TITLE 18. PROFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING
Title of Regulation: 18VAC110-30. Regulations for
Practitioners of the Healing Arts to Sell Controlled Substances (amending 18VAC110-30-15, 18VAC110-30-20,
18VAC110-30-30, 18VAC110-30-50 through 18VAC110-30-90; adding 18VAC110-30-21).
Statutory Authority: §§ 54.1-2400, 54.1-3304.1, and
54.1-3307 of the Code of Virginia.
Public Hearing Information:
December 12, 2016 - 9:05 a.m. - Department of Health
Professions, Perimeter Center, 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 201, Board Room 2,
Richmond, VA 23233
Public Comment Deadline: December 16, 2016.
Agency Contact: Caroline Juran, RPh, Executive Director,
Board of Pharmacy, 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 300, Richmond, VA 23233-1463,
telephone (804) 527-4416, FAX (804) 527-4472, or email
caroline.juran@dhp.virginia.gov.
Basis: Section 54.1-2400 of the Code of Virginia
authorizes health regulatory boards to promulgate regulations in accordance
with the Administrative Process Act.
The specific authority to issue permits and regulate facilities
in which practitioners of the healing arts dispense controlled substances is
found in § 54.1-3304.1 of the Code of Virginia, which authorizes the Board of
Pharmacy to license and regulate the dispensing of controlled substances by
practitioners of the healing arts.
Purpose: The Board of Pharmacy licenses individual
physicians to sell controlled substances to their own patients and already has
regulations for security, recordkeeping, storage and other requirements
relating to the facility from which physicians licensed to sell drugs dispense.
Oversight of physicians selling drugs was relatively simple when there were
approximately 100 licensees, but the total is now over 600 and continues to
increase. The increase is due to an increasingly larger supply of drugs on the
market repackaged specifically for physicians to sell, an increase in the
number of urgent care centers that dispense drugs when treating patients, and
an increase in drugs available to treat popular dermatological issues.
The practice of physicians selling drugs is analogous to
pharmacies dispensing drugs. In regulating the practice of pharmacy, the board
licenses both pharmacists and pharmacies. This level of oversight for both the
individuals and the facility works well, and this proposal seeks to mirror this
level of oversight for physicians selling drugs. Additionally, during
inspections of facilities where multiple licensed physicians sell drugs, it is
reasonable to hold the facility responsible for any possible violations and not
an individual physician. This proposed process is also analogous to the
inspection process currently used for pharmacies.
Failure to promulgate regulations would perpetuate the Board of
Pharmacy's difficulty in overseeing a growing number of physicians who are now
licensed to dispense drugs and limit the board's ability for whom it may take
disciplinary action when violations are noted during routine inspections. With
a facility permit, which is similar to a pharmacy permit, the board can hold
the permit holder responsible and accountable for the stock of drugs. Clearer
regulation and accountability will foster public protection in assuring the
safety and integrity of prescription drugs.
Substance: Regulations set fees for approval of
applications, renewal of permits, and reinstatement of lapsed permits. Requirements
for inspections, physical standards for the facility, and notification to the
board now fall to the facility permit rather than the individual licensee. For
an individual license, the fee is reduced from $240 to $180, since the facility
permit fee will now help cover the cost of inspections. For a facility permit,
the application fee is $240, which is similar to a pharmacy application and is
intended to help cover the cost of an initial inspection.
The only change in physical requirements is specificity about
the availability of hot and cold water, which must be within 20 feet of the
selling and storage area and not located within an examination room or
restroom.
Issues: The primary advantage to the public is more
accountability and consistency in the maintenance and security of controlled
substances in physician practices that are selling drugs to their patients. The
primary advantage to the agency is a single entity to hold accountable when
there are complaints or inspection violations rather than trying to assign
responsibility to a physician within a multi-practitioner group. Also,
promulgation of regulations for the issuance of permits to facilities is a
statutory mandate. There are no disadvantages.
