TITLE 2. AGRICULTURE
BOARD OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES
Forms
REGISTRAR'S NOTICE:
Forms used in administering the following regulation have been filed by the
Board of Agriculture and Consumer Services. The forms are not being published;
however, online users of this issue of the Virginia Register of Regulations may
click on the name of a form to access it. The forms are also available from the
agency contact or may be viewed at the Office of the Registrar of Regulations,
General Assembly Building, 2nd Floor, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
Title of Regulation: 2VAC5-585. Retail Food
Establishment Regulations.
Contact Information: Ryan Davis, Program Manager, Office
of Dairy and Foods, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102
Governor Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 786-8910, or email ryan.davis@vdacs.virginia.gov.
FORMS (2VAC5-585)
Food Safety and Security Program, Retail Inspection
Report, ODF-FSSP-10001 (rev. 9/2014)
Food Safety and Security Program, Complaint Report,
ODF-FSSP-10004 (rev. 12/2013)
Food Safety and Security Program, Foodborne Illness
Complaint Report, ODF-FSSP-10003 (rev. 12/2013)
Food Safety and Security Program, Sample Collection
Report, ODF-FSSP-10002 (rev. 12/2013)
Retail
Inspection Report, ODF-FSP-10001 (rev. 7/2016)
Foodborne
Illness Complaint Report, ODF-FSP-10003 (rev. 6/2016)
Complaint
Form, ODF-FSP-10004 (rev. 6/2016)
VA.R. Doc. No. R17-4838; Filed August 11, 2016, 5:46 p.m.
TITLE 12. HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Forms
REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: A form used in administering the following regulation has been filed by the Department of Health. The form is not being published; however, online users of this issue of the Virginia Register of Regulations may click on the name of the form to access it. The form is also available from the agency contact or may be viewed at the Office of the Registrar of Regulations, General Assembly Building, 2nd Floor, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
Title of Regulation: 12VAC5-195. Virginia WIC Program.
Contact Information: Susan Puglisi, Policy Analyst, Department of Health, 109 Governor Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 864-7175, or email susan.puglisi@vdh.virginia.gov.
FORMS (12VAC5-195)
Food application contact form, an online form available at http://www.vahealth.org/DCN/Publications/pubswic.htm.
Virginia WIC Program UPC Update Request Form (eff. 1/2014)
VA.R. Doc. No. R17-4853; Filed August 18, 2016, 4:13 p.m.
TITLE 12. HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES
Emergency Regulation
Title of Regulation: 12VAC30-50. Amount, Duration, and Scope of Medical and Remedial Care Services (amending 12VAC30-50-210).
Statutory Authority: § 32.1-325 of the Code of Virginia; 42 USC § 1396 et seq.
Effective Dates: August 22, 2016, through February 21, 2018.
Agency Contact: Emily McClellan, Regulatory Supervisor, Policy Division, Department of Medical Assistance Services, 600 East Broad Street, Suite 1300, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 371-4300, FAX (804) 786-1680, or email emily.mcclellan@dmas.virginia.gov.
Preamble:
This action qualifies as an emergency regulation pursuant to § 2.2-4011 A of the Code of Virginia because the Department of Medical Assistance Services has determined that these changes are necessitated by an emergency situation, consulted with the Attorney General, and received approval from the Governor to promulgate emergency regulations to address the emergency.
There are currently 48 confirmed cases of Zika virus infection in Virginia, almost all of which arise from mosquito bites, and are travel related. However, the state of Florida is now reporting 14 Zika cases in which the infection was caused by local mosquitos. It is clear that mosquito-borne Zika infections are now originating in the United States, and there is a threat that Virginia residents may soon be subject to locally-based Zika infection. The lack of access to mosquito repellant for Medicaid enrollees in Virginia has created an urgent situation that necessitates the implementation of emergency regulations to address this emerging public health threat. Infection by the Zika virus during the early stages of pregnancy can have a catastrophic impact on fetal development.
This emergency regulation provides Medicaid coverage for mosquito repellants prescribed by an authorized health professional for individuals of childbearing age and all pregnant women to prevent the transmission of the Zika virus.
12VAC30-50-210. Prescribed drugs, dentures, and prosthetic devices; and eyeglasses prescribed by a physician skilled in diseases of the eye or by an optometrist.
A. Prescribed drugs.
1. Drugs for which Federal Financial Participation is not available, pursuant to the requirements of § 1927 of the Social Security Act (OBRA 90 § 4401), shall not be covered.
2. Nonlegend drugs shall be covered by Medicaid in the following situations:
a. Insulin, syringes, and needles for diabetic patients;
b. Diabetic test strips for Medicaid recipients under 21 years of age;
c. Family planning supplies;
d. Designated categories of nonlegend drugs for Medicaid recipients in nursing homes; and
e. Designated drugs prescribed by a licensed prescriber to be used as less expensive therapeutic alternatives to covered legend drugs; and
f. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-registered insect repellents with one of the following active ingredients: DEET, picaridin, IR3535, oil of lemon eucalyptus, or p-Menthane-3,8-diol for all Medicaid members of reproductive age (ages 14 through 44 years) and all pregnant women, when prescribed by an authorized health professional.
3. Legend drugs are covered for a maximum of a 34-day supply per prescription per patient with the exception of the drugs or classes of drugs identified in 12VAC30-50-520. FDA-approved drug therapies and agents for weight loss, when preauthorized, will be covered for recipients who meet the strict disability standards for obesity established by the Social Security Administration in effect on April 7, 1999, and whose condition is certified as life threatening, consistent with Department of Medical Assistance Services' medical necessity requirements, by the treating physician. For prescription orders for which quantity exceeds a 34-day supply, refills may be dispensed in sufficient quantity to fulfill the prescription order within the limits of federal and state laws and regulations.
4. Prescriptions for Medicaid recipients for multiple source drugs subject to 42 CFR 447.332 shall be filled with generic drug products unless the physician or other practitioners so licensed and certified to prescribe drugs certifies in his own handwriting "brand necessary" for the prescription to be dispensed as written or unless the drug class is subject to the Preferred Drug List.
5. New drugs shall be covered in accordance with the Social Security Act § 1927(d) (OBRA 90 § 4401).
6. The number of refills shall be limited pursuant to § 54.1-3411 of the Drug Control Act.
7. Drug prior authorization.
a. Definitions. The following words and terms used in these regulations shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
"Clinical data" means drug monographs as well as any pertinent clinical studies, including peer review literature.
"Complex drug regimen" means treatment or course of therapy that typically includes multiple medications, co-morbidities and/or, or caregivers.
"Department" or "DMAS" means the Department of Medical Assistance Services.
"Drug" shall have the same meaning, unless the context otherwise dictates or the board otherwise provides by regulation, as provided in the Drug Control Act (§ 54.1-3400 et seq. of the Code of Virginia).
"Emergency supply" means 72-hour supplies of the prescribed medication that may be dispensed if the prescriber cannot readily obtain authorization, or if the physician is not available to consult with the pharmacist, including after hours, weekends, holidays and the pharmacist, in his professional judgment consistent with current standards of practice, feels that the patient's health would be compromised without the benefit of the drug, or other criteria defined by the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee and DMAS.
"Nonpreferred drugs" means those drugs that were reviewed by the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee and not included on the preferred drug list. Nonpreferred drugs may be prescribed but require authorization prior to dispensing to the patient.
"Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee," "P&T Committee" or "committee" means the committee formulated to review therapeutic classes, conduct clinical reviews of specific drugs, recommend additions or deletions to the preferred drug list, and perform other functions as required by the department.
"Preferred drug list" or "PDL" means the list of drugs that meet the safety, clinical efficacy, and pricing standards employed by the P&T Committee and adopted by the department for the Virginia Medicaid fee-for-service program. Most drugs on the PDL may be prescribed and dispensed in the Virginia Medicaid fee-for-service program without prior authorization; however, some drugs as recommended by the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee may require authorization prior to dispensing to the patient.
"Prior authorization," as it relates to the PDL, means the process of review by a clinical pharmacist of legend drugs that are not on the preferred drug list, or other drugs as recommended by the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee, to determine if medically justified.
"State supplemental rebate" means any cash rebate that offsets Virginia Medicaid expenditure and that supplements the federal rebate. State supplemental rebate amounts shall be calculated in accordance with the Virginia Supplemental Drug Rebate Agreement Contract and Addenda.
"Therapeutic class" means a grouping of medications sharing the same Specific Therapeutic Class Code (GC3) within the Federal Drug Data File published by First Data Bank, Inc.
"Utilization review" means the prospective and retrospective processes employed by the agency to evaluate the medical necessity of reimbursing for certain covered services.
b. Medicaid Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee.
(1) The department shall utilize a Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee to assist in the development and ongoing administration of the preferred drug list and other pharmacy program issues. The committee may adopt bylaws that set out its make-up and functioning. A quorum for action of the committee shall consist of seven members.
(2) Vacancies on the committee shall be filled in the same manner as original appointments. DMAS shall appoint individuals for the committee that assures a cross-section of the physician and pharmacy community and remains compliant with General Assembly membership guidelines.
(3) Duties of the committee. The committee shall receive and review clinical and pricing data related to the drug classes. The committee's medical and pharmacy experts shall make recommendations to DMAS regarding various aspects of the pharmacy program. For the preferred drug list program, the committee shall select those drugs to be deemed preferred that are safe, clinically effective, as supported by available clinical data, and meet pricing standards. Cost effectiveness or any pricing standard shall be considered only after a drug is determined to be safe and clinically effective.
(4) As the United States U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves new drug products, the department shall ensure that the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee will evaluate the drug for clinical effectiveness and safety. Based on clinical information and pricing standards, the P&T Committee will determine if the drug will be included in the PDL or require prior authorization.
(a) If the new drug product falls within a drug class previously reviewed by the P&T Committee, until the review of the new drug is completed, it will be classified as nonpreferred, requiring prior authorization in order to be dispensed. The new drug will be evaluated for inclusion in the PDL no later than at the next review of the drug class.
(b) If the new drug product does not fall within a drug class previously reviewed by the P&T Committee, the new drug shall be treated in the same manner as the other drugs in its class.
(5) To the extent feasible, the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee shall review all drug classes included in the preferred drug list at least every 12 months and may recommend additions to and deletions from the PDL.
(6) In formulating its recommendations to the department, the committee shall not be deemed to be formulating regulations for the purposes of the Administrative Process Act (§ 2.2-4000 et seq. of the Code of Virginia).
(7) Immunity. The members of the committee and the staff of the department and the contractor shall be immune, individually and jointly, from civil liability for any act, decision, or omission done or made in performance of their duties pursuant to this subsection while serving as a member of such board, committee, or staff provided that such act, decision, or omission is not done or made in bad faith or with malicious intent.
c. Pharmacy prior authorization program. Pursuant to § 1927 of the Act and 42 CFR 440.230, the department shall require the prior authorization of certain specified legend drugs. For those therapeutic classes of drugs subject to the PDL program, drugs with nonpreferred status included in the DMAS drug list shall be subject to prior authorization. The department also may require prior authorization of other drugs only if recommended by the P&T Committee. Providers who are licensed to prescribe legend drugs shall be required to obtain prior authorization for all nonpreferred drugs or other drugs as recommended by the P&T Committee.
(1) Prior authorization shall consist of prescription review by a licensed pharmacist or pharmacy technician to ensure that all predetermined clinically appropriate criteria, as established by the P&T Committee relative to each therapeutic class, have been met before the prescription may be dispensed. Prior authorization shall be obtained through a call center staffed with appropriate clinicians, or through written or electronic communications (e.g., faxes, mail). Responses by telephone or other telecommunications device within 24 hours of a request for prior authorization shall be provided. The dispensing of 72-hour emergency supplies of the prescribed drug may be permitted and dispensing fees shall be paid to the pharmacy for such emergency supply.
(2) The preferred drug list program shall include: (i) provisions for an expedited review process of denials of requested prior authorization by the department; (ii) consumer and provider education; (iii) training and information regarding the preferred drug list both prior to implementation as well as ongoing communications, to include computer and website access to information and multilingual material.
(3) Exclusion of protected groups from pharmacy preferred drug list prior authorization requirements. The following groups of Medicaid eligibles shall be excluded from pharmacy prior authorization requirements: individuals enrolled in hospice care, services through PACE or pre-PACE programs; persons having comprehensive third party insurance coverage; minor children who are the responsibility of the juvenile justice system; and refugees who are not otherwise eligible in a Medicaid covered group.
d. State supplemental rebates. The department has the authority to seek supplemental rebates from pharmaceutical manufacturers. The contract regarding supplemental rebates shall exist between the manufacturer and the Commonwealth. Rebate agreements between the Commonwealth and a pharmaceutical manufacturer shall be separate from the federal rebates and in compliance with federal law, §§ 1927(a)(1) and 1927(a)(4) of the Social Security Act. All rebates collected on behalf of the Commonwealth shall be collected for the sole benefit of the state share of costs. One hundred percent of the supplemental rebates collected on behalf of the state shall be remitted to the state. Supplemental drug rebates received by the Commonwealth in excess of those required under the national drug rebate agreement will be shared with the federal government on the same percentage basis as applied under the national drug rebate agreement.
e. Pursuant to 42 USC § 1396r-8(b)(3)(D), information disclosed to the department or to the committee by a pharmaceutical manufacturer or wholesaler which discloses the identity of a specific manufacturer or wholesaler and the pricing information regarding the drugs by such manufacturer or wholesaler is confidential and shall not be subject to the disclosure requirements of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act (§ 2.2-3700 et seq. of the Code of Virginia).
f. Appeals for denials of prior authorization shall be addressed pursuant to 12VAC30-110, Part I, Client Appeals.
