, records, and other information relevant to the covered person's  claim for benefits; 
    5. A statement indicating whether any additional internal  appeals are available or whether the covered person has received a final  adverse determination. If internal appeals are available, contact information  on where to submit the appeal; 
    6. A statement describing the external review procedures  offered by the health carrier and the covered person's right to obtain  information about such procedures and the covered person's right to bring a  civil action under § 502(a) of ERISA (29 USC § 1001 et seq.), if  applicable; and
    7. A statement indicating that the covered person has the  right to request an external review if the covered person has not received a  final benefit determination within the timeframes provided in 14VAC5-216-40 E,  unless the covered person requests or agrees to a delay.
    B. In the case of a group health plan, the required  notification shall also set forth the following:
    1. If an internal rule, guideline, protocol, or other similar  criterion (collectively "rule") was relied upon in making the adverse  benefit determination, either the specific rule or a statement that such rule  was relied upon in making the adverse benefit determination and that a copy of  the rule will be provided free of charge to the covered person upon request;
    2. If the adverse benefit determination is based on a medical  necessity or experimental treatment or similar exclusion or limit, either an  explanation of the scientific or clinical judgment for the determination,  applying the terms of the plan to the covered person's medical circumstances,  or a statement that such explanation will be provided free of charge upon  request; and
    3. Include a statement indicating that the covered person may  have other voluntary alternative dispute resolution options, such as mediation.  The covered person should be referred to the appropriate federal or state  agency, his plan administrator, or the health carrier, as appropriate. 
    C. All notices shall be provided in a culturally and  linguistically appropriate manner. The health carrier shall:
    1. Provide oral language services, such as a telephone  customer hotline, that include answering questions and providing assistance  with filing claims, benefit requests, internal appeals, and external review in  any applicable non-English language;
    2. Provide, upon request, any notice in any applicable  non-English language; and
    3. Include in the English versions of all notices, a  statement prominently displayed in any applicable non-English language clearly  indicating how to access the language services provided by the health carrier.
    With respect to any address in this Commonwealth to which  a notice is sent, a non-English language is an applicable non-English language  if 10% or more of the population residing in the city or county is literate  only in the same non-English language, as determined by the American Community  Survey data published by the United States Census Bureau.
    C. D. Electronic notification shall be in  accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (§ 59.1-479  et seq. of the Code of Virginia).
    VA.R. Doc. No. R12-2990; Filed December 5, 2011, 3:58 p.m. 
TITLE 14. INSURANCE
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The  State Corporation Commission is exempt from the Administrative Process Act in  accordance with § 2.2-4002 A 2 of the Code of Virginia, which exempts  courts, any agency of the Supreme Court, and any agency that by the  Constitution is expressly granted any of the powers of a court of record.
         Titles of Regulations: 14VAC5-215. Rules Governing  Independent External Review of Final Adverse Utilization Review Decisions (repealing 14VAC5-215-10 through 14VAC5-215-130).
    14VAC5-216. Rules Governing Internal Appeal and External  Review (amending 14VAC5-216-20, 14VAC5-216-40,  14VAC5-216-70; adding 14VAC5-216-45). 
    Statutory Authority: §§ 12.1-13 and 38.2-223 of the  Code of Virginia.
    Effective Date: January 1, 2012, for 14VAC5-216 and May  16, 2012, for repeal of 14VAC5-215.
    Agency Contact: Julie Blauvelt, Senior Insurance Market  Examiner, State Corporation Commission, Bureau of Insurance, P.O. Box 1157,  Richmond, VA 23218, telephone (804) 371-9865, FAX (804) 371-9944, or email  julie.blauvelt@scc.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    This action repeals 14VAC5-215, which is necessary because  pertinent provisions § 38.2-5900 of the Code of Virginia and  §§ 38.2-5901 through 38.2-5905 of the Code of Virginia were repealed by  the General Assembly in 2011 and the external review process was replaced with  a new process found in Chapter 35.1 (§§ 38.2-3556 through 38.2-3571) of  Title 38.2 of the Code of Virginia. External review under 14VAC5-215 will not  be available after May 15, 2012. Amendments and an added section to 14VAC5-216  are necessary because on June 22, 2011, the federal government issued  amendments to its "Rules Relating to Internal Claims and Appeals and  External Review Process" (amending 26 CFR Part 54, 29 CFR Part 2590, and  45 CFR Part 147) addressing exhaustion and notice issues. The amendments also  added a section to 14VAC5-216 to conform to these federal requirements. The  amendments to 4CAC5-216 are required to be effective by January 1, 2012. 
    AT RICHMOND, DECEMBER 1, 2011
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
    At the relation of the
    STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
    CASE NO. INS-2011-00200
    Ex Parte: In the matter of Repealing the 
  Rules Governing Independent External Review
  of Final Adverse Utilization Review Decisions
  and Amending the Rules Governing 
  Internal Appeal and External Review
    ORDER REPEALING AND ADOPTING RULES
    By Order entered herein September 27, 2011 ("Order to  Take Notice"), all interested persons were ordered to take notice that  subsequent to November 21, 2011, the State Corporation Commission  ("Commission") would consider the entry of an order to repeal the  "Rules Governing Independent External Review of Final Adverse Utilization  Review Decisions" at Chapter 215 of Title 14 of the Virginia Adminstrative  Code (14 VAC 5-215-10 through 14 VAC 5-215-130 and Forms) to be effective  on May 16, 2012, and amend certain sections in Chapter 216 of Title 14 of the  Virginia Administrative Code entitled "Rules Governing Internal Appeal and  External Review," specifically set forth at 14 VAC 5-216-20, 14 VAC  5-216-40, and 14 VAC 5-216-70, as well as add a new section at 14 VAC  5-216-45. These amendments were proposed by the Bureau of Insurance  ("Bureau"). The Order to Take Notice required that on or before  November 21, 2011, any person objecting to the repeal of Chapter 215 or  the amendments to Chapter 216 shall have filed a request for hearing with the  Clerk of the Commission ("Clerk"). 
    The Order to Take Notice also required all interested persons  to file their comments in support of or in opposition to the repeal of Chapter  215 and the amendments to Chapter 216 on or before November 21, 2011. 
    No comments were filed with the Clerk. No request for a  hearing was filed with the Clerk. 
    The Bureau recommends the repeal of Chapter 215 and the  adoption of the amendments to Chapter 216 as proposed.
    The repeal of Chapter 215 is necessary because pertinent  provisions of § 38.2-5900 and §§ 38.2-5901 through 38.2-5905 of the  Code of Virginia ("Code") were repealed by the General Assembly in  2011, and the external review process was replaced with a new process found in  Chapter 35.1 (§§ 38.2-3556 through 38.2-3571) of the Code. External review  under Chapter 215 will not be available after May 15, 2012. Amendments,  including a new section in Chapter 216, are necessary because the federal  government has issued amendments to its regulations relating to internal appeal  and external review, addressing exhaustion and notice issues. The amendments  and new section in Chapter 216 conform to the federal requirements. These  amendments are required to be effective by January 1, 2012.
    NOW THE COMMISSION, having considered the Bureau's  recommendation to repeal Chapter 215 effective on May 16, 2012, and amend as  well as add a new section to Chapter 216, is of the opinion that Chapter 215  should be repealed effective May 16, 2012, and the amendments to 14 VAC  5-216-20, 14 VAC 5-216-40, and 14 VAC 5-216-70, as well as a new section  at 14 VAC 5-216-45, should be adopted effective January 1, 2012. 
    Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    (1) Chapter 215 of Title 14 of the Virginia Administrative  Code entitled "Rules Governing Independent External Review of Final  Adverse Utilization Review Decisions" at 14 VAC 5-215-10 through 14 VAC  5-215-130 and Forms used in the administration of the Chapter, which are  attached hereto and made a part hereof, should be, and they are hereby,  REPEALED effective on May 16, 2012;
    (2) The amendments to certain sections in Chapter 216 of  Title 14 of the Virginia Administrative Code entitled "Rules Governing  Internal Appeal and External Review" specifically set forth at 14 VAC  5-216-20, 14 VAC 5-216-40, and 14 VAC 5-216-70, as well as a new  section at 14 VAC 5-216-45, which are attached hereto and made a part hereof,  should be, and they are hereby, ADOPTED effective on January 1, 2012;
    (3) AN ATTESTED COPY hereof, together with a copy of the  repealed Chapter 215 and adopted amendments to Chapter 216 shall be sent by the  Clerk of the Commission to Althelia Battle, Deputy Commissioner, Bureau of  Insurance, State Corporation Commission, who forthwith shall give further  notice of the repeal of Chapter 215 and the adopted amendments to Chapter 216  by mailing a copy of this Order, including a clean copy of the repeal of  Chapter 215 and the amendments to Chapter 216, to all companies, health  maintenance organizations and health service plans licensed by the Commission  to write accident and sickness insurance in the Commonwealth of Virginia, as  well as all interested parties;
    (4) The Commission's Division of Information Resources shall  cause a copy of this Order, together with the repealed Chapter 215 and adopted  amendments to Chapter 216, to be forwarded to the Virginia Registrar of the  Regulations for appropriate publication in the Virginia Register of  Regulations;
    (5) The Commission's Division of Information Resources shall  make available this Order and the attached repealed Chapter 215 and adopted  amendments to Chapter 216 on the Commission's website:  http://www.scc.virginia.gov/case; and
    (6) The Bureau of Insurance shall file with the Clerk of the  Commission an affidavit of compliance with the notice requirements of paragraph  (3) above. 
    14VAC5-216-20. Definitions.
    The following words and terms when used in this chapter shall  have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
    "Adverse benefit determination" in the context of  the internal appeals process means (i) a determination by a health carrier or  its designee utilization review entity that, based on the information provided,  a request for, a benefit under the health carrier's health benefit plan upon  application of any utilization review technique does not meet the health  carrier's requirements for medical necessity, appropriateness, health care  setting, level of care, or effectiveness or is determined to be experimental or  investigational and the requested benefit is therefore denied, reduced, or  terminated or payment is not provided or made, in whole or in part, for the  requested benefit; (ii) the denial, reduction, or termination of, or failure to  provide or make payment in whole or in part for, a benefit based on a  determination by a health carrier or its designee utilization review entity of  a covered person's eligibility to participate in the health carrier's health  benefit plan; (iii) any review determination that denies, reduces, or  terminates or fails to provide or make payment, in whole or in part, for a  benefit; (iv) a rescission of coverage determination as defined in § 38.2-3438  of the Code of Virginia; or (v) any decision to deny individual coverage in an  initial eligibility determination. 
    "Adverse determination" in the context of external  review means a determination by a health carrier or its designee utilization  review entity that an admission, availability of care, continued stay, or other  health care service that is a covered benefit has been reviewed and, based upon  the information provided, does not meet the health carrier's requirements for  medical necessity, appropriateness, health care setting, level of care, or  effectiveness or is determined to be experimental or investigational and the requested  service or payment for the service is therefore denied, reduced, or terminated.
    "Authorized representative" means (i) a person to  whom a covered person has given express written consent to represent the  covered person; (ii) a person authorized by law to provide substituted consent  for a covered person; (iii) a family member of a covered person or the covered  person's treating health care professional when the covered person is unable to  provide consent; (iv) a health care professional when the covered person's  health benefit plan requires that a request for a benefit under the plan be  initiated by the health care professional; or (v) in the case of an urgent care  internal appeal, a health care professional with knowledge of the covered  person's medical condition.
    "Clinical peer reviewer" means a practicing health  care professional who holds a nonrestricted license in a state, district, or  territory of the United States and in the same or similar specialty as  typically manages the medical condition, procedure, or treatment under appeal. 
    "Commission" means the State Corporation  Commission.
    "Concurrent review" means utilization review  conducted during a patient's stay or course of treatment in a facility, the  office of a health care professional, or other inpatient or outpatient health  care setting.
    "Covered person" means a policyholder, subscriber,  enrollee, or other individual participating in a health benefit plan. For  purposes of this chapter with respect to the administration of appeals,  references to a covered person include a covered person's authorized  representative, if any. 
    "Emergency services" means those health care  services that are rendered after the sudden onset of a medical condition that  manifests itself by symptoms of sufficient severity, including severe pain,  that the absence of immediate medical attention could reasonably be expected by  a prudent layperson who possesses an average knowledge of health and medicine  to result in (i) serious jeopardy to the mental or physical health of the individual,  (ii) danger of serious impairment of the individual's bodily functions, (iii)  serious dysfunction of any of the individual's bodily organs, or (iv) in the  case of a pregnant woman, serious jeopardy to the health of the fetus.
    "Final adverse determination" means an adverse  determination involving a covered benefit that has been upheld by a health  carrier, or its designee utilization review entity, at the completion of the  health carrier's internal appeal process. 
    "Group health plan" means an employee welfare  benefit plan (as defined in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974  (29 USC § 1002(1)), to the extent that the plan provides medical care and  including items and services paid for as medical care to employees or their  dependents (as defined under the terms of the plan) directly or through  insurance, reimbursement, or otherwise. 
    "Health benefit plan" means a policy, contract,  certificate, or agreement offered or issued by a health carrier to provide,  deliver, arrange for, pay for, or reimburse any of the costs of health care  services. "Health benefit plan" does not include accident only,  credit, or disability insurance; coverage of Medicare services or federal  employee health plans pursuant to contracts with the United States government;  Medicare supplement or long-term care insurance; Medicaid coverage; dental only  or vision only insurance; specified disease insurance; hospital indemnity  coverage; limited benefit health coverage; coverage issued as a supplement to  liability insurance; insurance arising out of a workers' compensation or  similar law; automobile medical payment insurance; medical expense and loss of  income benefits; or insurance under which benefits are payable with or without  regard to fault and that is statutorily required to be contained in any  liability insurance policy or equivalent self-insurance. 
    "Health care professional" means a physician or  other health care practitioner licensed, accredited, or certified to perform  specified health care services consistent with the laws of the Commonwealth. 
    "Health carrier" means an entity, subject to the  insurance laws and regulations of the Commonwealth or subject to the  jurisdiction of the commission, that contracts or offers to contract to  provide, deliver, arrange for, pay for, or reimburse any of the costs of health  care services, including an accident and sickness insurance company, a health  maintenance organization, a nonprofit hospital and health service corporation,  or a nonstock corporation offering or administering a health services plan, a  hospital services plan, or a medical or surgical services plan, or any other  entity providing a plan of health insurance, health benefits, or health care  services except as excluded under § 38.2-3557 of the Code of Virginia. 
    "Independent review organization" means an entity  that conducts independent external reviews of adverse determinations and final  adverse determinations, as well as alleged violations of 14VAC5-216-30  through 14VAC5-216-70 pertaining to internal appeal.
    "PPACA" means the Patient Protection and Affordable  Care Act (P.L. 111-148), as amended by the Health Care and Education  Reconciliation Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-152).
    "Pre-service claim" means a claim for a benefit  under a health benefit plan that requires approval of the benefit in whole or  in part, in advance of obtaining the service or treatment.
    "Post-service claim" means a claim for a benefit  under a health benefit plan that is not a pre-service claim, or the service or  treatment has been provided to the covered person.
    "Self-insured plan" means an "employee welfare  benefit plan" that has the meaning set forth in the Employee Retirement  Income Security Act of 1974, 29 USC § 1002(1).
    "Urgent care appeal" means an appeal for medical  care or treatment with respect to which the application of the time periods for  making non-urgent care determinations (i) could seriously jeopardize the life  or health of the covered person or the ability of the covered person to regain  maximum function; or (ii) in the opinion of the treating health care  professional with knowledge of the covered person's medical condition, would  subject the covered person to severe pain that cannot be adequately managed  without the care or treatment that is the subject of the appeal. An urgent care  appeal shall not be available for any post-service claim or retrospective  adverse benefit determination.
    "Utilization review" means a set of formal  techniques designed to monitor the use of or evaluate the clinical necessity,  appropriateness, efficacy, or efficiency of health care services, procedures or  settings. Techniques may include ambulatory review, prospective review, second  opinion, certification, concurrent review, case management, discharge planning,  or retrospective review. 
    14VAC5-216-40. Minimum appeal requirements.
    A. Each covered person shall be entitled to a full and fair  review of an adverse benefit determination. Within 180 days after the date of  receipt of a notice of an adverse benefit determination, a covered person may  file an appeal with the health carrier. A health carrier may designate a  utilization review entity to coordinate the review. For purposes of this  chapter, "health carrier" may also mean its designated utilization  review entity.
    B. The health carrier shall conduct the appeal in a manner to  ensure the independence and impartiality of the individuals involved in  reviewing the appeal. In ensuring the independence and impartiality of such  individuals, the health carrier shall not make decisions regarding hiring,  compensation, termination, promotion, or other similar matters based upon the  likelihood that an individual will support the denial of benefits.
    C. 1. In deciding an appeal of any adverse benefit  determination that is based in whole or in part on a medical judgment,  including determinations with regard to whether a particular treatment, drug,  or other service is experimental, investigational, or not medically necessary  or appropriate, the health carrier shall designate a clinical peer reviewer to  review the appeal. The clinical peer reviewer shall not have been involved in  any previous adverse benefit determination with respect to the claim. 
    2. A reviewer of any other type of adverse benefit  determination shall be an appropriate person designated by the health carrier.  The reviewer of the appeal shall not be the individual who made any previous  adverse benefit determination of the subject appeal nor the subordinate of such  individual and shall not defer to any prior adverse benefit determination.
    D. A full and fair review shall also provide for:
    1. The covered person to have an opportunity to submit written  comments, documents, records, and other information relating to the appeal for  the reviewer or reviewers to consider when reviewing the appeal;.
    2. Upon request to the health carrier, the covered person to  have reasonable access to and free of charge copies of all documents, records,  and other information relevant to the covered person's request for benefits (note  that any request for diagnosis and treatment codes, in itself, should not be  considered to be a request for an internal appeal);. This information  shall be provided to the covered person as soon as practicable.
    3. An appeal process that takes into account all comments,  documents, records, and other information submitted by the covered person  relating to the appeal, without regard to whether such information was  submitted or considered in the initial benefit determination. 
    4. The identification of medical or vocational experts whose  advice was obtained on behalf of the health benefit plan in connection with a  covered person's adverse benefit determination, without regard to whether the  advice was relied upon in making the benefit determination. 
    5. An urgent care appeal process.
    6. Prior to issuing a final adverse benefit determination, the  health carrier to provide free of charge to the covered person any new or  additional evidence relied upon or generated by the health carrier or at the  direction of the health carrier, in connection with the internal appeal  sufficiently in advance of the date the determination is required to be  provided to permit the covered person a reasonable opportunity to respond prior  to that date.
    E. A health carrier shall notify the covered person of the  final benefit determination within a reasonable period of time appropriate to  the medical circumstances, but not later than the timeframes established in  subdivisions 1 and 2 of this subsection.
    1. If an internal appeal involves a pre-service claim review  request, the health carrier shall notify the covered person of its decision  within 30 days after receipt of the appeal. A health carrier may provide a  second level of internal appeal for group health plans only, provided that a  maximum of 15 days is allowed for a benefit determination and notification from  each level of the appeal.
    2. If an internal appeal involves a post-service claim review  request, the health carrier shall notify the covered person of its decision  within 60 days after receipt of the appeal. A health carrier may provide a  second level of internal appeal for group health plans only, provided that a  maximum of 30 days is allowed for a benefit determination and notification from  each level of the appeal.
    14VAC5-216-45. Exhaustion.
    A. In addition to the provisions of § 38.2-3560 of the  Code of Virginia, the internal appeal process may be deemed exhausted based on  a violation of any of the provisions of 14VAC5-216-30 through 14VAC5-216-70.  The internal appeal process shall not be deemed exhausted based on a de minimis  violation that does not cause, and is not likely to cause, prejudice or harm to  the covered person so long as the health carrier demonstrates that the  violation was for good cause or due to matters beyond the control of the health  carrier and that the violation occurred in the context of an ongoing, good  faith exchange of information between the health carrier and the covered  person. If the violation is part of a pattern or practice of violations by the  health carrier, the violation shall not be considered de minimis.
    B. The covered person may request a written explanation of  the violation from the health carrier, and the health carrier shall provide the  written explanation within 10 days, including a specific description of its  basis, if any, for asserting that the violation should not cause the internal  appeal process to be deemed exhausted, along with a notification of the right  to review this matter by an independent review organization. A review by an  independent review organization may be requested by the covered person to the  commission to determine if the health carrier has met the standard under this  section. The covered person must include, as part of the request for review,  the written explanation of the violation by the health carrier. The independent  review organization shall have a maximum of 10 days to conduct this review and  provide a written response to the covered person, the health carrier, and the  commission. If rejected, within five days the health carrier shall provide the  covered person with a notice of the opportunity to resubmit and pursue an  internal appeal of the claim.
    C. The health carrier shall pay the independent review  organization costs incurred for this review.
    14VAC5-216-70. Notification requirements.
    A. A health carrier shall provide a covered person with  written or electronic notification of its benefit determination on appeal. The  notification of an adverse benefit determination shall be written in easily  understandable language and shall set forth the following:
    1. Information sufficient to identify the claim involved with  respect to the appeal, including the date of service, the health care provider,  and the claim amount, and a statement describing the availability,  upon request, of the diagnosis code and its corresponding meaning, and the treatment  code and its corresponding meaning.  The health carrier may not consider a  request for diagnosis or treatment information, in itself, to be a request for  internal appeal; 
    2. The specific reason or reasons for the adverse benefit  determination; 
    3. Reference to the specific plan provisions on which the  adverse benefit determination is made; 
    4. A statement that the covered person is entitled to receive,  upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to and copies of all  documents, records, and other information relevant to the covered person's  claim for benefits; 
    5. A statement indicating whether any additional internal  appeals are available or whether the covered person has received a final  adverse determination. If internal appeals are available, contact information  on where to submit the appeal; 
    6. A statement describing the external review procedures  offered by the health carrier and the covered person's right to obtain  information about such procedures and the covered person's right to bring a  civil action under § 502(a) of ERISA (29 USC § 1001 et seq.), if  applicable; and
    7. A statement indicating that the covered person has the  right to request an external review if the covered person has not received a  final benefit determination within the timeframes provided in 14VAC5-216-40 E,  unless the covered person requests or agrees to a delay.
    B. In the case of a group health plan, the required  notification shall also set forth the following:
    1. If an internal rule, guideline, protocol, or other similar  criterion (collectively "rule") was relied upon in making the adverse  benefit determination, either the specific rule or a statement that such rule  was relied upon in making the adverse benefit determination and that a copy of  the rule will be provided free of charge to the covered person upon request;
    2. If the adverse benefit determination is based on a medical  necessity or experimental treatment or similar exclusion or limit, either an  explanation of the scientific or clinical judgment for the determination,  applying the terms of the plan to the covered person's medical circumstances,  or a statement that such explanation will be provided free of charge upon  request; and
    3. Include a statement indicating that the covered person may  have other voluntary alternative dispute resolution options, such as mediation.  The covered person should be referred to the appropriate federal or state  agency, his plan administrator, or the health carrier, as appropriate. 
    C. All notices shall be provided in a culturally and  linguistically appropriate manner. The health carrier shall:
    1. Provide oral language services, such as a telephone  customer hotline, that include answering questions and providing assistance  with filing claims, benefit requests, internal appeals, and external review in  any applicable non-English language;
    2. Provide, upon request, any notice in any applicable  non-English language; and
    3. Include in the English versions of all notices, a  statement prominently displayed in any applicable non-English language clearly  indicating how to access the language services provided by the health carrier.
    With respect to any address in this Commonwealth to which  a notice is sent, a non-English language is an applicable non-English language  if 10% or more of the population residing in the city or county is literate  only in the same non-English language, as determined by the American Community  Survey data published by the United States Census Bureau.
    C. D. Electronic notification shall be in  accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (§ 59.1-479  et seq. of the Code of Virginia).
    VA.R. Doc. No. R12-2990; Filed December 5, 2011, 3:58 p.m. 
TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES
COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The  Commonwealth Transportation Board and the Commissioner of Highways are claiming  an exemption from the Administrative Process Act pursuant to the provisions of  Chapters 647, 870, and 888 of the 2011 Acts of Assembly.
         Titles of Regulations: 24VAC30-72. Access Management  Regulations: Principal Arterials (amending 24VAC30-72-10, 24VAC30-72-40,  24VAC30-72-60, 24VAC30-72-70, 24VAC30-72-80, 24VAC30-72-110, 24VAC30-72-130,  24VAC30-72-170).
    24VAC30-73. Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials,  Collectors, and Local Streets (amending 24VAC30-73-10, 24VAC30-73-40,  24VAC30-73-60, 24VAC30-73-70, 24VAC30-73-80, 24VAC30-73-110, 24VAC30-73-130, 24VAC30-73-170).
    24VAC30-92. Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (amending 24VAC30-92-10, 24VAC30-92-20,  24VAC30-92-60, 24VAC30-92-70, 24VAC30-92-80, 24VAC30-92-110, 24VAC30-92-120,  24VAC30-92-130, 24VAC30-92-140; repealing 24VAC30-92-50, 24VAC30-92-150).
    24VAC30-155. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (amending 24VAC30-155-10, 24VAC30-155-20,  24VAC30-155-30, 24VAC30-155-40, 24VAC30-155-60, 24VAC30-155-70, 24VAC30-155-80;  repealing 24VAC30-155-50, 24VAC30-155-100). 
    Statutory Authority: § 33.1-198.1 of the Code of  Virginia.
    Effective Date: December 31, 2011. 
    Agency Contact: Robert Hofrichter, Assistant Division  Administrator, Transportation & Mobility Planning Division, Department of  Transportation, 1401 East Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804)  786-0780, or email robert.hofrichter@vdot.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    During the 2011 session of the General Assembly, Chapters  647, 870, and 888, which relate to or impact the content of land development  regulations promulgated by the Commonwealth Transportation Board, VDOT, or the  Commissioner of Highways were enacted. These regulations include:
    24VAC30-72 – Access Management Regulations: Principal  Arterials
    24VAC30-73 – Access Management Regulations: Minor  Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets 
    24VAC30-92 – Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements 
    24VAC30-155 – Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations
    This action includes those regulatory changes made pursuant  to Chapters 647, 870, and 888, which will have an effective date of December  31, 2011. 
    In response to Chapter 647, which repealed subsection C of  § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia, the Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations  (TIA) are revised to remove the requirements for VDOT to review subdivision  plats, site plans, and plans for development. This legislation did not impact  the agency's review of comprehensive plans, comprehensive plan amendments, and  rezoning. VDOT made changes to the TIA Regulations pursuant to a specific  mandate in the second enactment clause of the legislation.
    Chapter 870 requires VDOT to: 
    1. Review and adopt any appropriate revisions to the TIA  Regulations prior to November 30, 2011; 
    2. Assist the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) to  research and make recommendations related to the adoption of revisions to the  Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (SSAR) prior to November 30, 2011; and
    3. Review and adopt revisions to the Access Management  Regulations: Principal Arterials and Access Management Regulations: Minor  Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets by November 11, 2011, concerning their  application to entrances for family subdivisions. 
    Chapter 888 also affects the TIA Regulations. This  legislation states that VDOT shall complete a "more limited" review  of rezoning requests when the proposed use is consistent with the current  locality comprehensive plan designation and the comprehensive plan was reviewed  previously pertaining to the TIA Regulations. Although VDOT will continue to  review comprehensive plans, related amendments, and proposed rezoning requests,  it revised the TIA Regulations to reflect this less stringent approach to such  reviews. 
    Significant changes made to each of the regulations are  described below. Additional minor changes to update references to forms and  technical documents to ensure consistency among the regulations examined were  also made where necessary. 
    Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials  (24VAC30-72) and Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials, Collectors,  and Local Streets (24VAC 30-73)
    The amendments add a low volume commercial entrance  category to the regulation for entrances associated with land uses that do not  generate high traffic volumes, but volumes above those expected from private  entrances (driveways serving one to two homes). The lower-cost design standards  for private entrances will apply to this new type of entrance, but the entrance  will need to meet a stopping sight distance requirement. (See Definitions,  24VAC30-72-80 and 24VAC30-73-80.) For clarity, text in the catchlines and  elsewhere in the regulations is amended to clarify how particular provisions  are applied to low volume commercial entrances, commercial entrances, and  private entrances.
    As the character of traffic created by family subdivisions  does not differ from any other entrances, setting out a specific entrance just  for family subdivisions is not logical from a safety standpoint. Family  subdivisions generally consist of up to five lots, which can be expected to  generate 50 trips, and 50 trips is already the established breakpoint for  paving eligibility on VDOT secondary highways. Stopping sight distance is the  minimum required by the American Association of State Highway and  Transportation Officials (AASHTO) national standards at entrances, and a new  document, "Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008," is added to  24VAC30-72 and 24VAC30-73 to address the revision to family entrance  provisions. 
    Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (24VAC30-92): 
    The amendments removed the "connectivity index"  requirement from the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements because many  parties outside of VDOT found the connectivity index confusing and complicated;  many also questioned if use of the index actually increased external  connectivity. The "area types" classification scheme is eliminated  because it was directly tied to connectivity index requirements, which are  eliminated, and the requirements associated with pedestrian accommodations are  modified based on input received. 
    For connectivity enhancements, a requirement is incorporated  for additional external connection or connections when certain dwelling unit or  vehicle per day (VPD) thresholds per network addition are met. Additional  external connections are required when the network addition contains over 200  dwelling units or the use generates over 2,000 VPD.  With the elimination  of the connectivity index, another connectivity standard is necessary to ensure  adequate "connectivity for the current and future transportation  network."
    An amendment to the regulation allows the District  Administrator's designee (rather than the District Administrator) to waive or  modify certain aspects or requirements relating to multiple connections and/or  additional external connections when specific and commonly occurring physical  situations exist. Since the original effective date of the Secondary Street  Acceptance Requirements in 2009, VDOT has gathered data on the occurrence of  regulation exceptions. The majority of exceptions granted relate to required  connections. The specific situations listed in the proposed Secondary  Street Acceptance Requirements include the majority of situations today that  result in approval of exceptions to connectivity requirements. By providing the  designee with approval authority, a request seeking approval of an exception  will receive the same thorough review, but the time needed for a review should  be reduced. 
    The VDOT review period for waivers and exceptions is  reduced from 45 calendar days to 30 calendar days for connectivity exceptions  and appeals. 
    Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (24VAC30-155):
    Reviews for site plans, subdivision plats, and plans of  development are removed due to the repeal of subsection C of § 15.2-2222.1  of the Code of Virginia, which required local submittal of these land  development proposals to VDOT for review. The entire section relating to these  reviews, 24VAC30-155-50, is removed as a result.
    Traffic impact analysis study criteria are reduced in scope  for rezoning proposals. The trip generation threshold requiring submittal of a  rezoning to VDOT is increased from 100 peak hour trips for residential and  2,500 daily trips for other land uses to a new 5,000 vehicle trips per day  threshold for all land uses. The submittal threshold is raised to  address/reshift focus to larger developments of a more regional scale. 
    An amendment is added to allow rezoning applicants to  submit a traffic impact analysis study prepared according to locality  requirements, provided the locality's requirements have been certified by VDOT  as meeting acceptable standards of professional practice. A developer will not  have to prepare separate traffic impact studies according to locality  requirements and according to VDOT requirements. Once a locality's traffic  impact statement requirements have been certified by VDOT, the local study can  satisfy both purposes. 
    An amendment stipulates that rezoning proposal is exempt  from the regulations when it (i) involves no changes in the land uses allowed  under the current zoning, or (ii) results in lower trip generation than land  uses allowed by right (except governmental uses) under the current zoning. This  amendment is made to bring the regulation more in line with statutory intent of  requiring traffic impact studies in situations that would substantially affect  state highways. Applying traffic impact regulations to a rezoning proposal that  will generate the same or less traffic than what could occur if the property  was developed by-right (uses allowed under the current zoning) would conflict  with the legislative intent.
    A provision is added requiring VDOT to schedule a meeting  with the locality and the developer to discuss the preparation of a traffic  impact study on a proposed rezoning within 60 days of receipt of a request for  a scoping meeting. The deadline helps assure that the arrangements for a  scoping meeting to discuss a rezoning proposal are handled in a timely manner.
    An amendment directs VDOT to provide the rezoning applicant  the opportunity and time to make modifications to information submitted under  the regulations before returning the package to the locality and requiring its  formal resubmission. The regulations allow, when possible, revisions to  submittals to be accommodated in a manner that does not unnecessarily extend  the local development review process.
    The methodology for preparing a traffic impact analysis  study is revised. The methodology was evaluated based on three years of  experience, utilizing the current methodology, as well as new concepts and best  practices in traffic impact analysis. 
    24VAC30-72-10. Definitions.
    "Access management" means the systematic control of  the location, spacing, design, and operation of entrances, median openings,  traffic signals, and interchanges for the purpose of providing vehicular access  to land development in a manner that preserves the safety and efficiency of the  transportation system. 
    "Commercial entrance" means any entrance serving  land uses other than two or fewer individual private residences. (See  "private entrance.")
    "Commissioner" means the individual who serves as  the chief executive officer of the Department of Transportation or his  designee.
    "Commonwealth" means the Commonwealth of Virginia.
    "Crossover" or "median opening" means an  opening in a nontraversable median (such as a concrete barrier or raised  island) that provides for crossing and turning traffic. 
    "Design speed" means the selected speed used to  determine the geometric design features of the highway. 
    "District" means each of the nine areas in which  VDOT is divided to oversee the maintenance and construction on the  state-maintained highways, bridges and tunnels within the boundaries of the  area. 
    "District administrator" means the VDOT employee  assigned to supervise the district. 
    "District administrator's designee" means the VDOT  employee or employees designated by the district administrator. 
    "Entrance" means any driveway, street, or other  means of providing for movement of vehicles to or from the highway.
    "Entrance, commercial" means any entrance  serving land uses that generate more than 50 vehicular trips per day or the  trip generation equivalent of more than five individual private residences or  lots for individual private residences using the methodology in the Institute  of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
    "Entrance, low volume commercial" means any  entrance, other than a private entrance, serving five or fewer individual  residences or lots for individual residences on a privately owned and  maintained road or land uses that generate 50 or fewer vehicular trips per day  using the methodology in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip  Generation, 8th Edition, 2008. 
    "Entrance, private" means an entrance that  serves up to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of  the occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain  access to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure  facilities that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump  stations, and stormwater management basins.
    "Frontage road" means a road that generally runs  parallel to a highway between the highway right-of-way and the front building  setback line of the abutting properties and provides access to the abutting  properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to the highway  and separating the abutting property traffic from through traffic on the  highway. 
    "Functional area" means the area of the physical  highway feature, such as an intersection, roundabout, railroad grade crossing,  or interchange, plus that portion of the highway that comprises the decision  and maneuver distance and required vehicle storage length to serve that highway  feature. 
    "Functional area of an intersection" means the  physical area of an at-grade intersection plus all required storage lengths for  separate turn lanes and for through traffic including any maneuvering distance  for separate turn lanes.
    "Functional classification" means the federal  system of classifying groups of highways according to the character of service  they are intended to provide and classifications made by the commissioner based  on the operational characteristics of a highway. Each highway is assigned a  functional classification based on the highway's intended purpose of providing  priority to through traffic movement or adjoining property access. The  functional classification system groups highways into three basic categories  identified as (i) arterial, with the function to provide through movement of  traffic; (ii) collector, with the function of supplying a combination of  through movement and access to property; and (iii) local, with the function of  providing access to property. 
    "Highway," "street," or "road"  means a public way for purposes of vehicular travel, including the entire area  within the right-of-way.
    "Intersection" means any at-grade connection with a  highway including two highways or an entrance and a highway.
    "Legal speed limit" means the speed limit set forth  on signs lawfully posted on a highway or in the absence of such signs the speed  limit established by Article 8 (§ 46.2-870 et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title 46.2  of the Code of Virginia.
    "Level of service" means a qualitative measure  describing the operational conditions within a vehicular traffic stream,  generally in terms of such service measures as speed, travel time, freedom to  maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience.  "Level-of-service" is defined and procedures are presented for  determining the level of service in the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-72-170 I).
    "Limited access highway" means a highway especially  designed for through traffic over which abutting properties have no easement or  right of light, air, or access by reason of the fact that their property abuts  upon the limited access highway.
    "Median" means the portion of a divided highway  that separates opposing traffic flows.
    "Operating speed" means the speed at which drivers  are observed operating their vehicles during free-flow conditions with the 85th  percentile of the distribution of observed speeds being the most frequently used  measure of the operating speed of a particular location or geometric feature. 
    "Permit" or "entrance permit" means a  document that sets the conditions under which VDOT allows a connection to a  highway. 
    "Permit applicant" means the person or persons, firm,  corporation, government, or other entity that has applied for a permit. 
    "Permittee" means the person or persons, firm,  corporation, government, or other entity that has been issued a permit.
    "Preliminary subdivision plat" means a plan of  development as set forth in § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Principal arterial" means the functional  classification for a major highway intended to serve through traffic where  access is carefully controlled, generally highways of regional importance, with  moderate to high volumes of traffic traveling relatively long distances and at  higher speeds.
    "Private entrance" means an entrance that serves  up to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of the  occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain access  to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure facilities  that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump stations, and  stormwater management basins.
    "Professional engineer" means a person who is  qualified to practice engineering by reason of his special knowledge and use of  mathematical, physical and engineering sciences and the principles and methods  of engineering analysis and design acquired by engineering education and  experience, and whose competence has been attested by the Virginia Board for  Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior  Designers and Landscape Architects through licensure as a professional  engineer.
    "Reverse frontage road" means a road that is  located to the rear of the properties fronting a highway and provides access to  the abutting properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to  the highway and removing the abutting property traffic from through traffic on  the highway.
    "Right-of-way" means that property within the  systems of state highways that is open or may be opened for public travel or  use or both in the Commonwealth. This definition includes those public  rights-of-way in which the Commonwealth has a prescriptive easement for  maintenance and public travel. 
    "Roadside" means the area adjoining the outer edge  of the roadway. The median of a divided highway may also be considered a  "roadside."
    "Roadway" means the portion of a highway, including  shoulders, for vehicular use. A divided highway has two or more roadways.
    "Shared entrance" means a single entrance serving  two or more adjoining parcels.
    "Sight distance" means the distance visible to the  driver of a vehicle when the view is unobstructed by traffic.
    "Site plan" and "subdivision plat" mean a  plan of development approved in accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241  through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia. 
    "Stopping sight distance" means the distance  required by a driver of a vehicle, traveling at a given speed, to bring the  vehicle to a stop after an object on the highway becomes visible, including the  distance traveled during the driver's perception and reaction times and the  vehicle braking distance.
    "Systems of state highways" means all highways and  roads under the ownership, the control, or the jurisdiction of VDOT, including  but not limited to, the primary, secondary and interstate highway. 
    "Traveled way" means the portion of the roadway for  the movement of vehicles, exclusive of shoulders and turn lanes.
    "Trip" means a single or one-directional vehicle  movement either entering or exiting a property; a vehicle leaving the property  is one trip and a vehicle returning to the property is one trip.
    "Turn lane" means a separate lane for the purpose  of enabling a vehicle that is entering or leaving a highway to increase or  decrease its speed to a rate at which it can more safely merge or diverge with  through traffic; acceleration and deceleration lanes.
    "Urban area" means an urbanized area with a  population of 50,000 or more, or an urban place (small urban area) as  designated by the Bureau of the Census having a population of 5,000 or more and  not within any urbanized area. The Federal Highway Administration defines  "urban area" in more detail based on the federal-aid highway law (23  USC § 101).
    "VDOT" means the Virginia Department of  Transportation, its successor, the Commissioner of Highways, or his designees.
    24VAC30-72-40. Administrative procedures and rules for  obtaining commercial and private entrance permits.
    All applications for entrance permits shall be obtained from  and submitted to the district administrator's designee for the county in which  the work is to be performed. The permit applicant shall submit the permit  application form, and the entrance permit, if approved, will be issued in  accordance with the applicable administrative rules, requirements, and  procedures of this chapter and the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-72-170 G). 
    24VAC30-72-60. General provisions governing commercial and  private entrances.
    A. No entrance of any nature may be constructed within the  right-of-way until the location has been approved by VDOT and an entrance  permit has been issued. The violation of any provision of this chapter and any  condition of approval of an entrance permit shall be subject to the penalties  for violations specified in the Land Use Permit Regulations (see 24VAC30-72-170  G).
    B. VDOT will permit reasonably convenient access to a parcel  of record. VDOT is not obligated to permit the most convenient access, nor is  VDOT obligated to approve the permit applicant's preferred entrance location or  entrance design. If a parcel is served by more than one road in the systems of  state highways, the district administrator's designee shall determine upon  which road or roads the proposed entrance or entrances is or are to be  constructed. 
    C. When two or more properties are to be served by the same  entrance, the permit applicant shall ensure that there is a recorded agreement  between the parties specifying the use and future maintenance of the entrance.  A copy of this recorded agreement shall be included in the entrance permit  application submitted to the district administrator's designee. The shared  entrance shall be identified on any site plan or subdivision plat of the  property.
    D. The district administrator's designee may require the  permit applicant to alter any proposed entrance location or design, whether  private or commercial, to obtain the best possible operational characteristics,  including, but not limited to, sight distance and entrance spacing.
    E. Entrance standards established by localities that are  stricter than those of VDOT shall govern.
    24VAC30-72-70. Commercial entrance design.
    A. All commercial Low volume commercial entrance  design and construction shall comply with the private entrance design standards  in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and the stopping sight  distance provision in 24VAC30-72-80. Commercial entrance design and  construction shall comply with the provisions of this chapter and the standards  in the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), the Road and Bridge Standards  (see 24VAC30-72-170 C), the Road and Bridge Specifications (see 24VAC30-72-170  B), other VDOT engineering and construction standards as may be appropriate, and  any additional conditions, restrictions, or modifications deemed necessary by  the district administrator's designee to preserve the safety, use and  maintenance of the systems of state highways. Entrance design and construction  shall comply with applicable guidelines and requirements of the Americans with  Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12101 et seq.). Ramps for curb sections  shall be provided as required in § 15.2-2021 of the Code of Virginia. The  standard drawing for depressed curb ramp as shown in the Road and Bridge  Standards (see 24VAC30-72-170 C), shall be utilized in the design.
    1. In the event an entrance is proposed within the limits of a  funded roadway project that will ultimately change a highway, the permit  applicant may be required to construct, to the extent possible, entrances  compatible with the roadway's ultimate design.
    2. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  pedestrian and bicycle users of the abutting highway in accordance with the  Commonwealth Transportation Board's "Policy for Integrating Bicycle and  Pedestrian Accommodations" (see 24VAC30-72-170 H).
    3. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  transit users of the abutting highway where applicable and provide  accommodations to the extent possible.
    4. Based on the existing and planned developments, the  district administrator's designee will determine the need for curb and gutter,  sidewalks, or other features within the general area of the proposed entrance  in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and the design standards in  Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A). 
    5. Sites accessed by an entrance shall be designed so as to  prevent unsafe and inefficient traffic movements from impacting travel on the  abutting highway. At the request of the district administrator's designee, the  permit applicant shall furnish a report that documents the impact of expected  traffic movements upon the function of the abutting highway during the peak  hours of the abutting highway.
    B. It is essential that entrance and site design allow safe  and efficient movements of traffic using the entrance while minimizing the  impact of such movements on the operation of the systems of state highways. 
    1. The permit applicant shall supply sufficient information to  demonstrate to the satisfaction of the district administrator's designee that  neither the entrance, nor the proposed traffic circulation patterns within the  parcel, will compromise the safety, use, operation, or maintenance of the  abutting highway. A rezoning traffic impact statement or a site  plan/subdivision plat supplemental traffic analysis submitted for a proposed  development of a parcel in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis  Regulations (24VAC30-155) may be used for this purpose, provided that it  adequately documents the effect of the proposed entrance and its related  traffic on the operation of the highway to be accessed. 
    2. If the proposed entrance will cause the systems of state  highways to experience degradation in safety or a significant increase in delay  or a significant reduction in capacity beyond an acceptable level of service,  the applicant shall be required to submit a plan to mitigate these impacts and  to bear the costs of such mitigation measures.
    3. Proposed mitigation measures must be approved by the  district administrator's designee prior to permit approval. Mitigation measures  that may be considered include but are not limited to:
    a. Construction of auxiliary lanes or turning lanes, or  pavement transitions/tapers;
    b. Construction of new crossovers, or the relocation, removal,  or consolidation of existing crossovers;
    c. Installation, modification, or removal of traffic signals  and related traffic control equipment;
    d. Provisions to limit the traffic generated by the development  served by the proposed entrance;
    e. Dedication of additional right-of-way or easement, or both,  for future road improvements; 
    f. Reconstruction of existing roadway to provide required  vertical and horizontal sight distances; 
    g. Relocation or consolidation of existing entrances; or
    h. Recommendations from adopted corridor studies, design  studies, other access management practices and principles, or any combination  of these, not otherwise mentioned in this chapter. 
    4. If an applicant is unwilling or unable to mitigate the  impacts identified in the traffic impact analysis, the entrance shall be  physically restricted to right-in or right-out movements or both or similar  restrictions such that the public interests in a safe and efficient flow of  traffic on the systems of state highways are protected. 
    24VAC30-72-80. Minimum sight distance for commercial entrances.
    A. No less than minimum intersection sight distance shall be  obtained for any a commercial entrance and no less than  minimum stopping sight distance shall be obtained for a low volume commercial  entrance. Sight distances shall be measured in accordance with VDOT  practices, and sight distance requirements shall conform to VDOT standards as  described in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A). The  legal speed limit shall be used unless the design speed is available and  approved for use by VDOT. 
    B. The operating speed may be used in lieu of the legal speed  limit in cases where the permit applicant furnishes the district administrator's  designee with a speed study prepared in accordance with the Manual on Uniform  Traffic Control Devices (see 24VAC30-72-170 D) methodology that demonstrates  the operating speed of the segment of highway is lower than the legal speed  limit and, in the judgment of the district administrator's designee, use of the  operating speed will not compromise safety for either a driver at an entrance  or a driver on the abutting highway. 
    C. VDOT may require that the vertical or horizontal alignment  of the existing roadway be adjusted to accommodate certain design elements of a  proposed commercial entrance including, but not limited to, median openings,  crossovers, roundabouts, and traffic signals, where adjustment is deemed  necessary. The cost of any work performed to adjust the horizontal or vertical  alignment of the roadway to achieve required intersection sight distance at a  proposed entrance shall be borne by the permit applicant.
    24VAC30-72-110. Tenure of commercial entrances.
    A. The tenure of a commercial entrance to any highway is  conditional. Reconstruction, relocation, commercial entrance consolidation, or  upgrading, or a combination of these, may be required at the owner's cost when  the district administrator's designee determines after review that one of the conditions  listed below exists. If the necessary changes are not made, the entrance may be  closed at the direction of the district administrator's designee. 
    1. Safety - When the entrance has been found to be unsafe for  public use in its present condition because of physical degradation of the  entrance, increase in motor vehicle traffic, or some other safety-related  condition.
    2. Use - When traffic in and out of the entrance has changed  significantly to require modifications or reconstruction, or both. Such changes  may include, but are not limited to, changes in traffic volume or operational  characteristics of the traffic. 
    3. Maintenance - When the entrance becomes unserviceable due  to heavy equipment damage or reclamation by natural causes.
    B. VDOT will maintain the commercial entrance only within the  normal shoulder of the roadway or to the flow line of the gutter pan. The owner  shall maintain all other portions of the entrance, including entrance aprons,  curb and gutter, culvert and drainage structures.
    C. Commercial entrances may also be reviewed by the district  administrator's designee when any of the following occur:
    1. The property is being considered for rezoning or other  local legislative action that involves a change in use of the property.
    2. The property is subject to a site plan or subdivision plat  review.
    3. There is a change in commercial use either by the property  owner or by a tenant. 
    4. Vehicular/pedestrian circulation between adjoining  properties becomes available.
    These periodic reviews are necessary to provide both the  driver and other highway users with a safe and operationally efficient means of  travel on state highways.
    D. The provisions of this section shall apply to low  volume commercial entrances.
    24VAC30-72-130. Drainage.
    A. Commercial and private entrances Entrances  shall be constructed so as not to impair drainage within the right-of-way and  so that surface water shall drain from the roadway.
    B. Where deemed necessary by the district administrator's  designee, a commercial entrance applicant shall provide copies of a complete  drainage layout based on a drainage study by a licensed design professional.  This layout shall clearly show how the permit applicant proposes to handle the  drainage and run-off from applicant's development.
    C. Pipe ends of culverts shall be reviewed independently by  the district administrator's designee and grading or treatment at pipe ends  shall minimize any hazard the pipe ends or structures may present to an errant  vehicle. 
    24VAC30-72-170. Documents incorporated by reference.
    A. Road Design Manual (effective January 1, 2005, revised  July 2008), 2011.
    Note: Appendix F (Access Management Design Standards for  Entrances and Intersections) contains the access management standards  referenced in Chapters 863 and 928 of the 2007 Acts of Assembly and Chapters  274 and 454 of the 2008 Acts of Assembly.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    B. 2007 Road and Bridge Specifications (effective July 2008)
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    C. Road and Bridge Standards (effective February 1, 2001)
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    D. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets  and Highways, 2003 Edition (effective December 22, 2003, revised November 2004)
           |   | Federal Highway AdministrationSuperintendent of Documents
 U.S. Government Printing Office
 P.O. Box 371954
 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954
 | 
  
    E. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,  Fifth Edition, 2004
           |   | American Association of State Highway and Transportation    Officials (AASHTO)444 North Capitol St. N.W., Suite 225
 Washington, D.C. 20001
 | 
  
    F. Change of Limited Access Control, 24VAC30-401
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    G. Land Use Permit Regulations, 24VAC30-151
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    H. Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian  Accommodations, eff. March 18, 2004
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    I. Highway Capacity Manual 2000
           |   | Transportation Research Board500 Fifth Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    J. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations, 24VAC30-155
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    K. Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008
           |   | Institute of Transportation Engineers1099 14th Street N. W., Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    24VAC30-73-10. Definitions.
    "Access management" means the systematic control of  the location, spacing, design, and operation of entrances, median  openings/crossovers, traffic signals, and interchanges for the purpose of  providing vehicular access to land development in a manner that preserves the  safety and efficiency of the transportation system.
    "Collectors" means the functional classification of  highways that provide land access service and traffic circulation within  residential, commercial, and industrial areas. The collector system distributes  trips from principal and minor arterials through the area to the ultimate  destination. Conversely, collectors also collect traffic and channel it into  the arterial system. 
    "Commercial entrance" means any entrance serving  land uses other than two or fewer individual private residences. (See  "private entrance.")
    "Commissioner" means the individual who serves as  the chief executive officer of the Department of Transportation or his  designee.
    "Commonwealth" means the Commonwealth of Virginia.
    "Crossover" means an opening in a nontraversable  median (such as a concrete barrier or raised island) that provides for crossing  movements and left and right turning movements. 
    "Design speed" means the selected speed used to  determine the geometric design features of the highway. 
    "District" means each of the nine areas in which  VDOT is divided to oversee the maintenance and construction on the  state-maintained highways, bridges and tunnels within the boundaries of the  area. 
    "District administrator" means the VDOT employee  assigned to supervise the district. 
    "District administrator's designee" means the VDOT  employee or employees designated by the district administrator. 
    "Entrance" means any driveway, street, or other  means of providing for movement of vehicles to or from the highway.
    "Entrance, commercial" means any entrance  serving land uses that generate more than 50 vehicular trips per day or the  trip generation equivalent of more than five individual private residences or  lots for individual private residences using the methodology in the Institute  of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
    "Entrance, low volume commercial" means any  entrance, other than a private entrance, serving five or fewer individual  residences or lots for individual residences on a privately owned and  maintained road or land uses that generate 50 or fewer vehicular trips per day  using the methodology in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip  Generation 8th Edition, 2008. 
    "Entrance, private" means an entrance that  serves up to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of  the occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain  access to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure  facilities that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump  stations, and stormwater management basins.
    "Frontage road" means a road that generally runs  parallel to a highway between the highway right-of-way and the front building  setback line of the abutting properties and provides access to the abutting  properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to the highway  and separating the abutting property traffic from through traffic on the  highway. 
    "Functional area" means the area of the physical  highway feature, such as an intersection, roundabout, railroad grade crossing,  or interchange, plus that portion of the highway that comprises the decision  and maneuver distance and required vehicle storage length to serve that highway  feature.
    "Functional area of an intersection" means the  physical area of an at-grade intersection plus all required storage lengths for  separate turn lanes and for through traffic, including any maneuvering distance  for separate turn lanes.
    "Functional classification" means the federal  system of classifying groups of highways according to the character of service  they are intended to provide and classifications made by the commissioner based  on the operational characteristics of a highway. Each highway is assigned a  functional classification based on the highway's intended purpose of providing  priority to through traffic movement or adjoining property access. The  functional classification system groups highways into three basic categories  identified as (i) arterial, with the function to provide through movement of  traffic; (ii) collector, with the function of supplying a combination of  through movement and access to property; and (iii) local, with the function of  providing access to property and to other streets. 
    "Highway," "street," or "road"  means a public way for purposes of vehicular travel, including the entire area  within the right-of-way.
    "Intersection" means (i) a crossing of two or more  highways at grade, (ii) a crossover, or (iii) any at-grade connection with a  highway such as a commercial entrance.
    "Intersection sight distance" means the sight  distance required at an intersection to allow the driver of a stopped vehicle a  sufficient view of the intersecting highway to decide when to enter, or cross,  the intersecting highway. 
    "Legal speed limit" means the speed limit set forth  on signs lawfully posted on a highway or, in the absence of such signs, the  speed limit established by Article 8 (§ 46.2-870 et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title  46.2 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Level of service" means a qualitative measure  describing the operational conditions within a vehicular traffic stream,  generally in terms of such service measures as speed, travel time, freedom to  maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience.  "Level-of-service" is defined and procedures are presented for  determining the level of service in the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-73-170 I).
    "Limited access highway" means a highway especially  designed for through traffic over which abutting properties have no easement or  right of light, air, or access by reason of the fact that those properties abut  upon the limited access highway.
    "Local streets" means the functional classification  for highways that comprise all facilities that are not collectors or arterials.  Local streets serve primarily to provide direct access to abutting land and to  other streets.
    "Median" means the portion of a divided highway  that separates opposing traffic flows.
    "Median opening" means a crossover or a directional  opening in a nontraversable median (such as a concrete barrier or raised  island) that physically restricts movements to specific turns such as left  turns and U-turns. 
    "Minor arterials" means the functional  classification for highways that interconnect with and augment the principal  arterial system. Minor arterials distribute traffic to smaller geographic areas  providing service between and within communities.
    "Operating speed" means the speed at which drivers  are observed operating their vehicles during free-flow conditions with the 85th  percentile of the distribution of observed speeds being the most frequently  used measure of the operating speed of a particular location or geometric  feature. 
    "Permit" or "entrance permit" means a  document that sets the conditions under which VDOT allows a connection to a  highway. 
    "Permit applicant" means the person or persons,  firm, corporation, government, or other entity that has applied for a permit. 
    "Permittee" means the person or persons, firm,  corporation, government, or other entity that has been issued a permit.
    "Preliminary subdivision plat" means a plan of  development as set forth in § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Principal arterials" means the functional  classification for major highways intended to serve through traffic where  access is carefully controlled, generally highways of regional importance, with  moderate to high volumes of traffic traveling relatively long distances and at  higher speeds.
    "Private entrance" means an entrance that serves  up to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of the  occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain access  to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure facilities  that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump stations, and  stormwater management basins.
    "Professional engineer" means a person who is  qualified to practice engineering by reason of his special knowledge and use of  mathematical, physical and engineering sciences and the principles and methods  of engineering analysis and design acquired by engineering education and  experience, and whose competence has been attested by the Virginia Board for  Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior  Designers and Landscape Architects through licensure as a professional  engineer.
    "Reverse frontage road" means a road that is  located to the rear of the properties fronting a highway and provides access to  the abutting properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to  the highway and removing the abutting property traffic from through traffic on  the highway.
    "Right-of-way" means that property within the  systems of state highways that is open or may be opened for public travel or  use or both in the Commonwealth. This definition includes those public  rights-of-way in which the Commonwealth has a prescriptive easement for  maintenance and public travel. 
    "Roadway" means the portion of a highway, including  shoulders, for vehicular use. A divided highway has two or more roadways.
    "Roundabout" means a circular intersection with  yield control of all entering traffic, right-of-way assigned to traffic within  the circular roadway, and channelized approaches and a central island that  deflect entering traffic to the right. 
    "Shared entrance" means a single entrance serving  two or more adjoining parcels.
    "Sight distance" means the distance visible to the  driver of a vehicle when the view is unobstructed by traffic.
    "Site plan" and "subdivision plat" mean a  plan of development approved in accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241  through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia. 
    "Systems of state highways" means all highways and  roads under the ownership, the control, or the jurisdiction of VDOT, including  but not limited to, the primary, secondary and interstate highways. 
    "Trip" means a single or one-directional vehicle  movement either entering or exiting a property; a vehicle leaving the property  is one trip and a vehicle returning to the property is one trip.
    "Turn lane" means a separate lane for the purpose  of enabling a vehicle that is entering or leaving a highway to increase or  decrease its speed to a rate at which it can more safely merge or diverge with  through traffic; an acceleration or deceleration lane.
    "Urban area" means an urbanized area with a  population of 50,000 or more, or an urban place (small urban area) as  designated by the Bureau of the Census having a population of 5,000 or more and  not within any urbanized area. The Federal Highway Administration defines "urban  area" in more detail based on the federal-aid highway law (23 USC § 101).
    "VDOT" means the Virginia Department of  Transportation, its successor, the Commissioner of Highways, or his designees. 
    24VAC30-73-40. Administrative procedures and rules for obtaining  commercial and private entrance permits.
    All applications for entrance permits shall be obtained from  and submitted to the district administrator's designee for the county in which  the work is to be performed. The permit applicant shall submit the permit  application form, and the entrance permit, if approved, will be issued in  accordance with the applicable administrative rules, requirements and  procedures of this chapter and the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-73-170 G). 
    24VAC30-73-60. General provisions governing commercial and  private entrances.
    A. No entrance of any nature may be constructed within the  right-of-way until the location has been approved by VDOT and an entrance  permit has been issued. Any person violating any provision of this chapter and  any condition of approval of an entrance permit shall be guilty of a  misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be punished as provided for in § 33.1-198 of the Code of Virginia. Such person shall be civilly liable to the  Commonwealth for actual damage sustained by the Commonwealth by reason of his  wrongful act.
    B. VDOT will permit reasonably convenient access to a parcel  of record. VDOT is not obligated to permit the most convenient access, nor is  VDOT obligated to approve the permit applicant's preferred entrance location or  entrance design. If a parcel is served by more than one road in the systems of  state highways, the district administrator's designee shall determine upon  which road or roads the proposed entrance or entrances is or are to be  constructed. 
    C. Entrance standards established by localities that are  stricter than those of VDOT shall govern. 
    24VAC30-73-70. Commercial entrance design.
    A. All commercial Low volume commercial entrance  design and construction shall comply with the private entrance design standards  in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and the stopping sight  distance provision in 24VAC30-73-80. Commercial entrance design and  construction shall comply with the provisions of this chapter and the standards  in the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A), the Road and Bridge Standards  (see 24VAC30-73-170 C), the Road and Bridge Specifications (see 24VAC30-73-170  B), other VDOT engineering and construction standards as may be appropriate,  and any additional conditions, restrictions, or modifications deemed necessary  by the district administrator's designee to preserve the safety, use and  maintenance of the systems of state highways. Entrance design and construction  shall comply with applicable guidelines and requirements of the Americans with  Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12101 et seq.). Ramps for curb sections  shall be provided as required in § 15.2-2021 of the Code of Virginia. The  standard drawing for depressed curb ramp as shown in the Road and Bridge  Standards (see 24VAC30-73-170 C) shall be utilized in the design.
    1. In the event an entrance is proposed within the limits of a  funded roadway project that will ultimately change a highway, the permit  applicant may be required to construct, to the extent possible, entrances  compatible with the roadway's ultimate design.
    2. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  pedestrian and bicycle users of the abutting highway in accordance with the  Commonwealth Transportation Board's "Policy for Integrating Bicycle and  Pedestrian Accommodations" (see 24VAC30-73-170 H).
    3. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  transit users of the abutting highway where applicable and provide  accommodations to the extent possible.
    4. Based on the existing and planned developments, the  district administrator's designee will determine the need for curb and gutter,  sidewalks, or other features within the general area of the proposed entrance  in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and the design standards in  Appendix G of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A).
    5. Sites accessed by an entrance shall be designed so as to  prevent unsafe and inefficient traffic movements from impacting travel on the  abutting highway. At the request of the district administrator's designee, the  permit applicant shall furnish a report that documents the impact of expected  traffic movements upon the function of the abutting highway during the peak  hours of the abutting highway or during the peak hours of the generator,  whichever is appropriate as determined by the district administrator's  designee.
    6. The use of a shared entrance between adjacent property  owners shall be the preferred method of access.
    7. The construction of new crossovers, or the relocation, removal,  or consolidation of existing crossovers shall be approved in accordance with  the crossover location approval process specified in Appendix G of the Road  Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A). 
    B. It is essential that entrance and site design allow safe  and efficient movements of traffic using the entrance while minimizing the  impact of such movements on the operation of the systems of state highways.
    1. The permit applicant shall supply sufficient information to  demonstrate to the satisfaction of the district administrator's designee that  neither the entrance, nor the proposed traffic circulation patterns within the  parcel, will compromise the safety, use, operation, or maintenance of the  abutting highway. A rezoning traffic impact statement or a site plan/subdivision  plat supplemental traffic analysis submitted for a proposed development of a  parcel in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (see  24VAC30-73-170 J) may be used for this purpose, provided that it adequately  documents the effect of the proposed entrance and its related traffic on the  operation of the highway to be accessed.
    2. If the proposed entrance will cause the systems of state  highways to experience degradation in safety or a significant increase in delay  or a significant reduction in capacity beyond an acceptable level of service,  the applicant shall be required to submit a plan to mitigate these impacts and  to bear the costs of such mitigation measures.
    3. Proposed mitigation measures must be approved by the  district administrator's designee prior to permit approval. The district  administrator's designee will consider what improvements will be needed to  preserve the operational characteristics of the highway, accommodate the  proposed traffic and, if entrance design modifications are needed, incorporate  them accordingly to protect the transportation corridor. Mitigation measures  that may be considered include but are not limited to:
    a. Construction of auxiliary lanes or turning lanes, or  pavement transitions/tapers;
    b. Construction of new crossovers, or the relocation, removal,  or consolidation of existing crossovers;
    c. Installation, modification, or removal of traffic signals  and related traffic control equipment;
    d. Provisions to limit the traffic generated by the development  served by the proposed entrance;
    e. Dedication of additional right-of-way or easement, or both,  for future road improvements; 
    f. Reconstruction of existing roadway to provide required  vertical and horizontal sight distances; 
    g. Relocation or consolidation of existing entrances; or
    h. Recommendations from adopted corridor studies, design  studies, other access management practices and principles, or any combination  of these, not otherwise mentioned in this chapter.
    4. If an applicant is unwilling or unable to mitigate the  impacts identified in the traffic impact analysis, the entrance shall be  physically restricted to right-in or right-out movements or both or similar  restrictions such that the public interests in a safe and efficient flow of  traffic on the systems of state highways are protected.
    24VAC30-73-80. Minimum sight distance for commercial entrances.
    A. No less than minimum intersection sight distance shall be  obtained for any a commercial entrance and no less than  minimum stopping sight distance shall be obtained for a low volume commercial  entrance. Sight distances shall be measured in accordance with VDOT  practices, and sight distance requirements shall conform to VDOT standards as  described in Appendix G of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A). The  legal speed limit shall be used unless the design speed is available and  approved for use by VDOT. 
    B. The operating speed may be used in lieu of the legal speed  limit in cases where the permit applicant furnishes the district administrator's  designee with a speed study prepared in accordance with the Manual on Uniform  Traffic Control Devices (see 24VAC30-73-170 D) methodology that demonstrates  the operating speed of the segment of highway is lower than the legal speed  limit and, in the judgment of the district administrator's designee, use of the  operating speed will not compromise safety for either a driver at an entrance  or a driver on the abutting highway. 
    C. VDOT may require that the vertical or horizontal alignment  of the existing roadway be adjusted to accommodate certain design elements of a  proposed commercial entrance including, but not limited to, median openings,  crossovers, roundabouts, and traffic signals, where adjustment is deemed  necessary. The cost of any work performed to adjust the horizontal or vertical  alignment of the roadway to achieve required intersection sight distance at a  proposed entrance shall be borne by the permit applicant. 
    24VAC30-73-110. Existing commercial entrances.
    A. The tenure of a commercial entrance to any highway is  conditional. Reconstruction, relocation, commercial entrance consolidation, or  upgrading, or a combination of these, may be required at the owner's cost when  the district administrator's designee determines after review that one of the  conditions listed below exists. If the necessary changes are not made, the  entrance may be closed at the direction of the district administrator's  designee. 
    1. Safety - When the entrance has been found to be unsafe for  public use in its present condition because of physical degradation of the  entrance, increase in motor vehicle traffic, or some other safety-related  condition.
    2. Use - When traffic in and out of the entrance has changed  significantly to require modifications or reconstruction, or both. Such changes  may include, but are not limited to, changes in traffic volume or operational  characteristics of the traffic. 
    3. Maintenance - When the entrance becomes unserviceable due  to heavy equipment damage or reclamation by natural causes.
    B. VDOT will maintain the commercial entrance only within the  normal shoulder of the roadway or to the flow line of the gutter pan. The owner  shall maintain all other portions of the entrance, including entrance aprons,  curb and gutter, culvert and drainage structures.
    C. Commercial entrances may also be reviewed by the district  administrator's designee, and reconstruction, relocation, commercial entrance  consolidation, or upgrading, or a combination of these, may be required, when  any of the following occur:
    1. The property is being considered for rezoning or other  local legislative action that involves a change in use of the property.
    2. The property is subject to a site plan or subdivision plat  review.
    3. There is a change in commercial use either by the property  owner or by a tenant. 
    4. Vehicular/pedestrian circulation between adjoining  properties becomes available.
    These periodic reviews are necessary to provide both the  driver and other highway users with a safe and operationally efficient means of  travel on state highways. 
    D. The provisions of this section shall apply to low  volume commercial entrances.
    24VAC30-73-130. Drainage.
    A. Commercial and private entrances Entrances  shall be constructed so as not to impair drainage within the right-of-way and  so that surface water shall drain from the roadway.
    B. Where deemed necessary by the district administrator's  designee, a commercial entrance applicant shall provide copies of a complete  drainage layout based on a drainage study by a licensed design professional.  This layout shall clearly show how the permit applicant proposes to handle the  drainage and run-off from applicant's development.
    C. Pipe ends of culverts shall be reviewed independently by  the district administrator's designee and grading or treatment at pipe ends  shall minimize any hazard the pipe ends or structures may present to an errant  vehicle. 
    24VAC30-73-170. Documents incorporated by reference. 
    A. Road Design Manual (effective January 1, 2005, revised  October 2009), 2011.
    Note: Appendices F and G (Access Management Design Standards  for Entrances and Intersections) contains the access management standards  referenced in Chapters 863 and 928 of the 2007 Acts of Assembly and Chapters  274 and 454 of the 2008 Acts of Assembly.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    B. 2007 Road and Bridge Specifications (effective July 2008).
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    C. 2008 Road and Bridge Standards (effective June 2009).
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    D. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets  and Highways, 2003 Edition (effective December 22, 2003, revised November  2004).
           |   | Federal Highway AdministrationSuperintendent of Documents
 U.S. Government Printing Office
 P.O. Box 371954
 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954
 | 
  
    E. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,  Fifth Edition, 2004.
           |   | American Association of State Highway and Transportation    Officials (AASHTO)444 North Capitol St. N.W., Suite 225
 Washington, D.C. 20001
 | 
  
