REGULATIONS
Vol. 39 Iss. 5 - October 24, 2022

TITLE 22. SOCIAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Chapter 160
Fast-Track

TITLE 22. SOCIAL SERVICES

STATE BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES

Fast-Track Regulation

Title of Regulation: 22VAC40-160. Fee Requirements for Processing Applications (amending 22VAC40-160-10).

Statutory Authority: §§ 63.2-217, 63.2-1732, 63.2-1733, and 63.2-1734 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: November 23, 2022.

Effective Date: December 8, 2022.

Agency Contact: Sherri Williams, Department of Social Services, 801 East Main Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 726-7132, or email sherri.williams@dss.virginia.gov.

Basis: Sections 63.2-217 and 63.2-1734 of the Code of Virginia mandates promulgation of regulations for the activities, services, and facilities to be employed by persons and agencies required to be licensed that shall be designed to ensure that such activities, services, and facilities are conducive to the welfare of adults and children.

Purpose: This regulatory change is needed to allow licensed programs the option to pay fees for processing applications for licenses using an online payment system. This action is necessary to allow online payments to be processed in a convenient manner.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This regulatory action is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because there will be no additional regulatory requirements. This action is intended to expand the method of payments to make it more convenient for licensed providers and department staff.

Substance: This amendment will allow application fees for licenses to be submitted manually by check or using an online payment system.

Issues: The primary advantage of this action is to expand the method of payment options to allow online payments for licensure fees. This regulatory change poses no disadvantages to the public, the agency, the Commonwealth, or other pertinent matters of interest to the regulated community or government officials.

The Department of Planning and Budget's Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia (Code) and Executive Order 14 (as amended, July 16, 2018). The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of these economic impacts.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. The State Board of Social Services (Board) proposes to amend the acceptable payment methods used by facilities or agencies to pay license application processing fees. The Department of Social Services (DSS) is developing an online system that will allow the fees for processing applications for licenses to be paid electronically. The proposed amendment would add online payments and remove money orders as an acceptable payment method.

Background. The regulation is derived from § 63.2-1700 of the Code of Virginia, which allows the Board to "adopt regulations and schedules for fees to be charged for processing applications for licenses to operate assisted living facilities, adult day care centers, and child welfare agencies."2 The regulation currently allows these facilities to make payments to DSS via personal check, money order, or certified check. The Board proposes to remove money orders as an acceptable payment method and add "the online process determined by the Department." DSS expects that allowing facilities to use online payments would make it more convenient for them to pay the annual license application fees. All payments would be made through a third-party payment processor who does not accept money orders; thus, money orders would be removed as an allowable payment method. Lastly, the text would be amended to replace "personal checks" and "certified checks" with simply "checks" to reflect current practice, since DSS no longer distinguishes between personal and certified checks.

Estimated Benefits and Costs. The online option is primarily intended to benefit facilities by offering a convenient and secure payment option for annual license application fees. Providers choosing to use the DSS online payment process will be assessed an additional 2.3% transaction processing fee if they choose to use a debit or credit card. This fee will be directly paid to the third-party payment processor. In addition, DSS will pay the payment processor $10 per month for each "Merchant Identification" (merchant IDs) used. DSS currently has 10 merchant IDs, which allow for different types of payments and program cost codes. If the provider pays by e-check there is an 18-cent fee per transaction. DSS expects to absorb these costs. Thus, the third-party payment processor would also benefit from the fees they collect. The full amount of the transaction processing fees paid by facilities and DSS to the payment processor will depend on the number of facilities that elect to use this option.

DSS will continue to accept payments made by check and will not charge a transaction processing fee for paper or electronic check payments. DSS does not anticipate that removing money orders as an allowable payment method would create any costs for facilities, since money orders are typically more expensive than checks. DSS does not track the payment type for licensing fees, so the number of facilities that regularly use money orders is unknown. Lastly, the proposed changes are not expected to impact recordkeeping costs for facilities or DSS.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. DSS reports that there are currently 816 licensed programs that are all required to pay license application fees every year. These programs would be affected to the extent that they choose to use the online payment process; they would not be affected if they continue to pay license application fees using a check. Five of these licensed programs are operated by localities, while the other 811 licensed programs are privately operated. No facilities appear to be disproportionately affected.