8. Coverage of home infusion therapy. This service shall be covered consistent with the limits and requirements set out within home health services (12VAC30-50-160). Multiple applications of the same therapy (e.g., two antibiotics on the same day) shall be covered under one service day rate of reimbursement. Multiple applications of different therapies (e.g., chemotherapy, hydration, and pain management on the same day) shall be a full service day rate methodology as provided in pharmacy services reimbursement.
B. Dentures. Dentures are provided only as a result of EPSDT and subject to medical necessity and preauthorization requirements specified under Dental Services.
C. Prosthetic devices.
1. Prosthetic services shall mean the replacement of missing arms, legs, eyes, and breasts and the provision of any internal (implant) body part. Nothing in this regulation shall be construed to refer to orthotic services or devices or organ transplantation services.
2. Artificial arms and legs, and their necessary supportive attachments, implants and breasts are provided when prescribed by a physician or other licensed practitioner of the healing arts within the scope of their professional licenses as defined by state law. This service, when provided by an authorized vendor, must be medically necessary and preauthorized for the minimum applicable component necessary for the activities of daily living.
3. Eye prostheses are provided when eyeballs are missing regardless of the age of the recipient or the cause of the loss of the eyeball. Eye prostheses are provided regardless of the function of the eye.
D. Eyeglasses. Eyeglasses shall be reimbursed for all recipients younger than 21 years of age according to medical necessity when provided by practitioners as licensed under the Code of Virginia.
VA.R. Doc. No. R17-4835; Filed August 16, 2016, 3:18 p.m.
TITLE 13. HOUSING
VIRGINIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Proposed Regulation
REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The
Virginia Housing Development Authority is claiming an exemption from the
Administrative Process Act (§ 2.2-4000 et seq. of the Code of Virginia)
pursuant to § 2.2-4002 A 4 of the Code of Virginia.
Title of Regulation: 13VAC10-180. Rules and
Regulations for Allocation of Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (amending 13VAC10-180-50, 13VAC10-180-60).
Statutory Authority: § 36-55.30:3 of the Code of
Virginia.
Public Hearing Information:
September 20, 2016 - 10 a.m. - Virginia Housing
Development Authority, 601 South Belvidere Street, Richmond, VA 23220.
Public Comment Deadline: September 20, 2016.
Agency Contact: Paul M. Brennan, General Counsel,
Virginia Housing Development Authority, 601 South Belvidere Street, Richmond,
VA 23220, telephone (804) 343-5798 or email paul.brennan@vhda.com.
Summary:
The proposed amendments (i) update the per unit cost
limits; (ii) set a maximum permissible minimum income requirement for tenants
receiving rental assistance that is applicable to all developments; (iii)
increase the maximum per-development credit limit in the nonprofit pool; (iv)
reduce the number of points awarded to applicants for providing a leasing
preference to persons on public housing waiting lists; (v) for both elderly and
family developments, implement a new sliding point scale for developments
located in areas of economic opportunity, defined based upon census data, and
delete language limiting points to census tracts with no other such
development; (vi) increase points for certain high priority rural development
deals; (vii) reflect elimination of at-large pool; (viii) define permissible
uses of community rooms receiving points; (ix) revise amenity point
requirements for certain windows and glass doors, internet service, and bath
vent fans; (x) increase points for developments with project-based vouchers and
meeting listed criteria; (xi) extend points for providing preference to persons
with developmental disabilities to an additional existing category of
developments; (xii) add points for EarthCraft Gold developments with tenant
utility monitoring and benchmarking; (xiii) eliminate points for developments
with less than 100 units; (xiv) increase points for developments applying for both
4% and 9% credits; (xv) reduce developer experience points based on penalties
for certain nonperformance; (xvi) impose penalty points for submission of a
subsequent application for credits prior to issuance of Form 8609; (xvii)
provide additional points for rental assistance demonstration deals competing
in the local housing authority pool; (xviii) delete the 20% limit on credits in
any pool for developments for the elderly; and (xix) make other miscellaneous
administrative or clarifying changes.
13VAC10-180-50. Application.
Prior to submitting an application for reservation,
applicants shall submit on such form as required by the executive director, the
letter for authority signature by which the authority shall notify the chief
executive officers (or the equivalent) of the local jurisdictions in which the
developments are to be located to provide such officers a reasonable
opportunity to comment on the developments.
Application for a reservation of credits shall be commenced
by filing with the authority an application, on such form or forms as the
executive director may from time to time prescribe or approve, together with
such documents and additional information (including, without limitation, a
market study that shows adequate demand for the housing units to be produced by
the applicant's proposed development) as may be requested by the authority in
order to comply with the IRC and this chapter and to make the reservation and
allocation of the credits in accordance with this chapter. The executive director
may reject any application from consideration for a reservation or allocation
of credits if in such application the applicant does not provide the proper
documentation or information on the forms prescribed by the executive director.
All sites in an application for a scattered site development
may only serve one primary market area. If the executive director determines
that the sites subject to a scattered site development are served by different
primary market areas, separate applications for credits must be filed for each
primary market area in which scattered sites are located within the deadlines
established by the executive director.
The application should include a breakdown of sources and
uses of funds sufficiently detailed to enable the authority to ascertain what
costs will be incurred and what will comprise the total financing package,
including the various subsidies and the anticipated syndication or placement
proceeds that will be raised. The following cost information, if applicable, needs
to be included in the application to determine the feasible credit amount: site
acquisition costs, site preparation costs, construction costs, construction
contingency, general contractor's overhead and profit, architect and engineer's
fees, permit and survey fees, insurance premiums, real estate taxes during
construction, title and recording fees, construction period interest, financing
fees, organizational costs, rent-up and marketing costs, accounting and
auditing costs, working capital and operating deficit reserves, syndication and
legal fees, development fees, and other costs and fees. All applications
seeking credits for rehabilitation of existing units must provide for
contractor construction costs of at least $10,000 per unit for developments financed
with tax-exempt bonds and $15,000 per unit for all other developments.
Any application that exceeds the cost limits set forth below
in subdivisions 1, 2, and 3 shall be rejected from further consideration
hereunder and shall not be eligible for any reservation or allocation of
credits.
1. Inner Northern Virginia. The Inner Northern Virginia region
shall consist of Arlington County, Fairfax County, City of Alexandria, City of
Fairfax, and City of Falls Church. The total development cost of proposed developments
in the Inner Northern Virginia region may not exceed (i) for new construction
or adaptive reuse: $335,475 $387,809 per unit plus up to an
additional $37,275 $43,090 per unit if the proposed development
contains underground or structured parking for each unit or (ii) for
acquisition/rehabilitation: $292,875 $338,564 per unit.
2. Prince William County, Loudoun County, and Fauquier
County, Manassas City, and Manassas Park City. The total development
cost of proposed developments in Prince William County, Loudoun County, and
Fauquier County, Manassas City, and Manassas Park City may not exceed
(i) for new construction or adaptive reuse: $249,210 $288,087 per
unit plus up to an additional $43,090 per unit if the proposed development
contains underground or structured parking for each unit or (ii) for
acquisition/rehabilitation: $175,725 $203,138 per unit.
3. Balance of state. The total development cost of proposed
developments in the balance of the state may not exceed (i) for new
construction or adaptive reuse: $186,375 $215,450 per unit plus
up to an additional $43,090 per unit if the proposed development contains
underground or structured parking for each unit or (ii) for
acquisition/rehabilitation: $143,775 $166,204 per unit.
Costs, subject to a per unit limit set by the executive
director, attributable to equipping units with electrical and plumbing hook-ups
for dehumidification systems will not be included in the calculation of the
above per unit cost limits.
The cost limits in subdivisions 1, 2, and 3 above are 2012
2015 fourth quarter base amounts. The cost limits shall be adjusted
annually beginning in the fourth quarter of 2013 2016 by the
authority in accordance with Marshall & Swift cost factors for such
quarter, and the adjusted limits will be indicated on the application form,
instructions, or other communication available to the public.
Each application shall include plans and specifications or,
in the case of rehabilitation for which plans will not be used, a unit-by-unit
work write-up for such rehabilitation with certification in such form and from
such person satisfactory to the executive director as to the completion of such
plans or specifications or work write-up.
Each application shall include evidence of (i) sole fee
simple ownership of the site of the proposed development by the applicant, (ii)
lease of such site by the applicant for a term exceeding the compliance period
(as defined in the IRC) or for such longer period as the applicant represents
in the application that the development will be held for occupancy by
low-income persons or families or (iii) right to acquire or lease such site
pursuant to a valid and binding written option or contract between the
applicant and the fee simple owner of such site for a period extending at least
four months beyond any application deadline established by the executive
director, provided that such option or contract shall have no conditions within
the discretion or control of such owner of such site. Any contract for the
acquisition of a site with existing residential property may not require an
empty building as a condition of such contract, unless relocation assistance is
provided to displaced households, if any, at such level required by the
authority. A contract that permits the owner to continue to market the
property, even if the applicant has a right of first refusal, does not
constitute the requisite site control required in clause (iii) above. No
application shall be considered for a reservation or allocation of credits
unless such evidence is submitted with the application and the authority
determines that the applicant owns, leases or has the right to acquire or lease
the site of the proposed development as described in the preceding sentence. In
the case of acquisition and rehabilitation of developments funded by Rural
Development of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (Rural Development), any site
control document subject to approval of the partners of the seller does not
need to be approved by all partners of the seller if the general partner of the
seller executing the site control document provides (i) an attorney's opinion
that such general partner has the authority to enter into the site control
document and such document is binding on the seller or (ii) a letter from the
existing syndicator indicating a willingness to secure the necessary partner
approvals upon the reservation of credits.
Effective January 1, 2016, each Each
application shall include written evidence satisfactory to the authority (i) of
proper zoning or special use permit for such site or (ii) that no zoning
requirements or special use permits are applicable.
Each application shall include, in a form or forms required
by the executive director, a certification of previous participation listing
all developments receiving an allocation of tax credits under § 42 of the IRC
in which the principal or principals have or had an ownership or participation
interest, the location of such developments, the number of residential units
and low-income housing units in such developments and such other information as
more fully specified by the executive director. Furthermore, for any such
development, the applicant must indicate whether the appropriate state housing
credit agency has ever filed a Form 8823 with the IRS reporting noncompliance
with the requirements of the IRC and that such noncompliance had not been
corrected at the time of the filing of such Form 8823. The executive director
may reject any application from consideration for a reservation or allocation
of credits unless the above information is submitted with the application. If,
after reviewing the above information or any other information available to the
authority, the executive director determines that the principal or principals
do not have the experience, financial capacity and predisposition to regulatory
compliance necessary to carry out the responsibilities for the acquisition,
construction, ownership, operation, marketing, maintenance and management of
the proposed development or the ability to fully perform all the duties and
obligations relating to the proposed development under law, regulation and the
reservation and allocation documents of the authority or if an applicant is in
substantial noncompliance with the requirements of the IRC, the executive director
may reject applications by the applicant. No application will be accepted from
any applicant with a principal that has or had an ownership or participation
interest in a development at the time the authority reported such development
to the IRS as no longer in compliance and no longer participating in the
federal low-income housing tax credit program.
Each application shall include, in a form or forms required
by the executive director, a certification that the design of the proposed
development meets all applicable amenity and design requirements required by
the executive director for the type of housing to be provided by the proposed
development.
The application should include pro forma financial statements
setting forth the anticipated cash flows during the credit period as defined in
the IRC. The application shall include a certification by the applicant as to
the full extent of all federal, state and local subsidies that apply (or that
the applicant expects to apply) with respect to each building or development.
The executive director may also require the submission of a legal opinion or
other assurances satisfactory to the executive director as to, among other
things, compliance of the proposed development with the IRC and a
certification, together with an opinion of an independent certified public
accountant or other assurances satisfactory to the executive director, setting
forth the calculation of the amount of credits requested by the application and
certifying, among other things, that under the existing facts and circumstances
the applicant will be eligible for the amount of credits requested.
Each applicant shall commit in the application to provide
relocation assistance to displaced households, if any, at such level required
by the executive director. Each applicant shall commit in the application to
use a property management company certified by the executive director to manage
the proposed development.
Each applicant shall commit in the application not to
require an annual minimum income requirement that exceeds the greater of $3,600
or 2.5 times the portion of rent to be paid by tenants receiving rental
assistance.
If an applicant submits an application for reservation or
allocation of credits that contains a material misrepresentation or fails to
include information regarding developments involving the applicant that have
been determined to be out of compliance with the requirements of the IRC, the
executive director may reject the application or stop processing such
application upon discovery of such misrepresentation or noncompliance and may
prohibit such applicant from submitting applications for credits to the
authority in the future.
In any situation in which the executive director deems it
appropriate, he may treat two or more applications as a single application.
Only one application may be submitted for each location.
The executive director may establish criteria and assumptions
to be used by the applicant in the calculation of amounts in the application,
and any such criteria and assumptions may be indicated on the application form,
instructions or other communication available to the public.