    F. Change of Limited Access Control, 24VAC30-401.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    G. Land Use Permit Regulations, 24VAC30-151.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    H. Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian  Accommodations, eff. March 18, 2004.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    I. Highway Capacity Manual, 2000.
           |   | Transportation Research Board500 Fifth Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    J. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations, 24VAC30-155.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    K. Instructional and Informational Memorandum IIM-LD-227.3,  eff. May 23, 2007.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    L. Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements, 24VAC30-92, eff.  March 9, 2009.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    M. Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
           |   | Institute of Transportation Engineers1099 14th Street N. W., Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    24VAC30-92-10. Definitions.
    The following words and terms when used in these regulations  shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates  otherwise:
    "Abandonment" in all its forms means the  legislative action reserved for and granted to the local governing body to  extinguish the public's right to a roadway under the jurisdiction of the  Virginia Department of Transportation pursuant to §§ 33.1-151 and 33.1-155  of the Code of Virginia.
    "Accessible route" means a public or private  continuous unobstructed, stable, firm and slip-resistant path connecting all  accessible elements of a facility (which may include parking access aisles,  curb ramps, crosswalks at vehicular ways, walks, ramps and lifts) that can be  approached, entered and used by persons with disabilities. An accessible route  shall, to the maximum extent feasible, coincide with the route for the general  public.
    "ADT" means average daily traffic count (see  "projected traffic").
    "Alley" means a narrow roadway segment used by  motor vehicles for access to the rear side of commercial or residential land  use, or access to auxiliary land uses and that is located within a dedicated  public way or public easement.
    "Applicable former requirements" means the 2005  Subdivision Street Requirements for developments submitted prior to July 1,  2009, and the 2009 edition of the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements for  developments submitted between July 1, 2009, and January 31, 2012, inclusive.
    "Best management practice" or "BMP"  means schedules of activities; prohibitions of practices, including both  structural and nonstructural practices; maintenance procedures; and other  management practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of surface waters and  groundwater systems from the impacts of land-disturbing activities.
    "Clear zone" means the total border area of a  roadway including, if any, parking lanes or planting strips that is  sufficiently wide for an errant vehicle to avoid a serious accident. (See the  Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and its Appendix B (1) (the  Subdivision Street Design Guide) (see 24VAC30-92-150) for  details.)
    "Commissioner" means the chief executive officer of  the Virginia Department of Transportation or his designee.
    "Complete development (land)" means the  utilization of the available areas in a manner as to realize its highest  density for the best potential use based on zoning, pending rezoning, the  adopted comprehensive plan of the governing body, or the customary use of  similar parcels of land.
    "Complete development (streets)" means the  development of a street in full compliance with all applicable provisions of  these regulations to the necessary standards of design, construction, and  public benefit requirements for the effective and efficient accommodation of  all modes of transportation generated by the complete development of the land,  both internal and external to the development.
    "Conceptual sketch" means a drawing of the proposed  development showing the location of existing and proposed land uses, any  existing and proposed transportation facilities, and any additional information  required so that the reviewer can determine the appropriate functional  classification of the proposed street or streets and verify if the calculation  of the connectivity index, if appropriate standards have been met.  
    "Connectivity index" means the number of street  segments divided by the number of intersections. Only street segments and  intersections within a network addition as well as any street segment or  intersection outside of the network addition connected to street segments  within the network addition, or that has been connected or will be connected  pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 7 to the network addition through the extension of  an existing stub out shall be used to calculate a network addition's  connectivity index.
    "Cul-de-sac" means a street with only one outlet  and having an appropriate turnaround for a safe and convenient reverse traffic  movement.
    "Dam" means an embankment or structure intended or  used to impound, retain, or store water, either as a permanent pond or as a  temporary storage facility.
    "Department" or "VDOT" means the Virginia  Department of Transportation.
    "Design speed" means a speed selected for purposes  of design and correlation of those features of a street such as curvature,  super elevation, and sight distance, upon which the safe operation of vehicles  is dependent.
    "Developer" means an individual, corporation, local  government, or registered partnership engaged in the subdivision, improvement,  or renovation of land.
    "Discontinuance," in all its forms, means the  legislative act of the Commonwealth Transportation Board, pursuant to § 33.1-150  of the Code of Virginia, that determines that a road no longer serves public  convenience warranting its maintenance with funds at the disposal of the  department.
    "District administrator" means the department  employee assigned the overall supervision of the departmental operations in one  of the Commonwealth's construction districts.
    "District administrator's designee" means the  department employee or employees designated by the district administrator to  oversee the implementation of this regulation.
    "Drainage Manual" means the department's Drainage  Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2002.
    "Dwelling unit" means a structure or part of a  structure containing sleeping, kitchen, and bathroom facilities that is  suitable for occupancy as a home or residence by one or more persons.
    "Easement" means a grant of a right to use property  of an owner for specific or limited purpose. 
    "External street segment" means a street segment  within a network addition that connects with the existing public street  network.
    "FAR" means floor area ratio, which is the ratio of  the total floor area of a building or buildings on a parcel to the size land  area of the parcel where the building or buildings are located. 
    "Functional classification" means the assigned  classification of a roadway based on the roadway's intended purpose of  providing priority to through traffic movement and access to adjoining property  as determined by the department, based on the federal system of classifying  groups of roadways according to the character of service they are intended to  provide.
    "Governing body" means the board of supervisors of  the county, but may also mean the local governing body of a town or city, if  appropriate, in the application of these requirements.
    "Intersection" means a juncture of three or more  street segments, or the terminus of a street segment, such as a cul-de-sac or  other dead end. The terminus of a stub out shall not constitute an intersection  for the purposes of this chapter. The juncture of a street with only a stub  out, and the juncture of a street with only a connection to the end of an  existing stub out, shall not constitute an intersection for the purposes of  this chapter, unless such stub out is the only facility providing service to  one or more lots within the development.
    "Level of service" means a qualitative measure  describing operational conditions within a vehicular traffic stream, and their  perception by motorists and passengers. For the purposes of these requirements,  the applicable provisions of the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2010 (VDOT) shall serve as the basis for  determining "levels of service."
    "Level terrain" means that condition where  highway sight distances, as governed by both horizontal and vertical  restrictions, are generally long or could be made so without construction  difficulty or major expense.
    "Locally controlled grade separation structure"  means a grade separation structure that does not qualify for maintenance by the  department but was established within the right-of-way of a street intended for  state maintenance.
    "Local official" means the representative of the  governing body appointed to serve as its agent in matters relating to  subdivisions and land development.
    "Multiuse trail" means a facility designed and  constructed for the purpose of providing bicycle and pedestrian transportation,  located within a dedicated public way and is anticipated to be maintained by an  entity other than the department.
    "Municipal separate storm sewer system" or  "MS4" means all separate storm sewers that are designated under  4VAC50-60-380 A 1 as municipal separate storm sewer systems located  in census urban areas. 
    "Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Management  Program" or "MS4 Program" means a management program covering the  duration of a permit for a municipal separate storm sewer system that includes  a comprehensive planning process that involves public participation and  intergovernmental coordination, to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the  maximum extent practicable, to protect water quality, and to satisfy the  appropriate water quality requirements of the Clean Water Act and corresponding  regulations and the Virginia Stormwater Management Act and attendant  regulations, using management practices, control techniques, and system, design  and engineering methods, and such other provisions that are appropriate. 
    "Network addition" means a group of interconnected  street segments and intersections shown in a plan of development that are  connected to the state highway system.
    "Parking bay" means an off-street area for parking  two or more vehicles that provides access to a public street.
    "Parking lane" means an area, generally seven or  eight feet in width, adjacent to and parallel with the travel lane of a roadway  that is used for parking vehicles.
    "Pavement Design Guide" means the Pavement Design  Guide for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia (see 24VAC30-92-150),  2009 (VDOT).
    "Permit Regulations" means the department's Land  Use Permit Regulations (see 24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-151). 
    "Phased development (streets)" means the method  outlined in 24VAC30-92-80 (phased development of streets) whereby the  acceptance of certain streets into the secondary system of state highways may  be considered before being completely developed in accordance with all  applicable requirements (e.g., two lanes of a four-lane facility are considered  for acceptance in advance of lanes three and four being finished).
    "Plan of development" means any site plat,  subdivision plan, preliminary subdivision plat, conceptual subdivision sketch,  or other engineered or surveyed drawings depicting proposed development of land  and street layout, including plans included with rezoning proposals.
    "Plans" means the standard drawings, including  profile and roadway typical section, that show the location, character,  dimensions, and details for the proposed construction of the street.
    "Planting strip" means a section of land between  the curb face and the pedestrian accommodation or shared use path.
    "Plat" means the schematic representation of the  land divided or to be divided.
    "Projected traffic" means the number of vehicles,  normally expressed in average daily traffic (ADT), forecast to travel over the  segment of the street involved.
    "Public street" means a street dedicated to public  use and available to the public's unrestricted use without regard to the  jurisdictional authority responsible for its operation and maintenance.
    "Requirements" means the design, construction,  public benefit, and related administrative considerations herein prescribed for  the acceptance of a street for maintenance by the department as part of the  secondary system of state highways.
    "Right-of-way" means the land, property, or  interest therein, usually in a strip, acquired for or devoted to a public  street designated to become part of the secondary system of state highways.
    "Roadway" means the portion of the road or street  within the limits of construction and all structures, ditches, channels, etc.,  necessary for the correct drainage thereof.
    "Secondary system of state highways" means those  public roads, streets, bridges, etc., established by a local governing body  pursuant to § 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia and subsequently accepted  by the department for supervision and maintenance under the provisions of  Articles 6 (§ 33.1-67 et seq.) and 11 (§ 33.1-150 et seq.) of Chapter  1 of Title 33.1 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Shared use path" means a facility that is designed  and constructed according to the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150),  2011 (VDOT), for the purpose of providing bicycle and pedestrian  transportation.
    "Smoothed urbanized area boundary" means the  modified area boundary of a census urbanized area as determined by the latest  U.S. decennial census and modified by appropriate state, regional, and local  government officials, and approved by the Federal Highway Administration.
    "Smoothed urban cluster boundary" means the  modified area boundary of a census urban cluster as determined by the latest  U.S. decennial census and modified by appropriate state, regional and local  government officials, and approved by the Federal Highway Administration.
    "Specifications" means the department's Road and  Bridge Specifications (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2007, revised 2011,  including related supplemental specifications and special provisions. 
    "Standards" means the applicable drawings and  related criteria contained in the department's Road and Bridge Standards (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2008, revised 2011.
    "Storm sewer system" means a conveyance or  system of conveyances and its appurtenances, including roads with drainage  systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade  channels, or storm drains.
    "Street" means any roadway that is created as part  of a plan of development, other subdivision of land, or is constructed by or at  the direction of the local governing body and is a public way for purposes of  vehicular traffic, including the entire area within the right-of-way. 
    "Street segment" means (i) a section of roadway  or alley that is between two intersections or (ii) a stub out or connection to  the end of an existing stub out. 
    "Stub out" means a transportation facility (i)  whose right-of-way terminates at a parcel abutting the development, (ii) that  consists of a short segment that is intended to serve current and future  development by providing continuity and connectivity of the public street  network, (iii) that based on the spacing between the stub out and other streets  or stub outs, and the current terrain there is a reasonable expectation that  connection with a future street is possible, and (iv) that is constructed to  the property line.
    "Subdivision" means the division of a lot, tract,  or parcel into two or more lots, plats, sites, or other divisions of land for  the purpose, whether immediate or future, of sale or of building development.  Any resubdivision of a previously subdivided tract or parcel of land shall also  be interpreted as a "subdivision." The division of a lot or parcel  permitted by § 15.2-2244 of the Code of Virginia will not be considered a  "subdivision" under this definition, provided no new road or street  is thereby established. However, any further division of such parcels shall be  considered a "subdivision."
    "Subdivision Street Design Guide" means Appendix B (1)  of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT).
    "Swale" means a broad depression within which  stormwater may drain during inclement weather, but that does not have a defined  bed or banks.
    "Total maximum daily load" or "TMDL"  is a water quality term that means the sum of the individual wasteload  allocations for point sources, load allocations (LAs) for nonpoint sources,  natural background loading and a margin of safety. TMDLs can be expressed in  terms of either mass per time, toxicity, or other appropriate measure. The TMDL  process provides for point versus nonpoint source trade-offs.
    "Traveled way" means the portion of the secondary  street designated for the movement of vehicles, exclusive of shoulders, parking  areas, turn lanes, etc.
    "Tree well" means an opening on a sidewalk,  generally abutting the curb, where a tree may be planted. 
    "VPD" means vehicles per day.
    "VPH" means vehicles per hour.
    "Wasteload allocation" or "wasteload"  or "WLA" means the portion of a receiving surface water's loading or  assimilative capacity allocated to one of its existing or future point sources  of pollution. WLAs are a type of water quality-based effluent limitation.
    "Watercourse" means a defined channel with bed and  banks within which water flows, either continuously or periodically.
    24VAC30-92-20. Applicability, effective date, and transition.
    A. Applicability. This regulation is intended to govern  secondary street development and the criteria for acceptance of these streets  by the department for subsequent maintenance. The Road Design Manual, 2011  (VDOT) and its Appendix B (1), the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) offer guidance on the design and construction features of  secondary street development and set out design parameters deemed appropriate for  most land development scenarios. However, the business of land development is  fluid and the department, in consultation with the local official, is prepared  to consider innovative transportation approaches associated with land  development proposals that are consistent with the design and connectivity  requirements of this chapter and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150), Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT).  However, when not specifically addressed in one of those documents, the  relevant requirements of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150),  2011 (VDOT), standards, specifications, the Pavement Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia, 2009  (VDOT) and associated instructions shall govern.
    These requirements apply to all streets designated to be  maintained by the department as part of the secondary system of state highways,  except for streets whose construction was funded by state highway construction  allocations. The department's review and approval shall apply only to  streets proposed for addition to the secondary system of state highways  maintained by the department. Any plans submitted for review that contain only  streets proposed for maintenance by entities other than the department may be  reviewed for general guidance at the discretion of the district administrator  but will not be officially approved. However, any such review shall not  represent the department's commitment to accept such streets for maintenance  irrespective of the quality of the construction of the street or streets.
    Any streets proposed to be privately maintained shall have a  notation on the plat and impacted deeds that clearly indicates that as a  prerequisite for the streets' future acceptance, the streets must be improved  to the department's prevailing requirements for acceptance at no cost to the  department. All notations made on plats or similar instruments pursuant to this  section shall be in accordance with § 33.1-72.2 of the Code of Virginia.
    B. Grandfathering.
    1. Streets where the street layout has been proffered pursuant  to § 15.2-2297, 15.2-2298, or 15.2-2303 of the Code of Virginia prior to March  9, 2009 February 1, 2012, shall may, at the discretion of  the developer, be considered for acceptance in accordance with the  applicable former requirements, provided the requirements of § 15.2-2307 of the  Code of Virginia have been met. This grandfathering shall not apply to any  streets where the proffered layout may be adjusted, without requiring a significant  affirmative governmental zoning action to modify such proffered conditions, to  meet the requirements of this chapter, unless a site plan, subdivision plat, or  preliminary plat relying on such proffered street layout has been submitted for  approval prior to March 9, 2009 February 1, 2012. In such  instances the grandfathering shall may, at the discretion of the  developer, apply to the applicable site plan, subdivision plat, or  preliminary subdivision plat. However, such streets may be considered for  acceptance under requirements of this chapter at the discretion of the  developer Notwithstanding any other provision of this subsection, the  grandfathering provided based upon proffers shall not be lost or adversely  impacted due to a modification of the relevant plan or plat so long as no more  than 20% (cumulative) of the original street centerline mileage is eliminated,  realigned, or added compared to the proffered layout and the modification is  not expected to result in an increase in traffic generation.
    2. Streets that are part of a recorded plat or final site plan  valid pursuant to § 15.2-2261 of the Code of Virginia and approved in  accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241 through 15.2-2245 of the Code of  Virginia prior to July 1, 2009 February 1, 2012, shall be  considered for acceptance in accordance with the applicable former requirements  as long as such plats or plans remain valid under applicable law. However, such  streets may be considered for acceptance under requirements of this chapter at  the discretion of the developer.
    3. Streets that are part of a preliminary subdivision plat  valid pursuant to § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia approved in accordance  with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241 through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia prior  to July 1, 2009 February 1, 2012, shall be considered for  acceptance in accordance with the applicable former requirements for a period  of up to five years or such longer period as such preliminary subdivision plat  is valid under applicable law, provided the requirements of § 15.2-2260 of the  Code of Virginia have been met. Such grandfathering shall apply to construction  plans, site plans, and final plats submitted and approved in furtherance of  such preliminary subdivision plat for as long as such plans or plats remain valid  under applicable law. However, such streets may be considered for acceptance  under requirements of this chapter at the discretion of the developer.
    4. Streets that are part of a street construction plan  approved by the department prior to July 1, 2009 February 1, 2012,  shall be considered for acceptance in accordance with the applicable former  requirements. However, such streets may be considered for acceptance under  requirements of this chapter at the discretion of the developer.
    5. When the local governing body takes an action that  modifies the applicable area types (see 24VAC30-92-50 for further details on  area type) within such locality or the applicable area type changes due to  adjustments in smoothed urbanized areas, urban cluster boundaries, or metropolitan  planning organization study area boundaries, the following shall apply for  development proposals approved after March 9, 2009.
    a. Streets where the layout was proffered pursuant to § 15.2-2297, 15.2-2298, or 15.2-2303 of the Code of Virginia prior to the  modification of the applicable area type shall be considered for acceptance in  accordance with the requirements of the former area type for a period of up to  10 years, provided the requirements of § 15.2-2307 of the Code of Virginia have  been met. This subsection shall not apply to any streets where the proffered  layout may be adjusted, without requiring a significant affirmative  governmental zoning action to modify such proffered conditions, to meet the  requirements of this chapter, unless a site plan, subdivision plat, or  preliminary plat relying on such proffered street layout has been submitted for  approval prior to March 9, 2009. In such instances the grandfathering shall  apply to the applicable site plan, subdivision plat, or preliminary subdivision  plat. However, such streets may be considered for acceptance under the modified  applicable area type at the discretion of the developer.
    b. Streets that are part of recorded plat or final site  plan pursuant to § 15.2-2261 of the Code of Virginia approved prior to the  modification of the applicable area type shall be considered for acceptance in  accordance with the requirements of the former area type for a period of up to  five years or such longer period as such recorded plat or final site plan is valid  under applicable law. However, such streets may be considered for acceptance  under the modified applicable area type at the discretion of the developer.
    c. Streets that are part of preliminary subdivision plat  pursuant to § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia approved prior to the  modification of the applicable area type shall be considered for acceptance in  accordance with the requirements of the former area type for a period of up to  five years or such longer period as such preliminary subdivision plat is valid  under applicable law. Such grandfathering shall apply to future construction  plans, site plans, and final plats approved in furtherance of such preliminary  plat for so long as such plans or plats remain valid under applicable law.  However, such streets may be considered for acceptance under the modified  applicable area type at the discretion of the developer.
    d. Streets that are part of a street construction plan  approved by the department prior to the modification of the applicable area  type shall be considered for acceptance in accordance with the requirements of  the former area type for a period of up to five years. However, such streets  may be considered for acceptance under the modified applicable area type at the  discretion of the developer.
    6. 5. If requested by the applicable locality,  the provisions of this subsection applicable former requirements  shall apply if the applicant has submitted at a minimum a conceptual sketch  that includes all of the elements required under 24VAC30-92-70 A prior to July  1, 2009 February 1, 2012. Subdivisions 1 through 5 4  of this subsection shall take precedence over this subdivision in any instances  of a conflict. 
    C. Effective date. All streets proposed for acceptance by the  department after March 9, 2009 January 1, 2012, shall be  considered for acceptance in accordance with this chapter, except as provided  for in subsection D of this section and as may be waived by the  commissioner pursuant to this chapter.
    D. Transition. Prior to July 1, 2009 February 1,  2012, the department will consider complete plats and plans developed in  accordance with either the applicable former requirements or  these requirements. Any plat or plan initially submitted to the department for  consideration after June 30, 2009 January 31, 2012, however,  shall be in accordance with these requirements.
    24VAC30-92-50. Area type thresholds. (Repealed.)
    A. Area type thresholds. There are three area types  established for secondary streets in the Commonwealth. Within each area type,  streets must meet the applicable design and public benefit requirements to be  eligible for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways. For the  purposes of this chapter the following area types shall determine the design  and public benefit requirements that apply to streets and network additions.
    1. Compact Area Type. The Compact Area Type shall apply  when any part of a network addition meets one or more of the following  criteria:
    a. Located within a locally designated urban development  area pursuant to § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of Virginia, or within an area  designated by an adopted local comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2223 of  the Code of Virginia as a village, town, or other growth area;
    b. Located within a smoothed urbanized area boundary;
    c. Located within an area designated by the local  government, by ordinance or by the adopted local comprehensive plan pursuant to  § 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia, to be subject to the Compact Area Type  requirements of this chapter provided such area is designated in the adopted  local comprehensive plan as an area for compact development with median lot  sizes no greater than 1/2 acre; 
    d. Located within a locally designated transfer of  development rights receiving area pursuant to § 15.2-2316.1 of the Code of  Virginia; or
    e. Located within a smoothed urban cluster boundary.
    2. Suburban Area Type. The Suburban Area Type shall apply  when any part of a network addition meets one or more of the following criteria  and does not meet any of the Compact Area Type criteria:
    a. Located outside a smoothed urbanized area boundary but  within an official Metropolitan Planning Organization Study Area;
    b. Located within a two-mile radius of a locally designated  urban development area pursuant to § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of Virginia;
    c. Located within a two-mile radius of a smoothed urban  cluster boundary;
    d. Located within a locally designated cluster development  pursuant to § 15.2-2286.1 of the Code of Virginia; or
    e. Located within an area not subject to the Compact Area  Type criteria that is designated by the local government, by ordinance or by  the adopted local comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2223 of the Code of  Virginia, to be subject to the Suburban Area Type requirements of this chapter  provided such area is designated in the adopted local comprehensive plan as an  area for suburban development with median lot sizes no greater than two acres.
    3. The Rural Area Type. The Rural Area Type shall apply in  all other areas of the Commonwealth.
    B. Modifications to the area type thresholds. Area type  perimeters shall be consistent with all planning boundaries listed within  subsection A of this section, except as may be allowed within this subsection.  Where the area type boundaries have been determined by a smoothed urbanized  area, smoothed urban cluster, metropolitan planning organization study area, or  within two miles of a smoothed urban cluster, and local governing body requests  that the current area type designation differ from the above stated planning  boundaries, the department will review such amendments related to a  modification to the area type. Approval of such modification requests is not  assured and will be reviewed on an individual basis. The commissioner, upon  receipt of a resolution from the local governing body, for good cause shown may  determine that an area type for a specific area within the local jurisdiction  should be modified to a different area type or that any of the requirements of  24VAC30-92-60 should be modified to the requirements of a different area type. The  commissioner shall consider and review the permissible parcel sizes and uses to  ensure that the area is indeed being regulated in such manner that necessitates  a change in area type. The department will notify the local government within  45 calendar days of the commissioner's final decision. Any such modification of  area type designations shall cease to apply if the zoning of the area is  altered in a manner that is inconsistent with the local government's original  request for the modification of the area type and that alters the type and  density of land uses permitted.
    C. Area type designation. At such time as the local  governing body or the metropolitan planning organization amend the boundaries  of one or more of the planning boundaries listed in subsection A of this  section, the department will recognize such amendments and revise the related  area type designation accordingly. When such local decision is made, the local  governing body or metropolitan planning organization shall provide the  department with a copy of any duly adopted ordinance or resolution that affects  one of the planning boundary criteria listed in this section and impacts the  area type designations within such locality or metropolitan planning  organization study boundary based on the thresholds in this section as well as  maps that show the affected areas as soon as practicable. Modifications to the  area type designations based on any ordinance or resolution duly adopted  between January 1 and June 30 of any year by a locality or metropolitan  planning organization shall become effective on October 1 of that year.  Modifications to the area type designations based on any ordinance or  resolution duly adopted between July 1 and December 31 of any year shall become  effective on April 1 of the next year.
    24VAC30-92-60. Public benefit requirements.
    A. Public benefit. A street or network addition may only be  accepted by the department for maintenance as part of the secondary system of  state highways if it provides sufficient public benefit to justify perpetual  public maintenance as defined by this chapter. A street shall be considered to  provide sufficient public benefit if it meets or exceeds the public service,  pedestrian accommodation, and connectivity requirements of the applicable  area type of this chapter.
    B. Public service requirements. In the event the governing  body requests the addition of a street or network addition before it meets  these public service provisions, the district administrator will review each  request on an individual case basis and determine if the acceptance of a street  prior to normal service requirements is justified, provided the street or  network addition meets all other applicable requirements including the  connectivity requirements of this chapter. At the request of the local  governing body, subject to approval by the district administrator, the public  service requirements may be reduced for individual streets serving state or  local economic development projects.
    1. Individual streets. For the purpose of these requirements without  regard to applicable area type, public service may include, but is not  necessarily limited to, streets meeting one or more of the following  situations:
    a. Serves three or more occupied units with a unit being a  single-family residence, owner-occupied apartment, owner-occupied residence in  a qualifying manufactured home park, a stand-alone business, or single business  entity occupying an individual building, or other similar facility. Also,  streets serving manufactured home parks may only be considered when the land  occupied by the manufactured home is in fee simple ownership by the residents  of such manufactured home.
    b. Constitutes a connecting segment between other streets that  qualify from the point of public service.
    c. Such street is a stub out.
    d. Serves as access to schools, churches, public sanitary  landfills, transfer stations, public recreational facilities, or similar  facilities open to public use.
    e. Serves at least 100 vehicles per day generated by an office  building, industrial site, or other similar nonresidential land use in advance  of the occupancy of three or more such units of varied proprietorship. Any  addition under this provision shall be limited to the segment of a street that  serves this minimum projected traffic and has been developed in compliance with  these requirements.
    f. Constitutes a part of the network of streets envisioned in  the transportation plan or element of a locality's comprehensive plan that, at  the time of acceptance, serves an active traffic volume of at least 100  vehicles per day.
    2. Multifamily, townhouse, and retail shopping complexes. A  through street that serves a multifamily building may be considered for  maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways if it is deemed  by the department to provide a public service and provided it is well defined  and the district administrator's designee determines that it is not a travel  way through a parking lot. 
    Entrance streets and the internal traffic circulation systems  of retail shopping complexes qualify only if more than three property owners  are served and the street is well defined and separated from the parking  areas district administrator's designee determines that it is not a  travel way through a parking lot.
    3. Network additions. A network addition shall be considered  to provide service if each street within the addition meets at least one of the  criteria in subdivision 1 of this subsection.
    4. Special exceptions. There may be other sets of  circumstances that could constitute public service. Consequently, any request  for clarification regarding unclear situations should be made in writing to the  district administrator's designee. 
    C. Connectivity requirements. All street segments streets  in a development as shown in a plan of development shall be considered for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways as one or multiple  network additions. However, streets with a functional classification of  collector and above may be eligible for acceptance as individual streets.
    For the purposes of this subsection, connection shall mean a  street connection to adjacent property or a stub out that will allow for future  street connection to an adjacent property. 
    If a stub out or stub outs maintained by the department  adjoin the property of a development with a network addition or individual  street proposed for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways,  such network addition or individual street must connect to such stub out or  stub outs to be eligible for acceptance into the secondary system of state  highways. Local street stub outs generally should not exceed 500 feet in  length. The applicant shall post a sign in accordance with the department's  standards that indicates that such stub out is a site for a future roadway  connection. 
    Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as to prohibit  a stub out from providing service to lots within a development. 
    The connectivity requirements of this chapter shall not apply  to the following: a frontage road or reverse frontage road as defined in the Access  Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (see 24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-72)  or Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials, Collectors, and Local  Streets (24VAC-30-73), streets petitioned for acceptance into the secondary  system of state highways through the Rural Addition Program pursuant to §§ 33.1-72.1  and 33.1-72.2 of the Code of Virginia, or streets petitioned for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways through the Commonwealth  Transportation Board's Rural Addition Policy provided such streets were  constructed prior to March 9, 2009, or streets constructed or improved  pursuant to §§ 33.1-221 and 33.1-223 of the Code of Virginia January 1,  2012.
    1. Compact standard. Stub out connection standard.  If a stub out or stub outs maintained by the department adjoin the property of  a development with a network addition or individual street proposed for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways, such network addition  or individual street must connect to such stub out or stub outs to be eligible  for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways. The district  administrator may waive this requirement if the existing stub out is of such  design as to make such a connection unsafe. 
    2. Multiple connections in multiple directions standard.  The streets within a network addition may be accepted into the secondary system  of state highways if the network addition meets the following requirements:  
    a. The streets are designed and constructed in compliance  with the compact design standards pursuant to this chapter, the Road Design  Manual, and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150); 
    b. The network addition provides sufficient connections in  multiple directions and to multiple properties, if applicable, to local and higher  order roadways to provide an overall connectivity index of 1.6 or higher. All  network additions shall have a minimum of two connections; and 
    c. The block layout and other features of the development  are designed in such a fashion as to provide reasonably direct pedestrian  movement throughout the development and to adjoining property. 
    provides at least two external connections, one of which  must be to a publicly maintained highway and the other providing a connection  to a different highway or a stub out to an adjoining property. Local street  stub outs generally should not exceed 500 feet in length. If a stub out is  constructed, the applicant shall post a sign in accordance with the  department's standards that indicates that such stub out is a site for a future  roadway connection. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as to prohibit a  stub out from providing service to lots within a development. The district  administrator's designee shall waive or modify the second required connection  of this standard if one or more of the following situations renders the  provision of such connection impracticable:
    a. The adjoining property is completely built out, its  state is such that redevelopment within 20 years is unlikely, and there is no  stub out (either constructed or platted) to the property served by the network  addition;
    b. The adjoining property is zoned for a use whose traffic  is incompatible with the development being served by the network addition,  providing, however, that in no case shall retail, residential, or office uses  be considered incompatible with other retail, residential, or office uses; or
    c. There is no reasonable connection possible to adjoining  property or adjacent highways due to a factor outside the control of the  developer of the network addition, such as the presence of conservation  easements not put in place by the developer of the network addition, water  features such as rivers or lakes, jurisdictional wetlands, grades in excess of  15% whose total elevation change is greater than five feet, limited access  highways, railroads, or government property to which access is restricted.
    2. Suburban 3. Additional connections standard. The  streets within a network addition Network additions providing direct  access to (i) more than 200 dwelling units or (ii) lots whose trip generation  is expected to be over 2,000 VPD may be accepted into the secondary system  of state highways if the network addition meets the following requirements: 
    a. The streets are designed and constructed in compliance  with the suburban design standards pursuant to this chapter, the Road Design  Manual, and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150);
    b. The network addition provides sufficient connections in  multiple directions and to multiple properties, if applicable, to local and  higher order roadways to provide an overall connectivity index of 1.4 or  higher. All network additions shall have a minimum of two connections; and 
    c. The block layout and other features of the development  are designed in such a fashion as to provide reasonably direct pedestrian  movement throughout the development and to adjoining property.
    3. Rural standard. The streets within a network addition  may be accepted into the secondary system of state highways if the network  addition meets the following requirements: 
    a. The streets are designed and constructed in compliance  with the rural design standards pursuant to this chapter, the Road Design  Manual, and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150); and 
    b. The network addition provides multiple connections to  adjacent properties or streets in varying directions.
    provides an additional external connection beyond that  required under subdivision 2 of this subsection for each additional 200  dwelling units or 2,000 VPD or portion of each over and above the initial 200  dwelling units or 2,000 VPD. For the purposes of this requirement, each  external connection of collector facilities that are elements of the county's  transportation plan and to which there is no direct lot access provided counts  as two external connections. The district administrator's designee shall waive  or modify this additional connections standard if one or more of the following  situations renders the provision of such connection impracticable:
    a. The adjoining property is completely built out, its  state is such that redevelopment within 20 years is unlikely, and there is no  stub out (either constructed or platted) to the property served by the network  addition; 
    b. The adjoining property is zoned for a use whose traffic  is incompatible with the development being served by the network addition,  providing, however, that in no case shall retail, residential, or office uses  be considered incompatible with retail, residential, or office uses;
    c. In developments with a median density of more than eight  lots per acre or with a FAR of 0.4 or higher, where the number of connections  provided would be contrary to the public interest; or
    d. There is no reasonable connection possible to adjoining  property or adjacent highways due to a factor outside the control of the  developer of the network addition, such as the presence of conservation  easements not put in place by the developer of the network addition, water  features such as rivers or lakes, jurisdictional wetlands, grades in excess of  15% whose total elevation change is greater than five feet, limited access  highways, railroads, or government property to which access is restricted.
    4. Individual street standard. Streets that are not part of a  network addition shall be accepted into the secondary system of state highways  upon petition by the local governing body as long as they meet the requirements  of the applicable design standard and both termini one terminus  of the street are intersections is an intersection with a roadway  or roadways that are is part of the existing publicly  maintained highway network, subject to the connectivity exceptions of  subdivision 5 of this subsection and the other terminus is either an  intersection with a roadway that is part of the existing publicly maintained  highway network or a stub out to an adjoining property. Streets considered  for individual acceptance should be (i) streets that provide a connection  between two existing publicly maintained streets, or (ii) streets  with a functional classification as collector or higher, (iii) a frontage  road or reverse frontage road pursuant to VDOT's Access Management Regulations:  Principal Arterials (see 24VAC30-92-150), (iv) streets petitioned for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways through the Rural  Addition Program pursuant to §§ 33.1-72.1 and 33.1-72.2 of the Code of Virginia  provided such street was constructed prior to March 9, 2009, (v) streets  petitioned for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways through  the Commonwealth Transportation Board's Rural Addition Policy provided such  street was constructed prior to March 9, 2009, or (vi) streets constructed or  improved pursuant to §§ 33.1-221 and 33.1-223 of the Code of Virginia.
    5. Connectivity exceptions. 
    a. The connectivity index requirement for a network  addition shall be reduced where a portion of the perimeter features one or more  of the following constraints: (i) railroad tracks; (ii) limited access highway;  (iii) an existing navigable river or a standing body of water with a depth  greater than four feet under normal conditions; (iv) terrain grades in excess  of 20%; and (v) government-owned property with restrictions upon development  such as military installations, parks in existence prior to the submission of the  development proposal for the network addition, and land under conservation  easements accepted by the Virginia Outdoors Foundation.
    The connectivity index shall be reduced based on the  percentage of the perimeter that features one or more constraints. In compact  area types, the connectivity index requirement shall be equal to 1.6 minus 0.6  times the ratio of the length of the perimeter that features one or more  constraints to the total length of the perimeter. In suburban area types, the  connectivity index requirement shall be equal to 1.4 minus 0.4 times the ratio  of the length of the perimeter that features one or more constraints to the  total length of the perimeter. 
    b. The Where the above standards for waiver or  modification or both have been met, the connectivity index requirement  requirements for a network addition may shall be reduced  waived or modified by the district administrator administrator's  designee. The developer shall submit any other request for  connectivity exceptions waiver or modification to the district  administrator's designee with a copy to the local official. The district  administrator's designee shall respond to requests for connectivity exceptions  within 45 30 calendar days of receipt of a request. For projects  where a scoping meeting pursuant to the Traffic Impact Analysis regulations  (24VAC30-155) will be held, requests for exceptions and supporting data should  be presented and discussed. The district administrator's designee may modify  the connectivity index requirements for one or more of the following criteria: 
    (1) If the locality's comprehensive plan designates  adjoining parcels to the proposed development for a land use that is determined  by the local official to be incompatible with the land use of the proposed  development. If the connectivity index requirement is modified due to  incompatible land use, such network additions shall provide stub out or stub  outs, as determined by the district administrator's designee based on the size  of the development, to allow for future connectivity in the event that the  comprehensive plan changes the designation of adjacent parcels to land use that  is not incompatible. In no instance shall any retail, office, or residential  land use be considered incompatible land use with any proposed retail, office,  or residential development.
    (2) Good cause is shown that such requirement cannot be met  due to unique characteristics of the parcel being developed such as  jurisdictional wetlands or cluster subdivisions developed pursuant to § 15.2-2286.1 of the Code of Virginia. 
    6. In instances where there is potential for conflict between  this chapter and the Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (see  24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-72) or the Access Management Regulations:  Minor Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets (see 24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-73),  the following shall apply.:
    a. For streets with a functional classification of collector  where additional connections necessary to meet the connectivity index  requirement requirements of this chapter cannot be accommodated  within the applicable spacing standards and cannot otherwise be met through  connections to lower order roadways or stub outs, such spacing standards shall  be modified by the district administrator administrator's designee  to allow for such connection. Such connection or connections shall be required  to meet intersection sight distance standards specified in the Road Design  Manual, 2011 (VDOT) (see 24VAC30-92-150).
    b. For streets with a functional classification of minor  arterial where additional connections necessary to meet the connectivity index  requirement requirements of this chapter cannot be accommodated  within the applicable spacing standards and cannot otherwise be met through  connections to lower order roadways or stub outs, the district administrator  administrator's designee shall, in consultation with the developer and  the local official, either modify the applicable spacing standards to allow for  such connection or connections, or modify the connectivity index requirement  requirements of this chapter to account for the inability to make such  connection. Such connection shall be required to meet intersection sight  distance as specified in the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) (see  24VAC30-92-150).
    c. For streets with a functional classification of principal  arterial where additional connections necessary to meet the external  connectivity requirements of this chapter cannot be accommodated within the  applicable spacing standards and cannot otherwise be met through connections to  lower order roadways or stub outs, the connectivity index requirement requirements  shall be modified by the district administrator administrator's  designee to account for the inability to make such connection.
    7. Failure to connect. As a local governing body is not  required to approve a subdivision plat that does not connect to stub outs in  adjacent developments, when If a local government approves a  subdivision plat for a new development that does not connect to a stub out or  stub outs in an adjacent development and such development's network addition or  individual street would meet the applicable requirements of this chapter if it  connected to a stub out or stub outs in the adjacent development, the network  addition or individual street may or may not be accepted into the  secondary system of state highways for maintenance pursuant to the authority  granted to the district administrators in accordance with 24VAC30-92-100. In  such event the department representative's and the commissioner's top priority  for expenditure of improvements funds for such locality's six-year plan for  secondary highways shall be to connect the street or streets in the recently  accepted network addition or individual street to the stub out or stub outs in  the adjacent developments in addition to safety.
    24VAC30-92-70. Administrative procedure.
    A. Conceptual sketch. A conceptual sketch of the development  that shows sufficient information for the department to review and concur with  the proposed functional classification for each street in the development shall  be provided to the district administrator's designee by the local official  prior to preparing detailed construction plans for review. Any preliminary or  conceptual plat, plan or sketch that conforms to the locality's zoning  requirements or subdivision ordinance is acceptable if the information required  by this subsection is shown. The submittal should include:
    1. The general location and configuration, including the  terminus, of each street, and the traffic volume anticipated when the land  served is fully developed in accordance with the land uses anticipated.
    2. The location, area, and density or floor area ratio (FAR)  of each type of proposed land use within the development.
    3. The location of any proposed transportation facility including  any public transportation facilities as well as bicycle and pedestrian  accommodations within the development's boundaries included in the  comprehensive plan of the governing body.
    4. The proposed functional classification for each street in  the development.
    5. The connectivity index of the network addition as  proposed, if applicable.
    6. The location of stub outs on adjoining property and the  existing land use of such adjacent property, if applicable, and the location of  any proposed stub outs within the network addition, if applicable.
    7. Any reductions to waiver or modification of  the connectivity requirement requirements or pending requests  therefore pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 5 a and approved modifications to  the connectivity requirement pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 5 b.
    8. Any requests for modifications to the connectivity  requirement pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 5 b. 
    9. 8. General preliminary information on the  type of any stormwater management facilities that are storm sewer  system, such as BMP, outfalls, or conveyance channels, that is proposed to  be located within the right-of-way as described in 24VAC30-92-120 L 2 and if  the project is located in a MS4 regulated area or a TMDL watershed. 
    10. 9. Other available information pertinent to  the intended development, including but not limited to any proposed phased  development of streets pursuant to 24VAC30-92-80.
    B. Conceptual sketch review. The district administrator's  designee will review the layout and functional classification of streets shown  in the concept sketch and within 45 calendar days notify the local official in  writing, as well as the developer, if applicable, of his concurrence or  recommendations and whether or not the streets in the proposed network addition  meet the connectivity and other requirements of this chapter. This concurrence  will be valid as long as the basic concept for the development, including the  general street layout and design, as submitted for review, remains unchanged.  The district administrator's designee shall also review any unresolved request  for modifications to the connectivity index requirement requirements  and include his decision in the written notification to the local official and  the developer. As part of his review, the district administrator's designee shall  review the provision of collector and other higher order streets and if  necessary make recommendations for the provision of such streets to address the  traffic generated by the development.
    C. Plan of development submission. Plats or plans, or both,  together with other pertinent data as herein prescribed, shall be submitted to  the local official in accordance with the practices of the local government and  to the district administrator's designee for all proposed developments whose  streets are intended to be added to the secondary system of state highways  maintained by the department. The district administrator's designee may,  subject to the availability of staff and upon the request of the local  official, cooperate in the review of proposed developments to be developed to  these standards but not initially intended for addition to the secondary system  of state highways maintained by the department. The department may recover the  costs for this service in accordance with 24VAC30-92-140.
    D. Plan review. Upon receipt of the plats or plans, or both,  the district administrator's designee will arrange for the appropriate review  to determine compliance with the requirements of this chapter and other  applicable VDOT requirements. The general procedure for this review is  described in the guidance document Guidance Document for the  Commonwealth Transportation Board's Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT).
    E. Plan approval. The district administrator's designee will  advise the appropriate local official and the developer, if applicable, as to  the results of the review.
    1. If the street development proposed by the plats or plans,  or both, is determined to be in compliance with these requirements, the  district administrator's designee will provide written confirmation of this  finding. This action signifies the district administrator's designee's approval  of the street layout and design shown on the plats or plans, as submitted. Any  subsequent revision, additions, or deletions thereto shall require specific  written approval of the district administrator's designee for each such change.
    2. If a revision of the submitted plats or plans is determined  necessary, the district administrator's designee will list the required changes  in a written response to the local official and the developer, if applicable.  Upon completion of the specified revisions, the plats or plans will be  resubmitted for review and approval by the district administrator's designee.
    The department's approval of a street construction plan shall  constitute its commitment to accept the street or network addition depicted  thereon when all applicable provisions of these requirements are satisfied and  the streets have been constructed according to the approved construction plan and  supporting specifications. However, during the department's or other approved  inspection of construction as specified by this chapter, if a situation is  discovered that was not addressed on the approved plan that could, in the  opinion of the district administrator's designee, adversely affect public  safety or the integrity of either the roadway or the adjacent property,  acceptance of the street or network addition shall be deferred until the  situation is corrected.
    The department's approval of a street construction plan shall  expire after a period of five years if construction has not commenced, in which  case the subdivision street construction plan shall be resubmitted for  subsequent review and approval. This shall not affect the adequacy of the  approved concept plan as depicted on a recorded final plat, as provided for  under § 15.2-2241 of the Code of Virginia.
    Network additions will only be accepted when the entire  network addition has been constructed, except in such instances where the  constructed portion meets the applicable public benefit requirements of this  chapter.
    F. Street acceptance. Upon the satisfactory completion of  construction of the street or streets in a network addition, the department  will advise the local governing body regarding the street or network addition's  readiness for acceptance and the local governing body, in consultation with the  district administrator's designee, will initiate its acceptance into the  secondary system of state highways maintained by the department provided:
    1. The developer dedicates the prescribed right-of-way to  public use.
    2. The street has or streets in the network addition have been  constructed in accordance with the applicable specifications, standards and the  plats or plans approved by the department.
    a. Traffic control markings, signs, and devices have been  installed in accordance with VDOT standards, specifications, and practices.
    b. Speed limits have been set in accordance with Article 8 (§ 46.2-870  et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title 46.2 of the Code of Virginia. For any streets  with speed limits different from those set out in § 46.2-870 or §§ 46.2-873  through 46.2-875 of the Code of Virginia, traffic engineering investigations  supporting such speed limits have been submitted to VDOT. 
    3. The developer furnishes all required information and data  to the district administrator's designee and the local government official  pertaining to the development's stormwater management system that are pertinent  to the locality's, department's, or other entity's Municipal Separate Storm  Sewer System (MS4) permit, if applicable. 
    4. The street or streets in a network addition provides  sufficient public benefit as prescribed in 24VAC30-92-60 and meets the  requirements of this chapter.
    5. The street or streets in the network addition has been  properly maintained since its completion.
    6. The developer furnishes the surety and fees in accordance  with 24VAC30-92-140.
    7. The governing body has or other responsible  parties have executed all agreements prescribed by these requirements,  unless specifically waived on an individual case basis by the department  employee, or his successor or his designee, responsible for overseeing these  requirements and the final acceptance of streets as part of the secondary  system of state highways maintained by the department.
    8. The governing body, by proper resolution, requests the  department to accept the street or streets in the network addition for  maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways under its  jurisdiction. The resolution shall include the governing body's guarantee of an  unrestricted and unencumbered right-of-way as dedicated, plus any necessary  easements for fills, drainage, or sight distance.
    Upon the department's determination that the requested street  or network addition is in compliance with the applicable provisions of these  requirements, the governing body will be officially advised of the street or  network addition's acceptance into the secondary system of state highways and  the effective date of such action. This notification serves as the district  administrator's designee's authority to begin maintenance thereon.
    24VAC30-92-80. Phased development of streets.
    A. Policy. Certain streets that require four or more travel  lanes to accommodate the projected traffic may be accepted by the department  for maintenance after completion of the first two lanes to an acceptable,  initial phase of construction, upon the request of the governing body. It is  recognized that there is a distinction between those streets that benefit the  regional transportation network and those that primarily serve the development  of land and local traffic, and, therefore, the criteria for phased construction  for each situation differs as described in subsection B of this section.
    However, in all cases, the right-of-way required for the road  at its complete stage of construction shall be dedicated and accepted as part  of the initial street acceptance. In addition, the initial phase of  construction shall be designed and constructed to facilitate construction of  the remaining phase in a manner that will avoid the need to reconstruct the  initial two lanes.
    Consideration for the acceptance of any street under the  provisions of this section shall be limited to the phased development of only  the street's roadway. All other applicable requirements, e.g., public benefit,  drainage easements, and administrative procedures, shall apply.
    B. Criteria.
    1. For streets included in the transportation plan of the  locality's comprehensive plan that serve diverse areas of the region or  locally, no special agreement or acknowledgement is needed as a prerequisite to  acceptance, provided: 
    a. The street is part of a transportation corridor that was  formally adopted as a part of the locality's comprehensive transportation plan  prior to the local governing body's approval of the plat or plan for the  development of the adjacent land.
    b. The transportation corridor is a major thoroughfare planned  primarily to move through traffic.
    c. When fully developed the street must satisfy the department's  functional classification criteria as a major collector or higher.
    d. The street has a projected traffic volume of 8,000 vehicles  per day or less for a period of 10 years following the date of the acceptance  for maintenance by the department.
    2. For all other streets, the local governing body's  resolution requesting acceptance of the initial two-lane section must include  provisions that acknowledge:
    a. The local governing body agrees that all costs incurred in  the street's complete construction, including right-of-way, engineering,  utility adjustment, etc., shall be provided from funds other than those derived  from state revenue sources administered by the department, except as may be  expressly authorized by the department.
    b. The local governing body agrees that it is its  responsibility to ensure that the roadway is completed as needed to accommodate  the traffic. However, the locality also acknowledges that a determination that  the street needs to be completed to its ultimate section will be made by the  district administrator's designee once it is determined that the first two  lanes will not sustain an acceptable level of service for the functional  classification of the roadway in accordance with the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2010 (TRB).
    C. Procedures.
    1. Plats or plans, or both, for the street's complete  development, in accordance with all applicable provisions of these  requirements, shall be submitted for approval.
    2. The plats or plans shall also delineate the street's initial  development as proposed pursuant to this section. In no case shall this design  provide less than one-half of the roadway typical section required by the  applicable requirements for the street's complete development.
    3. Unless waived by the district administrator's designee, a  capacity analysis shall be submitted to document that an acceptable level of  service will be maintained for the intended duration of the initial phase of  development. In determining an acceptable level of service, the beneficial effect  of the proposed street on the overall transportation network will be  considered.
    4. A determination will be made by the department in  consultation with the locality as to whether the street can be approved for  phased development and as to which criterion in subsection B of this section  applies.
    5. Upon the district administrator's designee's determination  that the proposal is in compliance with the applicable provisions of this  section, the plans may be approved accordingly.
    6. Upon completion of the street's initial phase in accordance  with approved plans, its compliance with all other applicable provisions of  this section, and the inclusion of the appropriate language in the resolution,  the street may be accepted for maintenance by the department as part of the  secondary system of state highways.
    24VAC30-92-110. Appeal to district administrator.
    The district administrator is authorized to consider and  render a ruling on unresolved differences of opinion between the developer and  the district administrator's designee that pertain to the interpretation and  application of these requirements.
    To obtain this review, the developer shall provide the  district administrator, the district administrator's designee, and the local  official a written request for such action, describing any unresolved issue.  After reviewing all pertinent information, the district administrator will  advise the developer in writing regarding the decision of the appeal, and  provide a copy of the decision to the local official and the district  administrator's designee. All correspondence requesting an appeal should  include copies of all prior correspondence with the local official and  department representatives regarding the issue or issues. The district  administrator shall advise the developer of the decision on the appeal within 45  30 calendar days. 
    The developer may request a meeting with the district  administrator concerning the appeal, and the district administrator shall  respond within 10 business days and provide to the developer a date, time, and  location for such meeting. After reviewing all pertinent information, the  district administrator shall advise the developer in writing regarding the  decision on the appeal, and provide a copy of the decision to the district  administrator's designee and the local official.
    The district administrator shall advise the developer of  the decision on the unresolved differences of opinion within 45 calendar days.  The developer may further appeal the district administrator's decision to  the commissioner. All correspondence requesting an appeal should include copies  of all prior correspondence with the local official and department  representatives regarding the issue or issues. The commissioner shall advise  the developer of the decision on the appeal within 30 calendar days.
    24VAC30-92-120. Design and agreement requirements.
    A. General requirements. Most criteria addressing the design  of new streets can be found in the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and its  Appendix B (1), the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150).  However, the following provisions are provided for guidance, particularly in  regard to features that require agreements or formal acknowledgements of the  governing body before VDOT's acceptance of the street or streets within a development.
    When an agreement is required between the local governing  body and the department as a prerequisite to the acceptance of a street,  nothing in these requirements shall preclude the local governing body from  entering into separate agreements with other entities to fulfill its  responsibilities. However, if the provisions are intended to ensure the safety  of the public using the street, the department reserves the right to approve  the involvement of the other party or parties.
    All streets functionally classified as local shall have a  design speed equal to the posted speed limit, except for streets functionally  classified as local with a projected traffic volume of 400 vehicles per day or  less, which may have a design speed less than the posted speed limit.
    The department, locality, and developer shall take measures  to minimize the impacts of through traffic on streets functionally classified  as local and accepted into the secondary system of state highways under these  regulations. Such measures shall include initial street designs that manage  motor vehicle speed to match local context.
    B. Geometric requirements. Geometric requirements for new  streets are established in the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and its  Appendix B (1), the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150).  Sufficient off-street parking must be provided by the local governing body in  accordance with this chapter if streets in a proposed network addition are  constructed in accordance with design requirements for streets with off-street  parking.
    C. Turn lanes. Left or right turn lanes shall be provided at  intersections when the department determines that projected turning movements  warrant their installation. These facilities shall be designed in accordance  with the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and its Appendix B (1),  the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) and, if  necessary, additional right-of-way shall be provided to accommodate these  facilities.
    D. Pavement structure.
    1. Pavement design. The pavement structure for new streets  shall be in accordance with the Pavement Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150)  for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia, 2009 (VDOT), including  any prescribed underdrains. Prior to construction of the pavement sub-base and  finish courses, the district administrator's designee shall approve the  proposed pavement design.
    2. Special pavement surfaces. The district administrator's  designee may approve special pavement surfaces, such as the use of stamped  pavement. However, if the pavement design is a type not addressed by the  Pavement Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) for Subdivision and  Secondary Roads in Virginia, 2009 (VDOT), an agreement shall be provided by  the governing body that addresses the future maintenance of such pavement.
    3. Pavement additions to existing streets. When an existing  VDOT-maintained roadway is to be widened to accommodate additional lanes or the  addition of turn lanes, the necessary pavement design shall be obtained from  the district administrator's designee and the entire surface of the roadway  (old and new portions) may be required to be overlaid and restriped if required  by the district administrator's designee. The district administrator's designee  shall not require the entire surface of the roadway to be overlaid and  restriped when the only pavement addition to the existing roadway was for  bicycle lanes unless extenuating circumstances require that the entire surface  of the roadway be overlaid and restriped.
    E. Parking.
    1. Perpendicular and angle parking along streets is normally  prohibited. However, perpendicular and angle parking along streets may be  considered if the features along the street cause the street to readily appear  to be a street rather than a travel way through a parking lot.
    Street design that anticipates limited or no on-street parking  shall be approved when sufficient off-street parking is provided in accordance  with this chapter. Street design that anticipates the restriction of on-street  parking on one side of the street shall be approved when sufficient off-street  parking is provided for buildings on the side of the street where it is  anticipated parking will be restricted.
    2. For streets designed without on-street parking, a minimum  of two off-street parking spaces per dwelling unit shall be provided in  proximity of the unit that they are intended to serve. Such spaces, which may  be provided in a parking bay, driveway, or garage facilities, shall be  provided outside of the street's right-of-way. The district administrator's  designee may approve lesser parking requirements for individual developments or  classes of developments when evidence is presented to support such an approval  such as proximity to transit service or the nature of the development.  Entrances to parking bays and garage facilities shall be designed in accordance  with the appropriate provisions of the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-92-150) and the Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (see  24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-72) and Access Management Regulations: Minor  Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets (24VAC30-73).
    3. In instances where the local governing body has determined,  through adoption of a parking ordinance or other similar ordinance, that lesser  parking requirements are sufficient for certain classes of development, such  lesser requirements shall govern.
    4. The department shall not prohibit roadway design that  allows for the provision of on-street parking on any roadway with a functional  classification of collector or local where the posted speed limit is 35 miles  per hour or less and that is located within a compact or suburban area type.
    F. Cul-de-sacs and turnarounds. An adequate turnaround  facility shall be provided at the end of each cul-de-sac to permit the safe and  convenient maneuvering by service vehicles. Various configurations of  turnarounds are illustrated in the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT));  however, alternative configurations may be approved by the district administrator's  designee. Additional right-of-way shall be provided as required by the design  of the turnaround. Normally, any nontraveled way areas within the turnaround,  such as an island, shall be included in the dedicated right-of-way of the  facility unless the department and the locality are able to reach an agreement  for the maintenance of such nontraveled way areas. Nothing in this chapter  shall prohibit the provision of stormwater management facilities in the  nontraveled way areas of a cul-de-sac, provided the requirements of subsection  L of this section are met.
    For circular turnarounds, a well-defined, identifiable street  segment, equal to the normal lot width along the intersected street that serves  the cul-de-sac, or 50 feet, whichever is greater, shall extend from the  intersected street to the turning area.
    G. Curb and gutter. For the purpose of these requirements,  the use of curb and gutter is an acceptable roadway design, rather than a  requirement. However, when used, curb and gutter shall be designed in  accordance with the Road Design Manual and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT))  and only one curb and gutter design may be used along the length of a street.
    1. Driveway entrance requirements. Without regard to the curb  design used, the curb shall incorporate a driveway entrance apron, as  illustrated in the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix  B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)), to provide a smooth  transition from the gutter invert or roadway surface onto the driveway.
    2. Curb ramps. All streets that incorporate accessible routes  for pedestrian use shall, without regard to the curb design used, include curb  ramps at intersections for use by persons with disabilities and shall  incorporate other applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act  (42 USC § 12101 et seq.).
    H. Private entrances. All private entrances shall be designed  and constructed in accordance with the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)).
    I. Pedestrian, bicycle, and shared use path facilities. The  Commonwealth Transportation Board's "Policy for Integrating Bicycle and  Pedestrian Accommodations," 2004 emphasizes accommodating  pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Any street proposed for VDOT acceptance shall  accommodate pedestrian and bicycle traffic in accordance with the Commonwealth  Transportation Board's policy and this chapter. Pedestrian and bicycle  facilities should be generally uniform between intersections and  included in the initial construction of the street, prior to VDOT acceptance. 
    1. Pedestrian accommodation requirements. Pedestrian  accommodations shall be provided based upon density of development, the plans  for or existence of public schools in the vicinity, the presence of existing  pedestrian accommodations, and the operational nature of the fronting street.  In all developments with pedestrian accommodations, such accommodations shall connect  with existing pedestrian accommodations and allow for connection to future  pedestrian accommodations to adjacent parcels. If multiple requirements apply  to a street, the greater accommodation requirement shall govern. The  district administrator's designee may waive or modify these requirements for  the provision of pedestrian accommodations in situations when the accommodation  exception provisions of the Commonwealth Transportation Board's policy are met.
    a. Pedestrian accommodations shall be provided along both  sides of the street or provisions made that provide equivalent pedestrian  mobility in areas with a median lot size of one half acre or less or a floor  area ratio (FAR) of 0.4 or greater for streets with an ADT over 400 that  are located in a development with a median lot size of one-quarter acre or  smaller or when the ADT for the street is over 8,000. 
    b. Pedestrian accommodations shall be provided along at least  one side of the street or provisions made that provide equivalent pedestrian  mobility in areas that have a median lot size between one-half acre to two  acres for streets with an ADT over 400 that are located in a development  with a median lot size between one-quarter acre and one-half acre or when the  ADT for the street is between 2,000 and 8,000. 
    c. Pedestrian accommodations shall be provided along at least  one side of the street or provisions made that provide equivalent pedestrian  mobility in suburban and compact area types along roadways within one-half  centerline mile of a public school within one-half street centerline  mile of a public school.
    d. When connecting to a stub street that has pedestrian  accommodations, the new street shall also include pedestrian accommodations.
    e. Pedestrian accommodations shall be provided along at least  one side of, or provisions made that provide equivalent pedestrian mobility  along, streets functionally classified as collectors or arterials with two  travel lanes not including turn lanes. In no instance shall any sidewalk abut  the curb or the edge of a collector or higher order street, unless the sidewalk  is at least eight feet wide. In such instances tree wells shall be provided. In  instances where it is necessary to retrofit streets with pedestrian  accommodations to allow the streets to be accepted into the secondary system of  state highways, the pedestrian accommodations less than eight feet wide may  abut the curb or the edge of the street.
    f. e. Pedestrian accommodations shall be  provided along both sides of, or provisions made that provide equivalent  pedestrian mobility along, streets functionally classified as collectors or  arterials with three or more travel lanes. In no instance shall any sidewalk  abut the curb or the edge of a collector or higher order street, unless the  sidewalk is at least eight feet wide. In such instances tree wells shall be  provided. In instances where it is necessary to retrofit streets with  pedestrian accommodations to allow the streets to be accepted into the  secondary system of state highways, the pedestrian accommodations less than  eight feet wide may abut the curb or the edge of the street.
    2. Maintenance of pedestrian and bicycle accommodations.  Pedestrian and bicycle facilities are eligible for VDOT acceptance and  maintenance based on the criteria of this section. A copy of an agreement or  other document showing the proposed maintenance responsibilities of pedestrian  and bicycle facilities shall be provided to VDOT for any pedestrian  accommodation outside of the VDOT right-of-way that is used to meet the  accommodation requirements of this subsection. 
    a. Compliant facilities. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities,  including shared use paths as defined under § 46.2-100 of the Code of Virginia,  shall be accepted as part of the street or network addition, unless otherwise  requested by the governing body, provided they are located fully within the  dedicated right-of-way of the street and they are constructed in accordance  with applicable criteria and standards of the department.
    (1) Sidewalk criteria. Sidewalks shall be constructed in  accordance with the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150)  (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)).
    (2) Bicycle facility criteria. Bicycle facilities contiguous  with the street shall be in accordance with the department's design and  construction criteria set forth in the Road Design Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2011.
    (3) Shared use path criteria. Shared use paths shall be  constructed in accordance with the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150),  2011 and closely follow the vertical alignment of the roadway without  meandering on and off the right-of-way.
    b. Noncompliant sidewalk, bicycle, and shared use paths.  Noncompliant sidewalk, bicycle, and shared use paths that fail to meet  requirements of the department's standards for construction, alignment, or  placement within the dedicated right-of-way of the street shall be deemed to be  noncompliant and not qualify for maintenance unless a design waiver or  exemption is granted by the department. Noncompliant sidewalks and shared use  paths may be constructed of stabilizer convenient to the applicant.  Noncompliant facilities may co-exist within the dedicated right-of-way of the  street under a land use permit issued by the district administrator's designee  to the local governing body responsible for having established the facility  through its subdivision process or other development process.
    Such permits will clearly specify the responsibility for  maintenance of the facility and related activities to the extent the facility  occupies the street's right-of-way. The permit applicant should be an entity  that can be reasonably expected to have perpetual maintenance capability. 
    J. Bridge, drainage, and other grade separation structures.  Bridges, drainage, and other grade separation structures shall be designed and  constructed in accordance with all applicable department criteria and  standards. The district administrator's designee may require special review of  the plans and construction inspection.
    The department will accept grade separation structures as  part of new streets, provided the structure is a drainage structure or is  intended to separate the movement of registered motor vehicles. In addition,  the department will accept grade separation structures intended to separate  pedestrians or bicyclists or any combination thereof from traffic using the  roadway, provided:
    1. The structure is available for unrestricted public use;
    2. The structure is accessible to pedestrian accommodations  situated along the street; and
    3. The projected traffic volume of the street is (i) not less  than 4,000 vpd ADT or (ii) if the structure otherwise serves as  part of the principal pedestrian access to a school or a mass transit facility  including stops and stations and a peak hour traffic volume of 450 vph VPH  or greater is projected.
    In all other instances, the grade separation structure shall  be deemed to be a locally controlled grade separation structure within the  right-of-way of the street, in which case the street will only be accepted as  part of the secondary system of state highways maintained by the department  after the local governing body and the department have executed an agreement  acceptable to the department that (i) acknowledges the department has no  responsibility or liability due to the presence of the structure and (ii)  assures the burden and costs of inspection, maintenance, and future  improvements to the structure are provided from sources other than those  administered by the department.
    In all cases, whether the structure is accepted as an integral  part of the roadway for maintenance by the department or it remains a locally  controlled structure, the lighting, safety, and security of those using such  facilities shall remain a responsibility of local government.
    K. Dams. The department will only consider accepting streets  for maintenance that traverse dams when all of the following provisions are  satisfied. For the purpose of this section, a roadway will be considered to  traverse a dam if any part of the fill for the roadway and the fill for the dam  overlap or if the area between the two embankments is filled in so that the  downstream face of the dam is obscured or if a closed drainage facility from a  dam extends under a roadway fill.
    1. Agreements with the governing body. Except as exempt under  subdivision 6 of this subsection, the governing body acknowledges by formal  agreement the department's liability is limited to the maintenance of the  roadway and that the department has no responsibility or liability due to the  presence of the dam, the maintenance of which shall remain the responsibility  of an owner, other than the department, as established by § 33.1-176 of  the Code of Virginia.
    2. Design review. An engineer licensed to practice in the  Commonwealth of Virginia shall certify that the hydraulic and structural design  of any dam, as described below, is in accordance with current national and  state engineering practice and that all pertinent provisions of the Subdivision  Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road  Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)) have been considered. Prior to approval of the  roadway construction plans, the hydraulic and structural design of a proposed  dam shall be reviewed by the department and meet the department's satisfaction  if:
    a. A roadway is considered to traverse a dam; or
    b. A roadway is located below but sufficiently close to the  dam that a catastrophic breach could endanger the roadway or the safety of  those using the roadway.
    3. Right-of-way requirements. The right-of-way of roads  considered to occupy dams shall be recorded either as an easement for public  road purposes or as a dedication specifically to the governing body.  Right-of-way dedicated in the name of the Commonwealth or any of its agencies  is not acceptable if it includes a dam, and roads through such right-of-way  will not be accepted as a part of the secondary system of state highways  maintained by the department.
    4. Supplemental, alternative access. To be considered for VDOT  maintenance, roadways that traverse a dam must be supplemented by an  appropriate alternative roadway facility for public ingress or egress having  suitable provisions that ensure perpetual maintenance.
    5. Permits. All applicable federal and state permits  associated with dams shall be secured and filed with the locality prior to  VDOT's acceptance of any street that traverses a dam.
    6. Dams exempt from agreements. The acceptance of roadways  that traverse dams shall be exempt from the requirements for an agreement with  the governing body, as required by subdivision 1 of this subsection, if all of  the following is satisfied:
    a. The dam is used to create a stormwater detention or  retention facility;
    b. The maximum depth of the water retained by the impoundment  at its 100-year storm flood elevation is not greater than four feet; and
    c. The surface area of the impoundment at full flood is not  greater than two acres and is beyond the right-of-way dedicated to public use.
    L. Roadway drainage.
    1. Policy and procedures. All drainage facilities shall be  designed in accordance with the department's Drainage Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2002 and supplemental directives or the Subdivision  Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road  Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)) as may be appropriate. All drainage  computations supporting a proposed drainage design shall be submitted to the  department for review as part of the documents necessary for the approval of a  construction plan.
    2. Stormwater management. Whereas the department considers  matters regarding stormwater management associated with the construction of  streets to be under the authority of the local governing body, decisions  regarding stormwater management in the construction of streets are deferred to  the locality. However, stormwater management, including the construction of  detention or retention facilities, or both, is recognized as an available  design alternative or BMP for water quantity, quality, or both. Where  the developer is required by regulations promulgated by an agency or  governmental subdivision other than the department or the developer chooses to  use stormwater management facilities in the design of a subdivision or other  development, the governing body shall, by formal agreement, and as a  prerequisite for the transfer of jurisdiction over the street to the  department, acknowledge that the department is not responsible for the  operation, maintenance, retrofitting, or liability of the stormwater  management facility or facilities associated with the subdivision or the  development. Any retrofits required to comply with a TMDL WLA will be the  responsibility of the locality. However, in the event the governing body  has executed a comprehensive, localitywide agreement with the department  addressing these matters, a specific agreement addressing stormwater management  controls in the subdivision or development will not be required as a condition  for street acceptance.
    Stormwater management controls for VDOT projects are to be  designed in accordance with the approved VDOT Erosion and Sediment Control and  Stormwater Management Program Standards and Specifications, 2010, as  annually approved by the Department of Conservation and Recreation (see  24VAC30-92-150), the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Regulations,  (4VAC50-30), and the Virginia Stormwater Management Program  (VSMP) Permit Regulations (4VAC50-60), and, if applicable, VDOT's MS4  Program Plan, 2008. While these controls may be necessary whenever a street  maintained by the department is widened or relocated, the department does not  require them in the development of new streets because such activity is  regulated by the local governments. However, developers and counties may find  these controls useful in managing land development activity.
    Generally devices and treatments intended to mitigate the  impact of stormwater shall be placed off of the right-of-way and shall be  designed to prevent the backup of water against the roadbed. However, such  devices and treatments may be placed within the right-of-way if the department  and the local governing body have executed an agreement that (i) acknowledges  the department has no responsibility or liability due to the presence of the  devices or treatments, or both; (ii) assures the burden and costs of  inspection, maintenance, VSMP permit requirements, TMDL WLA requirements,  retrofitting or other future improvements to the devices and treatments, or  other costs related to the placement of such devices or treatments within the  right-of-way are provided from sources other than those administered by the  department; (iii) a professional engineer licensed by the Commonwealth or the  manufacturer as required by the department, certifies the construction of the  facility to plans reviewed by the department; and (iv) a concept design  requirements of the facility is are included in the department's  Drainage Manual, 2002, the Department of Conservation and Recreation's  Stormwater Management Handbook, First Edition, 1999, or  supplemental directives (see 24VAC30-92-150).
    Where development activity results in increased runoff to the  extent that adjustment of an outfall facility is required, such adjustment  shall be at the developer's expense and shall be contained within an  appropriate easement.
    The department is required to implement the Municipal Separate  Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit for facilities located on its right-of-way. To  comply with these requirements, the local governing body shall provide to  the district administrator's designee all aspects of a proposed  development's storm sewer system and associated stormwater management system  plan that are pertinent to the locality's or the agency's department's  MS4 permit to the district administrator's designee. Additionally,  the local governing body shall provide to the district administrator's designee  an inventory of all outfalls to waters of the United States, physical  interconnections with other stormwater systems, stormwater management devices,  or both related to the project that are located within VDOT right-of-way as a  condition of street acceptance in accordance with the VDOT MS4 Stormwater  Outfall Inventory Manual, 2011. VDOT shall not accept a street for maintenance  as part of the secondary system of state highways that are not in compliance  with conditions of the pertinent MS4 permit and VDOT's MS4 Program Plan, 2008,  as such conditions existed at the time of the relevant street construction  plan's approval. VDOT shall not accept a street for maintenance if there is an  illicit discharge to the system, as defined by 4VAC50-60-10 until the illicit  discharge is eliminated.
    3. Drainage easements.
    a. An acceptable easement shall be provided from all drainage  outfalls to a natural watercourse, as opposed to a swale.
    b. The department normally accepts and maintains only that  portion of a drainage system that falls within the limits of the dedicated  right-of-way for a street. The department's responsibility to enter drainage  easements outside of the dedicated right-of-way shall be limited to undertaking  corrective measures to alleviate problems that may adversely affect the safe  operation or integrity of the roadway.
    c. In the event drainage to a natural watercourse is not  accomplished or is interrupted, an acceptable agreement from the governing body  may be considered as an alternative to providing an easement to a natural  watercourse, provided the agreement acknowledges that the department is neither  responsible nor liable for drainage from the roadway.
    M. Other design considerations.
    1. Guardrail. Guardrail shall be used when required by the  district administrator's designee, consistent with the Road Design Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2011. For placement considerations, see the  Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1)  of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)).
    2. Landscaping and erosion control. All disturbed areas within  the dedicated right-of-way and easements of any street shall be restored with  vegetation compatible with the surrounding area. Where there is visual evidence  of erosion or siltation, acceptance of the street as part of the secondary  system of state highways maintained by the department will be postponed until  appropriate protective measures, in accordance with VDOT's construction  practices, are taken. Except as otherwise approved by the district  administrator's designee, planting of trees or shrubs on the right-of-way shall  be in accordance with the Subdivision Street Design Guide and the Road  Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT) and its Appendix B  (1) (the Subdivision Street Design Guide).
    3. Lighting. Roadway, security, or pedestrian lighting, when  required by the governing body or desired by the developer, shall be installed  in accordance with the Subdivision Street Design Guide and the Road  Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT) and its Appendix B  (1) (the Subdivision Street Design Guide). However, VDOT shall not be  responsible for the maintenance or replacement of lighting fixtures or the  provision of power for lighting.
    4. Railroad crossings.
    a. Short-arm gates with flashing signals, flashing signals  alone, or other protective devices as deemed appropriate by the department  shall be provided at any at-grade crossing of an active railroad by a street.
    b. Crossings of railroad right-of-way are subject to the  requirements of the railroad. Streets to be accepted by the department for  maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways that cross  railroad right-of-way will only be considered if the protective measures  outlined under this section have been fully installed and an agreement between  the railroad, the developer, and the local governing body has been executed.  Prior to execution, such agreements shall be presented to the department for  consideration in consultation with the Department of Rail and Public  Transportation.
    5. Utilities. Local governments, the development community,  and the utility community are encouraged to coordinate and consolidate their  interests as part of the initial development plan.
    a. Underground utilities. The department allows the placement  of underground utilities within the dedicated right-of-way of streets, but  normally restricts placement to areas outside of the travel lanes. However, if  the governing body has established adequate requirements approved by the  department for the design, location, and construction of underground utilities  within the right-of-way of streets, including provisions that ensure that  adequate testing and inspection is performed to minimize future settlement,  those requirements shall become the department's requirements and govern  provided those requirements exceed the department's requirements.
    Manholes shall not be placed in sidewalk, multiuse trail, or  shared use path facilities, within five feet of curb ramps or within driveway  entrances. 
    When location of the utilities outside of the pavement area is  not practical such as in high density developments incorporating the principles  of new urbanism as described in § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of Virginia,  such installations:
    (1) Are acceptable within the shoulders along the street or  within the parking area.
    (2) May be acceptable beneath the travel lanes of the street  or alley when provisions are made to ensure adequate inspection and compaction  tests and:
    (a) Longitudinal installations and manholes are located  outside of the normal travel lanes; or 
    (b) Longitudinal installations and manholes are placed in the  center of a travel lane out of the wheel path.
    However, manholes shall not be placed in sidewalk, multiuse  trail, or shared use path facilities within five feet of curb ramps or within  driveway entrances.
    b. Open-cutting of hard-surfaced roadways. The department  usually prohibits the open-cutting of hard-surfaced roads except in extenuating  circumstances. Therefore, all underground utilities within the right-of-way, as  determined necessary by good engineering practice to serve the complete  development of adjacent properties, shall be installed during the street's  initial construction and prior to the application of its final pavement surface  course. This shall include extensions of all necessary cross-street connections  or service lines to an appropriate location beyond the pavement and preferably  the right-of-way line.
    In the event it is necessary to open the street pavement to  work on utilities after the surface has been placed, additional compaction  tests and paving as necessary to restore the integrity and appearance of the  roadway may be required at the discretion of the district administrator's  designee.
    c. Cross-street conduits. To facilitate the placement of  future underground utilities, cross-street conduits are encouraged, with  placement of such conduits occurring on each street at intersections.
    d. Aboveground utilities. All aboveground utilities shall be  installed behind the sidewalk or as close as possible to the limits of the  street's right-of-way but shall not encroach on the sidewalk, the shared use  path, or any clear zone.
    To assure the unencumbered dedication of the right-of-way for  street additions, easements or other interests within the platted right-of-way  shall be quitclaimed of any prior rights therein. In exchange, a permit may be  issued by the department for a utility to occupy the area involved. This permit  will be processed by the district administrator's designee upon acceptance of  the street into the secondary system of state highways maintained by the  department. No inspection fee is required for permits so issued.  However, the approval of the permit shall be contingent upon the utility's  compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-151).
    24VAC30-92-130. Right-of-way width, spite strips, and  encroachments.
    A. Right-of-way width. A clear and unencumbered right-of-way  shall be dedicated to public use for any street proposed for addition to the  secondary system of state highways maintained by the department. However, in  certain rare extenuating circumstances involving a party beyond the influence  of the developer, an easement for transportation purposes may be approved by  the district administrator's designee in lieu of dedicated right-of-way. In all  other cases, any easement that might interfere with the public's unencumbered  use of the street shall be quitclaimed in exchange for a land use permit as  outlined in 24VAC30-92-120 M 5.
    The width of right-of-way shall be as indicated in the Subdivision  Street Design Guide (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT))  and the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT) and  shall be sufficient to include all essential elements of the roadway intended  to be maintained by the department, including pedestrian, multiuse trail,  bicycle, or shared use path facilities and clear zone. However, supplemental  easements may be used to accommodate sight distance requirements and slopes for  cuts and fills. The right-of-way requirements are defined in the Subdivision  Street Design Guide (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT))  and the Road Design Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT).
    When an existing state maintained road is widened, the  additional right-of-way should be dedicated as follows:
    1. If the existing right-of-way consists of a prescriptive  easement, to the degree that the developer controls the land, the right-of-way  shall be dedicated to public use from the centerline of the alignment.
    2. If the existing right-of-way is dedicated to public use,  the additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to public use.
    3. If the existing right-of-way is titled in the name of the  department or the Commonwealth, the additional right-of-way shall be deeded to  the department or to the Commonwealth, consistent with the title of the  existing right-of-way.
    B. "Spite strips." Plans that include a reserved or  "spite" strip that prohibits otherwise lawful vehicular access to a  street from the adjacent properties, whether within or outside the subdivision  or development, will not be approved.
    C. Encroachments within the right-of-way. Recording of a plat  causes the fee title interest of areas dedicated to public use to transfer to  the local governing body. Therefore, objects installed within the right-of-way  for purposes other than transportation may be considered an unlawful  encroachment in the right-of-way and prevent the right-of-way from being  considered clear and unencumbered.
    Posts, walls, signs, or similar ornamental devices that do  not interfere with roadway capacity, encroach into a clear zone, or interfere  with prescribed sight distance requirements, or are not in conflict with  Chapter 7 (§ 33.1-351 et seq.) of Title 33.1 of the Code of Virginia may be  permitted within the right-of-way. However, specific authorization by the  district administrator's designee or as authorized under the Land Use Permit  Regulations (see 24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-151) is a requisite for  these devices or any other encroachment located within the right-of-way. For  the purposes of this subsection, mailboxes installed on breakaway posts may  occupy the right-of-way without permit. Otherwise, encroachments that do not  fall within the clear zone may be allowed within the right-of-way pursuant to a  land use permit issued by the district administrator's designee.
    24VAC30-92-140. Surety and fees.
    A. Policy. Except as otherwise provided herein, the developer  shall provide surety to guarantee the satisfactory performance of the street,  an inspection fee to cover the department's cost of inspecting the new street,  and an administrative cost recovery fee to recover the department's costs  associated with the review of subdivision or other development plans and the  administrative processing of the acceptance of new streets as determined in  this section. All surety and fees collected under this section shall be based  on the date of the local governing body's request and the aggregate mileage of  new streets in that request, rounded up to the next tenth of a mile. In the  event of extenuating circumstances beyond the developer's control, the  commissioner or his designee may waive all or a portion of any of the surety  and fees.
    B. Surety. The department reserves the right to inspect, or  have inspected, the street proposed for acceptance into the secondary system of  state highways at any stage of construction and prior to street acceptance. The  developer, contractor, and third-party inspector, if applicable, shall  cooperate with the assigned VDOT personnel to provide the access and information  necessary to verify that construction of the street is in accordance with the  street's approved design and appropriate standards and specifications. A  determination by the district administrator's designee that the required  cooperation has not been extended shall be grounds for VDOT to refuse to accept  the street for maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways. A  determination of noncooperation may be appealed as specified by this chapter  (see 24VAC30-92-110).
    1. Type of surety and expiration. The developer shall provide  surety to guarantee the satisfactory performance of the street. In the event  the developer fails to provide surety or any of the fees described in this  section within the 30-day period following the local governing body's request  for the department to accept the maintenance of a street, the department's or  other entity's previous final inspection of the street shall be considered void  and a new inspection shall be required. An acceptable surety may be in the form  of a performance bond, cash deposit, certified check, irrevocable letter of  credit, third-party escrow account, or other form mutually satisfactory to the  department and the developer. Under no circumstances shall the department or  any agency of the Commonwealth be named the escrow agent nor shall funds  deposited with the department as surety be subject to the payment of interest.
    a. Amount of surety. The surety shall be $3,000 for each tenth  of a lane mile, or portion thereof, to be accepted by the department for  maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways. The Commonwealth  Transportation Board may adjust the surety on an annual basis based on  increases or decreases in the producer price index for highway and street  construction materials up to an amount not to exceed $5,000 for each tenth of a  lane mile or portion thereof. 
    The surety shall be waived for streets petitioned for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways through the Rural  Addition Program pursuant to §§ 33.1-72.1 and 33.1-72.2 of the Code of  Virginia, and streets constructed or approved pursuant to §§ 33.1-221 and 33.1-223 of the Code of Virginia.
    b. Length of surety. The surety shall guarantee performance of  the street for one year from the date of its acceptance into the secondary  system of state highways.
    2. Alternatives to surety.
    a. In jurisdictions where the staff of the governing body  administers a comprehensive street construction inspection program that has  been approved by the department, the surety shall be waived upon certification  by the governing body that the proposed addition has been constructed in  accordance with approved plans and specifications.
    b. If requested by the developer and subject to availability  of departmental personnel or consultants, VDOT may perform the construction  inspection equivalent to that required for third-party inspection of any street  or streets proposed to be added to the secondary system of state highways. In  such cases, the developer shall bear all costs incurred by the department, the  surety shall be waived, and no street inspection fee pursuant to subsection D  of this section shall be charged.
    c. A third-party inspection process shall be acceptable to the  department if:
    (1) The developer or construction contractor arranges for a  firm not otherwise related to the developer or contractor to provide inspection  services for the construction of the streets in the development; 
    (2) Inspection and testing methodology and frequency are  accomplished in accordance with VDOT Materials Division's Manual of  Instructions, 2011 and the Virginia Department of Transportation Road  and Bridge Specifications (24VAC30-92-150), 2007, revised 2011;  and
    (3) A report is submitted to the department summarizing the  inspections steps taken, certifying the results of the inspection and testing  as accurate, and confirming that the street or streets were built to the  approved specifications and pavement design, signed and stamped by a  professional engineer licensed to practice as such in the Commonwealth. 
    C. Administrative cost recovery fee.
    1. Application of the administrative cost recovery fee. To  recover a portion of the department's direct costs associated with the review  of plans or plans of development, and the administrative processing of the  acceptance of new streets, an administrative cost recovery fee shall be  required from the developer at the time the streets are accepted by the  department. The amount of this cost recovery fee shall be computed at a base  rate of $500 per addition, without regard to street length, plus $250 per tenth  of a centerline mile, or portion thereof.
    2. Alternatives to the administrative cost recovery fee. As an  alternative to the administrative cost recovery fee, the department may use one  of the following approaches to recover its direct costs:
    a. For any development, at the developer's request, the  department may establish an account for the purpose of tracking these costs and  billing the developer not more often than every 30 days;
    b. For large, complex, multiuse developments, the department,  at its option, may establish an account for the purpose of tracking these costs  and billing the developer not more often than every 30 days. However, the cost  recovery fee assessed under this provision shall not be greater than two times  the prevailing administrative cost recovery fee structure; or
    c. If requested to provide plan review for streets that are  not intended for maintenance by the department, the department may establish an  account for the purpose of tracking these costs and billing the developer not  more often than every 30 days.
    D. Street inspection fee. To recover a portion of the  department's direct costs associated with the inspection of subdivision  streets, an inspection fee shall be required from the developer at the time the  streets are accepted by the department.
    The inspection fee shall be computed at a base rate of $250  per addition, without regard to street length, plus $125 per tenth of a  centerline mile, or portion thereof.
    The street inspection fee shall be reduced by 75% if either a  third-party inspection process pursuant to subdivision B 2 c of this section or  a local street inspection certification process pursuant to subdivision B 2 a  of this section was used.
    If requested to provide inspection services for subdivision  streets that are not intended for maintenance by the department, the department  may establish an account for the purpose of tracking these costs and billing  the developer not more often than every 30 days.
    24VAC30-92-150. Documents incorporated by reference. (Repealed.)
    Information pertaining to the availability and cost of any  of these publications should be directed to the address indicated below the  specific document. Requests for documents available from the department may be  obtained from the department at 1401 E. Broad St., Richmond, Virginia 23219;  however, department documents may be available over the Internet at  www.virginiadot.org.
    The department shall post all nonregulatory documents  incorporated into this regulation by reference and under its control on its  website. Official regulatory text is maintained by the Virginia Registrar of  Regulations in the Virginia Administrative Code. After the effective date of  any changes to such incorporated documents under the control of the department,  the department shall post the changes for a period of at least 60 days on its  website. Any changes to regulations appearing in this list shall be made in  accordance with the Administrative Process Act (§ 2.2-4000 et seq. of the Code  of Virginia), the Virginia Register Act (§ 2.2-4100 et seq. of the Code of  Virginia), or both.
    A. Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials,  24VAC30-72.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    B. Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials,  Collectors, and Local Streets, 24VAC30-73.
    VDOT
  1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    C. Drainage Manual, 2002.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    D. Guidance Document for the Commonwealth Transportation  Board's Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements, 2009.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    E. Highway Capacity Manual, 2000.
    Transportation Research Board
    500 Fifth Street, NW
    Washington, DC 20001
    F. Land Use Permit  Regulations, 24VAC30-151.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    G. Materials Division Manual of Instructions, 2006.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    H. Pavement Design Guide for Subdivision and Secondary  Roads in Virginia, 2000.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    I. Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian  Accommodations, 2004. (Note: This policy reference is included in the  regulation only for informational purposes and is not considered a regulatory  provision. Applicable elements of this policy are stated in the regulation  itself.)
    Commonwealth Transportation Board 
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    J. Road and Bridge Specifications, 2007, revised 2008.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    K. Road and Bridge Standards, 2008.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    L. Road Design Manual, 2008.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    M. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulation, 24VAC30-155.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    N. VDOT Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater  Management Program Standards and Specifications, 2004. 
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    O. Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Regulations,  4VAC50-30. 
    Virginia Department of Conservation  and Recreation
    Division of Soil and Water  Conservation 
    203 Governor Street, Suite 302
    Richmond, VA 23219-2094 
    P. Virginia Stormwater  Management Program (VSMP) Permit Regulations (4VAC50-60). 
    Virginia Department of Conservation  and Recreation
    Division of Soil and Water  Conservation
    203 Governor Street, Suite 302
    Richmond, VA 23219-2094 
    DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-92)
    Information pertaining to the availability and cost of any  of these publications should be directed to the address indicated for the  specific document. Requests for documents of the Virginia Department of  Transportation (VDOT) may be obtained from the department at 1401 E. Broad St.,  Richmond, Virginia 23219; however, department documents may be available over  the Internet at www.virginiadot.org.
    VDOT Drainage Manual, 2002. 
    VDOT Guidance Document for the Commonwealth Transportation  Board's Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements, 2011.
    Highway  Capacity Manual, 2010, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street, NW,  Washington, DC 20001.
    VDOT  Materials Division Manual of Instructions, 2011.
    VDOT  Pavement Design Guide for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia, 2009.
    VDOT  Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations, 2004.
    VDOT Road and Bridge Specifications, 2007, revised 2011.
    VDOT  Road and Bridge Standards, 2008, revised 2011.
    VDOT  Road Design Manual, 2011.
    VDOT  Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater Management Program Standards and  Specifications, 2010.
    VDOT  MS4 Program Plan, 2008, Location and Design Division.
    VDOT  MS4 Stormwater Outfall Inventory Manual, 2011, Maintenance Division.
    Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook, First Edition,  1999, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Soil and  Water Conservation, Stormwater Management, 203 Governor Street, Suite 206,  Richmond, VA 23219-2094.
    24VAC30-155-10. Definitions.
    The following words and terms when used in this chapter shall  have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
    "Connectivity index" means the number of street  segments divided by the number of intersections. Only street segments and  intersections within a network addition as well as any street segment or  intersection outside of the network addition that is connected to street  segments within the network addition or that has been connected or will be  connected pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 7 to the network addition through the  extension of an existing stub out shall be used to calculate a network  addition's connectivity index.
    "Floor area ratio" means the ratio of the total floor  area of a building or buildings on a parcel to the size of the parcel where the  building or buildings are located.
    "Intersection" means, only for the purposes of  calculating connectivity index, a juncture of three or more street segments or  the terminus of a street segment such as a cul-de-sac or other dead end. The  terminus of a stub out shall not constitute an intersection for the purposes of  this chapter. The juncture of a street with only a stub out, and the juncture  of a street with only a connection to the end of an existing stub out, shall  not constitute an intersection for the purposes of this chapter, unless such  stub out is the only facility providing service to one or more lots within the  development.
    "Local traffic impact statement" means a traffic  impact statement accepted or prepared by a locality pursuant to its land  development approval process and whose requirements regarding content are set  out in the locality's ordinances or published policies if such ordinances or  policies have been reviewed and certified by VDOT as requiring acceptable  standards of preparation and providing sufficient information to determine the  current and future impacts of development proposals.
    "Locality" means any local government, pursuant to  § 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia, that must prepare and recommend a  comprehensive plan for the physical development of the territory within its  jurisdiction.
    "Network addition" means a group of interconnected  street segments and intersections shown in a plan of development that is  connected to the state highway system and meets the requirements of the  Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (24VAC30-92).
    "Pedestrian facility coverage" means the ratio of:  (length of pedestrian facilities, such as sidewalks, foot paths, and multiuse  trails, along both sides of a roadway) divided by (length of roadway multiplied  by two).
    "Receipt" means the date on which a proposal or  request for a meeting is first in the possession of VDOT or a locality or an  agent thereof, as applicable.
    "Redevelopment site" means any existing use that  generates traffic and is intended to be developed as a different or more  dense denser land use.
    "Service level" means a measure of the quality,  level or comfort of a service calculated using methodologies approved by VDOT.
    "Small area plan" means a plan of development for  multiple contiguous properties that guides land use, zoning, transportation,  urban design, open space, and capital improvements at a high level of detail  within an urban development area or for a transit-oriented development that is  at least 1/2 square mile in size unless otherwise approved by VDOT due to  proximity to existing moderate to high density developments. A small area plan  shall include the following: (i) densities of at least four residential units  per acre and at least a floor area ratio of 0.4 or some proportional  combination thereof; (ii) mixed-use neighborhoods, including mixed housing  types and integration of residential, office, and retail development; (iii)  reduction of front and side yard building setbacks; and (iv)  pedestrian-friendly road design and connectivity of road and pedestrian  networks.
    "State-controlled highway" means a highway in  Virginia that is part of the interstate, primary, or secondary systems of state  highways and that is maintained by the state under the direction and  supervision of the Commissioner of Highways. Highways for which localities  receive maintenance payments pursuant to §§ 33.1-23.5:1 and 33.1-41.1 of  the Code of Virginia and highways maintained by VDOT in accordance with §§ 33.1-31, 33.1-32, 33.1-33, and 33.1-68 of the Code of Virginia are not considered  state-controlled highways for the purposes of determining whether a specific  land development proposal package must be submitted to meet the requirements of  this regulation.
    "Street segment" means (i) a section of roadway  or alley that is between two intersections or (ii) a stub out or connection to  the end of an existing stub out.
    "Stub out" means a transportation facility (i)  whose right-of-way terminates at a parcel abutting the development, (ii) that  consists of a short segment that is intended to serve current and future  development by providing continuity and connectivity of the public street  network, (iii) that based on the spacing between the stub out and other streets  or stub outs, and the current terrain there is a reasonable expectation that  connection with a future street is possible, and (iv) that is constructed to  the property line.
    "Traffic impact statement" means the document showing  how a proposed development will relate to existing and future transportation  facilities prepared in accordance with best professional practice and  standards that assesses the impact of a proposed development on the  transportation system and recommends improvements to lessen or negate those  impacts.
    "Transit-oriented development" means an area of  commercial and residential development at moderate to high densities within 1/2  mile of a station for heavy rail, light rail, commuter rail, or bus rapid  transit transportation and includes the following: (i) densities of at least  four residential units per acre and at least a floor area ratio of 0.4 or some  proportional combination thereof; (ii) mixed-use neighborhoods, including mixed  housing types and integration of residential, office, and retail development;  (iii) reduction of front and side yard building setbacks; and (iv)  pedestrian-friendly road design and connectivity of road and pedestrian  networks.
    "Transportation demand management" means a  combination of measures that reduce vehicle trip generation and improve  transportation system efficiency by altering demand, including but not limited  to the following: expanded transit service, employer-provided transit benefits,  bicycle and pedestrian investments, ridesharing, staggered work hours,  telecommuting, and parking management including parking pricing.
    "Urban development area" means an area designated  on a local comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of  Virginia that includes the following: (i) densities of at least four  residential units per acre and at least a floor area ratio of 0.4 or some  proportional combination thereof; (ii) mixed-use neighborhoods, including mixed  housing types and integration of residential, office, and retail development;  (iii) reduction of front and side yard building setbacks; and (iv)  pedestrian-friendly road design and connectivity of road and pedestrian  networks.
    "VDOT" means the Virginia Department of  Transportation, the Commissioner of Highways, or a designee.
    "VDOT traffic impact statement" means a traffic  impact statement prepared pursuant to 24VAC30-155-60.
    24VAC30-155-20. Authority.
    Section 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia requires  localities to submit comprehensive plans and amendments to comprehensive plans  that will substantially affect transportation on state-controlled highways to  VDOT in order for the agency to review and provide comments on the impact of  the item submitted. This section also requires localities to submit traffic  impact statements along with proposed rezonings, site plans, subdivision  plats, and subdivision development plans that will substantially affect  transportation on state-controlled highways to VDOT for comment by the agency.  Chapter 527 of the 2006 Acts of Assembly directs VDOT to promulgate regulations  for the implementation of these requirements. 
    24VAC30-155-30. Comprehensive plan and comprehensive plan  amendment.
    A. Plan and amendment submittal. Prior to adoption of any  comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia, any  part of a comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2228 of the Code of  Virginia, or any amendment to any comprehensive plan as described in  § 15.2-2229 of the Code of Virginia, including small area plans, if  required by this section of this chapter, the locality shall submit such plan  or amendment to VDOT for review and comment, such submission should take place  at least 100 days prior to anticipated final action by the locality. The  Virginia Department of Transportation shall, upon request, provide localities  with technical assistance in preparing the transportation plan of the  comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan or comprehensive plan amendment  package shall be submitted to VDOT, if it is reasonably anticipated to result  in substantially affect transportation on state controlled highways.  Substantially affect, for the purposes of comprehensive plans, includes  substantial changes or impacts to the existing transportation network. For the  purposes of this section, a substantial impact shall be defined as a change  that would allow the generation of 5,000 additional vehicle trips per day on  state-controlled highways compared to the existing comprehensive plan,  assuming the highest density of permissible use in accordance with the  Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook (see  24VAC30-155-100), 8th Edition, 2008 or, subject to the approval of  VDOT, the regional model as adopted by the local Metropolitan Planning  Organization, and substantial changes change shall include those  changes that materially alter future transportation infrastructure, travel  patterns, or the ability to improve future transportation facilities on  state-controlled highways.
    B. Required elements. The submission by the locality to VDOT  shall contain sufficient information so that VDOT may evaluate the system of  new and expanded transportation facilities, outlined in the transportation  plan, that are needed to support the current and planned development of the  territory covered by the plan. In order to conduct this evaluation, the package  submitted to VDOT shall contain the following items:
    1. For a comprehensive plan or a transportation plan, the  locality shall provide one paper and one electronic copy of the  following:
    a. A cover sheet, containing:
    (1) Contact information for the locality, and
    (2) Summary of major changes made to the comprehensive plan or  transportation plan;
    b. The proposed comprehensive plan or transportation plan, and  the following elements:
    (1) Inventory – an inventory (written or graphic) of the  existing transportation network, which shall include at a minimum all roadways  within the Federal Aid system.
    (2) Assumptions – planning assumptions shall be detailed,  since these assumptions directly influence the demand placed on the transportation  system. Population growth, employment growth, location of critical  infrastructure such as water and sewer facilities, among others, are examples  of planning assumptions that may be addressed. 
    (3) Needs assessment – written or graphic evaluation of the  transportation system's current and projected performance and conditions. The  needs assessment identifies specific deficiencies.
    (4) Recommendations – proposed improvements or additions to  the transportation infrastructure. Recommendations should be specific so that  the need, location and nature of the proposed improvements are clear and  understandable. Localities are encouraged to include pedestrian, bicycle,  transit, rail and other multimodal recommendations as they deem appropriate.  The transportation plan shall include a map showing road and transportation  improvements, taking into account the current and future needs of residents in  the locality while considering the current and future needs of the planning  district within which the locality is situated. Recommended improvements shall  include cost estimates as available from VDOT.
    2. For an amendment to a comprehensive plan or transportation  plan, the locality shall provide one paper and one electronic copy of  the following:
    a. A cover sheet, containing:
    (1) Contact information for the locality;
    (2) Summary of proposed amendment or amendments to the  comprehensive plan or transportation plan; and
    (3) Overview of reasoning and purpose for amendments.
    b. Application forms and documentation presented to or  prepared by the local jurisdiction,
    c. Associated maps or narratives that depict and detail the  amendment under consideration,
    d. Any changes to the planning assumptions associated with the  amendment, 
    e. Local assessment of the potential impacts the amendment may  have on the transportation system, and
    f. Those elements identified in subdivision 1 b of this  subsection that VDOT determines are needed in order to review and comment on  impacts to state-controlled highways.
    C. Small area plans for urban development areas and transit  oriented developments. A locality that develops a small area plan for all or a  portion of an urban development area or transit-oriented development and  corresponding amendments to their comprehensive plan, as described in § 15.2-2229  of the Code of Virginia, that will have a substantial impact effect  on the state transportation network pursuant to this section of the regulation,  may in lieu of submitting a comprehensive plan amendment package as required  under subsection B of this section submit a small area plan package.
    The small area plan package submitted by the locality to VDOT  shall contain sufficient information and data so that VDOT may determine the  location of the area impacted by the small area plan, its size, its impact on  state-controlled highways, and the methodology and assumptions used in the  analysis of the impact. Submittal of an incomplete small area plan package  shall be considered deficient in meeting the submission requirements of  § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and shall be returned to the  locality and the applicant, if applicable, identifying the deficiencies noted.  A small area plan package submitted to VDOT shall contain the following items:
    1. A cover sheet containing:
    a. Contact information for locality;
    b. Small area plan location, highways and transit facilities  adjacent to site, and parcel number or numbers;
    c. Proposal summary with development names, size, and proposed  zoning;
    2. A VDOT traffic impact statement prepared in  accordance with 24VAC30-155-60; and
    3. A plan of development for the area encompassed by the small  area plan.
    D. Review process. VDOT may pursuant to § 15.2-2222.1 of  the Code of Virginia request a meeting with the locality to discuss the plan or  amendment. The request must be made within 30 days of receipt of the proposal.  VDOT must provide written comments to the locality within 90 days of the  receipt of the plan or plan amendment or by such later deadline as may be  agreed to by the parties. VDOT will conduct its review and provide official  comments to the locality for inclusion in the official public record of the  locality. VDOT shall also make such comments available to the public. Nothing  in this section shall prohibit a locality from acting on a comprehensive plan  or plan amendment if VDOT's comments on the submission have not been received  within the timelines in this section.
    E. Concurrent consideration. For the purposes of this  regulation, when a related comprehensive plan or comprehensive plan amendment  and a rezoning proposal that cover the same geographical area are being  considered concurrently by a locality, only a rezoning package as required  under 24VAC30-155-40 shall be prepared and provided to VDOT for review.
    24VAC30-155-40. Rezoning.
    A. Proposal submittal. The locality shall submit a package to  VDOT within 10 business days of receipt of a complete application for a  rezoning proposal if the proposal substantially affects transportation on  state-controlled highways. All trip generation calculations used for the purposes  of determining if a proposal meets the criteria shall be based upon the rates  or equations published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip  Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100), 8th Edition, 2008, and shall  not be reduced through internal capture rates. For redevelopment sites, trips  currently generated by existing development that will be removed may be  deducted from the total site trips that are generated by the proposed land use.  However, no submission shall be required under this section if the rezoning  proposal consists of no changes in allowable land use. Furthermore, no  submission shall be required if the rezoning proposal results in lower maximum  daily trip generation and no increase in maximum trip generation for AM Peak  Hour of the adjacent street, PM Peak Hour of the adjacent street, and Weekend  Peak Hour when compared to the hourly trip generation of land uses allowed by  right under the current zoning, excepting governmental uses such as schools and  libraries.
    1. For the purposes of this section, a residential  rezoning proposal shall substantially affect transportation on state-controlled  highways if it meets or exceeds one or more of the following trip generation  criteria:
    a. 1. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT has  maintenance responsibility for the secondary highway system, if the proposal  generates more than 100 5,000 vehicle trips per peak hour of  the generator day at the site's connection to a state-controlled  highway. For a site that does not have an entrance onto a state-controlled  highway, the site's connection is assumed to be wherever the road network that  the site connects with attaches to a state-controlled highway. In cases where  the site has multiple entrances to highways, volumes on all entrances shall be  combined for the purposes of this determination; 
    b. 2. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT does  not have maintenance responsibility for the local highway system, if the  proposal generates more than 100 5,000 vehicle trips per peak  hour of the generator day and whose nearest property line is within  3,000 feet, measured along public roads or streets, of a connection to a  state-controlled highway; or
    c. 3. The proposal for residential rezoning  generates more than 200 400 daily vehicle trips on a  state-controlled highway and, once the site generated trips are distributed to  the receiving highway, the proposal's vehicle trips on a the  highway exceeds exceed the daily traffic volume such highway  presently carries. For the purposes of determining whether a proposal must be  submitted to VDOT, the traffic carried on the state-controlled highway shall be  assumed to be the most recently published amount measured in the last traffic  count conducted by VDOT or the locality on that highway. In cases where the  site has access to multiple highways, each receiving highway shall be evaluated  individually for the purposes of this determination.
    2. For the purposes of this section, all other rezoning  proposals shall substantially affect transportation on state-controlled  highways if they meet or exceed one or more of the following trip generation  criteria:
    a. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT has maintenance  responsibility for the secondary highway system, if the proposal generates more  than 250 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator or 2,500 vehicle trips  per day at the site's connection to a state-controlled highway. For a site that  does not have an entrance onto a state-controlled highway, the site's  connection is assumed to be wherever the road network that the site connects  with attaches to a state-controlled highway. In cases where the site has  multiple entrances to highways, volumes on all entrances shall be combined for  the purposes of this determination; or 
    b. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT does not have  maintenance responsibility for the local highway system, if the proposal  generates more than 250 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator or 2,500  vehicle trips per day and whose nearest property line is within 3,000 feet,  measured along public roads or streets, of a connection to a state-controlled  highway.
    B. Required proposal elements. The package submitted by the  locality to VDOT shall contain sufficient information and data so that VDOT may  determine the location of the rezoning, its size, its impact effect  on state-controlled highways, and methodology and assumptions used in the  analysis of the impact effect. Submittal of an incomplete package  shall be considered deficient in meeting the submission requirements of § 15.2-2222.1  of the Code of Virginia and shall be returned to the locality and the  applicant, if applicable, identifying the deficiencies noted. A package  submitted to VDOT shall contain consist of one paper copy and one  electronic copy and include the following items:
    1. A cover sheet containing:
    a. Contact information for locality and developer (or owner)  if applicable;
    b. Rezoning location, highways adjacent to site, and parcel  number or numbers;
    c. Proposal summary with development name, size, and proposed  zoning; and
    d. A statement regarding the proposal's compliance with the  comprehensive plan.
    2. A local traffic impact statement prepared in  accordance with 24VAC30-155-60 or, if the local requirements for traffic  statements contained in ordinances or policies have not been certified by VDOT,  a VDOT traffic impact statement. 
    3. A concept plan of the proposed development.
    C. Rezoning proposals associated with small area plans.
    1. A traffic impact statement prepared for a small area plan  pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C, or initiated for a small area plan at the request  of a locality prior to February 4, 2010, and that contains substantially the  same elements as those of a VDOT traffic impact statement, shall serve as  the traffic impact statement required pursuant to this section for any rezoning  proposals developed in furtherance of the adopted small area plan and related  comprehensive plan amendments provided the following:
    a. That the small area plan package is accompanied by a cover  letter that includes a statement that the assumptions made in the traffic impact  statement prepared for the small area plan remain generally valid.
    b. That the following are accurate:
    (1) The rezoning proposal is in substantial conformance with  the adopted small area plan. A deviation in density must be greater than 10% to  be considered no longer in substantial conformance with the adopted small area  plan.
    (2) The character and volume of the trip generation by the  proposed uses are similar to those proposed by the small area plan.
    (3) All other assumptions made in the traffic impact statement  prepared for the small area plan remain generally valid.
    2. In instances where the assumptions made in the traffic  impact statement prepared for the small area plan are no longer valid, the  traffic impact statement may be updated. If the traffic impact statement is  updated, it shall serve as the traffic impact statement required pursuant to  this section for any rezoning proposals developed in furtherance of the adopted  small area plan and related comprehensive plan amendments.
    D. Review process. After formal submission of a rezoning  proposal for review, VDOT may, pursuant to § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of  Virginia, request a meeting with the locality and rezoning applicant to discuss  potential modifications to the proposal to address any concerns or deficiencies.  The request must be made within 45 days of receipt by VDOT of the proposal.  VDOT must provide written comments to the locality and the rezoning  applicant within 45 days of VDOT's receipt of the proposal if no meeting is  scheduled or has been requested or within 120 days of the receipt of the  proposal otherwise. VDOT shall not reject or require resubmission if the  package has been prepared in accordance with best professional practice and  substantially documents the expected impacts of the proposal. If VDOT  determines that the package has not been prepared in accordance with best  professional practice or fails to substantially document the expected impacts  of the proposal, or if the submission is substantially incomplete, VDOT may  request of the applicant, in writing or at the above mentioned meeting,  modifications to address concerns. If the concerns are not adequately addressed  within 30 days of the transmission of such concerns, VDOT may require  resubmission. VDOT shall conduct its review and provide official comments  to the locality for inclusion in the official public record. VDOT shall also  make such comments available to the public. The department's comments on the  proposed rezoning shall be based upon the comprehensive plan, regulations and  guidelines of the department, engineering and design considerations, adopted  regional or statewide plans, and short and long term traffic impacts on and off  site. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a locality from acting on a  rezoning proposal if VDOT's comments on the submission have not been received  within the timelines in this section.
    24VAC30-155-50. Subdivision plat, site plan, plan of  development. (Repealed.)
    A. Proposal submittal. The locality shall submit a package  to VDOT within 10 business days of receipt of a complete development proposal  if the proposal substantially affects transportation on state-controlled  highways. All trip generation calculations used for the purposes of determining  if a proposal meets these requirements shall be based upon the rates or  equations published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip  Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100), and shall not be reduced through internal  capture rates. For redevelopment sites, trips currently generated by existing  development that will be removed may be deducted from the total site trips that  are generated by the proposed land use.
    1. For the purposes of this section, a residential  development proposal shall substantially affect transportation on  state-controlled highways if it meets or exceeds one or more of the following  trip generation criteria:
    a. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT has maintenance  responsibility for the secondary highway system, if the proposal generates more  than 100 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator at the site's connection  to a state-controlled highway. For a site that does not have an entrance onto a  state-controlled highway, the site's connection is assumed to be wherever the  road network that the site connects with attaches to a state-controlled  highway. In cases where the site has multiple entrances to highways, volumes on  all entrances shall be combined for the purposes of this determination; 
    b. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT does not have  maintenance responsibility for the local highway system, if the proposal  generates more than 100 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator and has an  entrance that is within 3,000 feet, measured along public roads or streets, of  a connection to a state-controlled highway; or
    c. The proposal generates more than 200 daily vehicle trips  on a state-controlled highway and, once the site-generated trips are  distributed to the receiving highway, the proposal's vehicle trips on such  highway exceeds the daily traffic volume the highway presently carries. For the  purposes of determining whether a proposal must be submitted to VDOT, the  traffic carried on the state-controlled highway shall be assumed to be the most  recently published amount measured in the last traffic count conducted by VDOT  or the locality on that highway. In cases where the site has access to multiple  highways, each receiving highway shall be evaluated individually for the  purposes of this determination.
    2. For the purposes of this section, all other development  proposals shall substantially affect transportation on state-controlled  highways if they meet or exceed one or more of the following trip generation  criteria:
    a. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT has maintenance  responsibility for the secondary highway system, if the proposal generates more  than 250 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator or 2,500 vehicle trips  per day at the site's connection to a state-controlled highway. For a site that  does not have an entrance onto a state-controlled highway, the site's  connection is assumed to be wherever the road network that the site connects  with attaches to a state-controlled highway. In cases where the site has  multiple entrances to highways, volumes on all entrances shall be combined for  the purposes of this determination; or 
    b. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT does not have  maintenance responsibility for the local highway system, if the proposal  generates more than 250 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator or 2,500  vehicle trips per day and has an entrance that is within 3,000 feet, measured  along public roads or streets, of a connection to a state-controlled highway.
    B. Required proposal elements.
    1. The package submitted by the locality to VDOT shall  contain sufficient information and data so that VDOT may determine the location  of the development, its size, its impact on state-controlled highways, and  methodology and assumptions used in the analysis of the impact. Submittal of an  incomplete package shall be considered deficient in meeting the submission  requirements of § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and shall be returned to  the locality and the applicant, if applicable, identifying the deficiencies  noted. A package submitted to VDOT shall contain the following items.
    a. A cover sheet containing:
    (1) Contact information for locality and developer (or  owner);
    (2) Development location, highways connected to, and parcel  number or numbers; and
    (3) Proposal summary with development name and size in  acres.
    b. A supplemental traffic analysis, as defined in  24VAC30-155-50 C. 
    c. A concept plan of the proposed development.
    C. Supplemental traffic analysis. For the purposes of this  subsection, a supplemental traffic analysis will be defined as follows:
    1. In cases where a traffic impact statement has been  submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-30 C, that statement shall  serve as the supplemental traffic impact analysis for the purposes of this  section for any site plan, subdivision plat, or plan of development proposals  developed in furtherance of the adopted small area plan and related  comprehensive plan amendments provided the following:
    a. That such package is accompanied by a cover letter that  includes a statement that the assumptions made in the traffic impact statement  prepared for the small area plan remain generally valid and a copy of the  traffic impact statement is included in the submission.
    b. That the following are accurate:
    (1) The rezoning site plan is in substantial conformance  with the adopted small area plan. A deviation in density must be greater than  10% to be considered no longer in substantial conformance with the adopted  small area plan.
    (2) The character and volume of the trip generation by the  proposed uses are similar to those proposed by the small area plan.
    (3) All other assumptions made in the traffic impact  statement prepared for the small area plan remain generally valid.
    2. In cases where a rezoning traffic impact statement has  been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-40, if all assumptions  made in the traffic impact statement prepared for the rezoning remain valid and  if the submission of the subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development to  the locality occurs within two years of the locality's approval of the rezoning  proposal, the supplemental traffic analysis shall be a letter that provides  VDOT with the following information:
    a. A statement that the impacts analyzed in the  development's rezoning traffic impact statement have not materially changed nor  have the adverse impacts on state-controlled highways increased.
    b. The date of the VDOT letter providing the locality  comments on the rezoning.
    3. In cases where a rezoning traffic impact statement has  been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-40, if all assumptions  made in the traffic impact statement prepared for the rezoning have not  materially changed, the adverse impacts of the proposal on state-controlled  highways have not increased and if the submission of the subdivision plat, site  plan, or plan of development to the locality occurs more than two years of the  locality's approval of the rezoning, the supplemental traffic analysis shall be  a letter that provides VDOT with the following information:
    a. A statement that the impacts analyzed in the  development's rezoning traffic impact statement have not materially changed nor  have the adverse impacts on state-controlled highways increased;
    b. The date of the VDOT letter providing the locality  comments on the rezoning;
    c. Documentation supporting the statement that the  development's rezoning traffic impact statement is still valid; and
    d. A copy of the original traffic impact statement.
    After review of such letter, VDOT may require submission in  accordance with subdivision 5 of this subsection.
    4. In cases where the small area plan traffic impact  statement has not been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-30 or  the rezoning traffic impact statement has not been submitted to VDOT in  accordance with 24VAC30-155-40, the supplemental traffic analysis shall contain  the information required for rezoning traffic impact statements with 100 to 499  peak hour trips. If the subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development  will generate less than 100 peak hour trips then the lowest required elements  for the rezoning traffic impact statement shall be used.
    5. In cases where the small area plan traffic impact  statement has been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-30 and the  conditions analyzed have materially changed such that the adverse impacts of  the proposal on state-controlled highways have increased, the rezoning traffic  impact statement has been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-40  and the conditions analyzed in such traffic impact statement have materially  changed such that the adverse impacts of the proposal on state-controlled highways  have increased or if required pursuant to subdivision 3 of this subsection, the  supplemental traffic analysis shall contain those elements required for  rezoning traffic impact statements with 100 to 499 peak hour trips, as  determined by VDOT. If the subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development  will generate less than 100 peak hour trips then the lowest required elements  for the rezoning traffic impact statement shall be used.
    6. In cases where rezoning occurred after January 1, 2002,  but prior to the implementation of this regulation, VDOT, at its discretion,  may evaluate traffic impact statements or studies performed as part of the  rezoning action. If, in the opinion of VDOT staff with the concurrence of the  locality, the traffic impact analysis work that was performed encompasses the  major elements of work required by this regulation and the underlying  assumptions of the study remain valid the previously prepared study may be  deemed to meet the requirements of this regulation. VDOT staff may also, upon  request of the submitter, allow a previously prepared study to be updated to  incorporate additional areas of analysis or revisions to assumptions to enhance  the accuracy of the study and may deem such updated study to encompass the  major elements of work required by this regulation.
    D. Review process. After formal submission of a  subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development to VDOT for review, VDOT  may, pursuant to § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia, request a meeting  with the locality to discuss potential modifications to the proposal to address  any concerns or deficiencies. The request must be made within 30 days of  receipt by VDOT of the proposal. The submission of the proposal to VDOT shall  toll all times for local review set out in Chapter 22 (§ 15.2-2200 et  seq.) of Title 15.2 of the Code of Virginia until the locality has received  VDOT's final comments. VDOT must provide written comments to the locality  within 30 days of VDOT's receipt of the proposal if no meeting is scheduled or  within 90 days of the receipt of the proposal otherwise. VDOT will conduct its  review and provide official comments to the locality for inclusion in the  official public record. VDOT shall also make such comments available to the  public. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a locality from acting on a  subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development if VDOT's comments on the  submission have not been received within the timelines in this section.
    24VAC30-155-60. Traffic VDOT traffic impact  statement.
    A. A VDOT traffic impact statement (TIS) (VTIS)  assesses the impact of a proposed development on the transportation system and  recommends improvements to lessen or negate those impacts. It shall (i)  identify any traffic issues associated with access from the site to the  existing transportation network, (ii) outline solutions to potential problems,  (iii) address the sufficiency of the future transportation network, and (iv)  present improvements to be incorporated into the proposed development. 
    If a TIS VTIS is required, data collection  shall be by the locality, developer, or owner, as determined by the locality  and the locality shall prepare or have the developer or owner prepare the TIS  VTIS. If the locality prepares the TIS VTIS it shall  provide a copy of the complete TIS VTIS to the applicant when one  is provided to VDOT. The completed TIS VTIS shall be submitted to  VDOT.
    The data and analysis contained in the TIS VTIS  shall be organized and presented in a manner acceptable to VDOT and consistent  with this regulation. Submittal of an incomplete TIS or one prepared using  unapproved methodology or assumptions shall be considered deficient in meeting  the submission requirements of § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and shall  be returned to the locality and the applicant, if applicable, identifying the  deficiencies noted by VDOT.
    B. Scope of work meeting.
    1. For proposals that generate less than 1,000 vehicle trips  per peak hour of the generator representatives of the locality, the applicant,  or the locality and the applicant may request a scope of work meeting with VDOT  to discuss the required elements of a TIS VTIS for any project  and VDOT shall reply to such request within 30 days of its receipt of such a  request and provide a date that is no more than 60 days from such receipt,  time and location for such a scope of work meeting to both the locality and the  applicant, if applicable.
    2. For proposals that generate 1,000 or more vehicle trips per  peak hour of the generator representatives of the locality and applicant, if  applicable, shall hold a scope of work meeting with VDOT to discuss the  required elements of a TIS VTIS. Once a locality or applicant has  contacted VDOT regarding the scheduling of a scope of work meeting, VDOT shall  reply to both the locality and the applicant, if applicable, within 30 days  of such contact and provide a date that is no more than 60 days from  such contact, time and location for such a meeting.
    At a scope of work meeting pursuant to this section, the  locality, the applicant and VDOT shall review the elements, methodology and  assumptions to be used in the preparation of the TIS VTIS, and  identify any other related local requirements adopted pursuant to law. The  results of the initial scoping meeting may be adjusted in accordance with sound  professional judgment and the requirements of this regulation if agreed upon by  VDOT, the locality, and applicant, if applicable.
    C. Required elements. The required elements and scope of a TIS  VTIS are dependent upon the scale and potential impact of the specific  development proposal being addressed by the TIS VTIS as  determined by VDOT in its sole discretion. 
    1. At a minimum, the TIS VTIS shall include the  elements shown in the table below. The site generated peak hour trips in the  table below shall be based upon the gross vehicle trip generation of the site  less internal capture and shall take into account bicycle, pedestrian, and  transit mode split reductions, if applicable. When the type  of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike  or transit trips either on-site or off-site, the TIS VTIS  shall estimate multimodal trips. All distances in the table below shall be  measured along roads or streets.
         
                 | Item | Site Generated Peak Hour Trips | 
       | Less than 100
 | 100 to 499Less than 500
 | 500 to 999 | 1,000 or more | 
       | Background information |   |   |   |   | 
       | List of all nonexistent    transportation improvements assumed in the analysis | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Map    of site location, description of the parcel, general terrain features, and location    within the jurisdiction and region. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description of geographic    scope/ limits of study area.  | Within 1,000 ft of site
 | Within 2,000 feet of site and    any roadway on which 50 or more of the new peak hour vehicle trips generated    by the proposal are distributed – not to exceed one mile | Within 2,000 feet of site and    any roadway on which 10% or more of the new vehicle trips generated by the    proposal are distributed – not to exceed two miles | To be determined by VDOT in    consultation with the locality | 
       | Plan at an engineering scale    of the existing and proposed site uses. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description and map or diagram    of nearby uses, including parcel zoning. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description and map or diagram    of existing roadways. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description and map or diagram    of programmed improvements to roadways, intersections, and other    transportation facilities within the study area. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Analysis of Existing    Conditions |   |   |   |   | 
       | Collected daily and peak hour    of the generator traffic volumes, tabulated and presented on diagrams with    counts provided in an appendix.  | Only diagrams required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Analyses for intersections and    roadways identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated    and LOS is presented on diagrams for each lane group.  | Only diagrams required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | When the type of development    proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit    trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle    facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments, tabulated and    presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist  | At frontage, only diagrams    required
 | Within 2,000 feet of site | Within 2,000 feet of site | To be determined by VDOT in    consultation with the locality | 
       | Speed Study | If requested by VDOT
 | If requested by VDOT | If requested by VDOT | If requested by VDOT | 
       | Crash history near site | If requested by VDOT
 | If requested by VDOT |  If requested by VDOT | If requested by VDOT | 
       | Sight distance | If requested by VDOT
 | If requested by VDOT |  If requested by VDOT | If requested by VDOT | 
       | Analysis of Future Conditions    without Development |   |   |   |   | 
       | Description of and    justification for the method and assumptions used to forecast future traffic    volumes.  | Optional
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Analyses for intersections and    roadways as identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are    tabulated and LOS is presented on diagrams for each lane group. | Optional
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | When the type of development    proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit    trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle    facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and    presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned. | At frontage, only diagrams    required
 | Within 2,000 feet of site | Within 2,000 feet of site | To be determined by VDOT in    consultation with the locality at the scope of work meeting | 
       | Trip Generation |   |   |   |   | 
       | Site trip generation, with    tabulated data, broken out by analysis year for multi-phase developments, and    including justification for deviations from ITE rates, if appropriate. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description    and justification of internal capture reductions for mixed use developments    and pass-by trip reductions, if appropriate, including table of calculations    used. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Site Traffic Distribution and    Assignment |   |   |   |   | 
       | Description of methodology    used to distribute trips, with supporting data. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description of the direction    of approach for site generated traffic and diagrams showing the traffic    assignment to the road network serving the site for the appropriate time    periods. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Analysis of Future Conditions    With Development |   |   |   |   | 
       | Forecast daily and peak hour    of the generator traffic volumes on the highway network in the study area,    site entrances and internal roadways, tabulated and presented on diagrams. | Current traffic + site    generated traffic
 | Future background + site    generated traffic, at each expected phase and at build - out or six years    after start, whichever is later | Future background + site    generated traffic, at each expected phase, at build - out, and six years    after build - out, which may be extended or reduced by VDOT in consultation    with the locality | At a minimum the future    background + site generated traffic, at each expected phase, at build - out,    and six years after build - out; may be extended by VDOT in consultation with    the locality | 
       | Analyses for intersections and    roadways identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated    and LOS presented on diagrams for each lane group. | Only diagrams required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | When the type of development    proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit    trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle    facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and    presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned. | At frontage, only diagrams    required
 | Within 2,000 feet of site | Within 2,000 feet of site |  To be determined by VDOT    in consultation with the locality | 
       | Recommended Improvements |   |   |   |   | 
       | Description and diagram of the    location, nature, and extent of proposed improvements, with preliminary cost    estimates as available from VDOT. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description of methodology    used to calculate the effects of travel demand management (TDM) measures, if    proposed, with supporting data. | Required if TDM proposed
 | Required if TDM proposed | Required if TDM proposed | Required if TDM proposed | 
       | Analyses for all proposed and    modified intersections in the study area under the forecast and site traffic.    Delay, and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS presented on diagrams    for each lane group. For intersections expected to be signalized, MUTCD    Signal Warrant analysis or ITE Manual for Traffic Signal Design, as    determined by VDOT, presented in tabular form. | Only diagrams required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | When the type of development    proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit    trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle    facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and    presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned. | At frontage, only diagrams    required
 | Within 2,000 feet of site | Within 2,000 feet of site | To be determined by VDOT in    consultation with the locality | 
       | Conclusions |   |   |   |   | 
       | Clear, concise description of    the study findings. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
  
         
          Notwithstanding the geographic scope noted above, the  geographic scope of the study noted above may be reduced or enlarged based upon  layout of the local transportation network, the geographical size of the  development, and the traffic volume on the existing network, as determined by  VDOT in consultation with the locality and the applicant, if applicable.  Typically, analysis will be conducted for any roadway on which the additional  trips generated by the proposal have a materially detrimental impact on traffic  conditions. The analysis presented in the TIS VTIS need not  include all roadway and roadway segments located within the geographic scope of  the study as determined by VDOT.
    2. A TIS VTIS for a development proposal that  only meets the low volume road submission criterion (24VAC30-155-40 A 1 c  and 24VAC30-155-50 A 1 c) (24VAC30-155-40 A 3) shall, at a minimum,  consist of the following elements, unless otherwise directed by VDOT.
    a. All elements contained in the Background Information  portion of the above table, except the geographic scope/limits of study area is  limited to the highway fronting the proposed development and the closest  intersection, in each direction if applicable, of that highway with a highway  that has an average daily traffic volume higher than the fronting highway.
    b. A roadway safety inventory study of the roadway segment or  segments between the site entrance to the nearest intersections with the higher  traffic volume highways, to include such elements as, but not limited to, speed  limit, existing warning signs, pavement and shoulder type, pavement and  shoulder width, intersection sight distances, and safe horizontal curve speeds.
    c. Daily and peak hour traffic volumes presented on diagrams,  with counts provided in an appendix, for the fronting highway at the site, at  the highway's intersections with the higher volume highway, and for the higher  volume highways at their intersection with the fronting highway.
    d. All relevant elements contained in the Trip Generation  portion of the above table.
    e. Projected daily and peak hour of the generator traffic  volumes assuming build-out of the proposal, presented on diagrams for the  receiving highway at the site, at the highway's intersection with the higher  volume highways, and for the higher volume highways at their intersections with  the receiving highway.
    f. Delay and level of service analysis for the intersections  of the receiving highway with the higher volume highways.
    g. A comparison of the existing geometrics of the fronting  highway under proposed build-out traffic conditions with the geometric  standards, based upon functional classification and volume, contained in the  Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2011 (VDOT).
    3. A VTIS for a rezoning proposal may be prepared in  accordance with the "Less than 500 Site Generated Peak Hour Trips" category  in the table in this section, regardless of actual projected trip generation,  provided that:
    a. The rezoning proposal is in conformance with a  locality’s adopted comprehensive plan that was reviewed in accordance with  24VAC30-155-30; and
    b. The review of the comprehensive plan included the  submission to VDOT of a technical evaluation of the traffic impacts for  anticipated development based on the future land use policies and map.
    D. Methodology and standard assumptions. A TIS VTIS  shall be prepared based upon methodology and assumptions noted below or as may  be agreed upon by VDOT based upon the results of a scope of work meeting held  by VDOT pursuant to this section.
    1. Data collection. Preparers shall collect traffic data in  accordance with the identified study area. The count data shall include at a  minimum, weekday 24-hour counts, and directional turning movement counts  during AM and PM peak times of the day. The 24-hour counts shall include  vehicle classification counts. With approval of VDOT, data collected by the  transportation professional preparer within the last 24 months may be used,  likewise for data from the VDOT count program. 
    The preparer shall monitor traffic operations during data  collection to ensure extraneous events such as vehicle crashes or special event  traffic do not affect integrity of count data. Preparers collecting data for  utilization in traffic impact studies shall normally avoid data collection  during the following instances:
    a. Holidays or times of the year when the traffic patterns are  deemed to be unrepresentative of typical conditions, unless required by VDOT or  the locality, or both.
    b. Summer months if school or schools in proximity.
    c. Fridays and weekends unless required by VDOT or the  locality, or both.
    d. Other times of the year contingent upon existing adjacent  land use activities.
    e. During times of inclement weather.
    2. Trip generation. Estimates of trip generation by a proposed  development shall be prepared using the Institute of Transportation Engineers  Trip Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100), 8th Edition, 2008, unless  VDOT agrees to allow the use of alternate trip generation rates based upon  alternate published guides or local trip generation studies. VDOT shall at all  times after July 1, 2011, have at least one non-ITE trip generation methodology  or alternative rate approved for the use in preparation of small area plan  traffic impact statements pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C that recognizes the  benefits of reduced vehicle trip generation and vehicle miles traveled from  developments that meet the criteria for a small area plan pursuant to this  regulation. Such alternate methodology or rate can be modified based upon  local factors if agreed to at a scoping meeting. Rezoning proposals shall  assume the highest vehicle trip generating use allowable under the proposed  zoning classification. In determining which trip generation process (equation  or rate) may be used, the preparer shall follow the guidance presented in the  Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Proposed  Recommended Practice (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2004, which is  summarized here, except rates may be utilized if the criteria for the use of  regression equations are not met. Regression equations to calculate trips  as a result of development shall be utilized, provided the following is true:
    a. Independent variable falls within range of data; and
    b. Either the data plot has at least 20 points; or
    c. R2 is greater than 0.75, equation falls  within data cluster in plot and standard deviation greater than 110% of  weighted average rate.
    If the above criteria are not met, then the preparer can use  average trip rates, provided at least one of though if the  following applies do not apply a rate based upon the study of similar  local sites should be considered:
    d. At least three data points exist;
    e. Standard deviation less than 110% of weighted average rate;  and
    f. R2 less than 0.75 or no regression equation  provided; or
    g. f. Weighted average rate falls within data  cluster in plot.
    3. Internal capture and pass-by trips.
    a. Internal capture rates consider site trips  "captured" within a mixed use development, recognizing that trips  from one land use can access another land use within a site development  without having to access the adjacent street system. Mixed use developments  include a combination of residential and nonresidential uses or a combination  of nonresidential uses only. Internal capture allows reduction of site trips  from adjacent intersections and roadways. For traffic impact statements  prepared for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C the internal capture  rate or rates may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved  by VDOT. Unless For ITE-based methodologies, unless otherwise  approved by VDOT, the following internal capture rates should be used if  appropriate:
    (1) Residential with a mix of nonresidential components - use  the smaller of 15% of residential or 15% nonresidential trips generated.
    (2) Residential with office use - use the smaller of 5.0% of  residential or 5.0% of office trips generated.
    (3) Residential with retail use - for AM peak hour, use the  smaller of 5.0% residential or 5.0% retail trips generated; for PM peak hour,  use the smaller of 10% residential or 10% retail trips generated; for 24-hour  traffic, use the smaller of 15% residential or 15% retail trips generated.
    (4) Hotel/motel with office use - use 15% of hotel/motel  trips, unless the overall volume of the office traffic is more than the overall  volume of hotel/motel traffic use in which case use the smaller of 10% of the  hotel/motel traffic or the office traffic.
    (5) Multiuse development with more than five million square  feet of office and retail - internal capture rate should be determined in  consultation with and approval of VDOT. 
    (6) Office with retail use – use the smaller of 5.0% office  or retail trips generated.
    (7) Some combination of the above, if approved by VDOT.
    b. Pass-by trip reductions consider site trips drawn from the  existing traffic stream on an adjacent street, recognizing that trips drawn to  a site would otherwise already traverse the adjacent street regardless of  existence of the site. Pass-by trip reductions allow a percentage reduction in  the forecast of trips otherwise added to the adjacent street from the proposed  development. The reduction applies only to volumes on adjacent streets, not to  ingress or egress volumes at entrances serving the proposed site. Unless  otherwise approved by VDOT, the following pass-by trip reductions may be  used: (1) Shopping center - 25% of trips generated may be considered pass-by.  (2) Convenience stores, service stations, fast food restaurants, and similar  land uses - 40% of trip generated may be considered pass-by.(3) pass-by  rates utilized shall be those reported in Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition  – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004. For traffic impact statements prepared  for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C, the pass-by trip reductions  may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved by VDOT.
    4. Trip distribution. In the absence of more detailed  information, trip distribution shall be in accordance with logical regional  travel patterns as suggested by existing highway directional split and  intersection movements or population and destination site distribution and shall  recognize the effects of increased street connectivity if such streets meet the  requirements of the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (see  24VAC30-155-100) (24VAC30-92). If more detailed information is  available from trip origin/destination studies, marketing studies, or regional  planning models, this may be used to distribute trips upon approval of VDOT.
    5. Planning horizon. In general, the analysis years shall be  related to (i) the opening date of the proposed development, (ii) build-out of  major phases of a multiyear development, (iii) long-range transportation plans,  and (iv) other significant transportation network changes. The preparer should  establish the planning horizon in consultation with and subject to the  acceptance of VDOT.
    6. Background traffic growth. Unless directed by VDOT,  geometric growth (or compound growth), based upon historical growth rates,  shall generally be used for determining future background traffic levels where  extensive traffic-count history is available and capacity constraint is not  appropriate. This growth rate replicates "natural growth" and is  typical for projecting urban growth. Natural growth of traffic can be  adjusted consistent with traffic forecasts associated with previously submitted  local land development projects within the study area.
    7. Future conditions. For the purpose of the TIS VTIS,  future conditions shall include background traffic and additional vehicle trips  anticipated to be generated by approved but not yet constructed or improved  projects.
    8. Level of service calculation. Level of service (LOS)  analysis for highways shall utilize the techniques described in the Highway  Capacity Manual (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2010 (TRB). Neither the  intersection capacity utilization method nor the percentile delay method may be  used in the traffic impact calculations of delay and level of service.  Preparers shall consult with VDOT on which traffic analysis software package is  to be used to conduct the LOS calculations. The results shall be tabulated and  displayed graphically, with levels of service provided for each lane group for  each peak period. All data used in the calculations must be provided along with  the results of the capacity analysis. Any assumptions made that deviate from  the programmed defaults must be documented and an explanation provided as to  why there was a deviation. Electronic files used for the analysis shall be  provided to VDOT as a digital submission (e.g..hcs,.sy6,.inp,.trf files), along  with the printed report. If intersections analyzed are in close proximity to  each other so that queuing may be a factor, VDOT may require the inclusion of  an analysis with a micro simulation model. Unless actual on-ground conditions  dictate otherwise, preparers should use the following defaults when utilizing  the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) or other approved programs when evaluating  roadway components:
    a. Terrain – choose the appropriate terrain type. Most of the  state will be level or rolling, but some areas may qualify for consideration as  mountainous.
    b. Twelve-foot wide lanes.
    c. No parking or bus activity unless field conditions include  such parking or bus activity or unless the locality has provided VDOT with a  written statement of intent for the services to be provided.
    d. Peak hour factor by approach – calculate from collected  traffic counts (requires at least a peak hour count in 15-minute increments). However,  the use of peak hour factors lower than 0.85 shall only be allowed if based  upon the average of more than three peak hour counts. For future conditions  analysis, unless specific site conditions can be expected to create extreme  peak hour factors, default peak hour factors between 0.92 and 1.00 should be  used.
    e. Heavy vehicle factor – calculate from collected traffic  (classification) counts or obtain from VDOT count publications. For future  conditions analysis with development traffic, the existing heavy vehicle factor  should be adjusted based upon the nature of the traffic being generated by the  development.
    f. Area type – noncenter of business district.
    The TIS VTIS shall identify any existing or  proposed bicycle and pedestrian accommodation that would be affected by the  proposal. For the purposes of this subsection, a bicycle accommodation is  defined as on-street bike lanes, paved shoulders of roadways that are not part  of the designated traveled way for vehicles, or exclusive and shared off-street  bicycle paths. 
    For the purposes of this subsection, a pedestrian  accommodation is defined as sidewalks, intersection treatments and exclusive or  shared off-street trails or paths. If significant potential for bicycle or  pedestrian trips exists, the TIS VTIS shall include current and  future service level analyses at build-out for existing or proposed bicycle and  pedestrian accommodations. When the proposal requires or includes improvements  or modifications to the roadway, bicycle or pedestrian accommodations, the TIS  VTIS shall analyze the impacts of such improvements and modifications on  bicycle and pedestrian accommodations and service levels, and provide  recommendations for mitigation of adverse impacts.
    The TIS VTIS shall provide analysis for all bus  service with routes that have, or will have a station or stop within 2,000 feet  of the proposal. The TIS VTIS shall evaluate and discuss  potential for increased demand for bus use due to the proposal, addressing  whether such increases will result in longer dwell time at stops or increase  the need for buses on a route. The quality of service analysis for bus service  shall be determined in accordance with the Transit Capacity and Quality of  Service Manual (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2nd Edition, 2003 (TRB).  The TIS VTIS shall provide both route and segment quality of  service. The TIS VTIS may consider the benefits of dedicated bus  lanes for more frequent and rapid service. The TIS VTIS shall  provide recommendations for mitigation of adverse impacts where adverse impacts  are expected to the quality of service to bus service. If an analysis of  pedestrian quality or level of service is required for calculation of the bus  quality of service, the preparer shall use a methodology approved by VDOT.
    9. Trip reduction, and pedestrian and bicycle accommodations.  When a proposal meets the criteria listed below, the preparer of the TIS  VTIS may reduce the number of vehicle trips generated by the proposal in  the TIS VTIS analysis in accordance with this subsection.  Notwithstanding the percentages below, the total number of reductions used by a  preparer in accordance with this subsection shall never not  exceed 500 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator unless otherwise  approved by VDOT. The trip reductions for traffic impact statements prepared  for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C may be based on the non-ITE  trip generation methodology approved by VDOT and are not subject to limitations  or requirements of this subdivision.
    a. Pedestrian accommodations. For the purposes of this  subsection, a pedestrian accommodation is defined as a sidewalk, pedestrian  path, or multiuse trail. Where a pedestrian service level of A exists, vehicle  trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by 4.0% for those portions  of the development within a 2,000-foot radius of the connections between the  proposed development and the adjoining network. Where a pedestrian service level  of B exists, vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by  3.0%; where a pedestrian service level of C exists, vehicle trips per peak hour  of the generator may be reduced by 1.5% for the portion of the development  noted above. These reductions may only be taken if:
    (1) Pedestrian facility coverage in a 2,000-foot radius of the  connections to the proposed development is on or along at least 80% of the road  network; 
    (2) The connectivity index within the 2,000-foot radius is  equal to or higher than 1.4 pedestrian facilities inside and outside the  development provide reasonably direct access to traffic generators; and
    (3) There are at least two of the 10 major land use  classifications, as defined in ITE Trip Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100),  8th Edition, 2008, within the 2,000-foot radius.
    b. Bicycle accommodations. For the purposes of this  subsection, a bicycle accommodation is defined as a street with a design speed  of 25 MPH or less that carries 400 vehicles per day or less, on-street bike  lanes, a pedestrian accommodation, paved shoulders of roadways that are not  part of the designated traveled way for vehicles and are at least two feet  wide, or exclusive and shared off-street bicycle paths. Where a bicycle service  level of A exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by 3.0%. Where a  bicycle service level of B exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by  2.0%. Where a bicycle service level of C exists, vehicle trips per day may be  reduced by 1.0%. These reductions may only be taken if:
    (1) Bicycle accommodations within a 2,000-foot radius of the  connections to the proposed development exist on or along at least 80% of the  road network; 
    (2) The connectivity index within the 2,000-foot radius is  equal to or higher than 1.4 bicycle accommodations inside and outside  the development provide reasonably direct access to traffic generators; and
    (3) There are at least two of the 10 major land use  classifications as defined in ITE Trip Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100),  8th Edition, 2008, within the 2,000-foot radius. 
    10. Modal split and trip reduction. All vehicle trip  reductions used in the TIS VTIS pursuant to this subsection are  subject to the approval of VDOT.
    a. If a proposal is located within 1/2 mile along roadways,  pedestrian or bicycle accommodations of a transit station, excluding bus stops  and stations, reasonable vehicle trip reductions of vehicle trips generated by  the proposal may be made with approval of VDOT. The preparer shall submit  documentation to justify any such vehicle trip reductions used with the TIS  VTIS. When a proposal is located more than 1/2 mile but less than two  miles from a transit stop, excluding bus stops and stations, with bicycle  parking accommodations transit additional bicycle modal split vehicle  trip reductions may be utilized. The analysis of capacity of the parking  accommodations shall be included in the TIS VTIS when such trip  reductions are used.
    b. If a proposal is located within 1/4 mile along roadways,  pedestrian or bicycle accommodations of a bus stop or station where the segment  and route service levels are C or higher, reasonable vehicle trip reductions of  vehicle trips generated by the proposal may be made with the approval of VDOT.  The preparer shall submit documentation to justify any such vehicle trip  reductions used with the TIS VTIS.
    c. Transit and bus modal split data from similar developments  within the geographic scope of the TIS VTIS or one mile of the  proposal, whichever is greater, shall be collected if the TIS VTIS  vehicle trip reductions are used pursuant to this subsection and similar  developments exist within the geographic scope of the TIS VTIS or  one mile of the proposal, whichever is greater.
    11. Signal warrant analysis. Traffic signal warrant analysis  shall be performed in accordance with the procedures set out in the Manual on  Uniform Traffic Control Devices (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2003, revised  2007, or ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design, 1998, as determined by  VDOT.
    12. Recommended improvements. Recommendations made in the TIS  VTIS for improvements to transportation facilities shall be in  accordance with the geometric standards contained within the Road Design Manual  (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2011 (VDOT).
    24VAC30-155-70. Departmental analysis.
    After concluding its review of a proposed comprehensive plan  or transportation plan or plan amendment, or rezoning, or site or  subdivision plan, VDOT shall provide the locality and applicant, if  applicable, with a written report detailing its analysis and when appropriate  recommending transportation improvements to mitigate any potential adverse  impacts on state-controlled highways. VDOT shall provide recommendations for  facilitating other modes of transportation including but not limited to  transit, bus, bicycle and pedestrian facilities or accommodations where such  facilities or accommodations are planned or exist, or where such facilities  have a significant potential for use. In addition, VDOT shall provide the  locality and the applicant, if applicable, with preliminary recommendations  regarding compliance with other VDOT regulations such as the Secondary Street  Acceptance Requirements (see 24VAC30-155-100) (24VAC30-92), the  Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (see 24VAC30-155-100)  (24VAC30-72), and the Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials,  Collectors, and Local Streets (see 24VAC30-155-100) (24VAC30-73).
    24VAC30-155-80. Fees.
    A. Locality initiated proposals. No fee shall be charged for  review of any comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan amendment, or  rezoning proposal, subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development  initiated by a locality or other public agency.
    B. Proposals containing a traffic impact statement as  described in subdivision C 1 of 24VAC30-155-40. No fee shall be charged for the  review of a rezoning submission that properly includes a traffic impact  statement submitted under subdivision C 1 of 24VAC30-155-40.
    C. Proposals containing supplemental traffic analysis as  described in subdivisions C 1, 2, and 5 of 24VAC30-155-50. No fee shall be  charged for the review of a subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development  submission that properly includes a supplemental traffic analysis submitted  under subdivisions C 1, 2, and 5 of 24VAC30-155-50.
    D. C. All other proposals. Any package  submitted to a locality by an applicant that will be subject to VDOT review  pursuant to this chapter shall include any required payment in a form payable  directly to VDOT.
    1. For initial or second review of all comprehensive plans,  comprehensive plan amendments, and transportation plans submitted to VDOT for  review, not initiated on behalf of the locality, there shall be a fee of $1,000  charged to the applicant. This fee shall be paid upon submission of a plan to  VDOT for review. 
    2. For initial or second review of rezoning proposals,  subdivision plats, site plans, or plans of development accompanied by a  traffic impact statement or supplemental traffic analysis, not initiated  on behalf of the locality, there shall be a single fee for both reviews  determined by the number of adjusted vehicle trips generated per peak hour, as  follows:
           | LowSubmission made due to 24VAC30-155-40 A 3 (low    volume road criteriononly) -
 | $250 | 
       | Less than 100 vehicles per peak hour - 
 | $500
 | 
       | 100 or more vehicles per peak hourAll other    submissions -
 | $1,000 | 
  
    The fee shall be paid upon submission of a package to VDOT for  review. 
    3. For a third or subsequent submission pursuant to  subdivisions 1 or 2 of this subsection, that is requested by VDOT on the basis  of the failure of the applicant to address deficiencies previously identified  by VDOT, the applicant shall be required to pay an additional fee as though the  third or subsequent submission were an initial submission and requiring the  fees identified above. An applicant or locality may appeal to the district  administrator a determination by VDOT that a submitted package failed to  address deficiencies previously identified by VDOT.
    24VAC30-155-100. Listing of documents incorporated by  reference. (Repealed.)
    Requests for information pertaining to the availability  and cost of any of these publications should be directed to the address  indicated below the specific document. Requests for documents available from  VDOT may be obtained from VDOT's division and representative indicated;  however, VDOT documents may be available over the Internet at  www.vdot.virginia.gov.
    1. Trip Generation (effective November 2003) 
           |   | Institute of Transportation    Engineers
 1099 14th Street NW
 Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    2. Trip Generation Handbook – an ITE Proposed Recommended  Practice (effective 2004)
           |   | Institute of Transportation    Engineers
 1099 14th Street NW
 Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    3. Road Design Manual (effective January 1, 2005) 
           |   | VDOT
 1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    4. Highway Capacity Manual (effective 2000)
           |   | Transportation Research Board
 500 Fifth Street NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    5. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (effective  December 22, 2003)
           |   | Federal Highway Administration
 Superintendent of Documents
 U.S. Government Printing Office
 P.O. Box 371954
 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250
 | 
  
    6. ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design (effective 1998)
           |   | Institute of Transportation    Engineers
 1099 14th Street NW
 Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    7. Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition  (effective 2003)
           |   | Transportation Research Board of    the National Academies
 Keck Center of the National    Academies
 Transportation Research Board
 500 Fifth Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    8. Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (24VAC30-92)
           |   | Commonwealth Transportation Board
 1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    9. Access Management: Principal Arterials (24VAC30-72)
           |   | VDOT
 1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    10. Access Management: Minor  Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets (24VAC30-73)
           |   | VDOT
 1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-155)
    Requests for information pertaining to the availability  and cost of any of these publications should be directed to the address  indicated for the specific document. Requests for documents available from VDOT  may be obtained from VDOT's division and representative indicated; however,  VDOT documents may be available over the Internet at www.vdot.virginia.gov.
    Highway  Capacity Manual, 2010, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street NW,  Washington, DC 20001.
    ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design (effective 1998),  Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600,  Washington, DC 20006.
    Manual  on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, effective 2003,  revised 2007, Federal Highway Administration, Superintendent of Documents, U.S.  Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250.
    Road  Design Manual, 2011, VDOT, 1401 E. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
    Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd  Edition, 2003; Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Keck  Center of the National Academies, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth  Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001.
    Trip  Generation, 8th Ed., 2008, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye  Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006.
    Trip  Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004,  Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600,  Washington, DC 20006.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R12-2999; Filed November 29, 2011, 10:45 a.m. 
TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES
COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The  Commissioner of Highways is claiming an exemption from the Administrative  Process Act in accordance with (i) § 2.2-4006 A 3 of the Code of Virginia,  which excludes regulations that consist only of changes in style or form or  corrections of technical errors and (ii) § 2.2-4006 A 4 a of the Code of  Virginia, which excludes regulations that are necessary to conform to changes  in Virginia statutory law where no agency discretion is involved. The  Commissioner of Highways will receive, consider, and respond to petitions by  any interested person at any time with respect to reconsideration or revision.
         Titles of Regulations: 24VAC30-72. Access Management  Regulations: Principal Arterials (amending 24VAC30-72-10, 24VAC30-72-20,  24VAC30-72-40, 24VAC30-72-50, 24VAC30-72-60, 24VAC30-72-70, 24VAC30-72-80,  24VAC30-72-120, 24VAC30-72-150; repealing 24VAC30-72-140, 24VAC30-72-170).
    24VAC30-73. Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials,  Collectors, and Local Streets (amending 24VAC30-73-10, 24VAC30-73-40,  24VAC30-73-50, 24VAC30-73-70, 24VAC30-73-80, 24VAC30-73-90, 24VAC30-73-120,  24VAC30-73-150; repealing 24VAC30-73-140, 24VAC30-73-170). 
    Statutory Authority: § 33.1-198.1 of the Code of  Virginia.
    Effective Date: January 18, 2012. 
    Agency Contact: Robert Hofrichter, Assistant Division  Administrator, Transportation and Mobility Management Division, Department of  Transportation, 1401 East Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804)  786-0780, or email robert.hofrichter@vdot.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    This regulatory action makes technical corrections to Access  Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (24VAC30-72) and Access Management  Regulations: Minor Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets (24VAC30-73) to  make them consistent with the revisions to the Traffic Impact Analysis  Regulations (24VAC30-155) and the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements  (24VAC30-92). 
    In addition, Chapters 104 and 164 of the 2011 Acts of  Assembly repealed the statutory provisions addressing regulation of drive-in  theaters, making the regulations addressing these entrances obsolete. 
    24VAC30-72-10. Definitions.
    "Access management" means the systematic control of  the location, spacing, design, and operation of entrances, median openings,  traffic signals, and interchanges for the purpose of providing vehicular access  to land development in a manner that preserves the safety and efficiency of the  transportation system. 
    "Commercial entrance" means any entrance serving  land uses other than two or fewer individual private residences. (See  "private entrance.")
    "Commissioner" means the individual who serves as  the chief executive officer of the Department of Transportation or his  designee.
    "Commonwealth" means the Commonwealth of Virginia.
    "Crossover" or "median opening" means an  opening in a nontraversable median (such as a concrete barrier or raised  island) that provides for crossing and turning traffic. 
    "Design speed" means the selected speed used to  determine the geometric design features of the highway. 
    "District" means each of the nine areas in which  VDOT is divided to oversee the maintenance and construction on the  state-maintained highways, bridges and tunnels within the boundaries of the  area. 
    "District administrator" means the VDOT employee  assigned to supervise the district. 
    "District administrator's designee" means the VDOT  employee or employees designated by the district administrator. 
    "Entrance" means any driveway, street, or other  means of providing for movement of vehicles to or from the highway.
    "Frontage road" means a road that generally runs  parallel to a highway between the highway right-of-way and the front building  setback line of the abutting properties and provides access to the abutting  properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to the highway  and separating the abutting property traffic from through traffic on the  highway. 
    "Functional area" means the area of the physical  highway feature, such as an intersection, roundabout, railroad grade crossing,  or interchange, plus that portion of the highway that comprises the decision  and maneuver distance and required vehicle storage length to serve that highway  feature. 
    "Functional area of an intersection" means the  physical area of an at-grade intersection plus all required storage lengths for  separate turn lanes and for through traffic including any maneuvering distance  for separate turn lanes.
    "Functional classification" means the federal  system of classifying groups of highways according to the character of service  they are intended to provide and classifications made by the commissioner based  on the operational characteristics of a highway. Each highway is assigned a  functional classification based on the highway's intended purpose of providing  priority to through traffic movement or adjoining property access. The  functional classification system groups highways into three basic categories  identified as (i) arterial, with the function to provide through movement of  traffic; (ii) collector, with the function of supplying a combination of  through movement and access to property; and (iii) local, with the function of  providing access to property. 
    "Highway," "street," or "road"  means a public way for purposes of vehicular travel, including the entire area  within the right-of-way.
    "Intersection" means any at-grade connection with a  highway including two highways or an entrance and a highway.
    "Legal speed limit" means the speed limit set forth  on signs lawfully posted on a highway or in the absence of such signs the speed  limit established by Article 8 (§ 46.2-870 et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title 46.2  of the Code of Virginia.
    "Level of service" means a qualitative measure  describing the operational conditions within a vehicular traffic stream,  generally in terms of such service measures as speed, travel time, freedom to  maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience.  "Level-of-service" is defined and procedures are presented for  determining the level of service in the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-72-170 I), 2010 (Transportation Research Board).
    "Limited access highway" means a highway especially  designed for through traffic over which abutting properties have no easement or  right of light, air, or access by reason of the fact that their property abuts  upon the limited access highway.
    "Median" means the portion of a divided highway  that separates opposing traffic flows.
    "Operating speed" means the speed at which drivers  are observed operating their vehicles during free-flow conditions with the 85th  percentile of the distribution of observed speeds being the most frequently  used measure of the operating speed of a particular location or geometric  feature. 
    "Permit" or "entrance permit" means a  document that sets the conditions under which VDOT allows a connection to a  highway. 
    "Permit applicant" means the person or persons,  firm, corporation, government, or other entity that has applied for a permit. 
    "Permittee" means the person or persons, firm,  corporation, government, or other entity that has been issued a permit.
    "Preliminary subdivision plat" means a plan of  development as set forth in § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Principal arterial" means the functional  classification for a major highway intended to serve through traffic where  access is carefully controlled, generally highways of regional importance, with  moderate to high volumes of traffic traveling relatively long distances and at  higher speeds.
    "Private entrance" means an entrance that serves up  to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of the  occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain access  to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure facilities  that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump stations, and  stormwater management basins.
    "Professional engineer" means a person who is qualified  to practice engineering by reason of his special knowledge and use of  mathematical, physical and engineering sciences and the principles and methods  of engineering analysis and design acquired by engineering education and  experience, and whose competence has been attested by the Virginia Board for  Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior  Designers and Landscape Architects through licensure as a professional  engineer.
    "Reverse frontage road" means a road that is  located to the rear of the properties fronting a highway and provides access to  the abutting properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to  the highway and removing the abutting property traffic from through traffic on  the highway.
    "Right-of-way" means that property within the  systems of state highways that is open or may be opened for public travel or  use or both in the Commonwealth. This definition includes those public  rights-of-way in which the Commonwealth has a prescriptive easement for maintenance  and public travel. 
    "Roadside" means the area adjoining the outer edge  of the roadway. The median of a divided highway may also be considered a  "roadside."
    "Roadway" means the portion of a highway, including  shoulders, for vehicular use. A divided highway has two or more roadways.
    "Shared entrance" means a single entrance serving  two or more adjoining parcels.
    "Sight distance" means the distance visible to the  driver of a vehicle when the view is unobstructed by traffic.
    "Site plan" and "subdivision plat" mean a  plan of development approved in accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241  through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia. 
    "Stopping sight distance" means the distance  required by a driver of a vehicle, traveling at a given speed, to bring the vehicle  to a stop after an object on the highway becomes visible, including the  distance traveled during the driver's perception and reaction times and the  vehicle braking distance.
    "Systems of state highways" means all highways and  roads under the ownership, the control, or the jurisdiction of VDOT, including  but not limited to, the primary, secondary and interstate highway. 
    "Traveled way" means the portion of the roadway for  the movement of vehicles, exclusive of shoulders and turn lanes.
    "Trip" means a single or one-directional vehicle  movement either entering or exiting a property; a vehicle leaving the property  is one trip and a vehicle returning to the property is one trip.
    "Turn lane" means a separate lane for the purpose  of enabling a vehicle that is entering or leaving a highway to increase or  decrease its speed to a rate at which it can more safely merge or diverge with  through traffic; acceleration and deceleration lanes.
    "Urban area" means an urbanized area with a  population of 50,000 or more, or an urban place (small urban area) as  designated by the Bureau of the Census having a population of 5,000 or more and  not within any urbanized area. The Federal Highway Administration defines  "urban area" in more detail based on the federal-aid highway law (23  USC § 101).
    "VDOT" means the Virginia Department of  Transportation, its successor, the Commissioner of Highways, or his designees.
    24VAC30-72-20. Authority to regulate entrances to highways.
    A. VDOT's authority to regulate highway entrances and manage  access to highways is provided in §§ 33.1-13, 33.1-197, 33.1-198, 33.1-198.1,  and 33.1-199 of the Code of Virginia, and its authority to make regulations  concerning the use of highways generally is provided in § 33.1-12 (3) of the  Code of Virginia. Each proposed highway entrance creates a potential conflict  point that impacts the safe and efficient flow of traffic on the highway;  therefore, private property interests in access to the highway must be balanced  with public interests of safety and mobility. Managing access to highways can  reduce traffic congestion, help maintain the levels of service, enhance public  safety by decreasing traffic conflict points, support economic development by  promoting the efficient movement of people and goods, reduce the need for new  highways and road widening by improving the performance of existing highways,  preserve the public investment in new highways by maximizing their efficient  operation, and better coordinate transportation and land use decisions.
    B. Where a plan of development with the specific location of  an entrance or entrances was proffered pursuant to § 15.2-2297, 15.2-2298, or 15.2-2303 of the Code of Virginia prior to July 1, 2008, such entrances shall  be exempt from the spacing standards for entrances and intersections in  Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011  (VDOT) provided the requirements of § 15.2-2307 of the Code of Virginia  have been met. Entrances shown on a subdivision plat, site plan, preliminary  subdivision plat that is valid pursuant to §§ 15.2-2260 and 15.2-2261 approved  in accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241 through 15.2-2245 prior to July  1, 2008, shall be exempt from the spacing standards for entrances and  intersections in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT).
    C. The Commonwealth Transportation Board has the authority to  designate highways as limited access and to regulate access rights to those  facilities as provided in § 33.1-58 of the Code of Virginia. No private or  commercial entrances shall be permitted within limited access rights-of-way  except as may be provided for by the regulation titled Change of Limited Access  Control (24VAC30-401).
    D. The VDOT district administrators or their designees are  authorized to issue private entrance permits and commercial entrance permits in  accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
    E. In cases where the provisions and requirements of this  chapter conflict with the Land Use Permit Regulations (see 24VAC30-72-170  G), (24VAC30-151), the provisions and requirements of this chapter  shall govern.
    24VAC30-72-40. Administrative procedures and rules for  obtaining commercial and private entrance permits.
    All applications for entrance permits shall be obtained from  and submitted to the district administrator's designee for the county in which  the work is to be performed. The permit applicant shall submit the permit  application form, and the entrance permit, if approved, will be issued in  accordance with the applicable administrative rules, requirements, and  procedures of this chapter and the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-72-170 G) (24VAC30-151). 
    24VAC30-72-50. Appeal and exception procedure.
    A. The permit applicant may appeal denial or revocation or  conditions imposed by a permit in writing to the district administrator with a  copy to the district administrator's designee and the chief administrative  officer of the locality where the entrance is proposed. 
    1. All appeals must be received within 30 days of receipt of  written notification of denial or revocation or issuance of a permit with  contested conditions and must set forth the grounds for the appeal and include  copies of all prior correspondence with any local government official and VDOT  representatives regarding the issue or issues. The permit applicant may request  a meeting with the district administrator concerning the appeal and the  district administrator will set a date, time, and location for such meeting. 
    2. After reviewing all pertinent information, the district  administrator will advise the permit applicant in writing regarding the  decision on the appeal within 60 days of receipt of the written appeal request  or such longer timeframe jointly agreed to by the parties, with a copy to the  district administrator's designee and the chief administrative officer of the  locality where the entrance is proposed.
    3. The permit applicant may further appeal the district  administrator's decision to the commissioner within 30 days of receipt of  written notification of the district administrator's decision. The commissioner  will advise the permit applicant in writing regarding the decision on the  appeal within 60 days of receipt of the written appeal request, with a copy to  the district administrator and the chief administrative officer of the locality  where the entrance is proposed. 
    B. The commissioner may grant an exception to the required  sight distance after a traffic engineering investigation has been performed. 
    1. If a sight distance exception is requested, the permit  applicant shall provide such request in writing to the commissioner with a copy  to the district administrator's designee and the chief administrative officer  of the locality where the entrance is proposed and shall furnish the  commissioner with a traffic engineering investigation report, prepared by a  professional engineer. The methodology and format of the report shall be in  conformance with requirements set forth in the Manual on Uniform Traffic  Control Devices (see 24VAC30-72-170 D). Refer to Instructional and  Informational Memorandum IIM-LD-227.5, 2011 (VDOT), for requirements concerning  approval of sight distance exceptions.
    2. The commissioner will advise the permit applicant in  writing regarding the decision on the sight distance exception request within  60 days of receipt of the written exception request or such longer timeframe  jointly agreed to by the parties, with a copy to the district administrator's  designee and the chief administrative officer of the locality where the  entrance is proposed.
    24VAC30-72-60. General provisions governing commercial and  private entrances.
    A. No entrance of any nature may be constructed within the  right-of-way until the location has been approved by VDOT and an entrance  permit has been issued. The violation of any provision of this chapter and any  condition of approval of an entrance permit shall be subject to the penalties  for violations specified in the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-72-170 G) (24VAC30-151).
    B. VDOT will permit reasonably convenient access to a parcel  of record. VDOT is not obligated to permit the most convenient access, nor is  VDOT obligated to approve the permit applicant's preferred entrance location or  entrance design. If a parcel is served by more than one road in the systems of  state highways, the district administrator's designee shall determine upon  which road or roads the proposed entrance or entrances is or are to be  constructed. 
    C. When two or more properties are to be served by the same  entrance, the permit applicant shall ensure that there is a recorded agreement  between the parties specifying the use and future maintenance of the entrance.  A copy of this recorded agreement shall be included in the entrance permit  application submitted to the district administrator's designee. The shared  entrance shall be identified on any site plan or subdivision plat of the  property.
    D. The district administrator's designee may require the  permit applicant to alter any proposed entrance location or design, whether  private or commercial, to obtain the best possible operational characteristics,  including, but not limited to, sight distance and entrance spacing.
    E. Entrance standards established by localities that are  stricter than those of VDOT shall govern.
    24VAC30-72-70. Commercial entrance design.
    A. All commercial entrance design and construction shall  comply with the provisions of this chapter and the standards in the Road Design  Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011 (VDOT), the Road and Bridge  Standards (see 24VAC30-72-170 C), 2008, revised 2011 (VDOT), the  Road and Bridge Specifications (see 24VAC30-72-170 B) 2007, revised  2011 (VDOT), other VDOT engineering and construction standards as may be  appropriate, and any additional conditions, restrictions, or modifications  deemed necessary by the district administrator's designee to preserve the  safety, use and maintenance of the systems of state highways. Entrance design  and construction shall comply with applicable guidelines and requirements of  the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12101 et seq.). Ramps for  curb sections shall be provided as required in § 15.2-2021 of the Code of  Virginia. The standard drawing for depressed curb ramp as shown in the Road and  Bridge Standards (see 24VAC30-72-170 C), 2008, revised 2011 (VDOT),  shall be utilized in the design.
    1. In the event an entrance is proposed within the limits of a  funded roadway project that will ultimately change a highway, the permit  applicant may be required to construct, to the extent possible, entrances  compatible with the roadway's ultimate design.
    2. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  pedestrian and bicycle users of the abutting highway in accordance with the  Commonwealth Transportation Board's "Policy for Integrating Bicycle and  Pedestrian Accommodations" (see 24VAC30-72-170 H), 2004.
    3. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  transit users of the abutting highway where applicable and provide  accommodations to the extent possible.
    4. Based on the existing and planned developments, the  district administrator's designee will determine the need for curb and gutter,  sidewalks, or other features within the general area of the proposed entrance  in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and the design standards in  Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011  (VDOT). 
    5. Sites accessed by an entrance shall be designed so as to  prevent unsafe and inefficient traffic movements from impacting travel on the  abutting highway. At the request of the district administrator's designee, the  permit applicant shall furnish a report that documents the impact of expected  traffic movements upon the function of the abutting highway during the peak  hours of the abutting highway.
    B. It is essential that entrance and site design allow safe  and efficient movements of traffic using the entrance while minimizing the  impact of such movements on the operation of the systems of state highways. 
    1. The permit applicant shall supply sufficient information to  demonstrate to the satisfaction of the district administrator's designee that  neither the entrance, nor the proposed traffic circulation patterns within the  parcel, will compromise the safety, use, operation, or maintenance of the  abutting highway. A rezoning traffic impact statement or a site  plan/subdivision plat supplemental traffic analysis submitted for a proposed  development of a parcel in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis  Regulations (24VAC30-155) may be used for this purpose, provided that it  adequately documents the effect of the proposed entrance and its related traffic  on the operation of the highway to be accessed. 
    2. If the proposed entrance will cause the systems of state  highways to experience degradation in safety or a significant increase in delay  or a significant reduction in capacity beyond an acceptable level of service,  the applicant shall be required to submit a plan to mitigate these impacts and  to bear the costs of such mitigation measures.
    3. Proposed mitigation measures must be approved by the  district administrator's designee prior to permit approval. Mitigation measures  that may be considered include but are not limited to:
    a. Construction of auxiliary lanes or turning lanes, or  pavement transitions/tapers;
    b. Construction of new crossovers, or the relocation, removal,  or consolidation of existing crossovers;
    c. Installation, modification, or removal of traffic signals  and related traffic control equipment;
    d. Provisions to limit the traffic generated by the  development served by the proposed entrance;
    e. Dedication of additional right-of-way or easement, or both,  for future road improvements; 
    f. Reconstruction of existing roadway to provide required  vertical and horizontal sight distances; 
    g. Relocation or consolidation of existing entrances; or
    h. Recommendations from adopted corridor studies, design  studies, other access management practices and principles, or any combination  of these, not otherwise mentioned in this chapter. 
    4. If an applicant is unwilling or unable to mitigate the  impacts identified in the traffic impact analysis, the entrance shall be  physically restricted to right-in or right-out movements or both or similar  restrictions such that the public interests in a safe and efficient flow of  traffic on the systems of state highways are protected. 
    24VAC30-72-80. Minimum sight distance for commercial entrances.
    A. No less than minimum intersection sight distance shall be  obtained for any commercial entrance. Sight distances shall be measured in  accordance with VDOT practices, and sight distance requirements shall conform  to VDOT standards as described in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see  24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011 (VDOT). The legal speed limit shall be used  unless the design speed is available and approved for use by VDOT. 
    B. The operating speed may be used in lieu of the legal speed  limit in cases where the permit applicant furnishes the district  administrator's designee with a speed study prepared in accordance with the  Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (see 24VAC30-72-170 D) 2003,  revised 2007 (FHWA), methodology that demonstrates the operating speed of  the segment of highway is lower than the legal speed limit and, in the judgment  of the district administrator's designee, use of the operating speed will not  compromise safety for either a driver at an entrance or a driver on the  abutting highway. 
    C. VDOT may require that the vertical or horizontal alignment  of the existing roadway be adjusted to accommodate certain design elements of a  proposed commercial entrance including, but not limited to, median openings,  crossovers, roundabouts, and traffic signals, where adjustment is deemed  necessary. The cost of any work performed to adjust the horizontal or vertical  alignment of the roadway to achieve required intersection sight distance at a  proposed entrance shall be borne by the permit applicant.
    24VAC30-72-120. Commercial entrance access management.
    A. As commercial entrance locations and designs are prepared  and reviewed, appropriate access management regulations and standards shall be  utilized to ensure the safety, integrity and operational characteristics of the  transportation system are maintained. The proposed commercial entrance shall  meet the access management standards contained in Appendix F of the Road Design  Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011 (VDOT), and the regulations  in this chapter to provide the users of such entrance with a safe means of  ingress and egress while minimizing the impact of such ingress and egress on  the operation of the highway. As part of any commercial entrance permit review,  the district administrator's designee will determine what improvements are  needed to preserve the operational characteristics of the highway, accommodate  the proposed traffic and, if entrance design modifications are needed,  incorporate them accordingly to protect the transportation corridor. If the  location of the entrance is within the limits of an access management plan  approved by the local government and VDOT, the plan should guide the district  administrator's designee in determining the appropriate design and location of  the entrance. Access management requirements, in addition to the regulations in  this chapter, include but are not limited to:
    1. Restricting commercial entrance locations. To prevent undue  interference with free traffic movement and to preserve safety, entrances to  the highways shall not be permitted within the functional areas of  intersections, roundabouts, railroad grade crossings, interchanges or similar  areas with sensitive traffic operations. Only the commissioner may grant an  exception to this requirement in accordance with the procedures set forth in  24VAC30-72-50 B. 
    2. Entrances shared with adjoining properties. To reduce the  number of entrances to state highways, the district administrator's designee  shall require that shared entrances be created and designed to serve adjoining  parcels unless the permit applicant submits compelling evidence that a  reasonable agreement cannot be reached with adjoining property owners or that  there are physical constraints, including but not limited to topography, environmentally  sensitive areas, and hazardous uses, to creating a shared entrance. A copy of  the property owners' recorded agreement to share use of and maintain the  entrance shall be submitted with the permit application for a shared entrance.  The shared entrance shall be identified on any site plan or subdivision plat of  the property. A permit applicant shall not be required to follow the procedures  for an appeal set forth in 24VAC30-72-50 to receive an exception to the  requirements of this subdivision.
    3. Spacing of entrances and intersections. The spacing of  proposed entrances and intersections shall comply with the spacing standards  for entrances and intersections in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see  24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011 (VDOT), except as specified below.
    a. On older, established business corridors of a locality  within an urban area where existing entrances and intersections did not meet  the spacing standards prior to July 1, 2008, spacing for new entrances and  intersections may be allowed by the district administrator's designee that is  consistent with the established spacing along the highway, provided that  reasonable efforts are made to comply with the other access management  requirements of this section including restricting entrances within the  functional areas of intersections, sharing entrances with and providing  vehicular and pedestrian connections between adjoining properties, and  physically restricting entrances to right-in or right-out or both movements. 
    b. Where a developer proposes a development within a  designated urban development area as defined in § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of  Virginia and other comparable local designations that fully incorporates  principles of new urbanism and traditional neighborhood development, which may  include but need not be limited to (i) pedestrian-friendly road design, (ii)  interconnection of new local streets with existing local streets and roads,  (iii) connectivity of road and pedestrian networks, (iv) preservation of  natural areas, (v) satisfaction of requirements for stormwater management, (vi)  mixed-use neighborhoods, including mixed housing types, (vii) reduction of  front and side yard building setbacks, and (viii) reduction of subdivision  street widths and turning radii at subdivision street intersections, the  district administrator's designee may approve spacing standards for entrances  and intersections internal to the development that differ from the otherwise  applicable spacing standards provided that such entrances and intersections  meet the intersection sight distance standards specified in Appendix F of the  Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011 (VDOT). 
    c. Where a development's second or additional commercial  entrances are necessary for the streets in the development to be eligible for acceptance  into the secondary system of state highways and such commercial entrances  cannot meet the spacing standards for highways, the district administrator's  designee shall waive such state requirements that necessitate second or  additional commercial entrances. 
    4. Vehicular/pedestrian circulation between adjoining  properties. To facilitate traffic circulation between adjacent properties,  reduce the number of entrances to the highway, and maximize use of new  signalized intersections, the permit applicant shall be required to record  access easements and to construct vehicular connections (which may include  frontage roads or reverse frontage roads) in such a manner that affords safe  and efficient future access between the permit applicant's property and the  adjoining properties. Where appropriate, the permit applicant also shall  construct pedestrian connections to the boundary lines of adjoining undeveloped  properties. 
    a. Such connections shall not be required if there are  physical constraints to making such connections between properties including  but not limited to topography, environmentally sensitive areas, and hazardous  uses. 
    b. At such time that a commercial entrance permit application  is submitted for the adjoining property, a condition of permit issuance shall  be to extend such vehicular/pedestrian connections into the proposed  development. 
    c. If a permit applicant cannot or does not wish to comply  with this requirement, the permit applicant's entrance shall be physically  restricted to right-in or right-out movements or both or similar restrictions  such that the public interests in a safe and efficient flow of traffic on the  systems of state highways are protected. 
    d. Development sites under the same ownership or consolidated  for the purposes of development and comprised of more than one building site  shall provide a unified access and circulation system between the sites.
    5. Traffic signal spacing. To promote the efficient  progression of traffic on highways, commercial entrances that are expected to  serve sufficient traffic volumes and movements to require signalization shall  not be permitted if the spacing between the entrance and at least one adjacent  signalized intersection is below signalized intersection spacing standards in  Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011  (VDOT). If sufficient spacing between adjacent traffic signals is not  available, the entrance shall be physically restricted to right-in or right-out  movements or both or similar restrictions such that the public interests in a  safe and efficient flow of traffic on the systems of state highways are  protected and preserved.
    6. Limiting entrance movements. To preserve the safety and  function of certain highways, the district administrator's designee may require  an entrance to be designed and constructed in such a manner as to physically  prohibit certain traffic movements.
    B. A request for an exception from the access management  requirements subsection A of this section shall follow the procedures for an  appeal set forth in 24VAC30-72-50. In addition such request shall include  specific and documented reasons based on a traffic engineering investigation  report prepared showing that highway operation and safety will not be adversely  impacted by the requested exception.
    C. VDOT may work with a locality or localities on access  management corridor plans. Such plans may allow for spacing standards that  differ from and supersede the spacing standards for entrances and intersections  in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011  (VDOT), subject to approval by the commissioner.
    24VAC30-72-140. Drive-in theaters. (Repealed.)
    A drive-in theater is a specialized commercial entrance.  In addition to the commercial entrance regulations set forth in this part, the  conditions set forth in § 33.1-12 (15) of the Code of Virginia shall be  satisfied in order to construct entrances to drive-in theaters.
    24VAC30-72-150. Temporary entrances (construction/logging  entrances).
    A. Construction of temporary construction or logging  entrances upon the systems of state highways shall be authorized in accordance  with the provisions in the Land Use Permit Regulations (see 24VAC30-72-170  G) (24VAC30-151). The permit applicant must contact the appropriate  district administrator's designee to approve the location prior to installing  an entrance or utilizing an existing entrance. The district administrator's  designee shall also be contacted to arrange and conduct a final inspection  prior to closing a temporary construction or logging entrance. In the event  that adequate sight distance is not achieved, additional signage that meets the  Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices standards (see 24VAC30-72-170 D),  2003, revised 2007, and certified flaggers shall be used to ensure safe  ingress and egress.
    B. Entrances shall be designed and operated in such a manner  as to prevent mud and debris from being tracked from the site onto the  highway's paved surface. If debris is tracked onto the highway, it shall be  removed by the permittee immediately as directed by the district  administrator's designee.
    C. The permittee must restore, at the permittee's cost, all  disturbed highway rights-of-way, including, but not limited to, ditches,  shoulders, roadside and pavement, to their original condition when removing the  entrance. All such restorations are subject to approval by the district  administrator's designee.
    24VAC30-72-170. Documents incorporated by reference. (Repealed.)
    A. Road Design Manual (effective January 1, 2005, revised  July 2008)
    Note: Appendix F (Access Management Design Standards for  Entrances and Intersections) contains the access management standards  referenced in Chapters 863 and 928 of the 2007 Acts of Assembly and Chapters  274 and 454 of the 2008 Acts of Assembly.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    B. 2007 Road and Bridge Specifications (effective July  2008)
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    C. Road and Bridge Standards (effective February 1, 2001)
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    D. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for  Streets and Highways, 2003 Edition (effective December 22, 2003, revised  November 2004)
           |   | Federal Highway    AdministrationSuperintendent of Documents
 U.S. Government Printing Office
 P.O. Box 371954
 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954
 | 
  
