REGULATIONS
Vol. 42 Iss. 7 - November 17, 2025

TITLE 4. CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION
Final

TITLE 4. CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES

DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION

Final Regulation

REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The Department of Conservation and Recreation is claiming an exemption from Article 2 of the Administrative Process Act in accordance with § 2.2-4006 A 1 of the Code of Virginia, which excludes agency orders or regulations fixing rates or prices. The Department of Conservation and Recreation will receive, consider, and respond to petitions by any interested person at any time with respect to reconsideration or revision.

Title of Regulation: 4VAC5-36. Standard Fees for Use of Department of Conservation and Recreation Facilities, Programs, and Services (repealing 4VAC5-36-10 through 4VAC5-36-220).

Statutory Authority: § 10.1-104 of the Code of Virginia.

Effective Date: December 17, 2025.

Agency Contact: Lisa McGee, Policy and Planning Director, Department of Conservation and Recreation, 600 East Main Street, 24th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 786-4378, fax (804) 786-6141, or email lisa.mcgee@dcr.virginia.gov.

Summary:

The action repeals Standard Fees for Use of Department of Conservation and Recreation Facilities, Programs, and Services (4VAC5-36). The Director of the Department of Conservation and Recreation has statutory authority for fee oversight. Repealing the regulation aligns agency practice and regulation with statutory mandates. The fees will be available for the public on the department website.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-4886; Filed October 15, 2025
TITLE 4. CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MARINE RESOURCES COMMISSION
Final

TITLE 4. CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES

MARINE RESOURCES COMMISSION

Final Regulation

REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The Marine Resources Commission is claiming an exemption from the Administrative Process Act in accordance with § 2.2-4006 A 11 of the Code of Virginia; however, the commission is required to publish the full text of final regulations.

Title of Regulation: 4VAC20-650. Establishment of Oyster Sanctuary Areas (amending 4VAC20-650-20).

Statutory Authority: § 28.2-201 of the Code of Virginia.

Effective Date: October 31, 2025.

Agency Contact: Zachary Widgeon, Director of Communications, Marine Resources Commission, 380 Fenwick Road, Building 96, Fort Monroe, VA 23651, telephone (757) 247-2200, fax (757) 247-2002, or email zachary.widgeon@mrc.virginia.gov.

Summary:

The amendments clarify that the Marine Resources Commission, not the Conservation and Replenishment Department, provides "no harvesting" signs for constructed oyster reef sanctuary areas.

4VAC20-650-20. Oyster sanctuary areas.

The following oyster sanctuary areas are established:

1. The Wreck Shoals-James River Oyster Sanctuary Area, consisting - Consisting of all public oyster grounds, with a boundary defined as: beginning at James River Channel Marker 6; thence westerly to James River Channel Marker 10A; thence northeasterly to a point at Lat. latitude 37° 04' 24" 04.4000000' N. Long., longitude 76° 34' 39" 34.6500000' W.; thence southeasterly to a point at Lat. latitude 37° 04' 02" 04.0333333' N., Long. longitude 76° 34' 06" 34.1000000' W.; thence southeasterly to James River Channel Marker 6, the point of beginning.

2. Smith Island Sanctuary - Beginning at a point in Smith Island Bay near the western shore of Smith Island, said point being approximately 9,900 feet north-northwest of the Cape Charles Light House and the northern most point on Ballard Fish and Oyster Co., Inc. oyster lease, plat 16613, said point being corner 85, having NAD 83 Geographic Coordinates of 37° 08.3987390' N., 75° 54.0094551' W.; thence in a northeasterly direction along the inshore oyster lease line of Thomas J. O'Conner, III, plat 17720, to corner 106, 37° 08.5079488' N., 75° 53.9121013' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 107, 37° 08.5406502' N., 75° 53.8494541' W.; thence east-northeasterly to corner 207, 37° 08.5420829' N., 75° 53.8281776' W.; thence east-northeasterly along the inshore oyster lease line of Mark R. Heath, plat 17721, to corner 108, 37° 08.5446005' N., 75° 53.7907806' W.; thence north-northeasterly to corner 109, 37° 08.5895883' N., 75° 53.7864524' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 110, 37° 08.6921483' N., 75° 53.6226465' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 111, 37° 08.7546771' N., 75° 53.4568175' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 112, 37° 08.7754748' N., 75° 53.3619827' W.; thence southeasterly along the inshore oyster lease line of H. M. Terry Co., Inc. to corner 18, 37° 08.7544364' N., 75° 53.3207742' W.; thence southeasterly to corner 17, 37° 08.7306590' N., 75° 53.2980718' W.; thence southeasterly to corner 16, 37° 08.6251318' N., 75° 53.1579039' W.; thence easterly to corner 15, 37° 08.6225028' N., 75° 53.1025432' W.; thence north-northeasterly to corner 14, 37° 08.6626612' N., 75° 53.0854858' W.; thence northwesterly to corner 153, 37° 08.6768312' N., 75° 53.1394736' W.; thence along the inshore oyster lease line of Daniel Scott Long, plat 16802, northeasterly to corner 152, 37° 08.7156785' N., 75° 53.0819599' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 151, 37° 08.8330482' N., 75° 52.7283538' W.; thence, south-southeasterly onto Smith Island to corner 1, 37° 08.4630004' N., 75° 52.6679990' W.; thence, southwesterly to corner 2, 37° 07.9690002' N., 75° 53.0919992' W.; thence southwesterly to corner 3, 37° 07.9080005' N., 75° 53.4390002' W.; thence southwesterly to corner 4, 37° 07.7800009' N., 75° 53.6839996' W.; thence southwesterly to corner 5, 37° 07.6540002' N., 75° 54.3200009' W.; thence southwesterly to corner 6, 37° 07.3169996' N., 75° 54.6700007' W.; thence northwesterly, off shore, to corner 170 of Mark R. Heath's oyster lease, plat 17456, 37° 07.3524313' N., 75° 54.6976587' W.; thence along the inshore line of said parcel, northwesterly to corner 169, 37° 07.3528695' N., 75° 54.7176135' W.; thence north-northeasterly to corner 168, 37° 07.4495084' N., 75° 54.7100342' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 92, 37° 07.5477653' N., 75° 54.5615711' W.; thence northeasterly along the inshore oyster lease line of Ballard Fish and Oyster Co., Inc., plat 16613, to corner 91, 37° 07.6416382' N., 75° 54.4402745' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 90, 37° 07.6890220' N., 75° 54.3527929' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 89, 37° 07.7661702' N., 75° 54.0839677' W.; thence northeasterly along the inshore oyster lease line of Henry S. Jones, Jr., plat 19450, to corner 254, 37° 07.7879690' N., 75° 53.9324560' W.; thence northerly to corner 253, 37° 07.8109207' N., 75° 53.9343385' W.; thence westerly to corner 252, 37° 07.8094111' N., 75° 53.9916726' W.; thence north-northwesterly to corner 251, 37° 07.8582020' N., 75° 53.9962243' W.; thence west-southwesterly to corner 250, 37° 07.8535649' N., 75° 54.0512576' W.; thence northwesterly to corner 249, 37° 07.9116397' N., 75° 54.0935389' W.; thence westerly to corner 248, 37° 07.9113922' N., 75° 54.0976427' W.; thence north-northwesterly along the inshore oyster lease line of Ballard Fish and Oyster Co., Inc., plat 16613, to corner 88, 37° 08.0660474' N., 75° 54.1122194' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 87, 37° 08.1821017' N., 75° 54.0516546' W.; thence north-northeasterly to corner 86, 37° 08.2555945' N., 75° 54.0483544' W.; thence north-northeasterly to corner 85, 37° 08.3987390' N., 75° 54.0094551' W., said point being the point of beginning.