The executive director may prescribe such deadlines for
submission of applications for reservation and allocation of credits for any
calendar year as he shall deem necessary or desirable to allow sufficient
processing time for the authority to make such reservations and allocations. If
the executive director determines that an applicant for a reservation of
credits has failed to submit one or more mandatory attachments to the
application by the reservation application deadline, he may allow such
applicant an opportunity to submit such attachments within a certain time
established by the executive director with a 10-point scoring penalty per item.
After receipt of the applications, if necessary, the
authority shall notify the chief executive officers (or the equivalent) of the
local jurisdictions in which the developments are to be located and shall
provide such officers a reasonable opportunity to comment on the developments.
The development for which an application is submitted may be,
but shall not be required to be, financed by the authority. If any such
development is to be financed by the authority, the application for such
financing shall be submitted to and received by the authority in accordance
with its applicable rules and regulations.
The authority may consider and approve, in accordance
herewith, both the reservation and the allocation of credits to buildings or
developments that the authority may own or may intend to acquire, construct
and/or rehabilitate.
13VAC10-180-60. Review and selection of applications;
reservation of credits.
The executive director may divide the amount of credits into
separate pools and each separate pool may be further divided into separate
tiers. The division of such pools and tiers may be based upon one or more of
the following factors: geographical areas of the state; types or
characteristics of housing, construction, financing, owners, occupants, or
source of credits; or any other factors deemed appropriate by him to best meet
the housing needs of the Commonwealth.
An amount, as determined by the executive director, not less
than 10% of the Commonwealth's annual state housing credit ceiling for credits,
shall be available for reservation and allocation to buildings or developments
with respect to which the following requirements are met:
1. A "qualified nonprofit organization" (as
described in § 42(h)(5)(C) of the IRC) that is authorized to do business
in Virginia and is determined by the executive director, on the basis of such
relevant factors as he shall consider appropriate, to be substantially based or
active in the community of the development and is to materially participate
(regular, continuous and substantial involvement as determined by the executive
director) in the development and operation of the development throughout the
"compliance period" (as defined in § 42(i)(1) of the IRC); and
2. (i) The "qualified nonprofit organization"
described in the preceding subdivision 1 is to own (directly or through a
partnership), prior to the reservation of credits to the buildings or
development, all of the general partnership interests of the ownership entity
thereof; (ii) the executive director of the authority shall have determined
that such qualified nonprofit organization is not affiliated with or controlled
by a for-profit organization; (iii) the executive director of the authority
shall have determined that the qualified nonprofit organization was not formed
by one or more individuals or for-profit entities for the principal purpose of
being included in any nonprofit pools (as defined below) established by the
executive director, and (iv) the executive director of the authority shall have
determined that no staff member, officer or member of the board of directors of
such qualified nonprofit organization will materially participate, directly or
indirectly, in the proposed development as a for-profit entity.
In making the determinations required by the preceding subdivision
1 and clauses (ii), (iii) and (iv) of subdivision 2 of this section, the
executive director may apply such factors as he deems relevant, including,
without limitation, the past experience and anticipated future activities of
the qualified nonprofit organization, the sources and manner of funding of the
qualified nonprofit organization, the date of formation and expected life of
the qualified nonprofit organization, the number of paid staff members and
volunteers of the qualified nonprofit organization, the nature and extent of
the qualified nonprofit organization's proposed involvement in the construction
or rehabilitation and the operation of the proposed development, the
relationship of the staff, directors or other principals involved in the formation
or operation of the qualified nonprofit organization with any persons or
entities to be involved in the proposed development on a for-profit basis, and
the proposed involvement in the construction or rehabilitation and operation of
the proposed development by any persons or entities involved in the proposed
development on a for-profit basis. The executive director may include in the
application of the foregoing factors any other nonprofit organizations that, in
his determination, are related (by shared directors, staff or otherwise) to the
qualified nonprofit organization for which such determination is to be made.
For purposes of the foregoing requirements, a qualified
nonprofit organization shall be treated as satisfying such requirements if any
qualified corporation (as defined in § 42(h)(5)(D)(ii) of the IRC) in
which such organization (by itself or in combination with one or more qualified
nonprofit organizations) holds 100% of the stock satisfies such requirements.
The applications shall include such representations and
warranties and such information as the executive director may require in order
to determine that the foregoing requirements have been satisfied. In no event
shall more than 90% of the Commonwealth's annual state housing credit ceiling
for credits be available for developments other than those satisfying the
preceding requirements. The executive director may establish such pools
(nonprofit pools) of credits as he may deem appropriate to satisfy the
foregoing requirement. If any such nonprofit pools are so established, the
executive director may rank the applications therein and reserve credits to
such applications before ranking applications and reserving credits in other
pools, and any such applications in such nonprofit pools not receiving any
reservations of credits or receiving such reservations in amounts less than the
full amount permissible hereunder (because there are not enough credits then
available in such nonprofit pools to make such reservations) shall be assigned
to such other pool as shall be appropriate hereunder; provided, however, that
if credits are later made available (pursuant to the IRC or as a result of
either a termination or reduction of a reservation of credits made from any
nonprofit pools or a rescission in whole or in part of an allocation of credits
made from such nonprofit pools or otherwise) for reservation and allocation by
the authority during the same calendar year as that in which applications in
the nonprofit pools have been so assigned to other pools as described above,
the executive director may, in such situations, designate all or any portion of
such additional credits for the nonprofit pools (or for any other pools as he
shall determine) and may, if additional credits have been so designated for the
nonprofit pools, reassign such applications to such nonprofit pools, rank the
applications therein and reserve credits to such applications in accordance
with the IRC and this chapter. In the event that during any round (as
authorized hereinbelow) of application review and ranking the amount of credits
reserved within such nonprofit pools is less than the total amount of credits
made available therein, the executive director may either (i) leave such
unreserved credits in such nonprofit pools for reservation and allocation in
any subsequent round or rounds or (ii) redistribute, to the extent permissible
under the IRC, such unreserved credits to such other pool or pools as the
executive director shall designate reservations therefore in the full amount permissible
hereunder (which applications shall hereinafter be referred to as "excess
qualified applications") or (iii) carry over such unreserved credits to
the next succeeding calendar year for the inclusion in the state housing credit
ceiling (as defined in § 42(h)(3)(C) of the IRC) for such year.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, no reservation of credits
shall be made from any nonprofit pools to any application with respect to which
the qualified nonprofit organization has not yet been legally formed in
accordance with the requirements of the IRC. In addition, no application for
credits from any nonprofit pools or any combination of pools may receive a
reservation or allocation of annual credits in an amount greater than $750,000
$950,000 unless credits remain available in such nonprofit pools after
all eligible applications for credits from such nonprofit pools receive a
reservation of credits.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, applicants
relying on the experience of a local housing authority for developer experience
points described hereinbelow and/or using Hope VI funds from HUD in connection
with the proposed development shall not be eligible to receive a reservation of
credits from any nonprofit pools.
The authority shall review each application, and, based on
the application and other information available to the authority, shall assign
points to each application as follows:
1. Readiness.
a. Written evidence satisfactory to the authority of
unconditional approval by local authorities of the plan of development or site
plan for the proposed development or that such approval is not required. (40
points; applicants receiving points under this subdivision 1 a are not eligible
for points under subdivision 5 a below)
b. For applications submitted prior to January 1, 2016,
written evidence satisfactory to the authority (i) of proper zoning or special
use permit for such site or (ii) that no zoning requirements or special use
permits are applicable. (40 points)
2. Housing needs characteristics.
a. Submission of the form prescribed by the authority with any
required attachments, providing such information necessary for the authority to
send a letter addressed to the current chief executive officer (or the
equivalent) of the locality in which the proposed development is located,
soliciting input on the proposed development from the locality within the
deadlines established by the executive director. (minus 50 points for failure
to make timely submission)
b. A letter in response to its notification to the chief
executive officer of the locality in which the proposed development is to be
located opposing the allocation of credits to the applicant for the
development. In any such letter, the chief executive officer must certify that
the proposed development is not consistent with current zoning or other
applicable land use regulations. Any such letter must also be accompanied by a
legal opinion of the locality's attorney opining that the locality's opposition
to the proposed development does not have a discriminatory intent or a
discriminatory effect (as defined in 24 CFR 100.500(a)) that is not supported
by a legally sufficient justification (as defined in 24 CFR 100.500(b)) in
violation of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968,
as amended) and the HUD implementing regulations. (minus 25 points)
c. Any proposed development that is to be located in a
revitalization area meeting the requirements of § 36-55.30:2 A of the Code
of Virginia. (10 points)
d. Commitment by the applicant for any development without
section 8 project-based assistance to give leasing preference to individuals
and families (i) on public housing waiting lists maintained by the local
housing authority operating in the locality in which the proposed development
is to be located and notification of the availability of such units to the
local housing authority by the applicant or (ii) on section 8 (as defined in
13VAC10-180-90) waiting lists maintained by the local or nearest section 8
administrator for the locality in which the proposed development is to be
located and notification of the availability of such units to the local section
8 administrator by the applicant. (10 points; Applicants receiving points
under this subdivision may not require an annual minimum income requirement for
prospective tenants that exceeds the greater of $3,600 or 2.5 times the portion
of rent to be paid by such tenants.) (5 points)
e. Any of the following: (i) firm financing commitment(s) from
the local government, local housing authority, Federal Home Loan Bank
affordable housing funds, Virginia Housing Trust Fund, funding from VOICE for
projects located in Prince William County and donations from unrelated private
foundations that have filed an IRS Form 990 (or a variation of such form) or
Rural Development for a below-market rate loan or grant; (ii) a resolution
passed by the locality in which the proposed development is to be located
committing such financial support to the development in a form approved by the
authority; (iii) a commitment to donate land, buildings or tap fee waivers from
the local government; or (iv) a commitment to donate land (including a below
market rate land lease) from an entity that is not a principal in the applicant
(the donor being the grantee of a right of first refusal or purchase option,
with no ownership interest in the applicant, shall not make the donor a
principal in the applicant). (The amount of such financing, dollar value of
local support, or value of donated land (including a below market rate land
lease) will be determined by the executive director and divided by the total
development sources of funds and the proposed development receives two points
for each percentage point up to a maximum of 40 points.)
f. Any development subject to (i) HUD's Section 8 or Section
236 programs program or (ii) Rural Development's 515 program, at
the time of application. (20 points, unless the applicant is, or has any
common interests with, the current owner, directly or indirectly, the
application will only qualify for these points if the applicant waives all
rights to any developer's fee and any other fees associated with the
acquisition and rehabilitation (or rehabilitation only) of the development
unless permitted by the executive director for good cause.)
g. Any development receiving (i) a real estate tax abatement
on the increase in the value of the development or (ii) new project-based
subsidy from HUD or Rural Development for the greater of five units or 10% of
the units of the proposed development. (10 points)
h. Any proposed elderly development located in a census tract
that has less than a 10% poverty rate (based upon Census Bureau data) with
no other elderly tax credit units in such census tract. (25 points).
Effective January 1, 2018, any proposed elderly development located in a census
tract that has less than a 12% poverty rate (based upon Census Bureau data) (20
points); any proposed elderly development located in a census tract that has
less than a 3.0% poverty rate (based upon Census Bureau data) (30 points).
i. Any proposed family development located in a census tract
that has less than a 10% poverty rate (based upon Census Bureau data) with
no other family tax credit units in such census tract. (25 points).
Effective January 1, 2018, any proposed family development located in a census
tract that has less than a 12% poverty rate (based upon Census Bureau data) (20
points); any proposed family development located in a census tract that has
less than a 3.0% poverty rate (based upon Census Bureau data) (30 points).
j. Any proposed development listed in the top 25 developments
identified by Rural Development as high priority for rehabilitation at the time
the application is submitted to the authority, (15 points); effective
January 1, 2018 (30 points).
k. Any proposed new construction development (including
adaptive re-use reuse and rehabilitation that creates additional
rental space) located in a pool identified by the authority as a pool with
little or no increase in rent-burdened population. (up to minus 20 points,
depending upon the portion of the development that is additional rental space,
in all pools except the at-large pool, 0 points in the at-large pool. The;
the executive director may make exceptions in the following circumstances:
(1) Specialized types of housing designed to meet special
needs that cannot readily be addressed utilizing existing residential
structures;
(2) Housing designed to serve as a replacement for housing
being demolished through redevelopment; or
(3) Housing that is an integral part of a neighborhood
revitalization project sponsored by a local housing authority.)
l. Any proposed new construction development (including
adaptive re-use reuse and rehabilitation that creates additional
rental space) that is located in a pool identified by the authority as a pool
with an increasing rent-burdened population. (up to 20 points, depending upon
the portion of the development that is additional rental space, in all pools except
the at-large pool, 0 points in the at-large pool)).
3. Development characteristics.
a. Evidence satisfactory to the authority documenting the
quality of the proposed development's amenities as determined by the following:
(1) The following points are available for any application:
(a) If a community/meeting room with a minimum of 749 square
feet is provided. (5 points) Community rooms receiving points under this
subdivision 3 a (1) (a) may not be used for commercial purposes. Provided that
the cost of the community room is not included in eligible basis, the owner may
conduct, or contract with a nonprofit provider to conduct, programs or classes
for tenants and members of the community in the community room, so long as (i)
tenants compose at least one-third of participants, with first preference given
to tenants above the one-third minimum; (ii) no program or class may be offered
more than five days per week; (iii) no individual program or class may last
more than eight hours per day, and all programs and class sessions may not last
more than 10 hours per day in the aggregate; (iv) cost of attendance of the
program or class must be below market rate with no profit from the operation of
the class or program being generated for the owner (owner may also collect an
amount of reimbursement of supplies and clean-up costs); (v) the community room
must be available for use by tenants when programs and classes are not offered,
subject to reasonable "quiet hours" established by owner; and (vi)
any owner offering programs or classes must provide an annual certification to
the authority that it is in compliance with such requirements, with failure to
comply with these requirements resulting in a 10-point penalty for three years
from the date of such noncompliance for principals in the owner.