    E. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,  Fifth Edition, 2004
           |   | American Association of State Highway and Transportation    Officials (AASHTO)444 North Capitol St. N.W., Suite 225
 Washington, D.C. 20001
 | 
  
    F. Change of Limited Access Control, 24VAC30-401
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    G. Land Use Permit Regulations, 24VAC30-151
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    H. Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian  Accommodations, eff. March 18, 2004
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    I. Highway Capacity Manual 2000 
           |   | Transportation Research Board500 Fifth Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    J. Traffic Impact Analysis  Regulations, 24VAC30-155
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
        NOTICE: The following  forms used in administering the regulation were filed by the agency. The forms  are not being published; however, online users of this issue of the Virginia  Register of Regulations may click on the name to access a form. The forms are  also available from the agency contact or may be viewed at the Office of the  Registrar of Regulations, General Assembly Building, 2nd Floor, Richmond,  Virginia 23219.
         FORMS (24VAC30-72)
    LUP-A - Land Use Permit Application (revised 1/2005).
    LUP-SP - Special Provisions (Notice of Permittee  Liability) (revised 11/2007).
    LUP-CSB - Corporate Surety Bond (revised 1/2005).
    LUP-LC - Irrevocable Letter of Credit Bank Agreement  (revised 1/2005).
    LUP-SB - Surety Bond (revised 1/2005).
    LUP-A  - Land Use Permit Application (rev. 03/10).
    LUP-SP  - Special Provisions (Notice of Permittee Liability (rev. 12/10).
    LUP-CSB  - Corporate Surety Bond (rev. 03/10).
    LUP-LC  - Irrevocable Letter of Credit Bank Agreement (rev. 03/10).
    LUP-SB  - Land Use Surety Bond (rev. 03/10).
    DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-72)
    Information pertaining to the availability and cost of any  of these publications should be directed to the address indicated for the  specific document. Requests for documents of the Virginia Department of  Transportation (VDOT) may be obtained from the department at 1401 E. Broad St.,  Richmond, Virginia 23219; however, department documents may be available over the  Internet at www.virginiadot.org.
    VDOT  Road Design Manual, 2011.
    Note: Appendix F (Access Management Design Standards for  Entrances and Intersections) contains the access management standards  referenced in Chapters 863 and 928 of the 2007 Acts of Assembly and Chapters  274 and 454 of the 2008 Acts of Assembly.
    VDOT  Road and Bridge Specifications, 2007, revised 2011.
    VDOT  Road and Bridge Standards, 2008, revised 2011.
    Manual  on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2003, revised  2007, Federal Highway Administration, Superintendent of Documents, U.S.  Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954.
    VDOT  Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations, 2004.
    Highway  Capacity Manual, 2010, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street, NW,  Washington, DC 20001.
    Trip  Generation, 8th Edition, 2008, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1099 14th  Street, N.W., Suite 300 West, Washington, DC 20005.
    VDOT  Instructional and Informational Memorandum IIM-LD-227.5, 2011.
    24VAC30-73-10. Definitions.
    "Access management" means the systematic control of  the location, spacing, design, and operation of entrances, median  openings/crossovers, traffic signals, and interchanges for the purpose of  providing vehicular access to land development in a manner that preserves the  safety and efficiency of the transportation system.
    "Collectors" means the functional classification of  highways that provide land access service and traffic circulation within  residential, commercial, and industrial areas. The collector system distributes  trips from principal and minor arterials through the area to the ultimate  destination. Conversely, collectors also collect traffic and channel it into  the arterial system. 
    "Commercial entrance" means any entrance serving  land uses other than two or fewer individual private residences. (See  "private entrance.")
    "Commissioner" means the individual who serves as  the chief executive officer of the Department of Transportation or his  designee.
    "Commonwealth" means the Commonwealth of Virginia.
    "Crossover" means an opening in a nontraversable  median (such as a concrete barrier or raised island) that provides for crossing  movements and left and right turning movements. 
    "Design speed" means the selected speed used to  determine the geometric design features of the highway. 
    "District" means each of the nine areas in which  VDOT is divided to oversee the maintenance and construction on the  state-maintained highways, bridges and tunnels within the boundaries of the  area. 
    "District administrator" means the VDOT employee  assigned to supervise the district. 
    "District administrator's designee" means the VDOT  employee or employees designated by the district administrator. 
    "Entrance" means any driveway, street, or other  means of providing for movement of vehicles to or from the highway.
    "Frontage road" means a road that generally runs  parallel to a highway between the highway right-of-way and the front building  setback line of the abutting properties and provides access to the abutting properties  for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to the highway and  separating the abutting property traffic from through traffic on the highway. 
    "Functional area" means the area of the physical  highway feature, such as an intersection, roundabout, railroad grade crossing,  or interchange, plus that portion of the highway that comprises the decision  and maneuver distance and required vehicle storage length to serve that highway  feature.
    "Functional area of an intersection" means the  physical area of an at-grade intersection plus all required storage lengths for  separate turn lanes and for through traffic, including any maneuvering distance  for separate turn lanes.
    "Functional classification" means the federal  system of classifying groups of highways according to the character of service  they are intended to provide and classifications made by the commissioner based  on the operational characteristics of a highway. Each highway is assigned a  functional classification based on the highway's intended purpose of providing  priority to through traffic movement or adjoining property access. The  functional classification system groups highways into three basic categories  identified as (i) arterial, with the function to provide through movement of  traffic; (ii) collector, with the function of supplying a combination of  through movement and access to property; and (iii) local, with the function of  providing access to property and to other streets. 
    "Highway," "street," or "road"  means a public way for purposes of vehicular travel, including the entire area  within the right-of-way.
    "Intersection" means (i) a crossing of two or more  highways at grade, (ii) a crossover, or (iii) any at-grade connection with a  highway such as a commercial entrance.
    "Intersection sight distance" means the sight  distance required at an intersection to allow the driver of a stopped vehicle a  sufficient view of the intersecting highway to decide when to enter, or cross,  the intersecting highway. 
    "Legal speed limit" means the speed limit set forth  on signs lawfully posted on a highway or, in the absence of such signs, the  speed limit established by Article 8 (§ 46.2-870 et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title  46.2 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Level of service" means a qualitative measure  describing the operational conditions within a vehicular traffic stream,  generally in terms of such service measures as speed, travel time, freedom to  maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience.  "Level-of-service" is defined and procedures are presented for  determining the level of service in the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-73-170 I), 2010 (Transportation Research Board).
    "Limited access highway" means a highway especially  designed for through traffic over which abutting properties have no easement or  right of light, air, or access by reason of the fact that those properties abut  upon the limited access highway.
    "Local streets" means the functional classification  for highways that comprise all facilities that are not collectors or arterials.  Local streets serve primarily to provide direct access to abutting land and to  other streets.
    "Median" means the portion of a divided highway  that separates opposing traffic flows.
    "Median opening" means a crossover or a directional  opening in a nontraversable median (such as a concrete barrier or raised  island) that physically restricts movements to specific turns such as left  turns and U-turns. 
    "Minor arterials" means the functional  classification for highways that interconnect with and augment the principal  arterial system. Minor arterials distribute traffic to smaller geographic areas  providing service between and within communities.
    "Operating speed" means the speed at which drivers  are observed operating their vehicles during free-flow conditions with the 85th  percentile of the distribution of observed speeds being the most frequently  used measure of the operating speed of a particular location or geometric  feature. 
    "Permit" or "entrance permit" means a  document that sets the conditions under which VDOT allows a connection to a  highway. 
    "Permit applicant" means the person or persons,  firm, corporation, government, or other entity that has applied for a permit. 
    "Permittee" means the person or persons, firm,  corporation, government, or other entity that has been issued a permit.
    "Preliminary subdivision plat" means a plan of  development as set forth in § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Principal arterials" means the functional  classification for major highways intended to serve through traffic where access  is carefully controlled, generally highways of regional importance, with  moderate to high volumes of traffic traveling relatively long distances and at  higher speeds.
    "Private entrance" means an entrance that serves up  to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of the  occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain access  to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure facilities  that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump stations, and  stormwater management basins.
    "Professional engineer" means a person who is  qualified to practice engineering by reason of his special knowledge and use of  mathematical, physical and engineering sciences and the principles and methods of  engineering analysis and design acquired by engineering education and  experience, and whose competence has been attested by the Virginia Board for  Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior  Designers and Landscape Architects through licensure as a professional  engineer.
    "Reverse frontage road" means a road that is  located to the rear of the properties fronting a highway and provides access to  the abutting properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to  the highway and removing the abutting property traffic from through traffic on  the highway.
    "Right-of-way" means that property within the  systems of state highways that is open or may be opened for public travel or  use or both in the Commonwealth. This definition includes those public  rights-of-way in which the Commonwealth has a prescriptive easement for  maintenance and public travel. 
    "Roadway" means the portion of a highway, including  shoulders, for vehicular use. A divided highway has two or more roadways.
    "Roundabout" means a circular intersection with  yield control of all entering traffic, right-of-way assigned to traffic within  the circular roadway, and channelized approaches and a central island that  deflect entering traffic to the right. 
    "Shared entrance" means a single entrance serving  two or more adjoining parcels.
    "Sight distance" means the distance visible to the  driver of a vehicle when the view is unobstructed by traffic.
    "Site plan" and "subdivision plat" mean a  plan of development approved in accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241  through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia. 
    "Systems of state highways" means all highways and  roads under the ownership, the control, or the jurisdiction of VDOT, including  but not limited to, the primary, secondary and interstate highways. 
    "Trip" means a single or one-directional vehicle  movement either entering or exiting a property; a vehicle leaving the property  is one trip and a vehicle returning to the property is one trip.
    "Turn lane" means a separate lane for the purpose  of enabling a vehicle that is entering or leaving a highway to increase or  decrease its speed to a rate at which it can more safely merge or diverge with  through traffic; an acceleration or deceleration lane.
    "Urban area" means an urbanized area with a  population of 50,000 or more, or an urban place (small urban area) as  designated by the Bureau of the Census having a population of 5,000 or more and  not within any urbanized area. The Federal Highway Administration defines  "urban area" in more detail based on the federal-aid highway law (23  USC § 101).
    "VDOT" means the Virginia Department of  Transportation, its successor, the Commissioner of Highways, or his designees. 
    24VAC30-73-40. Administrative procedures and rules for  obtaining commercial and private entrance permits.
    All applications for entrance permits shall be obtained from  and submitted to the district administrator's designee for the county in which  the work is to be performed. The permit applicant shall submit the permit  application form, and the entrance permit, if approved, will be issued in  accordance with the applicable administrative rules, requirements and  procedures of this chapter and the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-73-170 G) (24VAC30-151). 
    24VAC30-73-50. Appeal and sight distance exception procedure.
    A. The permit applicant may appeal denial or revocation or  conditions of a permit in writing to the district administrator with a copy to  the district administrator's designee and the chief administrative officer of the  locality where the entrance is proposed. 
    1. All appeals must be received within 30 calendar days of  receipt of written notification of denial or revocation or issuance of a permit  with contested conditions and must set forth the grounds for the appeal and  include copies of all prior correspondence with any local government official  and VDOT representatives regarding the issue or issues. The permit applicant  may request a meeting with the district administrator concerning the appeal and  the district administrator will set a date, time, and location for such  meeting. 
    2. After reviewing all pertinent information, the district  administrator will advise the permit applicant in writing regarding the  decision on the appeal within 60 calendar days of receipt of the written appeal  request or such longer timeframe jointly agreed to by the parties, with a copy  to the district administrator's designee and the chief administrative officer  of the locality where the entrance is proposed.
    3. The permit applicant may further appeal the district  administrator's decision to the commissioner within 30 calendar days of receipt  of written notification of the district administrator's decision. The  commissioner will advise the permit applicant in writing regarding the decision  on the appeal within 60 calendar days of receipt of the written appeal request,  with a copy to the district administrator and the chief administrative officer  of the locality where the entrance is proposed. 
    B. The commissioner may grant an exception to the required  sight distance after a traffic engineering investigation has been performed. 
    1. If a sight distance exception is requested, the permit  applicant shall provide such request in writing to the commissioner with a copy  to the district administrator's designee and the chief administrative officer  of the locality where the entrance is proposed and shall furnish the  commissioner with a traffic engineering investigation report, prepared by a  professional engineer. Refer to Instructional and Informational Memorandum IIM-LD-227  IIM LD-227.5, 2011 (VDOT), for requirements concerning approval of sight  distance exceptions (see 24VAC30-73-170 K). 
    2. The commissioner will advise the permit applicant in  writing regarding the decision on the sight distance exception request within  60 calendar days of receipt of the written exception request or such longer  timeframe jointly agreed to by the parties, with a copy to the district  administrator's designee and the chief administrative officer of the locality  where the entrance is proposed. 
    24VAC30-73-70. Commercial entrance design.
    A. All commercial entrance design and construction shall  comply with the provisions of this chapter and the standards in the Road Design  Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A), 2011 (VDOT), the Road and Bridge  Standards (see 24VAC30-73-170 C), 2008, revised 2011, the Road  and Bridge Specifications (see 24VAC30-73-170 B), 2007, revised 2011  (VDOT), other VDOT engineering and construction standards as may be  appropriate, and any additional conditions, restrictions, or modifications  deemed necessary by the district administrator's designee to preserve the  safety, use and maintenance of the systems of state highways. Entrance design  and construction shall comply with applicable guidelines and requirements of  the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12101 et seq.).  Ramps for curb sections shall be provided as required in § 15.2-2021 of  the Code of Virginia. The standard drawing for depressed curb ramp as shown in  the Road and Bridge Standards (see 24VAC30-73-170 C), 2008, revised  2011, shall be utilized in the design.
    1. In the event an entrance is proposed within the limits of a  funded roadway project that will ultimately change a highway, the permit  applicant may be required to construct, to the extent possible, entrances  compatible with the roadway's ultimate design.
    2. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  pedestrian and bicycle users of the abutting highway in accordance with the  Commonwealth Transportation Board's "Policy for Integrating Bicycle and  Pedestrian Accommodations" (see 24VAC30-73-170 H), 2004.
    3. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  transit users of the abutting highway where applicable and provide  accommodations to the extent possible.
    4. Based on the existing and planned developments, the  district administrator's designee will determine the need for curb and gutter,  sidewalks, or other features within the general area of the proposed entrance  in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and the design standards in  Appendix G F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A),  2011 (VDOT).
    5. Sites accessed by an entrance shall be designed so as to  prevent unsafe and inefficient traffic movements from impacting travel on the  abutting highway. At the request of the district administrator's designee, the  permit applicant shall furnish a report that documents the impact of expected  traffic movements upon the function of the abutting highway during the peak  hours of the abutting highway or during the peak hours of the generator,  whichever is appropriate as determined by the district administrator's  designee.
    6. The use of a shared entrance between adjacent property  owners shall be the preferred method of access.
    7. The construction of new crossovers, or the relocation,  removal, or consolidation of existing crossovers shall be approved in  accordance with the crossover location approval process specified in Appendix G  F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A), 2011  (VDOT). 
    B. It is essential that entrance and site design allow safe  and efficient movements of traffic using the entrance while minimizing the  impact of such movements on the operation of the systems of state highways.
    1. The permit applicant shall supply sufficient information to  demonstrate to the satisfaction of the district administrator's designee that  neither the entrance, nor the proposed traffic circulation patterns within the  parcel, will compromise the safety, use, operation, or maintenance of the  abutting highway. A rezoning traffic impact statement or a site  plan/subdivision plat supplemental traffic analysis submitted for a proposed  development of a parcel in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis  Regulations (see 24VAC30-73-170 J) (24VAC30-155) may be used for  this purpose, provided that it adequately documents the effect of the proposed  entrance and its related traffic on the operation of the highway to be  accessed.
    2. If the proposed entrance will cause the systems of state  highways to experience degradation in safety or a significant increase in delay  or a significant reduction in capacity beyond an acceptable level of service,  the applicant shall be required to submit a plan to mitigate these impacts and  to bear the costs of such mitigation measures.
    3. Proposed mitigation measures must be approved by the  district administrator's designee prior to permit approval. The district  administrator's designee will consider what improvements will be needed to  preserve the operational characteristics of the highway, accommodate the  proposed traffic and, if entrance design modifications are needed, incorporate  them accordingly to protect the transportation corridor. Mitigation measures  that may be considered include but are not limited to:
    a. Construction of auxiliary lanes or turning lanes, or  pavement transitions/tapers;
    b. Construction of new crossovers, or the relocation, removal,  or consolidation of existing crossovers;
    c. Installation, modification, or removal of traffic signals  and related traffic control equipment;
    d. Provisions to limit the traffic generated by the  development served by the proposed entrance;
    e. Dedication of additional right-of-way or easement, or both,  for future road improvements; 
    f. Reconstruction of existing roadway to provide required  vertical and horizontal sight distances; 
    g. Relocation or consolidation of existing entrances; or
    h. Recommendations from adopted corridor studies, design  studies, other access management practices and principles, or any combination  of these, not otherwise mentioned in this chapter.
    4. If an applicant is unwilling or unable to mitigate the  impacts identified in the traffic impact analysis, the entrance shall be  physically restricted to right-in or right-out movements or both or similar  restrictions such that the public interests in a safe and efficient flow of  traffic on the systems of state highways are protected.
    24VAC30-73-80. Minimum sight distance for commercial entrances.
    A. No less than minimum intersection sight distance shall be  obtained for any commercial entrance. Sight distances shall be measured in  accordance with VDOT practices, and sight distance requirements shall conform  to VDOT standards as described in Appendix G F of the Road Design  Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A), 2011 (VDOT). The legal speed limit  shall be used unless the design speed is available and approved for use by  VDOT. 
    B. The operating speed may be used in lieu of the legal speed  limit in cases where the permit applicant furnishes the district  administrator's designee with a speed study prepared in accordance with the  Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (see 24VAC30-73-170 D),  2003, revised 2007 (FHWA), methodology that demonstrates the operating  speed of the segment of highway is lower than the legal speed limit and, in the  judgment of the district administrator's designee, use of the operating speed  will not compromise safety for either a driver at an entrance or a driver on  the abutting highway. 
    C. VDOT may require that the vertical or horizontal alignment  of the existing roadway be adjusted to accommodate certain design elements of a  proposed commercial entrance including, but not limited to, median openings,  crossovers, roundabouts, and traffic signals, where adjustment is deemed  necessary. The cost of any work performed to adjust the horizontal or vertical  alignment of the roadway to achieve required intersection sight distance at a  proposed entrance shall be borne by the permit applicant. 
    24VAC30-73-90. Private entrances.
    A. The property owner shall identify the desired location of  the private entrance with the assistance of the district administrator's  designee. If the minimum intersection sight distance standards specified in  Appendix G F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A),  2011 (VDOT), cannot be met, the entrance should be placed at the location  with the best possible sight distance as determined by the district  administrator's designee. The district administrator's designee may require the  property owner to grade slopes, clear brush, remove trees, or conduct other  similar efforts, or any combination of these, necessary to provide the safest  possible means of ingress and egress that can be reasonably achieved. 
    B. The property owner shall obtain an entrance permit and, on  shoulder and ditch section roads, shall be responsible for installing the  private entrance in accordance with VDOT policies and engineering standards.  The property owner may request VDOT to perform the stabilization of the  shoulder and installation of the entrance pipe. In such cases, VDOT may install  the private entrance pipe and will stabilize the shoulder at the property  owner's expense. If VDOT installs these portions of the entrance, a cost  estimate for the installation will be provided to the property owner; however,  VDOT will bill the property owner the actual cost of installation. The property  owner shall be responsible for all grading beyond the shoulder.
    C. Grading and installation of a driveway from the edge of  the pavement to the right-of-way line shall be the responsibility of the property  owner. 
    D. Installation of a private entrance on a curb and gutter  street shall be the responsibility of the property owner.
    E. Maintenance of private entrances shall be by the owner of  the entrance, except that VDOT shall maintain:
    1. On shoulder section roadways, that portion of the entrance  within the normal shoulder portion of the roadway.
    2. On roadways with ditches, the drainage pipe at the  entrance.
    3. On roadways with curb, gutter, and sidewalk belonging to  VDOT, that portion of the entrance that extends to the back of the sidewalk. If  a sidewalk is not present, to the back of the curb line.
    4. On roadways with curb, gutter, and sidewalk not belonging  to VDOT, only to the flow line of the gutter pan.
    5. On roadways with shoulders, ditches, and sidewalk belonging  to VDOT, that portion of the entrance that extends to the back of the sidewalk.  
    24VAC30-73-120. Commercial entrance access management.
    A. As commercial entrance locations and designs are prepared  and reviewed, appropriate access management regulations and standards shall be  utilized to ensure the safety, integrity and operational characteristics of the  transportation system are maintained. The proposed commercial entrance shall  meet the access management standards contained in Appendix G F of  the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A), 2011 (VDOT), and  the regulations in this chapter to provide the users of such entrance with a  safe means of ingress and egress while minimizing the impact of such ingress  and egress on the operation of the highway. 
    B. A proposed development's compliance with the access  management requirements specified below should be considered during the local  government and VDOT's review of any rezoning, site plan, or subdivision plat  for the development. VDOT's review of a rezoning traffic impact statement and a  site plan/subdivision plat supplemental traffic analysis submitted for a  development in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (see  24VAC30-73-170 J) (24VAC30-155) shall include comments on the development's  compliance with the access management requirements specified below.
    C. Access management requirements, in addition to other  regulations in this chapter, include but are not limited to:
    1. Restricting commercial entrance locations. To prevent undue  interference with free traffic movement and to preserve safety, entrances to  the highways shall not be permitted within the functional areas of  intersections, roundabouts, railroad grade crossings, interchanges or similar  areas with sensitive traffic operations. A request for an exception to this  requirement submitted according to 24VAC30-73-120 D shall include a traffic  engineering investigation report that contains specific and documented reasons  showing that highway operation and safety will not be adversely impacted. 
    2. Entrances shared with adjoining properties on minor  arterials and collectors. To reduce the number of entrances to state highways,  a condition of entrance permit issuance shall be that entrances serve two or  more parcels. A street that meets the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (see  24VAC30-73-170 L) (24VAC30-92) will be publicly maintained and shall  be the preferred method for shared entrances as such entrances will allow for  the future development of a network of publicly maintained streets. Otherwise a  shared commercial entrance shall be created and designed to serve adjoining  properties. A copy of the property owners' recorded agreement to share use of  and maintain the entrance shall be included with the entrance permit application  submitted to the district administrator's designee. The shared entrance shall  be identified on any site plan or subdivision plat of the property. The  district administrator's designee is authorized to approve an exception to this  requirement upon submittal of a request according to 24VAC30-73-120 D that  includes the following: 
    a. Written evidence that a reasonable agreement to share an  entrance cannot be reached with adjoining property owners, or 
    b. Documentation that there are physical constraints,  including but not limited to topography, environmentally sensitive areas, and  hazardous uses, to creating a shared entrance. 
    3. Spacing of entrances and intersections. The spacing of  proposed entrances and intersections shall comply with the spacing standards  for entrances and intersections in Appendix G F of the Road  Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A), 2011 (VDOT), except as  specified below.
    a. Where a plan of development or a condition of development  that identifies the specific location of an entrance or entrances was proffered  pursuant to §§ 15.2-2297, 15.2-2298, or 15.2-2303 of the Code of Virginia  as part of a rezoning approved by the locality prior to October 14, 2009, such  entrances shall be exempt from the applicable spacing standards for entrances  and intersections, provided the requirements of § 15.2-2307 of the Code of  Virginia have been met. Entrances shall be exempt from the applicable spacing  standards for entrances and intersections when the location of such entrances  are shown on a subdivision plat, site plan, preliminary subdivision plat, or a  Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (see 24VAC30-73-170 L) (24VAC30-92)  conceptual sketch that was submitted by the locality to VDOT for review and  received by VDOT prior to October 14, 2009, or is valid pursuant to §§ 15.2-2260  and 15.2-2261 of the Code of Virginia and was approved in accordance with §§ 15.2-2286  and 15.2-2241 through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia prior to October 14,  2009. The district administrator's designee is authorized to exempt such  entrances from the spacing standards upon submittal of a request according to  24VAC30-73-120 D that includes documentation of the above criteria.
    b. VDOT may work with a locality or localities on access  management corridor plans. Such plans may allow for spacing standards that  differ from and supersede the applicable spacing standards for entrances and  intersections, subject to approval by the district administrator. Such plans  may also identify the locations of any physical constraints to creating shared  entrances or vehicular/pedestrian connections between adjoining properties (see  24VAC30-73-120 B 2 and B 4) C 2 and C 4). If the permit applicant  submits a request according to 24VAC30-73-120 D for an exception to the spacing  standards and provides documentation that the location of the proposed  commercial entrance is within the limits of an access management plan approved  by the local government and by VDOT, the plan should guide the district  administrator's designee in approving the exception request and in determining  the appropriate location of the entrance.
    c. On older, established business corridors of a locality  within an urban area where existing entrances and intersections did not meet  the spacing standards prior to October 14, 2009, spacing for new entrances and  intersections may be allowed by the district administrator's designee that is  consistent with the established spacing along the highway, provided that the  permit applicant submits a request according to 24VAC30-73-120 D for an  exception to the spacing standards that includes evidence that reasonable  efforts were made to comply with the other access management requirements of  this section including restricting entrances within the functional areas of  intersections, sharing entrances with and providing vehicular and pedestrian  connections between adjoining properties, and physically restricting entrances  to right-in or right-out or both movements. 
    d. Where a developer proposes a development within a  designated urban development area as defined in § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code  of Virginia or an area designated in the local comprehensive plan for higher  density development that incorporates principles of new urbanism and  traditional neighborhood development, which may include but need not be limited  to (i) pedestrian-friendly road design, (ii) interconnection of new local  streets with existing local streets and roads, (iii) connectivity of road and  pedestrian networks, (iv) preservation of natural areas, (v) satisfaction of  requirements for stormwater management, (vi) mixed-use neighborhoods, including  mixed housing types, (vii) reduction of front and side yard building setbacks,  and (viii) reduction of subdivision street widths and turning radii at  subdivision street intersections, the district administrator's designee may  approve spacing standards for public street intersections internal to the  development that differ from the otherwise applicable spacing standards,  provided that the developer submits a request according to 24VAC30-73-120 D for  an exception to the spacing standards that includes information on the design  of the development and on the conformance of such entrances and intersections  with the intersection sight distance standards specified in Appendix G F  of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A), 2011 (VDOT). 
    c. e. Where a development's second or additional  commercial entrances are necessary for the streets in the development to be  eligible for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways in  accordance with the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (see  24VAC30-73-170 L) (24VAC30-92) and such commercial entrances cannot  meet the spacing standards for highways, the developer may submit a request  according to 24VAC30-73-120 D for an exception to the spacing standards that  includes information on the design of the development. The following shall  apply to the exception request:
    (1) For highways with a functional classification as a  collector or local street, the district administrator's designee may approve  spacing standards that differ from the otherwise applicable spacing standards  to allow the approval of the entrance or entrances. Such commercial entrances  shall be required to meet the intersection sight distance standards specified  in Appendix G F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170  A), 2011 (VDOT).
    (2) For highways with a functional classification as a minor  arterial, the district administrator's designee shall, in consultation with the  developer and the locality within which the development is proposed, either  approve spacing standards that differ from the otherwise applicable spacing  standards to allow the approval of the entrance or entrances, or waive such  state requirements that necessitate second or additional commercial entrances.  If approved, such commercial entrances shall be required to meet the  intersection sight distance standards specified in Appendix G F  of the Road Design Manual (see 24 VAC 30-73-170 A), 2011 (VDOT).
    f. Where a parcel of record has insufficient frontage on a highway  to meet the spacing standards because of the dimensions of the parcel or a  physical constraint such as topography or an environmentally sensitive area,  the entrance shall be physically restricted to right-in or right-out movements  or both or similar restrictions such that the public interests in a safe and  efficient flow of traffic on the systems of state highways are protected and  preserved. A request for an exception to this requirement submitted according  to 24VAC30-73-120 D shall include a traffic engineering investigation report  that contains specific and documented reasons showing that highway operation  and safety will not be adversely impacted.
    4. Vehicular/pedestrian circulation between adjoining  properties. To facilitate traffic circulation between adjacent properties,  reduce the number of entrances to the highway, and maximize use of new  signalized intersections, the permit applicant shall be required on a highway  with a functional classification as a minor arterial highway, and may be required  by the district administrator's designee on a highway with a functional  classification as a collector, as a condition of permit issuance to record  access easements and to construct vehicular connections to the boundaries of  the property (which may include frontage roads or reverse frontage roads) in  such a manner that affords safe and efficient future access between the permit  applicant's property and adjoining undeveloped properties. Where appropriate,  the permit applicant also shall construct pedestrian connections to the  boundary lines of adjoining undeveloped properties and adjoining developed  properties with sidewalks that abut the property. At such time that a  commercial entrance permit application is submitted for the adjoining property,  a condition of permit issuance shall be to extend such vehicular/pedestrian  connections into the proposed development. Development sites under the same  ownership or consolidated for the purposes of development and comprised of more  than one building site shall provide a unified vehicular and pedestrian access  connection and circulation system between the sites. 
    a. Such connections shall not be required if the permit  applicant submits a request for an exception according to 24VAC30-73-120 D and  provides documentation that there are physical constraints to making such  connections between properties, including but not limited to topography,  environmentally sensitive areas, and hazardous uses. 
    b. If a permit applicant does not wish to comply with this  requirement, the permit applicant's entrance shall be physically restricted to  right-in or right-out movements or both or similar restrictions such that the  public interests in a safe and efficient flow of traffic on the systems of  state highways are protected. 
    5. Traffic signal spacing. To promote the efficient  progression of traffic on highways, commercial entrances that are expected to  serve sufficient traffic volumes and movements to require signalization shall  not be permitted if the spacing between the entrance and at least one adjacent  signalized intersection is below signalized intersection spacing standards in  Appendix G F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A),  2011 (VDOT). If sufficient spacing between adjacent traffic signals is not  available, the entrance shall be physically restricted to right-in or right-out  movements or both or similar restrictions such that the public interests in a  safe and efficient flow of traffic on the systems of state highways are  protected and preserved. A request for an exception to this requirement  submitted according to subsection D of this section shall include a traffic  engineering investigation report that (i) evaluates the suitability of the  entrance location for design as a roundabout, and (ii) contains specific and documented  reasons showing that highway operation and safety will not be adversely  impacted. 
    6. Limiting entrance movements. To preserve the safety and  function of certain highways, the district administrator's designee may require  an entrance to be designed and constructed in such a manner as to physically  prohibit certain traffic movements.
    D. A request for an exception from the access management  requirements in subsection C of this section shall be submitted in writing to  the district administrator's designee. The request shall identify the type of  exception, describe the reasons for the request, and include all documentation  specified in 24VAC30-73-120 C for the type of exception. After considering all  pertinent information including any improvements that will be needed to the  entrance or intersection to protect the operational characteristics of the  highway, the district administrator's designee will advise the applicant in  writing regarding the decision on the exception request within 30 calendar days  of receipt of the written exception request, with a copy to the district  administrator. The applicant may appeal the decision of the district  administrator's designee to the district administrator in accordance with the  procedures for an appeal set forth in 24VAC30-73-50.
    24VAC30-73-140. Drive-in theaters. (Repealed.)
    A drive-in theater is a specialized commercial entrance.  In addition to the commercial entrance regulations set forth in this part, the  conditions set forth in § 33.1-12 (15) of the Code of Virginia shall be  satisfied in order to construct entrances to drive-in theaters. 
    24VAC30-73-150. Temporary entrances (construction/logging  entrances).
    A. Construction of temporary construction or logging  entrances upon the systems of state highways shall be authorized in accordance  with the provisions in the Land Use Permit Regulations (see 24VAC30-73-170  G) (24VAC30-151). The permit applicant must contact the appropriate  district administrator's designee to approve the location prior to installing  an entrance or utilizing an existing entrance. The district administrator's  designee shall also be contacted to arrange and conduct a final inspection  prior to closing a temporary construction or logging entrance. In the event  that adequate sight distance is not achieved, additional signage that meets the  Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices standards (see 24VAC30-73-170 D),  2003, revised 2007 (FHWA), and certified flaggers shall be used to ensure  safe ingress and egress.
    B. Entrances shall be designed and operated in such a manner  as to prevent mud and debris from being tracked from the site onto the  highway's paved surface. If debris is tracked onto the highway, it shall be  removed by the permittee immediately as directed by the district  administrator's designee.
    C. The permittee must restore, at the permittee's cost, all  disturbed highway rights-of-way, including, but not limited to, ditches,  shoulders, and pavement, to their original condition when removing the  entrance. All such restorations are subject to approval by the district  administrator's designee. 
    24VAC30-73-170. Documents incorporated by reference. (Repealed.)
    A. Road Design Manual (effective January 1, 2005, revised  October 2009).
    Note: Appendices F and G (Access Management Design  Standards for Entrances and Intersections) contains the access management  standards referenced in Chapters 863 and 928 of the 2007 Acts of Assembly and  Chapters 274 and 454 of the 2008 Acts of Assembly.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad Street
    Richmond, Virginia 23219
    B. 2007 Road and Bridge Specifications (effective July  2008).
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad Street
    Richmond, Virginia 23219
    C. 2008 Road and Bridge Standards (effective June 2009).
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad Street
    Richmond, Virginia 23219
    D. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets  and Highways, 2003 Edition (effective December 22, 2003, revised November  2004).
    Federal Highway Administration
    Superintendent of Documents
    U.S. Government Printing Office
    P.O. Box 371954
    Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954
    E. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,  Fifth Edition, 2004.
    American Association of State  Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
    444 North Capitol St. N.W., Suite  225
    Washington, D.C. 20001
    F. Change of Limited Access Control, 24VAC30-401.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    G. Land Use Permit Regulations, 24VAC30-151.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    H. Policy for Integrating  Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations, eff. March 18, 2004.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    I. Highway Capacity Manual, 2000.
    Transportation Research Board
    500 Fifth Street, NW
    Washington, DC 20001
    J. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations, 24VAC30-155.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219 
    K. Instructional and Informational Memorandum  IIM-LD-227.3, eff. May 23, 2007.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad Street
    Richmond, VA 23219
    L. Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements, 24VAC30-92,  eff. March 9, 2009.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad Street
    Richmond, VA 23219 
        NOTICE: The following  forms used in administering the regulation were filed by the agency. The forms  are not being published; however, online users of this issue of the Virginia  Register of Regulations may click on the name to access a form. The forms are  also available from the agency contact or may be viewed at the Office of the  Registrar of Regulations, General Assembly Building, 2nd Floor, Richmond,  Virginia 23219.
         FORMS (24VAC30-73)
    LUP-A - Land Use Permit Application (revised 1/2005).
    LUP-SP - Land Use Permit Special Provisions (Notice of  Permittee Liability) (revised 11/2007).
    LUP-CSB - Land Use Permit Corporate Surety Bond (revised  1/2005).
    LUP-LC - Land Use Permit Irrevocable Letter of Credit Bank  Agreement (revised 1/2005).
    LUP-SB - Land Use Permit Surety Bond (revised 1/2005).
    LUP-A  - Land Use Permit Application (rev. 03/10).
    LUP-SP  - Land Use Permit Special Provisions (Notice of Permittee Liability) (rev.  12/10).
    LUP-CSB  - Corporate Surety Bond (rev. 03/10).
    LUP-LC  - Letter of Credit Bank Agreement (rev. 03/10).
    LUP-SB  - Land Use Permit Surety Bond (rev. 03/10).
    DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-73)
    Information pertaining to the availability and cost of any  of these publications should be directed to the address indicated for the  specific document. Requests for documents of the Virginia Department of  Transportation (VDOT) may be obtained from the department at 1401 E. Broad St.,  Richmond, Virginia 23219; however, department documents may be available over  the Internet at www.virginiadot.org.
    VDOT  Road Design Manual, 2011.
    Note: Appendix F (Access Management Design Standards for  Entrances and Intersections) contains the access management standards  referenced in Chapters 863 and 928 of the 2007 Acts of Assembly and Chapters  274 and 454 of the 2008 Acts of Assembly.
    VDOT  Road and Bridge Specifications, 2007, revised 2011.
    VDOT  Road and Bridge Standards, 2008, revised 2011.
    Manual  on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2003, revised  2007, Federal Highway Administration, Superintendent of Documents, U.S.  Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954.7.
    VDOT  Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations, 2004.
    Highway  Capacity Manual, 2010, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street, NW,  Washington, DC 20001.
    VDOT  Instructional and Informational Memorandum IIM-LD-227.5, 2011.
    Trip  Generation, 8th Edition, 2008, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1099 14th  Street, N.W., Suite 300 West, Washington, DC 20005.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R12-3066; Filed December 8, 2011, 1:31 p.m. 
TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES
COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The  Commissioner of Highways is claiming an exemption from the Administrative  Process Act in accordance with (i) § 2.2-4006 A 3 of the Code of Virginia,  which excludes regulations that consist only of changes in style or form or  corrections of technical errors and (ii) § 2.2-4006 A 4 a of the Code of  Virginia, which excludes regulations that are necessary to conform to changes  in Virginia statutory law where no agency discretion is involved. The  Commissioner of Highways will receive, consider, and respond to petitions by  any interested person at any time with respect to reconsideration or revision.
         Titles of Regulations: 24VAC30-72. Access Management  Regulations: Principal Arterials (amending 24VAC30-72-10, 24VAC30-72-20,  24VAC30-72-40, 24VAC30-72-50, 24VAC30-72-60, 24VAC30-72-70, 24VAC30-72-80,  24VAC30-72-120, 24VAC30-72-150; repealing 24VAC30-72-140, 24VAC30-72-170).
    24VAC30-73. Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials,  Collectors, and Local Streets (amending 24VAC30-73-10, 24VAC30-73-40,  24VAC30-73-50, 24VAC30-73-70, 24VAC30-73-80, 24VAC30-73-90, 24VAC30-73-120,  24VAC30-73-150; repealing 24VAC30-73-140, 24VAC30-73-170). 
    Statutory Authority: § 33.1-198.1 of the Code of  Virginia.
    Effective Date: January 18, 2012. 
    Agency Contact: Robert Hofrichter, Assistant Division  Administrator, Transportation and Mobility Management Division, Department of  Transportation, 1401 East Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804)  786-0780, or email robert.hofrichter@vdot.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    This regulatory action makes technical corrections to Access  Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (24VAC30-72) and Access Management  Regulations: Minor Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets (24VAC30-73) to  make them consistent with the revisions to the Traffic Impact Analysis  Regulations (24VAC30-155) and the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements  (24VAC30-92). 
    In addition, Chapters 104 and 164 of the 2011 Acts of  Assembly repealed the statutory provisions addressing regulation of drive-in  theaters, making the regulations addressing these entrances obsolete. 
    24VAC30-72-10. Definitions.
    "Access management" means the systematic control of  the location, spacing, design, and operation of entrances, median openings,  traffic signals, and interchanges for the purpose of providing vehicular access  to land development in a manner that preserves the safety and efficiency of the  transportation system. 
    "Commercial entrance" means any entrance serving  land uses other than two or fewer individual private residences. (See  "private entrance.")
    "Commissioner" means the individual who serves as  the chief executive officer of the Department of Transportation or his  designee.
    "Commonwealth" means the Commonwealth of Virginia.
    "Crossover" or "median opening" means an  opening in a nontraversable median (such as a concrete barrier or raised  island) that provides for crossing and turning traffic. 
    "Design speed" means the selected speed used to  determine the geometric design features of the highway. 
    "District" means each of the nine areas in which  VDOT is divided to oversee the maintenance and construction on the  state-maintained highways, bridges and tunnels within the boundaries of the  area. 
    "District administrator" means the VDOT employee  assigned to supervise the district. 
    "District administrator's designee" means the VDOT  employee or employees designated by the district administrator. 
    "Entrance" means any driveway, street, or other  means of providing for movement of vehicles to or from the highway.
    "Frontage road" means a road that generally runs  parallel to a highway between the highway right-of-way and the front building  setback line of the abutting properties and provides access to the abutting  properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to the highway  and separating the abutting property traffic from through traffic on the  highway. 
    "Functional area" means the area of the physical  highway feature, such as an intersection, roundabout, railroad grade crossing,  or interchange, plus that portion of the highway that comprises the decision  and maneuver distance and required vehicle storage length to serve that highway  feature. 
    "Functional area of an intersection" means the  physical area of an at-grade intersection plus all required storage lengths for  separate turn lanes and for through traffic including any maneuvering distance  for separate turn lanes.
    "Functional classification" means the federal  system of classifying groups of highways according to the character of service  they are intended to provide and classifications made by the commissioner based  on the operational characteristics of a highway. Each highway is assigned a  functional classification based on the highway's intended purpose of providing  priority to through traffic movement or adjoining property access. The  functional classification system groups highways into three basic categories  identified as (i) arterial, with the function to provide through movement of  traffic; (ii) collector, with the function of supplying a combination of  through movement and access to property; and (iii) local, with the function of  providing access to property. 
    "Highway," "street," or "road"  means a public way for purposes of vehicular travel, including the entire area  within the right-of-way.
    "Intersection" means any at-grade connection with a  highway including two highways or an entrance and a highway.
    "Legal speed limit" means the speed limit set forth  on signs lawfully posted on a highway or in the absence of such signs the speed  limit established by Article 8 (§ 46.2-870 et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title 46.2  of the Code of Virginia.
    "Level of service" means a qualitative measure  describing the operational conditions within a vehicular traffic stream,  generally in terms of such service measures as speed, travel time, freedom to  maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience.  "Level-of-service" is defined and procedures are presented for  determining the level of service in the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-72-170 I), 2010 (Transportation Research Board).
    "Limited access highway" means a highway especially  designed for through traffic over which abutting properties have no easement or  right of light, air, or access by reason of the fact that their property abuts  upon the limited access highway.
    "Median" means the portion of a divided highway  that separates opposing traffic flows.
    "Operating speed" means the speed at which drivers  are observed operating their vehicles during free-flow conditions with the 85th  percentile of the distribution of observed speeds being the most frequently  used measure of the operating speed of a particular location or geometric  feature. 
    "Permit" or "entrance permit" means a  document that sets the conditions under which VDOT allows a connection to a  highway. 
    "Permit applicant" means the person or persons,  firm, corporation, government, or other entity that has applied for a permit. 
    "Permittee" means the person or persons, firm,  corporation, government, or other entity that has been issued a permit.
    "Preliminary subdivision plat" means a plan of  development as set forth in § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Principal arterial" means the functional  classification for a major highway intended to serve through traffic where  access is carefully controlled, generally highways of regional importance, with  moderate to high volumes of traffic traveling relatively long distances and at  higher speeds.
    "Private entrance" means an entrance that serves up  to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of the  occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain access  to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure facilities  that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump stations, and  stormwater management basins.
    "Professional engineer" means a person who is qualified  to practice engineering by reason of his special knowledge and use of  mathematical, physical and engineering sciences and the principles and methods  of engineering analysis and design acquired by engineering education and  experience, and whose competence has been attested by the Virginia Board for  Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior  Designers and Landscape Architects through licensure as a professional  engineer.
    "Reverse frontage road" means a road that is  located to the rear of the properties fronting a highway and provides access to  the abutting properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to  the highway and removing the abutting property traffic from through traffic on  the highway.
    "Right-of-way" means that property within the  systems of state highways that is open or may be opened for public travel or  use or both in the Commonwealth. This definition includes those public  rights-of-way in which the Commonwealth has a prescriptive easement for maintenance  and public travel. 
    "Roadside" means the area adjoining the outer edge  of the roadway. The median of a divided highway may also be considered a  "roadside."
    "Roadway" means the portion of a highway, including  shoulders, for vehicular use. A divided highway has two or more roadways.
    "Shared entrance" means a single entrance serving  two or more adjoining parcels.
    "Sight distance" means the distance visible to the  driver of a vehicle when the view is unobstructed by traffic.
    "Site plan" and "subdivision plat" mean a  plan of development approved in accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241  through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia. 
    "Stopping sight distance" means the distance  required by a driver of a vehicle, traveling at a given speed, to bring the vehicle  to a stop after an object on the highway becomes visible, including the  distance traveled during the driver's perception and reaction times and the  vehicle braking distance.
    "Systems of state highways" means all highways and  roads under the ownership, the control, or the jurisdiction of VDOT, including  but not limited to, the primary, secondary and interstate highway. 
    "Traveled way" means the portion of the roadway for  the movement of vehicles, exclusive of shoulders and turn lanes.
    "Trip" means a single or one-directional vehicle  movement either entering or exiting a property; a vehicle leaving the property  is one trip and a vehicle returning to the property is one trip.
    "Turn lane" means a separate lane for the purpose  of enabling a vehicle that is entering or leaving a highway to increase or  decrease its speed to a rate at which it can more safely merge or diverge with  through traffic; acceleration and deceleration lanes.
    "Urban area" means an urbanized area with a  population of 50,000 or more, or an urban place (small urban area) as  designated by the Bureau of the Census having a population of 5,000 or more and  not within any urbanized area. The Federal Highway Administration defines  "urban area" in more detail based on the federal-aid highway law (23  USC § 101).
    "VDOT" means the Virginia Department of  Transportation, its successor, the Commissioner of Highways, or his designees.
    24VAC30-72-20. Authority to regulate entrances to highways.
    A. VDOT's authority to regulate highway entrances and manage  access to highways is provided in §§ 33.1-13, 33.1-197, 33.1-198, 33.1-198.1,  and 33.1-199 of the Code of Virginia, and its authority to make regulations  concerning the use of highways generally is provided in § 33.1-12 (3) of the  Code of Virginia. Each proposed highway entrance creates a potential conflict  point that impacts the safe and efficient flow of traffic on the highway;  therefore, private property interests in access to the highway must be balanced  with public interests of safety and mobility. Managing access to highways can  reduce traffic congestion, help maintain the levels of service, enhance public  safety by decreasing traffic conflict points, support economic development by  promoting the efficient movement of people and goods, reduce the need for new  highways and road widening by improving the performance of existing highways,  preserve the public investment in new highways by maximizing their efficient  operation, and better coordinate transportation and land use decisions.
    B. Where a plan of development with the specific location of  an entrance or entrances was proffered pursuant to § 15.2-2297, 15.2-2298, or 15.2-2303 of the Code of Virginia prior to July 1, 2008, such entrances shall  be exempt from the spacing standards for entrances and intersections in  Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011  (VDOT) provided the requirements of § 15.2-2307 of the Code of Virginia  have been met. Entrances shown on a subdivision plat, site plan, preliminary  subdivision plat that is valid pursuant to §§ 15.2-2260 and 15.2-2261 approved  in accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241 through 15.2-2245 prior to July  1, 2008, shall be exempt from the spacing standards for entrances and  intersections in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT).
    C. The Commonwealth Transportation Board has the authority to  designate highways as limited access and to regulate access rights to those  facilities as provided in § 33.1-58 of the Code of Virginia. No private or  commercial entrances shall be permitted within limited access rights-of-way  except as may be provided for by the regulation titled Change of Limited Access  Control (24VAC30-401).
    D. The VDOT district administrators or their designees are  authorized to issue private entrance permits and commercial entrance permits in  accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
    E. In cases where the provisions and requirements of this  chapter conflict with the Land Use Permit Regulations (see 24VAC30-72-170  G), (24VAC30-151), the provisions and requirements of this chapter  shall govern.
    24VAC30-72-40. Administrative procedures and rules for  obtaining commercial and private entrance permits.
    All applications for entrance permits shall be obtained from  and submitted to the district administrator's designee for the county in which  the work is to be performed. The permit applicant shall submit the permit  application form, and the entrance permit, if approved, will be issued in  accordance with the applicable administrative rules, requirements, and  procedures of this chapter and the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-72-170 G) (24VAC30-151). 
    24VAC30-72-50. Appeal and exception procedure.
    A. The permit applicant may appeal denial or revocation or  conditions imposed by a permit in writing to the district administrator with a  copy to the district administrator's designee and the chief administrative  officer of the locality where the entrance is proposed. 
    1. All appeals must be received within 30 days of receipt of  written notification of denial or revocation or issuance of a permit with  contested conditions and must set forth the grounds for the appeal and include  copies of all prior correspondence with any local government official and VDOT  representatives regarding the issue or issues. The permit applicant may request  a meeting with the district administrator concerning the appeal and the  district administrator will set a date, time, and location for such meeting. 
    2. After reviewing all pertinent information, the district  administrator will advise the permit applicant in writing regarding the  decision on the appeal within 60 days of receipt of the written appeal request  or such longer timeframe jointly agreed to by the parties, with a copy to the  district administrator's designee and the chief administrative officer of the  locality where the entrance is proposed.
    3. The permit applicant may further appeal the district  administrator's decision to the commissioner within 30 days of receipt of  written notification of the district administrator's decision. The commissioner  will advise the permit applicant in writing regarding the decision on the  appeal within 60 days of receipt of the written appeal request, with a copy to  the district administrator and the chief administrative officer of the locality  where the entrance is proposed. 
    B. The commissioner may grant an exception to the required  sight distance after a traffic engineering investigation has been performed. 
    1. If a sight distance exception is requested, the permit  applicant shall provide such request in writing to the commissioner with a copy  to the district administrator's designee and the chief administrative officer  of the locality where the entrance is proposed and shall furnish the  commissioner with a traffic engineering investigation report, prepared by a  professional engineer. The methodology and format of the report shall be in  conformance with requirements set forth in the Manual on Uniform Traffic  Control Devices (see 24VAC30-72-170 D). Refer to Instructional and  Informational Memorandum IIM-LD-227.5, 2011 (VDOT), for requirements concerning  approval of sight distance exceptions.
    2. The commissioner will advise the permit applicant in  writing regarding the decision on the sight distance exception request within  60 days of receipt of the written exception request or such longer timeframe  jointly agreed to by the parties, with a copy to the district administrator's  designee and the chief administrative officer of the locality where the  entrance is proposed.
    24VAC30-72-60. General provisions governing commercial and  private entrances.
    A. No entrance of any nature may be constructed within the  right-of-way until the location has been approved by VDOT and an entrance  permit has been issued. The violation of any provision of this chapter and any  condition of approval of an entrance permit shall be subject to the penalties  for violations specified in the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-72-170 G) (24VAC30-151).
    B. VDOT will permit reasonably convenient access to a parcel  of record. VDOT is not obligated to permit the most convenient access, nor is  VDOT obligated to approve the permit applicant's preferred entrance location or  entrance design. If a parcel is served by more than one road in the systems of  state highways, the district administrator's designee shall determine upon  which road or roads the proposed entrance or entrances is or are to be  constructed. 
    C. When two or more properties are to be served by the same  entrance, the permit applicant shall ensure that there is a recorded agreement  between the parties specifying the use and future maintenance of the entrance.  A copy of this recorded agreement shall be included in the entrance permit  application submitted to the district administrator's designee. The shared  entrance shall be identified on any site plan or subdivision plat of the  property.
    D. The district administrator's designee may require the  permit applicant to alter any proposed entrance location or design, whether  private or commercial, to obtain the best possible operational characteristics,  including, but not limited to, sight distance and entrance spacing.
    E. Entrance standards established by localities that are  stricter than those of VDOT shall govern.
    24VAC30-72-70. Commercial entrance design.
    A. All commercial entrance design and construction shall  comply with the provisions of this chapter and the standards in the Road Design  Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011 (VDOT), the Road and Bridge  Standards (see 24VAC30-72-170 C), 2008, revised 2011 (VDOT), the  Road and Bridge Specifications (see 24VAC30-72-170 B) 2007, revised  2011 (VDOT), other VDOT engineering and construction standards as may be  appropriate, and any additional conditions, restrictions, or modifications  deemed necessary by the district administrator's designee to preserve the  safety, use and maintenance of the systems of state highways. Entrance design  and construction shall comply with applicable guidelines and requirements of  the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12101 et seq.). Ramps for  curb sections shall be provided as required in § 15.2-2021 of the Code of  Virginia. The standard drawing for depressed curb ramp as shown in the Road and  Bridge Standards (see 24VAC30-72-170 C), 2008, revised 2011 (VDOT),  shall be utilized in the design.
    1. In the event an entrance is proposed within the limits of a  funded roadway project that will ultimately change a highway, the permit  applicant may be required to construct, to the extent possible, entrances  compatible with the roadway's ultimate design.
    2. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  pedestrian and bicycle users of the abutting highway in accordance with the  Commonwealth Transportation Board's "Policy for Integrating Bicycle and  Pedestrian Accommodations" (see 24VAC30-72-170 H), 2004.
    3. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  transit users of the abutting highway where applicable and provide  accommodations to the extent possible.
    4. Based on the existing and planned developments, the  district administrator's designee will determine the need for curb and gutter,  sidewalks, or other features within the general area of the proposed entrance  in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and the design standards in  Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011  (VDOT). 
    5. Sites accessed by an entrance shall be designed so as to  prevent unsafe and inefficient traffic movements from impacting travel on the  abutting highway. At the request of the district administrator's designee, the  permit applicant shall furnish a report that documents the impact of expected  traffic movements upon the function of the abutting highway during the peak  hours of the abutting highway.
    B. It is essential that entrance and site design allow safe  and efficient movements of traffic using the entrance while minimizing the  impact of such movements on the operation of the systems of state highways. 
    1. The permit applicant shall supply sufficient information to  demonstrate to the satisfaction of the district administrator's designee that  neither the entrance, nor the proposed traffic circulation patterns within the  parcel, will compromise the safety, use, operation, or maintenance of the  abutting highway. A rezoning traffic impact statement or a site  plan/subdivision plat supplemental traffic analysis submitted for a proposed  development of a parcel in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis  Regulations (24VAC30-155) may be used for this purpose, provided that it  adequately documents the effect of the proposed entrance and its related traffic  on the operation of the highway to be accessed. 
    2. If the proposed entrance will cause the systems of state  highways to experience degradation in safety or a significant increase in delay  or a significant reduction in capacity beyond an acceptable level of service,  the applicant shall be required to submit a plan to mitigate these impacts and  to bear the costs of such mitigation measures.
    3. Proposed mitigation measures must be approved by the  district administrator's designee prior to permit approval. Mitigation measures  that may be considered include but are not limited to:
    a. Construction of auxiliary lanes or turning lanes, or  pavement transitions/tapers;
    b. Construction of new crossovers, or the relocation, removal,  or consolidation of existing crossovers;
    c. Installation, modification, or removal of traffic signals  and related traffic control equipment;
    d. Provisions to limit the traffic generated by the  development served by the proposed entrance;
    e. Dedication of additional right-of-way or easement, or both,  for future road improvements; 
    f. Reconstruction of existing roadway to provide required  vertical and horizontal sight distances; 
    g. Relocation or consolidation of existing entrances; or
    h. Recommendations from adopted corridor studies, design  studies, other access management practices and principles, or any combination  of these, not otherwise mentioned in this chapter. 
    4. If an applicant is unwilling or unable to mitigate the  impacts identified in the traffic impact analysis, the entrance shall be  physically restricted to right-in or right-out movements or both or similar  restrictions such that the public interests in a safe and efficient flow of  traffic on the systems of state highways are protected. 
    24VAC30-72-80. Minimum sight distance for commercial entrances.
    A. No less than minimum intersection sight distance shall be  obtained for any commercial entrance. Sight distances shall be measured in  accordance with VDOT practices, and sight distance requirements shall conform  to VDOT standards as described in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see  24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011 (VDOT). The legal speed limit shall be used  unless the design speed is available and approved for use by VDOT. 
    B. The operating speed may be used in lieu of the legal speed  limit in cases where the permit applicant furnishes the district  administrator's designee with a speed study prepared in accordance with the  Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (see 24VAC30-72-170 D) 2003,  revised 2007 (FHWA), methodology that demonstrates the operating speed of  the segment of highway is lower than the legal speed limit and, in the judgment  of the district administrator's designee, use of the operating speed will not  compromise safety for either a driver at an entrance or a driver on the  abutting highway. 
    C. VDOT may require that the vertical or horizontal alignment  of the existing roadway be adjusted to accommodate certain design elements of a  proposed commercial entrance including, but not limited to, median openings,  crossovers, roundabouts, and traffic signals, where adjustment is deemed  necessary. The cost of any work performed to adjust the horizontal or vertical  alignment of the roadway to achieve required intersection sight distance at a  proposed entrance shall be borne by the permit applicant.
    24VAC30-72-120. Commercial entrance access management.
    A. As commercial entrance locations and designs are prepared  and reviewed, appropriate access management regulations and standards shall be  utilized to ensure the safety, integrity and operational characteristics of the  transportation system are maintained. The proposed commercial entrance shall  meet the access management standards contained in Appendix F of the Road Design  Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011 (VDOT), and the regulations  in this chapter to provide the users of such entrance with a safe means of  ingress and egress while minimizing the impact of such ingress and egress on  the operation of the highway. As part of any commercial entrance permit review,  the district administrator's designee will determine what improvements are  needed to preserve the operational characteristics of the highway, accommodate  the proposed traffic and, if entrance design modifications are needed,  incorporate them accordingly to protect the transportation corridor. If the  location of the entrance is within the limits of an access management plan  approved by the local government and VDOT, the plan should guide the district  administrator's designee in determining the appropriate design and location of  the entrance. Access management requirements, in addition to the regulations in  this chapter, include but are not limited to:
    1. Restricting commercial entrance locations. To prevent undue  interference with free traffic movement and to preserve safety, entrances to  the highways shall not be permitted within the functional areas of  intersections, roundabouts, railroad grade crossings, interchanges or similar  areas with sensitive traffic operations. Only the commissioner may grant an  exception to this requirement in accordance with the procedures set forth in  24VAC30-72-50 B. 
    2. Entrances shared with adjoining properties. To reduce the  number of entrances to state highways, the district administrator's designee  shall require that shared entrances be created and designed to serve adjoining  parcels unless the permit applicant submits compelling evidence that a  reasonable agreement cannot be reached with adjoining property owners or that  there are physical constraints, including but not limited to topography, environmentally  sensitive areas, and hazardous uses, to creating a shared entrance. A copy of  the property owners' recorded agreement to share use of and maintain the  entrance shall be submitted with the permit application for a shared entrance.  The shared entrance shall be identified on any site plan or subdivision plat of  the property. A permit applicant shall not be required to follow the procedures  for an appeal set forth in 24VAC30-72-50 to receive an exception to the  requirements of this subdivision.
    3. Spacing of entrances and intersections. The spacing of  proposed entrances and intersections shall comply with the spacing standards  for entrances and intersections in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see  24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011 (VDOT), except as specified below.
    a. On older, established business corridors of a locality  within an urban area where existing entrances and intersections did not meet  the spacing standards prior to July 1, 2008, spacing for new entrances and  intersections may be allowed by the district administrator's designee that is  consistent with the established spacing along the highway, provided that  reasonable efforts are made to comply with the other access management  requirements of this section including restricting entrances within the  functional areas of intersections, sharing entrances with and providing  vehicular and pedestrian connections between adjoining properties, and  physically restricting entrances to right-in or right-out or both movements. 
    b. Where a developer proposes a development within a  designated urban development area as defined in § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of  Virginia and other comparable local designations that fully incorporates  principles of new urbanism and traditional neighborhood development, which may  include but need not be limited to (i) pedestrian-friendly road design, (ii)  interconnection of new local streets with existing local streets and roads,  (iii) connectivity of road and pedestrian networks, (iv) preservation of  natural areas, (v) satisfaction of requirements for stormwater management, (vi)  mixed-use neighborhoods, including mixed housing types, (vii) reduction of  front and side yard building setbacks, and (viii) reduction of subdivision  street widths and turning radii at subdivision street intersections, the  district administrator's designee may approve spacing standards for entrances  and intersections internal to the development that differ from the otherwise  applicable spacing standards provided that such entrances and intersections  meet the intersection sight distance standards specified in Appendix F of the  Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011 (VDOT). 
    c. Where a development's second or additional commercial  entrances are necessary for the streets in the development to be eligible for acceptance  into the secondary system of state highways and such commercial entrances  cannot meet the spacing standards for highways, the district administrator's  designee shall waive such state requirements that necessitate second or  additional commercial entrances. 
    4. Vehicular/pedestrian circulation between adjoining  properties. To facilitate traffic circulation between adjacent properties,  reduce the number of entrances to the highway, and maximize use of new  signalized intersections, the permit applicant shall be required to record  access easements and to construct vehicular connections (which may include  frontage roads or reverse frontage roads) in such a manner that affords safe  and efficient future access between the permit applicant's property and the  adjoining properties. Where appropriate, the permit applicant also shall  construct pedestrian connections to the boundary lines of adjoining undeveloped  properties. 
    a. Such connections shall not be required if there are  physical constraints to making such connections between properties including  but not limited to topography, environmentally sensitive areas, and hazardous  uses. 
    b. At such time that a commercial entrance permit application  is submitted for the adjoining property, a condition of permit issuance shall  be to extend such vehicular/pedestrian connections into the proposed  development. 
    c. If a permit applicant cannot or does not wish to comply  with this requirement, the permit applicant's entrance shall be physically  restricted to right-in or right-out movements or both or similar restrictions  such that the public interests in a safe and efficient flow of traffic on the  systems of state highways are protected. 
    d. Development sites under the same ownership or consolidated  for the purposes of development and comprised of more than one building site  shall provide a unified access and circulation system between the sites.
    5. Traffic signal spacing. To promote the efficient  progression of traffic on highways, commercial entrances that are expected to  serve sufficient traffic volumes and movements to require signalization shall  not be permitted if the spacing between the entrance and at least one adjacent  signalized intersection is below signalized intersection spacing standards in  Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011  (VDOT). If sufficient spacing between adjacent traffic signals is not  available, the entrance shall be physically restricted to right-in or right-out  movements or both or similar restrictions such that the public interests in a  safe and efficient flow of traffic on the systems of state highways are  protected and preserved.
    6. Limiting entrance movements. To preserve the safety and  function of certain highways, the district administrator's designee may require  an entrance to be designed and constructed in such a manner as to physically  prohibit certain traffic movements.
    B. A request for an exception from the access management  requirements subsection A of this section shall follow the procedures for an  appeal set forth in 24VAC30-72-50. In addition such request shall include  specific and documented reasons based on a traffic engineering investigation  report prepared showing that highway operation and safety will not be adversely  impacted by the requested exception.
    C. VDOT may work with a locality or localities on access  management corridor plans. Such plans may allow for spacing standards that  differ from and supersede the spacing standards for entrances and intersections  in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), 2011  (VDOT), subject to approval by the commissioner.
    24VAC30-72-140. Drive-in theaters. (Repealed.)
    A drive-in theater is a specialized commercial entrance.  In addition to the commercial entrance regulations set forth in this part, the  conditions set forth in § 33.1-12 (15) of the Code of Virginia shall be  satisfied in order to construct entrances to drive-in theaters.
    24VAC30-72-150. Temporary entrances (construction/logging  entrances).
    A. Construction of temporary construction or logging  entrances upon the systems of state highways shall be authorized in accordance  with the provisions in the Land Use Permit Regulations (see 24VAC30-72-170  G) (24VAC30-151). The permit applicant must contact the appropriate  district administrator's designee to approve the location prior to installing  an entrance or utilizing an existing entrance. The district administrator's  designee shall also be contacted to arrange and conduct a final inspection  prior to closing a temporary construction or logging entrance. In the event  that adequate sight distance is not achieved, additional signage that meets the  Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices standards (see 24VAC30-72-170 D),  2003, revised 2007, and certified flaggers shall be used to ensure safe  ingress and egress.
    B. Entrances shall be designed and operated in such a manner  as to prevent mud and debris from being tracked from the site onto the  highway's paved surface. If debris is tracked onto the highway, it shall be  removed by the permittee immediately as directed by the district  administrator's designee.
    C. The permittee must restore, at the permittee's cost, all  disturbed highway rights-of-way, including, but not limited to, ditches,  shoulders, roadside and pavement, to their original condition when removing the  entrance. All such restorations are subject to approval by the district  administrator's designee.
    24VAC30-72-170. Documents incorporated by reference. (Repealed.)
    A. Road Design Manual (effective January 1, 2005, revised  July 2008)
    Note: Appendix F (Access Management Design Standards for  Entrances and Intersections) contains the access management standards  referenced in Chapters 863 and 928 of the 2007 Acts of Assembly and Chapters  274 and 454 of the 2008 Acts of Assembly.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    B. 2007 Road and Bridge Specifications (effective July  2008)
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    C. Road and Bridge Standards (effective February 1, 2001)
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    D. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for  Streets and Highways, 2003 Edition (effective December 22, 2003, revised  November 2004)
           |   | Federal Highway    AdministrationSuperintendent of Documents
 U.S. Government Printing Office
 P.O. Box 371954
 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954
 | 
  
    E. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,  Fifth Edition, 2004
           |   | American Association of State Highway and Transportation    Officials (AASHTO)444 North Capitol St. N.W., Suite 225
 Washington, D.C. 20001
 | 
  
    F. Change of Limited Access Control, 24VAC30-401
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    G. Land Use Permit Regulations, 24VAC30-151
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    H. Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian  Accommodations, eff. March 18, 2004
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    I. Highway Capacity Manual 2000 
           |   | Transportation Research Board500 Fifth Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    J. Traffic Impact Analysis  Regulations, 24VAC30-155
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
        NOTICE: The following  forms used in administering the regulation were filed by the agency. The forms  are not being published; however, online users of this issue of the Virginia  Register of Regulations may click on the name to access a form. The forms are  also available from the agency contact or may be viewed at the Office of the  Registrar of Regulations, General Assembly Building, 2nd Floor, Richmond,  Virginia 23219.
         FORMS (24VAC30-72)
    LUP-A - Land Use Permit Application (revised 1/2005).
    LUP-SP - Special Provisions (Notice of Permittee  Liability) (revised 11/2007).
    LUP-CSB - Corporate Surety Bond (revised 1/2005).
    LUP-LC - Irrevocable Letter of Credit Bank Agreement  (revised 1/2005).
    LUP-SB - Surety Bond (revised 1/2005).
    LUP-A  - Land Use Permit Application (rev. 03/10).
    LUP-SP  - Special Provisions (Notice of Permittee Liability (rev. 12/10).
    LUP-CSB  - Corporate Surety Bond (rev. 03/10).
    LUP-LC  - Irrevocable Letter of Credit Bank Agreement (rev. 03/10).
    LUP-SB  - Land Use Surety Bond (rev. 03/10).
    DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-72)
    Information pertaining to the availability and cost of any  of these publications should be directed to the address indicated for the  specific document. Requests for documents of the Virginia Department of  Transportation (VDOT) may be obtained from the department at 1401 E. Broad St.,  Richmond, Virginia 23219; however, department documents may be available over the  Internet at www.virginiadot.org.
    VDOT  Road Design Manual, 2011.
    Note: Appendix F (Access Management Design Standards for  Entrances and Intersections) contains the access management standards  referenced in Chapters 863 and 928 of the 2007 Acts of Assembly and Chapters  274 and 454 of the 2008 Acts of Assembly.
    VDOT  Road and Bridge Specifications, 2007, revised 2011.
    VDOT  Road and Bridge Standards, 2008, revised 2011.
    Manual  on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2003, revised  2007, Federal Highway Administration, Superintendent of Documents, U.S.  Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954.
    VDOT  Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations, 2004.
    Highway  Capacity Manual, 2010, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street, NW,  Washington, DC 20001.
    Trip  Generation, 8th Edition, 2008, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1099 14th  Street, N.W., Suite 300 West, Washington, DC 20005.
    VDOT  Instructional and Informational Memorandum IIM-LD-227.5, 2011.
    24VAC30-73-10. Definitions.
    "Access management" means the systematic control of  the location, spacing, design, and operation of entrances, median  openings/crossovers, traffic signals, and interchanges for the purpose of  providing vehicular access to land development in a manner that preserves the  safety and efficiency of the transportation system.
    "Collectors" means the functional classification of  highways that provide land access service and traffic circulation within  residential, commercial, and industrial areas. The collector system distributes  trips from principal and minor arterials through the area to the ultimate  destination. Conversely, collectors also collect traffic and channel it into  the arterial system. 
    "Commercial entrance" means any entrance serving  land uses other than two or fewer individual private residences. (See  "private entrance.")
    "Commissioner" means the individual who serves as  the chief executive officer of the Department of Transportation or his  designee.
    "Commonwealth" means the Commonwealth of Virginia.
    "Crossover" means an opening in a nontraversable  median (such as a concrete barrier or raised island) that provides for crossing  movements and left and right turning movements. 
    "Design speed" means the selected speed used to  determine the geometric design features of the highway. 
    "District" means each of the nine areas in which  VDOT is divided to oversee the maintenance and construction on the  state-maintained highways, bridges and tunnels within the boundaries of the  area. 
    "District administrator" means the VDOT employee  assigned to supervise the district. 
    "District administrator's designee" means the VDOT  employee or employees designated by the district administrator. 
    "Entrance" means any driveway, street, or other  means of providing for movement of vehicles to or from the highway.
    "Frontage road" means a road that generally runs  parallel to a highway between the highway right-of-way and the front building  setback line of the abutting properties and provides access to the abutting properties  for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to the highway and  separating the abutting property traffic from through traffic on the highway. 
    "Functional area" means the area of the physical  highway feature, such as an intersection, roundabout, railroad grade crossing,  or interchange, plus that portion of the highway that comprises the decision  and maneuver distance and required vehicle storage length to serve that highway  feature.
    "Functional area of an intersection" means the  physical area of an at-grade intersection plus all required storage lengths for  separate turn lanes and for through traffic, including any maneuvering distance  for separate turn lanes.
    "Functional classification" means the federal  system of classifying groups of highways according to the character of service  they are intended to provide and classifications made by the commissioner based  on the operational characteristics of a highway. Each highway is assigned a  functional classification based on the highway's intended purpose of providing  priority to through traffic movement or adjoining property access. The  functional classification system groups highways into three basic categories  identified as (i) arterial, with the function to provide through movement of  traffic; (ii) collector, with the function of supplying a combination of  through movement and access to property; and (iii) local, with the function of  providing access to property and to other streets. 
    "Highway," "street," or "road"  means a public way for purposes of vehicular travel, including the entire area  within the right-of-way.
    "Intersection" means (i) a crossing of two or more  highways at grade, (ii) a crossover, or (iii) any at-grade connection with a  highway such as a commercial entrance.
    "Intersection sight distance" means the sight  distance required at an intersection to allow the driver of a stopped vehicle a  sufficient view of the intersecting highway to decide when to enter, or cross,  the intersecting highway. 
    "Legal speed limit" means the speed limit set forth  on signs lawfully posted on a highway or, in the absence of such signs, the  speed limit established by Article 8 (§ 46.2-870 et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title  46.2 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Level of service" means a qualitative measure  describing the operational conditions within a vehicular traffic stream,  generally in terms of such service measures as speed, travel time, freedom to  maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience.  "Level-of-service" is defined and procedures are presented for  determining the level of service in the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-73-170 I), 2010 (Transportation Research Board).
    "Limited access highway" means a highway especially  designed for through traffic over which abutting properties have no easement or  right of light, air, or access by reason of the fact that those properties abut  upon the limited access highway.
    "Local streets" means the functional classification  for highways that comprise all facilities that are not collectors or arterials.  Local streets serve primarily to provide direct access to abutting land and to  other streets.
    "Median" means the portion of a divided highway  that separates opposing traffic flows.
    "Median opening" means a crossover or a directional  opening in a nontraversable median (such as a concrete barrier or raised  island) that physically restricts movements to specific turns such as left  turns and U-turns. 
    "Minor arterials" means the functional  classification for highways that interconnect with and augment the principal  arterial system. Minor arterials distribute traffic to smaller geographic areas  providing service between and within communities.
    "Operating speed" means the speed at which drivers  are observed operating their vehicles during free-flow conditions with the 85th  percentile of the distribution of observed speeds being the most frequently  used measure of the operating speed of a particular location or geometric  feature. 
    "Permit" or "entrance permit" means a  document that sets the conditions under which VDOT allows a connection to a  highway. 
    "Permit applicant" means the person or persons,  firm, corporation, government, or other entity that has applied for a permit. 
    "Permittee" means the person or persons, firm,  corporation, government, or other entity that has been issued a permit.
    "Preliminary subdivision plat" means a plan of  development as set forth in § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Principal arterials" means the functional  classification for major highways intended to serve through traffic where access  is carefully controlled, generally highways of regional importance, with  moderate to high volumes of traffic traveling relatively long distances and at  higher speeds.
    "Private entrance" means an entrance that serves up  to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of the  occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain access  to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure facilities  that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump stations, and  stormwater management basins.
    "Professional engineer" means a person who is  qualified to practice engineering by reason of his special knowledge and use of  mathematical, physical and engineering sciences and the principles and methods of  engineering analysis and design acquired by engineering education and  experience, and whose competence has been attested by the Virginia Board for  Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior  Designers and Landscape Architects through licensure as a professional  engineer.
    "Reverse frontage road" means a road that is  located to the rear of the properties fronting a highway and provides access to  the abutting properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to  the highway and removing the abutting property traffic from through traffic on  the highway.
    "Right-of-way" means that property within the  systems of state highways that is open or may be opened for public travel or  use or both in the Commonwealth. This definition includes those public  rights-of-way in which the Commonwealth has a prescriptive easement for  maintenance and public travel. 
    "Roadway" means the portion of a highway, including  shoulders, for vehicular use. A divided highway has two or more roadways.
    "Roundabout" means a circular intersection with  yield control of all entering traffic, right-of-way assigned to traffic within  the circular roadway, and channelized approaches and a central island that  deflect entering traffic to the right. 
    "Shared entrance" means a single entrance serving  two or more adjoining parcels.
    "Sight distance" means the distance visible to the  driver of a vehicle when the view is unobstructed by traffic.
    "Site plan" and "subdivision plat" mean a  plan of development approved in accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241  through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia. 
    "Systems of state highways" means all highways and  roads under the ownership, the control, or the jurisdiction of VDOT, including  but not limited to, the primary, secondary and interstate highways. 
    "Trip" means a single or one-directional vehicle  movement either entering or exiting a property; a vehicle leaving the property  is one trip and a vehicle returning to the property is one trip.
    "Turn lane" means a separate lane for the purpose  of enabling a vehicle that is entering or leaving a highway to increase or  decrease its speed to a rate at which it can more safely merge or diverge with  through traffic; an acceleration or deceleration lane.
    "Urban area" means an urbanized area with a  population of 50,000 or more, or an urban place (small urban area) as  designated by the Bureau of the Census having a population of 5,000 or more and  not within any urbanized area. The Federal Highway Administration defines  "urban area" in more detail based on the federal-aid highway law (23  USC § 101).
    "VDOT" means the Virginia Department of  Transportation, its successor, the Commissioner of Highways, or his designees. 
    24VAC30-73-40. Administrative procedures and rules for  obtaining commercial and private entrance permits.
    All applications for entrance permits shall be obtained from  and submitted to the district administrator's designee for the county in which  the work is to be performed. The permit applicant shall submit the permit  application form, and the entrance permit, if approved, will be issued in  accordance with the applicable administrative rules, requirements and  procedures of this chapter and the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-73-170 G) (24VAC30-151). 
    24VAC30-73-50. Appeal and sight distance exception procedure.
    A. The permit applicant may appeal denial or revocation or  conditions of a permit in writing to the district administrator with a copy to  the district administrator's designee and the chief administrative officer of the  locality where the entrance is proposed. 
    1. All appeals must be received within 30 calendar days of  receipt of written notification of denial or revocation or issuance of a permit  with contested conditions and must set forth the grounds for the appeal and  include copies of all prior correspondence with any local government official  and VDOT representatives regarding the issue or issues. The permit applicant  may request a meeting with the district administrator concerning the appeal and  the district administrator will set a date, time, and location for such  meeting. 
    2. After reviewing all pertinent information, the district  administrator will advise the permit applicant in writing regarding the  decision on the appeal within 60 calendar days of receipt of the written appeal  request or such longer timeframe jointly agreed to by the parties, with a copy  to the district administrator's designee and the chief administrative officer  of the locality where the entrance is proposed.
    3. The permit applicant may further appeal the district  administrator's decision to the commissioner within 30 calendar days of receipt  of written notification of the district administrator's decision. The  commissioner will advise the permit applicant in writing regarding the decision  on the appeal within 60 calendar days of receipt of the written appeal request,  with a copy to the district administrator and the chief administrative officer  of the locality where the entrance is proposed. 
    B. The commissioner may grant an exception to the required  sight distance after a traffic engineering investigation has been performed. 
    1. If a sight distance exception is requested, the permit  applicant shall provide such request in writing to the commissioner with a copy  to the district administrator's designee and the chief administrative officer  of the locality where the entrance is proposed and shall furnish the  commissioner with a traffic engineering investigation report, prepared by a  professional engineer. Refer to Instructional and Informational Memorandum IIM-LD-227  IIM LD-227.5, 2011 (VDOT), for requirements concerning approval of sight  distance exceptions (see 24VAC30-73-170 K). 
    2. The commissioner will advise the permit applicant in  writing regarding the decision on the sight distance exception request within  60 calendar days of receipt of the written exception request or such longer  timeframe jointly agreed to by the parties, with a copy to the district  administrator's designee and the chief administrative officer of the locality  where the entrance is proposed. 
    24VAC30-73-70. Commercial entrance design.
    A. All commercial entrance design and construction shall  comply with the provisions of this chapter and the standards in the Road Design  Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A), 2011 (VDOT), the Road and Bridge  Standards (see 24VAC30-73-170 C), 2008, revised 2011, the Road  and Bridge Specifications (see 24VAC30-73-170 B), 2007, revised 2011  (VDOT), other VDOT engineering and construction standards as may be  appropriate, and any additional conditions, restrictions, or modifications  deemed necessary by the district administrator's designee to preserve the  safety, use and maintenance of the systems of state highways. Entrance design  and construction shall comply with applicable guidelines and requirements of  the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12101 et seq.).  Ramps for curb sections shall be provided as required in § 15.2-2021 of  the Code of Virginia. The standard drawing for depressed curb ramp as shown in  the Road and Bridge Standards (see 24VAC30-73-170 C), 2008, revised  2011, shall be utilized in the design.
    1. In the event an entrance is proposed within the limits of a  funded roadway project that will ultimately change a highway, the permit  applicant may be required to construct, to the extent possible, entrances  compatible with the roadway's ultimate design.
    2. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  pedestrian and bicycle users of the abutting highway in accordance with the  Commonwealth Transportation Board's "Policy for Integrating Bicycle and  Pedestrian Accommodations" (see 24VAC30-73-170 H), 2004.
    3. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  transit users of the abutting highway where applicable and provide  accommodations to the extent possible.
    4. Based on the existing and planned developments, the  district administrator's designee will determine the need for curb and gutter,  sidewalks, or other features within the general area of the proposed entrance  in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and the design standards in  Appendix G F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A),  2011 (VDOT).
    5. Sites accessed by an entrance shall be designed so as to  prevent unsafe and inefficient traffic movements from impacting travel on the  abutting highway. At the request of the district administrator's designee, the  permit applicant shall furnish a report that documents the impact of expected  traffic movements upon the function of the abutting highway during the peak  hours of the abutting highway or during the peak hours of the generator,  whichever is appropriate as determined by the district administrator's  designee.
    6. The use of a shared entrance between adjacent property  owners shall be the preferred method of access.
    7. The construction of new crossovers, or the relocation,  removal, or consolidation of existing crossovers shall be approved in  accordance with the crossover location approval process specified in Appendix G  F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A), 2011  (VDOT). 
    B. It is essential that entrance and site design allow safe  and efficient movements of traffic using the entrance while minimizing the  impact of such movements on the operation of the systems of state highways.
    1. The permit applicant shall supply sufficient information to  demonstrate to the satisfaction of the district administrator's designee that  neither the entrance, nor the proposed traffic circulation patterns within the  parcel, will compromise the safety, use, operation, or maintenance of the  abutting highway. A rezoning traffic impact statement or a site  plan/subdivision plat supplemental traffic analysis submitted for a proposed  development of a parcel in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis  Regulations (see 24VAC30-73-170 J) (24VAC30-155) may be used for  this purpose, provided that it adequately documents the effect of the proposed  entrance and its related traffic on the operation of the highway to be  accessed.
    2. If the proposed entrance will cause the systems of state  highways to experience degradation in safety or a significant increase in delay  or a significant reduction in capacity beyond an acceptable level of service,  the applicant shall be required to submit a plan to mitigate these impacts and  to bear the costs of such mitigation measures.
    3. Proposed mitigation measures must be approved by the  district administrator's designee prior to permit approval. The district  administrator's designee will consider what improvements will be needed to  preserve the operational characteristics of the highway, accommodate the  proposed traffic and, if entrance design modifications are needed, incorporate  them accordingly to protect the transportation corridor. Mitigation measures  that may be considered include but are not limited to:
    a. Construction of auxiliary lanes or turning lanes, or  pavement transitions/tapers;
    b. Construction of new crossovers, or the relocation, removal,  or consolidation of existing crossovers;
    c. Installation, modification, or removal of traffic signals  and related traffic control equipment;
    d. Provisions to limit the traffic generated by the  development served by the proposed entrance;
    e. Dedication of additional right-of-way or easement, or both,  for future road improvements; 
    f. Reconstruction of existing roadway to provide required  vertical and horizontal sight distances; 
    g. Relocation or consolidation of existing entrances; or
    h. Recommendations from adopted corridor studies, design  studies, other access management practices and principles, or any combination  of these, not otherwise mentioned in this chapter.
    4. If an applicant is unwilling or unable to mitigate the  impacts identified in the traffic impact analysis, the entrance shall be  physically restricted to right-in or right-out movements or both or similar  restrictions such that the public interests in a safe and efficient flow of  traffic on the systems of state highways are protected.
    24VAC30-73-80. Minimum sight distance for commercial entrances.
    A. No less than minimum intersection sight distance shall be  obtained for any commercial entrance. Sight distances shall be measured in  accordance with VDOT practices, and sight distance requirements shall conform  to VDOT standards as described in Appendix G F of the Road Design  Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A), 2011 (VDOT). The legal speed limit  shall be used unless the design speed is available and approved for use by  VDOT. 
    B. The operating speed may be used in lieu of the legal speed  limit in cases where the permit applicant furnishes the district  administrator's designee with a speed study prepared in accordance with the  Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (see 24VAC30-73-170 D),  2003, revised 2007 (FHWA), methodology that demonstrates the operating  speed of the segment of highway is lower than the legal speed limit and, in the  judgment of the district administrator's designee, use of the operating speed  will not compromise safety for either a driver at an entrance or a driver on  the abutting highway. 
    C. VDOT may require that the vertical or horizontal alignment  of the existing roadway be adjusted to accommodate certain design elements of a  proposed commercial entrance including, but not limited to, median openings,  crossovers, roundabouts, and traffic signals, where adjustment is deemed  necessary. The cost of any work performed to adjust the horizontal or vertical  alignment of the roadway to achieve required intersection sight distance at a  proposed entrance shall be borne by the permit applicant. 
    24VAC30-73-90. Private entrances.
    A. The property owner shall identify the desired location of  the private entrance with the assistance of the district administrator's  designee. If the minimum intersection sight distance standards specified in  Appendix G F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A),  2011 (VDOT), cannot be met, the entrance should be placed at the location  with the best possible sight distance as determined by the district  administrator's designee. The district administrator's designee may require the  property owner to grade slopes, clear brush, remove trees, or conduct other  similar efforts, or any combination of these, necessary to provide the safest  possible means of ingress and egress that can be reasonably achieved. 
    B. The property owner shall obtain an entrance permit and, on  shoulder and ditch section roads, shall be responsible for installing the  private entrance in accordance with VDOT policies and engineering standards.  The property owner may request VDOT to perform the stabilization of the  shoulder and installation of the entrance pipe. In such cases, VDOT may install  the private entrance pipe and will stabilize the shoulder at the property  owner's expense. If VDOT installs these portions of the entrance, a cost  estimate for the installation will be provided to the property owner; however,  VDOT will bill the property owner the actual cost of installation. The property  owner shall be responsible for all grading beyond the shoulder.
    C. Grading and installation of a driveway from the edge of  the pavement to the right-of-way line shall be the responsibility of the property  owner. 
    D. Installation of a private entrance on a curb and gutter  street shall be the responsibility of the property owner.
    E. Maintenance of private entrances shall be by the owner of  the entrance, except that VDOT shall maintain:
    1. On shoulder section roadways, that portion of the entrance  within the normal shoulder portion of the roadway.
    2. On roadways with ditches, the drainage pipe at the  entrance.
    3. On roadways with curb, gutter, and sidewalk belonging to  VDOT, that portion of the entrance that extends to the back of the sidewalk. If  a sidewalk is not present, to the back of the curb line.
    4. On roadways with curb, gutter, and sidewalk not belonging  to VDOT, only to the flow line of the gutter pan.
    5. On roadways with shoulders, ditches, and sidewalk belonging  to VDOT, that portion of the entrance that extends to the back of the sidewalk.  
    24VAC30-73-120. Commercial entrance access management.
    A. As commercial entrance locations and designs are prepared  and reviewed, appropriate access management regulations and standards shall be  utilized to ensure the safety, integrity and operational characteristics of the  transportation system are maintained. The proposed commercial entrance shall  meet the access management standards contained in Appendix G F of  the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A), 2011 (VDOT), and  the regulations in this chapter to provide the users of such entrance with a  safe means of ingress and egress while minimizing the impact of such ingress  and egress on the operation of the highway. 
    B. A proposed development's compliance with the access  management requirements specified below should be considered during the local  government and VDOT's review of any rezoning, site plan, or subdivision plat  for the development. VDOT's review of a rezoning traffic impact statement and a  site plan/subdivision plat supplemental traffic analysis submitted for a  development in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (see  24VAC30-73-170 J) (24VAC30-155) shall include comments on the development's  compliance with the access management requirements specified below.
    C. Access management requirements, in addition to other  regulations in this chapter, include but are not limited to:
    1. Restricting commercial entrance locations. To prevent undue  interference with free traffic movement and to preserve safety, entrances to  the highways shall not be permitted within the functional areas of  intersections, roundabouts, railroad grade crossings, interchanges or similar  areas with sensitive traffic operations. A request for an exception to this  requirement submitted according to 24VAC30-73-120 D shall include a traffic  engineering investigation report that contains specific and documented reasons  showing that highway operation and safety will not be adversely impacted. 
    2. Entrances shared with adjoining properties on minor  arterials and collectors. To reduce the number of entrances to state highways,  a condition of entrance permit issuance shall be that entrances serve two or  more parcels. A street that meets the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (see  24VAC30-73-170 L) (24VAC30-92) will be publicly maintained and shall  be the preferred method for shared entrances as such entrances will allow for  the future development of a network of publicly maintained streets. Otherwise a  shared commercial entrance shall be created and designed to serve adjoining  properties. A copy of the property owners' recorded agreement to share use of  and maintain the entrance shall be included with the entrance permit application  submitted to the district administrator's designee. The shared entrance shall  be identified on any site plan or subdivision plat of the property. The  district administrator's designee is authorized to approve an exception to this  requirement upon submittal of a request according to 24VAC30-73-120 D that  includes the following: 
    a. Written evidence that a reasonable agreement to share an  entrance cannot be reached with adjoining property owners, or 
    b. Documentation that there are physical constraints,  including but not limited to topography, environmentally sensitive areas, and  hazardous uses, to creating a shared entrance. 
    3. Spacing of entrances and intersections. The spacing of  proposed entrances and intersections shall comply with the spacing standards  for entrances and intersections in Appendix G F of the Road  Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A), 2011 (VDOT), except as  specified below.
    a. Where a plan of development or a condition of development  that identifies the specific location of an entrance or entrances was proffered  pursuant to §§ 15.2-2297, 15.2-2298, or 15.2-2303 of the Code of Virginia  as part of a rezoning approved by the locality prior to October 14, 2009, such  entrances shall be exempt from the applicable spacing standards for entrances  and intersections, provided the requirements of § 15.2-2307 of the Code of  Virginia have been met. Entrances shall be exempt from the applicable spacing  standards for entrances and intersections when the location of such entrances  are shown on a subdivision plat, site plan, preliminary subdivision plat, or a  Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (see 24VAC30-73-170 L) (24VAC30-92)  conceptual sketch that was submitted by the locality to VDOT for review and  received by VDOT prior to October 14, 2009, or is valid pursuant to §§ 15.2-2260  and 15.2-2261 of the Code of Virginia and was approved in accordance with §§ 15.2-2286  and 15.2-2241 through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia prior to October 14,  2009. The district administrator's designee is authorized to exempt such  entrances from the spacing standards upon submittal of a request according to  24VAC30-73-120 D that includes documentation of the above criteria.
    b. VDOT may work with a locality or localities on access  management corridor plans. Such plans may allow for spacing standards that  differ from and supersede the applicable spacing standards for entrances and  intersections, subject to approval by the district administrator. Such plans  may also identify the locations of any physical constraints to creating shared  entrances or vehicular/pedestrian connections between adjoining properties (see  24VAC30-73-120 B 2 and B 4) C 2 and C 4). If the permit applicant  submits a request according to 24VAC30-73-120 D for an exception to the spacing  standards and provides documentation that the location of the proposed  commercial entrance is within the limits of an access management plan approved  by the local government and by VDOT, the plan should guide the district  administrator's designee in approving the exception request and in determining  the appropriate location of the entrance.
    c. On older, established business corridors of a locality  within an urban area where existing entrances and intersections did not meet  the spacing standards prior to October 14, 2009, spacing for new entrances and  intersections may be allowed by the district administrator's designee that is  consistent with the established spacing along the highway, provided that the  permit applicant submits a request according to 24VAC30-73-120 D for an  exception to the spacing standards that includes evidence that reasonable  efforts were made to comply with the other access management requirements of  this section including restricting entrances within the functional areas of  intersections, sharing entrances with and providing vehicular and pedestrian  connections between adjoining properties, and physically restricting entrances  to right-in or right-out or both movements. 
    d. Where a developer proposes a development within a  designated urban development area as defined in § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code  of Virginia or an area designated in the local comprehensive plan for higher  density development that incorporates principles of new urbanism and  traditional neighborhood development, which may include but need not be limited  to (i) pedestrian-friendly road design, (ii) interconnection of new local  streets with existing local streets and roads, (iii) connectivity of road and  pedestrian networks, (iv) preservation of natural areas, (v) satisfaction of  requirements for stormwater management, (vi) mixed-use neighborhoods, including  mixed housing types, (vii) reduction of front and side yard building setbacks,  and (viii) reduction of subdivision street widths and turning radii at  subdivision street intersections, the district administrator's designee may  approve spacing standards for public street intersections internal to the  development that differ from the otherwise applicable spacing standards,  provided that the developer submits a request according to 24VAC30-73-120 D for  an exception to the spacing standards that includes information on the design  of the development and on the conformance of such entrances and intersections  with the intersection sight distance standards specified in Appendix G F  of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A), 2011 (VDOT). 
    c. e. Where a development's second or additional  commercial entrances are necessary for the streets in the development to be  eligible for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways in  accordance with the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (see  24VAC30-73-170 L) (24VAC30-92) and such commercial entrances cannot  meet the spacing standards for highways, the developer may submit a request  according to 24VAC30-73-120 D for an exception to the spacing standards that  includes information on the design of the development. The following shall  apply to the exception request:
    (1) For highways with a functional classification as a  collector or local street, the district administrator's designee may approve  spacing standards that differ from the otherwise applicable spacing standards  to allow the approval of the entrance or entrances. Such commercial entrances  shall be required to meet the intersection sight distance standards specified  in Appendix G F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170  A), 2011 (VDOT).
    (2) For highways with a functional classification as a minor  arterial, the district administrator's designee shall, in consultation with the  developer and the locality within which the development is proposed, either  approve spacing standards that differ from the otherwise applicable spacing  standards to allow the approval of the entrance or entrances, or waive such  state requirements that necessitate second or additional commercial entrances.  If approved, such commercial entrances shall be required to meet the  intersection sight distance standards specified in Appendix G F  of the Road Design Manual (see 24 VAC 30-73-170 A), 2011 (VDOT).
    f. Where a parcel of record has insufficient frontage on a highway  to meet the spacing standards because of the dimensions of the parcel or a  physical constraint such as topography or an environmentally sensitive area,  the entrance shall be physically restricted to right-in or right-out movements  or both or similar restrictions such that the public interests in a safe and  efficient flow of traffic on the systems of state highways are protected and  preserved. A request for an exception to this requirement submitted according  to 24VAC30-73-120 D shall include a traffic engineering investigation report  that contains specific and documented reasons showing that highway operation  and safety will not be adversely impacted.
    4. Vehicular/pedestrian circulation between adjoining  properties. To facilitate traffic circulation between adjacent properties,  reduce the number of entrances to the highway, and maximize use of new  signalized intersections, the permit applicant shall be required on a highway  with a functional classification as a minor arterial highway, and may be required  by the district administrator's designee on a highway with a functional  classification as a collector, as a condition of permit issuance to record  access easements and to construct vehicular connections to the boundaries of  the property (which may include frontage roads or reverse frontage roads) in  such a manner that affords safe and efficient future access between the permit  applicant's property and adjoining undeveloped properties. Where appropriate,  the permit applicant also shall construct pedestrian connections to the  boundary lines of adjoining undeveloped properties and adjoining developed  properties with sidewalks that abut the property. At such time that a  commercial entrance permit application is submitted for the adjoining property,  a condition of permit issuance shall be to extend such vehicular/pedestrian  connections into the proposed development. Development sites under the same  ownership or consolidated for the purposes of development and comprised of more  than one building site shall provide a unified vehicular and pedestrian access  connection and circulation system between the sites. 
    a. Such connections shall not be required if the permit  applicant submits a request for an exception according to 24VAC30-73-120 D and  provides documentation that there are physical constraints to making such  connections between properties, including but not limited to topography,  environmentally sensitive areas, and hazardous uses. 
    b. If a permit applicant does not wish to comply with this  requirement, the permit applicant's entrance shall be physically restricted to  right-in or right-out movements or both or similar restrictions such that the  public interests in a safe and efficient flow of traffic on the systems of  state highways are protected. 
    5. Traffic signal spacing. To promote the efficient  progression of traffic on highways, commercial entrances that are expected to  serve sufficient traffic volumes and movements to require signalization shall  not be permitted if the spacing between the entrance and at least one adjacent  signalized intersection is below signalized intersection spacing standards in  Appendix G F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A),  2011 (VDOT). If sufficient spacing between adjacent traffic signals is not  available, the entrance shall be physically restricted to right-in or right-out  movements or both or similar restrictions such that the public interests in a  safe and efficient flow of traffic on the systems of state highways are  protected and preserved. A request for an exception to this requirement  submitted according to subsection D of this section shall include a traffic  engineering investigation report that (i) evaluates the suitability of the  entrance location for design as a roundabout, and (ii) contains specific and documented  reasons showing that highway operation and safety will not be adversely  impacted. 
    6. Limiting entrance movements. To preserve the safety and  function of certain highways, the district administrator's designee may require  an entrance to be designed and constructed in such a manner as to physically  prohibit certain traffic movements.
    D. A request for an exception from the access management  requirements in subsection C of this section shall be submitted in writing to  the district administrator's designee. The request shall identify the type of  exception, describe the reasons for the request, and include all documentation  specified in 24VAC30-73-120 C for the type of exception. After considering all  pertinent information including any improvements that will be needed to the  entrance or intersection to protect the operational characteristics of the  highway, the district administrator's designee will advise the applicant in  writing regarding the decision on the exception request within 30 calendar days  of receipt of the written exception request, with a copy to the district  administrator. The applicant may appeal the decision of the district  administrator's designee to the district administrator in accordance with the  procedures for an appeal set forth in 24VAC30-73-50.
    24VAC30-73-140. Drive-in theaters. (Repealed.)
    A drive-in theater is a specialized commercial entrance.  In addition to the commercial entrance regulations set forth in this part, the  conditions set forth in § 33.1-12 (15) of the Code of Virginia shall be  satisfied in order to construct entrances to drive-in theaters. 
    24VAC30-73-150. Temporary entrances (construction/logging  entrances).
    A. Construction of temporary construction or logging  entrances upon the systems of state highways shall be authorized in accordance  with the provisions in the Land Use Permit Regulations (see 24VAC30-73-170  G) (24VAC30-151). The permit applicant must contact the appropriate  district administrator's designee to approve the location prior to installing  an entrance or utilizing an existing entrance. The district administrator's  designee shall also be contacted to arrange and conduct a final inspection  prior to closing a temporary construction or logging entrance. In the event  that adequate sight distance is not achieved, additional signage that meets the  Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices standards (see 24VAC30-73-170 D),  2003, revised 2007 (FHWA), and certified flaggers shall be used to ensure  safe ingress and egress.
    B. Entrances shall be designed and operated in such a manner  as to prevent mud and debris from being tracked from the site onto the  highway's paved surface. If debris is tracked onto the highway, it shall be  removed by the permittee immediately as directed by the district  administrator's designee.
    C. The permittee must restore, at the permittee's cost, all  disturbed highway rights-of-way, including, but not limited to, ditches,  shoulders, and pavement, to their original condition when removing the  entrance. All such restorations are subject to approval by the district  administrator's designee. 
    24VAC30-73-170. Documents incorporated by reference. (Repealed.)
    A. Road Design Manual (effective January 1, 2005, revised  October 2009).
    Note: Appendices F and G (Access Management Design  Standards for Entrances and Intersections) contains the access management  standards referenced in Chapters 863 and 928 of the 2007 Acts of Assembly and  Chapters 274 and 454 of the 2008 Acts of Assembly.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad Street
    Richmond, Virginia 23219
    B. 2007 Road and Bridge Specifications (effective July  2008).
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad Street
    Richmond, Virginia 23219
    C. 2008 Road and Bridge Standards (effective June 2009).
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad Street
    Richmond, Virginia 23219
    D. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets  and Highways, 2003 Edition (effective December 22, 2003, revised November  2004).
    Federal Highway Administration
    Superintendent of Documents
    U.S. Government Printing Office
    P.O. Box 371954
    Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954
    E. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,  Fifth Edition, 2004.
    American Association of State  Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
    444 North Capitol St. N.W., Suite  225
    Washington, D.C. 20001
    F. Change of Limited Access Control, 24VAC30-401.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    G. Land Use Permit Regulations, 24VAC30-151.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    H. Policy for Integrating  Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations, eff. March 18, 2004.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    I. Highway Capacity Manual, 2000.
    Transportation Research Board
    500 Fifth Street, NW
    Washington, DC 20001
    J. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations, 24VAC30-155.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219 
    K. Instructional and Informational Memorandum  IIM-LD-227.3, eff. May 23, 2007.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad Street
    Richmond, VA 23219
    L. Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements, 24VAC30-92,  eff. March 9, 2009.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad Street
    Richmond, VA 23219 
        NOTICE: The following  forms used in administering the regulation were filed by the agency. The forms  are not being published; however, online users of this issue of the Virginia  Register of Regulations may click on the name to access a form. The forms are  also available from the agency contact or may be viewed at the Office of the  Registrar of Regulations, General Assembly Building, 2nd Floor, Richmond,  Virginia 23219.
         FORMS (24VAC30-73)
    LUP-A - Land Use Permit Application (revised 1/2005).
    LUP-SP - Land Use Permit Special Provisions (Notice of  Permittee Liability) (revised 11/2007).
    LUP-CSB - Land Use Permit Corporate Surety Bond (revised  1/2005).
    LUP-LC - Land Use Permit Irrevocable Letter of Credit Bank  Agreement (revised 1/2005).
    LUP-SB - Land Use Permit Surety Bond (revised 1/2005).
    LUP-A  - Land Use Permit Application (rev. 03/10).
    LUP-SP  - Land Use Permit Special Provisions (Notice of Permittee Liability) (rev.  12/10).
    LUP-CSB  - Corporate Surety Bond (rev. 03/10).
    LUP-LC  - Letter of Credit Bank Agreement (rev. 03/10).
    LUP-SB  - Land Use Permit Surety Bond (rev. 03/10).
    DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-73)
    Information pertaining to the availability and cost of any  of these publications should be directed to the address indicated for the  specific document. Requests for documents of the Virginia Department of  Transportation (VDOT) may be obtained from the department at 1401 E. Broad St.,  Richmond, Virginia 23219; however, department documents may be available over  the Internet at www.virginiadot.org.
    VDOT  Road Design Manual, 2011.
    Note: Appendix F (Access Management Design Standards for  Entrances and Intersections) contains the access management standards  referenced in Chapters 863 and 928 of the 2007 Acts of Assembly and Chapters  274 and 454 of the 2008 Acts of Assembly.
    VDOT  Road and Bridge Specifications, 2007, revised 2011.
    VDOT  Road and Bridge Standards, 2008, revised 2011.
    Manual  on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2003, revised  2007, Federal Highway Administration, Superintendent of Documents, U.S.  Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954.7.
    VDOT  Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations, 2004.
    Highway  Capacity Manual, 2010, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street, NW,  Washington, DC 20001.
    VDOT  Instructional and Informational Memorandum IIM-LD-227.5, 2011.
    Trip  Generation, 8th Edition, 2008, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1099 14th  Street, N.W., Suite 300 West, Washington, DC 20005.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R12-3066; Filed December 8, 2011, 1:31 p.m. 
TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES
COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The  Commonwealth Transportation Board and the Commissioner of Highways are claiming  an exemption from the Administrative Process Act pursuant to the provisions of  Chapters 647, 870, and 888 of the 2011 Acts of Assembly.
         Titles of Regulations: 24VAC30-72. Access Management  Regulations: Principal Arterials (amending 24VAC30-72-10, 24VAC30-72-40,  24VAC30-72-60, 24VAC30-72-70, 24VAC30-72-80, 24VAC30-72-110, 24VAC30-72-130,  24VAC30-72-170).
    24VAC30-73. Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials,  Collectors, and Local Streets (amending 24VAC30-73-10, 24VAC30-73-40,  24VAC30-73-60, 24VAC30-73-70, 24VAC30-73-80, 24VAC30-73-110, 24VAC30-73-130, 24VAC30-73-170).
    24VAC30-92. Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (amending 24VAC30-92-10, 24VAC30-92-20,  24VAC30-92-60, 24VAC30-92-70, 24VAC30-92-80, 24VAC30-92-110, 24VAC30-92-120,  24VAC30-92-130, 24VAC30-92-140; repealing 24VAC30-92-50, 24VAC30-92-150).
    24VAC30-155. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (amending 24VAC30-155-10, 24VAC30-155-20,  24VAC30-155-30, 24VAC30-155-40, 24VAC30-155-60, 24VAC30-155-70, 24VAC30-155-80;  repealing 24VAC30-155-50, 24VAC30-155-100). 
    Statutory Authority: § 33.1-198.1 of the Code of  Virginia.
    Effective Date: December 31, 2011. 
    Agency Contact: Robert Hofrichter, Assistant Division  Administrator, Transportation & Mobility Planning Division, Department of  Transportation, 1401 East Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804)  786-0780, or email robert.hofrichter@vdot.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    During the 2011 session of the General Assembly, Chapters  647, 870, and 888, which relate to or impact the content of land development  regulations promulgated by the Commonwealth Transportation Board, VDOT, or the  Commissioner of Highways were enacted. These regulations include:
    24VAC30-72 – Access Management Regulations: Principal  Arterials
    24VAC30-73 – Access Management Regulations: Minor  Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets 
    24VAC30-92 – Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements 
    24VAC30-155 – Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations
    This action includes those regulatory changes made pursuant  to Chapters 647, 870, and 888, which will have an effective date of December  31, 2011. 
    In response to Chapter 647, which repealed subsection C of  § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia, the Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations  (TIA) are revised to remove the requirements for VDOT to review subdivision  plats, site plans, and plans for development. This legislation did not impact  the agency's review of comprehensive plans, comprehensive plan amendments, and  rezoning. VDOT made changes to the TIA Regulations pursuant to a specific  mandate in the second enactment clause of the legislation.
    Chapter 870 requires VDOT to: 
    1. Review and adopt any appropriate revisions to the TIA  Regulations prior to November 30, 2011; 
    2. Assist the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) to  research and make recommendations related to the adoption of revisions to the  Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (SSAR) prior to November 30, 2011; and
    3. Review and adopt revisions to the Access Management  Regulations: Principal Arterials and Access Management Regulations: Minor  Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets by November 11, 2011, concerning their  application to entrances for family subdivisions. 
    Chapter 888 also affects the TIA Regulations. This  legislation states that VDOT shall complete a "more limited" review  of rezoning requests when the proposed use is consistent with the current  locality comprehensive plan designation and the comprehensive plan was reviewed  previously pertaining to the TIA Regulations. Although VDOT will continue to  review comprehensive plans, related amendments, and proposed rezoning requests,  it revised the TIA Regulations to reflect this less stringent approach to such  reviews. 
    Significant changes made to each of the regulations are  described below. Additional minor changes to update references to forms and  technical documents to ensure consistency among the regulations examined were  also made where necessary. 
    Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials  (24VAC30-72) and Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials, Collectors,  and Local Streets (24VAC 30-73)
    The amendments add a low volume commercial entrance  category to the regulation for entrances associated with land uses that do not  generate high traffic volumes, but volumes above those expected from private  entrances (driveways serving one to two homes). The lower-cost design standards  for private entrances will apply to this new type of entrance, but the entrance  will need to meet a stopping sight distance requirement. (See Definitions,  24VAC30-72-80 and 24VAC30-73-80.) For clarity, text in the catchlines and  elsewhere in the regulations is amended to clarify how particular provisions  are applied to low volume commercial entrances, commercial entrances, and  private entrances.
    As the character of traffic created by family subdivisions  does not differ from any other entrances, setting out a specific entrance just  for family subdivisions is not logical from a safety standpoint. Family  subdivisions generally consist of up to five lots, which can be expected to  generate 50 trips, and 50 trips is already the established breakpoint for  paving eligibility on VDOT secondary highways. Stopping sight distance is the  minimum required by the American Association of State Highway and  Transportation Officials (AASHTO) national standards at entrances, and a new  document, "Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008," is added to  24VAC30-72 and 24VAC30-73 to address the revision to family entrance  provisions. 
    Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (24VAC30-92): 
    The amendments removed the "connectivity index"  requirement from the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements because many  parties outside of VDOT found the connectivity index confusing and complicated;  many also questioned if use of the index actually increased external  connectivity. The "area types" classification scheme is eliminated  because it was directly tied to connectivity index requirements, which are  eliminated, and the requirements associated with pedestrian accommodations are  modified based on input received. 
    For connectivity enhancements, a requirement is incorporated  for additional external connection or connections when certain dwelling unit or  vehicle per day (VPD) thresholds per network addition are met. Additional  external connections are required when the network addition contains over 200  dwelling units or the use generates over 2,000 VPD.  With the elimination  of the connectivity index, another connectivity standard is necessary to ensure  adequate "connectivity for the current and future transportation  network."
    An amendment to the regulation allows the District  Administrator's designee (rather than the District Administrator) to waive or  modify certain aspects or requirements relating to multiple connections and/or  additional external connections when specific and commonly occurring physical  situations exist. Since the original effective date of the Secondary Street  Acceptance Requirements in 2009, VDOT has gathered data on the occurrence of  regulation exceptions. The majority of exceptions granted relate to required  connections. The specific situations listed in the proposed Secondary  Street Acceptance Requirements include the majority of situations today that  result in approval of exceptions to connectivity requirements. By providing the  designee with approval authority, a request seeking approval of an exception  will receive the same thorough review, but the time needed for a review should  be reduced. 
    The VDOT review period for waivers and exceptions is  reduced from 45 calendar days to 30 calendar days for connectivity exceptions  and appeals. 
    Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (24VAC30-155):
    Reviews for site plans, subdivision plats, and plans of  development are removed due to the repeal of subsection C of § 15.2-2222.1  of the Code of Virginia, which required local submittal of these land  development proposals to VDOT for review. The entire section relating to these  reviews, 24VAC30-155-50, is removed as a result.
    Traffic impact analysis study criteria are reduced in scope  for rezoning proposals. The trip generation threshold requiring submittal of a  rezoning to VDOT is increased from 100 peak hour trips for residential and  2,500 daily trips for other land uses to a new 5,000 vehicle trips per day  threshold for all land uses. The submittal threshold is raised to  address/reshift focus to larger developments of a more regional scale. 
    An amendment is added to allow rezoning applicants to  submit a traffic impact analysis study prepared according to locality  requirements, provided the locality's requirements have been certified by VDOT  as meeting acceptable standards of professional practice. A developer will not  have to prepare separate traffic impact studies according to locality  requirements and according to VDOT requirements. Once a locality's traffic  impact statement requirements have been certified by VDOT, the local study can  satisfy both purposes. 
    An amendment stipulates that rezoning proposal is exempt  from the regulations when it (i) involves no changes in the land uses allowed  under the current zoning, or (ii) results in lower trip generation than land  uses allowed by right (except governmental uses) under the current zoning. This  amendment is made to bring the regulation more in line with statutory intent of  requiring traffic impact studies in situations that would substantially affect  state highways. Applying traffic impact regulations to a rezoning proposal that  will generate the same or less traffic than what could occur if the property  was developed by-right (uses allowed under the current zoning) would conflict  with the legislative intent.
    A provision is added requiring VDOT to schedule a meeting  with the locality and the developer to discuss the preparation of a traffic  impact study on a proposed rezoning within 60 days of receipt of a request for  a scoping meeting. The deadline helps assure that the arrangements for a  scoping meeting to discuss a rezoning proposal are handled in a timely manner.
    An amendment directs VDOT to provide the rezoning applicant  the opportunity and time to make modifications to information submitted under  the regulations before returning the package to the locality and requiring its  formal resubmission. The regulations allow, when possible, revisions to  submittals to be accommodated in a manner that does not unnecessarily extend  the local development review process.
    The methodology for preparing a traffic impact analysis  study is revised. The methodology was evaluated based on three years of  experience, utilizing the current methodology, as well as new concepts and best  practices in traffic impact analysis. 
    24VAC30-72-10. Definitions.
    "Access management" means the systematic control of  the location, spacing, design, and operation of entrances, median openings,  traffic signals, and interchanges for the purpose of providing vehicular access  to land development in a manner that preserves the safety and efficiency of the  transportation system. 
    "Commercial entrance" means any entrance serving  land uses other than two or fewer individual private residences. (See  "private entrance.")
    "Commissioner" means the individual who serves as  the chief executive officer of the Department of Transportation or his  designee.
    "Commonwealth" means the Commonwealth of Virginia.
    "Crossover" or "median opening" means an  opening in a nontraversable median (such as a concrete barrier or raised  island) that provides for crossing and turning traffic. 
    "Design speed" means the selected speed used to  determine the geometric design features of the highway. 
    "District" means each of the nine areas in which  VDOT is divided to oversee the maintenance and construction on the  state-maintained highways, bridges and tunnels within the boundaries of the  area. 
    "District administrator" means the VDOT employee  assigned to supervise the district. 
    "District administrator's designee" means the VDOT  employee or employees designated by the district administrator. 
    "Entrance" means any driveway, street, or other  means of providing for movement of vehicles to or from the highway.
    "Entrance, commercial" means any entrance  serving land uses that generate more than 50 vehicular trips per day or the  trip generation equivalent of more than five individual private residences or  lots for individual private residences using the methodology in the Institute  of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
    "Entrance, low volume commercial" means any  entrance, other than a private entrance, serving five or fewer individual  residences or lots for individual residences on a privately owned and  maintained road or land uses that generate 50 or fewer vehicular trips per day  using the methodology in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip  Generation, 8th Edition, 2008. 
    "Entrance, private" means an entrance that  serves up to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of  the occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain  access to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure  facilities that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump  stations, and stormwater management basins.
    "Frontage road" means a road that generally runs  parallel to a highway between the highway right-of-way and the front building  setback line of the abutting properties and provides access to the abutting  properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to the highway  and separating the abutting property traffic from through traffic on the  highway. 
    "Functional area" means the area of the physical  highway feature, such as an intersection, roundabout, railroad grade crossing,  or interchange, plus that portion of the highway that comprises the decision  and maneuver distance and required vehicle storage length to serve that highway  feature. 
    "Functional area of an intersection" means the  physical area of an at-grade intersection plus all required storage lengths for  separate turn lanes and for through traffic including any maneuvering distance  for separate turn lanes.
    "Functional classification" means the federal  system of classifying groups of highways according to the character of service  they are intended to provide and classifications made by the commissioner based  on the operational characteristics of a highway. Each highway is assigned a  functional classification based on the highway's intended purpose of providing  priority to through traffic movement or adjoining property access. The  functional classification system groups highways into three basic categories  identified as (i) arterial, with the function to provide through movement of  traffic; (ii) collector, with the function of supplying a combination of  through movement and access to property; and (iii) local, with the function of  providing access to property. 
    "Highway," "street," or "road"  means a public way for purposes of vehicular travel, including the entire area  within the right-of-way.
    "Intersection" means any at-grade connection with a  highway including two highways or an entrance and a highway.
    "Legal speed limit" means the speed limit set forth  on signs lawfully posted on a highway or in the absence of such signs the speed  limit established by Article 8 (§ 46.2-870 et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title 46.2  of the Code of Virginia.
    "Level of service" means a qualitative measure  describing the operational conditions within a vehicular traffic stream,  generally in terms of such service measures as speed, travel time, freedom to  maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience.  "Level-of-service" is defined and procedures are presented for  determining the level of service in the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-72-170 I).
    "Limited access highway" means a highway especially  designed for through traffic over which abutting properties have no easement or  right of light, air, or access by reason of the fact that their property abuts  upon the limited access highway.
    "Median" means the portion of a divided highway  that separates opposing traffic flows.
    "Operating speed" means the speed at which drivers  are observed operating their vehicles during free-flow conditions with the 85th  percentile of the distribution of observed speeds being the most frequently used  measure of the operating speed of a particular location or geometric feature. 
    "Permit" or "entrance permit" means a  document that sets the conditions under which VDOT allows a connection to a  highway. 
    "Permit applicant" means the person or persons, firm,  corporation, government, or other entity that has applied for a permit. 
    "Permittee" means the person or persons, firm,  corporation, government, or other entity that has been issued a permit.
    "Preliminary subdivision plat" means a plan of  development as set forth in § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Principal arterial" means the functional  classification for a major highway intended to serve through traffic where  access is carefully controlled, generally highways of regional importance, with  moderate to high volumes of traffic traveling relatively long distances and at  higher speeds.
    "Private entrance" means an entrance that serves  up to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of the  occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain access  to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure facilities  that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump stations, and  stormwater management basins.
    "Professional engineer" means a person who is  qualified to practice engineering by reason of his special knowledge and use of  mathematical, physical and engineering sciences and the principles and methods  of engineering analysis and design acquired by engineering education and  experience, and whose competence has been attested by the Virginia Board for  Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior  Designers and Landscape Architects through licensure as a professional  engineer.
    "Reverse frontage road" means a road that is  located to the rear of the properties fronting a highway and provides access to  the abutting properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to  the highway and removing the abutting property traffic from through traffic on  the highway.
    "Right-of-way" means that property within the  systems of state highways that is open or may be opened for public travel or  use or both in the Commonwealth. This definition includes those public  rights-of-way in which the Commonwealth has a prescriptive easement for  maintenance and public travel. 
    "Roadside" means the area adjoining the outer edge  of the roadway. The median of a divided highway may also be considered a  "roadside."
    "Roadway" means the portion of a highway, including  shoulders, for vehicular use. A divided highway has two or more roadways.
    "Shared entrance" means a single entrance serving  two or more adjoining parcels.
    "Sight distance" means the distance visible to the  driver of a vehicle when the view is unobstructed by traffic.
    "Site plan" and "subdivision plat" mean a  plan of development approved in accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241  through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia. 
    "Stopping sight distance" means the distance  required by a driver of a vehicle, traveling at a given speed, to bring the  vehicle to a stop after an object on the highway becomes visible, including the  distance traveled during the driver's perception and reaction times and the  vehicle braking distance.
    "Systems of state highways" means all highways and  roads under the ownership, the control, or the jurisdiction of VDOT, including  but not limited to, the primary, secondary and interstate highway. 
    "Traveled way" means the portion of the roadway for  the movement of vehicles, exclusive of shoulders and turn lanes.
    "Trip" means a single or one-directional vehicle  movement either entering or exiting a property; a vehicle leaving the property  is one trip and a vehicle returning to the property is one trip.
    "Turn lane" means a separate lane for the purpose  of enabling a vehicle that is entering or leaving a highway to increase or  decrease its speed to a rate at which it can more safely merge or diverge with  through traffic; acceleration and deceleration lanes.
    "Urban area" means an urbanized area with a  population of 50,000 or more, or an urban place (small urban area) as  designated by the Bureau of the Census having a population of 5,000 or more and  not within any urbanized area. The Federal Highway Administration defines  "urban area" in more detail based on the federal-aid highway law (23  USC § 101).
    "VDOT" means the Virginia Department of  Transportation, its successor, the Commissioner of Highways, or his designees.
    24VAC30-72-40. Administrative procedures and rules for  obtaining commercial and private entrance permits.
    All applications for entrance permits shall be obtained from  and submitted to the district administrator's designee for the county in which  the work is to be performed. The permit applicant shall submit the permit  application form, and the entrance permit, if approved, will be issued in  accordance with the applicable administrative rules, requirements, and  procedures of this chapter and the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-72-170 G). 
    24VAC30-72-60. General provisions governing commercial and  private entrances.
    A. No entrance of any nature may be constructed within the  right-of-way until the location has been approved by VDOT and an entrance  permit has been issued. The violation of any provision of this chapter and any  condition of approval of an entrance permit shall be subject to the penalties  for violations specified in the Land Use Permit Regulations (see 24VAC30-72-170  G).
    B. VDOT will permit reasonably convenient access to a parcel  of record. VDOT is not obligated to permit the most convenient access, nor is  VDOT obligated to approve the permit applicant's preferred entrance location or  entrance design. If a parcel is served by more than one road in the systems of  state highways, the district administrator's designee shall determine upon  which road or roads the proposed entrance or entrances is or are to be  constructed. 
    C. When two or more properties are to be served by the same  entrance, the permit applicant shall ensure that there is a recorded agreement  between the parties specifying the use and future maintenance of the entrance.  A copy of this recorded agreement shall be included in the entrance permit  application submitted to the district administrator's designee. The shared  entrance shall be identified on any site plan or subdivision plat of the  property.
    D. The district administrator's designee may require the  permit applicant to alter any proposed entrance location or design, whether  private or commercial, to obtain the best possible operational characteristics,  including, but not limited to, sight distance and entrance spacing.
    E. Entrance standards established by localities that are  stricter than those of VDOT shall govern.
    24VAC30-72-70. Commercial entrance design.
    A. All commercial Low volume commercial entrance  design and construction shall comply with the private entrance design standards  in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and the stopping sight  distance provision in 24VAC30-72-80. Commercial entrance design and  construction shall comply with the provisions of this chapter and the standards  in the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), the Road and Bridge Standards  (see 24VAC30-72-170 C), the Road and Bridge Specifications (see 24VAC30-72-170  B), other VDOT engineering and construction standards as may be appropriate, and  any additional conditions, restrictions, or modifications deemed necessary by  the district administrator's designee to preserve the safety, use and  maintenance of the systems of state highways. Entrance design and construction  shall comply with applicable guidelines and requirements of the Americans with  Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12101 et seq.). Ramps for curb sections  shall be provided as required in § 15.2-2021 of the Code of Virginia. The  standard drawing for depressed curb ramp as shown in the Road and Bridge  Standards (see 24VAC30-72-170 C), shall be utilized in the design.
    1. In the event an entrance is proposed within the limits of a  funded roadway project that will ultimately change a highway, the permit  applicant may be required to construct, to the extent possible, entrances  compatible with the roadway's ultimate design.
    2. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  pedestrian and bicycle users of the abutting highway in accordance with the  Commonwealth Transportation Board's "Policy for Integrating Bicycle and  Pedestrian Accommodations" (see 24VAC30-72-170 H).
    3. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  transit users of the abutting highway where applicable and provide  accommodations to the extent possible.
    4. Based on the existing and planned developments, the  district administrator's designee will determine the need for curb and gutter,  sidewalks, or other features within the general area of the proposed entrance  in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and the design standards in  Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A). 
    5. Sites accessed by an entrance shall be designed so as to  prevent unsafe and inefficient traffic movements from impacting travel on the  abutting highway. At the request of the district administrator's designee, the  permit applicant shall furnish a report that documents the impact of expected  traffic movements upon the function of the abutting highway during the peak  hours of the abutting highway.
    B. It is essential that entrance and site design allow safe  and efficient movements of traffic using the entrance while minimizing the  impact of such movements on the operation of the systems of state highways. 
    1. The permit applicant shall supply sufficient information to  demonstrate to the satisfaction of the district administrator's designee that  neither the entrance, nor the proposed traffic circulation patterns within the  parcel, will compromise the safety, use, operation, or maintenance of the  abutting highway. A rezoning traffic impact statement or a site  plan/subdivision plat supplemental traffic analysis submitted for a proposed  development of a parcel in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis  Regulations (24VAC30-155) may be used for this purpose, provided that it  adequately documents the effect of the proposed entrance and its related  traffic on the operation of the highway to be accessed. 
    2. If the proposed entrance will cause the systems of state  highways to experience degradation in safety or a significant increase in delay  or a significant reduction in capacity beyond an acceptable level of service,  the applicant shall be required to submit a plan to mitigate these impacts and  to bear the costs of such mitigation measures.
    3. Proposed mitigation measures must be approved by the  district administrator's designee prior to permit approval. Mitigation measures  that may be considered include but are not limited to:
    a. Construction of auxiliary lanes or turning lanes, or  pavement transitions/tapers;
    b. Construction of new crossovers, or the relocation, removal,  or consolidation of existing crossovers;
    c. Installation, modification, or removal of traffic signals  and related traffic control equipment;
    d. Provisions to limit the traffic generated by the development  served by the proposed entrance;
    e. Dedication of additional right-of-way or easement, or both,  for future road improvements; 
    f. Reconstruction of existing roadway to provide required  vertical and horizontal sight distances; 
    g. Relocation or consolidation of existing entrances; or
    h. Recommendations from adopted corridor studies, design  studies, other access management practices and principles, or any combination  of these, not otherwise mentioned in this chapter. 
    4. If an applicant is unwilling or unable to mitigate the  impacts identified in the traffic impact analysis, the entrance shall be  physically restricted to right-in or right-out movements or both or similar  restrictions such that the public interests in a safe and efficient flow of  traffic on the systems of state highways are protected. 
    24VAC30-72-80. Minimum sight distance for commercial entrances.
    A. No less than minimum intersection sight distance shall be  obtained for any a commercial entrance and no less than  minimum stopping sight distance shall be obtained for a low volume commercial  entrance. Sight distances shall be measured in accordance with VDOT  practices, and sight distance requirements shall conform to VDOT standards as  described in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A). The  legal speed limit shall be used unless the design speed is available and  approved for use by VDOT. 
    B. The operating speed may be used in lieu of the legal speed  limit in cases where the permit applicant furnishes the district administrator's  designee with a speed study prepared in accordance with the Manual on Uniform  Traffic Control Devices (see 24VAC30-72-170 D) methodology that demonstrates  the operating speed of the segment of highway is lower than the legal speed  limit and, in the judgment of the district administrator's designee, use of the  operating speed will not compromise safety for either a driver at an entrance  or a driver on the abutting highway. 
    C. VDOT may require that the vertical or horizontal alignment  of the existing roadway be adjusted to accommodate certain design elements of a  proposed commercial entrance including, but not limited to, median openings,  crossovers, roundabouts, and traffic signals, where adjustment is deemed  necessary. The cost of any work performed to adjust the horizontal or vertical  alignment of the roadway to achieve required intersection sight distance at a  proposed entrance shall be borne by the permit applicant.
    24VAC30-72-110. Tenure of commercial entrances.
    A. The tenure of a commercial entrance to any highway is  conditional. Reconstruction, relocation, commercial entrance consolidation, or  upgrading, or a combination of these, may be required at the owner's cost when  the district administrator's designee determines after review that one of the conditions  listed below exists. If the necessary changes are not made, the entrance may be  closed at the direction of the district administrator's designee. 
    1. Safety - When the entrance has been found to be unsafe for  public use in its present condition because of physical degradation of the  entrance, increase in motor vehicle traffic, or some other safety-related  condition.
    2. Use - When traffic in and out of the entrance has changed  significantly to require modifications or reconstruction, or both. Such changes  may include, but are not limited to, changes in traffic volume or operational  characteristics of the traffic. 
    3. Maintenance - When the entrance becomes unserviceable due  to heavy equipment damage or reclamation by natural causes.
    B. VDOT will maintain the commercial entrance only within the  normal shoulder of the roadway or to the flow line of the gutter pan. The owner  shall maintain all other portions of the entrance, including entrance aprons,  curb and gutter, culvert and drainage structures.
    C. Commercial entrances may also be reviewed by the district  administrator's designee when any of the following occur:
    1. The property is being considered for rezoning or other  local legislative action that involves a change in use of the property.
    2. The property is subject to a site plan or subdivision plat  review.
    3. There is a change in commercial use either by the property  owner or by a tenant. 
    4. Vehicular/pedestrian circulation between adjoining  properties becomes available.
    These periodic reviews are necessary to provide both the  driver and other highway users with a safe and operationally efficient means of  travel on state highways.
    D. The provisions of this section shall apply to low  volume commercial entrances.
    24VAC30-72-130. Drainage.
    A. Commercial and private entrances Entrances  shall be constructed so as not to impair drainage within the right-of-way and  so that surface water shall drain from the roadway.
    B. Where deemed necessary by the district administrator's  designee, a commercial entrance applicant shall provide copies of a complete  drainage layout based on a drainage study by a licensed design professional.  This layout shall clearly show how the permit applicant proposes to handle the  drainage and run-off from applicant's development.
    C. Pipe ends of culverts shall be reviewed independently by  the district administrator's designee and grading or treatment at pipe ends  shall minimize any hazard the pipe ends or structures may present to an errant  vehicle. 
    24VAC30-72-170. Documents incorporated by reference.
    A. Road Design Manual (effective January 1, 2005, revised  July 2008), 2011.
    Note: Appendix F (Access Management Design Standards for  Entrances and Intersections) contains the access management standards  referenced in Chapters 863 and 928 of the 2007 Acts of Assembly and Chapters  274 and 454 of the 2008 Acts of Assembly.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    B. 2007 Road and Bridge Specifications (effective July 2008)
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    C. Road and Bridge Standards (effective February 1, 2001)
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    D. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets  and Highways, 2003 Edition (effective December 22, 2003, revised November 2004)
           |   | Federal Highway AdministrationSuperintendent of Documents
 U.S. Government Printing Office
 P.O. Box 371954
 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954
 | 
  