3. Cobb Island Oyster Sanctuary - Beginning at a point in Cobb Bay, near the western shore of Cobb Island and being the southern most point of the oyster lease of John R. Mariner, plat 16866, corner 355, said corner having NAD 83 Geographic Coordinates of 37° 19.3528688' N., 75° 45.9182774' W.; thence northeasterly along the inshore line of said oyster lease to corner 354, 37° 19.4051876' N., 75° 45.8386060' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 353, 37° 19.5182900' N., 75° 45.6662561' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 352, 37° 19.6443229' N., 75° 45.5201098' W.; thence southeasterly to a point on Cobb Island, corner 5, 37° 19.2960000' N., 75° 45.3319992' W.; thence southwesterly to corner 6, 37° 19.2109998' N., 75° 45.4150006' W.; thence southwesterly to a point west of Cobb Island, corner 7, 37° 18.9289998' N., 75° 45.5570001' W.; thence southwesterly to corner 8, 37° 18.8050003' N., 75° 45.7710008' W.; thence southwesterly to corner 9, 37° 18.2650004' N., 75° 46.3249991' W.; thence southwesterly to corner 10, 37° 18.1689997' N., 75° 46.6559996' W.; thence northerly to corner 11, 37° 18.6160000' N., 75° 46.6279994' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 12, 37° 18.7500009' N., 75° 46.5019997' W.; thence northeasterly to the western most point of the oyster lease of J. Steve McCready, plat 16371, corner 90, 37° 18.8870550' N., 75° 46.1567968' W.; thence southeasterly along the lease line to corner 89, 37° 18.8653681' N., 75° 46.1241425' W.; thence southeasterly along the oyster lease line of R&C Seafood, plat 16986 to corner 374, 37° 18.7448511' N., 75° 46.0512077' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 373, 37° 18.9339657' N., 75° 45.7191531' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 372, 37° 18.9858220' N., 75° 45.6864128' W.; thence northwesterly to corner 355, 37° 19.3528688' N., 75° 45.9182774' W., said point being the point of beginning.

4. Boxtree Oyster Sanctuary - Beginning at a point in Boxtree Creek, said point being the eastern most point on the oyster lease of Edwin E. Brady and Marion Brady, Jr., plat 16344, corner 7, said corner having NAD 83 Geographic Coordinates of 37° 23.7990757' N., 75° 51.5561984' W.; thence southeasterly to corner 2, 37° 23.6849997' N., 75° 51.4280006' W.; thence southerly to a point in Ramshorn Bay, corner 3, 37° 23.5570008' N., 75° 51.4309991' W.; thence southeasterly to corner 4, 37° 23.5009994' N., 75° 51.3100008' W.; thence southeasterly to corner 5, 37° 23.4050000' N., 75° 51.2529994' W.; thence southwesterly to corner 6, 37° 22.8749994' N., 75° 51.5500012' W.; thence westerly to a point on shore, corner 8, 37° 22.9039994' N., 75° 52.3000000' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 7, 37° 23.7990757' N., 75° 51.5561984' W., said point being the point of beginning.

5. Parramore Island Sanctuary - Beginning at a point, corner 1, in Swash Bay, near the western shore of Parramore Island, being approximately 1,550 feet northeast of the northern most point of the oyster lease of John Barr, plat 19331, said corner having NAD 83 Geographic Coordinates of 37° 32.7759991' N., 75° 39.1639995' W.; thence in a east-southeasterly direction, onto Parramore Island, to corner 2, 37° 32.7529993' N., 75° 39.0129998' W.; thence south-southeasterly to, a point on shore, corner 3, 37° 32.2970002' N., 75° 39.0090007' W.; thence northwesterly, off shore, to corner 4, 37° 32.3579996' N., 75° 39.1610007' W.; thence north-northwesterly to corner 1, 37° 32.7759991' N., 75° 39.1639995' W., said point being the point of beginning.