(b) If the exterior walls are constructed using the following
materials:
(i) Brick or other similar low-maintenance material approved
by the authority (as indicated on the application form, instructions, or other
communication available to the public) covering 30% or more of the exterior
walls. (10 points) and
(ii) If subdivision 3 a (1) (b) (i) above is met, an
additional one-fifth point for each percent of exterior wall brick or other
similar low-maintenance material approved by the authority (as indicated on the
application form, instructions, or other communication available to the public)
in excess of 30%. (maximum 10 points) and
(iii) If subdivision 3 a (1) (b) (i) above is met, an
additional one-tenth point for each percent of exterior wall covered by
fiber-cement board. (maximum 7 points)
(c) If all kitchen and laundry appliances (except range hoods)
meet the EPA's Energy Star qualified program requirements. (5 points)
(d) If all the windows and glass doors meet the EPA's
Energy Star qualified program requirements are Energy Star labeled for
the North-Central Zone or are National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC)
labeled with a maximum U-Factor of 0.27 and maximum solar heat gain coefficient
(SHGC) of 0.40. (5 points)
(e) If every unit in the development is heated and cooled with
either (i) heat pump equipment with both a SEER seasonal energy
efficiency ratio (SEER) rating of 15.0 or more and a HSPF heating
seasonal performance factor (HSPF) rating of 8.5 or more or (ii) air
conditioning equipment with a SEER rating of 15.0 or more, combined with a gas
furnace with an AFUE annual fuel utilization efficiency (AFUE)
rating of 90% or more. (10 points)
(f) If the water expense is submetered (the tenant will pay
monthly or bimonthly bill). (5 points)
(g) If each bathroom contains only WaterSense labeled faucets
and showerheads. (2 points)
(h) If each unit is provided with the necessary infrastructure
for high-speed cable, DSL or wireless Internet service. (1 point)
(i) If all the water heaters have an energy factor greater
than or equal to 67% for gas water heaters or greater than or equal to 93% for
electric water heaters; or any centralized commercial system that has an
efficiency performance rating equal to or greater than 95%, or any solar
thermal system that meets at least 60% of the development's domestic hot water
load. (5 points)
(j) If each bathroom is equipped with a WaterSense labeled
toilet. (2 points)
(k) For Effective until January 1, 2018, for new
construction only, if each full bathroom is equipped with EPA Energy Star
qualified bath vent fans. (2 points) Effective January 1, 2018, if each full
bathroom is provided either an EPA Energy Star qualified bath vent fan with
duct size per manufacturer requirements or a continuous exhaust as part of a
dedicated outdoor air system with humidity control. (2 points)
(l) If the development has or the application provides for
installation of continuous R-3 or higher wall sheathing insulation. (5 points)
(m) If all cooking surfaces are equipped with fire prevention
or suppression features that meet the authority's requirements (as indicated on
the application form, instructions, or other communication available to the
public). (2 points)
(2) The following points are available to applications
electing to serve elderly tenants:
(a) If all cooking ranges have front controls. (1 point)
(b) If all units have an emergency call system. (3 points)
(c) If all bathrooms have an independent or supplemental heat
source. (1 point)
(d) If all entrance doors to each unit have two eye viewers,
one at 42 inches and the other at standard height. (1 point)
(3) If the structure is historic, by virtue of being listed
individually in the National Register of Historic Places, or due to its location
in a registered historic district and certified by the Secretary of the
Interior as being of historical significance to the district, and the
rehabilitation will be completed in such a manner as to be eligible for
historic rehabilitation tax credits. (5 points)
b. Any development in which (i) the greater of five units or
10% of the units will be assisted by HUD project-based vouchers (as evidenced
by the submission of a letter satisfactory to the authority from an authorized
public housing authority (PHA) that the development meets all prerequisites for
such assistance) or other form of documented and binding federal or state
project-based rent subsidies in order to ensure occupancy by extremely
low-income persons; and (ii) the greater of five units or 10% of the units will
conform to HUD regulations interpreting the accessibility requirements of
§ 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and be actively marketed to persons with
disabilities as defined in the Fair Housing Act in accordance with a plan
submitted as part of the application for credits (all common space must also
conform to HUD regulations interpreting the accessibility requirements of § 504
of the Rehabilitation Act, and all the units described in clause (ii)
above must include roll-in showers and roll-under sinks and front control
ranges, unless agreed to by the authority prior to the applicant's submission
of its application). (50 points) (60 points)
In addition, for any development eligible for the preceding 50
60 points, subject to appropriate federal approval, any applicant that
commits to providing a first preference on its waiting list for persons with an
intellectual or a developmental disability (ID/DD) as
confirmed by the Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services (DMAS)
or the Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental
Services (DBHDS) for the greater of five units or 10% of the units. (25
points)
c. Any development in which the greater of five units or 10%
of the units (i) have rents within HUD's Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) payment
standard, (ii) conform to HUD regulations interpreting the accessibility
requirements of § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and (iii) are actively
marketed to persons with disabilities as defined in the Fair Housing Act in
accordance with a plan submitted as part of the application for credits (all
common space must also conform to HUD regulations interpreting the
accessibility requirements of § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act). (30 points)
In addition, for any development eligible for the preceding
30 points, subject to appropriate federal approval, any applicant that commits
to providing a first preference on its waiting list for persons with a
developmental disability as confirmed by the Virginia Department of Behavioral
Health and Developmental Services for the greater of 5 units or 10% of the
units. (25 points)
d. Any development in which 5.0% of the units (i) conform to
HUD regulations interpreting the accessibility requirements of § 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act and (ii) are actively marketed to persons with disabilities
as defined in the Fair Housing Act in accordance with a plan submitted as part
of the application for credits. (15 points)
e. Any development located within one-half mile of an existing
commuter rail, light rail or subway station or one-quarter mile of one or more
existing public bus stops. (10 points, unless the development is located within
the geographical area established by the executive director for a pool of
credits for Northern Virginia or Tidewater Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA),
in which case, the development will receive 20 points if the development is
ranked against other developments in such Northern Virginia or Tidewater MSA
pool, 10 points if the development is ranked against other developments in any
other pool of credits established by the executive director)
f. Any development for which the applicant agrees to obtain
either (i) EarthCraft certification or (ii) U.S. Green Building Council LEED
green-building certification prior to the issuance of an IRS Form 8609 with the
proposed development's architect certifying in the application that the
development's design will meet the criteria for such certification, provided
that the proposed development's architect is on the authority's list of
LEED/EarthCraft certified architects. (15 points for a LEED Silver development
or EarthCraft certified development; 30 points for a LEED Gold development or
EarthCraft Gold development; 45 points for a LEED Platinum development or
EarthCraft Platinum development.); 45 points for EarthCraft Gold
development and tenant utility monitoring and benchmarking.) The executive
director may, if needed, designate a proposed development as requiring an
increase in credit in order to be financially feasible and such development
shall be treated as if in a difficult development area as provided in the IRC
for any applicant receiving 30 or 45 points under this subdivision, provided
however, any resulting increase in such development's eligible basis shall be
limited to 5.0% of the development's eligible basis for 30 points awarded under
this subdivision and 10% for 45 points awarded under this subdivision of the
development's eligible basis.
g. If units are constructed to include the authority's
universal design features, provided that the proposed development's architect
is on the authority's list of universal design certified architects. (15
points, if all the units in an elderly development meet this requirement; 15
points multiplied by the percentage of units meeting this requirement for
nonelderly developments)
h. Any Effective until January 1, 2018, any
development in which the applicant proposes to produce less than 100 low-income
housing units. (20 points for producing 50 low-income housing units or less,
minus 0.4 points for each additional low-income housing unit produced down to 0
points for any development that produces 100 or more low-income housing units.)
i. Any applicant for a development that, pursuant to a common
plan of development, is part of a larger development located on the same or
contiguous sites, financed in part by tax-exempt bonds. (20 (25
points for tax-exempt bond financing of at least 30% of aggregate units, 30
35 points for tax-exempt bond financing of at least 40% of aggregate
units, and 40 45 points for tax-exempt bond financing of at least
50% of aggregate units; such points being noncumulative)
4. Tenant population characteristics. Commitment by the
applicant to give a leasing preference to individuals and families with
children in developments that will have no more than 20% of its units with one
bedroom or less. (15 points; plus 0.75 points for each percent of the
low-income units in the development with three or more bedrooms up to an
additional 15 points for a total of no more than 30 points)
5. Sponsor characteristics.
a. Evidence that the controlling general partner or managing
member of the controlling general partner or managing member for the proposed
development have developed:
(1) As controlling general partner or managing member, (i) at least
three tax credit developments that contain at least three times the number of
housing units in the proposed development or (ii) at least six tax credit
developments. (50 points) or
(2) At least three deals as a principal and have at least
$500,000 in liquid assets. "Liquid assets" means cash, cash
equivalents, and investments held in the name of the entity(s) and or
person(s), including cash in bank accounts, money market funds, U.S. Treasury
bills, and equities traded on the New York Stock Exchange or NASDAQ. Certain
cash and investments will not be considered liquid assets, including but not
limited to: (i) stock held in the applicant's own company or any closely held
entity, (ii) investments in retirement accounts, (iii) cash or investments
pledged as collateral for any liability, and (iv) cash in property accounts,
including reserves. The authority will assess the financial capacity of the
applicant based on its financial statements. The authority will accept
financial statements audited, reviewed, or compiled by an independent certified
public accountant. Only a balance sheet dated on or after December 31 of the
year prior to the application deadline is required. The authority will accept a
compilation report with or without full note disclosures. Supplementary
schedules for all significant assets and liabilities may be required. Financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States (U.S. GAAP) are preferred. Statements prepared in the
income tax basis or cash basis must disclose that basis in the report. The
authority reserves the right to verify information in the financial statements.
(50 points) or
(3) As controlling general partner or managing member, at
least one tax credit development that contains at least the number of housing
units in the proposed development. (10 points)
Applicants receiving points under subdivisions a (1) and a
(2) of this subdivision 5 shall have the 50 points reduced for each principal
in the applicant that acted as a principal in a development receiving an
allocation of credits from the authority where the following occurred: (i)
submission of a Form 8609 application that failed to match the required
accountant's cost certification (minus 10 points for two years); (ii) failure
to place a rehabilitation development in service by substantial completion
(e.g., placed in service by expenditures after two years) (minus 5 points for
two years); (iii) more than two requests for final inspection (minus 5 points
for two years); and (iv) requests for any deadline extension (minus 1 point for
two years).
Applicants receiving points under subdivision 5 subdivisions
a (1) and a (2) above of this subdivision 5 are not
eligible for points under subdivision a of subdivision 1 Readiness, above.
b. Any applicant that includes a principal that was a
principal in a development at the time the authority inspected such development
and discovered a life-threatening hazard under HUD's Uniform Physical Condition
Standards and such hazard was not corrected in the time frame timeframe
established by the authority. (minus 50 points for a period of three years
after the violation has been corrected)
c. Any applicant that includes a principal that was a
principal in a development that either (i) at the time the authority reported
such development to the IRS for noncompliance had not corrected such
noncompliance by the time a Form 8823 was filed by the authority or (ii)
remained out-of-compliance with the terms of its extended use commitment after notice
and expiration of any cure period set by the authority. (minus 15 points for a
period of three calendar years after the year the authority filed Form 8823 or
expiration of such cure period, unless the executive director determines that
such principal's attempts to correct such noncompliance was prohibited by a
court, local government or governmental agency, in which case, no negative
points will be assessed to the applicant, or 0 points, if the appropriate
individual or individuals connected to the principal attend compliance training
as recommended by the authority)
d. Any applicant that includes a principal that is or was a
principal in a development that (i) did not build a development as represented
in the application for credit (minus two times the number of points assigned to
the item or items not built or minus 20 points for failing to provide a minimum
building requirement, for a period of three years after the last Form 8609 is
issued for the development, in addition to any other penalties the authority
may seek under its agreements with the applicant), or (ii) has a reservation of
credits terminated by the authority (minus 10 points a period of three years
after the credits are returned to the authority).
e. Any applicant that includes a management company in its
application that is rated unsatisfactory by the executive director or if the
ownership of any applicant includes a principal that is or was a principal in a
development that hired a management company to manage a tax credit development
after such management company received a rating of unsatisfactory from the
executive director during the compliance period and extended use period of such
development. (minus 25 points)
f. Any applicant that includes a principal that was a
principal in a development for which the actual cost of construction (as
certified in the Independent Auditor's Report with attached Certification of
Sources and Uses that is submitted in connection with the Owner's Application
for IRS Form 8609) exceeded the applicable cost limit by 5.0% or more (minus 50
points for a period of three calendar years after December 31 of the year the
cost certification is complete; provided, however, if the Board of
Commissioners determines that such overage was outside of the applicant's control
based upon documented extenuating circumstances, no negative points will be
assessed).
g. Any applicant that includes a principal that has
submitted a subsequent application for a development prior to the issuance of
Form 8609 for that development. (minus 10 points for a period of two calendar
years after the year in which the subsequent application was submitted)
6. Efficient use of resources.
a. The percentage by which the total of the amount of credits
per low-income housing unit (the "per unit credit amount") of the
proposed development is less than the standard per unit credit amounts
established by the executive director for a given unit type, based upon the
number of such unit types in the proposed development. (200 points multiplied
by the percentage by which the total amount of the per unit credit amount of
the proposed development is less than the applicable standard per unit credit
amount established by the executive director, negative points will be assessed
using the percentage by which the total amount of the per unit credit amount of
the proposed development exceeds the applicable standard per unit credit amount
established by the executive director.)
b. The percentage by which the cost per low-income housing
unit (the "per unit cost"), adjusted by the authority for location,
of the proposed development is less than the standard per unit cost amounts
established by the executive director for a given unit type, based upon the
number of such unit types in the proposed development. (100 points multiplied
by the percentage by which the total amount of the per unit cost of the
proposed development is less than the applicable standard per unit cost amount
established by the executive director; negative points will be assessed using
the percentage by which the total amount of the per unit cost amount of the
proposed development exceeds the applicable standard per unit cost amount
established by the executive director.)