Department of Planning and Budget's Economic Impact
Analysis:
Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. As mandated
by Chapter 117 of the 2015 Acts of the Assembly, the Board of Pharmacy (Board)
proposes to promulgate a replacement regulation for an emergency regulation
that will expire on June 6, 2017. The emergency and replacement regulations: 1)
rearrange portions of the regulation so that classes of fees are grouped
together, 2) clarify that required sinks with hot and cold running water must
be within 20 feet of the selling and storage area of the facility and may not
be in a bathroom or examination room, 3) lower fees for initial individual
licensure for doctors of medicine, osteopathic medicine or podiatry1
to sell control substances, and 4) institute permit fees for most facilities2
where practitioners of the healing arts sell controlled substances.
Result of Analysis. For most proposed changes, benefits likely
outweigh costs. For one change, there is insufficient information to ascertain
whether benefits outweigh costs for all affected entities.
Estimated Economic Impact. Many of the Board's proposed
regulatory changes, including rearranging regulatory sections and expanding
language outlining the requirement for a sink in the immediate vicinity of a
facility's controlled substance selling and storage area, do not change current
rules or practice. For instance, the Board already requires a sink within 20
feet of the selling and storage area and does not allow that sink to be in a
bathroom3 or an examination room.4 For these changes, no
entities are likely to incur any costs. Interested parties, however, will
likely benefit from the additional clarity these changes bring to the
regulation.
Before the emergency changes to this regulation became
effective, individual practitioners of the healing arts paid $240 to be
initially licensed to sell controlled substances and $90 each year to renew
that license. Additionally, individuals who missed their renewal date but
renewed their license within a year of its expiration date paid a $30 late
renewal fee in addition to their regular renewal fee. Individuals who missed
their renewal date by more than a year had to pay a $210 reinstatement fee in
addition to their renewal fee. Because part of these individual fees were meant
to cover inspection of the facility from which individuals would be selling
controlled substances, and because the Board instituted facility permit fees
that would cover the cost of those inspections instead, the Board proposes to
lower half of the individual fees.
Under this proposed regulation, individual licensees will pay
$180 for initial licensure to sell controlled substances, $90 to renew their
licenses each year, $30 for late renewal and $150 for reinstatement after a
license has lapsed for more than a year. Licensees will benefit from these fee
reductions as they will either lower individual costs for licensure absolutely
and will partially or completely offset new facility permit fees for individual
practitioners who are in partnership private practices where partners are responsible
for splitting business expenses.
The Board also proposes to institute new fees for facility
permits. The fee for an initial permit is $240 and annual renewal of that
permit is also $240 so long as the permit is renewed in a timely manner. If
business owners renew the their facility permit after the renewal date but
within one year, they will have to pay an additional $40; the reinstatement fee
for renewing a facility permit more than a year after it lapsed is $240
additional to the on time renewal fee.
Both Chapter 117, and this regulation, exempt sole proprietor
practitioners from paying permit fees although they still have to obtain a
permit and will have to pay to be individually licensed. Because of this
exemption, no sole proprietor practitioner is likely to incur any additional
fees, either upon initial licensure/permitting or when they renew their
licenses or permits, on account of this proposed change.
Partnership practices with two or three partners5
will incur net extra costs of $1206 and $607 respectively
to be initially licensed/permitted when comparing higher individual licensure
fees paid before the emergency stage of this regulation to lower individual
fees plus the newly required facility permit paid under this proposed
regulation. Partnership practices with four partner practitioners are at a
point of indifference because combined fees to be initially licensed/permitted
would be the same $960 under the old regulation and under this proposed
regulation.
All partnerships with more than four partners and where the
business is actually owned by the partners will see cost savings on account of
lower combined initial fees under the proposed regulation. Board staff reports
that many practices are owned by corporations or hospitals; for those
practices, all individual practitioners will see lower initial licensure costs
and the corporation or hospital practice owner will incur the additional
facility permit fee.
All licensed practitioners except for sole practitioners, or
the businesses that they work for, will incur additional fee costs upon renewal
of their facility permits because individual renewal fees remain the same but
permit fees need to additionally be paid. There is insufficient information to
ascertain whether the benefits of requiring facility permits will outweigh the
higher costs that some individuals or businesses will accrue.