The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.3 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net revenue for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined. As noted above, the proposed amendments are intended to provide greater convenience by offering an online payment process as an option. Only entities choosing to use the online payment option would face the additional 2.3% transaction processing fee. Although some facilities that have chosen to use money orders in the past would no longer be allowed to do so, the use of checks is reported to be less expensive and the number of money orders is not known, therefore any potential impact is unclear. Accordingly, an adverse impact is not indicated.

Small Businesses4 Affected.5 In accordance with the above analysis, the proposed amendments do not appear to adversely affect small businesses.

Types and Estimated Number of Small Businesses Affected. DSS reports that the 811 privately-run licensed facilities that would be affected by the proposed changes are all small businesses.

Costs and Other Effects. The proposed amendments would not appear to create new costs for small businesses unless they choose to use the online payment process to pay license application fees.

Alternative Method that Minimizes Adverse Impact. There are no clear alternative methods that both reduce adverse impact and meet the intended policy goals.

Localities6 Affected.7 DSS reports there are five locality-operated licensed programs. Four are Assisted Living Facilities (ALF), each operated by a different community services board (CSB) and one ALF is operated by a Health Center Commission under local government. The breakdown of the affected localities is listed below.

Region Ten CSB

New River Valley CSB

Mt. Rogers CSB

Western Tidewater CSB

Health Center Commission

Charlottesville City

Floyd

Bland

Franklin County

Chesterfield

Albemarle

Giles

Carroll

Suffolk

Fluvanna

Montgomery

Grayson

Isle of Wight

Greene

Pulaski

Smyth County

Southampton

Louisa

Radford City

Wythe

Nelson

Galax City

However, localities would only be affected if they choose to use the online payment process to pay license application fees. Consequently, an adverse economic impact8 is not indicated for localities.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposed amendments would not be expected to affect total employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposed amendments would not affect the value of private facilities that operate children's welfare or adult services programs. The proposed amendments do not affect real estate development costs.

_____________________________________

1Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2Although these fees are referred to as application fees, the regulation notes that the fees are collected annually over the length of the applicable licensure period (one, two, or three years).

3Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

4Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

5If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, Code § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to Code § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

6"Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

7Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

8Adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net revenue for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.

Agency's Response to Economic Impact Analysis: The Department of Social Services reviewed the economic impact analysis prepared by the Department of Planning and Budget and has no comments.

Summary:

The amendment changes how fees may be paid for processing applications by allowing licensed programs to pay fees by submitting a check or using an online payment system as determined by the department.

22VAC40-160-10. Fees.

By act of the General Assembly and effective February 1, 1984, the Department of Social Services is authorized to charge fees for processing applications for licenses (§ 63.2-1700 of the Code of Virginia).

Such fees are to be used for the development and delivery of training for operators and staff of facilities or agencies for adults or children subject to licensure solely by the Department of Social Services.

Each license and renewal of it may be issued for a period of up to three successive years. The required fee for each licensed facility or agency will be based upon its licensed capacity and the length of the total licensure period. However, the fee will be collected annually and licensees will be billed each year by the Department of Social Services for the appropriate portion of the fee. (Example: A facility with a capacity of 55 participants is issued a license for a period of 24 months. The fee for that facility for the two-year period would be $210. The facility will be charged $105 at the beginning of the licensure period and billed again for $105 at the beginning of the second year of licensure.) No fee will be charged directly following the issuance of a conditional license.

Applicants shall use the following schedule of fees to determine the correct fee to pay for processing all applications.

Schedule of Fees

Capacity

1 year

2 years

3 years

1–12

$14

$28

$42

13–25

$35

$70

$105

26–50

$70

$140

$210

51–75

$105

$210

$315

76–200

$140

$280

$420

201 & up

$200

$400

$600

Flat Fees

Child Placing Agencies

$70

$140

$210

The fee shall be paid by personal check, money order, or certified check, made payable to "Treasurer of Virginia" or through the online process determined by the department.

A fee that is incorrect in amount or is made payable other than to the Treasurer of Virginia will be returned to the applicant. Otherwise, no fee will be returned or refunded for any reason.

Failure to submit the appropriate fee within the timeframe specified by the Department of Social Services may result in negative action against a facility's or agency's license.

A fee will be charged for checks that must be returned to the applicant because of insufficient funds.

VA.R. Doc. No. R23-7049; Filed September 28, 2022