    E. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,  Fifth Edition, 2004
           |   | American Association of State Highway and Transportation    Officials (AASHTO)444 North Capitol St. N.W., Suite 225
 Washington, D.C. 20001
 | 
  
    F. Change of Limited Access Control, 24VAC30-401
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    G. Land Use Permit Regulations, 24VAC30-151
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    H. Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian  Accommodations, eff. March 18, 2004
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    I. Highway Capacity Manual 2000
           |   | Transportation Research Board500 Fifth Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    J. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations, 24VAC30-155
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    K. Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008
           |   | Institute of Transportation Engineers1099 14th Street N. W., Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    24VAC30-73-10. Definitions.
    "Access management" means the systematic control of  the location, spacing, design, and operation of entrances, median  openings/crossovers, traffic signals, and interchanges for the purpose of  providing vehicular access to land development in a manner that preserves the  safety and efficiency of the transportation system.
    "Collectors" means the functional classification of  highways that provide land access service and traffic circulation within  residential, commercial, and industrial areas. The collector system distributes  trips from principal and minor arterials through the area to the ultimate  destination. Conversely, collectors also collect traffic and channel it into  the arterial system. 
    "Commercial entrance" means any entrance serving  land uses other than two or fewer individual private residences. (See  "private entrance.")
    "Commissioner" means the individual who serves as  the chief executive officer of the Department of Transportation or his  designee.
    "Commonwealth" means the Commonwealth of Virginia.
    "Crossover" means an opening in a nontraversable  median (such as a concrete barrier or raised island) that provides for crossing  movements and left and right turning movements. 
    "Design speed" means the selected speed used to  determine the geometric design features of the highway. 
    "District" means each of the nine areas in which  VDOT is divided to oversee the maintenance and construction on the  state-maintained highways, bridges and tunnels within the boundaries of the  area. 
    "District administrator" means the VDOT employee  assigned to supervise the district. 
    "District administrator's designee" means the VDOT  employee or employees designated by the district administrator. 
    "Entrance" means any driveway, street, or other  means of providing for movement of vehicles to or from the highway.
    "Entrance, commercial" means any entrance  serving land uses that generate more than 50 vehicular trips per day or the  trip generation equivalent of more than five individual private residences or  lots for individual private residences using the methodology in the Institute  of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
    "Entrance, low volume commercial" means any  entrance, other than a private entrance, serving five or fewer individual  residences or lots for individual residences on a privately owned and  maintained road or land uses that generate 50 or fewer vehicular trips per day  using the methodology in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip  Generation 8th Edition, 2008. 
    "Entrance, private" means an entrance that  serves up to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of  the occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain  access to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure  facilities that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump  stations, and stormwater management basins.
    "Frontage road" means a road that generally runs  parallel to a highway between the highway right-of-way and the front building  setback line of the abutting properties and provides access to the abutting  properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to the highway  and separating the abutting property traffic from through traffic on the  highway. 
    "Functional area" means the area of the physical  highway feature, such as an intersection, roundabout, railroad grade crossing,  or interchange, plus that portion of the highway that comprises the decision  and maneuver distance and required vehicle storage length to serve that highway  feature.
    "Functional area of an intersection" means the  physical area of an at-grade intersection plus all required storage lengths for  separate turn lanes and for through traffic, including any maneuvering distance  for separate turn lanes.
    "Functional classification" means the federal  system of classifying groups of highways according to the character of service  they are intended to provide and classifications made by the commissioner based  on the operational characteristics of a highway. Each highway is assigned a  functional classification based on the highway's intended purpose of providing  priority to through traffic movement or adjoining property access. The  functional classification system groups highways into three basic categories  identified as (i) arterial, with the function to provide through movement of  traffic; (ii) collector, with the function of supplying a combination of  through movement and access to property; and (iii) local, with the function of  providing access to property and to other streets. 
    "Highway," "street," or "road"  means a public way for purposes of vehicular travel, including the entire area  within the right-of-way.
    "Intersection" means (i) a crossing of two or more  highways at grade, (ii) a crossover, or (iii) any at-grade connection with a  highway such as a commercial entrance.
    "Intersection sight distance" means the sight  distance required at an intersection to allow the driver of a stopped vehicle a  sufficient view of the intersecting highway to decide when to enter, or cross,  the intersecting highway. 
    "Legal speed limit" means the speed limit set forth  on signs lawfully posted on a highway or, in the absence of such signs, the  speed limit established by Article 8 (§ 46.2-870 et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title  46.2 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Level of service" means a qualitative measure  describing the operational conditions within a vehicular traffic stream,  generally in terms of such service measures as speed, travel time, freedom to  maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience.  "Level-of-service" is defined and procedures are presented for  determining the level of service in the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-73-170 I).
    "Limited access highway" means a highway especially  designed for through traffic over which abutting properties have no easement or  right of light, air, or access by reason of the fact that those properties abut  upon the limited access highway.
    "Local streets" means the functional classification  for highways that comprise all facilities that are not collectors or arterials.  Local streets serve primarily to provide direct access to abutting land and to  other streets.
    "Median" means the portion of a divided highway  that separates opposing traffic flows.
    "Median opening" means a crossover or a directional  opening in a nontraversable median (such as a concrete barrier or raised  island) that physically restricts movements to specific turns such as left  turns and U-turns. 
    "Minor arterials" means the functional  classification for highways that interconnect with and augment the principal  arterial system. Minor arterials distribute traffic to smaller geographic areas  providing service between and within communities.
    "Operating speed" means the speed at which drivers  are observed operating their vehicles during free-flow conditions with the 85th  percentile of the distribution of observed speeds being the most frequently  used measure of the operating speed of a particular location or geometric  feature. 
    "Permit" or "entrance permit" means a  document that sets the conditions under which VDOT allows a connection to a  highway. 
    "Permit applicant" means the person or persons,  firm, corporation, government, or other entity that has applied for a permit. 
    "Permittee" means the person or persons, firm,  corporation, government, or other entity that has been issued a permit.
    "Preliminary subdivision plat" means a plan of  development as set forth in § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Principal arterials" means the functional  classification for major highways intended to serve through traffic where  access is carefully controlled, generally highways of regional importance, with  moderate to high volumes of traffic traveling relatively long distances and at  higher speeds.
    "Private entrance" means an entrance that serves  up to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of the  occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain access  to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure facilities  that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump stations, and  stormwater management basins.
    "Professional engineer" means a person who is  qualified to practice engineering by reason of his special knowledge and use of  mathematical, physical and engineering sciences and the principles and methods  of engineering analysis and design acquired by engineering education and  experience, and whose competence has been attested by the Virginia Board for  Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior  Designers and Landscape Architects through licensure as a professional  engineer.
    "Reverse frontage road" means a road that is  located to the rear of the properties fronting a highway and provides access to  the abutting properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to  the highway and removing the abutting property traffic from through traffic on  the highway.
    "Right-of-way" means that property within the  systems of state highways that is open or may be opened for public travel or  use or both in the Commonwealth. This definition includes those public  rights-of-way in which the Commonwealth has a prescriptive easement for  maintenance and public travel. 
    "Roadway" means the portion of a highway, including  shoulders, for vehicular use. A divided highway has two or more roadways.
    "Roundabout" means a circular intersection with  yield control of all entering traffic, right-of-way assigned to traffic within  the circular roadway, and channelized approaches and a central island that  deflect entering traffic to the right. 
    "Shared entrance" means a single entrance serving  two or more adjoining parcels.
    "Sight distance" means the distance visible to the  driver of a vehicle when the view is unobstructed by traffic.
    "Site plan" and "subdivision plat" mean a  plan of development approved in accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241  through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia. 
    "Systems of state highways" means all highways and  roads under the ownership, the control, or the jurisdiction of VDOT, including  but not limited to, the primary, secondary and interstate highways. 
    "Trip" means a single or one-directional vehicle  movement either entering or exiting a property; a vehicle leaving the property  is one trip and a vehicle returning to the property is one trip.
    "Turn lane" means a separate lane for the purpose  of enabling a vehicle that is entering or leaving a highway to increase or  decrease its speed to a rate at which it can more safely merge or diverge with  through traffic; an acceleration or deceleration lane.
    "Urban area" means an urbanized area with a  population of 50,000 or more, or an urban place (small urban area) as  designated by the Bureau of the Census having a population of 5,000 or more and  not within any urbanized area. The Federal Highway Administration defines "urban  area" in more detail based on the federal-aid highway law (23 USC § 101).
    "VDOT" means the Virginia Department of  Transportation, its successor, the Commissioner of Highways, or his designees. 
    24VAC30-73-40. Administrative procedures and rules for obtaining  commercial and private entrance permits.
    All applications for entrance permits shall be obtained from  and submitted to the district administrator's designee for the county in which  the work is to be performed. The permit applicant shall submit the permit  application form, and the entrance permit, if approved, will be issued in  accordance with the applicable administrative rules, requirements and  procedures of this chapter and the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-73-170 G). 
    24VAC30-73-60. General provisions governing commercial and  private entrances.
    A. No entrance of any nature may be constructed within the  right-of-way until the location has been approved by VDOT and an entrance  permit has been issued. Any person violating any provision of this chapter and  any condition of approval of an entrance permit shall be guilty of a  misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be punished as provided for in § 33.1-198 of the Code of Virginia. Such person shall be civilly liable to the  Commonwealth for actual damage sustained by the Commonwealth by reason of his  wrongful act.
    B. VDOT will permit reasonably convenient access to a parcel  of record. VDOT is not obligated to permit the most convenient access, nor is  VDOT obligated to approve the permit applicant's preferred entrance location or  entrance design. If a parcel is served by more than one road in the systems of  state highways, the district administrator's designee shall determine upon  which road or roads the proposed entrance or entrances is or are to be  constructed. 
    C. Entrance standards established by localities that are  stricter than those of VDOT shall govern. 
    24VAC30-73-70. Commercial entrance design.
    A. All commercial Low volume commercial entrance  design and construction shall comply with the private entrance design standards  in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and the stopping sight  distance provision in 24VAC30-73-80. Commercial entrance design and  construction shall comply with the provisions of this chapter and the standards  in the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A), the Road and Bridge Standards  (see 24VAC30-73-170 C), the Road and Bridge Specifications (see 24VAC30-73-170  B), other VDOT engineering and construction standards as may be appropriate,  and any additional conditions, restrictions, or modifications deemed necessary  by the district administrator's designee to preserve the safety, use and  maintenance of the systems of state highways. Entrance design and construction  shall comply with applicable guidelines and requirements of the Americans with  Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12101 et seq.). Ramps for curb sections  shall be provided as required in § 15.2-2021 of the Code of Virginia. The  standard drawing for depressed curb ramp as shown in the Road and Bridge  Standards (see 24VAC30-73-170 C) shall be utilized in the design.
    1. In the event an entrance is proposed within the limits of a  funded roadway project that will ultimately change a highway, the permit  applicant may be required to construct, to the extent possible, entrances  compatible with the roadway's ultimate design.
    2. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  pedestrian and bicycle users of the abutting highway in accordance with the  Commonwealth Transportation Board's "Policy for Integrating Bicycle and  Pedestrian Accommodations" (see 24VAC30-73-170 H).
    3. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  transit users of the abutting highway where applicable and provide  accommodations to the extent possible.
    4. Based on the existing and planned developments, the  district administrator's designee will determine the need for curb and gutter,  sidewalks, or other features within the general area of the proposed entrance  in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and the design standards in  Appendix G of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A).
    5. Sites accessed by an entrance shall be designed so as to  prevent unsafe and inefficient traffic movements from impacting travel on the  abutting highway. At the request of the district administrator's designee, the  permit applicant shall furnish a report that documents the impact of expected  traffic movements upon the function of the abutting highway during the peak  hours of the abutting highway or during the peak hours of the generator,  whichever is appropriate as determined by the district administrator's  designee.
    6. The use of a shared entrance between adjacent property  owners shall be the preferred method of access.
    7. The construction of new crossovers, or the relocation, removal,  or consolidation of existing crossovers shall be approved in accordance with  the crossover location approval process specified in Appendix G of the Road  Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A). 
    B. It is essential that entrance and site design allow safe  and efficient movements of traffic using the entrance while minimizing the  impact of such movements on the operation of the systems of state highways.
    1. The permit applicant shall supply sufficient information to  demonstrate to the satisfaction of the district administrator's designee that  neither the entrance, nor the proposed traffic circulation patterns within the  parcel, will compromise the safety, use, operation, or maintenance of the  abutting highway. A rezoning traffic impact statement or a site plan/subdivision  plat supplemental traffic analysis submitted for a proposed development of a  parcel in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (see  24VAC30-73-170 J) may be used for this purpose, provided that it adequately  documents the effect of the proposed entrance and its related traffic on the  operation of the highway to be accessed.
    2. If the proposed entrance will cause the systems of state  highways to experience degradation in safety or a significant increase in delay  or a significant reduction in capacity beyond an acceptable level of service,  the applicant shall be required to submit a plan to mitigate these impacts and  to bear the costs of such mitigation measures.
    3. Proposed mitigation measures must be approved by the  district administrator's designee prior to permit approval. The district  administrator's designee will consider what improvements will be needed to  preserve the operational characteristics of the highway, accommodate the  proposed traffic and, if entrance design modifications are needed, incorporate  them accordingly to protect the transportation corridor. Mitigation measures  that may be considered include but are not limited to:
    a. Construction of auxiliary lanes or turning lanes, or  pavement transitions/tapers;
    b. Construction of new crossovers, or the relocation, removal,  or consolidation of existing crossovers;
    c. Installation, modification, or removal of traffic signals  and related traffic control equipment;
    d. Provisions to limit the traffic generated by the development  served by the proposed entrance;
    e. Dedication of additional right-of-way or easement, or both,  for future road improvements; 
    f. Reconstruction of existing roadway to provide required  vertical and horizontal sight distances; 
    g. Relocation or consolidation of existing entrances; or
    h. Recommendations from adopted corridor studies, design  studies, other access management practices and principles, or any combination  of these, not otherwise mentioned in this chapter.
    4. If an applicant is unwilling or unable to mitigate the  impacts identified in the traffic impact analysis, the entrance shall be  physically restricted to right-in or right-out movements or both or similar  restrictions such that the public interests in a safe and efficient flow of  traffic on the systems of state highways are protected.
    24VAC30-73-80. Minimum sight distance for commercial entrances.
    A. No less than minimum intersection sight distance shall be  obtained for any a commercial entrance and no less than  minimum stopping sight distance shall be obtained for a low volume commercial  entrance. Sight distances shall be measured in accordance with VDOT  practices, and sight distance requirements shall conform to VDOT standards as  described in Appendix G of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A). The  legal speed limit shall be used unless the design speed is available and  approved for use by VDOT. 
    B. The operating speed may be used in lieu of the legal speed  limit in cases where the permit applicant furnishes the district administrator's  designee with a speed study prepared in accordance with the Manual on Uniform  Traffic Control Devices (see 24VAC30-73-170 D) methodology that demonstrates  the operating speed of the segment of highway is lower than the legal speed  limit and, in the judgment of the district administrator's designee, use of the  operating speed will not compromise safety for either a driver at an entrance  or a driver on the abutting highway. 
    C. VDOT may require that the vertical or horizontal alignment  of the existing roadway be adjusted to accommodate certain design elements of a  proposed commercial entrance including, but not limited to, median openings,  crossovers, roundabouts, and traffic signals, where adjustment is deemed  necessary. The cost of any work performed to adjust the horizontal or vertical  alignment of the roadway to achieve required intersection sight distance at a  proposed entrance shall be borne by the permit applicant. 
    24VAC30-73-110. Existing commercial entrances.
    A. The tenure of a commercial entrance to any highway is  conditional. Reconstruction, relocation, commercial entrance consolidation, or  upgrading, or a combination of these, may be required at the owner's cost when  the district administrator's designee determines after review that one of the  conditions listed below exists. If the necessary changes are not made, the  entrance may be closed at the direction of the district administrator's  designee. 
    1. Safety - When the entrance has been found to be unsafe for  public use in its present condition because of physical degradation of the  entrance, increase in motor vehicle traffic, or some other safety-related  condition.
    2. Use - When traffic in and out of the entrance has changed  significantly to require modifications or reconstruction, or both. Such changes  may include, but are not limited to, changes in traffic volume or operational  characteristics of the traffic. 
    3. Maintenance - When the entrance becomes unserviceable due  to heavy equipment damage or reclamation by natural causes.
    B. VDOT will maintain the commercial entrance only within the  normal shoulder of the roadway or to the flow line of the gutter pan. The owner  shall maintain all other portions of the entrance, including entrance aprons,  curb and gutter, culvert and drainage structures.
    C. Commercial entrances may also be reviewed by the district  administrator's designee, and reconstruction, relocation, commercial entrance  consolidation, or upgrading, or a combination of these, may be required, when  any of the following occur:
    1. The property is being considered for rezoning or other  local legislative action that involves a change in use of the property.
    2. The property is subject to a site plan or subdivision plat  review.
    3. There is a change in commercial use either by the property  owner or by a tenant. 
    4. Vehicular/pedestrian circulation between adjoining  properties becomes available.
    These periodic reviews are necessary to provide both the  driver and other highway users with a safe and operationally efficient means of  travel on state highways. 
    D. The provisions of this section shall apply to low  volume commercial entrances.
    24VAC30-73-130. Drainage.
    A. Commercial and private entrances Entrances  shall be constructed so as not to impair drainage within the right-of-way and  so that surface water shall drain from the roadway.
    B. Where deemed necessary by the district administrator's  designee, a commercial entrance applicant shall provide copies of a complete  drainage layout based on a drainage study by a licensed design professional.  This layout shall clearly show how the permit applicant proposes to handle the  drainage and run-off from applicant's development.
    C. Pipe ends of culverts shall be reviewed independently by  the district administrator's designee and grading or treatment at pipe ends  shall minimize any hazard the pipe ends or structures may present to an errant  vehicle. 
    24VAC30-73-170. Documents incorporated by reference. 
    A. Road Design Manual (effective January 1, 2005, revised  October 2009), 2011.
    Note: Appendices F and G (Access Management Design Standards  for Entrances and Intersections) contains the access management standards  referenced in Chapters 863 and 928 of the 2007 Acts of Assembly and Chapters  274 and 454 of the 2008 Acts of Assembly.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    B. 2007 Road and Bridge Specifications (effective July 2008).
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    C. 2008 Road and Bridge Standards (effective June 2009).
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    D. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets  and Highways, 2003 Edition (effective December 22, 2003, revised November  2004).
           |   | Federal Highway AdministrationSuperintendent of Documents
 U.S. Government Printing Office
 P.O. Box 371954
 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954
 | 
  
    E. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,  Fifth Edition, 2004.
           |   | American Association of State Highway and Transportation    Officials (AASHTO)444 North Capitol St. N.W., Suite 225
 Washington, D.C. 20001
 | 
  
    F. Change of Limited Access Control, 24VAC30-401.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    G. Land Use Permit Regulations, 24VAC30-151.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    H. Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian  Accommodations, eff. March 18, 2004.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    I. Highway Capacity Manual, 2000.
           |   | Transportation Research Board500 Fifth Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    J. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations, 24VAC30-155.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    K. Instructional and Informational Memorandum IIM-LD-227.3,  eff. May 23, 2007.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    L. Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements, 24VAC30-92, eff.  March 9, 2009.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    M. Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
           |   | Institute of Transportation Engineers1099 14th Street N. W., Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    24VAC30-92-10. Definitions.
    The following words and terms when used in these regulations  shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates  otherwise:
    "Abandonment" in all its forms means the  legislative action reserved for and granted to the local governing body to  extinguish the public's right to a roadway under the jurisdiction of the  Virginia Department of Transportation pursuant to §§ 33.1-151 and 33.1-155  of the Code of Virginia.
    "Accessible route" means a public or private  continuous unobstructed, stable, firm and slip-resistant path connecting all  accessible elements of a facility (which may include parking access aisles,  curb ramps, crosswalks at vehicular ways, walks, ramps and lifts) that can be  approached, entered and used by persons with disabilities. An accessible route  shall, to the maximum extent feasible, coincide with the route for the general  public.
    "ADT" means average daily traffic count (see  "projected traffic").
    "Alley" means a narrow roadway segment used by  motor vehicles for access to the rear side of commercial or residential land  use, or access to auxiliary land uses and that is located within a dedicated  public way or public easement.
    "Applicable former requirements" means the 2005  Subdivision Street Requirements for developments submitted prior to July 1,  2009, and the 2009 edition of the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements for  developments submitted between July 1, 2009, and January 31, 2012, inclusive.
    "Best management practice" or "BMP"  means schedules of activities; prohibitions of practices, including both  structural and nonstructural practices; maintenance procedures; and other  management practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of surface waters and  groundwater systems from the impacts of land-disturbing activities.
    "Clear zone" means the total border area of a  roadway including, if any, parking lanes or planting strips that is  sufficiently wide for an errant vehicle to avoid a serious accident. (See the  Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and its Appendix B (1) (the  Subdivision Street Design Guide) (see 24VAC30-92-150) for  details.)
    "Commissioner" means the chief executive officer of  the Virginia Department of Transportation or his designee.
    "Complete development (land)" means the  utilization of the available areas in a manner as to realize its highest  density for the best potential use based on zoning, pending rezoning, the  adopted comprehensive plan of the governing body, or the customary use of  similar parcels of land.
    "Complete development (streets)" means the  development of a street in full compliance with all applicable provisions of  these regulations to the necessary standards of design, construction, and  public benefit requirements for the effective and efficient accommodation of  all modes of transportation generated by the complete development of the land,  both internal and external to the development.
    "Conceptual sketch" means a drawing of the proposed  development showing the location of existing and proposed land uses, any  existing and proposed transportation facilities, and any additional information  required so that the reviewer can determine the appropriate functional  classification of the proposed street or streets and verify if the calculation  of the connectivity index, if appropriate standards have been met.  
    "Connectivity index" means the number of street  segments divided by the number of intersections. Only street segments and  intersections within a network addition as well as any street segment or  intersection outside of the network addition connected to street segments  within the network addition, or that has been connected or will be connected  pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 7 to the network addition through the extension of  an existing stub out shall be used to calculate a network addition's  connectivity index.
    "Cul-de-sac" means a street with only one outlet  and having an appropriate turnaround for a safe and convenient reverse traffic  movement.
    "Dam" means an embankment or structure intended or  used to impound, retain, or store water, either as a permanent pond or as a  temporary storage facility.
    "Department" or "VDOT" means the Virginia  Department of Transportation.
    "Design speed" means a speed selected for purposes  of design and correlation of those features of a street such as curvature,  super elevation, and sight distance, upon which the safe operation of vehicles  is dependent.
    "Developer" means an individual, corporation, local  government, or registered partnership engaged in the subdivision, improvement,  or renovation of land.
    "Discontinuance," in all its forms, means the  legislative act of the Commonwealth Transportation Board, pursuant to § 33.1-150  of the Code of Virginia, that determines that a road no longer serves public  convenience warranting its maintenance with funds at the disposal of the  department.
    "District administrator" means the department  employee assigned the overall supervision of the departmental operations in one  of the Commonwealth's construction districts.
    "District administrator's designee" means the  department employee or employees designated by the district administrator to  oversee the implementation of this regulation.
    "Drainage Manual" means the department's Drainage  Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2002.
    "Dwelling unit" means a structure or part of a  structure containing sleeping, kitchen, and bathroom facilities that is  suitable for occupancy as a home or residence by one or more persons.
    "Easement" means a grant of a right to use property  of an owner for specific or limited purpose. 
    "External street segment" means a street segment  within a network addition that connects with the existing public street  network.
    "FAR" means floor area ratio, which is the ratio of  the total floor area of a building or buildings on a parcel to the size land  area of the parcel where the building or buildings are located. 
    "Functional classification" means the assigned  classification of a roadway based on the roadway's intended purpose of  providing priority to through traffic movement and access to adjoining property  as determined by the department, based on the federal system of classifying  groups of roadways according to the character of service they are intended to  provide.
    "Governing body" means the board of supervisors of  the county, but may also mean the local governing body of a town or city, if  appropriate, in the application of these requirements.
    "Intersection" means a juncture of three or more  street segments, or the terminus of a street segment, such as a cul-de-sac or  other dead end. The terminus of a stub out shall not constitute an intersection  for the purposes of this chapter. The juncture of a street with only a stub  out, and the juncture of a street with only a connection to the end of an  existing stub out, shall not constitute an intersection for the purposes of  this chapter, unless such stub out is the only facility providing service to  one or more lots within the development.
    "Level of service" means a qualitative measure  describing operational conditions within a vehicular traffic stream, and their  perception by motorists and passengers. For the purposes of these requirements,  the applicable provisions of the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2010 (VDOT) shall serve as the basis for  determining "levels of service."
    "Level terrain" means that condition where  highway sight distances, as governed by both horizontal and vertical  restrictions, are generally long or could be made so without construction  difficulty or major expense.
    "Locally controlled grade separation structure"  means a grade separation structure that does not qualify for maintenance by the  department but was established within the right-of-way of a street intended for  state maintenance.
    "Local official" means the representative of the  governing body appointed to serve as its agent in matters relating to  subdivisions and land development.
    "Multiuse trail" means a facility designed and  constructed for the purpose of providing bicycle and pedestrian transportation,  located within a dedicated public way and is anticipated to be maintained by an  entity other than the department.
    "Municipal separate storm sewer system" or  "MS4" means all separate storm sewers that are designated under  4VAC50-60-380 A 1 as municipal separate storm sewer systems located  in census urban areas. 
    "Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Management  Program" or "MS4 Program" means a management program covering the  duration of a permit for a municipal separate storm sewer system that includes  a comprehensive planning process that involves public participation and  intergovernmental coordination, to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the  maximum extent practicable, to protect water quality, and to satisfy the  appropriate water quality requirements of the Clean Water Act and corresponding  regulations and the Virginia Stormwater Management Act and attendant  regulations, using management practices, control techniques, and system, design  and engineering methods, and such other provisions that are appropriate. 
    "Network addition" means a group of interconnected  street segments and intersections shown in a plan of development that are  connected to the state highway system.
    "Parking bay" means an off-street area for parking  two or more vehicles that provides access to a public street.
    "Parking lane" means an area, generally seven or  eight feet in width, adjacent to and parallel with the travel lane of a roadway  that is used for parking vehicles.
    "Pavement Design Guide" means the Pavement Design  Guide for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia (see 24VAC30-92-150),  2009 (VDOT).
    "Permit Regulations" means the department's Land  Use Permit Regulations (see 24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-151). 
    "Phased development (streets)" means the method  outlined in 24VAC30-92-80 (phased development of streets) whereby the  acceptance of certain streets into the secondary system of state highways may  be considered before being completely developed in accordance with all  applicable requirements (e.g., two lanes of a four-lane facility are considered  for acceptance in advance of lanes three and four being finished).
    "Plan of development" means any site plat,  subdivision plan, preliminary subdivision plat, conceptual subdivision sketch,  or other engineered or surveyed drawings depicting proposed development of land  and street layout, including plans included with rezoning proposals.
    "Plans" means the standard drawings, including  profile and roadway typical section, that show the location, character,  dimensions, and details for the proposed construction of the street.
    "Planting strip" means a section of land between  the curb face and the pedestrian accommodation or shared use path.
    "Plat" means the schematic representation of the  land divided or to be divided.
    "Projected traffic" means the number of vehicles,  normally expressed in average daily traffic (ADT), forecast to travel over the  segment of the street involved.
    "Public street" means a street dedicated to public  use and available to the public's unrestricted use without regard to the  jurisdictional authority responsible for its operation and maintenance.
    "Requirements" means the design, construction,  public benefit, and related administrative considerations herein prescribed for  the acceptance of a street for maintenance by the department as part of the  secondary system of state highways.
    "Right-of-way" means the land, property, or  interest therein, usually in a strip, acquired for or devoted to a public  street designated to become part of the secondary system of state highways.
    "Roadway" means the portion of the road or street  within the limits of construction and all structures, ditches, channels, etc.,  necessary for the correct drainage thereof.
    "Secondary system of state highways" means those  public roads, streets, bridges, etc., established by a local governing body  pursuant to § 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia and subsequently accepted  by the department for supervision and maintenance under the provisions of  Articles 6 (§ 33.1-67 et seq.) and 11 (§ 33.1-150 et seq.) of Chapter  1 of Title 33.1 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Shared use path" means a facility that is designed  and constructed according to the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150),  2011 (VDOT), for the purpose of providing bicycle and pedestrian  transportation.
    "Smoothed urbanized area boundary" means the  modified area boundary of a census urbanized area as determined by the latest  U.S. decennial census and modified by appropriate state, regional, and local  government officials, and approved by the Federal Highway Administration.
    "Smoothed urban cluster boundary" means the  modified area boundary of a census urban cluster as determined by the latest  U.S. decennial census and modified by appropriate state, regional and local  government officials, and approved by the Federal Highway Administration.
    "Specifications" means the department's Road and  Bridge Specifications (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2007, revised 2011,  including related supplemental specifications and special provisions. 
    "Standards" means the applicable drawings and  related criteria contained in the department's Road and Bridge Standards (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2008, revised 2011.
    "Storm sewer system" means a conveyance or  system of conveyances and its appurtenances, including roads with drainage  systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade  channels, or storm drains.
    "Street" means any roadway that is created as part  of a plan of development, other subdivision of land, or is constructed by or at  the direction of the local governing body and is a public way for purposes of  vehicular traffic, including the entire area within the right-of-way. 
    "Street segment" means (i) a section of roadway  or alley that is between two intersections or (ii) a stub out or connection to  the end of an existing stub out. 
    "Stub out" means a transportation facility (i)  whose right-of-way terminates at a parcel abutting the development, (ii) that  consists of a short segment that is intended to serve current and future  development by providing continuity and connectivity of the public street  network, (iii) that based on the spacing between the stub out and other streets  or stub outs, and the current terrain there is a reasonable expectation that  connection with a future street is possible, and (iv) that is constructed to  the property line.
    "Subdivision" means the division of a lot, tract,  or parcel into two or more lots, plats, sites, or other divisions of land for  the purpose, whether immediate or future, of sale or of building development.  Any resubdivision of a previously subdivided tract or parcel of land shall also  be interpreted as a "subdivision." The division of a lot or parcel  permitted by § 15.2-2244 of the Code of Virginia will not be considered a  "subdivision" under this definition, provided no new road or street  is thereby established. However, any further division of such parcels shall be  considered a "subdivision."
    "Subdivision Street Design Guide" means Appendix B (1)  of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT).
    "Swale" means a broad depression within which  stormwater may drain during inclement weather, but that does not have a defined  bed or banks.
    "Total maximum daily load" or "TMDL"  is a water quality term that means the sum of the individual wasteload  allocations for point sources, load allocations (LAs) for nonpoint sources,  natural background loading and a margin of safety. TMDLs can be expressed in  terms of either mass per time, toxicity, or other appropriate measure. The TMDL  process provides for point versus nonpoint source trade-offs.
    "Traveled way" means the portion of the secondary  street designated for the movement of vehicles, exclusive of shoulders, parking  areas, turn lanes, etc.
    "Tree well" means an opening on a sidewalk,  generally abutting the curb, where a tree may be planted. 
    "VPD" means vehicles per day.
    "VPH" means vehicles per hour.
    "Wasteload allocation" or "wasteload"  or "WLA" means the portion of a receiving surface water's loading or  assimilative capacity allocated to one of its existing or future point sources  of pollution. WLAs are a type of water quality-based effluent limitation.
    "Watercourse" means a defined channel with bed and  banks within which water flows, either continuously or periodically.
    24VAC30-92-20. Applicability, effective date, and transition.
    A. Applicability. This regulation is intended to govern  secondary street development and the criteria for acceptance of these streets  by the department for subsequent maintenance. The Road Design Manual, 2011  (VDOT) and its Appendix B (1), the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) offer guidance on the design and construction features of  secondary street development and set out design parameters deemed appropriate for  most land development scenarios. However, the business of land development is  fluid and the department, in consultation with the local official, is prepared  to consider innovative transportation approaches associated with land  development proposals that are consistent with the design and connectivity  requirements of this chapter and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150), Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT).  However, when not specifically addressed in one of those documents, the  relevant requirements of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150),  2011 (VDOT), standards, specifications, the Pavement Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia, 2009  (VDOT) and associated instructions shall govern.
    These requirements apply to all streets designated to be  maintained by the department as part of the secondary system of state highways,  except for streets whose construction was funded by state highway construction  allocations. The department's review and approval shall apply only to  streets proposed for addition to the secondary system of state highways  maintained by the department. Any plans submitted for review that contain only  streets proposed for maintenance by entities other than the department may be  reviewed for general guidance at the discretion of the district administrator  but will not be officially approved. However, any such review shall not  represent the department's commitment to accept such streets for maintenance  irrespective of the quality of the construction of the street or streets.
    Any streets proposed to be privately maintained shall have a  notation on the plat and impacted deeds that clearly indicates that as a  prerequisite for the streets' future acceptance, the streets must be improved  to the department's prevailing requirements for acceptance at no cost to the  department. All notations made on plats or similar instruments pursuant to this  section shall be in accordance with § 33.1-72.2 of the Code of Virginia.
    B. Grandfathering.
    1. Streets where the street layout has been proffered pursuant  to § 15.2-2297, 15.2-2298, or 15.2-2303 of the Code of Virginia prior to March  9, 2009 February 1, 2012, shall may, at the discretion of  the developer, be considered for acceptance in accordance with the  applicable former requirements, provided the requirements of § 15.2-2307 of the  Code of Virginia have been met. This grandfathering shall not apply to any  streets where the proffered layout may be adjusted, without requiring a significant  affirmative governmental zoning action to modify such proffered conditions, to  meet the requirements of this chapter, unless a site plan, subdivision plat, or  preliminary plat relying on such proffered street layout has been submitted for  approval prior to March 9, 2009 February 1, 2012. In such  instances the grandfathering shall may, at the discretion of the  developer, apply to the applicable site plan, subdivision plat, or  preliminary subdivision plat. However, such streets may be considered for  acceptance under requirements of this chapter at the discretion of the  developer Notwithstanding any other provision of this subsection, the  grandfathering provided based upon proffers shall not be lost or adversely  impacted due to a modification of the relevant plan or plat so long as no more  than 20% (cumulative) of the original street centerline mileage is eliminated,  realigned, or added compared to the proffered layout and the modification is  not expected to result in an increase in traffic generation.
    2. Streets that are part of a recorded plat or final site plan  valid pursuant to § 15.2-2261 of the Code of Virginia and approved in  accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241 through 15.2-2245 of the Code of  Virginia prior to July 1, 2009 February 1, 2012, shall be  considered for acceptance in accordance with the applicable former requirements  as long as such plats or plans remain valid under applicable law. However, such  streets may be considered for acceptance under requirements of this chapter at  the discretion of the developer.
    3. Streets that are part of a preliminary subdivision plat  valid pursuant to § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia approved in accordance  with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241 through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia prior  to July 1, 2009 February 1, 2012, shall be considered for  acceptance in accordance with the applicable former requirements for a period  of up to five years or such longer period as such preliminary subdivision plat  is valid under applicable law, provided the requirements of § 15.2-2260 of the  Code of Virginia have been met. Such grandfathering shall apply to construction  plans, site plans, and final plats submitted and approved in furtherance of  such preliminary subdivision plat for as long as such plans or plats remain valid  under applicable law. However, such streets may be considered for acceptance  under requirements of this chapter at the discretion of the developer.
    4. Streets that are part of a street construction plan  approved by the department prior to July 1, 2009 February 1, 2012,  shall be considered for acceptance in accordance with the applicable former  requirements. However, such streets may be considered for acceptance under  requirements of this chapter at the discretion of the developer.
    5. When the local governing body takes an action that  modifies the applicable area types (see 24VAC30-92-50 for further details on  area type) within such locality or the applicable area type changes due to  adjustments in smoothed urbanized areas, urban cluster boundaries, or metropolitan  planning organization study area boundaries, the following shall apply for  development proposals approved after March 9, 2009.
    a. Streets where the layout was proffered pursuant to § 15.2-2297, 15.2-2298, or 15.2-2303 of the Code of Virginia prior to the  modification of the applicable area type shall be considered for acceptance in  accordance with the requirements of the former area type for a period of up to  10 years, provided the requirements of § 15.2-2307 of the Code of Virginia have  been met. This subsection shall not apply to any streets where the proffered  layout may be adjusted, without requiring a significant affirmative  governmental zoning action to modify such proffered conditions, to meet the  requirements of this chapter, unless a site plan, subdivision plat, or  preliminary plat relying on such proffered street layout has been submitted for  approval prior to March 9, 2009. In such instances the grandfathering shall  apply to the applicable site plan, subdivision plat, or preliminary subdivision  plat. However, such streets may be considered for acceptance under the modified  applicable area type at the discretion of the developer.
    b. Streets that are part of recorded plat or final site  plan pursuant to § 15.2-2261 of the Code of Virginia approved prior to the  modification of the applicable area type shall be considered for acceptance in  accordance with the requirements of the former area type for a period of up to  five years or such longer period as such recorded plat or final site plan is valid  under applicable law. However, such streets may be considered for acceptance  under the modified applicable area type at the discretion of the developer.
    c. Streets that are part of preliminary subdivision plat  pursuant to § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia approved prior to the  modification of the applicable area type shall be considered for acceptance in  accordance with the requirements of the former area type for a period of up to  five years or such longer period as such preliminary subdivision plat is valid  under applicable law. Such grandfathering shall apply to future construction  plans, site plans, and final plats approved in furtherance of such preliminary  plat for so long as such plans or plats remain valid under applicable law.  However, such streets may be considered for acceptance under the modified  applicable area type at the discretion of the developer.
    d. Streets that are part of a street construction plan  approved by the department prior to the modification of the applicable area  type shall be considered for acceptance in accordance with the requirements of  the former area type for a period of up to five years. However, such streets  may be considered for acceptance under the modified applicable area type at the  discretion of the developer.
    6. 5. If requested by the applicable locality,  the provisions of this subsection applicable former requirements  shall apply if the applicant has submitted at a minimum a conceptual sketch  that includes all of the elements required under 24VAC30-92-70 A prior to July  1, 2009 February 1, 2012. Subdivisions 1 through 5 4  of this subsection shall take precedence over this subdivision in any instances  of a conflict. 
    C. Effective date. All streets proposed for acceptance by the  department after March 9, 2009 January 1, 2012, shall be  considered for acceptance in accordance with this chapter, except as provided  for in subsection D of this section and as may be waived by the  commissioner pursuant to this chapter.
    D. Transition. Prior to July 1, 2009 February 1,  2012, the department will consider complete plats and plans developed in  accordance with either the applicable former requirements or  these requirements. Any plat or plan initially submitted to the department for  consideration after June 30, 2009 January 31, 2012, however,  shall be in accordance with these requirements.
    24VAC30-92-50. Area type thresholds. (Repealed.)
    A. Area type thresholds. There are three area types  established for secondary streets in the Commonwealth. Within each area type,  streets must meet the applicable design and public benefit requirements to be  eligible for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways. For the  purposes of this chapter the following area types shall determine the design  and public benefit requirements that apply to streets and network additions.
    1. Compact Area Type. The Compact Area Type shall apply  when any part of a network addition meets one or more of the following  criteria:
    a. Located within a locally designated urban development  area pursuant to § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of Virginia, or within an area  designated by an adopted local comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2223 of  the Code of Virginia as a village, town, or other growth area;
    b. Located within a smoothed urbanized area boundary;
    c. Located within an area designated by the local  government, by ordinance or by the adopted local comprehensive plan pursuant to  § 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia, to be subject to the Compact Area Type  requirements of this chapter provided such area is designated in the adopted  local comprehensive plan as an area for compact development with median lot  sizes no greater than 1/2 acre; 
    d. Located within a locally designated transfer of  development rights receiving area pursuant to § 15.2-2316.1 of the Code of  Virginia; or
    e. Located within a smoothed urban cluster boundary.
    2. Suburban Area Type. The Suburban Area Type shall apply  when any part of a network addition meets one or more of the following criteria  and does not meet any of the Compact Area Type criteria:
    a. Located outside a smoothed urbanized area boundary but  within an official Metropolitan Planning Organization Study Area;
    b. Located within a two-mile radius of a locally designated  urban development area pursuant to § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of Virginia;
    c. Located within a two-mile radius of a smoothed urban  cluster boundary;
    d. Located within a locally designated cluster development  pursuant to § 15.2-2286.1 of the Code of Virginia; or
    e. Located within an area not subject to the Compact Area  Type criteria that is designated by the local government, by ordinance or by  the adopted local comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2223 of the Code of  Virginia, to be subject to the Suburban Area Type requirements of this chapter  provided such area is designated in the adopted local comprehensive plan as an  area for suburban development with median lot sizes no greater than two acres.
    3. The Rural Area Type. The Rural Area Type shall apply in  all other areas of the Commonwealth.
    B. Modifications to the area type thresholds. Area type  perimeters shall be consistent with all planning boundaries listed within  subsection A of this section, except as may be allowed within this subsection.  Where the area type boundaries have been determined by a smoothed urbanized  area, smoothed urban cluster, metropolitan planning organization study area, or  within two miles of a smoothed urban cluster, and local governing body requests  that the current area type designation differ from the above stated planning  boundaries, the department will review such amendments related to a  modification to the area type. Approval of such modification requests is not  assured and will be reviewed on an individual basis. The commissioner, upon  receipt of a resolution from the local governing body, for good cause shown may  determine that an area type for a specific area within the local jurisdiction  should be modified to a different area type or that any of the requirements of  24VAC30-92-60 should be modified to the requirements of a different area type. The  commissioner shall consider and review the permissible parcel sizes and uses to  ensure that the area is indeed being regulated in such manner that necessitates  a change in area type. The department will notify the local government within  45 calendar days of the commissioner's final decision. Any such modification of  area type designations shall cease to apply if the zoning of the area is  altered in a manner that is inconsistent with the local government's original  request for the modification of the area type and that alters the type and  density of land uses permitted.
    C. Area type designation. At such time as the local  governing body or the metropolitan planning organization amend the boundaries  of one or more of the planning boundaries listed in subsection A of this  section, the department will recognize such amendments and revise the related  area type designation accordingly. When such local decision is made, the local  governing body or metropolitan planning organization shall provide the  department with a copy of any duly adopted ordinance or resolution that affects  one of the planning boundary criteria listed in this section and impacts the  area type designations within such locality or metropolitan planning  organization study boundary based on the thresholds in this section as well as  maps that show the affected areas as soon as practicable. Modifications to the  area type designations based on any ordinance or resolution duly adopted  between January 1 and June 30 of any year by a locality or metropolitan  planning organization shall become effective on October 1 of that year.  Modifications to the area type designations based on any ordinance or  resolution duly adopted between July 1 and December 31 of any year shall become  effective on April 1 of the next year.
    24VAC30-92-60. Public benefit requirements.
    A. Public benefit. A street or network addition may only be  accepted by the department for maintenance as part of the secondary system of  state highways if it provides sufficient public benefit to justify perpetual  public maintenance as defined by this chapter. A street shall be considered to  provide sufficient public benefit if it meets or exceeds the public service,  pedestrian accommodation, and connectivity requirements of the applicable  area type of this chapter.
    B. Public service requirements. In the event the governing  body requests the addition of a street or network addition before it meets  these public service provisions, the district administrator will review each  request on an individual case basis and determine if the acceptance of a street  prior to normal service requirements is justified, provided the street or  network addition meets all other applicable requirements including the  connectivity requirements of this chapter. At the request of the local  governing body, subject to approval by the district administrator, the public  service requirements may be reduced for individual streets serving state or  local economic development projects.
    1. Individual streets. For the purpose of these requirements without  regard to applicable area type, public service may include, but is not  necessarily limited to, streets meeting one or more of the following  situations:
    a. Serves three or more occupied units with a unit being a  single-family residence, owner-occupied apartment, owner-occupied residence in  a qualifying manufactured home park, a stand-alone business, or single business  entity occupying an individual building, or other similar facility. Also,  streets serving manufactured home parks may only be considered when the land  occupied by the manufactured home is in fee simple ownership by the residents  of such manufactured home.
    b. Constitutes a connecting segment between other streets that  qualify from the point of public service.
    c. Such street is a stub out.
    d. Serves as access to schools, churches, public sanitary  landfills, transfer stations, public recreational facilities, or similar  facilities open to public use.
    e. Serves at least 100 vehicles per day generated by an office  building, industrial site, or other similar nonresidential land use in advance  of the occupancy of three or more such units of varied proprietorship. Any  addition under this provision shall be limited to the segment of a street that  serves this minimum projected traffic and has been developed in compliance with  these requirements.
    f. Constitutes a part of the network of streets envisioned in  the transportation plan or element of a locality's comprehensive plan that, at  the time of acceptance, serves an active traffic volume of at least 100  vehicles per day.
    2. Multifamily, townhouse, and retail shopping complexes. A  through street that serves a multifamily building may be considered for  maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways if it is deemed  by the department to provide a public service and provided it is well defined  and the district administrator's designee determines that it is not a travel  way through a parking lot. 
    Entrance streets and the internal traffic circulation systems  of retail shopping complexes qualify only if more than three property owners  are served and the street is well defined and separated from the parking  areas district administrator's designee determines that it is not a  travel way through a parking lot.
    3. Network additions. A network addition shall be considered  to provide service if each street within the addition meets at least one of the  criteria in subdivision 1 of this subsection.
    4. Special exceptions. There may be other sets of  circumstances that could constitute public service. Consequently, any request  for clarification regarding unclear situations should be made in writing to the  district administrator's designee. 
    C. Connectivity requirements. All street segments streets  in a development as shown in a plan of development shall be considered for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways as one or multiple  network additions. However, streets with a functional classification of  collector and above may be eligible for acceptance as individual streets.
    For the purposes of this subsection, connection shall mean a  street connection to adjacent property or a stub out that will allow for future  street connection to an adjacent property. 
    If a stub out or stub outs maintained by the department  adjoin the property of a development with a network addition or individual  street proposed for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways,  such network addition or individual street must connect to such stub out or  stub outs to be eligible for acceptance into the secondary system of state  highways. Local street stub outs generally should not exceed 500 feet in  length. The applicant shall post a sign in accordance with the department's  standards that indicates that such stub out is a site for a future roadway  connection. 
    Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as to prohibit  a stub out from providing service to lots within a development. 
    The connectivity requirements of this chapter shall not apply  to the following: a frontage road or reverse frontage road as defined in the Access  Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (see 24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-72)  or Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials, Collectors, and Local  Streets (24VAC-30-73), streets petitioned for acceptance into the secondary  system of state highways through the Rural Addition Program pursuant to §§ 33.1-72.1  and 33.1-72.2 of the Code of Virginia, or streets petitioned for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways through the Commonwealth  Transportation Board's Rural Addition Policy provided such streets were  constructed prior to March 9, 2009, or streets constructed or improved  pursuant to §§ 33.1-221 and 33.1-223 of the Code of Virginia January 1,  2012.
    1. Compact standard. Stub out connection standard.  If a stub out or stub outs maintained by the department adjoin the property of  a development with a network addition or individual street proposed for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways, such network addition  or individual street must connect to such stub out or stub outs to be eligible  for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways. The district  administrator may waive this requirement if the existing stub out is of such  design as to make such a connection unsafe. 
    2. Multiple connections in multiple directions standard.  The streets within a network addition may be accepted into the secondary system  of state highways if the network addition meets the following requirements:  
    a. The streets are designed and constructed in compliance  with the compact design standards pursuant to this chapter, the Road Design  Manual, and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150); 
    b. The network addition provides sufficient connections in  multiple directions and to multiple properties, if applicable, to local and higher  order roadways to provide an overall connectivity index of 1.6 or higher. All  network additions shall have a minimum of two connections; and 
    c. The block layout and other features of the development  are designed in such a fashion as to provide reasonably direct pedestrian  movement throughout the development and to adjoining property. 
    provides at least two external connections, one of which  must be to a publicly maintained highway and the other providing a connection  to a different highway or a stub out to an adjoining property. Local street  stub outs generally should not exceed 500 feet in length. If a stub out is  constructed, the applicant shall post a sign in accordance with the  department's standards that indicates that such stub out is a site for a future  roadway connection. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as to prohibit a  stub out from providing service to lots within a development. The district  administrator's designee shall waive or modify the second required connection  of this standard if one or more of the following situations renders the  provision of such connection impracticable:
    a. The adjoining property is completely built out, its  state is such that redevelopment within 20 years is unlikely, and there is no  stub out (either constructed or platted) to the property served by the network  addition;
    b. The adjoining property is zoned for a use whose traffic  is incompatible with the development being served by the network addition,  providing, however, that in no case shall retail, residential, or office uses  be considered incompatible with other retail, residential, or office uses; or
    c. There is no reasonable connection possible to adjoining  property or adjacent highways due to a factor outside the control of the  developer of the network addition, such as the presence of conservation  easements not put in place by the developer of the network addition, water  features such as rivers or lakes, jurisdictional wetlands, grades in excess of  15% whose total elevation change is greater than five feet, limited access  highways, railroads, or government property to which access is restricted.
    2. Suburban 3. Additional connections standard. The  streets within a network addition Network additions providing direct  access to (i) more than 200 dwelling units or (ii) lots whose trip generation  is expected to be over 2,000 VPD may be accepted into the secondary system  of state highways if the network addition meets the following requirements: 
    a. The streets are designed and constructed in compliance  with the suburban design standards pursuant to this chapter, the Road Design  Manual, and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150);
    b. The network addition provides sufficient connections in  multiple directions and to multiple properties, if applicable, to local and  higher order roadways to provide an overall connectivity index of 1.4 or  higher. All network additions shall have a minimum of two connections; and 
    c. The block layout and other features of the development  are designed in such a fashion as to provide reasonably direct pedestrian  movement throughout the development and to adjoining property.
    3. Rural standard. The streets within a network addition  may be accepted into the secondary system of state highways if the network  addition meets the following requirements: 
    a. The streets are designed and constructed in compliance  with the rural design standards pursuant to this chapter, the Road Design  Manual, and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150); and 
    b. The network addition provides multiple connections to  adjacent properties or streets in varying directions.
    provides an additional external connection beyond that  required under subdivision 2 of this subsection for each additional 200  dwelling units or 2,000 VPD or portion of each over and above the initial 200  dwelling units or 2,000 VPD. For the purposes of this requirement, each  external connection of collector facilities that are elements of the county's  transportation plan and to which there is no direct lot access provided counts  as two external connections. The district administrator's designee shall waive  or modify this additional connections standard if one or more of the following  situations renders the provision of such connection impracticable:
    a. The adjoining property is completely built out, its  state is such that redevelopment within 20 years is unlikely, and there is no  stub out (either constructed or platted) to the property served by the network  addition; 
    b. The adjoining property is zoned for a use whose traffic  is incompatible with the development being served by the network addition,  providing, however, that in no case shall retail, residential, or office uses  be considered incompatible with retail, residential, or office uses;
    c. In developments with a median density of more than eight  lots per acre or with a FAR of 0.4 or higher, where the number of connections  provided would be contrary to the public interest; or
    d. There is no reasonable connection possible to adjoining  property or adjacent highways due to a factor outside the control of the  developer of the network addition, such as the presence of conservation  easements not put in place by the developer of the network addition, water  features such as rivers or lakes, jurisdictional wetlands, grades in excess of  15% whose total elevation change is greater than five feet, limited access  highways, railroads, or government property to which access is restricted.
    4. Individual street standard. Streets that are not part of a  network addition shall be accepted into the secondary system of state highways  upon petition by the local governing body as long as they meet the requirements  of the applicable design standard and both termini one terminus  of the street are intersections is an intersection with a roadway  or roadways that are is part of the existing publicly  maintained highway network, subject to the connectivity exceptions of  subdivision 5 of this subsection and the other terminus is either an  intersection with a roadway that is part of the existing publicly maintained  highway network or a stub out to an adjoining property. Streets considered  for individual acceptance should be (i) streets that provide a connection  between two existing publicly maintained streets, or (ii) streets  with a functional classification as collector or higher, (iii) a frontage  road or reverse frontage road pursuant to VDOT's Access Management Regulations:  Principal Arterials (see 24VAC30-92-150), (iv) streets petitioned for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways through the Rural  Addition Program pursuant to §§ 33.1-72.1 and 33.1-72.2 of the Code of Virginia  provided such street was constructed prior to March 9, 2009, (v) streets  petitioned for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways through  the Commonwealth Transportation Board's Rural Addition Policy provided such  street was constructed prior to March 9, 2009, or (vi) streets constructed or  improved pursuant to §§ 33.1-221 and 33.1-223 of the Code of Virginia.
    5. Connectivity exceptions. 
    a. The connectivity index requirement for a network  addition shall be reduced where a portion of the perimeter features one or more  of the following constraints: (i) railroad tracks; (ii) limited access highway;  (iii) an existing navigable river or a standing body of water with a depth  greater than four feet under normal conditions; (iv) terrain grades in excess  of 20%; and (v) government-owned property with restrictions upon development  such as military installations, parks in existence prior to the submission of the  development proposal for the network addition, and land under conservation  easements accepted by the Virginia Outdoors Foundation.
    The connectivity index shall be reduced based on the  percentage of the perimeter that features one or more constraints. In compact  area types, the connectivity index requirement shall be equal to 1.6 minus 0.6  times the ratio of the length of the perimeter that features one or more  constraints to the total length of the perimeter. In suburban area types, the  connectivity index requirement shall be equal to 1.4 minus 0.4 times the ratio  of the length of the perimeter that features one or more constraints to the  total length of the perimeter. 
    b. The Where the above standards for waiver or  modification or both have been met, the connectivity index requirement  requirements for a network addition may shall be reduced  waived or modified by the district administrator administrator's  designee. The developer shall submit any other request for  connectivity exceptions waiver or modification to the district  administrator's designee with a copy to the local official. The district  administrator's designee shall respond to requests for connectivity exceptions  within 45 30 calendar days of receipt of a request. For projects  where a scoping meeting pursuant to the Traffic Impact Analysis regulations  (24VAC30-155) will be held, requests for exceptions and supporting data should  be presented and discussed. The district administrator's designee may modify  the connectivity index requirements for one or more of the following criteria: 
    (1) If the locality's comprehensive plan designates  adjoining parcels to the proposed development for a land use that is determined  by the local official to be incompatible with the land use of the proposed  development. If the connectivity index requirement is modified due to  incompatible land use, such network additions shall provide stub out or stub  outs, as determined by the district administrator's designee based on the size  of the development, to allow for future connectivity in the event that the  comprehensive plan changes the designation of adjacent parcels to land use that  is not incompatible. In no instance shall any retail, office, or residential  land use be considered incompatible land use with any proposed retail, office,  or residential development.
    (2) Good cause is shown that such requirement cannot be met  due to unique characteristics of the parcel being developed such as  jurisdictional wetlands or cluster subdivisions developed pursuant to § 15.2-2286.1 of the Code of Virginia. 
    6. In instances where there is potential for conflict between  this chapter and the Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (see  24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-72) or the Access Management Regulations:  Minor Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets (see 24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-73),  the following shall apply.:
    a. For streets with a functional classification of collector  where additional connections necessary to meet the connectivity index  requirement requirements of this chapter cannot be accommodated  within the applicable spacing standards and cannot otherwise be met through  connections to lower order roadways or stub outs, such spacing standards shall  be modified by the district administrator administrator's designee  to allow for such connection. Such connection or connections shall be required  to meet intersection sight distance standards specified in the Road Design  Manual, 2011 (VDOT) (see 24VAC30-92-150).
    b. For streets with a functional classification of minor  arterial where additional connections necessary to meet the connectivity index  requirement requirements of this chapter cannot be accommodated  within the applicable spacing standards and cannot otherwise be met through  connections to lower order roadways or stub outs, the district administrator  administrator's designee shall, in consultation with the developer and  the local official, either modify the applicable spacing standards to allow for  such connection or connections, or modify the connectivity index requirement  requirements of this chapter to account for the inability to make such  connection. Such connection shall be required to meet intersection sight  distance as specified in the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) (see  24VAC30-92-150).
    c. For streets with a functional classification of principal  arterial where additional connections necessary to meet the external  connectivity requirements of this chapter cannot be accommodated within the  applicable spacing standards and cannot otherwise be met through connections to  lower order roadways or stub outs, the connectivity index requirement requirements  shall be modified by the district administrator administrator's  designee to account for the inability to make such connection.
    7. Failure to connect. As a local governing body is not  required to approve a subdivision plat that does not connect to stub outs in  adjacent developments, when If a local government approves a  subdivision plat for a new development that does not connect to a stub out or  stub outs in an adjacent development and such development's network addition or  individual street would meet the applicable requirements of this chapter if it  connected to a stub out or stub outs in the adjacent development, the network  addition or individual street may or may not be accepted into the  secondary system of state highways for maintenance pursuant to the authority  granted to the district administrators in accordance with 24VAC30-92-100. In  such event the department representative's and the commissioner's top priority  for expenditure of improvements funds for such locality's six-year plan for  secondary highways shall be to connect the street or streets in the recently  accepted network addition or individual street to the stub out or stub outs in  the adjacent developments in addition to safety.
    24VAC30-92-70. Administrative procedure.
    A. Conceptual sketch. A conceptual sketch of the development  that shows sufficient information for the department to review and concur with  the proposed functional classification for each street in the development shall  be provided to the district administrator's designee by the local official  prior to preparing detailed construction plans for review. Any preliminary or  conceptual plat, plan or sketch that conforms to the locality's zoning  requirements or subdivision ordinance is acceptable if the information required  by this subsection is shown. The submittal should include:
    1. The general location and configuration, including the  terminus, of each street, and the traffic volume anticipated when the land  served is fully developed in accordance with the land uses anticipated.
    2. The location, area, and density or floor area ratio (FAR)  of each type of proposed land use within the development.
    3. The location of any proposed transportation facility including  any public transportation facilities as well as bicycle and pedestrian  accommodations within the development's boundaries included in the  comprehensive plan of the governing body.
    4. The proposed functional classification for each street in  the development.
    5. The connectivity index of the network addition as  proposed, if applicable.
    6. The location of stub outs on adjoining property and the  existing land use of such adjacent property, if applicable, and the location of  any proposed stub outs within the network addition, if applicable.
    7. Any reductions to waiver or modification of  the connectivity requirement requirements or pending requests  therefore pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 5 a and approved modifications to  the connectivity requirement pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 5 b.
    8. Any requests for modifications to the connectivity  requirement pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 5 b. 
    9. 8. General preliminary information on the  type of any stormwater management facilities that are storm sewer  system, such as BMP, outfalls, or conveyance channels, that is proposed to  be located within the right-of-way as described in 24VAC30-92-120 L 2 and if  the project is located in a MS4 regulated area or a TMDL watershed. 
    10. 9. Other available information pertinent to  the intended development, including but not limited to any proposed phased  development of streets pursuant to 24VAC30-92-80.
    B. Conceptual sketch review. The district administrator's  designee will review the layout and functional classification of streets shown  in the concept sketch and within 45 calendar days notify the local official in  writing, as well as the developer, if applicable, of his concurrence or  recommendations and whether or not the streets in the proposed network addition  meet the connectivity and other requirements of this chapter. This concurrence  will be valid as long as the basic concept for the development, including the  general street layout and design, as submitted for review, remains unchanged.  The district administrator's designee shall also review any unresolved request  for modifications to the connectivity index requirement requirements  and include his decision in the written notification to the local official and  the developer. As part of his review, the district administrator's designee shall  review the provision of collector and other higher order streets and if  necessary make recommendations for the provision of such streets to address the  traffic generated by the development.
    C. Plan of development submission. Plats or plans, or both,  together with other pertinent data as herein prescribed, shall be submitted to  the local official in accordance with the practices of the local government and  to the district administrator's designee for all proposed developments whose  streets are intended to be added to the secondary system of state highways  maintained by the department. The district administrator's designee may,  subject to the availability of staff and upon the request of the local  official, cooperate in the review of proposed developments to be developed to  these standards but not initially intended for addition to the secondary system  of state highways maintained by the department. The department may recover the  costs for this service in accordance with 24VAC30-92-140.
    D. Plan review. Upon receipt of the plats or plans, or both,  the district administrator's designee will arrange for the appropriate review  to determine compliance with the requirements of this chapter and other  applicable VDOT requirements. The general procedure for this review is  described in the guidance document Guidance Document for the  Commonwealth Transportation Board's Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT).
    E. Plan approval. The district administrator's designee will  advise the appropriate local official and the developer, if applicable, as to  the results of the review.
    1. If the street development proposed by the plats or plans,  or both, is determined to be in compliance with these requirements, the  district administrator's designee will provide written confirmation of this  finding. This action signifies the district administrator's designee's approval  of the street layout and design shown on the plats or plans, as submitted. Any  subsequent revision, additions, or deletions thereto shall require specific  written approval of the district administrator's designee for each such change.
    2. If a revision of the submitted plats or plans is determined  necessary, the district administrator's designee will list the required changes  in a written response to the local official and the developer, if applicable.  Upon completion of the specified revisions, the plats or plans will be  resubmitted for review and approval by the district administrator's designee.
    The department's approval of a street construction plan shall  constitute its commitment to accept the street or network addition depicted  thereon when all applicable provisions of these requirements are satisfied and  the streets have been constructed according to the approved construction plan and  supporting specifications. However, during the department's or other approved  inspection of construction as specified by this chapter, if a situation is  discovered that was not addressed on the approved plan that could, in the  opinion of the district administrator's designee, adversely affect public  safety or the integrity of either the roadway or the adjacent property,  acceptance of the street or network addition shall be deferred until the  situation is corrected.
    The department's approval of a street construction plan shall  expire after a period of five years if construction has not commenced, in which  case the subdivision street construction plan shall be resubmitted for  subsequent review and approval. This shall not affect the adequacy of the  approved concept plan as depicted on a recorded final plat, as provided for  under § 15.2-2241 of the Code of Virginia.
    Network additions will only be accepted when the entire  network addition has been constructed, except in such instances where the  constructed portion meets the applicable public benefit requirements of this  chapter.
    F. Street acceptance. Upon the satisfactory completion of  construction of the street or streets in a network addition, the department  will advise the local governing body regarding the street or network addition's  readiness for acceptance and the local governing body, in consultation with the  district administrator's designee, will initiate its acceptance into the  secondary system of state highways maintained by the department provided:
    1. The developer dedicates the prescribed right-of-way to  public use.
    2. The street has or streets in the network addition have been  constructed in accordance with the applicable specifications, standards and the  plats or plans approved by the department.
    a. Traffic control markings, signs, and devices have been  installed in accordance with VDOT standards, specifications, and practices.
    b. Speed limits have been set in accordance with Article 8 (§ 46.2-870  et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title 46.2 of the Code of Virginia. For any streets  with speed limits different from those set out in § 46.2-870 or §§ 46.2-873  through 46.2-875 of the Code of Virginia, traffic engineering investigations  supporting such speed limits have been submitted to VDOT. 
    3. The developer furnishes all required information and data  to the district administrator's designee and the local government official  pertaining to the development's stormwater management system that are pertinent  to the locality's, department's, or other entity's Municipal Separate Storm  Sewer System (MS4) permit, if applicable. 
    4. The street or streets in a network addition provides  sufficient public benefit as prescribed in 24VAC30-92-60 and meets the  requirements of this chapter.
    5. The street or streets in the network addition has been  properly maintained since its completion.
    6. The developer furnishes the surety and fees in accordance  with 24VAC30-92-140.
    7. The governing body has or other responsible  parties have executed all agreements prescribed by these requirements,  unless specifically waived on an individual case basis by the department  employee, or his successor or his designee, responsible for overseeing these  requirements and the final acceptance of streets as part of the secondary  system of state highways maintained by the department.
    8. The governing body, by proper resolution, requests the  department to accept the street or streets in the network addition for  maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways under its  jurisdiction. The resolution shall include the governing body's guarantee of an  unrestricted and unencumbered right-of-way as dedicated, plus any necessary  easements for fills, drainage, or sight distance.
    Upon the department's determination that the requested street  or network addition is in compliance with the applicable provisions of these  requirements, the governing body will be officially advised of the street or  network addition's acceptance into the secondary system of state highways and  the effective date of such action. This notification serves as the district  administrator's designee's authority to begin maintenance thereon.
    24VAC30-92-80. Phased development of streets.
    A. Policy. Certain streets that require four or more travel  lanes to accommodate the projected traffic may be accepted by the department  for maintenance after completion of the first two lanes to an acceptable,  initial phase of construction, upon the request of the governing body. It is  recognized that there is a distinction between those streets that benefit the  regional transportation network and those that primarily serve the development  of land and local traffic, and, therefore, the criteria for phased construction  for each situation differs as described in subsection B of this section.
    However, in all cases, the right-of-way required for the road  at its complete stage of construction shall be dedicated and accepted as part  of the initial street acceptance. In addition, the initial phase of  construction shall be designed and constructed to facilitate construction of  the remaining phase in a manner that will avoid the need to reconstruct the  initial two lanes.
    Consideration for the acceptance of any street under the  provisions of this section shall be limited to the phased development of only  the street's roadway. All other applicable requirements, e.g., public benefit,  drainage easements, and administrative procedures, shall apply.
    B. Criteria.
    1. For streets included in the transportation plan of the  locality's comprehensive plan that serve diverse areas of the region or  locally, no special agreement or acknowledgement is needed as a prerequisite to  acceptance, provided: 
    a. The street is part of a transportation corridor that was  formally adopted as a part of the locality's comprehensive transportation plan  prior to the local governing body's approval of the plat or plan for the  development of the adjacent land.
    b. The transportation corridor is a major thoroughfare planned  primarily to move through traffic.
    c. When fully developed the street must satisfy the department's  functional classification criteria as a major collector or higher.
    d. The street has a projected traffic volume of 8,000 vehicles  per day or less for a period of 10 years following the date of the acceptance  for maintenance by the department.
    2. For all other streets, the local governing body's  resolution requesting acceptance of the initial two-lane section must include  provisions that acknowledge:
    a. The local governing body agrees that all costs incurred in  the street's complete construction, including right-of-way, engineering,  utility adjustment, etc., shall be provided from funds other than those derived  from state revenue sources administered by the department, except as may be  expressly authorized by the department.
    b. The local governing body agrees that it is its  responsibility to ensure that the roadway is completed as needed to accommodate  the traffic. However, the locality also acknowledges that a determination that  the street needs to be completed to its ultimate section will be made by the  district administrator's designee once it is determined that the first two  lanes will not sustain an acceptable level of service for the functional  classification of the roadway in accordance with the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2010 (TRB).
    C. Procedures.
    1. Plats or plans, or both, for the street's complete  development, in accordance with all applicable provisions of these  requirements, shall be submitted for approval.
    2. The plats or plans shall also delineate the street's initial  development as proposed pursuant to this section. In no case shall this design  provide less than one-half of the roadway typical section required by the  applicable requirements for the street's complete development.
    3. Unless waived by the district administrator's designee, a  capacity analysis shall be submitted to document that an acceptable level of  service will be maintained for the intended duration of the initial phase of  development. In determining an acceptable level of service, the beneficial effect  of the proposed street on the overall transportation network will be  considered.
    4. A determination will be made by the department in  consultation with the locality as to whether the street can be approved for  phased development and as to which criterion in subsection B of this section  applies.
    5. Upon the district administrator's designee's determination  that the proposal is in compliance with the applicable provisions of this  section, the plans may be approved accordingly.
    6. Upon completion of the street's initial phase in accordance  with approved plans, its compliance with all other applicable provisions of  this section, and the inclusion of the appropriate language in the resolution,  the street may be accepted for maintenance by the department as part of the  secondary system of state highways.
    24VAC30-92-110. Appeal to district administrator.
    The district administrator is authorized to consider and  render a ruling on unresolved differences of opinion between the developer and  the district administrator's designee that pertain to the interpretation and  application of these requirements.
    To obtain this review, the developer shall provide the  district administrator, the district administrator's designee, and the local  official a written request for such action, describing any unresolved issue.  After reviewing all pertinent information, the district administrator will  advise the developer in writing regarding the decision of the appeal, and  provide a copy of the decision to the local official and the district  administrator's designee. All correspondence requesting an appeal should  include copies of all prior correspondence with the local official and  department representatives regarding the issue or issues. The district  administrator shall advise the developer of the decision on the appeal within 45  30 calendar days. 
    The developer may request a meeting with the district  administrator concerning the appeal, and the district administrator shall  respond within 10 business days and provide to the developer a date, time, and  location for such meeting. After reviewing all pertinent information, the  district administrator shall advise the developer in writing regarding the  decision on the appeal, and provide a copy of the decision to the district  administrator's designee and the local official.
    The district administrator shall advise the developer of  the decision on the unresolved differences of opinion within 45 calendar days.  The developer may further appeal the district administrator's decision to  the commissioner. All correspondence requesting an appeal should include copies  of all prior correspondence with the local official and department  representatives regarding the issue or issues. The commissioner shall advise  the developer of the decision on the appeal within 30 calendar days.
    24VAC30-92-120. Design and agreement requirements.
    A. General requirements. Most criteria addressing the design  of new streets can be found in the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and its  Appendix B (1), the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150).  However, the following provisions are provided for guidance, particularly in  regard to features that require agreements or formal acknowledgements of the  governing body before VDOT's acceptance of the street or streets within a development.
    When an agreement is required between the local governing  body and the department as a prerequisite to the acceptance of a street,  nothing in these requirements shall preclude the local governing body from  entering into separate agreements with other entities to fulfill its  responsibilities. However, if the provisions are intended to ensure the safety  of the public using the street, the department reserves the right to approve  the involvement of the other party or parties.
    All streets functionally classified as local shall have a  design speed equal to the posted speed limit, except for streets functionally  classified as local with a projected traffic volume of 400 vehicles per day or  less, which may have a design speed less than the posted speed limit.
    The department, locality, and developer shall take measures  to minimize the impacts of through traffic on streets functionally classified  as local and accepted into the secondary system of state highways under these  regulations. Such measures shall include initial street designs that manage  motor vehicle speed to match local context.
    B. Geometric requirements. Geometric requirements for new  streets are established in the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and its  Appendix B (1), the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150).  Sufficient off-street parking must be provided by the local governing body in  accordance with this chapter if streets in a proposed network addition are  constructed in accordance with design requirements for streets with off-street  parking.
    C. Turn lanes. Left or right turn lanes shall be provided at  intersections when the department determines that projected turning movements  warrant their installation. These facilities shall be designed in accordance  with the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and its Appendix B (1),  the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) and, if  necessary, additional right-of-way shall be provided to accommodate these  facilities.
    D. Pavement structure.
    1. Pavement design. The pavement structure for new streets  shall be in accordance with the Pavement Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150)  for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia, 2009 (VDOT), including  any prescribed underdrains. Prior to construction of the pavement sub-base and  finish courses, the district administrator's designee shall approve the  proposed pavement design.
    2. Special pavement surfaces. The district administrator's  designee may approve special pavement surfaces, such as the use of stamped  pavement. However, if the pavement design is a type not addressed by the  Pavement Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) for Subdivision and  Secondary Roads in Virginia, 2009 (VDOT), an agreement shall be provided by  the governing body that addresses the future maintenance of such pavement.
    3. Pavement additions to existing streets. When an existing  VDOT-maintained roadway is to be widened to accommodate additional lanes or the  addition of turn lanes, the necessary pavement design shall be obtained from  the district administrator's designee and the entire surface of the roadway  (old and new portions) may be required to be overlaid and restriped if required  by the district administrator's designee. The district administrator's designee  shall not require the entire surface of the roadway to be overlaid and  restriped when the only pavement addition to the existing roadway was for  bicycle lanes unless extenuating circumstances require that the entire surface  of the roadway be overlaid and restriped.
    E. Parking.
    1. Perpendicular and angle parking along streets is normally  prohibited. However, perpendicular and angle parking along streets may be  considered if the features along the street cause the street to readily appear  to be a street rather than a travel way through a parking lot.
    Street design that anticipates limited or no on-street parking  shall be approved when sufficient off-street parking is provided in accordance  with this chapter. Street design that anticipates the restriction of on-street  parking on one side of the street shall be approved when sufficient off-street  parking is provided for buildings on the side of the street where it is  anticipated parking will be restricted.
    2. For streets designed without on-street parking, a minimum  of two off-street parking spaces per dwelling unit shall be provided in  proximity of the unit that they are intended to serve. Such spaces, which may  be provided in a parking bay, driveway, or garage facilities, shall be  provided outside of the street's right-of-way. The district administrator's  designee may approve lesser parking requirements for individual developments or  classes of developments when evidence is presented to support such an approval  such as proximity to transit service or the nature of the development.  Entrances to parking bays and garage facilities shall be designed in accordance  with the appropriate provisions of the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-92-150) and the Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (see  24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-72) and Access Management Regulations: Minor  Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets (24VAC30-73).
    3. In instances where the local governing body has determined,  through adoption of a parking ordinance or other similar ordinance, that lesser  parking requirements are sufficient for certain classes of development, such  lesser requirements shall govern.
    4. The department shall not prohibit roadway design that  allows for the provision of on-street parking on any roadway with a functional  classification of collector or local where the posted speed limit is 35 miles  per hour or less and that is located within a compact or suburban area type.
    F. Cul-de-sacs and turnarounds. An adequate turnaround  facility shall be provided at the end of each cul-de-sac to permit the safe and  convenient maneuvering by service vehicles. Various configurations of  turnarounds are illustrated in the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT));  however, alternative configurations may be approved by the district administrator's  designee. Additional right-of-way shall be provided as required by the design  of the turnaround. Normally, any nontraveled way areas within the turnaround,  such as an island, shall be included in the dedicated right-of-way of the  facility unless the department and the locality are able to reach an agreement  for the maintenance of such nontraveled way areas. Nothing in this chapter  shall prohibit the provision of stormwater management facilities in the  nontraveled way areas of a cul-de-sac, provided the requirements of subsection  L of this section are met.
    For circular turnarounds, a well-defined, identifiable street  segment, equal to the normal lot width along the intersected street that serves  the cul-de-sac, or 50 feet, whichever is greater, shall extend from the  intersected street to the turning area.
    G. Curb and gutter. For the purpose of these requirements,  the use of curb and gutter is an acceptable roadway design, rather than a  requirement. However, when used, curb and gutter shall be designed in  accordance with the Road Design Manual and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT))  and only one curb and gutter design may be used along the length of a street.
    1. Driveway entrance requirements. Without regard to the curb  design used, the curb shall incorporate a driveway entrance apron, as  illustrated in the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix  B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)), to provide a smooth  transition from the gutter invert or roadway surface onto the driveway.
    2. Curb ramps. All streets that incorporate accessible routes  for pedestrian use shall, without regard to the curb design used, include curb  ramps at intersections for use by persons with disabilities and shall  incorporate other applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act  (42 USC § 12101 et seq.).
    H. Private entrances. All private entrances shall be designed  and constructed in accordance with the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)).
    I. Pedestrian, bicycle, and shared use path facilities. The  Commonwealth Transportation Board's "Policy for Integrating Bicycle and  Pedestrian Accommodations," 2004 emphasizes accommodating  pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Any street proposed for VDOT acceptance shall  accommodate pedestrian and bicycle traffic in accordance with the Commonwealth  Transportation Board's policy and this chapter. Pedestrian and bicycle  facilities should be generally uniform between intersections and  included in the initial construction of the street, prior to VDOT acceptance. 
    1. Pedestrian accommodation requirements. Pedestrian  accommodations shall be provided based upon density of development, the plans  for or existence of public schools in the vicinity, the presence of existing  pedestrian accommodations, and the operational nature of the fronting street.  In all developments with pedestrian accommodations, such accommodations shall connect  with existing pedestrian accommodations and allow for connection to future  pedestrian accommodations to adjacent parcels. If multiple requirements apply  to a street, the greater accommodation requirement shall govern. The  district administrator's designee may waive or modify these requirements for  the provision of pedestrian accommodations in situations when the accommodation  exception provisions of the Commonwealth Transportation Board's policy are met.
    a. Pedestrian accommodations shall be provided along both  sides of the street or provisions made that provide equivalent pedestrian  mobility in areas with a median lot size of one half acre or less or a floor  area ratio (FAR) of 0.4 or greater for streets with an ADT over 400 that  are located in a development with a median lot size of one-quarter acre or  smaller or when the ADT for the street is over 8,000. 
    b. Pedestrian accommodations shall be provided along at least  one side of the street or provisions made that provide equivalent pedestrian  mobility in areas that have a median lot size between one-half acre to two  acres for streets with an ADT over 400 that are located in a development  with a median lot size between one-quarter acre and one-half acre or when the  ADT for the street is between 2,000 and 8,000. 
    c. Pedestrian accommodations shall be provided along at least  one side of the street or provisions made that provide equivalent pedestrian  mobility in suburban and compact area types along roadways within one-half  centerline mile of a public school within one-half street centerline  mile of a public school.
    d. When connecting to a stub street that has pedestrian  accommodations, the new street shall also include pedestrian accommodations.
    e. Pedestrian accommodations shall be provided along at least  one side of, or provisions made that provide equivalent pedestrian mobility  along, streets functionally classified as collectors or arterials with two  travel lanes not including turn lanes. In no instance shall any sidewalk abut  the curb or the edge of a collector or higher order street, unless the sidewalk  is at least eight feet wide. In such instances tree wells shall be provided. In  instances where it is necessary to retrofit streets with pedestrian  accommodations to allow the streets to be accepted into the secondary system of  state highways, the pedestrian accommodations less than eight feet wide may  abut the curb or the edge of the street.
    f. e. Pedestrian accommodations shall be  provided along both sides of, or provisions made that provide equivalent  pedestrian mobility along, streets functionally classified as collectors or  arterials with three or more travel lanes. In no instance shall any sidewalk  abut the curb or the edge of a collector or higher order street, unless the  sidewalk is at least eight feet wide. In such instances tree wells shall be  provided. In instances where it is necessary to retrofit streets with  pedestrian accommodations to allow the streets to be accepted into the  secondary system of state highways, the pedestrian accommodations less than  eight feet wide may abut the curb or the edge of the street.
    2. Maintenance of pedestrian and bicycle accommodations.  Pedestrian and bicycle facilities are eligible for VDOT acceptance and  maintenance based on the criteria of this section. A copy of an agreement or  other document showing the proposed maintenance responsibilities of pedestrian  and bicycle facilities shall be provided to VDOT for any pedestrian  accommodation outside of the VDOT right-of-way that is used to meet the  accommodation requirements of this subsection. 
    a. Compliant facilities. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities,  including shared use paths as defined under § 46.2-100 of the Code of Virginia,  shall be accepted as part of the street or network addition, unless otherwise  requested by the governing body, provided they are located fully within the  dedicated right-of-way of the street and they are constructed in accordance  with applicable criteria and standards of the department.
    (1) Sidewalk criteria. Sidewalks shall be constructed in  accordance with the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150)  (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)).
    (2) Bicycle facility criteria. Bicycle facilities contiguous  with the street shall be in accordance with the department's design and  construction criteria set forth in the Road Design Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2011.
    (3) Shared use path criteria. Shared use paths shall be  constructed in accordance with the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150),  2011 and closely follow the vertical alignment of the roadway without  meandering on and off the right-of-way.
    b. Noncompliant sidewalk, bicycle, and shared use paths.  Noncompliant sidewalk, bicycle, and shared use paths that fail to meet  requirements of the department's standards for construction, alignment, or  placement within the dedicated right-of-way of the street shall be deemed to be  noncompliant and not qualify for maintenance unless a design waiver or  exemption is granted by the department. Noncompliant sidewalks and shared use  paths may be constructed of stabilizer convenient to the applicant.  Noncompliant facilities may co-exist within the dedicated right-of-way of the  street under a land use permit issued by the district administrator's designee  to the local governing body responsible for having established the facility  through its subdivision process or other development process.
    Such permits will clearly specify the responsibility for  maintenance of the facility and related activities to the extent the facility  occupies the street's right-of-way. The permit applicant should be an entity  that can be reasonably expected to have perpetual maintenance capability. 
    J. Bridge, drainage, and other grade separation structures.  Bridges, drainage, and other grade separation structures shall be designed and  constructed in accordance with all applicable department criteria and  standards. The district administrator's designee may require special review of  the plans and construction inspection.
    The department will accept grade separation structures as  part of new streets, provided the structure is a drainage structure or is  intended to separate the movement of registered motor vehicles. In addition,  the department will accept grade separation structures intended to separate  pedestrians or bicyclists or any combination thereof from traffic using the  roadway, provided:
    1. The structure is available for unrestricted public use;
    2. The structure is accessible to pedestrian accommodations  situated along the street; and
    3. The projected traffic volume of the street is (i) not less  than 4,000 vpd ADT or (ii) if the structure otherwise serves as  part of the principal pedestrian access to a school or a mass transit facility  including stops and stations and a peak hour traffic volume of 450 vph VPH  or greater is projected.
    In all other instances, the grade separation structure shall  be deemed to be a locally controlled grade separation structure within the  right-of-way of the street, in which case the street will only be accepted as  part of the secondary system of state highways maintained by the department  after the local governing body and the department have executed an agreement  acceptable to the department that (i) acknowledges the department has no  responsibility or liability due to the presence of the structure and (ii)  assures the burden and costs of inspection, maintenance, and future  improvements to the structure are provided from sources other than those  administered by the department.
    In all cases, whether the structure is accepted as an integral  part of the roadway for maintenance by the department or it remains a locally  controlled structure, the lighting, safety, and security of those using such  facilities shall remain a responsibility of local government.
    K. Dams. The department will only consider accepting streets  for maintenance that traverse dams when all of the following provisions are  satisfied. For the purpose of this section, a roadway will be considered to  traverse a dam if any part of the fill for the roadway and the fill for the dam  overlap or if the area between the two embankments is filled in so that the  downstream face of the dam is obscured or if a closed drainage facility from a  dam extends under a roadway fill.
    1. Agreements with the governing body. Except as exempt under  subdivision 6 of this subsection, the governing body acknowledges by formal  agreement the department's liability is limited to the maintenance of the  roadway and that the department has no responsibility or liability due to the  presence of the dam, the maintenance of which shall remain the responsibility  of an owner, other than the department, as established by § 33.1-176 of  the Code of Virginia.
    2. Design review. An engineer licensed to practice in the  Commonwealth of Virginia shall certify that the hydraulic and structural design  of any dam, as described below, is in accordance with current national and  state engineering practice and that all pertinent provisions of the Subdivision  Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road  Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)) have been considered. Prior to approval of the  roadway construction plans, the hydraulic and structural design of a proposed  dam shall be reviewed by the department and meet the department's satisfaction  if:
    a. A roadway is considered to traverse a dam; or
    b. A roadway is located below but sufficiently close to the  dam that a catastrophic breach could endanger the roadway or the safety of  those using the roadway.
    3. Right-of-way requirements. The right-of-way of roads  considered to occupy dams shall be recorded either as an easement for public  road purposes or as a dedication specifically to the governing body.  Right-of-way dedicated in the name of the Commonwealth or any of its agencies  is not acceptable if it includes a dam, and roads through such right-of-way  will not be accepted as a part of the secondary system of state highways  maintained by the department.
    4. Supplemental, alternative access. To be considered for VDOT  maintenance, roadways that traverse a dam must be supplemented by an  appropriate alternative roadway facility for public ingress or egress having  suitable provisions that ensure perpetual maintenance.
    5. Permits. All applicable federal and state permits  associated with dams shall be secured and filed with the locality prior to  VDOT's acceptance of any street that traverses a dam.
    6. Dams exempt from agreements. The acceptance of roadways  that traverse dams shall be exempt from the requirements for an agreement with  the governing body, as required by subdivision 1 of this subsection, if all of  the following is satisfied:
    a. The dam is used to create a stormwater detention or  retention facility;
    b. The maximum depth of the water retained by the impoundment  at its 100-year storm flood elevation is not greater than four feet; and
    c. The surface area of the impoundment at full flood is not  greater than two acres and is beyond the right-of-way dedicated to public use.
    L. Roadway drainage.
    1. Policy and procedures. All drainage facilities shall be  designed in accordance with the department's Drainage Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2002 and supplemental directives or the Subdivision  Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road  Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)) as may be appropriate. All drainage  computations supporting a proposed drainage design shall be submitted to the  department for review as part of the documents necessary for the approval of a  construction plan.
    2. Stormwater management. Whereas the department considers  matters regarding stormwater management associated with the construction of  streets to be under the authority of the local governing body, decisions  regarding stormwater management in the construction of streets are deferred to  the locality. However, stormwater management, including the construction of  detention or retention facilities, or both, is recognized as an available  design alternative or BMP for water quantity, quality, or both. Where  the developer is required by regulations promulgated by an agency or  governmental subdivision other than the department or the developer chooses to  use stormwater management facilities in the design of a subdivision or other  development, the governing body shall, by formal agreement, and as a  prerequisite for the transfer of jurisdiction over the street to the  department, acknowledge that the department is not responsible for the  operation, maintenance, retrofitting, or liability of the stormwater  management facility or facilities associated with the subdivision or the  development. Any retrofits required to comply with a TMDL WLA will be the  responsibility of the locality. However, in the event the governing body  has executed a comprehensive, localitywide agreement with the department  addressing these matters, a specific agreement addressing stormwater management  controls in the subdivision or development will not be required as a condition  for street acceptance.
    Stormwater management controls for VDOT projects are to be  designed in accordance with the approved VDOT Erosion and Sediment Control and  Stormwater Management Program Standards and Specifications, 2010, as  annually approved by the Department of Conservation and Recreation (see  24VAC30-92-150), the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Regulations,  (4VAC50-30), and the Virginia Stormwater Management Program  (VSMP) Permit Regulations (4VAC50-60), and, if applicable, VDOT's MS4  Program Plan, 2008. While these controls may be necessary whenever a street  maintained by the department is widened or relocated, the department does not  require them in the development of new streets because such activity is  regulated by the local governments. However, developers and counties may find  these controls useful in managing land development activity.
    Generally devices and treatments intended to mitigate the  impact of stormwater shall be placed off of the right-of-way and shall be  designed to prevent the backup of water against the roadbed. However, such  devices and treatments may be placed within the right-of-way if the department  and the local governing body have executed an agreement that (i) acknowledges  the department has no responsibility or liability due to the presence of the  devices or treatments, or both; (ii) assures the burden and costs of  inspection, maintenance, VSMP permit requirements, TMDL WLA requirements,  retrofitting or other future improvements to the devices and treatments, or  other costs related to the placement of such devices or treatments within the  right-of-way are provided from sources other than those administered by the  department; (iii) a professional engineer licensed by the Commonwealth or the  manufacturer as required by the department, certifies the construction of the  facility to plans reviewed by the department; and (iv) a concept design  requirements of the facility is are included in the department's  Drainage Manual, 2002, the Department of Conservation and Recreation's  Stormwater Management Handbook, First Edition, 1999, or  supplemental directives (see 24VAC30-92-150).
    Where development activity results in increased runoff to the  extent that adjustment of an outfall facility is required, such adjustment  shall be at the developer's expense and shall be contained within an  appropriate easement.
    The department is required to implement the Municipal Separate  Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit for facilities located on its right-of-way. To  comply with these requirements, the local governing body shall provide to  the district administrator's designee all aspects of a proposed  development's storm sewer system and associated stormwater management system  plan that are pertinent to the locality's or the agency's department's  MS4 permit to the district administrator's designee. Additionally,  the local governing body shall provide to the district administrator's designee  an inventory of all outfalls to waters of the United States, physical  interconnections with other stormwater systems, stormwater management devices,  or both related to the project that are located within VDOT right-of-way as a  condition of street acceptance in accordance with the VDOT MS4 Stormwater  Outfall Inventory Manual, 2011. VDOT shall not accept a street for maintenance  as part of the secondary system of state highways that are not in compliance  with conditions of the pertinent MS4 permit and VDOT's MS4 Program Plan, 2008,  as such conditions existed at the time of the relevant street construction  plan's approval. VDOT shall not accept a street for maintenance if there is an  illicit discharge to the system, as defined by 4VAC50-60-10 until the illicit  discharge is eliminated.
    3. Drainage easements.
    a. An acceptable easement shall be provided from all drainage  outfalls to a natural watercourse, as opposed to a swale.
    b. The department normally accepts and maintains only that  portion of a drainage system that falls within the limits of the dedicated  right-of-way for a street. The department's responsibility to enter drainage  easements outside of the dedicated right-of-way shall be limited to undertaking  corrective measures to alleviate problems that may adversely affect the safe  operation or integrity of the roadway.
    c. In the event drainage to a natural watercourse is not  accomplished or is interrupted, an acceptable agreement from the governing body  may be considered as an alternative to providing an easement to a natural  watercourse, provided the agreement acknowledges that the department is neither  responsible nor liable for drainage from the roadway.
    M. Other design considerations.
    1. Guardrail. Guardrail shall be used when required by the  district administrator's designee, consistent with the Road Design Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2011. For placement considerations, see the  Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1)  of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)).
    2. Landscaping and erosion control. All disturbed areas within  the dedicated right-of-way and easements of any street shall be restored with  vegetation compatible with the surrounding area. Where there is visual evidence  of erosion or siltation, acceptance of the street as part of the secondary  system of state highways maintained by the department will be postponed until  appropriate protective measures, in accordance with VDOT's construction  practices, are taken. Except as otherwise approved by the district  administrator's designee, planting of trees or shrubs on the right-of-way shall  be in accordance with the Subdivision Street Design Guide and the Road  Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT) and its Appendix B  (1) (the Subdivision Street Design Guide).
    3. Lighting. Roadway, security, or pedestrian lighting, when  required by the governing body or desired by the developer, shall be installed  in accordance with the Subdivision Street Design Guide and the Road  Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT) and its Appendix B  (1) (the Subdivision Street Design Guide). However, VDOT shall not be  responsible for the maintenance or replacement of lighting fixtures or the  provision of power for lighting.
    4. Railroad crossings.
    a. Short-arm gates with flashing signals, flashing signals  alone, or other protective devices as deemed appropriate by the department  shall be provided at any at-grade crossing of an active railroad by a street.
    b. Crossings of railroad right-of-way are subject to the  requirements of the railroad. Streets to be accepted by the department for  maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways that cross  railroad right-of-way will only be considered if the protective measures  outlined under this section have been fully installed and an agreement between  the railroad, the developer, and the local governing body has been executed.  Prior to execution, such agreements shall be presented to the department for  consideration in consultation with the Department of Rail and Public  Transportation.
    5. Utilities. Local governments, the development community,  and the utility community are encouraged to coordinate and consolidate their  interests as part of the initial development plan.
    a. Underground utilities. The department allows the placement  of underground utilities within the dedicated right-of-way of streets, but  normally restricts placement to areas outside of the travel lanes. However, if  the governing body has established adequate requirements approved by the  department for the design, location, and construction of underground utilities  within the right-of-way of streets, including provisions that ensure that  adequate testing and inspection is performed to minimize future settlement,  those requirements shall become the department's requirements and govern  provided those requirements exceed the department's requirements.
    Manholes shall not be placed in sidewalk, multiuse trail, or  shared use path facilities, within five feet of curb ramps or within driveway  entrances. 
    When location of the utilities outside of the pavement area is  not practical such as in high density developments incorporating the principles  of new urbanism as described in § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of Virginia,  such installations:
    (1) Are acceptable within the shoulders along the street or  within the parking area.
    (2) May be acceptable beneath the travel lanes of the street  or alley when provisions are made to ensure adequate inspection and compaction  tests and:
    (a) Longitudinal installations and manholes are located  outside of the normal travel lanes; or 
    (b) Longitudinal installations and manholes are placed in the  center of a travel lane out of the wheel path.
    However, manholes shall not be placed in sidewalk, multiuse  trail, or shared use path facilities within five feet of curb ramps or within  driveway entrances.
    b. Open-cutting of hard-surfaced roadways. The department  usually prohibits the open-cutting of hard-surfaced roads except in extenuating  circumstances. Therefore, all underground utilities within the right-of-way, as  determined necessary by good engineering practice to serve the complete  development of adjacent properties, shall be installed during the street's  initial construction and prior to the application of its final pavement surface  course. This shall include extensions of all necessary cross-street connections  or service lines to an appropriate location beyond the pavement and preferably  the right-of-way line.
    In the event it is necessary to open the street pavement to  work on utilities after the surface has been placed, additional compaction  tests and paving as necessary to restore the integrity and appearance of the  roadway may be required at the discretion of the district administrator's  designee.
    c. Cross-street conduits. To facilitate the placement of  future underground utilities, cross-street conduits are encouraged, with  placement of such conduits occurring on each street at intersections.
    d. Aboveground utilities. All aboveground utilities shall be  installed behind the sidewalk or as close as possible to the limits of the  street's right-of-way but shall not encroach on the sidewalk, the shared use  path, or any clear zone.
    To assure the unencumbered dedication of the right-of-way for  street additions, easements or other interests within the platted right-of-way  shall be quitclaimed of any prior rights therein. In exchange, a permit may be  issued by the department for a utility to occupy the area involved. This permit  will be processed by the district administrator's designee upon acceptance of  the street into the secondary system of state highways maintained by the  department. No inspection fee is required for permits so issued.  However, the approval of the permit shall be contingent upon the utility's  compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-151).
    24VAC30-92-130. Right-of-way width, spite strips, and  encroachments.
    A. Right-of-way width. A clear and unencumbered right-of-way  shall be dedicated to public use for any street proposed for addition to the  secondary system of state highways maintained by the department. However, in  certain rare extenuating circumstances involving a party beyond the influence  of the developer, an easement for transportation purposes may be approved by  the district administrator's designee in lieu of dedicated right-of-way. In all  other cases, any easement that might interfere with the public's unencumbered  use of the street shall be quitclaimed in exchange for a land use permit as  outlined in 24VAC30-92-120 M 5.
    The width of right-of-way shall be as indicated in the Subdivision  Street Design Guide (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT))  and the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT) and  shall be sufficient to include all essential elements of the roadway intended  to be maintained by the department, including pedestrian, multiuse trail,  bicycle, or shared use path facilities and clear zone. However, supplemental  easements may be used to accommodate sight distance requirements and slopes for  cuts and fills. The right-of-way requirements are defined in the Subdivision  Street Design Guide (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT))  and the Road Design Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT).
    When an existing state maintained road is widened, the  additional right-of-way should be dedicated as follows:
    1. If the existing right-of-way consists of a prescriptive  easement, to the degree that the developer controls the land, the right-of-way  shall be dedicated to public use from the centerline of the alignment.
    2. If the existing right-of-way is dedicated to public use,  the additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to public use.
    3. If the existing right-of-way is titled in the name of the  department or the Commonwealth, the additional right-of-way shall be deeded to  the department or to the Commonwealth, consistent with the title of the  existing right-of-way.
    B. "Spite strips." Plans that include a reserved or  "spite" strip that prohibits otherwise lawful vehicular access to a  street from the adjacent properties, whether within or outside the subdivision  or development, will not be approved.
    C. Encroachments within the right-of-way. Recording of a plat  causes the fee title interest of areas dedicated to public use to transfer to  the local governing body. Therefore, objects installed within the right-of-way  for purposes other than transportation may be considered an unlawful  encroachment in the right-of-way and prevent the right-of-way from being  considered clear and unencumbered.
    Posts, walls, signs, or similar ornamental devices that do  not interfere with roadway capacity, encroach into a clear zone, or interfere  with prescribed sight distance requirements, or are not in conflict with  Chapter 7 (§ 33.1-351 et seq.) of Title 33.1 of the Code of Virginia may be  permitted within the right-of-way. However, specific authorization by the  district administrator's designee or as authorized under the Land Use Permit  Regulations (see 24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-151) is a requisite for  these devices or any other encroachment located within the right-of-way. For  the purposes of this subsection, mailboxes installed on breakaway posts may  occupy the right-of-way without permit. Otherwise, encroachments that do not  fall within the clear zone may be allowed within the right-of-way pursuant to a  land use permit issued by the district administrator's designee.
    24VAC30-92-140. Surety and fees.
    A. Policy. Except as otherwise provided herein, the developer  shall provide surety to guarantee the satisfactory performance of the street,  an inspection fee to cover the department's cost of inspecting the new street,  and an administrative cost recovery fee to recover the department's costs  associated with the review of subdivision or other development plans and the  administrative processing of the acceptance of new streets as determined in  this section. All surety and fees collected under this section shall be based  on the date of the local governing body's request and the aggregate mileage of  new streets in that request, rounded up to the next tenth of a mile. In the  event of extenuating circumstances beyond the developer's control, the  commissioner or his designee may waive all or a portion of any of the surety  and fees.
    B. Surety. The department reserves the right to inspect, or  have inspected, the street proposed for acceptance into the secondary system of  state highways at any stage of construction and prior to street acceptance. The  developer, contractor, and third-party inspector, if applicable, shall  cooperate with the assigned VDOT personnel to provide the access and information  necessary to verify that construction of the street is in accordance with the  street's approved design and appropriate standards and specifications. A  determination by the district administrator's designee that the required  cooperation has not been extended shall be grounds for VDOT to refuse to accept  the street for maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways. A  determination of noncooperation may be appealed as specified by this chapter  (see 24VAC30-92-110).
    1. Type of surety and expiration. The developer shall provide  surety to guarantee the satisfactory performance of the street. In the event  the developer fails to provide surety or any of the fees described in this  section within the 30-day period following the local governing body's request  for the department to accept the maintenance of a street, the department's or  other entity's previous final inspection of the street shall be considered void  and a new inspection shall be required. An acceptable surety may be in the form  of a performance bond, cash deposit, certified check, irrevocable letter of  credit, third-party escrow account, or other form mutually satisfactory to the  department and the developer. Under no circumstances shall the department or  any agency of the Commonwealth be named the escrow agent nor shall funds  deposited with the department as surety be subject to the payment of interest.
    a. Amount of surety. The surety shall be $3,000 for each tenth  of a lane mile, or portion thereof, to be accepted by the department for  maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways. The Commonwealth  Transportation Board may adjust the surety on an annual basis based on  increases or decreases in the producer price index for highway and street  construction materials up to an amount not to exceed $5,000 for each tenth of a  lane mile or portion thereof. 
    The surety shall be waived for streets petitioned for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways through the Rural  Addition Program pursuant to §§ 33.1-72.1 and 33.1-72.2 of the Code of  Virginia, and streets constructed or approved pursuant to §§ 33.1-221 and 33.1-223 of the Code of Virginia.
    b. Length of surety. The surety shall guarantee performance of  the street for one year from the date of its acceptance into the secondary  system of state highways.
    2. Alternatives to surety.
    a. In jurisdictions where the staff of the governing body  administers a comprehensive street construction inspection program that has  been approved by the department, the surety shall be waived upon certification  by the governing body that the proposed addition has been constructed in  accordance with approved plans and specifications.
    b. If requested by the developer and subject to availability  of departmental personnel or consultants, VDOT may perform the construction  inspection equivalent to that required for third-party inspection of any street  or streets proposed to be added to the secondary system of state highways. In  such cases, the developer shall bear all costs incurred by the department, the  surety shall be waived, and no street inspection fee pursuant to subsection D  of this section shall be charged.
    c. A third-party inspection process shall be acceptable to the  department if:
    (1) The developer or construction contractor arranges for a  firm not otherwise related to the developer or contractor to provide inspection  services for the construction of the streets in the development; 
    (2) Inspection and testing methodology and frequency are  accomplished in accordance with VDOT Materials Division's Manual of  Instructions, 2011 and the Virginia Department of Transportation Road  and Bridge Specifications (24VAC30-92-150), 2007, revised 2011;  and
    (3) A report is submitted to the department summarizing the  inspections steps taken, certifying the results of the inspection and testing  as accurate, and confirming that the street or streets were built to the  approved specifications and pavement design, signed and stamped by a  professional engineer licensed to practice as such in the Commonwealth. 
    C. Administrative cost recovery fee.
    1. Application of the administrative cost recovery fee. To  recover a portion of the department's direct costs associated with the review  of plans or plans of development, and the administrative processing of the  acceptance of new streets, an administrative cost recovery fee shall be  required from the developer at the time the streets are accepted by the  department. The amount of this cost recovery fee shall be computed at a base  rate of $500 per addition, without regard to street length, plus $250 per tenth  of a centerline mile, or portion thereof.
    2. Alternatives to the administrative cost recovery fee. As an  alternative to the administrative cost recovery fee, the department may use one  of the following approaches to recover its direct costs:
    a. For any development, at the developer's request, the  department may establish an account for the purpose of tracking these costs and  billing the developer not more often than every 30 days;
    b. For large, complex, multiuse developments, the department,  at its option, may establish an account for the purpose of tracking these costs  and billing the developer not more often than every 30 days. However, the cost  recovery fee assessed under this provision shall not be greater than two times  the prevailing administrative cost recovery fee structure; or
    c. If requested to provide plan review for streets that are  not intended for maintenance by the department, the department may establish an  account for the purpose of tracking these costs and billing the developer not  more often than every 30 days.
    D. Street inspection fee. To recover a portion of the  department's direct costs associated with the inspection of subdivision  streets, an inspection fee shall be required from the developer at the time the  streets are accepted by the department.
    The inspection fee shall be computed at a base rate of $250  per addition, without regard to street length, plus $125 per tenth of a  centerline mile, or portion thereof.
    The street inspection fee shall be reduced by 75% if either a  third-party inspection process pursuant to subdivision B 2 c of this section or  a local street inspection certification process pursuant to subdivision B 2 a  of this section was used.
    If requested to provide inspection services for subdivision  streets that are not intended for maintenance by the department, the department  may establish an account for the purpose of tracking these costs and billing  the developer not more often than every 30 days.
    24VAC30-92-150. Documents incorporated by reference. (Repealed.)
    Information pertaining to the availability and cost of any  of these publications should be directed to the address indicated below the  specific document. Requests for documents available from the department may be  obtained from the department at 1401 E. Broad St., Richmond, Virginia 23219;  however, department documents may be available over the Internet at  www.virginiadot.org.
    The department shall post all nonregulatory documents  incorporated into this regulation by reference and under its control on its  website. Official regulatory text is maintained by the Virginia Registrar of  Regulations in the Virginia Administrative Code. After the effective date of  any changes to such incorporated documents under the control of the department,  the department shall post the changes for a period of at least 60 days on its  website. Any changes to regulations appearing in this list shall be made in  accordance with the Administrative Process Act (§ 2.2-4000 et seq. of the Code  of Virginia), the Virginia Register Act (§ 2.2-4100 et seq. of the Code of  Virginia), or both.
    A. Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials,  24VAC30-72.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    B. Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials,  Collectors, and Local Streets, 24VAC30-73.
    VDOT
  1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    C. Drainage Manual, 2002.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    D. Guidance Document for the Commonwealth Transportation  Board's Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements, 2009.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    E. Highway Capacity Manual, 2000.
    Transportation Research Board
    500 Fifth Street, NW
    Washington, DC 20001
    F. Land Use Permit  Regulations, 24VAC30-151.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    G. Materials Division Manual of Instructions, 2006.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    H. Pavement Design Guide for Subdivision and Secondary  Roads in Virginia, 2000.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    I. Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian  Accommodations, 2004. (Note: This policy reference is included in the  regulation only for informational purposes and is not considered a regulatory  provision. Applicable elements of this policy are stated in the regulation  itself.)
    Commonwealth Transportation Board 
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    J. Road and Bridge Specifications, 2007, revised 2008.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    K. Road and Bridge Standards, 2008.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    L. Road Design Manual, 2008.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    M. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulation, 24VAC30-155.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    N. VDOT Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater  Management Program Standards and Specifications, 2004. 
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    O. Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Regulations,  4VAC50-30. 
    Virginia Department of Conservation  and Recreation
    Division of Soil and Water  Conservation 
    203 Governor Street, Suite 302
    Richmond, VA 23219-2094 
    P. Virginia Stormwater  Management Program (VSMP) Permit Regulations (4VAC50-60). 
    Virginia Department of Conservation  and Recreation
    Division of Soil and Water  Conservation
    203 Governor Street, Suite 302
    Richmond, VA 23219-2094 
    DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-92)
    Information pertaining to the availability and cost of any  of these publications should be directed to the address indicated for the  specific document. Requests for documents of the Virginia Department of  Transportation (VDOT) may be obtained from the department at 1401 E. Broad St.,  Richmond, Virginia 23219; however, department documents may be available over  the Internet at www.virginiadot.org.
    VDOT Drainage Manual, 2002. 
    VDOT Guidance Document for the Commonwealth Transportation  Board's Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements, 2011.
    Highway  Capacity Manual, 2010, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street, NW,  Washington, DC 20001.
    VDOT  Materials Division Manual of Instructions, 2011.
    VDOT  Pavement Design Guide for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia, 2009.
    VDOT  Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations, 2004.
    VDOT Road and Bridge Specifications, 2007, revised 2011.
    VDOT  Road and Bridge Standards, 2008, revised 2011.
    VDOT  Road Design Manual, 2011.
    VDOT  Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater Management Program Standards and  Specifications, 2010.
    VDOT  MS4 Program Plan, 2008, Location and Design Division.
    VDOT  MS4 Stormwater Outfall Inventory Manual, 2011, Maintenance Division.
    Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook, First Edition,  1999, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Soil and  Water Conservation, Stormwater Management, 203 Governor Street, Suite 206,  Richmond, VA 23219-2094.
    24VAC30-155-10. Definitions.
    The following words and terms when used in this chapter shall  have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
    "Connectivity index" means the number of street  segments divided by the number of intersections. Only street segments and  intersections within a network addition as well as any street segment or  intersection outside of the network addition that is connected to street  segments within the network addition or that has been connected or will be  connected pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 7 to the network addition through the  extension of an existing stub out shall be used to calculate a network  addition's connectivity index.
    "Floor area ratio" means the ratio of the total floor  area of a building or buildings on a parcel to the size of the parcel where the  building or buildings are located.
    "Intersection" means, only for the purposes of  calculating connectivity index, a juncture of three or more street segments or  the terminus of a street segment such as a cul-de-sac or other dead end. The  terminus of a stub out shall not constitute an intersection for the purposes of  this chapter. The juncture of a street with only a stub out, and the juncture  of a street with only a connection to the end of an existing stub out, shall  not constitute an intersection for the purposes of this chapter, unless such  stub out is the only facility providing service to one or more lots within the  development.
    "Local traffic impact statement" means a traffic  impact statement accepted or prepared by a locality pursuant to its land  development approval process and whose requirements regarding content are set  out in the locality's ordinances or published policies if such ordinances or  policies have been reviewed and certified by VDOT as requiring acceptable  standards of preparation and providing sufficient information to determine the  current and future impacts of development proposals.
    "Locality" means any local government, pursuant to  § 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia, that must prepare and recommend a  comprehensive plan for the physical development of the territory within its  jurisdiction.
    "Network addition" means a group of interconnected  street segments and intersections shown in a plan of development that is  connected to the state highway system and meets the requirements of the  Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (24VAC30-92).
    "Pedestrian facility coverage" means the ratio of:  (length of pedestrian facilities, such as sidewalks, foot paths, and multiuse  trails, along both sides of a roadway) divided by (length of roadway multiplied  by two).
    "Receipt" means the date on which a proposal or  request for a meeting is first in the possession of VDOT or a locality or an  agent thereof, as applicable.
    "Redevelopment site" means any existing use that  generates traffic and is intended to be developed as a different or more  dense denser land use.
    "Service level" means a measure of the quality,  level or comfort of a service calculated using methodologies approved by VDOT.
    "Small area plan" means a plan of development for  multiple contiguous properties that guides land use, zoning, transportation,  urban design, open space, and capital improvements at a high level of detail  within an urban development area or for a transit-oriented development that is  at least 1/2 square mile in size unless otherwise approved by VDOT due to  proximity to existing moderate to high density developments. A small area plan  shall include the following: (i) densities of at least four residential units  per acre and at least a floor area ratio of 0.4 or some proportional  combination thereof; (ii) mixed-use neighborhoods, including mixed housing  types and integration of residential, office, and retail development; (iii)  reduction of front and side yard building setbacks; and (iv)  pedestrian-friendly road design and connectivity of road and pedestrian  networks.
    "State-controlled highway" means a highway in  Virginia that is part of the interstate, primary, or secondary systems of state  highways and that is maintained by the state under the direction and  supervision of the Commissioner of Highways. Highways for which localities  receive maintenance payments pursuant to §§ 33.1-23.5:1 and 33.1-41.1 of  the Code of Virginia and highways maintained by VDOT in accordance with §§ 33.1-31, 33.1-32, 33.1-33, and 33.1-68 of the Code of Virginia are not considered  state-controlled highways for the purposes of determining whether a specific  land development proposal package must be submitted to meet the requirements of  this regulation.
    "Street segment" means (i) a section of roadway  or alley that is between two intersections or (ii) a stub out or connection to  the end of an existing stub out.
    "Stub out" means a transportation facility (i)  whose right-of-way terminates at a parcel abutting the development, (ii) that  consists of a short segment that is intended to serve current and future  development by providing continuity and connectivity of the public street  network, (iii) that based on the spacing between the stub out and other streets  or stub outs, and the current terrain there is a reasonable expectation that  connection with a future street is possible, and (iv) that is constructed to  the property line.
    "Traffic impact statement" means the document showing  how a proposed development will relate to existing and future transportation  facilities prepared in accordance with best professional practice and  standards that assesses the impact of a proposed development on the  transportation system and recommends improvements to lessen or negate those  impacts.
    "Transit-oriented development" means an area of  commercial and residential development at moderate to high densities within 1/2  mile of a station for heavy rail, light rail, commuter rail, or bus rapid  transit transportation and includes the following: (i) densities of at least  four residential units per acre and at least a floor area ratio of 0.4 or some  proportional combination thereof; (ii) mixed-use neighborhoods, including mixed  housing types and integration of residential, office, and retail development;  (iii) reduction of front and side yard building setbacks; and (iv)  pedestrian-friendly road design and connectivity of road and pedestrian  networks.
    "Transportation demand management" means a  combination of measures that reduce vehicle trip generation and improve  transportation system efficiency by altering demand, including but not limited  to the following: expanded transit service, employer-provided transit benefits,  bicycle and pedestrian investments, ridesharing, staggered work hours,  telecommuting, and parking management including parking pricing.
    "Urban development area" means an area designated  on a local comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of  Virginia that includes the following: (i) densities of at least four  residential units per acre and at least a floor area ratio of 0.4 or some  proportional combination thereof; (ii) mixed-use neighborhoods, including mixed  housing types and integration of residential, office, and retail development;  (iii) reduction of front and side yard building setbacks; and (iv)  pedestrian-friendly road design and connectivity of road and pedestrian  networks.
    "VDOT" means the Virginia Department of  Transportation, the Commissioner of Highways, or a designee.
    "VDOT traffic impact statement" means a traffic  impact statement prepared pursuant to 24VAC30-155-60.
    24VAC30-155-20. Authority.
    Section 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia requires  localities to submit comprehensive plans and amendments to comprehensive plans  that will substantially affect transportation on state-controlled highways to  VDOT in order for the agency to review and provide comments on the impact of  the item submitted. This section also requires localities to submit traffic  impact statements along with proposed rezonings, site plans, subdivision  plats, and subdivision development plans that will substantially affect  transportation on state-controlled highways to VDOT for comment by the agency.  Chapter 527 of the 2006 Acts of Assembly directs VDOT to promulgate regulations  for the implementation of these requirements. 
    24VAC30-155-30. Comprehensive plan and comprehensive plan  amendment.
    A. Plan and amendment submittal. Prior to adoption of any  comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia, any  part of a comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2228 of the Code of  Virginia, or any amendment to any comprehensive plan as described in  § 15.2-2229 of the Code of Virginia, including small area plans, if  required by this section of this chapter, the locality shall submit such plan  or amendment to VDOT for review and comment, such submission should take place  at least 100 days prior to anticipated final action by the locality. The  Virginia Department of Transportation shall, upon request, provide localities  with technical assistance in preparing the transportation plan of the  comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan or comprehensive plan amendment  package shall be submitted to VDOT, if it is reasonably anticipated to result  in substantially affect transportation on state controlled highways.  Substantially affect, for the purposes of comprehensive plans, includes  substantial changes or impacts to the existing transportation network. For the  purposes of this section, a substantial impact shall be defined as a change  that would allow the generation of 5,000 additional vehicle trips per day on  state-controlled highways compared to the existing comprehensive plan,  assuming the highest density of permissible use in accordance with the  Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook (see  24VAC30-155-100), 8th Edition, 2008 or, subject to the approval of  VDOT, the regional model as adopted by the local Metropolitan Planning  Organization, and substantial changes change shall include those  changes that materially alter future transportation infrastructure, travel  patterns, or the ability to improve future transportation facilities on  state-controlled highways.
    B. Required elements. The submission by the locality to VDOT  shall contain sufficient information so that VDOT may evaluate the system of  new and expanded transportation facilities, outlined in the transportation  plan, that are needed to support the current and planned development of the  territory covered by the plan. In order to conduct this evaluation, the package  submitted to VDOT shall contain the following items:
    1. For a comprehensive plan or a transportation plan, the  locality shall provide one paper and one electronic copy of the  following:
    a. A cover sheet, containing:
    (1) Contact information for the locality, and
    (2) Summary of major changes made to the comprehensive plan or  transportation plan;
    b. The proposed comprehensive plan or transportation plan, and  the following elements:
    (1) Inventory – an inventory (written or graphic) of the  existing transportation network, which shall include at a minimum all roadways  within the Federal Aid system.
    (2) Assumptions – planning assumptions shall be detailed,  since these assumptions directly influence the demand placed on the transportation  system. Population growth, employment growth, location of critical  infrastructure such as water and sewer facilities, among others, are examples  of planning assumptions that may be addressed. 
    (3) Needs assessment – written or graphic evaluation of the  transportation system's current and projected performance and conditions. The  needs assessment identifies specific deficiencies.
    (4) Recommendations – proposed improvements or additions to  the transportation infrastructure. Recommendations should be specific so that  the need, location and nature of the proposed improvements are clear and  understandable. Localities are encouraged to include pedestrian, bicycle,  transit, rail and other multimodal recommendations as they deem appropriate.  The transportation plan shall include a map showing road and transportation  improvements, taking into account the current and future needs of residents in  the locality while considering the current and future needs of the planning  district within which the locality is situated. Recommended improvements shall  include cost estimates as available from VDOT.
    2. For an amendment to a comprehensive plan or transportation  plan, the locality shall provide one paper and one electronic copy of  the following:
    a. A cover sheet, containing:
    (1) Contact information for the locality;
    (2) Summary of proposed amendment or amendments to the  comprehensive plan or transportation plan; and
    (3) Overview of reasoning and purpose for amendments.
    b. Application forms and documentation presented to or  prepared by the local jurisdiction,
    c. Associated maps or narratives that depict and detail the  amendment under consideration,
    d. Any changes to the planning assumptions associated with the  amendment, 
    e. Local assessment of the potential impacts the amendment may  have on the transportation system, and
    f. Those elements identified in subdivision 1 b of this  subsection that VDOT determines are needed in order to review and comment on  impacts to state-controlled highways.
    C. Small area plans for urban development areas and transit  oriented developments. A locality that develops a small area plan for all or a  portion of an urban development area or transit-oriented development and  corresponding amendments to their comprehensive plan, as described in § 15.2-2229  of the Code of Virginia, that will have a substantial impact effect  on the state transportation network pursuant to this section of the regulation,  may in lieu of submitting a comprehensive plan amendment package as required  under subsection B of this section submit a small area plan package.
    The small area plan package submitted by the locality to VDOT  shall contain sufficient information and data so that VDOT may determine the  location of the area impacted by the small area plan, its size, its impact on  state-controlled highways, and the methodology and assumptions used in the  analysis of the impact. Submittal of an incomplete small area plan package  shall be considered deficient in meeting the submission requirements of  § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and shall be returned to the  locality and the applicant, if applicable, identifying the deficiencies noted.  A small area plan package submitted to VDOT shall contain the following items:
    1. A cover sheet containing:
    a. Contact information for locality;
    b. Small area plan location, highways and transit facilities  adjacent to site, and parcel number or numbers;
    c. Proposal summary with development names, size, and proposed  zoning;
    2. A VDOT traffic impact statement prepared in  accordance with 24VAC30-155-60; and
    3. A plan of development for the area encompassed by the small  area plan.
    D. Review process. VDOT may pursuant to § 15.2-2222.1 of  the Code of Virginia request a meeting with the locality to discuss the plan or  amendment. The request must be made within 30 days of receipt of the proposal.  VDOT must provide written comments to the locality within 90 days of the  receipt of the plan or plan amendment or by such later deadline as may be  agreed to by the parties. VDOT will conduct its review and provide official  comments to the locality for inclusion in the official public record of the  locality. VDOT shall also make such comments available to the public. Nothing  in this section shall prohibit a locality from acting on a comprehensive plan  or plan amendment if VDOT's comments on the submission have not been received  within the timelines in this section.
    E. Concurrent consideration. For the purposes of this  regulation, when a related comprehensive plan or comprehensive plan amendment  and a rezoning proposal that cover the same geographical area are being  considered concurrently by a locality, only a rezoning package as required  under 24VAC30-155-40 shall be prepared and provided to VDOT for review.
    24VAC30-155-40. Rezoning.
    A. Proposal submittal. The locality shall submit a package to  VDOT within 10 business days of receipt of a complete application for a  rezoning proposal if the proposal substantially affects transportation on  state-controlled highways. All trip generation calculations used for the purposes  of determining if a proposal meets the criteria shall be based upon the rates  or equations published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip  Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100), 8th Edition, 2008, and shall  not be reduced through internal capture rates. For redevelopment sites, trips  currently generated by existing development that will be removed may be  deducted from the total site trips that are generated by the proposed land use.  However, no submission shall be required under this section if the rezoning  proposal consists of no changes in allowable land use. Furthermore, no  submission shall be required if the rezoning proposal results in lower maximum  daily trip generation and no increase in maximum trip generation for AM Peak  Hour of the adjacent street, PM Peak Hour of the adjacent street, and Weekend  Peak Hour when compared to the hourly trip generation of land uses allowed by  right under the current zoning, excepting governmental uses such as schools and  libraries.
    1. For the purposes of this section, a residential  rezoning proposal shall substantially affect transportation on state-controlled  highways if it meets or exceeds one or more of the following trip generation  criteria:
    a. 1. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT has  maintenance responsibility for the secondary highway system, if the proposal  generates more than 100 5,000 vehicle trips per peak hour of  the generator day at the site's connection to a state-controlled  highway. For a site that does not have an entrance onto a state-controlled  highway, the site's connection is assumed to be wherever the road network that  the site connects with attaches to a state-controlled highway. In cases where  the site has multiple entrances to highways, volumes on all entrances shall be  combined for the purposes of this determination; 
    b. 2. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT does  not have maintenance responsibility for the local highway system, if the  proposal generates more than 100 5,000 vehicle trips per peak  hour of the generator day and whose nearest property line is within  3,000 feet, measured along public roads or streets, of a connection to a  state-controlled highway; or
    c. 3. The proposal for residential rezoning  generates more than 200 400 daily vehicle trips on a  state-controlled highway and, once the site generated trips are distributed to  the receiving highway, the proposal's vehicle trips on a the  highway exceeds exceed the daily traffic volume such highway  presently carries. For the purposes of determining whether a proposal must be  submitted to VDOT, the traffic carried on the state-controlled highway shall be  assumed to be the most recently published amount measured in the last traffic  count conducted by VDOT or the locality on that highway. In cases where the  site has access to multiple highways, each receiving highway shall be evaluated  individually for the purposes of this determination.
    2. For the purposes of this section, all other rezoning  proposals shall substantially affect transportation on state-controlled  highways if they meet or exceed one or more of the following trip generation  criteria:
    a. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT has maintenance  responsibility for the secondary highway system, if the proposal generates more  than 250 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator or 2,500 vehicle trips  per day at the site's connection to a state-controlled highway. For a site that  does not have an entrance onto a state-controlled highway, the site's  connection is assumed to be wherever the road network that the site connects  with attaches to a state-controlled highway. In cases where the site has  multiple entrances to highways, volumes on all entrances shall be combined for  the purposes of this determination; or 
    b. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT does not have  maintenance responsibility for the local highway system, if the proposal  generates more than 250 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator or 2,500  vehicle trips per day and whose nearest property line is within 3,000 feet,  measured along public roads or streets, of a connection to a state-controlled  highway.
    B. Required proposal elements. The package submitted by the  locality to VDOT shall contain sufficient information and data so that VDOT may  determine the location of the rezoning, its size, its impact effect  on state-controlled highways, and methodology and assumptions used in the  analysis of the impact effect. Submittal of an incomplete package  shall be considered deficient in meeting the submission requirements of § 15.2-2222.1  of the Code of Virginia and shall be returned to the locality and the  applicant, if applicable, identifying the deficiencies noted. A package  submitted to VDOT shall contain consist of one paper copy and one  electronic copy and include the following items:
    1. A cover sheet containing:
    a. Contact information for locality and developer (or owner)  if applicable;
    b. Rezoning location, highways adjacent to site, and parcel  number or numbers;
    c. Proposal summary with development name, size, and proposed  zoning; and
    d. A statement regarding the proposal's compliance with the  comprehensive plan.
    2. A local traffic impact statement prepared in  accordance with 24VAC30-155-60 or, if the local requirements for traffic  statements contained in ordinances or policies have not been certified by VDOT,  a VDOT traffic impact statement. 
    3. A concept plan of the proposed development.
    C. Rezoning proposals associated with small area plans.
    1. A traffic impact statement prepared for a small area plan  pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C, or initiated for a small area plan at the request  of a locality prior to February 4, 2010, and that contains substantially the  same elements as those of a VDOT traffic impact statement, shall serve as  the traffic impact statement required pursuant to this section for any rezoning  proposals developed in furtherance of the adopted small area plan and related  comprehensive plan amendments provided the following:
    a. That the small area plan package is accompanied by a cover  letter that includes a statement that the assumptions made in the traffic impact  statement prepared for the small area plan remain generally valid.
    b. That the following are accurate:
    (1) The rezoning proposal is in substantial conformance with  the adopted small area plan. A deviation in density must be greater than 10% to  be considered no longer in substantial conformance with the adopted small area  plan.
    (2) The character and volume of the trip generation by the  proposed uses are similar to those proposed by the small area plan.
    (3) All other assumptions made in the traffic impact statement  prepared for the small area plan remain generally valid.
    2. In instances where the assumptions made in the traffic  impact statement prepared for the small area plan are no longer valid, the  traffic impact statement may be updated. If the traffic impact statement is  updated, it shall serve as the traffic impact statement required pursuant to  this section for any rezoning proposals developed in furtherance of the adopted  small area plan and related comprehensive plan amendments.
    D. Review process. After formal submission of a rezoning  proposal for review, VDOT may, pursuant to § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of  Virginia, request a meeting with the locality and rezoning applicant to discuss  potential modifications to the proposal to address any concerns or deficiencies.  The request must be made within 45 days of receipt by VDOT of the proposal.  VDOT must provide written comments to the locality and the rezoning  applicant within 45 days of VDOT's receipt of the proposal if no meeting is  scheduled or has been requested or within 120 days of the receipt of the  proposal otherwise. VDOT shall not reject or require resubmission if the  package has been prepared in accordance with best professional practice and  substantially documents the expected impacts of the proposal. If VDOT  determines that the package has not been prepared in accordance with best  professional practice or fails to substantially document the expected impacts  of the proposal, or if the submission is substantially incomplete, VDOT may  request of the applicant, in writing or at the above mentioned meeting,  modifications to address concerns. If the concerns are not adequately addressed  within 30 days of the transmission of such concerns, VDOT may require  resubmission. VDOT shall conduct its review and provide official comments  to the locality for inclusion in the official public record. VDOT shall also  make such comments available to the public. The department's comments on the  proposed rezoning shall be based upon the comprehensive plan, regulations and  guidelines of the department, engineering and design considerations, adopted  regional or statewide plans, and short and long term traffic impacts on and off  site. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a locality from acting on a  rezoning proposal if VDOT's comments on the submission have not been received  within the timelines in this section.
    24VAC30-155-50. Subdivision plat, site plan, plan of  development. (Repealed.)
    A. Proposal submittal. The locality shall submit a package  to VDOT within 10 business days of receipt of a complete development proposal  if the proposal substantially affects transportation on state-controlled  highways. All trip generation calculations used for the purposes of determining  if a proposal meets these requirements shall be based upon the rates or  equations published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip  Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100), and shall not be reduced through internal  capture rates. For redevelopment sites, trips currently generated by existing  development that will be removed may be deducted from the total site trips that  are generated by the proposed land use.
    1. For the purposes of this section, a residential  development proposal shall substantially affect transportation on  state-controlled highways if it meets or exceeds one or more of the following  trip generation criteria:
    a. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT has maintenance  responsibility for the secondary highway system, if the proposal generates more  than 100 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator at the site's connection  to a state-controlled highway. For a site that does not have an entrance onto a  state-controlled highway, the site's connection is assumed to be wherever the  road network that the site connects with attaches to a state-controlled  highway. In cases where the site has multiple entrances to highways, volumes on  all entrances shall be combined for the purposes of this determination; 
    b. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT does not have  maintenance responsibility for the local highway system, if the proposal  generates more than 100 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator and has an  entrance that is within 3,000 feet, measured along public roads or streets, of  a connection to a state-controlled highway; or
    c. The proposal generates more than 200 daily vehicle trips  on a state-controlled highway and, once the site-generated trips are  distributed to the receiving highway, the proposal's vehicle trips on such  highway exceeds the daily traffic volume the highway presently carries. For the  purposes of determining whether a proposal must be submitted to VDOT, the  traffic carried on the state-controlled highway shall be assumed to be the most  recently published amount measured in the last traffic count conducted by VDOT  or the locality on that highway. In cases where the site has access to multiple  highways, each receiving highway shall be evaluated individually for the  purposes of this determination.
    2. For the purposes of this section, all other development  proposals shall substantially affect transportation on state-controlled  highways if they meet or exceed one or more of the following trip generation  criteria:
    a. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT has maintenance  responsibility for the secondary highway system, if the proposal generates more  than 250 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator or 2,500 vehicle trips  per day at the site's connection to a state-controlled highway. For a site that  does not have an entrance onto a state-controlled highway, the site's  connection is assumed to be wherever the road network that the site connects  with attaches to a state-controlled highway. In cases where the site has  multiple entrances to highways, volumes on all entrances shall be combined for  the purposes of this determination; or 
    b. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT does not have  maintenance responsibility for the local highway system, if the proposal  generates more than 250 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator or 2,500  vehicle trips per day and has an entrance that is within 3,000 feet, measured  along public roads or streets, of a connection to a state-controlled highway.
    B. Required proposal elements.
    1. The package submitted by the locality to VDOT shall  contain sufficient information and data so that VDOT may determine the location  of the development, its size, its impact on state-controlled highways, and  methodology and assumptions used in the analysis of the impact. Submittal of an  incomplete package shall be considered deficient in meeting the submission  requirements of § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and shall be returned to  the locality and the applicant, if applicable, identifying the deficiencies  noted. A package submitted to VDOT shall contain the following items.
    a. A cover sheet containing:
    (1) Contact information for locality and developer (or  owner);
    (2) Development location, highways connected to, and parcel  number or numbers; and
    (3) Proposal summary with development name and size in  acres.
    b. A supplemental traffic analysis, as defined in  24VAC30-155-50 C. 
    c. A concept plan of the proposed development.
    C. Supplemental traffic analysis. For the purposes of this  subsection, a supplemental traffic analysis will be defined as follows:
    1. In cases where a traffic impact statement has been  submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-30 C, that statement shall  serve as the supplemental traffic impact analysis for the purposes of this  section for any site plan, subdivision plat, or plan of development proposals  developed in furtherance of the adopted small area plan and related  comprehensive plan amendments provided the following:
    a. That such package is accompanied by a cover letter that  includes a statement that the assumptions made in the traffic impact statement  prepared for the small area plan remain generally valid and a copy of the  traffic impact statement is included in the submission.
    b. That the following are accurate:
    (1) The rezoning site plan is in substantial conformance  with the adopted small area plan. A deviation in density must be greater than  10% to be considered no longer in substantial conformance with the adopted  small area plan.
    (2) The character and volume of the trip generation by the  proposed uses are similar to those proposed by the small area plan.
    (3) All other assumptions made in the traffic impact  statement prepared for the small area plan remain generally valid.
    2. In cases where a rezoning traffic impact statement has  been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-40, if all assumptions  made in the traffic impact statement prepared for the rezoning remain valid and  if the submission of the subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development to  the locality occurs within two years of the locality's approval of the rezoning  proposal, the supplemental traffic analysis shall be a letter that provides  VDOT with the following information:
    a. A statement that the impacts analyzed in the  development's rezoning traffic impact statement have not materially changed nor  have the adverse impacts on state-controlled highways increased.
    b. The date of the VDOT letter providing the locality  comments on the rezoning.
    3. In cases where a rezoning traffic impact statement has  been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-40, if all assumptions  made in the traffic impact statement prepared for the rezoning have not  materially changed, the adverse impacts of the proposal on state-controlled  highways have not increased and if the submission of the subdivision plat, site  plan, or plan of development to the locality occurs more than two years of the  locality's approval of the rezoning, the supplemental traffic analysis shall be  a letter that provides VDOT with the following information:
    a. A statement that the impacts analyzed in the  development's rezoning traffic impact statement have not materially changed nor  have the adverse impacts on state-controlled highways increased;
    b. The date of the VDOT letter providing the locality  comments on the rezoning;
    c. Documentation supporting the statement that the  development's rezoning traffic impact statement is still valid; and
    d. A copy of the original traffic impact statement.
    After review of such letter, VDOT may require submission in  accordance with subdivision 5 of this subsection.
    4. In cases where the small area plan traffic impact  statement has not been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-30 or  the rezoning traffic impact statement has not been submitted to VDOT in  accordance with 24VAC30-155-40, the supplemental traffic analysis shall contain  the information required for rezoning traffic impact statements with 100 to 499  peak hour trips. If the subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development  will generate less than 100 peak hour trips then the lowest required elements  for the rezoning traffic impact statement shall be used.
    5. In cases where the small area plan traffic impact  statement has been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-30 and the  conditions analyzed have materially changed such that the adverse impacts of  the proposal on state-controlled highways have increased, the rezoning traffic  impact statement has been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-40  and the conditions analyzed in such traffic impact statement have materially  changed such that the adverse impacts of the proposal on state-controlled highways  have increased or if required pursuant to subdivision 3 of this subsection, the  supplemental traffic analysis shall contain those elements required for  rezoning traffic impact statements with 100 to 499 peak hour trips, as  determined by VDOT. If the subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development  will generate less than 100 peak hour trips then the lowest required elements  for the rezoning traffic impact statement shall be used.
    6. In cases where rezoning occurred after January 1, 2002,  but prior to the implementation of this regulation, VDOT, at its discretion,  may evaluate traffic impact statements or studies performed as part of the  rezoning action. If, in the opinion of VDOT staff with the concurrence of the  locality, the traffic impact analysis work that was performed encompasses the  major elements of work required by this regulation and the underlying  assumptions of the study remain valid the previously prepared study may be  deemed to meet the requirements of this regulation. VDOT staff may also, upon  request of the submitter, allow a previously prepared study to be updated to  incorporate additional areas of analysis or revisions to assumptions to enhance  the accuracy of the study and may deem such updated study to encompass the  major elements of work required by this regulation.
    D. Review process. After formal submission of a  subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development to VDOT for review, VDOT  may, pursuant to § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia, request a meeting  with the locality to discuss potential modifications to the proposal to address  any concerns or deficiencies. The request must be made within 30 days of  receipt by VDOT of the proposal. The submission of the proposal to VDOT shall  toll all times for local review set out in Chapter 22 (§ 15.2-2200 et  seq.) of Title 15.2 of the Code of Virginia until the locality has received  VDOT's final comments. VDOT must provide written comments to the locality  within 30 days of VDOT's receipt of the proposal if no meeting is scheduled or  within 90 days of the receipt of the proposal otherwise. VDOT will conduct its  review and provide official comments to the locality for inclusion in the  official public record. VDOT shall also make such comments available to the  public. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a locality from acting on a  subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development if VDOT's comments on the  submission have not been received within the timelines in this section.
    24VAC30-155-60. Traffic VDOT traffic impact  statement.
    A. A VDOT traffic impact statement (TIS) (VTIS)  assesses the impact of a proposed development on the transportation system and  recommends improvements to lessen or negate those impacts. It shall (i)  identify any traffic issues associated with access from the site to the  existing transportation network, (ii) outline solutions to potential problems,  (iii) address the sufficiency of the future transportation network, and (iv)  present improvements to be incorporated into the proposed development. 
    If a TIS VTIS is required, data collection  shall be by the locality, developer, or owner, as determined by the locality  and the locality shall prepare or have the developer or owner prepare the TIS  VTIS. If the locality prepares the TIS VTIS it shall  provide a copy of the complete TIS VTIS to the applicant when one  is provided to VDOT. The completed TIS VTIS shall be submitted to  VDOT.
    The data and analysis contained in the TIS VTIS  shall be organized and presented in a manner acceptable to VDOT and consistent  with this regulation. Submittal of an incomplete TIS or one prepared using  unapproved methodology or assumptions shall be considered deficient in meeting  the submission requirements of § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and shall  be returned to the locality and the applicant, if applicable, identifying the  deficiencies noted by VDOT.
    B. Scope of work meeting.
    1. For proposals that generate less than 1,000 vehicle trips  per peak hour of the generator representatives of the locality, the applicant,  or the locality and the applicant may request a scope of work meeting with VDOT  to discuss the required elements of a TIS VTIS for any project  and VDOT shall reply to such request within 30 days of its receipt of such a  request and provide a date that is no more than 60 days from such receipt,  time and location for such a scope of work meeting to both the locality and the  applicant, if applicable.
    2. For proposals that generate 1,000 or more vehicle trips per  peak hour of the generator representatives of the locality and applicant, if  applicable, shall hold a scope of work meeting with VDOT to discuss the  required elements of a TIS VTIS. Once a locality or applicant has  contacted VDOT regarding the scheduling of a scope of work meeting, VDOT shall  reply to both the locality and the applicant, if applicable, within 30 days  of such contact and provide a date that is no more than 60 days from  such contact, time and location for such a meeting.
    At a scope of work meeting pursuant to this section, the  locality, the applicant and VDOT shall review the elements, methodology and  assumptions to be used in the preparation of the TIS VTIS, and  identify any other related local requirements adopted pursuant to law. The  results of the initial scoping meeting may be adjusted in accordance with sound  professional judgment and the requirements of this regulation if agreed upon by  VDOT, the locality, and applicant, if applicable.
    C. Required elements. The required elements and scope of a TIS  VTIS are dependent upon the scale and potential impact of the specific  development proposal being addressed by the TIS VTIS as  determined by VDOT in its sole discretion. 
    1. At a minimum, the TIS VTIS shall include the  elements shown in the table below. The site generated peak hour trips in the  table below shall be based upon the gross vehicle trip generation of the site  less internal capture and shall take into account bicycle, pedestrian, and  transit mode split reductions, if applicable. When the type  of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike  or transit trips either on-site or off-site, the TIS VTIS  shall estimate multimodal trips. All distances in the table below shall be  measured along roads or streets.
         