The executive director may use a standard per square foot
credit amount and a standard per square foot cost amount in establishing the
per unit credit amount and the per unit cost amount in subdivision 6 above. For
the purpose of calculating the points to be assigned pursuant to such
subdivision 6 above, all credit amounts shall include any credits previously
allocated to the development.
7. Bonus points.
a. Commitment by the applicant to impose income limits on the
low-income housing units throughout the extended use period (as defined in the
IRC) below those required by the IRC in order for the development to be a
qualified low-income development. Applicants receiving points under this
subdivision 7 a may not receive points under subdivision 7 b
below. (Up to 50 points, the product of (i) 100 multiplied by (ii) the
percentage of housing units in the proposed development both rent restricted to
and occupied by households at or below 50% of the area median gross income;
plus one point for each percentage point of such housing units in the proposed
development that are further restricted to rents at or below 30% of 40% of the
area median gross income up to an additional 10 points.)
b. Commitment by the applicant to impose rent limits on the
low-income housing units throughout the extended use period (as defined in the
IRC) below those required by the IRC in order for the development to be a
qualified low-income development. Applicants receiving points under this
subdivision 7 b may not receive points under subdivision 7 a above.
(Up to 25 points, the product of (i) 50 multiplied by (ii) the percentage of
housing units in the proposed development rent restricted to households at or
below 50% of the area median gross income; plus one point for each percentage
point of such housing units in the proposed development that are further
restricted to rents at or below 30% of 40% of the area median gross income up
to an additional 10 points. Points for proposed developments in low-income
jurisdictions shall be two times the points calculated in the preceding
sentence, up to 50 points.)
c. Commitment by the applicant to maintain the low-income
housing units in the development as a qualified low-income housing development
beyond the 30-year extended use period (as defined in the IRC). Applicants
receiving points under this subdivision 7 c may not receive bonus points
under subdivision 7 d below. (40 points for a 10-year commitment
beyond the 30-year extended use period or 50 points for a 20-year commitment
beyond the 30-year extended use period.)
d. Participation by a local housing authority or qualified nonprofit
organization (substantially based or active in the community with at least a
10% ownership interest in the general partnership interest of the partnership)
and a commitment by the applicant to sell the proposed development pursuant to
an executed, recordable option or right of first refusal to such local housing
authority or qualified nonprofit organization or to a wholly owned subsidiary
of such organization or authority, at the end of the 15-year compliance period,
as defined by IRC, for a price not to exceed the outstanding debt and exit
taxes of the for-profit entity. The applicant must record such option or right
of first refusal immediately after the low-income housing commitment described
in 13VAC10-180-70. Applicants receiving points under this subdivision 7
d may not receive bonus points under subdivision 7 c above. (60
points; plus five points if the local housing authority or qualified nonprofit
organization submits a homeownership plan satisfactory to the authority in
which the local housing authority or qualified nonprofit organization commits
to sell the units in the development to tenants.)
e. Any development participating in the Rental Assistance
Demonstration (RAD) program competing in the local housing authority pool will
receive an additional 10 points. Applicants must show proof of a commitment to
enter into housing assistance payment (CHAP) or a RAD conversion commitment
(RCC).
In calculating the points for subdivisions 7 a and b above,
any units in the proposed development required by the locality to exceed 60% of
the area median gross income will not be considered when calculating the
percentage of low-income units of the proposed development with incomes below
those required by the IRC in order for the development to be a qualified
low-income development, provided that the locality submits evidence
satisfactory to the authority of such requirement.
After points have been assigned to each application in the
manner described above, the executive director shall compute the total number
of points assigned to each such application. Any application that is assigned a
total number of points less than a threshold amount of 425 points (325 points
for developments financed with tax-exempt bonds in such amount so as not to
require under the IRC an allocation of credits hereunder) shall be rejected
from further consideration hereunder and shall not be eligible for any
reservation or allocation of credits.
During its review of the submitted applications, the
authority may conduct its own analysis of the demand for the housing units to
be produced by each applicant's proposed development. Notwithstanding any
conclusion in the market study submitted with an application, if the authority
determines that, based upon information from its own loan portfolio or its own
market study, inadequate demand exists for the housing units to be produced by
an applicant's proposed development, the authority may exclude and disregard
the application for such proposed development.
The executive director may exclude and disregard any
application that he determines is not submitted in good faith or that he
determines would not be financially feasible.
Upon assignment of points to all of the applications, the
executive director shall rank the applications based on the number of points so
assigned. If any pools shall have been established, each application shall be
assigned to a pool and, if any, to the appropriate tier within such pool and
shall be ranked within such pool or tier, if any. The amount of credits made
available to each pool will be determined by the executive director. Available
credits will include unreserved per capita dollar amount credits from the
current calendar year under § 42(h)(3)(C)(i) of the IRC, any unreserved per
capita credits from previous calendar years, and credits returned to the
authority prior to the final ranking of the applications and may include up to
40% of next calendar year's per capita credits as shall be determined by the
executive director. Those applications assigned more points shall be ranked
higher than those applications assigned fewer points. However, if any
set-asides established by the executive director cannot be satisfied after
ranking the applications based on the number of points, the executive director
may rank as many applications as necessary to meet the requirements of such
set-aside (selecting the highest ranked application, or applications, meeting
the requirements of the set-aside) over applications with more points.
In the event of a tie in the number of points assigned to two
or more applications within the same pool, or, if none, within the
Commonwealth, and in the event that the amount of credits available for
reservation to such applications is determined by the executive director to be
insufficient for the financial feasibility of all of the developments described
therein, the authority shall, to the extent necessary to fully utilize the
amount of credits available for reservation within such pool or, if none,
within the Commonwealth, select one or more of the applications with the
highest combination of points from subdivision 7 above, and each application so
selected shall receive (in order based upon the number of such points,
beginning with the application with the highest number of such points) a
reservation of credits. If two or more of the tied applications receive the
same number of points from subdivision 7 above and if the amount of credits
available for reservation to such tied applications is determined by the
executive director to be insufficient for the financial feasibility of all the
developments described therein, the executive director shall select one or more
of such applications by lot, and each application so selected by lot shall
receive (in order of such selection by lot) a reservation of credits.
For each application which may receive a reservation of
credits, the executive director shall determine the amount, as of the date of
the deadline for submission of applications for reservation of credits, to be
necessary for the financial feasibility of the development and its viability as
a qualified low-income development throughout the credit period under the IRC.
In making this determination, the executive director shall consider the sources
and uses of the funds, the available federal, state and local subsidies
committed to the development, the total financing planned for the development
as well as the investment proceeds or receipts expected by the authority to be
generated with respect to the development, and the percentage of the credit dollar
amount used for development costs other than the costs of intermediaries. He
shall also examine the development's costs, including developer's fees and
other amounts in the application, for reasonableness, and if he determines that
such costs or other amounts are unreasonably high, he shall reduce them to
amounts that he determines to be reasonable. The executive director shall
review the applicant's projected rental income, operating expenses and debt
service for the credit period. The executive director may establish such
criteria and assumptions as he shall deem reasonable for the purpose of making
such determination, including, without limitation, criteria as to the
reasonableness of fees and profits and assumptions as to the amount of net
syndication proceeds to be received (based upon such percentage of the credit
dollar amount used for development costs, other than the costs of
intermediaries, as the executive director shall determine to be reasonable for
the proposed development), increases in the market value of the development,
and increases in operating expenses, rental income and, in the case of
applications without firm financing commitments (as defined hereinabove) at
fixed interest rates, debt service on the proposed mortgage loan. The executive
director may, if he deems it appropriate, consider the development to be a part
of a larger development. In such a case, the executive director may consider,
examine, review and establish any or all of the foregoing items as to the
larger development in making such determination for the development.
At such time or times during each calendar year as the
executive director shall designate, the executive director shall reserve
credits to applications in descending order of ranking within each pool and tier,
if applicable, until either substantially all credits therein are reserved or
all qualified applications therein have received reservations. (For the purpose
of the preceding sentence, if there is not more than a de minimis amount, as
determined by the executive director, of credits remaining in a pool after
reservations have been made, "substantially all" of the credits in
such pool shall be deemed to have been reserved.) The executive director may
rank the applications within pools at different times for different pools and
may reserve credits, based on such rankings, one or more times with respect to
each pool. The executive director may also establish more than one round of
review and ranking of applications and reservation of credits based on such rankings,
and he shall designate the amount of credits to be made available for
reservation within each pool during each such round. The amount reserved to
each such application shall be equal to the lesser of (i) the amount requested
in the application or (ii) an amount determined by the executive director, as
of the date of application, to be necessary for the financial feasibility of
the development and its viability as a qualified low-income development
throughout the credit period under the IRC; provided, however, that in no event
shall the amount of credits so reserved exceed the maximum amount permissible
under the IRC.
Not more than 20% of the credits in any pool may be
reserved to developments intended to provide elderly housing, unless the
feasible credit amount, as determined by the executive director, of the highest
ranked elderly housing development in any pool exceeds 20% of the credits in
such pool, then such elderly housing development shall be the only elderly
housing development eligible for a reservation of credits from such pool.
However, if credits remain available for reservation after all eligible
nonelderly housing developments receive a reservation of credits, such
remaining credits may be made available to additional elderly housing developments.
The above limitation of credits available for elderly housing shall not include
elderly housing developments with project-based subsidy providing rental
assistance for at least 20% of the units that are submitted as rehabilitation
developments or assisted living facilities licensed under Chapter 17 (§
63.2-1700 et seq.) of Title 63.2 of the Code of Virginia.
If the amount of credits available in any pool is determined
by the executive director to be insufficient for the financial feasibility of the
proposed development to which such available credits are to be reserved, the
executive director may move the proposed development and the credits available
to another pool. If any credits remain in any pool after moving proposed
developments and credits to another pool, the executive director may for
developments that meet the requirements of § 42(h)(1)(E) of the IRC only,
reserve the remaining credits to any proposed development(s) scoring at or
above the minimum point threshold established by this chapter without regard to
the ranking of such application with additional credits from the Commonwealth's
annual state housing credit ceiling for the following year in such an amount
necessary for the financial feasibility of the proposed development, or developments.
However, the reservation of credits from the Commonwealth's annual state
housing credit ceiling for the following year shall be in the reasonable
discretion of the executive director if he determines it to be in the best
interest of the plan. In the event a reservation or an allocation of credits
from the current year or a prior year is reduced, terminated, or canceled, the
executive director may substitute such credits for any credits reserved from
the following year's annual state housing credit ceiling.
In the event that during any round of application review and
ranking the amount of credits reserved within any pools is less than the total
amount of credits made available therein during such round, the executive
director may either (i) leave such unreserved credits in such pools for
reservation and allocation in any subsequent round or rounds or,
(ii) redistribute such unreserved credits to such other pool or pools as the
executive director may designate or, (iii) supplement such
unreserved credits in such pools with additional credits from the
Commonwealth's annual state housing credit ceiling for the following year for
reservation and allocation if in the reasonable discretion of the executive
director, it serves the best interest of the plan, or (iv) carry over such
unreserved credits to the next succeeding calendar year for inclusion in the
state housing credit ceiling (as defined in § 42(h)(3)(C) of the IRC) for such
year.