6. Hillcrest Oyster Sanctuary - Beginning at a point in Brockenberry Bay, on the south side of the entrance channel to Oyster Slip and approximately 139 feet south-southwest of Day Marker 14, said point being corner 1, having NAD 83 Geographic Coordinates of 37° 17.3320003' N., 75° 55.1269999' W.; thence southeasterly to corner 2, 37° 17.2680001' N., 75° 54.8050006' W.; thence east-northeasterly to corner 3, 37° 17.3050000' N., 75° 54.5899996' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 4, 37° 17.4090006' N., 75° 54.5039998' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 5, 37° 17.5909997' N., 75° 54.4389995' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 6, 37° 17.7330004 'N., 75° 54.2999997' W.; thence south-southeasterly to corner 7, 37° 17.5039998' N., 75° 54.0680001' W.; thence south-southeasterly to corner 8, 37° 17.3660002' N., 75° 53.9980006' W.; thence south-southeasterly to corner 9, 37° 16.8299992' N., 75° 53.9940006' W.; thence south-southwesterly to corner 10, 37° 16.4400007' N., 75° 54.0729995' W.; thence northwesterly to corner 11, 37° 16.6400008' N., 75° 54.3490009' W.; thence west-northwesterly to corner 12, 37° 16.7200007' N., 75° 54.5290004' W.; thence west-southwesterly to corner 13, 37° 16.7550008' N., 75° 55.1040003' W.; thence west-southwesterly to corner 14, 37° 16.7039996' N., 75° 55.6450007' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 15, 37° 17.0609995' N., 75° 55.0360003' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 16, 37° 17.1370004' N., 75° 54.9509998' W.; thence northwesterly to corner 17, 37° 17.2660006' N., 75° 55.0820004' W.; thence west-southwesterly to corner 18, 37° 17.2610009' N., 75° 55.2330009' W.; thence northerly to corner 19, 37° 17.2979996' N., 75° 55.2310007' W.; thence northeasterly to corner 1, 37° 17.3320003' N., 75° 55.1269999' W., said point being the point of beginning.

7. All constructed oyster reef sanctuary areas marked by a "no harvesting" sign provided by the Conservation and Replenishment Department Marine Resources Commission.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-8409; Filed October 28, 2025
TITLE 4. CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MARINE RESOURCES COMMISSION
Final

TITLE 4. CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES

MARINE RESOURCES COMMISSION

Final Regulation

REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The Marine Resources Commission is claiming an exemption from the Administrative Process Act in accordance with § 2.2-4006 A 11 of the Code of Virginia; however, the commission is required to publish the full text of final regulations.

Title of Regulation: 4VAC20-720. Pertaining to Restrictions on Oyster Harvest (amending 4VAC20-720-15, 4VAC20-720-20, 4VAC20-720-30, 4VAC20-720-40, 4VAC20-720-60, 4VAC20-720-70).

Statutory Authority: § 28.2-201 of the Code of Virginia.

Effective Date: October 31, 2025.

Agency Contact: Zachary Widgeon, Director of Communications, Marine Resources Commission, 380 Fenwick Road, Building 96, Fort Monroe, VA 23651, telephone (757) 247-2200, fax (757) 247-2002, or email zachary.widgeon@mrc.virginia.gov.

Summary:

The action establishes the 2025-2026 areas of public oyster harvest, public oyster harvest seasons, and oyster resource conservation measures. Specifically, the amendments (i) expand harvest areas and establish season dates for public oyster harvest areas, adding seven harvest areas; (ii) adopt more flexible gear measures; (iii) establish an exemption for Oyster User Fee transfers; and (iv) change the time-of-day harvest restrictions during the month of May.

4VAC20-720-15. Control date, license moratorium, transferability, and agents.

A. The Marine Resources Commission (commission) hereby establishes July 1, 2014, as the control date for management of all public oyster fisheries in Virginia. Participation by any individual in any public oyster fishery after the control date may not be considered in the calculation or distribution of oyster fishing rights should entry limitations be established. Any individual entering the public oyster fishery after the control date will forfeit any right to future participation in the public oyster fishery should further entry limitations be established by the commission.

B. Only individuals who have paid the oyster resource user fee described in clause (ii) of subsection A of § 28.2-541 of the Code of Virginia in any year from 2013 through 2016 may pay that fee in 2017 for harvest of oysters from public ground in that year. In any year following 2017, eligibility to pay the oyster resource user fee described in clause (ii) of subsection A of § 28.2-541 of the Code of Virginia shall be limited to those individuals who paid the oyster resource user fee for harvest of oysters from public ground in the previous year.

C. Should the number of people eligible to pay the oyster resource user fee described in clause (ii) of subsection A of § 28.2-541 of the Code of Virginia in any given year fall below 600, a random drawing shall be held to award eligibility to pay that oyster resource user fee to individuals who were not previously eligible until the number of persons eligible to pay the fee reaches 600. Any Commercial Fisherman Registration Licensee may apply for the random drawing.

D. Any person eligible to pay the oyster resource user fee described in clause (ii) of subsection A of § 28.2-541 of the Code of Virginia, or such person's legal representative, may transfer the eligibility to pay such user fee to:

1. A transferee who is the transferor's spouse, sibling, parent, child, grandparent, or grandchild and who possesses a current Commercial Fisherman Registration License and intends to participate in the public oyster fishery.

2. A transferee other than a person described in subdivision 1 of this subsection if the transferor has paid the oyster resource user fee described in clause (ii) of subsection A of § 28.2-541 of the Code of Virginia for the previous five consecutive calendar years and has satisfied one of the following conditions:

a. Has oyster harvest documented by the Marine Resources Commission's mandatory harvest reporting system and buyers' reports in a minimum of three of the previous five calendar years; or

b. Has a Commissioner of the Marine Resources-approved documented medical hardship, is in active military service, or is deceased.

The Commissioner of Marine Resources or the commissioner's designee may grant exceptions to this subsection for individuals eligible for the oyster resource user fee that are unable to fully meet the transfer requirements due to hardship. All transfers under this subsection shall be documented on a form provided by the Marine Resources Commission.

E. Exceptions to subsection B of this section shall only apply to those individuals who previously paid the oyster resource user fee described in clause (ii) of subsection A of § 28.2-541 of the Code of Virginia and shall be based on documented medical hardships or active military leave service that prevented the fisherman individual from fully satisfying the requirements of subsection B of this section. The Commissioner of the Marine Resources, in consultation with the Shellfish Management Division, shall have final authority of approval or denial concerning such medical hardship or active military leave service exception requests.

F. No person shall serve as an agent for any public oyster gear licensee.

4VAC20-720-20. Definitions.