                 | Item | Site Generated Peak Hour Trips | 
       | Less than 100
 | 100 to 499Less than 500
 | 500 to 999 | 1,000 or more | 
       | Background information |   |   |   |   | 
       | List of all nonexistent    transportation improvements assumed in the analysis | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Map    of site location, description of the parcel, general terrain features, and location    within the jurisdiction and region. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description of geographic    scope/ limits of study area.  | Within 1,000 ft of site
 | Within 2,000 feet of site and    any roadway on which 50 or more of the new peak hour vehicle trips generated    by the proposal are distributed – not to exceed one mile | Within 2,000 feet of site and    any roadway on which 10% or more of the new vehicle trips generated by the    proposal are distributed – not to exceed two miles | To be determined by VDOT in    consultation with the locality | 
       | Plan at an engineering scale    of the existing and proposed site uses. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description and map or diagram    of nearby uses, including parcel zoning. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description and map or diagram    of existing roadways. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description and map or diagram    of programmed improvements to roadways, intersections, and other    transportation facilities within the study area. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Analysis of Existing    Conditions |   |   |   |   | 
       | Collected daily and peak hour    of the generator traffic volumes, tabulated and presented on diagrams with    counts provided in an appendix.  | Only diagrams required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Analyses for intersections and    roadways identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated    and LOS is presented on diagrams for each lane group.  | Only diagrams required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | When the type of development    proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit    trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle    facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments, tabulated and    presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist  | At frontage, only diagrams    required
 | Within 2,000 feet of site | Within 2,000 feet of site | To be determined by VDOT in    consultation with the locality | 
       | Speed Study | If requested by VDOT
 | If requested by VDOT | If requested by VDOT | If requested by VDOT | 
       | Crash history near site | If requested by VDOT
 | If requested by VDOT |  If requested by VDOT | If requested by VDOT | 
       | Sight distance | If requested by VDOT
 | If requested by VDOT |  If requested by VDOT | If requested by VDOT | 
       | Analysis of Future Conditions    without Development |   |   |   |   | 
       | Description of and    justification for the method and assumptions used to forecast future traffic    volumes.  | Optional
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Analyses for intersections and    roadways as identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are    tabulated and LOS is presented on diagrams for each lane group. | Optional
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | When the type of development    proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit    trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle    facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and    presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned. | At frontage, only diagrams    required
 | Within 2,000 feet of site | Within 2,000 feet of site | To be determined by VDOT in    consultation with the locality at the scope of work meeting | 
       | Trip Generation |   |   |   |   | 
       | Site trip generation, with    tabulated data, broken out by analysis year for multi-phase developments, and    including justification for deviations from ITE rates, if appropriate. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description    and justification of internal capture reductions for mixed use developments    and pass-by trip reductions, if appropriate, including table of calculations    used. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Site Traffic Distribution and    Assignment |   |   |   |   | 
       | Description of methodology    used to distribute trips, with supporting data. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description of the direction    of approach for site generated traffic and diagrams showing the traffic    assignment to the road network serving the site for the appropriate time    periods. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Analysis of Future Conditions    With Development |   |   |   |   | 
       | Forecast daily and peak hour    of the generator traffic volumes on the highway network in the study area,    site entrances and internal roadways, tabulated and presented on diagrams. | Current traffic + site    generated traffic
 | Future background + site    generated traffic, at each expected phase and at build - out or six years    after start, whichever is later | Future background + site    generated traffic, at each expected phase, at build - out, and six years    after build - out, which may be extended or reduced by VDOT in consultation    with the locality | At a minimum the future    background + site generated traffic, at each expected phase, at build - out,    and six years after build - out; may be extended by VDOT in consultation with    the locality | 
       | Analyses for intersections and    roadways identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated    and LOS presented on diagrams for each lane group. | Only diagrams required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | When the type of development    proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit    trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle    facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and    presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned. | At frontage, only diagrams    required
 | Within 2,000 feet of site | Within 2,000 feet of site |  To be determined by VDOT    in consultation with the locality | 
       | Recommended Improvements |   |   |   |   | 
       | Description and diagram of the    location, nature, and extent of proposed improvements, with preliminary cost    estimates as available from VDOT. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description of methodology    used to calculate the effects of travel demand management (TDM) measures, if    proposed, with supporting data. | Required if TDM proposed
 | Required if TDM proposed | Required if TDM proposed | Required if TDM proposed | 
       | Analyses for all proposed and    modified intersections in the study area under the forecast and site traffic.    Delay, and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS presented on diagrams    for each lane group. For intersections expected to be signalized, MUTCD    Signal Warrant analysis or ITE Manual for Traffic Signal Design, as    determined by VDOT, presented in tabular form. | Only diagrams required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | When the type of development    proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit    trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle    facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and    presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned. | At frontage, only diagrams    required
 | Within 2,000 feet of site | Within 2,000 feet of site | To be determined by VDOT in    consultation with the locality | 
       | Conclusions |   |   |   |   | 
       | Clear, concise description of    the study findings. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
  
         
          Notwithstanding the geographic scope noted above, the  geographic scope of the study noted above may be reduced or enlarged based upon  layout of the local transportation network, the geographical size of the  development, and the traffic volume on the existing network, as determined by  VDOT in consultation with the locality and the applicant, if applicable.  Typically, analysis will be conducted for any roadway on which the additional  trips generated by the proposal have a materially detrimental impact on traffic  conditions. The analysis presented in the TIS VTIS need not  include all roadway and roadway segments located within the geographic scope of  the study as determined by VDOT.
    2. A TIS VTIS for a development proposal that  only meets the low volume road submission criterion (24VAC30-155-40 A 1 c  and 24VAC30-155-50 A 1 c) (24VAC30-155-40 A 3) shall, at a minimum,  consist of the following elements, unless otherwise directed by VDOT.
    a. All elements contained in the Background Information  portion of the above table, except the geographic scope/limits of study area is  limited to the highway fronting the proposed development and the closest  intersection, in each direction if applicable, of that highway with a highway  that has an average daily traffic volume higher than the fronting highway.
    b. A roadway safety inventory study of the roadway segment or  segments between the site entrance to the nearest intersections with the higher  traffic volume highways, to include such elements as, but not limited to, speed  limit, existing warning signs, pavement and shoulder type, pavement and  shoulder width, intersection sight distances, and safe horizontal curve speeds.
    c. Daily and peak hour traffic volumes presented on diagrams,  with counts provided in an appendix, for the fronting highway at the site, at  the highway's intersections with the higher volume highway, and for the higher  volume highways at their intersection with the fronting highway.
    d. All relevant elements contained in the Trip Generation  portion of the above table.
    e. Projected daily and peak hour of the generator traffic  volumes assuming build-out of the proposal, presented on diagrams for the  receiving highway at the site, at the highway's intersection with the higher  volume highways, and for the higher volume highways at their intersections with  the receiving highway.
    f. Delay and level of service analysis for the intersections  of the receiving highway with the higher volume highways.
    g. A comparison of the existing geometrics of the fronting  highway under proposed build-out traffic conditions with the geometric  standards, based upon functional classification and volume, contained in the  Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2011 (VDOT).
    3. A VTIS for a rezoning proposal may be prepared in  accordance with the "Less than 500 Site Generated Peak Hour Trips" category  in the table in this section, regardless of actual projected trip generation,  provided that:
    a. The rezoning proposal is in conformance with a  locality’s adopted comprehensive plan that was reviewed in accordance with  24VAC30-155-30; and
    b. The review of the comprehensive plan included the  submission to VDOT of a technical evaluation of the traffic impacts for  anticipated development based on the future land use policies and map.
    D. Methodology and standard assumptions. A TIS VTIS  shall be prepared based upon methodology and assumptions noted below or as may  be agreed upon by VDOT based upon the results of a scope of work meeting held  by VDOT pursuant to this section.
    1. Data collection. Preparers shall collect traffic data in  accordance with the identified study area. The count data shall include at a  minimum, weekday 24-hour counts, and directional turning movement counts  during AM and PM peak times of the day. The 24-hour counts shall include  vehicle classification counts. With approval of VDOT, data collected by the  transportation professional preparer within the last 24 months may be used,  likewise for data from the VDOT count program. 
    The preparer shall monitor traffic operations during data  collection to ensure extraneous events such as vehicle crashes or special event  traffic do not affect integrity of count data. Preparers collecting data for  utilization in traffic impact studies shall normally avoid data collection  during the following instances:
    a. Holidays or times of the year when the traffic patterns are  deemed to be unrepresentative of typical conditions, unless required by VDOT or  the locality, or both.
    b. Summer months if school or schools in proximity.
    c. Fridays and weekends unless required by VDOT or the  locality, or both.
    d. Other times of the year contingent upon existing adjacent  land use activities.
    e. During times of inclement weather.
    2. Trip generation. Estimates of trip generation by a proposed  development shall be prepared using the Institute of Transportation Engineers  Trip Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100), 8th Edition, 2008, unless  VDOT agrees to allow the use of alternate trip generation rates based upon  alternate published guides or local trip generation studies. VDOT shall at all  times after July 1, 2011, have at least one non-ITE trip generation methodology  or alternative rate approved for the use in preparation of small area plan  traffic impact statements pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C that recognizes the  benefits of reduced vehicle trip generation and vehicle miles traveled from  developments that meet the criteria for a small area plan pursuant to this  regulation. Such alternate methodology or rate can be modified based upon  local factors if agreed to at a scoping meeting. Rezoning proposals shall  assume the highest vehicle trip generating use allowable under the proposed  zoning classification. In determining which trip generation process (equation  or rate) may be used, the preparer shall follow the guidance presented in the  Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Proposed  Recommended Practice (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2004, which is  summarized here, except rates may be utilized if the criteria for the use of  regression equations are not met. Regression equations to calculate trips  as a result of development shall be utilized, provided the following is true:
    a. Independent variable falls within range of data; and
    b. Either the data plot has at least 20 points; or
    c. R2 is greater than 0.75, equation falls  within data cluster in plot and standard deviation greater than 110% of  weighted average rate.
    If the above criteria are not met, then the preparer can use  average trip rates, provided at least one of though if the  following applies do not apply a rate based upon the study of similar  local sites should be considered:
    d. At least three data points exist;
    e. Standard deviation less than 110% of weighted average rate;  and
    f. R2 less than 0.75 or no regression equation  provided; or
    g. f. Weighted average rate falls within data  cluster in plot.
    3. Internal capture and pass-by trips.
    a. Internal capture rates consider site trips  "captured" within a mixed use development, recognizing that trips  from one land use can access another land use within a site development  without having to access the adjacent street system. Mixed use developments  include a combination of residential and nonresidential uses or a combination  of nonresidential uses only. Internal capture allows reduction of site trips  from adjacent intersections and roadways. For traffic impact statements  prepared for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C the internal capture  rate or rates may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved  by VDOT. Unless For ITE-based methodologies, unless otherwise  approved by VDOT, the following internal capture rates should be used if  appropriate:
    (1) Residential with a mix of nonresidential components - use  the smaller of 15% of residential or 15% nonresidential trips generated.
    (2) Residential with office use - use the smaller of 5.0% of  residential or 5.0% of office trips generated.
    (3) Residential with retail use - for AM peak hour, use the  smaller of 5.0% residential or 5.0% retail trips generated; for PM peak hour,  use the smaller of 10% residential or 10% retail trips generated; for 24-hour  traffic, use the smaller of 15% residential or 15% retail trips generated.
    (4) Hotel/motel with office use - use 15% of hotel/motel  trips, unless the overall volume of the office traffic is more than the overall  volume of hotel/motel traffic use in which case use the smaller of 10% of the  hotel/motel traffic or the office traffic.
    (5) Multiuse development with more than five million square  feet of office and retail - internal capture rate should be determined in  consultation with and approval of VDOT. 
    (6) Office with retail use – use the smaller of 5.0% office  or retail trips generated.
    (7) Some combination of the above, if approved by VDOT.
    b. Pass-by trip reductions consider site trips drawn from the  existing traffic stream on an adjacent street, recognizing that trips drawn to  a site would otherwise already traverse the adjacent street regardless of  existence of the site. Pass-by trip reductions allow a percentage reduction in  the forecast of trips otherwise added to the adjacent street from the proposed  development. The reduction applies only to volumes on adjacent streets, not to  ingress or egress volumes at entrances serving the proposed site. Unless  otherwise approved by VDOT, the following pass-by trip reductions may be  used: (1) Shopping center - 25% of trips generated may be considered pass-by.  (2) Convenience stores, service stations, fast food restaurants, and similar  land uses - 40% of trip generated may be considered pass-by.(3) pass-by  rates utilized shall be those reported in Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition  – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004. For traffic impact statements prepared  for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C, the pass-by trip reductions  may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved by VDOT.
    4. Trip distribution. In the absence of more detailed  information, trip distribution shall be in accordance with logical regional  travel patterns as suggested by existing highway directional split and  intersection movements or population and destination site distribution and shall  recognize the effects of increased street connectivity if such streets meet the  requirements of the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (see  24VAC30-155-100) (24VAC30-92). If more detailed information is  available from trip origin/destination studies, marketing studies, or regional  planning models, this may be used to distribute trips upon approval of VDOT.
    5. Planning horizon. In general, the analysis years shall be  related to (i) the opening date of the proposed development, (ii) build-out of  major phases of a multiyear development, (iii) long-range transportation plans,  and (iv) other significant transportation network changes. The preparer should  establish the planning horizon in consultation with and subject to the  acceptance of VDOT.
    6. Background traffic growth. Unless directed by VDOT,  geometric growth (or compound growth), based upon historical growth rates,  shall generally be used for determining future background traffic levels where  extensive traffic-count history is available and capacity constraint is not  appropriate. This growth rate replicates "natural growth" and is  typical for projecting urban growth. Natural growth of traffic can be  adjusted consistent with traffic forecasts associated with previously submitted  local land development projects within the study area.
    7. Future conditions. For the purpose of the TIS VTIS,  future conditions shall include background traffic and additional vehicle trips  anticipated to be generated by approved but not yet constructed or improved  projects.
    8. Level of service calculation. Level of service (LOS)  analysis for highways shall utilize the techniques described in the Highway  Capacity Manual (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2010 (TRB). Neither the  intersection capacity utilization method nor the percentile delay method may be  used in the traffic impact calculations of delay and level of service.  Preparers shall consult with VDOT on which traffic analysis software package is  to be used to conduct the LOS calculations. The results shall be tabulated and  displayed graphically, with levels of service provided for each lane group for  each peak period. All data used in the calculations must be provided along with  the results of the capacity analysis. Any assumptions made that deviate from  the programmed defaults must be documented and an explanation provided as to  why there was a deviation. Electronic files used for the analysis shall be  provided to VDOT as a digital submission (e.g..hcs,.sy6,.inp,.trf files), along  with the printed report. If intersections analyzed are in close proximity to  each other so that queuing may be a factor, VDOT may require the inclusion of  an analysis with a micro simulation model. Unless actual on-ground conditions  dictate otherwise, preparers should use the following defaults when utilizing  the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) or other approved programs when evaluating  roadway components:
    a. Terrain – choose the appropriate terrain type. Most of the  state will be level or rolling, but some areas may qualify for consideration as  mountainous.
    b. Twelve-foot wide lanes.
    c. No parking or bus activity unless field conditions include  such parking or bus activity or unless the locality has provided VDOT with a  written statement of intent for the services to be provided.
    d. Peak hour factor by approach – calculate from collected  traffic counts (requires at least a peak hour count in 15-minute increments). However,  the use of peak hour factors lower than 0.85 shall only be allowed if based  upon the average of more than three peak hour counts. For future conditions  analysis, unless specific site conditions can be expected to create extreme  peak hour factors, default peak hour factors between 0.92 and 1.00 should be  used.
    e. Heavy vehicle factor – calculate from collected traffic  (classification) counts or obtain from VDOT count publications. For future  conditions analysis with development traffic, the existing heavy vehicle factor  should be adjusted based upon the nature of the traffic being generated by the  development.
    f. Area type – noncenter of business district.
    The TIS VTIS shall identify any existing or  proposed bicycle and pedestrian accommodation that would be affected by the  proposal. For the purposes of this subsection, a bicycle accommodation is  defined as on-street bike lanes, paved shoulders of roadways that are not part  of the designated traveled way for vehicles, or exclusive and shared off-street  bicycle paths. 
    For the purposes of this subsection, a pedestrian  accommodation is defined as sidewalks, intersection treatments and exclusive or  shared off-street trails or paths. If significant potential for bicycle or  pedestrian trips exists, the TIS VTIS shall include current and  future service level analyses at build-out for existing or proposed bicycle and  pedestrian accommodations. When the proposal requires or includes improvements  or modifications to the roadway, bicycle or pedestrian accommodations, the TIS  VTIS shall analyze the impacts of such improvements and modifications on  bicycle and pedestrian accommodations and service levels, and provide  recommendations for mitigation of adverse impacts.
    The TIS VTIS shall provide analysis for all bus  service with routes that have, or will have a station or stop within 2,000 feet  of the proposal. The TIS VTIS shall evaluate and discuss  potential for increased demand for bus use due to the proposal, addressing  whether such increases will result in longer dwell time at stops or increase  the need for buses on a route. The quality of service analysis for bus service  shall be determined in accordance with the Transit Capacity and Quality of  Service Manual (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2nd Edition, 2003 (TRB).  The TIS VTIS shall provide both route and segment quality of  service. The TIS VTIS may consider the benefits of dedicated bus  lanes for more frequent and rapid service. The TIS VTIS shall  provide recommendations for mitigation of adverse impacts where adverse impacts  are expected to the quality of service to bus service. If an analysis of  pedestrian quality or level of service is required for calculation of the bus  quality of service, the preparer shall use a methodology approved by VDOT.
    9. Trip reduction, and pedestrian and bicycle accommodations.  When a proposal meets the criteria listed below, the preparer of the TIS  VTIS may reduce the number of vehicle trips generated by the proposal in  the TIS VTIS analysis in accordance with this subsection.  Notwithstanding the percentages below, the total number of reductions used by a  preparer in accordance with this subsection shall never not  exceed 500 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator unless otherwise  approved by VDOT. The trip reductions for traffic impact statements prepared  for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C may be based on the non-ITE  trip generation methodology approved by VDOT and are not subject to limitations  or requirements of this subdivision.
    a. Pedestrian accommodations. For the purposes of this  subsection, a pedestrian accommodation is defined as a sidewalk, pedestrian  path, or multiuse trail. Where a pedestrian service level of A exists, vehicle  trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by 4.0% for those portions  of the development within a 2,000-foot radius of the connections between the  proposed development and the adjoining network. Where a pedestrian service level  of B exists, vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by  3.0%; where a pedestrian service level of C exists, vehicle trips per peak hour  of the generator may be reduced by 1.5% for the portion of the development  noted above. These reductions may only be taken if:
    (1) Pedestrian facility coverage in a 2,000-foot radius of the  connections to the proposed development is on or along at least 80% of the road  network; 
    (2) The connectivity index within the 2,000-foot radius is  equal to or higher than 1.4 pedestrian facilities inside and outside the  development provide reasonably direct access to traffic generators; and
    (3) There are at least two of the 10 major land use  classifications, as defined in ITE Trip Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100),  8th Edition, 2008, within the 2,000-foot radius.
    b. Bicycle accommodations. For the purposes of this  subsection, a bicycle accommodation is defined as a street with a design speed  of 25 MPH or less that carries 400 vehicles per day or less, on-street bike  lanes, a pedestrian accommodation, paved shoulders of roadways that are not  part of the designated traveled way for vehicles and are at least two feet  wide, or exclusive and shared off-street bicycle paths. Where a bicycle service  level of A exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by 3.0%. Where a  bicycle service level of B exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by  2.0%. Where a bicycle service level of C exists, vehicle trips per day may be  reduced by 1.0%. These reductions may only be taken if:
    (1) Bicycle accommodations within a 2,000-foot radius of the  connections to the proposed development exist on or along at least 80% of the  road network; 
    (2) The connectivity index within the 2,000-foot radius is  equal to or higher than 1.4 bicycle accommodations inside and outside  the development provide reasonably direct access to traffic generators; and
    (3) There are at least two of the 10 major land use  classifications as defined in ITE Trip Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100),  8th Edition, 2008, within the 2,000-foot radius. 
    10. Modal split and trip reduction. All vehicle trip  reductions used in the TIS VTIS pursuant to this subsection are  subject to the approval of VDOT.
    a. If a proposal is located within 1/2 mile along roadways,  pedestrian or bicycle accommodations of a transit station, excluding bus stops  and stations, reasonable vehicle trip reductions of vehicle trips generated by  the proposal may be made with approval of VDOT. The preparer shall submit  documentation to justify any such vehicle trip reductions used with the TIS  VTIS. When a proposal is located more than 1/2 mile but less than two  miles from a transit stop, excluding bus stops and stations, with bicycle  parking accommodations transit additional bicycle modal split vehicle  trip reductions may be utilized. The analysis of capacity of the parking  accommodations shall be included in the TIS VTIS when such trip  reductions are used.
    b. If a proposal is located within 1/4 mile along roadways,  pedestrian or bicycle accommodations of a bus stop or station where the segment  and route service levels are C or higher, reasonable vehicle trip reductions of  vehicle trips generated by the proposal may be made with the approval of VDOT.  The preparer shall submit documentation to justify any such vehicle trip  reductions used with the TIS VTIS.
    c. Transit and bus modal split data from similar developments  within the geographic scope of the TIS VTIS or one mile of the  proposal, whichever is greater, shall be collected if the TIS VTIS  vehicle trip reductions are used pursuant to this subsection and similar  developments exist within the geographic scope of the TIS VTIS or  one mile of the proposal, whichever is greater.
    11. Signal warrant analysis. Traffic signal warrant analysis  shall be performed in accordance with the procedures set out in the Manual on  Uniform Traffic Control Devices (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2003, revised  2007, or ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design, 1998, as determined by  VDOT.
    12. Recommended improvements. Recommendations made in the TIS  VTIS for improvements to transportation facilities shall be in  accordance with the geometric standards contained within the Road Design Manual  (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2011 (VDOT).
    24VAC30-155-70. Departmental analysis.
    After concluding its review of a proposed comprehensive plan  or transportation plan or plan amendment, or rezoning, or site or  subdivision plan, VDOT shall provide the locality and applicant, if  applicable, with a written report detailing its analysis and when appropriate  recommending transportation improvements to mitigate any potential adverse  impacts on state-controlled highways. VDOT shall provide recommendations for  facilitating other modes of transportation including but not limited to  transit, bus, bicycle and pedestrian facilities or accommodations where such  facilities or accommodations are planned or exist, or where such facilities  have a significant potential for use. In addition, VDOT shall provide the  locality and the applicant, if applicable, with preliminary recommendations  regarding compliance with other VDOT regulations such as the Secondary Street  Acceptance Requirements (see 24VAC30-155-100) (24VAC30-92), the  Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (see 24VAC30-155-100)  (24VAC30-72), and the Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials,  Collectors, and Local Streets (see 24VAC30-155-100) (24VAC30-73).
    24VAC30-155-80. Fees.
    A. Locality initiated proposals. No fee shall be charged for  review of any comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan amendment, or  rezoning proposal, subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development  initiated by a locality or other public agency.
    B. Proposals containing a traffic impact statement as  described in subdivision C 1 of 24VAC30-155-40. No fee shall be charged for the  review of a rezoning submission that properly includes a traffic impact  statement submitted under subdivision C 1 of 24VAC30-155-40.
    C. Proposals containing supplemental traffic analysis as  described in subdivisions C 1, 2, and 5 of 24VAC30-155-50. No fee shall be  charged for the review of a subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development  submission that properly includes a supplemental traffic analysis submitted  under subdivisions C 1, 2, and 5 of 24VAC30-155-50.
    D. C. All other proposals. Any package  submitted to a locality by an applicant that will be subject to VDOT review  pursuant to this chapter shall include any required payment in a form payable  directly to VDOT.
    1. For initial or second review of all comprehensive plans,  comprehensive plan amendments, and transportation plans submitted to VDOT for  review, not initiated on behalf of the locality, there shall be a fee of $1,000  charged to the applicant. This fee shall be paid upon submission of a plan to  VDOT for review. 
    2. For initial or second review of rezoning proposals,  subdivision plats, site plans, or plans of development accompanied by a  traffic impact statement or supplemental traffic analysis, not initiated  on behalf of the locality, there shall be a single fee for both reviews  determined by the number of adjusted vehicle trips generated per peak hour, as  follows:
           | LowSubmission made due to 24VAC30-155-40 A 3 (low    volume road criteriononly) -
 | $250 | 
       | Less than 100 vehicles per peak hour - 
 | $500
 | 
       | 100 or more vehicles per peak hourAll other    submissions -
 | $1,000 | 
  
    The fee shall be paid upon submission of a package to VDOT for  review. 
    3. For a third or subsequent submission pursuant to  subdivisions 1 or 2 of this subsection, that is requested by VDOT on the basis  of the failure of the applicant to address deficiencies previously identified  by VDOT, the applicant shall be required to pay an additional fee as though the  third or subsequent submission were an initial submission and requiring the  fees identified above. An applicant or locality may appeal to the district  administrator a determination by VDOT that a submitted package failed to  address deficiencies previously identified by VDOT.
    24VAC30-155-100. Listing of documents incorporated by  reference. (Repealed.)
    Requests for information pertaining to the availability  and cost of any of these publications should be directed to the address  indicated below the specific document. Requests for documents available from  VDOT may be obtained from VDOT's division and representative indicated;  however, VDOT documents may be available over the Internet at  www.vdot.virginia.gov.
    1. Trip Generation (effective November 2003) 
           |   | Institute of Transportation    Engineers
 1099 14th Street NW
 Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    2. Trip Generation Handbook – an ITE Proposed Recommended  Practice (effective 2004)
           |   | Institute of Transportation    Engineers
 1099 14th Street NW
 Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    3. Road Design Manual (effective January 1, 2005) 
           |   | VDOT
 1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    4. Highway Capacity Manual (effective 2000)
           |   | Transportation Research Board
 500 Fifth Street NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    5. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (effective  December 22, 2003)
           |   | Federal Highway Administration
 Superintendent of Documents
 U.S. Government Printing Office
 P.O. Box 371954
 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250
 | 
  
    6. ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design (effective 1998)
           |   | Institute of Transportation    Engineers
 1099 14th Street NW
 Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    7. Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition  (effective 2003)
           |   | Transportation Research Board of    the National Academies
 Keck Center of the National    Academies
 Transportation Research Board
 500 Fifth Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    8. Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (24VAC30-92)
           |   | Commonwealth Transportation Board
 1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    9. Access Management: Principal Arterials (24VAC30-72)
           |   | VDOT
 1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    10. Access Management: Minor  Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets (24VAC30-73)
           |   | VDOT
 1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-155)
    Requests for information pertaining to the availability  and cost of any of these publications should be directed to the address  indicated for the specific document. Requests for documents available from VDOT  may be obtained from VDOT's division and representative indicated; however,  VDOT documents may be available over the Internet at www.vdot.virginia.gov.
    Highway  Capacity Manual, 2010, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street NW,  Washington, DC 20001.
    ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design (effective 1998),  Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600,  Washington, DC 20006.
    Manual  on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, effective 2003,  revised 2007, Federal Highway Administration, Superintendent of Documents, U.S.  Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250.
    Road  Design Manual, 2011, VDOT, 1401 E. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
    Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd  Edition, 2003; Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Keck  Center of the National Academies, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth  Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001.
    Trip  Generation, 8th Ed., 2008, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye  Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006.
    Trip  Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004,  Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600,  Washington, DC 20006.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R12-2999; Filed November 29, 2011, 10:45 a.m. 
TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES
COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The  Commonwealth Transportation Board and the Commissioner of Highways are claiming  an exemption from the Administrative Process Act pursuant to the provisions of  Chapters 647, 870, and 888 of the 2011 Acts of Assembly.
         Titles of Regulations: 24VAC30-72. Access Management  Regulations: Principal Arterials (amending 24VAC30-72-10, 24VAC30-72-40,  24VAC30-72-60, 24VAC30-72-70, 24VAC30-72-80, 24VAC30-72-110, 24VAC30-72-130,  24VAC30-72-170).
    24VAC30-73. Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials,  Collectors, and Local Streets (amending 24VAC30-73-10, 24VAC30-73-40,  24VAC30-73-60, 24VAC30-73-70, 24VAC30-73-80, 24VAC30-73-110, 24VAC30-73-130, 24VAC30-73-170).
    24VAC30-92. Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (amending 24VAC30-92-10, 24VAC30-92-20,  24VAC30-92-60, 24VAC30-92-70, 24VAC30-92-80, 24VAC30-92-110, 24VAC30-92-120,  24VAC30-92-130, 24VAC30-92-140; repealing 24VAC30-92-50, 24VAC30-92-150).
    24VAC30-155. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (amending 24VAC30-155-10, 24VAC30-155-20,  24VAC30-155-30, 24VAC30-155-40, 24VAC30-155-60, 24VAC30-155-70, 24VAC30-155-80;  repealing 24VAC30-155-50, 24VAC30-155-100). 
    Statutory Authority: § 33.1-198.1 of the Code of  Virginia.
    Effective Date: December 31, 2011. 
    Agency Contact: Robert Hofrichter, Assistant Division  Administrator, Transportation & Mobility Planning Division, Department of  Transportation, 1401 East Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804)  786-0780, or email robert.hofrichter@vdot.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    During the 2011 session of the General Assembly, Chapters  647, 870, and 888, which relate to or impact the content of land development  regulations promulgated by the Commonwealth Transportation Board, VDOT, or the  Commissioner of Highways were enacted. These regulations include:
    24VAC30-72 – Access Management Regulations: Principal  Arterials
    24VAC30-73 – Access Management Regulations: Minor  Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets 
    24VAC30-92 – Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements 
    24VAC30-155 – Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations
    This action includes those regulatory changes made pursuant  to Chapters 647, 870, and 888, which will have an effective date of December  31, 2011. 
    In response to Chapter 647, which repealed subsection C of  § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia, the Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations  (TIA) are revised to remove the requirements for VDOT to review subdivision  plats, site plans, and plans for development. This legislation did not impact  the agency's review of comprehensive plans, comprehensive plan amendments, and  rezoning. VDOT made changes to the TIA Regulations pursuant to a specific  mandate in the second enactment clause of the legislation.
    Chapter 870 requires VDOT to: 
    1. Review and adopt any appropriate revisions to the TIA  Regulations prior to November 30, 2011; 
    2. Assist the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) to  research and make recommendations related to the adoption of revisions to the  Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (SSAR) prior to November 30, 2011; and
    3. Review and adopt revisions to the Access Management  Regulations: Principal Arterials and Access Management Regulations: Minor  Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets by November 11, 2011, concerning their  application to entrances for family subdivisions. 
    Chapter 888 also affects the TIA Regulations. This  legislation states that VDOT shall complete a "more limited" review  of rezoning requests when the proposed use is consistent with the current  locality comprehensive plan designation and the comprehensive plan was reviewed  previously pertaining to the TIA Regulations. Although VDOT will continue to  review comprehensive plans, related amendments, and proposed rezoning requests,  it revised the TIA Regulations to reflect this less stringent approach to such  reviews. 
    Significant changes made to each of the regulations are  described below. Additional minor changes to update references to forms and  technical documents to ensure consistency among the regulations examined were  also made where necessary. 
    Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials  (24VAC30-72) and Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials, Collectors,  and Local Streets (24VAC 30-73)
    The amendments add a low volume commercial entrance  category to the regulation for entrances associated with land uses that do not  generate high traffic volumes, but volumes above those expected from private  entrances (driveways serving one to two homes). The lower-cost design standards  for private entrances will apply to this new type of entrance, but the entrance  will need to meet a stopping sight distance requirement. (See Definitions,  24VAC30-72-80 and 24VAC30-73-80.) For clarity, text in the catchlines and  elsewhere in the regulations is amended to clarify how particular provisions  are applied to low volume commercial entrances, commercial entrances, and  private entrances.
    As the character of traffic created by family subdivisions  does not differ from any other entrances, setting out a specific entrance just  for family subdivisions is not logical from a safety standpoint. Family  subdivisions generally consist of up to five lots, which can be expected to  generate 50 trips, and 50 trips is already the established breakpoint for  paving eligibility on VDOT secondary highways. Stopping sight distance is the  minimum required by the American Association of State Highway and  Transportation Officials (AASHTO) national standards at entrances, and a new  document, "Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008," is added to  24VAC30-72 and 24VAC30-73 to address the revision to family entrance  provisions. 
    Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (24VAC30-92): 
    The amendments removed the "connectivity index"  requirement from the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements because many  parties outside of VDOT found the connectivity index confusing and complicated;  many also questioned if use of the index actually increased external  connectivity. The "area types" classification scheme is eliminated  because it was directly tied to connectivity index requirements, which are  eliminated, and the requirements associated with pedestrian accommodations are  modified based on input received. 
    For connectivity enhancements, a requirement is incorporated  for additional external connection or connections when certain dwelling unit or  vehicle per day (VPD) thresholds per network addition are met. Additional  external connections are required when the network addition contains over 200  dwelling units or the use generates over 2,000 VPD.  With the elimination  of the connectivity index, another connectivity standard is necessary to ensure  adequate "connectivity for the current and future transportation  network."
    An amendment to the regulation allows the District  Administrator's designee (rather than the District Administrator) to waive or  modify certain aspects or requirements relating to multiple connections and/or  additional external connections when specific and commonly occurring physical  situations exist. Since the original effective date of the Secondary Street  Acceptance Requirements in 2009, VDOT has gathered data on the occurrence of  regulation exceptions. The majority of exceptions granted relate to required  connections. The specific situations listed in the proposed Secondary  Street Acceptance Requirements include the majority of situations today that  result in approval of exceptions to connectivity requirements. By providing the  designee with approval authority, a request seeking approval of an exception  will receive the same thorough review, but the time needed for a review should  be reduced. 
    The VDOT review period for waivers and exceptions is  reduced from 45 calendar days to 30 calendar days for connectivity exceptions  and appeals. 
    Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (24VAC30-155):
    Reviews for site plans, subdivision plats, and plans of  development are removed due to the repeal of subsection C of § 15.2-2222.1  of the Code of Virginia, which required local submittal of these land  development proposals to VDOT for review. The entire section relating to these  reviews, 24VAC30-155-50, is removed as a result.
    Traffic impact analysis study criteria are reduced in scope  for rezoning proposals. The trip generation threshold requiring submittal of a  rezoning to VDOT is increased from 100 peak hour trips for residential and  2,500 daily trips for other land uses to a new 5,000 vehicle trips per day  threshold for all land uses. The submittal threshold is raised to  address/reshift focus to larger developments of a more regional scale. 
    An amendment is added to allow rezoning applicants to  submit a traffic impact analysis study prepared according to locality  requirements, provided the locality's requirements have been certified by VDOT  as meeting acceptable standards of professional practice. A developer will not  have to prepare separate traffic impact studies according to locality  requirements and according to VDOT requirements. Once a locality's traffic  impact statement requirements have been certified by VDOT, the local study can  satisfy both purposes. 
    An amendment stipulates that rezoning proposal is exempt  from the regulations when it (i) involves no changes in the land uses allowed  under the current zoning, or (ii) results in lower trip generation than land  uses allowed by right (except governmental uses) under the current zoning. This  amendment is made to bring the regulation more in line with statutory intent of  requiring traffic impact studies in situations that would substantially affect  state highways. Applying traffic impact regulations to a rezoning proposal that  will generate the same or less traffic than what could occur if the property  was developed by-right (uses allowed under the current zoning) would conflict  with the legislative intent.
    A provision is added requiring VDOT to schedule a meeting  with the locality and the developer to discuss the preparation of a traffic  impact study on a proposed rezoning within 60 days of receipt of a request for  a scoping meeting. The deadline helps assure that the arrangements for a  scoping meeting to discuss a rezoning proposal are handled in a timely manner.
    An amendment directs VDOT to provide the rezoning applicant  the opportunity and time to make modifications to information submitted under  the regulations before returning the package to the locality and requiring its  formal resubmission. The regulations allow, when possible, revisions to  submittals to be accommodated in a manner that does not unnecessarily extend  the local development review process.
    The methodology for preparing a traffic impact analysis  study is revised. The methodology was evaluated based on three years of  experience, utilizing the current methodology, as well as new concepts and best  practices in traffic impact analysis. 
    24VAC30-72-10. Definitions.
    "Access management" means the systematic control of  the location, spacing, design, and operation of entrances, median openings,  traffic signals, and interchanges for the purpose of providing vehicular access  to land development in a manner that preserves the safety and efficiency of the  transportation system. 
    "Commercial entrance" means any entrance serving  land uses other than two or fewer individual private residences. (See  "private entrance.")
    "Commissioner" means the individual who serves as  the chief executive officer of the Department of Transportation or his  designee.
    "Commonwealth" means the Commonwealth of Virginia.
    "Crossover" or "median opening" means an  opening in a nontraversable median (such as a concrete barrier or raised  island) that provides for crossing and turning traffic. 
    "Design speed" means the selected speed used to  determine the geometric design features of the highway. 
    "District" means each of the nine areas in which  VDOT is divided to oversee the maintenance and construction on the  state-maintained highways, bridges and tunnels within the boundaries of the  area. 
    "District administrator" means the VDOT employee  assigned to supervise the district. 
    "District administrator's designee" means the VDOT  employee or employees designated by the district administrator. 
    "Entrance" means any driveway, street, or other  means of providing for movement of vehicles to or from the highway.
    "Entrance, commercial" means any entrance  serving land uses that generate more than 50 vehicular trips per day or the  trip generation equivalent of more than five individual private residences or  lots for individual private residences using the methodology in the Institute  of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
    "Entrance, low volume commercial" means any  entrance, other than a private entrance, serving five or fewer individual  residences or lots for individual residences on a privately owned and  maintained road or land uses that generate 50 or fewer vehicular trips per day  using the methodology in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip  Generation, 8th Edition, 2008. 
    "Entrance, private" means an entrance that  serves up to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of  the occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain  access to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure  facilities that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump  stations, and stormwater management basins.
    "Frontage road" means a road that generally runs  parallel to a highway between the highway right-of-way and the front building  setback line of the abutting properties and provides access to the abutting  properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to the highway  and separating the abutting property traffic from through traffic on the  highway. 
    "Functional area" means the area of the physical  highway feature, such as an intersection, roundabout, railroad grade crossing,  or interchange, plus that portion of the highway that comprises the decision  and maneuver distance and required vehicle storage length to serve that highway  feature. 
    "Functional area of an intersection" means the  physical area of an at-grade intersection plus all required storage lengths for  separate turn lanes and for through traffic including any maneuvering distance  for separate turn lanes.
    "Functional classification" means the federal  system of classifying groups of highways according to the character of service  they are intended to provide and classifications made by the commissioner based  on the operational characteristics of a highway. Each highway is assigned a  functional classification based on the highway's intended purpose of providing  priority to through traffic movement or adjoining property access. The  functional classification system groups highways into three basic categories  identified as (i) arterial, with the function to provide through movement of  traffic; (ii) collector, with the function of supplying a combination of  through movement and access to property; and (iii) local, with the function of  providing access to property. 
    "Highway," "street," or "road"  means a public way for purposes of vehicular travel, including the entire area  within the right-of-way.
    "Intersection" means any at-grade connection with a  highway including two highways or an entrance and a highway.
    "Legal speed limit" means the speed limit set forth  on signs lawfully posted on a highway or in the absence of such signs the speed  limit established by Article 8 (§ 46.2-870 et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title 46.2  of the Code of Virginia.
    "Level of service" means a qualitative measure  describing the operational conditions within a vehicular traffic stream,  generally in terms of such service measures as speed, travel time, freedom to  maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience.  "Level-of-service" is defined and procedures are presented for  determining the level of service in the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-72-170 I).
    "Limited access highway" means a highway especially  designed for through traffic over which abutting properties have no easement or  right of light, air, or access by reason of the fact that their property abuts  upon the limited access highway.
    "Median" means the portion of a divided highway  that separates opposing traffic flows.
    "Operating speed" means the speed at which drivers  are observed operating their vehicles during free-flow conditions with the 85th  percentile of the distribution of observed speeds being the most frequently used  measure of the operating speed of a particular location or geometric feature. 
    "Permit" or "entrance permit" means a  document that sets the conditions under which VDOT allows a connection to a  highway. 
    "Permit applicant" means the person or persons, firm,  corporation, government, or other entity that has applied for a permit. 
    "Permittee" means the person or persons, firm,  corporation, government, or other entity that has been issued a permit.
    "Preliminary subdivision plat" means a plan of  development as set forth in § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Principal arterial" means the functional  classification for a major highway intended to serve through traffic where  access is carefully controlled, generally highways of regional importance, with  moderate to high volumes of traffic traveling relatively long distances and at  higher speeds.
    "Private entrance" means an entrance that serves  up to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of the  occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain access  to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure facilities  that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump stations, and  stormwater management basins.
    "Professional engineer" means a person who is  qualified to practice engineering by reason of his special knowledge and use of  mathematical, physical and engineering sciences and the principles and methods  of engineering analysis and design acquired by engineering education and  experience, and whose competence has been attested by the Virginia Board for  Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior  Designers and Landscape Architects through licensure as a professional  engineer.
    "Reverse frontage road" means a road that is  located to the rear of the properties fronting a highway and provides access to  the abutting properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to  the highway and removing the abutting property traffic from through traffic on  the highway.
    "Right-of-way" means that property within the  systems of state highways that is open or may be opened for public travel or  use or both in the Commonwealth. This definition includes those public  rights-of-way in which the Commonwealth has a prescriptive easement for  maintenance and public travel. 
    "Roadside" means the area adjoining the outer edge  of the roadway. The median of a divided highway may also be considered a  "roadside."
    "Roadway" means the portion of a highway, including  shoulders, for vehicular use. A divided highway has two or more roadways.
    "Shared entrance" means a single entrance serving  two or more adjoining parcels.
    "Sight distance" means the distance visible to the  driver of a vehicle when the view is unobstructed by traffic.
    "Site plan" and "subdivision plat" mean a  plan of development approved in accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241  through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia. 
    "Stopping sight distance" means the distance  required by a driver of a vehicle, traveling at a given speed, to bring the  vehicle to a stop after an object on the highway becomes visible, including the  distance traveled during the driver's perception and reaction times and the  vehicle braking distance.
    "Systems of state highways" means all highways and  roads under the ownership, the control, or the jurisdiction of VDOT, including  but not limited to, the primary, secondary and interstate highway. 
    "Traveled way" means the portion of the roadway for  the movement of vehicles, exclusive of shoulders and turn lanes.
    "Trip" means a single or one-directional vehicle  movement either entering or exiting a property; a vehicle leaving the property  is one trip and a vehicle returning to the property is one trip.
    "Turn lane" means a separate lane for the purpose  of enabling a vehicle that is entering or leaving a highway to increase or  decrease its speed to a rate at which it can more safely merge or diverge with  through traffic; acceleration and deceleration lanes.
    "Urban area" means an urbanized area with a  population of 50,000 or more, or an urban place (small urban area) as  designated by the Bureau of the Census having a population of 5,000 or more and  not within any urbanized area. The Federal Highway Administration defines  "urban area" in more detail based on the federal-aid highway law (23  USC § 101).
    "VDOT" means the Virginia Department of  Transportation, its successor, the Commissioner of Highways, or his designees.
    24VAC30-72-40. Administrative procedures and rules for  obtaining commercial and private entrance permits.
    All applications for entrance permits shall be obtained from  and submitted to the district administrator's designee for the county in which  the work is to be performed. The permit applicant shall submit the permit  application form, and the entrance permit, if approved, will be issued in  accordance with the applicable administrative rules, requirements, and  procedures of this chapter and the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-72-170 G). 
    24VAC30-72-60. General provisions governing commercial and  private entrances.
    A. No entrance of any nature may be constructed within the  right-of-way until the location has been approved by VDOT and an entrance  permit has been issued. The violation of any provision of this chapter and any  condition of approval of an entrance permit shall be subject to the penalties  for violations specified in the Land Use Permit Regulations (see 24VAC30-72-170  G).
    B. VDOT will permit reasonably convenient access to a parcel  of record. VDOT is not obligated to permit the most convenient access, nor is  VDOT obligated to approve the permit applicant's preferred entrance location or  entrance design. If a parcel is served by more than one road in the systems of  state highways, the district administrator's designee shall determine upon  which road or roads the proposed entrance or entrances is or are to be  constructed. 
    C. When two or more properties are to be served by the same  entrance, the permit applicant shall ensure that there is a recorded agreement  between the parties specifying the use and future maintenance of the entrance.  A copy of this recorded agreement shall be included in the entrance permit  application submitted to the district administrator's designee. The shared  entrance shall be identified on any site plan or subdivision plat of the  property.
    D. The district administrator's designee may require the  permit applicant to alter any proposed entrance location or design, whether  private or commercial, to obtain the best possible operational characteristics,  including, but not limited to, sight distance and entrance spacing.
    E. Entrance standards established by localities that are  stricter than those of VDOT shall govern.
    24VAC30-72-70. Commercial entrance design.
    A. All commercial Low volume commercial entrance  design and construction shall comply with the private entrance design standards  in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and the stopping sight  distance provision in 24VAC30-72-80. Commercial entrance design and  construction shall comply with the provisions of this chapter and the standards  in the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), the Road and Bridge Standards  (see 24VAC30-72-170 C), the Road and Bridge Specifications (see 24VAC30-72-170  B), other VDOT engineering and construction standards as may be appropriate, and  any additional conditions, restrictions, or modifications deemed necessary by  the district administrator's designee to preserve the safety, use and  maintenance of the systems of state highways. Entrance design and construction  shall comply with applicable guidelines and requirements of the Americans with  Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12101 et seq.). Ramps for curb sections  shall be provided as required in § 15.2-2021 of the Code of Virginia. The  standard drawing for depressed curb ramp as shown in the Road and Bridge  Standards (see 24VAC30-72-170 C), shall be utilized in the design.
    1. In the event an entrance is proposed within the limits of a  funded roadway project that will ultimately change a highway, the permit  applicant may be required to construct, to the extent possible, entrances  compatible with the roadway's ultimate design.
    2. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  pedestrian and bicycle users of the abutting highway in accordance with the  Commonwealth Transportation Board's "Policy for Integrating Bicycle and  Pedestrian Accommodations" (see 24VAC30-72-170 H).
    3. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  transit users of the abutting highway where applicable and provide  accommodations to the extent possible.
    4. Based on the existing and planned developments, the  district administrator's designee will determine the need for curb and gutter,  sidewalks, or other features within the general area of the proposed entrance  in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and the design standards in  Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A). 
    5. Sites accessed by an entrance shall be designed so as to  prevent unsafe and inefficient traffic movements from impacting travel on the  abutting highway. At the request of the district administrator's designee, the  permit applicant shall furnish a report that documents the impact of expected  traffic movements upon the function of the abutting highway during the peak  hours of the abutting highway.
    B. It is essential that entrance and site design allow safe  and efficient movements of traffic using the entrance while minimizing the  impact of such movements on the operation of the systems of state highways. 
    1. The permit applicant shall supply sufficient information to  demonstrate to the satisfaction of the district administrator's designee that  neither the entrance, nor the proposed traffic circulation patterns within the  parcel, will compromise the safety, use, operation, or maintenance of the  abutting highway. A rezoning traffic impact statement or a site  plan/subdivision plat supplemental traffic analysis submitted for a proposed  development of a parcel in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis  Regulations (24VAC30-155) may be used for this purpose, provided that it  adequately documents the effect of the proposed entrance and its related  traffic on the operation of the highway to be accessed. 
    2. If the proposed entrance will cause the systems of state  highways to experience degradation in safety or a significant increase in delay  or a significant reduction in capacity beyond an acceptable level of service,  the applicant shall be required to submit a plan to mitigate these impacts and  to bear the costs of such mitigation measures.
    3. Proposed mitigation measures must be approved by the  district administrator's designee prior to permit approval. Mitigation measures  that may be considered include but are not limited to:
    a. Construction of auxiliary lanes or turning lanes, or  pavement transitions/tapers;
    b. Construction of new crossovers, or the relocation, removal,  or consolidation of existing crossovers;
    c. Installation, modification, or removal of traffic signals  and related traffic control equipment;
    d. Provisions to limit the traffic generated by the development  served by the proposed entrance;
    e. Dedication of additional right-of-way or easement, or both,  for future road improvements; 
    f. Reconstruction of existing roadway to provide required  vertical and horizontal sight distances; 
    g. Relocation or consolidation of existing entrances; or
    h. Recommendations from adopted corridor studies, design  studies, other access management practices and principles, or any combination  of these, not otherwise mentioned in this chapter. 
    4. If an applicant is unwilling or unable to mitigate the  impacts identified in the traffic impact analysis, the entrance shall be  physically restricted to right-in or right-out movements or both or similar  restrictions such that the public interests in a safe and efficient flow of  traffic on the systems of state highways are protected. 
    24VAC30-72-80. Minimum sight distance for commercial entrances.
    A. No less than minimum intersection sight distance shall be  obtained for any a commercial entrance and no less than  minimum stopping sight distance shall be obtained for a low volume commercial  entrance. Sight distances shall be measured in accordance with VDOT  practices, and sight distance requirements shall conform to VDOT standards as  described in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A). The  legal speed limit shall be used unless the design speed is available and  approved for use by VDOT. 
    B. The operating speed may be used in lieu of the legal speed  limit in cases where the permit applicant furnishes the district administrator's  designee with a speed study prepared in accordance with the Manual on Uniform  Traffic Control Devices (see 24VAC30-72-170 D) methodology that demonstrates  the operating speed of the segment of highway is lower than the legal speed  limit and, in the judgment of the district administrator's designee, use of the  operating speed will not compromise safety for either a driver at an entrance  or a driver on the abutting highway. 
    C. VDOT may require that the vertical or horizontal alignment  of the existing roadway be adjusted to accommodate certain design elements of a  proposed commercial entrance including, but not limited to, median openings,  crossovers, roundabouts, and traffic signals, where adjustment is deemed  necessary. The cost of any work performed to adjust the horizontal or vertical  alignment of the roadway to achieve required intersection sight distance at a  proposed entrance shall be borne by the permit applicant.
    24VAC30-72-110. Tenure of commercial entrances.
    A. The tenure of a commercial entrance to any highway is  conditional. Reconstruction, relocation, commercial entrance consolidation, or  upgrading, or a combination of these, may be required at the owner's cost when  the district administrator's designee determines after review that one of the conditions  listed below exists. If the necessary changes are not made, the entrance may be  closed at the direction of the district administrator's designee. 
    1. Safety - When the entrance has been found to be unsafe for  public use in its present condition because of physical degradation of the  entrance, increase in motor vehicle traffic, or some other safety-related  condition.
    2. Use - When traffic in and out of the entrance has changed  significantly to require modifications or reconstruction, or both. Such changes  may include, but are not limited to, changes in traffic volume or operational  characteristics of the traffic. 
    3. Maintenance - When the entrance becomes unserviceable due  to heavy equipment damage or reclamation by natural causes.
    B. VDOT will maintain the commercial entrance only within the  normal shoulder of the roadway or to the flow line of the gutter pan. The owner  shall maintain all other portions of the entrance, including entrance aprons,  curb and gutter, culvert and drainage structures.
    C. Commercial entrances may also be reviewed by the district  administrator's designee when any of the following occur:
    1. The property is being considered for rezoning or other  local legislative action that involves a change in use of the property.
    2. The property is subject to a site plan or subdivision plat  review.
    3. There is a change in commercial use either by the property  owner or by a tenant. 
    4. Vehicular/pedestrian circulation between adjoining  properties becomes available.
    These periodic reviews are necessary to provide both the  driver and other highway users with a safe and operationally efficient means of  travel on state highways.
    D. The provisions of this section shall apply to low  volume commercial entrances.
    24VAC30-72-130. Drainage.
    A. Commercial and private entrances Entrances  shall be constructed so as not to impair drainage within the right-of-way and  so that surface water shall drain from the roadway.
    B. Where deemed necessary by the district administrator's  designee, a commercial entrance applicant shall provide copies of a complete  drainage layout based on a drainage study by a licensed design professional.  This layout shall clearly show how the permit applicant proposes to handle the  drainage and run-off from applicant's development.
    C. Pipe ends of culverts shall be reviewed independently by  the district administrator's designee and grading or treatment at pipe ends  shall minimize any hazard the pipe ends or structures may present to an errant  vehicle. 
    24VAC30-72-170. Documents incorporated by reference.
    A. Road Design Manual (effective January 1, 2005, revised  July 2008), 2011.
    Note: Appendix F (Access Management Design Standards for  Entrances and Intersections) contains the access management standards  referenced in Chapters 863 and 928 of the 2007 Acts of Assembly and Chapters  274 and 454 of the 2008 Acts of Assembly.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    B. 2007 Road and Bridge Specifications (effective July 2008)
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    C. Road and Bridge Standards (effective February 1, 2001)
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    D. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets  and Highways, 2003 Edition (effective December 22, 2003, revised November 2004)
           |   | Federal Highway AdministrationSuperintendent of Documents
 U.S. Government Printing Office
 P.O. Box 371954
 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954
 | 
  
    E. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,  Fifth Edition, 2004
           |   | American Association of State Highway and Transportation    Officials (AASHTO)444 North Capitol St. N.W., Suite 225
 Washington, D.C. 20001
 | 
  
    F. Change of Limited Access Control, 24VAC30-401
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    G. Land Use Permit Regulations, 24VAC30-151
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    H. Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian  Accommodations, eff. March 18, 2004
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    I. Highway Capacity Manual 2000
           |   | Transportation Research Board500 Fifth Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    J. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations, 24VAC30-155
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    K. Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008
           |   | Institute of Transportation Engineers1099 14th Street N. W., Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    24VAC30-73-10. Definitions.
    "Access management" means the systematic control of  the location, spacing, design, and operation of entrances, median  openings/crossovers, traffic signals, and interchanges for the purpose of  providing vehicular access to land development in a manner that preserves the  safety and efficiency of the transportation system.
    "Collectors" means the functional classification of  highways that provide land access service and traffic circulation within  residential, commercial, and industrial areas. The collector system distributes  trips from principal and minor arterials through the area to the ultimate  destination. Conversely, collectors also collect traffic and channel it into  the arterial system. 
    "Commercial entrance" means any entrance serving  land uses other than two or fewer individual private residences. (See  "private entrance.")
    "Commissioner" means the individual who serves as  the chief executive officer of the Department of Transportation or his  designee.
    "Commonwealth" means the Commonwealth of Virginia.
    "Crossover" means an opening in a nontraversable  median (such as a concrete barrier or raised island) that provides for crossing  movements and left and right turning movements. 
    "Design speed" means the selected speed used to  determine the geometric design features of the highway. 
    "District" means each of the nine areas in which  VDOT is divided to oversee the maintenance and construction on the  state-maintained highways, bridges and tunnels within the boundaries of the  area. 
    "District administrator" means the VDOT employee  assigned to supervise the district. 
    "District administrator's designee" means the VDOT  employee or employees designated by the district administrator. 
    "Entrance" means any driveway, street, or other  means of providing for movement of vehicles to or from the highway.
    "Entrance, commercial" means any entrance  serving land uses that generate more than 50 vehicular trips per day or the  trip generation equivalent of more than five individual private residences or  lots for individual private residences using the methodology in the Institute  of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
    "Entrance, low volume commercial" means any  entrance, other than a private entrance, serving five or fewer individual  residences or lots for individual residences on a privately owned and  maintained road or land uses that generate 50 or fewer vehicular trips per day  using the methodology in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip  Generation 8th Edition, 2008. 
    "Entrance, private" means an entrance that  serves up to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of  the occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain  access to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure  facilities that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump  stations, and stormwater management basins.
    "Frontage road" means a road that generally runs  parallel to a highway between the highway right-of-way and the front building  setback line of the abutting properties and provides access to the abutting  properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to the highway  and separating the abutting property traffic from through traffic on the  highway. 
    "Functional area" means the area of the physical  highway feature, such as an intersection, roundabout, railroad grade crossing,  or interchange, plus that portion of the highway that comprises the decision  and maneuver distance and required vehicle storage length to serve that highway  feature.
    "Functional area of an intersection" means the  physical area of an at-grade intersection plus all required storage lengths for  separate turn lanes and for through traffic, including any maneuvering distance  for separate turn lanes.
    "Functional classification" means the federal  system of classifying groups of highways according to the character of service  they are intended to provide and classifications made by the commissioner based  on the operational characteristics of a highway. Each highway is assigned a  functional classification based on the highway's intended purpose of providing  priority to through traffic movement or adjoining property access. The  functional classification system groups highways into three basic categories  identified as (i) arterial, with the function to provide through movement of  traffic; (ii) collector, with the function of supplying a combination of  through movement and access to property; and (iii) local, with the function of  providing access to property and to other streets. 
    "Highway," "street," or "road"  means a public way for purposes of vehicular travel, including the entire area  within the right-of-way.
    "Intersection" means (i) a crossing of two or more  highways at grade, (ii) a crossover, or (iii) any at-grade connection with a  highway such as a commercial entrance.
    "Intersection sight distance" means the sight  distance required at an intersection to allow the driver of a stopped vehicle a  sufficient view of the intersecting highway to decide when to enter, or cross,  the intersecting highway. 
    "Legal speed limit" means the speed limit set forth  on signs lawfully posted on a highway or, in the absence of such signs, the  speed limit established by Article 8 (§ 46.2-870 et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title  46.2 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Level of service" means a qualitative measure  describing the operational conditions within a vehicular traffic stream,  generally in terms of such service measures as speed, travel time, freedom to  maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience.  "Level-of-service" is defined and procedures are presented for  determining the level of service in the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-73-170 I).
    "Limited access highway" means a highway especially  designed for through traffic over which abutting properties have no easement or  right of light, air, or access by reason of the fact that those properties abut  upon the limited access highway.
    "Local streets" means the functional classification  for highways that comprise all facilities that are not collectors or arterials.  Local streets serve primarily to provide direct access to abutting land and to  other streets.
    "Median" means the portion of a divided highway  that separates opposing traffic flows.
    "Median opening" means a crossover or a directional  opening in a nontraversable median (such as a concrete barrier or raised  island) that physically restricts movements to specific turns such as left  turns and U-turns. 
    "Minor arterials" means the functional  classification for highways that interconnect with and augment the principal  arterial system. Minor arterials distribute traffic to smaller geographic areas  providing service between and within communities.
    "Operating speed" means the speed at which drivers  are observed operating their vehicles during free-flow conditions with the 85th  percentile of the distribution of observed speeds being the most frequently  used measure of the operating speed of a particular location or geometric  feature. 
    "Permit" or "entrance permit" means a  document that sets the conditions under which VDOT allows a connection to a  highway. 
    "Permit applicant" means the person or persons,  firm, corporation, government, or other entity that has applied for a permit. 
    "Permittee" means the person or persons, firm,  corporation, government, or other entity that has been issued a permit.
    "Preliminary subdivision plat" means a plan of  development as set forth in § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Principal arterials" means the functional  classification for major highways intended to serve through traffic where  access is carefully controlled, generally highways of regional importance, with  moderate to high volumes of traffic traveling relatively long distances and at  higher speeds.
    "Private entrance" means an entrance that serves  up to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of the  occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain access  to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure facilities  that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump stations, and  stormwater management basins.
    "Professional engineer" means a person who is  qualified to practice engineering by reason of his special knowledge and use of  mathematical, physical and engineering sciences and the principles and methods  of engineering analysis and design acquired by engineering education and  experience, and whose competence has been attested by the Virginia Board for  Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior  Designers and Landscape Architects through licensure as a professional  engineer.
    "Reverse frontage road" means a road that is  located to the rear of the properties fronting a highway and provides access to  the abutting properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to  the highway and removing the abutting property traffic from through traffic on  the highway.
    "Right-of-way" means that property within the  systems of state highways that is open or may be opened for public travel or  use or both in the Commonwealth. This definition includes those public  rights-of-way in which the Commonwealth has a prescriptive easement for  maintenance and public travel. 
    "Roadway" means the portion of a highway, including  shoulders, for vehicular use. A divided highway has two or more roadways.
    "Roundabout" means a circular intersection with  yield control of all entering traffic, right-of-way assigned to traffic within  the circular roadway, and channelized approaches and a central island that  deflect entering traffic to the right. 
    "Shared entrance" means a single entrance serving  two or more adjoining parcels.
    "Sight distance" means the distance visible to the  driver of a vehicle when the view is unobstructed by traffic.
    "Site plan" and "subdivision plat" mean a  plan of development approved in accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241  through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia. 
    "Systems of state highways" means all highways and  roads under the ownership, the control, or the jurisdiction of VDOT, including  but not limited to, the primary, secondary and interstate highways. 
    "Trip" means a single or one-directional vehicle  movement either entering or exiting a property; a vehicle leaving the property  is one trip and a vehicle returning to the property is one trip.
    "Turn lane" means a separate lane for the purpose  of enabling a vehicle that is entering or leaving a highway to increase or  decrease its speed to a rate at which it can more safely merge or diverge with  through traffic; an acceleration or deceleration lane.
    "Urban area" means an urbanized area with a  population of 50,000 or more, or an urban place (small urban area) as  designated by the Bureau of the Census having a population of 5,000 or more and  not within any urbanized area. The Federal Highway Administration defines "urban  area" in more detail based on the federal-aid highway law (23 USC § 101).
    "VDOT" means the Virginia Department of  Transportation, its successor, the Commissioner of Highways, or his designees. 
    24VAC30-73-40. Administrative procedures and rules for obtaining  commercial and private entrance permits.
    All applications for entrance permits shall be obtained from  and submitted to the district administrator's designee for the county in which  the work is to be performed. The permit applicant shall submit the permit  application form, and the entrance permit, if approved, will be issued in  accordance with the applicable administrative rules, requirements and  procedures of this chapter and the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-73-170 G). 
    24VAC30-73-60. General provisions governing commercial and  private entrances.
    A. No entrance of any nature may be constructed within the  right-of-way until the location has been approved by VDOT and an entrance  permit has been issued. Any person violating any provision of this chapter and  any condition of approval of an entrance permit shall be guilty of a  misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be punished as provided for in § 33.1-198 of the Code of Virginia. Such person shall be civilly liable to the  Commonwealth for actual damage sustained by the Commonwealth by reason of his  wrongful act.
    B. VDOT will permit reasonably convenient access to a parcel  of record. VDOT is not obligated to permit the most convenient access, nor is  VDOT obligated to approve the permit applicant's preferred entrance location or  entrance design. If a parcel is served by more than one road in the systems of  state highways, the district administrator's designee shall determine upon  which road or roads the proposed entrance or entrances is or are to be  constructed. 
    C. Entrance standards established by localities that are  stricter than those of VDOT shall govern. 
    24VAC30-73-70. Commercial entrance design.
    A. All commercial Low volume commercial entrance  design and construction shall comply with the private entrance design standards  in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and the stopping sight  distance provision in 24VAC30-73-80. Commercial entrance design and  construction shall comply with the provisions of this chapter and the standards  in the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A), the Road and Bridge Standards  (see 24VAC30-73-170 C), the Road and Bridge Specifications (see 24VAC30-73-170  B), other VDOT engineering and construction standards as may be appropriate,  and any additional conditions, restrictions, or modifications deemed necessary  by the district administrator's designee to preserve the safety, use and  maintenance of the systems of state highways. Entrance design and construction  shall comply with applicable guidelines and requirements of the Americans with  Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12101 et seq.). Ramps for curb sections  shall be provided as required in § 15.2-2021 of the Code of Virginia. The  standard drawing for depressed curb ramp as shown in the Road and Bridge  Standards (see 24VAC30-73-170 C) shall be utilized in the design.
    1. In the event an entrance is proposed within the limits of a  funded roadway project that will ultimately change a highway, the permit  applicant may be required to construct, to the extent possible, entrances  compatible with the roadway's ultimate design.
    2. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  pedestrian and bicycle users of the abutting highway in accordance with the  Commonwealth Transportation Board's "Policy for Integrating Bicycle and  Pedestrian Accommodations" (see 24VAC30-73-170 H).
    3. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  transit users of the abutting highway where applicable and provide  accommodations to the extent possible.
    4. Based on the existing and planned developments, the  district administrator's designee will determine the need for curb and gutter,  sidewalks, or other features within the general area of the proposed entrance  in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and the design standards in  Appendix G of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A).
    5. Sites accessed by an entrance shall be designed so as to  prevent unsafe and inefficient traffic movements from impacting travel on the  abutting highway. At the request of the district administrator's designee, the  permit applicant shall furnish a report that documents the impact of expected  traffic movements upon the function of the abutting highway during the peak  hours of the abutting highway or during the peak hours of the generator,  whichever is appropriate as determined by the district administrator's  designee.
    6. The use of a shared entrance between adjacent property  owners shall be the preferred method of access.
    7. The construction of new crossovers, or the relocation, removal,  or consolidation of existing crossovers shall be approved in accordance with  the crossover location approval process specified in Appendix G of the Road  Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A). 
    B. It is essential that entrance and site design allow safe  and efficient movements of traffic using the entrance while minimizing the  impact of such movements on the operation of the systems of state highways.
    1. The permit applicant shall supply sufficient information to  demonstrate to the satisfaction of the district administrator's designee that  neither the entrance, nor the proposed traffic circulation patterns within the  parcel, will compromise the safety, use, operation, or maintenance of the  abutting highway. A rezoning traffic impact statement or a site plan/subdivision  plat supplemental traffic analysis submitted for a proposed development of a  parcel in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (see  24VAC30-73-170 J) may be used for this purpose, provided that it adequately  documents the effect of the proposed entrance and its related traffic on the  operation of the highway to be accessed.
    2. If the proposed entrance will cause the systems of state  highways to experience degradation in safety or a significant increase in delay  or a significant reduction in capacity beyond an acceptable level of service,  the applicant shall be required to submit a plan to mitigate these impacts and  to bear the costs of such mitigation measures.
    3. Proposed mitigation measures must be approved by the  district administrator's designee prior to permit approval. The district  administrator's designee will consider what improvements will be needed to  preserve the operational characteristics of the highway, accommodate the  proposed traffic and, if entrance design modifications are needed, incorporate  them accordingly to protect the transportation corridor. Mitigation measures  that may be considered include but are not limited to:
    a. Construction of auxiliary lanes or turning lanes, or  pavement transitions/tapers;
    b. Construction of new crossovers, or the relocation, removal,  or consolidation of existing crossovers;
    c. Installation, modification, or removal of traffic signals  and related traffic control equipment;
    d. Provisions to limit the traffic generated by the development  served by the proposed entrance;
    e. Dedication of additional right-of-way or easement, or both,  for future road improvements; 
    f. Reconstruction of existing roadway to provide required  vertical and horizontal sight distances; 
    g. Relocation or consolidation of existing entrances; or
    h. Recommendations from adopted corridor studies, design  studies, other access management practices and principles, or any combination  of these, not otherwise mentioned in this chapter.
    4. If an applicant is unwilling or unable to mitigate the  impacts identified in the traffic impact analysis, the entrance shall be  physically restricted to right-in or right-out movements or both or similar  restrictions such that the public interests in a safe and efficient flow of  traffic on the systems of state highways are protected.
    24VAC30-73-80. Minimum sight distance for commercial entrances.
    A. No less than minimum intersection sight distance shall be  obtained for any a commercial entrance and no less than  minimum stopping sight distance shall be obtained for a low volume commercial  entrance. Sight distances shall be measured in accordance with VDOT  practices, and sight distance requirements shall conform to VDOT standards as  described in Appendix G of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A). The  legal speed limit shall be used unless the design speed is available and  approved for use by VDOT. 
    B. The operating speed may be used in lieu of the legal speed  limit in cases where the permit applicant furnishes the district administrator's  designee with a speed study prepared in accordance with the Manual on Uniform  Traffic Control Devices (see 24VAC30-73-170 D) methodology that demonstrates  the operating speed of the segment of highway is lower than the legal speed  limit and, in the judgment of the district administrator's designee, use of the  operating speed will not compromise safety for either a driver at an entrance  or a driver on the abutting highway. 
    C. VDOT may require that the vertical or horizontal alignment  of the existing roadway be adjusted to accommodate certain design elements of a  proposed commercial entrance including, but not limited to, median openings,  crossovers, roundabouts, and traffic signals, where adjustment is deemed  necessary. The cost of any work performed to adjust the horizontal or vertical  alignment of the roadway to achieve required intersection sight distance at a  proposed entrance shall be borne by the permit applicant. 
    24VAC30-73-110. Existing commercial entrances.
    A. The tenure of a commercial entrance to any highway is  conditional. Reconstruction, relocation, commercial entrance consolidation, or  upgrading, or a combination of these, may be required at the owner's cost when  the district administrator's designee determines after review that one of the  conditions listed below exists. If the necessary changes are not made, the  entrance may be closed at the direction of the district administrator's  designee. 
    1. Safety - When the entrance has been found to be unsafe for  public use in its present condition because of physical degradation of the  entrance, increase in motor vehicle traffic, or some other safety-related  condition.
    2. Use - When traffic in and out of the entrance has changed  significantly to require modifications or reconstruction, or both. Such changes  may include, but are not limited to, changes in traffic volume or operational  characteristics of the traffic. 
    3. Maintenance - When the entrance becomes unserviceable due  to heavy equipment damage or reclamation by natural causes.
    B. VDOT will maintain the commercial entrance only within the  normal shoulder of the roadway or to the flow line of the gutter pan. The owner  shall maintain all other portions of the entrance, including entrance aprons,  curb and gutter, culvert and drainage structures.
    C. Commercial entrances may also be reviewed by the district  administrator's designee, and reconstruction, relocation, commercial entrance  consolidation, or upgrading, or a combination of these, may be required, when  any of the following occur:
    1. The property is being considered for rezoning or other  local legislative action that involves a change in use of the property.
    2. The property is subject to a site plan or subdivision plat  review.
    3. There is a change in commercial use either by the property  owner or by a tenant. 
    4. Vehicular/pedestrian circulation between adjoining  properties becomes available.
    These periodic reviews are necessary to provide both the  driver and other highway users with a safe and operationally efficient means of  travel on state highways. 
    D. The provisions of this section shall apply to low  volume commercial entrances.
    24VAC30-73-130. Drainage.
    A. Commercial and private entrances Entrances  shall be constructed so as not to impair drainage within the right-of-way and  so that surface water shall drain from the roadway.
    B. Where deemed necessary by the district administrator's  designee, a commercial entrance applicant shall provide copies of a complete  drainage layout based on a drainage study by a licensed design professional.  This layout shall clearly show how the permit applicant proposes to handle the  drainage and run-off from applicant's development.
    C. Pipe ends of culverts shall be reviewed independently by  the district administrator's designee and grading or treatment at pipe ends  shall minimize any hazard the pipe ends or structures may present to an errant  vehicle. 
    24VAC30-73-170. Documents incorporated by reference. 
    A. Road Design Manual (effective January 1, 2005, revised  October 2009), 2011.
    Note: Appendices F and G (Access Management Design Standards  for Entrances and Intersections) contains the access management standards  referenced in Chapters 863 and 928 of the 2007 Acts of Assembly and Chapters  274 and 454 of the 2008 Acts of Assembly.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    B. 2007 Road and Bridge Specifications (effective July 2008).
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    C. 2008 Road and Bridge Standards (effective June 2009).
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    D. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets  and Highways, 2003 Edition (effective December 22, 2003, revised November  2004).
           |   | Federal Highway AdministrationSuperintendent of Documents
 U.S. Government Printing Office
 P.O. Box 371954
 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954
 | 
  
