The Virginia Register OF  REGULATIONS is an official state publication issued every other week  throughout the year. Indexes are published quarterly, and are cumulative for  the year. The Virginia Register has several functions. The new and  amended sections of regulations, both as proposed and as finally adopted, are  required by law to be published in the Virginia Register. In addition,  the Virginia Register is a source of other information about state  government, including petitions for rulemaking, emergency regulations,  executive orders issued by the Governor, the Virginia Tax Bulletin issued  periodically by the Department of Taxation, and notices of public hearings and  open meetings of state agencies.
    ADOPTION,  AMENDMENT, AND REPEAL OF REGULATIONS
    An  agency wishing to adopt, amend, or repeal regulations must first publish in the  Virginia Register a notice of intended regulatory action; a basis,  purpose, substance and issues statement; an economic impact analysis prepared  by the Department of Planning and Budget; the agency’s response to the economic  impact analysis; a summary; a notice giving the public an opportunity to  comment on the proposal; and the text of the proposed regulation.
    Following  publication of the proposal in the Virginia Register, the promulgating agency  receives public comments for a minimum of 60 days. The Governor reviews the  proposed regulation to determine if it is necessary to protect the public  health, safety and welfare, and if it is clearly written and easily  understandable. If the Governor chooses to comment on the proposed regulation,  his comments must be transmitted to the agency and the Registrar no later than  15 days following the completion of the 60-day public comment period. The  Governor’s comments, if any, will be published in the Virginia Register.  Not less than 15 days following the completion of the 60-day public comment  period, the agency may adopt the proposed regulation.
    The  Joint Commission on Administrative Rules (JCAR) or the appropriate standing  committee of each house of the General Assembly may meet during the  promulgation or final adoption process and file an objection with the Registrar  and the promulgating agency. The objection will be published in the Virginia  Register. Within 21 days after receipt by the agency of a legislative  objection, the agency shall file a response with the Registrar, the objecting  legislative body, and the Governor.
    When  final action is taken, the agency again publishes the text of the regulation as  adopted, highlighting all changes made to the proposed regulation and  explaining any substantial changes made since publication of the proposal. A  30-day final adoption period begins upon final publication in the Virginia  Register.
    The  Governor may review the final regulation during this time and, if he objects,  forward his objection to the Registrar and the agency. In addition to or in  lieu of filing a formal objection, the Governor may suspend the effective date  of a portion or all of a regulation until the end of the next regular General  Assembly session by issuing a directive signed by a majority of the members of  the appropriate legislative body and the Governor. The Governor’s objection or  suspension of the regulation, or both, will be published in the Virginia  Register. If the Governor finds that changes made to the proposed  regulation have substantial impact, he may require the agency to provide an  additional 30-day public comment period on the changes. Notice of the  additional public comment period required by the Governor will be published in  the Virginia Register.
    The  agency shall suspend the regulatory process for 30 days when it receives  requests from 25 or more individuals to solicit additional public comment,  unless the agency determines that the changes have minor or inconsequential  impact.
    A  regulation becomes effective at the conclusion of the 30-day final adoption  period, or at any other later date specified by the promulgating agency, unless  (i) a legislative objection has been filed, in which event the regulation,  unless withdrawn, becomes effective on the date specified, which shall be after  the expiration of the 21-day objection period; (ii) the Governor exercises his  authority to require the agency to provide for additional public comment, in  which event the regulation, unless withdrawn, becomes effective on the date  specified, which shall be after the expiration of the period for which the  Governor has provided for additional public comment; (iii) the Governor and the  General Assembly exercise their authority to suspend the effective date of a  regulation until the end of the next regular legislative session; or (iv) the  agency suspends the regulatory process, in which event the regulation, unless  withdrawn, becomes effective on the date specified, which shall be after the  expiration of the 30-day public comment period and no earlier than 15 days from  publication of the readopted action.
    Proposed  regulatory action may be withdrawn by the promulgating agency at any time  before the regulation becomes final.
    FAST-TRACK  RULEMAKING PROCESS
    Section 2.2-4012.1 of the Code of Virginia provides an exemption from certain  provisions of the Administrative Process Act for agency regulations deemed by  the Governor to be noncontroversial.  To use this process, Governor's  concurrence is required and advance notice must be provided to certain  legislative committees.  Fast-track regulations will become effective on the  date noted in the regulatory action if no objections to using the process are  filed in accordance with § 2.2-4012.1.
    EMERGENCY  REGULATIONS
    Pursuant  to § 2.2-4011 of the Code  of Virginia, an agency, upon consultation with the Attorney General, and at the  discretion of the Governor, may adopt emergency regulations that are  necessitated by an emergency situation. An agency may also adopt an emergency  regulation when Virginia statutory law or the appropriation act or federal law  or federal regulation requires that a regulation be effective in 280 days or  less from its enactment. The emergency  regulation becomes operative upon its adoption and filing with the Registrar of  Regulations, unless a later date is specified. Emergency regulations are  limited to no more than 12 months in duration; however, may be extended for six  months under certain circumstances as provided for in § 2.2-4011 D.  Emergency regulations are published as soon as possible in the Register.
    During  the time the emergency status is in effect, the agency may proceed with the  adoption of permanent regulations through the usual procedures. To begin  promulgating the replacement regulation, the agency must (i) file the Notice of  Intended Regulatory Action with the Registrar within 60 days of the effective  date of the emergency regulation and (ii) file the proposed regulation with the  Registrar within 180 days of the effective date of the emergency regulation. If  the agency chooses not to adopt the regulations, the emergency status ends when  the prescribed time limit expires.
    STATEMENT
    The  foregoing constitutes a generalized statement of the procedures to be followed.  For specific statutory language, it is suggested that Article 2 (§ 2.2-4006  et seq.) of Chapter 40 of Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia be examined  carefully.
    CITATION  TO THE VIRGINIA REGISTER
    The Virginia  Register is cited by volume, issue, page number, and date. 23:7 VA.R. 1023-1140  December 11, 2006, refers to Volume 23, Issue 7, pages 1023 through 1140 of  the Virginia Register issued on December 11, 2006.
    The  Virginia Register of Regulations is  published pursuant to Article 6 (§ 2.2-4031 et seq.) of Chapter 40 of Title 2.2  of the Code of Virginia. 
    Members  of the Virginia Code Commission: R.  Steven Landes, Chairman; John S. Edwards, Vice Chairman; Ryan T.  McDougle; Robert Hurt; Robert L. Calhoun; Frank S. Ferguson; E.M.  Miller, Jr.; Thomas M. Moncure, Jr.; James F. Almand; Jane M. Roush.
    Staff  of the Virginia Register: Jane  D. Chaffin, Registrar of Regulations; June T. Chandler, Assistant  Registrar.
         
       
                                                        PUBLICATION SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES
Vol. 26 Iss. 9 - January 04, 2010
January 2010 through October 2010
 
  | Volume: Issue | Material Submitted By Noon* | Will Be Published On | 
 
  | INDEX 1 Volume 26 |   | January 2010 | 
 
  | 26:9 | December 15, 2009 (Tuesday) | January 4, 2010 | 
 
  | 26:10 | December 29, 2009 (Tuesday) | January 18, 2010 | 
 
  | 26:11 | January 13, 2010 | February 1, 2010 | 
 
  | 26:12 | January 27, 2010 | February 15, 2010 | 
 
  | 26:13 | February 10, 2010 | March 1, 2010 | 
 
  | 26:14 | February 24, 2010 | March 15, 2010 | 
 
  | INDEX 2 Volume 26 |   | April 2010 | 
 
  | 26:15 | March 10, 2010 | March 29, 2010 | 
 
  | 26:16 | March 24, 2010 | April 12, 2010 | 
 
  | 26:17 | April 7, 2010 | April 26, 2010 | 
 
  | 26:18 | April 21, 2010 | May 10, 2010 | 
 
  | 26:19 | May 5, 2010 | May 24, 2010 | 
 
  | 26:20 | May 19, 2010 | June 7, 2010 | 
 
  | INDEX 3 Volume 26 |   | July 2010 | 
 
  | 26:21 | June 2, 2010 | June 21, 2010 | 
 
  | 26:22 | June 16, 2010 | July 5, 2010 | 
 
  | 26:23 | June 30, 2010 | July 19, 2010 | 
 
  | 26:24 | July 14, 2010 | August 2, 2010 | 
 
  | 26:25 | July 28, 2010 | August 16, 2010 | 
 
  | 26:26 | August 11, 2010 | August 30, 2010 | 
 
  | FINAL INDEX Volume 26 |   | October 2010 | 
 
  | 27:1 | August 25, 2010 | September 13, 2010 | 
 
  | 27:2 | September 8, 2010 | September 27, 2010 | 
 
  | 27:3 | September 22, 2010 | October 11, 2010 | 
 
  | 27:4 | October 6, 2010 | October 25, 2010 | 
*Filing deadlines are Wednesdays
unless otherwise specified.
 
   
                                                        PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING
Vol. 26 Iss. 9 - January 04, 2010
TITLE 12. HEALTH
    STATE BOARD OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES
    Agency Decision
    Title of Regulation:  12VAC35-115. Rules and Regulations to Assure the Rights of Individuals  Receiving Services from Providers Licensed, Funded, or Operated by the  Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services.
    Statutory Authority:  §§ 37.2-202 and 37.2-400 of the Code of Virginia.
    Name of Petitioner: Steven  Shoon.
    Nature of Petitioner's Request:  Amend the regulations to require the reason documented for denying patient  access to service records and criteria for removal to be consistent with the  statement the physician is required to put into the service record in order to  deny patient access to the same.
    Agency Decision: Request  denied.
    Statement of Reason for Decision:  The board determined that 12VAC35-115 provides adequate protections with  respect to restrictions being placed on an individual access to his or her  services record.
    Agency Contact: Linda B.  Grasewicz, Senior Planner, Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental  Services, P.O. Box 1797, Richmond, VA 23218-1797, telephone (804) 786-0040, FAX  (804) 371-0092, or email linda.grasewicz@dbhds.virginia.gov.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-04; Filed December 9, 2009, 3:55 p.m. 
    Agency Decision
    Title of Regulation:  12VAC35-115. Rules and Regulations to Assure the Rights of Individuals  Receiving Services from Providers Licensed, Funded, or Operated by the  Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services.
    Statutory Authority:  §§ 37.2-202 and 37.2-400 of the Code of Virginia.
    Name of Petitioner: Steven  Shoon.
    Nature of Petitioner's Request:  The reinstatement of the requirement on limiting the timeframe of how long the  provider can impose a restriction on the patient's access to their service  records.
    Agency Decision: Request  denied.
    Statement of Reasons for Decision:  The board determined that 12VAC35-115 has never included a requirement limiting  the length of time that a restriction could be placed on a patient's access to  his or her service record. The board determined that to do so would be to regulate  a clinical practice issue.
    Agency Contact: Linda B.  Grasewicz, Senior Planner, Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental  Services, P.O. Box 1797, Richmond, VA 23218-1797, telephone (804) 786-0040, FAX  (804) 371-0092, or email linda.grasewicz@dbhds.virginia.gov.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-05; Filed December 9, 2009, 3:55 p.m.
    Agency Decision
    Title of Regulation:  12VAC35-115. Rules and Regulations to Assure the Rights of Individuals  Receiving Services from Providers Licensed, Funded, or Operated by the  Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services.
    Statutory Authority:  §§ 37.2-202 and 37.2-400 of the Code of Virginia.
    Name of Petitioner: Steven  Shoon.
    Nature of Petitioner's Request:  Regulation governing amendment of the service records should be amended to  require the reviewer of patient requests to amend/correct their services  records to be neither the patient's treating clinician nor a person who wrote  the particular note in the service record that the patient is requesting to be  amended/corrected.
    Agency Decision: Request  denied.
    Statement of Reasons for Decision:  The board determined that the existing provisions of 12VAC35-115 provide  individuals receiving services with a clearly delineated right to have a  statement of disagreement included in the record.
    Agency Contact: Linda B.  Grasewicz, Senior Planner, Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental  Services, P.O. Box 1797, Richmond, VA 23218-1797, telephone (804) 786-0040, FAX  (804) 371-0092, or email linda.grasewicz@dbhds.virginia.gov.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-06; Filed December 9, 2009, 3:55 p.m.
    Agency Decision
    Title of Regulation:  12VAC35-115. Rules and Regulations to Assure the Rights of Individuals  Receiving Services from Providers Licensed, Funded, or Operated by the  Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services.
    Statutory Authority:  §§ 37.2-202 and 37.2-400 of the Code of Virginia.
    Name of Petitioner: Steven  Shoon.
    Nature of Petitioner's Request:  Regulation governing access to or amendment/correction of patients' service  records should be amended to limit to 10 days from the date of the submission's  request, (i) the physician's response to a patient's request for accessing his  service record and (ii) the reviewer's response to a patient's request for  amending/correcting his service record.
    Agency Decision: Request  denied.
    Statement of Reasons for Decision:  The board determined that 12VAC35-115 should not be changed to establish a  specific timeframe within which a provider must respond to record access  requests. Requirements regarding response timeframes are already established by  state and federal laws and differ based on the type of provider.
    Agency Contact: Linda B.  Grasewicz, Senior Planner, Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental  Services, P.O. Box 1797, Richmond, VA 23218-1797, telephone (804) 786-0040, FAX  (804) 371-0092, or email linda.grasewicz@dbhds.virginia.gov.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-07; Filed December 9, 2009, 3:55 p.m.
    Agency Decision
    Title of Regulation: None  specified.
    Statutory Authority:  §§ 37.2-202 and 37.2-400 of the Code of Virginia.
    Name of Petitioner: Steven  Shoon.
    Nature of Petitioner's Request:  Regulation governing different legal statuses of inpatient hospitalization and  their discharge criteria should repeal the provision requiring or allowing a  "provider" to wait until after 30 days from admission to inform the  involuntarily, civilly committed patients' of their right to seek discharge  from the facility director and their right to seek legal appeal of their civil  commitment order to the Circuit Court pursuant to § 37.2-830 of the Code  of Virginia.
    Agency Decision: Request  denied.
    Statement of Reasons for Decision:  The board determined that 12VAC35-115-70 B 8 b neither requires nor allows a  provider to wait for 30 days after admission to notify the individual receiving  services of his right to appeal an order of involuntary commitment.
    Agency Contact: Linda B.  Grasewicz, Senior Planner, Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental  Services, P.O. Box 1797, Richmond, VA 23218-1797, telephone (804) 786-0040, FAX  (804) 371-0092, or email linda.grasewicz@dbhds.virginia.gov.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-08; Filed December 9, 2009, 3:55 p.m.
    Agency Decision
    Title of Regulation:  12VAC35-115. Rules and Regulations to Assure the Rights of Individuals  Receiving Services from Providers Licensed, Funded, or Operated by the  Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services.
    Statutory Authority:  §§ 37.2-202 and 37.2-400 of the Code of Virginia.
    Name of Petitioner: Steven  Shoon.
    Nature of Petitioner's Request:  Regulations allowing the commissioner to suspend the applicability of the human  rights regulation, through a written exemption, to people on forensic status or  civilly committed as sexually violent predators should be repealed.
    Agency Decision: Request  denied.
    Statement of Reasons for Decision:  The board determined that the authority granted under 12VAC35-115 to the  commissioner to balance individual rights with the need for public safety is  consistent with the provisions of § 37.2-400 of the Code of Virginia.
    Agency Contact: Linda B.  Grasewicz, Senior Planner, Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental  Services, P.O. Box 1797, Richmond, VA 23218-1797, telephone (804) 786-0040, FAX  (804) 371-0092, or email linda.grasewicz@dbhds.virginia.gov.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-09; Filed December 9, 2009, 3:55 p.m.
    Agency Decision
    Title of Regulation:  12VAC35-115. Rules and Regulations to Assure the Rights of Individuals  Receiving Services from Providers Licensed, Funded, or Operated by the  Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services.
    Statutory Authority:  §§ 37.2-202 and 37.2-400 of the Code of Virginia.
    Name of Petitioner: Steven  Shoon.
    Nature of Petitioner's Request:  Regulation should be amended to prohibit the commissioner from suspending the  applicability of provisions in the human rights regulations that apply to  people on forensic status or civilly committed as sexually violent predators  through a written exemption where there are duplicate provisions of the same  rights in the statutes (§ 37.2-400 of the Code of Virginia).
    Agency Decision: Request  denied.
    Statement of Reasons for Decision:  The board determined that § 37.2-400 of the Code of Virginia does allow  qualifications to the statutorily defined rights when such qualifications are  consistent with reasonable limitations and sound therapeutic treatment.
    Agency Contact: Linda B.  Grasewicz, Senior Planner, Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental  Services, P.O. Box 1797, Richmond, VA 23218-1797, telephone (804) 786-0040, FAX  (804) 371-0092, or email linda.grasewicz@dbhds.virginia.gov.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-10; Filed December 9, 2009, 3:55 p.m.
     
    Agency Decision
    Title of Regulation:  12VAC35-115. Rules and Regulations to Assure the Rights of Individuals  Receiving Services from Providers Licensed, Funded, or Operated by the  Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services.
    Statutory Authority:  §§ 37.2-202 and 37.2-400 of the Code of Virginia.
    Name of Petitioner: Steven  Shoon.
    Nature of Petitioner's Request:  Regulation should be amended to require the commissioner to specify the section  codes and provisions as apart of the written exemptions for suspending the  applicability of the human rights regulation to people on forensic status and  civilly committed as sexually violent predators.
    Agency Decision: Request  denied.
    Statement of Reasons for Decision:  The board determined that the subject of this petition is adequately addressed  in departmental policy guidance and does not require regulatory action.
    Agency Contact: Linda B.  Grasewicz, Senior Planner, Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental  Services, P.O. Box 1797, Richmond, VA 23218-1797, telephone (804) 786-0040, FAX  (804) 371-0092, or email linda.grasewicz@dbhds.virginia.gov.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-11; Filed December 9, 2009, 3:55 p.m.
    Initial Agency Notice
    Title of Regulation:  12VAC35-115. Rules and Regulations to Assure the Rights of Individuals  Receiving Services from Providers Licensed, Funded, or Operated by the  Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services.
    Statutory Authority:  §§ 37.2-202 and 37.2-400 of the Code of Virginia.
    Name of Petitioner: Steven  Shoon.
    Nature of Petitioner's Request:  Adjust the complaint resolution process to remove the director or director's  designee from handling the Human Rights Complaint when the director or  director's designee's conduct, position, or circumstances renders them unable  to perform an impartial review of the Human Rights Complaint. This includes  prohibiting the director of appointing a designee for handling the Human Rights  Complaint.
    Agency's Plan for Disposition of  the Request: The board will consider the petition and any comments received  at its first meeting after the conclusion of the public comment period.
    Comments  may be submitted until January 25, 2010.
    Agency Contact: Linda B.  Grasewicz, Senior Planner, Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental  Services, P.O. Box 1797, Richmond, VA 23218-1797, telephone (804) 786-0040, FAX  (804) 371-0092, or email linda.grasewicz@dbhds.virginia.gov.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-30; Filed December 10, 2009, 4:38 p.m.
         
       
                                                        
                                                        NOTICES OF INTENDED REGULATORY ACTION
Vol. 26 Iss. 9 - January 04, 2010
TITLE 4. CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Virginia Stormwater Management Regulations
Notice of Intended Regulatory Action
    Notice is hereby given in accordance with § 2.2-4007.01 of  the Code of Virginia that the Virginia Soil and Water Conservation Board  intends to consider amending the following regulations: 4VAC50-60, Virginia  Stormwater Management Regulations. The purpose of the proposed action is to  establish water quality design criteria for new development activities within  the Chesapeake Bay Watershed that are consistent with the pollutant loadings  called for in the Environmental Protection Agency-approved Virginia Total  Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan for the Chesapeake Bay Nutrient  and Sediment TMDL, and consider compliance methodologies and mechanisms associated  with any new design criteria.
    The agency intends to hold a public hearing on the proposed  action after publication in the Virginia Register. 
    Statutory Authority: §§ 10.1-107 and 10.1-603.4 of  the Code of Virginia.
    Public Comment Deadline: February 3, 2010.
    Agency Contact: David C. Dowling, Policy, Planning, and  Budget Director, Department of Conservation and Recreation, 203 Governor  Street, Suite 302, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 786-2291, FAX (804)  786-6141, or email david.dowling@dcr.virginia.gov.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-2265; Filed December 14, 2009, 3:23 p.m. 
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
Career and Technical Education Regulations
Notice of Intended Regulatory Action
    Notice is hereby given in accordance with § 2.2-4007.01 of  the Code of Virginia that the State Board of Education intends to consider  amending the following regulations: 8VAC20-120, Career and Technical  Education Regulations. Changes in both federal and state laws pertaining to  career and technical education have made it necessary to revise the Career and  Technical Education Regulations. The regulations will be examined in their  entirety, including the requirements for general provisions, administration of  career and technical education programs, and operation of career and technical  education programs. The goals of this review are to (i) update the regulations  to comply with new state and federal laws, such as an identification and  clarification of the U.S. Department of Education's approved Virginia  requirements for meeting the performance standards of the Perkins Act of 2006;  (ii) update definitions for consistency with state and federal regulations  dealing with similar issues such as a clarification of "career  clusters," "career pathways," "sustained professional  development," and other terms impacted by the Perkins Act of 2006; and  (iii) eliminate any duplication of regulations.
    The agency intends to hold a public hearing on the proposed  action after publication in the Virginia Register. 
    Statutory Authority: §§ 22.1-16 and 22.1-227 of the  Code of Virginia.
    Public Comment Deadline: February 8, 2010.
    Agency Contact: Anne Rowe, Career and Technical  Education Coordinator, Department of Education, P.O. Box 2120, Richmond, VA  23218, telephone (804) 225-2838, FAX (804) 371-2456, or email anne.rowe@doe.virginia.gov.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-2244; Filed December 14, 2009, 2:01 p.m. 
TITLE 13. HOUSING
 Enterprise Zone Grant Program Regulation
Notice of Intended Regulatory Action
    Notice is hereby given in accordance with § 2.2-4007.01 of  the Code of Virginia that the Board of Housing and Community Development  intends to consider amending the following regulations: 13VAC5-112,  Enterprise Zone Grant Program Regulation. The purpose of the proposed  action is to enable the enterprise zone program to be administered in a more  efficient and economical manner and to ensure that the regulations provide  clear and understandable guidelines by addressing all issues concerning the  performance of the program by (i) further clarifying the intent of the program  and insuring that it is being met, (ii) providing additional guidance to  program constituents, (iii) formalizing what has been common practice, and (iv)  updating references to specific statutes and dates.
    The agency intends to hold a public hearing on the proposed  action after publication in the Virginia Register.
    Statutory Authority: § 59.1-533 of the Code of  Virginia.
    Public Comment Deadline: February 3, 2010.
    Agency Contact: Stephen W. Calhoun, Regulatory  Coordinator, Department of Housing and Community Development, Main Street  Centre, 600 E. Main Street, Suite 300, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804)  371-7000, FAX (804) 371-7090, TTY (804) 371-7089, or email  steve.calhoun@dhcd.virginia.gov.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-2174; Filed December 14, 2009, 2:02 p.m. 
 
                                                        REGULATIONS
Vol. 26 Iss. 9 - January 04, 2010
TITLE 1. ADMINISTRATION
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The  following regulatory action is exempt from the Administrative Process Act in  accordance with § 2.2-4006 A 4 c of the Code of Virginia, which excludes  regulations that are necessary to meet the requirements of federal law or  regulations, provided such regulations do not differ materially from those  required by federal law or regulation. The Department of General Services will  receive, consider, and respond to petitions by any interested person at any  time with respect to reconsideration or revision.
         Title of Regulation: 1VAC30-40. Regulations for the  Certification of Laboratories Analyzing Drinking Water (amending 1VAC30-40-10, 1VAC30-40-20,  1VAC30-40-30, 1VAC30-40-40, 1VAC30-40-100, 1VAC30-40-110, 1VAC30-40-130,  1VAC30-40-150, 1VAC30-40-240, 1VAC30-40-250, 1VAC30-40-280, 1VAC30-40-320,  1VAC30-40-330, 1VAC30-40-340, 1VAC30-40-360, 1VAC30-40-370; adding  1VAC30-40-85).
    Statutory Authority: §§ 2.2-1102 and 2.2-1105 of  the Code of Virginia.
    Effective Date: February 3, 2010.
    Agency Contact: Rhonda Bishton, Regulatory Coordinator,  Department of General Services, 1100 Bank Street, Suite 420, Richmond, VA  23219, telephone (804) 786-3311, FAX (804) 371-8305, or email  rhonda.bishton@dgs.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    Laboratories analyzing drinking water samples under the  federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) must use current federal Environmental  Protection Agency (EPA) approved test methods and adhere to other  laboratory-specific requirements, as set out in 40 CFR Parts 141 and 143. The  lists of test methods are revised regularly to include newly approved methods  and delete out-of-date methods. These lists are also revised when new SDWA  program requirements are promulgated in the Federal Register. 
    The changes to the Certification of Laboratories Analyzing  Drinking Water Regulations conform them to current federal requirements for  test methods, sampling, and laboratory certification.  1VAC30-40-85 is  added to incorporate by reference the most current federal requirements.  Out-of-date citations and out-of-date tables listing test methods and sample  container, preservation, and holding time requirements are deleted. Provisions  in the regulations that were taken verbatim from now out-of-date test methods  and federal requirements are deleted and replaced by incorporating by reference  current requirements. Finally, technical changes are made to replace the  Division of Water Supply Engineering with the Office of Drinking Water to  reflect the correct name of the Virginia Department of Health division  responsible for these regulations. 
    Part I 
  General Provisions 
    1VAC30-40-10. Introduction. 
    The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) of December 16, 1974,  mandated the establishment of drinking water regulations. The United States  Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) was authorized to set the national  drinking water regulations and oversee the implementation of the SDWA. State  governments through their health departments or environmental agencies were to  accept the responsibility for the implementation and enforcement of the SDWA'S  provisions. 
    The Virginia Department of Health, Division of Water  Supply Engineering (VDH-DWSE) Office of Drinking Water (VDH-ODW) has  accepted and maintains the primary enforcement responsibility (primacy) under  the SDWA and the requirements of the National Primary Drinking Water  Regulations (NPDWR) 40 CFR 141, 142 and 143 (2009). The regulation at  40 CFR 141.28 requires that all testing for compliance purposes except  turbidity, free chlorine residual, temperature and pH be performed by  laboratories certified by the state. 
    The Department of General Services, Division of Consolidated  Laboratory Services (DGS-DCLS) has been designated by VDH- DWSE VDH-ODW  as the principal state laboratory. Pursuant to regulation 40 CFR  142.10(b)(3)(i) (2009), DGS-DCLS has established and maintains the state  program for the certification of laboratories conducting analytical  measurements of drinking water contaminants. 
    This chapter provides the mechanism to assure that  laboratories are capable of providing valid data for compliance under the SDWA.  
    1VAC30-40-20. Definitions. 
    The following words and terms, when used in this chapter,  shall have the following meanings, unless the context already indicates  otherwise: 
    "Analyst" means a chemist, microbiologist,  physicist, or technician who actually performs a test. The analyst may carry  out the complete test or participate jointly with other analysts. The  qualifications an analyst needs depend greatly on functions being performed. 
    "Certifying team" means experienced DGS-DCLS professionals  to perform laboratory on-site evaluations under the SDWA. 
    "CFR" means Code of Federal Regulations. 
    "Compliance sample" means any sample required by  the Virginia Department of Health to determine that the water quality does not  exceed the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for each specified parameter. 
    "DGS-DCLS" means the Department of General  Services-Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services. 
    "EMSL-LV" means the Environmental Monitoring  Systems Laboratory in Las Vegas, Nevada. 
    "Maximum contaminant level (MCL)" means the maximum  permissible level of a contaminant in water which is delivered to the free  flowing outlet of the ultimate user of a waterworks. 
    "Minimum requirements" means criteria which are  critical to the generation of valid data. These criteria describe the lowest  level of capability at which the analyses can be successfully performed. 
    "NPDWR" means the National Primary Drinking Water  Regulations (40 CFR 141 et seq.) (2009). 
    "Performance evaluation sample" means annual sample  to be analyzed by a laboratory on certain parameters for which certification  has been requested or granted. This annual sample is a form of documentation of  a laboratory's capabilities in conjunction with on-site inspection evaluations  of the laboratory by the certifying team. 
    "Primary enforcement responsibility (Primacy)"  means the primary responsibility for administration and enforcement of primary  drinking water regulations and related requirements applicable to public water  systems within a state. 
    "Quality Assurance (QA) Plan" means a written  description of a laboratory's quality assurance activities. 
    "SDWA" means the Safe Drinking Water Act (21  USCS § 349; 42 USCS §§ 201, 300f to 300j-9) (42 USC § 300 f et  seq.). 
    "TTHM" means Total Trihalomethanes. 
    "USEPA" means the United States Environmental  Protection Agency. 
    "VDH-DWSE" "VDH-ODW" means  the Virginia Department of Health-Division of Water Supply Engineering Virginia  Department of Health - Office of Drinking Water. 
    "Virginia laboratory officer" means the DGS-DCLS  coordinator of drinking water laboratory certification activities. 
    1VAC30-40-30. Public notification for exceeded MCL. 
    The public notification regulations require that a laboratory  analyzing compliance samples immediately notify the VDH-DWSE VDH-ODW  of all results which exceed an MCL in accordance with Virginia Waterworks  Regulations, 12VAC5-590-530 and 12VAC5-590-540, June 23, 1993; the  Public Notification Final Rule, Federal Register Vol. 52, No. 208, October 28,  1987; and the Public Notification Technical Amendment, Federal Register Vol.  54, No. 72, April 17, 1989. 
    1VAC30-40-40. Compliance data report. 
    A. A waterworks with an on-site certified laboratory  shall follow the reporting requirements outlined in Virginia Waterworks  Regulations, VR 355-18-005.09, 2.20 Reporting, June 23, 1993 12VAC5-590-530.  
    B. A contract laboratory analyzing compliance samples  shall complete the appropriate VDH-DWSE VDH-ODW Sample Input Form  in accordance with the instructions for compliance under the SDWA. The contract  laboratory shall report the analysis result to the VDH-DWSE VDH-ODW  within three days of completion date of sample analysis. 
    1VAC30-40-85. Incorporation by reference.
    A. The sampling, analytical methodology, and laboratory  certification requirements of 40 CFR 141 and 143 (2009) are incorporated by  reference into this chapter.
    B. The specific sampling, analytical methodology, and  laboratory certification requirements incorporated by reference are listed  below by category:
    1. Inorganic chemistry: 40 CFR 141.23, 40 CFR 141.89, and  40 CFR 141.131.
    2. Organic chemistry: 40 CFR 141.24 and 40 CFR 141.131.
    3. Microbiology: 40 CFR 141.21, 40 CFR 141.74, 40 CFR  141.174, 40 CFR 141.704, and 40 CFR 141.705. 40 CFR 136.3 (a) for e. coli  requirements under 40 CFR 141.704.
    4. Radiochemistry: 40 CFR 141.25.
    5. Alternative testing methods: 40 CFR Part 141, Subpart C,  Appendix A.
    6. Test methods specified for secondary maximum contaminant  levels: 40 CFR 143.4.
    C. The exceptions to the requirements for laboratory certification  in 40 CFR 141.28, 40 CFR 141.74(a), 40 CFR 141.89(a)(1), 40 CFR 141.131(b)(3),  and 40 CFR 141.131(c)(3) are incorporated by reference into this chapter.  Laboratory testing for alkalinity, calcium, conductivity, disinfectant  residual, orthophosphate, pH, silica, temperature, and turbidity for compliance  purposes may be performed by laboratories or persons not certified under this  chapter but acceptable to VDH-ODW.
    1VAC30-40-100. Evaluation procedure. 
    A. DGS-DCLS shall notify a laboratory three weeks before the  on-site evaluation. 
    B. During the on-site evaluation, the certifying team shall  evaluate the laboratory on its equipment and supplies, general laboratory  practices, sample collection, handling and preservation, methodology and  quality assurance. A laboratory may be required to analyze an unknown sample or  perform analysis on a parameter during the evaluation. 
    Survey forms may be used as guidelines for complete coverage  of the laboratory's activities. Each deviation observed during the laboratory  evaluation shall be discussed at the time it is observed. The certifying team  shall make an oral report to the laboratory staff at the end of the evaluation.  
    C. The certifying team shall prepare a narrative and action  report for the Virginia laboratory officer. This report shall contain  information pertinent to the evaluation. The report shall recommend the  parameters in a category for which certification can be granted. 
    D. DGS-DCLS shall obtain from VDH-DWSE VDH-ODW  an identification number for a newly certified laboratory. DGS-DCLS shall  inform VDH- DSWE VDH-ODW of the certification status of a  laboratory. 
    E. The Virginia laboratory officer shall advise the  laboratory within 30 days after the on-site evaluation of its certification  status and forward the certifying team's complete report. 
    F. Each laboratory found to be in noncompliance with this  chapter, as indicated in the certifying team report, shall submit documentation  of the corrective actions at the time specified by DGS-DCLS. 
    G. Additional actions toward certification shall be  determined based on the specific circumstances. 
    1VAC30-40-110. Levels of certification. 
    Certification is granted for individual parameters in a  category except for the volatile organic chemicals (VOC's). The VOC's are  certified as a group based on the method employed and successful completion of  the performance evaluation study. 
    1. "Certified" means a laboratory that meets the  minimum requirements as determined by the certifying team using this chapter.  The certification shall be valid for up to three years. 
    2. "Provisionally certified" means a laboratory  which has deficiencies but can still produce valid data. The laboratory can  continue to report compliance data to VDH-DWSE VDH-ODW. A  laboratory shall be permitted up to six months for correction of deficiencies.  The certifying team may perform an announced or unannounced on-site evaluation  to determine the adequacy of documented corrective actions. The certifying team  shall recommend to the Virginia laboratory officer to upgrade the laboratory's  certification status. 
    3. "Not certified" means a laboratory that does not  meet the minimum requirements as determined by the certifying team using this  chapter. 
    1VAC30-40-130. Maintenance of certified status. 
    To maintain its certified status, a laboratory shall: 
    1. Continue to meet the requirements listed in this chapter  based on the on-site evaluation. 
    2. Pass performance evaluation samples on an annual basis (for  radiochemistry pass additional two cross-check samples). 
    3. Perform a minimum of five water analyses for each chemical  parameter per month. Refer to 1VAC30-40-330 for the minimum number of  microbiology analyses. This shall ensure that the laboratory maintains  expertise in the certified categories. 
    4. Notify DGS-DCLS within 30 days of changes in personnel,  equipment or laboratory location which may change the laboratory's analytical  capability. 
    5. Use approved methodology listed in this chapter incorporated  by reference at 1VAC30-40-85. 
    6. Notify VDH-DWSE VDH-ODW in accordance with  1VAC30-40-30. 
    1VAC30-40-150. Revocation of certified status. 
    A laboratory shall be downgraded from certified or  provisionally certified to not certified status for: 
    1. Failure to employ USEPA approved methods incorporated by  reference at 1VAC30-40-85. 
    2. Failure to submit report for the performance evaluation  study at the specified time limit unless a waiver is approved by DGS-DCLS. 
    3. Failure to successfully analyze a parameter that is  provisionally certified. 
    4. Submission of a performance evaluation sample to another  laboratory for analysis and reporting the data as its own. 
    5. Failure to correct identified deficiencies based on an  on-site visit. 
    6. Permitting persons other than qualified personnel to  perform and report results for drinking water analysis. 
    7. Falsification of data or use of other deceptive practices. 
    8. Failure to notify the VDH-DWSE VDH-ODW in  accordance with 1VAC30-40-30. 
    1VAC30-40-240. Analytical methodology. 
    Analytical methods are specified in NPDWR 40 CFR 141 and  143. All procedural steps in the approved methods are considered requirements. 
    1. Inorganic contaminants. Table III-1 of this chapter  shows the approved methodology for inorganic contaminants. 
    2. Organic contaminants. Table III-2 of this chapter shows  the approved methodology for organic contaminants. 
    3. Secondary inoraganic contaminants. Table III-3 of this  chapter shows the approved methodology for secondary inorganic contaminants.  
    A. Laboratories shall meet the sampling and analytical  methodology requirements incorporated by reference at 1VAC30-40-85 B 1 for  primary inorganic contaminants, 1VAC30-40-85 B 2 for primary organic  contaminants, and 1VAC30-40-85 B 5 for alternative testing methods.
    4. Prepackaged kits. B. DPD Colorimetric Test  Kit and FACTS Colorimetric Test Kit are the only acceptable prepackaged  kits for free chlorine residual. 
    5. C. Measurement for residual disinfectant,  turbidity, pH and temperature need not be made in certified laboratories but  may be performed by any persons acceptable by the VDH-DWSE VDH-ODW.  The following are the critical elements of these tests: 
    a. 1. Sealed liquid turbidity standards  purchased from the instrument manufacturer shall be calibrated against properly  prepared and diluted formazin or styrene divinylbenzene polymer standards at  least every four months in order to monitor for any eventual deterioration.  This calibration shall be documented. The standards shall be replaced when they  do not fall within 15% of the assigned value of the standard. Solid turbidity  standards composed of plastic, glass, or other materials shall not be used. 
    b. 2. Calibration interval for color wheels,  sealed ampules, and other visual standards for free chlorine residual at least  every six months. These calibrations shall be documented. By comparing  standards and plotting such a comparison on graph paper, a correction factor  can be derived and applied to all future results obtained on the now calibrated  apparatus. 
    c. 3. Additional criteria. The following  criteria shall be used by persons for performing free chlorine residual,  turbidity, pH and temperature measurements. 
    (1) a. Free chlorine residual. Samples shall be  collected in plastic or glass. Samples are not preserved; analyses are made  within 15 minutes. A DPD or FACTS Colorimetric Test Kit, spectrophotometer or  photometer is required. 
    (2) b. Turbidity. Samples shall be collected in  plastic or glass. Samples are not preserved; analyses are to be made within 15  minutes. Nephelometer is needed with light source for illuminating the sample  and one or more photoelectric detectors with a readout device to indicate the  intensity of light scattered at right angles to the path of the incident light.  Unit may be line/bench or battery/portable operated. 
    (3) c. pH. Samples shall be collected in plastic  or glass. Samples are not preserved. Analyses are to be made within 15 minutes.  A pH meter is necessary. 
    (4) d. Temperature. Samples shall be analyzed  immediately. Good A good grade mercury-filled or dial-type  centigrade thermometer, or thermistor are is required. 
    1VAC30-40-250. Sample collection, handling, and preservation. 
    A. A written sampling procedure with specified sampling  instructions shall be made available to sample collectors. The laboratory shall  require strict adherence to correct sampling procedures, complete  identification of a sample and prompt transfer of the sample to the laboratory.  
    B. The collector shall be trained in sampling procedures. 
    C. The sample needs to be representative of the  potable water system. The water tap shall be sampled after maintaining a steady  water flow for two or three minutes to clear service line unless otherwise  specified by the method, as an example, lead and copper. The tap shall be free  of any attachments or water purification devices. 
    D. The sample report form shall be completed  immediately after collection with location, date and time of collection,  collector's name, preservative added and any remarks concerning the sample.  Indelible ink shall be used. 
    C. E. The sample container, required preservative  preservation, and maximum holding time requirements for sampling  and analyzing inorganic contaminants are listed in Table III-4 of this  chapter incorporated by reference at 1VAC30-40-85 B 1. 
    D. F. The sample container, required preservative  preservation, and maximum holding time requirements for sampling  and analyzing organic contaminants are listed in Table III-5 of this  chapter incorporated by reference at 1VAC30-40-85 B 2. 
    G. The sample container, required preservation, and  maximum holding time requirements for alternative test methods are incorporated  by reference at 1VAC30-40-85 B 5.
    E. H. The laboratory shall reject any sample  not meeting the above criteria and notify the system or individual requesting  the analyses. 
    1VAC30-40-280. Action response to laboratory results.
    When the action response is a designated laboratory  responsibility, the laboratory shall notify the proper authority of  noncompliance sample results and request resampling from the same sampling  point immediately. 
         
                 | TABLE III-1Approved Methodology for Inorganic Contaminants
 | 
       | Contaminant
 | Methodology
 | EPA
 | ASTM3
 | SM4
 | USGS5
 | Other
 | 
       | Alkalinity
 | Titrimetric
 | 1 310.1
 | D1067-88B
 | 2320
 | 1-030-85
 | _____
 | 
       | Antimony6
 | ICP-Mass Spectrometry
 | 2 200.8
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Hydride-Atomic Absorption10
 | _____
 | D-3697-87
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Platform
 | 2 200.9
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Furnace
 | _____
 | _____
 | 3113B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Arsenic6
 | Inductively Coupled Plasma
 | 2 200.7
 | _____
 | 3120B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | ICP-Mass Spectrometry
 | 2 200.8
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Platform
 | 2 200.9
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Furnace
 | 2,11 206.2
 | D-2972-88C
 | 3113B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Hydride Atomic Absorption10
 | _____
 | D-2972-88B
 | 3114B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Asbestos
 | Transmission Electron Microscopy
 | 13 100.1
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Transmission Electron Microscopy
 | 14 100.2
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Barium6
 | Inductively Coupled Plasma
 | 2 200.7
 | _____
 | 3120B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | ICP-Mass Spectrometry
 | 2 200.8
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Direct
 | _____
 | _____
 | 3111D
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Furnace
 | 1 208.2
 | _____
 | 3113B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Berryllium6
 | Inductively Coupled Plasma
 | 2 200.7
 | _____
 | 3120B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | ICP-Mass Spectrometry
 | 2 200.8
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Platform
 | 2 200.9
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Furnace
 | _____
 | D-3645-84B
 | 3113B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Cadmium6
 | Inductively Coupled Plasma
 | 2 200.7
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | ICP-Mass Spectrometry
 | 2 200.8
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Platform
 | 2 200.9
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Furnace
 | _____
 | _____
 | 3113B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Calcium6
 | EDTA Titrimetric
 | 1 215.2
 | D511-88A
 | 3500-Ca-D
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Direct Aspiration
 | 1 215.1
 | D511-88B
 | 3111-B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Inductively Coupled Plasma
 | 2 200.7
 | _____
 | 3120
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Chromium6
 | Inductively Coupled Plasma
 | 2 200.7
 | _____
 | 3120B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | ICP-Mass Spectrometry
 | 2 200.8
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Platform
 | 2 200.9
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Furnace
 | _____
 | _____
 | 3113B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Conductivity
 | Conductance
 | 1 120.1
 | D1125-82B
 | 2510
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Copper6
 | Atomic Absorption; Furnace
 | 1 220.2
 | D1688--90C
 | 3113B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Platform
 | 2 200.9
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Direct Aspiration
 | 1 220.1
 | D1688--90A
 | 3111-B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Inductively Coupled Plasma
 | 2 200.7
 | _____
 | 3120
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | ICP-Mass Spectrometry
 | 2 200.8
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Cyanide
 | Amenable, Spectrophotometric
 | _____
 | D2036-91B
 | 4500CN-G
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Manual Distillation followed by Spectro.
 | _____
 | _____
 | 4500-CN-C16, 18
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       |   | Manual
 | _____
 | D2036-91A
 | 4500-CN-E
 | 1-3300-85
 | _____
 | 
       |   | Semi-automated
 | 9 335.4
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       |   | Selective Electrode
 | _____
 | D2036-91A
 | 4500CN-F
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Fluoride
 | Ion Chromatography
 | 9 300.0
 | D4327-91
 | 4110B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Manual Distill; Color. SPADNS
 | _____
 | _____
 | 4500F-B,D
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Manual Electrode
 | _____
 | D1179-88B
 | 4500F-C
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Automated Electrode
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 3800-75W E20
 | _____
 | 
       | Automated Alizarin
 | _____
 | _____
 | 4500F-E
 | _____
 | 129-71W19
 | 
       | Lead6
 | Atomic Absorption; Furnace Technique
 | 1 239.2
 | D3559-85D
 | 3113B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Platform
 | 2 200.9
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       |   | 2 200.8
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Mercury
 | Manual, Cold Vapor10
 | 1 245.1
 | D3223-91
 | 3112B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Automated, Cold Vapor10
 | 1 245.2
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Nickel6
 | Inductively Coupled Plasma
 | 2 200.7
 | _____
 | 3120B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | ICP-Mass Spectrometry
 | 2 200.8
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Platform
 | 2 200.9
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Direct
 | _____
 | _____
 | 3111B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Furnace
 | _____
 | _____
 | 3113B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Nitrate
 | Ion Chromatography
 | 9 300.0
 | D4327-91
 | 4110B
 | _____
 | B-10118
 | 
       | Automated Cadmium Reduction
 | 9 353.2
 | D3867-90A
 | 4500-NO3 -F
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Ion Selective Electrode
 | _____
 | _____
 | 4500-NO3 -D
 | _____
 | WeWWG-/58807
 | 
       | Manual Cadmium Reduction
 | _____
 | D3867-90B
 | 4500-NO3 -E
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Nitrite
 | Ion Chromatography
 | 9 300.0
 | D4327-91
 | 4110B
 | _____
 | B-10118
 | 
       | Automated Cadmium Reduction
 | 9 353.2
 | D3887--90A
 | 4500-NO3--F
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Manual Cadmium Reduction
 | _____
 | D3867-90B
 | 4500-NO3--E
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Spectrophotometric
 | 1 354.1
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | O-Phosphate Unfiltered, no digestion or hydrolysis
 | Colorimetric: Ascorbic Acid
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       |   | Manual; 2 Reagent
 | 1 365.3
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       |   | Manual; 1 Reagent
 | 1 365.2
 | D515-88A
 | 4500-P-E
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       |   | Auto; Segmented
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 1-2601-85
 | _____
 | 
       |   | Auto; Discrete
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 1-2598-85
 | _____
 | 
       | Ion Chromatography
 | 9 300.0
 | D4327-91
 | 4110B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | pH
 | Electrometric - Individual Measurement
 | 1 150.1
 | D1293-84B
 | 4500-H
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Electrometric - Online Measurement
 | 1 150.2
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Residual Disinfectant Chlorine
 | Amperometric Titration
 | _____
 | _____
 | 4500C1-D
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Amperometric Titration- low level
 | _____
 | _____
 | 4500C1-E
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | DPD Colorimetric Method
 | _____
 | _____
 | 4500C1-G
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | DPD Titrimetric
 | _____
 | _____
 | 4500C1-F
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Syringaldazine (FACTS)
 | _____
 | _____
 | 4500C1-H
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Ozone Chlorine Dioxide
 | Indigo Method
 | _____
 | _____
 | 4500O3 B
 | _____
 | 21
 | 
       | Amperometric Method
 | _____
 | _____
 | 4500C102
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | DPD Colorimetric
 | _____
 | _____
 | 4500C102 -D
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Amperometric Method
 | _____
 | _____
 | 4500C102 -E
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Selenium6
 | Hydride-Atomic Absorption10
 | _____
 | D3859-88A
 | 3114B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | ICP-Mass Spectrometry
 | 2 200.8
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Platform
 | 2 200.9
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Furnace11
 | _____
 | D3859-88B
 | 3113B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Silicafiltered
 | Colorimetric-Molybdate Blue-Manual
 | 1 370.1
 | D89-88
 | _____
 | 1-700-85
 | _____
 | 
       | Automated
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 1-2700-85
 | _____
 | 
       | Molybdosilicate-Manual
 | _____
 | _____
 | 4500Si-D
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Heteropoly Blue-Manual
 | _____
 | _____
 | 4500Si-E
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Molybdate Reactive Silica-Automated
 | _____
 | _____
 | 4500Si-F
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Inductively Coupled Plasma
 | 2 200.7
 | _____
 | 3120
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Sodium6
 | Atomic Absorption: Direct Aspiration
 | 1 273.1
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Inductively Coupled Plasma
 | 2 200.7
 | _____
 | 3120
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Flame Photometric
 | _____
 | D1428-82A
 | 3500Na-D
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Temperature
 | Thermometric
 | _____
 | _____
 | 2550
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Thallium6
 | ICP-Mass Spectrometry
 | 2 200.8
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Platform
 | 2 200.9
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Atomic Absorption; Furnace
 | _____
 | _____
 | 3113B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Turbidity
 | Nephelometric
 | 1 180.1
 | _____
 | 2130B
 | _____
 | _____
 | 
       | Great Lake Instruments
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | _____
 | Method 2
 | 
       | 1 Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and    Wastes, EPA-600/4-79-020, March 1983. Available at NTIS, publication order    number PB84-128677.
 | 
       | 2 Methods for the Determination of Metals in    Environmental Samples. EPA-600/4-91-010. Available at NTIS, PB 91-231498,    June 1991.
 | 
       | 3 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vols. 11.01    and 11.02, 1993, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1918 Race    Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103.
 | 
       | 4 18th edition of Standard methods for the    Examination of Water and Wastewater, 1992, American Public Health    Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation.
 | 
       | 5 Techniques of Water Resources Investigations    of the U.S. Geological Survey, Book 5, Chapter A-1, Third Edition, 1989.    Available at Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government printing Office,    Washington, DC 20402.
 | 
       | 6 Samples may not be filtered. Samples that    contain less than 1 NTU(ne phelometric turbidity unit) and are properly    preserved (concentrated nitric acid to pH <2) may be analyzed directly    (without digestion) for total metals; otherwise, digestion is required.    Turbidity must be measured on the preserved samples just prior to the    initiation of metal analysis. When digestion is required, the total    recoverable technique as defined in the method must be used.
 | 
       | 7 Orion Guide to Water and Wastewater    Analysis, Form WeWWG/5880, p. 5, 1985. Orion Research, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
 | 
       | 8 Waters Test Method for Determination of    Nitrite/Nitrate in Water Using Single Column Ion Chromatography, Method    B-1011, Millipore Corporation, Waters Chromatography Division, 34 Maple    Street, Milford, MA 01757.
 | 
       | 9 Methods for the Determination of Inorganic    Substances in Environmental Samples, EPA/600/R/93/100, August 1993.    Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH 45268.
 | 
       | 10 For the Gaseous hydride determinations of    antimony, arsenic, and selenium and for the determination of mercury by the    cold vapor techniques, the proper digestion technique as defined in the    method must be followed to ensure the element is in the proper state for    analysis.
 | 
       | 11 Add 2 ml of 30% hydrogen peroxide and an    appropriate concentration of matrix modifier nickel nitrate to samples.
 | 
       | 13 Method 100.1 Analytical method for    Determination of Asbestos, Fibers in Water, EPA-600/4-83-043, September 1983,    U.S. EPA Environmental Research Laboratory, Athena, GA 30613. Available at    NTIS, PB 83-260471.
 | 
       | 14 Method 100.2 Method for the Determination    of Asbestos Structure over 10 pm in Length in Drinking Water, (1993),    Technical Support division, Cincinnati, OH 45268.
 | 
       | 16 The distillation procedure in EPA Method    335.2 should not be used.
 | 
       | 18 EPA Methods 335.2 and 335.3 require the    sodium hydroxide absorber solution final concentration to be adjusted to 0.25    N before colorimetric analysis. 
 | 
       | 19 Fluoride in Water and Wastewater.    Industrial Method No. 129-71-W. Technicon Industrial Systems. Tarrytown, NY    10591 December 1972.
 | 
       | 20 Fluoride in Water and Wastewater, Method    No. 380-75WE. Technicon Industrial Systems. Tarrytown, NY 10591, February    1976.
 | 
  
     
           | Table III-2Approved Methodology for Organic Contaminants
 | 
       | Contaminant
 | EPA Method
 | 
       | Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM)
 | 502.2, 524.2, 551
 | 
       | Maximum Trihalomethane Potential (MTP)
 | 510.1
 | 
       | Benzene
 | 502.2, 524.2
 | 
       | Carbon tetrachloride
 | 502.2, 524.2, 551.
 | 
       | 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
 | 502.2, 524.2
 | 
       | 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
 | 502.2, 524.2
 | 
       | 1,2-Dichloroethane
 | 502.2, 524.2
 | 
       | cis-Dichloroethylene
 | 502.2, 524.2
 | 
       | trans-Dichloroethylene
 | 502.2, 524.2
 | 
       | Dichloromethane
 | 502.2, 524.2
 | 
       | 1,2-Dichloropropane
 | 502.2, 524.2
 | 
       | Ethylbenzene
 | 502.2, 524.2
 | 
       | Styrene
 | 502.2, 524.2
 | 
       | Tetrachloroethylene
 | 502.2, 524.2, 551.
 | 
       | 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
 | 502.2, 524.2, 551.
 | 
       | Trichloroethylene
 | 502.2, 524.2, 551.
 | 
       | Toluene
 | 502.2, 524.2.
 | 
       | 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
 | 502.2, 524.2.
 | 
       | 1,1-Dichloroethylene
 | 502.2, 524.2.
 | 
       | 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
 | 502.2, 524.2
 | 
       | Vinyl chloride
 | 502.2, 524.2.
 | 
       | Xylene (total)
 | 502.2, 524.2.
 | 
       | 2,3,7,8-TCDD (dioxin)
 | 1613.
 | 
       | 2,4-D
 | 515.2, 555.
 | 
       | 2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
 | 515.2, 555.
 | 
       | Alachlor
 | 505, 507 2, 525.2.
 | 
       | Atrazine
 | 505, 507 2, 525.2.
 | 
       | Benzo(a)pyrene
 | 525.2, 550, 550.1.
 | 
       | Carbofuran
 | 531.1
 | 
       | Chlordane
 | 531.1
 | 
       | Dalapony
 | 552.1
 | 
       | Di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate
 | 506, 525.2.
 | 
       | Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
 | 506, 525.2.
 | 
       | Dibromochloropropane (DBCP)
 | 504, 551.
 | 
       | Dinoseb
 | 515.2, 555.
 | 
       | Diquat
 | 549.1
 | 
       | Endothal
 | 548.1
 | 
       | Endrin
 | 505, 508 2, 525.2.
 | 
       | Ethylenedibromide (EDB)
 | 504, 551.
 | 
       | Glyphosate
 | 547, 6651 1.
 | 
       | Heptachlor
 | 505, 508 2, 525.2.
 | 
       | Heptachlor Epoxide
 | 505, 508 2, 525.2.
 | 
       | Hexachlorobenzene
 | 505, 508 2, 525.2.
 | 
       | Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
 | 505, 525.2
 | 
       | Lindane
 | 505, 508 2, 525.2
 | 
       | Methoxychlor
 | 505,508 2, 525.2
 | 
       | Oxamyl
 | 531.1.
 | 
       | PCBs 3 (as decachlorobiphenyl)
 | 508A
 | 
       |   | (as Aroclors)
 | 505, 508 2
 | 
       | Pentachlorophenol
 | 515.2, 525.2, 555
 | 
       | Picloram
 | 515.2, 555.
 | 
       | Simazine
 | 505, 507 2, 525.2
 | 
       | Toxaphene
 | 508 2, 525.2
 | 
       | Aldicarb
 | 531.1
 | 
       | Aldicarb sulfone
 | 531.1.
 | 
       | Aldicarb sulfoxide
 | 531.1.
 | 
       | Aldrin
 | 505, 508 2, 525.2.
 | 
       | Butachlor
 | 507 2, 525.2.
 | 
       | Carbaryl
 | 531.1.
 | 
       | Dicamba
 | 515.2, 555.
 | 
       | Dieldrin
 | 505, 508 2, 525.2.
 | 
       | 3-hydroxycarbofuran
 | 531.1.
 | 
       | Methomyl
 | 531.1.
 | 
       | Metholachlor
 | 507 2, 525.2.
 | 
       | Metribuzin
 | 507 2, 525.2.
 | 
       | Propachlor
 | 508 2, 525.2.
 | 
       | 1 Method 6651 is contained in the 18th edition    of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewate, 1992,    American Public Health Association, Water Works Association, Water    Environmental Federation.
 2 Solid phase extraction procedures, as    specified in USEPA Method 525.2, may be used as an option with USEPA Methods    507 and 508.
 3 PCBs are qualitatively identified as    Aroclors and measured for compliance purposes as decachlorobiphenyl.
 | 
       |  |  |  | 
  
     
           | Table III-3Approved Methodology for Secondary Inorganic Contaminants
 | 
       | Containment
 | EPA
 | ASTM 3
 | SM 4
 | Other
 | 
       | Aluminum 6
 | 2 200.7
 |   | 3120B
 |   | 
       |   | 2 200.8
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 2 200.9
 |   | 3113B
 |   | 
       |   |   |   | 3111D
 | 5 1-305-85
 | 
       | Chloride
 | 8 300.0
 | 4327-91
 | 4110
 |   | 
       |   |   |   | 4500-C1-D
 |   | 
       | Color
 | 1 110.2
 |   | 2120B
 |   | 
       | Copper 6
 | 2 200.7
 |   | 3120B
 |   | 
       |   | 2 200.8
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 2 200.9
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 1 200.1
 | D1688-90A
 | 3111B
 |   | 
       |   | 1 200.2
 | D1688-90C
 | 3113B
 |   | 
       | Flouride
 | 8 300.0
 | D4327-91
 | 4110
 |   | 
       |   |   | D1179-88A
 | 4500F-B
 |   | 
       |   |   | D1179-88B
 | and D
 |   | 
       |   |   |   | 4500F-C
 | 7 129-71W
 | 
       |   |   |   | 4500F-E
 | 10 380-75WE
 | 
       | Foaming Agents
 | 1 425.1
 |   | 5540C
 |   | 
       | Iron 6
 | 2 200.7
 |   | 3120B
 |   | 
       |   | 2 200.9
 |   | 3111B
 |   | 
       |   |   |   | 3113B
 |   | 
       | Manganese 6
 | 2 200.7
 |   | 3120B
 |   | 
       |   | 2 200.8
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 2 200.9
 |   | 3111B
 |   | 
       |   |   |   | 3113B
 |   | 
       | Odor
 | 1 140.1
 |   | 2150B
 |   | 
       | pH
 | 1 150.1
 | D1293-84B
 | 4500-H
 |   | 
       | Silver 6
 | 2 200.7
 |   | 3120B
 | 5 1-2822-85
 | 
       |   | 2 200.8
 |   | 3111B
 |   | 
       |   | 2 200.9
 |   | 3113B
 |   | 
       | Sulfate
 | 8 300.0
 | D4327-01
 | 4110
 | 5 1-2822-85
 | 
       |   | 8 375.2
 |   | 4500-SO4-F
 | 5 1-28223-85
 | 
       |   |   |   | 4500-SO4-E
 |   | 
       | Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) 
 | 1 160.1
 |   | 3120B
 |   | 
       |   |   |   | 3111B
 |   | 
       | Zinc
 | 2 200.7
 |   | 3120B
 |   | 
       |   | 2 200.8
 |   | 3111B
 |   | 
  
    1 Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and  Wastes, EPA-600/4-79-020, March 1983. Available at NTIS as publication number  PB84-128677. 
    2 Methods for the Determination of Metals in  Environmental Samples. Available at NTIS as publication number PB91-231498,  June 1991. 
    3 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vols. 11.01 and  11.02, 1993, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1916 Race Street,  Philadelphia, PA 19103.
    4 18th edition of Standard Methods for the  Examination of Water and Wastewater, 1992, American Public Health Association,  American Water Works Association, Water Environmental Federation. 
    5 Techniques of Water Resources Investigations  of the U.S. Geological Survey, Book 5, Chapter A-1, Third Edition, 1989.  Available at Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office,  Washington, DC 20402.
    6 Samples may not be filtered. Samples that  contain less than 1 NTU (nephelometeric turbidity unit) and are properly  preserved (concentrated nitric acid to pH *2) may be analyzed directly (without  digestion) for total metals, otherwise, digestion is required. Turbidity must  be measured on the preserved samples just prior to the initiation of metal  analysis. When digestion is required, the total recoverable technique as  defined in the method must be used; samples cannot be filtered.
    7 Fluoride in Water and Wastewater. Industrial  Method No. 129-71W. Technicon Industrial Systems. Tarrytown, NY, 10591,  December 1972. 
    8 Methods for the Determination of Inorganic  Substances in Environmental Samples, EPA/600/R/93/100, August 1993.  EPA/Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH 45268. 
    9 (Reserved).
    10 Fluoride in Water and Wastewater, Method No.  380-75WE. Technicon Industrial Systems. Tarrytown, NY 10591, February 1976.
           | Table III-4Sample Collection, Containers, and Preservation for Inorganic Contaminants
 | 
       | Contaminant
 | Preservative 2
 | Container 3
 | Maximum Holding Time 4
 | 
       | Alkalinity
 | Cool 4°C
 | P or G
 | 14 days
 | 
       | Antimony
 | Conc HNO3 to pH <2
 | P or G
 | 6 months
 | 
       | Arsenic
 | Conc HNO3 to pH <2
 | P or G
 | 6 months
 | 
       | Asbestos
 | Cool 4°C 5
 | P or G
 | 48 hours
 | 
       | Barium
 | Conc HNO3 to pH <2
 | P or G
 | 6 months
 | 
       | Beryllium
 | Conc HNO3 to pH <2
 | P or G
 | 6 months
 | 
       | Cadmium
 | Conc HNO3 to pH <2
 | P or G
 | 6 months
 | 
       | Calcium
 | Conc HNO3 to ph <2
 | P or G
 | 6 months
 | 
       | Chloride
 | None
 | P or G
 | 28 days
 | 
       | Chromium
 | Conc HNO3 to pH <2
 | P or G
 | 6 months
 | 
       | Copper
 | Conc HNO3 to pH <2
 | P or G
 | 6 months
 | 
       | Cyanide
 | NaOH to pH >12, Cool 4°C0.6g ascorbid acid 6
 | P or G
 | 14 days
 | 
       | Fluoride
 | None
 | P or G
 | 1 month
 | 
       | Free Chlorine Residual
 | None
 | P or G
 | Analyze immediately 7
 | 
       | Lead
 | Conc HNO3 to pH <2
 | P or G
 | 6 months
 | 
       | Mercury
 | Conc HNO3 to ph <2
 | P or G
 | 28 days
 | 
       | Nickel
 | Conc HNO3 to pH <2
 | P or G
 | 6 months
 | 
       | Nitrate N
 | Cool 4°C
 | P or G
 | 28 days
 | 
       | Total Nitrate/Nitrite
 | Conc H2SO4 to pH <2
 | P or G
 | 28 days
 | 
       | Nitrite-N
 | Cool 4°C
 | P or G
 | 48 hours
 | 
       | 0-Phosphate
 | Filter immediately, Cool 4°C
 | P or G
 | 48 hours
 | 
       | pH
 | None
 | P or G
 | Analyze immediately 7
 | 
       | Selenium
 | Conc HNO3 to pH <2
 | P or G
 | 6 months
 | 
       | Silica
 | Cool 4°C
 | P
 | 28 days
 | 
       | Sodium
 | Conc HNO3 to pH <2
 | P or G
 | 6 months
 | 
       | Temperature
 | None
 | P or G
 | Analyze immediately 7
 | 
       | Thallium
 | Conc HNO3 to pH <2
 | P or G
 | 6 months
 | 
       | Total Filterable Residue (TDS)
 | Cool 4°C
 | P or G
 | 7 days
 | 
       | Turbidity
 | Cool 4°C
 | P or G
 | 48 hours
 | 
  
    1 The laboratory director must reject any  samples, taken for compliance purposes, not meeting these criteria and notify  the authority requesting the analysis.
    2 If HNO3 cannot be used because of  shipping restrictions, immediately ship the sample to the laboratory at ambient  temperature. Upon receipts, the sample must be acidified with conc. HNO3  to pH <2 and held for at least 16 hours before analysis.
    3 P = plastic, hard or soft; G = glass, hard or  soft.
    4 In all cases, samples should be analyzed as  soon after collection as possible.
    5 These samples should never be frozen.
    6 Ascorbic acid should only be used in the  presence of residual chlorine.
    7 Analyze immediately generally means within 15  minutes of sample collection.
           | Table III-5Sample Collection, Containers, and Preservation for Organic Contaminants
 | 
       | Contaminant
 | Method
 | Preservative
 | Container
 | Holding Time
 | 
       | To Extraction
 | After Extraction
 | 
       | Non-Volatile SOCs
 | 504 
 | 3 mg/40 ml sodium thiosulfate
 | GlassTeflon cap liners
 | 28 days
 | Analyze immediately
 | 
       |   |   | HCl to pH 2Cool 4°C
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 505
 | 3 mg/40 ml sodium thiosulfate
 | Glass (dark)Teflon cap liners
 | 14 days
 | Analyze immediately
 | 
       |   |   | Cool 4°C
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 506
 | 60 mg/l sodium thiosulfate
 | Glass (dark)Teflon cap liners
 | 14 days 1
 | 14 days
 | 
       |   |   | Cool 4°C
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 507 2
 | 80 mg/l sodium thiosulfate
 | Glass (dark)Teflon cap liners
 | 14 days
 | 14 days
 | 
       |   |   | Cool 4°C
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 508A
 | Cool 4°C
 | GlassTeflon cap liners
 | 14 days
 | 30 days
 | 
       |   | 508 2
 | 80 mg/l sodium thiosulfate
 | Glass (dark)Teflon cap liners
 | 7 days
 | 14 days
 | 
       |   |   | Cool 4°C
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 515.2
 | 6N HCl to pH <280 mg/l sodium thiosulfate
 | Glass (dark)Teflon cap liners
 | 14 days
 | 14 days
 | 
       |   |   | Cool 4°C
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 525.2
 | 40-50 mg/l sodium sulfiteHCl to pH <2
 | GlassTeflon cap liners
 | 7 days
 | 30 days
 | 
       |   |   | Cool 4°C
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 531.1
 | Monochloracetic acid to pH 380 mg/l sodium thiosulfate
 | GlassTeflon cap liners
 | 28 days-10°C
 | No extract
 | 
       |   |  
 | Cool 4°C until storageStore at -10°C
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 547
 | 100 mg/l sodium thiosulfate
 | Glass (dark)Teflon cap liners
 | 14 days
 | No extract
 | 
       |   |   | Cool 4°C
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 548.1
 | Cool 4°C
 | GlassTeflon cap liners
 | 7 days
 | 1 day
 | 
       |   | 549.1
 | 100 mg/l sodium thiosulfateH2SO4 to pH2
 | Amber PVC high density or amber silanized glass
 | 7 days
 | 21 days
 | 
       |   |   | Cool 4°C
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 550.0
 | 100 mg/l sodium thiosulfate6N HCl to pH <2
 | Glass (dark)Teflon cap liners
 | 7 days
 | 40 days
 | 
       |   |   | Cool 4°C
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 550.1
 | 100 mg/l sodium    thiosulfate6N HCl to pH <2
 | Glass (dark)Teflon cap liners
 | 7 days
 | 40 days
 | 
       |   |   | Cool 4°C
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 552.1
 | 10 mg/l NH4Cl 
 | GlassTeflon cap liners
 | 28 days
 | 48 hours
 | 
       |   |   | Cool 4°C
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 555
 | 6N HCl to pH <24-5mg sodium sulfite
 | Glass
 | 14 days
 |   | 
       |   |   | Cool 4°C
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 1613
 | 80 mg/l sodium thiosulfate
 | Glass (dark)
 |   | 40 days
 | 
       |   |   | Cool 4°C
 |   |   |   | 
       | MTP
 | 510.1
 | Cool 4°C
 | Glass (dark)Silicon/Teflon cap liners
 | 14 days
 |   | 
       | TTHMs/VOCs
 | 502.2
 | 25 mg/40 ml ascorbic acid or 3 mg/40 ml sodium    thiosulfate1:1 HCl to pH <2
 | GlassSilicon/Teflon cap liners
 | 14 days
 |   | 
       |   |   | Cool 4°C
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 524.2
 | 25 mg/60 ml ascorbic acid1:1 HCl to pH <2
 | GlassSilicon/Teflon cap liners
 | 14 days
 |   | 
       |   |   | Cool 4°C
 |   |   |   | 
       |   | 551
 | 4 mg sodium thiosulfate or sulfite and ammonium chloride    or 25mg ascorbic acid0.2N HCl to pH 4.5-5.0
 | GlassSilicon/Teflon cap liners
 | 14 days
 |   | 
       |   |   | Cool 4°C
 |   |   |   | 
  
    1 The holding time for Heptachor under this  method is 7 days.
    2 Add 10 mg/l HgCL2 in any drinking  water sample that might be expected to exhibit biological degradation of the  target pesticides. Samples that have been preserved with HgCl2 may  be disposed of in at least two ways: as a hazardous waste, or by passing over  an absorbent column (i.e., Alumina, activated with carbon, etc.) for mercury  absorption, with the effluent analyzed periodically for breakthrough. The  absorbent would then be disposed of as a hazardous waste. Other techniques may  be applicable.
         