The following words and terms when used in this chapter shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

"Aid to navigation" means any public or private day beacon, lighted channel marker, channel buoy, lighted channel buoy, or lighthouse that may be at, or adjacent to, any latitude and longitude used in area descriptions.

"Beasley Bay Area" means that portion of Pocomoke and Tangier Sound Rotation Area 2 in the Pocomoke Sound east of a line that begins at a point located off the north end of Russell Island at Latitude 37° 48.4715943' N., Longitude 75° 46.9955932' W.; thence northerly to an end at Long Point at Latitude 37° 53.8568300' N., Longitude 75° 45.3632100' W.

"California Rock Area" means that portion of Pocomoke and Tangier Sound Rotation Area 2 in the Tangier Sound south of a line that begins at a point located approximately 1.6 miles east of East Point Marsh at Latitude 37° 50.4093779' N., Longitude 75° 56.5165564' W.; thence due east to an end at a point at Latitude 37° 50.4093779' N., Longitude 75° 53.6926361' W.

"Chesapeake Bay Patent Tong Area" means all public grounds and unassigned grounds in that area of the Chesapeake Bay, including the Deep Rock Area, bounded by a line beginning at the southeastern corner of the Upper Chesapeake Bay - Blackberry Hangs Area, at a point located at Latitude 37° 49.4231463' N., Longitude 76° 13.1972058' W.; thence southerly to the northeastern-most corner of the Deep Rock Area at a point located at Latitude 37° 32.2712826' N., Longitude 76° 11.4813655' W.; thence southerly to the southeastern-most point at the corner of Public Ground 6 of Mathews Counts, located at Latitude 37° 23.2914687' N., Longitude 76° 11.7129870' W.; thence southerly to Plum Tree Point, located at Latitude 37° 07.634478' N., Longitude 76° 17.4847488' W.; thence northwesterly, following the western boundaries of public grounds in and in the vicinity of the Poquoson Flats, Poquoson River, Chisman Creek, and Back River, to Tue Point, at the mouth of the York River, located at Latitude 37° 13.7353263' N., Longitude 76° 23.1214137' W.; thence northeasterly to New Point Comfort Light, located at Latitude 37° 18.0444793' N., Longitude 76° 16.5883654' W.; thence northerly, following the inshore western boundary of public clam ground 906 and 905 in Mathews County to a point located at Latitude 37° 22.8921535' N., Longitude 76° 14.8393041' W.; thence northerly to the southwestern-most corner of the Deep Rock Area, located at Latitude 37° 28.1475258' N., Longitude 76° 15.8185669' W.; thence northerly following the boundary of the Deep Rock Area to Cherry Point, located at Latitude 37° 30.9790359’ N., Longitude 76° 17.6755365' W.; thence westerly to Stove Point, located at Latitude 37° 31.4971000' N., Longitude 76° 19.8766986' W.; thence following the shoreline north and northeasterly to Stingray Point, located at Latitude 37° 33.5324634' N., Longitude 76° 17.8232983' W.; thence northeasterly to the eastern-most corner of Rappahannock Rotation Area 1, located at Latitude 37° 34.329127' N., Longitude 76° 15.8396537' W.; thence northerly to a point east of Windmill Point, located at Latitude 37° 36.9479925' N., Longitude 76° 16.5064757' W.; thence northerly to Hughlett Point, located at Latitude 37° 43.7775644' N., Longitude 76° 18.0814988' W.; thence northerly to the northeastern corner of Public Ground 28 of Northumberland County, located at Latitude 37° 46.38727361' N., Longitude 76° 18.235200' W.; thence easterly to the southeastern corner of Great Wicomico Rotation Area 2, located at Latitude 37° 46.6609063' N., Longitude 76° 15.9799327' W.; thence north to boundary line between Great Wicomico Rotation Area 1 and 2, located at Latitude 37° 48.2078168' N., Longitude 76° 15.9799324' W.; thence northerly to the southwestern corner of Upper Chesapeake Bay - Blackberry Hangs Area, located at Latitude 37° 50.0560555' N., Longitude 76° 15.0023233' W.; thence easterly to the southeastern corner of the Upper Chesapeake Bay - Blackberry Hangs Area, at point, located at Latitude 37° 49.4231463' N., Longitude 76° 13.1972058' W., which is the point of beginning.

"Clean culled oyster" means any oyster taken from natural public beds, rocks, or shoals that is three inches or greater in shell length.

"Coan River Area" means the Public Grounds within the Coan River consisting of Public Grounds 77 and 78 of Northumberland County described as:

Public Ground 77 of Northumberland County is located near the mouth of the Coan River, beginning at a point approximately 2,300 feet northeast of Honest Point and 1,300 feet southwest of Travis Point, said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 37° 59.5257207' N., Longitude 76° 27.8810639' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 2, Latitude 37° 59.3710259' N., Longitude 76° 27.9962148' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 3, Latitude 37° 59.2953830' N., Longitude 76° 28.0468953' W.; thence northwesterly to Corner 4, Latitude 37° 59.3350863' N., Longitude 76° 28.0968837' W.; thence northeasterly to Corner 5, Latitude 37° 59.3965161' N., Longitude 76° 28.0287342' W.; thence northwesterly to Corner 6, Latitude 37° 59.4758507' N., Longitude 76° 28.1112280' W.; thence north-northwesterly to Corner 7, Latitude 37° 59.5079401' N., Longitude 76° 28.1230058' W.; thence northeasterly to Corner 8, Latitude 37° 59.5579153' N., Longitude 76° 27.9889429' W.; thence southeasterly to Corner 1, said corner being which is the point of beginning.

Public Ground 78 of Northumberland County is located near the mouth of the Coan River, beginning at a point approximately 3,420 feet southeast of Travis Point and 3,260 feet northwest of Great Point, said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 37° 59.4822275' N., Longitude 76° 27.1878637' W.; thence southeasterly to Corner 2, Latitude 37° 59.3824046' N., Longitude 76° 27.1088650' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 3, Latitude 37° 59.2283287' N., Longitude 76° 27.8632901' W.; thence northeasterly to Corner 4, Latitude 37° 59.4368502' N., Longitude 76° 27.6868001' W.; thence continuing northeasterly to Corner 5, Latitude 37° 59.5949216' N., Longitude 76° 27.5399436' W.; thence southeasterly to Corner 1, said corner being which is the point of beginning.