    E. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,  Fifth Edition, 2004.
           |   | American Association of State Highway and Transportation    Officials (AASHTO)444 North Capitol St. N.W., Suite 225
 Washington, D.C. 20001
 | 
  
    F. Change of Limited Access Control, 24VAC30-401.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    G. Land Use Permit Regulations, 24VAC30-151.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    H. Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian  Accommodations, eff. March 18, 2004.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    I. Highway Capacity Manual, 2000.
           |   | Transportation Research Board500 Fifth Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    J. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations, 24VAC30-155.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    K. Instructional and Informational Memorandum IIM-LD-227.3,  eff. May 23, 2007.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    L. Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements, 24VAC30-92, eff.  March 9, 2009.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    M. Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
           |   | Institute of Transportation Engineers1099 14th Street N. W., Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    24VAC30-92-10. Definitions.
    The following words and terms when used in these regulations  shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates  otherwise:
    "Abandonment" in all its forms means the  legislative action reserved for and granted to the local governing body to  extinguish the public's right to a roadway under the jurisdiction of the  Virginia Department of Transportation pursuant to §§ 33.1-151 and 33.1-155  of the Code of Virginia.
    "Accessible route" means a public or private  continuous unobstructed, stable, firm and slip-resistant path connecting all  accessible elements of a facility (which may include parking access aisles,  curb ramps, crosswalks at vehicular ways, walks, ramps and lifts) that can be  approached, entered and used by persons with disabilities. An accessible route  shall, to the maximum extent feasible, coincide with the route for the general  public.
    "ADT" means average daily traffic count (see  "projected traffic").
    "Alley" means a narrow roadway segment used by  motor vehicles for access to the rear side of commercial or residential land  use, or access to auxiliary land uses and that is located within a dedicated  public way or public easement.
    "Applicable former requirements" means the 2005  Subdivision Street Requirements for developments submitted prior to July 1,  2009, and the 2009 edition of the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements for  developments submitted between July 1, 2009, and January 31, 2012, inclusive.
    "Best management practice" or "BMP"  means schedules of activities; prohibitions of practices, including both  structural and nonstructural practices; maintenance procedures; and other  management practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of surface waters and  groundwater systems from the impacts of land-disturbing activities.
    "Clear zone" means the total border area of a  roadway including, if any, parking lanes or planting strips that is  sufficiently wide for an errant vehicle to avoid a serious accident. (See the  Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and its Appendix B (1) (the  Subdivision Street Design Guide) (see 24VAC30-92-150) for  details.)
    "Commissioner" means the chief executive officer of  the Virginia Department of Transportation or his designee.
    "Complete development (land)" means the  utilization of the available areas in a manner as to realize its highest  density for the best potential use based on zoning, pending rezoning, the  adopted comprehensive plan of the governing body, or the customary use of  similar parcels of land.
    "Complete development (streets)" means the  development of a street in full compliance with all applicable provisions of  these regulations to the necessary standards of design, construction, and  public benefit requirements for the effective and efficient accommodation of  all modes of transportation generated by the complete development of the land,  both internal and external to the development.
    "Conceptual sketch" means a drawing of the proposed  development showing the location of existing and proposed land uses, any  existing and proposed transportation facilities, and any additional information  required so that the reviewer can determine the appropriate functional  classification of the proposed street or streets and verify if the calculation  of the connectivity index, if appropriate standards have been met.  
    "Connectivity index" means the number of street  segments divided by the number of intersections. Only street segments and  intersections within a network addition as well as any street segment or  intersection outside of the network addition connected to street segments  within the network addition, or that has been connected or will be connected  pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 7 to the network addition through the extension of  an existing stub out shall be used to calculate a network addition's  connectivity index.
    "Cul-de-sac" means a street with only one outlet  and having an appropriate turnaround for a safe and convenient reverse traffic  movement.
    "Dam" means an embankment or structure intended or  used to impound, retain, or store water, either as a permanent pond or as a  temporary storage facility.
    "Department" or "VDOT" means the Virginia  Department of Transportation.
    "Design speed" means a speed selected for purposes  of design and correlation of those features of a street such as curvature,  super elevation, and sight distance, upon which the safe operation of vehicles  is dependent.
    "Developer" means an individual, corporation, local  government, or registered partnership engaged in the subdivision, improvement,  or renovation of land.
    "Discontinuance," in all its forms, means the  legislative act of the Commonwealth Transportation Board, pursuant to § 33.1-150  of the Code of Virginia, that determines that a road no longer serves public  convenience warranting its maintenance with funds at the disposal of the  department.
    "District administrator" means the department  employee assigned the overall supervision of the departmental operations in one  of the Commonwealth's construction districts.
    "District administrator's designee" means the  department employee or employees designated by the district administrator to  oversee the implementation of this regulation.
    "Drainage Manual" means the department's Drainage  Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2002.
    "Dwelling unit" means a structure or part of a  structure containing sleeping, kitchen, and bathroom facilities that is  suitable for occupancy as a home or residence by one or more persons.
    "Easement" means a grant of a right to use property  of an owner for specific or limited purpose. 
    "External street segment" means a street segment  within a network addition that connects with the existing public street  network.
    "FAR" means floor area ratio, which is the ratio of  the total floor area of a building or buildings on a parcel to the size land  area of the parcel where the building or buildings are located. 
    "Functional classification" means the assigned  classification of a roadway based on the roadway's intended purpose of  providing priority to through traffic movement and access to adjoining property  as determined by the department, based on the federal system of classifying  groups of roadways according to the character of service they are intended to  provide.
    "Governing body" means the board of supervisors of  the county, but may also mean the local governing body of a town or city, if  appropriate, in the application of these requirements.
    "Intersection" means a juncture of three or more  street segments, or the terminus of a street segment, such as a cul-de-sac or  other dead end. The terminus of a stub out shall not constitute an intersection  for the purposes of this chapter. The juncture of a street with only a stub  out, and the juncture of a street with only a connection to the end of an  existing stub out, shall not constitute an intersection for the purposes of  this chapter, unless such stub out is the only facility providing service to  one or more lots within the development.
    "Level of service" means a qualitative measure  describing operational conditions within a vehicular traffic stream, and their  perception by motorists and passengers. For the purposes of these requirements,  the applicable provisions of the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2010 (VDOT) shall serve as the basis for  determining "levels of service."
    "Level terrain" means that condition where  highway sight distances, as governed by both horizontal and vertical  restrictions, are generally long or could be made so without construction  difficulty or major expense.
    "Locally controlled grade separation structure"  means a grade separation structure that does not qualify for maintenance by the  department but was established within the right-of-way of a street intended for  state maintenance.
    "Local official" means the representative of the  governing body appointed to serve as its agent in matters relating to  subdivisions and land development.
    "Multiuse trail" means a facility designed and  constructed for the purpose of providing bicycle and pedestrian transportation,  located within a dedicated public way and is anticipated to be maintained by an  entity other than the department.
    "Municipal separate storm sewer system" or  "MS4" means all separate storm sewers that are designated under  4VAC50-60-380 A 1 as municipal separate storm sewer systems located  in census urban areas. 
    "Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Management  Program" or "MS4 Program" means a management program covering the  duration of a permit for a municipal separate storm sewer system that includes  a comprehensive planning process that involves public participation and  intergovernmental coordination, to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the  maximum extent practicable, to protect water quality, and to satisfy the  appropriate water quality requirements of the Clean Water Act and corresponding  regulations and the Virginia Stormwater Management Act and attendant  regulations, using management practices, control techniques, and system, design  and engineering methods, and such other provisions that are appropriate. 
    "Network addition" means a group of interconnected  street segments and intersections shown in a plan of development that are  connected to the state highway system.
    "Parking bay" means an off-street area for parking  two or more vehicles that provides access to a public street.
    "Parking lane" means an area, generally seven or  eight feet in width, adjacent to and parallel with the travel lane of a roadway  that is used for parking vehicles.
    "Pavement Design Guide" means the Pavement Design  Guide for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia (see 24VAC30-92-150),  2009 (VDOT).
    "Permit Regulations" means the department's Land  Use Permit Regulations (see 24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-151). 
    "Phased development (streets)" means the method  outlined in 24VAC30-92-80 (phased development of streets) whereby the  acceptance of certain streets into the secondary system of state highways may  be considered before being completely developed in accordance with all  applicable requirements (e.g., two lanes of a four-lane facility are considered  for acceptance in advance of lanes three and four being finished).
    "Plan of development" means any site plat,  subdivision plan, preliminary subdivision plat, conceptual subdivision sketch,  or other engineered or surveyed drawings depicting proposed development of land  and street layout, including plans included with rezoning proposals.
    "Plans" means the standard drawings, including  profile and roadway typical section, that show the location, character,  dimensions, and details for the proposed construction of the street.
    "Planting strip" means a section of land between  the curb face and the pedestrian accommodation or shared use path.
    "Plat" means the schematic representation of the  land divided or to be divided.
    "Projected traffic" means the number of vehicles,  normally expressed in average daily traffic (ADT), forecast to travel over the  segment of the street involved.
    "Public street" means a street dedicated to public  use and available to the public's unrestricted use without regard to the  jurisdictional authority responsible for its operation and maintenance.
    "Requirements" means the design, construction,  public benefit, and related administrative considerations herein prescribed for  the acceptance of a street for maintenance by the department as part of the  secondary system of state highways.
    "Right-of-way" means the land, property, or  interest therein, usually in a strip, acquired for or devoted to a public  street designated to become part of the secondary system of state highways.
    "Roadway" means the portion of the road or street  within the limits of construction and all structures, ditches, channels, etc.,  necessary for the correct drainage thereof.
    "Secondary system of state highways" means those  public roads, streets, bridges, etc., established by a local governing body  pursuant to § 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia and subsequently accepted  by the department for supervision and maintenance under the provisions of  Articles 6 (§ 33.1-67 et seq.) and 11 (§ 33.1-150 et seq.) of Chapter  1 of Title 33.1 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Shared use path" means a facility that is designed  and constructed according to the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150),  2011 (VDOT), for the purpose of providing bicycle and pedestrian  transportation.
    "Smoothed urbanized area boundary" means the  modified area boundary of a census urbanized area as determined by the latest  U.S. decennial census and modified by appropriate state, regional, and local  government officials, and approved by the Federal Highway Administration.
    "Smoothed urban cluster boundary" means the  modified area boundary of a census urban cluster as determined by the latest  U.S. decennial census and modified by appropriate state, regional and local  government officials, and approved by the Federal Highway Administration.
    "Specifications" means the department's Road and  Bridge Specifications (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2007, revised 2011,  including related supplemental specifications and special provisions. 
    "Standards" means the applicable drawings and  related criteria contained in the department's Road and Bridge Standards (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2008, revised 2011.
    "Storm sewer system" means a conveyance or  system of conveyances and its appurtenances, including roads with drainage  systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade  channels, or storm drains.
    "Street" means any roadway that is created as part  of a plan of development, other subdivision of land, or is constructed by or at  the direction of the local governing body and is a public way for purposes of  vehicular traffic, including the entire area within the right-of-way. 
    "Street segment" means (i) a section of roadway  or alley that is between two intersections or (ii) a stub out or connection to  the end of an existing stub out. 
    "Stub out" means a transportation facility (i)  whose right-of-way terminates at a parcel abutting the development, (ii) that  consists of a short segment that is intended to serve current and future  development by providing continuity and connectivity of the public street  network, (iii) that based on the spacing between the stub out and other streets  or stub outs, and the current terrain there is a reasonable expectation that  connection with a future street is possible, and (iv) that is constructed to  the property line.
    "Subdivision" means the division of a lot, tract,  or parcel into two or more lots, plats, sites, or other divisions of land for  the purpose, whether immediate or future, of sale or of building development.  Any resubdivision of a previously subdivided tract or parcel of land shall also  be interpreted as a "subdivision." The division of a lot or parcel  permitted by § 15.2-2244 of the Code of Virginia will not be considered a  "subdivision" under this definition, provided no new road or street  is thereby established. However, any further division of such parcels shall be  considered a "subdivision."
    "Subdivision Street Design Guide" means Appendix B (1)  of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT).
    "Swale" means a broad depression within which  stormwater may drain during inclement weather, but that does not have a defined  bed or banks.
    "Total maximum daily load" or "TMDL"  is a water quality term that means the sum of the individual wasteload  allocations for point sources, load allocations (LAs) for nonpoint sources,  natural background loading and a margin of safety. TMDLs can be expressed in  terms of either mass per time, toxicity, or other appropriate measure. The TMDL  process provides for point versus nonpoint source trade-offs.
    "Traveled way" means the portion of the secondary  street designated for the movement of vehicles, exclusive of shoulders, parking  areas, turn lanes, etc.
    "Tree well" means an opening on a sidewalk,  generally abutting the curb, where a tree may be planted. 
    "VPD" means vehicles per day.
    "VPH" means vehicles per hour.
    "Wasteload allocation" or "wasteload"  or "WLA" means the portion of a receiving surface water's loading or  assimilative capacity allocated to one of its existing or future point sources  of pollution. WLAs are a type of water quality-based effluent limitation.
    "Watercourse" means a defined channel with bed and  banks within which water flows, either continuously or periodically.
    24VAC30-92-20. Applicability, effective date, and transition.
    A. Applicability. This regulation is intended to govern  secondary street development and the criteria for acceptance of these streets  by the department for subsequent maintenance. The Road Design Manual, 2011  (VDOT) and its Appendix B (1), the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) offer guidance on the design and construction features of  secondary street development and set out design parameters deemed appropriate for  most land development scenarios. However, the business of land development is  fluid and the department, in consultation with the local official, is prepared  to consider innovative transportation approaches associated with land  development proposals that are consistent with the design and connectivity  requirements of this chapter and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150), Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT).  However, when not specifically addressed in one of those documents, the  relevant requirements of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150),  2011 (VDOT), standards, specifications, the Pavement Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia, 2009  (VDOT) and associated instructions shall govern.
    These requirements apply to all streets designated to be  maintained by the department as part of the secondary system of state highways,  except for streets whose construction was funded by state highway construction  allocations. The department's review and approval shall apply only to  streets proposed for addition to the secondary system of state highways  maintained by the department. Any plans submitted for review that contain only  streets proposed for maintenance by entities other than the department may be  reviewed for general guidance at the discretion of the district administrator  but will not be officially approved. However, any such review shall not  represent the department's commitment to accept such streets for maintenance  irrespective of the quality of the construction of the street or streets.
    Any streets proposed to be privately maintained shall have a  notation on the plat and impacted deeds that clearly indicates that as a  prerequisite for the streets' future acceptance, the streets must be improved  to the department's prevailing requirements for acceptance at no cost to the  department. All notations made on plats or similar instruments pursuant to this  section shall be in accordance with § 33.1-72.2 of the Code of Virginia.
    B. Grandfathering.
    1. Streets where the street layout has been proffered pursuant  to § 15.2-2297, 15.2-2298, or 15.2-2303 of the Code of Virginia prior to March  9, 2009 February 1, 2012, shall may, at the discretion of  the developer, be considered for acceptance in accordance with the  applicable former requirements, provided the requirements of § 15.2-2307 of the  Code of Virginia have been met. This grandfathering shall not apply to any  streets where the proffered layout may be adjusted, without requiring a significant  affirmative governmental zoning action to modify such proffered conditions, to  meet the requirements of this chapter, unless a site plan, subdivision plat, or  preliminary plat relying on such proffered street layout has been submitted for  approval prior to March 9, 2009 February 1, 2012. In such  instances the grandfathering shall may, at the discretion of the  developer, apply to the applicable site plan, subdivision plat, or  preliminary subdivision plat. However, such streets may be considered for  acceptance under requirements of this chapter at the discretion of the  developer Notwithstanding any other provision of this subsection, the  grandfathering provided based upon proffers shall not be lost or adversely  impacted due to a modification of the relevant plan or plat so long as no more  than 20% (cumulative) of the original street centerline mileage is eliminated,  realigned, or added compared to the proffered layout and the modification is  not expected to result in an increase in traffic generation.
    2. Streets that are part of a recorded plat or final site plan  valid pursuant to § 15.2-2261 of the Code of Virginia and approved in  accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241 through 15.2-2245 of the Code of  Virginia prior to July 1, 2009 February 1, 2012, shall be  considered for acceptance in accordance with the applicable former requirements  as long as such plats or plans remain valid under applicable law. However, such  streets may be considered for acceptance under requirements of this chapter at  the discretion of the developer.
    3. Streets that are part of a preliminary subdivision plat  valid pursuant to § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia approved in accordance  with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241 through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia prior  to July 1, 2009 February 1, 2012, shall be considered for  acceptance in accordance with the applicable former requirements for a period  of up to five years or such longer period as such preliminary subdivision plat  is valid under applicable law, provided the requirements of § 15.2-2260 of the  Code of Virginia have been met. Such grandfathering shall apply to construction  plans, site plans, and final plats submitted and approved in furtherance of  such preliminary subdivision plat for as long as such plans or plats remain valid  under applicable law. However, such streets may be considered for acceptance  under requirements of this chapter at the discretion of the developer.
    4. Streets that are part of a street construction plan  approved by the department prior to July 1, 2009 February 1, 2012,  shall be considered for acceptance in accordance with the applicable former  requirements. However, such streets may be considered for acceptance under  requirements of this chapter at the discretion of the developer.
    5. When the local governing body takes an action that  modifies the applicable area types (see 24VAC30-92-50 for further details on  area type) within such locality or the applicable area type changes due to  adjustments in smoothed urbanized areas, urban cluster boundaries, or metropolitan  planning organization study area boundaries, the following shall apply for  development proposals approved after March 9, 2009.
    a. Streets where the layout was proffered pursuant to § 15.2-2297, 15.2-2298, or 15.2-2303 of the Code of Virginia prior to the  modification of the applicable area type shall be considered for acceptance in  accordance with the requirements of the former area type for a period of up to  10 years, provided the requirements of § 15.2-2307 of the Code of Virginia have  been met. This subsection shall not apply to any streets where the proffered  layout may be adjusted, without requiring a significant affirmative  governmental zoning action to modify such proffered conditions, to meet the  requirements of this chapter, unless a site plan, subdivision plat, or  preliminary plat relying on such proffered street layout has been submitted for  approval prior to March 9, 2009. In such instances the grandfathering shall  apply to the applicable site plan, subdivision plat, or preliminary subdivision  plat. However, such streets may be considered for acceptance under the modified  applicable area type at the discretion of the developer.
    b. Streets that are part of recorded plat or final site  plan pursuant to § 15.2-2261 of the Code of Virginia approved prior to the  modification of the applicable area type shall be considered for acceptance in  accordance with the requirements of the former area type for a period of up to  five years or such longer period as such recorded plat or final site plan is valid  under applicable law. However, such streets may be considered for acceptance  under the modified applicable area type at the discretion of the developer.
    c. Streets that are part of preliminary subdivision plat  pursuant to § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia approved prior to the  modification of the applicable area type shall be considered for acceptance in  accordance with the requirements of the former area type for a period of up to  five years or such longer period as such preliminary subdivision plat is valid  under applicable law. Such grandfathering shall apply to future construction  plans, site plans, and final plats approved in furtherance of such preliminary  plat for so long as such plans or plats remain valid under applicable law.  However, such streets may be considered for acceptance under the modified  applicable area type at the discretion of the developer.
    d. Streets that are part of a street construction plan  approved by the department prior to the modification of the applicable area  type shall be considered for acceptance in accordance with the requirements of  the former area type for a period of up to five years. However, such streets  may be considered for acceptance under the modified applicable area type at the  discretion of the developer.
    6. 5. If requested by the applicable locality,  the provisions of this subsection applicable former requirements  shall apply if the applicant has submitted at a minimum a conceptual sketch  that includes all of the elements required under 24VAC30-92-70 A prior to July  1, 2009 February 1, 2012. Subdivisions 1 through 5 4  of this subsection shall take precedence over this subdivision in any instances  of a conflict. 
    C. Effective date. All streets proposed for acceptance by the  department after March 9, 2009 January 1, 2012, shall be  considered for acceptance in accordance with this chapter, except as provided  for in subsection D of this section and as may be waived by the  commissioner pursuant to this chapter.
    D. Transition. Prior to July 1, 2009 February 1,  2012, the department will consider complete plats and plans developed in  accordance with either the applicable former requirements or  these requirements. Any plat or plan initially submitted to the department for  consideration after June 30, 2009 January 31, 2012, however,  shall be in accordance with these requirements.
    24VAC30-92-50. Area type thresholds. (Repealed.)
    A. Area type thresholds. There are three area types  established for secondary streets in the Commonwealth. Within each area type,  streets must meet the applicable design and public benefit requirements to be  eligible for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways. For the  purposes of this chapter the following area types shall determine the design  and public benefit requirements that apply to streets and network additions.
    1. Compact Area Type. The Compact Area Type shall apply  when any part of a network addition meets one or more of the following  criteria:
    a. Located within a locally designated urban development  area pursuant to § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of Virginia, or within an area  designated by an adopted local comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2223 of  the Code of Virginia as a village, town, or other growth area;
    b. Located within a smoothed urbanized area boundary;
    c. Located within an area designated by the local  government, by ordinance or by the adopted local comprehensive plan pursuant to  § 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia, to be subject to the Compact Area Type  requirements of this chapter provided such area is designated in the adopted  local comprehensive plan as an area for compact development with median lot  sizes no greater than 1/2 acre; 
    d. Located within a locally designated transfer of  development rights receiving area pursuant to § 15.2-2316.1 of the Code of  Virginia; or
    e. Located within a smoothed urban cluster boundary.
    2. Suburban Area Type. The Suburban Area Type shall apply  when any part of a network addition meets one or more of the following criteria  and does not meet any of the Compact Area Type criteria:
    a. Located outside a smoothed urbanized area boundary but  within an official Metropolitan Planning Organization Study Area;
    b. Located within a two-mile radius of a locally designated  urban development area pursuant to § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of Virginia;
    c. Located within a two-mile radius of a smoothed urban  cluster boundary;
    d. Located within a locally designated cluster development  pursuant to § 15.2-2286.1 of the Code of Virginia; or
    e. Located within an area not subject to the Compact Area  Type criteria that is designated by the local government, by ordinance or by  the adopted local comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2223 of the Code of  Virginia, to be subject to the Suburban Area Type requirements of this chapter  provided such area is designated in the adopted local comprehensive plan as an  area for suburban development with median lot sizes no greater than two acres.
    3. The Rural Area Type. The Rural Area Type shall apply in  all other areas of the Commonwealth.
    B. Modifications to the area type thresholds. Area type  perimeters shall be consistent with all planning boundaries listed within  subsection A of this section, except as may be allowed within this subsection.  Where the area type boundaries have been determined by a smoothed urbanized  area, smoothed urban cluster, metropolitan planning organization study area, or  within two miles of a smoothed urban cluster, and local governing body requests  that the current area type designation differ from the above stated planning  boundaries, the department will review such amendments related to a  modification to the area type. Approval of such modification requests is not  assured and will be reviewed on an individual basis. The commissioner, upon  receipt of a resolution from the local governing body, for good cause shown may  determine that an area type for a specific area within the local jurisdiction  should be modified to a different area type or that any of the requirements of  24VAC30-92-60 should be modified to the requirements of a different area type. The  commissioner shall consider and review the permissible parcel sizes and uses to  ensure that the area is indeed being regulated in such manner that necessitates  a change in area type. The department will notify the local government within  45 calendar days of the commissioner's final decision. Any such modification of  area type designations shall cease to apply if the zoning of the area is  altered in a manner that is inconsistent with the local government's original  request for the modification of the area type and that alters the type and  density of land uses permitted.
    C. Area type designation. At such time as the local  governing body or the metropolitan planning organization amend the boundaries  of one or more of the planning boundaries listed in subsection A of this  section, the department will recognize such amendments and revise the related  area type designation accordingly. When such local decision is made, the local  governing body or metropolitan planning organization shall provide the  department with a copy of any duly adopted ordinance or resolution that affects  one of the planning boundary criteria listed in this section and impacts the  area type designations within such locality or metropolitan planning  organization study boundary based on the thresholds in this section as well as  maps that show the affected areas as soon as practicable. Modifications to the  area type designations based on any ordinance or resolution duly adopted  between January 1 and June 30 of any year by a locality or metropolitan  planning organization shall become effective on October 1 of that year.  Modifications to the area type designations based on any ordinance or  resolution duly adopted between July 1 and December 31 of any year shall become  effective on April 1 of the next year.
    24VAC30-92-60. Public benefit requirements.
    A. Public benefit. A street or network addition may only be  accepted by the department for maintenance as part of the secondary system of  state highways if it provides sufficient public benefit to justify perpetual  public maintenance as defined by this chapter. A street shall be considered to  provide sufficient public benefit if it meets or exceeds the public service,  pedestrian accommodation, and connectivity requirements of the applicable  area type of this chapter.
    B. Public service requirements. In the event the governing  body requests the addition of a street or network addition before it meets  these public service provisions, the district administrator will review each  request on an individual case basis and determine if the acceptance of a street  prior to normal service requirements is justified, provided the street or  network addition meets all other applicable requirements including the  connectivity requirements of this chapter. At the request of the local  governing body, subject to approval by the district administrator, the public  service requirements may be reduced for individual streets serving state or  local economic development projects.
    1. Individual streets. For the purpose of these requirements without  regard to applicable area type, public service may include, but is not  necessarily limited to, streets meeting one or more of the following  situations:
    a. Serves three or more occupied units with a unit being a  single-family residence, owner-occupied apartment, owner-occupied residence in  a qualifying manufactured home park, a stand-alone business, or single business  entity occupying an individual building, or other similar facility. Also,  streets serving manufactured home parks may only be considered when the land  occupied by the manufactured home is in fee simple ownership by the residents  of such manufactured home.
    b. Constitutes a connecting segment between other streets that  qualify from the point of public service.
    c. Such street is a stub out.
    d. Serves as access to schools, churches, public sanitary  landfills, transfer stations, public recreational facilities, or similar  facilities open to public use.
    e. Serves at least 100 vehicles per day generated by an office  building, industrial site, or other similar nonresidential land use in advance  of the occupancy of three or more such units of varied proprietorship. Any  addition under this provision shall be limited to the segment of a street that  serves this minimum projected traffic and has been developed in compliance with  these requirements.
    f. Constitutes a part of the network of streets envisioned in  the transportation plan or element of a locality's comprehensive plan that, at  the time of acceptance, serves an active traffic volume of at least 100  vehicles per day.
    2. Multifamily, townhouse, and retail shopping complexes. A  through street that serves a multifamily building may be considered for  maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways if it is deemed  by the department to provide a public service and provided it is well defined  and the district administrator's designee determines that it is not a travel  way through a parking lot. 
    Entrance streets and the internal traffic circulation systems  of retail shopping complexes qualify only if more than three property owners  are served and the street is well defined and separated from the parking  areas district administrator's designee determines that it is not a  travel way through a parking lot.
    3. Network additions. A network addition shall be considered  to provide service if each street within the addition meets at least one of the  criteria in subdivision 1 of this subsection.
    4. Special exceptions. There may be other sets of  circumstances that could constitute public service. Consequently, any request  for clarification regarding unclear situations should be made in writing to the  district administrator's designee. 
    C. Connectivity requirements. All street segments streets  in a development as shown in a plan of development shall be considered for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways as one or multiple  network additions. However, streets with a functional classification of  collector and above may be eligible for acceptance as individual streets.
    For the purposes of this subsection, connection shall mean a  street connection to adjacent property or a stub out that will allow for future  street connection to an adjacent property. 
    If a stub out or stub outs maintained by the department  adjoin the property of a development with a network addition or individual  street proposed for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways,  such network addition or individual street must connect to such stub out or  stub outs to be eligible for acceptance into the secondary system of state  highways. Local street stub outs generally should not exceed 500 feet in  length. The applicant shall post a sign in accordance with the department's  standards that indicates that such stub out is a site for a future roadway  connection. 
    Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as to prohibit  a stub out from providing service to lots within a development. 
    The connectivity requirements of this chapter shall not apply  to the following: a frontage road or reverse frontage road as defined in the Access  Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (see 24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-72)  or Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials, Collectors, and Local  Streets (24VAC-30-73), streets petitioned for acceptance into the secondary  system of state highways through the Rural Addition Program pursuant to §§ 33.1-72.1  and 33.1-72.2 of the Code of Virginia, or streets petitioned for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways through the Commonwealth  Transportation Board's Rural Addition Policy provided such streets were  constructed prior to March 9, 2009, or streets constructed or improved  pursuant to §§ 33.1-221 and 33.1-223 of the Code of Virginia January 1,  2012.
    1. Compact standard. Stub out connection standard.  If a stub out or stub outs maintained by the department adjoin the property of  a development with a network addition or individual street proposed for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways, such network addition  or individual street must connect to such stub out or stub outs to be eligible  for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways. The district  administrator may waive this requirement if the existing stub out is of such  design as to make such a connection unsafe. 
    2. Multiple connections in multiple directions standard.  The streets within a network addition may be accepted into the secondary system  of state highways if the network addition meets the following requirements:  
    a. The streets are designed and constructed in compliance  with the compact design standards pursuant to this chapter, the Road Design  Manual, and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150); 
    b. The network addition provides sufficient connections in  multiple directions and to multiple properties, if applicable, to local and higher  order roadways to provide an overall connectivity index of 1.6 or higher. All  network additions shall have a minimum of two connections; and 
    c. The block layout and other features of the development  are designed in such a fashion as to provide reasonably direct pedestrian  movement throughout the development and to adjoining property. 
    provides at least two external connections, one of which  must be to a publicly maintained highway and the other providing a connection  to a different highway or a stub out to an adjoining property. Local street  stub outs generally should not exceed 500 feet in length. If a stub out is  constructed, the applicant shall post a sign in accordance with the  department's standards that indicates that such stub out is a site for a future  roadway connection. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as to prohibit a  stub out from providing service to lots within a development. The district  administrator's designee shall waive or modify the second required connection  of this standard if one or more of the following situations renders the  provision of such connection impracticable:
    a. The adjoining property is completely built out, its  state is such that redevelopment within 20 years is unlikely, and there is no  stub out (either constructed or platted) to the property served by the network  addition;
    b. The adjoining property is zoned for a use whose traffic  is incompatible with the development being served by the network addition,  providing, however, that in no case shall retail, residential, or office uses  be considered incompatible with other retail, residential, or office uses; or
    c. There is no reasonable connection possible to adjoining  property or adjacent highways due to a factor outside the control of the  developer of the network addition, such as the presence of conservation  easements not put in place by the developer of the network addition, water  features such as rivers or lakes, jurisdictional wetlands, grades in excess of  15% whose total elevation change is greater than five feet, limited access  highways, railroads, or government property to which access is restricted.
    2. Suburban 3. Additional connections standard. The  streets within a network addition Network additions providing direct  access to (i) more than 200 dwelling units or (ii) lots whose trip generation  is expected to be over 2,000 VPD may be accepted into the secondary system  of state highways if the network addition meets the following requirements: 
    a. The streets are designed and constructed in compliance  with the suburban design standards pursuant to this chapter, the Road Design  Manual, and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150);
    b. The network addition provides sufficient connections in  multiple directions and to multiple properties, if applicable, to local and  higher order roadways to provide an overall connectivity index of 1.4 or  higher. All network additions shall have a minimum of two connections; and 
    c. The block layout and other features of the development  are designed in such a fashion as to provide reasonably direct pedestrian  movement throughout the development and to adjoining property.
    3. Rural standard. The streets within a network addition  may be accepted into the secondary system of state highways if the network  addition meets the following requirements: 
    a. The streets are designed and constructed in compliance  with the rural design standards pursuant to this chapter, the Road Design  Manual, and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150); and 
    b. The network addition provides multiple connections to  adjacent properties or streets in varying directions.
    provides an additional external connection beyond that  required under subdivision 2 of this subsection for each additional 200  dwelling units or 2,000 VPD or portion of each over and above the initial 200  dwelling units or 2,000 VPD. For the purposes of this requirement, each  external connection of collector facilities that are elements of the county's  transportation plan and to which there is no direct lot access provided counts  as two external connections. The district administrator's designee shall waive  or modify this additional connections standard if one or more of the following  situations renders the provision of such connection impracticable:
    a. The adjoining property is completely built out, its  state is such that redevelopment within 20 years is unlikely, and there is no  stub out (either constructed or platted) to the property served by the network  addition; 
    b. The adjoining property is zoned for a use whose traffic  is incompatible with the development being served by the network addition,  providing, however, that in no case shall retail, residential, or office uses  be considered incompatible with retail, residential, or office uses;
    c. In developments with a median density of more than eight  lots per acre or with a FAR of 0.4 or higher, where the number of connections  provided would be contrary to the public interest; or
    d. There is no reasonable connection possible to adjoining  property or adjacent highways due to a factor outside the control of the  developer of the network addition, such as the presence of conservation  easements not put in place by the developer of the network addition, water  features such as rivers or lakes, jurisdictional wetlands, grades in excess of  15% whose total elevation change is greater than five feet, limited access  highways, railroads, or government property to which access is restricted.
    4. Individual street standard. Streets that are not part of a  network addition shall be accepted into the secondary system of state highways  upon petition by the local governing body as long as they meet the requirements  of the applicable design standard and both termini one terminus  of the street are intersections is an intersection with a roadway  or roadways that are is part of the existing publicly  maintained highway network, subject to the connectivity exceptions of  subdivision 5 of this subsection and the other terminus is either an  intersection with a roadway that is part of the existing publicly maintained  highway network or a stub out to an adjoining property. Streets considered  for individual acceptance should be (i) streets that provide a connection  between two existing publicly maintained streets, or (ii) streets  with a functional classification as collector or higher, (iii) a frontage  road or reverse frontage road pursuant to VDOT's Access Management Regulations:  Principal Arterials (see 24VAC30-92-150), (iv) streets petitioned for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways through the Rural  Addition Program pursuant to §§ 33.1-72.1 and 33.1-72.2 of the Code of Virginia  provided such street was constructed prior to March 9, 2009, (v) streets  petitioned for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways through  the Commonwealth Transportation Board's Rural Addition Policy provided such  street was constructed prior to March 9, 2009, or (vi) streets constructed or  improved pursuant to §§ 33.1-221 and 33.1-223 of the Code of Virginia.
    5. Connectivity exceptions. 
    a. The connectivity index requirement for a network  addition shall be reduced where a portion of the perimeter features one or more  of the following constraints: (i) railroad tracks; (ii) limited access highway;  (iii) an existing navigable river or a standing body of water with a depth  greater than four feet under normal conditions; (iv) terrain grades in excess  of 20%; and (v) government-owned property with restrictions upon development  such as military installations, parks in existence prior to the submission of the  development proposal for the network addition, and land under conservation  easements accepted by the Virginia Outdoors Foundation.
    The connectivity index shall be reduced based on the  percentage of the perimeter that features one or more constraints. In compact  area types, the connectivity index requirement shall be equal to 1.6 minus 0.6  times the ratio of the length of the perimeter that features one or more  constraints to the total length of the perimeter. In suburban area types, the  connectivity index requirement shall be equal to 1.4 minus 0.4 times the ratio  of the length of the perimeter that features one or more constraints to the  total length of the perimeter. 
    b. The Where the above standards for waiver or  modification or both have been met, the connectivity index requirement  requirements for a network addition may shall be reduced  waived or modified by the district administrator administrator's  designee. The developer shall submit any other request for  connectivity exceptions waiver or modification to the district  administrator's designee with a copy to the local official. The district  administrator's designee shall respond to requests for connectivity exceptions  within 45 30 calendar days of receipt of a request. For projects  where a scoping meeting pursuant to the Traffic Impact Analysis regulations  (24VAC30-155) will be held, requests for exceptions and supporting data should  be presented and discussed. The district administrator's designee may modify  the connectivity index requirements for one or more of the following criteria: 
    (1) If the locality's comprehensive plan designates  adjoining parcels to the proposed development for a land use that is determined  by the local official to be incompatible with the land use of the proposed  development. If the connectivity index requirement is modified due to  incompatible land use, such network additions shall provide stub out or stub  outs, as determined by the district administrator's designee based on the size  of the development, to allow for future connectivity in the event that the  comprehensive plan changes the designation of adjacent parcels to land use that  is not incompatible. In no instance shall any retail, office, or residential  land use be considered incompatible land use with any proposed retail, office,  or residential development.
    (2) Good cause is shown that such requirement cannot be met  due to unique characteristics of the parcel being developed such as  jurisdictional wetlands or cluster subdivisions developed pursuant to § 15.2-2286.1 of the Code of Virginia. 
    6. In instances where there is potential for conflict between  this chapter and the Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (see  24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-72) or the Access Management Regulations:  Minor Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets (see 24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-73),  the following shall apply.:
    a. For streets with a functional classification of collector  where additional connections necessary to meet the connectivity index  requirement requirements of this chapter cannot be accommodated  within the applicable spacing standards and cannot otherwise be met through  connections to lower order roadways or stub outs, such spacing standards shall  be modified by the district administrator administrator's designee  to allow for such connection. Such connection or connections shall be required  to meet intersection sight distance standards specified in the Road Design  Manual, 2011 (VDOT) (see 24VAC30-92-150).
    b. For streets with a functional classification of minor  arterial where additional connections necessary to meet the connectivity index  requirement requirements of this chapter cannot be accommodated  within the applicable spacing standards and cannot otherwise be met through  connections to lower order roadways or stub outs, the district administrator  administrator's designee shall, in consultation with the developer and  the local official, either modify the applicable spacing standards to allow for  such connection or connections, or modify the connectivity index requirement  requirements of this chapter to account for the inability to make such  connection. Such connection shall be required to meet intersection sight  distance as specified in the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) (see  24VAC30-92-150).
    c. For streets with a functional classification of principal  arterial where additional connections necessary to meet the external  connectivity requirements of this chapter cannot be accommodated within the  applicable spacing standards and cannot otherwise be met through connections to  lower order roadways or stub outs, the connectivity index requirement requirements  shall be modified by the district administrator administrator's  designee to account for the inability to make such connection.
    7. Failure to connect. As a local governing body is not  required to approve a subdivision plat that does not connect to stub outs in  adjacent developments, when If a local government approves a  subdivision plat for a new development that does not connect to a stub out or  stub outs in an adjacent development and such development's network addition or  individual street would meet the applicable requirements of this chapter if it  connected to a stub out or stub outs in the adjacent development, the network  addition or individual street may or may not be accepted into the  secondary system of state highways for maintenance pursuant to the authority  granted to the district administrators in accordance with 24VAC30-92-100. In  such event the department representative's and the commissioner's top priority  for expenditure of improvements funds for such locality's six-year plan for  secondary highways shall be to connect the street or streets in the recently  accepted network addition or individual street to the stub out or stub outs in  the adjacent developments in addition to safety.
    24VAC30-92-70. Administrative procedure.
    A. Conceptual sketch. A conceptual sketch of the development  that shows sufficient information for the department to review and concur with  the proposed functional classification for each street in the development shall  be provided to the district administrator's designee by the local official  prior to preparing detailed construction plans for review. Any preliminary or  conceptual plat, plan or sketch that conforms to the locality's zoning  requirements or subdivision ordinance is acceptable if the information required  by this subsection is shown. The submittal should include:
    1. The general location and configuration, including the  terminus, of each street, and the traffic volume anticipated when the land  served is fully developed in accordance with the land uses anticipated.
    2. The location, area, and density or floor area ratio (FAR)  of each type of proposed land use within the development.
    3. The location of any proposed transportation facility including  any public transportation facilities as well as bicycle and pedestrian  accommodations within the development's boundaries included in the  comprehensive plan of the governing body.
    4. The proposed functional classification for each street in  the development.
    5. The connectivity index of the network addition as  proposed, if applicable.
    6. The location of stub outs on adjoining property and the  existing land use of such adjacent property, if applicable, and the location of  any proposed stub outs within the network addition, if applicable.
    7. Any reductions to waiver or modification of  the connectivity requirement requirements or pending requests  therefore pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 5 a and approved modifications to  the connectivity requirement pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 5 b.
    8. Any requests for modifications to the connectivity  requirement pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 5 b. 
    9. 8. General preliminary information on the  type of any stormwater management facilities that are storm sewer  system, such as BMP, outfalls, or conveyance channels, that is proposed to  be located within the right-of-way as described in 24VAC30-92-120 L 2 and if  the project is located in a MS4 regulated area or a TMDL watershed. 
    10. 9. Other available information pertinent to  the intended development, including but not limited to any proposed phased  development of streets pursuant to 24VAC30-92-80.
    B. Conceptual sketch review. The district administrator's  designee will review the layout and functional classification of streets shown  in the concept sketch and within 45 calendar days notify the local official in  writing, as well as the developer, if applicable, of his concurrence or  recommendations and whether or not the streets in the proposed network addition  meet the connectivity and other requirements of this chapter. This concurrence  will be valid as long as the basic concept for the development, including the  general street layout and design, as submitted for review, remains unchanged.  The district administrator's designee shall also review any unresolved request  for modifications to the connectivity index requirement requirements  and include his decision in the written notification to the local official and  the developer. As part of his review, the district administrator's designee shall  review the provision of collector and other higher order streets and if  necessary make recommendations for the provision of such streets to address the  traffic generated by the development.
    C. Plan of development submission. Plats or plans, or both,  together with other pertinent data as herein prescribed, shall be submitted to  the local official in accordance with the practices of the local government and  to the district administrator's designee for all proposed developments whose  streets are intended to be added to the secondary system of state highways  maintained by the department. The district administrator's designee may,  subject to the availability of staff and upon the request of the local  official, cooperate in the review of proposed developments to be developed to  these standards but not initially intended for addition to the secondary system  of state highways maintained by the department. The department may recover the  costs for this service in accordance with 24VAC30-92-140.
    D. Plan review. Upon receipt of the plats or plans, or both,  the district administrator's designee will arrange for the appropriate review  to determine compliance with the requirements of this chapter and other  applicable VDOT requirements. The general procedure for this review is  described in the guidance document Guidance Document for the  Commonwealth Transportation Board's Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT).
    E. Plan approval. The district administrator's designee will  advise the appropriate local official and the developer, if applicable, as to  the results of the review.
    1. If the street development proposed by the plats or plans,  or both, is determined to be in compliance with these requirements, the  district administrator's designee will provide written confirmation of this  finding. This action signifies the district administrator's designee's approval  of the street layout and design shown on the plats or plans, as submitted. Any  subsequent revision, additions, or deletions thereto shall require specific  written approval of the district administrator's designee for each such change.
    2. If a revision of the submitted plats or plans is determined  necessary, the district administrator's designee will list the required changes  in a written response to the local official and the developer, if applicable.  Upon completion of the specified revisions, the plats or plans will be  resubmitted for review and approval by the district administrator's designee.
    The department's approval of a street construction plan shall  constitute its commitment to accept the street or network addition depicted  thereon when all applicable provisions of these requirements are satisfied and  the streets have been constructed according to the approved construction plan and  supporting specifications. However, during the department's or other approved  inspection of construction as specified by this chapter, if a situation is  discovered that was not addressed on the approved plan that could, in the  opinion of the district administrator's designee, adversely affect public  safety or the integrity of either the roadway or the adjacent property,  acceptance of the street or network addition shall be deferred until the  situation is corrected.
    The department's approval of a street construction plan shall  expire after a period of five years if construction has not commenced, in which  case the subdivision street construction plan shall be resubmitted for  subsequent review and approval. This shall not affect the adequacy of the  approved concept plan as depicted on a recorded final plat, as provided for  under § 15.2-2241 of the Code of Virginia.
    Network additions will only be accepted when the entire  network addition has been constructed, except in such instances where the  constructed portion meets the applicable public benefit requirements of this  chapter.
    F. Street acceptance. Upon the satisfactory completion of  construction of the street or streets in a network addition, the department  will advise the local governing body regarding the street or network addition's  readiness for acceptance and the local governing body, in consultation with the  district administrator's designee, will initiate its acceptance into the  secondary system of state highways maintained by the department provided:
    1. The developer dedicates the prescribed right-of-way to  public use.
    2. The street has or streets in the network addition have been  constructed in accordance with the applicable specifications, standards and the  plats or plans approved by the department.
    a. Traffic control markings, signs, and devices have been  installed in accordance with VDOT standards, specifications, and practices.
    b. Speed limits have been set in accordance with Article 8 (§ 46.2-870  et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title 46.2 of the Code of Virginia. For any streets  with speed limits different from those set out in § 46.2-870 or §§ 46.2-873  through 46.2-875 of the Code of Virginia, traffic engineering investigations  supporting such speed limits have been submitted to VDOT. 
    3. The developer furnishes all required information and data  to the district administrator's designee and the local government official  pertaining to the development's stormwater management system that are pertinent  to the locality's, department's, or other entity's Municipal Separate Storm  Sewer System (MS4) permit, if applicable. 
    4. The street or streets in a network addition provides  sufficient public benefit as prescribed in 24VAC30-92-60 and meets the  requirements of this chapter.
    5. The street or streets in the network addition has been  properly maintained since its completion.
    6. The developer furnishes the surety and fees in accordance  with 24VAC30-92-140.
    7. The governing body has or other responsible  parties have executed all agreements prescribed by these requirements,  unless specifically waived on an individual case basis by the department  employee, or his successor or his designee, responsible for overseeing these  requirements and the final acceptance of streets as part of the secondary  system of state highways maintained by the department.
    8. The governing body, by proper resolution, requests the  department to accept the street or streets in the network addition for  maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways under its  jurisdiction. The resolution shall include the governing body's guarantee of an  unrestricted and unencumbered right-of-way as dedicated, plus any necessary  easements for fills, drainage, or sight distance.
    Upon the department's determination that the requested street  or network addition is in compliance with the applicable provisions of these  requirements, the governing body will be officially advised of the street or  network addition's acceptance into the secondary system of state highways and  the effective date of such action. This notification serves as the district  administrator's designee's authority to begin maintenance thereon.
    24VAC30-92-80. Phased development of streets.
    A. Policy. Certain streets that require four or more travel  lanes to accommodate the projected traffic may be accepted by the department  for maintenance after completion of the first two lanes to an acceptable,  initial phase of construction, upon the request of the governing body. It is  recognized that there is a distinction between those streets that benefit the  regional transportation network and those that primarily serve the development  of land and local traffic, and, therefore, the criteria for phased construction  for each situation differs as described in subsection B of this section.
    However, in all cases, the right-of-way required for the road  at its complete stage of construction shall be dedicated and accepted as part  of the initial street acceptance. In addition, the initial phase of  construction shall be designed and constructed to facilitate construction of  the remaining phase in a manner that will avoid the need to reconstruct the  initial two lanes.
    Consideration for the acceptance of any street under the  provisions of this section shall be limited to the phased development of only  the street's roadway. All other applicable requirements, e.g., public benefit,  drainage easements, and administrative procedures, shall apply.
    B. Criteria.
    1. For streets included in the transportation plan of the  locality's comprehensive plan that serve diverse areas of the region or  locally, no special agreement or acknowledgement is needed as a prerequisite to  acceptance, provided: 
    a. The street is part of a transportation corridor that was  formally adopted as a part of the locality's comprehensive transportation plan  prior to the local governing body's approval of the plat or plan for the  development of the adjacent land.
    b. The transportation corridor is a major thoroughfare planned  primarily to move through traffic.
    c. When fully developed the street must satisfy the department's  functional classification criteria as a major collector or higher.
    d. The street has a projected traffic volume of 8,000 vehicles  per day or less for a period of 10 years following the date of the acceptance  for maintenance by the department.
    2. For all other streets, the local governing body's  resolution requesting acceptance of the initial two-lane section must include  provisions that acknowledge:
    a. The local governing body agrees that all costs incurred in  the street's complete construction, including right-of-way, engineering,  utility adjustment, etc., shall be provided from funds other than those derived  from state revenue sources administered by the department, except as may be  expressly authorized by the department.
    b. The local governing body agrees that it is its  responsibility to ensure that the roadway is completed as needed to accommodate  the traffic. However, the locality also acknowledges that a determination that  the street needs to be completed to its ultimate section will be made by the  district administrator's designee once it is determined that the first two  lanes will not sustain an acceptable level of service for the functional  classification of the roadway in accordance with the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2010 (TRB).
    C. Procedures.
    1. Plats or plans, or both, for the street's complete  development, in accordance with all applicable provisions of these  requirements, shall be submitted for approval.
    2. The plats or plans shall also delineate the street's initial  development as proposed pursuant to this section. In no case shall this design  provide less than one-half of the roadway typical section required by the  applicable requirements for the street's complete development.
    3. Unless waived by the district administrator's designee, a  capacity analysis shall be submitted to document that an acceptable level of  service will be maintained for the intended duration of the initial phase of  development. In determining an acceptable level of service, the beneficial effect  of the proposed street on the overall transportation network will be  considered.
    4. A determination will be made by the department in  consultation with the locality as to whether the street can be approved for  phased development and as to which criterion in subsection B of this section  applies.
    5. Upon the district administrator's designee's determination  that the proposal is in compliance with the applicable provisions of this  section, the plans may be approved accordingly.
    6. Upon completion of the street's initial phase in accordance  with approved plans, its compliance with all other applicable provisions of  this section, and the inclusion of the appropriate language in the resolution,  the street may be accepted for maintenance by the department as part of the  secondary system of state highways.
    24VAC30-92-110. Appeal to district administrator.
    The district administrator is authorized to consider and  render a ruling on unresolved differences of opinion between the developer and  the district administrator's designee that pertain to the interpretation and  application of these requirements.
    To obtain this review, the developer shall provide the  district administrator, the district administrator's designee, and the local  official a written request for such action, describing any unresolved issue.  After reviewing all pertinent information, the district administrator will  advise the developer in writing regarding the decision of the appeal, and  provide a copy of the decision to the local official and the district  administrator's designee. All correspondence requesting an appeal should  include copies of all prior correspondence with the local official and  department representatives regarding the issue or issues. The district  administrator shall advise the developer of the decision on the appeal within 45  30 calendar days. 
    The developer may request a meeting with the district  administrator concerning the appeal, and the district administrator shall  respond within 10 business days and provide to the developer a date, time, and  location for such meeting. After reviewing all pertinent information, the  district administrator shall advise the developer in writing regarding the  decision on the appeal, and provide a copy of the decision to the district  administrator's designee and the local official.
    The district administrator shall advise the developer of  the decision on the unresolved differences of opinion within 45 calendar days.  The developer may further appeal the district administrator's decision to  the commissioner. All correspondence requesting an appeal should include copies  of all prior correspondence with the local official and department  representatives regarding the issue or issues. The commissioner shall advise  the developer of the decision on the appeal within 30 calendar days.
    24VAC30-92-120. Design and agreement requirements.
    A. General requirements. Most criteria addressing the design  of new streets can be found in the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and its  Appendix B (1), the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150).  However, the following provisions are provided for guidance, particularly in  regard to features that require agreements or formal acknowledgements of the  governing body before VDOT's acceptance of the street or streets within a development.
    When an agreement is required between the local governing  body and the department as a prerequisite to the acceptance of a street,  nothing in these requirements shall preclude the local governing body from  entering into separate agreements with other entities to fulfill its  responsibilities. However, if the provisions are intended to ensure the safety  of the public using the street, the department reserves the right to approve  the involvement of the other party or parties.
    All streets functionally classified as local shall have a  design speed equal to the posted speed limit, except for streets functionally  classified as local with a projected traffic volume of 400 vehicles per day or  less, which may have a design speed less than the posted speed limit.
    The department, locality, and developer shall take measures  to minimize the impacts of through traffic on streets functionally classified  as local and accepted into the secondary system of state highways under these  regulations. Such measures shall include initial street designs that manage  motor vehicle speed to match local context.
    B. Geometric requirements. Geometric requirements for new  streets are established in the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and its  Appendix B (1), the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150).  Sufficient off-street parking must be provided by the local governing body in  accordance with this chapter if streets in a proposed network addition are  constructed in accordance with design requirements for streets with off-street  parking.
    C. Turn lanes. Left or right turn lanes shall be provided at  intersections when the department determines that projected turning movements  warrant their installation. These facilities shall be designed in accordance  with the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and its Appendix B (1),  the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) and, if  necessary, additional right-of-way shall be provided to accommodate these  facilities.
    D. Pavement structure.
    1. Pavement design. The pavement structure for new streets  shall be in accordance with the Pavement Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150)  for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia, 2009 (VDOT), including  any prescribed underdrains. Prior to construction of the pavement sub-base and  finish courses, the district administrator's designee shall approve the  proposed pavement design.
    2. Special pavement surfaces. The district administrator's  designee may approve special pavement surfaces, such as the use of stamped  pavement. However, if the pavement design is a type not addressed by the  Pavement Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) for Subdivision and  Secondary Roads in Virginia, 2009 (VDOT), an agreement shall be provided by  the governing body that addresses the future maintenance of such pavement.
    3. Pavement additions to existing streets. When an existing  VDOT-maintained roadway is to be widened to accommodate additional lanes or the  addition of turn lanes, the necessary pavement design shall be obtained from  the district administrator's designee and the entire surface of the roadway  (old and new portions) may be required to be overlaid and restriped if required  by the district administrator's designee. The district administrator's designee  shall not require the entire surface of the roadway to be overlaid and  restriped when the only pavement addition to the existing roadway was for  bicycle lanes unless extenuating circumstances require that the entire surface  of the roadway be overlaid and restriped.
    E. Parking.
    1. Perpendicular and angle parking along streets is normally  prohibited. However, perpendicular and angle parking along streets may be  considered if the features along the street cause the street to readily appear  to be a street rather than a travel way through a parking lot.
    Street design that anticipates limited or no on-street parking  shall be approved when sufficient off-street parking is provided in accordance  with this chapter. Street design that anticipates the restriction of on-street  parking on one side of the street shall be approved when sufficient off-street  parking is provided for buildings on the side of the street where it is  anticipated parking will be restricted.
    2. For streets designed without on-street parking, a minimum  of two off-street parking spaces per dwelling unit shall be provided in  proximity of the unit that they are intended to serve. Such spaces, which may  be provided in a parking bay, driveway, or garage facilities, shall be  provided outside of the street's right-of-way. The district administrator's  designee may approve lesser parking requirements for individual developments or  classes of developments when evidence is presented to support such an approval  such as proximity to transit service or the nature of the development.  Entrances to parking bays and garage facilities shall be designed in accordance  with the appropriate provisions of the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-92-150) and the Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (see  24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-72) and Access Management Regulations: Minor  Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets (24VAC30-73).
    3. In instances where the local governing body has determined,  through adoption of a parking ordinance or other similar ordinance, that lesser  parking requirements are sufficient for certain classes of development, such  lesser requirements shall govern.
    4. The department shall not prohibit roadway design that  allows for the provision of on-street parking on any roadway with a functional  classification of collector or local where the posted speed limit is 35 miles  per hour or less and that is located within a compact or suburban area type.
    F. Cul-de-sacs and turnarounds. An adequate turnaround  facility shall be provided at the end of each cul-de-sac to permit the safe and  convenient maneuvering by service vehicles. Various configurations of  turnarounds are illustrated in the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT));  however, alternative configurations may be approved by the district administrator's  designee. Additional right-of-way shall be provided as required by the design  of the turnaround. Normally, any nontraveled way areas within the turnaround,  such as an island, shall be included in the dedicated right-of-way of the  facility unless the department and the locality are able to reach an agreement  for the maintenance of such nontraveled way areas. Nothing in this chapter  shall prohibit the provision of stormwater management facilities in the  nontraveled way areas of a cul-de-sac, provided the requirements of subsection  L of this section are met.
    For circular turnarounds, a well-defined, identifiable street  segment, equal to the normal lot width along the intersected street that serves  the cul-de-sac, or 50 feet, whichever is greater, shall extend from the  intersected street to the turning area.
    G. Curb and gutter. For the purpose of these requirements,  the use of curb and gutter is an acceptable roadway design, rather than a  requirement. However, when used, curb and gutter shall be designed in  accordance with the Road Design Manual and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT))  and only one curb and gutter design may be used along the length of a street.
    1. Driveway entrance requirements. Without regard to the curb  design used, the curb shall incorporate a driveway entrance apron, as  illustrated in the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix  B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)), to provide a smooth  transition from the gutter invert or roadway surface onto the driveway.
    2. Curb ramps. All streets that incorporate accessible routes  for pedestrian use shall, without regard to the curb design used, include curb  ramps at intersections for use by persons with disabilities and shall  incorporate other applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act  (42 USC § 12101 et seq.).
    H. Private entrances. All private entrances shall be designed  and constructed in accordance with the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)).
    I. Pedestrian, bicycle, and shared use path facilities. The  Commonwealth Transportation Board's "Policy for Integrating Bicycle and  Pedestrian Accommodations," 2004 emphasizes accommodating  pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Any street proposed for VDOT acceptance shall  accommodate pedestrian and bicycle traffic in accordance with the Commonwealth  Transportation Board's policy and this chapter. Pedestrian and bicycle  facilities should be generally uniform between intersections and  included in the initial construction of the street, prior to VDOT acceptance. 
    1. Pedestrian accommodation requirements. Pedestrian  accommodations shall be provided based upon density of development, the plans  for or existence of public schools in the vicinity, the presence of existing  pedestrian accommodations, and the operational nature of the fronting street.  In all developments with pedestrian accommodations, such accommodations shall connect  with existing pedestrian accommodations and allow for connection to future  pedestrian accommodations to adjacent parcels. If multiple requirements apply  to a street, the greater accommodation requirement shall govern. The  district administrator's designee may waive or modify these requirements for  the provision of pedestrian accommodations in situations when the accommodation  exception provisions of the Commonwealth Transportation Board's policy are met.
    a. Pedestrian accommodations shall be provided along both  sides of the street or provisions made that provide equivalent pedestrian  mobility in areas with a median lot size of one half acre or less or a floor  area ratio (FAR) of 0.4 or greater for streets with an ADT over 400 that  are located in a development with a median lot size of one-quarter acre or  smaller or when the ADT for the street is over 8,000. 
    b. Pedestrian accommodations shall be provided along at least  one side of the street or provisions made that provide equivalent pedestrian  mobility in areas that have a median lot size between one-half acre to two  acres for streets with an ADT over 400 that are located in a development  with a median lot size between one-quarter acre and one-half acre or when the  ADT for the street is between 2,000 and 8,000. 
    c. Pedestrian accommodations shall be provided along at least  one side of the street or provisions made that provide equivalent pedestrian  mobility in suburban and compact area types along roadways within one-half  centerline mile of a public school within one-half street centerline  mile of a public school.
    d. When connecting to a stub street that has pedestrian  accommodations, the new street shall also include pedestrian accommodations.
    e. Pedestrian accommodations shall be provided along at least  one side of, or provisions made that provide equivalent pedestrian mobility  along, streets functionally classified as collectors or arterials with two  travel lanes not including turn lanes. In no instance shall any sidewalk abut  the curb or the edge of a collector or higher order street, unless the sidewalk  is at least eight feet wide. In such instances tree wells shall be provided. In  instances where it is necessary to retrofit streets with pedestrian  accommodations to allow the streets to be accepted into the secondary system of  state highways, the pedestrian accommodations less than eight feet wide may  abut the curb or the edge of the street.
    f. e. Pedestrian accommodations shall be  provided along both sides of, or provisions made that provide equivalent  pedestrian mobility along, streets functionally classified as collectors or  arterials with three or more travel lanes. In no instance shall any sidewalk  abut the curb or the edge of a collector or higher order street, unless the  sidewalk is at least eight feet wide. In such instances tree wells shall be  provided. In instances where it is necessary to retrofit streets with  pedestrian accommodations to allow the streets to be accepted into the  secondary system of state highways, the pedestrian accommodations less than  eight feet wide may abut the curb or the edge of the street.
    2. Maintenance of pedestrian and bicycle accommodations.  Pedestrian and bicycle facilities are eligible for VDOT acceptance and  maintenance based on the criteria of this section. A copy of an agreement or  other document showing the proposed maintenance responsibilities of pedestrian  and bicycle facilities shall be provided to VDOT for any pedestrian  accommodation outside of the VDOT right-of-way that is used to meet the  accommodation requirements of this subsection. 
    a. Compliant facilities. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities,  including shared use paths as defined under § 46.2-100 of the Code of Virginia,  shall be accepted as part of the street or network addition, unless otherwise  requested by the governing body, provided they are located fully within the  dedicated right-of-way of the street and they are constructed in accordance  with applicable criteria and standards of the department.
    (1) Sidewalk criteria. Sidewalks shall be constructed in  accordance with the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150)  (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)).
    (2) Bicycle facility criteria. Bicycle facilities contiguous  with the street shall be in accordance with the department's design and  construction criteria set forth in the Road Design Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2011.
    (3) Shared use path criteria. Shared use paths shall be  constructed in accordance with the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150),  2011 and closely follow the vertical alignment of the roadway without  meandering on and off the right-of-way.
    b. Noncompliant sidewalk, bicycle, and shared use paths.  Noncompliant sidewalk, bicycle, and shared use paths that fail to meet  requirements of the department's standards for construction, alignment, or  placement within the dedicated right-of-way of the street shall be deemed to be  noncompliant and not qualify for maintenance unless a design waiver or  exemption is granted by the department. Noncompliant sidewalks and shared use  paths may be constructed of stabilizer convenient to the applicant.  Noncompliant facilities may co-exist within the dedicated right-of-way of the  street under a land use permit issued by the district administrator's designee  to the local governing body responsible for having established the facility  through its subdivision process or other development process.
    Such permits will clearly specify the responsibility for  maintenance of the facility and related activities to the extent the facility  occupies the street's right-of-way. The permit applicant should be an entity  that can be reasonably expected to have perpetual maintenance capability. 
    J. Bridge, drainage, and other grade separation structures.  Bridges, drainage, and other grade separation structures shall be designed and  constructed in accordance with all applicable department criteria and  standards. The district administrator's designee may require special review of  the plans and construction inspection.
    The department will accept grade separation structures as  part of new streets, provided the structure is a drainage structure or is  intended to separate the movement of registered motor vehicles. In addition,  the department will accept grade separation structures intended to separate  pedestrians or bicyclists or any combination thereof from traffic using the  roadway, provided:
    1. The structure is available for unrestricted public use;
    2. The structure is accessible to pedestrian accommodations  situated along the street; and
    3. The projected traffic volume of the street is (i) not less  than 4,000 vpd ADT or (ii) if the structure otherwise serves as  part of the principal pedestrian access to a school or a mass transit facility  including stops and stations and a peak hour traffic volume of 450 vph VPH  or greater is projected.
    In all other instances, the grade separation structure shall  be deemed to be a locally controlled grade separation structure within the  right-of-way of the street, in which case the street will only be accepted as  part of the secondary system of state highways maintained by the department  after the local governing body and the department have executed an agreement  acceptable to the department that (i) acknowledges the department has no  responsibility or liability due to the presence of the structure and (ii)  assures the burden and costs of inspection, maintenance, and future  improvements to the structure are provided from sources other than those  administered by the department.
    In all cases, whether the structure is accepted as an integral  part of the roadway for maintenance by the department or it remains a locally  controlled structure, the lighting, safety, and security of those using such  facilities shall remain a responsibility of local government.
    K. Dams. The department will only consider accepting streets  for maintenance that traverse dams when all of the following provisions are  satisfied. For the purpose of this section, a roadway will be considered to  traverse a dam if any part of the fill for the roadway and the fill for the dam  overlap or if the area between the two embankments is filled in so that the  downstream face of the dam is obscured or if a closed drainage facility from a  dam extends under a roadway fill.
    1. Agreements with the governing body. Except as exempt under  subdivision 6 of this subsection, the governing body acknowledges by formal  agreement the department's liability is limited to the maintenance of the  roadway and that the department has no responsibility or liability due to the  presence of the dam, the maintenance of which shall remain the responsibility  of an owner, other than the department, as established by § 33.1-176 of  the Code of Virginia.
    2. Design review. An engineer licensed to practice in the  Commonwealth of Virginia shall certify that the hydraulic and structural design  of any dam, as described below, is in accordance with current national and  state engineering practice and that all pertinent provisions of the Subdivision  Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road  Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)) have been considered. Prior to approval of the  roadway construction plans, the hydraulic and structural design of a proposed  dam shall be reviewed by the department and meet the department's satisfaction  if:
    a. A roadway is considered to traverse a dam; or
    b. A roadway is located below but sufficiently close to the  dam that a catastrophic breach could endanger the roadway or the safety of  those using the roadway.
    3. Right-of-way requirements. The right-of-way of roads  considered to occupy dams shall be recorded either as an easement for public  road purposes or as a dedication specifically to the governing body.  Right-of-way dedicated in the name of the Commonwealth or any of its agencies  is not acceptable if it includes a dam, and roads through such right-of-way  will not be accepted as a part of the secondary system of state highways  maintained by the department.
    4. Supplemental, alternative access. To be considered for VDOT  maintenance, roadways that traverse a dam must be supplemented by an  appropriate alternative roadway facility for public ingress or egress having  suitable provisions that ensure perpetual maintenance.
    5. Permits. All applicable federal and state permits  associated with dams shall be secured and filed with the locality prior to  VDOT's acceptance of any street that traverses a dam.
    6. Dams exempt from agreements. The acceptance of roadways  that traverse dams shall be exempt from the requirements for an agreement with  the governing body, as required by subdivision 1 of this subsection, if all of  the following is satisfied:
    a. The dam is used to create a stormwater detention or  retention facility;
    b. The maximum depth of the water retained by the impoundment  at its 100-year storm flood elevation is not greater than four feet; and
    c. The surface area of the impoundment at full flood is not  greater than two acres and is beyond the right-of-way dedicated to public use.
    L. Roadway drainage.
    1. Policy and procedures. All drainage facilities shall be  designed in accordance with the department's Drainage Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2002 and supplemental directives or the Subdivision  Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road  Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)) as may be appropriate. All drainage  computations supporting a proposed drainage design shall be submitted to the  department for review as part of the documents necessary for the approval of a  construction plan.
    2. Stormwater management. Whereas the department considers  matters regarding stormwater management associated with the construction of  streets to be under the authority of the local governing body, decisions  regarding stormwater management in the construction of streets are deferred to  the locality. However, stormwater management, including the construction of  detention or retention facilities, or both, is recognized as an available  design alternative or BMP for water quantity, quality, or both. Where  the developer is required by regulations promulgated by an agency or  governmental subdivision other than the department or the developer chooses to  use stormwater management facilities in the design of a subdivision or other  development, the governing body shall, by formal agreement, and as a  prerequisite for the transfer of jurisdiction over the street to the  department, acknowledge that the department is not responsible for the  operation, maintenance, retrofitting, or liability of the stormwater  management facility or facilities associated with the subdivision or the  development. Any retrofits required to comply with a TMDL WLA will be the  responsibility of the locality. However, in the event the governing body  has executed a comprehensive, localitywide agreement with the department  addressing these matters, a specific agreement addressing stormwater management  controls in the subdivision or development will not be required as a condition  for street acceptance.
    Stormwater management controls for VDOT projects are to be  designed in accordance with the approved VDOT Erosion and Sediment Control and  Stormwater Management Program Standards and Specifications, 2010, as  annually approved by the Department of Conservation and Recreation (see  24VAC30-92-150), the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Regulations,  (4VAC50-30), and the Virginia Stormwater Management Program  (VSMP) Permit Regulations (4VAC50-60), and, if applicable, VDOT's MS4  Program Plan, 2008. While these controls may be necessary whenever a street  maintained by the department is widened or relocated, the department does not  require them in the development of new streets because such activity is  regulated by the local governments. However, developers and counties may find  these controls useful in managing land development activity.
    Generally devices and treatments intended to mitigate the  impact of stormwater shall be placed off of the right-of-way and shall be  designed to prevent the backup of water against the roadbed. However, such  devices and treatments may be placed within the right-of-way if the department  and the local governing body have executed an agreement that (i) acknowledges  the department has no responsibility or liability due to the presence of the  devices or treatments, or both; (ii) assures the burden and costs of  inspection, maintenance, VSMP permit requirements, TMDL WLA requirements,  retrofitting or other future improvements to the devices and treatments, or  other costs related to the placement of such devices or treatments within the  right-of-way are provided from sources other than those administered by the  department; (iii) a professional engineer licensed by the Commonwealth or the  manufacturer as required by the department, certifies the construction of the  facility to plans reviewed by the department; and (iv) a concept design  requirements of the facility is are included in the department's  Drainage Manual, 2002, the Department of Conservation and Recreation's  Stormwater Management Handbook, First Edition, 1999, or  supplemental directives (see 24VAC30-92-150).
    Where development activity results in increased runoff to the  extent that adjustment of an outfall facility is required, such adjustment  shall be at the developer's expense and shall be contained within an  appropriate easement.
    The department is required to implement the Municipal Separate  Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit for facilities located on its right-of-way. To  comply with these requirements, the local governing body shall provide to  the district administrator's designee all aspects of a proposed  development's storm sewer system and associated stormwater management system  plan that are pertinent to the locality's or the agency's department's  MS4 permit to the district administrator's designee. Additionally,  the local governing body shall provide to the district administrator's designee  an inventory of all outfalls to waters of the United States, physical  interconnections with other stormwater systems, stormwater management devices,  or both related to the project that are located within VDOT right-of-way as a  condition of street acceptance in accordance with the VDOT MS4 Stormwater  Outfall Inventory Manual, 2011. VDOT shall not accept a street for maintenance  as part of the secondary system of state highways that are not in compliance  with conditions of the pertinent MS4 permit and VDOT's MS4 Program Plan, 2008,  as such conditions existed at the time of the relevant street construction  plan's approval. VDOT shall not accept a street for maintenance if there is an  illicit discharge to the system, as defined by 4VAC50-60-10 until the illicit  discharge is eliminated.
    3. Drainage easements.
    a. An acceptable easement shall be provided from all drainage  outfalls to a natural watercourse, as opposed to a swale.
    b. The department normally accepts and maintains only that  portion of a drainage system that falls within the limits of the dedicated  right-of-way for a street. The department's responsibility to enter drainage  easements outside of the dedicated right-of-way shall be limited to undertaking  corrective measures to alleviate problems that may adversely affect the safe  operation or integrity of the roadway.
    c. In the event drainage to a natural watercourse is not  accomplished or is interrupted, an acceptable agreement from the governing body  may be considered as an alternative to providing an easement to a natural  watercourse, provided the agreement acknowledges that the department is neither  responsible nor liable for drainage from the roadway.
    M. Other design considerations.
    1. Guardrail. Guardrail shall be used when required by the  district administrator's designee, consistent with the Road Design Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2011. For placement considerations, see the  Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1)  of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)).
    2. Landscaping and erosion control. All disturbed areas within  the dedicated right-of-way and easements of any street shall be restored with  vegetation compatible with the surrounding area. Where there is visual evidence  of erosion or siltation, acceptance of the street as part of the secondary  system of state highways maintained by the department will be postponed until  appropriate protective measures, in accordance with VDOT's construction  practices, are taken. Except as otherwise approved by the district  administrator's designee, planting of trees or shrubs on the right-of-way shall  be in accordance with the Subdivision Street Design Guide and the Road  Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT) and its Appendix B  (1) (the Subdivision Street Design Guide).
    3. Lighting. Roadway, security, or pedestrian lighting, when  required by the governing body or desired by the developer, shall be installed  in accordance with the Subdivision Street Design Guide and the Road  Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT) and its Appendix B  (1) (the Subdivision Street Design Guide). However, VDOT shall not be  responsible for the maintenance or replacement of lighting fixtures or the  provision of power for lighting.
    4. Railroad crossings.
    a. Short-arm gates with flashing signals, flashing signals  alone, or other protective devices as deemed appropriate by the department  shall be provided at any at-grade crossing of an active railroad by a street.
    b. Crossings of railroad right-of-way are subject to the  requirements of the railroad. Streets to be accepted by the department for  maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways that cross  railroad right-of-way will only be considered if the protective measures  outlined under this section have been fully installed and an agreement between  the railroad, the developer, and the local governing body has been executed.  Prior to execution, such agreements shall be presented to the department for  consideration in consultation with the Department of Rail and Public  Transportation.
    5. Utilities. Local governments, the development community,  and the utility community are encouraged to coordinate and consolidate their  interests as part of the initial development plan.
    a. Underground utilities. The department allows the placement  of underground utilities within the dedicated right-of-way of streets, but  normally restricts placement to areas outside of the travel lanes. However, if  the governing body has established adequate requirements approved by the  department for the design, location, and construction of underground utilities  within the right-of-way of streets, including provisions that ensure that  adequate testing and inspection is performed to minimize future settlement,  those requirements shall become the department's requirements and govern  provided those requirements exceed the department's requirements.
    Manholes shall not be placed in sidewalk, multiuse trail, or  shared use path facilities, within five feet of curb ramps or within driveway  entrances. 
    When location of the utilities outside of the pavement area is  not practical such as in high density developments incorporating the principles  of new urbanism as described in § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of Virginia,  such installations:
    (1) Are acceptable within the shoulders along the street or  within the parking area.
    (2) May be acceptable beneath the travel lanes of the street  or alley when provisions are made to ensure adequate inspection and compaction  tests and:
    (a) Longitudinal installations and manholes are located  outside of the normal travel lanes; or 
    (b) Longitudinal installations and manholes are placed in the  center of a travel lane out of the wheel path.
    However, manholes shall not be placed in sidewalk, multiuse  trail, or shared use path facilities within five feet of curb ramps or within  driveway entrances.
    b. Open-cutting of hard-surfaced roadways. The department  usually prohibits the open-cutting of hard-surfaced roads except in extenuating  circumstances. Therefore, all underground utilities within the right-of-way, as  determined necessary by good engineering practice to serve the complete  development of adjacent properties, shall be installed during the street's  initial construction and prior to the application of its final pavement surface  course. This shall include extensions of all necessary cross-street connections  or service lines to an appropriate location beyond the pavement and preferably  the right-of-way line.
    In the event it is necessary to open the street pavement to  work on utilities after the surface has been placed, additional compaction  tests and paving as necessary to restore the integrity and appearance of the  roadway may be required at the discretion of the district administrator's  designee.
    c. Cross-street conduits. To facilitate the placement of  future underground utilities, cross-street conduits are encouraged, with  placement of such conduits occurring on each street at intersections.
    d. Aboveground utilities. All aboveground utilities shall be  installed behind the sidewalk or as close as possible to the limits of the  street's right-of-way but shall not encroach on the sidewalk, the shared use  path, or any clear zone.
    To assure the unencumbered dedication of the right-of-way for  street additions, easements or other interests within the platted right-of-way  shall be quitclaimed of any prior rights therein. In exchange, a permit may be  issued by the department for a utility to occupy the area involved. This permit  will be processed by the district administrator's designee upon acceptance of  the street into the secondary system of state highways maintained by the  department. No inspection fee is required for permits so issued.  However, the approval of the permit shall be contingent upon the utility's  compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-151).
    24VAC30-92-130. Right-of-way width, spite strips, and  encroachments.
    A. Right-of-way width. A clear and unencumbered right-of-way  shall be dedicated to public use for any street proposed for addition to the  secondary system of state highways maintained by the department. However, in  certain rare extenuating circumstances involving a party beyond the influence  of the developer, an easement for transportation purposes may be approved by  the district administrator's designee in lieu of dedicated right-of-way. In all  other cases, any easement that might interfere with the public's unencumbered  use of the street shall be quitclaimed in exchange for a land use permit as  outlined in 24VAC30-92-120 M 5.
    The width of right-of-way shall be as indicated in the Subdivision  Street Design Guide (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT))  and the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT) and  shall be sufficient to include all essential elements of the roadway intended  to be maintained by the department, including pedestrian, multiuse trail,  bicycle, or shared use path facilities and clear zone. However, supplemental  easements may be used to accommodate sight distance requirements and slopes for  cuts and fills. The right-of-way requirements are defined in the Subdivision  Street Design Guide (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT))  and the Road Design Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT).
    When an existing state maintained road is widened, the  additional right-of-way should be dedicated as follows:
    1. If the existing right-of-way consists of a prescriptive  easement, to the degree that the developer controls the land, the right-of-way  shall be dedicated to public use from the centerline of the alignment.
    2. If the existing right-of-way is dedicated to public use,  the additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to public use.
    3. If the existing right-of-way is titled in the name of the  department or the Commonwealth, the additional right-of-way shall be deeded to  the department or to the Commonwealth, consistent with the title of the  existing right-of-way.
    B. "Spite strips." Plans that include a reserved or  "spite" strip that prohibits otherwise lawful vehicular access to a  street from the adjacent properties, whether within or outside the subdivision  or development, will not be approved.
    C. Encroachments within the right-of-way. Recording of a plat  causes the fee title interest of areas dedicated to public use to transfer to  the local governing body. Therefore, objects installed within the right-of-way  for purposes other than transportation may be considered an unlawful  encroachment in the right-of-way and prevent the right-of-way from being  considered clear and unencumbered.
    Posts, walls, signs, or similar ornamental devices that do  not interfere with roadway capacity, encroach into a clear zone, or interfere  with prescribed sight distance requirements, or are not in conflict with  Chapter 7 (§ 33.1-351 et seq.) of Title 33.1 of the Code of Virginia may be  permitted within the right-of-way. However, specific authorization by the  district administrator's designee or as authorized under the Land Use Permit  Regulations (see 24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-151) is a requisite for  these devices or any other encroachment located within the right-of-way. For  the purposes of this subsection, mailboxes installed on breakaway posts may  occupy the right-of-way without permit. Otherwise, encroachments that do not  fall within the clear zone may be allowed within the right-of-way pursuant to a  land use permit issued by the district administrator's designee.
    24VAC30-92-140. Surety and fees.
    A. Policy. Except as otherwise provided herein, the developer  shall provide surety to guarantee the satisfactory performance of the street,  an inspection fee to cover the department's cost of inspecting the new street,  and an administrative cost recovery fee to recover the department's costs  associated with the review of subdivision or other development plans and the  administrative processing of the acceptance of new streets as determined in  this section. All surety and fees collected under this section shall be based  on the date of the local governing body's request and the aggregate mileage of  new streets in that request, rounded up to the next tenth of a mile. In the  event of extenuating circumstances beyond the developer's control, the  commissioner or his designee may waive all or a portion of any of the surety  and fees.
    B. Surety. The department reserves the right to inspect, or  have inspected, the street proposed for acceptance into the secondary system of  state highways at any stage of construction and prior to street acceptance. The  developer, contractor, and third-party inspector, if applicable, shall  cooperate with the assigned VDOT personnel to provide the access and information  necessary to verify that construction of the street is in accordance with the  street's approved design and appropriate standards and specifications. A  determination by the district administrator's designee that the required  cooperation has not been extended shall be grounds for VDOT to refuse to accept  the street for maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways. A  determination of noncooperation may be appealed as specified by this chapter  (see 24VAC30-92-110).
    1. Type of surety and expiration. The developer shall provide  surety to guarantee the satisfactory performance of the street. In the event  the developer fails to provide surety or any of the fees described in this  section within the 30-day period following the local governing body's request  for the department to accept the maintenance of a street, the department's or  other entity's previous final inspection of the street shall be considered void  and a new inspection shall be required. An acceptable surety may be in the form  of a performance bond, cash deposit, certified check, irrevocable letter of  credit, third-party escrow account, or other form mutually satisfactory to the  department and the developer. Under no circumstances shall the department or  any agency of the Commonwealth be named the escrow agent nor shall funds  deposited with the department as surety be subject to the payment of interest.
    a. Amount of surety. The surety shall be $3,000 for each tenth  of a lane mile, or portion thereof, to be accepted by the department for  maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways. The Commonwealth  Transportation Board may adjust the surety on an annual basis based on  increases or decreases in the producer price index for highway and street  construction materials up to an amount not to exceed $5,000 for each tenth of a  lane mile or portion thereof. 
    The surety shall be waived for streets petitioned for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways through the Rural  Addition Program pursuant to §§ 33.1-72.1 and 33.1-72.2 of the Code of  Virginia, and streets constructed or approved pursuant to §§ 33.1-221 and 33.1-223 of the Code of Virginia.
    b. Length of surety. The surety shall guarantee performance of  the street for one year from the date of its acceptance into the secondary  system of state highways.
    2. Alternatives to surety.
    a. In jurisdictions where the staff of the governing body  administers a comprehensive street construction inspection program that has  been approved by the department, the surety shall be waived upon certification  by the governing body that the proposed addition has been constructed in  accordance with approved plans and specifications.
    b. If requested by the developer and subject to availability  of departmental personnel or consultants, VDOT may perform the construction  inspection equivalent to that required for third-party inspection of any street  or streets proposed to be added to the secondary system of state highways. In  such cases, the developer shall bear all costs incurred by the department, the  surety shall be waived, and no street inspection fee pursuant to subsection D  of this section shall be charged.
    c. A third-party inspection process shall be acceptable to the  department if:
    (1) The developer or construction contractor arranges for a  firm not otherwise related to the developer or contractor to provide inspection  services for the construction of the streets in the development; 
    (2) Inspection and testing methodology and frequency are  accomplished in accordance with VDOT Materials Division's Manual of  Instructions, 2011 and the Virginia Department of Transportation Road  and Bridge Specifications (24VAC30-92-150), 2007, revised 2011;  and
    (3) A report is submitted to the department summarizing the  inspections steps taken, certifying the results of the inspection and testing  as accurate, and confirming that the street or streets were built to the  approved specifications and pavement design, signed and stamped by a  professional engineer licensed to practice as such in the Commonwealth. 
    C. Administrative cost recovery fee.
    1. Application of the administrative cost recovery fee. To  recover a portion of the department's direct costs associated with the review  of plans or plans of development, and the administrative processing of the  acceptance of new streets, an administrative cost recovery fee shall be  required from the developer at the time the streets are accepted by the  department. The amount of this cost recovery fee shall be computed at a base  rate of $500 per addition, without regard to street length, plus $250 per tenth  of a centerline mile, or portion thereof.
    2. Alternatives to the administrative cost recovery fee. As an  alternative to the administrative cost recovery fee, the department may use one  of the following approaches to recover its direct costs:
    a. For any development, at the developer's request, the  department may establish an account for the purpose of tracking these costs and  billing the developer not more often than every 30 days;
    b. For large, complex, multiuse developments, the department,  at its option, may establish an account for the purpose of tracking these costs  and billing the developer not more often than every 30 days. However, the cost  recovery fee assessed under this provision shall not be greater than two times  the prevailing administrative cost recovery fee structure; or
    c. If requested to provide plan review for streets that are  not intended for maintenance by the department, the department may establish an  account for the purpose of tracking these costs and billing the developer not  more often than every 30 days.
    D. Street inspection fee. To recover a portion of the  department's direct costs associated with the inspection of subdivision  streets, an inspection fee shall be required from the developer at the time the  streets are accepted by the department.
    The inspection fee shall be computed at a base rate of $250  per addition, without regard to street length, plus $125 per tenth of a  centerline mile, or portion thereof.
    The street inspection fee shall be reduced by 75% if either a  third-party inspection process pursuant to subdivision B 2 c of this section or  a local street inspection certification process pursuant to subdivision B 2 a  of this section was used.
    If requested to provide inspection services for subdivision  streets that are not intended for maintenance by the department, the department  may establish an account for the purpose of tracking these costs and billing  the developer not more often than every 30 days.
    24VAC30-92-150. Documents incorporated by reference. (Repealed.)
    Information pertaining to the availability and cost of any  of these publications should be directed to the address indicated below the  specific document. Requests for documents available from the department may be  obtained from the department at 1401 E. Broad St., Richmond, Virginia 23219;  however, department documents may be available over the Internet at  www.virginiadot.org.
    The department shall post all nonregulatory documents  incorporated into this regulation by reference and under its control on its  website. Official regulatory text is maintained by the Virginia Registrar of  Regulations in the Virginia Administrative Code. After the effective date of  any changes to such incorporated documents under the control of the department,  the department shall post the changes for a period of at least 60 days on its  website. Any changes to regulations appearing in this list shall be made in  accordance with the Administrative Process Act (§ 2.2-4000 et seq. of the Code  of Virginia), the Virginia Register Act (§ 2.2-4100 et seq. of the Code of  Virginia), or both.
    A. Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials,  24VAC30-72.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    B. Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials,  Collectors, and Local Streets, 24VAC30-73.
    VDOT
  1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    C. Drainage Manual, 2002.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    D. Guidance Document for the Commonwealth Transportation  Board's Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements, 2009.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    E. Highway Capacity Manual, 2000.
    Transportation Research Board
    500 Fifth Street, NW
    Washington, DC 20001
    F. Land Use Permit  Regulations, 24VAC30-151.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    G. Materials Division Manual of Instructions, 2006.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    H. Pavement Design Guide for Subdivision and Secondary  Roads in Virginia, 2000.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    I. Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian  Accommodations, 2004. (Note: This policy reference is included in the  regulation only for informational purposes and is not considered a regulatory  provision. Applicable elements of this policy are stated in the regulation  itself.)
    Commonwealth Transportation Board 
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    J. Road and Bridge Specifications, 2007, revised 2008.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    K. Road and Bridge Standards, 2008.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    L. Road Design Manual, 2008.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    M. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulation, 24VAC30-155.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    N. VDOT Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater  Management Program Standards and Specifications, 2004. 
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    O. Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Regulations,  4VAC50-30. 
    Virginia Department of Conservation  and Recreation
    Division of Soil and Water  Conservation 
    203 Governor Street, Suite 302
    Richmond, VA 23219-2094 
    P. Virginia Stormwater  Management Program (VSMP) Permit Regulations (4VAC50-60). 
    Virginia Department of Conservation  and Recreation
    Division of Soil and Water  Conservation
    203 Governor Street, Suite 302
    Richmond, VA 23219-2094 
    DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-92)
    Information pertaining to the availability and cost of any  of these publications should be directed to the address indicated for the  specific document. Requests for documents of the Virginia Department of  Transportation (VDOT) may be obtained from the department at 1401 E. Broad St.,  Richmond, Virginia 23219; however, department documents may be available over  the Internet at www.virginiadot.org.
    VDOT Drainage Manual, 2002. 
    VDOT Guidance Document for the Commonwealth Transportation  Board's Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements, 2011.
    Highway  Capacity Manual, 2010, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street, NW,  Washington, DC 20001.
    VDOT  Materials Division Manual of Instructions, 2011.
    VDOT  Pavement Design Guide for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia, 2009.
    VDOT  Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations, 2004.
    VDOT Road and Bridge Specifications, 2007, revised 2011.
    VDOT  Road and Bridge Standards, 2008, revised 2011.
    VDOT  Road Design Manual, 2011.
    VDOT  Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater Management Program Standards and  Specifications, 2010.
    VDOT  MS4 Program Plan, 2008, Location and Design Division.
    VDOT  MS4 Stormwater Outfall Inventory Manual, 2011, Maintenance Division.
    Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook, First Edition,  1999, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Soil and  Water Conservation, Stormwater Management, 203 Governor Street, Suite 206,  Richmond, VA 23219-2094.
    24VAC30-155-10. Definitions.
    The following words and terms when used in this chapter shall  have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
    "Connectivity index" means the number of street  segments divided by the number of intersections. Only street segments and  intersections within a network addition as well as any street segment or  intersection outside of the network addition that is connected to street  segments within the network addition or that has been connected or will be  connected pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 7 to the network addition through the  extension of an existing stub out shall be used to calculate a network  addition's connectivity index.
    "Floor area ratio" means the ratio of the total floor  area of a building or buildings on a parcel to the size of the parcel where the  building or buildings are located.
    "Intersection" means, only for the purposes of  calculating connectivity index, a juncture of three or more street segments or  the terminus of a street segment such as a cul-de-sac or other dead end. The  terminus of a stub out shall not constitute an intersection for the purposes of  this chapter. The juncture of a street with only a stub out, and the juncture  of a street with only a connection to the end of an existing stub out, shall  not constitute an intersection for the purposes of this chapter, unless such  stub out is the only facility providing service to one or more lots within the  development.
    "Local traffic impact statement" means a traffic  impact statement accepted or prepared by a locality pursuant to its land  development approval process and whose requirements regarding content are set  out in the locality's ordinances or published policies if such ordinances or  policies have been reviewed and certified by VDOT as requiring acceptable  standards of preparation and providing sufficient information to determine the  current and future impacts of development proposals.
    "Locality" means any local government, pursuant to  § 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia, that must prepare and recommend a  comprehensive plan for the physical development of the territory within its  jurisdiction.
    "Network addition" means a group of interconnected  street segments and intersections shown in a plan of development that is  connected to the state highway system and meets the requirements of the  Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (24VAC30-92).
    "Pedestrian facility coverage" means the ratio of:  (length of pedestrian facilities, such as sidewalks, foot paths, and multiuse  trails, along both sides of a roadway) divided by (length of roadway multiplied  by two).
    "Receipt" means the date on which a proposal or  request for a meeting is first in the possession of VDOT or a locality or an  agent thereof, as applicable.
    "Redevelopment site" means any existing use that  generates traffic and is intended to be developed as a different or more  dense denser land use.
    "Service level" means a measure of the quality,  level or comfort of a service calculated using methodologies approved by VDOT.
    "Small area plan" means a plan of development for  multiple contiguous properties that guides land use, zoning, transportation,  urban design, open space, and capital improvements at a high level of detail  within an urban development area or for a transit-oriented development that is  at least 1/2 square mile in size unless otherwise approved by VDOT due to  proximity to existing moderate to high density developments. A small area plan  shall include the following: (i) densities of at least four residential units  per acre and at least a floor area ratio of 0.4 or some proportional  combination thereof; (ii) mixed-use neighborhoods, including mixed housing  types and integration of residential, office, and retail development; (iii)  reduction of front and side yard building setbacks; and (iv)  pedestrian-friendly road design and connectivity of road and pedestrian  networks.
    "State-controlled highway" means a highway in  Virginia that is part of the interstate, primary, or secondary systems of state  highways and that is maintained by the state under the direction and  supervision of the Commissioner of Highways. Highways for which localities  receive maintenance payments pursuant to §§ 33.1-23.5:1 and 33.1-41.1 of  the Code of Virginia and highways maintained by VDOT in accordance with §§ 33.1-31, 33.1-32, 33.1-33, and 33.1-68 of the Code of Virginia are not considered  state-controlled highways for the purposes of determining whether a specific  land development proposal package must be submitted to meet the requirements of  this regulation.
    "Street segment" means (i) a section of roadway  or alley that is between two intersections or (ii) a stub out or connection to  the end of an existing stub out.
    "Stub out" means a transportation facility (i)  whose right-of-way terminates at a parcel abutting the development, (ii) that  consists of a short segment that is intended to serve current and future  development by providing continuity and connectivity of the public street  network, (iii) that based on the spacing between the stub out and other streets  or stub outs, and the current terrain there is a reasonable expectation that  connection with a future street is possible, and (iv) that is constructed to  the property line.
    "Traffic impact statement" means the document showing  how a proposed development will relate to existing and future transportation  facilities prepared in accordance with best professional practice and  standards that assesses the impact of a proposed development on the  transportation system and recommends improvements to lessen or negate those  impacts.
    "Transit-oriented development" means an area of  commercial and residential development at moderate to high densities within 1/2  mile of a station for heavy rail, light rail, commuter rail, or bus rapid  transit transportation and includes the following: (i) densities of at least  four residential units per acre and at least a floor area ratio of 0.4 or some  proportional combination thereof; (ii) mixed-use neighborhoods, including mixed  housing types and integration of residential, office, and retail development;  (iii) reduction of front and side yard building setbacks; and (iv)  pedestrian-friendly road design and connectivity of road and pedestrian  networks.
    "Transportation demand management" means a  combination of measures that reduce vehicle trip generation and improve  transportation system efficiency by altering demand, including but not limited  to the following: expanded transit service, employer-provided transit benefits,  bicycle and pedestrian investments, ridesharing, staggered work hours,  telecommuting, and parking management including parking pricing.
    "Urban development area" means an area designated  on a local comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of  Virginia that includes the following: (i) densities of at least four  residential units per acre and at least a floor area ratio of 0.4 or some  proportional combination thereof; (ii) mixed-use neighborhoods, including mixed  housing types and integration of residential, office, and retail development;  (iii) reduction of front and side yard building setbacks; and (iv)  pedestrian-friendly road design and connectivity of road and pedestrian  networks.
    "VDOT" means the Virginia Department of  Transportation, the Commissioner of Highways, or a designee.
    "VDOT traffic impact statement" means a traffic  impact statement prepared pursuant to 24VAC30-155-60.
    24VAC30-155-20. Authority.
    Section 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia requires  localities to submit comprehensive plans and amendments to comprehensive plans  that will substantially affect transportation on state-controlled highways to  VDOT in order for the agency to review and provide comments on the impact of  the item submitted. This section also requires localities to submit traffic  impact statements along with proposed rezonings, site plans, subdivision  plats, and subdivision development plans that will substantially affect  transportation on state-controlled highways to VDOT for comment by the agency.  Chapter 527 of the 2006 Acts of Assembly directs VDOT to promulgate regulations  for the implementation of these requirements. 
    24VAC30-155-30. Comprehensive plan and comprehensive plan  amendment.
    A. Plan and amendment submittal. Prior to adoption of any  comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia, any  part of a comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2228 of the Code of  Virginia, or any amendment to any comprehensive plan as described in  § 15.2-2229 of the Code of Virginia, including small area plans, if  required by this section of this chapter, the locality shall submit such plan  or amendment to VDOT for review and comment, such submission should take place  at least 100 days prior to anticipated final action by the locality. The  Virginia Department of Transportation shall, upon request, provide localities  with technical assistance in preparing the transportation plan of the  comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan or comprehensive plan amendment  package shall be submitted to VDOT, if it is reasonably anticipated to result  in substantially affect transportation on state controlled highways.  Substantially affect, for the purposes of comprehensive plans, includes  substantial changes or impacts to the existing transportation network. For the  purposes of this section, a substantial impact shall be defined as a change  that would allow the generation of 5,000 additional vehicle trips per day on  state-controlled highways compared to the existing comprehensive plan,  assuming the highest density of permissible use in accordance with the  Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook (see  24VAC30-155-100), 8th Edition, 2008 or, subject to the approval of  VDOT, the regional model as adopted by the local Metropolitan Planning  Organization, and substantial changes change shall include those  changes that materially alter future transportation infrastructure, travel  patterns, or the ability to improve future transportation facilities on  state-controlled highways.
    B. Required elements. The submission by the locality to VDOT  shall contain sufficient information so that VDOT may evaluate the system of  new and expanded transportation facilities, outlined in the transportation  plan, that are needed to support the current and planned development of the  territory covered by the plan. In order to conduct this evaluation, the package  submitted to VDOT shall contain the following items:
    1. For a comprehensive plan or a transportation plan, the  locality shall provide one paper and one electronic copy of the  following:
    a. A cover sheet, containing:
    (1) Contact information for the locality, and
    (2) Summary of major changes made to the comprehensive plan or  transportation plan;
    b. The proposed comprehensive plan or transportation plan, and  the following elements:
    (1) Inventory – an inventory (written or graphic) of the  existing transportation network, which shall include at a minimum all roadways  within the Federal Aid system.
    (2) Assumptions – planning assumptions shall be detailed,  since these assumptions directly influence the demand placed on the transportation  system. Population growth, employment growth, location of critical  infrastructure such as water and sewer facilities, among others, are examples  of planning assumptions that may be addressed. 
    (3) Needs assessment – written or graphic evaluation of the  transportation system's current and projected performance and conditions. The  needs assessment identifies specific deficiencies.
    (4) Recommendations – proposed improvements or additions to  the transportation infrastructure. Recommendations should be specific so that  the need, location and nature of the proposed improvements are clear and  understandable. Localities are encouraged to include pedestrian, bicycle,  transit, rail and other multimodal recommendations as they deem appropriate.  The transportation plan shall include a map showing road and transportation  improvements, taking into account the current and future needs of residents in  the locality while considering the current and future needs of the planning  district within which the locality is situated. Recommended improvements shall  include cost estimates as available from VDOT.
    2. For an amendment to a comprehensive plan or transportation  plan, the locality shall provide one paper and one electronic copy of  the following:
    a. A cover sheet, containing:
    (1) Contact information for the locality;
    (2) Summary of proposed amendment or amendments to the  comprehensive plan or transportation plan; and
    (3) Overview of reasoning and purpose for amendments.
    b. Application forms and documentation presented to or  prepared by the local jurisdiction,
    c. Associated maps or narratives that depict and detail the  amendment under consideration,
    d. Any changes to the planning assumptions associated with the  amendment, 
    e. Local assessment of the potential impacts the amendment may  have on the transportation system, and
    f. Those elements identified in subdivision 1 b of this  subsection that VDOT determines are needed in order to review and comment on  impacts to state-controlled highways.
    C. Small area plans for urban development areas and transit  oriented developments. A locality that develops a small area plan for all or a  portion of an urban development area or transit-oriented development and  corresponding amendments to their comprehensive plan, as described in § 15.2-2229  of the Code of Virginia, that will have a substantial impact effect  on the state transportation network pursuant to this section of the regulation,  may in lieu of submitting a comprehensive plan amendment package as required  under subsection B of this section submit a small area plan package.
    The small area plan package submitted by the locality to VDOT  shall contain sufficient information and data so that VDOT may determine the  location of the area impacted by the small area plan, its size, its impact on  state-controlled highways, and the methodology and assumptions used in the  analysis of the impact. Submittal of an incomplete small area plan package  shall be considered deficient in meeting the submission requirements of  § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and shall be returned to the  locality and the applicant, if applicable, identifying the deficiencies noted.  A small area plan package submitted to VDOT shall contain the following items:
    1. A cover sheet containing:
    a. Contact information for locality;
    b. Small area plan location, highways and transit facilities  adjacent to site, and parcel number or numbers;
    c. Proposal summary with development names, size, and proposed  zoning;
    2. A VDOT traffic impact statement prepared in  accordance with 24VAC30-155-60; and
    3. A plan of development for the area encompassed by the small  area plan.
    D. Review process. VDOT may pursuant to § 15.2-2222.1 of  the Code of Virginia request a meeting with the locality to discuss the plan or  amendment. The request must be made within 30 days of receipt of the proposal.  VDOT must provide written comments to the locality within 90 days of the  receipt of the plan or plan amendment or by such later deadline as may be  agreed to by the parties. VDOT will conduct its review and provide official  comments to the locality for inclusion in the official public record of the  locality. VDOT shall also make such comments available to the public. Nothing  in this section shall prohibit a locality from acting on a comprehensive plan  or plan amendment if VDOT's comments on the submission have not been received  within the timelines in this section.
    E. Concurrent consideration. For the purposes of this  regulation, when a related comprehensive plan or comprehensive plan amendment  and a rezoning proposal that cover the same geographical area are being  considered concurrently by a locality, only a rezoning package as required  under 24VAC30-155-40 shall be prepared and provided to VDOT for review.
    24VAC30-155-40. Rezoning.
    A. Proposal submittal. The locality shall submit a package to  VDOT within 10 business days of receipt of a complete application for a  rezoning proposal if the proposal substantially affects transportation on  state-controlled highways. All trip generation calculations used for the purposes  of determining if a proposal meets the criteria shall be based upon the rates  or equations published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip  Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100), 8th Edition, 2008, and shall  not be reduced through internal capture rates. For redevelopment sites, trips  currently generated by existing development that will be removed may be  deducted from the total site trips that are generated by the proposed land use.  However, no submission shall be required under this section if the rezoning  proposal consists of no changes in allowable land use. Furthermore, no  submission shall be required if the rezoning proposal results in lower maximum  daily trip generation and no increase in maximum trip generation for AM Peak  Hour of the adjacent street, PM Peak Hour of the adjacent street, and Weekend  Peak Hour when compared to the hourly trip generation of land uses allowed by  right under the current zoning, excepting governmental uses such as schools and  libraries.
    1. For the purposes of this section, a residential  rezoning proposal shall substantially affect transportation on state-controlled  highways if it meets or exceeds one or more of the following trip generation  criteria:
    a. 1. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT has  maintenance responsibility for the secondary highway system, if the proposal  generates more than 100 5,000 vehicle trips per peak hour of  the generator day at the site's connection to a state-controlled  highway. For a site that does not have an entrance onto a state-controlled  highway, the site's connection is assumed to be wherever the road network that  the site connects with attaches to a state-controlled highway. In cases where  the site has multiple entrances to highways, volumes on all entrances shall be  combined for the purposes of this determination; 
    b. 2. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT does  not have maintenance responsibility for the local highway system, if the  proposal generates more than 100 5,000 vehicle trips per peak  hour of the generator day and whose nearest property line is within  3,000 feet, measured along public roads or streets, of a connection to a  state-controlled highway; or
    c. 3. The proposal for residential rezoning  generates more than 200 400 daily vehicle trips on a  state-controlled highway and, once the site generated trips are distributed to  the receiving highway, the proposal's vehicle trips on a the  highway exceeds exceed the daily traffic volume such highway  presently carries. For the purposes of determining whether a proposal must be  submitted to VDOT, the traffic carried on the state-controlled highway shall be  assumed to be the most recently published amount measured in the last traffic  count conducted by VDOT or the locality on that highway. In cases where the  site has access to multiple highways, each receiving highway shall be evaluated  individually for the purposes of this determination.
    2. For the purposes of this section, all other rezoning  proposals shall substantially affect transportation on state-controlled  highways if they meet or exceed one or more of the following trip generation  criteria:
    a. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT has maintenance  responsibility for the secondary highway system, if the proposal generates more  than 250 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator or 2,500 vehicle trips  per day at the site's connection to a state-controlled highway. For a site that  does not have an entrance onto a state-controlled highway, the site's  connection is assumed to be wherever the road network that the site connects  with attaches to a state-controlled highway. In cases where the site has  multiple entrances to highways, volumes on all entrances shall be combined for  the purposes of this determination; or 
    b. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT does not have  maintenance responsibility for the local highway system, if the proposal  generates more than 250 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator or 2,500  vehicle trips per day and whose nearest property line is within 3,000 feet,  measured along public roads or streets, of a connection to a state-controlled  highway.
    B. Required proposal elements. The package submitted by the  locality to VDOT shall contain sufficient information and data so that VDOT may  determine the location of the rezoning, its size, its impact effect  on state-controlled highways, and methodology and assumptions used in the  analysis of the impact effect. Submittal of an incomplete package  shall be considered deficient in meeting the submission requirements of § 15.2-2222.1  of the Code of Virginia and shall be returned to the locality and the  applicant, if applicable, identifying the deficiencies noted. A package  submitted to VDOT shall contain consist of one paper copy and one  electronic copy and include the following items:
    1. A cover sheet containing:
    a. Contact information for locality and developer (or owner)  if applicable;
    b. Rezoning location, highways adjacent to site, and parcel  number or numbers;
    c. Proposal summary with development name, size, and proposed  zoning; and
    d. A statement regarding the proposal's compliance with the  comprehensive plan.
    2. A local traffic impact statement prepared in  accordance with 24VAC30-155-60 or, if the local requirements for traffic  statements contained in ordinances or policies have not been certified by VDOT,  a VDOT traffic impact statement. 
    3. A concept plan of the proposed development.
    C. Rezoning proposals associated with small area plans.
    1. A traffic impact statement prepared for a small area plan  pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C, or initiated for a small area plan at the request  of a locality prior to February 4, 2010, and that contains substantially the  same elements as those of a VDOT traffic impact statement, shall serve as  the traffic impact statement required pursuant to this section for any rezoning  proposals developed in furtherance of the adopted small area plan and related  comprehensive plan amendments provided the following:
    a. That the small area plan package is accompanied by a cover  letter that includes a statement that the assumptions made in the traffic impact  statement prepared for the small area plan remain generally valid.
    b. That the following are accurate:
    (1) The rezoning proposal is in substantial conformance with  the adopted small area plan. A deviation in density must be greater than 10% to  be considered no longer in substantial conformance with the adopted small area  plan.
    (2) The character and volume of the trip generation by the  proposed uses are similar to those proposed by the small area plan.
    (3) All other assumptions made in the traffic impact statement  prepared for the small area plan remain generally valid.
    2. In instances where the assumptions made in the traffic  impact statement prepared for the small area plan are no longer valid, the  traffic impact statement may be updated. If the traffic impact statement is  updated, it shall serve as the traffic impact statement required pursuant to  this section for any rezoning proposals developed in furtherance of the adopted  small area plan and related comprehensive plan amendments.
    D. Review process. After formal submission of a rezoning  proposal for review, VDOT may, pursuant to § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of  Virginia, request a meeting with the locality and rezoning applicant to discuss  potential modifications to the proposal to address any concerns or deficiencies.  The request must be made within 45 days of receipt by VDOT of the proposal.  VDOT must provide written comments to the locality and the rezoning  applicant within 45 days of VDOT's receipt of the proposal if no meeting is  scheduled or has been requested or within 120 days of the receipt of the  proposal otherwise. VDOT shall not reject or require resubmission if the  package has been prepared in accordance with best professional practice and  substantially documents the expected impacts of the proposal. If VDOT  determines that the package has not been prepared in accordance with best  professional practice or fails to substantially document the expected impacts  of the proposal, or if the submission is substantially incomplete, VDOT may  request of the applicant, in writing or at the above mentioned meeting,  modifications to address concerns. If the concerns are not adequately addressed  within 30 days of the transmission of such concerns, VDOT may require  resubmission. VDOT shall conduct its review and provide official comments  to the locality for inclusion in the official public record. VDOT shall also  make such comments available to the public. The department's comments on the  proposed rezoning shall be based upon the comprehensive plan, regulations and  guidelines of the department, engineering and design considerations, adopted  regional or statewide plans, and short and long term traffic impacts on and off  site. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a locality from acting on a  rezoning proposal if VDOT's comments on the submission have not been received  within the timelines in this section.
    24VAC30-155-50. Subdivision plat, site plan, plan of  development. (Repealed.)
    A. Proposal submittal. The locality shall submit a package  to VDOT within 10 business days of receipt of a complete development proposal  if the proposal substantially affects transportation on state-controlled  highways. All trip generation calculations used for the purposes of determining  if a proposal meets these requirements shall be based upon the rates or  equations published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip  Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100), and shall not be reduced through internal  capture rates. For redevelopment sites, trips currently generated by existing  development that will be removed may be deducted from the total site trips that  are generated by the proposed land use.
    1. For the purposes of this section, a residential  development proposal shall substantially affect transportation on  state-controlled highways if it meets or exceeds one or more of the following  trip generation criteria:
    a. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT has maintenance  responsibility for the secondary highway system, if the proposal generates more  than 100 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator at the site's connection  to a state-controlled highway. For a site that does not have an entrance onto a  state-controlled highway, the site's connection is assumed to be wherever the  road network that the site connects with attaches to a state-controlled  highway. In cases where the site has multiple entrances to highways, volumes on  all entrances shall be combined for the purposes of this determination; 
    b. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT does not have  maintenance responsibility for the local highway system, if the proposal  generates more than 100 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator and has an  entrance that is within 3,000 feet, measured along public roads or streets, of  a connection to a state-controlled highway; or
    c. The proposal generates more than 200 daily vehicle trips  on a state-controlled highway and, once the site-generated trips are  distributed to the receiving highway, the proposal's vehicle trips on such  highway exceeds the daily traffic volume the highway presently carries. For the  purposes of determining whether a proposal must be submitted to VDOT, the  traffic carried on the state-controlled highway shall be assumed to be the most  recently published amount measured in the last traffic count conducted by VDOT  or the locality on that highway. In cases where the site has access to multiple  highways, each receiving highway shall be evaluated individually for the  purposes of this determination.
    2. For the purposes of this section, all other development  proposals shall substantially affect transportation on state-controlled  highways if they meet or exceed one or more of the following trip generation  criteria:
    a. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT has maintenance  responsibility for the secondary highway system, if the proposal generates more  than 250 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator or 2,500 vehicle trips  per day at the site's connection to a state-controlled highway. For a site that  does not have an entrance onto a state-controlled highway, the site's  connection is assumed to be wherever the road network that the site connects  with attaches to a state-controlled highway. In cases where the site has  multiple entrances to highways, volumes on all entrances shall be combined for  the purposes of this determination; or 
    b. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT does not have  maintenance responsibility for the local highway system, if the proposal  generates more than 250 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator or 2,500  vehicle trips per day and has an entrance that is within 3,000 feet, measured  along public roads or streets, of a connection to a state-controlled highway.
    B. Required proposal elements.
    1. The package submitted by the locality to VDOT shall  contain sufficient information and data so that VDOT may determine the location  of the development, its size, its impact on state-controlled highways, and  methodology and assumptions used in the analysis of the impact. Submittal of an  incomplete package shall be considered deficient in meeting the submission  requirements of § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and shall be returned to  the locality and the applicant, if applicable, identifying the deficiencies  noted. A package submitted to VDOT shall contain the following items.
    a. A cover sheet containing:
    (1) Contact information for locality and developer (or  owner);
    (2) Development location, highways connected to, and parcel  number or numbers; and
    (3) Proposal summary with development name and size in  acres.
    b. A supplemental traffic analysis, as defined in  24VAC30-155-50 C. 
    c. A concept plan of the proposed development.
    C. Supplemental traffic analysis. For the purposes of this  subsection, a supplemental traffic analysis will be defined as follows:
    1. In cases where a traffic impact statement has been  submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-30 C, that statement shall  serve as the supplemental traffic impact analysis for the purposes of this  section for any site plan, subdivision plat, or plan of development proposals  developed in furtherance of the adopted small area plan and related  comprehensive plan amendments provided the following:
    a. That such package is accompanied by a cover letter that  includes a statement that the assumptions made in the traffic impact statement  prepared for the small area plan remain generally valid and a copy of the  traffic impact statement is included in the submission.
    b. That the following are accurate:
    (1) The rezoning site plan is in substantial conformance  with the adopted small area plan. A deviation in density must be greater than  10% to be considered no longer in substantial conformance with the adopted  small area plan.
    (2) The character and volume of the trip generation by the  proposed uses are similar to those proposed by the small area plan.
    (3) All other assumptions made in the traffic impact  statement prepared for the small area plan remain generally valid.
    2. In cases where a rezoning traffic impact statement has  been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-40, if all assumptions  made in the traffic impact statement prepared for the rezoning remain valid and  if the submission of the subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development to  the locality occurs within two years of the locality's approval of the rezoning  proposal, the supplemental traffic analysis shall be a letter that provides  VDOT with the following information:
    a. A statement that the impacts analyzed in the  development's rezoning traffic impact statement have not materially changed nor  have the adverse impacts on state-controlled highways increased.
    b. The date of the VDOT letter providing the locality  comments on the rezoning.
    3. In cases where a rezoning traffic impact statement has  been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-40, if all assumptions  made in the traffic impact statement prepared for the rezoning have not  materially changed, the adverse impacts of the proposal on state-controlled  highways have not increased and if the submission of the subdivision plat, site  plan, or plan of development to the locality occurs more than two years of the  locality's approval of the rezoning, the supplemental traffic analysis shall be  a letter that provides VDOT with the following information:
    a. A statement that the impacts analyzed in the  development's rezoning traffic impact statement have not materially changed nor  have the adverse impacts on state-controlled highways increased;
    b. The date of the VDOT letter providing the locality  comments on the rezoning;
    c. Documentation supporting the statement that the  development's rezoning traffic impact statement is still valid; and
    d. A copy of the original traffic impact statement.
    After review of such letter, VDOT may require submission in  accordance with subdivision 5 of this subsection.
    4. In cases where the small area plan traffic impact  statement has not been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-30 or  the rezoning traffic impact statement has not been submitted to VDOT in  accordance with 24VAC30-155-40, the supplemental traffic analysis shall contain  the information required for rezoning traffic impact statements with 100 to 499  peak hour trips. If the subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development  will generate less than 100 peak hour trips then the lowest required elements  for the rezoning traffic impact statement shall be used.
    5. In cases where the small area plan traffic impact  statement has been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-30 and the  conditions analyzed have materially changed such that the adverse impacts of  the proposal on state-controlled highways have increased, the rezoning traffic  impact statement has been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-40  and the conditions analyzed in such traffic impact statement have materially  changed such that the adverse impacts of the proposal on state-controlled highways  have increased or if required pursuant to subdivision 3 of this subsection, the  supplemental traffic analysis shall contain those elements required for  rezoning traffic impact statements with 100 to 499 peak hour trips, as  determined by VDOT. If the subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development  will generate less than 100 peak hour trips then the lowest required elements  for the rezoning traffic impact statement shall be used.
    6. In cases where rezoning occurred after January 1, 2002,  but prior to the implementation of this regulation, VDOT, at its discretion,  may evaluate traffic impact statements or studies performed as part of the  rezoning action. If, in the opinion of VDOT staff with the concurrence of the  locality, the traffic impact analysis work that was performed encompasses the  major elements of work required by this regulation and the underlying  assumptions of the study remain valid the previously prepared study may be  deemed to meet the requirements of this regulation. VDOT staff may also, upon  request of the submitter, allow a previously prepared study to be updated to  incorporate additional areas of analysis or revisions to assumptions to enhance  the accuracy of the study and may deem such updated study to encompass the  major elements of work required by this regulation.
    D. Review process. After formal submission of a  subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development to VDOT for review, VDOT  may, pursuant to § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia, request a meeting  with the locality to discuss potential modifications to the proposal to address  any concerns or deficiencies. The request must be made within 30 days of  receipt by VDOT of the proposal. The submission of the proposal to VDOT shall  toll all times for local review set out in Chapter 22 (§ 15.2-2200 et  seq.) of Title 15.2 of the Code of Virginia until the locality has received  VDOT's final comments. VDOT must provide written comments to the locality  within 30 days of VDOT's receipt of the proposal if no meeting is scheduled or  within 90 days of the receipt of the proposal otherwise. VDOT will conduct its  review and provide official comments to the locality for inclusion in the  official public record. VDOT shall also make such comments available to the  public. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a locality from acting on a  subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development if VDOT's comments on the  submission have not been received within the timelines in this section.
    24VAC30-155-60. Traffic VDOT traffic impact  statement.
    A. A VDOT traffic impact statement (TIS) (VTIS)  assesses the impact of a proposed development on the transportation system and  recommends improvements to lessen or negate those impacts. It shall (i)  identify any traffic issues associated with access from the site to the  existing transportation network, (ii) outline solutions to potential problems,  (iii) address the sufficiency of the future transportation network, and (iv)  present improvements to be incorporated into the proposed development. 
    If a TIS VTIS is required, data collection  shall be by the locality, developer, or owner, as determined by the locality  and the locality shall prepare or have the developer or owner prepare the TIS  VTIS. If the locality prepares the TIS VTIS it shall  provide a copy of the complete TIS VTIS to the applicant when one  is provided to VDOT. The completed TIS VTIS shall be submitted to  VDOT.
    The data and analysis contained in the TIS VTIS  shall be organized and presented in a manner acceptable to VDOT and consistent  with this regulation. Submittal of an incomplete TIS or one prepared using  unapproved methodology or assumptions shall be considered deficient in meeting  the submission requirements of § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and shall  be returned to the locality and the applicant, if applicable, identifying the  deficiencies noted by VDOT.
    B. Scope of work meeting.
    1. For proposals that generate less than 1,000 vehicle trips  per peak hour of the generator representatives of the locality, the applicant,  or the locality and the applicant may request a scope of work meeting with VDOT  to discuss the required elements of a TIS VTIS for any project  and VDOT shall reply to such request within 30 days of its receipt of such a  request and provide a date that is no more than 60 days from such receipt,  time and location for such a scope of work meeting to both the locality and the  applicant, if applicable.
    2. For proposals that generate 1,000 or more vehicle trips per  peak hour of the generator representatives of the locality and applicant, if  applicable, shall hold a scope of work meeting with VDOT to discuss the  required elements of a TIS VTIS. Once a locality or applicant has  contacted VDOT regarding the scheduling of a scope of work meeting, VDOT shall  reply to both the locality and the applicant, if applicable, within 30 days  of such contact and provide a date that is no more than 60 days from  such contact, time and location for such a meeting.
    At a scope of work meeting pursuant to this section, the  locality, the applicant and VDOT shall review the elements, methodology and  assumptions to be used in the preparation of the TIS VTIS, and  identify any other related local requirements adopted pursuant to law. The  results of the initial scoping meeting may be adjusted in accordance with sound  professional judgment and the requirements of this regulation if agreed upon by  VDOT, the locality, and applicant, if applicable.
    C. Required elements. The required elements and scope of a TIS  VTIS are dependent upon the scale and potential impact of the specific  development proposal being addressed by the TIS VTIS as  determined by VDOT in its sole discretion. 
    1. At a minimum, the TIS VTIS shall include the  elements shown in the table below. The site generated peak hour trips in the  table below shall be based upon the gross vehicle trip generation of the site  less internal capture and shall take into account bicycle, pedestrian, and  transit mode split reductions, if applicable. When the type  of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike  or transit trips either on-site or off-site, the TIS VTIS  shall estimate multimodal trips. All distances in the table below shall be  measured along roads or streets.
         