          1VAC30-40-320. General laboratory practices. 
    A. Sterilization procedures. 
           | Table IV-1 The following times and temperatures shall be used for autoclaving materials:
 | 
       | Material | Temperature/Time | 
       | Membrane filters and pads | 121°C/10 min. | 
       | Carbohydrate-containing media    (except P-A Broth) | 121°C/12-15 min. | 
       | P-A Broth | 121°C/12 min. | 
       | Contaminated materials and    discarded tests | 121°C/30 min. | 
       | Membrane filter funnel assemblies    (wrapped), sample collection bottles (empty), individual glassware items | 121°C/15 min. | 
       | Dilution water blank (99 mL) | 121°C/15 min. | 
       | Rinse water volumes of 500 mL    to 1000 mL | 121°C/30 min. | 
       | Rinse water in excess of 1000    mL | 121°C/time adjusted for volume | 
  
    1. Media, membrane filters and pads shall be removed  immediately after completion of sterilization cycle. 
    2. Membrane filter assemblies shall be sterilized  between sample filtration series. A filtration series ends when 30 minutes or  longer elapse between individual sample filtrations. 
    B. Laboratory pure water. 
    1. Use only satisfactorily tested reagent water from  stills or deionization units to prepare media, reagents and dilution/rinse  water for microbiological analyses. 
    2. QC - Test the quality of the lab pure water or have  it tested by a certified lab to assure it meets these criteria: 
           | Table IV-2 | 
       | Parameter | Limits | Frequency | 
       | Conductivity | Less than 2 Micromho/cm at    25°C | Monthly | 
       | or |   |   | 
       | Resistivity | Greater than 0.5 megohms at    25°C  | Monthly | 
       | Heterotrophic    Plate Count (Pour Plate) | Less    than 500 CFU/ml | Monthly | 
       | Total Chlorine Residual | Nondetectable | Monthly | 
       | Trace Metals (Pb, Cd, Cr, Cu,    Ni, Zn) | Not greater than 0.05 mg/L per    contaminant.Collectively, no greater than 0.1 mg/L
 | Annually | 
       | Test for bacteriological    quality of reagent water Standard Methods, 18th Ed., 1992, Part 9020 B.3.c.1 | Ratio 0.8 - 3.0 | Annually | 
  
    C. Dilution/rinse water. 
    1. Prepare stock buffer solution according to Standard  Methods, 18th Ed., 1992, Part 9050 C.1.a. Autoclave or filter sterilize stock  buffer, label and date container and store in refrigerator. Ensure stored stock  buffer solution is free of turbidity. 
    2. Prepare rinse/dilution water by adding 1.25 mL of  stock buffer solution and 5 mL of magnesium chloride (MgCl2)  solution to one liter of lab pure water. Make magnesium chloride solution by  adding 81.1 g MgCl2. 6H2O or 38g of anhydrous MgCl2  to one liter of lab pure water. Autoclave rinse/dilution water according to  Table IV-1 of this chapter. 
    3. QC - Check each batch of dilution/rinse water for  sterility by adding 50 mL of dilution/rinse water to 50 mL of double strength  TSB. Incubate at 35° ± 0.5°C for 24 hours and check for growth. 
    D. Glassware washing. 
    1. Washing processes shall provide clean glassware with  no stains or spotting. Glassware shall be washed in a warm detergent solution  and thoroughly rinsed initially in tap water. Use distilled or deionized water  for final rinse. 
    2. QC - Perform the Inhibitory Residue Test (Standard  Methods, 18th Ed., 1992, Part 9020 B.3.a.2) ) on the initial use of a washing  compound and whenever a different formulation of washing compound, or washing  procedure, is used to ensure glassware is free of toxic residue. 
    E. Media; general requirements. 
    1. Use dehydrated or ready to use media manufactured  commercially. Store dehydrated media in a cool, dry location away from direct  sunlight and discard caked or discolored dehydrated media. 
    2. Date bottles of dehydrated media when  received and when opened. Discard dehydrated media six months after opening; if  stored in a desiccator from the time of opening, storage is extended to 12  months. Discard dehydrated media that has passed the manufacturer's expiration  date. Unopened dehydrated media should be used within two years of date of  receipt. 
    3. QC - Record the date of preparation, type of medium,  manufacturer's lot number, sterilization time and temperature, final pH and  technician's initials for media prepared in the laboratory. Store prepared  media as described in Table IV-3. 
    4. QC - Check each batch of laboratory-prepared media  and each lot number of commercially prepared (ready to use) media before use  with a known positive and a known negative culture control. These control  organisms can be stock cultures (periodically checked for purity) or  commercially available disks impregnated with the organism. 
           | Table IV-3Storage times for prepared media.
 | 
       | Media Type | Maximum StorageTime/Temperature
 | 
       | m-Endo Broth in screw-cap    flasks or bottles  | 96 hours/4°C | 
       | Poured plates of LES Endo Agar    and Nutrient Agar + MUG in sealed plastic bags | 2 weeks/4°C | 
       | LTB,, BGLB, EC Medium,    ECMedium + MUG, and TSB in loose-cap tubes  | 1 week/4°C | 
       | LTB, BGLB, P-A Broth, EC    Medium, EC Medium + MUG and TSB in screw-cap tubesor bottles | 3 months/4°C | 
       | HPC agar in screw-cap flasks or    bottles | 2 weeks/4°C | 
  
    5. Incubate refrigerated broth in culture tubes and  bottles with fermentation vials overnight at 35°C before use. Discard tubes and  bottles showing growth or bubbles. 
    6. Check tubes and bottles of broth before use and  discard if evaporation exceeds 10% of original volume. 
    7. QC - For commercially prepared (ready to use) liquid  media and agars, record the date received, lot number and pH verification.  Discard media by manufacturer's expiration date. 
           | Table    IV-4pH of Media
 | 
       | Medium | pH    Range | 
       | Single-Strength    LTB | 6.6    - 7.0 | 
       | Double-Strength    LTB | 6.5    - 6.9 | 
       | Triple-Strength LTB | 6.4 - 6.8 | 
       | BGLB Broth | 7.0 - 7.4 | 
       | m-Endo Broth and LES Endo Agar | 7.0 - 7.4 | 
       | P-A Broth | 6.6 - 7.0 | 
       | EC Medium and EC Medium + MUG | 6.7 - 7.1 | 
       | Nutrient Agar + MUG | 6.6 - 7.0 | 
       | HPC Agar | 6.8 - 7.2 | 
       | Trypticase Soy Broth and Agar,    Tryptic Soy Broth and and Agar, and Tryptose Broth | 7.1 - 7.5 | 
  
    F. Membrane Filter (MF) Media. 
    Use m-Endo broth or LES Endo agar  for the Membrane Filter Test. Ensure that alcohol used in medium rehydration  procedure is not denatured. 
    Prepare medium in a sterile flask  and use a boiling water bath or a constantly attended hot plate with a stir bar  to bring medium just to the boiling point. Do not boil medium. Do not autoclave  medium. 
    G. Fermentation technique media. 
    Use lauryl tryptose broth or lauryl sulfate broth in the  presumptive test. The appropriate presumptive test medium concentration will  vary according to sample volume (10, 20 or 100 mL) in each culture tube/bottle.  
     
     
     
         
             | Table    IV-5Preparation of Lauryl Tryptose Broth for Presumptive Test
 (Total Sample Size is 100mL)
 | 
       | Number of Tubes or Single    Bottle
 | Sample per Tube/ Bottle
 | Medium per Tube/ Bottle
 | Total Volume of Medium +    Sample
 | Dehy-drated Medium
 | Medium Concen-tration
 | Minimum Tube or Bottle Size
 | 
       |   | mL
 | mL
 | mL
 | g/L
 |   | mm
 | 
       | 10
 | 10
 | 10
 | 20
 | 71.2
 | 2x
 | 20 x 150
 | 
       | 10
 | 10
 | 20
 | 30
 | 53.4
 | 1.5x
 | 25 x 150
 | 
       | 5
 | 20
 | 10
 | 30
 | 106.8
 | 3x
 | 25 x 150
 | 
       | 5
 | 20
 | 20
 | 40
 | 71.2
 | 2x
 | 25 x 200
 | 
       | 1
 | 100
 | 50
 | 150
 | 106.8
 | 3x
 | 50 x 50
 | 
       |   |   |   |   |   |   | x 160
 | 
  
         
      Use single strength brilliant green lactose bile (BGLB)  broth in the confirmed test. Use LES Endo agar for the completed test. Prepare  m-Endo LES agar as described in this subsection. 
    H. Presence- Absence (P-A) Medium. 
    Use triple-strength Presence-Absence Broth for the  Presence-Absence Test. Autoclave media for 12 minutes at 121°C, leave space  between bottles. Do not leave media in theautoclave for more than 30 minutes. 
    Use single strength brilliant green lactose bile (BGLB)  broth in the confirmed test. Use LES Endo agar for the completed test. 
    I. ONPG-MUG Test Medium. 
    Use ONPG-MUG Test Medium for the ONPG-MUG Test for total  coliform and E. coli. Do not prepare this medium from basic ingredients.  Protect medium from light. Do not autoclave medium. 
    Each lot of ONPG- MUG Test Medium shall be checked before  use with stock cultures or commercially available disks impregnated with  Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Use sterile  distilled water as the test sample and inoculate three tests from each lot of  the ONPG-MUG medium with these cultures and incubate at 35° ± 0.5°C for 24-28  hours. The results shall be yellow color with fluorescence with E. coli, yellow  color without fluorescence with K. pneumoniae and no color with no fluorescence  with P. Aeruginosa. 
    J. EC Medium. 
    Use EC Medium to check for fecal coliforms in total  coliform positive MF, Fermentation and P-A Tests. 
    K. EC Medium + MUG. 
    Use EC Medium + MUG to check  for E. coli in total coliform positive MF, Fermentation and P-A Tests. The  medium is made up of EC Medium supplemented with 50 ug/ml of  4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-glucuronide (MUG). MUG may be added to EC Medium  before autoclaving or EC Medium + MUG may be purchased commercially. Use 10 mL  of medium in each cluture tube. 
    Do not use a fermentation  vial. Gas production is not relevant to the test and the use of a fermentation  vial may cause confusion on test interpretation. 
    QC - Check uninocultated culture tubes and medium before  use with a 365 or 366 nm ultraviolet light to insure they do not fluoresce.  
    L. Nutrient Agar + MUG. 
    Use Nutrient Agar + MUG to check for E. coli in total  coliform positive MF Tests. The medium is nutrient agar supplemented with 100  ug/ml of 4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-glucuronide (MUG). Sertilize agar in 100  ml volumes at 121°C for 15 minutes. 
    M. Heterotrophic Plate Count Agar. 
    Temper melted agar to 44-46°C before pouring plates. Hold  melted agar no longer than three hours. Do not melt sterile agar more than  once. 
    N. Trypticase Soy Broth. Tryptic Soy Broth or Tryptose  Broth. 
    Use these broths for sterility checks of sample containers,  membrane filters and rinse/dilution water. Also use these broths to rehydrate  lyophilized disks of control organisms. 
    O. Trypticase Soy Agar or Tryptic Soy Agar. 
    Use this agar to prepare slants for growth and storage of  control organisms. 
    1VAC30-40-330. Analytical methodology. 
    A. Table IV-6 of this chapter describes the EPA-approved  methods which are mandatory for microbiological analyses of drinking water.  Laboratories shall meet the sampling and analytical methodology requirements  incorporated by reference at 1VAC30-40-85 B 3 for microbiology and 1VAC30-40-85  B 5 for alternative test methods.
           | TABLE IV-6EPA APPROVED METHODS FOR MICROBIOLOGY
 | 
       | PARAMETER
 | METHOD
 | SM1
 | FR2
 | 
       | TOTAL COLIFORM
 | Membrane Filter Technique
 | 9222A,B,C
 |   | 
       | TOTAL COLIFORM
 | Standard Total Coliform    Fermentation Technique
 | 9221A,B
 |   | 
       | TOTAL COLIFORM
 | Presence-Absence(P-A) Coliform Test
 | 9221D
 |   | 
       | TOTAL COLIFORM
 | ONPG-MUG
 | 9223
 |   | 
       | FECAL COLIFORM
 | EC Medium
 |   | 40 CFR 141.21(f)(5)
 | 
       | E.coli
 | EC Medium + MUG
 |   | 40 CFR 141.21(f)(6)(i)
 | 
       | E.coli
 | Nutrient Agar + MUG
 |   | 40 CFR 141.21(f)(6)(ii)
 | 
       | E.coli
 | ONPG-MUG Test
 |   | 40 CFR 141.21(f)(6)(iii)
 | 
       | HETEROTROPHIC PLATE COUNT
 | Heterotrophic Plate, Plate    Count, Pour Plate Technique
 | 9215B
 |   | 
  
    1Standard Methods for the Examination of Water  and Waste Water, 18th Edition, American Public Health Association, American  Waterworks Association, Water Environment Federation, 1992.
    2Federal Register, 40 CFR Part 141.
    B. Use only the analytical methodology specified in the  National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (40 CFR Part 141.21(f)). 
    B. A laboratory shall be certified for all analytical  methods indicated below that it uses. At minimum, the laboratory shall  be certified for one total coliform method, one fecal coliform or E. coli  method, and the Pour Plate Method for heterotrophic bacteria. 
    C. Laboratories shall perform a minimum of 20 coliform  analyses monthly by each coliform method for which it is certified in order to  maintain certification status or qualify for initial certification. The minimum  number of coliform analyses (20) may be performed on a variety of water sample  types collected from different stages of the water treatment process, raw  source water, surface or ground water, as well as drinking water samples  collected from a distribution system or private wells. 
    If any drinking water sample is total coliform-positive,  the lab shall analyze that total coliform-positive culture to determine if  fecal coliforms are present, except that the lab may test for E. coli in lieu  of fecal coliforms. These tests are described in subsections G, H, and I of  this section. 
    Invalidate any sample results that show interference from  noncoliform organisms and request another sample from the same sampling point.  This interference is generally caused by heterotrophic bacteria and is  exhibited by a turbid culture with no gas formation in the presumptive phase of  the Fermentation Test, confluent growth without coliforms or TNTC without  coliforms in the Membrane Filter Test, a turbid culture bottle without color  change in the Presence-Absence Test, or an indeterminate color change in the  ONPG-MUG Test. 
    Public water systems need only determine the presence or  absence of total and fecal coliforms; coliform density determination is not  required. 100 mL of sample shall be used for each total coliform test. 
    Incubate cultures within 30 minutes of inoculation. 
    C. Membrane filter technique. 
    Shake sample vigorously before analyzing. Sample volume  used shall be 100 ± 2.5 mL. 
    QC - Conduct MF sterility check by filtering 100 mL of  sterile rinse water and plating on m-Endo medium at the beginning and the end  of each sample filtration series. If sterile controls indicate contamination,  reject all data from that series and request immediate resampling of those waters  involved in the laboratory error. 
    QC - Run a 100 mL sterile rinse water blank between every  10 samples if the number of samples in a series exceeds 10. 
    Invalidate all samples resulting in confluent growth or  TNTC (too numerous to count) without evidence of total coliforms. Record as  "confluent growth" or "TNTC" and request an additional  sample from the same sampling point. Confluent growth is defined as a  continuous bacterial growth, without evidence of total coliforms, covering the  entire membrane filter. TNTC is defined as greater than 200 colonies on the  membrane filter in the absence of detectable coliforms. Do not invalidate the  sample when the membrane filter contains at least one total coliform colony. 
    Typical coliform colonies have a pink to dark-red color  with a metallic golden green sheen. Subject all sheen colonies to verification  when there are 10 or fewer sheen colonies. When the number of coliform colonies  exceeds 10, randomly pick 10 colonies for verification. Alternatively, swab the  entire membrane surface and transfer to the verification media. 
    Verify sheen colonies using single strength LTB and then  single strength BGLB broth, or an EPA-approved cytochrome oxidase and  beta-galactosidase rapid test procedure. 
    To verify colonies in LTB and BGLB broth, use a sterile  needle, loop, applicator stick or cotton swab. To verify colonies using the  rapid test (cytochrome oxidase/beta-galactosidase test), pick isolated colonies  using a sterile needle or applicator stick. 
    QC - If no coliform positive tests result from potable  water samples, perform the MF procedure on a known-positive sample each month.  Include the verification test for total and fecal coliform (or E. coli). 
    D. Fermentation Technique. 
    100 mL of sample shall be used for each presumptive test.  Laboratories may use 10 tubes, 5 tubes or a single culture bottle containing  lauryl tryptose broth formulated as described in Table IV-5 of this chapter. 
    Confirm all gas-positive presumptive tubes and bottles in  BGLB Broth. The formation of gas in any amount in the fermentation vial of the  BGLB broth tube within a 48 ±3 hour incubation time indicates a positive  confirmed test. 
    QC - All presumptive tubes or bottles with turbidity or  heavy growth without gas production shall be submitted to the confirmed test to  check for the suppression of coliforms. Invalidate all samples which produce a  turbid presumptive culture without gas and request an additional sample from  the same sampling point, unless total coliforms are detected in the confirmed  test. 
    QC - On a quarterly basis, conduct the completed test on at  least 10% of all coliform-positive samples. 
    QC - If no coliform-positive tests result from potable  water samples, perform the fermentation procedure monthly on a known-positive  sample. Perform the confirmed test and the completed test on all  coliform-positive tubes or bottles. Include the fecal coliform or E. coli test.  
    E. Presence-Absence (P-A) Coliform Test. 
    Inoculate 100 mL of sample into P-A culture bottle. 
    Observe for turbidity and yellow color or turbidity alone  after 24 and 48 hours. Confirm yellow cultures in BGLB broth. The presence of  gas in the fermentation vial of the BGLB broth tube within a 48 ±3 hour  incubation time indicates a positive confirmation test for total coliforms. 
    QC - Confirm turbid and yellow cultures or turbid cultures  with no color change in BGLB broth. Invalidate all samples which produce a  turbid culture with no color change and request an additional sample from the  same sampling point, unless coliforms are detected in the confirmed test. 
    QC - On a quarterly basis, conduct the completed test on at  least 10% of all coliform-positive samples. 
    QC - If no coliform positive tests result from potable  water samples, perform the P-A Test on a known positive sample at least once a  month. Include the confirmed test, the competed test and the fecal coliform or  E. coli test. 
    F. ONPG-MUG Test. 
    Use 10 tubes, each containing 10 mL of sample, or a single  sterile, transparent, nonfluorescent borosilicate glass culture bottle or  equivalent bottle containing 100 mL of water sample. 
    Avoid prolonged exposure of inoculated tests to direct  sunlight. Sunlight may hydrolyze indicator compounds and cause false positive  results. 
    Incubate for 24 hours at 35 ±0.5°C. A yellow color indicates  the presence of total coliforms. 
    If yellow color is detected, check for fluorescence in the  dark with a 365 or 366 nm UV lamp. Fluorescence indicates the presence of E.  coli. 
    If the color of the ONPG-MUG culture changes during the  initial 24-hour incubation period, but is still not as yellow as the  comparator, incubate for another four hours. Do not incubate for more than a  total of 28 hours. 
    QC - If, at the end of the additional four-hour incubation  period, the color is still not as yellow as the comparator, invalidate the test  and request an additional sample from the same sample site. 
    Laboratories are encouraged to perform parallel testing  between the ONPG-MUG Test and another EPA-approved method for total coliforms  for at least several months or several seasons to determine the effectiveness  of the ONPG-MUG Test on a variety of water submitted for analysis. 
    G. Fecal Coliform Test. 
    Use EC Medium for determining whether a total  coliform-positive culture contains fecal coliforms. 
    Laboratories shall conduct fecal coliform analysis in  accordance with the following procedures. When the Fermentation Technique or  the Presence-Absence (P-A) Test is used to test for total coliforms, gently  agitate the positive presumptive fermentation tube or bottle or the positive  P-A bottle and transfer the growth with a sterile 3 mm loop or sterile  applicator stick into brilliant green lactose bile broth and EC medium to  determine the presence of total and fecal coliforms, respectively. Incubate the  BGLB broth at 35° ±0.5°C for 24-48 hours and check for gas. Incubate the EC  medium at 44.5° ±0.2°C for 24 ±2 hours and check for gas. 
    When the Membrane Filter Test is used, verify the sheen  colonies by one of the following two methods: Swab the entire membrane filter  surface with a sterile cotton swab and inoculate the contents of the swab into  LTB. Do not leave the swab in the LTB. Alternatively, pick up to ten individual  sheen colonies and inoculate into LTB. Gently agitate the inoculated tubes of  LTB to insure adequate mixing. Incubate the LTB at 35° ±0.5°C for 24-48 hours.  If the LTB tube shows gas within 24-48 hours, transfer by inoculating loop to a  tube of BGLB broth and a tube of EC medium. Incubate the BGLB broth at 35°  ±0.5°C for 24-48 hours and check for gas. Incubate the EC medium at 44.5°  ±0.2°C for 24 ±2 hours and check for gas. The water level of the water bath  shall reach the upper level of the medium in the culture tubes. Gas production  of any amount in the inner fermentation tube of the EC medium indicates a positive  fecal coliform test. The preparation of EC medium is described in Standard  Methods, 18th Ed., 1992, Part 9221 E.1.a.. Public water systems need only  determine the presence or absence of fecal coliforms; a determination of fecal  coliform density is not required. 
    H. EC Medium + MUG Test (for E. coli). 
    Use EC Medium supplemented with 50 ug/mL of  4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-glucuronide (MUG). The procedure for transferring  and incubating a total coliform-positive culture to EC Medium + MUG is the same  as that specified in subsection G of this section for transferring and  incubating a total coliform-positive culture to EC Medium. After incubation,  observe for fluorescence with a 365 or 366 nm ultraviolet light in the dark. A  test is positive for E. coli if the medium fluoresces. 
    I. Nutrient Agar + MUG Test (for E. coli). 
    This test is used to determine if a total coliform-positive  sample, as determined by the Membrane Filter Technique, contains E. coli. 
    Use Nutrient Agar supplemented with 100 ug/mL of  4-methylumbelli-feryl-beta-D-glucuronide (MUG). Pour agar into 50 mm Petri  dishes. 
    Pick up to 10 coliform colonies for verification in LTB and  BGLB as described in subsection C of this section. 
    Using sterile forceps, transfer the membrane filter containing  one or more suspected coliform colonies from the m-Endo medium to the surface  of the Nutrient Agar + MUG medium. Incubate plate at 35° ± 0.5°C for four hours  and observe for fluorescence using a 365 or 366 nm ultraviolet lamp in the  dark. Any amount of fluorescence on a sheen colony is positive for E. coli. 
    J. ONPG-MUG Test (for E. coli). 
    See subsection F of this section. 
    K. Heterotrophic Plate Count (HPC). 
    Use the pour plate method to determine the HPC for potable  water and lab pure water samples. The pour plate method shall be performed as  described in Standard Methods, 18th Ed., 1992, Part 9215 B. 
    QC - Check each flask of HPC agar for sterility by pouring  a final control plate. Reject data if controls are contaminated. 
    1VAC30-40-340. Sample collection, handling and preservation 
    A. If a laboratory does not collect samples and has no  control over sample collection, handling, preservation and identification, the  laboratory director must reject any samples not meeting sampling criteria and  notify the authority requesting the analyses. QC The laboratory shall  have a written sample rejection policy covering those samples that do not meet  sampling requirements. 
    B. Sample collector shall be trained in sampling procedures  and, if required, approved by the VDH-DWSE VDH-ODW. 
    C. Samples shall be representative of the potable water  distribution system. Samples collected from Public Water Supplies public  water supplies shall be collected in accordance with a Sample Siting  Report sample siting report approved by the VDH-DWSE VDH-ODW.  Water taps used for sampling are free of aerators, strainers, hose attachments,  mixing type faucets and purification devices. Maintain a steady water flow for  at least two minutes to clear the service line before sampling. Collect at  least a 100 mL sample volume and allow at least ½ 1/2 inch of  space in the sample container to facilitate mixing of sample by shaking. 
    D. Laboratories that collect as well as analyze samples shall  ice samples immediately after collection and deliver the samples directly to  the laboratory. 
    E. Holding/travel time between sampling and analysis shall  not exceed 30 hours. If the sample is analyzed after 30 hours, the laboratory  shall indicate that the data may be invalid because of excessive delay before  sample processing. No samples received after 48 hours shall be analyzed. 
    All samples received in the laboratory shall be analyzed  on the day of receipt. In all cases, samples shall be analyzed as soon after  collection as possible. 
    E. The sample container, required preservation, and  maximum holding time requirements for sampling and analyzing microbiological  contaminants are incorporated by reference at 1VAC30-40-85 B 3.
    F. Sample report.
    1. Immediately after collection, enter on the sample  report form the sample site location, sample type (e.g. regular, repeat, etc.),  date and time of collection, free chlorine residual, collector's name and any  remarks. 
    2. Record the date and time of sample arrival at the  laboratory and the date and time analysis begins. 
    1VAC30-40-360. Action response to laboratory results. 
    A. Immediately notify the appropriate field office of the VDH-DWSE  VDH-ODW of any coliform-positive samples from Public Water Supplies  public water supplies. 
    B. All analytical results for compliance shall be reported  directly to the VDH-DWSE VDH-ODW as described in 1VAC30-40-40. 
    C. Repeat sampling shall be initiated on the basis of  coliform presence in either the Fermentation Technique confirmed test,  unverified MF Test, P-A confirmed test, or ONPG-MUG Test. Data used to  determine monthly compliance may be adjusted by using the Fermentation  Technique completed test, verified MF Test results or P- A completed test  results. 
    D. Notify the appropriate field office of the VDH-DWSE  VDH-ODW when samples from Public Water Supplies public water  supplies are invalidated due to interference from noncoliforms. 
    Part V 
  Radiochemistry 
    1VAC30-40-370. Radiochemistry. 
    A. Laboratories shall meet the sampling and analytical  methodology requirements incorporated by reference at 1VAC30-40-85 B 4 for  radiochemistry and 1VAC30-40-85 B 5 for alternative testing methods.
    B. For radiochemistry certification of laboratories,  DGS-DCLS shall require conformance to USEPA "Manual for the Certification  of Laboratories Analyzing Drinking Water," EPA-814B-92-002 Chapter VI,  Radiochemistry, September 1992. Appropriate revisions of the manual shall  become effective upon issuance. 
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-2189; Filed December 14, 2009, 2:24 p.m. 
TITLE 2. AGRICULTURE
BOARD OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES
Proposed Regulation
    Title of Regulation: 2VAC5-70. Health Requirements  Governing the Control of Equine Infectious Anemia in Virginia (amending 2VAC5-70-20; repealing 2VAC5-70-30).
    Statutory Authority:  § 3.2-6002 of the Code of Virginia.
    Public Hearing Information:
    March 25, 2010 - 10 a.m. - Oliver Hill Building, 102  Governor Street, Second Floor Board Room, Richmond, VA
    Public Comment Deadline: April 5, 2010.
    Agency Contact: Doug Saunders, Deputy Director,  Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, P.O. Box 1163, Richmond, VA  23218, telephone (804) 786-8905, FAX (804) 371-2380, or email doug.saunders@vdacs.virginia.gov.
    Basis: Section 3.2-6002 of the Code of Virginia  authorizes the Board of Agriculture and Consumer Services to adopt regulations  as may be necessary to prevent, control, or eradicate infectious or contagious  diseases in livestock and poultry in Virginia.
    Purpose: The current regulation establishes  requirements for the control of equine infectious anemia (EIA) in Virginia. EIA  is a contagious and infectious disease of horses, ponies, jackasses, mules and  other animals of the genus Equus. This regulation requires the testing of  equine animals to be imported into the state and those to be assembled for  sale, auction, and other purposes. Additionally, the current regulation  authorizes the State Veterinarian to allow, as an alternative or option, the  testing of horses at the market or auction where equines are sold rather than  requiring the test before the animals are transported to market.
    The purpose of this regulatory action is two-fold. First, the  language in 2VAC5-70-20 requiring EIA testing is amended to explain that the  testing requirements apply to any activity on properties where horses owned by  two or more owners may come into contact with each other, such as in state  parks. This change is necessary to clarify that horses that come into contact  with horses owned by others must have the required testing to further control  the spread of EIA, thereby enhancing the health, safety, and welfare of the  public. Second, 2VAC5-70-30, which addresses alternate testing requirements,  will be eliminated as such alternate testing requirements are ineffective in  controlling the spread of EIA.
    Substance: Changes being proposed to the current  regulation will (i) clarify that the EIA testing requirements identified in  2VAC5-70-20 apply to activities on properties where horses owned by two or more  owners may come into contact with each other, such as in state parks, and (ii)  remove the authority of the State Veterinarian in 2VAC5-70-30 to allow the EIA  (Coggins agar gel immunodiffusin (AGID)) test to be made at market or auction,  rather than prior to horses being transported to these activities.
    Issues: The predominant issue associated with the  proposed regulatory action is the control of EIA in animals of the genus Equus.  The current regulation was established in 1985 and has been effective in  controlling the spread of EIA. However, instances have arisen where individuals  who gather with their horses for the purpose of riding activities, such as in  state parks, have argued that the testing requirements do not apply to them.  The amendments to 2VAC5-70-20 clarify that the regulation also applies to such  activities, providing greater protection to Virginia's horse industry and  protecting the horses owned by those individuals who have argued that the testing  requirements do not apply to them. Additionally, eliminating 2VAC5-70-30 will  remove the allowance for alternate testing that is ineffective in controlling  the spread of EIA.
    The advantage of these proposed changes is much greater control  of the spread of EIA within horse populations in Virginia. This advantage  applies to anyone owning a horse, whether an individual horse owner or a large  horse operation. The agency does not see any disadvantages of the proposed  changes.
    The Department of Planning and Budget's Economic Impact  Analysis:
    Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. The current  regulation details requirements for the control of Equine Infectious Anemia  (EIA) in Virginia. EIA is a contagious and infectious disease of horses,  ponies, jackasses, mules and other animals of the genus Equus. The regulation  requires the testing for EIA of equine animals to be imported into the state  and for those to be assembled for sale, auction and other purposes. Horses  found to have EIA are quarantined. Additionally, the current regulation  authorizes the State Veterinarian to allow, as an alternative or option, the  testing of horses at the market or auction where equines are sold rather than  requiring the test before the animals are transported to market.
    The Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services  (VDACS) proposes: 1) to amend language to clarify that testing  requirements apply to all horses involved in activities on properties where  horses owned by two or more owners may come into contact with each other and 2)  to eliminate the language on alternate testing requirements for horses  assembled for sale or auction in Virginia when authorized by the State  Veterinarian.
    Result of Analysis. The benefits likely exceed the costs for  all proposed changes.
    Estimated Economic Impact. The current regulations specify that  "All horses assembled at a show, fair, race meet, or other such function  in Virginia, must be accompanied by a report of an official negative test for  equine infectious anemia conducted within 12 months prior to such event."  According to VDACS, there has been some confusion as to whether horses that are  brought to state parks are subject to the negative test requirement. Thus the  agency proposes to specify that the requirement applies to all horses involved  in activities on properties where horses owned by two or more owners may come  into contact with each other.
    VDACS estimates that 2,000 or fewer horses that are currently  not already being tested by their owners will need to be tested. Given VDACS'  estimate that veterinary practitioners charge $30.00 for an EIA test, the  cumulative monetary impact on horse owners in the Commonwealth will be $60,000  or less. Horses infected with EIA can die within two to three weeks.1  Given the relatively small testing cost of $30 per horse per year, the cost of  required testing would seem to be outweighed by the benefit of reduced risk of  equine fatalities. VDACS reports that EIA has been present in the Commonwealth  in recent years.
    According to VDACS, the State Veterinarian has not authorized  the testing of horses at the market or auction where equines are sold rather  than requiring the test before the animals are transported to market. Thus the  proposal to eliminate the language on alternate testing requirements for horses  assembled for sale or auction in Virginia when authorized by the State  Veterinarian will have no impact beyond the beneficial impact of reducing  confusion for the public.
    Businesses and Entities Affected. The Virginia Department of  Agriculture and Consumer Services estimates that a maximum of 1500 owners  owning 2000 horses will be affected by the proposed amendments. The Department  estimates that 100 or fewer private businesses, such as horse camps or bed and  breakfast establishments that accept horses, will be affected.
    Localities Particularly Affected. The proposed amendments  potentially affect all localities. Those localities which contain state parks  that are frequented by horses are particularly affected.
    Projected Impact on Employment. The proposed amendments are  unlikely to have a significant net impact on employment.
    Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposal  to amend language to clarify that testing requirements apply to all horses  involved in activities on properties where horses owned by two or more owners  may come into contact with each other will likely encourage some additional EIA  testing. Veterinarians will likely get some additional business.
    Small Businesses: Costs and Other Effects. The proposed amendments  are unlikely to increase costs for small businesses.
    Small Businesses: Alternative Method that Minimizes Adverse  Impact. The proposed amendments are unlikely to adversely affect small  businesses.
    Real Estate Development Costs. The proposed amendments are  unlikely to significantly affect real estate development costs.
    Legal Mandate. The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has  analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with  § 2.2-4007.04 of the Administrative Process Act and Executive Order Number  36 (06). Section 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses  include, but need not be limited to, the projected number of businesses or  other entities to whom the regulation would apply, the identity of any  localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, the  projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, the  projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with  the regulation, and the impact on the use and value of private property.  Further, if the proposed regulation has adverse effect on small businesses,  § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include (i) an  identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the  regulation; (ii) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other  administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the  regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing  required reports and other documents; (iii) a statement of the probable effect  of the regulation on affected small businesses; and (iv) a description of any  less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of  the regulation. The analysis presented above represents DPB's best estimate of  these economic impacts.
    ____________________________
    1 Source: Virginia Department of Agriculture and  Consumer Services
    Agency's Response to the Department of Planning and Budget's  Economic Impact Analysis: The agency concurs with the analysis of the  Department of Planning and Budget.
    Summary:
    The proposed amendments (i) clarify that testing  requirements apply to all horses involved in activities on properties where  horses owned by two or more owners may come into contact with each other and  (ii) eliminate the alternate testing requirements for horses assembled for sale  or auction in Virginia.
    2VAC5-70-20. Testing requirements for horses exhibited at  shows, fairs, or other exhibitions, or coming into contact with horses owned  by others in Virginia.
    All horses assembled at a show, fair, race meet, or other  such function, or participating in any activity on properties where horses  owned by two or more owners may come into contact with each other in  Virginia, must be accompanied by a report of an official negative test for  equine infectious anemia conducted within 12 months prior to such event or  activity. The person in charge will ensure that a copy of the official  negative test results accompanies each horse in the event or activity,  and shall make such reports available for inspection by a representative of the  State Veterinarian upon request. The person in charge shall exclude any horse  which is not accompanied by a negative test report. 
    2VAC5-70-30. Alternate testing requirements for horses  assembled for sale or auction in Virginia. (Repealed.)
    Horses may be assembled at a sale or auction without a  negative test for equine infectious anemia, provided that the State  Veterinarian so approves, and that the following requirements are met: 
    1. All horses, while assembled at the sale or auction,  shall have blood samples drawn for equine infectious anemia testing. 
    2. Horses consigned or sold for immediate slaughter to an  official slaughtering establishment are exempt from equine infectious anemia  testing. Such horses shall be identified in a manner approved by the State  Veterinarian, and a written permit shall be issued for their transfer to the  slaughtering establishment. 
    3. The owner or manager of the sale or auction shall employ  a licensed accredited veterinarian, who shall draw blood samples from all  horses required to be tested, and shall record all visible markings or other  permanent identification for each horse bled. 
    4. The owner or manager shall announce, prior to the sale  or auction, that all nonslaughter horses will be tested. Each buyer of a  nonslaughter horse or horses at the sale or auction shall sign a release form,  signifying his agreement to maintain such horse or horses at a specified  location until notified of the results of the test. Horses that prove negative  to the test may move in normal trade channels. Owners of horses that react to  the test must comply with 2VAC5-70-40 of this chapter. 
    5. The State Veterinarian may grant such exceptions to  these requirements as he feels the circumstances warrant and that are not in  variance with other rules and regulations of the Commonwealth of Virginia. 
    VA.R. Doc. No. R09-913; Filed December 15, 2009, 11:34 a.m. 
TITLE 2. AGRICULTURE
BOARD OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The  Board of Agriculture and Consumer Services is claiming an exemption from the  Administrative Process Act in accordance with § 3.2-703 of the Code of  Virginia, which exempts quarantine to prevent or retard the spread of a pest  into, within, or from the Commonwealth, and § 3.2-704 of the Code of Virginia,  which provides that the Board of Agriculture and Consumer Services shall  prohibit the importation of any regulated article from any locality of other  states, territories, or countries, into the Commonwealth.
          