Notwithstanding anything contained herein, the total amount
of credits that may be awarded in any credit year after credit year 2001 to any
applicant or to any related applicants for one or more developments shall not
exceed 15% of Virginia's per capita dollar amount of credits for such credit
year (the "credit cap"). However, if the amount of credits to be
reserved in any such credit year to all applications assigned a total number of
points at or above the threshold amount set forth above shall be less than
Virginia's dollar amount of credits available for such credit year, then the
authority's board of commissioners may waive the credit cap to the extent it
deems necessary to reserve credits in an amount at least equal to such dollar
amount of credits. Applicants shall be deemed to be related if any principal in
a proposed development or any person or entity related to the applicant or
principal will be a principal in any other proposed development or
developments. For purposes of this paragraph, a principal shall also include
any person or entity who, in the determination of the executive director, has
exercised or will exercise, directly or indirectly, substantial control over
the applicant or has performed or will perform (or has assisted or will assist
the applicant in the performance of), directly or indirectly, substantial
responsibilities or functions customarily performed by applicants with respect
to applications or developments. For the purpose of determining whether any
person or entity is related to the applicant or principal, persons or entities
shall be deemed to be related if the executive director determines that any
substantial relationship existed, either directly between them or indirectly
through a series of one or more substantial relationships (e.g., if party A has
a substantial relationship with party B and if party B has a substantial
relationship with party C, then A has a substantial relationship with both
party B and party C), at any time within three years of the filing of the
application for the credits. In determining in any credit year whether an applicant
has a substantial relationship with another applicant with respect to any
application for which credits were awarded in any prior credit year, the
executive director shall determine whether the applicants were related as of
the date of the filing of such prior credit year's application or within three
years prior thereto and shall not consider any relationships or any changes in
relationships subsequent to such date. Substantial relationships shall include,
but not be limited to, the following relationships (in each of the following
relationships, the persons or entities involved in the relationship are deemed
to be related to each other): (i) the persons are in the same immediate family
(including, without limitation, a spouse, children, parents, grandparents,
grandchildren, brothers, sisters, uncles, aunts, nieces, and nephews) and are
living in the same household; (ii) the entities have one or more common general
partners or members (including related persons and entities), or the entities
have one or more common owners that (by themselves or together with any other
related persons and entities) have, in the aggregate, 5.0% or more ownership
interest in each entity; (iii) the entities are under the common control (e.g.,
the same person or persons and any related persons serve as a majority of the
voting members of the boards of such entities or as chief executive officers of
such entities) of one or more persons or entities (including related persons
and entities); (iv) the person is a general partner, member or employee in the
entity or is an owner (by himself or together with any other related persons
and entities) of 5.0% or more ownership interest in the entity; (v) the entity
is a general partner or member in the other entity or is an owner (by itself or
together with any other related persons and entities) of 5.0% or more ownership
interest in the other entity; or (vi) the person or entity is otherwise
controlled, in whole or in part, by the other person or entity. In determining
compliance with the credit cap with respect to any application, the executive
director may exclude any person or entity related to the applicant or to any
principal in such applicant if the executive director determines that (i) such
person or entity will not participate, directly or indirectly, in matters
relating to the applicant or the ownership of the development to be assisted by
the credits for which the application is submitted, (ii) such person or entity
has no agreement or understanding relating to such application or the tax
credits requested therein, and (iii) such person or entity will not receive a
financial benefit from the tax credits requested in the application. A limited
partner or other similar investor shall not be determined to be a principal and
shall be excluded from the determination of related persons or entities unless
the executive director shall determine that such limited partner or investor
will, directly or indirectly, exercise control over the applicant or
participate in matters relating to the ownership of the development
substantially beyond the degree of control or participation that is usual and
customary for limited partners or other similar investors with respect to
developments assisted by the credits. If the award of multiple applications of
any applicant or related applicants in any credit year shall cause the credit
cap to be exceeded, such applicant or applicants shall, upon notice from the
authority, jointly designate those applications for which credits are not to be
reserved so that such limitation shall not be exceeded. Such notice shall
specify the date by which such designation shall be made. In the absence of any
such designation by the date specified in such notice, the executive director
shall make such designation as he shall determine to best serve the interests
of the program. Each applicant and each principal therein shall make such
certifications, shall disclose such facts and shall submit such documents to
the authority as the executive director may require to determine compliance
with credit cap. If an applicant or any principal therein makes any
misrepresentation to the authority concerning such applicant's or principal's
relationship with any other person or entity, the executive director may reject
any or all of such applicant's pending applications for reservation or
allocation of credits, may terminate any or all reservations of credits to the
applicant, and may prohibit such applicant, the principals therein and any
persons and entities then or thereafter having a substantial relationship (in
the determination of the executive director as described above) with the
applicant or any principal therein from submitting applications for credits for
such period of time as the executive director shall determine.
Within a reasonable time after credits are reserved to any
applicants' applications, the executive director shall notify each applicant
for such reservations of credits either of the amount of credits reserved to
such applicant's application (by issuing to such applicant a written binding
commitment to allocate such reserved credits subject to such terms and
conditions as may be imposed by the executive director therein, by the IRC and
by this chapter) or, as applicable, that the applicant's application has been
rejected or excluded or has otherwise not been reserved credits in accordance
herewith. The written binding commitment shall prohibit any transfer, direct or
indirect, of partnership interests (except those involving the admission of
limited partners) prior to the placed-in-service date of the proposed
development unless the transfer is consented to by the executive director. The
written binding commitment shall further limit the developers' fees to the
amounts established during the review of the applications for reservation of
credits and such amounts shall not be increased unless consented to by the
executive director.
If credits are reserved to any applicants for developments
that have also received an allocation of credits from prior years, the
executive director may reserve additional credits from the current year equal
to the amount of credits allocated to such developments from prior years,
provided such previously allocated credits are returned to the authority. Any
previously allocated credits returned to the authority under such circumstances
shall be placed into the credit pools from which the current year's credits are
reserved to such applicants.
The executive director shall make a written explanation
available to the general public for any allocation of housing credit dollar
amount that is not made in accordance with established priorities and selection
criteria of the authority.
The authority's board shall review and consider the analysis
and recommendation of the executive director for the reservation of credits to
an applicant, and, if it concurs with such recommendation, it shall by
resolution ratify the reservation by the executive director of the credits to
the applicant, subject to such terms and conditions as it shall deem necessary
or appropriate to assure compliance with the aforementioned binding commitment
issued or to be issued to the applicant, the IRC and this chapter. If the board
determines not to ratify a reservation of credits or to establish any such
terms and conditions, the executive director shall so notify the applicant.
The executive director may require the applicant to make a
good faith deposit or to execute such contractual agreements providing for
monetary or other remedies as it may require, or both, to assure that the
applicant will comply with all requirements under the IRC, this chapter and the
binding commitment (including, without limitation, any requirement to conform
to all of the representations, commitments and information contained in the
application for which points were assigned pursuant to this section). Upon
satisfaction of all such aforementioned requirements (including any
post-allocation requirements), such deposit shall be refunded to the applicant
or such contractual agreements shall terminate, or both, as applicable.
If, as of the date the application is approved by the
executive director, the applicant is entitled to an allocation of the credits
under the IRC, this chapter and the terms of any binding commitment that the
authority would have otherwise issued to such applicant, the executive director
may at that time allocate the credits to such qualified low-income buildings or
development without first providing a reservation of such credits. This
provision in no way limits the authority of the executive director to require a
good faith deposit or contractual agreement, or both, as described in the
preceding paragraph, nor to relieve the applicant from any other requirements
hereunder for eligibility for an allocation of credits. Any such allocation
shall be subject to ratification by the board in the same manner as provided
above with respect to reservations.
The executive director may require that applicants to whom
credits have been reserved shall submit from time to time or at such specified
times as he shall require, written confirmation and documentation as to the
status of the proposed development and its compliance with the application, the
binding commitment and any contractual agreements between the applicant and the
authority. If on the basis of such written confirmation and documentation as
the executive director shall have received in response to such a request, or on
the basis of such other available information, or both, the executive director
determines any or all of the buildings in the development that were to become
qualified low-income buildings will not do so within the time period required
by the IRC or will not otherwise qualify for such credits under the IRC, this
chapter or the binding commitment, then the executive director may (i) terminate
the reservation of such credits and draw on any good faith deposit, or (ii)
substitute the reservation of credits from the current credit year with a
reservation of credits from a future credit year if the delay is caused by a
lawsuit beyond the applicant's control that prevents the applicant from
proceeding with the development. If, in lieu of or in addition to the foregoing
determination, the executive director determines that any contractual
agreements between the applicant and the authority have been breached by the
applicant, whether before or after allocation of the credits, he may seek to
enforce any and all remedies to which the authority may then be entitled under
such contractual agreements.
The executive director may establish such deadlines for
determining the ability of the applicant to qualify for an allocation of
credits as he shall deem necessary or desirable to allow the authority
sufficient time, in the event of a reduction or termination of the applicant's
reservation, to reserve such credits to other eligible applications and to
allocate such credits pursuant thereto.
Any material changes to the development, as proposed in the
application, occurring subsequent to the submission of the application for the
credits therefor shall be subject to the prior written approval of the
executive director. As a condition to any such approval, the executive director
may, as necessary to comply with this chapter, the IRC, the binding commitment
and any other contractual agreement between the authority and the applicant,
reduce the amount of credits applied for or reserved or impose additional terms
and conditions with respect thereto. If such changes are made without the prior
written approval of the executive director, he may terminate or reduce the reservation
of such credits, impose additional terms and conditions with respect thereto,
seek to enforce any contractual remedies to which the authority may then be
entitled, draw on any good faith deposit, or any combination of the foregoing.
In the event that any reservation of credits is terminated or
reduced by the executive director under this section, he may reserve, allocate
or carry over, as applicable, such credits in such manner as he shall determine
consistent with the requirements of the IRC and this chapter.
Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, the executive
director may make a reservation of credits to any applicant that proposes a
nonelderly development that (i) will be assisted by HUD project-based vouchers
or another form of documented and binding federal or state project-based rent
subsidies in order to ensure occupancy by extremely low-income persons; (ii)
conforms to HUD regulations interpreting the accessibility requirements of §
504 of the Rehabilitation Act; and (iii) will be actively marketed to people
with disabilities in accordance with a plan submitted as part of the
application for credits and approved by the executive director for either (a)
at least 25% of the units in the development or (b) if HUD Section 811 funds are
providing the rent subsidies, at least 15% but not more than 25% of the units
in the development. Any such reservations made in any calendar year may be up
to 6.0% of the Commonwealth's annual state housing credit ceiling for the
applicable credit year. However, such reservation will be for credits from the
Commonwealth's annual state housing credit ceiling from the following calendar
year.
VA.R. Doc. No. R17-4837; Filed August 16, 2016, 12:23 p.m.
TITLE 18. PROFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING
BOARD OF MEDICINE
Final Regulation
REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The
Board of Medicine is claiming an exemption from Article 2 of the Administrative
Process Act in accordance with § 2.2-4006 A 4 a of the Code of Virginia,
which excludes regulations that are necessary to conform to changes in Virginia
statutory law or the appropriation act where no agency discretion is involved.
The Board of Medicine will receive, consider, and respond to petitions by any
interested person at any time with respect to reconsideration or revision.
Title of Regulation: 18VAC85-50. Regulations
Governing the Practice of Physician Assistants (amending 18VAC85-50-57, 18VAC85-50-101,
18VAC85-50-110, 18VAC85-50-115).
Statutory Authority: § 54.1-2400 of the Code of
Virginia.
Effective Date: October 5, 2016.
Agency Contact: William L. Harp, M.D., Executive
Director, Board of Medicine, 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 300, Richmond, VA 23233,
telephone (804) 367-4558, FAX (804) 527-4429, or email william.harp@dhp.virginia.gov.
Summary:
The amendments (i) remove the requirements for submission
of a practice agreement for approval by the board; (ii) permit, rather than
require, that a practice agreement include periodic site visits by supervising
licensees of a physician assistant who provides services at locations other
than where the supervising licensee regularly practices; (iii) permit
electronic practice agreements; and (iv) amend the provisions regarding temporary
delegation of supervisory responsibilities. The amendments make conforming
changes to the regulation pursuant to Chapter 450 of the 2016 Acts of Assembly.
18VAC85-50-57. Discontinuation of employment.
If for any reason the assistant discontinues working in the
employment and under the supervision of a licensed practitioner, such
assistant or the employing practitioner shall so inform the board. A a
new practice agreement shall be submitted to the board and approved by the
board entered into in order for the assistant either to be
reemployed by the same practitioner or to accept new employment with another
supervising physician.
Part IV
Practice Requirements
18VAC85-50-101. Requirements for a practice agreement.
A. Prior to initiation of practice, a physician assistant and
his supervising physician shall submit enter into a written or
electronic practice agreement which that spells out the roles
and functions of the assistant. Any such practice agreement shall take into
account such factors as the physician assistant's level of competence, the
number of patients, the types of illness treated by the physician, the nature
of the treatment, special procedures, and the nature of the physician
availability in ensuring direct physician involvement at an early stage and
regularly thereafter. The practice agreement shall also provide an evaluation
process for the physician assistant's performance, including a requirement
specifying the time period, proportionate to the acuity of care and practice
setting, within which the supervising physician shall review the record of
services rendered by the physician assistant. The practice agreement may
include requirements for periodic site visits by supervising licensees who
supervise and direct assistants who provide services at a location other than
where the licensee regularly practices.
B. The board may require information regarding the level of
supervision, (i.e., "direct," "personal,"
or "general,") with which the supervising physician
plans to supervise the physician assistant for selected tasks. The board may
also require the supervising physician to document the assistant's competence
in performing such tasks.
C. If the role of the assistant includes prescribing for
drugs and devices, the written practice agreement shall include: 1. Those
those schedules and categories of drugs and devices that are within the
scope of practice and proficiency of the supervising physician; and
2. Requirements for periodic site visits by supervising
licensees who supervise and direct assistants who provide services at a
location other than where the licensee regularly practices.
D. If the initial practice agreement did not include
prescriptive authority, there shall be an addendum to the practice
agreement for prescriptive authority shall be submitted.
E. If there are any changes in supervision, authorization, or
scope of practice, a revised practice agreement shall be submitted entered
into at the time of the change.
18VAC85-50-110. Responsibilities of the supervisor.
The supervising physician shall:
1. Review the clinical course and treatment plan for any
patient who presents for the same acute complaint twice in a single episode of
care and has failed to improve as expected. The supervising physician shall be
involved with any patient with a continuing illness as noted in the written or
electronic practice agreement for the evaluation process.