Businesses and Entities Affected. Board staff reports that
there are approximately 200 facilities which are permitted to sell controlled
substances in the state and that the Board licenses 624 practitioners of the
healing arts to sell controlled substances. All of these licensees, all future
licensees and all businesses that need facility permits are affected by this
proposed regulation.
Localities Particularly Affected. No locality will be
particularly affected by these proposed regulatory changes.
Projected Impact on Employment. These proposed regulatory
changes are unlikely to affect employment in the Commonwealth.
Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The facility
permit fees in this regulation will raise total fees costs very marginally for
some businesses in the Commonwealth. To the extent that those small costs are
not passed on to patients in the form of slightly higher cost of care, those
businesses will see a very marginal decrease in value.
Real Estate Development Costs. These proposed regulatory
changes are unlikely to affect real estate development costs in the
Commonwealth.
Small Businesses:
Definition. Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia,
small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates,
that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500
full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."
Costs and Other Effects. Small business partnerships will
likely incur additional costs on account of the new facility permit fee in this
proposed regulation.
Alternative Method that Minimizes Adverse Impact. There are no
alternatives that would both lower costs and meet the legislative mandate for
facility permits.
Adverse Impacts:
Businesses. Physician practices will likely incur additional
costs on account of the new facility permit fee in this proposed regulation.
Localities. Localities in the Commonwealth are unlikely to see
any adverse impacts on account of these proposed regulatory changes.
Other Entities. No other entities are likely to be adversely
affected by these proposed changes.
____________________________________
1 These entities are practitioners of the healing arts
for the purposes of this regulation.
2 By statute and this regulation, sole practitioners who
sell controlled substances must pay individual licensure fees but are exempt
from having to pay facility permit fees (although they will have to pay
licensure fees).
3 Board staff reports that sinks in bathrooms are not
sanitary enough for mixing medications.
4 Board staff reports that this is not allowed because
doctors may need to access the sink when the examination room is occupied by a
patient.
5 This math is assuming partnerships where the
individual partners own the business and will split business expenses.
6 For a partnership with two doctors licensed to sell
controlled substances, the doctors paid a $480 combined to be initially licensed
($240 for each doctor's individual license x 2) under pre-emergency
regulation and now pay $600 under the proposed regulation to be initially
licensed ($180 for each doctor's individual license plus $240 for the facility
license).
7 For partnerships with three doctors licensed to sell
control substances, the doctors paid $720 combined to be initially licensed
($240 for each doctor's individual license x 3) under pre-emergency regulation
and now pay $780 under the proposed regulation to be initially licensed ($180
for each doctor's individual license plus $240 for the facility license).
Agency's Response to Economic Impact Analysis: In
general, the Board of Pharmacy concurs with the analysis of the Department of
Planning and Budget on proposed amended regulations for 18VAC110-30,
Regulations for Practitioners of the Healing Arts to Sell Controlled
Substances.
The cost/benefit analysis fails to take into account the
financial benefit that accrues to a facility in which practitioners are selling
controlled substances to their patients. The increase in $120 and $60 per year
for partnerships of two or three practitioners is an insignificant cost for a
business that may resemble a small pharmacy in the number of drugs being stored
and sold to patients.
The agency also disagrees with the adverse impact notification
to the General Assembly. The board has acted in compliance with the second
enactment clause of Chapter 117 of the 2015 Acts of the Assembly, which
required the board to promulgate regulations to implement the requirement of
law that practitioners of the healing arts must dispense controlled substances
in permitted facilities. As a nongeneral fund agency, the board establishes a
fee schedule intended to cover the cost of administering a regulatory program.
Any adverse impact of such regulation was a mandate of the General Assembly and
the Code of Virginia, so there should be no need for notification.