     
    Title of  Regulation: 2VAC5-316. Rules and Regulations for Enforcement of the  Virginia Pest Law - Beach Vitex Quarantine (adding 2VAC5-316-10 through 2VAC5-316-110).
    Statutory Authority: § 3.2-703 of the Code of  Virginia.
    Effective Date: January 8, 2010.
    Agency Contact: Roy E. Seward, Jr., Regulatory  Coordinator, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Oliver Hill  Building, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 786-3535,  FAX (804) 371-7679, or email roy.seward@vdacs.virginia.gov.
    Summary: 
    This action establishes the Beach Vitex Quarantine in the  cities of Norfolk and Virginia Beach and the counties of Accomack and  Northhampton. Beach Vitex is a highly invasive, deciduous, woody vine native to  Asia that grows rapidly along dunes and shorelines causing damage to these  areas by crowding out native plants and threatening the habitats of various  animals. The purpose of this action is to prevent the long distance, artificial  spread of Beach Vitex from coastal areas of the Commonwealth that are infested  with Beach Vitex to other areas that are not infested.
    CHAPTER 316
  RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR ENFORCEMENT OF THE VIRGINIA PEST LAW - BEACH VITEX  QUARANTINE 
    2VAC5-316-10. Declaration of quarantine.
    A quarantine is hereby established to restrict the  movement of the invasive plant, Beach Vitex, and articles capable of  transporting life stages of Beach Vitex unless such articles comply with the  conditions specified herein. 
    2VAC5-316-20. Purpose of quarantine.
    Beach Vitex, a deciduous woody vine native to the Pacific  Rim, grows rapidly along dunes and shorelines causing damage to these areas by  crowding out native plants and threatening the habitats of various animals,  including the endangered loggerhead sea turtle. Although Beach Vitex has been  planted in efforts to stabilize dunes, it is less effective than native grasses  in controlling dune erosion. Beach Vitex has been detected in several coastal  sites in the Commonwealth and has the potential to spread to other areas  through the artificial movement of Beach Vitex by individuals, or through the  natural movement of Beach Vitex parts such as seeds and stems that could be  carried by water currents to uninfested coastal areas. The purpose of this  quarantine is to help prevent the spread of Beach Vitex by prohibiting its  artificial movement and the movement of those articles that are capable of  transporting it. 
    2VAC5-316-30. Definitions.
    The following words and terms shall have the following  meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
    "Beach Vitex" means the live plant, in any life  stage, known as Beach Vitex, Vitex rotundifolia.
    "Board" means the Virginia Board of Agriculture  and Consumer Services.
    "Certificate" means a document issued by an  inspector or person operating in accordance with a compliance agreement to  allow the movement of regulated articles to any destination.
    "Commissioner" means the Commissioner of the  Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
    "Compliance agreement" means a written agreement  between a person engaged in handling, receiving, or moving regulated articles  and the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services wherein the  former agrees to fulfill the requirements of the compliance agreement and  comply with the provisions of this regulation. 
    "Department" means the Virginia Department of  Agriculture and Consumer Services.
    "Infestation" means the presence of Beach Vitex  or the existence of circumstances that make it reasonable to believe that life  stages of Beach Vitex are present.
    "Inspector" means an employee of the Virginia  Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services or other person authorized by  the Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer  Services to enforce the provisions of this quarantine or regulation. 
    "Limited permit" means a document issued by an  inspector to allow the movement of regulated articles to a specific  destination.
    "Moved," "move," or "movement"  means shipped, offered for shipment, received for transportation, transported,  carried, or allowed to be moved, shipped, transported, or carried.
    "Person" means the term as defined in § 1-230 of the Code of Virginia. 
    "Regulated area" means the locality or area  listed in 2VAC5-315-50 of this quarantine.
    "Virginia Pest Law" means the statute set forth  in Chapter 7 (§ 3.2-700 et seq.) of Title 3.2 of the Code of Virginia. 
    2VAC5-316-40. Regulated articles.
    The following articles are regulated under the provisions  of this quarantine and shall not be moved into, within, or out of any regulated  area in Virginia, except in compliance with the conditions prescribed in this  quarantine:
    1.  Beach Vitex, in any life stage, including roots,  stems, and seeds.
    2.  Any article known to be infested with Beach Vitex,  such as sand, soil, or mulch containing Beach Vitex in any life stage.
    3.  Any other article or means of conveyance when it  is determined by an inspector that it presents a risk of spreading Beach Vitex.
    2VAC5-316-50. Regulated areas.
    The following areas in Virginia are quarantined for Beach  Vitex:
    The entire counties of: 
    Accomack
    Northampton
    The entire cities of:
    Norfolk
    Virginia Beach 
    2VAC5-316-60. Conditions governing the intrastate movement  of regulated articles.
    A. Movement within regulated area – movement of a  regulated article solely within the quarantined area is prohibited unless  accompanied by a valid certificate or limited permit. 
    B. Movement from regulated area into nonregulated area –  movement of a regulated article that originates inside of the quarantined area  to an area outside of the quarantined area is prohibited unless accompanied by  a valid certificate or limited permit.
    C. Movement from nonregulated area into regulated area –  movement of a regulated article that originates outside of the quarantined area  to an area inside of the quarantined area is prohibited unless accompanied by a  valid certificate or limited permit.
    D. Movement outside of the regulated area – movement of a  regulated article solely outside of the quarantined area is not restricted. 
    2VAC5-316-70. Issuance and cancellation of certificates and  limited permits.
    A. Certificates and limited permits may be issued by an  inspector for the movement of regulated articles into, within, or out of any  regulated area to any destination within Virginia when the regulated articles  meet the following three conditions:
    1. The regulated articles are to be moved intrastate to a  specified destination under conditions that specify the limited handling,  utilization, processing, or treatment of the articles when the inspector  determines that such movement will not result in the spread of Beach Vitex  because the life stage of the plant will be destroyed by such specified  handling, utilization, processing, or treatment; or the regulated articles  are to be moved by a state or federal agency or person authorized by the  department for experimental or scientific purposes; 
    2. The regulated articles are to be moved in compliance  with any additional conditions deemed necessary under the Virginia Pest Law to  prevent the spread of Beach Vitex; and
    3. The regulated articles are eligible for unrestricted  movement under all other domestic plant quarantines and regulations applicable  to the regulated articles.
    B. Any certificate or limited permit that has been issued  or authorized may be withdrawn by the inspector orally or in writing if the  inspector determines that the holder of the certificate or limited permit has  not complied with all conditions for the use of the certificate or limited  permit or with any applicable compliance agreement. If the withdrawal is oral,  the withdrawal and the reasons for the withdrawal shall be confirmed in writing  and communicated to the certificate or limited permit holder as promptly as  circumstances allow. 
    2VAC5-316-80. Assembly and inspection of regulated articles.
    A.  Any person who desires to move regulated articles  into, within, or out of any regulated area shall apply for a limited permit as  far in advance as practical but no less than five business days before the  regulated articles are to be moved. 
    B.  The regulated article must be assembled at the  place and in the manner the inspector designates as necessary to facilitate  inspection and shall be safeguarded from infestation.
    2VAC5-316-90. Attachment and disposition of certificates and  limited permits.
    A. A certificate or limited permit required for the  movement of a regulated article into, within, or out of any regulated area must  be attached at all times during the intrastate movement to the outside of the  container that contains the regulated article or to the regulated article  itself. The requirements of this section may also be met by attaching the  certificate or limited permit to the consignee's copy of the waybill provided  the regulated article is sufficiently described on the certificate or limited  permit and on the waybill to facilitate the identification of the regulated  article.
    B. The certificate or limited permit for the intrastate  movement of a regulated article must be furnished by the carrier to the  consignee at the destination of the regulated article. A copy of the  certificate or the limited permit must be retained by the sender of the  regulated article at the place of shipment.
    2VAC5-316-100. Inspection and disposal of regulated articles  and pests.
    Upon presentation of official credentials, an inspector is  authorized to stop and inspect, and to seize, destroy, or otherwise dispose of,  or require disposal of, regulated articles as provided in the Virginia Pest  Law. 
    2VAC5-316-110. Nonliability of the department.
    The department shall not be liable for any costs incurred  by third parties whose costs result from or are incidental to inspections  required under the provisions of the quarantine.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-2205; Filed December 9, 2009, 2:08 p.m. 
TITLE 4. CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MARINE RESOURCES COMMISSION
Final Regulation
    Title of Regulation: 4VAC20-20. Pertaining to the  Licensing of Fixed Fishing Devices (amending 4VAC20-20-50). 
    Statutory Authority: § 28.2-201 of the Code of Virginia.
    Effective Date: December 18, 2009. 
    Agency Contact: Jane Warren, Agency Regulatory  Coordinator, Marine Resources Commission, 2600 Washington Avenue, 3rd Floor,  Newport News, VA 23607, telephone (757) 247-2248, FAX (757) 247-2002, or email  betty.warren@mrc.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    The amendment requires that pound net licensees set and  fish pound nets at least once during two consecutive calendar years starting in  2009 to maintain their licenses and priority rights associated with those pound  nets. 
    4VAC20-20-50. Priority rights; renewal by current licensee. 
    A. Applications for renewal of license for existing fixed  fishing devices may be accepted by the officer beginning at 9 a.m. on December  1 of the current license year through noon on January 10 of the next license  year providing the applicant has met all requirements of law and this chapter.  Any location not relicensed during the above period of time shall be considered  vacant and available to any qualified applicant after noon on January 10. 
    B. Except as provided in subsections C and D of this section,  a currently licensed fixed fishing device must have been fished during the  current license year in order for the licensee to maintain his priority right  to such location. It shall be mandatory for the licensee to notify the officer,  on forms provided by the commission, when the fixed fishing device is ready to  be fished in the location applied for, by a complete system of nets and poles,  except as provided in subsection D of this section, for the purpose of visual  inspection by the officer. Either the failure of the licensee to notify the  officer when the fixed fishing device is ready to be fished or the failure by  the licensee actually to fish the licensed device, by use of a complete system  of nets and poles, except as provided in subsection D of this section, shall  terminate his right or privilege to renew the license during the period set  forth in subsection A of this section of this chapter, and he shall not become  a qualified applicant for such location until 9 a.m. on February 1. Any  application received from an unqualified applicant under this subsection shall  be considered as received at 9 a.m. on February 1; however, in the event of the  death of a current license holder, the priority right to renew the currently  held locations of the deceased licensee shall not expire by reason of failure  to fish said locations during the year for which they were licensed, but one  additional year shall be and is hereby granted to the personal representative  or lawful beneficiary of the deceased licensee to license the location in the  name of the estate of the deceased licensee for purposes of fishing said  location or making valid assignment thereof. 
    C. During the effective period of 4VAC20-530, which  establishes a moratorium on the taking and possession of American shad in the  Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, any person licensed during 1993 to set a  staked gill net who chooses not to set that net during the period of the  moratorium may maintain his priority right to the stake net's 1993 location by  completing an application for a fixed fishing device and submitting it to the  officer. No license fee shall be charged for the application. 
    D. Current pound net licensees shall not be required to  fish their pound nets or establish a complete system of nets and poles in 2008  in order to renew their licenses or maintain their priority rights to such  locations for 2009. In order to maintain priority rights and renew a  license to a specific pound net location, a pound net licensee shall be  required to set and fish that pound net at least once during two consecutive  calendar years starting with calendar year 2009.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-2257; Filed December 17, 2009, 4:18 p.m. 
TITLE 4. CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MARINE RESOURCES COMMISSION
Final Regulation
    Title of Regulation:  4VAC20-490. Pertaining to Sharks (amending 4VAC20-490-44).
    Statutory Authority: § 28.2-201 of the Code of Virginia.
    Effective Date: December 23, 2009. 
    Agency Contact: Jane Warren, Agency Regulatory  Coordinator, Marine Resources Commission, 2600 Washington Avenue, 3rd Floor,  Newport News, VA 23607, telephone (757) 247-2248, FAX (757) 247-2002, or email  betty.warren@mrc.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    The amendment makes it unlawful to transfer any spiny  dogfish limited entry permit after November 23, 2009. 
    4VAC20-490-44. Spiny dogfish limited entry permit and permit  transfers.
    A. It shall be unlawful for any person to take, catch,  possess, or land any spiny dogfish without first having obtained a spiny  dogfish limited entry permit from the Marine Resources Commission. Such permit  shall be completed in full by the permittee who shall keep a copy of that  permit in his possession while fishing for or selling spiny dogfish. Permits  shall only be issued to Virginia registered commercial fishermen meeting either  of the following criteria:
    1. Shall have documented on Virginia mandatory harvest  reporting forms harvest from a legally licensed, movable gill net for an  average of at least 60 days from 2006 through 2008, and a minimum harvest of  one pound of spiny dogfish at any time from 2006 through 2008.
    2. Shall have documented on Virginia mandatory reporting forms  harvests that total greater than 10,000 pounds of spiny dogfish in any one year  from 2006 through 2008.
    B. A spiny dogfish limited entry permittee may only  transfer that permit to another Virginia registered commercial fisherman. The  transferor and the transferee shall have documented any prior fishing activity  on Virginia mandatory reporting forms and shall not be under any sanction by  the Marine Resources Commission for noncompliance with the regulation.  Transfers must be approved by the commissioner, or his designee, and are  permanent. The permanent transfer authorizes the transferee to possess a spiny  dogfish limited entry permit, and the transferor shall lose his eligibility for  that spiny dogfish limited entry permit. It is unlawful to transfer any  spiny dogfish limited entry permit after November 23, 2009.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-2259; Filed December 17, 2009, 4:21 p.m. 
TITLE 4. CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MARINE RESOURCES COMMISSION
Final Regulation
    Final Regulation
    Title of Regulation:  4VAC20-610. Pertaining to Commercial Fishing and Mandatory Harvest Reporting (amending 4VAC20-610-20, 4VAC20-610-60; adding  4VAC20-610-65).
    Statutory Authority: § 28.2-201 of the Code of Virginia.
    Effective Date: January 1, 2010. 
    Agency Contact: Jane Warren, Agency Regulatory  Coordinator, Marine Resources Commission, 2600 Washington Avenue, 3rd Floor,  Newport News, VA 23607, telephone (757) 247-2248, FAX (757) 247-2002, or email  betty.warren@mrc.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    The amendments (i) define "agent" as any person  who possesses the commercial fisherman registration license, fishing gear  license, or fishing permit of a registered commercial fisherman, in order to  fish that commercial fisherman's gear or sell that commercial fisherman's  harvest; (ii) require commercial harvesters to report use of an agent to  harvest for them; (iii) limit the number of helpers reported by a commercial  fisherman registration licensee to five; and (iv) provide guidelines for the  commission to use in noncompliance with mandatory reporting cases that are  linked to the severity of those noncompliance violations. 
    4VAC20-610-20. Definitions.
    The following words and terms when used in this chapter shall  have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
    "Agent" means any person who possesses the  commercial fisherman registration license, fishing gear license, or fishing  permit of a registered commercial fisherman in order to fish that commercial  fisherman's gear or sell that commercial fisherman's harvest.
    "Clam aquaculture product owner" means any person  or firm that owns clams on leased, subleased or fee simple ground or on any  growing area within or adjacent to Virginia tidal waters that are raised by any  form of aquaculture. This does not include any riparian shellfish gardeners  whose activities are authorized by 4VAC20-336.
    "Commission" means the Marine Resources Commission.
    "Commissioner" means the Commissioner of the Marine  Resources Commission.
    "Continuing business enterprise" means any business  that is required to have a Virginia Seafood Buyer's License or is required to  have a business license by county, city or local ordinance.
    "Oyster aquaculture product owner" means any person  or firm that owns oysters on leased, subleased or fee simple ground or on any  growing area within or adjacent to Virginia tidal waters that are raised by any  form of aquaculture. This does not include any riparian shellfish gardeners  whose activities are authorized by 4VAC20-336.
    "Sale" means sale, trade, or barter.
    "Sell" means sell, trade, or barter.
    "Selling" means selling, trading or bartering.
    "Sold" means sold, traded, or bartered.
    4VAC20-610-60. Mandatory harvest reporting.
    A. It shall be unlawful for any valid commercial fisherman  registration licensee, seafood landing licensee, oyster aquaculture product  owner permittee, or clam aquaculture product owner permittee to fail to fully  report harvests and related information as set forth in this chapter.
    B. It shall be unlawful for any recreational fisherman,  charter boat captain, head boat captain, commercial fishing pier operator, or  owner of a private boat licensed pursuant to §§ 28.2-302.7 through 28.2-302.9  of the Code of Virginia, to fail to report recreational harvests, upon request,  to those authorized by the commission.
    C. All registered commercial fishermen and any valid seafood  landing licensee, oyster aquaculture product owner permittee, and clam  aquaculture product owner permittee shall complete a daily form accurately  quantifying and legibly describing that day's harvest from Virginia tidal and  federal waters. The forms used to record daily harvest shall be those provided  by the commission or another form approved by the commission. Registered commercial  fishermen and seafood landing licensees may use more than one form when selling  to more than one buyer.
    D. Registered commercial fishermen, seafood landing  licensees, valid oyster aquaculture product owner permittees and valid clam  aquaculture product owner permittees shall submit a monthly harvest report to  the commission no later than the fifth day of the following month. This report  shall be accompanied by the daily harvest records described in subsection E of  this section. Completed forms shall be mailed or delivered to the commission or  other designated locations.
    E. The monthly harvest report and daily harvest records  from registered commercial fishermen shall include the name and signature of  the registered commercial fisherman and his license registration number; buyer  or private sale information; date of harvest; city or county of landing; water  body fished; gear type and amount used; number of hours gear fished; number of  hours the registered commercial fisherman fished; number of crew on board,  including captain; species harvested; market category; live weight or processed  weight of species harvested; and vessel identification (Coast Guard  documentation number, Virginia license number or hull/VIN number). Any  information on the price paid for the harvest may be provided voluntarily. The  monthly harvest report and daily harvest records from oyster aquaculture  product owner permittees and clam aquaculture product owner permittees shall  include the name, signature, permit number, lease number, date of harvest, city  or county of landing, gear (growing technique) used, species harvested in  weight or amount, number of crew, and buyer or private sale information. The  monthly harvest report and daily harvest records from seafood landing licensees  shall include the name and signature of the seafood landing licensee and his  seafood landing license number; buyer or private sale information; date of  harvest; city or county of landing; water body fished; gear type and amount  used; number of hours gear fished; number of hours the seafood landing licensee  fished; number of crew on board, including captain; nonfederally permitted  species harvested; market category; live weight or processed weight of species  harvested; and vessel identification (Coast Guard documentation number,  Virginia license number, or hull/VIN number).
    E. The monthly harvest report requirements shall be as  follows:
    1. Registered commercial fishermen shall be responsible for  providing monthly harvest report and daily harvest records that include the  name and signature of the registered commercial fisherman and his commercial  fisherman's registration license number; the name and license registration  number of any agent, if used; the license registration number of no more than  five helpers who were not serving as agents; any buyer or private sale  information; the date of any harvest; the city or county of landing that  harvest; the water body fished, gear type, and amount of gear used for that  harvest; the number of hours any gear was fished and the number of hours the  registered commercial fisherman fished; the number of crew on board, including  captain; species harvested; market category; live weight or processed weight of  species harvested; and vessel identification (Coast Guard documentation number,  Virginia license number, or hull/VIN number). Any information on the price paid  for the harvest may be provided voluntarily. 
    2. The monthly harvest report and daily harvest records  from oyster aquaculture product owner permittees and clam aquaculture product  owner permittees shall include the name, signature, permit number, lease  number, date of harvest, city or county of landing, gear (growing technique)  used, weight or amount of species harvested, number of crew, and buyer or  private sale information.  
    3. The monthly harvest report and daily harvest records  from seafood landing licensees shall include the name and signature of the  seafood landing licensee and his seafood landing license number; buyer or  private sale information; date of harvest; city or county of landing; water  body fished; gear type and amount used; number of hours gear fished; number of  hours the seafood landing licensee fished; number of crew on board, including  captain; nonfederally permitted species harvested; market category; live weight  or processed weight of species harvested; and vessel identification (Coast  Guard documentation number, Virginia license number, or hull/VIN number).
    F. Registered commercial fishermen, oyster aquaculture  product owner permittees and clam aquaculture product owner permittees not  fishing during a month, or seafood landing licensees not landing in Virginia  during a month, shall so notify the commission no later than the fifth of the  following month by postage paid postal card provided by the commission or by  calling the commission's toll free telephone line.
    G. Any person licensed as a commercial seafood buyer pursuant  to § 28.2-228 of the Code of Virginia shall maintain for a period of one year a  copy of each fisherman's daily harvest record form for each purchase made. Such  records shall be made available upon request to those authorized by the  commission.
    H. Registered commercial fishermen, seafood landing  licensees, oyster aquaculture product owner permittees and clam aquaculture  product owner permittees shall maintain their daily harvest records for one  year and shall make them available upon request to those authorized by the  commission.
    I. Registered commercial fishermen, seafood landing  licensees, and licensed seafood buyers shall allow those authorized by the  commission to sample harvest and seafood products to obtain biological  information for scientific and management purposes only. Such sampling shall be  conducted in a manner that does not hinder normal business operations.
    J. The reporting of oyster harvest and transactions by  licensed seafood buyers, oyster aquaculture product owner permittees, clam  aquaculture product owner permittees, and any registered commercial fisherman  who self-markets his oyster harvest shall be made in accordance with 4VAC20-200  and Article 3 (§ 28.2-538 et seq.) of Chapter 5 of Title 28.2 of the Code of  Virginia.
    K. The reporting of the harvest of federally permitted  species from beyond Virginia's tidal waters that are sold to a federally  permitted dealer shall be exempt from the procedures described in this section.
    L. The owner of any purse seine vessel or bait seine vessel  (snapper rig) licensed under the provisions of § 28.2-402 of the Code of  Virginia shall submit the Captain's Daily Fishing Reports to the National  Marine Fisheries Service, in accordance with provisions of Amendment 1 to the  Interstate Fishery Management Plan of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries  Commission for Atlantic Menhaden, which became effective July 2001.
    4VAC20-610-65. Noncompliance.
    A. Any initial violation of 4VAC20-610-60 by any  registered commercial fisherman, oyster aquaculture product owner permittee,  clam aquaculture product owner permittee, or seafood landing licensee shall be  subject to penalties as described in subdivisions 1 through 4 of this  subsection.
    1. Any failure to report harvest or no harvest activity or  no landing in Virginia within one to three months after that report was due  shall result in a minimum of one year of probation. 
    2. Any failure to report harvest or no harvest activity or  no landing in Virginia within four to six months after that report was due  shall result in a minimum of two years of probation.
    3. Any failure to report harvest or no harvest activity or  no landing in Virginia within seven to 12 months after that report was due  shall result in a minimum of six months of suspension of all commercial  licenses and permits. 
    4. Any failure to report harvest or no harvest activity or  no landing in Virginia more than 12 months after that report was due shall result  in a minimum of one year of suspension of all commercial licenses and permits.
    B. Any second or subsequent violation of 4VAC20-610-60 by  any registered commercial fisherman, oyster aquaculture product owner  permittee, clam aquaculture product owner permittee, or seafood landing  licensee may be subject to having his commercial licenses and permits suspended  by the commission.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-2258; Filed December 17, 2009, 4:13 p.m. 
TITLE 4. CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MARINE RESOURCES COMMISSION
Final Regulation
    Title of Regulation: 4VAC20-900. Pertaining to Horseshoe  Crab (amending 4VAC20-900-25, 4VAC20-900-30,  4VAC20-900-35). 
    Statutory Authority: § 28.2-201 of the Code of Virginia.
    Effective Date: January 1, 2010. 
    Agency Contact: Jane Warren, Agency Regulatory  Coordinator, Marine Resources Commission, 2600 Washington Avenue, 3rd Floor,  Newport News, VA 23607, telephone (757) 247-2248, FAX (757) 247-2002, or email  betty.warren@mrc.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    The amendments (i) reduce the 2010 horseshoe crab harvest  quota to 137,168, and (ii) enhance management and harvest control measures  within the fishery to include (a) reducing the landing limit trigger from 85%  to 50%, (b) establishing a horseshoe crab bycatch permit, (c) establishing  daily call-in requirements for buyers, (d) increasing the frequency of buyer's  reports from monthly to weekly, (e) establishing a separate quota management  area for waters east of the COLREGS line, and (f) establishing separate landing  limit triggers and provisions for quota overage payback for waters east of the  COLREGS line. 
    4VAC20-900-25. Commercial fisheries management measures. 
    A. It shall be unlawful for any person to harvest horseshoe  crabs from any shore or tidal waters of Virginia within 1,000 feet in any direction  of the mean low water line from May 1 through June 7. The harvests of horseshoe  crabs for biomedical use shall not be subject to this limitation.
    B. From January 1 through June 7 of each year, it shall be  unlawful for any person to land, in Virginia, any horseshoe crab harvested from  federal waters.
    C. Harvests for biomedical purposes shall require a special  permit issued by the Commissioner of Marine Resources, and all crabs taken  pursuant to such permit shall be returned to the same waters from which they  were collected.
    D. The commercial quota of horseshoe crab for each  calendar year 2010 shall be 152,495 137,168 horseshoe  crabs. Additional quantities of horseshoe crab may be transferred to Virginia  by other jurisdictions in accordance with the provisions of Addendum I to the  Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Fishery Management Plan for  Horseshoe Crab, April 2000, provided that the combined total of the commercial  quota and transfer from other jurisdictions shall not exceed 355,000 horseshoe  crabs. It shall be unlawful for any person to harvest from Virginia waters, or  to land in Virginia, any horseshoe crab for commercial purposes after any  calendar-year commercial quota of horseshoe crab has been attained and  announced as such.
    E. During each calendar year no more than 40% of Virginia's  the commercial horseshoe crab quota and any and all transfers of quota  from other jurisdictions shall be harvested from waters east of the COLREGS  Line. It shall be unlawful for any person to harvest horseshoe crabs from  waters east of the COLREGS Line, or to land horseshoe crabs, in Virginia, that  are harvested east of the COLREGS Line, after 40% of Virginia's horseshoe crab  quota and any and all transfers of quota have been attained for this designated  area and announced as such.
    E. F. It shall be unlawful for any person whose  harvest of horseshoe crabs is from waters east of the COLREGS Line to possess  aboard a vessel or to land in Virginia any quantity of horseshoe crabs that, in  aggregate, is not comprised of at least a minimum ratio of two male horseshoe  crabs to one female horseshoe crab. For the purposes of this regulation, no  horseshoe crab shall be considered a male horseshoe crab unless it possesses at  least one modified, hook-like appendage as its first pair of walking legs.
    F. G. Limitations on the daily harvest and  possession of horseshoe crabs for any vessel described below are as follows:
    1. It shall be unlawful for any person who meets the  requirements of 4VAC20-900-30 D and holds a valid horseshoe crab endorsement  license to possess aboard any vessel or to land any number of horseshoe crabs  in excess of 5,000, except that when it is projected and announced that 85%  50% of the commercial quota is taken it shall be unlawful for any person  who meets the requirements of 4VAC20-900-30 D and holds a valid horseshoe crab  endorsement license to possess aboard any vessel in Virginia any number of  horseshoe crabs in excess of 2,500.
    2. It shall be unlawful for any person who meets the  requirements of 4VAC20-900-30 E and holds a valid horseshoe crab endorsement  license to possess aboard any vessel or to land any number of horseshoe crabs  in excess of 2,000, except that when it is projected and announced that 85%  50% of the commercial quota is taken, it shall be unlawful for any  person who meets the requirements of 4VAC20-900-30 D E and holds  a valid horseshoe crab endorsement license to possess aboard any vessel in  Virginia any number of horseshoe crabs in excess of 1,000. The harvest of  horseshoe crabs, described in this subdivision, shall be restricted to using  only crab dredge.
    3. It shall be unlawful for any registered commercial  fisherman or seafood landing licensee who does not possess a horseshoe crab  endorsement license to possess horseshoe crabs, without first obtaining a  horseshoe crab bycatch permit. It shall be unlawful for a horseshoe crab  bycatch permittee to possess aboard any vessel more than 500 horseshoe  crabs or for any vessel to land any number of horseshoe crabs in excess of 500,  per day. When it is projected and announced that 50% of the commercial  quota is taken, it shall be unlawful for any person with a horseshoe crab  bycatch permit to possess aboard any vessel more than 250 horseshoe crabs or  for any vessel to land any number of horseshoe crabs in excess of 250 per day.
    G. H. It shall be unlawful for any fisherman  issued a horseshoe crab endorsement license to offload any horseshoe crabs  between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m.
    I. When it is projected and announced that 20% of the commercial  quota, as described in 4 VAC20-900-25D, has been taken from waters east of the  COLREGS line, the limitations on the possession and landing of horseshoe crabs  are as follows: 
    1. It shall be unlawful for any person who possesses a  valid horseshoe crab endorsement license to possess aboard any vessel in waters  east of the COLREGS Line or to land more than 2,500 horseshoe crabs per day.
    2. It shall be unlawful for any person who possesses a  valid restricted horseshoe crab endorsement license to possess aboard any  vessel in waters east of the COLREGS Line or to land more than 1,000 horseshoe  crabs per day.
    3. It shall be unlawful for any person who possesses a  valid horseshoe crab bycatch permit to possess aboard any vessel east of the  COLREGS Line or to land more than 250 horseshoe crabs per day.
    4VAC20-900-30. License requirements and exemption. 
    A. It shall be unlawful for any person to harvest horseshoe  crabs by hand for commercial purposes without first obtaining a commercial  fisherman registration license and a horseshoe crab hand harvester license. 
    B. The taking by hand of as many as five horseshoe crabs in  any one day for personal use only shall be exempt from the above licensing  requirement. 
    C. Except as provided for in 4VAC20-900-25 F G  3, it shall be unlawful for any boat or vessel to land horseshoe crabs in  Virginia for commercial purposes without first obtaining a horseshoe crab  endorsement license as described in this section. The horseshoe crab  endorsement license shall be required of each boat or vessel used to land  horseshoe crabs for commercial purposes. Possession of any quantity of  horseshoe crabs that exceeds the limit described in subsection B of this  section shall be presumed for commercial purposes. There shall be no fee for  the license. 
    D. To be eligible for an unrestricted horseshoe crab  endorsement license, the boat or vessel shall have landed and sold at least 500  horseshoe crabs in Virginia in at least one year during the period 1998-2000,  except as described in subsection E of this section. 
    1. The owner shall complete an application for each boat or  vessel by providing to the Marine Resources Commission a notarized and signed  statement of applicant's name, address, telephone number, boat or vessel name  and its registration or documentation number. 
    2. The owner shall complete a notarized authorization to allow  the Marine Resources Commission to obtain copies of landings data from the  National Marine Fisheries Service. 
    E. Any Virginia registered commercial fisherman is eligible  for a horseshoe crab endorsement license that is restricted to using a crab  dredge to harvest horseshoe crabs provided his boat or vessel shall have landed  at least 10,000 pounds of whelk in any one year from 2002 through 2005. 
    1. The Virginia registered commercial fisherman shall complete  an application for each boat or vessel by providing to the Marine Resources  Commission a notarized and signed statement of the applicant's name, address,  telephone number, boat or vessel name and its registration or documentation  number. 
    2. The Virginia registered commercial fisherman shall complete  a notarized authorization to allow the Marine Resources Commission to obtain  copies of whelk landings data from the National Marine Fisheries Service. 
    4VAC20-900-35. Monitoring requirements. 
    A. Any person harvesting or landing horseshoe crabs in  Virginia shall report monthly on forms provided by the Marine Resources  Commission all harvests of horseshoe crabs including, but not limited to, bait  fisheries, bycatch, biomedical industry, and scientific and educational  research harvests. Reporting requirements shall consist of numbers and pounds  landed by sex, harvest method and harvest location.
    B. It shall be unlawful for a horseshoe crab endorsement  license holder to fail to contact the Marine Resources Operations Station prior  to the vessel issued a horseshoe crab endorsement license offloading horseshoe  crabs. The horseshoe crab endorsement license holder shall provide the Marine  Resources Commission the name of the vessel and its captain and the anticipated  or approximate offloading time and site. Following offloading, the horseshoe  crab endorsement license holder shall contact the Virginia Marine Resources  Commission Interactive-Voice-Response (IVR) System within 24 hours of landing  and provide his horseshoe crab endorsement license number; the time, date and  location of offloading; and the number of horseshoe crabs landed.
    C. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation  to buy any horseshoe crabs from any lawful harvester on or after July 1, 2007,  without first having obtained a Horseshoe Crab Buying Permit from the Marine  Resources Commission. The permit application shall be completed in full by the  licensed seafood buyer, and a copy of the permit shall be kept in possession of  the licensed buyer while buying or possessing horseshoe crabs.
    D. Any licensed seafood buyer permitted to purchase horseshoe  crabs shall provide written reports to the commission of daily purchases and  harvest information on forms provided by the commission. Such information shall  include the date of the purchase, the buyer's horseshoe crab permit number and  harvester's Commercial Fisherman Registration License number, gear type used,  water area fished, city or county of landing, and the number of female horseshoe  crabs and male horseshoe crabs for each purchased harvest  of horseshoe crabs. These reports of any current monthly weekly  purchases shall be completed in full and submitted to the commission no later  than the 5th day Thursday of the following month week.  In addition, once it has been projected and announced that 85% of the annual  commercial quota of horseshoe crab quota has been landed, or  34% of the commercial quota of horseshoe crab established for the horseshoe  crab harvest east of the COLREGS Line has been landed each permitted buyer  shall call the commission's interactive voice recording system on a daily basis  to report his name and permit number, date, number of female horseshoe crabs  and number of male horseshoe crabs purchased, gear used and water area fished  by the harvester.
    E. Persons harvesting horseshoe crabs for biomedical use and  owners of facilities using horseshoe crabs for biomedical purposes shall  monitor and report monthly to the commission all harvests or purchases of  horseshoe crabs and the percentage of mortality up to the point of release  including that mortality which occurs during harvest, shipping, handling, and  bleeding.
    F. Owners of biomedical facilities using horseshoe crabs  shall participate in the tagging program of the commission to evaluate the  post-release mortality of horseshoe crabs.
    G. Monthly reports shall be due to the commission no later  than the fifth day of the following month.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-2267; Filed December 17, 2009, 4:16 p.m. 
TITLE 4. CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
VIRGINIA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION BOARD
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S  NOTICE: Final amendments to 4VAC50-60, Virginia Stormwater Management  Program (VSMP) Permit Regulations, were initially published 26:4 VA.R. 345-354  October 26, 2009; but were simultaneously suspended pursuant to § 2.2-4015  A 4 of the Virginia Administrative Process Act to allow time for a 30-day  public review and comment period on changes made since the original proposed  regulation was published in 25:21 VA.R. 3791-3808 June 22, 2009. No changes  were made to the regulation since the 26:4 publication.
         Title of Regulation: 4VAC50-60. Virginia Stormwater  Management Program (VSMP) Permit Regulations (amending 4VAC50-60-700, 4VAC50-60-720,  4VAC50-60-730, 4VAC50-60-740, 4VAC50-60-750, 4VAC50-60-760, 4VAC50-60-770,  4VAC50-60-780, 4VAC50-60-790, 4VAC50-60-800, 4VAC50-60-810, 4VAC50-60-820,  4VAC50-60-830; adding 4VAC50-60-825; repealing 4VAC50-60-710).
    Statutory Authority: §§ 10.1-603.2:1 and 10.1-603.4  of the Code of Virginia.
    Effective Date: February 3, 2010. 
    Agency Contact: David C. Dowling, Policy, Planning, and  Budget Director, Department of Conservation and Recreation, 203 Governor  Street, Suite 302, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 786-2291, FAX (804)  786-6141, or email david.dowling@dcr.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    This regulatory action establishes a statewide base fee  schedule for stormwater management projects and establishes the fee assessment  and the collection and distribution systems for those fees. Permit fees are  established for: Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (new coverage);  Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (major modifications); Construction  activity general permit coverage; Construction activity individual permits,  Construction activity modifications or transfers; and MS4 and Construction  activity annual permit maintenance fees.
    This action is closely tied to the Parts I, II, and III  action as the base fees generated are necessary to fund the local stormwater  management programs established through that concurrent regulatory action also  published in this Register. The fees are established using estimates of the  time determined to be necessary for different-sized projects; for a local  stormwater management program to conduct plan review, inspections (including  stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) review and reinspections),  enforcement, technical assistance, and permit coverage; and for the Department  of Conservation and Recreation to provide oversight of the Commonwealth's  stormwater management program.
    The permit base fee levels were arrived at through  discussions of a subcommittee of the Technical Advisory Committee and  discussions with the overall Technical Advisory Committee and through  corroboration of the costs of conducting the various components of program  implementation with Department of Conservation and Recreation stormwater field  staff and with a number of local government program personnel.
    The qualifying local program with approval of the Virginia  Soil and Water Conservation Board (board) was authorized to establish a lower  construction fee provided that it can demonstrate its ability to fully and  successfully implement a program. Additional authority is added to allow a  qualifying local program to establish greater fees if it demonstrates to the  board that greater fees are necessary to properly administer a program.  Additionally, the permit maintenance fee for MS4s with general permit coverage  is reduced from $4,000 to $3,000 and an annual increase in fees based on the  CPI-U is removed.
    Summary of Public Comments and Agency's Response: A  summary of comments made by the public and the agency's response may be  obtained from the promulgating agency or viewed at the office of the Registrar  of Regulations. 
    Part XIII 
  Fees 
    4VAC50-60-700. Purpose.
    Sections 10.1-603.4 and 10.1-603.5 of the Code of Virginia  authorize the establishment of a statewide fee schedule, including  administrative charges for state agencies, for stormwater management and  state agency projects for land-disturbing activities and for municipal  separate storm sewer systems. These regulations in this This  part establish establishes the fee assessment and the  collection system and distribution systems for those fees. The  fees associated with individual permits or coverage under the General Permit  for Discharges of Stormwater From Construction Activities (permits for  stormwater management for land-disturbing activities) issued by a qualifying  local program or a department-administered local stormwater management program  that has been approved by the board shall include costs associated with plan  review, permit review and issuance, inspections, enforcement, program  administration and oversight, and database management. Fees shall also be  established for permit maintenance, modification, and transfer.
    Should a qualifying local program demonstrate to the board  its ability to fully and successfully implement a qualifying local program  without a full implementation of the fees set out in this part, the board may  authorize the administrative establishment of a lower fee for that program  provided that such reduction shall not reduce the amount of fees due to the  department for its program oversight and shall not affect the fee schedules set  forth herein.
    A qualifying local program may establish greater fees than  those base fees specified by this part should it be demonstrated to the board  that such greater fees are necessary to properly administer the qualifying  local program. Any fee increases established by the qualifying local program  beyond those base fees established in this part shall not be subject to the fee  distribution formula set out in 4VAC50-60-780. Nothing in this part shall  prohibit a locality from establishing other local fees authorized by the Code  of Virginia related to stormwater management within their jurisdictions. 
    As part of its program oversight, the department shall  periodically assess the revenue generated by both the localities and the department  to ensure that the fees have been appropriately set and the fees may be  adjusted through periodic regulatory actions should significant deviations  become apparent. The department may make such periodic adjustments in  addition to the annual fee increases authorized by 4VAC50-60-840. 
    4VAC50-60-710. Definitions. (Repealed.)
    The following words and terms used in this chapter have  the following meanings: 
    "Permit applicant" means for the purposes of  this part any person submitting a permit application for issuance, reissuance,  or modification, except as exempted by 4VAC50-60-740, of a permit or filing a  registration statement or permit application for coverage under a general  permit issued pursuant to the Act and this chapter. 
    "Permit application" means for the purposes of  this part the forms approved by the Virginia Soil and Water Conservation Board  for applying for issuance or reissuance of a permit or for filing a  registration statement or application for coverage under a general permit  issued in response to the Act and this chapter. In the case of modifications to  an existing permit requested by the permit holder and not exempted by  4VAC50-60-740, the application shall consist of the formal written request and  any accompanying documentation submitted by the permit holder to initiate the  modification. 
    4VAC50-60-720. Authority. 
    The authority for this part is pursuant to §§ 10.1-604.4  §§ 10.1-603.4 and 10.1-603.4:1 of the Code of Virginia and enactment  clause 7 governing the transfer of the relevant provisions of Fees for Permits  and Certificates Regulations, 9VAC25-20, in accordance with Chapter 372 of the  2004 Virginia Acts of Assembly. 
    4VAC50-60-730. Applicability. 
    A. This part applies to: 
    1. All permit applicants for issuance of persons  seeking coverage of a MS4 under a new permit or reissuance of an  existing permit, except as specifically exempt under 4VAC50-60-740 A. The  fee due shall be as specified under 4VAC50-60-800 or 4VAC50-60-820. 
    2. All permittees operators who request that an  existing MS4 individual permit be modified, except as specifically  exempt under 4VAC50-60-740 A 1 of this chapter. The fee due shall be as  specified under 4VAC50-60-810. 
    3. All persons seeking coverage under the General Permit  for Discharges of Stormwater From Construction Activities or a person seeking  an Individual Permit for Discharges of Stormwater From Construction  Activities.  The fee due shall be as specified under 4VAC50-60-820.
    4. All permittees who request modifications to or transfers  of their existing registration statement for coverage under a General Permit  for Discharges of Stormwater From Construction Activities or of an Individual  Permit for Discharges of Stormwater From Construction Activities.  The fee  due shall be as specified under 4VAC50-60-825 in addition to any additional  fees necessary pursuant to 4VAC50-60-820 due to an increase in acreage.
    B. An applicant for a permit involving a permit that is to  be revoked and reissued Persons who are applicants for an individual  VSMP Municipal Separate Stormwater Sewer System permit as a result of existing  permit revocation shall be considered an applicant for a new permit. The  fee due shall be as specified under 4VAC50-60-800. 
    Persons whose coverage under the General Permit for  Discharges of Stormwater From Construction Activities has been revoked shall  reapply for an Individual Permit for Discharges of Stormwater From Construction  Activities. The fee due shall be as specified under 4VAC50-60-820.
    C. Permit and permit coverage maintenance fees may  apply to each Virginia Stormwater Management Permit Program  (VSMP) permit holder. The fee due shall be as specified under 4VAC50-60-830. 
    4VAC50-60-740. Exemptions.
    A. No permit application fees will be assessed to: 
    1. Permittees who request minor modifications or minor  amendments to permits as defined in 4VAC50-60-10 or other minor  amendments at the discretion of the local stormwater management program. 
    2. Permittees whose permits are modified or amended at the  initiative of the permit-issuing authority. This does not include errors in  the registration statement identified by the local stormwater management  program or errors related to the acreage of the site. 
    B. Permit modifications at the request of the permittee  resulting in changes to stormwater management plans that require additional  review by the local stormwater management program shall not be exempt pursuant  to this section and shall be subject to fees specified under 4VAC50-60-825.
    4VAC50-60-750. Due dates for Virginia Stormwater Management  Program (VSMP) Permits. 
    A. Permit application fees for all new permit applications  are due on the day a permit application is submitted and shall be Requests  for a permit, permit modification, or general permit coverage shall not be  processed until the fees required pursuant to this part are paid in  accordance with 4VAC50-60-760. Applications will not be processed without  payment of the required fee. 
    B. A permit application fee is due on the day a permit  application is submitted for a major modification that occurs (and becomes  effective) before the stated permit expiration date. There is no application  fee for a major modification or amendment that is made at the permit-issuing  authority's initiative. 
    C. Permit B. Individual permit or general permit  coverage maintenance fees shall be paid annually to the permit-issuing  authority by October 1 of each year department or the qualifying local  program, as applicable, by the anniversary date of individual permit issuance  or general permit coverage. No permit will be reissued or automatically  continued without payment of the required fee. Individual permit or general  permit coverage maintenance fees shall be applied until a Notice of Termination  is effective.
    MS4 individual operators who currently pay a permit  maintenance fee that is due by October 1 of each year shall continue to pay the  maintenance fee by October 1 until their current permit expires. Upon  reissuance of the MS4 individual permit, maintenance fees shall be paid on the  anniversary date of the reissued permit.
    Effective April 1, 2005, any permit holder whose permit is  effective as of April 1 of a given year (including permits that have been  administratively continued) shall pay the permit maintenance fee or fees to the  permit-issuing authority by October 1 of that same year. 
    4VAC50-60-760. Method of payment. 
    A. Fees, as applicable, shall be, at the discretion  of the department, submitted electronically or be paid by check, draft or  postal money order payable to:
    the 1. The Treasurer of Virginia, for a MS4 individual  or general permit or for a coverage issued by the department under the General  Permit for Discharges of Stormwater From Construction Activities or Individual  Permit for Discharges of Stormwater From Construction Activities, to the  permit-issuing authority, and must be in U.S. currency, except that  agencies and institutions of the Commonwealth of Virginia may submit  Interagency Transfers for the amount of the fee. To pay electronically, go  to the Department of Conservation and Recreation's stormwater management  section of the Department's public website at http://www.dcr.virginia.gov. The  Department of Conservation and Recreation may provide a means to pay fees  electronically. Fees not submitted electronically shall be sent to the  following address: Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation,  Division of Finance, Accounts Payable, 203 Governor Street, Richmond, VA 23219.  
           | Virginia Department of Conservation and RecreationDivision of Finance, Accounts Payable
 203 Governor Street
 Richmond, VA 23219
 | 
  
    2. The qualifying local program, for coverage authorized by  the qualifying local program under the General Permit for Discharges of  Stormwater From Construction Activities, and must be in U.S. currency.
    B. Required information . for permits or permit  coverage: All applicants for new permit issuance, permit reissuance, or  permit modification, unless otherwise specified by the department,  shall submit the following information along with the fee payment or utilize  the Department of Conservation and Recreation Permit Application Fee Form: 
    1. Applicant name, address and daytime phone number. 
    2. Applicant Federal Identification Number (FIN), if  applicable. 
    3. The name of the facility/activity, and the  facility/activity location. 
    4. The type of permit applied for. 
    5. Whether the application is for a new permit issuance,  permit reissuance, permit maintenance, or permit modification. 
    6. The amount of fee submitted. 
    7. The existing permit number, if applicable. 
    8. Other information as required by the local stormwater  management program.
    4VAC50-60-770. Incomplete payments and late payments. 
    All incomplete payments will be deemed as nonpayments. The  department or the qualifying local program, as applicable, shall provide  notification to the applicant of any incomplete payments.
    Interest may be charged for late payments at the underpayment  rate set out by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service established pursuant to §  6621(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code. This rate is prescribed set  forth in § 58.1-15 of the Code of Virginia and is calculated on a monthly  basis at the applicable periodic rate. 
    A 10% late payment fee may shall be charged to  any delinquent (over 90 days past due) account. 
    The permit-issuing authority is department and the  qualifying local program are entitled to all remedies available under the  Code of Virginia in collecting any past due amount and may recover any  attorney's fees and/or other administrative costs incurred in pursuing and  collecting any past due amount. 
    4VAC50-60-780. Deposit and use of fees.
    A. All fees collected by the board department  or department board in response pursuant to  this chapter shall be deposited into a special nonreverting fund known as  the Virginia Stormwater Management Fund established by, and shall be  used and accounted for as specified in § 10.1-603.4:1 of the Code of Virginia.  Fees collected by the department or board shall be exempt from statewide  indirect costs charged and collected by the Department of Accounts. 
    B. All fees collected by a qualifying local program  pursuant to this chapter shall be subject to accounting review and shall be  used solely to carry out the qualifying local program's responsibilities  pursuant to Part II and Part III A of this chapter.
    Whenever Pursuant to subdivision 5 a of § 10.1-603.4  of the Code of Virginia, whenever the board has delegated authorized  the administration of a stormwater management program to by a  locality or is required to do so by the Act qualifying local program,  no more than 30% 28% of the total revenue generated by the  statewide stormwater management fees collected within the locality in  accordance with 4VAC50-60-820 shall be remitted on a monthly basis  to the State Treasurer for deposit in the Virginia Stormwater Management Fund unless  otherwise collected electronically. If the qualifying local program waives or  reduces any fee due in accordance with 4VAC50-60-820, the qualifying local  program shall remit the 28% portion that would be due to the Virginia  Stormwater Management Fund if such fee were charged in full. Any fee increases  established by the qualifying local program beyond the base fees established in  this part shall not be subject to the fee distribution formula.
    4VAC50-60-790. General. 
    Each permit application for a new permit each permit  application for reissuance of a permit, each permit application for major  modification of a permit, and each revocation and reissuance of a permit is a  The fees for individual permits, general permit coverage, permit or  registration statement modification, or permit transfers are considered  separate action actions and shall be assessed a separate fee, as  applicable. The fees for each type of permit that the permit-issuing  authority has the authority to issue, reissue or modify will be as specified in  this part. 
    4VAC50-60-800. Fee schedules for VSMP Municipal Separate Storm  Sewer System new permit issuance.
    The following fee schedule applies to permit applications for  issuance of a new individual VSMP Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System  permit or coverage under a MS4 General Permit. All regulated MS4s  that apply for joint coverage under an individual permit or general permit  registration shall each pay the appropriate fees set out below. 
           | VSMP Municipal Stormwater / MS4 Individual (Large and    Medium) | $21,300$16,000
 | 
       | VSMP Municipal Stormwater / MS4 Individual (Small) | $2,000$8,000
 | 
       | VSMP Municipal Stormwater / MS4 General Permit (Small) | $600$4,000
 | 
  
    4VAC50-60-810. Fee schedules for major modification of MS4  individual permits or certificates requested by the permitee operator.  
    The following fee schedules apply schedule applies  to applications for major modification of an individual MS4 permit  requested by the permittee: 
    The permit application fees listed in the table below  apply to a major modification of a VSMP Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems  Permit that occurs (and becomes effective) before the stated permit expiration  date. 
           | VSMP Municipal Stormwater / MS4 Individual (Large and    Medium) | $10,650$5,000
 | 
       | VSMP Municipal Stormwater / MS4 Individual (Small) | $1,000$2,500
 | 
  
     
    4VAC50-60-820. Fees for filing  permit applications (registration statements) for general permits issued by the  permit-issuing authority an individual permit or coverage under the  General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities.
    The following fees apply to filing of permit applications  (registration statements) for all general permits issued by the permit-issuing  authority, except VSMP Stormwater Construction General Permits coverage  under the General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction  Activities issued by the department prior to a qualifying local program or a  department-administered local stormwater management program being approved by  the board in the area where the applicable land-disturbing activity is located,  or where the department has issued an individual permit or coverage under the  General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities for a  state or federal agency for which it has approved annual standards and  specifications.
    The fee for filing a permit application (registration  statement) for coverage under a VSMP stormwater general permit issued by the  permit-issuing authority shall be: 
           | VSMP General / Stormwater Management - Phase I Land Clearing    ("Large" Construction Activity - Sites or common plans of    development equal to or greater than 5five acres) | $500 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management - Phase II Land    Clearing ("Small" Construction Activity - Sites or common plans of    development equal to or greater than 1one acre and less than5    Acres)five acres) | $300 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management - Small Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites within designated areas of Chesapeake Bay Act    localities with land disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 2,500    square feet and less than one acre) | $200 | 
  
    The following fees apply to coverage under the General  Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities for a state or  federal agency that does not file annual standards and specifications, an  individual permit issued by the board or coverage under the General Permit for  Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities issued by a qualifying  local program, or a department-administered local stormwater management program  that has been approved by the board. For coverage under the General Permit for  Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities, no more than 50% of the  base fee set out in this part shall be due at the time that a stormwater  management plan or an initial stormwater management plan is submitted for  review in accordance with 4VAC50-60-108. The remaining 50% base fee  balance shall be due prior to the issuance of coverage under the General Permit  for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities.
    When a site or sites are purchased for development within  a previously permitted common plan of development or sale, the applicant shall  be subject to fees in accordance with the disturbed acreage of their site or  sites according to the following table.
           | VSMP General / Stormwater Management - Small Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites within designated areas of Chesapeake Bay Act    localities with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 2,500    square feet and less than 0.5 acre) | $290 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management - Small Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Areas within common plans of development or sale with    land-disturbance acreage less than one acre) | $290 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management - Small Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites within designated areas of Chesapeake Bay Act    localities with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 0.5 acre    and less than one acre) | $1,500 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management - Small Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or    sale with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than one acre and less    than five acres) | $2,700 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management - Large Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or    sale with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than five acres and    less than 10 acres) | $3,400 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management - Large Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or    sale with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 10 acres and less    than 50 acres) | $4,500 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management - Large Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or    sale with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 50 acres and less    than 100 acres) | $6,100 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management - Large Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or    sale with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 100 acres) | $9,600 | 
       | VSMP Individual Permit for Discharges of Stormwater From    Construction Activities | $15,000 | 
  
    4VAC50-60-825. Fees for the modification or transfer of  individual permits or of registration statements for the General Permit for  Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities.
    The following fees apply to modification or transfer of  individual permits or of registration statements for the General Permit for  Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities issued by a qualifying  local program or a department-administered local stormwater management program  that has been approved by the board. If the permit modifications result in  changes to stormwater management plans that require additional review by the  local stormwater management program, such reviews shall be subject to the fees  set out in this section. The fee assessed shall be based on the total disturbed  acreage of the site. In addition to the permit modification fee, modifications  resulting in an increase in total disturbed acreage shall pay the difference in  the initial permit fee paid and the permit fee that would have applied for the  total disturbed acreage in 4VAC50-60-820. No modification or transfer fee shall  be required until such board-approved programs exist. No modification fee shall  be required for the General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from  Construction Activities for a state or federal agency that is administering a  project in accordance with approved annual standards and specifications but  shall apply to all other state or federal agency projects.
           | VSMP General / Stormwater Management – Small Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites within designated areas of Chesapeake Bay Act    localities with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 2,500    square feet and less than 0.5 acre) | $20 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management – Small Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Areas within common plans of development or sale with    land disturbance acreage less than one acre) | $20 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management – Small Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites within designated areas of Chesapeake Bay Act    localities with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 0.5 acre    and less than one acre) | $100 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management – Small Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or    sale with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than one and less than    five acres) | $200 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management – Large Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or    sale with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than five acres and    less than 10 acres) | $250 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management – Large Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or    sale with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 10 acres and less    than 50 acres) | $300 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management – Large Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or sale    with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 50 acres and less than    100 acres) | $450 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management – Large Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or    sale with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 100 acres) | $700 | 
       | VSMP Individual Permit for Discharges of Stormwater From    Construction Activities | $5,000 | 
  
    4VAC50-60-830. Permit maintenance fees.
    A. The following annual permit maintenance fees apply  to each VSMP permit identified below, including expired permits that have been  administratively continued:. With respect to the General Permit for  Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities, these fees shall apply  until the permit coverage is terminated, and shall only be effective when  assessed by a qualifying local program or a department-administered local  stormwater management program that has been approved by the board. No  maintenance fee shall be required for a General Permit for Discharges of  Stormwater from Construction Activities until such board approved programs  exist. No maintenance fee shall be required for the General Permit for  Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities for a state or federal  agency that is administering a project in accordance with approved annual  standards and specifications but shall apply to all other state or federal  agency projects. All regulated MS4s who are issued joint coverage under an  individual permit or general permit registration shall each pay the appropriate  fees set out below:
           | VSMP Municipal Stormwater / MS4 Individual (Large and    Medium) | $3,800$8,800
 | 
       | VSMP Municipal Stormwater / MS4 Individual (Small) | $400$6,000
 | 
       | VSMP Municipal Stormwater / MS4 General Permit (Small) | $4,000$3,000
 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management - Phase I Land    Clearing ("Large" Construction Activity - Sites or common plans of    development equal to or greater than 5 acres)
 | $0
 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management - Phase II Land    Clearing ("Small" Construction Activity - Sites or common plans of    development equal to or greater than 1 acre and less than 5 Acres)
 | $0
 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management – Small Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites within designated areas of Chesapeake Bay Act    localities with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 2,500    square feet and less than 0.5 acre) | $50 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management – Small Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Areas within common plans of development or sale with    land-disturbance acreage less than one acre) | $50 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management – Small Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites within designated areas of Chesapeake Bay Act    localities with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 0.5 acre    and less than one acre) | $200 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management – Small Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or    sale with land-disturbance equal to or greater than one acre and less than    five acres) | $400 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management – Large Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or    sale with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than five acres and    less than 10 acres) | $500 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management – Large Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or    sale with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 10 acres and less    than 50 acres) | $650 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management – Large Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or    sale with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater than 50 acres and less    than 100 acres) | $900 | 
       | VSMP General / Stormwater Management – Large Construction    Activity/Land Clearing (Sites or areas within common plans of development or    sale with land-disturbance acreage equal to or greater 100 acres) | $1,400 | 
       | VSMP Individual Permit for Discharges Fromfrom    Construction Activities | $3,000 | 
  
    B. An additional permit maintenance fee of $1,000 shall be  paid annually by permittees in a toxics management program. Any facility that  performs acute or chronic biological testing for compliance with a limit or  special condition requiring monitoring in a VPDES permit is included in the  toxics management program. 
    4VAC50-60-840. [Reserved.] Annual increase in fees.
    The fees set out in 4VAC50-60-800 through 4VAC50-60-830  shall be increased each July 1 by multiplying the fee by the percentage by  which the consumer price index for all-urban consumers published by the United  States Department of Labor (CPI-U) for the 12-month period ending May 31 of the  preceding year exceeds the CPI-U for the 12-month period ending May 31, 2007,  and the result shall be rounded to the nearest $1 increment. The fee schedule  shall be posted to the department's website and distributed to each qualified  local program in advance of each fiscal year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in  no event shall the permit fee be decreased and in no event shall any increase  exceed 4.0% per annum without formal action by the board.
        NOTICE: The forms used  in administering the above regulation are listed below. Any amended or added  forms are reflected in the listing and published following the listing.
         FORMS (4VAC50-60)
    Application Form 1-General Information, Consolidated Permits  Program, EPA Form 3510-1, DCR 199-149 (August 1990).
    Department of Conservation and Recreation Permit Fee Form,  DCR 199-145 (03/09) (9/08) (10/09).
    VSMP General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from  Construction Activities (VAR10) - Registration Statement, DCR 199-146 (03/09).
    VSMP General Permit Notice of Termination - Construction  Activity Stormwater Discharges (VAR10), DCR 199-147 (03/09).
    VSMP General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from  Construction Activities (VAR10) - Transfer Agreement, DCR199-191 (03/09).
    VSMP General Permit Registration Statement for Stormwater  Discharges From Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (VAR04), DCR  199-148 (07/08).
         
          
    