"Corrotoman Hand Tong Area" means all public grounds in that area of the Corrotoman River and its tributaries north of a line beginning at Bar Point at Latitude 37° 41.65256000' N., Longitude 76° 28.66195000' W.; thence easterly to Black Stump Point at Latitude 37° 41.7360900' N., Longitude 76° 28.1212200' W.

"Deep Rock Area" means all public grounds and unassigned grounds, in that area of the Chesapeake Bay near Gwynn Island, beginning at Cherry Point at the western-most point of the eastern headland of Kibble Pond located at Latitude 37° 30.9802148' N., Longitude 76° 17.6764393' W.; thence northeasterly to the Piankatank River, Flashing Green Channel Light "3", Latitude 37° 32.3671325' N., Longitude 76° 16.7038334' W.; thence east-southeasterly to the Rappahannock River Entrance Lighted Buoy G"1R", Latitude 37° 32.2712833' N., Longitude 76° 11.4813666' W.; thence southwesterly to the southern-most point of Sandy Point, the northern headland of "The Hole in the Wall", Latitude 37° 28.1475258' N., Longitude 76° 15.8185670' W.; thence northwesterly along the Chesapeake Bay mean low water line of the barrier islands of Milford Haven, connecting headland to headland at their eastern-most points, and of Gwynn Island to the western-most point of the eastern headland of Kibble Pond on Cherry Point, said point being which is the point of beginning.

"Deep Water Shoal State Replenishment Seed Area" or "DWS" means that area in the James River near Mulberry Island, beginning at a point approximately 530 feet west of Deep Water Shoal Light, said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 37° 08.9433287' N., Longitude 76° 38.3213007' W.; thence southeasterly to Corner 2, Latitude 37° 09.5734380' N., Longitude 76° 37.8300582' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 3, Latitude 37° 08.9265524' N., Longitude 76° 37.0574269' W.; thence westerly to Corner 4, Latitude 37° 08.4466039 N., Longitude 76° 37.4523346' W.; thence northwesterly to Corner 5, Latitude 37° 08.4491489' N., Longitude 76° 38.0215553' W.; thence northeasterly to Corner 1, said corner being which is the point of beginning.

"Great Wicomico River Hand Tong Area" means that area of the Great Wicomico River known as Haynie Point, Sandy Point, and Shell Bar.

Haynie Point consists of the area bounded by a line beginning at a point located at Latitude 37° 49.7907323' N., Longitude 76° 18.6294277' W.; thence northeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 49.8578592' N., Longitude 76° 18.5570328' W.; thence southeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 49.7892242' N., Longitude 76° 18.5140118' W.; thence southwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 49.7380000' N., Longitude 76° 18.5672041' W.; thence northwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 49.7907323' N., Longitude 76° 18.6294277' W., being which is the point of beginning, containing 4.64 acres.

Sandy Point consists of the area bounded by a line beginning at a point located at Latitude 37° 49.2576829' N., Longitude 76° 18.7547649' W.; thence northeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 49.2832242' N., Longitude 76° 18.6559957' W.; thence northeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 49.3541620' N., Longitude 76° 18.4765658' W.; thence southerly to a point located at Latitude 37° 49.2917724' N., Longitude 76° 18.4583880' W.; thence southwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 49.2335757' N., Longitude 76° 18.6003145' W.; thence southwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 49.2166701' N., Longitude 76° 18.7332435' W.; thence northwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 49.2576829' N., Longitude 76° 18.7547649' W., being which is the point of beginning, containing 11.71 acres.

Shell Bar consists of the area bounded by a line beginning at a point located at Latitude 37° 49.4334037' N., Longitude 76° 18.9831193' W.; thence northeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 49.5165040' N., Longitude 76° 18.9165237' W.; thence southeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 49.3666408' N., Longitude 76° 18.7164965' W.; thence southwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 49.3169571' N., Longitude 76° 18.8165540' W.; thence northwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 49.3499945' N., Longitude 76° 18.9166098' W.; thence northwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 49.4334037' N., Longitude 76° 18.9831193' W, being which is the point of beginning, containing 17.67 acres.

"Great Wicomico River Rotation Area 1" means all public grounds and unassigned grounds in that area of the Great Wicomico River, Ingram Bay, and the Chesapeake Bay beginning at a point on Sandy Point, Latitude 37° 49.3269652' N., Longitude 76° 18.3821766' W.; thence easterly to the southern-most point of Cockrell Point, Latitude 37° 49.2664838' N., Longitude 76° 17.3454434' W.; thence easterly following the mean low water line of Cockrell Point to a point on the boundary of Public Ground 115 at Cash Point, Latitude 37° 49.2695619' N., Longitude 76° 17.2804046' W.; thence southeasterly to the gazebo on the pier head at Fleeton Point, Latitude 37° 48.7855824' N., Longitude 76° 16.9609311' W.; thence southeasterly to the Great Wicomico River Light; Latitude 37° 48.2078167' N., Longitude 76° 15.9799333' W.; thence westerly to a point on the offshore end of the southern jetty at the entrance to Towles Creek, Latitude 37° 48.3743771' N., Longitude 76° 17.9600320' W.; thence northerly crossing the entrance to Towles Creek at the offshore ends of the jetties and continuing along the mean low water line to Bussel Point, Latitude 37° 48.6879208' N., Longitude 76° 18.4670860' W.; thence northwesterly to the northern headland of Cranes Creek, Latitude 37° 48.8329168' N., Longitude 76° 18.7308073' W.; thence following the mean low water line northerly to a point on Sandy Point, Latitude 37° 49.3269652' N., Longitude 76° 18.3821766' W., said point being which is the point of beginning.

