TITLE 13. HOUSING
TITLE 13. HOUSING
VIRGINIA MANUFACTURED HOUSING BOARD
Fast-Track Regulation
Title of Regulation: 13VAC6-11. Public Participation Guidelines (amending 13VAC6-11-50).
Statutory Authority: §§ 2.2-4007.02 and 36-85.18 of the Code of Virginia.
Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.
Public Comment Deadline: November 20, 2024.
Effective Date: December 5, 2024.
Agency Contact: Jeff Brown, Director, State Building Codes Office, Department of Housing and Community Development, Main Street Centre, 600 East Main Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 371-7161, FAX (804) 371-7092, or email jeff.brown@dhcd.virginia.gov.
Basis: The Virginia Manufactured Housing Board (board) has authority to promulgate regulations through § 36-85.36 of the Code of Virginia and amends 13VAC6-11 pursuant to § 2.2-4007.02 of the Code of Virginia, which requires an agency, pursuant to its public participation guidelines, to afford interested persons an opportunity to be accompanied by and represented by counsel or other representatives when submitting data, views, or arguments on a regulatory action promulgated by the board.
Purpose: This regulatory change is essential to protect the health, safety, and welfare of citizens by requiring the board to provide an opportunity for the public to be represented by counsel or other representatives when submitting data, views, or arguments on a regulatory action promulgated by the board.
Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This action conforms 13VAC6-11, Public Participation Guidelines, to Chapter 795 of the 2012 Acts of Assembly, which amended § 2.2-4007.02 B of the Code of Virginia on public participation guidelines. This action is not expected to be controversial because it is mandated by statute.
Substance: The amendment provides that interested persons may be accompanied by and represented by counsel or other representatives when submitting data, views, or arguments on a regulatory action promulgated by the board.
Issues: The primary advantage of this regulatory action for the public and the agency is that it provides the public with the opportunity to be represented by counsel or other representatives when submitting data, views, or arguments on a regulatory action promulgated by the board. There are no disadvantages to the public, the agency, or the Commonwealth.
Department of Planning and Budget's Economic Impact Analysis:
The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1
Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. Pursuant to Chapter 795 of the 2012 Acts of the Assembly,2 the Manufactured Housing Board (board) proposes to specify in this regulation that interested persons shall be afforded an opportunity to be accompanied by and represented by counsel or other representative when submitting data, views, and arguments, either orally or in writing, to the agency.
Background. Chapter 795 of the 2012 Acts of the Assembly added § 2.2-4007.02 of the Code of Virginia, Public participation guidelines, which states that interested persons also be afforded an opportunity to be accompanied by and represented by counsel or other representative. The current Public Participation Guidelines state that: "In considering any nonemergency, nonexempt regulatory action, the agency shall afford interested persons an opportunity to submit data, views, and arguments, either orally or in writing, to the agency." Due to the legislation, the Board proposes to append "and (ii) be accompanied by and represented by counsel or other representative."
Estimated Benefits and Costs. Since the Code of Virginia already specifies that interested persons shall be afforded an opportunity to be accompanied by and represented by counsel or other representative, the board's proposal to add this language to the regulation will not change the law in effect, but would be beneficial in that it would inform interested parties who read this regulation but not the statute of their legal rights concerning representation.
Businesses and Other Entities Affected. The proposed amendment could affect persons who read the regulation, but not the statute, in that they would be better informed on legal rights concerning representation. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.3 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.4 The proposal neither increases costs nor reduces benefit for any entity. Thus, no adverse impact is indicated.
Small Businesses5 Affected.6 The proposed amendment does not adversely affect small businesses.
Localities7 Affected.8 The proposed amendment neither disproportionately affects any particular localities, nor introduces costs for local governments.
Projected Impact on Employment. The proposed amendment does not substantively affect employment.
Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposed amendment does not affect the use and value of private property or real estate development costs.
_____________________________
1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.
2 See http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?121+ful+CHAP0795+hil.
3 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.
4 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.
5 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."
6 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.
7 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.
8 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.
Agency's Response to Economic Impact Analysis: The Manufactured Housing Board concurs with the analysis and findings in the economic impact analysis prepared by the Department of Planning and Budget.
Summary:
Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.02 of the Code of Virginia, the amendment provides that interested persons submitting data, views, and arguments on a regulatory action may be accompanied by and represented by counsel or another representative.
13VAC6-11-50. Public comment.
A. In considering any nonemergency, nonexempt regulatory action, the agency shall afford interested persons an opportunity to (i) submit data, views, and arguments, either orally or in writing, to the agency and (ii) be accompanied by and represented by counsel or other representative. Such opportunity to comment shall include an online public comment forum on the Town Hall.
1. To any requesting person, the agency shall provide copies of the statement of basis, purpose, substance, and issues; the economic impact analysis of the proposed or fast-track regulatory action; and the agency's response to public comments received.
2. The agency may begin crafting a regulatory action prior to or during any opportunities it provides to the public to submit comments.
B. The agency shall accept public comments in writing after the publication of a regulatory action in the Virginia Register as follows:
1. For a minimum of 30 calendar days following the publication of the notice of intended regulatory action (NOIRA).
2. For a minimum of 60 calendar days following the publication of a proposed regulation.
3. For a minimum of 30 calendar days following the publication of a reproposed regulation.
4. For a minimum of 30 calendar days following the publication of a final adopted regulation.
5. For a minimum of 30 calendar days following the publication of a fast-track regulation.
6. For a minimum of 21 calendar days following the publication of a notice of periodic review.
7. Not later than 21 calendar days following the publication of a petition for rulemaking.
C. The agency may determine if any of the comment periods listed in subsection B of this section shall be extended.
D. If the Governor finds that one or more changes with substantial impact have been made to a proposed regulation, he the Governor may require the agency to provide an additional 30 calendar days to solicit additional public comment on the changes in accordance with § 2.2-4013 C of the Code of Virginia.
E. The agency shall send a draft of the agency's summary description of public comment to all public commenters on the proposed regulation at least five days before final adoption of the regulation pursuant to § 2.2-4012 E of the Code of Virginia.
VA.R. Doc. No. R25-7680; Filed September 24, 2024