    VA.R. Doc. No. R06-129; Filed December 15, 2009, 9:54 a.m. 
TITLE 4. CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
VIRGINIA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION BOARD
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE:  Final amendments to 4VAC50-60, Virginia Stormwater Management Program (VSMP)  Permit Regulations, were initially published in 26:4 VA.R. 355-393 October 26,  2009, but were simultaneously suspended pursuant to § 2.2-4015 A 4 of the  Virginia Administrative Process Act to allow time for a 30-day public review  and comment period on changes made since the original proposed regulation was  published in 25:21 VA.R. 3803-3849 June 22, 2009. The changes made since the  26:4 publication are shown in brackets.
         Title of Regulation: 4VAC50-60. Virginia Stormwater  Management Program (VSMP) Permit Regulations (amending 4VAC50-60-10, 4VAC50-60-20,  4VAC50-60-30, 4VAC50-60-40; adding 4VAC50-60-45, 4VAC50-60-48, 4VAC50-60-53,  4VAC50-60-56, 4VAC50-60-63, 4VAC50-60-65, 4VAC50-60-66, 4VAC50-60-69,  4VAC50-60-72, 4VAC50-60-74, 4VAC50-60-76, 4VAC50-60-85, 4VAC50-60-92, 4VAC50-60-93,  4VAC50-60-94, 4VAC50-60-95, 4VAC50-60-96, 4VAC50-60-97, 4VAC50-60-98,  4VAC50-60-99, 4VAC50-60-102, 4VAC50-60-104, 4VAC50-60-106, 4VAC50-60-108,  4VAC50-60-112, 4VAC50-60-114, 4VAC50-60-116, 4VAC50-60-118, 4VAC50-60-122,  4VAC50-60-124, 4VAC50-60-126, 4VAC50-60-128, 4VAC50-60-132, 4VAC50-60-134,  4VAC50-60-136, 4VAC50-60-138, 4VAC50-60-142, 4VAC50-60-154, 4VAC50-60-156,  4VAC50-60-157, 4VAC50-60-158, 4VAC50-60-159; repealing 4VAC50-60-50 through 4VAC50-60-150).  
    Statutory Authority: §§ 10.1-603.2:1 and 10.1-603.4  of the Code of Virginia.
    Effective Date: July 1, 2010. 
    Agency Contact: David C. Dowling, Policy, Planning, and  Budget Director, Department of Conservation and Recreation, 203 Governor  Street, Suite 302, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 786-2291, FAX (804)  786-6141, or email david.dowling@dcr.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    This final regulatory action amends the technical criteria  applicable to stormwater discharges from construction activities; establishes  minimum criteria for locality-administered stormwater management programs  (qualifying local programs) and Department of Conservation and Recreation  (department) administered local stormwater management programs, as well as  authorization procedures and review procedures for qualifying local programs;  and amends the definitions section applicable to all of the Virginia Stormwater  Management Program (VSMP) regulations.
    The proposed version of the regulations established  consistent statewide water quality requirements that included a 0.28  lbs/acre/year phosphorus standard for new development and a requirement that  total phosphorus loads be reduced to an amount at least 20% below the  predevelopment phosphorus load on prior developed lands. Concerning water  quantity, the proposed version specified that stormwater discharged from a site  to an unstable channel must be released at or below a "forested" peak  flow rate condition. No exceptions to the standard were provided. As described  below, the final regulations change these technical standards and provide  additional flexibility that was not present in the proposed regulations.
    In the final action, with regard to technical criteria  applicable to stormwater discharges from construction activities, revised water  quality and water quantity requirements are included in Part II A of the  regulations (existing technical criteria will now be maintained in a new Part  II B that applies to grandfathered projects). These revised technical  requirements in Part II A include:
    1. A 0.45 lbs/acre/year phosphorus standard for new  development activities statewide;
    2. A requirement that total phosphorus loads be reduced to  an amount at least 20% below the predevelopment phosphorus load on prior  developed lands for land disturbing activities greater than or equal to an acre  and 10% for redevelopment sites disturbing less than 1 acre;
    3. A requirement that control measures be installed on a  site to meet any applicable wasteload allocation; and
    4. Water quantity requirements that include both channel  protection and flood protection criteria. In the final version, stormwater that  is discharged from a site to an unstable channel must be released at or below a  "good pasture" peak flow rate condition unless the predeveloped  condition for the site is forest, in which case, the runoff shall be held to  the forested condition. Exceptions to the "good pasture" standard are  provided to a land disturbing activity that is less than five acres on prior  developed lands; or less than one acre for new development. Under the  exceptions, the sites are expected to improve upon the predeveloped runoff  condition.
    The final regulations also provide five offsite options  organized in a new section that may be utilized as specified in the regulation  for a developer to achieve the required onsite water quality and, where  allowed, water quantity requirements (the proposed regulations only contained  three options). One of the new provisions includes a state buy-down option that  would be available in the future should a standard more stringent than 0.45  lbs/acre/year phosphorus be established for projects occurring within the  Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
    The proposed regulations did not contain grandfathering  provisions. The final regulations contain a new section on grandfathering that  specifies that if the operator of a project has met the three listed local  vesting criteria related to significant affirmative governmental acts and has  received general permit coverage by July 1, 2010, then the project is  grandfathered under today's water quality and quantity technical standards  (Part II B) until June 30, 2014. If permit coverage is maintained by the  operator, then the project will remain grandfathered until June 30, 2019. It  also notes that past June 30, 2019, or if a project's general permit coverage  is not maintained, portions of the project not yet completed shall become  subject to the new technical criteria set out in Part II A. The grandfathering  provisions also contain criteria for the grandfathering of state agency  projects for which state or federal funding has been approved as of July 1,  2010, and finally, criteria for grandfathering projects that governmental  bonding or public debt financing has been issued prior to July 1, 2010.
    This final action establishes the minimum criteria and  ordinance requirements (where applicable) for a Virginia Soil and Water  Conservation Board (board) authorized qualifying local program (Part III A) or  for a board-authorized department-administered local stormwater management  program (Part III B) which include, but are not limited to, administration,  plan review, issuance of coverage under the General Virginia Stormwater  Management Program (VSMP) Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction  Activities, inspection, enforcement, reporting, and recordkeeping. Part III D  establishes the procedures the board will utilize in authorizing a locality to  administer a qualifying local program. Part III C establishes the  criteria the department will utilize in reviewing a locality's administration  of a qualifying local program.
    The primary issue in Part III that changed between the  proposed and final regulations is that in the final regulations language was  added that specified that stormwater management facilities designed to treat  stormwater runoff primarily from an individual residential lot, at the  qualifying program's discretion, are not subject to the locality inspection  requirements (once every five years), homeowner inspection requirements,  maintenance agreement requirements, or construction record drawing  requirements. Instead, a qualifying local program is authorized to develop a  strategy for addressing maintenance of stormwater management facilities located  on and primarily designed to treat stormwater runoff from an individual  residential lot. Such a strategy may include periodic inspections, public  outreach and education, or other method targeted at promoting the long-term  maintenance of such facilities.
    Finally, this action changes definitions in Part I, which  is applicable to the full body of the VSMP regulations. Unnecessary definitions  are deleted, needed definitions are added, and many existing definitions are  updated. In the final action, several additional definitions are added and  other minor refinements address comments received.
    Summary of Public Comments and Agency's Response: A  summary of comments made by the public and the agency's response may be  obtained from the promulgating agency or viewed at the office of the Registrar  of Regulations. 
    Part I 
  Definitions, Purpose, and Applicability 
    4VAC50-60-10. Definitions.
    The following words and terms used in this chapter have the  following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
    "Act" means the Virginia Stormwater Management Act,  Article 1.1 (§ 10.1-603.1 et seq.) of Chapter 6 of Title 10.1 of the Code of  Virginia.
    "Adequate channel" means a channel watercourse  or wetland that will convey the designated frequency storm event  without overtopping the channel bank nor its banks or causing  erosive damage to the channel bed or, banks, or  overbank sections of the same. A wetland may be considered an adequate channel  provided the discharge from the designated frequency storm event does not cause  erosion in the wetland. 
    "Administrator" means the Administrator of the  United States Environmental Protection Agency or an authorized representative.
    "Applicable standards and limitations" means all state,  interstate, and federal standards and limitations to which a discharge or a  related activity is subject under the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1251 et  seq.) and the Act, including effluent limitations, water quality standards,  standards of performance, toxic effluent standards or prohibitions, best  management practices, and standards for sewage sludge use or disposal under §§  301, 302, 303, 304, 306, 307, 308, 403 and 405 of CWA.
    "Approval authority" means the Virginia Soil and  Water Conservation Board or their its designee.
    "Approved program" or "approved state"  means a state or interstate program that has been approved or authorized by EPA  under 40 CFR Part 123 (2000).
    "Aquatic bench" means a 10- to 15-foot wide  bench around the inside perimeter of a permanent pool that ranges in depth from  zero to 12 inches. Vegetated with emergent plants, the bench augments pollutant  removal, provides habitats, conceals trash and water level fluctuations, and  enhances safety.
    "Average land cover condition" means a measure  of the average amount of impervious surfaces within a watershed, assumed to be  16%. Note that a locality may opt to calculate actual watershed-specific values  for the average land cover condition based upon 4VAC50-60-110.
    "Average monthly discharge limitation" means the  highest allowable average of daily discharges over a calendar month, calculated  as the sum of all daily discharges measured during a calendar month divided by  the number of daily discharges measured during that month.
    "Average weekly discharge limitation" means the  highest allowable average of daily discharges over a calendar week, calculated  as the sum of all daily discharges measured during a calendar week divided by  the number of daily discharges measured during that week.
    "Best management practice (BMP)" or  "BMP" means schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices,  including both structural and nonstructural practices, maintenance procedures,  and other management practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of surface  waters and groundwater systems from the impacts of land-disturbing activities. 
    "Bioretention basin" means a water quality BMP  engineered to filter the water quality volume through an engineered planting  bed, consisting of a vegetated surface layer (vegetation, mulch, ground cover),  planting soil, and sand bed, and into the in-situ material.
    "Bioretention filter" means a bioretention basin  with the addition of a sand filter collector pipe system beneath the planting  bed.
    "Board" means the Virginia Soil and Water  Conservation Board.
    "Bypass" means the intentional diversion of waste  streams from any portion of a treatment facility.
    "Channel" means a natural stream or manmade waterway  watercourse with defined bed and banks that conducts continuously or  periodically flowing water.
    "Chesapeake Bay watershed" means all land areas  draining to the following Virginia river basins: Potomac River Basin, James  River Basin, Rappahannock River Basin, Chesapeake Bay and small coastal basins,  and York River Basin. 
    "Common plan of development or sale" means a  contiguous area where separate and distinct construction activities may be  taking place at different times on different schedules.
    "Constructed wetlands" means areas intentionally  designed and created to emulate the water quality improvement function of  wetlands for the primary purpose of removing pollutants from stormwater.
    "Comprehensive stormwater management plan" means  a plan, which may be integrated with other land use plans or regulations, that  specifies how the water quality and components, quantity components, or  both of stormwater are to be managed on the basis of an entire watershed or a  portion thereof. The plan may also provide for the remediation of erosion,  flooding, and water quality and quantity problems caused by prior development.
    "Construction activity" means any clearing, grading  or excavation associated with large construction activity or associated with  small construction activity.
    "Contiguous zone" means the entire zone established  by the United States under Article 24 of the Convention on the Territorial Sea  and the Contiguous Zone (37 FR 11906 June 15, 1972).
    "Continuous discharge" means a discharge which  occurs without interruption throughout the operating hours of the facility,  except for infrequent shutdowns for maintenance, process changes, or other  similar activities.
    "Control measure" means any BMP, stormwater  facility, or other method used to minimize the discharge of pollutants to state  waters.
    "Co-operator" means an operator to of  a VSMP permit that is only responsible for permit conditions relating to the  discharge for which it is the operator.
    "Clean Water Act" or "CWA" means the  federal Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1251 et seq.), formerly referred to as the  Federal Water Pollution Control Act or Federal Water Pollution Control Act  Amendments of 1972, Public Law 92-500, as amended by Public Law 95-217, Public  Law 95-576, Public Law 96-483, and Public Law 97-117, or any subsequent  revisions thereto.
    "CWA and regulations" means the Clean Water Act  (CWA) and applicable regulations published in the Code of Federal Regulations  promulgated thereunder. For the purposes of this chapter, it includes state  program requirements.
    "Daily discharge" means the discharge of a  pollutant measured during a calendar day or any 24-hour period that reasonably  represents the calendar day for purposes of sampling. For pollutants with  limitations expressed in units of mass, the daily discharge is calculated as  the total mass of the pollutant discharged over the day. For pollutants with  limitations expressed in other units of measurement, the daily discharge is  calculated as the average measurement of the pollutant over the day.
    "Department" means the Department of Conservation  and Recreation.
    "Development" means a tract of land developed or  to be developed as a unit under single ownership or unified control which is to  be used for any business or industrial purpose or is to contain three or more  residential dwelling units land disturbance and the resulting landform  associated with the construction of residential, commercial, industrial,  institutional, recreation, transportation, or utility facilities or structures  or the clearing of land for nonagricultural or nonsilvicultural purposes.
    "Direct discharge" means the discharge of a  pollutant.
    "Director" means the Director of the Department of  Conservation and Recreation or his designee.
    "Discharge," when used without qualification, means  the discharge of a pollutant.
    "Discharge of a pollutant" means:
    1. Any addition of any pollutant or combination of pollutants  to state waters from any point source; or 
    2. Any addition of any pollutant or combination of pollutants  to the waters of the contiguous zone or the ocean from any point source other  than a vessel or other floating craft which is being used as a means of  transportation.
    This definition includes additions of pollutants into surface  waters from: surface runoff that is collected or channeled by man; discharges  through pipes, sewers, or other conveyances owned by a state, municipality, or  other person that do not lead to a treatment works; and discharges through  pipes, sewers, or other conveyances, leading into privately owned treatment  works. This term does not include an addition of pollutants by any indirect  discharger.
    "Discharge Monitoring Report" or "DMR"  means the form supplied by the department, or an equivalent form developed by  the operator and approved by the board, for the reporting of self-monitoring  results by operators.
    "Draft permit" means a document indicating the board's  tentative decision to issue or deny, modify, revoke and reissue, terminate, or  reissue a permit. A notice of intent to terminate a permit, and a notice of  intent to deny a permit are types of draft permits. A denial of a request for  modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination is not a draft permit.  A proposed permit is not a draft permit.
    "Drainage area" means a land and area,  water area on a land-disturbing site, or both from which runoff flows to  a common outlet point.
    "Effluent limitation" means any restriction imposed  by the board on quantities, discharge rates, and concentrations of pollutants  which are discharged from point sources into surface waters, the waters of the  contiguous zone, or the ocean.
    "Effluent limitations guidelines" means a  regulation published by the administrator under § 304(b) of the CWA to adopt or  revise effluent limitations.
    "Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)" or  "EPA" means the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
    "Existing permit" means for the purposes of this  chapter a permit issued by the permit-issuing authority and currently held by a  permit applicant.
    "Existing source" means any source that is not a  new source or a new discharger.
    "Facilities or equipment" means buildings,  structures, process or production equipment or machinery that form a permanent  part of a new source and that will be used in its operation, if these  facilities or equipment are of such value as to represent a substantial  commitment to construct. It excludes facilities or equipment used in connection  with feasibility, engineering, and design studies regarding the new source or  water pollution treatment for the new source.
    "Facility or activity" means any VSMP point source  or treatment works treating domestic sewage or any other facility or activity  (including land or appurtenances thereto) that is subject to regulation under  the VSMP program.
    "Flood fringe" is the portion of the floodplain  outside the floodway, usually associated with standing rather than flowing  water, which is covered by floodwater during the 100-year discharge  [ that is covered with water from the 100-year storm event ].
    "Flooding" means a volume of water that is too  great to be confined within the banks or walls of the stream, water body or  conveyance system and that overflows onto adjacent lands, thereby  causing or threatening damage.
    "Floodplain" means any land area adjoining a  channel, river, stream, or other water body that is susceptible to being  inundated by water. It includes the floodway and flood fringe areas [ associated  with the 100-year storm event ].
    "Floodway" means the channel of a river or other  watercourse and the adjacent land areas, usually associated with flowing water,  that must be reserved in order to discharge the [ base flood  100-year storm event ] without cumulatively increasing the water  surface elevation more than one foot or as otherwise designated by the Federal  Emergency Management Agency.
    "General permit" means a VSMP permit authorizing a  category of discharges under the CWA and the Act within a geographical area of  the Commonwealth of Virginia.
    "Grassed swale" means an earthen conveyance  system which is broad and shallow with erosion resistant grasses and check  dams, engineered to remove pollutants from stormwater runoff by filtration  through grass and infiltration into the soil.
    "Hazardous substance" means any substance  designated under the Code of Virginia or 40 CFR Part 116 (2000) pursuant to §  311 of the CWA.
    "Hydrologic Unit Code" or "HUC" means a  watershed unit established in the most recent version of Virginia's 6th Order  National Watershed Boundary Dataset.
    "Illicit discharge" means any discharge to a  municipal separate storm sewer that is not composed entirely of stormwater,  except discharges pursuant to a VPDES or VSMP permit (other than the VSMP  permit for discharges from the municipal separate storm sewer), discharges  resulting from fire fighting activities, and discharges identified by and in  compliance with 4VAC50-60-1220 C 2.
    "Impervious cover" means a surface composed of any  material that significantly impedes or prevents natural infiltration of water  into soil. Impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to, conventional  roofs, buildings, streets, parking areas, and any conventional concrete,  asphalt, or compacted gravel surface that is or may become compacted.
    "Incorporated place" means a city, town, township,  or village that is incorporated under the Code of Virginia.
    "Indian country" means (i) all land within the  limits of any Indian reservation under the jurisdiction of the United States  government, notwithstanding the issuance of any patent, and including  rights-of-way running through the reservation; (ii) all dependent Indian  communities with the borders of the United States whether within the originally  or subsequently acquired territory thereof, and whether within or without the  limits of a state; and (iii) all Indian allotments, the Indian titles to which  have not been extinguished, including rights-of-way running through the same. 
    "Indirect discharger" means a nondomestic  discharger introducing "pollutants" to a "publicly owned  treatment works (POTW)."
    "Infiltration facility" means a stormwater  management facility that temporarily impounds runoff and discharges it via  infiltration through the surrounding soil. While an infiltration facility may  also be equipped with an outlet structure to discharge impounded runoff, such  discharge is normally reserved for overflow and other emergency conditions.  Since an infiltration facility impounds runoff only temporarily, it is normally  dry during nonrainfall periods. Infiltration basin, infiltration trench,  infiltration dry well, and porous pavement shall be considered infiltration  facilities.
    "Inspection" means an on-site review of the  project's compliance with the permit, the local stormwater management program,  and any applicable design criteria, or an on-site review to obtain information  or conduct surveys or investigations necessary in the enforcement of the Act  and this chapter.
    "Interstate agency" means an agency of two or more  states established by or under an agreement or compact approved by Congress, or  any other agency of two or more states having substantial powers or duties  pertaining to the control of pollution as determined and approved by the  administrator under the CWA and regulations.
    "Karst area" means any land area predominantly  underlain at the surface or shallow subsurface by limestone, dolomite, or other  soluble bedrock regardless of any obvious surface karst features.
    "Karst features" means sinkholes, sinking and  losing streams, caves, large flow springs, and other such landscape features  found in karst areas.
    "Land disturbance" or "land-disturbing  activity" means a manmade change to the land surface that potentially  changes its runoff characteristics including any clearing, grading, or  excavation associated with a construction activity regulated pursuant to the federal  Clean Water Act CWA, the Act, and this chapter.
    "Large construction activity" means construction  activity including clearing, grading and excavation, except operations that  result in the disturbance of less than five acres of total land area. Large  construction activity also includes the disturbance of less than five acres of  total land area that is a part of a larger common plan of development or sale  if the larger common plan will ultimately disturb five acres or more.
    "Large municipal separate storm sewer system" means  all municipal separate storm sewers that are either:
    1. Located in an incorporated place with a population of  250,000 or more as determined by the 1990 decennial census by the Bureau of  Census (40 CFR Part 122 Appendix F (2000));
    2. Located in the counties listed in 40 CFR Part 122 Appendix  H (2000), except municipal separate storm sewers that are located in the  incorporated places, townships or towns within such counties;
    3. Owned or operated by a municipality other than those  described in subdivision 1 or 2 of this definition and that are designated by  the board as part of the large or medium municipal separate storm sewer system  due to the interrelationship between the discharges of the designated storm  sewer and the discharges from municipal separate storm sewers described under  subdivision 1 or 2 of this definition. In making this determination the board  may consider the following factors:
    a. Physical interconnections between the municipal separate  storm sewers;
    b. The location of discharges from the designated municipal  separate storm sewer relative to discharges from municipal separate storm  sewers described in subdivision 1 of this definition;
    c. The quantity and nature of pollutants discharged to surface  waters;
    d. The nature of the receiving surface waters; and
    e. Other relevant factors.
    4. The board may, upon petition, designate as a large  municipal separate storm sewer system, municipal separate storm sewers located  within the boundaries of a region defined by a stormwater management regional  authority based on a jurisdictional, watershed, or other appropriate basis that  includes one or more of the systems described in this definition.
    "Linear development project" means a  land-disturbing activity that is linear in nature such as, but not limited to,  (i) the construction of electric and telephone utility lines, and natural gas  pipelines; (ii) construction of tracks, rights-of-way, bridges, communication  facilities and other related structures of a railroad company; (iii) highway  construction projects and; (iv) construction of stormwater  channels and stream restoration activities; and (v) water and sewer lines.  Private subdivision roads or streets shall not be considered linear development  projects.
    "Local stormwater management program" or  "local program" means a statement of the various methods  employed by a locality or the department to manage the quality and  quantity of runoff resulting from land-disturbing activities and shall include  such items as local ordinances, permit requirements, policies and guidelines,  technical materials, plan review, inspection, enforcement, and  evaluation consistent with the Act and this chapter. The ordinance shall  include provisions to require the control of after-development stormwater  runoff rate of flow, the proper maintenance of stormwater management  facilities, and minimum administrative procedures.
    "Locality" means a county, city, or town.
    "Major facility" means any VSMP facility or  activity classified as such by the regional administrator in conjunction with  the board.
    "Major modification" means, for the purposes of  this chapter, the modification or amendment of an existing permit before its  expiration that is not a minor modification as defined in this regulation.
    "Major municipal separate storm sewer outfall (or  major outfall)" or "major outfall" means a municipal  separate storm sewer outfall that discharges from a single pipe with an inside  diameter of 36 inches or more or its equivalent (discharge from a single  conveyance other than circular pipe which is associated with a drainage area of  more than 50 acres); or for municipal separate storm sewers that receive  stormwater from lands zoned for industrial activity (based on comprehensive  zoning plans or the equivalent), with an outfall that discharges from a single  pipe with an inside diameter of 12 inches or more or from its equivalent  (discharge from other than a circular pipe associated with a drainage area of  two acres or more).
    "Manmade" means constructed by man.
    "Manmade stormwater conveyance system" means a  pipe, ditch, vegetated swale, or other conveyance constructed by man.
    "Maximum daily discharge limitation" means the highest  allowable daily discharge.
    "Maximum extent practicable" or "MEP"  means the technology-based discharge standard for municipal separate storm  sewer systems established by CWA § 402(p). MEP is achieved, in part, by  selecting and implementing effective structural and nonstructural best  management practices (BMPs) and rejecting ineffective BMPs and replacing them  with effective best management practices (BMPs). MEP is an iterative standard,  which evolves over time as urban runoff management knowledge increases. As  such, the operator's MS4 program must continually be assessed and modified to  incorporate improved programs, control measures, BMPs, etc., to attain  compliance with water quality standards.
    "Medium municipal separate storm sewer system"  means all municipal separate storm sewers that are either:
    1. Located in an incorporated place with a population of  100,000 or more but less than 250,000 as determined by the 1990 decennial  census by the Bureau of Census (40 CFR Part 122 Appendix G (2000)); 
    2. Located in the counties listed in 40 CFR Part 122 Appendix  I (2000), except municipal separate storm sewers that are located in the  incorporated places, townships or towns within such counties;
    3. Owned or operated by a municipality other than those  described in subdivision 1 or 2 of this definition and that are designated by  the board as part of the large or medium municipal separate storm sewer system  due to the interrelationship between the discharges of the designated storm  sewer and the discharges from municipal separate storm sewers described under  subdivision 1 or 2 of this definition. In making this determination the board  may consider the following factors:
    a. Physical interconnections between the municipal separate  storm sewers;
    b. The location of discharges from the designated municipal  separate storm sewer relative to discharges from municipal separate storm  sewers described in subdivision 1 of this definition;
    c. The quantity and nature of pollutants discharged to surface  waters;
    d. The nature of the receiving surface waters; or
    e. Other relevant factors.
    4. The board may, upon petition, designate as a medium  municipal separate storm sewer system, municipal separate storm sewers located  within the boundaries of a region defined by a stormwater management regional  authority based on a jurisdictional, watershed, or other appropriate basis that  includes one or more of the systems described in subdivisions 1, 2 and 3 of  this definition.
    "Minor modification" means, for the purposes of  this chapter, minor modification or amendment of an existing permit before its  expiration for the reasons listed at 40 CFR 122.63 and as specified in  4VAC50-60-640. Minor modification for the purposes of this chapter also means  other modifications and amendments not requiring extensive review and  evaluation including, but not limited to, changes in EPA promulgated test  protocols, increasing monitoring frequency requirements, changes in sampling  locations, and changes to compliance dates within the overall compliance  schedules. A minor permit modification or amendment does not substantially  alter permit conditions, substantially increase or decrease the amount of  surface water impacts, increase the size of the operation, or reduce the  capacity of the facility to protect human health or the environment.
    "Municipal separate storm sewer" means a conveyance  or system of conveyances otherwise known as a municipal separate storm sewer  system, including roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins,  curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade channels, or storm drains:
    1. Owned or operated by a federal, state, city, town, county,  district, association, or other public body, created by or pursuant to state  law, having jurisdiction or delegated authority for erosion and sediment  control and stormwater management, or a designated and approved management  agency under § 208 of the CWA that discharges to surface waters;
    2. Designed or used for collecting or conveying stormwater;
    3. That is not a combined sewer; and
    4. That is not part of a publicly owned treatment works.
    "Municipal separate storm sewer system" or  "MS4" means all separate storm sewers that are defined as  "large" or "medium" or "small" municipal separate  storm sewer systems or designated under 4VAC50-60-380 A 1.
    "Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Management  Program" or "MS4 Program" means a management program covering  the duration of a permit for a municipal separate storm sewer system that  includes a comprehensive planning process that involves public participation  and intergovernmental coordination, to reduce the discharge of pollutants to  the maximum extent practicable, to protect water quality, and to satisfy the  appropriate water quality requirements of the CWA and regulations and the Virginia  Stormwater Management Act and attendant regulations, using management  practices, control techniques, and system, design and engineering methods, and  such other provisions that are appropriate.
    "Municipality" means a city, town, county,  district, association, or other public body created by or under state law and  having jurisdiction over disposal of sewage, industrial wastes, or other  wastes, or an Indian tribe or an authorized Indian tribal organization, or a  designated and approved management agency under § 208 of the CWA.
    "National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)"  or "NPDES" means the national program for issuing, modifying,  revoking and reissuing, terminating, monitoring and enforcing permits, and  imposing and enforcing pretreatment requirements under §§ 307, 402, 318, and  405 of the CWA. The term includes an approved program.
    "Natural channel design concepts" means the  utilization of engineering analysis and fluvial geomorphic processes to create,  rehabilitate, restore, or stabilize an open conveyance system for the purpose  of creating or recreating a stream that conveys its bankfull storm event within  its banks and allows larger flows to access its floodplain.
    "Natural stormwater conveyance system" means the  main channel of a natural stream, in combination with the floodway and flood  fringe, which compose the floodplain.
    "Natural stream" means a tidal or nontidal  watercourse that is part of the natural topography. It usually maintains a  continuous or seasonal flow during the year and is characterized as being  irregular in cross-section with a meandering course. Constructed channels such  as drainage ditches or swales shall not be considered natural streams ;  however, channels designed utilizing natural channel design concepts may be  considered natural streams.
    "New discharger" means any building, structure,  facility, or installation:
    1. From which there is or may be a discharge of pollutants;
    2. That did not commence the discharge of pollutants at a  particular site prior to August 13, 1979;
    3. Which is not a new source; and
    4. Which has never received a finally effective VPDES or VSMP  permit for discharges at that site.
    This definition includes an indirect discharger that  commences discharging into surface waters after August 13, 1979. It also  includes any existing mobile point source (other than an offshore or coastal  oil and gas exploratory drilling rig or a coastal oil and gas developmental  drilling rig) such as a seafood processing rig, seafood processing vessel, or  aggregate plant, that begins discharging at a site for which it does not have a  permit; and any offshore or coastal mobile oil and gas exploratory drilling rig  or coastal mobile oil and gas developmental drilling rig that commences the  discharge of pollutants after August 13, 1979.
    "New permit" means, for the purposes of this  chapter, a permit issued by the permit-issuing authority to a permit applicant  that does not currently hold and has never held a permit of that type, for that  activity, at that location.
    "New source," means any building, structure, facility,  or installation from which there is or may be a discharge of pollutants, the  construction of which commenced:
    1. After promulgation of standards of performance under § 306  of the CWA that are applicable to such source; or
    2. After proposal of standards of performance in accordance  with § 306 of the CWA that are applicable to such source, but only if the  standards are promulgated in accordance with § 306 of the CWA within 120 days  of their proposal.
    "Nonpoint source pollution" means pollution such as  sediment, nitrogen and phosphorous, hydrocarbons, heavy metals, and toxics  whose sources cannot be pinpointed but rather are washed from the land surface  in a diffuse manner by stormwater runoff.
    "Nonpoint source pollutant runoff load" or  "pollutant discharge" means the average amount of a particular  pollutant measured in pounds per year, delivered in a diffuse manner by  stormwater runoff.
    "Operator" means the owner or operator of any  facility or activity subject to the VSMP permit regulation. In the context of  stormwater associated with a large or small construction activity, operator  means any person associated with a construction project that meets either of  the following two criteria: (i) the person has direct operational control over  construction plans and specifications, including the ability to make  modifications to those plans and specifications or (ii) the person has  day-to-day operational control of those activities at a project that are  necessary to ensure compliance with a stormwater pollution prevention plan for  the site or other permit conditions (i.e., they are authorized to direct  workers at a site to carry out activities required by the stormwater pollution  prevention plan or comply with other permit conditions). In the context of  stormwater discharges from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s),  operator means the operator of the regulated MS4 system. 
    "Outfall" means, when used in reference to  municipal separate storm sewers, a point source at the point where a municipal  separate storm sewer discharges to surface waters and does not include open  conveyances connecting two municipal separate storm sewers, or pipes, tunnels  or other conveyances which connect segments of the same stream or other surface  waters and are used to convey surface waters.
    "Overburden" means any material of any nature,  consolidated or unconsolidated, that overlies a mineral deposit, excluding  topsoil or similar naturally occurring surface materials that are not disturbed  by mining operations.
    "Owner" means the Commonwealth or any of its  political subdivisions including, but not limited to, sanitation district  commissions and authorities, and any public or private institution,  corporation, association, firm or company organized or existing under the laws  of this or any other state or country, or any officer or agency of the United  States, or any person or group of persons acting individually or as a group  that owns, operates, charters, rents, or otherwise exercises control over or is  responsible for any actual or potential discharge of sewage, industrial wastes,  or other wastes or pollutants to state waters, or any facility or  operation that has the capability to alter the physical, chemical, or  biological properties of state waters in contravention of § 62.1-44.5 of the Code  of Virginia, the Act and this chapter.
    "Peak flow rate" means the maximum instantaneous  flow from a prescribed design storm at a particular location.
    "Percent impervious" means the impervious area  within the site divided by the area of the site multiplied by 100.
    "Permit" means an approval issued by the  permit-issuing authority for the initiation of a land-disturbing activity or  for stormwater discharges from an MS4. Permit does not include any permit that  has not yet been the subject of final permit-issuing authority action, such as  a draft permit or a proposed permit.
    "Permit-issuing authority" means the board, the  department, or a locality that is delegated authority by the board to issue,  deny, revoke, terminate, or amend stormwater permits under the provisions of  the Act and this chapter with a qualifying local program.
    "Permittee" means the person or locality to which  the permit is issued, including any owner or operator whose construction site  is covered under a construction general permit.
    "Person" means any individual, corporation,  partnership, association, state, municipality, commission, or political  subdivision of a state, governmental body (including but not limited to a  federal, state, or local entity), any interstate body or any other legal  entity.
    "Planning area" means a designated portion of the  parcel on which the land development project is located. Planning areas shall  be established by delineation on a master plan. Once established, planning  areas shall be applied consistently for all future projects.
    "Point of discharge" means a location at which  concentrated stormwater runoff is released.
    "Point source" means any discernible, confined, and  discrete conveyance including, but not limited to, any pipe, ditch, channel,  tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure, container, rolling stock, concentrated  animal feeding operation, landfill leachate collection system, vessel, or other  floating craft from which pollutants are or may be discharged. This term does  not include return flows from irrigated agriculture or agricultural stormwater  runoff.
    "Pollutant" means dredged spoil, solid waste,  incinerator residue, filter backwash, sewage, garbage, sewage sludge,  munitions, chemical wastes, biological materials, radioactive materials (except  those regulated under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 USC § 2011  et seq.)), heat, wrecked or discarded equipment, rock, sand, cellar dirt and  industrial, municipal, and agricultural waste discharged into water. It does  not mean:
    1. Sewage from vessels; or
    2. Water, gas, or other material that is injected into a well  to facilitate production of oil or gas, or water derived in association with  oil and gas production and disposed of in a well if the well used either to  facilitate production or for disposal purposes is approved by the board and if  the board determines that the injection or disposal will not result in the  degradation of ground or surface water resources.
    "Pollutant discharge" means the average amount  of a particular pollutant measured in pounds per year or other standard  reportable unit as appropriate, delivered in a diffuse manner by  stormwater runoff.
    "Pollution" means such alteration of the physical,  chemical or biological properties of any state waters as will or is likely to  create a nuisance or render such waters (a) harmful or detrimental or injurious  to the public health, safety or welfare, or to the health of animals, fish or  aquatic life; (b) unsuitable with reasonable treatment for use as present or  possible future sources of public water supply; or (c) unsuitable for  recreational, commercial, industrial, agricultural, or other reasonable uses,  provided that (i) an alteration of the physical, chemical, or biological  property of state waters, or a discharge or deposit of sewage, industrial  wastes or other wastes to state waters by any owner which by itself is not  sufficient to cause pollution, but which, in combination with such alteration  of or discharge or deposit to state waters by other owners, is sufficient to  cause pollution; (ii) the discharge of untreated sewage by any owner into state  waters; and (iii) contributing to the contravention of standards of water  quality duly established by the State Water Control Board, are  "pollution" for the terms and purposes of this chapter.
    "Post-development" "Postdevelopment"  refers to conditions that reasonably may be expected or anticipated to exist  after completion of the land development activity on a specific site or tract  of land.
    "Pre-development" "Predevelopment"  refers to the conditions that exist at the time that plans for the land  development of a tract of land are approved by submitted to the  plan approval authority. Where phased development or plan approval occurs  (preliminary grading, demolition of existing structures, roads and utilities,  etc.), the existing conditions at the time prior to the first item being approved  or permitted submitted shall establish pre-development predevelopment  conditions.
    "Prior developed lands" means land that has been  previously utilized for residential, commercial, industrial, institutional,  recreation, transportation or utility facilities or structures, and that will  have the impervious areas associated with those uses altered during a  land-disturbing activity.
    "Privately owned treatment works (PVOTW)" or  "PVOTW" means any device or system that is (i) used to treat  wastes from any facility whose operator is not the operator of the treatment  works and (ii) not a POTW.
    "Proposed permit" means a VSMP permit prepared  after the close of the public comment period (and, when applicable, any public  hearing and administrative appeals) that is sent to EPA for review before final  issuance. A proposed permit is not a draft permit.
    "Publicly owned treatment works (POTW)" or  "POTW" means a treatment works as defined by § 212 of the  CWA that is owned by a state or municipality (as defined by § 502(4) of  the CWA). This definition includes any devices and systems used in the storage,  treatment, recycling, and reclamation of municipal sewage or industrial wastes  of a liquid nature. It also includes sewers, pipes, and other conveyances only  if they convey wastewater to a POTW treatment plant. The term also means the  municipality as defined in § 502(4) of the CWA, that has jurisdiction over the  indirect discharges to and the discharges from such a treatment works.
    "Qualified personnel" means a licensed professional  engineer, responsible land disturber, or other person who holds a certificate  of competency from the board in the area of project inspection or combined  administrator.
    "Qualifying local stormwater management program"  or "qualifying local program" means a local program that is  administered by a locality that has been authorized by the board to issue  coverage under the VSMP General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from  Construction Activities (4VAC50-60-1170).
    "Recommencing discharger" means a source that  recommences discharge after terminating operations.
    "Regional administrator" means the Regional  Administrator of Region III of the Environmental Protection Agency or the  authorized representative of the regional administrator.
    "Regional (watershed-wide) stormwater management  facility" or "regional facility" means a facility or series of  facilities designed to control stormwater runoff from a specific watershed,  although only portions of the watershed may experience land development.
    "Regional (watershed-wide) stormwater management  plan" or "regional plan" means a document containing material  describing how runoff from open space, existing development and future planned  development areas within a watershed will be controlled by coordinated design  and implementation of regional stormwater management facilities.
    "Restored stormwater conveyance system" means a  stormwater conveyance system that has been designed and constructed using  natural channel design concepts, including the main channel, floodway, and  flood fringe.
    "Revoked permit" means, for the purposes of this  chapter, an existing permit that is terminated by the board before its  expiration.
    "Runoff coefficient" means the fraction of total  rainfall that will appear at a conveyance as runoff. 
    "Runoff" or "stormwater runoff" means  that portion of precipitation that is discharged across the land surface or  through conveyances to one or more waterways.
    "Sand filter" means a contained bed of sand that  acts to filter the first flush of runoff. The runoff is then collected beneath  the sand bed and conveyed to an adequate discharge point or infiltrated into  the in-situ soils.
    "Runoff characteristics" include , but are  not limited to, velocity, peak flow rate, volume, time of concentration,  and flow duration, and their influence on channel morphology including  sinuosity, channel cross-sectional area, and channel slope.
    "Runoff volume" means the volume of water that  runs off the site of a land-disturbing activity from a prescribed design storm.
    "Schedule of compliance" means a schedule of  remedial measures included in a permit, including an enforceable sequence of  interim requirements (for example, actions, operations, or milestone events)  leading to compliance with the Act, the CWA and regulations.
    "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Army, acting  through the Chief of Engineers.
    "Severe property damage" means substantial physical  damage to property, damage to the treatment facilities that causes them to  become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources that  can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. Severe property  damage does not mean economic loss caused by delays in production.
    "Shallow marsh" means a zone within a stormwater  extended detention basin that exists from the surface of the normal pool to a  depth of six to 18 inches, and has a large surface area and, therefore,  requires a reliable source of baseflow, groundwater supply, or a sizeable  drainage area, to maintain the desired water surface elevations to support  emergent vegetation.
    "Significant materials" means, but is not limited  to: raw materials; fuels; materials such as solvents, detergents, and plastic  pellets; finished materials such as metallic products; raw materials used in  food processing or production; hazardous substances designated under § 101(14)  of CERCLA (42 USC § 9601(14)); any chemical the facility is required to report  pursuant to § 313 of Title III of SARA (42 USC § 11023); fertilizers;  pesticides; and waste products such as ashes, slag and sludge that have the  potential to be released with stormwater discharges.
    "Single jurisdiction" means, for the purposes of  this chapter, a single county or city. The term county includes incorporated  towns which are part of the county.
    "Site" means the land or water area where any  facility or activity is physically located or conducted, a parcel of land being  developed, or a designated planning area of a parcel in which the  land development project is located. Areas channelward of mean low water in  tidal Virginia shall not be considered part of a site.
    "Site hydrology" means the movement of water on,  across, through and off the site as determined by parameters including, but not  limited to, soil types, soil permeability, vegetative cover, seasonal water  tables, slopes, land cover, and impervious cover.
    "Small construction activity" means:
    1. Construction activities including clearing, grading, and  excavating that results in land disturbance of equal to or greater than one  acre, or equal to or greater than 2,500 square feet in all areas of the  jurisdictions designated as subject to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area  Designation and Management Regulations adopted pursuant to the Chesapeake Bay  Preservation Act, and less than five acres. Small construction activity also  includes the disturbance of less than one acre of total land area that is part  of a larger common plan of development or sale if the larger common plan will ultimately  disturb equal to or greater than one and less than five acres. Small  construction activity does not include routine maintenance that is performed to  maintain the original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original purpose  of the facility. The board may waive the otherwise applicable requirements in a  general permit for a stormwater discharge from construction activities that  disturb less than five acres where stormwater controls are not needed based on  a "total maximum daily load" (TMDL) approved or established by EPA  that addresses the pollutant(s) of concern or, for nonimpaired waters that do  not require TMDLs, an equivalent analysis that determines allocations for small  construction sites for the pollutant(s) of concern or that determines that such  allocations are not needed to protect water quality based on consideration of  existing in-stream concentrations, expected growth in pollutant contributions  from all sources, and a margin of safety. For the purpose of this subdivision,  the pollutant(s) of concern include sediment or a parameter that addresses  sediment (such as total suspended solids, turbidity or siltation) and any other  pollutant that has been identified as a cause of impairment of any water body  that will receive a discharge from the construction activity. The operator must  certify to the board that the construction activity will take place, and  stormwater discharges will occur, within the drainage area addressed by the  TMDL or equivalent analysis.
    2. Any other construction activity designated by the either  the board or the EPA regional administrator, based on the potential for  contribution to a violation of a water quality standard or for significant  contribution of pollutants to surface waters.
    "Small municipal separate storm sewer system" or  "small MS4" means all separate storm sewers that are (i) owned or  operated by the United States, a state, city, town, borough, county, parish,  district, association, or other public body (created by or pursuant to state  law) having jurisdiction over disposal of sewage, industrial wastes,  stormwater, or other wastes, including special districts under state law such  as a sewer district, flood control district or drainage district, or similar  entity, or an Indian tribe or an authorized Indian tribal organization, or a  designated and approved management agency under § 208 of the CWA that  discharges to surface waters and (ii) not defined as "large" or  "medium" municipal separate storm sewer systems or designated under  4VAC50-60-380 A 1. This term includes systems similar to separate storm sewer  systems in municipalities, such as systems at military bases, large hospital or  prison complexes, and highway and other thoroughfares. The term does not  include separate storm sewers in very discrete areas, such as individual  buildings.
    "Source" means any building, structure, facility,  or installation from which there is or may be a discharge of pollutants.
    "Stable" means, in the context of channels, a  channel that has developed an established dimension, pattern, and profile such  that over time, these features are maintained.
    "State" means the Commonwealth of Virginia.
    "State/EPA agreement" means an agreement between  the regional administrator and the state that coordinates EPA and state  activities, responsibilities and programs including those under the CWA and the  Act.
    "State project" means any land development project  that is undertaken by any state agency, board, commission, authority or any  branch of state government, including state-supported institutions of higher  learning.
    "State Water Control Law" means Chapter 3.1 (§ 62.1-44.2  et seq.) of Title 62.1 of the Code of Virginia.
    "State waters" means all water, on the surface and  under the ground, wholly or partially within or bordering the Commonwealth or  within its jurisdiction, including wetlands.
    "Stormwater" means precipitation that is discharged  across the land surface or through conveyances to one or more waterways and  that may include stormwater runoff, snow melt runoff, and surface runoff and  drainage.
    "Stormwater conveyance system" means any of the  following, either within or downstream of the land-disturbing activity: (i) a  manmade stormwater conveyance system, (ii) a natural stormwater conveyance  system, or (iii) a restored stormwater conveyance system. 
    "Stormwater detention basin" or "detention  basin" means a stormwater management facility that temporarily impounds  runoff and discharges it through a hydraulic outlet structure to a downstream  conveyance system. While a certain amount of outflow may also occur via  infiltration through the surrounding soil, such amounts are negligible when  compared to the outlet structure discharge rates and are, therefore, not  considered in the facility's design. Since a detention facility impounds runoff  only temporarily, it is normally dry during nonrainfall periods.
    "Stormwater discharge associated with construction  activity" means a discharge of pollutants in stormwater runoff from areas  where land-disturbing activities (e.g., clearing, grading, or excavation);  construction materials or equipment storage or maintenance (e.g., fill piles,  borrow area, concrete truck washout, fueling); or other industrial stormwater  directly related to the construction process (e.g., concrete or asphalt batch  plants) are located.
    "Stormwater discharge associated with large construction  activity" means the discharge of stormwater from large construction  activities.
    "Stormwater discharge associated with small construction  activity" means the discharge of stormwater from small construction activities.
    "Stormwater extended detention basin" or  "extended detention basin" means a stormwater management facility  that temporarily impounds runoff and discharges it through a hydraulic outlet  structure over a specified period of time to a downstream conveyance system for  the purpose of water quality enhancement or stream channel erosion control.  While a certain amount of outflow may also occur via infiltration through the  surrounding soil, such amounts are negligible when compared to the outlet  structure discharge rates and, therefore, are not considered in the facility's  design. Since an extended detention basin impounds runoff only temporarily, it  is normally dry during nonrainfall periods.
    "Stormwater extended detention basin-enhanced"  or "extended detention basin-enhanced" means an extended detention  basin modified to increase pollutant removal by providing a shallow marsh in  the lower stage of the basin.
    "Stormwater management facility" means a device  that controls stormwater runoff and changes the characteristics of that runoff  including, but not limited to, the quantity and quality, the period of release  or the velocity of flow.
    "Stormwater management plan" means a document(s)  containing material for describing how existing runoff characteristics will be  maintained by a land-disturbing activity and methods for complying with the  requirements of the local program or this chapter.
    "Stormwater Management Program" means a program  established by a locality that is consistent with the requirements of the Virginia  Stormwater Management Act, this chapter and associated guidance documents.
    "Stormwater management standards" means the  minimum criteria for stormwater management programs and land-disturbing  activities as set out in Part II (4VAC50-60-40 et seq.) of this chapter.
    "Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan" or  "SWPPP" means a document that is prepared in accordance with good  engineering practices and that identifies potential sources of pollutants that  may reasonably be expected to affect the quality of stormwater discharges from  the construction site or its associated land-disturbing activities. In addition  the document shall identify and require the implementation of control measures,  and shall include, but not be limited to the inclusion of, or the incorporation  by reference of, an erosion and sediment control plan, a post-construction  stormwater management plan, a spill prevention control and countermeasure  (SPCC) plan, and other practices that will be used to minimize pollutants in  stormwater discharges from land-disturbing activities in compliance with the  terms and conditions of this chapter. All plans incorporated by reference into  the SWPPP shall be enforceable under the permit issued or general permit  coverage authorized.
    "Stormwater retention basin" or "retention  basin" means a stormwater management facility that includes a permanent  impoundment, or normal pool of water, for the purpose of enhancing water  quality and, therefore, is normally wet, even during nonrainfall periods. Storm  runoff inflows may be temporarily stored above this permanent impoundment for  the purpose of reducing flooding, or stream channel erosion.
    "Stormwater retention basin I" or  "retention basin I" means a retention basin with the volume of the  permanent pool equal to three times the water quality volume.
    "Stormwater retention basin II" or  "retention basin II" means a retention basin with the volume of the  permanent pool equal to four times the water quality volume.
    "Stormwater retention basin III" or  "retention basin III" means a retention basin with the volume of the  permanent pool equal to four times the water quality volume with the addition  of an aquatic bench.
    "Subdivision" means the same as defined in § 15.2-2201 of the Code of Virginia.
    "Surface waters" means:
    1. All waters that are currently used, were used in the past,  or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all  waters that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide;
    2. All interstate waters, including interstate wetlands;
    3. All other waters such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams  (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs,  prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds the use,  degradation, or destruction of which would affect or could affect interstate or  foreign commerce including any such waters:
    a. That are or could be used by interstate or foreign  travelers for recreational or other purposes;
    b. From which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold  in interstate or foreign commerce; or
    c. That are used or could be used for industrial purposes by  industries in interstate commerce.
    4. All impoundments of waters otherwise defined as surface  waters under this definition;
    5. Tributaries of waters identified in subdivisions 1 through 4  of this definition;
    6. The territorial sea; and
    7. Wetlands adjacent to waters (other than waters that are  themselves wetlands) identified in subdivisions 1 through 6 of this definition.
    Waste treatment systems, including treatment ponds or lagoons  designed to meet the requirements of the CWA and the law, are not surface  waters. Surface waters do not include prior converted cropland. Notwithstanding  the determination of an area's status as prior converted cropland by any other  agency, for the purposes of the Clean Water Act, the final authority regarding  the Clean Water Act jurisdiction remains with the EPA.
    "Total dissolved solids" means the total dissolved  (filterable) solids as determined by use of the method specified in 40 CFR Part  136 (2000).
    "Total maximum daily load" or "TMDL"  means the sum of the individual wasteload allocations for point sources, load  allocations (LAs) for nonpoint sources, natural background loading and a margin  of safety. TMDLs can be expressed in terms of either mass per time, toxicity,  or other appropriate measure. The TMDL process provides for point versus  nonpoint source trade-offs.
    "Toxic pollutant" means any pollutant listed as  toxic under § 307(a)(1) of the CWA or, in the case of sludge use or  disposal practices, any pollutant identified in regulations implementing §  405(d) of the CWA.
    "Unstable" means, in the context of channels, a  channel that is not stable.
    "Upset" means an exceptional incident in which  there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with technology based permit  effluent limitations because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the  operator. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by  operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate  treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper  operation.
    "Urban development area" or "UDA"  means, as defined by § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of Virginia, an area  designated by a locality that is appropriate for higher density development due  to proximity to transportation facilities, the availability of a public or  community water and sewer system, or proximity to a city, town, or other  developed area. 
    "Variance" means any mechanism or provision under § 301  or § 316 of the CWA or under 40 CFR Part 125 (2000), or in the applicable  federal effluent limitations guidelines that allows modification to or waiver  of the generally applicable effluent limitation requirements or time deadlines  of the CWA. This includes provisions that allow the establishment of  alternative limitations based on fundamentally different factors or on §  301(c), § 301(g), § 301(h), § 301(i), or § 316(a) of the CWA.
    "Vegetated filter strip" means a densely  vegetated section of land engineered to accept runoff as overland sheet flow from  upstream development. It shall adopt any natural vegetated form, from grassy  meadow to small forest. The vegetative cover facilitates pollutant removal  through filtration, sediment deposition, infiltration and absorption, and is  dedicated for that purpose.
    "Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (VPDES)  permit" or "VPDES permit" means a document issued by the State  Water Control Board pursuant to the State Water Control Law authorizing, under  prescribed conditions, the potential or actual discharge of pollutants from a  point source to surface waters and the use or disposal of sewage sludge.
    "Virginia Stormwater Management Act" means Article  1.1 (§ 10.1-603.1 et seq.) of Chapter 6 of Title 10.1 of the Code of  Virginia.
    "Virginia Stormwater BMP Clearinghouse website"  means a website that contains detailed design standards and specifications for  control measures that may be used in Virginia to comply with the requirements  of the Virginia Stormwater Management Act and associated regulations and that  is jointly created by the department and the Virginia Water Resources Research  Center subject to advice to the director from a permanent stakeholder advisory  committee.
    "Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook" means  a collection of pertinent information that provides general guidance for  compliance with the Act and associated regulations and is developed by the  department with advice from a stakeholder advisory committee.
    "Virginia Stormwater Management Program (VSMP)"  or "VSMP" means the Virginia program for issuing, modifying,  revoking and reissuing, terminating, monitoring and enforcing permits, and  imposing and enforcing requirements pursuant to the federal Clean Water Act  CWA, the Virginia Stormwater Management Act, this chapter, and  associated guidance documents.
    "Virginia Stormwater Management Program (VSMP)  permit" or "VSMP permit" means a document issued by the  permit-issuing authority pursuant to the Virginia Stormwater Management Act and  this chapter authorizing, under prescribed conditions, the potential or actual  discharge of pollutants from a point source to surface waters. Under the  approved state program, a VSMP permit is equivalent to a NPDES permit.
    "VSMP application" or "application" means  the standard form or forms, including any additions, revisions or modifications  to the forms, approved by the administrator and the board for applying for a  VSMP permit.
    "Wasteload allocation" or "wasteload" or  "WLA" means the portion of a receiving surface water's loading or  assimilative capacity allocated to one of its existing or future point sources  of pollution. WLAs are a type of water quality-based effluent limitation.
    "Water quality standards" or "WQS" means  provisions of state or federal law that consist of a designated use or uses for  the waters of the Commonwealth and water quality criteria for such waters based  on such uses. Water quality standards are to protect the public health or  welfare, enhance the quality of water, and serve the purposes of the State  Water Control Law (§ 62.1-44.2 et seq. of the Code of Virginia), the Virginia  Stormwater Management Act (§ 10.1-603.1 et seq. of the Code of Virginia),  and the federal Clean Water Act CWA (33 USC § 1251 et seq.). 
    "Water quality volume" means the volume equal to  the first 1/2 inch of runoff multiplied by the impervious surface of the land  development project.
    "Watershed" means a defined land area drained by a  river or stream, karst system, or system of connecting rivers or streams  such that all surface water within the area flows through a single outlet. In  karst areas, the karst feature to which the water drains may be considered the  single outlet for the watershed.
    "Wetlands" means those areas that are inundated or  saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support,  and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation  typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally  include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas.
    "Whole effluent toxicity" means the aggregate toxic  effect of an effluent measured directly by a toxicity test.
    4VAC50-60-20. Purposes. 
    The purposes of this chapter are to provide a framework for  the administration, implementation and enforcement of the Virginia  Stormwater Management Act (Act) and to delineate the procedures and  requirements to be followed in connection with VSMP permits issued by the board  or its designee pursuant to the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the Virginia  Stormwater Management Act, while at the same time providing flexibility for innovative  solutions to stormwater management issues. The chapter also establishes the  board's procedures for the authorization of a qualifying local program, board  and department oversight authorities for an authorized qualifying local  program, the board's procedures for utilization by the department in  administering a local program in localities where no qualifying local program  is authorized, and the components of a stormwater management program including  but not limited to stormwater management standards.
    4VAC50-60-30. Applicability. 
    This chapter is applicable to: 
    1. Every private, local, state, or federal entity that  establishes a stormwater management program or a MS4 program; 
    2. The department in its oversight of locally administered  programs or in its administration of a local program;
    2. 3. Every state agency project regulated under  the Act and this chapter; and 
    3. 4. Every land-disturbing activity regulated  under § 10.1-603.8 of the Code of Virginia unless otherwise exempted in  § 10.1-603.8 B. 
    Part II A 
  Stormwater Management Program Technical Criteria 
    4VAC50-60-40. Applicability Authority and  applicability.
    This part specifies technical criteria for every  stormwater management program and land-disturbing activity. 
    Pursuant to the Virginia Stormwater Management Act (§ 10.1-603.2  et seq. of the Code of Virginia), the board is required to take actions  ensuring the general health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the  Commonwealth as well as protecting the quality and quantity of state waters  from the potential harm of unmanaged stormwater. In addition to other authority  granted to the board under the Stormwater Management Act, the board is  authorized pursuant to §§ 10.1-603.2:1 and 10.1-603.4 to adopt regulations that  specify minimum technical criteria for stormwater management programs in  Virginia, to establish statewide standards for stormwater management from  land-disturbing activities, and to protect properties, the quality and quantity  of state waters, the physical integrity of stream channels, and other natural  resources.
    In accordance with the board's authority, this part  establishes the minimum technical criteria and stormwater management standards  that shall be employed by a state agency in accordance with an implementation  schedule set by the board, or by a qualifying local program or  department-administered local stormwater management program that has been  approved by the board, to protect the quality and quantity of state waters from  the potential harm of unmanaged stormwater runoff resulting from  land-disturbing activities.
    For those localities required to adopt a local  stormwater management program pursuant to § 10.1-603.3 of the Code of Virginia,  until a local program is approved by the board, the technical criteria required  shall be that found at 4VAC50-60-1180 through 4VAC50-60-1190. 
    4VAC50-60-45. Applicability.
    In accordance with the board's authority, this part  establishes the minimum technical criteria and stormwater management standards  that shall be employed by a state agency in accordance with an implementation  schedule set by the board, or by a qualifying local program or  department-administered local stormwater management program that has been  approved by the board, to protect the quality and quantity of state waters from  the potential harm of unmanaged stormwater runoff resulting from  land-disturbing activities, except as provided in 4VAC50-60-48.
    4VAC50-60-48. Grandfathering.
    A. Land-disturbing activities that receive coverage under  the VSMP General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction  Activities prior to the adoption of a local stormwater management program  within their jurisdiction shall not be subject to the technical criteria of  Part II A, but shall be subject to the technical criteria of Part II B, until  the expiration of that permit on June 30, 2014.
    B. If the operator of a project, as of July 1, 2010, (i)  obtained or is the beneficiary of a significant affirmative governmental act  that remains in effect allowing development of a specific project, (ii) relied  in good faith on the significant affirmative governmental act, (iii) incurred  extensive obligations or substantial expenses in diligent pursuit of the  specific project in reliance on the significant affirmative governmental act,  and (iv) obtained VSMP general permit coverage prior to July 1, 2010, then the  land-disturbing activity associated with the project is grandfathered and shall  remain subject to the Part II B Technical Criteria until June 30, 2014. If  permit coverage continuously remains in effect for the land-disturbing activity  within the entire project area, then the project shall remain subject to the  Part II B Technical Criteria until June 30, 2019. Should permit coverage not be  maintained or if the land-disturbing activity continues beyond June 30, 2019,  portions of the project not completed shall be subject to the Part II A  Technical Criteria. In the event that the qualifying significant affirmative  governmental act or the VSMP permit is subsequently modified or amended in a  manner such that there is no increase in the amount of phosphorus leaving the  site through stormwater runoff, and such that there is no increase in the  volume or rate of runoff, the grandfathering shall continue as before.
    For purposes of this subsection and without limitation,  the following are deemed to be significant affirmative governmental acts  allowing development of a specific project: (i) the governing body has accepted  proffers or proffered conditions that specify use related to a zoning  amendment; (ii) the governing body has approved an application for a rezoning  for a specific use or density; (iii) the governing body or board of zoning  appeals has granted a special exception or use permit with conditions; (iv) the  board of zoning appeals has approved a variance; (v) the governing body or its  designated agent has approved a preliminary subdivision plat, site plan, or  plan of development for the landowner's property and the applicant diligently  pursues approval of the final plat or plan within a reasonable period of time  under the circumstances; or (vi) the governing body or its designated agent has  approved a final subdivision plat, site plan or plan of development for the  landowner's property. [ For the purposes of this subsection and  without limitation, for state and federal projects, the approval of state or  federal funding for a project or the approval of a stormwater management plan  are deemed to be significant affirmative governmental acts. ] 
    C. Where a land-disturbing activity is part of a common  plan of development or sale that has obtained VSMP general permit coverage from  the department prior to July 1, 2010, the land-disturbing activity will be  subject to the technical criteria of Part II B. The registration statement  shall include the permit coverage number for the common plan of development or  sale for which association is being claimed. 
    [ D. In cases where governmental bonding or public  debt financing has been issued for a project prior to July 1, 2010, such  project shall be subject to the technical criteria of Part II B. ] 
    4VAC50-60-50. General. (Repealed.)
    A. Determination of flooding and channel erosion impacts  to receiving streams due to land-disturbing activities shall be measured at  each point of discharge from the land disturbance and such determination shall  include any runoff from the balance of the watershed which also contributes to  that point of discharge. 
    B. The specified design storms shall be defined as either  a 24-hour storm using the rainfall distribution recommended by the U.S. Department  of Agriculture's Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) when using NRCS  methods or as the storm of critical duration that produces the greatest  required storage volume at the site when using a design method such as the  Modified Rational Method. 
    C. For purposes of computing runoff, all pervious lands in  the site shall be assumed prior to development to be in good condition (if the  lands are pastures, lawns, or parks), with good cover (if the lands are woods),  or with conservation treatment (if the lands are cultivated); regardless of  conditions existing at the time of computation. 
    D. Construction of stormwater management facilities or  modifications to channels shall comply with all applicable laws and  regulations. Evidence of approval of all necessary permits shall be presented. 
    E. Impounding structures that are not covered by the  Impounding Structure Regulations (4VAC50-20) shall be engineered for structural  integrity during the 100-year storm event. 
    F. Pre-development and post-development runoff rates shall  be verified by calculations that are consistent with good engineering  practices. 
    G. Outflows from a stormwater management facility or  stormwater conveyance system, shall be discharged to an adequate channel. 
    H. Proposed residential, commercial, or industrial  subdivisions shall apply these stormwater management criteria to the land  disturbance as a whole. Individual lots in new subdivisions shall not be  considered separate land-disturbing activities, but rather the entire  subdivision shall be considered a single land development project. Hydrologic  parameters shall reflect the ultimate land disturbance and shall be used in all  engineering calculations. 
    I. All stormwater management facilities shall have an  inspection and maintenance plan that identifies the owner and the responsible  party for carrying out the inspection and maintenance plan. 
    J. Construction of stormwater management impoundment  structures within a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) designated  100-year floodplain shall be avoided to the extent possible. When this is  unavoidable, all stormwater management facility construction shall be in  compliance with all applicable regulations under the National Flood Insurance  Program, 44 CFR Part 59. 
    K. Natural channel characteristics shall be preserved to  the maximum extent practicable. 
    L. Land-disturbing activities shall comply with the  Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Law (§ 10.1-560 et seq. of the Code of  Virginia) and attendant regulations. 
    M. Flood control and stormwater management facilities that  drain or treat water from multiple development projects or from a significant  portion of a watershed may be allowed in Resource Protection Areas defined in  the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, provided that (i) the local government has  conclusively established that the location of the facility within the Resource  Protection Area is the optimum location; (ii) the size of the facility is the  minimum necessary to provide necessary flood control, stormwater treatment, or  both; and, (iii) the facility must be consistent with a stormwater management  program that has been approved by the board. 
    4VAC50-60-53. General requirements.
    The physical, chemical, biological, and hydrologic  characteristics and the water quality and quantity of the receiving state  waters shall be maintained, protected, or improved in accordance with the  requirements of this part. Objectives include, but are not limited to,  supporting state designated uses and water quality standards. All control  measures used shall be employed in a manner that minimizes impacts on receiving  state waters.
    4VAC50-60-56. Applicability of other laws and regulations.
    Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as limiting the  applicability of other laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, the  CWA, Virginia Stormwater Management Act, Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control  Law, and the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, except as provided in §  10.1-603.3 I of the Code of Virginia and all applicable regulations adopted in  accordance with those laws, or the rights of other federal agencies, state  agencies, or local governments to impose more stringent technical criteria or  other requirements as allowed by law.
    4VAC50-60-60. Water quality. (Repealed.)
    A. Compliance with the water quality criteria may be  achieved by applying the performance-based criteria or the technology-based  criteria to either the site or a planning area. 
    B. Performance-based criteria. For land-disturbing  activities, the calculated post-development nonpoint source pollutant runoff  load shall be compared to the calculated pre-development load based upon the  average land cover condition or the existing site condition. A BMP shall be  located, designed, and maintained to achieve the target pollutant removal  efficiencies specified in Table 1 to effectively reduce the pollutant load to  the required level based upon the following four applicable land development  situations for which the performance criteria apply: 
    1. Situation 1 consists of land-disturbing activities where  the existing percent impervious cover is less than or equal to the average land  cover condition and the proposed improvements will create a total percent  impervious cover which is less than the average land cover condition. 
    Requirement: No reduction in the after disturbance  pollutant discharge is required. 
    2. Situation 2 consists of land-disturbing activities where  the existing percent impervious cover is less than or equal to the average land  cover condition and the proposed improvements will create a total percent  impervious cover which is greater than the average land cover condition. 
    Requirement: The pollutant discharge after disturbance  shall not exceed the existing pollutant discharge based on the average land  cover condition. 
    3. Situation 3 consists of land disturbing activities where  the existing percent impervious cover is greater than the average land cover  condition. 
    Requirement: The pollutant discharge after disturbance  shall not exceed (i) the pollutant discharge based on existing conditions less  10% or (ii) the pollutant discharge based on the average land cover condition,  whichever is greater. 
    4. Situation 4 consists of land disturbing activities where  the existing percent impervious cover is served by an existing stormwater  management BMP that addresses water quality. 
    Requirement: The pollutant discharge after disturbance  shall not exceed the existing pollutant discharge based on the existing percent  impervious cover while served by the existing BMP. The existing BMP shall be  shown to have been designed and constructed in accordance with proper design  standards and specifications, and to be in proper functioning condition. 
    C. Technology-based criteria. For land-disturbing  activities, the post-developed stormwater runoff from the impervious cover  shall be treated by an appropriate BMP as required by the post-developed  condition percent impervious cover as specified in Table 1. The selected BMP  shall be located, designed, and maintained to perform at the target pollutant  removal efficiency specified in Table 1. Design standards and specifications  for the BMPs in Table 1 that meet the required target pollutant removal  efficiency will be available at the department. 
    Table 1*
           | Water Quality BMP*
 | Target Phosphorus Removal Efficiency
 | Percent Impervious Cover
 | 
       | Vegetated filter strip
 Grassed Swale
 | 10%
 15%
 | 16-21%
 | 
       | Constructed wetlands
 Extended detention (2 x WQ Vol)
 Retention basin I (3 x WQ Vol)
 | 20%
 35%
 40%
 | 22-37%
 | 
       | Bioretention basin
 Bioretention filter
 Extended detention-enhanced
 Retention basin II (4 x WQ Vol)
 Infiltration (1 x WQ Vol)
 | 50%
 50%
 50%
 50%
 50%
 | 38-66%
 | 
       | Sand filter
 Infiltration (2 x WQ Vol)
 Retention basin III (4 x WQ Vol with aquatic bench)
 | 65%
 65%
 65%
 | 67-100%
 | 
  
    *Innovative or alternate BMPs not included in this table may  be allowed at the discretion of the local program administrator or the  department. Innovative or alternate BMPs not included in this table which  target appropriate nonpoint source pollution other than phosphorous may be  allowed at the discretion of the local program administrator or the department.
    4VAC50-60-63. Water quality design criteria requirements.
    In order to protect the quality of state waters and to  control nonpoint source pollution stormwater pollutants, the following  minimum technical criteria and statewide standards for stormwater management  shall be applied to the site of a land-disturbing activity. The local  program shall have discretion to allow for application of the criteria to each  drainage area of the site. However, where a site drains to more than one HUC,  the pollutant load reduction requirements shall be applied independently within  each HUC unless reductions are achieved in accordance with a comprehensive  watershed stormwater management plan in accordance with 4VAC50-60-96.
    1. New development. The total phosphorus load of new  development projects shall not exceed 0.28 0.45 pounds per acre  per year, as calculated pursuant to 4VAC50-60-65, except:
    [ a. The total phosphorus load of a new development  project disturbing greater than or equal to one acre in the Chesapeake  Bay watershed shall not exceed 0.28 pounds per acre per year, as calculated  pursuant to 4VAC50-60-65. 
    b. Within a. Should the board establish by  regulatory action a standard more stringent than 0.45 pounds per acre per year  in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, then a qualifying local program may establish  a standard of no greater than 0.45 pounds per acre per year to be applied  within ] urban development areas designated pursuant to § 15.2-2223.1  of the Code of Virginia [ in the Chesapeake Bay watershed a  qualifying local program may establish a phosphorus standard between 0.28 and  0.45 pounds per acre per year ] for projects greater than or  equal to one acre in order to encourage compact development that achieves  superior water quality benefits. The qualifying local program shall provide to  the board for approval a justification for any standards established [ if  greater than 0.28 ] and shall define the types of projects  within a UDA that would qualify for the [ relaxed ]  standards. The standard shall be based upon factors including, but not  limited to, number of housing units per acre for residential development, floor  area ratio for nonresidential development, level of imperviousness, brownfield  remediation potential, mixed-use and transit oriented development potential,  proximity to the Chesapeake Bay or local waters of concern, and the presence of  impaired waters. This provision shall not apply to department-administered  local programs.
    [ c. Localities b. Should the board  establish by regulatory action a standard more stringent than 0.45 pounds per  acre per year in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, localities ] that  have lands that drain to both the Chesapeake Bay watershed and other  non-Chesapeake Bay watersheds may choose to apply the [ 0.28 pounds  per acre per year more stringent ] phosphorus standard  [ for the Chesapeake Bay watershed ] to land-disturbing  activities that discharge to watersheds other than the Chesapeake Bay  watershed.
    [ c. Upon the completion of the Virginia TMDL  Implementation Plan for the Chesapeake Bay Nutrient and Sediment TMDL approved  by EPA, the board shall by regulatory action establish a water quality design  criteria for new development activities that is consistent with the pollutant  loadings called for in the approved Implementation Plan. ] 
    2. Development on prior developed lands. 
    a. The total phosphorus load of projects a project  occurring on prior developed lands and [ distributing  disturbing ] greater than or equal to one acre shall be reduced to  an amount at least 20% below the predevelopment total phosphorus load. 
    However, the b. The total phosphorus load of  a project occurring on prior developed lands and disturbing less than one acre  shall be reduced to an amount at least 10% below the predevelopment total phosphorus  load.
    c. The total phosphorus load shall not be required to be  reduced to below 0.28 pounds per acre per year the applicable standard  for new development unless a more stringent standard has been established by a  qualifying local program.
    3. Compliance with subdivisions 1 and 2 of this section  shall be determined in accordance with 4VAC50-60-65 shall constitute  compliance with subdivisions 1 and 2 of this section.
    4. TMDL. In addition to the above requirements, if a  specific WLA for a pollutant has been established in a TMDL and is assigned to  stormwater discharges from a construction activity, necessary control measures  must be implemented by the operator to meet the WLA in accordance with the  requirements established in the General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater  from Construction Activities or an individual permit, which address both  construction and postconstruction discharges.
    5. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a qualifying  local program from establishing a more stringent standard. 
    4VAC50-60-65. Water quality compliance.
    A. Compliance with the water quality design criteria set  out in subdivisions 1 and 2 of 4VAC50-60-63 shall be determined by utilizing  the Virginia Runoff Reduction Method or another methodology that is  demonstrated by the qualifying local program to achieve equivalent or more  stringent results and is approved by the board.
    B. The BMPs listed in Table 1 or the BMPs available on  the Virginia Stormwater BMP Clearinghouse website shall be utilized as  necessary to effectively reduce the phosphorus load in accordance with the  Virginia Runoff Reduction Method. Design specifications for the BMPs listed in  Table 1 can be found on the Virginia Stormwater BMP Clearinghouse Website at  http://www.vwrrc.vt.edu/swc. Other approved BMPs available on this website may  also be utilized.
           | TABLE 1 BMP Pollutant Removal Efficiencies
 | 
       | Practice | Removal of Total Phosphorus    by Runoff Volume Reduction (RR, as %) (based upon 1 inch of rainfall --90%    storm) | Removal of Total Phosphorus    by Treatment -- Pollutant Concentration Reduction (PR, as %) | Total Mass Load Removal of Total Phosphorus (TR,    as %) [ 5 ]  | 
       | GreenVegetated Roof 1
 | 45 | 0 | 45 | 
       | GreenVegetated Roof 2
 | 60 | 0 | 60 | 
       | Rooftop Disconnection 12 | 25 or 501  | 0 | 25 or 501 | 
       | Rooftop Disconnection 2
 | 50
 | 0
 | 50
 | 
       | Rain Tanks/Cisterns 1Rainwater Harvesting
 | actual volume x .75up to 903 [, 5]
 | 0 | actual volume x .75up to 903 [, 5]
 | 
       | Soil Amendments 1
 | 50
 | 0
 | 50
 | 
       | Soil Amendments 2
 | 75
 | 0
 | 75
 | 
       | Soil Amendments | Can be used to decrease    runoff coefficient for turf cover at site. See designs for Rooftop    Disconnection, Sheet Flow, and Grass Channel practices. | 
       | Permeable Pavement 1 | 45 | 25 | 59 | 
       | Permeable Pavement 2 | 75 | 25 | 81 | 
       | Grass Channel 1 | 10 or 201 | 15 | 23 | 
       | Grass Channel 2
 | 20
 | 15
 | 32
 | 
       | Bioretention 1 (also    applies to Urban Bioretention) | 40 | 25 | 55 | 
       | Bioretention 2 | 80 | 50 | 90 | 
       | Infiltration 1 | 50 | 25 | 63 | 
       | Infiltration 2 | 90 | 25 | 93 | 
       | Dry Swale 1 | 40 | 20 | 52 | 
       | Dry Swale 2 | 60 | 40 | 76 | 
       | Wet Swale 1 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 
       | Wet Swale 2 | 0 | 40 | 40 | 
       | Sheet Flow to ConservedFilter/ Open Space 1 | 025 or 501
 | 500
 | 25 or 501 | 
       | Sheet Flow to ConservedFilter/ Open Space 2[52 ] | 050 or 751
 | 750
 | 50 or 751 | 
       | Extended Detention Pond 1 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 
       | Extended Detention Pond 2 | 15 | 15 | 2831
 | 
       | Filtering Practice 1 | 0 | 60 | 60 | 
       | Filtering Practice 2 | 0 | 65 | 65 | 
       | Constructed Wetland 1 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 
       | Constructed Wetland 2 | 0 | 75 | 75 | 
       | Wet Pond 1 | 0 | 50 (454) | 50 (454) | 
       | Wet Pond 2 | 0 | 75 (654) | 75 (654) | 
       |   | 
       | 1 Lower rate is for Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) class    C and D soils; higher rate is for HSG class A and B soils.  | 
       | 2 The removal can be increased to 50% for C and D    soils by adding soil compost amendments, and may be higher yet if combined    with secondary runoff reduction practices.  | 
       | 3 Credit up to 90% is possible if all water from storms    1" or less is used through demand, and tank is sized such that no    overflow occurs. Total credit is not to exceed 90%. | 
       | 4 Lower nutrient removals in parentheses apply to wet    ponds in coastal plain terrain. | 
       | 5 See BMP design specification for an explanation of    how additional pollutant removal can be achieved.  | 
  