"Great Wicomico River Rotation Area 2" means all public grounds and unassigned grounds in that area of the Great Wicomico River, Ingram Bay, and the Chesapeake Bay beginning at a point on Great Wicomico River Light, Latitude 37° 48.2078167' N., Longitude 76° 15.9799333' W.; thence due south to a point due east of the southern-most point of Dameron Marsh, Latitude 37° 46.6610003' N., Longitude 76° 16.0570007' W.; thence due west to the southern-most point of Dameron Marsh, Latitude 37° 46.6609070' N., Longitude 76° 17.2670707' W.; thence along the mean low water line of Dameron Marsh, north and west to Garden Point, Latitude 37° 47.2519872' N., Longitude 76° 18.4028142' W.; thence northwesterly to Windmill Point, Latitude 37° 47.5194547' N., Longitude 76° 18.7132194' W.; thence northerly along the mean low water line to the western headland of Harveys Creek, Latitude 37° 47.7923573' N., Longitude 76° 18.6881450' W.; thence east-southeasterly to the eastern headland of Harveys Creek, Latitude 37° 47.7826936' N., Longitude 76° 18.5469879' W.; thence northerly along the mean low water line to a point on the offshore end of the southern jetty at the entrance to Towles Creek, Latitude 37° 48.3743771' N., Longitude 76° 17.9600320' W.; thence easterly to Great Wicomico River Light, Latitude 37° 48.2078167' N., Longitude 76° 15.9799333' W., said point being which is the point of beginning.

"Hand scrape" means any device or instrument with a catching bar having an inside measurement of no more than 22 inches, which is used or usable for the purpose of extracting or removing shellfish from a water bottom or the bed of a body of water.

"Hand tong" or "ordinary tong" means any pincers, nippers, tongs, or similar device used in catching oysters, which consists of two shafts or handles attached to opposable and complementary pincers, baskets, or containers operated entirely by hand, from the surface of the water and has no external or internal power source.

"Hurleys Rock Area" means that portion of Pocomoke and Tangier Sound Rotation Area 1 in the Tangier Sound north of a line beginning at a point on the Maryland-Virginia state line, located at Latitude 37° 54.6136000' N., Longitude 75° 53.9739600' W., thence due west to an end at a point at Latitude 37° 54.6136000' N., Longitude 76° 00.0687800' W.

"Indian Creek Area" means all public grounds and unassigned grounds in that area of Indian Creek and its tributaries in Northumberland and Lancaster Counties between a line beginning at a point on the shore on the south side of the creek located at Latitude 37° 041.4021100' N., Longitude 76° 20.7493600' W.; thence in a straight line to a point on shore on the north side of the creek located at Latitude 37° 041.4999200' N., Longitude 76° 20.5974400' W.; thence southeasterly to a line beginning on the south shore of the mouth of the creek located at Latitude 37° 041.2975900' N., Longitude 76° 19.5082500' W.; thence in a straight line to a point on shore on the north side of the mouth of the creek located at Latitude 37° 041.0934000' N., Longitude 76° 18.7589400' W.

"James River Area 1" means all public grounds and unassigned grounds in that area of the James River, excluding White Shoal, beginning at the Flashing Green Channel Light #5, located at Latitude 37° 02.3528833' N., Longitude 76° 32.7785333' W.; thence southeasterly to the Flashing Green Channel Light #3, located at Latitude 37° 01.7124500' N., Longitude 76° 31.8210667' W.; thence southeasterly to the Flashing Green Channel Light #1, located at Latitude 37° 00.7666667' N., Longitude 76° 29.9083333' W.; thence southeasterly to the northeast corner of the western draw span pier of the James River Bridge (U.S. Route 17), Latitude 37° 00.1524824' N., Longitude 76° 28.1581984' W.; thence southwesterly along the upstream side of the James River Bridge to the mean low water line; thence northwesterly along the mean low water line, crossing Kings Creek at the headlands and continuing along the mean low water line to a point on the shore at Rainbow Farm Point in line with VMRC Markers "STH" and "SMT," located at Latitude 37° 00.1965862' N., Longitude 76° 34.0712010' W.; thence north-northeasterly to a VMRC Marker "STH," Latitude 37° 00.9815328' N., Longitude 76° 33.5955842' W.; thence to a VMRC Marker "SMT," at Latitude 37° 01.3228160' N., Longitude 76° 33.3887351' W.; thence to the Flashing Green Channel Light #5, at Latitude 37° 02.3528833' N., Longitude 76° 32.7785333' W., said point being which is the point of beginning.

"James River Area 2" means all public grounds and unassigned grounds in that area of the James River beginning at the Flashing Green Channel Light #5, located at Latitude 37° 02.3528833' N., Longitude 76° 32.7785333' W.; thence northeasterly to a VMRC Marker "NMT," Latitude 37° 02.7740540' N., Longitude 76° 32.0960864' W.; thence to a VMRC Marker "NTH" located at Latitude 37° 03.2030055' N., Longitude 76° 31.4231211' W.; thence to a point on the north shore of the river at Blunt (Blount) Point, said point being in line with VMRC Markers "NMT" and "NTH" and located at Latitude 37° 03.3805862' N., Longitude 76° 31.1444562' W.; thence southeasterly along the mean low water line to the upstream side of the James River Bridge (U.S. Route 17); thence westerly along the James River Bridge to the northeast corner of the western draw span pier, Latitude 37° 00.1524824' N., Longitude 76° 28.1581984' W.; thence northwesterly to the Flashing Green Channel Light #1, located at Latitude 37° 00.7666667' N., Longitude 76° 29.9083333' W.; thence northwesterly to the Flashing Green Channel Light #3, located at Latitude 37° 01.7124500' N., Longitude 76° 31.8210667' W.; thence northwesterly to the Flashing Green Channel Light #5, located at Latitude 37° 02.3528833' N., Longitude 76° 32.7785333' W., said point being which is the point of beginning.

"James River Area 3" means those public grounds of Isle of Wight County and Nansemond County (City of Suffolk) located in the James River and Nansemond River west of the Monitor Merrimac Memorial Bridge Tunnel (Route I-664), northeast of the Mills E. Godwin, Jr. Bridge (U.S. Route 17) on the Nansemond River, and south of the James River Bridge (U.S. Route 17).