2. Be responsible for all invasive procedures.
a. Under general supervision, a physician assistant may insert
a nasogastric tube, bladder catheter, needle, or peripheral intravenous
catheter, but not a flow-directed catheter, and may perform minor suturing,
venipuncture, and subcutaneous intramuscular or intravenous injection.
b. All other invasive procedures not listed above in
subdivision 2 a of this section must be performed under direct supervision
unless, after directly supervising the performance of a specific invasive
procedure three times or more, the supervising physician attests to the
competence of the physician assistant to perform the specific procedure without
direct supervision by certifying to the board in writing the number of times
the specific procedure has been performed and that the physician assistant is competent
to perform the specific procedure. After such certification has been accepted
and approved by the board, the physician assistant may perform the procedure
under general supervision.
3. Be responsible for all prescriptions issued by the
assistant and attest to the competence of the assistant to prescribe drugs and
devices.
18VAC85-50-115. Responsibilities of the physician assistant.
A. The physician assistant shall not render independent
health care and shall:
1. Perform only those medical care services that are within
the scope of the practice and proficiency of the supervising physician as
prescribed in the physician assistant's practice agreement. When a physician
assistant is to be supervised by an alternate supervising physician outside the
scope of specialty of the supervising physician, then the physician assistant's
functions shall be limited to those areas not requiring specialized clinical
judgment, unless a separate practice agreement for that alternate supervising
physician is approved and on file with the board.
2. Prescribe only those drugs and devices as allowed in Part V
(18VAC85-50-130 et seq.) of this chapter.
3. Wear during the course of performing his duties
identification showing clearly that he is a physician assistant.
B. If, due to illness, vacation, or unexpected absence, the
supervising physician or alternate supervising physician is unable to supervise
the activities of his assistant, such supervising physician may temporarily
delegate the responsibility to another doctor of medicine, osteopathic
medicine, or podiatry. The supervising physician so delegating his
responsibility shall report such arrangement for coverage, with the reason
therefor, to the board office in writing, subject to the following provisions:
1. For planned absence, such notification shall be received
at the board office at least one month prior to the absence of both the
supervising and alternate supervising physicians;
2. For sudden illness or other unexpected absence that
necessitates temporary coverage, the board office shall be notified as promptly
as possible, but in no event later than one week; and
3. Temporary coverage may not exceed four weeks unless
special permission is granted by the board.
C. With respect to assistants employed by institutions, the
following additional regulations shall apply:
1. No assistant may render care to a patient unless the
physician responsible for that patient has signed the practice agreement to act
as supervising physician for that assistant. The board shall make available
appropriate forms for physicians to join the practice agreement for an
assistant employed by an institution.
2. Any such practice agreement as described in subdivision 1
of this subsection shall delineate the duties which said physician authorizes
the assistant to perform.
3. The assistant shall, as soon as circumstances may dictate,
report an acute or significant finding or change in clinical status to the
supervising physician concerning the examination of the patient. The assistant
shall also record his findings in appropriate institutional records.
D. Practice by a physician assistant in a hospital, including
an emergency department, shall be in accordance with § 54.1-2952 of the
Code of Virginia.
VA.R. Doc. No. R17-4730; Filed August 10, 2016, 9:42 a.m.
TITLE 18. PROFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING
BOARD OF NURSING
Final Regulation
REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The
Board of Nursing is claiming an exemption from Article 2 of the Administrative
Process Act in accordance with § 2.2-4006 A 4 a of the Code of Virginia,
which excludes regulations that are necessary to conform to changes in Virginia
statutory law or the appropriation act where no agency discretion is involved.
The Board of Nursing will receive, consider, and respond to petitions by any
interested person at any time with respect to reconsideration or revision.
Titles of Regulations: 18VAC90-30. Regulations
Governing the Licensure of Nurse Practitioners (amending 18VAC90-30-10, 18VAC90-30-120;
adding 18VAC90-30-123; repealing 18VAC90-30-122).
18VAC90-40. Regulations for Prescriptive Authority for Nurse
Practitioners (amending 18VAC90-40-10, 18VAC90-40-90,
18VAC90-40-130).
Statutory Authority: §§ 54.1-2400 and 54.1-2957 of the
Code of Virginia.
Effective Date: October 5, 2016.
Agency Contact: Jay P. Douglas, R.N., Executive
Director, Board of Nursing, 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 300, Richmond, VA
23233-1463, telephone (804) 367-4515, FAX (804) 527-4455, or email jay.douglas@dhp.virginia.gov.
Summary:
The amendments conform the regulations to changes made to
the Code of Virginia enacted by Chapters 93 and 495 of the 2016 Acts of
Assembly. The amendments delete a requirement for certified registered nurse
anesthetists to have a practice agreement with a supervising physician and
modify the practice model for certified nurse midwives who now practice in
consultation with a physician.
Part I
General Provisions
18VAC90-30-10. Definitions.
The following words and terms when used in this chapter shall
have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
"Approved program" means a nurse practitioner
education program that is accredited by the Council on Accreditation of Nurse
Anesthesia Educational Programs/Schools, American College of Nurse Midwives,
Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education, or the National League for
Nursing Accrediting Commission or is offered by a school of nursing or jointly
offered by a school of medicine and a school of nursing that grant a graduate
degree in nursing and which hold a national accreditation acceptable to the
boards.
"Boards" means the Virginia Board of Nursing and
the Virginia Board of Medicine.
"Certified nurse midwife" means an advanced
practice registered nurse who is certified in the specialty of nurse midwifery
and who is jointly licensed by the Boards of Medicine and Nursing as a nurse
practitioner pursuant to § 54.1-2957 of the Code of Virginia.
"Certified registered nurse anesthetist" means
an advanced practice registered nurse who is certified in the specialty of
nurse anesthesia, who is jointly licensed by the Boards of Medicine and Nursing
as a nurse practitioner pursuant to § 54.1-2957, and who practices under
the supervision of a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, podiatry, or dentistry but
is not subject to the practice agreement requirement described in § 54.1-2957.
"Collaboration" means the communication and
decision-making process among members of a patient care team related to the
treatment and care of a patient and includes (i) communication of data and
information about the treatment and care of a patient, including exchange of
clinical observations and assessments, and (ii) development of an appropriate
plan of care, including decisions regarding the health care provided, accessing
and assessment of appropriate additional resources or expertise, and
arrangement of appropriate referrals, testing, or studies.
"Committee" means the Committee of the Joint Boards
of Nursing and Medicine.
"Consultation" means the communicating of data and
information, exchanging of clinical observations and assessments, accessing and
assessing of additional resources and expertise, problem solving, and arranging
for referrals, testing, or studies.
"Licensed nurse practitioner" means an advanced
practice registered nurse who has met the requirements for licensure as stated
in Part II (18VAC90-30-60 et seq.) of this chapter.
"National certifying body" means a national
organization that is accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by the U.S.
Department of Education or deemed acceptable by the National Council of State
Boards of Nursing and has as one of its purposes the certification of nurse
anesthetists, nurse midwives or nurse practitioners, referred to in this
chapter as professional certification, and whose certification of such persons
by examination is accepted by the committee.
"Patient care team physician" means a person who
holds an active, unrestricted license issued by the Virginia Board of Medicine
to practice medicine or osteopathic medicine.
"Practice agreement" means a written or electronic
statement, jointly developed by the collaborating patient care team
physician(s) and the licensed nurse practitioner(s) that describes the
procedures to be followed and the acts appropriate to the specialty practice
area to be performed by the licensed nurse practitioner(s) in the care and
management of patients. The practice agreement also describes the prescriptive
authority of the nurse practitioner, if applicable. For a nurse practitioner
licensed in the category of certified nurse midwife, the practice agreement is
a statement jointly developed with the consulting physician.
Part III
Practice of Licensed Nurse Practitioners
18VAC90-30-120. Practice of licensed nurse practitioners other
than certified registered nurse anesthetists or certified nurse midwives.
A. A nurse practitioner licensed in a category other than
certified registered nurse anesthetist or certified nurse midwife shall
be authorized to render care in collaboration and consultation with a licensed
patient care team physician as part of a patient care team.
B. The practice of all licensed nurse practitioners
shall be based on specialty education preparation as an advanced practice
registered nurse in accordance with standards of the applicable certifying
organization, as identified in 18VAC90-30-90. A nurse practitioner licensed
in the category of a certified nurse midwife shall practice in accordance with
the Standards for the Practice of Midwifery (Revised 2011) defined by the
American College of Nurse-Midwives.
C. All nurse practitioners licensed in any category other
than certified registered nurse anesthetist or certified nurse midwife shall
practice in accordance with a written or electronic practice agreement as
defined in 18VAC90-30-10.
D. The written or electronic practice agreement shall
include provisions for:
1. The periodic review of patient charts or electronic
patient records by a patient care team physician and may include provisions for
visits to the site where health care is delivered in the manner and at the
frequency determined by the patient care team;
2. Appropriate physician input in complex clinical cases
and patient emergencies and for referrals; and
3. The nurse practitioner's authority for signatures,
certifications, stamps, verifications, affidavits, and endorsements provided it
is:
a. In accordance with the specialty license of the nurse
practitioner and within the scope of practice of the patient care team
physician;
b. Permitted by § 54.1-2957.02 or applicable sections of
the Code of Virginia; and
c. Not in conflict with federal law or regulation.
E. The practice agreement shall be maintained by the nurse
practitioner and provided to the boards upon request. For nurse practitioners
providing care to patients within a hospital or health care system, the practice
agreement may be included as part of documents delineating the nurse
practitioner's clinical privileges or the electronic or written delineation of
duties and responsibilities; however, the nurse practitioner shall be
responsible for providing a copy to the boards upon request.
18VAC90-30-122. Practice agreements. (Repealed.)
A. All nurse practitioners licensed in any category shall
practice in accordance with a written or electronic practice agreement as
defined in 18VAC90-30-10.
B. The written or electronic practice agreement shall
include provisions for:
1. The periodic review of patient charts or electronic
patient records by a patient care team physician and may include provisions for
visits to the site where health care is delivered in the manner and at the
frequency determined by the patient care team;
2. Appropriate physician input in complex clinical cases
and patient emergencies and for referrals; and
3. The nurse practitioner's authority for signatures,
certifications, stamps, verifications, affidavits, and endorsements provided it
is:
a. In accordance with the specialty license of the nurse
practitioner and within the scope of practice of the patient care team
physician;
b. Permitted by § 54.1-2957.02 or applicable sections
of the Code of Virginia; and
c. Not in conflict with federal law or regulation.
C. The practice agreement shall be maintained by the nurse
practitioner and provided to the boards upon request. For nurse practitioners
providing care to patients within a hospital or health care system, the
practice agreement may be included as part of documents delineating the nurse
practitioner's clinical privileges or the electronic or written delineation of
duties and responsibilities; however, the nurse practitioner shall be responsible
for providing a copy to the boards upon request.
18VAC90-30-123. Practice of nurse practitioners licensed as
certified nurse midwives.
A. A nurse practitioner licensed in the category of
certified nurse midwife shall practice in consultation with a licensed
physician in accordance with a practice agreement between the nurse
practitioner and the physician. Such practice agreement shall address the
availability of the physician for routine and urgent consultation on patient
care.
B. The practice agreement shall be maintained by the nurse
midwife and provided to the boards upon request. For nurse midwives providing
care to patients within a hospital or health care system, the practice
agreement may be included as part of documents delineating the nurse midwife's
clinical privileges or the electronic or written delineation of duties and
responsibilities; however, the nurse midwife shall be responsible for providing
a copy to the boards upon request.
C. A nurse practitioner licensed in the category of a
certified nurse midwife shall practice in accordance with the Standards for the
Practice of Midwifery (Revised 2011) defined by the American College of
Nurse-Midwives.
Part I
General Provisions
18VAC90-40-10. Definitions.
The following words and terms when used in this chapter shall
have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
"Boards" means the Virginia Board of Medicine and
the Virginia Board of Nursing.
"Certified nurse midwife" means an advanced
practice registered nurse who is certified in the specialty of nurse midwifery
and who is jointly licensed by the Boards of Medicine and Nursing as a nurse
practitioner pursuant to § 54.1-2957 of the Code of Virginia.
"Committee" means the Committee of the Joint Boards
of Nursing and Medicine.
"Nonprofit health care clinics or programs" means a
clinic organized in whole or in part for the delivery of health care services
without charge or when a reasonable minimum fee is charged only to cover
administrative costs.
"Nurse practitioner" means an advanced practice
registered nurse who has met the requirements for licensure as a nurse
practitioner as stated in 18VAC90-30.
"Practice agreement" means a written or electronic
agreement jointly developed by the patient care team physician and the nurse
practitioner for the practice of the nurse practitioner that also describes the
prescriptive authority of the nurse practitioner, if applicable. For a nurse
practitioner licensed in the category of certified nurse midwife, the practice
agreement is a statement jointly developed with the consulting physician.
Part III
Practice Requirements
18VAC90-40-90. Practice agreement.
A. A With the exception of subsection E of this
section, a nurse practitioner with prescriptive authority may prescribe only
within the scope of the written or electronic practice agreement with a patient
care team physician.
B. At any time there are changes in the patient care team
physician, authorization to prescribe, or scope of practice, the nurse
practitioner shall revise the practice agreement and maintain the revised
agreement.
C. The practice agreement shall contain the following:
1. A description of the prescriptive authority of the nurse
practitioner within the scope allowed by law and the practice of the nurse practitioner.