    C. BMPs differing from those listed in Table 1 shall be  reviewed and approved by the director in accordance with procedures established  by the BMP Clearinghouse Committee and approved by the board.
    D. A qualifying local program may establish use  limitations on the use of specific BMPs following the submission of the  proposed use limitation and written justification to the department.
    E. Where the land-disturbing activity only occurs on a  portion of the site, the local program may review the stormwater management  plan based upon the portion of the site that is proposed to be developed,  provided that the local program has established guidance for such a review.  Such portion shall be deemed to include any area left undeveloped pursuant to  any local requirement or proffer accepted by a locality. Any such guidance  shall be provided to the department.
    F. If a comprehensive watershed stormwater management  plan has been adopted pursuant to 4VAC50-60-96 for the watershed within which a  project is located, then the qualifying local program may allow offsite  controls in accordance with the plan to achieve the postdevelopment pollutant  load water quality technical criteria set out in subdivisions 1 and 2 of  4VAC50-60-63. Such offsite controls shall achieve the required pollutant  reductions either completely offsite in accordance with the plan or in a  combination of onsite and offsite controls. The local program shall have  the discretion to allow for application of the criteria to each drainage area  of the site. However, where a site drains to more than one HUC, the pollutant  load reduction requirements shall be applied independently within each HUC  unless reductions are achieved in accordance with a comprehensive watershed  stormwater management plan in accordance with 4VAC50-60-92. 
    G. Where no plan exists pursuant to subsection F of  this section, offsite controls may be used to meet the postdevelopment  pollutant load water quality technical criteria set out in subdivisions 1 and 2  of 4VAC50-60-63 provided: 
    1. The local program allows for offsite controls;
    2. The applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the  local program that offsite reductions equal to or greater than those that would  otherwise be required for the site are achieved;
    3. The applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the  local program that the development's runoff and the runoff from any offsite  treatment area shall be controlled in accordance with 4VAC50-60-66;
    4. Offsite controls must be located within the same HUC  or the adjacent downstream HUC to the land-disturbing site; and
    5. The applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the  local program that the right to utilize the offsite control area and any  necessary easements has been obtained and maintenance agreements for the  stormwater management facilities have been established pursuant to  4VAC50-60-124.
    H. Alternatively, the local program may waive the  requirements of subdivisions 1 and 2 of 4VAC50-60-63 through the granting of an  exception pursuant to 4VAC50-60-122. G. Offsite alternatives where  allowed in accordance with 4VAC50-60-69 may be utilized to meet the design  criteria of subdivisions 1 and 2 of 4VAC50-60-63. 
    4VAC50-60-66. Water quantity.
    A. Channel protection and flood protection shall be  addressed in accordance with the minimum standards set out in this section,  which are established pursuant to the requirements of subdivision 7 of §  10.1-603.4 of the Code of Virginia. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a  qualifying local program from establishing a more stringent standard. 
    B. Channel protection. Concentrated stormwater flow from  the site and offsite contributing areas shall be released into a stormwater  conveyance system and shall meet one of the following criteria as demonstrated  by use of accepted hydrologic and hydraulic methodologies:
    1. Concentrated stormwater flow to manmade stormwater  conveyance systems. The point of discharge releases stormwater into a manmade  stormwater conveyance system that, following the land-disturbing activity,  conveys the postdevelopment peak flow rate from the two-year 24-hour storm without  causing erosion of the system.
    2. Concentrated stormwater flow to restored stormwater  conveyance systems. The point of discharge releases stormwater into a  stormwater conveyance system that (i) has been restored and is functioning as  designed or (ii) will be restored. The applicant must demonstrate that the  runoff following the land-disturbing activity, in combination with other  existing stormwater runoff, will not exceed the design of the restored  stormwater conveyance system nor result in instability of the system.
    3. Concentrated stormwater flow to stable natural  stormwater conveyance systems. The point of discharge releases stormwater into  a natural stormwater conveyance system that is stable and, following the  land-disturbing activity, (i) will not become unstable as a result of the  discharge from the one-year 24-hour storm, and (ii) provides a peak flow rate  from the one-year 24-hour storm calculated as follows or in accordance with  another methodology that is demonstrated by the local program to achieve  equivalent results and is approved by the board:
    QDeveloped* RVDeveloped ≤ QPre-Developed  * RVPre-Developed, where
    QDeveloped = The allowable peak flow rate of  runoff from the developed site. [ Such peak flow rate must be less  than or equal to QPre-developed. ] 
    QPre-Developed = The peak flow rate of runoff  from the site in the predeveloped condition.
    RVPre-Developed = The volume of runoff from the  site in the predeveloped condition.
    RVDeveloped = The volume of runoff from the  developed site.
    4. Concentrated Except as set out in subdivision 5  of this subsection, concentrated stormwater flow to unstable natural stormwater  conveyance systems. Where the point of discharge releases stormwater into a  natural stormwater conveyance system that is unstable, stormwater runoff  following a land-disturbing activity shall be released into a channel at or  below a peak flow rate (QDeveloped) based on the one-year 24-hour  storm, calculated as follows or in accordance with another methodology that is  demonstrated by the local program to achieve equivalent or more stringent  results and is approved by the board:
    QDeveloped* RVDeveloped ≤ QForested  Good Pasture * RVForested Good Pasture  , where
    QDeveloped = The allowable peak flow rate from  the developed site. [ Such peak flow rate must be less than or  equal to QGood Pasture. ] 
    QForested Good Pasture = The  peak flow rate from the site in a forested good pasture condition.
    RVForested Good Pasture = The  volume of runoff from the site in a forested good pasture condition.
    RVDeveloped = The volume of runoff from the  developed site.
    However, in the case that the predeveloped condition is  forested, [ both the peak flow rate and the volume of runoff  from the developed site shall be held to the forested condition the  forested condition shall be utilized instead of the good pasture condition in  all instances in the calculation above ]. 
    5. This subdivision shall apply to concentrated stormwater  flow to unstable natural stormwater conveyance systems from (i) a  land-disturbing activity less than five acres on prior developed lands, or (ii)  a regulated land-disturbing activity less than one acre for new development.  Where the point of discharge releases stormwater into a natural stormwater  conveyance system that is unstable, stormwater runoff following a  land-disturbing activity shall provide a peak flow rate from the one-year  24-hour storm, calculated as follows or in accordance with another methodology  that is demonstrated by the local program to achieve equivalent or more  stringent results and is approved by the board:
    QDeveloped* RVDeveloped < QPre-Developed  * RVPre-Developed, where
    QDeveloped = The allowable peak flow rate from  the developed site. Such peak flow rate must be less than QPre-Developed.  
    QPre-Developed = The peak flow rate from the  site in pre-development condition.
    RVPre-Developed = The volume of runoff from the  site in pre-development condition.
    RVDeveloped = The volume of runoff from the  developed site. [ Such volume must be less than RVPre-Developed. ]  
    C. Flood protection. Concentrated stormwater flow shall be  released into a stormwater conveyance system and shall meet one of the following  criteria as demonstrated by use of accepted hydrologic and hydraulic  methodologies:
    1. Concentrated stormwater flow to manmade stormwater  conveyance systems. The point of discharge releases stormwater into a manmade  stormwater conveyance system that, following the land-disturbing activity,  confines the postdevelopment peak flow rate from the 10-year 24-hour storm  within the manmade stormwater conveyance system.
    2. Concentrated stormwater flow to restored stormwater  conveyance systems. The point of discharge releases stormwater into a  stormwater conveyance system that (i) has been restored and is functioning as  designed or (ii) will be restored. The applicant must demonstrate that the peak  flow rate from the 10-year 24-hour storm following the land-disturbing activity  will be confined within the system.
    3. Concentrated stormwater flow to natural stormwater  conveyance systems. The point of discharge releases stormwater into a natural  stormwater conveyance system that currently does not flood during the 10-year  24-hour storm and, following the land-disturbing activity, confines the  postdevelopment peak flow rate from the 10-year 24-hour storm within the  system.
    4. Concentrated stormwater flow to natural stormwater  conveyance systems where localized flooding exists during the 10-year 24-hour  storm. The point of discharge releases a postdevelopment peak flow rate for the  10-year 24-hour storm that shall not exceed the predevelopment peak flow rate  from the 10-year 24-hour storm based on forested good pasture  conditions, unless the predeveloped condition is forested, in which case the  peak flow rate from the developed site shall be held to the forested condition.  
    5. A local program may adopt alternate flood protection  design criteria that (i) achieve equivalent or more stringent results, (ii) are  based upon geographic, land use, topographic, geologic, or other downstream  conveyance factors, and (iii) are approved by the board. Subdivision C 4 of  this subsection notwithstanding, this subdivision shall apply to concentrated  stormwater flow to natural stormwater conveyance systems where localized  flooding exists during the 10-year 24-hour storm from (i) a land-disturbing  activity less than five acres on prior developed lands, or (ii) a regulated  land-disturbing activity less than one acre for new development. The point of  discharge releases a postdevelopment peak flow rate for the 10-year 24-hour  storm that is less than the predevelopment peak flow rate from the 10-year  24-hour storm.
    D. One percent rule. If either of the following criteria  are met, subsections A B and B C of this section do not apply,  nor is the analysis of subsection H required:
    1. Based on area. Prior to any land disturbance, the site's  contributing drainage area to a point of discharge from the site is less than  or equal to 1.0% of the total watershed area draining to that point of  discharge; or
    2. Based on peak flow rate. Based on the postdevelopment  land cover conditions prior to the implementation of any stormwater quantity  control measures, the development of the site results in an increase in the  peak flow rate from the one-year 24-hour storm that is less than 1.0% of the  existing peak flow rate from the one-year 24-hour storm generated by the total  watershed area draining to that point of discharge.
    E. Increased volumes of sheet flow resulting from pervious  or disconnected impervious areas, or from physical spreading of concentrated  flow through level spreaders, must be identified and evaluated for potential  impacts on down gradient properties or resources. Increased volumes of sheet  flow that will cause or contribute to erosion, sedimentation, or flooding of  down gradient properties or resources shall be diverted to a detention  stormwater management facility or a stormwater conveyance system that conveys  the runoff without causing down gradient erosion, sedimentation, or flooding.  If all runoff from the site is sheet flow and the conditions of this subsection  are met, no further water quantity controls are required.
    F. For purposes of computing predevelopment runoff from  prior developed sites, all pervious lands on the site shall be assumed to be in  good hydrologic condition in accordance with the U.S. Department of  Agriculture's Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) standards, regardless  of conditions existing at the time of computation. Predevelopment runoff  calculations utilizing other hydrologic conditions may be utilized provided  that it is demonstrated to and approved by the local program that actual site  conditions warrant such considerations.
    G. Predevelopment runoff characteristics and site  hydrology shall be verified by site inspections, topographic surveys, available  soil mapping or studies, and calculations consistent with good engineering  practices in accordance with guidance. Guidance provided in the Virginia  Stormwater Management Handbook and by the qualifying local program shall  be considered appropriate standards.
    H. Except where the compliance options under subdivisions  B 4 and 5 and C 4 and 5 of this section are utilized, flooding and channel  erosion impacts to stormwater conveyance systems shall be analyzed for each  point of discharge in accordance with channel analysis guidance provided in  Technical Bulletin # 1, Stream Channel Erosion Control, or in accordance with more  stringent channel analysis guidance established by the qualifying local program  and provided to the department. Such analysis shall include estimates of runoff  from the developed site and the entire upstream watershed that contributes to  that point of discharge. Good engineering practices and calculations in  accordance with department guidance shall be used to evaluate postdevelopment  runoff characteristics and site hydrology, and flooding and channel erosion  impacts.
    If the downstream owner or owners refuse to give  permission to access the property for the collection of data, evidence of this  refusal shall be given and arrangements made satisfactory to the local program  to provide an alternative method for the collection of data to complete the  analysis, such as through the use of photos, aerial surveys, "as  built" plans, topographic maps, soils maps, and any other relevant  information.
    4VAC50-60-69. Offsite compliance options.
    A. A qualifying local program shall have the authority to  consider the use of the following offsite compliance options:
    1. If a comprehensive watershed stormwater management plan  has been adopted pursuant to 4VAC50-60-92 for the local watershed within which  a project is located, then the qualifying local program may allow offsite controls  in accordance with the plan to achieve the water quality reductions, quantity  reductions, or both required for a site by this chapter. Such offsite controls  shall achieve the required reductions either completely offsite in accordance  with the plan or by a combination of on site and offsite controls.
    2. A pro rata fee in accordance with § 15.2-2243 of the  Code of Virginia or similar [ local ] funding mechanism  through which the water quality and quantity reductions required for a site by  this chapter may be achieved by the payment of a fee sufficient to fund  improvements necessary to adequately achieve offsite reductions equal to or  greater than those that would otherwise be required for the site.
    3. The nonpoint nutrient offset program established by § 10.1-603.8:1  of the Code of Virginia.
    4. Where no comprehensive watershed stormwater management  plan or pro rata fee exists, or where a qualifying local program otherwise  elects to allow the use of this subdivision, offsite stormwater management  facilities may be used by the operator of a land-disturbing activity to meet  the water quality reductions required for a site by this chapter provided:
    a. The operator demonstrates to the satisfaction of the  local program that offsite reductions equal to or greater than those that would  otherwise be required for the site are achieved;
    b. The operator demonstrates to the satisfaction of the  local program that the development's runoff and the runoff from any offsite  treatment area shall be controlled in accordance with 4VAC50-60-66;
    c. Offsite stormwater management facilities must be located  within the HUC or within the upstream HUCs in the local watershed that the  land-disturbing activity directly discharges to or within the same watershed,  as determined by the local program; and
    d. The operator demonstrates to the satisfaction of the  local program that the right to utilize the offsite area and any necessary  easements have been obtained and maintenance agreements for the stormwater  management facilities have been established pursuant to 4VAC50-60-124.
    B. [ Should the board establish by regulatory  action a standard more stringent than 0.45 pounds per acre per year in the  Chesapeake Bay watershed, the offsite compliance option provided by this  subsection shall be available as follows. ] Where the offsite  options of subsection A of this section are not available for use, where the  fee established by a qualifying local program to offset a pound of phosphorus  removal onsite pursuant to subdivision A 2 exceeds $23,900, or where a  qualifying local program otherwise elects to allow the use of this subsection,  offsite compliance may be achieved through a payment in accordance with the  following:
    1. When the land-disturbing activity is in an urban  development area the payment shall be $15,000 per pound of phosphorus and shall  be calculated based on the poundage not treated on site. In all other cases the  payment shall be $23,900 per pound of phosphorus. Payment amounts shall be  determined based upon the nearest 0.01 of a pound of phosphorus.
    2. All payments shall be deposited and utilized in  accordance with the following:
    a. Payments shall be made prior to commencement of the  land-disturbing activity and shall be deposited to the Virginia Stormwater  Management Fund and held in a subaccount.
    b. The board shall establish priorities for the use of  these funds by December 1 of each year. Payments held in the fund shall be  promptly applied to ensure that nutrient reduction practices are being  implemented. Priorities for the funds shall be established in accordance with  the following:
    (1) At least 50% of the funds shall be utilized for  projects to address local stormwater quality issues related to the impacts of  development activities including but not limited to urban retrofits, urban stream  restorations, and reduction of impervious areas.
    (2) Priority use for the remaining funds shall be for the  acquisition of certified nonpoint nutrient offsets at a rate not to exceed  $23,900 per pound of phosphorus. Any remaining funds shall be utilized to fund  long-term contracts for agricultural best management practices no less than 20  years in duration or long-term best management practices including but not  limited to stream fencing, alternative water supplies, and riparian buffers in  accordance with practice standards established within the Virginia Agricultural  BMP Cost Share Program administered by the department.
    (3) In establishing priorities, the board shall consider  targeting equivalent reductions in the same local watershed as where the payment  came from; implementing urban practices/retrofits that address TMDLs; securing  permanent practices; and achieving measurable reductions. When purchasing  agricultural best management practices, the board shall consider purchasing  practices beyond the baseline established under the Chesapeake Bay Watershed  Nutrient Credit Exchange Program (§ 62.1-44.19:12 et seq. of the Code of  Virginia).
    c. The department shall track the payment amount, the  associated poundage of phosphorus purchased, the jurisdiction where the payment  originated, the regulated MS4 name, if any, and the HUC for the land-disturbing  activity. The department shall additionally track the annual expenditure of the  funds including the locality and regulated MS4 name, if any, where the moneys  are expended, the associated poundage of phosphorus reduced, and the cost per  pound for phosphorus reductions associated with the nutrient reduction  practices.
    d. The department may annually utilize up to 6.0% of the  payments to administer the stormwater management program.
    e. The board shall periodically review the payment amount,  at least every five years or in conjunction with the development of a new  construction general permit, and shall evaluate the performance of the fund and  the sufficiency of the payment rate in achieving the needed offsite pollution  reductions. The board shall adjust the payment amount based upon this analysis.
    3. Utilization of a payment to achieve compliance with the  water quality technical criteria shall be subject to the following limitations:
    a. A new development project disturbing greater than or  equal to one acre in the Chesapeake Bay watershed must reduce its phosphorus  discharge to a level of 0.45 pounds per acre per year of phosphorus on site, or  less, and then may achieve all or a portion of the remaining required  phosphorus reductions through a payment.
    b. A new development project disturbing less than one acre  in the Chesapeake Bay watershed may achieve all necessary phosphorus reductions  through a payment.
    c. A new development project outside of the Chesapeake Bay  watershed must achieve all necessary phosphorus reductions on site.
    d. Development on prior developed lands disturbing greater  than or equal to one acre must achieve at least a 10% reduction from the  predevelopment total phosphorus load on site and then may achieve the remaining  required phosphorus reductions through a payment.
    e. Development on prior developed lands disturbing less  than one acre may achieve all necessary phosphorus reductions through a  payment.
    4. Nitrogen or other pollutant reductions achieved through  payments into the fund must be retired and shall not be made available to other  parties.
    C. Where the department is administering a local program,  only offsite options set out in subdivisions A 3 and A 4 [ , ]  and [ , when available,  ] subsection B of this  section shall be available. 
    4VAC50-60-70. Stream channel erosion. (Repealed.)
    A. Properties and receiving waterways downstream of any  land-disturbing activity shall be protected from erosion and damage due to  changes in runoff rate of flow and hydrologic characteristics, including but  not limited to, changes in volume, velocity, frequency, duration, and peak flow  rate of stormwater runoff in accordance with the minimum design standards set  out in this section. 
    B. The permit-issuing authority shall require compliance  with subdivision 19 of 4VAC50-30-40 of the Erosion and Sediment Control  Regulations, promulgated pursuant to Article 4 (§ 10.1-560 et seq.) of Chapter  5 of Title 10.1 of the Code of Virginia. 
    C. The permit-issuing authority may determine that some  watersheds or receiving stream systems require enhanced criteria in order to  address the increased frequency of bankfull flow conditions (top of bank)  brought on by land-disturbing activities. Therefore, in lieu of the reduction  of the two-year post-developed peak rate of runoff as required in subsection B  of this section, the land development project being considered shall provide  24-hour extended detention of the runoff generated by the one-year, 24-hour  duration storm. 
    D. In addition to subsections B and C of this section  permit-issuing authorities, by local ordinance may, or the board by state  regulation may, adopt more stringent channel analysis criteria or design  standards to ensure that the natural level of channel erosion, to the maximum  extent practicable, will not increase due to the land-disturbing activities.  These criteria may include, but are not limited to, the following: 
    1. Criteria and procedures for channel analysis and classification.  
    2. Procedures for channel data collection. 
    3. Criteria and procedures for the determination of the  magnitude and frequency of natural sediment transport loads. 
    4. Criteria for the selection of proposed natural or  man-made channel linings. 
    4VAC50-60-72. Design storms and hydrologic methods.
    A. Unless otherwise specified, the prescribed design  storms are the one-year, two-year, and 10-year 24-hour storms using the  site-specific rainfall precipitation frequency data recommended by the U.S.  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 14. Partial  duration time series shall be used for the precipitation data.
    B. All Unless otherwise specified, all hydrologic  analyses shall be based on the existing watershed characteristics and the ultimate  development condition of the subject project.
    C. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Natural Resources  Conservation Service (NRCS) synthetic 24-hour rainfall distribution and models,  including, but not limited to TR-55 and TR-20; hydrologic and hydraulic methods  developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; or other standard hydrologic and  hydraulic methods, shall be used to conduct the analyses described in this  part. 
    D. The local program may allow for the use of the Rational  Method for evaluating peak discharges or the Modified Rational Method for  evaluating volumetric flows to stormwater conveyances with drainage areas of  200 acres or less.
    4VAC50-60-74. Stormwater harvesting.
    In accordance with § 10.1-603.4 of the Code of  Virginia, stormwater harvesting is encouraged for the purposes of landscape  irrigation systems, fire protection systems, flushing water closets and  urinals, and other water handling systems to the extent such systems are  consistent with federal, state, and local regulatory authorities.
    4VAC50-60-76. Linear development projects.
    Unless exempt pursuant to § 10.1-603.8 B of the Code  of Virginia, linear development projects shall control postdevelopment  stormwater runoff in accordance with a site-specific stormwater management plan  or a comprehensive watershed stormwater management plan developed in accordance  with these regulations.
    4VAC50-60-80. Flooding. (Repealed.)
    A. Downstream properties and waterways shall be protected  from damages from localized flooding due to changes in runoff rate of flow and  hydrologic characteristics, including but not limited to, changes in volume,  velocity, frequency, duration, and peak flow rate of stormwater runoff in  accordance with the minimum design standards set out in this section. 
    B. The 10-year post-developed peak rate of runoff from the  development site shall not exceed the 10-year pre-developed peak rate of  runoff. 
    C. In lieu of subsection B of this section, localities  may, by ordinance, adopt alternate design criteria based upon geographic, land  use, topographic, geologic factors or other downstream conveyance factors as  appropriate. 
    D. Linear development projects shall not be required to  control post-developed stormwater runoff for flooding, except in accordance  with a watershed or regional stormwater management plan. 
    4VAC50-60-85. Stormwater management impoundment structures  or facilities.
    A. Construction of stormwater management impoundment  structures or facilities within tidal or nontidal wetlands and perennial  streams is not recommended.
    B. Construction of stormwater management impoundment  structures or facilities within a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)  designated 100-year floodplain is not recommended. 
    C. Stormwater management wet ponds and extended detention  ponds that are not covered by the Impounding Structure Regulations (4VAC50-20)  shall, at a minimum, be engineered for structural integrity and spillway  design for the 100-year storm event.
    D. Construction of stormwater management impoundment  structures or facilities may occur in karst areas only after a geological  study of the geology and hydrology of the area has been conducted to determine  the presence or absence of karst features that may be impacted by stormwater  runoff and BMP placement.
    E. Discharge of stormwater runoff to a karst feature shall  meet the water quality criteria set out in 4VAC50-60-63 and the water quantity  criteria set out in 4VAC50-60-66. Permanent stormwater management impoundment  structures or facilities shall only be constructed in karst features after  completion of a geotechnical investigation that identifies any necessary  modifications to the BMP to ensure its structural integrity and maintain its  water quality and quantity efficiencies. The person responsible for the  land-disturbing activity is encouraged to screen for known existence of  heritage resources in the karst features. Any Class V Underground Injection  Control Well registration statements for stormwater discharges to improved  sinkholes shall be included in the SWPPP.
    4VAC50-60-90. Regional (watershed-wide) stormwater  management plans. (Repealed.)
    This section enables localities to develop regional  stormwater management plans. State agencies intending to develop large tracts  of land such as campuses or prison compounds are encouraged to develop regional  plans where practical. 
    The objective of a regional stormwater management plan is  to address the stormwater management concerns in a given watershed with greater  economy and efficiency by installing regional stormwater management facilities  versus individual, site-specific facilities. The result will be fewer  stormwater management facilities to design, build and maintain in the affected  watershed. It is also anticipated that regional stormwater management  facilities will not only help mitigate the impacts of new development, but may  also provide for the remediation of erosion, flooding or water quality problems  caused by existing development within the given watershed. 
    If developed, a regional plan shall, at a minimum, address  the following: 
    1. The specific stormwater management issues within the  targeted watersheds. 
    2. The technical criteria in 4VAC50-60-40 through  4VAC50-60-80 as needed based on subdivision 1 of this section. 
    3. The implications of any local comprehensive plans,  zoning requirements, local ordinances pursuant to the Chesapeake Bay  Preservation Area Designation and Management Regulations adopted pursuant to  the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, and other planning documents. 
    4. Opportunities for financing a watershed plan through  cost sharing with neighboring agencies or localities, implementation of  regional stormwater utility fees, etc. 
    5. Maintenance of the selected stormwater management  facilities. 
    6. Future expansion of the selected stormwater management  facilities in the event that development exceeds the anticipated level. 
    4VAC50-60-92. Comprehensive watershed stormwater management  plans.
    [ A. ] Qualifying local programs  may develop comprehensive watershed stormwater management plans to be approved  by the department that meet the water quality objectives, quantity objectives,  or both of this chapter:
    1. Such plans shall ensure that offsite reductions equal to  or greater than those that would be required on each contributing  land-disturbing site are achieved within the same HUC or within another locally  designated watershed. Pertaining to water quantity objectives, the plan may  provide for implementation of a combination of channel improvement, stormwater  detention, or other measures that are satisfactory to the qualifying local  program to prevent downstream erosion and flooding.
    2. If the land use assumptions upon which the plan was  based change or if any other amendments are deemed necessary by the qualifying  local program, the qualifying local program shall provide plan amendments to  the board for review and approval.
    3. During the plan's implementation, the qualifying local  program shall account for nutrient reductions accredited to the BMPs specified  in the plan.
    4. State and federal agencies may develop comprehensive  stormwater management plans, and may participate in locality-developed  comprehensive watershed stormwater management plans where practicable and  permitted by the qualifying local program. 
    4VAC50-60-93. Stormwater management plan development.  (Reserved.) 
    A. A stormwater management plan for a land-disturbing  activity shall apply these stormwater management technical criteria to the  entire land-disturbing activity.
    B. Individual lots or planned phases of developments  shall not be considered separate land-disturbing activities, but rather the  entire development shall be considered a single land-disturbing activity.
    C. The stormwater management plan shall consider all  sources of surface runoff and all sources of subsurface and groundwater flows  converted to surface runoff. 
    Part II B
  Stormwater Management Program Technical Criteria: Grandfathered Projects
    4VAC50-60-94. Applicability.
    This part specifies the technical criteria for regulated  land-disturbing activities that are not subject to the technical criteria of  Part II A in accordance with 4VAC 50-60-48.
    4VAC50-60-95. General.
    A. Determination of flooding and channel erosion impacts  to receiving streams due to land-disturbing activities shall be measured at  each point of discharge from the land disturbance and such determination shall  include any runoff from the balance of the watershed that also contributes to  that point of discharge.
    B. The specified design storms shall be defined as either  a 24-hour storm using the rainfall distribution recommended by the U.S.  Department of Agriculture's Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) when  using NRCS methods or as the storm of critical duration that produces the  greatest required storage volume at the site when using a design method such as  the Modified Rational Method.
    C. For purposes of computing runoff, all pervious lands in  the site shall be assumed prior to development to be in good condition (if the  lands are pastures, lawns, or parks), with good cover (if the lands are woods),  or with conservation treatment (if the lands are cultivated); regardless of  conditions existing at the time of computation.
    D. Construction of stormwater management facilities or  modifications to channels shall comply with all applicable laws and  regulations. Evidence of approval of all necessary permits shall be presented.
    E. Impounding structures that are not covered by the  Impounding Structure Regulations (4VAC50-20) shall be engineered for structural  integrity during the 100-year storm event.
    F. Predevelopment and postdevelopment runoff rates shall  be verified by calculations that are consistent with good engineering  practices.
    G. Outflows from a stormwater management facility or  stormwater conveyance system shall be discharged to an adequate channel.
    H. Proposed residential, commercial, or industrial  subdivisions shall apply these stormwater management criteria to the land  disturbance as a whole. Individual lots in new subdivisions shall not be  considered separate land-disturbing activities, but rather the entire  subdivision shall be considered a single land development project. Hydrologic  parameters shall reflect the ultimate land disturbance and shall be used in all  engineering calculations.
    I. All stormwater management facilities shall have an  inspection and maintenance plan that identifies the owner and the responsible  party for carrying out the inspection and maintenance plan.
    J. Construction of stormwater management impoundment  structures within a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) designated  100-year floodplain shall be avoided to the extent possible. When this is  unavoidable, all stormwater management facility construction shall be in  compliance with all applicable regulations under the National Flood Insurance  Program, 44 CFR Part 59.
    K. Natural channel characteristics shall be preserved to  the maximum extent practicable.
    L. Land-disturbing activities shall comply with the  Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Law (§ 10.1-560 et seq. of the Code  of Virginia) and attendant regulations.
    M. Flood control and stormwater management facilities that  drain or treat water from multiple development projects or from a significant  portion of a watershed may be allowed in resource protection areas defined in  the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, provided that (i) the local government has  conclusively established that the location of the facility within the resource  protection area is the optimum location; (ii) the size of the facility is the  minimum necessary to provide necessary flood control, stormwater treatment, or  both; and (iii) the facility must be consistent with a stormwater management  program that has been approved by the board, the Chesapeake Bay Local  Assistance Board, or the Board of Conservation and Recreation. 
    4VAC50-60-96. Comprehensive watershed stormwater management  plans Water quality.
    A. Local programs may develop comprehensive watershed  stormwater management plans to be approved by the department that meet the  water quality objectives, quantity objectives, or both of this chapter: 
    1. Such plans shall ensure that offsite reductions  equal to or greater than those that would be required on each contributing  land-disturbing site are achieved within the same HUC or within another locally  designated watershed. Pertaining to water quantity objectives, the plan may provide  for implementation of a combination of channel improvement, stormwater  detention, or other measures that are satisfactory to the local program to  prevent downstream erosion and flooding.
    2. If the land use assumptions upon which the plan was  based change or if any other amendments are deemed necessary by the local  program, the local program shall provide plan amendments to the board for  review and approval.
    3. During the plan's implementation, the local program  shall account for nutrient reductions accredited to the BMPs specified in the  plan.
    4. State and federal agencies may participate in  comprehensive watershed stormwater management plans where practicable and  permitted by the local program. 
    A. Compliance with the water quality criteria may be achieved  by applying the performance-based criteria or the technology-based criteria to  either the site or a planning area. 
    B. If the qualifying local program allows for a pro  rata fee in accordance with § 15.2-2243 of the Code of Virginia, then the  reductions required for a site by this chapter may be achieved by the payment  of a pro rata fee sufficient to fund improvements necessary to adequately  achieve those requirements in accordance with that section of the Code of  Virginia and this chapter. Performance-based criteria. For land-disturbing  activities, the calculated postdevelopment nonpoint source pollutant runoff  load shall be compared to the calculated predevelopment load based upon the  average land cover condition or the existing site condition. A BMP shall be  located, designed, and maintained to achieve the target pollutant removal  efficiencies specified in Table 2 of this section to effectively reduce the  pollutant load to the required level based upon the following four applicable  land development situations for which the performance criteria apply:
    1. Situation 1 consists of land-disturbing activities where  the existing percent impervious cover is less than or equal to the average land  cover condition and the proposed improvements will create a total percent  impervious cover that is less than the average land cover condition.
    Requirement: No reduction in the after disturbance  pollutant discharge is required.
    2. Situation 2 consists of land-disturbing activities where  the existing percent impervious cover is less than or equal to the average land  cover condition and the proposed improvements will create a total percent  impervious cover that is greater than the average land cover condition.
    Requirement: The pollutant discharge after disturbance  shall not exceed the existing pollutant discharge based on the average land  cover condition.
    3. Situation 3 consists of land-disturbing activities where  the existing percent impervious cover is greater than the average land cover  condition.
    Requirement: The pollutant discharge after disturbance  shall not exceed (i) the pollutant discharge based on existing conditions less  10% or (ii) the pollutant discharge based on the average land cover condition,  whichever is greater.
    4. Situation 4 consists of land-disturbing activities where  the existing percent impervious cover is served by an existing stormwater  management BMP that addresses water quality.
    Requirement: The pollutant discharge after disturbance  shall not exceed the existing pollutant discharge based on the existing percent  impervious cover while served by the existing BMP. The existing BMP shall be  shown to have been designed and constructed in accordance with proper design  standards and specifications, and to be in proper functioning condition.
    C. Technology-based criteria. For land-disturbing  activities, the postdeveloped stormwater runoff from the impervious cover shall  be treated by an appropriate BMP as required by the postdeveloped condition  percent impervious cover as specified in Table 2 of this section. The selected  BMP shall be located, designed, and maintained to perform at the target  pollutant removal efficiency specified in Table 2 or those found in  4VAC50-60-65. Design standards and specifications for the BMPs in Table 2 that  meet the required target pollutant removal efficiency are available in the 1990  Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook. Other approved BMPs available on the  Virginia Stormwater BMP Clearinghouse website at http://www.vwrrc.vt.edu/swc  may also be utilized.
           | Table 2* | 
       | Water Quality BMP* | Target Phosphorus Removal    Efficiency | Percent Impervious Cover | 
       | Vegetated filter strip | 10% | 16-21% | 
       | Grassed Swale | 15% | 
       | Constructed wetlands | 20% | 22-37% | 
       | Extended detention (2 x WQ    Vol) | 35% | 
       | Retention basin I (3 x WQ    Vol) | 40% | 
       | Bioretention basin | 50% | 38-66% | 
       | Bioretention filter | 50% | 
       | Extended detention-enhanced | 50% | 
       | Retention basin II (4 x WQ    Vol) | 50% | 
       | Infiltration (1 x WQ Vol) | 50% | 
       | Sand filter | 65% | 67-100% | 
       | Infiltration (2 x WQ Vol) | 65% | 
       | Retention basin III (4 x WQ    Vol with aquatic bench) | 65% | 
       | *Innovative or alternate    BMPs not included in this table may be allowed at the discretion of the local    program administrator or the department. Innovative or alternate BMPs not    included in this table that target appropriate nonpoint source pollution    other than phosphorous may be allowed at the discretion of the local program    administrator or the department. | 
  
    4VAC50-60-97. Stream channel erosion.
    A. Properties and receiving waterways downstream of any  land-disturbing activity shall be protected from erosion and damage due to  changes in runoff rate of flow and hydrologic characteristics, including, but  not limited to, changes in volume, velocity, frequency, duration, and peak flow  rate of stormwater runoff in accordance with the minimum design standards set  out in this section.
    B. The permit-issuing authority shall require compliance  with subdivision 19 of 4VAC50-30-40 of the Erosion and Sediment Control  Regulations, promulgated pursuant to Article 4 (§ 10.1-560 et seq.) of Chapter  5 of Title 10.1 of the Code of Virginia.
    C. The permit-issuing authority may determine that some  watersheds or receiving stream systems require enhanced criteria in order to  address the increased frequency of bankfull flow conditions (top of bank)  brought on by land-disturbing activities. Therefore, in lieu of the reduction  of the two-year postdeveloped peak rate of runoff as required in subsection B  of this section, the land development project being considered shall provide  24-hour extended detention of the runoff generated by the one-year, 24-hour  duration storm.
    D. In addition to subsections B and C of this section,  permit-issuing authorities, by local ordinance may, or the board by state  regulation may, adopt more stringent channel analysis criteria or design  standards to ensure that the natural level of channel erosion, to the maximum  extent practicable, will not increase due to the land-disturbing activities.  These criteria may include, but are not limited to, the following:
    1. Criteria and procedures for channel analysis and  classification.
    2. Procedures for channel data collection.
    3. Criteria and procedures for the determination of the  magnitude and frequency of natural sediment transport loads.
    4. Criteria for the selection of proposed natural or  manmade channel linings.
    4VAC50-60-98. Flooding.
    A. Downstream properties and waterways shall be protected  from damages from localized flooding due to changes in runoff rate of flow and  hydrologic characteristics, including, but not limited to, changes in volume,  velocity, frequency, duration, and peak flow rate of stormwater runoff in  accordance with the minimum design standards set out in this section.
    B. The 10-year postdeveloped peak rate of runoff from the  development site shall not exceed the 10-year predeveloped peak rate of runoff.  
    C. In lieu of subsection B of this section, localities  may, by ordinance, adopt alternate design criteria based upon geographic, land  use, topographic, geologic factors, or other downstream conveyance factors as  appropriate.
    D. Linear development projects shall not be required to  control postdeveloped stormwater runoff for flooding, except in accordance with  a watershed or regional stormwater management plan.
    4VAC50-60-99. Regional [ (watershedwide)  (watershed-wide) ] stormwater management plans.
    Water quality and where allowed, water quantity, may be  achieved in accordance with sections 4VAC50-60-69 and 4VAC50-60-92. 
    Part III 
  Local Programs 
    4VAC50-60-100. Applicability. (Repealed.)
    This part specifies technical criteria, minimum ordinance  requirements, and administrative procedures for all localities operating local  stormwater management programs. 
    Part III A 
  Local Programs 
    4VAC50-60-102. Authority and applicability.
    If a locality has adopted a local stormwater management  program in accordance with the Virginia Stormwater Management Act  (§ 10.1-603.2 et seq. of the Code of Virginia) and the board has deemed  such program adoption consistent with the Virginia Stormwater Management Act  and these regulations in accordance with § 10.1-603.3 F of the Code of Virginia,  the board may authorize a locality to administer a qualifying local program.  Pursuant to § 10.1-603.4, the board is required to establish standards and  procedures for such an authorization.
    This part specifies the minimum technical criteria and the  local government ordinance requirements for a local program to be considered a  qualifying local program. Such criteria include but are not limited to  administration, plan review, issuance of coverage under the Virginia Stormwater  Management Program (VSMP) General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from  Construction Activities, inspection, and enforcement.
    4VAC50-60-104. Technical criteria for qualifying local  programs.
    A. All qualifying local programs shall require compliance  with the provisions of Part II Part II A and Part II B as applicable  (4VAC50-60-40 et seq.) of this chapter unless an exception is granted pursuant  to 4VAC50-60-122 and shall comply with the requirements of 4VAC50-60-460 L.
    B. When a locality operating a qualifying local program  has adopted requirements more stringent than those imposed by this chapter in  accordance with § 10.1-603.7 of the Code of Virginia or implemented a  comprehensive stormwater management plan, the department shall consider such  requirements in its review of state projects within that locality in accordance  with Part IV (4VAC50-60-160 et seq.) of this chapter.
    C. Nothing in this part shall be construed as authorizing  a locality to regulate, or to require prior approval by the locality for, a  state project.
    4VAC50-60-106. Qualifying local program administrative  requirements.
    A. A qualifying local program shall provide for the  following:
    1. Identification of the authority authorizing coverage  under the VSMP General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities,  the plan reviewing authority, the plan approving authority, the inspection  authority, and the enforcement authority;
    2. Technical criteria to be used in the qualifying local  program;
    3. Procedures for the submission and approval of plans;
    4. Inspection and monitoring of land-disturbing activities  covered by a permit for compliance;
    5. Procedures or policies for long-term inspection and  maintenance of stormwater management facilities Enforcement; and 
    6. Enforcement Procedures or policies for long-term  inspection and maintenance of stormwater management facilities.
    B. A locality qualifying local program shall adopt  an ordinance(s) that incorporates the components set out in subdivisions 1  through 5 of subsection A of this section and consent to follow procedures  provided by the department for the issuance, denial, revocation, termination,  reissuance, transfer, or modifications of coverage under the VSMP General  Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities.
    C. A qualifying local program shall report to the  department information related to the administration and implementation of the  qualifying local program in accordance with 4VAC50-60-126.
    D. A qualifying local program may require the submission  of a reasonable performance bond or other financial surety and provide for the  release of such sureties in accordance with the criteria set forth in §  10.1-603.8 of the Code of Virginia.
    4VAC50-60-108. Qualifying local program stormwater  management plan review.
    A. A qualifying local program shall require stormwater  management plans to be submitted for review and be approved prior to  commencement of land-disturbing activities. In addition to the other  requirements of this chapter, a stormwater management plan must be developed in  accordance with the following:
    1. A stormwater management plan for a land-disturbing  activity shall apply the stormwater management technical criteria to the entire  land-disturbing activity.
    2. At the discretion of the qualifying local program,  individual lots or planned phases of developments shall not be considered  separate land-disturbing activities, but rather the entire development shall be  considered a single land-disturbing activity.
    3. The stormwater management plan shall consider all  sources of surface runoff and all sources of subsurface and groundwater flows  converted to surface runoff. 
    B. A qualifying local program shall approve or disapprove  a stormwater management plan and required accompanying information according to  the following:
    1. Stormwater management plan review shall begin upon  submission of a complete plan. A complete plan shall include the following  elements:
    a. The location of all points of stormwater discharge,  receiving surface waters or karst features into which the stormwater  discharges, and predevelopment and postdevelopment conditions for drainage  areas, including final drainage patterns and changes to existing contours;
    b. Contact information including the name, address, and  telephone number of the property owner and the tax reference number and parcel  number of the property or properties affected;
    c. A narrative that includes a description of current site  conditions and proposed development and final site conditions, including  proposed stormwater management facilities and the mechanism, including an  identification of financially responsible parties, through which the facilities  will be operated and maintained during and after construction activity;
    d. The location and the design of the proposed stormwater  management facilities;
    e. Information identifying the hydrologic characteristics  and structural properties of soils utilized with the installation of stormwater  management facilities;
    f. Hydrologic and hydraulic computations of the  predevelopment and postdevelopment runoff conditions for the required design  storms;
    g. Good engineering practices and calculations verifying  compliance with the water quality and quantity requirements of this chapter;
    h. A map or maps of the site that depicts the topography of  the site and includes:
    (1) All contributing drainage areas; 
    (2) Receiving surface waters or karst features into which  stormwater will be discharged;
    (3) Existing streams, ponds, culverts, ditches, wetlands,  and other water bodies;
    (4) Soil types, geologic formations, forest cover, and other  vegetative areas;
    (5) Current land use including existing structures, roads,  and locations of known utilities and easements;
    (6) Sufficient information on adjoining parcels to assess  the impacts of stormwater from the site;
    (7) The limits of clearing and grading, and the proposed  drainage patterns on the site;
    (8) Proposed buildings, roads, parking areas, utilities,  and stormwater management facilities; and
    (9) Proposed land use with tabulation of the percentage of  surface area to be adapted to various uses, including but not limited to  planned locations of utilities, roads, and easements.
    i. No more than 50% of the required base fee in accordance  with 4VAC50-60-820, and the required fee form must have been submitted.
    2. Elements of the stormwater management plans shall be  appropriately sealed and signed by a professional in adherence to all minimum  standards and requirements pertaining to the practice of that profession in  accordance with Chapter 4 (§ 54.1-400 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code of  Virginia and attendant regulations.
    3. Completeness of a plan and required accompanying  information shall be determined by the qualifying local program, and the  applicant shall be notified of any determination, within 15 calendar days of  receipt.
    a. If within those 15 days the plan is deemed to be  incomplete based on the criteria set out in this subsection, the applicant  shall be notified in writing of the reasons the plan is deemed incomplete.
    b. If a determination of completeness is made and  communicated to the applicant within the 15 calendar days, an additional 60  calendar days from the date of the communication will be allowed for the review  of the plan.
    c. If a determination of completeness is not made and  communicated to the applicant within the 15 calendar days, the plan shall be  deemed complete as of the date of submission and a total of 60 calendar days  from the date of submission will be allowed for the review of the plan.
    d. The qualifying local program shall act within 45 days on  any plan that has been previously disapproved and resubmitted.
    4. During the review period, the plan shall be approved or  disapproved and the decision communicated in writing to the person responsible  for the land-disturbing activity or his designated agent. If the plan is not approved,  the reasons for not approving the plan shall be provided in writing. Approval  or denial shall be based on the plan's compliance with the requirements of this  chapter and of the qualifying local program. Where available to the applicant,  electronic communication may be considered communication in writing. 
    5. If a plan meeting all requirements of this chapter and  of the qualifying local program is submitted and no action is taken within the  time specified above, the plan shall be deemed approved.
    C. Notwithstanding the requirements of subsection A of  this section, if allowed by the qualifying local program, an initial stormwater  management plan may be submitted for review and approval when it is accompanied  by an erosion and sediment control plan, preliminary stormwater design for the  current and future site work, fee form, and no more than 50% of the base fee  required by 4VAC50-60-820. Such plans shall be limited to the initial clearing  and grading of the site unless otherwise allowed by the qualifying local  program. Approval by the qualifying local program of an initial plan does not  supersede the need for the submittal and approval of a complete stormwater  management plan and the updating of the SWPPP prior to the commencement of  activities beyond initial clearing and grading and other activities approved by  the local program. The initial plan shall include information detailed in  subsection B of this section to the extent required by the qualifying local  program and such other information as may be required by the qualifying local  program.
    D. Each approved plan may be modified in accordance with  the following:
    1. Modifications to an approved stormwater management plan  shall be allowed only after review and written approval by the qualifying local  program. The qualifying local program shall have 60 calendar days to respond in  writing either approving or disapproving such requests.
    2. Based on an inspection, the qualifying local program may  require amendments to the approved stormwater management plan to address the  noted deficiencies and notify the permittee of the required modifications.
    4VAC50-60-110. Technical criteria for local programs. (Repealed.)
    A. All local stormwater management programs shall comply  with the general technical criteria as outlined in 4VAC50-60-50. 
    B. All local stormwater management programs which contain  provisions for stormwater runoff quality shall comply with 4VAC50-60-60. A  locality may establish criteria for selecting either the site or a planning  area on which to apply the water quality criteria. A locality may opt to  calculate actual watershed specific or locality wide values for the average  land cover condition based upon: 
    1. Existing land use data at time of local Chesapeake Bay  Preservation Act Program or department stormwater management program adoption,  whichever was adopted first; 
    2. Watershed or locality size; and 
    3. Determination of equivalent values of impervious cover  for nonurban land uses which contribute nonpoint source pollution, such as  agriculture, forest, etc. 
    C. All local stormwater management programs which contain  provisions for stream channel erosion shall comply with 4VAC50-60-70. 
    D. All local stormwater management programs must contain  provisions for flooding and shall comply with 4VAC50-60-80. 
    E. All local stormwater management programs which contain  provisions for watershed or regional stormwater management plans shall comply  with 4VAC50-60-110. 
    F. A locality that has adopted more stringent requirements  or implemented a regional (watershed-wide) stormwater management plan may  request, in writing, that the department consider these requirements in its  review of state projects within that locality. 
    G. Nothing in this part shall be construed as authorizing  a locality to regulate, or to require prior approval by the locality for, a  state project. 
    4VAC50-60-112. Qualifying local program authorization of  coverage under the VSMP General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from  Construction Activities.
    A. Coverage shall be authorized by the qualifying local  program under the VSMP General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from  Construction Activities in accordance with the following:
    1. The applicant must have an approved initial stormwater  management plan or an approved stormwater management plan for the  land-disturbing activity.
    2. The applicant must have submitted proposed  right-of-entry agreements or easements from the owner for purposes of  inspection and maintenance and proposed maintenance agreements, including  inspection schedules, where required in accordance with 4VAC50-60-124.
    3. The applicant must have an approved registration  statement for the VSMP General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from  Construction Activities.
    4. The applicant must have submitted the required fee form  and total fee required by 4VAC50-60-820.
    5. Applicants submitting registration statements deemed to  be incomplete must be notified within 15 working days of receipt by the  qualifying local program that the registration statement is not complete and be  notified (i) of what material needs to be submitted to complete the  registration statement, and (ii) that the land-disturbing activity does not  have coverage under the VSMP General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from  Construction Activities.
    B. Coverage or termination of coverage shall be authorized  through a standardized database or other method provided by the department.  Such database shall include, at a minimum, permit number, operator name,  activity name, acres disturbed, date of permit coverage, and site address and  location as well as date of termination.
    C. Coverage information pertaining to the VSMP General  Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities shall be  reported to the department in accordance with 4VAC50-60-126 by the qualifying  local program.
    D. The applicant shall be notified of authorization of  permit coverage by the qualifying local program.
    4VAC50-60-114. Inspections.
    A. The qualifying local program or its designee shall  inspect the land-disturbing activity during construction for compliance with  the VSMP General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction  Activities.
    B. The person responsible for the development project or  their designated agent shall submit to a qualifying local program a  construction record drawing for permanent stormwater management facilities,  appropriately sealed, and signed by a professional in accordance with all  minimum standards and requirements pertaining to the practice of that  profession pursuant to Chapter 4 (§ 54.1-400 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code  of Virginia and attendant regulations, certifying that the stormwater  management facilities have been constructed in accordance with the approved  plan. The qualifying local program shall have the construction record drawing  and certification on file prior to the release of the portion of the any  performance bond or surety associated with the stormwater management facility.  The qualifying local program may elect not to require construction record  drawings for stormwater management facilities for which maintenance agreements  are not required pursuant to 4VAC50-60-124. 
    C. The owners owner of a stormwater management facilities  facility for which a maintenance agreement is required pursuant to  4VAC50-60-124 shall be required to conduct inspections in accordance with an  inspection schedule in a the recorded maintenance agreement, and shall  submit written inspection and maintenance reports to the qualifying local  program upon request. Such reports, if consistent with a board-approved  inspection program established in subsection D E of this section, may be  utilized by the qualifying local program if the inspection is conducted by a  person who is licensed as a professional engineer, architect, certified  landscape architect, or land surveyor pursuant to Article 1 (§ 54.1-400 et  seq.) of Chapter 4 of Title 54.1 or who holds a certificate of competence from  the board. The reports, if so utilized, must be kept on file with the  qualifying local program. 
    D. A qualifying local program shall develop a strategy for  addressing maintenance of stormwater management facilities designed to treat  stormwater runoff [ solely primarily ] from  an individual residential lot on which they are located. Such a strategy may  include periodic inspections, homeowner outreach and education, or other method  targeted at promoting the long-term maintenance of such facilities. Such  facilities shall not be subject to the requirement for an inspection to be  conducted by the qualifying local program every five years contained within subsection  E of this section.
    E. A qualifying local program shall establish an  inspection program that ensures that the stormwater management facilities are  being maintained as designed. Any inspection program shall be:
    1. Approved by the board prior to implementation;
    2. Established in writing;
    3. Based on a system of priorities that takes into  consideration the purpose and type of the facility, ownership and the existence  of a recorded maintenance agreement and inspection schedule where required, the  contributing drainage area, and downstream conditions;
    4. Demonstrated to be an enforceable inspection program  that meets the intent of the regulations and ensures that each stormwater  management facility is inspected by the qualifying local program or its  designee, not to include the owner, except as provided in subsection  subsections C and D of this section, at least every five years; and
    5. Documented by inspection records.
    E. F. Inspection reports shall be generated  and kept on file in accordance with 4VAC50-60-126 for all stormwater management  facilities inspected by the qualifying local program.
     
     
    4VAC50-60-116. Qualifying local program enforcement.
    A. A qualifying local program may incorporate the  following components:
    1. Informal and formal administrative enforcement  procedures including:
    a. Verbal warnings and inspection reports;
    b. Notices of corrective action;
    c. Consent special orders and civil charges in accordance  with subdivision 7 of § 10.1-603.2:1 and § 10.1-603.14 D 2 of the Code of  Virginia;
    d. Notices to comply in accordance with § 10.1-603.11 of  the Code of Virginia;
    e. Special orders in accordance with subdivision 7 of § 10.1-603.2:1  of the Code of Virginia;
    f. Emergency special orders in accordance with subdivision  7 of § 10.1-603.2:1 of the Code of Virginia; and
    g. Public notice and comment periods pursuant to  4VAC50-60-660.
    2. Civil and criminal judicial enforcement procedures  including:
    a. Schedule of civil penalties set out in subsection D of  this section;
    b. Criminal penalties in accordance with § 10.1-603.14 B  and C of the Code of Virginia; and
    c. Injunctions in accordance with §§ 10.1-603.12:4,  10.1-603.2:1 and 10.1-603.14 D 1 of the Code of Virginia.
    B. A qualifying local program shall develop policies and  procedures that outline the steps to be taken regarding enforcement actions  under the Stormwater Management Act and attendant regulations and the local  ordinance.
    C. A qualifying local program may utilize the department's  Stormwater Management Enforcement Manual as guidance in establishing policies  and procedures.
    D. A court may utilize as guidance the following Schedule  of Civil Penalties set by the board in accordance with § 10.1-603.14 A of  the Code of Virginia. The range contained within the schedule reflects the  degree of harm caused by the violation, which is site-specific and may vary  greatly from case to case, as may the economic benefit of noncompliance to the  violator. Each day of violation of each requirement shall constitute a separate  offense. Assignment of the degree of harm is a qualitative decision subject to  the court's discretion. The court has the discretion to impose a maximum  penalty of $32,500 per violation per day in accordance with § 10.1-603.14  A of the Code of Virginia.
         
                 | 1. Gravity-based Component | Marginal | Moderate | Serious |   | 
       | Violations* and Frequency of Occurrence ** | $$ x occurrences | $$ x occurrences | $$ x occurrences | SUBTOTAL | 
       | No Permit Registration (each month w/o coverage = 1    occurrence) | 500 x ____ | 1,000 x ____ | 2,000 x ____ |     | 
       | No SWPPP (No SWPPP components including E&S Plan) (each month of land-disturbing without SWPPP = 1    occurrence) | 1,000 x ____ | 1,500 x ____ | 2,000 x ____ |   | 
       | Incomplete SWPPP | 300 x ____ | 500 x ____ | 1,000 x ____ |   | 
       | SWPPP not on site  | 100 x ____ | 300 x ____ | 500 x ____ |   | 
       | No approved Erosion and Sediment Control Plan | 500 x ____ | 1,000 x ____ | 2,000 x ____ |   | 
       | Failure to install stormwater BMPs or erosion and    sediment ("E&S") controls  | 300 x ____ | 500 x ____ | 1,000 x ____ |   | 
       | Stormwater BMPs or E&S controls improperly installed    or maintained  | 250 x ____ | 500 x ____ | 750 x ____ |   | 
       | Operational deficiencies (e.g., failure to initiate    stabilization measures as soon as practicable; unauthorized discharges of    stormwater; failure to implement control measures for construction debris) | 1,000 x ____   | 2,000 x ____ | 5,000 x ____ |   | 
       | Failure to conduct required inspections  | 500 x ____ | 2,000 x____ | 3,000 x ____ |   | 
       | Incomplete, improper or missed inspections (e.g.,    inspections not conducted by qualified personnel; site inspection reports do    not include date, weather information, location of discharge, or are not    certified, etc.) | 300 x____ | 500 x ___ | 1,000 x ____ |   | 
       |   | Subtotal #1 |   | 
       | 2. Estimated Economic Benefit of Noncompliance (if    applicable) | Subtotal #2 |   | 
       | 3. Recommended civil penalty | Total (#1 and #2) |   | 
       | * Each stormwater BMP or E&S control that is either    not installed or improperly installed or maintained is a separate violation. ** The frequency of occurrence is per event unless    otherwise noted. | 
  