Summary:
The Board of Pharmacy is proposing amendments to its
regulations to implement the requirements of Chapter 117 of the 2015 Acts of
Assembly that practitioners of the healing arts must dispense controlled
substances in permitted facilities. The proposed amendments (i) institute
permit fees for most facilities where practitioners of the healing arts sell controlled
substances; (ii) lower fees for initial individual licensure for doctors of
medicine, osteopathic medicine, or podiatry to sell controlled substances;
(iii) place requirements for inspections, physical standards for the facility,
and notification to the board with the permitted facility rather than the
individual licensee; and (iv) clarify that required sinks with hot and cold
water must be available within 20 feet of the selling and storage area of the
facility and may not be located within an examination room or restroom.
18VAC110-30-15. Fees.
A. Unless otherwise provided, fees listed in this section
shall not be refundable.
B. Fee for initial license for a practitioner of the
healing arts to sell controlled substances Initial application fees.
1. The application fee for initial licensure shall be $240
License for practitioner of the healing arts to sell controlled substances:
$180.
2. The application fee for reinstatement of a license that
has been revoked or suspended indefinitely shall be $500 Permit for
facility in which practitioners of the healing arts sell controlled substances:
$240.
C. Renewal of license for a practitioner of the healing
arts to sell controlled substances Annual renewal fees.
1. The annual fee for renewal of an active license shall be
$90. For the annual renewal due on December 31, 2009, the fee shall be $50 License
for practitioner of the healing arts to sell controlled substances: $90.
2. The late fee for renewal of a license within one year
after the expiration date is $30 in addition to the annual renewal fee Permit
for facility in which practitioners of the healing arts sell controlled
substances: $240.
3. The fee for reinstatement of a license expired for more
than one year shall be $210.
D. Late fees. The following late fees shall be paid in
addition to the current renewal fee to renew an expired license within one year
of the expiration date.
1. License for practitioner of the healing arts to sell
controlled substances: $30.
2. Permit for facility in which practitioners of the
healing arts sell controlled substances: $40.
E. Reinstatement fees. Any person or entity attempting to
renew a license or permit more than one year after the expiration date shall
submit an application for reinstatement with any required fees.
1. License for practitioner of the healing arts to sell
controlled substances: $150.
2. Permit for facility in which practitioners of the
healing arts sell controlled substances: $240.
3. Application fee for reinstatement of a license or permit
that has been revoked or suspended indefinitely: $500.
F. Facilities in which only one practitioner of the
healing arts is licensed by the board to sell controlled substances shall be
exempt from fees associated with obtaining and renewing a facility permit.
D. G. The fee for reinspection of any facility
shall be $150.
E. H. The fee for a returned check shall be
$35.
Part II
Licensure Requirements
18VAC110-30-20. Application for licensure.
A. Prior to engaging in the sale of controlled substances, a
practitioner shall make application on a form provided by the board and be
issued a license. After June 7, 2016, the practitioner shall engage in such
sale from a location that has been issued a facility permit.
B. In order to be eligible for a license to sell controlled
substances, a practitioner shall possess a current, active license to practice
medicine, osteopathic medicine, or podiatry issued by the Virginia Board of
Medicine. Any disciplinary action taken by the Board of Medicine against the
practitioner's license to practice shall constitute grounds for the board to
deny, restrict, or place terms on the license to sell.
C. For good cause shown, the board may issue a limited-use
license, when the scope, degree or type of services provided to the patient is
of a limited nature. The license to be issued shall be based on conditions of
use requested by the applicant or imposed by the board in cases where certain
requirements of regulations may be waived. The following conditions shall
apply:
1. A policy and procedure manual detailing the type and
volume of controlled substances to be sold and safeguards against diversion
must accompany the application. The application shall list the regulatory
requirements for which a waiver is requested and a brief explanation as to why
each requirement should not apply to that practice; and
2. The issuance and continuation of such license shall be
subject to continuing compliance with the conditions set forth by the board.
18VAC110-30-21. Application for facility permit.
A. After June 7, 2016, any location at which practitioners
of the healing arts sell controlled substances shall have a permit issued by
the board in accordance with § 54.1-3304.1 of the Code of Virginia. A licensed
practitioner of the healing arts shall apply for the facility permit on a form
provided by the board.