2. An authorization for categories of drugs and devices within
the requirements of § 54.1-2957.01 of the Code of Virginia.
3. The signature of the patient care team physician who is
practicing with the nurse practitioner or a clear statement of the name of the
patient care team physician who has entered into the practice agreement.
D. In accordance with § 54.1-2957.01 of the Code of
Virginia, a physician shall not serve as a patient care team physician to more
than six nurse practitioners with prescriptive authority at any one time.
E. A nurse practitioner licensed in the category of
certified nurse midwife and holding a license for prescriptive authority may
prescribe in accordance with a written or electronic practice agreement with a
consulting physician or may prescribe Schedule VI controlled substances without
the requirement for inclusion of such prescriptive authority in a practice
agreement.
Part IV
Discipline
18VAC90-40-130. Grounds for disciplinary action.
A. The boards may deny approval of prescriptive authority,
revoke or suspend authorization, or take other disciplinary actions against a
nurse practitioner who:
1. Exceeds his authority to prescribe or prescribes outside of
the written or electronic practice agreement with the patient care team
physician or, for certified nurse midwives, the practice agreement with the
consulting physician;
2. Has had his license as a nurse practitioner suspended,
revoked, or otherwise disciplined by the boards pursuant to 18VAC90-30-220;
3. Fails to comply with requirements for continuing competency
as set forth in 18VAC90-40-55.
B. Unauthorized use or disclosure of confidential information
received from the Prescription Monitoring Program shall be grounds for
disciplinary action.
VA.R. Doc. No. R17-4833; Filed August 10, 2016, 9:44 a.m.
TITLE 18. PROFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING
BOARD OF NURSING
Final Regulation
REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The
Board of Nursing is claiming an exemption from Article 2 of the Administrative
Process Act in accordance with § 2.2-4006 A 4 a of the Code of Virginia,
which excludes regulations that are necessary to conform to changes in Virginia
statutory law or the appropriation act where no agency discretion is involved.
The Board of Nursing will receive, consider, and respond to petitions by any
interested person at any time with respect to reconsideration or revision.
Titles of Regulations: 18VAC90-30. Regulations
Governing the Licensure of Nurse Practitioners (amending 18VAC90-30-10, 18VAC90-30-120;
adding 18VAC90-30-123; repealing 18VAC90-30-122).
18VAC90-40. Regulations for Prescriptive Authority for Nurse
Practitioners (amending 18VAC90-40-10, 18VAC90-40-90,
18VAC90-40-130).
Statutory Authority: §§ 54.1-2400 and 54.1-2957 of the
Code of Virginia.
Effective Date: October 5, 2016.
Agency Contact: Jay P. Douglas, R.N., Executive
Director, Board of Nursing, 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 300, Richmond, VA
23233-1463, telephone (804) 367-4515, FAX (804) 527-4455, or email jay.douglas@dhp.virginia.gov.
Summary:
The amendments conform the regulations to changes made to
the Code of Virginia enacted by Chapters 93 and 495 of the 2016 Acts of
Assembly. The amendments delete a requirement for certified registered nurse
anesthetists to have a practice agreement with a supervising physician and
modify the practice model for certified nurse midwives who now practice in
consultation with a physician.
Part I
General Provisions
18VAC90-30-10. Definitions.
The following words and terms when used in this chapter shall
have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
"Approved program" means a nurse practitioner
education program that is accredited by the Council on Accreditation of Nurse
Anesthesia Educational Programs/Schools, American College of Nurse Midwives,
Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education, or the National League for
Nursing Accrediting Commission or is offered by a school of nursing or jointly
offered by a school of medicine and a school of nursing that grant a graduate
degree in nursing and which hold a national accreditation acceptable to the
boards.
"Boards" means the Virginia Board of Nursing and
the Virginia Board of Medicine.
"Certified nurse midwife" means an advanced
practice registered nurse who is certified in the specialty of nurse midwifery
and who is jointly licensed by the Boards of Medicine and Nursing as a nurse
practitioner pursuant to § 54.1-2957 of the Code of Virginia.
"Certified registered nurse anesthetist" means
an advanced practice registered nurse who is certified in the specialty of
nurse anesthesia, who is jointly licensed by the Boards of Medicine and Nursing
as a nurse practitioner pursuant to § 54.1-2957, and who practices under
the supervision of a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, podiatry, or dentistry but
is not subject to the practice agreement requirement described in § 54.1-2957.
"Collaboration" means the communication and
decision-making process among members of a patient care team related to the
treatment and care of a patient and includes (i) communication of data and
information about the treatment and care of a patient, including exchange of
clinical observations and assessments, and (ii) development of an appropriate
plan of care, including decisions regarding the health care provided, accessing
and assessment of appropriate additional resources or expertise, and
arrangement of appropriate referrals, testing, or studies.
"Committee" means the Committee of the Joint Boards
of Nursing and Medicine.
"Consultation" means the communicating of data and
information, exchanging of clinical observations and assessments, accessing and
assessing of additional resources and expertise, problem solving, and arranging
for referrals, testing, or studies.
"Licensed nurse practitioner" means an advanced
practice registered nurse who has met the requirements for licensure as stated
in Part II (18VAC90-30-60 et seq.) of this chapter.
"National certifying body" means a national
organization that is accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by the U.S.
Department of Education or deemed acceptable by the National Council of State
Boards of Nursing and has as one of its purposes the certification of nurse
anesthetists, nurse midwives or nurse practitioners, referred to in this
chapter as professional certification, and whose certification of such persons
by examination is accepted by the committee.
"Patient care team physician" means a person who
holds an active, unrestricted license issued by the Virginia Board of Medicine
to practice medicine or osteopathic medicine.
"Practice agreement" means a written or electronic
statement, jointly developed by the collaborating patient care team
physician(s) and the licensed nurse practitioner(s) that describes the
procedures to be followed and the acts appropriate to the specialty practice
area to be performed by the licensed nurse practitioner(s) in the care and
management of patients. The practice agreement also describes the prescriptive
authority of the nurse practitioner, if applicable. For a nurse practitioner
licensed in the category of certified nurse midwife, the practice agreement is
a statement jointly developed with the consulting physician.
Part III
Practice of Licensed Nurse Practitioners
18VAC90-30-120. Practice of licensed nurse practitioners other
than certified registered nurse anesthetists or certified nurse midwives.
A. A nurse practitioner licensed in a category other than
certified registered nurse anesthetist or certified nurse midwife shall
be authorized to render care in collaboration and consultation with a licensed
patient care team physician as part of a patient care team.
B. The practice of all licensed nurse practitioners
shall be based on specialty education preparation as an advanced practice
registered nurse in accordance with standards of the applicable certifying
organization, as identified in 18VAC90-30-90. A nurse practitioner licensed
in the category of a certified nurse midwife shall practice in accordance with
the Standards for the Practice of Midwifery (Revised 2011) defined by the
American College of Nurse-Midwives.
C. All nurse practitioners licensed in any category other
than certified registered nurse anesthetist or certified nurse midwife shall
practice in accordance with a written or electronic practice agreement as
defined in 18VAC90-30-10.
D. The written or electronic practice agreement shall
include provisions for:
1. The periodic review of patient charts or electronic
patient records by a patient care team physician and may include provisions for
visits to the site where health care is delivered in the manner and at the
frequency determined by the patient care team;
2. Appropriate physician input in complex clinical cases
and patient emergencies and for referrals; and
3. The nurse practitioner's authority for signatures,
certifications, stamps, verifications, affidavits, and endorsements provided it
is:
a. In accordance with the specialty license of the nurse
practitioner and within the scope of practice of the patient care team
physician;
b. Permitted by § 54.1-2957.02 or applicable sections of
the Code of Virginia; and
c. Not in conflict with federal law or regulation.
E. The practice agreement shall be maintained by the nurse
practitioner and provided to the boards upon request. For nurse practitioners
providing care to patients within a hospital or health care system, the practice
agreement may be included as part of documents delineating the nurse
practitioner's clinical privileges or the electronic or written delineation of
duties and responsibilities; however, the nurse practitioner shall be
responsible for providing a copy to the boards upon request.
18VAC90-30-122. Practice agreements. (Repealed.)
A. All nurse practitioners licensed in any category shall
practice in accordance with a written or electronic practice agreement as
defined in 18VAC90-30-10.
B. The written or electronic practice agreement shall
include provisions for:
1. The periodic review of patient charts or electronic
patient records by a patient care team physician and may include provisions for
visits to the site where health care is delivered in the manner and at the
frequency determined by the patient care team;
2. Appropriate physician input in complex clinical cases
and patient emergencies and for referrals; and
3. The nurse practitioner's authority for signatures,
certifications, stamps, verifications, affidavits, and endorsements provided it
is:
a. In accordance with the specialty license of the nurse
practitioner and within the scope of practice of the patient care team
physician;
b. Permitted by § 54.1-2957.02 or applicable sections
of the Code of Virginia; and
c. Not in conflict with federal law or regulation.
C. The practice agreement shall be maintained by the nurse
practitioner and provided to the boards upon request. For nurse practitioners
providing care to patients within a hospital or health care system, the
practice agreement may be included as part of documents delineating the nurse
practitioner's clinical privileges or the electronic or written delineation of
duties and responsibilities; however, the nurse practitioner shall be responsible
for providing a copy to the boards upon request.
18VAC90-30-123. Practice of nurse practitioners licensed as
certified nurse midwives.
A. A nurse practitioner licensed in the category of
certified nurse midwife shall practice in consultation with a licensed
physician in accordance with a practice agreement between the nurse
practitioner and the physician. Such practice agreement shall address the
availability of the physician for routine and urgent consultation on patient
care.
B. The practice agreement shall be maintained by the nurse
midwife and provided to the boards upon request. For nurse midwives providing
care to patients within a hospital or health care system, the practice
agreement may be included as part of documents delineating the nurse midwife's
clinical privileges or the electronic or written delineation of duties and
responsibilities; however, the nurse midwife shall be responsible for providing
a copy to the boards upon request.
C. A nurse practitioner licensed in the category of a
certified nurse midwife shall practice in accordance with the Standards for the
Practice of Midwifery (Revised 2011) defined by the American College of
Nurse-Midwives.
Part I
General Provisions
18VAC90-40-10. Definitions.
The following words and terms when used in this chapter shall
have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
"Boards" means the Virginia Board of Medicine and
the Virginia Board of Nursing.
"Certified nurse midwife" means an advanced
practice registered nurse who is certified in the specialty of nurse midwifery
and who is jointly licensed by the Boards of Medicine and Nursing as a nurse
practitioner pursuant to § 54.1-2957 of the Code of Virginia.
"Committee" means the Committee of the Joint Boards
of Nursing and Medicine.
"Nonprofit health care clinics or programs" means a
clinic organized in whole or in part for the delivery of health care services
without charge or when a reasonable minimum fee is charged only to cover
administrative costs.
"Nurse practitioner" means an advanced practice
registered nurse who has met the requirements for licensure as a nurse
practitioner as stated in 18VAC90-30.
"Practice agreement" means a written or electronic
agreement jointly developed by the patient care team physician and the nurse
practitioner for the practice of the nurse practitioner that also describes the
prescriptive authority of the nurse practitioner, if applicable. For a nurse
practitioner licensed in the category of certified nurse midwife, the practice
agreement is a statement jointly developed with the consulting physician.
Part III
Practice Requirements
18VAC90-40-90. Practice agreement.
A. A With the exception of subsection E of this
section, a nurse practitioner with prescriptive authority may prescribe only
within the scope of the written or electronic practice agreement with a patient
care team physician.
B. At any time there are changes in the patient care team
physician, authorization to prescribe, or scope of practice, the nurse
practitioner shall revise the practice agreement and maintain the revised
agreement.
C. The practice agreement shall contain the following:
1. A description of the prescriptive authority of the nurse
practitioner within the scope allowed by law and the practice of the nurse practitioner.
2. An authorization for categories of drugs and devices within
the requirements of § 54.1-2957.01 of the Code of Virginia.
3. The signature of the patient care team physician who is
practicing with the nurse practitioner or a clear statement of the name of the
patient care team physician who has entered into the practice agreement.
D. In accordance with § 54.1-2957.01 of the Code of
Virginia, a physician shall not serve as a patient care team physician to more
than six nurse practitioners with prescriptive authority at any one time.
E. A nurse practitioner licensed in the category of
certified nurse midwife and holding a license for prescriptive authority may
prescribe in accordance with a written or electronic practice agreement with a
consulting physician or may prescribe Schedule VI controlled substances without
the requirement for inclusion of such prescriptive authority in a practice
agreement.
Part IV
Discipline
18VAC90-40-130. Grounds for disciplinary action.
A. The boards may deny approval of prescriptive authority,
revoke or suspend authorization, or take other disciplinary actions against a
nurse practitioner who:
1. Exceeds his authority to prescribe or prescribes outside of
the written or electronic practice agreement with the patient care team
physician or, for certified nurse midwives, the practice agreement with the
consulting physician;
2. Has had his license as a nurse practitioner suspended,
revoked, or otherwise disciplined by the boards pursuant to 18VAC90-30-220;
3. Fails to comply with requirements for continuing competency
as set forth in 18VAC90-40-55.
B. Unauthorized use or disclosure of confidential information
received from the Prescription Monitoring Program shall be grounds for
disciplinary action.
VA.R. Doc. No. R17-4833; Filed August 10, 2016, 9:44 a.m.