         
          E. Pursuant to subdivision 2 of § 10.1-603.2:1 of the Code  of Virginia, authorization to administer a qualifying local program shall not  remove from the board the authority to enforce the provisions of the Virginia  Stormwater Management Act and attendant regulations.
    F. Pursuant to § 10.1-603.14 A of the Code of Virginia,  amounts recovered by a qualifying local program shall be paid into the treasury  of the locality in which the violation occurred and are to be used for the  purpose of minimizing, preventing, managing, or mitigating pollution of the  waters of the locality and abating environmental pollution therein in such  manner as the court may, by order, direct. 
    4VAC50-60-118. Hearings.
    A qualifying local program shall ensure that any permit  applicant or permittee shall have a right to a hearing pursuant to  § 10.1-603.12:6 of the Code of Virginia and shall ensure that all hearings  held under this chapter shall be conducted in accordance with  § 10.1-603.12:7 of the Code of Virginia or as otherwise provided by law.
    4VAC50-60-120. Requirements for local program and ordinance.  (Repealed.)
    A. At a minimum, the local stormwater management program  and implementing ordinance shall meet the following: 
    1. The ordinance shall identify the plan-approving  authority and other positions of authority within the program, and shall  include the regulations and technical criteria to be used in the program. 
    2. The ordinance shall include procedures for submission  and approval of plans, issuance of permits, monitoring and inspections of land  development projects. The party responsible for conducting inspections shall be  identified. The local program authority shall maintain, either on-site or in  local program files, a copy of the approved plan and a record of all  inspections for each land development project. 
    B. The department shall periodically review each locality's  stormwater management program, implementing ordinance, and amendments.  Subsequent to this review, the department shall determine if the program and  ordinance are consistent with the state stormwater management regulations and  notify the locality of its findings. To the maximum extent practicable the  department will coordinate the reviews with other local government program  reviews to avoid redundancy. The review of a local program shall consist of the  following: 
    1. A personal interview between department staff and the  local program administrator or his designee; 
    2. A review of the local ordinance and other applicable  documents; 
    3. A review of plans approved by the locality and  consistency of application; 
    4. An inspection of regulated activities; and 
    5. A review of enforcement actions. 
    C. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as limiting  the rights of other federal and state agencies from imposing stricter technical  criteria or other requirements as allowed by law. 
    4VAC50-60-122. Qualifying local program exceptions.
    A. A qualifying local program may grant exceptions to the  provisions of Part II (4VAC50-60-40 et seq.) Parts II A and II B of this  chapter through an administrative process. A request for an exception,  including the reasons for making the request, shall be submitted in writing to  the qualifying local program. An exception may be granted provided that (i) the  exception is the minimum necessary to afford relief, (ii) reasonable and  appropriate conditions shall be imposed as necessary upon any exception granted  so that the intent of the Act and this chapter are preserved, (iii) granting  the exception will not confer on the permittee any special privileges that are  denied to other permittees who present similar circumstances, and (iv)  exception requests are not based upon conditions or circumstances that are  self-imposed or self-created.
    B. Economic hardship alone is not sufficient reason to  grant an exception from the requirements of this chapter.
    C. Under no circumstance shall the qualifying local  program grant an exception to the requirement that the land-disturbing activity  obtain a permit.
    D. Any exception to the water quality technical criteria  of subdivisions 1 and 2 of 4VAC50-60-63 shall require that all available  offsite options be utilized before an exception is granted and that any  necessary phosphorus reductions unable to be achieved on site or through the  available offsite options of subsection A of 4VAC50-60-69 be achieved through a  payment made in accordance with subsection B of 4VAC50-60-69 [ ,  when such payment option is available ]. In the case of the  granting of an exception, the minimum on site thresholds of subsection B of  4VAC50-60-69 shall not apply.
    E. A record of all exceptions applied for and granted  shall be maintained by the qualifying local program and reported to the  department in accordance with 4VAC50-60-126.
    4VAC50-60-124. Qualifying local program stormwater  management facility maintenance.
    A. Responsibility for the operation and maintenance of  stormwater management facilities in accordance with this chapter, unless  assumed by a governmental agency, shall remain with the property owner or other  legally established entity and shall pass to any successor. 
    1. The government entity implementing the qualifying  local program shall be a party to each require a maintenance agreement  for each stormwater management facility except as provided in subdivision 2.  Such maintenance agreement shall include a schedule for require the  owner to (i) perform inspections by the owner, and, in addition to ensuring  that each on a specified schedule, (ii) maintain the facility is  maintained as designed, shall ensure that and (iii) maintain the  designed flow and drainage patterns from the site to a permanent facility are  maintained. Such agreements may also contain provisions specifying that,  where maintenance or repair of a stormwater management facility located on the  owner's property is neglected, or the stormwater management facility becomes a  public health or safety concern and the owner has failed to perform the  necessary maintenance and repairs after receiving notice from the locality, the  qualifying local program may perform the necessary maintenance and repairs and  recover the costs from the owner. In the specific case of a public health or  safety danger, the agreement may provide that the written notice may be waived  by the locality.
    2. Maintenance agreements, at the discretion of the  qualifying local program, shall not be required for stormwater management  facilities designed to treat stormwater runoff [ solely  primarily ] from an individual residential lot on which they are  located, provided it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the qualifying  local program that future maintenance of such facilities will be addressed through  a deed restriction or other mechanism enforceable [ by  at the discretion of ] the qualifying local program. 
    B. The Where a maintenance agreement is required  for a stormwater management facility, the qualifying local program shall be  notified of any transfer or conveyance of ownership or responsibility for  maintenance of a stormwater management facility.
    C. The Where a maintenance agreement is required  for a stormwater management facility, the qualifying local program shall  require right-of-entry agreements or easements from the property owner for  purposes of inspection and maintenance.
    4VAC50-60-126. Qualifying local program report and  recordkeeping.
    A. On a fiscal year basis (July 1 to June 30), a  qualifying local program shall report to the department by October 1 of each  year in a format provided by the department. The information to be provided  shall include the following:
    1. Information on each permanent stormwater management  facility completed during the fiscal year to include type of stormwater management  facility, coordinates, acres treated, and the surface waters or karst features  into which the stormwater management facility will discharge;
    2. Number of VSMP General Permit for Discharges of  Stormwater from Construction Activities projects inspected and the total number  of inspections by acreage categories determined by the department during the  fiscal year;
    3. Number and type of enforcement actions during the fiscal  year; and
    4. Number of exceptions applied for and the number granted  or denied during the fiscal year.
    B. A qualifying local program shall make information set  out in subsection A of this section available to the department upon request.
    C. A qualifying local program shall keep records in  accordance with the following:
    1. Permit files shall be kept for three years after permit  termination. After three years, the permit file shall be delivered to the  department by October 1 of each year.
    2. Stormwater maintenance facility inspection reports shall  be kept for five years from the date of inspection. 
    3. Stormwater maintenance agreements, design standards and  specifications, postconstruction surveys construction record drawings,  and maintenance records shall be maintained in perpetuity or until a stormwater  management facility is removed due to redevelopment of the site.
    Part III B 
  Department of Conservation and Recreation Administered Local Programs 
    4VAC50-60-128. Authority and applicability.
    In the absence of a qualifying local program, the  department, in accordance with an adoption and implementation schedule set by  the board and upon board approval, shall administer the local stormwater  management program in a locality in accordance with § 10.1-603.3 C of the Code  of Virginia. This part specifies the minimum technical criteria for a department-administered  local stormwater management program in accordance with the Virginia Stormwater  Management Act (§ 10.1-603.2 et seq. of the Code of Virginia), and the  standards and criteria established in these regulations by the board pursuant  to its authority under that article. Such criteria include but are not limited  to administration, plan review, issuance of coverage under the Virginia  Stormwater Management Program (VSMP) General Permit for Discharges of  Stormwater from Construction Activities, issuance of individual permits,  inspection, enforcement, and education and outreach components.
    4VAC50-60-130. Administrative procedures: stormwater  management plans. (Repealed.)
    A. Localities shall approve or disapprove stormwater  management plans according to the following: 
    1. A maximum of 60 calendar days from the day a complete  stormwater management plan is accepted for review will be allowed for the  review of the plan. During the 60-day review period, the locality shall either  approve or disapprove the plan and communicate its decision to the applicant in  writing. Approval or denial shall be based on the plan's compliance with the  locality's stormwater management program. 
    2. A disapproval of a plan shall contain the reasons for  disapproval. 
    B. Each plan approved by a locality shall be subject to  the following conditions: 
    1. The applicant shall comply with all applicable  requirements of the approved plan, the local program, this chapter and the Act,  and shall certify that all land clearing, construction, land development and  drainage will be done according to the approved plan. 
    2. The land development project shall be conducted only  within the area specified in the approved plan. 
    3. The locality shall be allowed, after giving notice to  the owner, occupier or operator of the land development project, to conduct  periodic inspections of the project. 
    4. The person responsible for implementing the approved  plan shall conduct monitoring and submit reports as the locality may require to  ensure compliance with the approved plan and to determine whether the plan  provides effective stormwater management. 
    5. No changes may be made to an approved plan without  review and written approval by the locality. 
    4VAC50-60-132. Technical criteria.
    A. The department-administered local stormwater management  programs shall require compliance with the provisions of Part II Part II  A and Part II B as applicable (4VAC50-60-40 et seq.) of this chapter unless an  exception is granted pursuant to 4VAC50-60-142 D and shall comply with the  requirements of 4VAC50-60-460 L.
    B. When reviewing a federal project, the department shall  apply the provisions of this chapter.
    C. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as limiting  the rights of other federal and state agencies to impose stricter technical  criteria or other requirements as allowed by law.
    4VAC50-60-134. Administrative authorities.
    A. The department is the permit-issuing authority, plan  approving authority, and the enforcement authority.
    B. The department or its designee is the plan reviewing  authority and the inspection authority.
    C. The department shall assess and collect fees.
    D. The department may require the submission of a  reasonable performance bond or other financial surety in accordance with the  criteria set forth in § 10.1-603.8 of the Code of Virginia prior to the  issuance of coverage under the VSMP General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater  from Construction Activities and in accordance with the following:
    1. The amount of the installation performance security  shall be the total estimated construction cost of the stormwater management  BMPs approved under the stormwater management plan, plus 25%;
    2. The performance security shall contain forfeiture  provisions for failure, after proper notice, to complete work within the time  specified, or to initiate or maintain appropriate actions that may be required  in accordance with the approved stormwater management plan;
    3. Upon failure by the applicant to take such action as  required, the department may act and may collect from the applicant the  difference should the amount of the reasonable cost of such action exceed the  amount of the security held; and
    4. Within 60 days of the completion of the requirements and  conditions of the VSMP General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from  Construction Activities and the department's acceptance of the Notice of  Termination, such bond, cash escrow, letter of credit, or other legal  arrangement shall be refunded to the applicant.
    4VAC50-60-136. Stormwater management plan review.
    A. Stormwater management plans shall be reviewed and  approved by the department prior to commencement of land-disturbing activities.
    B. The department shall approve or disapprove a stormwater  management plan and required accompanying information according to the criteria  set out for a qualifying local program in 4VAC50-60-108 B.
    C. The department shall not accept review or  approve initial stormwater management plans.
    D. Each approved stormwater management plan may be  modified in accordance with the criteria set out for a qualifying local program  in 4VAC50-60-108 D.
    4VAC50-60-138. Issuance of coverage under the VSMP General  Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities.
    The department shall issue coverage under the VSMP General  Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities in accordance  with the following:
    1. The applicant must have a department-approved stormwater  management plan for the land-disturbing activity.
    2. The applicant must have submitted a complete  registration statement for the VSMP General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater  from Construction Activities in accordance with Part VII (4VAC50-60-360 et  seq.) of this chapter and the requirements of the VSMP General Permit for  Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities, which acknowledges that  a SWPPP has been developed and will be implemented, and the registration  statement must have been reviewed and approved prior to the commencement of  land disturbance.
    3. The applicant must have submitted the required fee form  and fee for the registration statement seeking coverage under the VSMP General  Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities.
    4. Applicants submitting registration statements deemed to  be incomplete must be notified within 15 working days of receipt by the  department that the registration statement is not complete and be notified (i)  of what material needs to be submitted to complete the registration statement,  and (ii) that the land-disturbing activity does not have coverage under the VSMP  General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater from Construction Activities.
    5. The applicant shall be notified of authorization of  permit coverage by the department.
    6. Individual permits for qualifying land-disturbing  activities may be issued at the discretion of the board or its designee  pursuant to 4VAC50-60-410 B 3.
    4VAC50-60-140. Administrative procedures: exceptions. (Repealed.)
    A. A request for an exception shall be submitted, in  writing, to the locality. An exception from the stormwater management regulations  may be granted, provided that: (i) exceptions to the criteria are the minimum  necessary to afford relief and (ii) reasonable and appropriate conditions shall  be imposed as necessary upon any exception granted so that the intent of the  Act and this chapter are preserved. 
    B. Economic hardship is not sufficient reason to grant an  exception from the requirements of this chapter. 
    4VAC50-60-142. Inspections, enforcement, hearings,  exceptions, and stormwater management facility maintenance.
    A. Inspections shall be conducted by the department in  accordance with 4VAC50-60-114.
    B. Enforcement actions shall be conducted by the  department in accordance with 4VAC50-60-116. The department's Stormwater  Management Enforcement Manual shall serve as guidance to be utilized in  enforcement actions under the Stormwater Management Act and attendant  regulations. Any amounts assessed by a court as a result of a summons issued by  the board or the department shall be paid into the state treasury and deposited  by the State Treasurer into the Virginia Stormwater Management Fund established  pursuant to § 10.1-603.4:1 of the Code of Virginia.
    C. Hearings shall be conducted by the department in  accordance with 4VAC50-60-118.
    D. Exceptions may be granted by the department in accordance  with 4VAC50-60-122.
    E. Stormwater management facility maintenance shall be  conducted in accordance with 4VAC50-60-124.
    4VAC50-60-150. Administrative procedures: maintenance and  inspections. (Repealed.)
    A. Responsibility for the operation and maintenance of  stormwater management facilities, unless assumed by a governmental agency,  shall remain with the property owner and shall pass to any successor or owner.  If portions of the land are to be sold, legally binding arrangements shall be  made to pass the basic responsibility to successors in title. These  arrangements shall designate for each project the property owner, governmental  agency, or other legally established entity to be permanently responsible for  maintenance. 
    B. In the case of developments where lots are to be sold,  permanent arrangements satisfactory to the locality shall be made to ensure  continued performance of this chapter. 
    C. A schedule of maintenance inspections shall be  incorporated into the local ordinance. Ordinances shall provide that in cases  where maintenance or repair is neglected, or the stormwater management facility  becomes a danger to public health or safety, the locality has the authority to  perform the work and to recover the costs from the owner. 
    D. Localities may require right-of-entry agreements or  easements from the applicant for purposes of inspection and maintenance. 
    E. Periodic inspections are required for all stormwater  management facilities. Localities shall either: 
    1. Provide for inspection of stormwater management  facilities on an annual basis; or 
    2. Establish an alternative inspection program which  ensures that stormwater management facilities are functioning as intended. Any  alternative inspection program shall be: 
    a. Established in writing; 
    b. Based on a system of priorities that, at a minimum,  considers the purpose of the facility, the contributing drainage area, and  downstream conditions; and 
    c. Documented by inspection records. 
    F. During construction of the stormwater management  facilities, localities shall make inspections on a regular basis. 
    G. Inspection reports shall be maintained as part of a  land development project file. 
    4VAC50-60-154. Reporting and recordkeeping.
    A. The department shall maintain a current database of  permit coverage information for all projects that includes permit number,  operator name, activity name, acres disturbed, date of permit coverage, and  site address and location.
    B. On a fiscal year basis (July 1 to June 30), a local  program shall report to the department shall compile a report on the local  programs it administers by October 1 in accordance with 4VAC50-60-126 A.
    C. On a fiscal year basis (July 1 to June 30), the  department shall compile information provided by local programs.
    D. C. Records shall be maintained by the department  in accordance with 4VAC50-60-126 C.
    Part III C 
  Department of Conservation and Recreation Procedures for Review of  Qualifying Local Programs 
    4VAC50-60-156. Authority and applicability.
    This part specifies the criteria that the department will  utilize in reviewing a locality's administration of a qualifying local program  pursuant to § 10.1-603.12 of the Code of Virginia following the board's  approval of such program in accordance with the Virginia Stormwater Management  Act and these regulations.
    4VAC50-60-157. Stormwater management program review.
    A. The department shall review each board-approved  qualifying local program at least once every five years on a review schedule  approved by the board. The department may review a qualifying local program on  a more frequent basis if deemed necessary by the board and shall notify the  local government if such review is scheduled.
    B. The review of a board-approved qualifying local program  shall consist of the following:
    1. An interview between department staff and the qualifying  local program administrator or his designee;
    2. A review of the local ordinance(s) and other applicable  documents;
    3. A review of a subset of the plans approved by the  qualifying local program and consistency of application including exceptions  granted;
    4. An accounting of the receipt and of the expenditure of  fees received;
    5. An inspection of regulated activities; and
    6. A review of enforcement actions and an accounting of  amounts recovered through enforcement actions.
    C. To the extent practicable, the department will  coordinate the reviews with other local government program reviews to avoid  redundancy.
    D. The department shall provide its recommendations to the  board within 90 days of the completion of a review. Such recommendations shall  be provided to the locality in advance of the meeting.
    E. The board shall determine if the qualifying local  program and ordinance are consistent with the Act and state stormwater  management regulations and notify the qualifying local program of its findings.
    F. If the board determines that the deficiencies noted in  the review will cause the qualifying local program to be out of compliance with  the Stormwater Management Act and its attendant regulations, the board shall  notify the qualifying local program concerning the deficiencies and provide a  reasonable period of time for corrective action to be taken. If the qualifying  local program agrees to the corrective action recommended by the board, the  qualifying local program will be considered to be conditionally compliant with  the Stormwater Management Act and its attendant regulations until a subsequent  finding is issued by the board. If the qualifying local program fails to take  the corrective action within the specified time, the board may take action pursuant  to § 10.1-603.12 of the Code of Virginia.
    Part III D 
  Virginia Soil and Water Conservation Board Authorization for Qualifying  Local Programs 
    4VAC50-60-158. Authority and applicability.
    Subdivision 1 of § 10.1-603.4 of the Code of Virginia  requires that the board establish standards and procedures for authorizing a  locality to administer a stormwater management program. In accordance with that  requirement, and with the further authority conferred upon the board by the  Virginia Stormwater Management Act (§ 10.1-603.2 et seq. of the Code of  Virginia), this part specifies the procedures the board will utilize in  authorizing a locality to administer a qualifying local program.
    4VAC50-60-159. Authorization procedures for qualifying local  programs.
    A. A locality required to adopt a program in accordance  with § 10.1-603.3 A of the Code of Virginia or those electing to seek  authorization to administer a qualifying local program must submit to the board  an application package which, at a minimum, contains the following:
    1. The local program ordinance(s);
    2. A funding and staffing plan based on the projected  permitting fees; and
    3. The policies and procedures, including but not limited  to, agreements with Soil and Water Conservation Districts, adjacent localities,  or other entities, for the administration, plan review, permit issuance,  inspection, and enforcement components of the program.
    B. Upon receipt of an application package, the board or  its designee shall have 20 30 calendar days to determine the completeness  of the application package. If an application package is deemed to be  incomplete based on the criteria set out in subsection A of this section, the  board or its designee must identify in writing the reasons the application  package is deemed deficient.
    C. Upon receipt of a complete application package, the  board or its designee shall have 90 calendar days for the review of the  application package. During the 90-day review period, the board or its designee  shall either approve or disapprove the application, or notify the locality of a  time extension for the review, and communicate its decision to the locality in  writing. If the application is not approved, the reasons for not approving the  application shall be provided to the locality in writing. Approval or denial  shall be based on the application's compliance with the Virginia Stormwater  Management Act and these regulations.
    D. A locality required to adopt a qualifying local program  in accordance with § 10.1-603.3 A of the Code of Virginia shall submit a  complete application package for the board's review pursuant to a schedule set  by the board in accordance with § 10.1-603.3 and shall adopt a qualifying local  program consistent with the Act and this chapter within the timeframe  established pursuant to § 10.1-603.3.
    E. A locality not required to adopt a qualifying local  program in accordance with § 10.1-603.3 A but electing to adopt a qualifying  local program shall notify the board in accordance with the following:
    1. A locality electing to adopt a qualifying local program  may notify the board of its intention within six months of the effective date  of these regulations. Such locality shall submit a complete application package  for the board's review pursuant to a schedule set by the board and shall adopt  a qualifying local program within the timeframe established by the board.
    2. A locality electing to adopt a qualifying local program  that does not notify the board within the initial six-month period of its  intention may thereafter notify the board at any regular meeting of the board.  Such notification shall include a proposed schedule for adoption of a  qualifying local program within a timeframe agreed upon by the board.
    F. The department shall administer the responsibilities of  the Act and this chapter in any locality in which a qualifying local program  has not been adopted. The department shall develop a schedule, to be approved  by the board, for adoption and implementation of the requirements of this  chapter in such localities. Such schedule may include phases of implementation  and shall be based upon considerations including the typical number of  permitted projects located within a locality, total number of acres disturbed  by such permitted projects, and such other considerations as may be deemed  necessary by the board.
    DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (4VAC50-60)
    Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination – A Guidance  Manual for Program Development and Technical Assessments, EPA Cooperative  Agreement X-82907801-0, October 2004, by Center for Watershed Protection and  Robert Pitt, University of Alabama, available on the Internet at  http://www.cwp.org/idde_verify.htm.
    Getting in Step – A Guide for Conducting Watershed Outreach  Campaigns, EPA-841-B-03-002, December 2003, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,  Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, available on the Internet at  http://www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/outreach/documents/getnstep.pdf, or may be  ordered from National Service Center for Environmental Publications, telephone  1-800-490-9198.
    Municipal Stormwater Program Evaluation Guidance,  EPA-833-R-07-003, January 2007 (field test version), U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency, Office of Wastewater Management, available on the Internet  at http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/docs.cfm?program_id=6&view=allprog&sort=name#ms4_guidance,  or may be ordered from National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal  Road, Springfield, VA 22161, telephone 1-800-553-6847 or (703) 605-6000.
    [ Erosion & Sediment Control ] Technical  Bulletin #1 [ - Stream Channel Erosion Control  Improving Soil Quality in Urbanizing Areas ], Virginia Department  of Conservation and Recreation, 2000.
    Technical Memorandum – The Runoff Reduction Method, April  2008, and beta-version addendum addendums, [ September  December ] 2008 2009.
    Virginia Runoff Reduction Method Worksheet, [ September  December ] 2008 2009.
    Virginia Runoff Reduction Method Worksheet –  Redevelopment, [ September December ] 2009.  
    VA.R. Doc. No. R08-587; Filed December 15, 2009, 9:56 a.m. 
TITLE 9. ENVIRONMENT
STATE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
Fast-Track Regulation
    Title of Regulation: 9VAC5-10. General Definitions (amending 9VAC5-10-20).
    Statutory Authority: § 10.1-1308 of the Code of  Virginia.
    Public Hearing Information: No public hearings are scheduled.
    Public Comment Deadline: February 3, 2010.
    Effective Date: February 18, 2010. 
    Agency Contact: Karen G. Sabasteanski, Department of  Environmental Quality, 629 East Main Street, P.O. Box 1105, Richmond, VA 23218,  telephone (804) 698-4426, FAX (804) 698-4510, or email  karen.sabasteanski@deq.virginia.gov.
    Basis: Section 10.1-1308 of the Virginia Air Pollution  Control Law (Chapter 13 (§ 10.1-1300 et seq.) of Title 10.1 of the Code of  Virginia) authorizes the State Air Pollution Control Board to promulgate  regulations abating, controlling, and prohibiting air pollution in order to  protect public health and welfare.
    Federal Requirements
    Section 109 (a) of the Clean Air Act requires the Environmental  Protection Agency (EPA) to prescribe national ambient air quality standards  (NAAQS) to protect public health. Section 110 mandates that each state adopt  and submit to EPA a plan (the state implementation plan or SIP) that provides  for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the NAAQS. Ozone, one  of the pollutants for which there is a NAAQS, is in part created by emissions  of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Therefore, in order to control ozone,  VOCs must be addressed in Virginia's SIP.
    40 CFR Part 51 sets out requirements for the preparation,  adoption, and submittal of SIPs. Subpart F of Part 51, Procedural Requirements,  includes § 51.100, which consists of a list of definitions. 40 CFR 51.100  contains a definition of VOC. This definition is revised by EPA in order to add  or remove VOCs as necessary. If, for example, it can be demonstrated that a  particular VOC is "negligibly reactive" (that is, if it can be shown  that a VOC is not as reactive or makes a significant contribution to ozone formation),  then EPA may remove that substance from the definition of VOC.
    On January 21, 2009 (74 FR 3437), EPA revised the definition of  VOC in 40 CFR 51.100 to exclude two substances from the definition of VOC:  propylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate. This exclusion is accomplished by  adding the substances to a list of substances not considered to be a VOC. This  change to the exemption list became effective on February 20, 2009.
    State Requirements
    These specific amendments are not required by state mandate.  Rather, Virginia's Air Pollution Control Law gives the State Air Pollution  Control Board the discretionary authority to promulgate regulations  "abating, controlling and prohibiting air pollution throughout or in any  part of the Commonwealth" (§ 10.1-1308 A of the Code of Virginia).  The law defines such air pollution as "the presence in the outdoor  atmosphere of one or more substances which are or may be harmful or injurious  to human health, welfare or safety, to animal or plant life, or to property, or  which unreasonably interfere with the enjoyment by the people or life or  property" (§ 10.1-1300 of the Code of Virginia).
    Purpose: The purpose of the regulation is not to impose  any regulatory requirements in and of itself, but to provide a basis for and support  to other provisions of the Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air  Pollution, which are in place in order to protect public health and welfare.  The proposed amendments are being made to ensure that the definition of VOC,  which is crucial to most of the regulations, is up to date and scientifically  accurate, as well as consistent with the overall EPA requirements under which  the regulations operate.
    Rationale for Using Fast-Track Process: The  definition is being revised to add two less-reactive substances to the list of  compounds not considered to be VOCs. As discussed elsewhere, this revision is  not expected to affect a significant number of sources or have any significant  impact, other than a positive one, on air quality overall. Additionally,  removal of the substances at the federal level was accompanied by detailed  scientific review and public comment and no negative comments were received  during the federal public comment period. Therefore, no additional information  on the reactivity of these substances or the appropriateness of their removal  is anticipated.
    Substance: The general definitions impose no  regulatory requirements in and of themselves but provide support to other  provisions of the Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air Pollution  (9VAC5-10 through 9VAC5-80). The list of substances not considered to be VOCs  in Virginia has been revised to include propylene carbonate and dimethyl  carbonate.
    Issues: The general public health and welfare will  benefit because the revision may encourage the use of products containing the  less-reactive substances in place of products containing more reactive and  thereby more polluting substances, ultimately resulting in fewer emissions of  VOCs and reduced production of ozone, which results from VOC emissions.  Companies that use these substances in place of more reactive substances may  also benefit by reducing their VOC emissions and concomitant reductions in  permitting and other regulatory requirements.
    The revision will allow the department to focus VOC reduction  strategies on substances that are more responsible for ozone formation.
    The Department of Planning and Budget's Economic Impact  Analysis:
    Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. The State Air  Pollution Control Board (Board) proposes to add propylene carbonate and  dimethyl carbonate to the list of substances not considered volatile organic  compounds (VOCs).
    Result of Analysis. The benefits likely exceed the costs for  all proposed changes.
    Estimated Economic Impact. Section 109 (a) of the federal Clean  Air Act requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to prescribe  national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) to protect public health.  Section 110 mandates that each state adopt and submit to EPA a plan (the state  implementation plan or SIP) which provides for the implementation, maintenance,  and enforcement of the NAAQS. Ozone, one of the pollutants for which there is a  NAAQS, is in part created by emissions of VOCs. Therefore, in order to control  ozone, VOCs are addressed in Virginia's SIP.
    Federal regulation 40 CFR Part 51 sets out requirements for the  preparation, adoption, and submittal of SIPs and includes a definition of VOC.  This definition is periodically revised by EPA in order to add or remove VOCs  as necessary. If, for example, it can be demonstrated that a particular VOC is  negligibly reactive, then EPA may remove that substance from the definition of  VOC.
    On January 21, 2009, EPA revised the definition of VOC to  exclude two substances from the definition of VOC: propylene carbonate and  dimethyl carbonate. This exclusion is accomplished by adding the substances to  a list of substances not considered to be a VOC. Consequently, the Board  proposes to add propylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate to the list of substances  not considered VOCs in Virginia’s Regulations for the Control and Abatement of  Air Pollution.
    Propylene carbonate can be used in cosmetics, as an adhesive  component in food packaging, as a solvent for plasticizers and synthetic fibers  and polymers, and as a solvent for aerial pesticide application.1   Dimethyl carbonate may be used as a solvent in paints and coatings, or in  waterborne paints and adhesives. It may also be used as a methylation and  carbonylation agent in organic synthesis, and can be used as a fuel additive.2   According to the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), neither propylene  carbonate nor dimethyl carbonate are currently known to be used in Virginia. By  being added to the list of substances not considered VOCs, firms could start  using these substances instead of substances that continue to be considered  VOCs, and would have their official VOC emissions be considered lower. This  would potentially allow firms greater flexibility in meeting Board permit  requirements. DEQ is not aware of any firms that plan to do this, but the  potential for future firms to reduce costs this way would exist. If firms were  to start using propylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate instead of other  substances there would be no increase in air pollution and possibly a  reduction. Since there would be no harm to air quality, and there is the  potential for cost savings for firms, the Board’s proposal creates a net  benefit.
    Businesses and Entities Affected. According to DEQ, neither  propylene carbonate nor dimethyl carbonate are currently known to be used in  Virginia.  Propylene carbonate can be used in cosmetics, as an adhesive  component in food packaging, as a solvent for plasticizers and synthetic fibers  and polymers, and as a solvent for aerial pesticide application. Dimethyl  carbonate may be used as a solvent in paints and coatings, or in waterborne  paints and adhesives. It may also be used as a methylation and carbonylation  agent in organic synthesis, and can be used as a fuel additive. Thus, there is the  potential that firms involved in these activities may at some time in the  future choose to use propylene carbonate or dimethyl carbonate.
    Localities Particularly Affected. There is no locality which  will bear any identified disproportionate impact due to the proposed  amendments.
    Projected Impact on Employment. The proposal to add propylene  carbonate and dimethyl carbonate to the list of substances not considered VOCs  would potentially allow firms greater flexibility in meeting Board permit  requirements. This greater flexibility may allow some firms to operate at lower  cost which could potentially make more business activity profitable. If more  business activity becomes profitable, there is the potential for increased  business activity and employment. As of now though, DEQ is not aware of any  Virginia firms with immediate plans to use propylene carbonate or dimethyl  carbonate.
    Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposal  to add propylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate to the list of substances not  considered VOCs would potentially allow firms greater flexibility in meeting  Board permit requirements. This greater flexibility may allow some futures to  operate at lower cost which could potentially make more business activity  profitable.
    Small Businesses: Costs and Other Effects. The proposal is not  expected to increase costs for small businesses.
    Small Businesses: Alternative Method that Minimizes Adverse  Impact. The proposal is not expected to increase costs for small businesses.
    Real Estate Development Costs. The proposed amendments are not  expected to significantly affect real estate development costs.
    Legal Mandate. The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has  analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04  of the Administrative Process Act and Executive Order Number 36 (06). Section 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include, but need not  be limited to, the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the  regulation would apply, the identity of any localities and types of businesses  or other entities particularly affected, the projected number of persons and  employment positions to be affected, the projected costs to affected businesses  or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and the impact on the  use and value of private property. Further, if the proposed regulation has  adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such  economic impact analyses include (i) an identification and estimate of the  number of small businesses subject to the regulation; (ii) the projected  reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small  businesses to comply with the regulation, including the type of professional  skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents; (iii) a  statement of the probable effect of the regulation on affected small  businesses; and (iv) a description of any less intrusive or less costly  alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the regulation. The analysis  presented above represents DPB's best estimate of these economic impacts.
    _______________________
    1 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
    2 Ibid
    Agency's Response to the Department of Planning and Budget's  Economic Impact Analysis: The department has reviewed the economic impact  analysis prepared by the Department of Planning and Budget and has no comment.
    Summary:
    The general definitions of 9VAC5-10 impose no regulatory  requirements in and of themselves but provide support to other provisions of  the Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air Pollution (9VAC5-10  through 9VAC5-80). The definition of volatile organic compound (VOC) is revised  to add two substances that have been demonstrated to be less reactive to the  list of substances that are not considered to be VOCs: propylene carbonate and  dimethyl carbonate.
    9VAC5-10-20. Terms defined.
    "Actual emissions rate" means the actual rate of  emissions of a pollutant from an emissions unit. In general actual emissions  shall equal the average rate, in tons per year, at which the unit actually  emitted the pollutant during the most recent two-year period or some other  two-year period which is representative of normal source operation. If the  board determines that no two-year period is representative of normal source  operation, the board shall allow the use of an alternative period of time upon  a determination by the board that it is more representative of normal source  operation. Actual emissions shall be calculated using the unit's actual  operating hours, production rates, and types of materials processed, stored, or  combusted during the selected time period.
    "Administrator" means the administrator of the U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or his authorized representative.
    "Affected facility" means, with reference to a  stationary source, any part, equipment, facility, installation, apparatus,  process or operation to which an emission standard is applicable or any other  facility so designated. The term "affected facility" includes any  affected source as defined in 40 CFR 63.2.
    "Air pollution" means the presence in the outdoor  atmosphere of one or more substances which are or may be harmful or injurious  to human health, welfare or safety; to animal or plant life; or to property; or  which unreasonably interfere with the enjoyment by the people of life or  property.
    "Air quality" means the specific measurement in the  ambient air of a particular air pollutant at any given time.
    "Air quality control region" means any area  designated as such in 9VAC5-20-200.
    "Alternative method" means any method of sampling  and analyzing for an air pollutant which is not a reference or equivalent  method, but which has been demonstrated to the satisfaction of the board, in  specific cases, to produce results adequate for its determination of  compliance.
    "Ambient air" means that portion of the atmosphere,  external to buildings, to which the general public has access.
    "Ambient air quality standard" means any primary or  secondary standard designated as such in 9VAC5-30 (Ambient Air Quality  Standards).
    "Board" means the State Air Pollution Control Board  or its designated representative.
    "Class I area" means any prevention of significant  deterioration area (i) in which virtually any deterioration of existing air  quality is considered significant and (ii) designated as such in 9VAC5-20-205.
    "Class II area" means any prevention of significant  deterioration area (i) in which any deterioration of existing air quality  beyond that normally accompanying well-controlled growth is considered  significant and (ii) designated as such in 9VAC5-20-205.
    "Class III area" means any prevention of  significant deterioration area (i) in which deterioration of existing air  quality to the levels of the ambient air quality standards is permitted and  (ii) designated as such in 9VAC5-20-205.
    "Continuous monitoring system" means the total  equipment used to sample and condition (if applicable), to analyze, and to  provide a permanent continuous record of emissions or process parameters.
    "Control program" means a plan formulated by the  owner of a stationary source to establish pollution abatement goals, including  a compliance schedule to achieve such goals. The plan may be submitted  voluntarily, or upon request or by order of the board, to ensure compliance by  the owner with standards, policies and regulations adopted by the board. The  plan shall include system and equipment information and operating performance  projections as required by the board for evaluating the probability of  achievement. A control program shall contain the following increments of  progress:
    1. The date by which contracts for emission control system or  process modifications are to be awarded, or the date by which orders are to be  issued for the purchase of component parts to accomplish emission control or  process modification.
    2. The date by which the on-site construction or installation  of emission control equipment or process change is to be initiated.
    3. The date by which the on-site construction or installation  of emission control equipment or process modification is to be completed.
    4. The date by which final compliance is to be achieved.
    "Criteria pollutant" means any pollutant for which  an ambient air quality standard is established under 9VAC5-30 (Ambient Air  Quality Standards).
    "Day" means a 24-hour period beginning at midnight.
    "Delayed compliance order" means any order of the  board issued after an appropriate hearing to an owner which postpones the date  by which a stationary source is required to comply with any requirement  contained in the applicable implementation plan.
    "Department" means any employee or other  representative of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, as  designated by the director.
    "Director" or "executive director" means  the director of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality or a  designated representative.
    "Dispersion technique"
    1. Means any technique which attempts to affect the  concentration of a pollutant in the ambient air by:
    a. Using that portion of a stack which exceeds good  engineering practice stack height;
    b. Varying the rate of emission of a pollutant according to  atmospheric conditions or ambient concentrations of that pollutant; or
    c. Increasing final exhaust gas plume rise by manipulating  source process parameters, exhaust gas parameters, stack parameters, or  combining exhaust gases from several existing stacks into one stack; or other  selective handling of exhaust gas streams so as to increase the exhaust gas  plume rise.
    2. The preceding sentence does not include:
    a. The reheating of a gas stream, following use of a pollution  control system, for the purpose of returning the gas to the temperature at  which it was originally discharged from the facility generating the gas stream;
    b. The merging of exhaust gas streams where:
    (1) The owner demonstrates that the facility was originally  designed and constructed with such merged gas streams;
    (2) After July 8, 1985, such merging is part of a change in  operation at the facility that includes the installation of pollution controls  and is accompanied by a net reduction in the allowable emissions of a  pollutant. This exclusion from the definition of "dispersion  techniques" shall apply only to the emissions limitation for the pollutant  affected by such change in operation; or
    (3) Before July 8, 1985, such merging was part of a change in  operation at the facility that included the installation of emissions control  equipment or was carried out for sound economic or engineering reasons. Where  there was an increase in the emissions limitation or, in the event that no  emissions limitation was in existence prior to the merging, an increase in the  quantity of pollutants actually emitted prior to the merging, the board shall  presume that merging was significantly motivated by an intent to gain emissions  credit for greater dispersion. Absent a demonstration by the owner that merging  was not significantly motivated by such intent, the board shall deny credit for  the effects of such merging in calculating the allowable emissions for the  source;
    c. Smoke management in agricultural or silvicultural  prescribed burning programs;
    d. Episodic restrictions on residential woodburning and open  burning; or
    e. Techniques under subdivision 1 c of this definition which  increase final exhaust gas plume rise where the resulting allowable emissions  of sulfur dioxide from the facility do not exceed 5,000 tons per year.
    "Emergency" means a situation that immediately and  unreasonably affects, or has the potential to immediately and unreasonably  affect, public health, safety or welfare; the health of animal or plant life;  or property, whether used for recreational, commercial, industrial,  agricultural or other reasonable use.
    "Emissions limitation" means any requirement  established by the board which limits the quantity, rate, or concentration of  continuous emissions of air pollutants, including any requirements which limit  the level of opacity, prescribe equipment, set fuel specifications, or  prescribe operation or maintenance procedures to assure continuous emission reduction.
    "Emission standard" means any provision of 9VAC5-40  (Existing Stationary Sources), 9VAC5-50 (New and Modified Stationary Sources),  or 9VAC5-60 (Hazardous Air Pollutant Sources) that prescribes an emissions  limitation, or other requirements that control air pollution emissions.
    "Emissions unit" means any part of a stationary  source which emits or would have the potential to emit any air pollutant. 
    "Equivalent method" means any method of sampling  and analyzing for an air pollutant which has been demonstrated to the  satisfaction of the board to have a consistent and quantitative relationship to  the reference method under specified conditions. 
    "EPA" means the U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency or an authorized representative. 
    "Excess emissions" means emissions of air pollutant  in excess of an emission standard. 
    "Excessive concentration" is defined for the  purpose of determining good engineering practice (GEP) stack height under  subdivision 3 of the GEP definition and means: 
    1. For sources seeking credit for stack height exceeding that  established under subdivision 2 of the GEP definition, a maximum ground-level  concentration due to emissions from a stack due in whole or part to downwash,  wakes, and eddy effects produced by nearby structures or nearby terrain  features which individually is at least 40% in excess of the maximum  concentration experienced in the absence of such downwash, wakes, or eddy  effects and which contributes to a total concentration due to emissions from  all sources that is greater than an ambient air quality standard. For sources  subject to the provisions of Article 8 (9VAC5-80-1605 et seq.) of Part II of  9VAC5-80 (Permits for Stationary Sources), an excessive concentration  alternatively means a maximum ground-level concentration due to emissions from  a stack due in whole or part to downwash, wakes, or eddy effects produced by  nearby structures or nearby terrain features which individually is at least 40%  in excess of the maximum concentration experienced in the absence of the maximum  concentration experienced in the absence of such downwash, wakes, or eddy  effects and greater than a prevention of significant deterioration increment.  The allowable emission rate to be used in making demonstrations under this  provision shall be prescribed by the new source performance standard that is  applicable to the source category unless the owner demonstrates that this  emission rate is infeasible. Where such demonstrations are approved by the  board, an alternative emission rate shall be established in consultation with  the owner; 
    2. For sources seeking credit after October 11, 1983, for  increases in existing stack heights up to the heights established under  subdivision 2 of the GEP definition, either (i) a maximum ground-level  concentration due in whole or part to downwash, wakes or eddy effects as  provided in subdivision 1 of this definition, except that the emission rate  specified by any applicable implementation plan (or, in the absence of such a  limit, the actual emission rate) shall be used, or (ii) the actual presence of  a local nuisance caused by the existing stack, as determined by the board; and 
    3. For sources seeking credit after January 12, 1979, for a  stack height determined under subdivision 2 of the GEP definition where the  board requires the use of a field study or fluid model to verify GEP stack  height, for sources seeking stack height credit after November 9, 1984, based  on the aerodynamic influence of cooling towers, and for sources seeking stack  height credit after December 31, 1970, based on the aerodynamic influence of  structures not adequately represented by the equations in subdivision 2 of the  GEP definition, a maximum ground-level concentration due in whole or part to  downwash, wakes or eddy effects that is at least 40% in excess of the maximum  concentration experienced in the absence of such downwash, wakes, or eddy  effects. 
    "Existing source" means any stationary source other  than a new source or modified source. 
    "Facility" means something that is built, installed  or established to serve a particular purpose; includes, but is not limited to,  buildings, installations, public works, businesses, commercial and industrial  plants, shops and stores, heating and power plants, apparatus, processes,  operations, structures, and equipment of all types. 
    "Federal Clean Air Act" means Chapter 85  (§ 7401 et seq.) of Title 42 of the United States Code.
    "Federally enforceable" means all limitations and  conditions which are enforceable by the administrator and citizens under the  federal Clean Air Act or that are enforceable under other statutes administered  by the administrator. Federally enforceable limitations and conditions include,  but are not limited to, the following: 
    1. Emission standards, alternative emission standards,  alternative emissions limitations, and equivalent emissions limitations  established pursuant to § 112 of the federal Clean Air Act as amended in  1990.
    2. New source performance standards established pursuant to  § 111 of the federal Clean Air Act, and emission standards established  pursuant to § 112 of the federal Clean Air Act before it was amended in  1990.
    3. All terms and conditions in a federal operating permit,  including any provisions that limit a source's potential to emit, unless  expressly designated as not federally enforceable.
    4. Limitations and conditions that are part of an  implementation plan.
    5. Limitations and conditions that are part of a section  111(d) or section 111(d)/129 plan.
    6. Limitations and conditions that are part of a federal  construction permit issued under 40 CFR 52.21 or any construction permit issued  under regulations approved by EPA in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51.
    7. Limitations and conditions that are part of an operating  permit issued pursuant to a program approved by EPA into an implementation plan  as meeting EPA's minimum criteria for federal enforceability, including  adequate notice and opportunity for EPA and public comment prior to issuance of  the final permit and practicable enforceability.
    8. Limitations and conditions in a Virginia regulation or  program that has been approved by EPA under subpart E of 40 CFR Part 63 for the  purposes of implementing and enforcing § 112 of the federal Clean Air Act.
    9. Individual consent agreements issued pursuant to the legal  authority of EPA.
    "Good engineering practice" or "GEP,"  with reference to the height of the stack, means the greater of:
    1. 65 meters, measured from the ground-level elevation at the  base of the stack;
    2. a. For stacks in existence on January 12, 1979, and for  which the owner had obtained all applicable permits or approvals required under  9VAC5-80 (Permits for Stationary Sources),
    Hg = 2.5H, 
    provided the owner produces evidence that this equation was  actually relied on in establishing an emissions limitation; 
    b. For all other stacks, 
    Hg = H + 1.5L, 
    where: 
    Hg = good engineering practice stack height, measured from the  ground-level elevation at the base of the stack, 
    H = height of nearby structure(s) measured from the  ground-level elevation at the base of the stack, 
    L = lesser dimension, height or projected width, of nearby  structure(s) provided that the board may require the use of a field study or  fluid model to verify GEP stack height for the source; or 
    3. The height demonstrated by a fluid model or a field study  approved by the board, which ensures that the emissions from a stack do not  result in excessive concentrations of any air pollutant as a result of  atmospheric downwash, wakes, or eddy effects created by the source itself,  nearby structures or nearby terrain features. 
    "Hazardous air pollutant" means an air pollutant to  which no ambient air quality standard is applicable and which in the judgment  of the administrator causes, or contributes to, air pollution which may  reasonably be anticipated to result in an increase in mortality or an increase  in serious irreversible, or incapacitating reversible, illness. 
    "Implementation plan" means the portion or portions  of the state implementation plan, or the most recent revision thereof, which  has been approved under § 110 of the federal Clean Air Act, or promulgated  under § 110(c) of the federal Clean Air Act, or promulgated or approved  pursuant to regulations promulgated under § 301(d) of the federal Clean  Air Act and which implements the relevant requirements of the federal Clean Air  Act. 
    "Initial emission test" means the test required by  any regulation, permit issued pursuant to 9VAC5-80 (Permits for Stationary  Sources), control program, compliance schedule or other enforceable mechanism  for determining compliance with new or more stringent emission standards or  permit limitations or other emissions limitations requiring the installation or  modification of air pollution control equipment or implementation of a control  method. Initial emission tests shall be conducted in accordance with  9VAC5-40-30.
    "Initial performance test" means the test required  by (i) 40 CFR Part 60 for determining compliance with standards of performance,  or (ii) a permit issued pursuant to 9VAC5-80 (Permits for Stationary Sources)  for determining initial compliance with permit limitations. Initial performance  tests shall be conducted in accordance with 9VAC5-50-30 and 9VAC5-60-30.
    "Isokinetic sampling" means sampling in which the  linear velocity of the gas entering the sampling nozzle is equal to that of the  undisturbed gas stream at the sample point. 
    "Locality" means a city, town, county or other  public body created by or pursuant to state law. 
    "Maintenance area" means any geographic region of  the United States previously designated as a nonattainment area and  subsequently redesignated to attainment subject to the requirement to develop a  maintenance plan and designated as such in 9VAC5-20-203. 
    "Malfunction" means any sudden failure of air  pollution control equipment, of process equipment, or of a process to operate  in a normal or usual manner, which failure is not due to intentional misconduct  or negligent conduct on the part of the owner or other person. Failures that  are caused in part by poor maintenance or careless operation are not  malfunctions. 
    "Metropolitan statistical area" means any area  designated as such in 9VAC5-20-202. 
    "Monitoring device" means the total equipment used  to measure and record (if applicable) process parameters. 
    "Nearby" as used in the definition of good  engineering practice (GEP) is defined for a specific structure or terrain  feature and: 
    1. For purposes of applying the formulae provided in  subdivision 2 of the GEP definition means that distance up to five times the  lesser of the height or the width dimension of a structure, but not greater  than 0.8 km (1/2 mile); and 
    2. For conducting demonstrations under subdivision 3 of the  GEP definition means not greater than 0.8 km (1/2 mile), except that the  portion of a terrain feature may be considered to be nearby which falls within  a distance of up to 10 times the maximum height (Ht) of the feature, not to  exceed two miles if such feature achieves a height (Ht) 0.8 km from the stack  that is at least 40% of the GEP stack height determined by the formulae  provided in subdivision 2 b of the GEP definition or 26 meters, whichever is  greater, as measured from the ground-level elevation at the base of the stack.  The height of the structure or terrain feature is measured from the  ground-level elevation at the base of the stack. 
    "Nitrogen oxides" means all oxides of nitrogen  except nitrous oxide, as measured by test methods set forth in 40 CFR Part 60. 
    "Nonattainment area" means any area which is shown  by air quality monitoring data or, where such data are not available, which is  calculated by air quality modeling (or other methods determined by the board to  be reliable) to exceed the levels allowed by the ambient air quality standard  for a given pollutant including, but not limited to, areas designated as such  in 9VAC5-20-204. 
    "One hour" means any period of 60 consecutive  minutes. 
    "One-hour period" means any period of 60  consecutive minutes commencing on the hour. 
    "Organic compound" means any chemical compound of  carbon excluding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic disulfide, carbonic  acid, metallic carbides, metallic carbonates and ammonium carbonate. 
    "Owner" means any person, including bodies politic  and corporate, associations, partnerships, personal representatives, trustees  and committees, as well as individuals, who owns, leases, operates, controls or  supervises a source. 
    "Particulate matter" means any airborne finely  divided solid or liquid material with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 100  micrometers. 
    "Particulate matter emissions" means all finely  divided solid or liquid material, other than uncombined water, emitted to the  ambient air as measured by the applicable reference method, or an equivalent or  alternative method.
    "PM10" means particulate matter with an  aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers as measured  by the applicable reference method or an equivalent method.
    "PM10 emissions" means finely divided  solid or liquid material, with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a  nominal 10 micrometers emitted to the ambient air as measured by the applicable  reference method, or an equivalent or alternative method.
    "Performance test" means a test for determining  emissions from new or modified sources.
    "Person" means an individual, corporation,  partnership, association, a governmental body, a municipal corporation, or any  other legal entity.
    "Pollutant" means any substance the presence of  which in the outdoor atmosphere is or may be harmful or injurious to human  health, welfare or safety, to animal or plant life, or to property, or which  unreasonably interferes with the enjoyment by the people of life or property.
    "Potential to emit" means the maximum capacity of a  stationary source to emit a pollutant under its physical and operational  design. Any physical or operational limitation on the capacity of the source to  emit a pollutant, including air pollution control equipment, and restrictions  on hours of operation or on the type or amount of material combusted, stored,  or processed, shall be treated as part of its design only if the limitation or  its effect on emissions is state and federally enforceable.
    "Prevention of significant deterioration area"  means any area not designated as a nonattainment area in 9VAC5-20-204 for a  particular pollutant and designated as such in 9VAC5-20-205.
    "Proportional sampling" means sampling at a rate  that produces a constant ratio of sampling rate to stack gas flow rate. 
    "Public hearing" means, unless indicated otherwise,  an informal proceeding, similar to that provided for in § 2.2-4007.02 of  the Administrative Process Act, held to afford persons an opportunity to submit  views and data relative to a matter on which a decision of the board is  pending.
    "Reference method" means any method of sampling and  analyzing for an air pollutant as described in the following EPA regulations:
    1. For ambient air quality standards in 9VAC5-30 (Ambient Air  Quality Standards): The applicable appendix of 40 CFR Part 50 or any method  that has been designated as a reference method in accordance with 40 CFR Part  53, except that it does not include a method for which a reference designation  has been canceled in accordance with 40 CFR 53.11 or 40 CFR 53.16.
    2. For emission standards in 9VAC5-40 (Existing Stationary  Sources) and 9VAC5-50 (New and Modified Stationary Sources): Appendix M of 40  CFR Part 51 or Appendix A of 40 CFR Part 60.
    3. For emission standards in 9VAC5-60 (Hazardous Air Pollutant  Sources): Appendix B of 40 CFR Part 61 or Appendix A of 40 CFR Part 63.
    "Regional director" means the regional director of  an administrative region of the Department of Environmental Quality or a  designated representative.
    "Regulation of the board" means any regulation  adopted by the State Air Pollution Control Board under any provision of the  Code of Virginia.
    "Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air  Pollution" means 9VAC5-10 (General Definitions) through 9VAC5-80 (Permits  for Stationary Sources).
    "Reid vapor pressure" means the absolute vapor  pressure of volatile crude oil and volatile nonviscous petroleum liquids except  liquefied petroleum gases as determined by American Society for Testing and  Materials publication, "Standard Test Method for Vapor Pressure of  Petroleum Products (Reid Method)" (see 9VAC5-20-21).
    "Run" means the net period of time during which an  emission sample is collected. Unless otherwise specified, a run may be either  intermittent or continuous within the limits of good engineering practice.
    "Section 111(d) plan" means the portion or portions  of the plan, or the most recent revision thereof, which has been approved under  40 CFR 60.27(b) in accordance with § 111(d)(1) of the federal Clean Air  Act, or promulgated under 40 CFR 60.27(d) in accordance with § 111 (d)(2)  of the federal Clean Air Act, and which implements the relevant requirements of  the federal Clean Air Act. 
    "Section 111(d)/129 plan" means the portion or  portions of the plan, or the most recent revision thereof, which has been  approved under 40 CFR 60.27(b) in accordance with §§ 111(d)(1) and  129(b)(2) of the federal Clean Air Act, or promulgated under 40 CFR 60.27(d) in  accordance with §§ 111(d)(2) and 129(b)(3) of the federal Clean Air Act,  and which implements the relevant requirements of the federal Clean Air Act. 
    "Shutdown" means the cessation of operation of an  affected facility for any purpose. 
    "Source" means any one or combination of the  following: buildings, structures, facilities, installations, articles,  machines, equipment, landcraft, watercraft, aircraft or other contrivances  which contribute, or may contribute, either directly or indirectly to air  pollution. Any activity by any person that contributes, or may contribute,  either directly or indirectly to air pollution, including, but not limited to,  open burning, generation of fugitive dust or emissions, and cleaning with  abrasives or chemicals. 
    "Stack" means any point in a source designed to  emit solids, liquids or gases into the air, including a pipe or duct, but not  including flares. 
    "Stack in existence" means that the owner had: 
    1. Begun, or caused to begin, a continuous program of physical  on site construction of the stack; or 
    2. Entered into binding agreements or contractual obligations,  which could not be canceled or modified without substantial loss to the owner,  to undertake a program of construction of the stack to be completed in a  reasonable time. 
    "Standard conditions" means a temperature of 20°C  (68°F) and a pressure of 760 mm of Hg (29.92 inches of Hg). 
    "Standard of performance" means any provision of  9VAC5-50 (New and Modified Stationary Sources) which prescribes an emissions  limitation or other requirements that control air pollution emissions. 
    "Startup" means the setting in operation of an  affected facility for any purpose. 
    "State enforceable" means all limitations and  conditions which are enforceable by the board or department, including, but not  limited to, those requirements developed pursuant to 9VAC5-20-110; requirements  within any applicable regulation, order, consent agreement or variance; and any  permit requirements established pursuant to 9VAC5-80 (Permits for Stationary  Sources). 
    "State Implementation Plan" means the plan,  including the most recent revision thereof, which has been approved or  promulgated by the administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, under  § 110 of the federal Clean Air Act, and which implements the requirements  of § 110.
    "Stationary source" means any building, structure,  facility or installation which emits or may emit any air pollutant. A  stationary source shall include all of the pollutant-emitting activities which  belong to the same industrial grouping, are located on one or more contiguous  or adjacent properties, and are under the control of the same person (or  persons under common control) except the activities of any vessel.  Pollutant-emitting activities shall be considered as part of the same  industrial grouping if they belong to the same "Major Group" (i.e.,  which have the same two-digit code) as described in the Standard Industrial  Classification Manual (see 9VAC5-20-21).
    "These regulations" means 9VAC5-10 (General  Definitions) through 9VAC5-80 (Permits for Stationary Sources).
    "Total suspended particulate (TSP)" means  particulate matter as measured by the reference method described in Appendix B  of 40 CFR Part 50. 
    "True vapor pressure" means the equilibrium partial  pressure exerted by a petroleum liquid as determined in accordance with methods  described in American Petroleum Institute (API) publication, "Evaporative  Loss from External Floating-Roof Tanks" (see 9VAC5-20-21). The API  procedure may not be applicable to some high viscosity or high pour crudes.  Available estimates of true vapor pressure may be used in special cases such as  these. 
    "Urban area" means any area consisting of a core  city with a population of 50,000 or more plus any surrounding localities with a  population density of 80 persons per square mile and designated as such in  9VAC5-20-201. 
    "Vapor pressure," except where specific test  methods are specified, means true vapor pressure, whether measured directly, or  determined from Reid vapor pressure by use of the applicable nomograph in  American Petroleum Institute publication, "Evaporative Loss from  Floating-Roof Tanks" (see 9VAC5-20-21). 
    "Virginia Air Pollution Control Law" means Chapter  13 (§ 10.1-1300 et seq.) of Title 10.1 of the Code of Virginia. 
    "Volatile organic compound" means any compound of  carbon, excluding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic  carbides or carbonates, and ammonium carbonate, which participates in  atmospheric photochemical reactions. 
    1. This includes any such organic compounds which have been  determined to have negligible photochemical reactivity other than the  following: 
    a. Methane; 
    b. Ethane; 
    c. Methylene chloride (dichloromethane); 
    d. 1,1,1-trichloroethane (methyl chloroform); 
    e. 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (CFC-113); 
    f. Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11); 
    g. Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12); 
    h. Chlorodifluoromethane (H CFC-22); 
    i. Trifluoromethane (H FC-23); 
    j. 1,2-dichloro 1,1,2,2,-tetrafluoroethane (CFC-114); 
    k. Chloropentafluoroethane (CFC-115); 
    l. 1,1,1-trifluoro 2,2-dichloroethane (HCFC-123); 
    m. 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a); 
    n. 1,1-dichloro 1-fluoroethane (HCFC-141b); 
    o. 1-chloro 1,1-difluoroethane (HCFC-142b); 
    p. 2-chloro-1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HCFC-124); 
    q. Pentafluoroethane (HFC-125); 
    r. 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134); 
    s. 1,1,1-trifluoroethane (HFC-143a); 
    t. 1,1-difluoroethane (HFC-152a); 
    u. Parachlorobenzotrifluoride (PCBTF); 
    v. Cyclic, branched, or linear completely methylated  siloxanes; 
    w. Acetone; 
    x. Perchloroethylene (tetrachloroethylene); 
    y. 3,3-dichloro-1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoropropane (HCFC-225ca); 
    z. 1,3-dichloro-1,1,2,2,3-pentafluoropropane (HCFC-225cb); 
    aa. 1,1,1,2,3,4,4,5,5,5-decafluoropentane (HFC 43-10mee); 
    bb. Difluoromethane (HFC-32); 
    cc. Ethylfluoride (HFC-161); 
    dd. 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoropropane (HFC-236fa); 
    ee. 1,1,2,2,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245ca); 
    ff. 1,1,2,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245ea); 
    gg. 1,1,1,2,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245eb); 
    hh. 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa); 
    ii. 1,1,1,2,3,3-hexafluoropropane (HFC-236ea); 
    jj. 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (HFC-365mfc); 
    kk. Chlorofluoromethane (HCFC-31); 
    ll. 1 chloro-1-fluoroethane (HCFC-151a); 
    mm. 1,2-dichloro-1,1,2-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123a); 
    nn. 1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4-nonafluoro-4-methoxy-butane (C4F9OCH3  or HFE-7100); 
    oo. 2-(difluoromethoxymethyl)-1,1,1,2,3,3,3-hepta-fluoropropane  ((CF3)2CFCF2 OCH3); 
    pp. 1-ethoxy-1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4-nonafluorobutane (C4F9  OC2H5 or HFE-7200); 
    qq. 2-(ethoxydifluoromethyl)-1,1,1,2,3,3,3-hepta-fluoropropane  ((CF3)2CFCF2OC2H5); 
    rr. Methyl acetate; ss.  1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptafluoro-3-methoxy-propane (n-C3F7OCH3)  (HFE-7000); 
    tt.  3-ethoxy-1,1,1,2,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-dodecafluoro-2-(trifluoromethyl) hexane  (HFE-7500); 
    uu. 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (HFC 227ea); 
    vv. methyl formate (HCOOCH3); 
    ww. (1)  1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,5,5-decafluoro-3-methoxy-4-trifluoromethyl-pentane (HFE-7300); 
    xx. propylene carbonate;
    yy. dimethyl carbonate; and
    xx. zz. Perfluorocarbon compounds which fall  into these classes: 
    (1) Cyclic, branched, or linear, completely fluorinated  alkanes; 
    (2) Cyclic, branched, or linear, completely fluorinated ethers  with no unsaturations; 
    (3) Cyclic, branched, or linear, completely fluorinated  tertiary amines with no unsaturations; and 
    (4) Sulfur containing perfluorocarbons with no unsaturations  and with sulfur bonds only to carbon and fluorine. 
    2. For purposes of determining compliance with emissions  standards, volatile organic compounds shall be measured by the appropriate  reference method in accordance with the provisions of 9VAC5-40-30 or  9VAC5-50-30, as applicable. Where such a method also measures compounds with  negligible photochemical reactivity, these negligibly reactive compounds may be  excluded as a volatile organic compound if the amount of such compounds is  accurately quantified, and such exclusion is approved by the board. 
    3. As a precondition to excluding these compounds as volatile  organic compounds or at any time thereafter, the board may require an owner to  provide monitoring or testing methods and results demonstrating, to the  satisfaction of the board, the amount of negligibly reactive compounds in the  emissions of the source. 
    4. Exclusion of the above compounds in this definition in  effect exempts such compounds from the provisions of emission standards for  volatile organic compounds. The compounds are exempted on the basis of being so  inactive that they will not contribute significantly to the formation of ozone  in the troposphere. However, this exemption does not extend to other properties  of the exempted compounds which, at some future date, may require regulation  and limitation of their use in accordance with requirements of the federal  Clean Air Act. 
    5. The following compound is a VOC for purposes of all  recordkeeping, emissions reporting, photochemical dispersion modeling and  inventory requirements that apply to VOCs and shall be uniquely identified in  emission reports, but is not a VOC for purposes of VOC emission standards, VOC  emissions limitations, or VOC content requirements: t-butyl acetate. 
    "Welfare" means that language referring to effects  on welfare includes, but is not limited to, effects on soils, water, crops,  vegetation, man-made materials, animals, wildlife, weather, visibility and  climate, damage to and deterioration of property, and hazards to  transportation, as well as effects on economic values and on personal comfort  and well-being. 
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-1982; Filed December 15, 2009, 10:44 a.m. 
TITLE 10. FINANCE AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The  State Corporation Commission is exempt from the Administrative Process Act in  accordance with § 2.2-4002 A 2 of the Code of Virginia, which exempts  courts, any agency of the Supreme Court, and any agency that by the  Constitution is expressly granted any of the powers of a court of record.
         Title of Regulation: 10VAC5-110. Credit Counseling (adding 10VAC5-110-30).
    Statutory Authority: §§ 6.1-363.14 and 12.1-13 of  the Code of Virginia.
    Effective Date: January 1, 2010. 
    Agency Contact: Gerald Fallen, Deputy Commissioner,  Bureau of Financial Institutions, State Corporation Commission, P. O. Box 640,  Richmond, VA 23218, telephone (804) 371-9699, FAX (804) 371-9416, or email  gerald.fallen@scc.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    The State Corporation Commission is adopting a regulation  that prescribes the annual fees to be paid by credit counseling agencies  licensed under Chapter 10.2 (§ 6.1-363.2 et seq.) of Title 6.1 of the Code of  Virginia to defray the costs of their examination, supervision, and regulation.  The adopted final regulation revises the schedule contained in the proposed  version of the regulation. Under the final regulation, if a licensee maintains  less than 250 debt management plans for Virginia residents as of December 31 of  the calendar year preceding the year of assessment, the licensee will be  required to pay an annual fee of $0 plus $4.33 per debt management plan. If a licensee  maintains 250 or more debt management plans for Virginia residents as of  December 31 of the calendar year preceding the year of assessment, the licensee  will be required to pay an annual fee of $500 plus $4.33 per debt management  plan.
    AT RICHMOND, DECEMBER 9, 2009
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, ex rel.
    STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
    CASE NO. BFI-2009-00276
    Ex Parte: In re: annual fees for
  licensed credit counseling agencies 
    ORDER ADOPTING A REGULATION
    On April 17, 2009, the State Corporation Commission ("Commission")  entered an Order to Take Notice of a proposal by the Bureau of Financial  Institutions ("Bureau") to adopt a regulation pursuant to § 6.1-363.14  of the Code of Virginia.  The proposed regulation,  10 VAC 5-110-30, sets forth a schedule of annual fees to be paid by  credit counseling agencies licensed under Chapter 10.2 of Title 6.1 of the Code  of Virginia ("licensees") in order to defray the cost of their  examination, supervision, and regulation. The Order and proposed regulation  were published in the Virginia Register of Regulations on May 11, 2009, posted  on the Commission's website, and mailed to all licensees. Licensees and other  interested parties were afforded the opportunity to file written comments or  request a hearing on or before May 20, 2009.
    Comments on the proposed regulation were filed by Credit Card  Management Services, Inc., the Center for Child & Family Services d/b/a  Consumer Credit Counseling Services of Hampton Roads ("CCCSHR"),  American Debt Counseling, Inc., Family Credit Counseling Service, Inc. d/b/a  Family Credit Management Services, and Virginia State Senator John Miller.  Additionally, the American Association of Debt Management Organizations  ("AADMO") filed comments on the proposed regulation and requested a  hearing.
    On October 28, 2009, the Commission convened a hearing to  consider the adoption of the proposed regulation.  Michael Edmonds,  Executive Director of CCCSHR, offered testimony supporting the written comments  filed on behalf of CCCSHR and indicated, among other things, that (i) CCCSHR is  a non-profit agency that offers credit counseling services through nine credit  counseling employees and administers debt management plans for 496 clients,  (ii) the proposed assessment schedule unfairly imposes additional fees on the non-profit  community and penalizes smaller non-profits by charging the highest fees to  those who have fewer clients, and (iii) the Commission should consider waiving  the fee for non-profit agencies with fewer than 600 clients whose main offices  are in Virginia.
    In support of the proposed regulation, the Commissioner of  Financial Institutions expressed in a letter to AADMO dated October 16, 2009  that in addition to the direct costs associated with the examination of  licensees, the Bureau incurs other expenses including a share of the operation  and maintenance of the agency's headquarters building, the procurement,  configuration, and support of its information technology resources, legal  support, accounting, and fringe benefit administration. All of these costs are  defrayed through annual assessments and other fees paid by licensees and other  types of institutions that are supervised and regulated by the Bureau. The  Commissioner of Financial Institutions also pointed out that although Chapter  10.2 of Title 6.1 of the Code of Virginia has been in effect for five years,  licensees have yet to pay any annual fees in order to defray the costs of their  examination, supervision, and regulation.  Moreover, the Bureau has  conducted 50 examinations of licensees during this period, thereby incurring  direct and associated costs of $89,923. In addition to these examination  expenses, the Commissioner of Financial Institutions indicated that the total  annual overhead cost allocated to licensees is $36,166.
    The Bureau concluded that a total annual assessment of  $117,144 was required for the oversight of licensees and offered into the  record several proposed schedules designed to generate the target amount of  income ("Schedule" or "Schedules"). The initial Schedule,  which was set forth in the proposed regulation, prescribed a base fee of $500  plus an additional amount per debt management plan ("DMP") which  varied based on the total number of DMPs maintained by a licensee for Virginia  residents as of December 31 of the calendar year preceding the year of  assessment. At the hearing Staff counsel introduced a document containing three  alternative assessment Schedules, which was accepted into the record as Exhibit  2. The three alternative assessment Schedules contained in Exhibit 2 set forth  a base fee of either $0 or $500, plus an additional amount of between $3.93 and  $4.69 per DMP. Another alternative assessment Schedule was accepted into the  record as late-filed Exhibit 3 and set forth a base fee of either $250 (if a  licensee maintained less than 250 DMPs) or $500 (if a licensee maintained at  least 250 DMPs) plus an additional amount of $4.13 per DMP.
    NOW THE COMMISSION, having considered the proposed  regulation, the record herein, and applicable law, concludes that the proposed  regulation should be modified to reflect the second alternative described in  Exhibit 2, and that the proposed regulation, as modified, should be adopted  with an effective date of January 1, 2010. Under this alternative, a licensee  will be required to pay an annual fee that is comprised of the sum of (i) a  base fee of $0 if the licensee maintained less than 250 DMPs for Virginia  residents as of December 31 of the calendar year preceding the year of  assessment, or a base fee of $500 if the licensee maintained 250 DMPs or more  for Virginia residents as of December 31 of the calendar year preceding the  year of assessment; and (ii) $4.33 per DMP maintained by the licensee for  Virginia residents as of December 31 of the calendar year preceding the year of  assessment.
    Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED  THAT:
    (1) The proposed regulation, 10 VAC 5-110-30, as modified  herein and attached hereto, is adopted effective January 1, 2010.
    (2) This Order and the attached regulation shall be posted on  the Commission's website at http://www.scc.virginia.gov/case.
    (3) The Commission's Division of Information Resources shall  send a copy of this Order, including a copy of the attached regulation, to the  Virginia Registrar of Regulations for publication in the Virginia Register of  Regulations.
    (4) This case is dismissed from the Commission's docket of  active cases.
    AN ATTESTED COPY hereof shall be sent by the Clerk of the  Commission to:  Paul Donohue, Credit Card Management Services, Inc., 4611  Okeechobee Boulevard, Suite 114, West Palm Beach, Florida 33417; Michael  Edmonds, Executive Director, Center for Child & Family Services d/b/a  Consumer Credit Counseling Services of Hampton Roads, P.O. Box 7315, 2021  Cunningham Drive, Suite 400, Hampton, Virginia 23666; Alan Silverberg, Chief  Executive Officer, American Debt Counseling, Inc., 14051 NW 14th  Street, Sunrise, Florida 33323; Patrick F. Steva, Legal Compliance Coordinator,  Family Credit Counseling Service, Inc. d/b/a Family Credit Management Services,  4306 Charles Street, Rockford, Illinois 61108; Mark Guimond, Executive  Director, American Association of Debt Management Organizations, 5210  Laurelwood Drive, Kingwood, Texas 77345; and to the Commissioner of Financial  Institutions, who shall mail a copy of this Order and the attached regulation  to all licensed credit counseling agencies and any applicants currently seeking  a license under Chapter 10.2 of Title 6.1 of the Code of Virginia.
    10VAC5-110-30. Schedule of annual fees for the examination,  supervision, and regulation of credit counseling agencies.
    Pursuant to § 6.1-363.14 of the Code of Virginia, the  commission sets the following schedule of annual fees to be paid by persons  licensed under Chapter 10.2 (§ 6.1-363.2 et seq.) of Title 6.1 of the Code  of Virginia. The fees are to defray the costs of examination, supervision, and  regulation of licensees by the Bureau of Financial Institutions.
    SCHEDULE
    [ The annual fee shall be $500 plus the following  additional amount based on the total number of debt management plans maintained  in Virginia as of December 31 of the calendar year preceding the year of  assessment:
           | Total Number of Debt    Management Plans
 | Amount
 | 
       | Less than 501
 | $5.00 per debt management    plan
 | 
       | 501 to 1,000
 | $4.00 per debt management    plan
 | 
       | 1,001 to 2,000
 | $3.00 per debt management    plan
 | 
       | 2,001 to 3,000
 | $2.50 per debt management    plan
 | 
       | Over 3,000
 | $2.00 per debt management    plan
 | 
  