"James River Seed Area" means all public grounds and unassigned grounds in that area of the James River and its tributaries with a southeastern boundary beginning at a point on the shore on the south side of the river at Rainbow Farm Point in Isle of Wight County located at Latitude 37° 00.1965862' N., Longitude 76° 34.0712010' W.; thence north-northeasterly to a VMRC Marker "STH," Latitude 37° 00.9815328 N., Longitude 76° 33.5955842' W.; thence to a VMRC Marker "SMT," at Latitude 37° 01.3228160' N., Longitude 76° 33.3887351' W.; thence to the Flashing Green Channel Light #5, at Latitude 37° 02.3528833' N., Longitude 76° 32.7785333' W.; thence northeasterly to a VMRC Marker "NMT," Latitude 37° 02.7740540' N., Longitude 76° 32.0960864' W.; thence to a VMRC Marker "NTH" located at Latitude 37° 03.2030055' N., Longitude 76° 31.4231211' W.; thence to a point on the north shore of the river at Blunt (Blount) Point, in the City of Newport News, located at Latitude 37° 03.3805862' N., Longitude 76° 31.1444562' W.; the northern boundary, being a straight line, beginning at a point on the shore on the east side of the river in the City of Newport News, at Latitude 37° 08.4458787' N., Longitude 76° 37.2855533' W.; thence westerly to the southeast corner of the Deep Water Shoal State Replenishment Seed Area, Latitude 37° 08.4466039' N., Longitude 76° 37.4523346' W.; thence westerly to the southwest corner of the Deep Water Shoal State Replenishment Seed Area, Latitude 37° 08.4490472' N., Longitude 76° 38.0215554' W.; thence westerly to a point on the shore on the west side of the river at the mouth of Lawnes Creek in Isle of Wight County, Latitude 37° 08.4582990' N., Longitude 76° 40.2816023' W.

"Larsons Bay Area" means all public grounds in that area of Larsons Bay in the Rappahannock River, beginning at Cherry Point at Latitude 37° 37.6554400' N., Longitude 76° 24.1203200' W.; thence south east to the southern-most corner of the house on Mosquito Point at Latitude 37° 36.5230000' N., Longitude 76° 21.5950000' W.; thence following the ordinary mean low water line in a northwesterly direction to Cherry Point, said point being which is the point of beginning.

"Latitude and longitude" means values that are based upon a geodetic reference system of the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83). When latitude and longitude are used in any area description, in conjunction with any physical landmark, to include aids to navigation, the latitude and longitude value is the legal point defining the boundary.

"Little Wicomico River" means that area of the Little Wicomico River inside of Public Ground 43 of Northumberland County, located in the Little Wicomico River near Bridge Creek, beginning at a point approximately 150 feet north of Peachtree Point, said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 37° 53.2910650' N., Longitude 76° 16.7312926' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 2, Latitude 37° 53.2601877' N., Longitude 76° 16.8662408' W.; thence northwesterly to Corner 3, Latitude 37° 53.2678470' N., Longitude 76° 16.8902408' W.; thence northeasterly to Corner 4, Latitude 37° 53.3113148' N., Longitude 76° 16.8211543' W.; thence southeasterly to Corner 1, said corner being which is the point of beginning.

"Middle Ground" means all public grounds in the area of the Corrotoman River between a line beginning at Ball Point at Latitude 37° 40.65133000' N., Longitude 76° 28.4440000' W.; thence easterly to a point at the western side of the mouth of Taylor Creek at Latitude 37° 40.97331000' N., Longitude 76° 27.59471000' W.; upstream to a line from Bar Point at Latitude 37° 41.65256000' N., Longitude 76° 28.66195000' W.; thence easterly to Black Stump Point at Latitude 37° 41.7360900' N., Longitude 76° 28.1212200' W.

"Milford Haven" means all public grounds and unassigned grounds in that area of Milford Haven and its tributaries bound on the west by a line from a point on the southernmost point of land of the north shore of Milford Haven being near the end of State Route 634, Latitude 37° 29.5971' N., Longitude 76° 18.1822' W.; thence south-southeasterly to a point on the northeast corner of the pier head of the long pier being on the south shore of Milford Haven immediately west of the Sea Farms Inc. facility, Latitude 37° 29.3546' N., Longitude 76° 18.1323' W.; thence following the east side of the pier to the shore and bound on the east by a line from a point on the shore at the western headland of the wash formerly Hills Creek, Latitude 37° 29.0278' N., Longitude 76° 16.3834' W.; thence easterly to a point on the north shore of Sandy Point near Latitude 37° 29.0017' N., Longitude 76° 16.1640' W.; thence following the shore of the east side of Sandy Point to a point on the shoreline at Latitude 37° 28.6233' N., Longitude 76° 15.8605' W.; thence in a line south-southeasterly to a point on the breakwater at Haven Beach, Latitude 37° 26.2006' N., Longitude 76° 15.1257' W.

"Mobjack Bay Area" means that area of Mobjack Bay consisting of Public Ground 2 of Mathews County (Pultz Bar) and Public Ground 25 of Gloucester County (Tow Stake) described as:

Public Ground 2 of Mathews County, known as Pultz Bar, is located in Mobjack Bay, beginning at a point approximately 5,420 feet south of Minter Point, said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 37° 21.2500000' N., Longitude 76° 21.3700000' W.; thence easterly to Corner 2, Latitude 37° 21.2700000' N., Longitude 76° 20.9600000' W.; thence southerly to Corner 3, Latitude 37° 21.0200000' N., Longitude 76° 20.9400000' W.; thence westerly to Corner 4, Latitude 37° 21.0500000' N., Longitude 76° 21.3300000' W.; thence northerly to Corner 1, said corner being which is the point of beginning.

Public Ground 25 of Gloucester County, known as Tow Stake, is located in Mobjack Bay, near the mouth of the Severn River, beginning at a point approximately 2,880 feet east-northeast of Tow Stake Point, said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 37° 20.3883888' N., Longitude 76° 23.5883836' W.; thence northeasterly to Corner 2, Latitude 37° 30.5910482' N., Longitude 76° 23.2372184' W.; thence southeasterly to Corner 3, Latitude 37° 20.3786971' N., Longitude 76° 22.7241180' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 4, Latitude 37° 19.8616759' N., Longitude 76° 23.5914937' W.; thence northwesterly to Corner 5, Latitude 37° 20.0284019' N., Longitude 76° 23.7717423' W.; thence northeasterly to Corner 1, said corner being which is the point of beginning.