                 | Item | Site Generated Peak Hour Trips | 
       | Less than 100
 | 100 to 499Less than 500
 | 500 to 999 | 1,000 or more | 
       | Background information |   |   |   |   | 
       | List of all nonexistent    transportation improvements assumed in the analysis | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Map    of site location, description of the parcel, general terrain features, and location    within the jurisdiction and region. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description of geographic    scope/ limits of study area.  | Within 1,000 ft of site
 | Within 2,000 feet of site and    any roadway on which 50 or more of the new peak hour vehicle trips generated    by the proposal are distributed – not to exceed one mile | Within 2,000 feet of site and    any roadway on which 10% or more of the new vehicle trips generated by the    proposal are distributed – not to exceed two miles | To be determined by VDOT in    consultation with the locality | 
       | Plan at an engineering scale    of the existing and proposed site uses. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description and map or diagram    of nearby uses, including parcel zoning. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description and map or diagram    of existing roadways. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description and map or diagram    of programmed improvements to roadways, intersections, and other    transportation facilities within the study area. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Analysis of Existing    Conditions |   |   |   |   | 
       | Collected daily and peak hour    of the generator traffic volumes, tabulated and presented on diagrams with    counts provided in an appendix.  | Only diagrams required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Analyses for intersections and    roadways identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated    and LOS is presented on diagrams for each lane group.  | Only diagrams required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | When the type of development    proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit    trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle    facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments, tabulated and    presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist  | At frontage, only diagrams    required
 | Within 2,000 feet of site | Within 2,000 feet of site | To be determined by VDOT in    consultation with the locality | 
       | Speed Study | If requested by VDOT
 | If requested by VDOT | If requested by VDOT | If requested by VDOT | 
       | Crash history near site | If requested by VDOT
 | If requested by VDOT |  If requested by VDOT | If requested by VDOT | 
       | Sight distance | If requested by VDOT
 | If requested by VDOT |  If requested by VDOT | If requested by VDOT | 
       | Analysis of Future Conditions    without Development |   |   |   |   | 
       | Description of and    justification for the method and assumptions used to forecast future traffic    volumes.  | Optional
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Analyses for intersections and    roadways as identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are    tabulated and LOS is presented on diagrams for each lane group. | Optional
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | When the type of development    proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit    trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle    facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and    presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned. | At frontage, only diagrams    required
 | Within 2,000 feet of site | Within 2,000 feet of site | To be determined by VDOT in    consultation with the locality at the scope of work meeting | 
       | Trip Generation |   |   |   |   | 
       | Site trip generation, with    tabulated data, broken out by analysis year for multi-phase developments, and    including justification for deviations from ITE rates, if appropriate. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description    and justification of internal capture reductions for mixed use developments    and pass-by trip reductions, if appropriate, including table of calculations    used. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Site Traffic Distribution and    Assignment |   |   |   |   | 
       | Description of methodology    used to distribute trips, with supporting data. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description of the direction    of approach for site generated traffic and diagrams showing the traffic    assignment to the road network serving the site for the appropriate time    periods. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Analysis of Future Conditions    With Development |   |   |   |   | 
       | Forecast daily and peak hour    of the generator traffic volumes on the highway network in the study area,    site entrances and internal roadways, tabulated and presented on diagrams. | Current traffic + site    generated traffic
 | Future background + site    generated traffic, at each expected phase and at build - out or six years    after start, whichever is later | Future background + site    generated traffic, at each expected phase, at build - out, and six years    after build - out, which may be extended or reduced by VDOT in consultation    with the locality | At a minimum the future    background + site generated traffic, at each expected phase, at build - out,    and six years after build - out; may be extended by VDOT in consultation with    the locality | 
       | Analyses for intersections and    roadways identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated    and LOS presented on diagrams for each lane group. | Only diagrams required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | When the type of development    proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit    trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle    facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and    presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned. | At frontage, only diagrams    required
 | Within 2,000 feet of site | Within 2,000 feet of site |  To be determined by VDOT    in consultation with the locality | 
       | Recommended Improvements |   |   |   |   | 
       | Description and diagram of the    location, nature, and extent of proposed improvements, with preliminary cost    estimates as available from VDOT. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description of methodology    used to calculate the effects of travel demand management (TDM) measures, if    proposed, with supporting data. | Required if TDM proposed
 | Required if TDM proposed | Required if TDM proposed | Required if TDM proposed | 
       | Analyses for all proposed and    modified intersections in the study area under the forecast and site traffic.    Delay, and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS presented on diagrams    for each lane group. For intersections expected to be signalized, MUTCD    Signal Warrant analysis or ITE Manual for Traffic Signal Design, as    determined by VDOT, presented in tabular form. | Only diagrams required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | When the type of development    proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit    trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle    facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and    presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned. | At frontage, only diagrams    required
 | Within 2,000 feet of site | Within 2,000 feet of site | To be determined by VDOT in    consultation with the locality | 
       | Conclusions |   |   |   |   | 
       | Clear, concise description of    the study findings. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
  
         
          Notwithstanding the geographic scope noted above, the  geographic scope of the study noted above may be reduced or enlarged based upon  layout of the local transportation network, the geographical size of the  development, and the traffic volume on the existing network, as determined by  VDOT in consultation with the locality and the applicant, if applicable.  Typically, analysis will be conducted for any roadway on which the additional  trips generated by the proposal have a materially detrimental impact on traffic  conditions. The analysis presented in the TIS VTIS need not  include all roadway and roadway segments located within the geographic scope of  the study as determined by VDOT.
    2. A TIS VTIS for a development proposal that  only meets the low volume road submission criterion (24VAC30-155-40 A 1 c  and 24VAC30-155-50 A 1 c) (24VAC30-155-40 A 3) shall, at a minimum,  consist of the following elements, unless otherwise directed by VDOT.
    a. All elements contained in the Background Information  portion of the above table, except the geographic scope/limits of study area is  limited to the highway fronting the proposed development and the closest  intersection, in each direction if applicable, of that highway with a highway  that has an average daily traffic volume higher than the fronting highway.
    b. A roadway safety inventory study of the roadway segment or  segments between the site entrance to the nearest intersections with the higher  traffic volume highways, to include such elements as, but not limited to, speed  limit, existing warning signs, pavement and shoulder type, pavement and  shoulder width, intersection sight distances, and safe horizontal curve speeds.
    c. Daily and peak hour traffic volumes presented on diagrams,  with counts provided in an appendix, for the fronting highway at the site, at  the highway's intersections with the higher volume highway, and for the higher  volume highways at their intersection with the fronting highway.
    d. All relevant elements contained in the Trip Generation  portion of the above table.
    e. Projected daily and peak hour of the generator traffic  volumes assuming build-out of the proposal, presented on diagrams for the  receiving highway at the site, at the highway's intersection with the higher  volume highways, and for the higher volume highways at their intersections with  the receiving highway.
    f. Delay and level of service analysis for the intersections  of the receiving highway with the higher volume highways.
    g. A comparison of the existing geometrics of the fronting  highway under proposed build-out traffic conditions with the geometric  standards, based upon functional classification and volume, contained in the  Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2011 (VDOT).
    3. A VTIS for a rezoning proposal may be prepared in  accordance with the "Less than 500 Site Generated Peak Hour Trips" category  in the table in this section, regardless of actual projected trip generation,  provided that:
    a. The rezoning proposal is in conformance with a  locality’s adopted comprehensive plan that was reviewed in accordance with  24VAC30-155-30; and
    b. The review of the comprehensive plan included the  submission to VDOT of a technical evaluation of the traffic impacts for  anticipated development based on the future land use policies and map.
    D. Methodology and standard assumptions. A TIS VTIS  shall be prepared based upon methodology and assumptions noted below or as may  be agreed upon by VDOT based upon the results of a scope of work meeting held  by VDOT pursuant to this section.
    1. Data collection. Preparers shall collect traffic data in  accordance with the identified study area. The count data shall include at a  minimum, weekday 24-hour counts, and directional turning movement counts  during AM and PM peak times of the day. The 24-hour counts shall include  vehicle classification counts. With approval of VDOT, data collected by the  transportation professional preparer within the last 24 months may be used,  likewise for data from the VDOT count program. 
    The preparer shall monitor traffic operations during data  collection to ensure extraneous events such as vehicle crashes or special event  traffic do not affect integrity of count data. Preparers collecting data for  utilization in traffic impact studies shall normally avoid data collection  during the following instances:
    a. Holidays or times of the year when the traffic patterns are  deemed to be unrepresentative of typical conditions, unless required by VDOT or  the locality, or both.
    b. Summer months if school or schools in proximity.
    c. Fridays and weekends unless required by VDOT or the  locality, or both.
    d. Other times of the year contingent upon existing adjacent  land use activities.
    e. During times of inclement weather.
    2. Trip generation. Estimates of trip generation by a proposed  development shall be prepared using the Institute of Transportation Engineers  Trip Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100), 8th Edition, 2008, unless  VDOT agrees to allow the use of alternate trip generation rates based upon  alternate published guides or local trip generation studies. VDOT shall at all  times after July 1, 2011, have at least one non-ITE trip generation methodology  or alternative rate approved for the use in preparation of small area plan  traffic impact statements pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C that recognizes the  benefits of reduced vehicle trip generation and vehicle miles traveled from  developments that meet the criteria for a small area plan pursuant to this  regulation. Such alternate methodology or rate can be modified based upon  local factors if agreed to at a scoping meeting. Rezoning proposals shall  assume the highest vehicle trip generating use allowable under the proposed  zoning classification. In determining which trip generation process (equation  or rate) may be used, the preparer shall follow the guidance presented in the  Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Proposed  Recommended Practice (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2004, which is  summarized here, except rates may be utilized if the criteria for the use of  regression equations are not met. Regression equations to calculate trips  as a result of development shall be utilized, provided the following is true:
    a. Independent variable falls within range of data; and
    b. Either the data plot has at least 20 points; or
    c. R2 is greater than 0.75, equation falls  within data cluster in plot and standard deviation greater than 110% of  weighted average rate.
    If the above criteria are not met, then the preparer can use  average trip rates, provided at least one of though if the  following applies do not apply a rate based upon the study of similar  local sites should be considered:
    d. At least three data points exist;
    e. Standard deviation less than 110% of weighted average rate;  and
    f. R2 less than 0.75 or no regression equation  provided; or
    g. f. Weighted average rate falls within data  cluster in plot.
    3. Internal capture and pass-by trips.
    a. Internal capture rates consider site trips  "captured" within a mixed use development, recognizing that trips  from one land use can access another land use within a site development  without having to access the adjacent street system. Mixed use developments  include a combination of residential and nonresidential uses or a combination  of nonresidential uses only. Internal capture allows reduction of site trips  from adjacent intersections and roadways. For traffic impact statements  prepared for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C the internal capture  rate or rates may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved  by VDOT. Unless For ITE-based methodologies, unless otherwise  approved by VDOT, the following internal capture rates should be used if  appropriate:
    (1) Residential with a mix of nonresidential components - use  the smaller of 15% of residential or 15% nonresidential trips generated.
    (2) Residential with office use - use the smaller of 5.0% of  residential or 5.0% of office trips generated.
    (3) Residential with retail use - for AM peak hour, use the  smaller of 5.0% residential or 5.0% retail trips generated; for PM peak hour,  use the smaller of 10% residential or 10% retail trips generated; for 24-hour  traffic, use the smaller of 15% residential or 15% retail trips generated.
    (4) Hotel/motel with office use - use 15% of hotel/motel  trips, unless the overall volume of the office traffic is more than the overall  volume of hotel/motel traffic use in which case use the smaller of 10% of the  hotel/motel traffic or the office traffic.
    (5) Multiuse development with more than five million square  feet of office and retail - internal capture rate should be determined in  consultation with and approval of VDOT. 
    (6) Office with retail use – use the smaller of 5.0% office  or retail trips generated.
    (7) Some combination of the above, if approved by VDOT.
    b. Pass-by trip reductions consider site trips drawn from the  existing traffic stream on an adjacent street, recognizing that trips drawn to  a site would otherwise already traverse the adjacent street regardless of  existence of the site. Pass-by trip reductions allow a percentage reduction in  the forecast of trips otherwise added to the adjacent street from the proposed  development. The reduction applies only to volumes on adjacent streets, not to  ingress or egress volumes at entrances serving the proposed site. Unless  otherwise approved by VDOT, the following pass-by trip reductions may be  used: (1) Shopping center - 25% of trips generated may be considered pass-by.  (2) Convenience stores, service stations, fast food restaurants, and similar  land uses - 40% of trip generated may be considered pass-by.(3) pass-by  rates utilized shall be those reported in Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition  – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004. For traffic impact statements prepared  for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C, the pass-by trip reductions  may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved by VDOT.
    4. Trip distribution. In the absence of more detailed  information, trip distribution shall be in accordance with logical regional  travel patterns as suggested by existing highway directional split and  intersection movements or population and destination site distribution and shall  recognize the effects of increased street connectivity if such streets meet the  requirements of the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (see  24VAC30-155-100) (24VAC30-92). If more detailed information is  available from trip origin/destination studies, marketing studies, or regional  planning models, this may be used to distribute trips upon approval of VDOT.
    5. Planning horizon. In general, the analysis years shall be  related to (i) the opening date of the proposed development, (ii) build-out of  major phases of a multiyear development, (iii) long-range transportation plans,  and (iv) other significant transportation network changes. The preparer should  establish the planning horizon in consultation with and subject to the  acceptance of VDOT.
    6. Background traffic growth. Unless directed by VDOT,  geometric growth (or compound growth), based upon historical growth rates,  shall generally be used for determining future background traffic levels where  extensive traffic-count history is available and capacity constraint is not  appropriate. This growth rate replicates "natural growth" and is  typical for projecting urban growth. Natural growth of traffic can be  adjusted consistent with traffic forecasts associated with previously submitted  local land development projects within the study area.
    7. Future conditions. For the purpose of the TIS VTIS,  future conditions shall include background traffic and additional vehicle trips  anticipated to be generated by approved but not yet constructed or improved  projects.
    8. Level of service calculation. Level of service (LOS)  analysis for highways shall utilize the techniques described in the Highway  Capacity Manual (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2010 (TRB). Neither the  intersection capacity utilization method nor the percentile delay method may be  used in the traffic impact calculations of delay and level of service.  Preparers shall consult with VDOT on which traffic analysis software package is  to be used to conduct the LOS calculations. The results shall be tabulated and  displayed graphically, with levels of service provided for each lane group for  each peak period. All data used in the calculations must be provided along with  the results of the capacity analysis. Any assumptions made that deviate from  the programmed defaults must be documented and an explanation provided as to  why there was a deviation. Electronic files used for the analysis shall be  provided to VDOT as a digital submission (e.g..hcs,.sy6,.inp,.trf files), along  with the printed report. If intersections analyzed are in close proximity to  each other so that queuing may be a factor, VDOT may require the inclusion of  an analysis with a micro simulation model. Unless actual on-ground conditions  dictate otherwise, preparers should use the following defaults when utilizing  the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) or other approved programs when evaluating  roadway components:
    a. Terrain – choose the appropriate terrain type. Most of the  state will be level or rolling, but some areas may qualify for consideration as  mountainous.
    b. Twelve-foot wide lanes.
    c. No parking or bus activity unless field conditions include  such parking or bus activity or unless the locality has provided VDOT with a  written statement of intent for the services to be provided.
    d. Peak hour factor by approach – calculate from collected  traffic counts (requires at least a peak hour count in 15-minute increments). However,  the use of peak hour factors lower than 0.85 shall only be allowed if based  upon the average of more than three peak hour counts. For future conditions  analysis, unless specific site conditions can be expected to create extreme  peak hour factors, default peak hour factors between 0.92 and 1.00 should be  used.
    e. Heavy vehicle factor – calculate from collected traffic  (classification) counts or obtain from VDOT count publications. For future  conditions analysis with development traffic, the existing heavy vehicle factor  should be adjusted based upon the nature of the traffic being generated by the  development.
    f. Area type – noncenter of business district.
    The TIS VTIS shall identify any existing or  proposed bicycle and pedestrian accommodation that would be affected by the  proposal. For the purposes of this subsection, a bicycle accommodation is  defined as on-street bike lanes, paved shoulders of roadways that are not part  of the designated traveled way for vehicles, or exclusive and shared off-street  bicycle paths. 
    For the purposes of this subsection, a pedestrian  accommodation is defined as sidewalks, intersection treatments and exclusive or  shared off-street trails or paths. If significant potential for bicycle or  pedestrian trips exists, the TIS VTIS shall include current and  future service level analyses at build-out for existing or proposed bicycle and  pedestrian accommodations. When the proposal requires or includes improvements  or modifications to the roadway, bicycle or pedestrian accommodations, the TIS  VTIS shall analyze the impacts of such improvements and modifications on  bicycle and pedestrian accommodations and service levels, and provide  recommendations for mitigation of adverse impacts.
    The TIS VTIS shall provide analysis for all bus  service with routes that have, or will have a station or stop within 2,000 feet  of the proposal. The TIS VTIS shall evaluate and discuss  potential for increased demand for bus use due to the proposal, addressing  whether such increases will result in longer dwell time at stops or increase  the need for buses on a route. The quality of service analysis for bus service  shall be determined in accordance with the Transit Capacity and Quality of  Service Manual (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2nd Edition, 2003 (TRB).  The TIS VTIS shall provide both route and segment quality of  service. The TIS VTIS may consider the benefits of dedicated bus  lanes for more frequent and rapid service. The TIS VTIS shall  provide recommendations for mitigation of adverse impacts where adverse impacts  are expected to the quality of service to bus service. If an analysis of  pedestrian quality or level of service is required for calculation of the bus  quality of service, the preparer shall use a methodology approved by VDOT.
    9. Trip reduction, and pedestrian and bicycle accommodations.  When a proposal meets the criteria listed below, the preparer of the TIS  VTIS may reduce the number of vehicle trips generated by the proposal in  the TIS VTIS analysis in accordance with this subsection.  Notwithstanding the percentages below, the total number of reductions used by a  preparer in accordance with this subsection shall never not  exceed 500 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator unless otherwise  approved by VDOT. The trip reductions for traffic impact statements prepared  for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C may be based on the non-ITE  trip generation methodology approved by VDOT and are not subject to limitations  or requirements of this subdivision.
    a. Pedestrian accommodations. For the purposes of this  subsection, a pedestrian accommodation is defined as a sidewalk, pedestrian  path, or multiuse trail. Where a pedestrian service level of A exists, vehicle  trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by 4.0% for those portions  of the development within a 2,000-foot radius of the connections between the  proposed development and the adjoining network. Where a pedestrian service level  of B exists, vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by  3.0%; where a pedestrian service level of C exists, vehicle trips per peak hour  of the generator may be reduced by 1.5% for the portion of the development  noted above. These reductions may only be taken if:
    (1) Pedestrian facility coverage in a 2,000-foot radius of the  connections to the proposed development is on or along at least 80% of the road  network; 
    (2) The connectivity index within the 2,000-foot radius is  equal to or higher than 1.4 pedestrian facilities inside and outside the  development provide reasonably direct access to traffic generators; and
    (3) There are at least two of the 10 major land use  classifications, as defined in ITE Trip Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100),  8th Edition, 2008, within the 2,000-foot radius.
    b. Bicycle accommodations. For the purposes of this  subsection, a bicycle accommodation is defined as a street with a design speed  of 25 MPH or less that carries 400 vehicles per day or less, on-street bike  lanes, a pedestrian accommodation, paved shoulders of roadways that are not  part of the designated traveled way for vehicles and are at least two feet  wide, or exclusive and shared off-street bicycle paths. Where a bicycle service  level of A exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by 3.0%. Where a  bicycle service level of B exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by  2.0%. Where a bicycle service level of C exists, vehicle trips per day may be  reduced by 1.0%. These reductions may only be taken if:
    (1) Bicycle accommodations within a 2,000-foot radius of the  connections to the proposed development exist on or along at least 80% of the  road network; 
    (2) The connectivity index within the 2,000-foot radius is  equal to or higher than 1.4 bicycle accommodations inside and outside  the development provide reasonably direct access to traffic generators; and
    (3) There are at least two of the 10 major land use  classifications as defined in ITE Trip Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100),  8th Edition, 2008, within the 2,000-foot radius. 
    10. Modal split and trip reduction. All vehicle trip  reductions used in the TIS VTIS pursuant to this subsection are  subject to the approval of VDOT.
    a. If a proposal is located within 1/2 mile along roadways,  pedestrian or bicycle accommodations of a transit station, excluding bus stops  and stations, reasonable vehicle trip reductions of vehicle trips generated by  the proposal may be made with approval of VDOT. The preparer shall submit  documentation to justify any such vehicle trip reductions used with the TIS  VTIS. When a proposal is located more than 1/2 mile but less than two  miles from a transit stop, excluding bus stops and stations, with bicycle  parking accommodations transit additional bicycle modal split vehicle  trip reductions may be utilized. The analysis of capacity of the parking  accommodations shall be included in the TIS VTIS when such trip  reductions are used.
    b. If a proposal is located within 1/4 mile along roadways,  pedestrian or bicycle accommodations of a bus stop or station where the segment  and route service levels are C or higher, reasonable vehicle trip reductions of  vehicle trips generated by the proposal may be made with the approval of VDOT.  The preparer shall submit documentation to justify any such vehicle trip  reductions used with the TIS VTIS.
    c. Transit and bus modal split data from similar developments  within the geographic scope of the TIS VTIS or one mile of the  proposal, whichever is greater, shall be collected if the TIS VTIS  vehicle trip reductions are used pursuant to this subsection and similar  developments exist within the geographic scope of the TIS VTIS or  one mile of the proposal, whichever is greater.
    11. Signal warrant analysis. Traffic signal warrant analysis  shall be performed in accordance with the procedures set out in the Manual on  Uniform Traffic Control Devices (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2003, revised  2007, or ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design, 1998, as determined by  VDOT.
    12. Recommended improvements. Recommendations made in the TIS  VTIS for improvements to transportation facilities shall be in  accordance with the geometric standards contained within the Road Design Manual  (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2011 (VDOT).
    24VAC30-155-70. Departmental analysis.
    After concluding its review of a proposed comprehensive plan  or transportation plan or plan amendment, or rezoning, or site or  subdivision plan, VDOT shall provide the locality and applicant, if  applicable, with a written report detailing its analysis and when appropriate  recommending transportation improvements to mitigate any potential adverse  impacts on state-controlled highways. VDOT shall provide recommendations for  facilitating other modes of transportation including but not limited to  transit, bus, bicycle and pedestrian facilities or accommodations where such  facilities or accommodations are planned or exist, or where such facilities  have a significant potential for use. In addition, VDOT shall provide the  locality and the applicant, if applicable, with preliminary recommendations  regarding compliance with other VDOT regulations such as the Secondary Street  Acceptance Requirements (see 24VAC30-155-100) (24VAC30-92), the  Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (see 24VAC30-155-100)  (24VAC30-72), and the Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials,  Collectors, and Local Streets (see 24VAC30-155-100) (24VAC30-73).
    24VAC30-155-80. Fees.
    A. Locality initiated proposals. No fee shall be charged for  review of any comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan amendment, or  rezoning proposal, subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development  initiated by a locality or other public agency.
    B. Proposals containing a traffic impact statement as  described in subdivision C 1 of 24VAC30-155-40. No fee shall be charged for the  review of a rezoning submission that properly includes a traffic impact  statement submitted under subdivision C 1 of 24VAC30-155-40.
    C. Proposals containing supplemental traffic analysis as  described in subdivisions C 1, 2, and 5 of 24VAC30-155-50. No fee shall be  charged for the review of a subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development  submission that properly includes a supplemental traffic analysis submitted  under subdivisions C 1, 2, and 5 of 24VAC30-155-50.
    D. C. All other proposals. Any package  submitted to a locality by an applicant that will be subject to VDOT review  pursuant to this chapter shall include any required payment in a form payable  directly to VDOT.
    1. For initial or second review of all comprehensive plans,  comprehensive plan amendments, and transportation plans submitted to VDOT for  review, not initiated on behalf of the locality, there shall be a fee of $1,000  charged to the applicant. This fee shall be paid upon submission of a plan to  VDOT for review. 
    2. For initial or second review of rezoning proposals,  subdivision plats, site plans, or plans of development accompanied by a  traffic impact statement or supplemental traffic analysis, not initiated  on behalf of the locality, there shall be a single fee for both reviews  determined by the number of adjusted vehicle trips generated per peak hour, as  follows:
           | LowSubmission made due to 24VAC30-155-40 A 3 (low    volume road criteriononly) -
 | $250 | 
       | Less than 100 vehicles per peak hour - 
 | $500
 | 
       | 100 or more vehicles per peak hourAll other    submissions -
 | $1,000 | 
  
    The fee shall be paid upon submission of a package to VDOT for  review. 
    3. For a third or subsequent submission pursuant to  subdivisions 1 or 2 of this subsection, that is requested by VDOT on the basis  of the failure of the applicant to address deficiencies previously identified  by VDOT, the applicant shall be required to pay an additional fee as though the  third or subsequent submission were an initial submission and requiring the  fees identified above. An applicant or locality may appeal to the district  administrator a determination by VDOT that a submitted package failed to  address deficiencies previously identified by VDOT.
    24VAC30-155-100. Listing of documents incorporated by  reference. (Repealed.)
    Requests for information pertaining to the availability  and cost of any of these publications should be directed to the address  indicated below the specific document. Requests for documents available from  VDOT may be obtained from VDOT's division and representative indicated;  however, VDOT documents may be available over the Internet at  www.vdot.virginia.gov.
    1. Trip Generation (effective November 2003) 
           |   | Institute of Transportation    Engineers
 1099 14th Street NW
 Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    2. Trip Generation Handbook – an ITE Proposed Recommended  Practice (effective 2004)
           |   | Institute of Transportation    Engineers
 1099 14th Street NW
 Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    3. Road Design Manual (effective January 1, 2005) 
           |   | VDOT
 1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    4. Highway Capacity Manual (effective 2000)
           |   | Transportation Research Board
 500 Fifth Street NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    5. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (effective  December 22, 2003)
           |   | Federal Highway Administration
 Superintendent of Documents
 U.S. Government Printing Office
 P.O. Box 371954
 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250
 | 
  
    6. ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design (effective 1998)
           |   | Institute of Transportation    Engineers
 1099 14th Street NW
 Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    7. Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition  (effective 2003)
           |   | Transportation Research Board of    the National Academies
 Keck Center of the National    Academies
 Transportation Research Board
 500 Fifth Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    8. Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (24VAC30-92)
           |   | Commonwealth Transportation Board
 1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    9. Access Management: Principal Arterials (24VAC30-72)
           |   | VDOT
 1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    10. Access Management: Minor  Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets (24VAC30-73)
           |   | VDOT
 1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-155)
    Requests for information pertaining to the availability  and cost of any of these publications should be directed to the address  indicated for the specific document. Requests for documents available from VDOT  may be obtained from VDOT's division and representative indicated; however,  VDOT documents may be available over the Internet at www.vdot.virginia.gov.
    Highway  Capacity Manual, 2010, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street NW,  Washington, DC 20001.
    ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design (effective 1998),  Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600,  Washington, DC 20006.
    Manual  on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, effective 2003,  revised 2007, Federal Highway Administration, Superintendent of Documents, U.S.  Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250.
    Road  Design Manual, 2011, VDOT, 1401 E. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
    Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd  Edition, 2003; Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Keck  Center of the National Academies, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth  Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001.
    Trip  Generation, 8th Ed., 2008, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye  Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006.
    Trip  Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004,  Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600,  Washington, DC 20006.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R12-2999; Filed November 29, 2011, 10:45 a.m. 
TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES
COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The  Commonwealth Transportation Board and the Commissioner of Highways are claiming  an exemption from the Administrative Process Act pursuant to the provisions of  Chapters 647, 870, and 888 of the 2011 Acts of Assembly.
         Titles of Regulations: 24VAC30-72. Access Management  Regulations: Principal Arterials (amending 24VAC30-72-10, 24VAC30-72-40,  24VAC30-72-60, 24VAC30-72-70, 24VAC30-72-80, 24VAC30-72-110, 24VAC30-72-130,  24VAC30-72-170).
    24VAC30-73. Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials,  Collectors, and Local Streets (amending 24VAC30-73-10, 24VAC30-73-40,  24VAC30-73-60, 24VAC30-73-70, 24VAC30-73-80, 24VAC30-73-110, 24VAC30-73-130, 24VAC30-73-170).
    24VAC30-92. Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (amending 24VAC30-92-10, 24VAC30-92-20,  24VAC30-92-60, 24VAC30-92-70, 24VAC30-92-80, 24VAC30-92-110, 24VAC30-92-120,  24VAC30-92-130, 24VAC30-92-140; repealing 24VAC30-92-50, 24VAC30-92-150).
    24VAC30-155. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (amending 24VAC30-155-10, 24VAC30-155-20,  24VAC30-155-30, 24VAC30-155-40, 24VAC30-155-60, 24VAC30-155-70, 24VAC30-155-80;  repealing 24VAC30-155-50, 24VAC30-155-100). 
    Statutory Authority: § 33.1-198.1 of the Code of  Virginia.
    Effective Date: December 31, 2011. 
    Agency Contact: Robert Hofrichter, Assistant Division  Administrator, Transportation & Mobility Planning Division, Department of  Transportation, 1401 East Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804)  786-0780, or email robert.hofrichter@vdot.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    During the 2011 session of the General Assembly, Chapters  647, 870, and 888, which relate to or impact the content of land development  regulations promulgated by the Commonwealth Transportation Board, VDOT, or the  Commissioner of Highways were enacted. These regulations include:
    24VAC30-72 – Access Management Regulations: Principal  Arterials
    24VAC30-73 – Access Management Regulations: Minor  Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets 
    24VAC30-92 – Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements 
    24VAC30-155 – Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations
    This action includes those regulatory changes made pursuant  to Chapters 647, 870, and 888, which will have an effective date of December  31, 2011. 
    In response to Chapter 647, which repealed subsection C of  § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia, the Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations  (TIA) are revised to remove the requirements for VDOT to review subdivision  plats, site plans, and plans for development. This legislation did not impact  the agency's review of comprehensive plans, comprehensive plan amendments, and  rezoning. VDOT made changes to the TIA Regulations pursuant to a specific  mandate in the second enactment clause of the legislation.
    Chapter 870 requires VDOT to: 
    1. Review and adopt any appropriate revisions to the TIA  Regulations prior to November 30, 2011; 
    2. Assist the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) to  research and make recommendations related to the adoption of revisions to the  Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (SSAR) prior to November 30, 2011; and
    3. Review and adopt revisions to the Access Management  Regulations: Principal Arterials and Access Management Regulations: Minor  Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets by November 11, 2011, concerning their  application to entrances for family subdivisions. 
    Chapter 888 also affects the TIA Regulations. This  legislation states that VDOT shall complete a "more limited" review  of rezoning requests when the proposed use is consistent with the current  locality comprehensive plan designation and the comprehensive plan was reviewed  previously pertaining to the TIA Regulations. Although VDOT will continue to  review comprehensive plans, related amendments, and proposed rezoning requests,  it revised the TIA Regulations to reflect this less stringent approach to such  reviews. 
    Significant changes made to each of the regulations are  described below. Additional minor changes to update references to forms and  technical documents to ensure consistency among the regulations examined were  also made where necessary. 
    Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials  (24VAC30-72) and Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials, Collectors,  and Local Streets (24VAC 30-73)
    The amendments add a low volume commercial entrance  category to the regulation for entrances associated with land uses that do not  generate high traffic volumes, but volumes above those expected from private  entrances (driveways serving one to two homes). The lower-cost design standards  for private entrances will apply to this new type of entrance, but the entrance  will need to meet a stopping sight distance requirement. (See Definitions,  24VAC30-72-80 and 24VAC30-73-80.) For clarity, text in the catchlines and  elsewhere in the regulations is amended to clarify how particular provisions  are applied to low volume commercial entrances, commercial entrances, and  private entrances.
    As the character of traffic created by family subdivisions  does not differ from any other entrances, setting out a specific entrance just  for family subdivisions is not logical from a safety standpoint. Family  subdivisions generally consist of up to five lots, which can be expected to  generate 50 trips, and 50 trips is already the established breakpoint for  paving eligibility on VDOT secondary highways. Stopping sight distance is the  minimum required by the American Association of State Highway and  Transportation Officials (AASHTO) national standards at entrances, and a new  document, "Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008," is added to  24VAC30-72 and 24VAC30-73 to address the revision to family entrance  provisions. 
    Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (24VAC30-92): 
    The amendments removed the "connectivity index"  requirement from the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements because many  parties outside of VDOT found the connectivity index confusing and complicated;  many also questioned if use of the index actually increased external  connectivity. The "area types" classification scheme is eliminated  because it was directly tied to connectivity index requirements, which are  eliminated, and the requirements associated with pedestrian accommodations are  modified based on input received. 
    For connectivity enhancements, a requirement is incorporated  for additional external connection or connections when certain dwelling unit or  vehicle per day (VPD) thresholds per network addition are met. Additional  external connections are required when the network addition contains over 200  dwelling units or the use generates over 2,000 VPD.  With the elimination  of the connectivity index, another connectivity standard is necessary to ensure  adequate "connectivity for the current and future transportation  network."
    An amendment to the regulation allows the District  Administrator's designee (rather than the District Administrator) to waive or  modify certain aspects or requirements relating to multiple connections and/or  additional external connections when specific and commonly occurring physical  situations exist. Since the original effective date of the Secondary Street  Acceptance Requirements in 2009, VDOT has gathered data on the occurrence of  regulation exceptions. The majority of exceptions granted relate to required  connections. The specific situations listed in the proposed Secondary  Street Acceptance Requirements include the majority of situations today that  result in approval of exceptions to connectivity requirements. By providing the  designee with approval authority, a request seeking approval of an exception  will receive the same thorough review, but the time needed for a review should  be reduced. 
    The VDOT review period for waivers and exceptions is  reduced from 45 calendar days to 30 calendar days for connectivity exceptions  and appeals. 
    Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (24VAC30-155):
    Reviews for site plans, subdivision plats, and plans of  development are removed due to the repeal of subsection C of § 15.2-2222.1  of the Code of Virginia, which required local submittal of these land  development proposals to VDOT for review. The entire section relating to these  reviews, 24VAC30-155-50, is removed as a result.
    Traffic impact analysis study criteria are reduced in scope  for rezoning proposals. The trip generation threshold requiring submittal of a  rezoning to VDOT is increased from 100 peak hour trips for residential and  2,500 daily trips for other land uses to a new 5,000 vehicle trips per day  threshold for all land uses. The submittal threshold is raised to  address/reshift focus to larger developments of a more regional scale. 
    An amendment is added to allow rezoning applicants to  submit a traffic impact analysis study prepared according to locality  requirements, provided the locality's requirements have been certified by VDOT  as meeting acceptable standards of professional practice. A developer will not  have to prepare separate traffic impact studies according to locality  requirements and according to VDOT requirements. Once a locality's traffic  impact statement requirements have been certified by VDOT, the local study can  satisfy both purposes. 
    An amendment stipulates that rezoning proposal is exempt  from the regulations when it (i) involves no changes in the land uses allowed  under the current zoning, or (ii) results in lower trip generation than land  uses allowed by right (except governmental uses) under the current zoning. This  amendment is made to bring the regulation more in line with statutory intent of  requiring traffic impact studies in situations that would substantially affect  state highways. Applying traffic impact regulations to a rezoning proposal that  will generate the same or less traffic than what could occur if the property  was developed by-right (uses allowed under the current zoning) would conflict  with the legislative intent.
    A provision is added requiring VDOT to schedule a meeting  with the locality and the developer to discuss the preparation of a traffic  impact study on a proposed rezoning within 60 days of receipt of a request for  a scoping meeting. The deadline helps assure that the arrangements for a  scoping meeting to discuss a rezoning proposal are handled in a timely manner.
    An amendment directs VDOT to provide the rezoning applicant  the opportunity and time to make modifications to information submitted under  the regulations before returning the package to the locality and requiring its  formal resubmission. The regulations allow, when possible, revisions to  submittals to be accommodated in a manner that does not unnecessarily extend  the local development review process.
    The methodology for preparing a traffic impact analysis  study is revised. The methodology was evaluated based on three years of  experience, utilizing the current methodology, as well as new concepts and best  practices in traffic impact analysis. 
    24VAC30-72-10. Definitions.
    "Access management" means the systematic control of  the location, spacing, design, and operation of entrances, median openings,  traffic signals, and interchanges for the purpose of providing vehicular access  to land development in a manner that preserves the safety and efficiency of the  transportation system. 
    "Commercial entrance" means any entrance serving  land uses other than two or fewer individual private residences. (See  "private entrance.")
    "Commissioner" means the individual who serves as  the chief executive officer of the Department of Transportation or his  designee.
    "Commonwealth" means the Commonwealth of Virginia.
    "Crossover" or "median opening" means an  opening in a nontraversable median (such as a concrete barrier or raised  island) that provides for crossing and turning traffic. 
    "Design speed" means the selected speed used to  determine the geometric design features of the highway. 
    "District" means each of the nine areas in which  VDOT is divided to oversee the maintenance and construction on the  state-maintained highways, bridges and tunnels within the boundaries of the  area. 
    "District administrator" means the VDOT employee  assigned to supervise the district. 
    "District administrator's designee" means the VDOT  employee or employees designated by the district administrator. 
    "Entrance" means any driveway, street, or other  means of providing for movement of vehicles to or from the highway.
    "Entrance, commercial" means any entrance  serving land uses that generate more than 50 vehicular trips per day or the  trip generation equivalent of more than five individual private residences or  lots for individual private residences using the methodology in the Institute  of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
    "Entrance, low volume commercial" means any  entrance, other than a private entrance, serving five or fewer individual  residences or lots for individual residences on a privately owned and  maintained road or land uses that generate 50 or fewer vehicular trips per day  using the methodology in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip  Generation, 8th Edition, 2008. 
    "Entrance, private" means an entrance that  serves up to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of  the occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain  access to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure  facilities that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump  stations, and stormwater management basins.
    "Frontage road" means a road that generally runs  parallel to a highway between the highway right-of-way and the front building  setback line of the abutting properties and provides access to the abutting  properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to the highway  and separating the abutting property traffic from through traffic on the  highway. 
    "Functional area" means the area of the physical  highway feature, such as an intersection, roundabout, railroad grade crossing,  or interchange, plus that portion of the highway that comprises the decision  and maneuver distance and required vehicle storage length to serve that highway  feature. 
    "Functional area of an intersection" means the  physical area of an at-grade intersection plus all required storage lengths for  separate turn lanes and for through traffic including any maneuvering distance  for separate turn lanes.
    "Functional classification" means the federal  system of classifying groups of highways according to the character of service  they are intended to provide and classifications made by the commissioner based  on the operational characteristics of a highway. Each highway is assigned a  functional classification based on the highway's intended purpose of providing  priority to through traffic movement or adjoining property access. The  functional classification system groups highways into three basic categories  identified as (i) arterial, with the function to provide through movement of  traffic; (ii) collector, with the function of supplying a combination of  through movement and access to property; and (iii) local, with the function of  providing access to property. 
    "Highway," "street," or "road"  means a public way for purposes of vehicular travel, including the entire area  within the right-of-way.
    "Intersection" means any at-grade connection with a  highway including two highways or an entrance and a highway.
    "Legal speed limit" means the speed limit set forth  on signs lawfully posted on a highway or in the absence of such signs the speed  limit established by Article 8 (§ 46.2-870 et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title 46.2  of the Code of Virginia.
    "Level of service" means a qualitative measure  describing the operational conditions within a vehicular traffic stream,  generally in terms of such service measures as speed, travel time, freedom to  maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience.  "Level-of-service" is defined and procedures are presented for  determining the level of service in the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-72-170 I).
    "Limited access highway" means a highway especially  designed for through traffic over which abutting properties have no easement or  right of light, air, or access by reason of the fact that their property abuts  upon the limited access highway.
    "Median" means the portion of a divided highway  that separates opposing traffic flows.
    "Operating speed" means the speed at which drivers  are observed operating their vehicles during free-flow conditions with the 85th  percentile of the distribution of observed speeds being the most frequently used  measure of the operating speed of a particular location or geometric feature. 
    "Permit" or "entrance permit" means a  document that sets the conditions under which VDOT allows a connection to a  highway. 
    "Permit applicant" means the person or persons, firm,  corporation, government, or other entity that has applied for a permit. 
    "Permittee" means the person or persons, firm,  corporation, government, or other entity that has been issued a permit.
    "Preliminary subdivision plat" means a plan of  development as set forth in § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Principal arterial" means the functional  classification for a major highway intended to serve through traffic where  access is carefully controlled, generally highways of regional importance, with  moderate to high volumes of traffic traveling relatively long distances and at  higher speeds.
    "Private entrance" means an entrance that serves  up to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of the  occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain access  to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure facilities  that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump stations, and  stormwater management basins.
    "Professional engineer" means a person who is  qualified to practice engineering by reason of his special knowledge and use of  mathematical, physical and engineering sciences and the principles and methods  of engineering analysis and design acquired by engineering education and  experience, and whose competence has been attested by the Virginia Board for  Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior  Designers and Landscape Architects through licensure as a professional  engineer.
    "Reverse frontage road" means a road that is  located to the rear of the properties fronting a highway and provides access to  the abutting properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to  the highway and removing the abutting property traffic from through traffic on  the highway.
    "Right-of-way" means that property within the  systems of state highways that is open or may be opened for public travel or  use or both in the Commonwealth. This definition includes those public  rights-of-way in which the Commonwealth has a prescriptive easement for  maintenance and public travel. 
    "Roadside" means the area adjoining the outer edge  of the roadway. The median of a divided highway may also be considered a  "roadside."
    "Roadway" means the portion of a highway, including  shoulders, for vehicular use. A divided highway has two or more roadways.
    "Shared entrance" means a single entrance serving  two or more adjoining parcels.
    "Sight distance" means the distance visible to the  driver of a vehicle when the view is unobstructed by traffic.
    "Site plan" and "subdivision plat" mean a  plan of development approved in accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241  through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia. 
    "Stopping sight distance" means the distance  required by a driver of a vehicle, traveling at a given speed, to bring the  vehicle to a stop after an object on the highway becomes visible, including the  distance traveled during the driver's perception and reaction times and the  vehicle braking distance.
    "Systems of state highways" means all highways and  roads under the ownership, the control, or the jurisdiction of VDOT, including  but not limited to, the primary, secondary and interstate highway. 
    "Traveled way" means the portion of the roadway for  the movement of vehicles, exclusive of shoulders and turn lanes.
    "Trip" means a single or one-directional vehicle  movement either entering or exiting a property; a vehicle leaving the property  is one trip and a vehicle returning to the property is one trip.
    "Turn lane" means a separate lane for the purpose  of enabling a vehicle that is entering or leaving a highway to increase or  decrease its speed to a rate at which it can more safely merge or diverge with  through traffic; acceleration and deceleration lanes.
    "Urban area" means an urbanized area with a  population of 50,000 or more, or an urban place (small urban area) as  designated by the Bureau of the Census having a population of 5,000 or more and  not within any urbanized area. The Federal Highway Administration defines  "urban area" in more detail based on the federal-aid highway law (23  USC § 101).
    "VDOT" means the Virginia Department of  Transportation, its successor, the Commissioner of Highways, or his designees.
    24VAC30-72-40. Administrative procedures and rules for  obtaining commercial and private entrance permits.
    All applications for entrance permits shall be obtained from  and submitted to the district administrator's designee for the county in which  the work is to be performed. The permit applicant shall submit the permit  application form, and the entrance permit, if approved, will be issued in  accordance with the applicable administrative rules, requirements, and  procedures of this chapter and the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-72-170 G). 
    24VAC30-72-60. General provisions governing commercial and  private entrances.
    A. No entrance of any nature may be constructed within the  right-of-way until the location has been approved by VDOT and an entrance  permit has been issued. The violation of any provision of this chapter and any  condition of approval of an entrance permit shall be subject to the penalties  for violations specified in the Land Use Permit Regulations (see 24VAC30-72-170  G).
    B. VDOT will permit reasonably convenient access to a parcel  of record. VDOT is not obligated to permit the most convenient access, nor is  VDOT obligated to approve the permit applicant's preferred entrance location or  entrance design. If a parcel is served by more than one road in the systems of  state highways, the district administrator's designee shall determine upon  which road or roads the proposed entrance or entrances is or are to be  constructed. 
    C. When two or more properties are to be served by the same  entrance, the permit applicant shall ensure that there is a recorded agreement  between the parties specifying the use and future maintenance of the entrance.  A copy of this recorded agreement shall be included in the entrance permit  application submitted to the district administrator's designee. The shared  entrance shall be identified on any site plan or subdivision plat of the  property.
    D. The district administrator's designee may require the  permit applicant to alter any proposed entrance location or design, whether  private or commercial, to obtain the best possible operational characteristics,  including, but not limited to, sight distance and entrance spacing.
    E. Entrance standards established by localities that are  stricter than those of VDOT shall govern.
    24VAC30-72-70. Commercial entrance design.
    A. All commercial Low volume commercial entrance  design and construction shall comply with the private entrance design standards  in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and the stopping sight  distance provision in 24VAC30-72-80. Commercial entrance design and  construction shall comply with the provisions of this chapter and the standards  in the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A), the Road and Bridge Standards  (see 24VAC30-72-170 C), the Road and Bridge Specifications (see 24VAC30-72-170  B), other VDOT engineering and construction standards as may be appropriate, and  any additional conditions, restrictions, or modifications deemed necessary by  the district administrator's designee to preserve the safety, use and  maintenance of the systems of state highways. Entrance design and construction  shall comply with applicable guidelines and requirements of the Americans with  Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12101 et seq.). Ramps for curb sections  shall be provided as required in § 15.2-2021 of the Code of Virginia. The  standard drawing for depressed curb ramp as shown in the Road and Bridge  Standards (see 24VAC30-72-170 C), shall be utilized in the design.
    1. In the event an entrance is proposed within the limits of a  funded roadway project that will ultimately change a highway, the permit  applicant may be required to construct, to the extent possible, entrances  compatible with the roadway's ultimate design.
    2. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  pedestrian and bicycle users of the abutting highway in accordance with the  Commonwealth Transportation Board's "Policy for Integrating Bicycle and  Pedestrian Accommodations" (see 24VAC30-72-170 H).
    3. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  transit users of the abutting highway where applicable and provide  accommodations to the extent possible.
    4. Based on the existing and planned developments, the  district administrator's designee will determine the need for curb and gutter,  sidewalks, or other features within the general area of the proposed entrance  in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and the design standards in  Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A). 
    5. Sites accessed by an entrance shall be designed so as to  prevent unsafe and inefficient traffic movements from impacting travel on the  abutting highway. At the request of the district administrator's designee, the  permit applicant shall furnish a report that documents the impact of expected  traffic movements upon the function of the abutting highway during the peak  hours of the abutting highway.
    B. It is essential that entrance and site design allow safe  and efficient movements of traffic using the entrance while minimizing the  impact of such movements on the operation of the systems of state highways. 
    1. The permit applicant shall supply sufficient information to  demonstrate to the satisfaction of the district administrator's designee that  neither the entrance, nor the proposed traffic circulation patterns within the  parcel, will compromise the safety, use, operation, or maintenance of the  abutting highway. A rezoning traffic impact statement or a site  plan/subdivision plat supplemental traffic analysis submitted for a proposed  development of a parcel in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis  Regulations (24VAC30-155) may be used for this purpose, provided that it  adequately documents the effect of the proposed entrance and its related  traffic on the operation of the highway to be accessed. 
    2. If the proposed entrance will cause the systems of state  highways to experience degradation in safety or a significant increase in delay  or a significant reduction in capacity beyond an acceptable level of service,  the applicant shall be required to submit a plan to mitigate these impacts and  to bear the costs of such mitigation measures.
    3. Proposed mitigation measures must be approved by the  district administrator's designee prior to permit approval. Mitigation measures  that may be considered include but are not limited to:
    a. Construction of auxiliary lanes or turning lanes, or  pavement transitions/tapers;
    b. Construction of new crossovers, or the relocation, removal,  or consolidation of existing crossovers;
    c. Installation, modification, or removal of traffic signals  and related traffic control equipment;
    d. Provisions to limit the traffic generated by the development  served by the proposed entrance;
    e. Dedication of additional right-of-way or easement, or both,  for future road improvements; 
    f. Reconstruction of existing roadway to provide required  vertical and horizontal sight distances; 
    g. Relocation or consolidation of existing entrances; or
    h. Recommendations from adopted corridor studies, design  studies, other access management practices and principles, or any combination  of these, not otherwise mentioned in this chapter. 
    4. If an applicant is unwilling or unable to mitigate the  impacts identified in the traffic impact analysis, the entrance shall be  physically restricted to right-in or right-out movements or both or similar  restrictions such that the public interests in a safe and efficient flow of  traffic on the systems of state highways are protected. 
    24VAC30-72-80. Minimum sight distance for commercial entrances.
    A. No less than minimum intersection sight distance shall be  obtained for any a commercial entrance and no less than  minimum stopping sight distance shall be obtained for a low volume commercial  entrance. Sight distances shall be measured in accordance with VDOT  practices, and sight distance requirements shall conform to VDOT standards as  described in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-72-170 A). The  legal speed limit shall be used unless the design speed is available and  approved for use by VDOT. 
    B. The operating speed may be used in lieu of the legal speed  limit in cases where the permit applicant furnishes the district administrator's  designee with a speed study prepared in accordance with the Manual on Uniform  Traffic Control Devices (see 24VAC30-72-170 D) methodology that demonstrates  the operating speed of the segment of highway is lower than the legal speed  limit and, in the judgment of the district administrator's designee, use of the  operating speed will not compromise safety for either a driver at an entrance  or a driver on the abutting highway. 
    C. VDOT may require that the vertical or horizontal alignment  of the existing roadway be adjusted to accommodate certain design elements of a  proposed commercial entrance including, but not limited to, median openings,  crossovers, roundabouts, and traffic signals, where adjustment is deemed  necessary. The cost of any work performed to adjust the horizontal or vertical  alignment of the roadway to achieve required intersection sight distance at a  proposed entrance shall be borne by the permit applicant.
    24VAC30-72-110. Tenure of commercial entrances.
    A. The tenure of a commercial entrance to any highway is  conditional. Reconstruction, relocation, commercial entrance consolidation, or  upgrading, or a combination of these, may be required at the owner's cost when  the district administrator's designee determines after review that one of the conditions  listed below exists. If the necessary changes are not made, the entrance may be  closed at the direction of the district administrator's designee. 
    1. Safety - When the entrance has been found to be unsafe for  public use in its present condition because of physical degradation of the  entrance, increase in motor vehicle traffic, or some other safety-related  condition.
    2. Use - When traffic in and out of the entrance has changed  significantly to require modifications or reconstruction, or both. Such changes  may include, but are not limited to, changes in traffic volume or operational  characteristics of the traffic. 
    3. Maintenance - When the entrance becomes unserviceable due  to heavy equipment damage or reclamation by natural causes.
    B. VDOT will maintain the commercial entrance only within the  normal shoulder of the roadway or to the flow line of the gutter pan. The owner  shall maintain all other portions of the entrance, including entrance aprons,  curb and gutter, culvert and drainage structures.
    C. Commercial entrances may also be reviewed by the district  administrator's designee when any of the following occur:
    1. The property is being considered for rezoning or other  local legislative action that involves a change in use of the property.
    2. The property is subject to a site plan or subdivision plat  review.
    3. There is a change in commercial use either by the property  owner or by a tenant. 
    4. Vehicular/pedestrian circulation between adjoining  properties becomes available.
    These periodic reviews are necessary to provide both the  driver and other highway users with a safe and operationally efficient means of  travel on state highways.
    D. The provisions of this section shall apply to low  volume commercial entrances.
    24VAC30-72-130. Drainage.
    A. Commercial and private entrances Entrances  shall be constructed so as not to impair drainage within the right-of-way and  so that surface water shall drain from the roadway.
    B. Where deemed necessary by the district administrator's  designee, a commercial entrance applicant shall provide copies of a complete  drainage layout based on a drainage study by a licensed design professional.  This layout shall clearly show how the permit applicant proposes to handle the  drainage and run-off from applicant's development.
    C. Pipe ends of culverts shall be reviewed independently by  the district administrator's designee and grading or treatment at pipe ends  shall minimize any hazard the pipe ends or structures may present to an errant  vehicle. 
    24VAC30-72-170. Documents incorporated by reference.
    A. Road Design Manual (effective January 1, 2005, revised  July 2008), 2011.
    Note: Appendix F (Access Management Design Standards for  Entrances and Intersections) contains the access management standards  referenced in Chapters 863 and 928 of the 2007 Acts of Assembly and Chapters  274 and 454 of the 2008 Acts of Assembly.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    B. 2007 Road and Bridge Specifications (effective July 2008)
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    C. Road and Bridge Standards (effective February 1, 2001)
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    D. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets  and Highways, 2003 Edition (effective December 22, 2003, revised November 2004)
           |   | Federal Highway AdministrationSuperintendent of Documents
 U.S. Government Printing Office
 P.O. Box 371954
 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954
 | 
  
    E. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,  Fifth Edition, 2004
           |   | American Association of State Highway and Transportation    Officials (AASHTO)444 North Capitol St. N.W., Suite 225
 Washington, D.C. 20001
 | 
  
    F. Change of Limited Access Control, 24VAC30-401
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    G. Land Use Permit Regulations, 24VAC30-151
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    H. Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian  Accommodations, eff. March 18, 2004
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    I. Highway Capacity Manual 2000
           |   | Transportation Research Board500 Fifth Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    J. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations, 24VAC30-155
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad St.
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    K. Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008
           |   | Institute of Transportation Engineers1099 14th Street N. W., Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    24VAC30-73-10. Definitions.
    "Access management" means the systematic control of  the location, spacing, design, and operation of entrances, median  openings/crossovers, traffic signals, and interchanges for the purpose of  providing vehicular access to land development in a manner that preserves the  safety and efficiency of the transportation system.
    "Collectors" means the functional classification of  highways that provide land access service and traffic circulation within  residential, commercial, and industrial areas. The collector system distributes  trips from principal and minor arterials through the area to the ultimate  destination. Conversely, collectors also collect traffic and channel it into  the arterial system. 
    "Commercial entrance" means any entrance serving  land uses other than two or fewer individual private residences. (See  "private entrance.")
    "Commissioner" means the individual who serves as  the chief executive officer of the Department of Transportation or his  designee.
    "Commonwealth" means the Commonwealth of Virginia.
    "Crossover" means an opening in a nontraversable  median (such as a concrete barrier or raised island) that provides for crossing  movements and left and right turning movements. 
    "Design speed" means the selected speed used to  determine the geometric design features of the highway. 
    "District" means each of the nine areas in which  VDOT is divided to oversee the maintenance and construction on the  state-maintained highways, bridges and tunnels within the boundaries of the  area. 
    "District administrator" means the VDOT employee  assigned to supervise the district. 
    "District administrator's designee" means the VDOT  employee or employees designated by the district administrator. 
    "Entrance" means any driveway, street, or other  means of providing for movement of vehicles to or from the highway.
    "Entrance, commercial" means any entrance  serving land uses that generate more than 50 vehicular trips per day or the  trip generation equivalent of more than five individual private residences or  lots for individual private residences using the methodology in the Institute  of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
    "Entrance, low volume commercial" means any  entrance, other than a private entrance, serving five or fewer individual  residences or lots for individual residences on a privately owned and  maintained road or land uses that generate 50 or fewer vehicular trips per day  using the methodology in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip  Generation 8th Edition, 2008. 
    "Entrance, private" means an entrance that  serves up to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of  the occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain  access to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure  facilities that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump  stations, and stormwater management basins.
    "Frontage road" means a road that generally runs  parallel to a highway between the highway right-of-way and the front building  setback line of the abutting properties and provides access to the abutting  properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to the highway  and separating the abutting property traffic from through traffic on the  highway. 
    "Functional area" means the area of the physical  highway feature, such as an intersection, roundabout, railroad grade crossing,  or interchange, plus that portion of the highway that comprises the decision  and maneuver distance and required vehicle storage length to serve that highway  feature.
    "Functional area of an intersection" means the  physical area of an at-grade intersection plus all required storage lengths for  separate turn lanes and for through traffic, including any maneuvering distance  for separate turn lanes.
    "Functional classification" means the federal  system of classifying groups of highways according to the character of service  they are intended to provide and classifications made by the commissioner based  on the operational characteristics of a highway. Each highway is assigned a  functional classification based on the highway's intended purpose of providing  priority to through traffic movement or adjoining property access. The  functional classification system groups highways into three basic categories  identified as (i) arterial, with the function to provide through movement of  traffic; (ii) collector, with the function of supplying a combination of  through movement and access to property; and (iii) local, with the function of  providing access to property and to other streets. 
    "Highway," "street," or "road"  means a public way for purposes of vehicular travel, including the entire area  within the right-of-way.
    "Intersection" means (i) a crossing of two or more  highways at grade, (ii) a crossover, or (iii) any at-grade connection with a  highway such as a commercial entrance.
    "Intersection sight distance" means the sight  distance required at an intersection to allow the driver of a stopped vehicle a  sufficient view of the intersecting highway to decide when to enter, or cross,  the intersecting highway. 
    "Legal speed limit" means the speed limit set forth  on signs lawfully posted on a highway or, in the absence of such signs, the  speed limit established by Article 8 (§ 46.2-870 et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title  46.2 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Level of service" means a qualitative measure  describing the operational conditions within a vehicular traffic stream,  generally in terms of such service measures as speed, travel time, freedom to  maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience.  "Level-of-service" is defined and procedures are presented for  determining the level of service in the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-73-170 I).
    "Limited access highway" means a highway especially  designed for through traffic over which abutting properties have no easement or  right of light, air, or access by reason of the fact that those properties abut  upon the limited access highway.
    "Local streets" means the functional classification  for highways that comprise all facilities that are not collectors or arterials.  Local streets serve primarily to provide direct access to abutting land and to  other streets.
    "Median" means the portion of a divided highway  that separates opposing traffic flows.
    "Median opening" means a crossover or a directional  opening in a nontraversable median (such as a concrete barrier or raised  island) that physically restricts movements to specific turns such as left  turns and U-turns. 
    "Minor arterials" means the functional  classification for highways that interconnect with and augment the principal  arterial system. Minor arterials distribute traffic to smaller geographic areas  providing service between and within communities.
    "Operating speed" means the speed at which drivers  are observed operating their vehicles during free-flow conditions with the 85th  percentile of the distribution of observed speeds being the most frequently  used measure of the operating speed of a particular location or geometric  feature. 
    "Permit" or "entrance permit" means a  document that sets the conditions under which VDOT allows a connection to a  highway. 
    "Permit applicant" means the person or persons,  firm, corporation, government, or other entity that has applied for a permit. 
    "Permittee" means the person or persons, firm,  corporation, government, or other entity that has been issued a permit.
    "Preliminary subdivision plat" means a plan of  development as set forth in § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Principal arterials" means the functional  classification for major highways intended to serve through traffic where  access is carefully controlled, generally highways of regional importance, with  moderate to high volumes of traffic traveling relatively long distances and at  higher speeds.
    "Private entrance" means an entrance that serves  up to two private residences and is used for the exclusive benefit of the  occupants or an entrance that allows agricultural operations to obtain access  to fields or an entrance to civil and communication infrastructure facilities  that generate 10 or fewer trips per day such as cell towers, pump stations, and  stormwater management basins.
    "Professional engineer" means a person who is  qualified to practice engineering by reason of his special knowledge and use of  mathematical, physical and engineering sciences and the principles and methods  of engineering analysis and design acquired by engineering education and  experience, and whose competence has been attested by the Virginia Board for  Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior  Designers and Landscape Architects through licensure as a professional  engineer.
    "Reverse frontage road" means a road that is  located to the rear of the properties fronting a highway and provides access to  the abutting properties for the purpose of reducing the number of entrances to  the highway and removing the abutting property traffic from through traffic on  the highway.
    "Right-of-way" means that property within the  systems of state highways that is open or may be opened for public travel or  use or both in the Commonwealth. This definition includes those public  rights-of-way in which the Commonwealth has a prescriptive easement for  maintenance and public travel. 
    "Roadway" means the portion of a highway, including  shoulders, for vehicular use. A divided highway has two or more roadways.
    "Roundabout" means a circular intersection with  yield control of all entering traffic, right-of-way assigned to traffic within  the circular roadway, and channelized approaches and a central island that  deflect entering traffic to the right. 
    "Shared entrance" means a single entrance serving  two or more adjoining parcels.
    "Sight distance" means the distance visible to the  driver of a vehicle when the view is unobstructed by traffic.
    "Site plan" and "subdivision plat" mean a  plan of development approved in accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241  through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia. 
    "Systems of state highways" means all highways and  roads under the ownership, the control, or the jurisdiction of VDOT, including  but not limited to, the primary, secondary and interstate highways. 
    "Trip" means a single or one-directional vehicle  movement either entering or exiting a property; a vehicle leaving the property  is one trip and a vehicle returning to the property is one trip.
    "Turn lane" means a separate lane for the purpose  of enabling a vehicle that is entering or leaving a highway to increase or  decrease its speed to a rate at which it can more safely merge or diverge with  through traffic; an acceleration or deceleration lane.
    "Urban area" means an urbanized area with a  population of 50,000 or more, or an urban place (small urban area) as  designated by the Bureau of the Census having a population of 5,000 or more and  not within any urbanized area. The Federal Highway Administration defines "urban  area" in more detail based on the federal-aid highway law (23 USC § 101).
    "VDOT" means the Virginia Department of  Transportation, its successor, the Commissioner of Highways, or his designees. 
    24VAC30-73-40. Administrative procedures and rules for obtaining  commercial and private entrance permits.
    All applications for entrance permits shall be obtained from  and submitted to the district administrator's designee for the county in which  the work is to be performed. The permit applicant shall submit the permit  application form, and the entrance permit, if approved, will be issued in  accordance with the applicable administrative rules, requirements and  procedures of this chapter and the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-73-170 G). 
    24VAC30-73-60. General provisions governing commercial and  private entrances.
    A. No entrance of any nature may be constructed within the  right-of-way until the location has been approved by VDOT and an entrance  permit has been issued. Any person violating any provision of this chapter and  any condition of approval of an entrance permit shall be guilty of a  misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be punished as provided for in § 33.1-198 of the Code of Virginia. Such person shall be civilly liable to the  Commonwealth for actual damage sustained by the Commonwealth by reason of his  wrongful act.
    B. VDOT will permit reasonably convenient access to a parcel  of record. VDOT is not obligated to permit the most convenient access, nor is  VDOT obligated to approve the permit applicant's preferred entrance location or  entrance design. If a parcel is served by more than one road in the systems of  state highways, the district administrator's designee shall determine upon  which road or roads the proposed entrance or entrances is or are to be  constructed. 
    C. Entrance standards established by localities that are  stricter than those of VDOT shall govern. 
    24VAC30-73-70. Commercial entrance design.
    A. All commercial Low volume commercial entrance  design and construction shall comply with the private entrance design standards  in Appendix F of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and the stopping sight  distance provision in 24VAC30-73-80. Commercial entrance design and  construction shall comply with the provisions of this chapter and the standards  in the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A), the Road and Bridge Standards  (see 24VAC30-73-170 C), the Road and Bridge Specifications (see 24VAC30-73-170  B), other VDOT engineering and construction standards as may be appropriate,  and any additional conditions, restrictions, or modifications deemed necessary  by the district administrator's designee to preserve the safety, use and  maintenance of the systems of state highways. Entrance design and construction  shall comply with applicable guidelines and requirements of the Americans with  Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC § 12101 et seq.). Ramps for curb sections  shall be provided as required in § 15.2-2021 of the Code of Virginia. The  standard drawing for depressed curb ramp as shown in the Road and Bridge  Standards (see 24VAC30-73-170 C) shall be utilized in the design.
    1. In the event an entrance is proposed within the limits of a  funded roadway project that will ultimately change a highway, the permit  applicant may be required to construct, to the extent possible, entrances  compatible with the roadway's ultimate design.
    2. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  pedestrian and bicycle users of the abutting highway in accordance with the  Commonwealth Transportation Board's "Policy for Integrating Bicycle and  Pedestrian Accommodations" (see 24VAC30-73-170 H).
    3. All entrance design and construction shall accommodate  transit users of the abutting highway where applicable and provide  accommodations to the extent possible.
    4. Based on the existing and planned developments, the  district administrator's designee will determine the need for curb and gutter,  sidewalks, or other features within the general area of the proposed entrance  in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and the design standards in  Appendix G of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A).
    5. Sites accessed by an entrance shall be designed so as to  prevent unsafe and inefficient traffic movements from impacting travel on the  abutting highway. At the request of the district administrator's designee, the  permit applicant shall furnish a report that documents the impact of expected  traffic movements upon the function of the abutting highway during the peak  hours of the abutting highway or during the peak hours of the generator,  whichever is appropriate as determined by the district administrator's  designee.
    6. The use of a shared entrance between adjacent property  owners shall be the preferred method of access.
    7. The construction of new crossovers, or the relocation, removal,  or consolidation of existing crossovers shall be approved in accordance with  the crossover location approval process specified in Appendix G of the Road  Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A). 
    B. It is essential that entrance and site design allow safe  and efficient movements of traffic using the entrance while minimizing the  impact of such movements on the operation of the systems of state highways.
    1. The permit applicant shall supply sufficient information to  demonstrate to the satisfaction of the district administrator's designee that  neither the entrance, nor the proposed traffic circulation patterns within the  parcel, will compromise the safety, use, operation, or maintenance of the  abutting highway. A rezoning traffic impact statement or a site plan/subdivision  plat supplemental traffic analysis submitted for a proposed development of a  parcel in accordance with the Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (see  24VAC30-73-170 J) may be used for this purpose, provided that it adequately  documents the effect of the proposed entrance and its related traffic on the  operation of the highway to be accessed.
    2. If the proposed entrance will cause the systems of state  highways to experience degradation in safety or a significant increase in delay  or a significant reduction in capacity beyond an acceptable level of service,  the applicant shall be required to submit a plan to mitigate these impacts and  to bear the costs of such mitigation measures.
    3. Proposed mitigation measures must be approved by the  district administrator's designee prior to permit approval. The district  administrator's designee will consider what improvements will be needed to  preserve the operational characteristics of the highway, accommodate the  proposed traffic and, if entrance design modifications are needed, incorporate  them accordingly to protect the transportation corridor. Mitigation measures  that may be considered include but are not limited to:
    a. Construction of auxiliary lanes or turning lanes, or  pavement transitions/tapers;
    b. Construction of new crossovers, or the relocation, removal,  or consolidation of existing crossovers;
    c. Installation, modification, or removal of traffic signals  and related traffic control equipment;
    d. Provisions to limit the traffic generated by the development  served by the proposed entrance;
    e. Dedication of additional right-of-way or easement, or both,  for future road improvements; 
    f. Reconstruction of existing roadway to provide required  vertical and horizontal sight distances; 
    g. Relocation or consolidation of existing entrances; or
    h. Recommendations from adopted corridor studies, design  studies, other access management practices and principles, or any combination  of these, not otherwise mentioned in this chapter.
    4. If an applicant is unwilling or unable to mitigate the  impacts identified in the traffic impact analysis, the entrance shall be  physically restricted to right-in or right-out movements or both or similar  restrictions such that the public interests in a safe and efficient flow of  traffic on the systems of state highways are protected.
    24VAC30-73-80. Minimum sight distance for commercial entrances.
    A. No less than minimum intersection sight distance shall be  obtained for any a commercial entrance and no less than  minimum stopping sight distance shall be obtained for a low volume commercial  entrance. Sight distances shall be measured in accordance with VDOT  practices, and sight distance requirements shall conform to VDOT standards as  described in Appendix G of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-73-170 A). The  legal speed limit shall be used unless the design speed is available and  approved for use by VDOT. 
    B. The operating speed may be used in lieu of the legal speed  limit in cases where the permit applicant furnishes the district administrator's  designee with a speed study prepared in accordance with the Manual on Uniform  Traffic Control Devices (see 24VAC30-73-170 D) methodology that demonstrates  the operating speed of the segment of highway is lower than the legal speed  limit and, in the judgment of the district administrator's designee, use of the  operating speed will not compromise safety for either a driver at an entrance  or a driver on the abutting highway. 
    C. VDOT may require that the vertical or horizontal alignment  of the existing roadway be adjusted to accommodate certain design elements of a  proposed commercial entrance including, but not limited to, median openings,  crossovers, roundabouts, and traffic signals, where adjustment is deemed  necessary. The cost of any work performed to adjust the horizontal or vertical  alignment of the roadway to achieve required intersection sight distance at a  proposed entrance shall be borne by the permit applicant. 
    24VAC30-73-110. Existing commercial entrances.
    A. The tenure of a commercial entrance to any highway is  conditional. Reconstruction, relocation, commercial entrance consolidation, or  upgrading, or a combination of these, may be required at the owner's cost when  the district administrator's designee determines after review that one of the  conditions listed below exists. If the necessary changes are not made, the  entrance may be closed at the direction of the district administrator's  designee. 
    1. Safety - When the entrance has been found to be unsafe for  public use in its present condition because of physical degradation of the  entrance, increase in motor vehicle traffic, or some other safety-related  condition.
    2. Use - When traffic in and out of the entrance has changed  significantly to require modifications or reconstruction, or both. Such changes  may include, but are not limited to, changes in traffic volume or operational  characteristics of the traffic. 
    3. Maintenance - When the entrance becomes unserviceable due  to heavy equipment damage or reclamation by natural causes.
    B. VDOT will maintain the commercial entrance only within the  normal shoulder of the roadway or to the flow line of the gutter pan. The owner  shall maintain all other portions of the entrance, including entrance aprons,  curb and gutter, culvert and drainage structures.
    C. Commercial entrances may also be reviewed by the district  administrator's designee, and reconstruction, relocation, commercial entrance  consolidation, or upgrading, or a combination of these, may be required, when  any of the following occur:
    1. The property is being considered for rezoning or other  local legislative action that involves a change in use of the property.
    2. The property is subject to a site plan or subdivision plat  review.
    3. There is a change in commercial use either by the property  owner or by a tenant. 
    4. Vehicular/pedestrian circulation between adjoining  properties becomes available.
    These periodic reviews are necessary to provide both the  driver and other highway users with a safe and operationally efficient means of  travel on state highways. 
    D. The provisions of this section shall apply to low  volume commercial entrances.
    24VAC30-73-130. Drainage.
    A. Commercial and private entrances Entrances  shall be constructed so as not to impair drainage within the right-of-way and  so that surface water shall drain from the roadway.
    B. Where deemed necessary by the district administrator's  designee, a commercial entrance applicant shall provide copies of a complete  drainage layout based on a drainage study by a licensed design professional.  This layout shall clearly show how the permit applicant proposes to handle the  drainage and run-off from applicant's development.
    C. Pipe ends of culverts shall be reviewed independently by  the district administrator's designee and grading or treatment at pipe ends  shall minimize any hazard the pipe ends or structures may present to an errant  vehicle. 
    24VAC30-73-170. Documents incorporated by reference. 
    A. Road Design Manual (effective January 1, 2005, revised  October 2009), 2011.
    Note: Appendices F and G (Access Management Design Standards  for Entrances and Intersections) contains the access management standards  referenced in Chapters 863 and 928 of the 2007 Acts of Assembly and Chapters  274 and 454 of the 2008 Acts of Assembly.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    B. 2007 Road and Bridge Specifications (effective July 2008).
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    C. 2008 Road and Bridge Standards (effective June 2009).
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    D. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets  and Highways, 2003 Edition (effective December 22, 2003, revised November  2004).
           |   | Federal Highway AdministrationSuperintendent of Documents
 U.S. Government Printing Office
 P.O. Box 371954
 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954
 | 
  
    E. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,  Fifth Edition, 2004.
           |   | American Association of State Highway and Transportation    Officials (AASHTO)444 North Capitol St. N.W., Suite 225
 Washington, D.C. 20001
 | 
  