    If a licensee maintained less than 250 debt management  plans for Virginia residents as of December 31 of the calendar year preceding  the year of assessment, the licensee shall pay an annual fee of $0 plus $4.33  per debt management plan. 
    If a licensee maintained 250 or more debt management plans  for Virginia residents as of December 31 of the calendar year preceding the  year of assessment, the licensee shall pay an annual fee of $500 plus $4.33 per  debt management plan. ] 
    The fee assessed using the above schedule shall be rounded  down to the nearest whole dollar.
    Fees shall be assessed on or before June 1 for the current  calendar year. The fee shall be paid on or before July 1.
    The annual report, due March 25 each year, of each  licensee provides the basis for its assessment. In cases where a license has  been granted between January 1 and March 25 [ of the year of  assessment ], the licensee's [ initial ] annual fee  shall be $250.
    Fees prescribed and assessed by this schedule are apart  from, and do not include, the reimbursement for expenses permitted by  subsection B of § 6.1-363.14 of the Code of Virginia.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R09-1919; Filed December 16, 2009, 10:31 a.m. 
TITLE 13. HOUSING
VIRGINIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The  Virginia Housing Development Authority is exempt from the Administrative  Process Act (§ 2.2-4000 et seq. of the Code of Virginia) pursuant to § 2.2-4002  A 4; however, under the provisions of § 2.2-4031, it is required to  publish all proposed and final regulations.
         Title of Regulation: 13VAC10-180. Rules and  Regulations for Allocation of Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (amending 13VAC10-180-60; repealing  13VAC10-180-80).
    Statutory Authority: § 36-55.30:3 of the Code of  Virginia.
    Effective Date: January 1, 2010.
    Agency Contact: J. Judson McKellar, Jr., General  Counsel, Virginia Housing Development Authority, 601 South Belvidere Street,  Richmond, VA 23220, telephone (804) 343-5540, or email  judson.mckellar@vhda.com.
    Summary:
    The amendments (i) add a source of financing to the  subsidized funding category, (ii) add a negative point category to discourage  construction of new rental space in areas anticipated to have little or no  increase in rent-burdened households, (iii) add a point category to encourage  new rental space in urban development growth areas or zoned areas with an  affordable dwelling unit bonus, (iv) revise the amenity category for high  efficiency heat pumps and gas furnaces, (v) add a point amenity category for  geothermal heat pump systems, (vi) add a point amenity category for solar  electric systems, (vii) revise the point category for units for persons with  disabilities with federal project-based subsidy, (viii) delete the point  category for a LEED-certified design team member, (ix) suspend the preservation  pool for credit year 2010, and (x) make other miscellaneous administrative  clarification changes.
    13VAC10-180-60. Review and selection of applications;  reservation of credits.
    The executive director may divide the amount of credits into  separate pools and each separate pool may be further divided into separate  tiers. The division of such pools and tiers may be based upon one or more of  the following factors: geographical areas of the state; types or  characteristics of housing, construction, financing, owners, occupants, or source  of credits; or any other factors deemed appropriate by him to best meet the  housing needs of the Commonwealth.
    An amount, as determined by the executive director, not less  than 10% of the Commonwealth's annual state housing credit ceiling for credits,  shall be available for reservation and allocation to buildings or developments  with respect to which the following requirements are met:
    1. A "qualified nonprofit organization" (as  described in § 42(h)(5)(C) of the IRC) which is authorized to do business  in Virginia and is determined by the executive director, on the basis of such  relevant factors as he shall consider appropriate, to be substantially based or  active in the community of the development and is to materially participate  (regular, continuous and substantial involvement as determined by the executive  director) in the development and operation of the development throughout the  "compliance period" (as defined in § 42(i)(1) of the IRC); and
    2. (i) The "qualified nonprofit organization"  described in the preceding subdivision 1 is to own (directly or through a  partnership), prior to the reservation of credits to the buildings or  development, all of the general partnership interests of the ownership entity  thereof; (ii) the executive director of the authority shall have determined  that such qualified nonprofit organization is not affiliated with or controlled  by a for-profit organization; (iii) the executive director of the authority  shall have determined that the qualified nonprofit organization was not formed  by one or more individuals or for-profit entities for the principal purpose of  being included in any nonprofit pools (as defined below) established by the  executive director, and (iv) the executive director of the authority shall have  determined that no staff member, officer or member of the board of directors of  such qualified nonprofit organization will materially participate, directly or  indirectly, in the proposed development as a for-profit entity.
    In making the determinations required by the preceding  subdivision 1 and clauses (ii), (iii) and (iv) of subdivision 2 of this  section, the executive director may apply such factors as he deems relevant,  including, without limitation, the past experience and anticipated future  activities of the qualified nonprofit organization, the sources and manner of  funding of the qualified nonprofit organization, the date of formation and  expected life of the qualified nonprofit organization, the number of paid staff  members and volunteers of the qualified nonprofit organization, the nature and  extent of the qualified nonprofit organization's proposed involvement in the  construction or rehabilitation and the operation of the proposed development,  the relationship of the staff, directors or other principals involved in the  formation or operation of the qualified nonprofit organization with any persons  or entities to be involved in the proposed development on a for-profit basis,  and the proposed involvement in the construction or rehabilitation and  operation of the proposed development by any persons or entities involved in  the proposed development on a for-profit basis. The executive director may  include in the application of the foregoing factors any other nonprofit  organizations which, in his determination, are related (by shared directors,  staff or otherwise) to the qualified nonprofit organization for which such  determination is to be made.
    For purposes of the foregoing requirements, a qualified  nonprofit organization shall be treated as satisfying such requirements if any  qualified corporation (as defined in § 42(h)(5)(D)(ii) of the IRC) in  which such organization (by itself or in combination with one or more qualified  nonprofit organizations) holds 100% of the stock satisfies such requirements.
    The applications shall include such representations and  warranties and such information as the executive director may require in order  to determine that the foregoing requirements have been satisfied. In no event  shall more than 90% of the Commonwealth's annual state housing credit ceiling  for credits be available for developments other than those satisfying the  preceding requirements. The executive director may establish such pools  (nonprofit pools) of credits as he may deem appropriate to satisfy the  foregoing requirement. If any such nonprofit pools are so established, the  executive director may rank the applications therein and reserve credits to  such applications before ranking applications and reserving credits in other  pools, and any such applications in such nonprofit pools not receiving any  reservations of credits or receiving such reservations in amounts less than the  full amount permissible hereunder (because there are not enough credits then  available in such nonprofit pools to make such reservations) shall be assigned  to such other pool as shall be appropriate hereunder; provided, however, that  if credits are later made available (pursuant to the IRC or as a result of  either a termination or reduction of a reservation of credits made from any  nonprofit pools or a rescission in whole or in part of an allocation of credits  made from such nonprofit pools or otherwise) for reservation and allocation by  the authority during the same calendar year as that in which applications in  the nonprofit pools have been so assigned to other pools as described above,  the executive director may, in such situations, designate all or any portion of  such additional credits for the nonprofit pools (or for any other pools as he  shall determine) and may, if additional credits have been so designated for the  nonprofit pools, reassign such applications to such nonprofit pools, rank the  applications therein and reserve credits to such applications in accordance  with the IRC and this chapter. In the event that during any round (as  authorized hereinbelow) of application review and ranking the amount of credits  reserved within such nonprofit pools is less than the total amount of credits  made available therein, the executive director may either (i) leave such  unreserved credits in such nonprofit pools for reservation and allocation in  any subsequent round or rounds or (ii) redistribute, to the extent permissible  under the IRC, such unreserved credits to such other pool or pools as the  executive director shall designate reservations therefore in the full amount  permissible hereunder (which applications shall hereinafter be referred to as  "excess qualified applications") or (iii) carry over such unreserved  credits to the next succeeding calendar year for the inclusion in the state  housing credit ceiling (as defined in § 42(h)(3)(C) of the IRC) for such  year. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, no reservation of  credits shall be made from any nonprofit pools to any application with respect  to which the qualified nonprofit organization has not yet been legally formed  in accordance with the requirements of the IRC. In addition, no application for  credits from any nonprofit pools or any combination of pools may receive a  reservation or allocation of annual credits in an amount greater than $750,000  unless credits remain available in such nonprofit pools after all eligible  applications for credits from such nonprofit pools receive a reservation of  credits.
    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, applicants  relying on the experience of a local housing authority for developer experience  points described hereinbelow and/or using Hope VI funds from HUD in connection  with the proposed development shall not be eligible to receive a reservation of  credits from any nonprofit pools.
    The authority shall review each application, and, based on  the application and other information available to the authority, shall assign  points to each application as follows:
    1. Readiness.
    a. Written evidence satisfactory to the authority of  unconditional approval by local authorities of the plan of development or site  plan for the proposed development or that such approval is not required. (40  points; applicants receiving points under this subdivision 1 a are not eligible  for points under subdivision 5 a below)
    b. Written evidence satisfactory to the authority (i) of  proper zoning or special use permit for such site or (ii) that no zoning  requirements or special use permits are applicable. (40 points)
    2. Housing needs characteristics.
    a. Submission of the form prescribed by the authority with any  required attachments, providing such information necessary for the authority to  send a letter addressed to the current chief executive officer (or the  equivalent) of the locality in which the proposed development is located,  soliciting input on the proposed development from the locality within the  deadlines established by the executive director. (minus 50 points for failure  to make timely submission)
    b. (1) A letter dated within three months prior to the  application deadline addressed to the authority and signed by the chief  executive officer of the locality in which the proposed development is to be  located stating, without qualification or limitation, the following:
    "The construction or rehabilitation of (name of  development) and the allocation of federal housing tax credits available under  IRC Section 42 for that development will help meet the housing needs and  priorities of (name of locality). Accordingly, (name of locality) supports the  allocation of federal housing tax credits requested by (name of applicant) for  that development." (50 points)
    (2) No letter from the chief executive officer of the locality  in which the proposed development is to be located, or a letter addressed to  the authority and signed by such chief executive officer stating neither  support (as described in subdivision b (1) above) nor opposition (as described  in subdivision b (3) below) as to the allocation of credits to the applicant  for the development. (25 points)
    (3) A letter in response to its notification to the chief  executive officer of the locality in which the proposed development is to be  located opposing the allocation of credits to the applicant for the  development. In any such letter, the chief executive officer must certify that  the proposed development is not consistent with current zoning or other  applicable land use regulations. (0 points)
    c. Documentation in a form approved by the authority from the  chief executive officer (or the equivalent) of the local jurisdiction in which  the development is to be located (including the certification described in the  definition of revitalization area in 13VAC10-180-10) that the area in which the  proposed development is to be located is a revitalization area and the proposed  development is an integral part of the local government's plan for  revitalization of the area. (30 points)
    d. If the proposed development is located in a qualified  census tract as defined in § 42(d)(5)(C)(ii) of the IRC and is in a  revitalization area. (5 points)
    e. Commitment by the applicant to give leasing preference to  individuals and families (i) on public housing waiting lists maintained by the  local housing authority operating in the locality in which the proposed  development is to be located and notification of the availability of such units  to the local housing authority by the applicant or (ii) on section 8 (as  defined in 13VAC10-180-90) waiting lists maintained by the local or nearest  section 8 administrator for the locality in which the proposed development is  to be located and notification of the availability of such units to the local  section 8 administrator by the applicant. (10 points; Applicants receiving  points under this subdivision may not require an annual minimum income  requirement for prospective tenants that exceeds the greater of $3,600 or 2.5  times the portion of rent to be paid by such tenants.)
    f. Any of the following: (i) firm financing commitment(s) from  the local government, local housing authority, Federal Home Loan Bank  affordable housing funds, Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Behavioral  Health and [ Development Developmental ] Services  funds from Item 315-Z of the 2008-2010 Appropriation Act, or the Rural  Development for a below-market rate loan or grant or Rural Development's  interest credit used to reduce the interest rate on the loan financing the  proposed development; (ii) a resolution passed by the locality in which the  proposed development is to be located committing such financial support to the  development in a form approved by the authority; or (iii) a commitment to  donate land, buildings or waive tap fee waivers from the local government. (The  amount of such financing or dollar value of local support will be divided by  the total development sources of funds and the proposed development receives two  points for each percentage point up to a maximum of 40 points.)
    g. Any development subject to (i) HUD's Section 8 or Section  236 programs or (ii) Rural Development's 515 program, at the time of  application. (20 points, unless the applicant is, or has any common interests  with, the current owner, directly or indirectly, the application will only  qualify for these points if the applicant waives all rights to any developer's  fee and any other fees associated with the acquisition and rehabilitation (or  rehabilitation only) of the development unless permitted by the executive  director for good cause.)
    h. Any development receiving (i) a real estate tax abatement  on the increase in the value of the development or (ii) new project-based  subsidy from HUD or Rural Development for the greater of 5 units or 10% of the  units of the proposed development. (10 points)
    i. Any proposed development located in a census tract that has  less than a 10% poverty rate (based upon Census Bureau data) with no other tax  credit units in such census tract. (25 points)
    j. Any proposed development listed in the top 25 developments  identified by Rural Development as high priority for rehabilitation at the time  the application is submitted to the authority. (15 points)
    k. Any proposed new construction development (including  adaptive re-use and rehabilitation that creates additional rental space)  located in a pool identified by the authority as a pool with little or no  increase in rent-burdened population. (up to minus 20 points, depending upon  the portion of the development that is additional rental space, in all pools  except the at-large pool, 0 points in the at-large pool. The executive director  may make exceptions in the following circumstances:
    (1) Specialized types of housing designed to meet special  needs that cannot readily be addressed utilizing existing residential  structures;
    (2) Housing designed to serve as a replacement for housing  being demolished through redevelopment; or
    (3) Housing that is an integral part of a neighborhood  revitalization project sponsored by a local housing authority.)
    l. Any proposed new construction development (including  adaptive re-use and rehabilitation that creates additional rental space) that  is located in a pool identified by the authority as a pool with an increasing  rent-burdened population and is also in an urban development area as defined in  § 15.2-2223.1 of the Code of Virginia or participating in a locally  adopted affordable housing dwelling unit program as described in either  § 15.2-2304 or 15.2-2305 of the Code of Virginia. (up to 20 points,  depending upon the portion of the development that is additional rental space,  in all pools except the at-large pool, 0 points in the at-large pool)
    3. Development characteristics.
    a. The average unit size. (100 points multiplied by the sum of  the products calculated by multiplying, for each unit type as defined by the  number of bedrooms per unit, (i) the quotient of the number of units of a given  unit type divided by the total number of units in the proposed development,  times (ii) the quotient of the average actual gross square footage per unit for  a given unit type minus the lowest gross square footage per unit for a given  unit type established by the executive director divided by the highest gross  square footage per unit for a given unit type established by the executive  director minus the lowest gross square footage per unit for a given unit type  established by the executive director. If the average actual gross square  footage per unit for a given unit type is less than the lowest gross square  footage per unit for a given unit type established by the executive director or  greater than the highest gross square footage per unit for a given unit type  established by the executive director, the lowest or highest, as the case may  be, gross square footage per unit for a given unit type established by the  executive director shall be used in the above calculation rather than the  actual gross square footage per unit for a given unit type.)
    b. Evidence satisfactory to the authority documenting the  quality of the proposed development's amenities as determined by the following:
    (1) The following points are available for any application:
    (a) If 2-bedroom units have 1.5 bathrooms and 3-bedroom units  have 2 bathrooms. (15 points multiplied by the percentage of units meeting  these requirements)
    (b) If a community/meeting room with a minimum of 749 square  feet is provided. (5 points)
    (c) Brick covering 30% or more of the exterior walls. (20  points times the percentage of exterior walls covered by brick)
    (d) If all kitchen and laundry appliances meet the EPA's  Energy Star qualified program requirements. (5 points)
    (e) If all the windows meet the EPA's Energy Star qualified  program requirements. (5 points)
    (f) If every unit in the development is heated and air  conditioned cooled with either (i) heat pump units equipment  with both a SEER rating of 14.0 15.0 or more and a HSPF rating of  8.2 8.5 or more and a variable speed air handling unit or  thru-the-wall heat pump equipment that has an EER rating of 11.0 or more or  (ii) air conditioning units equipment with a SEER rating of 14.0  15.0 or more and a variable speed air handling unit, combined  with a gas furnace with an AFUE rating of 90% or more. (10 points)
    (g) If the water expense is submetered (the tenant will pay  monthly or bimonthly bill). (5 points)
    (h) If each bathroom contains only low-flow faucets and  showerheads as defined by the authority. (3 points)
    (i) If each unit is provided with the necessary infrastructure  for high-speed cable, DSL or wireless Internet service. (1 point)
    (j) Beginning January 1, 2009, if If all the  water heaters meet the EPA's Energy Star qualified program requirements. (5  points)
    (k) If every unit in the development is heated and cooled  with a geothermal heat pump that meets the EPA's Energy Star qualified program  requirements. (5 points)
    (l) If the development has a solar electric system that  will remain unshaded year-round, be oriented to within 15 degrees of true  south, and be angled horizontally within 15 degrees of latitude. (1 point for  each 2.0% of the development's electrical load that can be met by the solar  electric system, up to 5 points)
    (2) The following points are available to applications  electing to serve elderly and/or physically disabled tenants:
    (a) If all cooking ranges have front controls. (1 point)
    (b) If all units have an emergency call system. (3 points)
    (c) If all bathrooms have an independent or supplemental heat  source. (1 point)
    (d) If all entrance doors to each unit have two eye viewers,  one at 48 inches and the other at standard height. (1 point)
    (3) If the structure is historic, by virtue of being listed  individually in the National Register of Historic Places, or due to its  location in a registered historic district and certified by the Secretary of  the Interior as being of historical significance to the district, and the  rehabilitation will be completed in such a manner as to be eligible for  historic rehabilitation tax credits. (5 points)
    The maximum number of points that may be awarded under any  combination of the scoring categories under subdivision 3 b of this section is 60  70 points.
    c. Any nonelderly development in which (i) the greater  of 5 units or 10% of the units (i) provide will be subject to  federal project-based rent subsidies or equivalent assistance in order to  ensure occupancy by extremely low-income persons; and (ii) the  greater of 5 units or 10% of the units will conform to HUD regulations  interpreting the accessibility requirements of § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act;  and (iii) are be actively marketed to people with special needs  in accordance with a plan submitted as part of the application for credits (if  special needs includes mobility impairments (all the units described  in (ii) above must include roll-in showers and roll-under sinks and ranges)  ranges, unless agreed to by the authority prior to the applicant's  submission of its application). (50 points)
    d. Any nonelderly development in which the greater of 5 units  or 10% of the units (i) have rents within HUD's Housing Choice Voucher (HCV)  payment standard; (ii) conform to HUD regulations interpreting the  accessibility requirements of § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act; and (iii) are  actively marketed to people with mobility impairments including HCV holders in accordance  with a plan submitted as part of the application for credits. (30 points)
    e. Any nonelderly development in which 4.0% of the units (i)  conform to HUD regulations interpreting the accessibility requirements of § 504  of the Rehabilitation Act and (ii) are actively marketed to people with  mobility impairments in accordance with a plan submitted as part of the  application for credits. (15 points)
    f. Any development located within one-half mile of an existing  commuter rail, light rail or subway station or one-quarter mile of one or more  existing public bus stops. (10 points, unless the development is located within  the geographical area established by the executive director for a pool of  credits for northern Virginia, in which case, the development will receive 20  points if the development is ranked against other developments in such northern  Virginia pool, 10 points if the development is ranked against other  developments in any other pool of credits established by the executive  director)
    g. Any development for which the applicant agrees to obtain  either (i) EarthCraft certification or (ii) US Green Building Council LEED  green-building certification prior to the issuance of an IRS Form 8609 with the  proposed development's architect certifying in the application that the  development's design will meet the criteria for such certification, provided  that the proposed development's architect is on the Authority's list of  LEED/EarthCraft certified architects. The executive director may, if needed,  designate a proposed development as requiring an increase in credit in order to  be financially feasible and such development shall be treated as if in a  difficult development area as provided in the IRC for any applicant receiving  points under this subdivision and 60 points under either subdivision 7 a or b  of this section, provided however, any resulting increase in such development's  eligible basis shall be limited to 5.0% of the development's eligible basis.  (30 points)
    h. Any development for which the applicant agrees to use an  authority-certified property manager to manage the development. (25 points)
    i. If units are constructed to meet the authority's universal  design standards, provided that the proposed development's architect is on the  Authority's list of universal design certified architects. (15 points, if all  the units in an elderly development meet this requirement; 15 points multiplied  by the percentage of units meeting this requirement for nonelderly  developments)
    j. Any development in which the applicant proposes to produce  less than 100 low-income housing units. (20 points for producing 50 low-income  housing units or less, minus.4 points for each additional low-income housing  unit produced down to 0 points for any development that produces 100 or more low-income  housing units.) 
    4. Tenant population characteristics. Commitment by the  applicant to give a leasing preference to individuals and families with  children in developments that will have no more than 20% of its units with one  bedroom or less. (15 points; plus 0.75 points for each percent of the  low-income units in the development with three or more bedrooms up to an  additional 15 points for a total of no more than 30 points)
    5. Sponsor characteristics.
    a. Evidence that the principal or principals, as a group or  individually, for the proposed development have developed, as controlling  general partner or managing member, (i) at least three tax credit developments  that contain at least three times the number of housing units in the proposed  development or (ii) at least six tax credit developments that contain at least  the number of housing units in the proposed development. (50 points; applicants  receiving points under this subdivision 5 a are not eligible for points under  subdivision 1 a above)
    b. Evidence that the principal or principals for the proposed  development have developed at least one tax credit development that contains at  least the number of housing units in the proposed development. (10 points)
    c. Any applicant that includes a principal that was a  principal in a development at the time the authority reported such development  to the IRS for an uncorrected life-threatening hazard under HUD's Uniform  Physical Condition Standards. (minus 50 points for a period of three years  after the violation has been corrected)
    d. Any applicant that includes a principal that was a  principal in a development that either (i) at the time the authority  reported such development to the IRS for noncompliance that has not been  had not corrected such noncompliance by the time a Form 8823 is  was filed by the authority or (ii) remained out-of-compliance with  the terms of its extended use commitment after notice and expiration of any  cure period set by the authority. (minus 15 points for a period of three  years after the time the authority filed Form 8823 or expiration of such  cure period, unless the executive director determines that such principal's  attempts to correct such noncompliance was prohibited by a court, local  government or governmental agency, in which case, no negative points will be  assessed to the applicant)
    e. Any applicant that includes a principal that is or was a  principal in a development that (i) did not build a development as represented  in the application for credit (minus two times the number of points assigned to  the item or items not built or minus 20 points for failing to provide a minimum  building requirement, for a period of three years after the last Form 8609 is  issued for the development, in addition to any other penalties the authority  may seek under its agreements with the applicant), or (ii) has a reservation of  credits terminated by the authority (minus 10 points a period of three years  after the credits are returned to the authority).
    f. Any applicant that includes a management company in its  application that is rated unsatisfactory by the executive director or if the  ownership of any applicant includes a principal that is or was a principal in a  development that hired a management company to manage a tax credit development  after such management company received a rating of unsatisfactory from the  executive director during the compliance period and extended use period of such  development. (minus 25 points)
    g. Evidence that a US Green Building Council LEED certified  design professional participated in the design of the proposed development. (10  points)
    6. Efficient use of resources.
    a. The percentage by which the total of the amount of credits  per low-income housing unit (the "per unit credit amount") of the  proposed development is less than the standard per unit credit amounts  established by the executive director for a given unit type, based upon the  number of such unit types in the proposed development. (180 points multiplied  by the percentage by which the total amount of the per unit credit amount of  the proposed development is less than the applicable standard per unit credit  amount established by the executive director, negative points will be assessed  using the percentage by which the total amount of the per unit credit amount of  the proposed development exceeds the applicable standard per unit credit amount  established by the executive director.)
    b. The percentage by which the cost per low-income housing  unit (the "per unit cost"), adjusted by the authority for location,  of the proposed development is less than the standard per unit cost amounts  established by the executive director for a given unit type, based upon the  number of such unit types in the proposed development. (75 points multiplied by  the percentage by which the total amount of the per unit cost of the proposed  development is less than the applicable standard per unit cost amount  established by the executive director.)
    The executive director may use a standard per square foot  credit amount and a standard per square foot cost amount in establishing the  per unit credit amount and the per unit cost amount in subdivision 6 above. For  the purpose of calculating the points to be assigned pursuant to such  subdivision 6 above, all credit amounts shall include any credits previously  allocated to the development, and the per unit credit amount for any building  documented by the applicant to be located in both a revitalization area and  either (i) a qualified census tract or (ii) difficult development area (such  tract or area being as defined in the IRC) shall be determined based upon 100%  of the eligible basis of such building, in the case of new construction, or  100% of the rehabilitation expenditures, in the case of rehabilitation of an  existing building, notwithstanding any use by the applicant of 130% of such  eligible basis or rehabilitation expenditures in determining the amount of  credits as provided in the IRC.
    7. Bonus points.
    a. Commitment by the applicant to impose income limits on the  low-income housing units throughout the extended use period (as defined in the  IRC) below those required by the IRC in order for the development to be a  qualified low-income development. Applicants receiving points under this  subdivision a may not receive points under subdivision b below. (The product of  (i) 50 points multiplied by (ii) the percentage of housing units in the  proposed development both rent restricted to and occupied by households at or  below 50% of the area median gross income; plus 1 point for each percentage  point of such housing units in the proposed development which are further  restricted to rents at or below 30% of 40% of the area median gross income up  to an additional 10 points.)
    b. Commitment by the applicant to impose rent limits on the  low-income housing units throughout the extended use period (as defined in the  IRC) below those required by the IRC in order for the development to be a  qualified low-income development. Applicants receiving points under this  subdivision b may not receive points under subdivision a above. (The product of  (i) 25 points (50 points for proposed developments in low-income jurisdictions)  multiplied by (ii) the percentage of housing units in the proposed development  rent restricted to households at or below 50% of the area median gross income;  plus 1 point for each percentage point of such housing units in the proposed  development which are further restricted to rents at or below 30% of 40% of the  area median gross income up to an additional 10 points.)
    c. Commitment by the applicant to maintain the low-income  housing units in the development as a qualified low-income housing development  beyond the 30-year extended use period (as defined in the IRC). Applicants  receiving points under this subdivision c may not receive bonus points under  subdivision d below. (40 points for a 10-year commitment beyond the 30-year  extended use period or 50 points for a 20-year commitment beyond the 30-year  extended use period.)
    d. Participation by a local housing authority or qualified  nonprofit organization (substantially based or active in the community with at  least a 10% ownership interest in the general partnership interest of the  partnership) and a commitment by the applicant to sell the proposed development  pursuant to an executed, recordable option or right of first refusal to such  local housing authority or qualified nonprofit organization or to a wholly  owned subsidiary of such organization or authority, at the end of the 15-year  compliance period, as defined by IRC, for a price not to exceed the outstanding  debt and exit taxes of the for-profit entity. The applicant must record such  option or right of first refusal immediately after the low-income housing  commitment described in 13VAC10-180-70 and give the qualified nonprofit veto  power over any refinancing of the development. Applicants receiving points  under this subdivision d may not receive bonus points under subdivision c  above. (60 points; plus 5 points if the local housing authority or qualified  nonprofit organization submits a homeownership plan satisfactory to the  authority in which the local housing authority or qualified nonprofit  organization commits to sell the units in the development to tenants.)
    In calculating the points for subdivisions 7 a and b above,  any units in the proposed development required by the locality to exceed 60% of  the area median gross income will not be considered when calculating the  percentage of low-income units of the proposed development with incomes below  those required by the IRC in order for the development to be a qualified low-income  development, provided that the locality submits evidence satisfactory to the  authority of such requirement.
    After points have been assigned to each application in the  manner described above, the executive director shall compute the total number  of points assigned to each such application. Any application that is assigned a  total number of points less than a threshold amount of 450 points for  calendar year 2008, and 500 points after January 1, 2009 (425 (475  points for developments financed with tax-exempt bonds in such amount so as not  to require under the IRC an allocation of credits hereunder for calendar  year 2008, and 475 points for such developments after January 1, 2009),)  shall be rejected from further consideration hereunder and shall not be eligible  for any reservation or allocation of credits.
    During its review of the submitted applications, the  authority may conduct its own analysis of the demand for the housing units to  be produced by each applicant's proposed development. Notwithstanding any  conclusion in the market study submitted with an application, if the authority  determines that, based upon information from its own loan portfolio or its own  market study, inadequate demand exists for the housing units to be produced by  an applicant's proposed development, the authority may exclude and disregard  the application for such proposed development.
    The executive director may exclude and disregard any  application which he determines is not submitted in good faith or which he  determines would not be financially feasible.
    Upon assignment of points to all of the applications, the  executive director shall rank the applications based on the number of points so  assigned. If any pools shall have been established, each application shall be  assigned to a pool and, if any, to the appropriate tier within such pool and  shall be ranked within such pool or tier, if any. The amount of credits made  available to each pool will be determined by the executive director. Available  credits will include unreserved per capita dollar amount credits from the  current calendar year under § 42(h)(3)(C)(i) of the IRC, any unreserved per  capita credits from previous calendar years, and credits returned to the  authority prior to the final ranking of the applications and may include up to  10% of next calendar year's per capita credits as shall be determined by the  executive director. Those applications assigned more points shall be ranked  higher than those applications assigned fewer points. However, if any  set-asides established by the executive director cannot be satisfied after  ranking the applications based on the number of points, the executive director  may rank as many applications as necessary to meet the requirements of such  set-aside (selecting the highest ranked application, or applications, meeting  the requirements of the set-aside) over applications with more points.
    In the event of a tie in the number of points assigned to two  or more applications within the same pool, or, if none, within the  Commonwealth, and in the event that the amount of credits available for  reservation to such applications is determined by the executive director to be  insufficient for the financial feasibility of all of the developments described  therein, the authority shall, to the extent necessary to fully utilize the  amount of credits available for reservation within such pool or, if none,  within the Commonwealth, select one or more of the applications with the  highest combination of points from subdivision 7 above, and each application so  selected shall receive (in order based upon the number of such points,  beginning with the application with the highest number of such points) a  reservation of credits. If two or more of the tied applications receive the  same number of points from subdivision 7 above and if the amount of credits  available for reservation to such tied applications is determined by the  executive director to be insufficient for the financial feasibility of all the  developments described therein, the executive director shall select one or more  of such applications by lot, and each application so selected by lot shall  receive (in order of such selection by lot) a reservation of credits.
    For each application which may receive a reservation of  credits, the executive director shall determine the amount, as of the date of  the deadline for submission of applications for reservation of credits, to be  necessary for the financial feasibility of the development and its viability as  a qualified low-income development throughout the credit period under the IRC.  In making this determination, the executive director shall consider the sources  and uses of the funds, the available federal, state and local subsidies  committed to the development, the total financing planned for the development  as well as the investment proceeds or receipts expected by the authority to be  generated with respect to the development, and the percentage of the credit  dollar amount used for development costs other than the costs of  intermediaries. He shall also examine the development's costs, including  developer's fees and other amounts in the application, for reasonableness and,  if he determines that such costs or other amounts are unreasonably high, he  shall reduce them to amounts that he determines to be reasonable. The executive  director shall review the applicant's projected rental income, operating  expenses and debt service for the credit period. The executive director may  establish such criteria and assumptions as he shall deem reasonable for the  purpose of making such determination, including, without limitation, criteria  as to the reasonableness of fees and profits and assumptions as to the amount  of net syndication proceeds to be received (based upon such percentage of the  credit dollar amount used for development costs, other than the costs of  intermediaries, as the executive director shall determine to be reasonable for  the proposed development), increases in the market value of the development,  and increases in operating expenses, rental income and, in the case of applications  without firm financing commitments (as defined hereinabove) at fixed interest  rates, debt service on the proposed mortgage loan. The executive director may,  if he deems it appropriate, consider the development to be a part of a larger  development. In such a case, the executive director may consider, examine,  review and establish any or all of the foregoing items as to the larger  development in making such determination for the development.
    At such time or times during each calendar year as the  executive director shall designate, the executive director shall reserve  credits to applications in descending order of ranking within each pool and  tier, if applicable, until either substantially all credits therein are  reserved or all qualified applications therein have received reservations. (For  the purpose of the preceding sentence, if there is not more than a de minimis  amount, as determined by the executive director, of credits remaining in a pool  after reservations have been made, "substantially all" of the credits  in such pool shall be deemed to have been reserved.) The executive director may  rank the applications within pools at different times for different pools and  may reserve credits, based on such rankings, one or more times with respect to  each pool. The executive director may also establish more than one round of  review and ranking of applications and reservation of credits based on such  rankings, and he shall designate the amount of credits to be made available for  reservation within each pool during each such round. The amount reserved to  each such application shall be equal to the lesser of (i) the amount requested  in the application or (ii) an amount determined by the executive director, as  of the date of application, to be necessary for the financial feasibility of  the development and its viability as a qualified low-income development  throughout the credit period under the IRC; provided, however, that in no event  shall the amount of credits so reserved exceed the maximum amount permissible  under the IRC.
    Not more than 20% of the credits in any pool may be reserved  to developments intended to provide elderly housing, unless the feasible credit  amount, as determined by the executive director, of the highest ranked elderly  housing development in any pool exceeds 20% of the credits in such pool, then  such elderly housing development shall be the only elderly housing development  eligible for a reservation of credits from such pool. However, if credits  remain available for reservation after all eligible nonelderly housing  developments receive a reservation of credits, such remaining credits may be  made available to additional elderly housing developments. The above limitation  of credits available for elderly housing shall not include elderly housing developments  with project-based subsidy providing rental assistance for at least 20% of the  units that are submitted as rehabilitation developments or assisted living  facilities licensed under Chapter 17 of Title 63.2 of the Code of Virginia.
    If the amount of credits available in any pool is determined  by the executive director to be insufficient for the financial feasibility of  the proposed development to which such available credits are to be reserved,  the executive director may move the proposed development and the credits  available to another pool. If any credits remain in any pool after moving  proposed developments and credits to another pool, the executive director may  for developments that meet the requirements of § 42(h)(1)(E) of the IRC only,  reserve the remaining credits to any proposed development(s) scoring at or  above the minimum point threshold established by this chapter without regard to  the ranking of such application with additional credits from the Commonwealth's  annual state housing credit ceiling for the following year in such an amount  necessary for the financial feasibility of the proposed development, or  developments. However, the reservation of credits from the Commonwealth's  annual state housing credit ceiling for the following year shall be in the  reasonable discretion of the executive director if he determines it to be in  the best interest of the plan. In the event a reservation or an allocation of  credits from the current year or a prior year is reduced, terminated or  cancelled, the executive director may substitute such credits for any credits  reserved from the following year's annual state housing credit ceiling.
    In the event that during any round of application review and  ranking the amount of credits reserved within any pools is less than the total  amount of credits made available therein during such round, the executive  director may either (i) leave such unreserved credits in such pools for  reservation and allocation in any subsequent round or rounds or (ii)  redistribute such unreserved credits to such other pool or pools as the  executive director may designate or (iii) carry over such unreserved credits to  the next succeeding calendar year for inclusion in the state housing credit  ceiling (as defined in § 42(h)(3)(C) of the IRC) for such year.
    Notwithstanding anything contained herein, the total amount  of credits that may be awarded in any credit year after credit year 2001 to any  applicant or to any related applicants for one or more developments shall not  exceed 15% of Virginia's per capita dollar amount of credits for such credit  year (the "credit cap"). However, if the amount of credits to be  reserved in any such credit year to all applications assigned a total number of  points at or above the threshold amount set forth above shall be less than  Virginia's dollar amount of credits available for such credit year, then the  authority's board of commissioners may waive the credit cap to the extent it  deems necessary to reserve credits in an amount at least equal to such dollar  amount of credits. Applicants shall be deemed to be related if any principal in  a proposed development or any person or entity related to the applicant or  principal will be a principal in any other proposed development or  developments. For purposes of this paragraph, a principal shall also include  any person or entity who, in the determination of the executive director, has  exercised or will exercise, directly or indirectly, substantial control over  the applicant or has performed or will perform (or has assisted or will assist  the applicant in the performance of), directly or indirectly, substantial  responsibilities or functions customarily performed by applicants with respect  to applications or developments. For the purpose of determining whether any  person or entity is related to the applicant or principal, persons or entities  shall be deemed to be related if the executive director determines that any  substantial relationship existed, either directly between them or indirectly  through a series of one or more substantial relationships (e.g., if party A has  a substantial relationship with party B and if party B has a substantial  relationship with party C, then A has a substantial relationship with both  party B and party C), at any time within three years of the filing of the  application for the credits. In determining in any credit year whether an  applicant has a substantial relationship with another applicant with respect to  any application for which credits were awarded in any prior credit year, the  executive director shall determine whether the applicants were related as of  the date of the filing of such prior credit year's application or within three  years prior thereto and shall not consider any relationships or any changes in  relationships subsequent to such date. Substantial relationships shall include,  but not be limited to, the following relationships (in each of the following  relationships, the persons or entities involved in the relationship are deemed  to be related to each other): (i) the persons are in the same immediate family  (including, without limitation, a spouse, children, parents, grandparents,  grandchildren, brothers, sisters, uncles, aunts, nieces, and nephews) and are  living in the same household; (ii) the entities have one or more common general  partners or members (including related persons and entities), or the entities  have one or more common owners that (by themselves or together with any other  related persons and entities) have, in the aggregate, 5.0% or more ownership  interest in each entity; (iii) the entities are under the common control (e.g.,  the same person or persons and any related persons serve as a majority of the  voting members of the boards of such entities or as chief executive officers of  such entities) of one or more persons or entities (including related persons  and entities); (iv) the person is a general partner, member or employee in the  entity or is an owner (by himself or together with any other related persons  and entities) of 5.0% or more ownership interest in the entity; (v) the entity  is a general partner or member in the other entity or is an owner (by itself or  together with any other related persons and entities) of 5.0% or more ownership  interest in the other entity; or (vi) the person or entity is otherwise  controlled, in whole or in part, by the other person or entity. In determining  compliance with the credit cap with respect to any application, the executive  director may exclude any person or entity related to the applicant or to any  principal in such applicant if the executive director determines that (i) such  person or entity will not participate, directly or indirectly, in matters  relating to the applicant or the ownership of the development to be assisted by  the credits for which the application is submitted, (ii) such person or entity  has no agreement or understanding relating to such application or the tax  credits requested therein, and (iii) such person or entity will not receive a  financial benefit from the tax credits requested in the application. A limited  partner or other similar investor shall not be determined to be a principal and  shall be excluded from the determination of related persons or entities unless  the executive director shall determine that such limited partner or investor  will, directly or indirectly, exercise control over the applicant or  participate in matters relating to the ownership of the development  substantially beyond the degree of control or participation that is usual and  customary for limited partners or other similar investors with respect to  developments assisted by the credits. If the award of multiple applications of  any applicant or related applicants in any credit year shall cause the credit  cap to be exceeded, such applicant or applicants shall, upon notice from the  authority, jointly designate those applications for which credits are not to be  reserved so that such limitation shall not be exceeded. Such notice shall  specify the date by which such designation shall be made. In the absence of any  such designation by the date specified in such notice, the executive director  shall make such designation as he shall determine to best serve the interests  of the program. Each applicant and each principal therein shall make such  certifications, shall disclose such facts and shall submit such documents to  the authority as the executive director may require to determine compliance  with credit cap. If an applicant or any principal therein makes any  misrepresentation to the authority concerning such applicant's or principal's  relationship with any other person or entity, the executive director may reject  any or all of such applicant's pending applications for reservation or  allocation of credits, may terminate any or all reservations of credits to the  applicant, and may prohibit such applicant, the principals therein and any  persons and entities then or thereafter having a substantial relationship (in  the determination of the executive director as described above) with the  applicant or any principal therein from submitting applications for credits for  such period of time as the executive director shall determine.
    Within a reasonable time after credits are reserved to any  applicants' applications, the executive director shall notify each applicant  for such reservations of credits either of the amount of credits reserved to  such applicant's application (by issuing to such applicant a written binding  commitment to allocate such reserved credits subject to such terms and  conditions as may be imposed by the executive director therein, by the IRC and  by this chapter) or, as applicable, that the applicant's application has been  rejected or excluded or has otherwise not been reserved credits in accordance  herewith. The written binding commitment shall prohibit any transfer, direct or  indirect, of partnership interests (except those involving the admission of  limited partners) prior to the placed-in-service date of the proposed  development unless the transfer is consented to by the executive director. The  written binding commitment shall further limit the developers' fees to the  amounts established during the review of the applications for reservation of  credits and such amounts shall not be increased unless consented to by the  executive director. The executive director shall, as a condition to the  binding commitment, require each applicant to obtain a market study, in form  and substance satisfactory to the authority, that shows adequate demand for the  housing units to be produced by each applicant's proposed development.
    If credits are reserved to any applicants for developments  which have also received an allocation of credits from prior years, the  executive director may reserve additional credits from the current year equal  to the amount of credits allocated to such developments from prior years,  provided such previously allocated credits are returned to the authority. Any  previously allocated credits returned to the authority under such circumstances  shall be placed into the credit pools from which the current year's credits are  reserved to such applicants.
    The executive director shall make a written explanation  available to the general public for any allocation of housing credit dollar  amount which is not made in accordance with established priorities and  selection criteria of the authority.
    The authority's board shall review and consider the analysis  and recommendation of the executive director for the reservation of credits to  an applicant, and, if it concurs with such recommendation, it shall by  resolution ratify the reservation by the executive director of the credits to  the applicant, subject to such terms and conditions as it shall deem necessary  or appropriate to assure compliance with the aforementioned binding commitment  issued or to be issued to the applicant, the IRC and this chapter. If the board  determines not to ratify a reservation of credits or to establish any such  terms and conditions, the executive director shall so notify the applicant.
    Subsequent to such ratification of the reservation of  credits, the executive director may, in his discretion and without ratification  or approval by the board, increase the amount of such reservation by an amount  not to exceed 10% of the initial reservation amount.
    The executive director may require the applicant to make a  good faith deposit or to execute such contractual agreements providing for  monetary or other remedies as it may require, or both, to assure that the  applicant will comply with all requirements under the IRC, this chapter and the  binding commitment (including, without limitation, any requirement to conform  to all of the representations, commitments and information contained in the  application for which points were assigned pursuant to this section). Upon  satisfaction of all such aforementioned requirements (including any  post-allocation requirements), such deposit shall be refunded to the applicant  or such contractual agreements shall terminate, or both, as applicable.
    If, as of the date the application is approved by the  executive director, the applicant is entitled to an allocation of the credits  under the IRC, this chapter and the terms of any binding commitment that the  authority would have otherwise issued to such applicant, the executive director  may at that time allocate the credits to such qualified low-income buildings or  development without first providing a reservation of such credits. This  provision in no way limits the authority of the executive director to require a  good faith deposit or contractual agreement, or both, as described in the  preceding paragraph, nor to relieve the applicant from any other requirements  hereunder for eligibility for an allocation of credits. Any such allocation  shall be subject to ratification by the board in the same manner as provided  above with respect to reservations.
    The executive director may require that applicants to whom  credits have been reserved shall submit from time to time or at such specified  times as he shall require, written confirmation and documentation as to the  status of the proposed development and its compliance with the application, the  binding commitment and any contractual agreements between the applicant and the  authority. If on the basis of such written confirmation and documentation as  the executive director shall have received in response to such a request, or on  the basis of such other available information, or both, the executive director  determines any or all of the buildings in the development which were to become  qualified low-income buildings will not do so within the time period required  by the IRC or will not otherwise qualify for such credits under the IRC, this  chapter or the binding commitment, then the executive director may (i)  terminate the reservation of such credits and draw on any good faith deposit,  or (ii) substitute the reservation of credits from the current credit year with  a reservation of credits from a future credit year, if the delay is caused by a  lawsuit beyond the applicant's control that prevents the applicant from  proceeding with the development. If, in lieu of or in addition to the foregoing  determination, the executive director determines that any contractual  agreements between the applicant and the authority have been breached by the  applicant, whether before or after allocation of the credits, he may seek to  enforce any and all remedies to which the authority may then be entitled under  such contractual agreements.
    The executive director may establish such deadlines for  determining the ability of the applicant to qualify for an allocation of  credits as he shall deem necessary or desirable to allow the authority  sufficient time, in the event of a reduction or termination of the applicant's  reservation, to reserve such credits to other eligible applications and to  allocate such credits pursuant thereto.
    Any material changes to the development, as proposed in the  application, occurring subsequent to the submission of the application for the  credits therefor shall be subject to the prior written approval of the  executive director. As a condition to any such approval, the executive director  may, as necessary to comply with this chapter, the IRC, the binding commitment  and any other contractual agreement between the authority and the applicant,  reduce the amount of credits applied for or reserved or impose additional terms  and conditions with respect thereto. If such changes are made without the prior  written approval of the executive director, he may terminate or reduce the  reservation of such credits, impose additional terms and conditions with  respect thereto, seek to enforce any contractual remedies to which the  authority may then be entitled, draw on any good faith deposit, or any  combination of the foregoing.
    In the event that any reservation of credits is terminated or  reduced by the executive director under this section, he may reserve, allocate  or carry over, as applicable, such credits in such manner as he shall determine  consistent with the requirements of the IRC and this chapter.
    Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, the executive  director may make a reservation of credits to any applicant that proposes a  nonelderly development that (i) provides rent subsidies or equivalent  assistance in order to ensure occupancy by extremely low-income persons; (ii)  conforms to HUD regulations interpreting the accessibility requirements of §  504 of the Rehabilitation Act; and (iii) will be actively marketed to people  with disabilities in accordance with a plan submitted as part of the  application for credits and approved by the executive director for at least 50%  of the units in the development. Any such reservations made in any calendar  year may be up to 6.0% of the Commonwealth's annual state housing credit  ceiling for the applicable credit year. However, such reservation will be for  credits from the Commonwealth's annual state housing credit ceiling from the  following calendar year.
    Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, the executive  director may, except in calendar year 2010 make a reservation of  credits, to any applicant that proposes to acquire and rehabilitate a  nonelderly development that the executive director determines (i) cannot be  acquired within the schedule for the competitive scoring process described in  this section and (ii) cannot be financed with tax-exempt bonds using the  authority's normal underwriting criteria for its multifamily tax-exempt bond  program. Any proposed development subject to an application submitted under  this paragraph must meet the following criteria: (i) at least 20% of the units  in the development must be low-income housing units for residents at 50% of the  area median income or less, (ii) the development must be eligible for points  under subdivision 3 b (1) (g) of this section or a combination of at least 20  points under subdivisions 3 b (1) (b) through 3 b (1) (j), excluding  subdivision 3 b (1) (c), (iii) the executive director's review of the  application must confirm that the portion of the developer's fee to be deferred  is at least 5.0% of the total development costs, (iv) participation by the  local government in the form of low-interest loan/grant moneys from such  locality's affordable housing funds in an amount equal to or greater than 20%  of the total development costs, and (v) the application for the development  must obtain as many points as the lowest ranked development that could have  received a partial reservation of credits from the geographic pool in which the  applicant would have been ranked in the most recent competitive scoring round.  Any such reservations made in any calendar year may be up to 15% of the  Commonwealth's annual state housing credit ceiling for the applicable credit  year, of which at least 10% of the Commonwealth's annual state housing credit  ceiling for the applicable credit year will be reserved for developments within  Arlington County, Fairfax County, Alexandria City, Fairfax City or Falls Church  City. However, such reservation will be for credits from the Commonwealth's  annual state housing credit ceiling from the following calendar year. 
    13VAC10-180-80. Reservation and allocation of additional  credits. (Repealed.)
    Prior to the initial determination of the qualified basis  (as defined in the IRC) of the qualified low-income buildings of a development  pursuant to the IRC, an applicant to whose buildings' credits have been  reserved may submit an application for a reservation of additional credits.  Subsequent to such initial determination of the qualified basis, the applicant  may submit an application for an additional allocation of credits by reason of  an increase in qualified basis based on an increase in the number of low-income  housing units or in the amount of floor space of the low-income housing units.  Any application for an additional allocation of credits shall include such  information, opinions, certifications and documentation as the executive  director shall require in order to determine that the applicant's buildings or  development will be entitled to such additional credits under the IRC and this  chapter. The application shall be submitted, reviewed, ranked and selected by  the executive director in accordance with the provisions of 13VAC10-180-60, and  any allocation of credits shall be made in accordance with 13VAC10-180-70. For  the purposes of such review, ranking and selection and the determinations to be  made by the executive director under the rules and regulations as to the  financial feasibility of the development and its viability as a qualified  low-income development during the credit period, the amount of credits  previously reserved to the application or allocated to the buildings or  development (or, in the case of any development or building to be financed by  certain tax-exempt bonds in an amount so as not to require an allocation of  credits hereunder, the amount of credit which may be claimed by the applicant)  shall be included with the amount of such credits so requested. 
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-2185; Filed December 16, 2009, 4:48 p.m. 
TITLE 14. INSURANCE
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The  State Corporation Commission is exempt from the Administrative Process Act in  accordance with § 2.2-4002 A 2 of the Code of Virginia, which exempts  courts, any agency of the Supreme Court, and any agency that by the  Constitution is expressly granted any of the powers of a court of record.
         Titles of Regulations: 14VAC5-310. Rules Governing  Actuarial Opinions and Memoranda (amending 14VAC5-310-90).
    14VAC5-321. Use of the 2001 CSO Mortality Table in  Determining Reserve Liabilities and Nonforfeiture Benefits (amending 14VAC5-321-30).
    Statutory Authority: §§ 12.1-13 and 38.2-223 of the  Code of Virginia.
    Effective Date: December 31, 2009.
    Agency Contact: Raquel C. Pino-Moreno, Principal  Insurance Analyst, Bureau of Insurance, State Corporation Commission, 1300 East  Main Street, P.O. Box 1157, Richmond, VA 23218, telephone (804) 371-9499, FAX  (804) 371-9511, or email raquel.pino-moreno@scc.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    The revisions allow the Bureau of Insurance to authorize  insurance companies to use the 2001 CSO Mortality Table for policies issued on  or after January 1, 2004 (14VAC5-321). The current provision is applicable for  policies issued on or after July 1, 2004. The revisions also require an  appointed actuary to produce a report attesting to the fact that a company has  booked reserves satisfying the minimum reserve requirements and describing how  they reached their conclusion regarding adequacy (14VAC5-310). The revisions to  the rules are based on the National Association of Insurance Commissioner’s  (NAIC) revisions to its Actuarial Opinion and Memorandum Regulation Model,  which was adopted by the NAIC on September 23, 2009, and its Recognition of the  2001 CSO Mortality Table for Use in Determining Minimum Reserve Liabilities and  Nonforfeiture Benefits Model Regulation, which was adopted by the NAIC in 2002.  The revisions were adopted as proposed. 
    AT RICHMOND, DECEMBER 4, 2009
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
    At the relation of the
    STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
    CASE NO. INS-2009-00230
    Ex Parte: In the matter of Adopting
  Revisions to the Rules Governing
  Actuarial Opinions and Memoranda
  and Use of the 2001 CSO Mortality Table
  in Determining Reserve Liabilities
  and Nonforfeiture Benefits
    ORDER ADOPTING RULES
    By Order To Take Notice entered October 21, 2009, all  interested persons were ordered to take notice that subsequent to November 29,  2009, the State Corporation Commission ("Commission") would consider  the entry of an order adopting amendments to the regulations entitled Rules  Governing Actuarial Opinions and Memoranda and Use of the 2001 CSO Mortality  Table in Determining Reserve Liabilities and Nonforfeiture Benefits ("Regulations"),  proposed by the Bureau of Insurance ("Bureau") which amend the  regulations at 14 VAC 5-310-90 and 14 VAC 5-321-30, unless on or  before November 29, 2009, any person objecting to the adoption of the proposed  amendments to the Regulations filed a request for a hearing with the Clerk of  the Commission ("Clerk").
    The Order to Take Notice also required all interested persons  to file their comments in support of or in opposition to the proposed  amendments to the Regulations on or before November 29, 2009.
    No request for a hearing was filed with the Clerk.  By  letter dated November 5, 2009, Transamerica Life Insurance Company  ("Transamerica") filed comments with the Clerk.  The comments  filed by Transamerica did not address the proposed amendments to the Regulations.   Instead, the comments addressed the fact that § 38.2-3127.1 of the Code of  Virginia requires that the Actuarial Opinion and accompanying Regulatory Asset  Adequacy Issues Summary be filed with the Bureau annually rather than upon the  request of the Bureau.
    The Bureau does not recommend further changes to the proposed  amendments to the Regulations and further recommends that the amendments to the  rules be adopted as proposed.
    THE COMMISSION,  having considered the Bureau's  recommendation, is of the opinion that the attached amendments to the  Regulations should be adopted.
    Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    (1)  The amendments to the regulations entitled  Rules Governing Actuarial Opinions and Memoranda and Use of the 2001 CSO  Mortality Table in Determining Reserve Liabilities and Nonforfeiture Benefits  at 14 VAC 5-310-90 and 14 VAC 5-321-30 which are attached hereto and made a  part hereof, should be, and they are hereby, ADOPTED to be effective  December 31, 2009.
    (2)  The Commission's Division of Information  Resources forthwith shall cause a copy of this Order, together with the  attached rules, to be forwarded to the Virginia Registrar of Regulations for  appropriate publication in the Virginia Register of Regulations.
    (3)  The Commission's Division of Information  Resources shall make available this Order and the adopted rules on the  Commission's website, http://www.scc.virginia.gov/case.
    (4)  AN ATTESTED COPY hereof, together with a copy  of the amended regulations, shall be sent by the Clerk of the Commission to the  Bureau in care of Deputy Commissioner Douglas C. Stolte, who forthwith shall  give further notice of the amendments to the regulations by mailing a copy of  this Order, together with the amended regulations, to all licensed life  insurers, burial societies, fraternal benefit societies, qualified reinsurers,  and certain interested parties designated by the Bureau.
    (5)  The Bureau shall file with the Clerk of the  Commission an affidavit of compliance with the notice requirements of Ordering  Paragraph (2) above.
    14VAC5-310-90. Description of actuarial memorandum issued for  an asset adequacy analysis and regulatory asset adequacy issues summary. 
    A. The following general provisions shall apply with respect  to the preparation and submission of the asset adequacy memorandum required by  § 38.2-3127.1 of the Code of Virginia. 
    1. In accordance with § 38.2-3127.1 of the Code of  Virginia, the appointed actuary shall prepare a memorandum to the company  describing the analysis done in support of his opinion regarding the reserves.  The memorandum shall be made available for examination by the commission upon  its request but shall be returned to the company after such examination and  shall not be considered a record of the Bureau of Insurance or subject to  automatic filing with the commission. 
    2. In preparing the memorandum, the appointed actuary may rely  on, and include as a part of his memorandum, memoranda prepared and signed by  other actuaries who are qualified within the meaning of 14VAC5-310-50 B, with  respect to the areas covered in such memoranda, and so state in their  memoranda. 
    3. If the commission requests a memorandum and no such  memorandum exists or if the commission finds that the analysis described in the  memorandum fails to meet the standards of the Actuarial Standards Board or the  standards and requirements of this chapter, the commission may designate a  qualified actuary to review the opinion and prepare such supporting memorandum  as is required for review. The reasonable and necessary expense of the  independent review shall be paid by the company but shall be directed and  controlled by the commission.
    4. The reviewing actuary shall have the same status as an  examiner for purposes of obtaining data from the company and the work papers  and documentation of the reviewing actuary shall be retained by the commission;  provided, however, that any information provided by the company  to the reviewing actuary and included in the work papers shall be considered as  material provided by the company to the commission and shall be kept  confidential to the same extent as is prescribed by law with respect to other  material provided by the company to the commission pursuant to the statute  governing this chapter. The reviewing actuary shall not be an employee of a consulting  firm involved with the preparation of any prior memorandum or opinion for the  insurer pursuant to this chapter for any one of the current year or the  preceding three years. 
    5. In accordance with § 38.2-3127.1 of the Code of  Virginia, the appointed actuary shall prepare a regulatory asset adequacy  issues summary, the contents of which are specified in subsection C of this  section. The regulatory asset adequacy issues summary shall be submitted no  later than March 15 of the year following the year for which a statement of  actuarial opinion based on asset adequacy is required. The regulatory asset  adequacy issues summary is to be kept confidential to the same extent and under  the same conditions as the actuarial memorandum. 
    B. A section of the memorandum shall document asset adequacy  testing by demonstrating that the analysis has been done in accordance with the  standards for asset adequacy referred to in 14VAC5-310-50 D and any additional  standards under this chapter. It shall specify: 
    1. For reserves: 
    a. Product descriptions including market description,  underwriting and other aspects of a risk profile, and the specific risks the  appointed actuary deems significant; 
    b. Source of liability in force; 
    c. Reserve method and basis; 
    d. Investment reserves; 
    e. Reinsurance arrangements; 
    f. Identification of any explicit or implied guarantees made  by the general account in support of benefits provided through a separate  account policy or contract and the methods used by the appointed actuary to  provide for the guarantees in the asset adequacy analysis; and 
    g. Documentation of assumptions to test reserves for (i) lapse  rates, whether base or excess, (ii) interest crediting rate strategy, (iii)  mortality, (iv) policyholder dividend strategy, (v) competitor or market  interest rate, (vi) annuitization rates, (vii) commission and expenses, and  (viii) morbidity. 
    The documentation of the assumptions shall be such that an  actuary reviewing the actuarial memorandum could form a conclusion as to the  reasonableness of the assumption. 
    2. For assets: 
    a. Portfolio descriptions, including a risk profile disclosing  the quality, distribution and types of assets; 
    b. Investment and disinvestment assumptions; 
    c. Source of asset data; 
    d. Asset valuation bases; and 
    e. Documentation of assumptions made for (i) default costs,  (ii) bond call function, (iii) mortgage prepayment function, (iv) determining  market value for assets sold due to disinvestment strategy, and (v) determining  yield on assets acquired through the investment strategy. 
    The documentation of the assumptions shall be such that an  actuary reviewing the actuarial memorandum could form a conclusion as to the  reasonableness of the assumption. 
    3. For the analysis basis: 
    a. Methodology; 
    b. Rationale for inclusion or exclusion of different blocks of  business and how pertinent risks were analyzed; 
    c. Rationale for degree of rigor in analyzing different blocks  of business, including the rationale for the level of "materiality"  that was used in determining how rigorously to analyze different blocks of  business; 
    d. Criteria for determining asset adequacy, including in the  criteria the precise basis for determining if assets are adequate to cover  reserves under "moderately adverse conditions" or other conditions as  specified in relevant actuarial standards of practice; and 
    e. Whether the impact of federal income taxes was considered  and the method of treating reinsurance in the asset adequacy analysis. 
    4. Summary of material changes in methods, procedures, or  assumptions from prior year's asset adequacy analysis; 
    5. Summary of results; and 
    6. Conclusion. 
    C. The regulatory asset adequacy issues summary shall contain  the name of the company for which the regulatory asset adequacy issues summary  is being supplied and shall be signed and dated by the appointed actuary  rendering the actuarial opinion. The regulatory asset adequacy issues summary  also shall include each of the following: 
    1. Descriptions of the scenarios tested, including whether  those scenarios are stochastic or deterministic, and the sensitivity testing  done relative to those scenarios. If negative ending surplus results under  certain tests in the aggregate, the actuary should describe those tests and the  amount of additional reserve as of the valuation date which, if held, would  eliminate the negative aggregate surplus values. Ending surplus values shall be  determined by either extending the projection period until the in-force and  associated assets and liabilities at the end of the projection period are  immaterial or by adjusting the surplus amount at the end of the projection  period by an amount that appropriately estimates the value that reasonably can  be expected to arise from the assets and liabilities remaining in force; 
    2. The extent to which the appointed actuary uses assumptions  in the asset adequacy analysis that are materially different from the  assumptions used in the previous asset adequacy analysis; 
    3. The amount of reserves and the identity of the product  lines that had been subjected to asset adequacy analysis in the prior opinion  but were not subject to analysis for the current opinion; 
    4. Comments on any interim results that may be of significant  concern to the appointed actuary. For example, the impact of the  insufficiency of assets to support the payment of benefits and expenses and the  establishment of statutory reserves during one or more interim periods; 
    5. The methods used by the actuary to recognize the impact of  reinsurance on the company's cash flows, including both assets and liabilities,  under each of the scenarios tested; and 
    6. Whether the actuary has been satisfied that all options  whether explicit or embedded, in any asset or liability, including but not  limited to those affecting cash flows embedded in fixed income securities, and  equity-like features in any investments have been appropriately considered in  the asset adequacy analysis. 
    D. The actuarial methods, considerations, and analyses shall  conform to appropriate standards of practice and the memorandum shall include  the following statement: 
    "Actuarial methods, considerations and analyses used in  the preparation of this memorandum conform to the appropriate Standards of  Practice as promulgated by the Actuarial Standards Board, which standards form  the basis for this memorandum." 
    E. An appropriate allocation of assets in the amount of  Interest Maintenance Reserve (IMR), whether positive or negative, shall be used  in any asset adequacy analysis. Analysis of risks regarding asset default shall  include an appropriate allocation of assets supporting the Asset Valuation  Reserve (AVR); these AVR assets shall not be applied for any other risks with  respect to reserve adequacy. Analysis of these and other risks shall include  assets supporting other mandatory or voluntary reserves available to the extent  not used for risk analysis and reserve support. The amount of the assets used  for the AVR shall be disclosed in the Table of Reserves and Liabilities of the  opinion and in the memorandum. The method used for selecting particular assets  or allocated portions of assets shall be disclosed in the memorandum. 
    14VAC5-321-30. 2001 CSO Mortality Table.
    A. At the election of the insurer for any one or more  specified plans of insurance and subject to the conditions stated in this  chapter, the 2001 CSO Mortality Table may be used as the minimum standard for  policies issued on or after July January 1, 2004, and before the  date specified in subsection B of this section to which subdivision 1 of  § 38.2-3130 and § 38.2-3209 of the Code of Virginia are applicable. If the  insurer elects to use the 2001 CSO Mortality Table, it shall do so for both  valuation and nonforfeiture purposes.
    B. Subject to the conditions stated in this chapter, the 2001  CSO Mortality Table shall be used in determining minimum standards for policies  issued on and after January 1, 2009, to which subdivision 1 of § 38.2-3130  and § 38.2-3209 of the Code of Virginia are applicable.
    C. A table from the 2001 CSO Preferred Class Structure  Mortality Table used in place of a 2001 CSO Mortality Table, pursuant to the  requirements of 14VAC5-322, will be treated as part of the 2001 CSO Mortality  Table only for purposes of reserve valuation pursuant to the requirements of  this chapter.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-2018; Filed December 8, 2009, 3:17 p.m. 
TITLE 14. INSURANCE
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The  State Corporation Commission is exempt from the Administrative Process Act in  accordance with § 2.2-4002 A 2 of the Code of Virginia, which exempts  courts, any agency of the Supreme Court, and any agency that by the  Constitution is expressly granted any of the powers of a court of record.
         Titles of Regulations: 14VAC5-310. Rules Governing  Actuarial Opinions and Memoranda (amending 14VAC5-310-90).
    14VAC5-321. Use of the 2001 CSO Mortality Table in  Determining Reserve Liabilities and Nonforfeiture Benefits (amending 14VAC5-321-30).
    Statutory Authority: §§ 12.1-13 and 38.2-223 of the  Code of Virginia.
    Effective Date: December 31, 2009.
    Agency Contact: Raquel C. Pino-Moreno, Principal  Insurance Analyst, Bureau of Insurance, State Corporation Commission, 1300 East  Main Street, P.O. Box 1157, Richmond, VA 23218, telephone (804) 371-9499, FAX  (804) 371-9511, or email raquel.pino-moreno@scc.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    The revisions allow the Bureau of Insurance to authorize  insurance companies to use the 2001 CSO Mortality Table for policies issued on  or after January 1, 2004 (14VAC5-321). The current provision is applicable for  policies issued on or after July 1, 2004. The revisions also require an  appointed actuary to produce a report attesting to the fact that a company has  booked reserves satisfying the minimum reserve requirements and describing how  they reached their conclusion regarding adequacy (14VAC5-310). The revisions to  the rules are based on the National Association of Insurance Commissioner’s  (NAIC) revisions to its Actuarial Opinion and Memorandum Regulation Model,  which was adopted by the NAIC on September 23, 2009, and its Recognition of the  2001 CSO Mortality Table for Use in Determining Minimum Reserve Liabilities and  Nonforfeiture Benefits Model Regulation, which was adopted by the NAIC in 2002.  The revisions were adopted as proposed. 
    AT RICHMOND, DECEMBER 4, 2009
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
    At the relation of the
    STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
    CASE NO. INS-2009-00230
    Ex Parte: In the matter of Adopting
  Revisions to the Rules Governing
  Actuarial Opinions and Memoranda
  and Use of the 2001 CSO Mortality Table
  in Determining Reserve Liabilities
  and Nonforfeiture Benefits
    ORDER ADOPTING RULES
    By Order To Take Notice entered October 21, 2009, all  interested persons were ordered to take notice that subsequent to November 29,  2009, the State Corporation Commission ("Commission") would consider  the entry of an order adopting amendments to the regulations entitled Rules  Governing Actuarial Opinions and Memoranda and Use of the 2001 CSO Mortality  Table in Determining Reserve Liabilities and Nonforfeiture Benefits ("Regulations"),  proposed by the Bureau of Insurance ("Bureau") which amend the  regulations at 14 VAC 5-310-90 and 14 VAC 5-321-30, unless on or  before November 29, 2009, any person objecting to the adoption of the proposed  amendments to the Regulations filed a request for a hearing with the Clerk of  the Commission ("Clerk").
    The Order to Take Notice also required all interested persons  to file their comments in support of or in opposition to the proposed  amendments to the Regulations on or before November 29, 2009.
    No request for a hearing was filed with the Clerk.  By  letter dated November 5, 2009, Transamerica Life Insurance Company  ("Transamerica") filed comments with the Clerk.  The comments  filed by Transamerica did not address the proposed amendments to the Regulations.   Instead, the comments addressed the fact that § 38.2-3127.1 of the Code of  Virginia requires that the Actuarial Opinion and accompanying Regulatory Asset  Adequacy Issues Summary be filed with the Bureau annually rather than upon the  request of the Bureau.
    The Bureau does not recommend further changes to the proposed  amendments to the Regulations and further recommends that the amendments to the  rules be adopted as proposed.
    THE COMMISSION,  having considered the Bureau's  recommendation, is of the opinion that the attached amendments to the  Regulations should be adopted.
    Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    (1)  The amendments to the regulations entitled  Rules Governing Actuarial Opinions and Memoranda and Use of the 2001 CSO  Mortality Table in Determining Reserve Liabilities and Nonforfeiture Benefits  at 14 VAC 5-310-90 and 14 VAC 5-321-30 which are attached hereto and made a  part hereof, should be, and they are hereby, ADOPTED to be effective  December 31, 2009.
    (2)  The Commission's Division of Information  Resources forthwith shall cause a copy of this Order, together with the  attached rules, to be forwarded to the Virginia Registrar of Regulations for  appropriate publication in the Virginia Register of Regulations.
    (3)  The Commission's Division of Information  Resources shall make available this Order and the adopted rules on the  Commission's website, http://www.scc.virginia.gov/case.
    (4)  AN ATTESTED COPY hereof, together with a copy  of the amended regulations, shall be sent by the Clerk of the Commission to the  Bureau in care of Deputy Commissioner Douglas C. Stolte, who forthwith shall  give further notice of the amendments to the regulations by mailing a copy of  this Order, together with the amended regulations, to all licensed life  insurers, burial societies, fraternal benefit societies, qualified reinsurers,  and certain interested parties designated by the Bureau.
    (5)  The Bureau shall file with the Clerk of the  Commission an affidavit of compliance with the notice requirements of Ordering  Paragraph (2) above.
    14VAC5-310-90. Description of actuarial memorandum issued for  an asset adequacy analysis and regulatory asset adequacy issues summary. 
    A. The following general provisions shall apply with respect  to the preparation and submission of the asset adequacy memorandum required by  § 38.2-3127.1 of the Code of Virginia. 
    1. In accordance with § 38.2-3127.1 of the Code of  Virginia, the appointed actuary shall prepare a memorandum to the company  describing the analysis done in support of his opinion regarding the reserves.  The memorandum shall be made available for examination by the commission upon  its request but shall be returned to the company after such examination and  shall not be considered a record of the Bureau of Insurance or subject to  automatic filing with the commission. 
    2. In preparing the memorandum, the appointed actuary may rely  on, and include as a part of his memorandum, memoranda prepared and signed by  other actuaries who are qualified within the meaning of 14VAC5-310-50 B, with  respect to the areas covered in such memoranda, and so state in their  memoranda. 
    3. If the commission requests a memorandum and no such  memorandum exists or if the commission finds that the analysis described in the  memorandum fails to meet the standards of the Actuarial Standards Board or the  standards and requirements of this chapter, the commission may designate a  qualified actuary to review the opinion and prepare such supporting memorandum  as is required for review. The reasonable and necessary expense of the  independent review shall be paid by the company but shall be directed and  controlled by the commission.
    4. The reviewing actuary shall have the same status as an  examiner for purposes of obtaining data from the company and the work papers  and documentation of the reviewing actuary shall be retained by the commission;  provided, however, that any information provided by the company  to the reviewing actuary and included in the work papers shall be considered as  material provided by the company to the commission and shall be kept  confidential to the same extent as is prescribed by law with respect to other  material provided by the company to the commission pursuant to the statute  governing this chapter. The reviewing actuary shall not be an employee of a consulting  firm involved with the preparation of any prior memorandum or opinion for the  insurer pursuant to this chapter for any one of the current year or the  preceding three years. 
    5. In accordance with § 38.2-3127.1 of the Code of  Virginia, the appointed actuary shall prepare a regulatory asset adequacy  issues summary, the contents of which are specified in subsection C of this  section. The regulatory asset adequacy issues summary shall be submitted no  later than March 15 of the year following the year for which a statement of  actuarial opinion based on asset adequacy is required. The regulatory asset  adequacy issues summary is to be kept confidential to the same extent and under  the same conditions as the actuarial memorandum. 
    B. A section of the memorandum shall document asset adequacy  testing by demonstrating that the analysis has been done in accordance with the  standards for asset adequacy referred to in 14VAC5-310-50 D and any additional  standards under this chapter. It shall specify: 
    1. For reserves: 
    a. Product descriptions including market description,  underwriting and other aspects of a risk profile, and the specific risks the  appointed actuary deems significant; 
    b. Source of liability in force; 
    c. Reserve method and basis; 
    d. Investment reserves; 
    e. Reinsurance arrangements; 
    f. Identification of any explicit or implied guarantees made  by the general account in support of benefits provided through a separate  account policy or contract and the methods used by the appointed actuary to  provide for the guarantees in the asset adequacy analysis; and 
    g. Documentation of assumptions to test reserves for (i) lapse  rates, whether base or excess, (ii) interest crediting rate strategy, (iii)  mortality, (iv) policyholder dividend strategy, (v) competitor or market  interest rate, (vi) annuitization rates, (vii) commission and expenses, and  (viii) morbidity. 
    The documentation of the assumptions shall be such that an  actuary reviewing the actuarial memorandum could form a conclusion as to the  reasonableness of the assumption. 
    2. For assets: 
    a. Portfolio descriptions, including a risk profile disclosing  the quality, distribution and types of assets; 
    b. Investment and disinvestment assumptions; 
    c. Source of asset data; 
    d. Asset valuation bases; and 
    e. Documentation of assumptions made for (i) default costs,  (ii) bond call function, (iii) mortgage prepayment function, (iv) determining  market value for assets sold due to disinvestment strategy, and (v) determining  yield on assets acquired through the investment strategy. 
    The documentation of the assumptions shall be such that an  actuary reviewing the actuarial memorandum could form a conclusion as to the  reasonableness of the assumption. 
    3. For the analysis basis: 
    a. Methodology; 
    b. Rationale for inclusion or exclusion of different blocks of  business and how pertinent risks were analyzed; 
    c. Rationale for degree of rigor in analyzing different blocks  of business, including the rationale for the level of "materiality"  that was used in determining how rigorously to analyze different blocks of  business; 
    d. Criteria for determining asset adequacy, including in the  criteria the precise basis for determining if assets are adequate to cover  reserves under "moderately adverse conditions" or other conditions as  specified in relevant actuarial standards of practice; and 
    e. Whether the impact of federal income taxes was considered  and the method of treating reinsurance in the asset adequacy analysis. 
    4. Summary of material changes in methods, procedures, or  assumptions from prior year's asset adequacy analysis; 
    5. Summary of results; and 
    6. Conclusion. 
    C. The regulatory asset adequacy issues summary shall contain  the name of the company for which the regulatory asset adequacy issues summary  is being supplied and shall be signed and dated by the appointed actuary  rendering the actuarial opinion. The regulatory asset adequacy issues summary  also shall include each of the following: 
    1. Descriptions of the scenarios tested, including whether  those scenarios are stochastic or deterministic, and the sensitivity testing  done relative to those scenarios. If negative ending surplus results under  certain tests in the aggregate, the actuary should describe those tests and the  amount of additional reserve as of the valuation date which, if held, would  eliminate the negative aggregate surplus values. Ending surplus values shall be  determined by either extending the projection period until the in-force and  associated assets and liabilities at the end of the projection period are  immaterial or by adjusting the surplus amount at the end of the projection  period by an amount that appropriately estimates the value that reasonably can  be expected to arise from the assets and liabilities remaining in force; 
    2. The extent to which the appointed actuary uses assumptions  in the asset adequacy analysis that are materially different from the  assumptions used in the previous asset adequacy analysis; 
    3. The amount of reserves and the identity of the product  lines that had been subjected to asset adequacy analysis in the prior opinion  but were not subject to analysis for the current opinion; 
    4. Comments on any interim results that may be of significant  concern to the appointed actuary. For example, the impact of the  insufficiency of assets to support the payment of benefits and expenses and the  establishment of statutory reserves during one or more interim periods; 
    5. The methods used by the actuary to recognize the impact of  reinsurance on the company's cash flows, including both assets and liabilities,  under each of the scenarios tested; and 
    6. Whether the actuary has been satisfied that all options  whether explicit or embedded, in any asset or liability, including but not  limited to those affecting cash flows embedded in fixed income securities, and  equity-like features in any investments have been appropriately considered in  the asset adequacy analysis. 
    D. The actuarial methods, considerations, and analyses shall  conform to appropriate standards of practice and the memorandum shall include  the following statement: 
    "Actuarial methods, considerations and analyses used in  the preparation of this memorandum conform to the appropriate Standards of  Practice as promulgated by the Actuarial Standards Board, which standards form  the basis for this memorandum." 
    E. An appropriate allocation of assets in the amount of  Interest Maintenance Reserve (IMR), whether positive or negative, shall be used  in any asset adequacy analysis. Analysis of risks regarding asset default shall  include an appropriate allocation of assets supporting the Asset Valuation  Reserve (AVR); these AVR assets shall not be applied for any other risks with  respect to reserve adequacy. Analysis of these and other risks shall include  assets supporting other mandatory or voluntary reserves available to the extent  not used for risk analysis and reserve support. The amount of the assets used  for the AVR shall be disclosed in the Table of Reserves and Liabilities of the  opinion and in the memorandum. The method used for selecting particular assets  or allocated portions of assets shall be disclosed in the memorandum. 
    14VAC5-321-30. 2001 CSO Mortality Table.
    A. At the election of the insurer for any one or more  specified plans of insurance and subject to the conditions stated in this  chapter, the 2001 CSO Mortality Table may be used as the minimum standard for  policies issued on or after July January 1, 2004, and before the  date specified in subsection B of this section to which subdivision 1 of  § 38.2-3130 and § 38.2-3209 of the Code of Virginia are applicable. If the  insurer elects to use the 2001 CSO Mortality Table, it shall do so for both  valuation and nonforfeiture purposes.
    B. Subject to the conditions stated in this chapter, the 2001  CSO Mortality Table shall be used in determining minimum standards for policies  issued on and after January 1, 2009, to which subdivision 1 of § 38.2-3130  and § 38.2-3209 of the Code of Virginia are applicable.
    C. A table from the 2001 CSO Preferred Class Structure  Mortality Table used in place of a 2001 CSO Mortality Table, pursuant to the  requirements of 14VAC5-322, will be treated as part of the 2001 CSO Mortality  Table only for purposes of reserve valuation pursuant to the requirements of  this chapter.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-2018; Filed December 8, 2009, 3:17 p.m. 
TITLE 20. PUBLIC UTILITIES AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The  State Corporation Commission is exempt from the Administrative Process Act in  accordance with § 2.2-4002 A 2 of the Code of Virginia, which exempts  courts, any agency of the Supreme Court, and any agency that by the  Constitution is expressly granted any of the powers of a court of record.
         Title of Regulation: 20VAC5-317. Rates for Standby  Service Furnished to Certain Renewable Cogeneration Facilities Pursuant to  § 56-235.1:1 of the Code of Virginia (adding 20VAC5-317-10 through 20VAC5-317-50).
    Statutory Authority: §§ 12.1-13 and 56-235.1:1 of  the Code of Virginia.
    Effective Date: January 1, 2010. 
    Agency Contact: Cody Walker, Assistant Director, Energy  Division, State Corporation Commission, P.O. Box 1197, Richmond, VA 23218,  telephone (804) 371-9611, FAX (804) 371-9350, or email  cody.walker@scc.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    As directed by Chapter 745 of the 2009 Acts of Assembly,  codified as § 56-235.1:1 of the Code of Virginia, the regulation establishes  a regulatory framework for electric utility standby service to customers that  operate cogeneration facilities in the Commonwealth generating renewable  energy, as defined in § 56-576 of the Code of Virginia. The legislation  further states that such regulations must allow electric utilities to recover  all of the costs that are identified by these utilities and determined by the  commission to be related to the provision of standby service. Chapter 745  specifically states that these costs include, but are not limited to, the costs  of transformers and other equipment required to provide standby service and the  costs of capacity and generation, including, but not limited to, fuel costs.  Chapter 745 also directs that within 90 days of the effective date of regulations  adopted pursuant to this legislation, each public utility providing electric  service in the Commonwealth must submit to the commission a plan setting forth  how the utility will comply with the regulations if it does not already have  standby provisions approved by the commission that comply with the regulations.  The regulation (i) identifies costs that may be recovered by utilities under  standby rates from utility customers operating cogeneration facilities  generating renewable energy and (ii) establishes requirements for utilities'  compliance plans to be submitted within 90 days of the regulation's effective  date. 
    Changes to the proposed regulation are principally  clarifying in nature and include establishing an April 1, 2010, deadline for  utilities to submit their plans for compliance with § 56-235.1:1 of the Code of  Virginia and this regulation.
    AT RICHMOND, DECEMBER 2, 2009
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
    At the relation of the
    STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
    CASE NO. PUE-2009-00080
    Ex Parte: In the matter of establishing
  rules of the State Corporation Commission
  governing rates for stand-by service furnished
  to certain renewable cogeneration facilities
    ORDER PROMULGATING REGULATIONS
    This Order promulgates State Corporation Commission  ("Commission") rules required by HB 2152 as enacted by the  2009 Session of the Virginia General Assembly.1 HB 2152  directs the Commission in § 56-235.1:1 of the Code of Virginia  ("Code") (a new statutory provision enacted in HB 2152) to  establish a regulatory framework for electric utility stand‑by service  provided by electric utilities to "customers that operate a cogeneration  facility in the Commonwealth that generates renewable energy, as defined in  § 56-576." Section 56-235.1:1 of the Code further requires that such  regulations must "allow the electric utility to recover all of the costs  that are identified by the electric utility and determined by the Commission to  be related to the provision of the stand-by service, including but not limited  to the costs of transformers and other equipment required to provide stand-by  service and the costs of capacity and generation, including but not limited to  fuel costs."
    Within 90 days of the effective date of the regulations  promulgated under this Order, § 56-235.1:1 of the Code requires each  public utility providing electric service in the Commonwealth to "submit a  plan setting forth how the utility will comply with the regulations if it does  not already have stand-by provisions approved by the Commission that comply  with the regulations."  Id. Thereafter, the Commission will, after  notice and an opportunity for a hearing, "determine whether a utility's  plan complies with the regulations."  Id.
    On August 19, 2009, the Commission issued an order  establishing this docket ("August 19, 2009 Order").   Attached to that order were proposed rules prepared by the Commission's Staff  ("Staff") implementing the rulemaking requirements of  § 56-235.1:1 of the Code ("Proposed Rules"). The Proposed Rules,  inter alia, set forth costs that may be recovered, under stand-by rates, by  utilities from their customers operating cogeneration facilities generating  renewable energy. The Proposed Rules also establish requirements for utilities'  compliance plans to be submitted within 90 days of such rules' effective  date.
    The Commission's August 19, 2009 Order directed that on or  before September 11, 2009, the Commission's Division of Information  Resources should secure publication of notice concerning this proceeding in  newspapers of general circulation throughout the Commonwealth of Virginia. The  August 19, 2009 Order also permitted interested persons to comment on, propose  modifications or supplements to, or request a hearing on the Proposed Rules on  or before October 2, 2009. The Order further permitted the Staff to file a  report with the Clerk of the Commission on or before October 28, 2009,  concerning comments submitted to the Commission by interested persons  addressing the Proposed Rules.
    Comments concerning the Proposed Rules were received from  Virginia Electric and Power Company d/b/a Dominion Virginia Power  ("Dominion" or "Dominion Virginia Power"); Appalachian  Power Company ("Appalachian"); and certain Virginia electric  cooperatives2 filing jointly with the Virginia, Maryland, and  Delaware Association of Electric Cooperatives (collectively, "Virginia  Cooperatives" or "Cooperatives"). No party requested a hearing,  and the Staff did not file comments in this proceeding.
    The comments received from Dominion Virginia Power,3  Appalachian, and the Virginia Cooperatives were principally supportive of the  Proposed Rules, proposed only editorial changes for purposes of clarification,  or described how these rules would or should be implemented.
    Dominion's comments, for example, indicated that company's  support for the Proposed Rules and offered no suggested changes or  modifications thereto. Dominion did state, however, that stand-by service  encompassed by this rulemaking can be accommodated under most, if not all, of  Dominion's current rate schedules. Dominion Comments at 5. Thus, Dominion  asserts that "[g]iven the Company's currently approved tariffs and those  proposed in the 2009 Rate Case Filing [(Case No. PUE-2009-00019)], most  customers will have alternative rate options for securing stand-by service and  will have a choice of selecting the rate schedule that best fits their  individual stand-by service requirements."  Id. In this regard,  Dominion states regarding 20 VAC 5-317-20 in the Proposed Rules that  this rule "should not be interpreted as requiring a utility to provide  rates specifically designed for stand-by service to customers that operate  cogeneration facilities that generate renewable energy, where other tariffs  properly apply to such customers."  Id. at 6.
    Appalachian states in its comments that it supports the  Proposed Rules, but has offered changes it characterizes as minor to  "ensure the clear applicability of the Rules." Appalachian Comments  at 1. These suggested changes include substituting the term "customer  charges" for "metering charges" in Subdivision 1 of 20 VAC  5-317-30 of the Proposed Rules (id.); modifying Subdivision 2 of 20 VAC  5-317-30 concerning its scope to specify that utilities' recoverable  distribution service charges are those associated with "owning and  operating" distribution facilities (id. at 2); and making minor clarifying  edits in Subdivision 4 of 20 VAC 5-317-30 (id.).
    The comments filed by the Virginia Cooperatives state that  "[h]istorically, the Cooperatives have negotiated stand-by rates on an  individual case basis to recover the costs of installing and maintaining the  distribution facilities necessary to serve the customer and providing as-needed  generation supply service.  We believe that the Proposed Rules would  continue to allow this approach."  Cooperatives Comments at 4. These  comments also provided illustrations of this approach as experienced by three  Virginia cooperatives. Id. at 4-5. The Virginia Cooperatives further state that  "[t]he Proposed Rules appear to endorse the notion that the generator to  whom stand-by service is supplied is responsible for the increased costs  associated with that service, and the Cooperatives support the Proposed  Rules."4  Id. at 6.
    NOW UPON CONSIDERATION of the comments filed herein, we find  that we should adopt and promulgate the rules appended hereto as Attachment A,  governing rates for stand-by service furnished to certain renewable  cogeneration facilities, such rulemaking having been directed by § 56-235.1:1  of the Code enacted in Chapter 745 of the 2009 Acts of Assembly.
    The Commission notes, first of all, that the Proposed Rules  were broadly supported by the parties filing comments in this docket: Dominion  Virginia Power, Appalachian, and the Virginia Cooperatives. Second, we will  adopt—either verbatim or in substance—nearly all of the suggested editorial  changes to the Proposed Rules by Appalachian. They clarify the final rules we  approve in this docket. However, we will not adopt the amendment proposed by  Appalachian to Subdivision 2 of 20 VAC 5-317-30 (concerning its scope to  specify that utilities' recoverable distribution service charges are those  associated with "owning and operating" distribution facilities); the  language in that subdivision is sufficiently clear without those modifiers, and  it is that language we adopt in our final rules.
    We will also address Dominion's concerns, described above,  that 20 VAC 5-317-20 in the Proposed Rules should not be interpreted as  requiring a utility "to provide rates specifically designed for stand-by  service to customers that operate cogeneration facilities that generate  renewable energy, where other tariffs properly apply to such  customers."  Specifically, Dominion states that its existing tariffs  or those proposed in its pending rate case (PUE-2009-00019) are or will be  sufficient to the task.  The Commission would observe that Dominion will  be required to submit a compliance plan under these rules (20 VAC 5-317-40)  within 90 days of their promulgation in which Dominion may seek this  Commission's ruling, inter alia, that such tariffs are sufficient to satisfy  the requirements of § 56-235.1:1 of the Code and the Commission's rules  implementing this new statute that we adopt herein.  Similarly, the  Virginia Cooperatives may submit for Commission review under 20 VAC 5-317-40,  their current practice of negotiating stand-by rates "on an individual  case basis" to recover their costs associated with providing that  service—if that is their proposed compliance plan under these rules.
    Put simply, the rules we adopt in this order (implementing § 56-235.1:1  of the Code) require that within 90 days of the effective date of these rules,  electric utilities subject to their provisions must submit compliance plans to  the Commission for review and approval, subject to notice and an opportunity  for hearing.  It is at that time that the Commission will "determine  whether a utility's plan complies with the regulations."  Section 56-235.1:1 B of the Code. Consequently, we do not reach in this order whether  Dominion's or the Cooperative's intended compliance strategies—evidently  previewed in their comments filed in this docket—satisfy the requirements of  § 56-235.1:1 of the Code and the regulations we adopt herein. That  determination must await their filings required by 20 VAC 5-317-40 of these  regulations.
    Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    (1) We hereby adopt and promulgate the Commission's  rules governing Rates for Stand-by Service Furnished to Certain Renewable  Cogeneration Facilities, pursuant to § 56-235.1:1 of the Code of Virginia to be  set forth in a new Chapter 317 (20 VAC 5-317-10 et seq.) in Title 20 of  the Virginia Administrative Code, appended hereto as Attachment A, all to  become effective on January 1, 2010.
    (2) A copy of this Order and the rules adopted herein  shall be promptly forwarded for publication in the Virginia Register of  Regulations.
    (3) This case is dismissed and the papers filed herein  shall be placed in the file for end causes.
    AN ATTESTED COPY hereof shall be sent by the Clerk of the  Commission to: Pamela A. Walker, Deputy General Counsel, Dominion Virginia  Power, Law Department PH‑1, P.O. Box 26532, Richmond, Virginia  23261-6532; Barry L. Thomas, Director, Regulatory Affairs, Appalachian  Power Company, 1051 East Cary Street, Suite 702, Richmond, Virginia 23219;  Kendrick R. Riggs, Esquire, Stoll Keenon Ogden, 2000 PNC Plaza, 500  West Jefferson Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40202; Jeffery P. Trout, Esquire,  Allegheny Power, 800 Cabin Hill Road, Greensburg, Pennsylvania 15601;  C. Meade Browder, Jr., Senior Assistant Attorney General, Division of  Consumer Counsel, Office of Attorney General, 900 East Main Street,  2nd Floor, Richmond, Virginia 23219; all Virginia electric cooperatives as  listed in Appendix A attached hereto; and a copy shall be delivered to the  Commission's Office of General Counsel and Division of Energy Regulation.
        