B. For good cause shown, the board may issue a limited-use
facility permit when the scope, degree, or type of services provided to the
patient is of a limited nature. The permit to be issued shall be based on
conditions of use requested by the applicant or imposed by the board in cases
where certain requirements of this chapter may be waived.
1. The limited-use facility permit application shall list
the regulatory requirements for which a waiver is requested, if any, and a
brief explanation as to why each requirement should not apply to that practice.
2. A policy and procedure manual detailing the type and
volume of controlled substances to be sold and safeguards against diversion
shall accompany the application.
3. The issuance and continuation of a limited-use facility
permit shall be subject to continuing compliance with the conditions set forth
by the board.
C. The executive director may grant a waiver of the
security system when storing and selling multiple strengths and formulations of
no more than five different topical Schedule VI drugs intended for cosmetic
use.
18VAC110-30-30. Renewal of license or permit.
A. A license or facility permit so issued shall be
valid until December 31 of the year of issue. Renewal of the license shall be
made on or before December 31 of each year.
B. If a practitioner fails to renew his license or
facility permit to sell within the Commonwealth by the renewal date, he
must pay the renewal fee plus the late fee. He may renew his license or
facility permit by payment of these fees for one year from the date of
expiration.
C. Failure to renew the license or facility permit to
sell within one year following expiration shall cause the license or permit
to lapse. The selling of controlled substances with a lapsed license or
permit shall be illegal and may subject the practitioner to disciplinary
action by the board. To reinstate a lapsed license or permit, a
practitioner shall submit an application for reinstatement and pay the
reinstatement fee, plus the reinspection fee if a reinspection is required as
set forth in subsection D of this section. Reinstatement is at the discretion
of the board and may be granted by the executive director on the board's behalf
provided no grounds exist to deny said reinstatement.
D. Prior to reinstatement of a license facility
permit that has been lapsed for more than one year, a reinspection of the
storage and selling area shall be conducted unless another practitioner at
the same location has held an active license to sell controlled substances
during that period. A practitioner seeking reinstatement of a facility
permit shall not stock drugs until approved by the board or its authorized
agent.
E. The selling of controlled substances without a current,
active license or facility permit is unlawful and shall constitute
grounds for disciplinary action by the board.
18VAC110-30-50. Licensees ceasing to sell controlled
substances; inventory required prior to disposal.
A. Any licensee who intends to cease selling controlled
substances shall notify the board 10 days prior to cessation and surrender his
license, and his license will be placed on expired status. If no other
practitioner of the healing arts licensed to sell controlled substances intends
to sell controlled substances from the same location, the practitioner shall
also surrender the facility permit, and the permit will be placed on expired
status.
B. Any Schedule II through V controlled substances shall be
inventoried and may be disposed of by transferring the controlled substance
stock to another licensee or other person authorized by law to possess such
drugs or by destruction as set forth in this chapter.
C. The licensee or other responsible person shall inform the
board of the name and address of the licensee to whom the controlled substances
are transferred.
D. A licensee who has surrendered his license or facility
permit pursuant to this section may request that it be made current again
at any time within the same renewal year without having to pay an additional
fee, provided the licensee is selling from the same location or from another
location that has been inspected and approved by the board.
Part III
Inspection Requirements, Standards, and Security for Storage Areas; Disposal of
Controlled Substances
18VAC110-30-70. Maintenance of a common stock of controlled
substances Practitioner in charge in a permitted facility.
Any two or more licensees who elect to maintain a common
stock of A facility with a permit for practitioners of the healing arts
to sell controlled substances for dispensing shall:
1. Designate a licensee practitioner with a license
to sell controlled substances who shall be the primary person responsible
for the stock, the required inventory, the records of receipt and destruction,
safeguards against diversion and compliance with this chapter;
2. Report to the board the name of the licensee and the
location of the controlled substance stock on a form provided by the board;
3. Upon a change in the licensee so designated, an inventory
of all Schedule II through V controlled substances shall be conducted in the
manner set forth in § 54.1-3404 of the Drug Control Act of the Code of Virginia
and such change shall immediately be reported to the board; and
4. Nothing shall relieve the other individual licensees who
sell controlled substances at the location of the responsibility for the
requirements set forth in this chapter.