    F. Change of Limited Access Control, 24VAC30-401.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    G. Land Use Permit Regulations, 24VAC30-151.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    H. Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian  Accommodations, eff. March 18, 2004.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    I. Highway Capacity Manual, 2000.
           |   | Transportation Research Board500 Fifth Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    J. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations, 24VAC30-155.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    K. Instructional and Informational Memorandum IIM-LD-227.3,  eff. May 23, 2007.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    L. Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements, 24VAC30-92, eff.  March 9, 2009.
           |   | VDOT1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    M. Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
           |   | Institute of Transportation Engineers1099 14th Street N. W., Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    24VAC30-92-10. Definitions.
    The following words and terms when used in these regulations  shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates  otherwise:
    "Abandonment" in all its forms means the  legislative action reserved for and granted to the local governing body to  extinguish the public's right to a roadway under the jurisdiction of the  Virginia Department of Transportation pursuant to §§ 33.1-151 and 33.1-155  of the Code of Virginia.
    "Accessible route" means a public or private  continuous unobstructed, stable, firm and slip-resistant path connecting all  accessible elements of a facility (which may include parking access aisles,  curb ramps, crosswalks at vehicular ways, walks, ramps and lifts) that can be  approached, entered and used by persons with disabilities. An accessible route  shall, to the maximum extent feasible, coincide with the route for the general  public.
    "ADT" means average daily traffic count (see  "projected traffic").
    "Alley" means a narrow roadway segment used by  motor vehicles for access to the rear side of commercial or residential land  use, or access to auxiliary land uses and that is located within a dedicated  public way or public easement.
    "Applicable former requirements" means the 2005  Subdivision Street Requirements for developments submitted prior to July 1,  2009, and the 2009 edition of the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements for  developments submitted between July 1, 2009, and January 31, 2012, inclusive.
    "Best management practice" or "BMP"  means schedules of activities; prohibitions of practices, including both  structural and nonstructural practices; maintenance procedures; and other  management practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of surface waters and  groundwater systems from the impacts of land-disturbing activities.
    "Clear zone" means the total border area of a  roadway including, if any, parking lanes or planting strips that is  sufficiently wide for an errant vehicle to avoid a serious accident. (See the  Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and its Appendix B (1) (the  Subdivision Street Design Guide) (see 24VAC30-92-150) for  details.)
    "Commissioner" means the chief executive officer of  the Virginia Department of Transportation or his designee.
    "Complete development (land)" means the  utilization of the available areas in a manner as to realize its highest  density for the best potential use based on zoning, pending rezoning, the  adopted comprehensive plan of the governing body, or the customary use of  similar parcels of land.
    "Complete development (streets)" means the  development of a street in full compliance with all applicable provisions of  these regulations to the necessary standards of design, construction, and  public benefit requirements for the effective and efficient accommodation of  all modes of transportation generated by the complete development of the land,  both internal and external to the development.
    "Conceptual sketch" means a drawing of the proposed  development showing the location of existing and proposed land uses, any  existing and proposed transportation facilities, and any additional information  required so that the reviewer can determine the appropriate functional  classification of the proposed street or streets and verify if the calculation  of the connectivity index, if appropriate standards have been met.  
    "Connectivity index" means the number of street  segments divided by the number of intersections. Only street segments and  intersections within a network addition as well as any street segment or  intersection outside of the network addition connected to street segments  within the network addition, or that has been connected or will be connected  pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 7 to the network addition through the extension of  an existing stub out shall be used to calculate a network addition's  connectivity index.
    "Cul-de-sac" means a street with only one outlet  and having an appropriate turnaround for a safe and convenient reverse traffic  movement.
    "Dam" means an embankment or structure intended or  used to impound, retain, or store water, either as a permanent pond or as a  temporary storage facility.
    "Department" or "VDOT" means the Virginia  Department of Transportation.
    "Design speed" means a speed selected for purposes  of design and correlation of those features of a street such as curvature,  super elevation, and sight distance, upon which the safe operation of vehicles  is dependent.
    "Developer" means an individual, corporation, local  government, or registered partnership engaged in the subdivision, improvement,  or renovation of land.
    "Discontinuance," in all its forms, means the  legislative act of the Commonwealth Transportation Board, pursuant to § 33.1-150  of the Code of Virginia, that determines that a road no longer serves public  convenience warranting its maintenance with funds at the disposal of the  department.
    "District administrator" means the department  employee assigned the overall supervision of the departmental operations in one  of the Commonwealth's construction districts.
    "District administrator's designee" means the  department employee or employees designated by the district administrator to  oversee the implementation of this regulation.
    "Drainage Manual" means the department's Drainage  Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2002.
    "Dwelling unit" means a structure or part of a  structure containing sleeping, kitchen, and bathroom facilities that is  suitable for occupancy as a home or residence by one or more persons.
    "Easement" means a grant of a right to use property  of an owner for specific or limited purpose. 
    "External street segment" means a street segment  within a network addition that connects with the existing public street  network.
    "FAR" means floor area ratio, which is the ratio of  the total floor area of a building or buildings on a parcel to the size land  area of the parcel where the building or buildings are located. 
    "Functional classification" means the assigned  classification of a roadway based on the roadway's intended purpose of  providing priority to through traffic movement and access to adjoining property  as determined by the department, based on the federal system of classifying  groups of roadways according to the character of service they are intended to  provide.
    "Governing body" means the board of supervisors of  the county, but may also mean the local governing body of a town or city, if  appropriate, in the application of these requirements.
    "Intersection" means a juncture of three or more  street segments, or the terminus of a street segment, such as a cul-de-sac or  other dead end. The terminus of a stub out shall not constitute an intersection  for the purposes of this chapter. The juncture of a street with only a stub  out, and the juncture of a street with only a connection to the end of an  existing stub out, shall not constitute an intersection for the purposes of  this chapter, unless such stub out is the only facility providing service to  one or more lots within the development.
    "Level of service" means a qualitative measure  describing operational conditions within a vehicular traffic stream, and their  perception by motorists and passengers. For the purposes of these requirements,  the applicable provisions of the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2010 (VDOT) shall serve as the basis for  determining "levels of service."
    "Level terrain" means that condition where  highway sight distances, as governed by both horizontal and vertical  restrictions, are generally long or could be made so without construction  difficulty or major expense.
    "Locally controlled grade separation structure"  means a grade separation structure that does not qualify for maintenance by the  department but was established within the right-of-way of a street intended for  state maintenance.
    "Local official" means the representative of the  governing body appointed to serve as its agent in matters relating to  subdivisions and land development.
    "Multiuse trail" means a facility designed and  constructed for the purpose of providing bicycle and pedestrian transportation,  located within a dedicated public way and is anticipated to be maintained by an  entity other than the department.
    "Municipal separate storm sewer system" or  "MS4" means all separate storm sewers that are designated under  4VAC50-60-380 A 1 as municipal separate storm sewer systems located  in census urban areas. 
    "Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Management  Program" or "MS4 Program" means a management program covering the  duration of a permit for a municipal separate storm sewer system that includes  a comprehensive planning process that involves public participation and  intergovernmental coordination, to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the  maximum extent practicable, to protect water quality, and to satisfy the  appropriate water quality requirements of the Clean Water Act and corresponding  regulations and the Virginia Stormwater Management Act and attendant  regulations, using management practices, control techniques, and system, design  and engineering methods, and such other provisions that are appropriate. 
    "Network addition" means a group of interconnected  street segments and intersections shown in a plan of development that are  connected to the state highway system.
    "Parking bay" means an off-street area for parking  two or more vehicles that provides access to a public street.
    "Parking lane" means an area, generally seven or  eight feet in width, adjacent to and parallel with the travel lane of a roadway  that is used for parking vehicles.
    "Pavement Design Guide" means the Pavement Design  Guide for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia (see 24VAC30-92-150),  2009 (VDOT).
    "Permit Regulations" means the department's Land  Use Permit Regulations (see 24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-151). 
    "Phased development (streets)" means the method  outlined in 24VAC30-92-80 (phased development of streets) whereby the  acceptance of certain streets into the secondary system of state highways may  be considered before being completely developed in accordance with all  applicable requirements (e.g., two lanes of a four-lane facility are considered  for acceptance in advance of lanes three and four being finished).
    "Plan of development" means any site plat,  subdivision plan, preliminary subdivision plat, conceptual subdivision sketch,  or other engineered or surveyed drawings depicting proposed development of land  and street layout, including plans included with rezoning proposals.
    "Plans" means the standard drawings, including  profile and roadway typical section, that show the location, character,  dimensions, and details for the proposed construction of the street.
    "Planting strip" means a section of land between  the curb face and the pedestrian accommodation or shared use path.
    "Plat" means the schematic representation of the  land divided or to be divided.
    "Projected traffic" means the number of vehicles,  normally expressed in average daily traffic (ADT), forecast to travel over the  segment of the street involved.
    "Public street" means a street dedicated to public  use and available to the public's unrestricted use without regard to the  jurisdictional authority responsible for its operation and maintenance.
    "Requirements" means the design, construction,  public benefit, and related administrative considerations herein prescribed for  the acceptance of a street for maintenance by the department as part of the  secondary system of state highways.
    "Right-of-way" means the land, property, or  interest therein, usually in a strip, acquired for or devoted to a public  street designated to become part of the secondary system of state highways.
    "Roadway" means the portion of the road or street  within the limits of construction and all structures, ditches, channels, etc.,  necessary for the correct drainage thereof.
    "Secondary system of state highways" means those  public roads, streets, bridges, etc., established by a local governing body  pursuant to § 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia and subsequently accepted  by the department for supervision and maintenance under the provisions of  Articles 6 (§ 33.1-67 et seq.) and 11 (§ 33.1-150 et seq.) of Chapter  1 of Title 33.1 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Shared use path" means a facility that is designed  and constructed according to the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150),  2011 (VDOT), for the purpose of providing bicycle and pedestrian  transportation.
    "Smoothed urbanized area boundary" means the  modified area boundary of a census urbanized area as determined by the latest  U.S. decennial census and modified by appropriate state, regional, and local  government officials, and approved by the Federal Highway Administration.
    "Smoothed urban cluster boundary" means the  modified area boundary of a census urban cluster as determined by the latest  U.S. decennial census and modified by appropriate state, regional and local  government officials, and approved by the Federal Highway Administration.
    "Specifications" means the department's Road and  Bridge Specifications (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2007, revised 2011,  including related supplemental specifications and special provisions. 
    "Standards" means the applicable drawings and  related criteria contained in the department's Road and Bridge Standards (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2008, revised 2011.
    "Storm sewer system" means a conveyance or  system of conveyances and its appurtenances, including roads with drainage  systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade  channels, or storm drains.
    "Street" means any roadway that is created as part  of a plan of development, other subdivision of land, or is constructed by or at  the direction of the local governing body and is a public way for purposes of  vehicular traffic, including the entire area within the right-of-way. 
    "Street segment" means (i) a section of roadway  or alley that is between two intersections or (ii) a stub out or connection to  the end of an existing stub out. 
    "Stub out" means a transportation facility (i)  whose right-of-way terminates at a parcel abutting the development, (ii) that  consists of a short segment that is intended to serve current and future  development by providing continuity and connectivity of the public street  network, (iii) that based on the spacing between the stub out and other streets  or stub outs, and the current terrain there is a reasonable expectation that  connection with a future street is possible, and (iv) that is constructed to  the property line.
    "Subdivision" means the division of a lot, tract,  or parcel into two or more lots, plats, sites, or other divisions of land for  the purpose, whether immediate or future, of sale or of building development.  Any resubdivision of a previously subdivided tract or parcel of land shall also  be interpreted as a "subdivision." The division of a lot or parcel  permitted by § 15.2-2244 of the Code of Virginia will not be considered a  "subdivision" under this definition, provided no new road or street  is thereby established. However, any further division of such parcels shall be  considered a "subdivision."
    "Subdivision Street Design Guide" means Appendix B (1)  of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT).
    "Swale" means a broad depression within which  stormwater may drain during inclement weather, but that does not have a defined  bed or banks.
    "Total maximum daily load" or "TMDL"  is a water quality term that means the sum of the individual wasteload  allocations for point sources, load allocations (LAs) for nonpoint sources,  natural background loading and a margin of safety. TMDLs can be expressed in  terms of either mass per time, toxicity, or other appropriate measure. The TMDL  process provides for point versus nonpoint source trade-offs.
    "Traveled way" means the portion of the secondary  street designated for the movement of vehicles, exclusive of shoulders, parking  areas, turn lanes, etc.
    "Tree well" means an opening on a sidewalk,  generally abutting the curb, where a tree may be planted. 
    "VPD" means vehicles per day.
    "VPH" means vehicles per hour.
    "Wasteload allocation" or "wasteload"  or "WLA" means the portion of a receiving surface water's loading or  assimilative capacity allocated to one of its existing or future point sources  of pollution. WLAs are a type of water quality-based effluent limitation.
    "Watercourse" means a defined channel with bed and  banks within which water flows, either continuously or periodically.
    24VAC30-92-20. Applicability, effective date, and transition.
    A. Applicability. This regulation is intended to govern  secondary street development and the criteria for acceptance of these streets  by the department for subsequent maintenance. The Road Design Manual, 2011  (VDOT) and its Appendix B (1), the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) offer guidance on the design and construction features of  secondary street development and set out design parameters deemed appropriate for  most land development scenarios. However, the business of land development is  fluid and the department, in consultation with the local official, is prepared  to consider innovative transportation approaches associated with land  development proposals that are consistent with the design and connectivity  requirements of this chapter and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150), Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT).  However, when not specifically addressed in one of those documents, the  relevant requirements of the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150),  2011 (VDOT), standards, specifications, the Pavement Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia, 2009  (VDOT) and associated instructions shall govern.
    These requirements apply to all streets designated to be  maintained by the department as part of the secondary system of state highways,  except for streets whose construction was funded by state highway construction  allocations. The department's review and approval shall apply only to  streets proposed for addition to the secondary system of state highways  maintained by the department. Any plans submitted for review that contain only  streets proposed for maintenance by entities other than the department may be  reviewed for general guidance at the discretion of the district administrator  but will not be officially approved. However, any such review shall not  represent the department's commitment to accept such streets for maintenance  irrespective of the quality of the construction of the street or streets.
    Any streets proposed to be privately maintained shall have a  notation on the plat and impacted deeds that clearly indicates that as a  prerequisite for the streets' future acceptance, the streets must be improved  to the department's prevailing requirements for acceptance at no cost to the  department. All notations made on plats or similar instruments pursuant to this  section shall be in accordance with § 33.1-72.2 of the Code of Virginia.
    B. Grandfathering.
    1. Streets where the street layout has been proffered pursuant  to § 15.2-2297, 15.2-2298, or 15.2-2303 of the Code of Virginia prior to March  9, 2009 February 1, 2012, shall may, at the discretion of  the developer, be considered for acceptance in accordance with the  applicable former requirements, provided the requirements of § 15.2-2307 of the  Code of Virginia have been met. This grandfathering shall not apply to any  streets where the proffered layout may be adjusted, without requiring a significant  affirmative governmental zoning action to modify such proffered conditions, to  meet the requirements of this chapter, unless a site plan, subdivision plat, or  preliminary plat relying on such proffered street layout has been submitted for  approval prior to March 9, 2009 February 1, 2012. In such  instances the grandfathering shall may, at the discretion of the  developer, apply to the applicable site plan, subdivision plat, or  preliminary subdivision plat. However, such streets may be considered for  acceptance under requirements of this chapter at the discretion of the  developer Notwithstanding any other provision of this subsection, the  grandfathering provided based upon proffers shall not be lost or adversely  impacted due to a modification of the relevant plan or plat so long as no more  than 20% (cumulative) of the original street centerline mileage is eliminated,  realigned, or added compared to the proffered layout and the modification is  not expected to result in an increase in traffic generation.
    2. Streets that are part of a recorded plat or final site plan  valid pursuant to § 15.2-2261 of the Code of Virginia and approved in  accordance with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241 through 15.2-2245 of the Code of  Virginia prior to July 1, 2009 February 1, 2012, shall be  considered for acceptance in accordance with the applicable former requirements  as long as such plats or plans remain valid under applicable law. However, such  streets may be considered for acceptance under requirements of this chapter at  the discretion of the developer.
    3. Streets that are part of a preliminary subdivision plat  valid pursuant to § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia approved in accordance  with §§ 15.2-2286 and 15.2-2241 through 15.2-2245 of the Code of Virginia prior  to July 1, 2009 February 1, 2012, shall be considered for  acceptance in accordance with the applicable former requirements for a period  of up to five years or such longer period as such preliminary subdivision plat  is valid under applicable law, provided the requirements of § 15.2-2260 of the  Code of Virginia have been met. Such grandfathering shall apply to construction  plans, site plans, and final plats submitted and approved in furtherance of  such preliminary subdivision plat for as long as such plans or plats remain valid  under applicable law. However, such streets may be considered for acceptance  under requirements of this chapter at the discretion of the developer.
    4. Streets that are part of a street construction plan  approved by the department prior to July 1, 2009 February 1, 2012,  shall be considered for acceptance in accordance with the applicable former  requirements. However, such streets may be considered for acceptance under  requirements of this chapter at the discretion of the developer.
    5. When the local governing body takes an action that  modifies the applicable area types (see 24VAC30-92-50 for further details on  area type) within such locality or the applicable area type changes due to  adjustments in smoothed urbanized areas, urban cluster boundaries, or metropolitan  planning organization study area boundaries, the following shall apply for  development proposals approved after March 9, 2009.
    a. Streets where the layout was proffered pursuant to § 15.2-2297, 15.2-2298, or 15.2-2303 of the Code of Virginia prior to the  modification of the applicable area type shall be considered for acceptance in  accordance with the requirements of the former area type for a period of up to  10 years, provided the requirements of § 15.2-2307 of the Code of Virginia have  been met. This subsection shall not apply to any streets where the proffered  layout may be adjusted, without requiring a significant affirmative  governmental zoning action to modify such proffered conditions, to meet the  requirements of this chapter, unless a site plan, subdivision plat, or  preliminary plat relying on such proffered street layout has been submitted for  approval prior to March 9, 2009. In such instances the grandfathering shall  apply to the applicable site plan, subdivision plat, or preliminary subdivision  plat. However, such streets may be considered for acceptance under the modified  applicable area type at the discretion of the developer.
    b. Streets that are part of recorded plat or final site  plan pursuant to § 15.2-2261 of the Code of Virginia approved prior to the  modification of the applicable area type shall be considered for acceptance in  accordance with the requirements of the former area type for a period of up to  five years or such longer period as such recorded plat or final site plan is valid  under applicable law. However, such streets may be considered for acceptance  under the modified applicable area type at the discretion of the developer.
    c. Streets that are part of preliminary subdivision plat  pursuant to § 15.2-2260 of the Code of Virginia approved prior to the  modification of the applicable area type shall be considered for acceptance in  accordance with the requirements of the former area type for a period of up to  five years or such longer period as such preliminary subdivision plat is valid  under applicable law. Such grandfathering shall apply to future construction  plans, site plans, and final plats approved in furtherance of such preliminary  plat for so long as such plans or plats remain valid under applicable law.  However, such streets may be considered for acceptance under the modified  applicable area type at the discretion of the developer.
    d. Streets that are part of a street construction plan  approved by the department prior to the modification of the applicable area  type shall be considered for acceptance in accordance with the requirements of  the former area type for a period of up to five years. However, such streets  may be considered for acceptance under the modified applicable area type at the  discretion of the developer.
    6. 5. If requested by the applicable locality,  the provisions of this subsection applicable former requirements  shall apply if the applicant has submitted at a minimum a conceptual sketch  that includes all of the elements required under 24VAC30-92-70 A prior to July  1, 2009 February 1, 2012. Subdivisions 1 through 5 4  of this subsection shall take precedence over this subdivision in any instances  of a conflict. 
    C. Effective date. All streets proposed for acceptance by the  department after March 9, 2009 January 1, 2012, shall be  considered for acceptance in accordance with this chapter, except as provided  for in subsection D of this section and as may be waived by the  commissioner pursuant to this chapter.
    D. Transition. Prior to July 1, 2009 February 1,  2012, the department will consider complete plats and plans developed in  accordance with either the applicable former requirements or  these requirements. Any plat or plan initially submitted to the department for  consideration after June 30, 2009 January 31, 2012, however,  shall be in accordance with these requirements.
    24VAC30-92-50. Area type thresholds. (Repealed.)
    A. Area type thresholds. There are three area types  established for secondary streets in the Commonwealth. Within each area type,  streets must meet the applicable design and public benefit requirements to be  eligible for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways. For the  purposes of this chapter the following area types shall determine the design  and public benefit requirements that apply to streets and network additions.
    1. Compact Area Type. The Compact Area Type shall apply  when any part of a network addition meets one or more of the following  criteria:
    a. Located within a locally designated urban development  area pursuant to § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of Virginia, or within an area  designated by an adopted local comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2223 of  the Code of Virginia as a village, town, or other growth area;
    b. Located within a smoothed urbanized area boundary;
    c. Located within an area designated by the local  government, by ordinance or by the adopted local comprehensive plan pursuant to  § 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia, to be subject to the Compact Area Type  requirements of this chapter provided such area is designated in the adopted  local comprehensive plan as an area for compact development with median lot  sizes no greater than 1/2 acre; 
    d. Located within a locally designated transfer of  development rights receiving area pursuant to § 15.2-2316.1 of the Code of  Virginia; or
    e. Located within a smoothed urban cluster boundary.
    2. Suburban Area Type. The Suburban Area Type shall apply  when any part of a network addition meets one or more of the following criteria  and does not meet any of the Compact Area Type criteria:
    a. Located outside a smoothed urbanized area boundary but  within an official Metropolitan Planning Organization Study Area;
    b. Located within a two-mile radius of a locally designated  urban development area pursuant to § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of Virginia;
    c. Located within a two-mile radius of a smoothed urban  cluster boundary;
    d. Located within a locally designated cluster development  pursuant to § 15.2-2286.1 of the Code of Virginia; or
    e. Located within an area not subject to the Compact Area  Type criteria that is designated by the local government, by ordinance or by  the adopted local comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2223 of the Code of  Virginia, to be subject to the Suburban Area Type requirements of this chapter  provided such area is designated in the adopted local comprehensive plan as an  area for suburban development with median lot sizes no greater than two acres.
    3. The Rural Area Type. The Rural Area Type shall apply in  all other areas of the Commonwealth.
    B. Modifications to the area type thresholds. Area type  perimeters shall be consistent with all planning boundaries listed within  subsection A of this section, except as may be allowed within this subsection.  Where the area type boundaries have been determined by a smoothed urbanized  area, smoothed urban cluster, metropolitan planning organization study area, or  within two miles of a smoothed urban cluster, and local governing body requests  that the current area type designation differ from the above stated planning  boundaries, the department will review such amendments related to a  modification to the area type. Approval of such modification requests is not  assured and will be reviewed on an individual basis. The commissioner, upon  receipt of a resolution from the local governing body, for good cause shown may  determine that an area type for a specific area within the local jurisdiction  should be modified to a different area type or that any of the requirements of  24VAC30-92-60 should be modified to the requirements of a different area type. The  commissioner shall consider and review the permissible parcel sizes and uses to  ensure that the area is indeed being regulated in such manner that necessitates  a change in area type. The department will notify the local government within  45 calendar days of the commissioner's final decision. Any such modification of  area type designations shall cease to apply if the zoning of the area is  altered in a manner that is inconsistent with the local government's original  request for the modification of the area type and that alters the type and  density of land uses permitted.
    C. Area type designation. At such time as the local  governing body or the metropolitan planning organization amend the boundaries  of one or more of the planning boundaries listed in subsection A of this  section, the department will recognize such amendments and revise the related  area type designation accordingly. When such local decision is made, the local  governing body or metropolitan planning organization shall provide the  department with a copy of any duly adopted ordinance or resolution that affects  one of the planning boundary criteria listed in this section and impacts the  area type designations within such locality or metropolitan planning  organization study boundary based on the thresholds in this section as well as  maps that show the affected areas as soon as practicable. Modifications to the  area type designations based on any ordinance or resolution duly adopted  between January 1 and June 30 of any year by a locality or metropolitan  planning organization shall become effective on October 1 of that year.  Modifications to the area type designations based on any ordinance or  resolution duly adopted between July 1 and December 31 of any year shall become  effective on April 1 of the next year.
    24VAC30-92-60. Public benefit requirements.
    A. Public benefit. A street or network addition may only be  accepted by the department for maintenance as part of the secondary system of  state highways if it provides sufficient public benefit to justify perpetual  public maintenance as defined by this chapter. A street shall be considered to  provide sufficient public benefit if it meets or exceeds the public service,  pedestrian accommodation, and connectivity requirements of the applicable  area type of this chapter.
    B. Public service requirements. In the event the governing  body requests the addition of a street or network addition before it meets  these public service provisions, the district administrator will review each  request on an individual case basis and determine if the acceptance of a street  prior to normal service requirements is justified, provided the street or  network addition meets all other applicable requirements including the  connectivity requirements of this chapter. At the request of the local  governing body, subject to approval by the district administrator, the public  service requirements may be reduced for individual streets serving state or  local economic development projects.
    1. Individual streets. For the purpose of these requirements without  regard to applicable area type, public service may include, but is not  necessarily limited to, streets meeting one or more of the following  situations:
    a. Serves three or more occupied units with a unit being a  single-family residence, owner-occupied apartment, owner-occupied residence in  a qualifying manufactured home park, a stand-alone business, or single business  entity occupying an individual building, or other similar facility. Also,  streets serving manufactured home parks may only be considered when the land  occupied by the manufactured home is in fee simple ownership by the residents  of such manufactured home.
    b. Constitutes a connecting segment between other streets that  qualify from the point of public service.
    c. Such street is a stub out.
    d. Serves as access to schools, churches, public sanitary  landfills, transfer stations, public recreational facilities, or similar  facilities open to public use.
    e. Serves at least 100 vehicles per day generated by an office  building, industrial site, or other similar nonresidential land use in advance  of the occupancy of three or more such units of varied proprietorship. Any  addition under this provision shall be limited to the segment of a street that  serves this minimum projected traffic and has been developed in compliance with  these requirements.
    f. Constitutes a part of the network of streets envisioned in  the transportation plan or element of a locality's comprehensive plan that, at  the time of acceptance, serves an active traffic volume of at least 100  vehicles per day.
    2. Multifamily, townhouse, and retail shopping complexes. A  through street that serves a multifamily building may be considered for  maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways if it is deemed  by the department to provide a public service and provided it is well defined  and the district administrator's designee determines that it is not a travel  way through a parking lot. 
    Entrance streets and the internal traffic circulation systems  of retail shopping complexes qualify only if more than three property owners  are served and the street is well defined and separated from the parking  areas district administrator's designee determines that it is not a  travel way through a parking lot.
    3. Network additions. A network addition shall be considered  to provide service if each street within the addition meets at least one of the  criteria in subdivision 1 of this subsection.
    4. Special exceptions. There may be other sets of  circumstances that could constitute public service. Consequently, any request  for clarification regarding unclear situations should be made in writing to the  district administrator's designee. 
    C. Connectivity requirements. All street segments streets  in a development as shown in a plan of development shall be considered for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways as one or multiple  network additions. However, streets with a functional classification of  collector and above may be eligible for acceptance as individual streets.
    For the purposes of this subsection, connection shall mean a  street connection to adjacent property or a stub out that will allow for future  street connection to an adjacent property. 
    If a stub out or stub outs maintained by the department  adjoin the property of a development with a network addition or individual  street proposed for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways,  such network addition or individual street must connect to such stub out or  stub outs to be eligible for acceptance into the secondary system of state  highways. Local street stub outs generally should not exceed 500 feet in  length. The applicant shall post a sign in accordance with the department's  standards that indicates that such stub out is a site for a future roadway  connection. 
    Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as to prohibit  a stub out from providing service to lots within a development. 
    The connectivity requirements of this chapter shall not apply  to the following: a frontage road or reverse frontage road as defined in the Access  Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (see 24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-72)  or Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials, Collectors, and Local  Streets (24VAC-30-73), streets petitioned for acceptance into the secondary  system of state highways through the Rural Addition Program pursuant to §§ 33.1-72.1  and 33.1-72.2 of the Code of Virginia, or streets petitioned for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways through the Commonwealth  Transportation Board's Rural Addition Policy provided such streets were  constructed prior to March 9, 2009, or streets constructed or improved  pursuant to §§ 33.1-221 and 33.1-223 of the Code of Virginia January 1,  2012.
    1. Compact standard. Stub out connection standard.  If a stub out or stub outs maintained by the department adjoin the property of  a development with a network addition or individual street proposed for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways, such network addition  or individual street must connect to such stub out or stub outs to be eligible  for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways. The district  administrator may waive this requirement if the existing stub out is of such  design as to make such a connection unsafe. 
    2. Multiple connections in multiple directions standard.  The streets within a network addition may be accepted into the secondary system  of state highways if the network addition meets the following requirements:  
    a. The streets are designed and constructed in compliance  with the compact design standards pursuant to this chapter, the Road Design  Manual, and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150); 
    b. The network addition provides sufficient connections in  multiple directions and to multiple properties, if applicable, to local and higher  order roadways to provide an overall connectivity index of 1.6 or higher. All  network additions shall have a minimum of two connections; and 
    c. The block layout and other features of the development  are designed in such a fashion as to provide reasonably direct pedestrian  movement throughout the development and to adjoining property. 
    provides at least two external connections, one of which  must be to a publicly maintained highway and the other providing a connection  to a different highway or a stub out to an adjoining property. Local street  stub outs generally should not exceed 500 feet in length. If a stub out is  constructed, the applicant shall post a sign in accordance with the  department's standards that indicates that such stub out is a site for a future  roadway connection. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as to prohibit a  stub out from providing service to lots within a development. The district  administrator's designee shall waive or modify the second required connection  of this standard if one or more of the following situations renders the  provision of such connection impracticable:
    a. The adjoining property is completely built out, its  state is such that redevelopment within 20 years is unlikely, and there is no  stub out (either constructed or platted) to the property served by the network  addition;
    b. The adjoining property is zoned for a use whose traffic  is incompatible with the development being served by the network addition,  providing, however, that in no case shall retail, residential, or office uses  be considered incompatible with other retail, residential, or office uses; or
    c. There is no reasonable connection possible to adjoining  property or adjacent highways due to a factor outside the control of the  developer of the network addition, such as the presence of conservation  easements not put in place by the developer of the network addition, water  features such as rivers or lakes, jurisdictional wetlands, grades in excess of  15% whose total elevation change is greater than five feet, limited access  highways, railroads, or government property to which access is restricted.
    2. Suburban 3. Additional connections standard. The  streets within a network addition Network additions providing direct  access to (i) more than 200 dwelling units or (ii) lots whose trip generation  is expected to be over 2,000 VPD may be accepted into the secondary system  of state highways if the network addition meets the following requirements: 
    a. The streets are designed and constructed in compliance  with the suburban design standards pursuant to this chapter, the Road Design  Manual, and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150);
    b. The network addition provides sufficient connections in  multiple directions and to multiple properties, if applicable, to local and  higher order roadways to provide an overall connectivity index of 1.4 or  higher. All network additions shall have a minimum of two connections; and 
    c. The block layout and other features of the development  are designed in such a fashion as to provide reasonably direct pedestrian  movement throughout the development and to adjoining property.
    3. Rural standard. The streets within a network addition  may be accepted into the secondary system of state highways if the network  addition meets the following requirements: 
    a. The streets are designed and constructed in compliance  with the rural design standards pursuant to this chapter, the Road Design  Manual, and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150); and 
    b. The network addition provides multiple connections to  adjacent properties or streets in varying directions.
    provides an additional external connection beyond that  required under subdivision 2 of this subsection for each additional 200  dwelling units or 2,000 VPD or portion of each over and above the initial 200  dwelling units or 2,000 VPD. For the purposes of this requirement, each  external connection of collector facilities that are elements of the county's  transportation plan and to which there is no direct lot access provided counts  as two external connections. The district administrator's designee shall waive  or modify this additional connections standard if one or more of the following  situations renders the provision of such connection impracticable:
    a. The adjoining property is completely built out, its  state is such that redevelopment within 20 years is unlikely, and there is no  stub out (either constructed or platted) to the property served by the network  addition; 
    b. The adjoining property is zoned for a use whose traffic  is incompatible with the development being served by the network addition,  providing, however, that in no case shall retail, residential, or office uses  be considered incompatible with retail, residential, or office uses;
    c. In developments with a median density of more than eight  lots per acre or with a FAR of 0.4 or higher, where the number of connections  provided would be contrary to the public interest; or
    d. There is no reasonable connection possible to adjoining  property or adjacent highways due to a factor outside the control of the  developer of the network addition, such as the presence of conservation  easements not put in place by the developer of the network addition, water  features such as rivers or lakes, jurisdictional wetlands, grades in excess of  15% whose total elevation change is greater than five feet, limited access  highways, railroads, or government property to which access is restricted.
    4. Individual street standard. Streets that are not part of a  network addition shall be accepted into the secondary system of state highways  upon petition by the local governing body as long as they meet the requirements  of the applicable design standard and both termini one terminus  of the street are intersections is an intersection with a roadway  or roadways that are is part of the existing publicly  maintained highway network, subject to the connectivity exceptions of  subdivision 5 of this subsection and the other terminus is either an  intersection with a roadway that is part of the existing publicly maintained  highway network or a stub out to an adjoining property. Streets considered  for individual acceptance should be (i) streets that provide a connection  between two existing publicly maintained streets, or (ii) streets  with a functional classification as collector or higher, (iii) a frontage  road or reverse frontage road pursuant to VDOT's Access Management Regulations:  Principal Arterials (see 24VAC30-92-150), (iv) streets petitioned for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways through the Rural  Addition Program pursuant to §§ 33.1-72.1 and 33.1-72.2 of the Code of Virginia  provided such street was constructed prior to March 9, 2009, (v) streets  petitioned for acceptance into the secondary system of state highways through  the Commonwealth Transportation Board's Rural Addition Policy provided such  street was constructed prior to March 9, 2009, or (vi) streets constructed or  improved pursuant to §§ 33.1-221 and 33.1-223 of the Code of Virginia.
    5. Connectivity exceptions. 
    a. The connectivity index requirement for a network  addition shall be reduced where a portion of the perimeter features one or more  of the following constraints: (i) railroad tracks; (ii) limited access highway;  (iii) an existing navigable river or a standing body of water with a depth  greater than four feet under normal conditions; (iv) terrain grades in excess  of 20%; and (v) government-owned property with restrictions upon development  such as military installations, parks in existence prior to the submission of the  development proposal for the network addition, and land under conservation  easements accepted by the Virginia Outdoors Foundation.
    The connectivity index shall be reduced based on the  percentage of the perimeter that features one or more constraints. In compact  area types, the connectivity index requirement shall be equal to 1.6 minus 0.6  times the ratio of the length of the perimeter that features one or more  constraints to the total length of the perimeter. In suburban area types, the  connectivity index requirement shall be equal to 1.4 minus 0.4 times the ratio  of the length of the perimeter that features one or more constraints to the  total length of the perimeter. 
    b. The Where the above standards for waiver or  modification or both have been met, the connectivity index requirement  requirements for a network addition may shall be reduced  waived or modified by the district administrator administrator's  designee. The developer shall submit any other request for  connectivity exceptions waiver or modification to the district  administrator's designee with a copy to the local official. The district  administrator's designee shall respond to requests for connectivity exceptions  within 45 30 calendar days of receipt of a request. For projects  where a scoping meeting pursuant to the Traffic Impact Analysis regulations  (24VAC30-155) will be held, requests for exceptions and supporting data should  be presented and discussed. The district administrator's designee may modify  the connectivity index requirements for one or more of the following criteria: 
    (1) If the locality's comprehensive plan designates  adjoining parcels to the proposed development for a land use that is determined  by the local official to be incompatible with the land use of the proposed  development. If the connectivity index requirement is modified due to  incompatible land use, such network additions shall provide stub out or stub  outs, as determined by the district administrator's designee based on the size  of the development, to allow for future connectivity in the event that the  comprehensive plan changes the designation of adjacent parcels to land use that  is not incompatible. In no instance shall any retail, office, or residential  land use be considered incompatible land use with any proposed retail, office,  or residential development.
    (2) Good cause is shown that such requirement cannot be met  due to unique characteristics of the parcel being developed such as  jurisdictional wetlands or cluster subdivisions developed pursuant to § 15.2-2286.1 of the Code of Virginia. 
    6. In instances where there is potential for conflict between  this chapter and the Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (see  24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-72) or the Access Management Regulations:  Minor Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets (see 24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-73),  the following shall apply.:
    a. For streets with a functional classification of collector  where additional connections necessary to meet the connectivity index  requirement requirements of this chapter cannot be accommodated  within the applicable spacing standards and cannot otherwise be met through  connections to lower order roadways or stub outs, such spacing standards shall  be modified by the district administrator administrator's designee  to allow for such connection. Such connection or connections shall be required  to meet intersection sight distance standards specified in the Road Design  Manual, 2011 (VDOT) (see 24VAC30-92-150).
    b. For streets with a functional classification of minor  arterial where additional connections necessary to meet the connectivity index  requirement requirements of this chapter cannot be accommodated  within the applicable spacing standards and cannot otherwise be met through  connections to lower order roadways or stub outs, the district administrator  administrator's designee shall, in consultation with the developer and  the local official, either modify the applicable spacing standards to allow for  such connection or connections, or modify the connectivity index requirement  requirements of this chapter to account for the inability to make such  connection. Such connection shall be required to meet intersection sight  distance as specified in the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) (see  24VAC30-92-150).
    c. For streets with a functional classification of principal  arterial where additional connections necessary to meet the external  connectivity requirements of this chapter cannot be accommodated within the  applicable spacing standards and cannot otherwise be met through connections to  lower order roadways or stub outs, the connectivity index requirement requirements  shall be modified by the district administrator administrator's  designee to account for the inability to make such connection.
    7. Failure to connect. As a local governing body is not  required to approve a subdivision plat that does not connect to stub outs in  adjacent developments, when If a local government approves a  subdivision plat for a new development that does not connect to a stub out or  stub outs in an adjacent development and such development's network addition or  individual street would meet the applicable requirements of this chapter if it  connected to a stub out or stub outs in the adjacent development, the network  addition or individual street may or may not be accepted into the  secondary system of state highways for maintenance pursuant to the authority  granted to the district administrators in accordance with 24VAC30-92-100. In  such event the department representative's and the commissioner's top priority  for expenditure of improvements funds for such locality's six-year plan for  secondary highways shall be to connect the street or streets in the recently  accepted network addition or individual street to the stub out or stub outs in  the adjacent developments in addition to safety.
    24VAC30-92-70. Administrative procedure.
    A. Conceptual sketch. A conceptual sketch of the development  that shows sufficient information for the department to review and concur with  the proposed functional classification for each street in the development shall  be provided to the district administrator's designee by the local official  prior to preparing detailed construction plans for review. Any preliminary or  conceptual plat, plan or sketch that conforms to the locality's zoning  requirements or subdivision ordinance is acceptable if the information required  by this subsection is shown. The submittal should include:
    1. The general location and configuration, including the  terminus, of each street, and the traffic volume anticipated when the land  served is fully developed in accordance with the land uses anticipated.
    2. The location, area, and density or floor area ratio (FAR)  of each type of proposed land use within the development.
    3. The location of any proposed transportation facility including  any public transportation facilities as well as bicycle and pedestrian  accommodations within the development's boundaries included in the  comprehensive plan of the governing body.
    4. The proposed functional classification for each street in  the development.
    5. The connectivity index of the network addition as  proposed, if applicable.
    6. The location of stub outs on adjoining property and the  existing land use of such adjacent property, if applicable, and the location of  any proposed stub outs within the network addition, if applicable.
    7. Any reductions to waiver or modification of  the connectivity requirement requirements or pending requests  therefore pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 5 a and approved modifications to  the connectivity requirement pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 5 b.
    8. Any requests for modifications to the connectivity  requirement pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 5 b. 
    9. 8. General preliminary information on the  type of any stormwater management facilities that are storm sewer  system, such as BMP, outfalls, or conveyance channels, that is proposed to  be located within the right-of-way as described in 24VAC30-92-120 L 2 and if  the project is located in a MS4 regulated area or a TMDL watershed. 
    10. 9. Other available information pertinent to  the intended development, including but not limited to any proposed phased  development of streets pursuant to 24VAC30-92-80.
    B. Conceptual sketch review. The district administrator's  designee will review the layout and functional classification of streets shown  in the concept sketch and within 45 calendar days notify the local official in  writing, as well as the developer, if applicable, of his concurrence or  recommendations and whether or not the streets in the proposed network addition  meet the connectivity and other requirements of this chapter. This concurrence  will be valid as long as the basic concept for the development, including the  general street layout and design, as submitted for review, remains unchanged.  The district administrator's designee shall also review any unresolved request  for modifications to the connectivity index requirement requirements  and include his decision in the written notification to the local official and  the developer. As part of his review, the district administrator's designee shall  review the provision of collector and other higher order streets and if  necessary make recommendations for the provision of such streets to address the  traffic generated by the development.
    C. Plan of development submission. Plats or plans, or both,  together with other pertinent data as herein prescribed, shall be submitted to  the local official in accordance with the practices of the local government and  to the district administrator's designee for all proposed developments whose  streets are intended to be added to the secondary system of state highways  maintained by the department. The district administrator's designee may,  subject to the availability of staff and upon the request of the local  official, cooperate in the review of proposed developments to be developed to  these standards but not initially intended for addition to the secondary system  of state highways maintained by the department. The department may recover the  costs for this service in accordance with 24VAC30-92-140.
    D. Plan review. Upon receipt of the plats or plans, or both,  the district administrator's designee will arrange for the appropriate review  to determine compliance with the requirements of this chapter and other  applicable VDOT requirements. The general procedure for this review is  described in the guidance document Guidance Document for the  Commonwealth Transportation Board's Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT).
    E. Plan approval. The district administrator's designee will  advise the appropriate local official and the developer, if applicable, as to  the results of the review.
    1. If the street development proposed by the plats or plans,  or both, is determined to be in compliance with these requirements, the  district administrator's designee will provide written confirmation of this  finding. This action signifies the district administrator's designee's approval  of the street layout and design shown on the plats or plans, as submitted. Any  subsequent revision, additions, or deletions thereto shall require specific  written approval of the district administrator's designee for each such change.
    2. If a revision of the submitted plats or plans is determined  necessary, the district administrator's designee will list the required changes  in a written response to the local official and the developer, if applicable.  Upon completion of the specified revisions, the plats or plans will be  resubmitted for review and approval by the district administrator's designee.
    The department's approval of a street construction plan shall  constitute its commitment to accept the street or network addition depicted  thereon when all applicable provisions of these requirements are satisfied and  the streets have been constructed according to the approved construction plan and  supporting specifications. However, during the department's or other approved  inspection of construction as specified by this chapter, if a situation is  discovered that was not addressed on the approved plan that could, in the  opinion of the district administrator's designee, adversely affect public  safety or the integrity of either the roadway or the adjacent property,  acceptance of the street or network addition shall be deferred until the  situation is corrected.
    The department's approval of a street construction plan shall  expire after a period of five years if construction has not commenced, in which  case the subdivision street construction plan shall be resubmitted for  subsequent review and approval. This shall not affect the adequacy of the  approved concept plan as depicted on a recorded final plat, as provided for  under § 15.2-2241 of the Code of Virginia.
    Network additions will only be accepted when the entire  network addition has been constructed, except in such instances where the  constructed portion meets the applicable public benefit requirements of this  chapter.
    F. Street acceptance. Upon the satisfactory completion of  construction of the street or streets in a network addition, the department  will advise the local governing body regarding the street or network addition's  readiness for acceptance and the local governing body, in consultation with the  district administrator's designee, will initiate its acceptance into the  secondary system of state highways maintained by the department provided:
    1. The developer dedicates the prescribed right-of-way to  public use.
    2. The street has or streets in the network addition have been  constructed in accordance with the applicable specifications, standards and the  plats or plans approved by the department.
    a. Traffic control markings, signs, and devices have been  installed in accordance with VDOT standards, specifications, and practices.
    b. Speed limits have been set in accordance with Article 8 (§ 46.2-870  et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title 46.2 of the Code of Virginia. For any streets  with speed limits different from those set out in § 46.2-870 or §§ 46.2-873  through 46.2-875 of the Code of Virginia, traffic engineering investigations  supporting such speed limits have been submitted to VDOT. 
    3. The developer furnishes all required information and data  to the district administrator's designee and the local government official  pertaining to the development's stormwater management system that are pertinent  to the locality's, department's, or other entity's Municipal Separate Storm  Sewer System (MS4) permit, if applicable. 
    4. The street or streets in a network addition provides  sufficient public benefit as prescribed in 24VAC30-92-60 and meets the  requirements of this chapter.
    5. The street or streets in the network addition has been  properly maintained since its completion.
    6. The developer furnishes the surety and fees in accordance  with 24VAC30-92-140.
    7. The governing body has or other responsible  parties have executed all agreements prescribed by these requirements,  unless specifically waived on an individual case basis by the department  employee, or his successor or his designee, responsible for overseeing these  requirements and the final acceptance of streets as part of the secondary  system of state highways maintained by the department.
    8. The governing body, by proper resolution, requests the  department to accept the street or streets in the network addition for  maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways under its  jurisdiction. The resolution shall include the governing body's guarantee of an  unrestricted and unencumbered right-of-way as dedicated, plus any necessary  easements for fills, drainage, or sight distance.
    Upon the department's determination that the requested street  or network addition is in compliance with the applicable provisions of these  requirements, the governing body will be officially advised of the street or  network addition's acceptance into the secondary system of state highways and  the effective date of such action. This notification serves as the district  administrator's designee's authority to begin maintenance thereon.
    24VAC30-92-80. Phased development of streets.
    A. Policy. Certain streets that require four or more travel  lanes to accommodate the projected traffic may be accepted by the department  for maintenance after completion of the first two lanes to an acceptable,  initial phase of construction, upon the request of the governing body. It is  recognized that there is a distinction between those streets that benefit the  regional transportation network and those that primarily serve the development  of land and local traffic, and, therefore, the criteria for phased construction  for each situation differs as described in subsection B of this section.
    However, in all cases, the right-of-way required for the road  at its complete stage of construction shall be dedicated and accepted as part  of the initial street acceptance. In addition, the initial phase of  construction shall be designed and constructed to facilitate construction of  the remaining phase in a manner that will avoid the need to reconstruct the  initial two lanes.
    Consideration for the acceptance of any street under the  provisions of this section shall be limited to the phased development of only  the street's roadway. All other applicable requirements, e.g., public benefit,  drainage easements, and administrative procedures, shall apply.
    B. Criteria.
    1. For streets included in the transportation plan of the  locality's comprehensive plan that serve diverse areas of the region or  locally, no special agreement or acknowledgement is needed as a prerequisite to  acceptance, provided: 
    a. The street is part of a transportation corridor that was  formally adopted as a part of the locality's comprehensive transportation plan  prior to the local governing body's approval of the plat or plan for the  development of the adjacent land.
    b. The transportation corridor is a major thoroughfare planned  primarily to move through traffic.
    c. When fully developed the street must satisfy the department's  functional classification criteria as a major collector or higher.
    d. The street has a projected traffic volume of 8,000 vehicles  per day or less for a period of 10 years following the date of the acceptance  for maintenance by the department.
    2. For all other streets, the local governing body's  resolution requesting acceptance of the initial two-lane section must include  provisions that acknowledge:
    a. The local governing body agrees that all costs incurred in  the street's complete construction, including right-of-way, engineering,  utility adjustment, etc., shall be provided from funds other than those derived  from state revenue sources administered by the department, except as may be  expressly authorized by the department.
    b. The local governing body agrees that it is its  responsibility to ensure that the roadway is completed as needed to accommodate  the traffic. However, the locality also acknowledges that a determination that  the street needs to be completed to its ultimate section will be made by the  district administrator's designee once it is determined that the first two  lanes will not sustain an acceptable level of service for the functional  classification of the roadway in accordance with the Highway Capacity Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2010 (TRB).
    C. Procedures.
    1. Plats or plans, or both, for the street's complete  development, in accordance with all applicable provisions of these  requirements, shall be submitted for approval.
    2. The plats or plans shall also delineate the street's initial  development as proposed pursuant to this section. In no case shall this design  provide less than one-half of the roadway typical section required by the  applicable requirements for the street's complete development.
    3. Unless waived by the district administrator's designee, a  capacity analysis shall be submitted to document that an acceptable level of  service will be maintained for the intended duration of the initial phase of  development. In determining an acceptable level of service, the beneficial effect  of the proposed street on the overall transportation network will be  considered.
    4. A determination will be made by the department in  consultation with the locality as to whether the street can be approved for  phased development and as to which criterion in subsection B of this section  applies.
    5. Upon the district administrator's designee's determination  that the proposal is in compliance with the applicable provisions of this  section, the plans may be approved accordingly.
    6. Upon completion of the street's initial phase in accordance  with approved plans, its compliance with all other applicable provisions of  this section, and the inclusion of the appropriate language in the resolution,  the street may be accepted for maintenance by the department as part of the  secondary system of state highways.
    24VAC30-92-110. Appeal to district administrator.
    The district administrator is authorized to consider and  render a ruling on unresolved differences of opinion between the developer and  the district administrator's designee that pertain to the interpretation and  application of these requirements.
    To obtain this review, the developer shall provide the  district administrator, the district administrator's designee, and the local  official a written request for such action, describing any unresolved issue.  After reviewing all pertinent information, the district administrator will  advise the developer in writing regarding the decision of the appeal, and  provide a copy of the decision to the local official and the district  administrator's designee. All correspondence requesting an appeal should  include copies of all prior correspondence with the local official and  department representatives regarding the issue or issues. The district  administrator shall advise the developer of the decision on the appeal within 45  30 calendar days. 
    The developer may request a meeting with the district  administrator concerning the appeal, and the district administrator shall  respond within 10 business days and provide to the developer a date, time, and  location for such meeting. After reviewing all pertinent information, the  district administrator shall advise the developer in writing regarding the  decision on the appeal, and provide a copy of the decision to the district  administrator's designee and the local official.
    The district administrator shall advise the developer of  the decision on the unresolved differences of opinion within 45 calendar days.  The developer may further appeal the district administrator's decision to  the commissioner. All correspondence requesting an appeal should include copies  of all prior correspondence with the local official and department  representatives regarding the issue or issues. The commissioner shall advise  the developer of the decision on the appeal within 30 calendar days.
    24VAC30-92-120. Design and agreement requirements.
    A. General requirements. Most criteria addressing the design  of new streets can be found in the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and its  Appendix B (1), the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150).  However, the following provisions are provided for guidance, particularly in  regard to features that require agreements or formal acknowledgements of the  governing body before VDOT's acceptance of the street or streets within a development.
    When an agreement is required between the local governing  body and the department as a prerequisite to the acceptance of a street,  nothing in these requirements shall preclude the local governing body from  entering into separate agreements with other entities to fulfill its  responsibilities. However, if the provisions are intended to ensure the safety  of the public using the street, the department reserves the right to approve  the involvement of the other party or parties.
    All streets functionally classified as local shall have a  design speed equal to the posted speed limit, except for streets functionally  classified as local with a projected traffic volume of 400 vehicles per day or  less, which may have a design speed less than the posted speed limit.
    The department, locality, and developer shall take measures  to minimize the impacts of through traffic on streets functionally classified  as local and accepted into the secondary system of state highways under these  regulations. Such measures shall include initial street designs that manage  motor vehicle speed to match local context.
    B. Geometric requirements. Geometric requirements for new  streets are established in the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and its  Appendix B (1), the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150).  Sufficient off-street parking must be provided by the local governing body in  accordance with this chapter if streets in a proposed network addition are  constructed in accordance with design requirements for streets with off-street  parking.
    C. Turn lanes. Left or right turn lanes shall be provided at  intersections when the department determines that projected turning movements  warrant their installation. These facilities shall be designed in accordance  with the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT) and its Appendix B (1),  the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) and, if  necessary, additional right-of-way shall be provided to accommodate these  facilities.
    D. Pavement structure.
    1. Pavement design. The pavement structure for new streets  shall be in accordance with the Pavement Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150)  for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia, 2009 (VDOT), including  any prescribed underdrains. Prior to construction of the pavement sub-base and  finish courses, the district administrator's designee shall approve the  proposed pavement design.
    2. Special pavement surfaces. The district administrator's  designee may approve special pavement surfaces, such as the use of stamped  pavement. However, if the pavement design is a type not addressed by the  Pavement Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) for Subdivision and  Secondary Roads in Virginia, 2009 (VDOT), an agreement shall be provided by  the governing body that addresses the future maintenance of such pavement.
    3. Pavement additions to existing streets. When an existing  VDOT-maintained roadway is to be widened to accommodate additional lanes or the  addition of turn lanes, the necessary pavement design shall be obtained from  the district administrator's designee and the entire surface of the roadway  (old and new portions) may be required to be overlaid and restriped if required  by the district administrator's designee. The district administrator's designee  shall not require the entire surface of the roadway to be overlaid and  restriped when the only pavement addition to the existing roadway was for  bicycle lanes unless extenuating circumstances require that the entire surface  of the roadway be overlaid and restriped.
    E. Parking.
    1. Perpendicular and angle parking along streets is normally  prohibited. However, perpendicular and angle parking along streets may be  considered if the features along the street cause the street to readily appear  to be a street rather than a travel way through a parking lot.
    Street design that anticipates limited or no on-street parking  shall be approved when sufficient off-street parking is provided in accordance  with this chapter. Street design that anticipates the restriction of on-street  parking on one side of the street shall be approved when sufficient off-street  parking is provided for buildings on the side of the street where it is  anticipated parking will be restricted.
    2. For streets designed without on-street parking, a minimum  of two off-street parking spaces per dwelling unit shall be provided in  proximity of the unit that they are intended to serve. Such spaces, which may  be provided in a parking bay, driveway, or garage facilities, shall be  provided outside of the street's right-of-way. The district administrator's  designee may approve lesser parking requirements for individual developments or  classes of developments when evidence is presented to support such an approval  such as proximity to transit service or the nature of the development.  Entrances to parking bays and garage facilities shall be designed in accordance  with the appropriate provisions of the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-92-150) and the Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (see  24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-72) and Access Management Regulations: Minor  Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets (24VAC30-73).
    3. In instances where the local governing body has determined,  through adoption of a parking ordinance or other similar ordinance, that lesser  parking requirements are sufficient for certain classes of development, such  lesser requirements shall govern.
    4. The department shall not prohibit roadway design that  allows for the provision of on-street parking on any roadway with a functional  classification of collector or local where the posted speed limit is 35 miles  per hour or less and that is located within a compact or suburban area type.
    F. Cul-de-sacs and turnarounds. An adequate turnaround  facility shall be provided at the end of each cul-de-sac to permit the safe and  convenient maneuvering by service vehicles. Various configurations of  turnarounds are illustrated in the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT));  however, alternative configurations may be approved by the district administrator's  designee. Additional right-of-way shall be provided as required by the design  of the turnaround. Normally, any nontraveled way areas within the turnaround,  such as an island, shall be included in the dedicated right-of-way of the  facility unless the department and the locality are able to reach an agreement  for the maintenance of such nontraveled way areas. Nothing in this chapter  shall prohibit the provision of stormwater management facilities in the  nontraveled way areas of a cul-de-sac, provided the requirements of subsection  L of this section are met.
    For circular turnarounds, a well-defined, identifiable street  segment, equal to the normal lot width along the intersected street that serves  the cul-de-sac, or 50 feet, whichever is greater, shall extend from the  intersected street to the turning area.
    G. Curb and gutter. For the purpose of these requirements,  the use of curb and gutter is an acceptable roadway design, rather than a  requirement. However, when used, curb and gutter shall be designed in  accordance with the Road Design Manual and the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT))  and only one curb and gutter design may be used along the length of a street.
    1. Driveway entrance requirements. Without regard to the curb  design used, the curb shall incorporate a driveway entrance apron, as  illustrated in the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix  B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)), to provide a smooth  transition from the gutter invert or roadway surface onto the driveway.
    2. Curb ramps. All streets that incorporate accessible routes  for pedestrian use shall, without regard to the curb design used, include curb  ramps at intersections for use by persons with disabilities and shall  incorporate other applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act  (42 USC § 12101 et seq.).
    H. Private entrances. All private entrances shall be designed  and constructed in accordance with the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see  24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)).
    I. Pedestrian, bicycle, and shared use path facilities. The  Commonwealth Transportation Board's "Policy for Integrating Bicycle and  Pedestrian Accommodations," 2004 emphasizes accommodating  pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Any street proposed for VDOT acceptance shall  accommodate pedestrian and bicycle traffic in accordance with the Commonwealth  Transportation Board's policy and this chapter. Pedestrian and bicycle  facilities should be generally uniform between intersections and  included in the initial construction of the street, prior to VDOT acceptance. 
    1. Pedestrian accommodation requirements. Pedestrian  accommodations shall be provided based upon density of development, the plans  for or existence of public schools in the vicinity, the presence of existing  pedestrian accommodations, and the operational nature of the fronting street.  In all developments with pedestrian accommodations, such accommodations shall connect  with existing pedestrian accommodations and allow for connection to future  pedestrian accommodations to adjacent parcels. If multiple requirements apply  to a street, the greater accommodation requirement shall govern. The  district administrator's designee may waive or modify these requirements for  the provision of pedestrian accommodations in situations when the accommodation  exception provisions of the Commonwealth Transportation Board's policy are met.
    a. Pedestrian accommodations shall be provided along both  sides of the street or provisions made that provide equivalent pedestrian  mobility in areas with a median lot size of one half acre or less or a floor  area ratio (FAR) of 0.4 or greater for streets with an ADT over 400 that  are located in a development with a median lot size of one-quarter acre or  smaller or when the ADT for the street is over 8,000. 
    b. Pedestrian accommodations shall be provided along at least  one side of the street or provisions made that provide equivalent pedestrian  mobility in areas that have a median lot size between one-half acre to two  acres for streets with an ADT over 400 that are located in a development  with a median lot size between one-quarter acre and one-half acre or when the  ADT for the street is between 2,000 and 8,000. 
    c. Pedestrian accommodations shall be provided along at least  one side of the street or provisions made that provide equivalent pedestrian  mobility in suburban and compact area types along roadways within one-half  centerline mile of a public school within one-half street centerline  mile of a public school.
    d. When connecting to a stub street that has pedestrian  accommodations, the new street shall also include pedestrian accommodations.
    e. Pedestrian accommodations shall be provided along at least  one side of, or provisions made that provide equivalent pedestrian mobility  along, streets functionally classified as collectors or arterials with two  travel lanes not including turn lanes. In no instance shall any sidewalk abut  the curb or the edge of a collector or higher order street, unless the sidewalk  is at least eight feet wide. In such instances tree wells shall be provided. In  instances where it is necessary to retrofit streets with pedestrian  accommodations to allow the streets to be accepted into the secondary system of  state highways, the pedestrian accommodations less than eight feet wide may  abut the curb or the edge of the street.
    f. e. Pedestrian accommodations shall be  provided along both sides of, or provisions made that provide equivalent  pedestrian mobility along, streets functionally classified as collectors or  arterials with three or more travel lanes. In no instance shall any sidewalk  abut the curb or the edge of a collector or higher order street, unless the  sidewalk is at least eight feet wide. In such instances tree wells shall be  provided. In instances where it is necessary to retrofit streets with  pedestrian accommodations to allow the streets to be accepted into the  secondary system of state highways, the pedestrian accommodations less than  eight feet wide may abut the curb or the edge of the street.
    2. Maintenance of pedestrian and bicycle accommodations.  Pedestrian and bicycle facilities are eligible for VDOT acceptance and  maintenance based on the criteria of this section. A copy of an agreement or  other document showing the proposed maintenance responsibilities of pedestrian  and bicycle facilities shall be provided to VDOT for any pedestrian  accommodation outside of the VDOT right-of-way that is used to meet the  accommodation requirements of this subsection. 
    a. Compliant facilities. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities,  including shared use paths as defined under § 46.2-100 of the Code of Virginia,  shall be accepted as part of the street or network addition, unless otherwise  requested by the governing body, provided they are located fully within the  dedicated right-of-way of the street and they are constructed in accordance  with applicable criteria and standards of the department.
    (1) Sidewalk criteria. Sidewalks shall be constructed in  accordance with the Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150)  (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)).
    (2) Bicycle facility criteria. Bicycle facilities contiguous  with the street shall be in accordance with the department's design and  construction criteria set forth in the Road Design Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2011.
    (3) Shared use path criteria. Shared use paths shall be  constructed in accordance with the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150),  2011 and closely follow the vertical alignment of the roadway without  meandering on and off the right-of-way.
    b. Noncompliant sidewalk, bicycle, and shared use paths.  Noncompliant sidewalk, bicycle, and shared use paths that fail to meet  requirements of the department's standards for construction, alignment, or  placement within the dedicated right-of-way of the street shall be deemed to be  noncompliant and not qualify for maintenance unless a design waiver or  exemption is granted by the department. Noncompliant sidewalks and shared use  paths may be constructed of stabilizer convenient to the applicant.  Noncompliant facilities may co-exist within the dedicated right-of-way of the  street under a land use permit issued by the district administrator's designee  to the local governing body responsible for having established the facility  through its subdivision process or other development process.
    Such permits will clearly specify the responsibility for  maintenance of the facility and related activities to the extent the facility  occupies the street's right-of-way. The permit applicant should be an entity  that can be reasonably expected to have perpetual maintenance capability. 
    J. Bridge, drainage, and other grade separation structures.  Bridges, drainage, and other grade separation structures shall be designed and  constructed in accordance with all applicable department criteria and  standards. The district administrator's designee may require special review of  the plans and construction inspection.
    The department will accept grade separation structures as  part of new streets, provided the structure is a drainage structure or is  intended to separate the movement of registered motor vehicles. In addition,  the department will accept grade separation structures intended to separate  pedestrians or bicyclists or any combination thereof from traffic using the  roadway, provided:
    1. The structure is available for unrestricted public use;
    2. The structure is accessible to pedestrian accommodations  situated along the street; and
    3. The projected traffic volume of the street is (i) not less  than 4,000 vpd ADT or (ii) if the structure otherwise serves as  part of the principal pedestrian access to a school or a mass transit facility  including stops and stations and a peak hour traffic volume of 450 vph VPH  or greater is projected.
    In all other instances, the grade separation structure shall  be deemed to be a locally controlled grade separation structure within the  right-of-way of the street, in which case the street will only be accepted as  part of the secondary system of state highways maintained by the department  after the local governing body and the department have executed an agreement  acceptable to the department that (i) acknowledges the department has no  responsibility or liability due to the presence of the structure and (ii)  assures the burden and costs of inspection, maintenance, and future  improvements to the structure are provided from sources other than those  administered by the department.
    In all cases, whether the structure is accepted as an integral  part of the roadway for maintenance by the department or it remains a locally  controlled structure, the lighting, safety, and security of those using such  facilities shall remain a responsibility of local government.
    K. Dams. The department will only consider accepting streets  for maintenance that traverse dams when all of the following provisions are  satisfied. For the purpose of this section, a roadway will be considered to  traverse a dam if any part of the fill for the roadway and the fill for the dam  overlap or if the area between the two embankments is filled in so that the  downstream face of the dam is obscured or if a closed drainage facility from a  dam extends under a roadway fill.
    1. Agreements with the governing body. Except as exempt under  subdivision 6 of this subsection, the governing body acknowledges by formal  agreement the department's liability is limited to the maintenance of the  roadway and that the department has no responsibility or liability due to the  presence of the dam, the maintenance of which shall remain the responsibility  of an owner, other than the department, as established by § 33.1-176 of  the Code of Virginia.
    2. Design review. An engineer licensed to practice in the  Commonwealth of Virginia shall certify that the hydraulic and structural design  of any dam, as described below, is in accordance with current national and  state engineering practice and that all pertinent provisions of the Subdivision  Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road  Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)) have been considered. Prior to approval of the  roadway construction plans, the hydraulic and structural design of a proposed  dam shall be reviewed by the department and meet the department's satisfaction  if:
    a. A roadway is considered to traverse a dam; or
    b. A roadway is located below but sufficiently close to the  dam that a catastrophic breach could endanger the roadway or the safety of  those using the roadway.
    3. Right-of-way requirements. The right-of-way of roads  considered to occupy dams shall be recorded either as an easement for public  road purposes or as a dedication specifically to the governing body.  Right-of-way dedicated in the name of the Commonwealth or any of its agencies  is not acceptable if it includes a dam, and roads through such right-of-way  will not be accepted as a part of the secondary system of state highways  maintained by the department.
    4. Supplemental, alternative access. To be considered for VDOT  maintenance, roadways that traverse a dam must be supplemented by an  appropriate alternative roadway facility for public ingress or egress having  suitable provisions that ensure perpetual maintenance.
    5. Permits. All applicable federal and state permits  associated with dams shall be secured and filed with the locality prior to  VDOT's acceptance of any street that traverses a dam.
    6. Dams exempt from agreements. The acceptance of roadways  that traverse dams shall be exempt from the requirements for an agreement with  the governing body, as required by subdivision 1 of this subsection, if all of  the following is satisfied:
    a. The dam is used to create a stormwater detention or  retention facility;
    b. The maximum depth of the water retained by the impoundment  at its 100-year storm flood elevation is not greater than four feet; and
    c. The surface area of the impoundment at full flood is not  greater than two acres and is beyond the right-of-way dedicated to public use.
    L. Roadway drainage.
    1. Policy and procedures. All drainage facilities shall be  designed in accordance with the department's Drainage Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2002 and supplemental directives or the Subdivision  Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1) of the Road  Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)) as may be appropriate. All drainage  computations supporting a proposed drainage design shall be submitted to the  department for review as part of the documents necessary for the approval of a  construction plan.
    2. Stormwater management. Whereas the department considers  matters regarding stormwater management associated with the construction of  streets to be under the authority of the local governing body, decisions  regarding stormwater management in the construction of streets are deferred to  the locality. However, stormwater management, including the construction of  detention or retention facilities, or both, is recognized as an available  design alternative or BMP for water quantity, quality, or both. Where  the developer is required by regulations promulgated by an agency or  governmental subdivision other than the department or the developer chooses to  use stormwater management facilities in the design of a subdivision or other  development, the governing body shall, by formal agreement, and as a  prerequisite for the transfer of jurisdiction over the street to the  department, acknowledge that the department is not responsible for the  operation, maintenance, retrofitting, or liability of the stormwater  management facility or facilities associated with the subdivision or the  development. Any retrofits required to comply with a TMDL WLA will be the  responsibility of the locality. However, in the event the governing body  has executed a comprehensive, localitywide agreement with the department  addressing these matters, a specific agreement addressing stormwater management  controls in the subdivision or development will not be required as a condition  for street acceptance.
    Stormwater management controls for VDOT projects are to be  designed in accordance with the approved VDOT Erosion and Sediment Control and  Stormwater Management Program Standards and Specifications, 2010, as  annually approved by the Department of Conservation and Recreation (see  24VAC30-92-150), the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Regulations,  (4VAC50-30), and the Virginia Stormwater Management Program  (VSMP) Permit Regulations (4VAC50-60), and, if applicable, VDOT's MS4  Program Plan, 2008. While these controls may be necessary whenever a street  maintained by the department is widened or relocated, the department does not  require them in the development of new streets because such activity is  regulated by the local governments. However, developers and counties may find  these controls useful in managing land development activity.
    Generally devices and treatments intended to mitigate the  impact of stormwater shall be placed off of the right-of-way and shall be  designed to prevent the backup of water against the roadbed. However, such  devices and treatments may be placed within the right-of-way if the department  and the local governing body have executed an agreement that (i) acknowledges  the department has no responsibility or liability due to the presence of the  devices or treatments, or both; (ii) assures the burden and costs of  inspection, maintenance, VSMP permit requirements, TMDL WLA requirements,  retrofitting or other future improvements to the devices and treatments, or  other costs related to the placement of such devices or treatments within the  right-of-way are provided from sources other than those administered by the  department; (iii) a professional engineer licensed by the Commonwealth or the  manufacturer as required by the department, certifies the construction of the  facility to plans reviewed by the department; and (iv) a concept design  requirements of the facility is are included in the department's  Drainage Manual, 2002, the Department of Conservation and Recreation's  Stormwater Management Handbook, First Edition, 1999, or  supplemental directives (see 24VAC30-92-150).
    Where development activity results in increased runoff to the  extent that adjustment of an outfall facility is required, such adjustment  shall be at the developer's expense and shall be contained within an  appropriate easement.
    The department is required to implement the Municipal Separate  Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit for facilities located on its right-of-way. To  comply with these requirements, the local governing body shall provide to  the district administrator's designee all aspects of a proposed  development's storm sewer system and associated stormwater management system  plan that are pertinent to the locality's or the agency's department's  MS4 permit to the district administrator's designee. Additionally,  the local governing body shall provide to the district administrator's designee  an inventory of all outfalls to waters of the United States, physical  interconnections with other stormwater systems, stormwater management devices,  or both related to the project that are located within VDOT right-of-way as a  condition of street acceptance in accordance with the VDOT MS4 Stormwater  Outfall Inventory Manual, 2011. VDOT shall not accept a street for maintenance  as part of the secondary system of state highways that are not in compliance  with conditions of the pertinent MS4 permit and VDOT's MS4 Program Plan, 2008,  as such conditions existed at the time of the relevant street construction  plan's approval. VDOT shall not accept a street for maintenance if there is an  illicit discharge to the system, as defined by 4VAC50-60-10 until the illicit  discharge is eliminated.
    3. Drainage easements.
    a. An acceptable easement shall be provided from all drainage  outfalls to a natural watercourse, as opposed to a swale.
    b. The department normally accepts and maintains only that  portion of a drainage system that falls within the limits of the dedicated  right-of-way for a street. The department's responsibility to enter drainage  easements outside of the dedicated right-of-way shall be limited to undertaking  corrective measures to alleviate problems that may adversely affect the safe  operation or integrity of the roadway.
    c. In the event drainage to a natural watercourse is not  accomplished or is interrupted, an acceptable agreement from the governing body  may be considered as an alternative to providing an easement to a natural  watercourse, provided the agreement acknowledges that the department is neither  responsible nor liable for drainage from the roadway.
    M. Other design considerations.
    1. Guardrail. Guardrail shall be used when required by the  district administrator's designee, consistent with the Road Design Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2011. For placement considerations, see the  Subdivision Street Design Guide (see 24VAC30-92-150) (Appendix B (1)  of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT)).
    2. Landscaping and erosion control. All disturbed areas within  the dedicated right-of-way and easements of any street shall be restored with  vegetation compatible with the surrounding area. Where there is visual evidence  of erosion or siltation, acceptance of the street as part of the secondary  system of state highways maintained by the department will be postponed until  appropriate protective measures, in accordance with VDOT's construction  practices, are taken. Except as otherwise approved by the district  administrator's designee, planting of trees or shrubs on the right-of-way shall  be in accordance with the Subdivision Street Design Guide and the Road  Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT) and its Appendix B  (1) (the Subdivision Street Design Guide).
    3. Lighting. Roadway, security, or pedestrian lighting, when  required by the governing body or desired by the developer, shall be installed  in accordance with the Subdivision Street Design Guide and the Road  Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT) and its Appendix B  (1) (the Subdivision Street Design Guide). However, VDOT shall not be  responsible for the maintenance or replacement of lighting fixtures or the  provision of power for lighting.
    4. Railroad crossings.
    a. Short-arm gates with flashing signals, flashing signals  alone, or other protective devices as deemed appropriate by the department  shall be provided at any at-grade crossing of an active railroad by a street.
    b. Crossings of railroad right-of-way are subject to the  requirements of the railroad. Streets to be accepted by the department for  maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways that cross  railroad right-of-way will only be considered if the protective measures  outlined under this section have been fully installed and an agreement between  the railroad, the developer, and the local governing body has been executed.  Prior to execution, such agreements shall be presented to the department for  consideration in consultation with the Department of Rail and Public  Transportation.
    5. Utilities. Local governments, the development community,  and the utility community are encouraged to coordinate and consolidate their  interests as part of the initial development plan.
    a. Underground utilities. The department allows the placement  of underground utilities within the dedicated right-of-way of streets, but  normally restricts placement to areas outside of the travel lanes. However, if  the governing body has established adequate requirements approved by the  department for the design, location, and construction of underground utilities  within the right-of-way of streets, including provisions that ensure that  adequate testing and inspection is performed to minimize future settlement,  those requirements shall become the department's requirements and govern  provided those requirements exceed the department's requirements.
    Manholes shall not be placed in sidewalk, multiuse trail, or  shared use path facilities, within five feet of curb ramps or within driveway  entrances. 
    When location of the utilities outside of the pavement area is  not practical such as in high density developments incorporating the principles  of new urbanism as described in § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of Virginia,  such installations:
    (1) Are acceptable within the shoulders along the street or  within the parking area.
    (2) May be acceptable beneath the travel lanes of the street  or alley when provisions are made to ensure adequate inspection and compaction  tests and:
    (a) Longitudinal installations and manholes are located  outside of the normal travel lanes; or 
    (b) Longitudinal installations and manholes are placed in the  center of a travel lane out of the wheel path.
    However, manholes shall not be placed in sidewalk, multiuse  trail, or shared use path facilities within five feet of curb ramps or within  driveway entrances.
    b. Open-cutting of hard-surfaced roadways. The department  usually prohibits the open-cutting of hard-surfaced roads except in extenuating  circumstances. Therefore, all underground utilities within the right-of-way, as  determined necessary by good engineering practice to serve the complete  development of adjacent properties, shall be installed during the street's  initial construction and prior to the application of its final pavement surface  course. This shall include extensions of all necessary cross-street connections  or service lines to an appropriate location beyond the pavement and preferably  the right-of-way line.
    In the event it is necessary to open the street pavement to  work on utilities after the surface has been placed, additional compaction  tests and paving as necessary to restore the integrity and appearance of the  roadway may be required at the discretion of the district administrator's  designee.
    c. Cross-street conduits. To facilitate the placement of  future underground utilities, cross-street conduits are encouraged, with  placement of such conduits occurring on each street at intersections.
    d. Aboveground utilities. All aboveground utilities shall be  installed behind the sidewalk or as close as possible to the limits of the  street's right-of-way but shall not encroach on the sidewalk, the shared use  path, or any clear zone.
    To assure the unencumbered dedication of the right-of-way for  street additions, easements or other interests within the platted right-of-way  shall be quitclaimed of any prior rights therein. In exchange, a permit may be  issued by the department for a utility to occupy the area involved. This permit  will be processed by the district administrator's designee upon acceptance of  the street into the secondary system of state highways maintained by the  department. No inspection fee is required for permits so issued.  However, the approval of the permit shall be contingent upon the utility's  compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Permit Regulations (see  24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-151).
    24VAC30-92-130. Right-of-way width, spite strips, and  encroachments.
    A. Right-of-way width. A clear and unencumbered right-of-way  shall be dedicated to public use for any street proposed for addition to the  secondary system of state highways maintained by the department. However, in  certain rare extenuating circumstances involving a party beyond the influence  of the developer, an easement for transportation purposes may be approved by  the district administrator's designee in lieu of dedicated right-of-way. In all  other cases, any easement that might interfere with the public's unencumbered  use of the street shall be quitclaimed in exchange for a land use permit as  outlined in 24VAC30-92-120 M 5.
    The width of right-of-way shall be as indicated in the Subdivision  Street Design Guide (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT))  and the Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT) and  shall be sufficient to include all essential elements of the roadway intended  to be maintained by the department, including pedestrian, multiuse trail,  bicycle, or shared use path facilities and clear zone. However, supplemental  easements may be used to accommodate sight distance requirements and slopes for  cuts and fills. The right-of-way requirements are defined in the Subdivision  Street Design Guide (Appendix B (1) of the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT))  and the Road Design Manual (see  24VAC30-92-150), 2011 (VDOT).
    When an existing state maintained road is widened, the  additional right-of-way should be dedicated as follows:
    1. If the existing right-of-way consists of a prescriptive  easement, to the degree that the developer controls the land, the right-of-way  shall be dedicated to public use from the centerline of the alignment.
    2. If the existing right-of-way is dedicated to public use,  the additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to public use.
    3. If the existing right-of-way is titled in the name of the  department or the Commonwealth, the additional right-of-way shall be deeded to  the department or to the Commonwealth, consistent with the title of the  existing right-of-way.
    B. "Spite strips." Plans that include a reserved or  "spite" strip that prohibits otherwise lawful vehicular access to a  street from the adjacent properties, whether within or outside the subdivision  or development, will not be approved.
    C. Encroachments within the right-of-way. Recording of a plat  causes the fee title interest of areas dedicated to public use to transfer to  the local governing body. Therefore, objects installed within the right-of-way  for purposes other than transportation may be considered an unlawful  encroachment in the right-of-way and prevent the right-of-way from being  considered clear and unencumbered.
    Posts, walls, signs, or similar ornamental devices that do  not interfere with roadway capacity, encroach into a clear zone, or interfere  with prescribed sight distance requirements, or are not in conflict with  Chapter 7 (§ 33.1-351 et seq.) of Title 33.1 of the Code of Virginia may be  permitted within the right-of-way. However, specific authorization by the  district administrator's designee or as authorized under the Land Use Permit  Regulations (see 24VAC30-92-150) (24VAC30-151) is a requisite for  these devices or any other encroachment located within the right-of-way. For  the purposes of this subsection, mailboxes installed on breakaway posts may  occupy the right-of-way without permit. Otherwise, encroachments that do not  fall within the clear zone may be allowed within the right-of-way pursuant to a  land use permit issued by the district administrator's designee.
    24VAC30-92-140. Surety and fees.
    A. Policy. Except as otherwise provided herein, the developer  shall provide surety to guarantee the satisfactory performance of the street,  an inspection fee to cover the department's cost of inspecting the new street,  and an administrative cost recovery fee to recover the department's costs  associated with the review of subdivision or other development plans and the  administrative processing of the acceptance of new streets as determined in  this section. All surety and fees collected under this section shall be based  on the date of the local governing body's request and the aggregate mileage of  new streets in that request, rounded up to the next tenth of a mile. In the  event of extenuating circumstances beyond the developer's control, the  commissioner or his designee may waive all or a portion of any of the surety  and fees.
    B. Surety. The department reserves the right to inspect, or  have inspected, the street proposed for acceptance into the secondary system of  state highways at any stage of construction and prior to street acceptance. The  developer, contractor, and third-party inspector, if applicable, shall  cooperate with the assigned VDOT personnel to provide the access and information  necessary to verify that construction of the street is in accordance with the  street's approved design and appropriate standards and specifications. A  determination by the district administrator's designee that the required  cooperation has not been extended shall be grounds for VDOT to refuse to accept  the street for maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways. A  determination of noncooperation may be appealed as specified by this chapter  (see 24VAC30-92-110).
    1. Type of surety and expiration. The developer shall provide  surety to guarantee the satisfactory performance of the street. In the event  the developer fails to provide surety or any of the fees described in this  section within the 30-day period following the local governing body's request  for the department to accept the maintenance of a street, the department's or  other entity's previous final inspection of the street shall be considered void  and a new inspection shall be required. An acceptable surety may be in the form  of a performance bond, cash deposit, certified check, irrevocable letter of  credit, third-party escrow account, or other form mutually satisfactory to the  department and the developer. Under no circumstances shall the department or  any agency of the Commonwealth be named the escrow agent nor shall funds  deposited with the department as surety be subject to the payment of interest.
    a. Amount of surety. The surety shall be $3,000 for each tenth  of a lane mile, or portion thereof, to be accepted by the department for  maintenance as part of the secondary system of state highways. The Commonwealth  Transportation Board may adjust the surety on an annual basis based on  increases or decreases in the producer price index for highway and street  construction materials up to an amount not to exceed $5,000 for each tenth of a  lane mile or portion thereof. 
    The surety shall be waived for streets petitioned for  acceptance into the secondary system of state highways through the Rural  Addition Program pursuant to §§ 33.1-72.1 and 33.1-72.2 of the Code of  Virginia, and streets constructed or approved pursuant to §§ 33.1-221 and 33.1-223 of the Code of Virginia.
    b. Length of surety. The surety shall guarantee performance of  the street for one year from the date of its acceptance into the secondary  system of state highways.
    2. Alternatives to surety.
    a. In jurisdictions where the staff of the governing body  administers a comprehensive street construction inspection program that has  been approved by the department, the surety shall be waived upon certification  by the governing body that the proposed addition has been constructed in  accordance with approved plans and specifications.
    b. If requested by the developer and subject to availability  of departmental personnel or consultants, VDOT may perform the construction  inspection equivalent to that required for third-party inspection of any street  or streets proposed to be added to the secondary system of state highways. In  such cases, the developer shall bear all costs incurred by the department, the  surety shall be waived, and no street inspection fee pursuant to subsection D  of this section shall be charged.
    c. A third-party inspection process shall be acceptable to the  department if:
    (1) The developer or construction contractor arranges for a  firm not otherwise related to the developer or contractor to provide inspection  services for the construction of the streets in the development; 
    (2) Inspection and testing methodology and frequency are  accomplished in accordance with VDOT Materials Division's Manual of  Instructions, 2011 and the Virginia Department of Transportation Road  and Bridge Specifications (24VAC30-92-150), 2007, revised 2011;  and
    (3) A report is submitted to the department summarizing the  inspections steps taken, certifying the results of the inspection and testing  as accurate, and confirming that the street or streets were built to the  approved specifications and pavement design, signed and stamped by a  professional engineer licensed to practice as such in the Commonwealth. 
    C. Administrative cost recovery fee.
    1. Application of the administrative cost recovery fee. To  recover a portion of the department's direct costs associated with the review  of plans or plans of development, and the administrative processing of the  acceptance of new streets, an administrative cost recovery fee shall be  required from the developer at the time the streets are accepted by the  department. The amount of this cost recovery fee shall be computed at a base  rate of $500 per addition, without regard to street length, plus $250 per tenth  of a centerline mile, or portion thereof.
    2. Alternatives to the administrative cost recovery fee. As an  alternative to the administrative cost recovery fee, the department may use one  of the following approaches to recover its direct costs:
    a. For any development, at the developer's request, the  department may establish an account for the purpose of tracking these costs and  billing the developer not more often than every 30 days;
    b. For large, complex, multiuse developments, the department,  at its option, may establish an account for the purpose of tracking these costs  and billing the developer not more often than every 30 days. However, the cost  recovery fee assessed under this provision shall not be greater than two times  the prevailing administrative cost recovery fee structure; or
    c. If requested to provide plan review for streets that are  not intended for maintenance by the department, the department may establish an  account for the purpose of tracking these costs and billing the developer not  more often than every 30 days.
    D. Street inspection fee. To recover a portion of the  department's direct costs associated with the inspection of subdivision  streets, an inspection fee shall be required from the developer at the time the  streets are accepted by the department.
    The inspection fee shall be computed at a base rate of $250  per addition, without regard to street length, plus $125 per tenth of a  centerline mile, or portion thereof.
    The street inspection fee shall be reduced by 75% if either a  third-party inspection process pursuant to subdivision B 2 c of this section or  a local street inspection certification process pursuant to subdivision B 2 a  of this section was used.
    If requested to provide inspection services for subdivision  streets that are not intended for maintenance by the department, the department  may establish an account for the purpose of tracking these costs and billing  the developer not more often than every 30 days.
    24VAC30-92-150. Documents incorporated by reference. (Repealed.)
    Information pertaining to the availability and cost of any  of these publications should be directed to the address indicated below the  specific document. Requests for documents available from the department may be  obtained from the department at 1401 E. Broad St., Richmond, Virginia 23219;  however, department documents may be available over the Internet at  www.virginiadot.org.
    The department shall post all nonregulatory documents  incorporated into this regulation by reference and under its control on its  website. Official regulatory text is maintained by the Virginia Registrar of  Regulations in the Virginia Administrative Code. After the effective date of  any changes to such incorporated documents under the control of the department,  the department shall post the changes for a period of at least 60 days on its  website. Any changes to regulations appearing in this list shall be made in  accordance with the Administrative Process Act (§ 2.2-4000 et seq. of the Code  of Virginia), the Virginia Register Act (§ 2.2-4100 et seq. of the Code of  Virginia), or both.
    A. Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials,  24VAC30-72.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    B. Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials,  Collectors, and Local Streets, 24VAC30-73.
    VDOT
  1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    C. Drainage Manual, 2002.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    D. Guidance Document for the Commonwealth Transportation  Board's Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements, 2009.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    E. Highway Capacity Manual, 2000.
    Transportation Research Board
    500 Fifth Street, NW
    Washington, DC 20001
    F. Land Use Permit  Regulations, 24VAC30-151.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    G. Materials Division Manual of Instructions, 2006.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    H. Pavement Design Guide for Subdivision and Secondary  Roads in Virginia, 2000.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    I. Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian  Accommodations, 2004. (Note: This policy reference is included in the  regulation only for informational purposes and is not considered a regulatory  provision. Applicable elements of this policy are stated in the regulation  itself.)
    Commonwealth Transportation Board 
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    J. Road and Bridge Specifications, 2007, revised 2008.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    K. Road and Bridge Standards, 2008.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    L. Road Design Manual, 2008.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    M. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulation, 24VAC30-155.
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    N. VDOT Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater  Management Program Standards and Specifications, 2004. 
    VDOT
    1401 E. Broad St.
    Richmond, VA 23219
    O. Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Regulations,  4VAC50-30. 
    Virginia Department of Conservation  and Recreation
    Division of Soil and Water  Conservation 
    203 Governor Street, Suite 302
    Richmond, VA 23219-2094 
    P. Virginia Stormwater  Management Program (VSMP) Permit Regulations (4VAC50-60). 
    Virginia Department of Conservation  and Recreation
    Division of Soil and Water  Conservation
    203 Governor Street, Suite 302
    Richmond, VA 23219-2094 
    DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-92)
    Information pertaining to the availability and cost of any  of these publications should be directed to the address indicated for the  specific document. Requests for documents of the Virginia Department of  Transportation (VDOT) may be obtained from the department at 1401 E. Broad St.,  Richmond, Virginia 23219; however, department documents may be available over  the Internet at www.virginiadot.org.
    VDOT Drainage Manual, 2002. 
    VDOT Guidance Document for the Commonwealth Transportation  Board's Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements, 2011.
    Highway  Capacity Manual, 2010, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street, NW,  Washington, DC 20001.
    VDOT  Materials Division Manual of Instructions, 2011.
    VDOT  Pavement Design Guide for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia, 2009.
    VDOT  Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations, 2004.
    VDOT Road and Bridge Specifications, 2007, revised 2011.
    VDOT  Road and Bridge Standards, 2008, revised 2011.
    VDOT  Road Design Manual, 2011.
    VDOT  Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater Management Program Standards and  Specifications, 2010.
    VDOT  MS4 Program Plan, 2008, Location and Design Division.
    VDOT  MS4 Stormwater Outfall Inventory Manual, 2011, Maintenance Division.
    Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook, First Edition,  1999, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Soil and  Water Conservation, Stormwater Management, 203 Governor Street, Suite 206,  Richmond, VA 23219-2094.
    24VAC30-155-10. Definitions.
    The following words and terms when used in this chapter shall  have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
    "Connectivity index" means the number of street  segments divided by the number of intersections. Only street segments and  intersections within a network addition as well as any street segment or  intersection outside of the network addition that is connected to street  segments within the network addition or that has been connected or will be  connected pursuant to 24VAC30-92-60 C 7 to the network addition through the  extension of an existing stub out shall be used to calculate a network  addition's connectivity index.
    "Floor area ratio" means the ratio of the total floor  area of a building or buildings on a parcel to the size of the parcel where the  building or buildings are located.
    "Intersection" means, only for the purposes of  calculating connectivity index, a juncture of three or more street segments or  the terminus of a street segment such as a cul-de-sac or other dead end. The  terminus of a stub out shall not constitute an intersection for the purposes of  this chapter. The juncture of a street with only a stub out, and the juncture  of a street with only a connection to the end of an existing stub out, shall  not constitute an intersection for the purposes of this chapter, unless such  stub out is the only facility providing service to one or more lots within the  development.
    "Local traffic impact statement" means a traffic  impact statement accepted or prepared by a locality pursuant to its land  development approval process and whose requirements regarding content are set  out in the locality's ordinances or published policies if such ordinances or  policies have been reviewed and certified by VDOT as requiring acceptable  standards of preparation and providing sufficient information to determine the  current and future impacts of development proposals.
    "Locality" means any local government, pursuant to  § 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia, that must prepare and recommend a  comprehensive plan for the physical development of the territory within its  jurisdiction.
    "Network addition" means a group of interconnected  street segments and intersections shown in a plan of development that is  connected to the state highway system and meets the requirements of the  Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (24VAC30-92).
    "Pedestrian facility coverage" means the ratio of:  (length of pedestrian facilities, such as sidewalks, foot paths, and multiuse  trails, along both sides of a roadway) divided by (length of roadway multiplied  by two).
    "Receipt" means the date on which a proposal or  request for a meeting is first in the possession of VDOT or a locality or an  agent thereof, as applicable.
    "Redevelopment site" means any existing use that  generates traffic and is intended to be developed as a different or more  dense denser land use.
    "Service level" means a measure of the quality,  level or comfort of a service calculated using methodologies approved by VDOT.
    "Small area plan" means a plan of development for  multiple contiguous properties that guides land use, zoning, transportation,  urban design, open space, and capital improvements at a high level of detail  within an urban development area or for a transit-oriented development that is  at least 1/2 square mile in size unless otherwise approved by VDOT due to  proximity to existing moderate to high density developments. A small area plan  shall include the following: (i) densities of at least four residential units  per acre and at least a floor area ratio of 0.4 or some proportional  combination thereof; (ii) mixed-use neighborhoods, including mixed housing  types and integration of residential, office, and retail development; (iii)  reduction of front and side yard building setbacks; and (iv)  pedestrian-friendly road design and connectivity of road and pedestrian  networks.
    "State-controlled highway" means a highway in  Virginia that is part of the interstate, primary, or secondary systems of state  highways and that is maintained by the state under the direction and  supervision of the Commissioner of Highways. Highways for which localities  receive maintenance payments pursuant to §§ 33.1-23.5:1 and 33.1-41.1 of  the Code of Virginia and highways maintained by VDOT in accordance with §§ 33.1-31, 33.1-32, 33.1-33, and 33.1-68 of the Code of Virginia are not considered  state-controlled highways for the purposes of determining whether a specific  land development proposal package must be submitted to meet the requirements of  this regulation.
    "Street segment" means (i) a section of roadway  or alley that is between two intersections or (ii) a stub out or connection to  the end of an existing stub out.
    "Stub out" means a transportation facility (i)  whose right-of-way terminates at a parcel abutting the development, (ii) that  consists of a short segment that is intended to serve current and future  development by providing continuity and connectivity of the public street  network, (iii) that based on the spacing between the stub out and other streets  or stub outs, and the current terrain there is a reasonable expectation that  connection with a future street is possible, and (iv) that is constructed to  the property line.
    "Traffic impact statement" means the document showing  how a proposed development will relate to existing and future transportation  facilities prepared in accordance with best professional practice and  standards that assesses the impact of a proposed development on the  transportation system and recommends improvements to lessen or negate those  impacts.
    "Transit-oriented development" means an area of  commercial and residential development at moderate to high densities within 1/2  mile of a station for heavy rail, light rail, commuter rail, or bus rapid  transit transportation and includes the following: (i) densities of at least  four residential units per acre and at least a floor area ratio of 0.4 or some  proportional combination thereof; (ii) mixed-use neighborhoods, including mixed  housing types and integration of residential, office, and retail development;  (iii) reduction of front and side yard building setbacks; and (iv)  pedestrian-friendly road design and connectivity of road and pedestrian  networks.
    "Transportation demand management" means a  combination of measures that reduce vehicle trip generation and improve  transportation system efficiency by altering demand, including but not limited  to the following: expanded transit service, employer-provided transit benefits,  bicycle and pedestrian investments, ridesharing, staggered work hours,  telecommuting, and parking management including parking pricing.
    "Urban development area" means an area designated  on a local comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of  Virginia that includes the following: (i) densities of at least four  residential units per acre and at least a floor area ratio of 0.4 or some  proportional combination thereof; (ii) mixed-use neighborhoods, including mixed  housing types and integration of residential, office, and retail development;  (iii) reduction of front and side yard building setbacks; and (iv)  pedestrian-friendly road design and connectivity of road and pedestrian  networks.
    "VDOT" means the Virginia Department of  Transportation, the Commissioner of Highways, or a designee.
    "VDOT traffic impact statement" means a traffic  impact statement prepared pursuant to 24VAC30-155-60.
    24VAC30-155-20. Authority.
    Section 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia requires  localities to submit comprehensive plans and amendments to comprehensive plans  that will substantially affect transportation on state-controlled highways to  VDOT in order for the agency to review and provide comments on the impact of  the item submitted. This section also requires localities to submit traffic  impact statements along with proposed rezonings, site plans, subdivision  plats, and subdivision development plans that will substantially affect  transportation on state-controlled highways to VDOT for comment by the agency.  Chapter 527 of the 2006 Acts of Assembly directs VDOT to promulgate regulations  for the implementation of these requirements. 
    24VAC30-155-30. Comprehensive plan and comprehensive plan  amendment.
    A. Plan and amendment submittal. Prior to adoption of any  comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia, any  part of a comprehensive plan pursuant to § 15.2-2228 of the Code of  Virginia, or any amendment to any comprehensive plan as described in  § 15.2-2229 of the Code of Virginia, including small area plans, if  required by this section of this chapter, the locality shall submit such plan  or amendment to VDOT for review and comment, such submission should take place  at least 100 days prior to anticipated final action by the locality. The  Virginia Department of Transportation shall, upon request, provide localities  with technical assistance in preparing the transportation plan of the  comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan or comprehensive plan amendment  package shall be submitted to VDOT, if it is reasonably anticipated to result  in substantially affect transportation on state controlled highways.  Substantially affect, for the purposes of comprehensive plans, includes  substantial changes or impacts to the existing transportation network. For the  purposes of this section, a substantial impact shall be defined as a change  that would allow the generation of 5,000 additional vehicle trips per day on  state-controlled highways compared to the existing comprehensive plan,  assuming the highest density of permissible use in accordance with the  Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook (see  24VAC30-155-100), 8th Edition, 2008 or, subject to the approval of  VDOT, the regional model as adopted by the local Metropolitan Planning  Organization, and substantial changes change shall include those  changes that materially alter future transportation infrastructure, travel  patterns, or the ability to improve future transportation facilities on  state-controlled highways.
    B. Required elements. The submission by the locality to VDOT  shall contain sufficient information so that VDOT may evaluate the system of  new and expanded transportation facilities, outlined in the transportation  plan, that are needed to support the current and planned development of the  territory covered by the plan. In order to conduct this evaluation, the package  submitted to VDOT shall contain the following items:
    1. For a comprehensive plan or a transportation plan, the  locality shall provide one paper and one electronic copy of the  following:
    a. A cover sheet, containing:
    (1) Contact information for the locality, and
    (2) Summary of major changes made to the comprehensive plan or  transportation plan;
    b. The proposed comprehensive plan or transportation plan, and  the following elements:
    (1) Inventory – an inventory (written or graphic) of the  existing transportation network, which shall include at a minimum all roadways  within the Federal Aid system.
    (2) Assumptions – planning assumptions shall be detailed,  since these assumptions directly influence the demand placed on the transportation  system. Population growth, employment growth, location of critical  infrastructure such as water and sewer facilities, among others, are examples  of planning assumptions that may be addressed. 
    (3) Needs assessment – written or graphic evaluation of the  transportation system's current and projected performance and conditions. The  needs assessment identifies specific deficiencies.
    (4) Recommendations – proposed improvements or additions to  the transportation infrastructure. Recommendations should be specific so that  the need, location and nature of the proposed improvements are clear and  understandable. Localities are encouraged to include pedestrian, bicycle,  transit, rail and other multimodal recommendations as they deem appropriate.  The transportation plan shall include a map showing road and transportation  improvements, taking into account the current and future needs of residents in  the locality while considering the current and future needs of the planning  district within which the locality is situated. Recommended improvements shall  include cost estimates as available from VDOT.
    2. For an amendment to a comprehensive plan or transportation  plan, the locality shall provide one paper and one electronic copy of  the following:
    a. A cover sheet, containing:
    (1) Contact information for the locality;
    (2) Summary of proposed amendment or amendments to the  comprehensive plan or transportation plan; and
    (3) Overview of reasoning and purpose for amendments.
    b. Application forms and documentation presented to or  prepared by the local jurisdiction,
    c. Associated maps or narratives that depict and detail the  amendment under consideration,
    d. Any changes to the planning assumptions associated with the  amendment, 
    e. Local assessment of the potential impacts the amendment may  have on the transportation system, and
    f. Those elements identified in subdivision 1 b of this  subsection that VDOT determines are needed in order to review and comment on  impacts to state-controlled highways.
    C. Small area plans for urban development areas and transit  oriented developments. A locality that develops a small area plan for all or a  portion of an urban development area or transit-oriented development and  corresponding amendments to their comprehensive plan, as described in § 15.2-2229  of the Code of Virginia, that will have a substantial impact effect  on the state transportation network pursuant to this section of the regulation,  may in lieu of submitting a comprehensive plan amendment package as required  under subsection B of this section submit a small area plan package.
    The small area plan package submitted by the locality to VDOT  shall contain sufficient information and data so that VDOT may determine the  location of the area impacted by the small area plan, its size, its impact on  state-controlled highways, and the methodology and assumptions used in the  analysis of the impact. Submittal of an incomplete small area plan package  shall be considered deficient in meeting the submission requirements of  § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and shall be returned to the  locality and the applicant, if applicable, identifying the deficiencies noted.  A small area plan package submitted to VDOT shall contain the following items:
    1. A cover sheet containing:
    a. Contact information for locality;
    b. Small area plan location, highways and transit facilities  adjacent to site, and parcel number or numbers;
    c. Proposal summary with development names, size, and proposed  zoning;
    2. A VDOT traffic impact statement prepared in  accordance with 24VAC30-155-60; and
    3. A plan of development for the area encompassed by the small  area plan.
    D. Review process. VDOT may pursuant to § 15.2-2222.1 of  the Code of Virginia request a meeting with the locality to discuss the plan or  amendment. The request must be made within 30 days of receipt of the proposal.  VDOT must provide written comments to the locality within 90 days of the  receipt of the plan or plan amendment or by such later deadline as may be  agreed to by the parties. VDOT will conduct its review and provide official  comments to the locality for inclusion in the official public record of the  locality. VDOT shall also make such comments available to the public. Nothing  in this section shall prohibit a locality from acting on a comprehensive plan  or plan amendment if VDOT's comments on the submission have not been received  within the timelines in this section.
    E. Concurrent consideration. For the purposes of this  regulation, when a related comprehensive plan or comprehensive plan amendment  and a rezoning proposal that cover the same geographical area are being  considered concurrently by a locality, only a rezoning package as required  under 24VAC30-155-40 shall be prepared and provided to VDOT for review.
    24VAC30-155-40. Rezoning.
    A. Proposal submittal. The locality shall submit a package to  VDOT within 10 business days of receipt of a complete application for a  rezoning proposal if the proposal substantially affects transportation on  state-controlled highways. All trip generation calculations used for the purposes  of determining if a proposal meets the criteria shall be based upon the rates  or equations published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip  Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100), 8th Edition, 2008, and shall  not be reduced through internal capture rates. For redevelopment sites, trips  currently generated by existing development that will be removed may be  deducted from the total site trips that are generated by the proposed land use.  However, no submission shall be required under this section if the rezoning  proposal consists of no changes in allowable land use. Furthermore, no  submission shall be required if the rezoning proposal results in lower maximum  daily trip generation and no increase in maximum trip generation for AM Peak  Hour of the adjacent street, PM Peak Hour of the adjacent street, and Weekend  Peak Hour when compared to the hourly trip generation of land uses allowed by  right under the current zoning, excepting governmental uses such as schools and  libraries.
    1. For the purposes of this section, a residential  rezoning proposal shall substantially affect transportation on state-controlled  highways if it meets or exceeds one or more of the following trip generation  criteria:
    a. 1. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT has  maintenance responsibility for the secondary highway system, if the proposal  generates more than 100 5,000 vehicle trips per peak hour of  the generator day at the site's connection to a state-controlled  highway. For a site that does not have an entrance onto a state-controlled  highway, the site's connection is assumed to be wherever the road network that  the site connects with attaches to a state-controlled highway. In cases where  the site has multiple entrances to highways, volumes on all entrances shall be  combined for the purposes of this determination; 
    b. 2. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT does  not have maintenance responsibility for the local highway system, if the  proposal generates more than 100 5,000 vehicle trips per peak  hour of the generator day and whose nearest property line is within  3,000 feet, measured along public roads or streets, of a connection to a  state-controlled highway; or
    c. 3. The proposal for residential rezoning  generates more than 200 400 daily vehicle trips on a  state-controlled highway and, once the site generated trips are distributed to  the receiving highway, the proposal's vehicle trips on a the  highway exceeds exceed the daily traffic volume such highway  presently carries. For the purposes of determining whether a proposal must be  submitted to VDOT, the traffic carried on the state-controlled highway shall be  assumed to be the most recently published amount measured in the last traffic  count conducted by VDOT or the locality on that highway. In cases where the  site has access to multiple highways, each receiving highway shall be evaluated  individually for the purposes of this determination.
    2. For the purposes of this section, all other rezoning  proposals shall substantially affect transportation on state-controlled  highways if they meet or exceed one or more of the following trip generation  criteria:
    a. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT has maintenance  responsibility for the secondary highway system, if the proposal generates more  than 250 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator or 2,500 vehicle trips  per day at the site's connection to a state-controlled highway. For a site that  does not have an entrance onto a state-controlled highway, the site's  connection is assumed to be wherever the road network that the site connects  with attaches to a state-controlled highway. In cases where the site has  multiple entrances to highways, volumes on all entrances shall be combined for  the purposes of this determination; or 
    b. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT does not have  maintenance responsibility for the local highway system, if the proposal  generates more than 250 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator or 2,500  vehicle trips per day and whose nearest property line is within 3,000 feet,  measured along public roads or streets, of a connection to a state-controlled  highway.
    B. Required proposal elements. The package submitted by the  locality to VDOT shall contain sufficient information and data so that VDOT may  determine the location of the rezoning, its size, its impact effect  on state-controlled highways, and methodology and assumptions used in the  analysis of the impact effect. Submittal of an incomplete package  shall be considered deficient in meeting the submission requirements of § 15.2-2222.1  of the Code of Virginia and shall be returned to the locality and the  applicant, if applicable, identifying the deficiencies noted. A package  submitted to VDOT shall contain consist of one paper copy and one  electronic copy and include the following items:
    1. A cover sheet containing:
    a. Contact information for locality and developer (or owner)  if applicable;
    b. Rezoning location, highways adjacent to site, and parcel  number or numbers;
    c. Proposal summary with development name, size, and proposed  zoning; and
    d. A statement regarding the proposal's compliance with the  comprehensive plan.
    2. A local traffic impact statement prepared in  accordance with 24VAC30-155-60 or, if the local requirements for traffic  statements contained in ordinances or policies have not been certified by VDOT,  a VDOT traffic impact statement. 
    3. A concept plan of the proposed development.
    C. Rezoning proposals associated with small area plans.
    1. A traffic impact statement prepared for a small area plan  pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C, or initiated for a small area plan at the request  of a locality prior to February 4, 2010, and that contains substantially the  same elements as those of a VDOT traffic impact statement, shall serve as  the traffic impact statement required pursuant to this section for any rezoning  proposals developed in furtherance of the adopted small area plan and related  comprehensive plan amendments provided the following:
    a. That the small area plan package is accompanied by a cover  letter that includes a statement that the assumptions made in the traffic impact  statement prepared for the small area plan remain generally valid.
    b. That the following are accurate:
    (1) The rezoning proposal is in substantial conformance with  the adopted small area plan. A deviation in density must be greater than 10% to  be considered no longer in substantial conformance with the adopted small area  plan.
    (2) The character and volume of the trip generation by the  proposed uses are similar to those proposed by the small area plan.
    (3) All other assumptions made in the traffic impact statement  prepared for the small area plan remain generally valid.
    2. In instances where the assumptions made in the traffic  impact statement prepared for the small area plan are no longer valid, the  traffic impact statement may be updated. If the traffic impact statement is  updated, it shall serve as the traffic impact statement required pursuant to  this section for any rezoning proposals developed in furtherance of the adopted  small area plan and related comprehensive plan amendments.
    D. Review process. After formal submission of a rezoning  proposal for review, VDOT may, pursuant to § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of  Virginia, request a meeting with the locality and rezoning applicant to discuss  potential modifications to the proposal to address any concerns or deficiencies.  The request must be made within 45 days of receipt by VDOT of the proposal.  VDOT must provide written comments to the locality and the rezoning  applicant within 45 days of VDOT's receipt of the proposal if no meeting is  scheduled or has been requested or within 120 days of the receipt of the  proposal otherwise. VDOT shall not reject or require resubmission if the  package has been prepared in accordance with best professional practice and  substantially documents the expected impacts of the proposal. If VDOT  determines that the package has not been prepared in accordance with best  professional practice or fails to substantially document the expected impacts  of the proposal, or if the submission is substantially incomplete, VDOT may  request of the applicant, in writing or at the above mentioned meeting,  modifications to address concerns. If the concerns are not adequately addressed  within 30 days of the transmission of such concerns, VDOT may require  resubmission. VDOT shall conduct its review and provide official comments  to the locality for inclusion in the official public record. VDOT shall also  make such comments available to the public. The department's comments on the  proposed rezoning shall be based upon the comprehensive plan, regulations and  guidelines of the department, engineering and design considerations, adopted  regional or statewide plans, and short and long term traffic impacts on and off  site. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a locality from acting on a  rezoning proposal if VDOT's comments on the submission have not been received  within the timelines in this section.
    24VAC30-155-50. Subdivision plat, site plan, plan of  development. (Repealed.)
    A. Proposal submittal. The locality shall submit a package  to VDOT within 10 business days of receipt of a complete development proposal  if the proposal substantially affects transportation on state-controlled  highways. All trip generation calculations used for the purposes of determining  if a proposal meets these requirements shall be based upon the rates or  equations published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip  Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100), and shall not be reduced through internal  capture rates. For redevelopment sites, trips currently generated by existing  development that will be removed may be deducted from the total site trips that  are generated by the proposed land use.
    1. For the purposes of this section, a residential  development proposal shall substantially affect transportation on  state-controlled highways if it meets or exceeds one or more of the following  trip generation criteria:
    a. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT has maintenance  responsibility for the secondary highway system, if the proposal generates more  than 100 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator at the site's connection  to a state-controlled highway. For a site that does not have an entrance onto a  state-controlled highway, the site's connection is assumed to be wherever the  road network that the site connects with attaches to a state-controlled  highway. In cases where the site has multiple entrances to highways, volumes on  all entrances shall be combined for the purposes of this determination; 
    b. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT does not have  maintenance responsibility for the local highway system, if the proposal  generates more than 100 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator and has an  entrance that is within 3,000 feet, measured along public roads or streets, of  a connection to a state-controlled highway; or
    c. The proposal generates more than 200 daily vehicle trips  on a state-controlled highway and, once the site-generated trips are  distributed to the receiving highway, the proposal's vehicle trips on such  highway exceeds the daily traffic volume the highway presently carries. For the  purposes of determining whether a proposal must be submitted to VDOT, the  traffic carried on the state-controlled highway shall be assumed to be the most  recently published amount measured in the last traffic count conducted by VDOT  or the locality on that highway. In cases where the site has access to multiple  highways, each receiving highway shall be evaluated individually for the  purposes of this determination.
    2. For the purposes of this section, all other development  proposals shall substantially affect transportation on state-controlled  highways if they meet or exceed one or more of the following trip generation  criteria:
    a. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT has maintenance  responsibility for the secondary highway system, if the proposal generates more  than 250 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator or 2,500 vehicle trips  per day at the site's connection to a state-controlled highway. For a site that  does not have an entrance onto a state-controlled highway, the site's  connection is assumed to be wherever the road network that the site connects  with attaches to a state-controlled highway. In cases where the site has  multiple entrances to highways, volumes on all entrances shall be combined for  the purposes of this determination; or 
    b. Within a jurisdiction in which VDOT does not have  maintenance responsibility for the local highway system, if the proposal  generates more than 250 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator or 2,500  vehicle trips per day and has an entrance that is within 3,000 feet, measured  along public roads or streets, of a connection to a state-controlled highway.
    B. Required proposal elements.
    1. The package submitted by the locality to VDOT shall  contain sufficient information and data so that VDOT may determine the location  of the development, its size, its impact on state-controlled highways, and  methodology and assumptions used in the analysis of the impact. Submittal of an  incomplete package shall be considered deficient in meeting the submission  requirements of § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and shall be returned to  the locality and the applicant, if applicable, identifying the deficiencies  noted. A package submitted to VDOT shall contain the following items.
    a. A cover sheet containing:
    (1) Contact information for locality and developer (or  owner);
    (2) Development location, highways connected to, and parcel  number or numbers; and
    (3) Proposal summary with development name and size in  acres.
    b. A supplemental traffic analysis, as defined in  24VAC30-155-50 C. 
    c. A concept plan of the proposed development.
    C. Supplemental traffic analysis. For the purposes of this  subsection, a supplemental traffic analysis will be defined as follows:
    1. In cases where a traffic impact statement has been  submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-30 C, that statement shall  serve as the supplemental traffic impact analysis for the purposes of this  section for any site plan, subdivision plat, or plan of development proposals  developed in furtherance of the adopted small area plan and related  comprehensive plan amendments provided the following:
    a. That such package is accompanied by a cover letter that  includes a statement that the assumptions made in the traffic impact statement  prepared for the small area plan remain generally valid and a copy of the  traffic impact statement is included in the submission.
    b. That the following are accurate:
    (1) The rezoning site plan is in substantial conformance  with the adopted small area plan. A deviation in density must be greater than  10% to be considered no longer in substantial conformance with the adopted  small area plan.
    (2) The character and volume of the trip generation by the  proposed uses are similar to those proposed by the small area plan.
    (3) All other assumptions made in the traffic impact  statement prepared for the small area plan remain generally valid.
    2. In cases where a rezoning traffic impact statement has  been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-40, if all assumptions  made in the traffic impact statement prepared for the rezoning remain valid and  if the submission of the subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development to  the locality occurs within two years of the locality's approval of the rezoning  proposal, the supplemental traffic analysis shall be a letter that provides  VDOT with the following information:
    a. A statement that the impacts analyzed in the  development's rezoning traffic impact statement have not materially changed nor  have the adverse impacts on state-controlled highways increased.
    b. The date of the VDOT letter providing the locality  comments on the rezoning.
    3. In cases where a rezoning traffic impact statement has  been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-40, if all assumptions  made in the traffic impact statement prepared for the rezoning have not  materially changed, the adverse impacts of the proposal on state-controlled  highways have not increased and if the submission of the subdivision plat, site  plan, or plan of development to the locality occurs more than two years of the  locality's approval of the rezoning, the supplemental traffic analysis shall be  a letter that provides VDOT with the following information:
    a. A statement that the impacts analyzed in the  development's rezoning traffic impact statement have not materially changed nor  have the adverse impacts on state-controlled highways increased;
    b. The date of the VDOT letter providing the locality  comments on the rezoning;
    c. Documentation supporting the statement that the  development's rezoning traffic impact statement is still valid; and
    d. A copy of the original traffic impact statement.
    After review of such letter, VDOT may require submission in  accordance with subdivision 5 of this subsection.
    4. In cases where the small area plan traffic impact  statement has not been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-30 or  the rezoning traffic impact statement has not been submitted to VDOT in  accordance with 24VAC30-155-40, the supplemental traffic analysis shall contain  the information required for rezoning traffic impact statements with 100 to 499  peak hour trips. If the subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development  will generate less than 100 peak hour trips then the lowest required elements  for the rezoning traffic impact statement shall be used.
    5. In cases where the small area plan traffic impact  statement has been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-30 and the  conditions analyzed have materially changed such that the adverse impacts of  the proposal on state-controlled highways have increased, the rezoning traffic  impact statement has been submitted to VDOT in accordance with 24VAC30-155-40  and the conditions analyzed in such traffic impact statement have materially  changed such that the adverse impacts of the proposal on state-controlled highways  have increased or if required pursuant to subdivision 3 of this subsection, the  supplemental traffic analysis shall contain those elements required for  rezoning traffic impact statements with 100 to 499 peak hour trips, as  determined by VDOT. If the subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development  will generate less than 100 peak hour trips then the lowest required elements  for the rezoning traffic impact statement shall be used.
    6. In cases where rezoning occurred after January 1, 2002,  but prior to the implementation of this regulation, VDOT, at its discretion,  may evaluate traffic impact statements or studies performed as part of the  rezoning action. If, in the opinion of VDOT staff with the concurrence of the  locality, the traffic impact analysis work that was performed encompasses the  major elements of work required by this regulation and the underlying  assumptions of the study remain valid the previously prepared study may be  deemed to meet the requirements of this regulation. VDOT staff may also, upon  request of the submitter, allow a previously prepared study to be updated to  incorporate additional areas of analysis or revisions to assumptions to enhance  the accuracy of the study and may deem such updated study to encompass the  major elements of work required by this regulation.
    D. Review process. After formal submission of a  subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development to VDOT for review, VDOT  may, pursuant to § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia, request a meeting  with the locality to discuss potential modifications to the proposal to address  any concerns or deficiencies. The request must be made within 30 days of  receipt by VDOT of the proposal. The submission of the proposal to VDOT shall  toll all times for local review set out in Chapter 22 (§ 15.2-2200 et  seq.) of Title 15.2 of the Code of Virginia until the locality has received  VDOT's final comments. VDOT must provide written comments to the locality  within 30 days of VDOT's receipt of the proposal if no meeting is scheduled or  within 90 days of the receipt of the proposal otherwise. VDOT will conduct its  review and provide official comments to the locality for inclusion in the  official public record. VDOT shall also make such comments available to the  public. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a locality from acting on a  subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development if VDOT's comments on the  submission have not been received within the timelines in this section.
    24VAC30-155-60. Traffic VDOT traffic impact  statement.
    A. A VDOT traffic impact statement (TIS) (VTIS)  assesses the impact of a proposed development on the transportation system and  recommends improvements to lessen or negate those impacts. It shall (i)  identify any traffic issues associated with access from the site to the  existing transportation network, (ii) outline solutions to potential problems,  (iii) address the sufficiency of the future transportation network, and (iv)  present improvements to be incorporated into the proposed development. 
    If a TIS VTIS is required, data collection  shall be by the locality, developer, or owner, as determined by the locality  and the locality shall prepare or have the developer or owner prepare the TIS  VTIS. If the locality prepares the TIS VTIS it shall  provide a copy of the complete TIS VTIS to the applicant when one  is provided to VDOT. The completed TIS VTIS shall be submitted to  VDOT.
    The data and analysis contained in the TIS VTIS  shall be organized and presented in a manner acceptable to VDOT and consistent  with this regulation. Submittal of an incomplete TIS or one prepared using  unapproved methodology or assumptions shall be considered deficient in meeting  the submission requirements of § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and shall  be returned to the locality and the applicant, if applicable, identifying the  deficiencies noted by VDOT.
    B. Scope of work meeting.
    1. For proposals that generate less than 1,000 vehicle trips  per peak hour of the generator representatives of the locality, the applicant,  or the locality and the applicant may request a scope of work meeting with VDOT  to discuss the required elements of a TIS VTIS for any project  and VDOT shall reply to such request within 30 days of its receipt of such a  request and provide a date that is no more than 60 days from such receipt,  time and location for such a scope of work meeting to both the locality and the  applicant, if applicable.
    2. For proposals that generate 1,000 or more vehicle trips per  peak hour of the generator representatives of the locality and applicant, if  applicable, shall hold a scope of work meeting with VDOT to discuss the  required elements of a TIS VTIS. Once a locality or applicant has  contacted VDOT regarding the scheduling of a scope of work meeting, VDOT shall  reply to both the locality and the applicant, if applicable, within 30 days  of such contact and provide a date that is no more than 60 days from  such contact, time and location for such a meeting.
    At a scope of work meeting pursuant to this section, the  locality, the applicant and VDOT shall review the elements, methodology and  assumptions to be used in the preparation of the TIS VTIS, and  identify any other related local requirements adopted pursuant to law. The  results of the initial scoping meeting may be adjusted in accordance with sound  professional judgment and the requirements of this regulation if agreed upon by  VDOT, the locality, and applicant, if applicable.
    C. Required elements. The required elements and scope of a TIS  VTIS are dependent upon the scale and potential impact of the specific  development proposal being addressed by the TIS VTIS as  determined by VDOT in its sole discretion. 
    1. At a minimum, the TIS VTIS shall include the  elements shown in the table below. The site generated peak hour trips in the  table below shall be based upon the gross vehicle trip generation of the site  less internal capture and shall take into account bicycle, pedestrian, and  transit mode split reductions, if applicable. When the type  of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike  or transit trips either on-site or off-site, the TIS VTIS  shall estimate multimodal trips. All distances in the table below shall be  measured along roads or streets.
         
                 | Item | Site Generated Peak Hour Trips | 
       | Less than 100
 | 100 to 499Less than 500
 | 500 to 999 | 1,000 or more | 
       | Background information |   |   |   |   | 
       | List of all nonexistent    transportation improvements assumed in the analysis | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Map    of site location, description of the parcel, general terrain features, and location    within the jurisdiction and region. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description of geographic    scope/ limits of study area.  | Within 1,000 ft of site
 | Within 2,000 feet of site and    any roadway on which 50 or more of the new peak hour vehicle trips generated    by the proposal are distributed – not to exceed one mile | Within 2,000 feet of site and    any roadway on which 10% or more of the new vehicle trips generated by the    proposal are distributed – not to exceed two miles | To be determined by VDOT in    consultation with the locality | 
       | Plan at an engineering scale    of the existing and proposed site uses. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description and map or diagram    of nearby uses, including parcel zoning. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description and map or diagram    of existing roadways. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description and map or diagram    of programmed improvements to roadways, intersections, and other    transportation facilities within the study area. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Analysis of Existing    Conditions |   |   |   |   | 
       | Collected daily and peak hour    of the generator traffic volumes, tabulated and presented on diagrams with    counts provided in an appendix.  | Only diagrams required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Analyses for intersections and    roadways identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated    and LOS is presented on diagrams for each lane group.  | Only diagrams required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | When the type of development    proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit    trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle    facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments, tabulated and    presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist  | At frontage, only diagrams    required
 | Within 2,000 feet of site | Within 2,000 feet of site | To be determined by VDOT in    consultation with the locality | 
       | Speed Study | If requested by VDOT
 | If requested by VDOT | If requested by VDOT | If requested by VDOT | 
       | Crash history near site | If requested by VDOT
 | If requested by VDOT |  If requested by VDOT | If requested by VDOT | 
       | Sight distance | If requested by VDOT
 | If requested by VDOT |  If requested by VDOT | If requested by VDOT | 
       | Analysis of Future Conditions    without Development |   |   |   |   | 
       | Description of and    justification for the method and assumptions used to forecast future traffic    volumes.  | Optional
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Analyses for intersections and    roadways as identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are    tabulated and LOS is presented on diagrams for each lane group. | Optional
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | When the type of development    proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit    trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle    facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and    presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned. | At frontage, only diagrams    required
 | Within 2,000 feet of site | Within 2,000 feet of site | To be determined by VDOT in    consultation with the locality at the scope of work meeting | 
       | Trip Generation |   |   |   |   | 
       | Site trip generation, with    tabulated data, broken out by analysis year for multi-phase developments, and    including justification for deviations from ITE rates, if appropriate. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description    and justification of internal capture reductions for mixed use developments    and pass-by trip reductions, if appropriate, including table of calculations    used. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Site Traffic Distribution and    Assignment |   |   |   |   | 
       | Description of methodology    used to distribute trips, with supporting data. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description of the direction    of approach for site generated traffic and diagrams showing the traffic    assignment to the road network serving the site for the appropriate time    periods. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Analysis of Future Conditions    With Development |   |   |   |   | 
       | Forecast daily and peak hour    of the generator traffic volumes on the highway network in the study area,    site entrances and internal roadways, tabulated and presented on diagrams. | Current traffic + site    generated traffic
 | Future background + site    generated traffic, at each expected phase and at build - out or six years    after start, whichever is later | Future background + site    generated traffic, at each expected phase, at build - out, and six years    after build - out, which may be extended or reduced by VDOT in consultation    with the locality | At a minimum the future    background + site generated traffic, at each expected phase, at build - out,    and six years after build - out; may be extended by VDOT in consultation with    the locality | 
       | Analyses for intersections and    roadways identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated    and LOS presented on diagrams for each lane group. | Only diagrams required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | When the type of development    proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit    trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle    facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and    presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned. | At frontage, only diagrams    required
 | Within 2,000 feet of site | Within 2,000 feet of site |  To be determined by VDOT    in consultation with the locality | 
       | Recommended Improvements |   |   |   |   | 
       | Description and diagram of the    location, nature, and extent of proposed improvements, with preliminary cost    estimates as available from VDOT. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | Description of methodology    used to calculate the effects of travel demand management (TDM) measures, if    proposed, with supporting data. | Required if TDM proposed
 | Required if TDM proposed | Required if TDM proposed | Required if TDM proposed | 
       | Analyses for all proposed and    modified intersections in the study area under the forecast and site traffic.    Delay, and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS presented on diagrams    for each lane group. For intersections expected to be signalized, MUTCD    Signal Warrant analysis or ITE Manual for Traffic Signal Design, as    determined by VDOT, presented in tabular form. | Only diagrams required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
       | When the type of development    proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit    trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle    facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and    presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned. | At frontage, only diagrams    required
 | Within 2,000 feet of site | Within 2,000 feet of site | To be determined by VDOT in    consultation with the locality | 
       | Conclusions |   |   |   |   | 
       | Clear, concise description of    the study findings. | Required
 | Required | Required | Required | 
  
         
          Notwithstanding the geographic scope noted above, the  geographic scope of the study noted above may be reduced or enlarged based upon  layout of the local transportation network, the geographical size of the  development, and the traffic volume on the existing network, as determined by  VDOT in consultation with the locality and the applicant, if applicable.  Typically, analysis will be conducted for any roadway on which the additional  trips generated by the proposal have a materially detrimental impact on traffic  conditions. The analysis presented in the TIS VTIS need not  include all roadway and roadway segments located within the geographic scope of  the study as determined by VDOT.
    2. A TIS VTIS for a development proposal that  only meets the low volume road submission criterion (24VAC30-155-40 A 1 c  and 24VAC30-155-50 A 1 c) (24VAC30-155-40 A 3) shall, at a minimum,  consist of the following elements, unless otherwise directed by VDOT.
    a. All elements contained in the Background Information  portion of the above table, except the geographic scope/limits of study area is  limited to the highway fronting the proposed development and the closest  intersection, in each direction if applicable, of that highway with a highway  that has an average daily traffic volume higher than the fronting highway.
    b. A roadway safety inventory study of the roadway segment or  segments between the site entrance to the nearest intersections with the higher  traffic volume highways, to include such elements as, but not limited to, speed  limit, existing warning signs, pavement and shoulder type, pavement and  shoulder width, intersection sight distances, and safe horizontal curve speeds.
    c. Daily and peak hour traffic volumes presented on diagrams,  with counts provided in an appendix, for the fronting highway at the site, at  the highway's intersections with the higher volume highway, and for the higher  volume highways at their intersection with the fronting highway.
    d. All relevant elements contained in the Trip Generation  portion of the above table.
    e. Projected daily and peak hour of the generator traffic  volumes assuming build-out of the proposal, presented on diagrams for the  receiving highway at the site, at the highway's intersection with the higher  volume highways, and for the higher volume highways at their intersections with  the receiving highway.
    f. Delay and level of service analysis for the intersections  of the receiving highway with the higher volume highways.
    g. A comparison of the existing geometrics of the fronting  highway under proposed build-out traffic conditions with the geometric  standards, based upon functional classification and volume, contained in the  Road Design Manual (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2011 (VDOT).
    3. A VTIS for a rezoning proposal may be prepared in  accordance with the "Less than 500 Site Generated Peak Hour Trips" category  in the table in this section, regardless of actual projected trip generation,  provided that:
    a. The rezoning proposal is in conformance with a  locality’s adopted comprehensive plan that was reviewed in accordance with  24VAC30-155-30; and
    b. The review of the comprehensive plan included the  submission to VDOT of a technical evaluation of the traffic impacts for  anticipated development based on the future land use policies and map.
    D. Methodology and standard assumptions. A TIS VTIS  shall be prepared based upon methodology and assumptions noted below or as may  be agreed upon by VDOT based upon the results of a scope of work meeting held  by VDOT pursuant to this section.
    1. Data collection. Preparers shall collect traffic data in  accordance with the identified study area. The count data shall include at a  minimum, weekday 24-hour counts, and directional turning movement counts  during AM and PM peak times of the day. The 24-hour counts shall include  vehicle classification counts. With approval of VDOT, data collected by the  transportation professional preparer within the last 24 months may be used,  likewise for data from the VDOT count program. 
    The preparer shall monitor traffic operations during data  collection to ensure extraneous events such as vehicle crashes or special event  traffic do not affect integrity of count data. Preparers collecting data for  utilization in traffic impact studies shall normally avoid data collection  during the following instances:
    a. Holidays or times of the year when the traffic patterns are  deemed to be unrepresentative of typical conditions, unless required by VDOT or  the locality, or both.
    b. Summer months if school or schools in proximity.
    c. Fridays and weekends unless required by VDOT or the  locality, or both.
    d. Other times of the year contingent upon existing adjacent  land use activities.
    e. During times of inclement weather.
    2. Trip generation. Estimates of trip generation by a proposed  development shall be prepared using the Institute of Transportation Engineers  Trip Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100), 8th Edition, 2008, unless  VDOT agrees to allow the use of alternate trip generation rates based upon  alternate published guides or local trip generation studies. VDOT shall at all  times after July 1, 2011, have at least one non-ITE trip generation methodology  or alternative rate approved for the use in preparation of small area plan  traffic impact statements pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C that recognizes the  benefits of reduced vehicle trip generation and vehicle miles traveled from  developments that meet the criteria for a small area plan pursuant to this  regulation. Such alternate methodology or rate can be modified based upon  local factors if agreed to at a scoping meeting. Rezoning proposals shall  assume the highest vehicle trip generating use allowable under the proposed  zoning classification. In determining which trip generation process (equation  or rate) may be used, the preparer shall follow the guidance presented in the  Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Proposed  Recommended Practice (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2004, which is  summarized here, except rates may be utilized if the criteria for the use of  regression equations are not met. Regression equations to calculate trips  as a result of development shall be utilized, provided the following is true:
    a. Independent variable falls within range of data; and
    b. Either the data plot has at least 20 points; or
    c. R2 is greater than 0.75, equation falls  within data cluster in plot and standard deviation greater than 110% of  weighted average rate.
    If the above criteria are not met, then the preparer can use  average trip rates, provided at least one of though if the  following applies do not apply a rate based upon the study of similar  local sites should be considered:
    d. At least three data points exist;
    e. Standard deviation less than 110% of weighted average rate;  and
    f. R2 less than 0.75 or no regression equation  provided; or
    g. f. Weighted average rate falls within data  cluster in plot.
    3. Internal capture and pass-by trips.
    a. Internal capture rates consider site trips  "captured" within a mixed use development, recognizing that trips  from one land use can access another land use within a site development  without having to access the adjacent street system. Mixed use developments  include a combination of residential and nonresidential uses or a combination  of nonresidential uses only. Internal capture allows reduction of site trips  from adjacent intersections and roadways. For traffic impact statements  prepared for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C the internal capture  rate or rates may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved  by VDOT. Unless For ITE-based methodologies, unless otherwise  approved by VDOT, the following internal capture rates should be used if  appropriate:
    (1) Residential with a mix of nonresidential components - use  the smaller of 15% of residential or 15% nonresidential trips generated.
    (2) Residential with office use - use the smaller of 5.0% of  residential or 5.0% of office trips generated.
    (3) Residential with retail use - for AM peak hour, use the  smaller of 5.0% residential or 5.0% retail trips generated; for PM peak hour,  use the smaller of 10% residential or 10% retail trips generated; for 24-hour  traffic, use the smaller of 15% residential or 15% retail trips generated.
    (4) Hotel/motel with office use - use 15% of hotel/motel  trips, unless the overall volume of the office traffic is more than the overall  volume of hotel/motel traffic use in which case use the smaller of 10% of the  hotel/motel traffic or the office traffic.
    (5) Multiuse development with more than five million square  feet of office and retail - internal capture rate should be determined in  consultation with and approval of VDOT. 
    (6) Office with retail use – use the smaller of 5.0% office  or retail trips generated.
    (7) Some combination of the above, if approved by VDOT.
    b. Pass-by trip reductions consider site trips drawn from the  existing traffic stream on an adjacent street, recognizing that trips drawn to  a site would otherwise already traverse the adjacent street regardless of  existence of the site. Pass-by trip reductions allow a percentage reduction in  the forecast of trips otherwise added to the adjacent street from the proposed  development. The reduction applies only to volumes on adjacent streets, not to  ingress or egress volumes at entrances serving the proposed site. Unless  otherwise approved by VDOT, the following pass-by trip reductions may be  used: (1) Shopping center - 25% of trips generated may be considered pass-by.  (2) Convenience stores, service stations, fast food restaurants, and similar  land uses - 40% of trip generated may be considered pass-by.(3) pass-by  rates utilized shall be those reported in Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition  – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004. For traffic impact statements prepared  for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C, the pass-by trip reductions  may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved by VDOT.
    4. Trip distribution. In the absence of more detailed  information, trip distribution shall be in accordance with logical regional  travel patterns as suggested by existing highway directional split and  intersection movements or population and destination site distribution and shall  recognize the effects of increased street connectivity if such streets meet the  requirements of the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (see  24VAC30-155-100) (24VAC30-92). If more detailed information is  available from trip origin/destination studies, marketing studies, or regional  planning models, this may be used to distribute trips upon approval of VDOT.
    5. Planning horizon. In general, the analysis years shall be  related to (i) the opening date of the proposed development, (ii) build-out of  major phases of a multiyear development, (iii) long-range transportation plans,  and (iv) other significant transportation network changes. The preparer should  establish the planning horizon in consultation with and subject to the  acceptance of VDOT.
    6. Background traffic growth. Unless directed by VDOT,  geometric growth (or compound growth), based upon historical growth rates,  shall generally be used for determining future background traffic levels where  extensive traffic-count history is available and capacity constraint is not  appropriate. This growth rate replicates "natural growth" and is  typical for projecting urban growth. Natural growth of traffic can be  adjusted consistent with traffic forecasts associated with previously submitted  local land development projects within the study area.
    7. Future conditions. For the purpose of the TIS VTIS,  future conditions shall include background traffic and additional vehicle trips  anticipated to be generated by approved but not yet constructed or improved  projects.
    8. Level of service calculation. Level of service (LOS)  analysis for highways shall utilize the techniques described in the Highway  Capacity Manual (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2010 (TRB). Neither the  intersection capacity utilization method nor the percentile delay method may be  used in the traffic impact calculations of delay and level of service.  Preparers shall consult with VDOT on which traffic analysis software package is  to be used to conduct the LOS calculations. The results shall be tabulated and  displayed graphically, with levels of service provided for each lane group for  each peak period. All data used in the calculations must be provided along with  the results of the capacity analysis. Any assumptions made that deviate from  the programmed defaults must be documented and an explanation provided as to  why there was a deviation. Electronic files used for the analysis shall be  provided to VDOT as a digital submission (e.g..hcs,.sy6,.inp,.trf files), along  with the printed report. If intersections analyzed are in close proximity to  each other so that queuing may be a factor, VDOT may require the inclusion of  an analysis with a micro simulation model. Unless actual on-ground conditions  dictate otherwise, preparers should use the following defaults when utilizing  the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) or other approved programs when evaluating  roadway components:
    a. Terrain – choose the appropriate terrain type. Most of the  state will be level or rolling, but some areas may qualify for consideration as  mountainous.
    b. Twelve-foot wide lanes.
    c. No parking or bus activity unless field conditions include  such parking or bus activity or unless the locality has provided VDOT with a  written statement of intent for the services to be provided.
    d. Peak hour factor by approach – calculate from collected  traffic counts (requires at least a peak hour count in 15-minute increments). However,  the use of peak hour factors lower than 0.85 shall only be allowed if based  upon the average of more than three peak hour counts. For future conditions  analysis, unless specific site conditions can be expected to create extreme  peak hour factors, default peak hour factors between 0.92 and 1.00 should be  used.
    e. Heavy vehicle factor – calculate from collected traffic  (classification) counts or obtain from VDOT count publications. For future  conditions analysis with development traffic, the existing heavy vehicle factor  should be adjusted based upon the nature of the traffic being generated by the  development.
    f. Area type – noncenter of business district.
    The TIS VTIS shall identify any existing or  proposed bicycle and pedestrian accommodation that would be affected by the  proposal. For the purposes of this subsection, a bicycle accommodation is  defined as on-street bike lanes, paved shoulders of roadways that are not part  of the designated traveled way for vehicles, or exclusive and shared off-street  bicycle paths. 
    For the purposes of this subsection, a pedestrian  accommodation is defined as sidewalks, intersection treatments and exclusive or  shared off-street trails or paths. If significant potential for bicycle or  pedestrian trips exists, the TIS VTIS shall include current and  future service level analyses at build-out for existing or proposed bicycle and  pedestrian accommodations. When the proposal requires or includes improvements  or modifications to the roadway, bicycle or pedestrian accommodations, the TIS  VTIS shall analyze the impacts of such improvements and modifications on  bicycle and pedestrian accommodations and service levels, and provide  recommendations for mitigation of adverse impacts.
    The TIS VTIS shall provide analysis for all bus  service with routes that have, or will have a station or stop within 2,000 feet  of the proposal. The TIS VTIS shall evaluate and discuss  potential for increased demand for bus use due to the proposal, addressing  whether such increases will result in longer dwell time at stops or increase  the need for buses on a route. The quality of service analysis for bus service  shall be determined in accordance with the Transit Capacity and Quality of  Service Manual (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2nd Edition, 2003 (TRB).  The TIS VTIS shall provide both route and segment quality of  service. The TIS VTIS may consider the benefits of dedicated bus  lanes for more frequent and rapid service. The TIS VTIS shall  provide recommendations for mitigation of adverse impacts where adverse impacts  are expected to the quality of service to bus service. If an analysis of  pedestrian quality or level of service is required for calculation of the bus  quality of service, the preparer shall use a methodology approved by VDOT.
    9. Trip reduction, and pedestrian and bicycle accommodations.  When a proposal meets the criteria listed below, the preparer of the TIS  VTIS may reduce the number of vehicle trips generated by the proposal in  the TIS VTIS analysis in accordance with this subsection.  Notwithstanding the percentages below, the total number of reductions used by a  preparer in accordance with this subsection shall never not  exceed 500 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator unless otherwise  approved by VDOT. The trip reductions for traffic impact statements prepared  for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C may be based on the non-ITE  trip generation methodology approved by VDOT and are not subject to limitations  or requirements of this subdivision.
    a. Pedestrian accommodations. For the purposes of this  subsection, a pedestrian accommodation is defined as a sidewalk, pedestrian  path, or multiuse trail. Where a pedestrian service level of A exists, vehicle  trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by 4.0% for those portions  of the development within a 2,000-foot radius of the connections between the  proposed development and the adjoining network. Where a pedestrian service level  of B exists, vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by  3.0%; where a pedestrian service level of C exists, vehicle trips per peak hour  of the generator may be reduced by 1.5% for the portion of the development  noted above. These reductions may only be taken if:
    (1) Pedestrian facility coverage in a 2,000-foot radius of the  connections to the proposed development is on or along at least 80% of the road  network; 
    (2) The connectivity index within the 2,000-foot radius is  equal to or higher than 1.4 pedestrian facilities inside and outside the  development provide reasonably direct access to traffic generators; and
    (3) There are at least two of the 10 major land use  classifications, as defined in ITE Trip Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100),  8th Edition, 2008, within the 2,000-foot radius.
    b. Bicycle accommodations. For the purposes of this  subsection, a bicycle accommodation is defined as a street with a design speed  of 25 MPH or less that carries 400 vehicles per day or less, on-street bike  lanes, a pedestrian accommodation, paved shoulders of roadways that are not  part of the designated traveled way for vehicles and are at least two feet  wide, or exclusive and shared off-street bicycle paths. Where a bicycle service  level of A exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by 3.0%. Where a  bicycle service level of B exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by  2.0%. Where a bicycle service level of C exists, vehicle trips per day may be  reduced by 1.0%. These reductions may only be taken if:
    (1) Bicycle accommodations within a 2,000-foot radius of the  connections to the proposed development exist on or along at least 80% of the  road network; 
    (2) The connectivity index within the 2,000-foot radius is  equal to or higher than 1.4 bicycle accommodations inside and outside  the development provide reasonably direct access to traffic generators; and
    (3) There are at least two of the 10 major land use  classifications as defined in ITE Trip Generation (see 24VAC30-155-100),  8th Edition, 2008, within the 2,000-foot radius. 
    10. Modal split and trip reduction. All vehicle trip  reductions used in the TIS VTIS pursuant to this subsection are  subject to the approval of VDOT.
    a. If a proposal is located within 1/2 mile along roadways,  pedestrian or bicycle accommodations of a transit station, excluding bus stops  and stations, reasonable vehicle trip reductions of vehicle trips generated by  the proposal may be made with approval of VDOT. The preparer shall submit  documentation to justify any such vehicle trip reductions used with the TIS  VTIS. When a proposal is located more than 1/2 mile but less than two  miles from a transit stop, excluding bus stops and stations, with bicycle  parking accommodations transit additional bicycle modal split vehicle  trip reductions may be utilized. The analysis of capacity of the parking  accommodations shall be included in the TIS VTIS when such trip  reductions are used.
    b. If a proposal is located within 1/4 mile along roadways,  pedestrian or bicycle accommodations of a bus stop or station where the segment  and route service levels are C or higher, reasonable vehicle trip reductions of  vehicle trips generated by the proposal may be made with the approval of VDOT.  The preparer shall submit documentation to justify any such vehicle trip  reductions used with the TIS VTIS.
    c. Transit and bus modal split data from similar developments  within the geographic scope of the TIS VTIS or one mile of the  proposal, whichever is greater, shall be collected if the TIS VTIS  vehicle trip reductions are used pursuant to this subsection and similar  developments exist within the geographic scope of the TIS VTIS or  one mile of the proposal, whichever is greater.
    11. Signal warrant analysis. Traffic signal warrant analysis  shall be performed in accordance with the procedures set out in the Manual on  Uniform Traffic Control Devices (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2003, revised  2007, or ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design, 1998, as determined by  VDOT.
    12. Recommended improvements. Recommendations made in the TIS  VTIS for improvements to transportation facilities shall be in  accordance with the geometric standards contained within the Road Design Manual  (see 24VAC30-155-100), 2011 (VDOT).
    24VAC30-155-70. Departmental analysis.
    After concluding its review of a proposed comprehensive plan  or transportation plan or plan amendment, or rezoning, or site or  subdivision plan, VDOT shall provide the locality and applicant, if  applicable, with a written report detailing its analysis and when appropriate  recommending transportation improvements to mitigate any potential adverse  impacts on state-controlled highways. VDOT shall provide recommendations for  facilitating other modes of transportation including but not limited to  transit, bus, bicycle and pedestrian facilities or accommodations where such  facilities or accommodations are planned or exist, or where such facilities  have a significant potential for use. In addition, VDOT shall provide the  locality and the applicant, if applicable, with preliminary recommendations  regarding compliance with other VDOT regulations such as the Secondary Street  Acceptance Requirements (see 24VAC30-155-100) (24VAC30-92), the  Access Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (see 24VAC30-155-100)  (24VAC30-72), and the Access Management Regulations: Minor Arterials,  Collectors, and Local Streets (see 24VAC30-155-100) (24VAC30-73).
    24VAC30-155-80. Fees.
    A. Locality initiated proposals. No fee shall be charged for  review of any comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan amendment, or  rezoning proposal, subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development  initiated by a locality or other public agency.
    B. Proposals containing a traffic impact statement as  described in subdivision C 1 of 24VAC30-155-40. No fee shall be charged for the  review of a rezoning submission that properly includes a traffic impact  statement submitted under subdivision C 1 of 24VAC30-155-40.
    C. Proposals containing supplemental traffic analysis as  described in subdivisions C 1, 2, and 5 of 24VAC30-155-50. No fee shall be  charged for the review of a subdivision plat, site plan, or plan of development  submission that properly includes a supplemental traffic analysis submitted  under subdivisions C 1, 2, and 5 of 24VAC30-155-50.
    D. C. All other proposals. Any package  submitted to a locality by an applicant that will be subject to VDOT review  pursuant to this chapter shall include any required payment in a form payable  directly to VDOT.
    1. For initial or second review of all comprehensive plans,  comprehensive plan amendments, and transportation plans submitted to VDOT for  review, not initiated on behalf of the locality, there shall be a fee of $1,000  charged to the applicant. This fee shall be paid upon submission of a plan to  VDOT for review. 
    2. For initial or second review of rezoning proposals,  subdivision plats, site plans, or plans of development accompanied by a  traffic impact statement or supplemental traffic analysis, not initiated  on behalf of the locality, there shall be a single fee for both reviews  determined by the number of adjusted vehicle trips generated per peak hour, as  follows:
           | LowSubmission made due to 24VAC30-155-40 A 3 (low    volume road criteriononly) -
 | $250 | 
       | Less than 100 vehicles per peak hour - 
 | $500
 | 
       | 100 or more vehicles per peak hourAll other    submissions -
 | $1,000 | 
  
    The fee shall be paid upon submission of a package to VDOT for  review. 
    3. For a third or subsequent submission pursuant to  subdivisions 1 or 2 of this subsection, that is requested by VDOT on the basis  of the failure of the applicant to address deficiencies previously identified  by VDOT, the applicant shall be required to pay an additional fee as though the  third or subsequent submission were an initial submission and requiring the  fees identified above. An applicant or locality may appeal to the district  administrator a determination by VDOT that a submitted package failed to  address deficiencies previously identified by VDOT.
    24VAC30-155-100. Listing of documents incorporated by  reference. (Repealed.)
    Requests for information pertaining to the availability  and cost of any of these publications should be directed to the address  indicated below the specific document. Requests for documents available from  VDOT may be obtained from VDOT's division and representative indicated;  however, VDOT documents may be available over the Internet at  www.vdot.virginia.gov.
    1. Trip Generation (effective November 2003) 
           |   | Institute of Transportation    Engineers
 1099 14th Street NW
 Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    2. Trip Generation Handbook – an ITE Proposed Recommended  Practice (effective 2004)
           |   | Institute of Transportation    Engineers
 1099 14th Street NW
 Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    3. Road Design Manual (effective January 1, 2005) 
           |   | VDOT
 1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    4. Highway Capacity Manual (effective 2000)
           |   | Transportation Research Board
 500 Fifth Street NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    5. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (effective  December 22, 2003)
           |   | Federal Highway Administration
 Superintendent of Documents
 U.S. Government Printing Office
 P.O. Box 371954
 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250
 | 
  
    6. ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design (effective 1998)
           |   | Institute of Transportation    Engineers
 1099 14th Street NW
 Suite 300 West
 Washington, DC 20005
 | 
  
    7. Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition  (effective 2003)
           |   | Transportation Research Board of    the National Academies
 Keck Center of the National    Academies
 Transportation Research Board
 500 Fifth Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20001
 | 
  
    8. Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (24VAC30-92)
           |   | Commonwealth Transportation Board
 1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    9. Access Management: Principal Arterials (24VAC30-72)
           |   | VDOT
 1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    10. Access Management: Minor  Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets (24VAC30-73)
           |   | VDOT
 1401 E. Broad Street
 Richmond, Virginia 23219
 | 
  
    DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-155)
    Requests for information pertaining to the availability  and cost of any of these publications should be directed to the address  indicated for the specific document. Requests for documents available from VDOT  may be obtained from VDOT's division and representative indicated; however,  VDOT documents may be available over the Internet at www.vdot.virginia.gov.
    Highway  Capacity Manual, 2010, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street NW,  Washington, DC 20001.
    ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design (effective 1998),  Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600,  Washington, DC 20006.
    Manual  on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, effective 2003,  revised 2007, Federal Highway Administration, Superintendent of Documents, U.S.  Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250.
    Road  Design Manual, 2011, VDOT, 1401 E. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
    Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd  Edition, 2003; Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Keck  Center of the National Academies, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth  Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001.
    Trip  Generation, 8th Ed., 2008, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye  Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006.
    Trip  Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004,  Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600,  Washington, DC 20006.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R12-2999; Filed November 29, 2011, 10:45 a.m.