    
    1 Chapter 745 of the 2009 Acts of Assembly. 
    2 A & N Electric Cooperative, BARC Electric  Cooperative, Central Virginia Electric Cooperative; Community Electric  Cooperative, Craig-Botetourt Electric Cooperative, Mecklenburg Electric  Cooperative, Northern Neck Electric Cooperative, Northern Virginia Electric  Cooperative, Prince George Electric Cooperative, Rappahannock Electric  Cooperative, Shenandoah Valley Electric Cooperative, and Southside Electric  Cooperative. 
    3 Dominion requested the opportunity to file reply  comments in order to respond to the comments of other parties and to those of  the Staff.  However, in light of the comments filed by the other parties  supporting the Proposed Rules, and the Staff's election to not file comments in  this proceeding, we find that reply comments are not necessary.
    4 The Cooperatives elaborate on generator responsibility  by stating that "[o]ftentimes, a cooperative's interest in protecting its  other customers results in (i) the stand-by service customer being required to  make a CIAC payment, and (ii) necessarily high monthly rates to ensure cost  recovery on both the distribution and supply sides of the utility's  operations."  Cooperatives' Comments at 6.
     
    CHAPTER 317
  RATES FOR STANDBY SERVICE FURNISHED TO CERTAIN RENEWABLE COGENERATION  FACILITIES PURSUANT TO § 56-235.1:1 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA 
    20VAC5-317-10. Applicability and scope.
    This chapter is promulgated pursuant to the provisions of  § 56-235.1:1 of the Code of Virginia. It is applicable to (i) Virginia's  electric utilities ("utilities" or "utility") subject to  the provisions of § 56-235.1:1 [ , ] and  (ii) utilities' customers that operate cogeneration facilities that generate  renewable energy, as that term is defined in § 56-576 of the Code of  Virginia, and desire to obtain standby service from utilities.
    20VAC5-317-20. Duty to provide rate for [ stand-by  standby ] service.
    Every utility subject to the provisions of § 56-235.1:1  of the Code of Virginia shall provide a rate for standby service to customers  in its certificated territory that operate a cogeneration facility in the  Commonwealth that generates renewable energy as defined in § 56-576 of the  Code of Virginia.
    20VAC5-317-30. Costs to be recovered in [ stand-by  standby ] rates.
    Costs to be recovered in utility rates for standby service  provided to cogeneration facilities generating renewable energy shall include,  but are not limited to, the following:
    1. [ Metering Customer ]  charges [ , including, but not limited to, metering charges ]  to recover utility costs associated with metering facilities, meter reading  (where appropriate), processing, communication equipment (where appropriate),  and administration.
    2. Distribution service charges to recover utility costs  associated with distribution facilities including [ , but not  limited to, ] the costs of transformers and other distribution  equipment necessary to provide standby service.
    3. Transmission service charges to recover utility costs  (i) for transmission services provided to the utility by the regional  transmission entity of which the utility is a member, as determined under  applicable rates, terms, and conditions approved by the Federal Energy  Regulatory Commission [ , ] and (ii) charged to  the utility that are associated with demand response programs approved by the  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and administered by the regional  transmission entity of which the utility is a member.
    4. Electricity supply service charges to recover  [ (i) ] utility fixed costs and nonfuel-related operating  and maintenance expenses associated with investments in generating units and  [ (ii) ] capacity payments associated with power purchases  including, but not limited to, a return on the undepreciated generating unit  investments, associated income taxes, depreciation expenses, operations and  maintenance expenses, and property taxes.
    5. Fuel charges to recover utility fuel costs including  purchased power costs.
    20VAC5-317-40. Initial implementation of standby rates.
    On or before [ within 90 days of the  effective date of these regulations April 1, 2010 ] ,  each utility shall submit to the State Corporation Commission (commission) a  plan setting forth the utility's plan for compliance with this chapter. A  utility may submit its existing standby provisions as its proposed plan for  compliance with this chapter. Thereafter, following notice and an opportunity  for hearing, the commission will determine whether a utility's plan complies  with this chapter.
    20VAC5-317-50. Waiver.
    The commission may waive any or all parts of this chapter  for good cause shown.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-2091; Filed December 7, 2009, 12:46 p.m. 
TITLE 22. SOCIAL SERVICES
STATE BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Proposed Regulation
    Title of Regulation: 22VAC40-601. Food Stamp Program (amending 22VAC40-601-10, 22VAC40-601-40;  adding 22VAC40-601-50, 22VAC40-601-60).
    Statutory Authority: § 63.2-217 of the Code of  Virginia.
    Public Hearing Information:
    February 17, 2010 - 10 a.m. - Department of Social Services,  801 East Main Street, 2nd Floor, Richmond, VA
    Public Comment Deadline: March 5, 2010.
    Agency Contact: Celestine Jackson, Program Consultant,  Department of Social Services, Division of Benefit Programs, 7 North 8th  Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 726-7376, FAX (804) 726-7356, TTY  (800) 828-1120, or email celestine.jackson@dss.virginia.gov.
    Basis: Section 63.2-217 of the Code of Virginia requires  the State Board of Social Services to adopt regulations necessary or desirable  to operate assistance programs in Virginia. The federal government delegates  authority to state agencies in 7 CFR 271.4  to administer the program  within the states.
    The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (Pub. L. No.  110-246) (FCEA) contains a provision allowing states to expand transitional  benefits to cases with children who receive state maintenance-of-effort (MOE)  funds or state funds that do not count toward the state MOE requirements.
    Federal regulation, 7 CFR 273.2(h), allows states an option to  either deny food stamp applications after 30 days or to extend the pending  status.
    Purpose: This regulatory action will change how food  stamp applications are handled when an application is not processed after 30  days because information is lacking due to the fault of the household. The  purpose is to reduce the number of administrative matters held open by local  eligibility workers. The amount of benefits households receive, and the number  of eligible households, will not be affected by the change in how applications  are processed.
    Citizens who seek food stamp benefits must apply for them in  the city or county where they live. Local eligibility workers have 30 days to  process an application for food stamp benefits. Benefits are calculated from  the application date, so eligible households will receive a higher benefit if  the application is filed early in the month. Currently, if the eligibility  worker is unable to process the application at the end of 30 days because of  the applicant's failure to provide information or to take other needed actions,  the eligibility worker must extend the processing period by an additional 30  days. If the applicant supplies the information or takes the needed actions  during the second 30 day period, benefits are prorated from the date the  information is supplied. The application is denied if information is still  needed at the end of the 60th day.
    Approximately 30% of food stamp applications that are held for  the extended period are processed, while the majority of the pending  applications are ultimately denied because of the failure of the applicant  household to provide needed information.
    This regulatory action will create a new section,  22VAC40-60-50, that will require applications for Supplemental Nutrition  Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits to be disposed of within 30 days.  Eligibility workers will be required to reopen the denied application if an  applicant provides the information before the 60th day. If the household is  eligible, benefits will be calculated from the date the last verification was  provided.
    This regulatory action will also create a second new section,  22VAC40-60-60, providing that transitional SNAP benefits will apply to  households with children whose state-funded MOE program benefits or benefits  from a state funded program that does not count toward MOE programs or benefits  end in the same manner as federally funded public assistance benefits. The  transitional benefits component allows eligibility for SNAP benefits to be  determined without considering current circumstances to allow the recipient to  adjust to the loss of the public assistance income source. Transitional SNAP  benefits are a means to provide up to five months of SNAP benefits to  households leaving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) cash  assistance without requiring the household to submit additional paperwork or  information. The federal Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (FCEA)  contains a provision that allows states an option to expand transitional benefits  to cases with children who receive state MOE funds or state funds that do not  count toward the state MOE requirements. The Department of Social Services  would like to expand transitional benefits to include the closure of  state-funded programs that count toward the TANF MOE requirement, such as the  VIEW Transitional Payment (VTP) component, or state-funded programs that do not  count toward the TANF MOE requirement, such as the General Relief Program.
    FCEA renamed the Food Stamp Program the Supplemental Nutrition  Assistance Program on a national basis. This change acknowledges the  transformation that has occurred in the delivery of benefits. Benefits are no  longer issued through paper coupons or stamps but are instead issued  electronically. FCEA does not mandate adoption of the SNAP name by states;  however, adoption of the name will lessen confusion as all references, guidance  documents, and instructions provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture will  identify the program as SNAP. The name change is also important because it  focuses on the importance of SNAP in meeting the nutritional needs of  low-income Virginians. Further, it reduces the stigma associated with receiving  food stamps. The Department of Social Services will be phasing in the program name  change gradually.
    These amendments will not affect the health or safety of  citizens.
    Substance: New 22VAC40-601-50 mandates that  applications for SNAP benefits be disposed of within 30 days.  If an  application cannot be processed by the 30th day because information needed to  determine eligibility is lacking due to the fault of the household, the  application must be denied. The eligibility worker must reinstate the  application and prorate benefits to the date the verification was provided if  the applicant provides the information during the next 30 days. Applicants will  not be required to submit a new application to have the local department of  social services reopen the case and consider any newly submitted information.  Federal regulation 7 CFR 273.10(g)(ii) requires that the eligibility worker  send applicants a notice that details the actions or information needed and  inform the applicant that the denial will be cancelled if the applicant  provides the information within 30 days.
    New 22VAC40-601-60 provides that transitional SNAP benefits  will apply to households with children whose state-funded programs or benefits  end in the same manner as federally funded public assistance benefits. The  transitional benefits component allows eligibility for SNAP benefits to be  determined without considering current circumstances to allow the recipient to  adjust to the loss of the public assistance income source. Transitional food  stamp benefits allow eligible households to receive benefits for up to five  months without a new application while the households adjust to the terminated  TANF benefit.
    This regulatory action also changes all references in the  regulation from "Food Stamp Program" and "food stamps" to  "Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)" and "SNAP benefits."
    Issues: This regulatory action will benefit workers of  local departments of social services by allowing them to dispose of SNAP  applications that likely will be abandoned by the applicant. Instead of holding  an application in pending status for up to 60 days, the application would be  denied after 30 days if the applicant has failed to provide requested  verification or information to process the application. If the applicant  subsequently provides the requested verification or information, the local  department must reactivate the application and continue the processing, so it  does not result in any lost benefits to the household. Eligible households will  receive the same amount of benefits with implementation of new 22VAC40-601-50  as they would under the current process.
    New 22VAC40-601-60 provides advantages to recipient SNAP  households whose TANF or state-funded programs end when the SNAP benefit amount  is held constant for up to five months, regardless of the current  circumstances. Households may elect to withdraw from the transitional benefits  component in order to have current circumstances evaluated if substantial  changes exist in addition to the loss of the public assistance income. This  provision does not offer any advantages or disadvantages to the local social  services staff.
    Low-income Virginia households that may not have applied for  food stamp benefits because of the perceived stigma of receiving a  "welfare" benefit are benefited by changing the program. The name  change also benefits participant families by emphasizing the importance of the  program in supplementing families' budgets to assist them in meeting their  nutritional needs.
    The Department of Planning and Budget's Economic Impact  Analysis:
    Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. The State  Board of Social Services (Board) proposes to: 1) change the name of the program  from "Food Stamp Program" to "Supplemental Nutrition Assistance  Program" (SNAP) and the name of the benefits from "food stamps" to  "SNAP benefits," 2) expand transitional SNAP benefits to children who  receive state maintenance-of-effort (MOE) funds or state funds that do not  count toward the state MOE requirement, and 3) mandate that applications for  SNAP benefits be processed within 30 days, rather than the current 60 day  period in which they remain open.
    Result of Analysis. The benefits likely exceed the costs for  all proposed changes.
    Estimated Economic Impact
    Name change
    The federal Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (FCEA)  renamed the Food Stamp Program the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program on  a national basis. This change acknowledges the transformation that has occurred  in the delivery of benefits. Benefits are no longer issued through paper  coupons or stamps but are instead issued electronically. FCEA does not mandate  adoption of the SNAP name by states; however, adoption of the name will lessen  confusion as all references, guidance documents, and instructions provided by  the U.S. Department of Agriculture will identify the program as SNAP. The name  change is also important because it focuses on the importance of SNAP in  meeting the nutritional needs of low-income Virginians. Further, it reduces the  stigma associated with receiving food stamps. The Virginia Department of Social  Services (DSS) will be phasing in the program name change gradually.
    Expand Transitional Benefits
    The Board proposes to provide that transitional SNAP benefits  will apply to households with children whose state-funded MOE program benefits  or benefits from a state funded program that does not count toward MOE end in  the same manner as federally funded public assistance benefits. The  transitional benefits component allows eligibility for SNAP benefits to be  determined without considering current circumstances to allow the recipient to  adjust to the loss of the public assistance income source. Transitional SNAP  benefits are a means to provide up to five months of SNAP benefits to  households leaving TANF cash assistance without requiring the household to  submit additional paperwork or information. The FCEA contains a provision that  allows states an option to expand transitional benefits to cases with children  that receive state MOE funds or state funds that do not count toward the state  MOE requirements.  Approximately 3,600 TANF cases are closed per month.1  According to DSS, at least half those households will be eligible for the  proposed transitional benefits. Since all of the additional transitional  benefits are paid for with federal dollars, this is unambiguously a net benefit  for the Commonwealth.
    SNAP Application Processing
    The Board also proposes to change how SNAP benefit applications  are handled when an application is not processed after 30 days because  information is lacking due to the fault of the household.  The purpose of  this proposed regulatory action is to reduce the number of administrative  matters held open by local eligibility workers.  According to DSS, the  amount of benefits households receive, and the number of eligible households,  will not be affected by the change in how applications are processed. 
    Citizens who seek SNAP benefits must apply for them in the city  or county where they live. Local eligibility workers have 30 days to process an  application for SNAP benefits. Benefits are calculated from the application  date, so eligible households will receive a higher benefit if the application  is filed early in the month. Currently, if the eligibility worker is unable to  process the application at the end of 30 days because of the applicant’s  failure to provide information or to take other needed actions, the eligibility  worker must extend the processing period by an additional 30 days. If the  applicant supplies the information or takes the needed actions during the  second 30 day period, benefits are prorated from the date the information is  supplied. The application is denied if information is still needed at the end  of the 60th day.
    Approximately 30% of SNAP applications that are held for the  extended period are processed, while the majority (or about 1,000 per month) of  the pending applications are ultimately denied because of the failure of the  applicant household to provide needed information. The Board proposes to  require that applications for SNAP benefits be disposed of within 30 days.  Eligibility workers will be required to reopen the denied application if an  applicant provides the information before the 60th day. If the household is  eligible, benefits will be calculated from the date the last verification was  provided.
    Under the proposed amended system, local departments of social  services will save an estimated 15 to 30 minutes of staff time for each of the  approximate 1,000 applications that are ultimately denied because of the  failure of the applicant household to provide needed information. That works out  to about a range of 250 to 500 hours of staff time saved per month.  Since  the amount of benefits households receive and the number of eligible households  will not be affected by the change in how applications are processed, while  there is a significant reduction in cost due to reduced staff time expended,  this proposal should produce a net benefit.
    Businesses and Entities Affected. The proposed amendments  affect the state and local departments of social services, and SNAP recipients  and applicants.
    Localities Particularly Affected. The proposed amendments  affect Virginia localities. Localities with proportionately more residents  receiving SNAP benefits will be particularly affected.
    Projected Impact on Employment. The proposed amendments are  unlikely to significantly affect employment.
    Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposed  new transitional benefits will moderately increase the net worth of households  who receive this aid.
    Small Businesses: Costs and Other Effects. The proposed amendments  are unlikely to significantly affect small businesses.
    Small Businesses: Alternative Method that Minimizes Adverse  Impact. The proposed amendments are unlikely to significantly affect small  businesses.
    Real Estate Development Costs. The proposed amendments will not  significantly affect real estate development costs.
    Legal Mandate. The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has  analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with  § 2.2-4007.04 of the Administrative Process Act and Executive Order Number  36 (06). Section 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses  include, but need not be limited to, the projected number of businesses or  other entities to whom the regulation would apply, the identity of any localities  and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, the projected  number of persons and employment positions to be affected, the projected costs  to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation,  and the impact on the use and value of private property. Further, if the  proposed regulation has adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04  requires that such economic impact analyses include (i) an identification and  estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the regulation; (ii) the  projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for  small businesses to comply with the regulation, including the type of  professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents;  (iii) a statement of the probable effect of the regulation on affected small  businesses; and (iv) a description of any less intrusive or less costly  alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the regulation. The analysis  presented above represents DPB's best estimate of these economic impacts.
    _____________________________
    1 Estimate based on data provided by the Virginia  Department of Social Services
    Agency's Response to the Department of Planning and Budget's  Economic Impact Analysis: The Department of Social Services concurs with  the economic impact analysis prepared by the Department of Planning and Budget.
    Summary:
    This regulatory action changes the title name and all  references in the regulation from "Food Stamp Program" and "food  stamps" to "Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)"  and "SNAP benefits."
    It creates a new section, 22VAC40-601-50, that mandates  applications for SNAP benefits be disposed of within 30 days. If an application  cannot be processed by the 30th day because information needed to determine  eligibility is lacking due to the fault of the household, the application must  be denied. The eligibility worker must reinstate the application and prorate  benefits to the date the verification was provided if the applicant provides  the information during the next 30 days. 
    A second new section, 22VAC40-601-60, which provides that  transitional SNAP benefits to households with children whose state-funded  maintenance-of-effort (MOE) program benefits or benefits from a state funded  program that does not count toward MOE end in the same manner as federally  funded Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) benefits. The  transitional benefits component allows eligibility for SNAP benefits to be  determined without considering current circumstances to allow the recipient to  adjust to the loss of the public assistance income source.
    CHAPTER 601 
  FOOD STAMP SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 
    22VAC40-601-10. Definitions.
    The following words and terms when used in these guidelines  will have the following meaning unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
    "Access device" means any card, plate, code,  account number, or other means of access that can be used alone or in  conjunction with another access device, to obtain payments, allotments,  benefits, money, goods, or other things of value, or that can be used to  initiate a transfer of funds under the Food Stamp Act of 1977, as amended. 
    "Administrative disqualification hearing" or  "ADH" means an impartial review by a hearing officer of a household  member's actions involving an alleged intentional program violation for the  purpose of rendering a decision of guilty or not guilty of committing an  intentional program violation (IPV).
    "Authorization to participate" or "ATP"  means a document authorizing a household to receive a food stamp SNAP  allotment in a specific amount for a specific entitlement period from an  authorized food coupon issuance agent.
    "Hearing officer" means an impartial representative  of the state who receives requests for administrative disqualification hearings  or fair hearings. The hearing officer has the authority to conduct and control  hearings and to render decisions.
    "Intentional program violations" or "IPV"  means any action by an individual who intentionally made a false or misleading  statement to the local department, either orally or in writing, to obtain  benefits to which the household is not entitled; concealed information or  withheld facts to obtain benefits to which the household is not entitled; or  committed any act that constitutes a violation of the Food Stamp Act, Food  Stamp SNAP regulations, or any state statutes relating to the use,  presentation, transfer, acquisition, receipt, or possession of food stamp  coupons, authorization to participate cards, access devices, or food stamp  SNAP benefits.
    "Local department" means the local department of  social services of any county or city in this Commonwealth.
    "SNAP" means Supplemental Nutrition Assistance  Program.
    22VAC40-601-40. Administrative disqualification hearing.
    A. The local department is responsible for investigating any  case of alleged intentional program violation and ensuring that appropriate  cases are acted upon either through referral for an administrative  disqualification hearing or for prosecution by a court of appropriate  jurisdiction.
    B. In order for a local department to request an ADH, there  must be clear and convincing evidence that demonstrates a household member  committed or intended to commit an IPV.
    C. The local department shall ensure that evidence against  the household member alleged to have committed an IPV is reviewed by either an  eligibility supervisor or the local department director to certify that the  evidence warrants referral for an ADH.
    D. Before submitting the referral for an ADH to the state  hearing manager, the local department shall send a notice to the person  suspected of an IPV that the member may waive the right to a hearing. The  person must sign a waiver request and return it to the local department within  10 days from the date the notice was sent to the household member in order to  avoid the submission of the ADH referral.
    E. If the local department receives a signed waiver, there  will not be a hearing but the person will be disqualified for the length of  time prescribed by federal policy.
    F. The hearing officer will schedule a date for the ADH and  provide written notice to the household member suspected of an IPV by certified  mail - return receipt requested or first class mail. The notice must be mailed  at least 30 days in advance of the date the ADH scheduled. If the notice is  sent using first class mail and is returned as undeliverable, the hearing may  still be held. The hearing officer must compare the household's address on the  local department referral with other documents associated with the case. A  revised notice must be provided to the household member if an error is  discovered in the address used for the original notice of the hearing.
    G. The requirement to notify the individual about the ADH  will be met if there is proof of receipt of the advance notice of the ADH or if  there is proof that the person refused to accept the notice.
    H. The time and place of the ADH shall be arranged so that  the hearing is acceptable to the person suspected of an IPV.
    I. The person or representative may request a postponement of  the ADH if the request for postponement is made at least 10 days in advance of  the date of the scheduled hearing.
    J. The ADH may be held even if the person or representative  subsequently cannot be located or fails to appear without good cause.
    K. If the hearing officer finds that a household member  committed an IPV but the hearing officer later determines there was good cause  for not appearing, including that the notice was sent to an incorrect address,  the previous decision will no longer be valid. A new ADH shall be conducted.
    L. A pending ADH shall not affect the household or an  individual's right to be certified and participate in the Food Stamp Program  SNAP.
    M. The hearing officer shall:
    1. Identify those present for the record.
    2. Advise the person or representative that he may refuse to  answer questions during the hearing.
    3. Explain the purpose of the ADH, the procedure, how and by  whom a decision will be reached and communicated, and the option of either the  local department or the household to request an administrative review of the  hearing officer's decision. The hearing officer shall also explain that only  the household may seek a change to the hearing officer's decision through a  court of appropriate jurisdiction.
    4. Consider all relevant issues. Even if the person or  representative is not present, the hearing officer must carefully consider the  evidence and determine if any IPV was committed based on clear and convincing  evidence.
    5. Request, receive and make part of the record all evidence  determined necessary to render a decision.
    6. Regulate the conduct and course of the hearing consistent  with the process to ensure an orderly hearing.
    N. The person alleged to have committed an IPV and the  representative shall be given adequate opportunity to:
    1. Examine all documents and records to be used at the ADH at  a reasonable time prior to the ADH as well as during the ADH.
    2. Present the case or have it presented by legal counsel or  another person.
    3. Bring witnesses.
    4. Advance arguments without undue interference.
    5. Question or refute any testimony or evidence, including the  opportunity to confront and cross-examine witnesses.
    6. Submit evidence to establish all pertinent fact and  circumstances in the case.
    O. The hearing officer is responsible for rendering a  decision based on clear and convincing evidence from the hearing record that  can be substantiated by supporting evidence and applicable regulations.
    P. The hearing officer shall prepare a written report of the  substance of the findings, conclusions, decisions, and appropriate  recommendations.
    Q. The hearing officer shall notify the person of the  decision in writing and of the household's right to seek an administrative  review or court appeal of the decision.
    R. If the hearing officer finds that the individual did  commit an IPV, the written decision shall advise that household that  disqualification shall occur.
    S. The determination of IPV by the hearing officer cannot be  reversed by a subsequent fair hearing decision.
    T. Upon receipt of the notice of a decision from the hearing  officer that the household member is guilty of an IPV, the local department  shall inform the household of the reason for the disqualification and the date  the disqualification will take effect.
    22VAC40-601-50. Application processing.
    Applications for SNAP benefits must be disposed of within  30 days. Applicants have 30 days to provide verification or information needed  to determine eligibility of the household. If an application cannot be  processed by the 30th day because such information is lacking due to the fault  of the household, the application must be denied. If the applicant provides the  information during the next 30 days, the eligibility worker must reinstate the  application and prorate benefits to the date the last verification was  provided.
    22VAC40-601-60. Transitional benefits.
    Transitional SNAP benefits will apply to households whose  state-funded programs or benefits end in the same manner as federally funded  public assistance programs. Transitional SNAP benefits will apply only to  households with children. The state-funded programs may or may not be counted  toward the maintenance-of-effort requirements needed for the Temporary  Assistance for Needy Families block grant.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R09-1977; Filed December 15, 2009, 10:43 a.m. 
TITLE 23. TAXATION
DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
Final Regulation
    Title of Regulation: 23VAC10-210. Retail Sales and  Use Tax (amending 23VAC10-210-1020).
    Statutory Authority: § 58.1-203 of the Code of  Virginia.
    Effective Date: February 3, 2010.
    Agency Contact: Bland Sutton, Analyst, Department of  Taxation, 600 East Main Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 371-2332,  FAX (804) 371-2355, or email bland.sutton@tax.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    Chapter 121 of the Acts of Assembly amended the definition  of "retail sale" and "sale at retail" set forth in § 58.1-602  of the Code of Virginia to include separately stated charges for materials used  in automotive refinishing and repair when such materials become permanently  attached to the vehicle being refinished or repaired. This change in the  definition of "retail sale" and "sale at retail" is a  departure from the Department of  Taxation's longstanding policy that  treats automotive refinishers and painters as service providers and the taxable  user or consumer of tangible personal property used in providing their service.  The amended regulation allows automotive refinishers and repairers the option  of continuing to operate as service providers or to be treated as retailers by  separately stating their charge for materials.
    Summary of Public Comments and Agency's Response: No  public comments were received by the promulgating agency. 
    23VAC10-210-1020. Motor vehicle refinishers, painters and car  washers.
    A. Generally. Motor vehicle refinishers and,  painters, and washers are generally engaged primarily in  rendering personal services, and their gross receipts are not subject to the  tax. However, they As personal service providers, motor vehicle  refinishers, painters, and washers are the users and consumers of  the materials used in their business and are required to pay tax on their  purchases. When motor vehicle refinishers and, painters,  and washers go beyond the rendition of services and sell tangible personal  property such as accessories, parts, seatcovers, paint, etc., they are  required to register and collect and pay remit the tax on those  retail sales. This section also applies to car washers.
    B. Optional tax treatment for motor vehicle refinishers  and painters. Effective July 1, 2005, the definition of "retail sale"  and "sale at retail" was amended to include separately stated charges  made for automotive refinish repair materials that are permanently applied to  or affixed to a motor vehicle during its repair. This definitional change  affords motor vehicle refinishers and painters the option of either continuing  to be treated as a personal service provider with respect to paint, clearcoat,  sealants, and other similar items that become a component part of a motor  vehicle during the refinishing or repair of the motor vehicle, or to be treated  as a retailer with respect to such items. The election to be treated as a  retailer is solely at the discretion of the motor vehicle refinisher or  painter.
    C. Motor vehicle refinishers and painters electing to  operate as a retailer. A motor vehicle refinisher or painter electing to  operate as a retailer is required to register with the Department of Taxation  as a licensed dealer and collect and remit to the Department of Taxation the  retail sales tax on all sales of tangible personal property made, including  separately stated charges for automotive refinish repair materials. As a  licensed dealer, a motor vehicle refinisher or painter may purchase all  tangible personal property that becomes a component part of a motor vehicle  during the refinishing, painting, or repair of the motor vehicle exempt of the  tax for resale. Once a motor vehicle refinisher or painter elects to treat  himself as a retailer, such election and tax application must be uniformly  applied to all motor vehicle refinishing and repair work performed by such  dealer.
    D. Consumables and equipment. Regardless of whether the  optional tax treatment is elected or not, motor vehicle refinishers, painters,  and washers are liable for the tax on purchases of all tangible personal  property used or consumed in the performance of their work, and that does not  transfer to the customer.
    VA.R. Doc. No. R07-250; Filed December 3, 2009, 9:22 a.m. 
TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES
COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD
Final Regulation
        REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The  following regulation filed by the Commonwealth Transportation Board is exempt  from the Administrative Process Act in accordance with § 2.2-4002 B 3 of the  Code of Virginia, which exempts regulations relating to the location, design,  specifications, or construction of public buildings or other facilities.
         Title of Regulation: 24VAC30-510. Frontage Roads (repealing 24VAC30-510-10).
    Statutory Authority: § 33.1-61 of the Code of Virginia.
    Effective Date: December 10, 2009. 
    Agency Contact: David L. Roberts, Program Administration  Specialist III, Department of Transportation, Policy Division, 1401 E. Broad  St., Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 786-3620, FAX (804) 225-4700, or email  david.roberts@vdot.virginia.gov.
    Summary:
    This chapter is repealed because the content has been incorporated  into the Road Design Manual, which is incorporated by reference into the Access  Management Regulations: Principal Arterials (24VAC30-72) and Access Management  Regulations: Minor Arterials, Collectors, and Local Streets (24VAC30-73). As a  result, the Frontage Roads regulation is no longer needed. 
    VA.R. Doc. No. R10-2261; Filed December 10, 2009, 3:47 p.m. 
 
                                                        REISSUANCE OF EXECUTIVE ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIRGINIA  RECOVERY ZONE VOLUME CAP ALLOCATIONS PROVIDED UNDER THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND  REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009
    The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("ARRA")  created Recovery Zone Economic Development Bonds and Recovery Zone Facility  Bonds (together, "Recovery Zone Bonds"), that must be issued before  January 1, 2011 (the "Expiration Date"). Recovery Zone Bonds are  intended to lower the costs of borrowing for purposes of promoting job creation  and economic recovery in areas designated as Recovery Zones. Pursuant to ARRA  and as described in Notice 2009-50 of the Internal Revenue Service  ("Notice 2009-50"), the Commonwealth of Virginia (the  "Commonwealth") received volume cap allocations of $104,396,000 in  Recovery Zone Economic Development Bonds and $156,595,000 in Recovery Zone  Facility Bonds (together, the "Commonwealth Allocation"). Notice  2009-50 further provides that the Commonwealth Allocation be initially  allocated among counties and cities of the Commonwealth as provided on Exhibit  A (the "Originally Awarded Localities" and the "Original  Allocations").
    Together, the ARRA and Notice 2009-50 provide that all or any  portion of the Original Allocations may be waived or deemed waived by the  Originally Awarded Localities, and upon such waiver, the state shall be  authorized to re-allocate the waived volume cap in any reasonable manner as it  shall determine in good faith in its discretion. For additional information on  Recovery Zone Bonds please visit: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-09-50.pdf.
     It is critical that the Commonwealth and its localities take  advantage of this financing mechanism to create jobs, foster economic  development, and develop critical infrastructure. Therefore, to the extent any  Original Allocation will not be used by the Originally Awarded Localities, it  is imperative to provide for the re-allocation of such unused amounts to  projects that would promote economic recovery of the Commonwealth prior to the  Expiration Date.
     On September 30, 2009, I issued Executive Order Number 94 to  establish a procedure for the waiver of allocations by Originally Awarded  Localities, and further to direct my Chief of Staff to serve as re-allocation  director (the "Re-allocation Director") to establish a process for  the re-allocation of such allocations waived by the Originally Awarded  Localities. Since September 30, 2009, my office has received a number of  requests and comments from Originally Awarded Localities and other interested  parties concerning Executive Order Number 94, particularly regarding paragraph  3) under the heading "Waiver Requirements."
     In response to these requests and comments and by virtue of  the authority vested in me as Governor under Article V of the Constitution of  Virginia and Sections 2.2-103 and 2.2-435.7 of the Code of Virginia, and  subject to my continuing and ultimate authority and responsibility to act in  such matters, I hereby rescind my previously-issued Executive Order Number 94  and reissue it in the form of this order to establish the following procedure  for the waiver of allocations by Originally Awarded Localities, and further to  direct my Chief of Staff to serve as re-allocation director (the  "Re-allocation Director") to establish a process for the  re-allocation of such allocations waived by the Originally Awarded Localities.  The only changes to Executive Order Number 94 are set forth below in paragraph  3) under the heading "Waiver Requirements" and provide an extension  of the filing deadline contained therein and additional flexibility with  respect to the commitment letter filing requirement.
    1) By November 2, 2009, Originally Awarded Localities intending  to utilize all or any portion of the Original Allocations must file a completed  Notice of Intent with the Re-allocation Director. The amount so indicated will  be reserved for such locality (the "Reserved Amount"). The form for  such Notice of Intent is available from the Virginia Association of Counties,  the Virginia Municipal League, and at www.stimulus.virginia.gov.
    2) Failure by any Originally Awarded Locality to file such  Notice of Intent shall be deemed a waiver of its entire Original Allocation.  Any amounts so waived, with any amounts in excess of Reserved Amounts and such  other amounts described herein, will be considered waived by the Originally Awarded  Locality (together, "Waived Amounts").
    3) By January 12, 2010, any Originally Awarded Locality with a  Reserved Amount must file a Project Verification Report with the Re-Allocation  Director. Such documentation will include, as applicable, (i) a resolution or  action designating the Recovery Zone in accordance with Section 1400-U-1  through 1400U-3 of the ARRA, (ii) a resolution of the issuer approving the  project, which may take the form of a reimbursement resolution or an inducement  resolution, (iii) documentation of the appropriate governing bodies' or elected  official's approval of the project, in conformity with applicable federal and  state law, (iv) an opinion of bond counsel, and (v) a commitment letter from a  purchaser or underwriter of the subject bonds or such other evidence of the  Originally Awarded Locality's ability to sell the subject bonds before March  15, 2010, as may be reasonably acceptable to the Re-Allocation Director (such  as, for example, a letter from the financial advisor to an Originally Awarded  Locality stating that the Locality reasonably expects, based on the Locality's  credit ratings, to be able to sell the subject bonds in a competitive or  negotiated sale). The form for such Project Verification Report including  applicable attachments is available from the Virginia Association of Counties,  the Virginia Municipal League, and at www.stimulus.virginia.gov.
    4) Failure to provide a Project Verification Report shall be  deemed a waiver of the Reserved Amount, and such amount so waived shall be included  in the Waived Amounts.
    5) Within 30 days of issuance of any Recovery Zone Bonds, the  Originally Awarded Locality (or the entity issuing Recovery Zone Bonds on its  behalf) shall provide to the Re-allocation Director the completed Internal  Revenue Service reporting form then in effect for the type of Recovery Zone  Bonds being issued.
    6) Any Original Allocation, including any Reserved Amount, of  Recovery Zone Bonds not issued by March 15, 2010 will be deemed waived, and  such amount so waived shall be included in the Waived Amounts.
    Any Waived Amounts, including amounts voluntarily waived,  deemed waived or returned to the Re-allocation Director pursuant to the  process, will be available for re-allocation by the Re-allocation Director to  another locality or issuer ("Subsequent Awarded Entity").  Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, any Originally Awarded  Locality or any Subsequent Awarded Entity may voluntarily waive its allocation  at any time by providing notice to the Re-allocation Director.
    1) The Re-allocation Director shall develop a process for the  application, evaluation and re-allocation of the Waived Amounts to maximize the  use of this financing mechanism to stimulate jobs and develop critical  infrastructure within the Commonwealth.
    2) The Re-allocation Director is hereby authorized to delegate  to any official or agency or department of the Commonwealth any matter or task  described herein, to take any action that he, as the Re-allocation Director,  deems necessary or desirable to affect the purposes hereof, and to create an  advisory committee consistent with, and in furtherance of, this Executive  Order.
    3) Determination of compliance with the procedures and  requirements set forth herein or in the additional guidance, including any  filings to be made and the timing and substance thereof, shall be subject to  the sole discretion of the Re-allocation Director. The Re-allocation Director  shall have sole discretion as to the manner and location of any on-line postings  required herein or pursuant to such further rules and procedures promulgated by  him so long as such posting are on an official website of the Commonwealth.
    This Executive Order shall be effective upon its signing and  shall remain in full force and effect until December 31, 2011, unless sooner  amended or rescinded by further executive order.
     Given under my hand and under the Seal of the Commonwealth of  Virginia this 4th day of December 2009.
    /s/ Timothy M. Kaine
    The Virginia Public Broadcasting Board serves as a conduit for  state financial support of public television and radio stations, including the  radio reading service. It provides grants and contracts with public  broadcasting stations to implement instructional television programming for  K-12 schools and community interest programs. Public broadcasting stations are  a leading provider of digital learning content for pre-K-12 educators and offer  a broad array of other educational services to teachers, parents and children.
    For organizational purposes, the Public Broadcasting Board has  been under the oversight of the Secretary of Administration. While this  arrangement has served the Commonwealth well, educational and cultural services  could be further improved by transferring the Public Broadcasting Board to the  Secretary of Education. Education is a core value of public broadcasting and  the Public Broadcasting Board has long been a partner with higher education to  provide quality distance learning to students and faculty.
    The transfer will facilitate greater cooperation between the  Public Broadcasting Stations and Virginia's schools, colleges and universities  as new emerging digital technology promises to provide additional tools to address  curriculum objectives.
    This Executive Order shall become effective upon its signing  and shall remain in full force and effect unless amended or rescinded by  further executive order.
    Given under my hand and under the Seal of the Commonwealth of  Virginia this 7th day of December 2009.
    /s/ Timothy M. Kaine