18VAC110-30-80. Inspection and notice required.
A. The area designated for the storage and selling of
controlled substances shall be inspected by an agent of the board prior to the
issuance of the first license to sell controlled substances from that site.
Inspection prior to issuance of subsequent licenses at the same location shall
be conducted at the discretion of the board.
B. Applications for licenses which facility permits
that indicate a requested inspection date, or requests which that
are received after the application is filed, shall be honored provided a 14-day
notice to the board is allowed prior to the requested inspection date.
C. Requested inspection dates which that do not
allow a 14-day notice to the board may be adjusted by the board to provide 14
days for the scheduling of the inspection.
D. At the time of the inspection, the controlled substance
selling and storage area shall comply with 18VAC110-30-90, 18VAC110-30-100,
18VAC110-30-110, 18VAC110-30-120, and 18VAC110-30-130.
E. If an applicant substantially fails to meet the
requirements for issuance of a license facility permit and a
reinspection is required, or if the applicant is not ready for the inspection
on the established date and fails to notify the inspector or the board at least
24 hours prior to the inspection, the applicant shall pay a reinspection fee as
specified in 18VAC110-30-15 prior to a reinspection being conducted.
F. No license facility permit shall be issued
to sell controlled substances until adequate safeguards against diversion have
been provided for the controlled substance storage and selling area and
approved by the the inspector or board staff.
G. The licensee shall notify the board of any substantive
changes to the approved selling and storage area including moving the location
of the area, making structural changes to the area, or making changes to the
alarm system for the area prior to the changes being made and pay a
reinspection fee. An inspection shall be conducted prior to approval of the new
or altered selling and storage area.
18VAC110-30-90. Physical standards.
Physical standards for the controlled substance selling and
storage area:
1. The building in which the controlled substances selling and
storage area is located shall be constructed of permanent and secure materials.
Trailers and other movable facilities shall not be permitted;
2. There shall be an enclosed area of not less than 40 square
feet that is designated as the controlled substances selling and storage area,
which shall be used exclusively for storage, preparation, and dispensing.
Records related to the sale of controlled substances may be maintained outside
the selling and storage area with access limited to the licensee and those
persons authorized to assist in the area. The work space used in preparation of
the drugs shall be contained within the enclosed area. A controlled substance
selling and storage area inspected and approved prior to November 3, 1993,
shall not be required to meet the size requirement of this chapter;
3. Controlled substances maintained for ultimate sale shall be
maintained separately from any other controlled substances maintained for other
purposes. Controlled substances maintained for other purposes such as
administration or samples may be stored within the selling and storage area
provided they are clearly separated from the stock maintained for sale;
4. The selling and storage area, work counter space and
equipment in the area shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner;
5. A sink with hot and cold running water shall be available
within the immediate vicinity 20 feet of the selling and storage
area and not located within an examination room or restroom; and
6. The entire area described in this chapter shall be well
lighted and ventilated; the proper storage temperature shall be maintained to
meet official specifications for controlled substance storage.
NOTICE: The following
forms used in administering the regulation were filed by the agency. The forms
are not being published; however, online users of this issue of the Virginia
Register of Regulations may click on the name of a form with a hyperlink to
access it. The forms are also available from the agency contact or may be
viewed at the Office of the Registrar of Regulations, General Assembly
Building, 2nd Floor, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
FORMS (18VAC110-30)
Application for a License to Sell Controlled Substances by
a Practitioner of the Healing Arts (rev. 8/07).
Application
for a License to Sell Controlled Substances by a Practitioner of the Healing
Arts (rev. 12/2015)
Application
for a Facility Permit for Practitioner(s) of the Healing Arts to Sell
Controlled Substances (rev. 12/2015)
VA.R. Doc. No. R16-4532; Filed September 26, 2016, 8:35 a.m.