"Nomini Creek Area" means that area of Nomini Creek inside of Public Grounds 26 and 28 of Westmoreland County.

Public Ground 26 of Westmoreland County is located in Nomini Creek, north of Beales Wharf and east of Barnes Point, beginning at a point approximately 1,400 feet north of Barnes Point, said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 38° 07.2690219' N., Longitude 76° 42.6784210' W.; thence southeasterly to Corner 2, Latitude 38° 07.0924060' N., Longitude 76° 42.4745767' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 3, Latitude 38° 06.8394053' N., Longitude 76° 42.6704025' W.; thence northwesterly to Corner 4, Latitude 38° 06.8743004' N., Longitude 76° 42.7552151' W.; thence northeasterly to Corner 5, Latitude 38° 07.0569717' N., Longitude 76° 42.5603535' W.; thence northwesterly to Corner 1, said corner being which is the point of beginning.

Public Ground 28 of Westmoreland County is located at the mouth of Nomini Creek, beginning at a point approximately 50 feet west of White Oak Point, said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 38° 07.6429987' N., Longitude 76° 43.0337082' W.; thence south-southeasterly to Corner 2, Latitude 38° 07.2987193' N., Longitude 76° 43.1101420' W.; thence northwesterly to Corner 3, Latitude 38° 07.7029267' N., Longitude 76° 43.3337762' W.; thence west to the mean low water line, Latitude 38° 07.7031535' N., Longitude 76° 43.3378345' W.; thence northerly and westerly along the mean low water line of Nomini Creek to a point southwest of Cedar Island, Latitude 38° 07.8986449' N., Longitude 76° 43.6329097' W.; thence northeasterly to a point on the mean low water line at the southern-most point of Cedar Island, Latitude 38° 07.8986449' N., Longitude 76° 43.6329097' W.; thence following the mean low water line of the southern and eastern sides of Cedar Island to a point, Latitude 38° 08.0164430' N., Longitude 76° 43.4773169' W.; thence northeasterly to Corner 4, Latitude 38° 08.0712849' N., Longitude 76° 43.4416606' W.; thence northeasterly to a point on the northern headland of Nomini Creek at the mean low water line, said point being Corner 5, Latitude 38° 08.2729626' N., Longitude 76° 43.3105315' W.; thence following the mean low water line of White Point to a point northwest of Snake Island, Corner 6, Latitude 38° 08.4066960' N., Longitude 76° 42.9105565' W.; thence southeast, crossing the mouth of Buckner Creek, to a point on the mean low water line of Snake Island, Corner 7, Latitude 38° 08.3698254' N., Longitude 76° 42.8939656' W.; thence southeasterly following the mean low water line of Snake Island to Corner 8, Latitude 38° 08.2333798' N., Longitude 76° 42.7778877' W.; thence south-southwesterly, crossing the mouth of Buckner Creek, to Corner 9, Latitude 38° 08.2134371' N., Longitude 76° 42.7886409' W.; thence southeasterly to a point on the mean low water line of the southern headland of Buckner Creek, Corner 10, Latitude 38° 08.1956281' N., Longitude 76° 42.7679625' W.; thence southwesterly following the mean low water line of Nomini Creek, crossing the mouth of an unnamed cove at the narrowest point between the headlands and continuing to follow the mean low water line to a point on White Oak Point, Latitude 38° 07.6428228' N., Longitude 76° 43.0233530' W.; thence west to Corner 1, said point being which is the point of beginning.

"Oyster" means any shellfish of the species Crassostrea virginica.

"Oyster dredge" means any device having a maximum weight of 150 pounds with attachments, maximum width of 50 inches, and maximum tooth length of four inches.

"Oyster patent tong" means any patent tong not exceeding 100 pounds in gross weight, including any attachment other than rope and with the teeth not to exceed four inches in length.

"Oyster resource user fee" means a fee that must be paid each calendar year by anyone who grows, harvests, shucks, packs, or ships oysters for commercial purposes.

"Piankatank River Area" means that area those areas in the Piankatank River known as Bland Point, Burton Point bounded by a line beginning at a point located at Latitude 37° 30.8149992' N., Longitude 76° 19.8179990' W.; thence northeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 30.9333442' N., Longitude 76° 19.7333318' W.; thence southeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 30.8832475' N., Longitude 76° 19.5827984' W.; thence southeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 30.8335420' N., Longitude 76° 19.3835660' W.; thence southwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 30.6867440' N., Longitude 76° 19.5250181' W.; thence northwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 30.7700556' N., Longitude 76° 19.7721907' W.; thence northwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 30.8149992' N., Longitude 76° 19.8179990' W., being the point of beginning, containing 38.99 acres, and Cape Tune.

"Bland Point" means that area in the Piankatank River bounded by a line beginning at a point located at Latitude 37° 31.7504466' N., Longitude 76° 21.3243911' W.; thence westerly to a point located at Latitude 37° 31.7928543' N., Longitude 76° 21.5539642' W.; thence northerly to a point located at Latitude 37° 31.9666666' N., Longitude 76° 21.4833333' W.; thence easterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 31.916666' N., Longitude 76° 21.2666666' W.; thence southerly to a point located at Latitude 37° 31.7504466' N., Longitude 76° 21.3243911' W., which is the point of beginning.

"Burton Point" means that area in the Piankatank River bounded by a line beginning at a point located at Latitude 37° 30.8149992' N., Longitude 76° 19.8179990' W.; thence northeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 30.9333442' N., Longitude 76° 19.7333318' W.; thence southeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 30.8832475' N., Longitude 76° 19.5827984' W.; thence southeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 30.8335420' N., Longitude 76° 19.3835660' W.; thence southwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 30.6867440' N., Longitude 76° 19.5250181' W.; thence northwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 30.7700556' N., Longitude 76° 19.7721907' W.; thence northwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 30.8149992' N., Longitude 76° 19.8179990' W., which is the point of beginning.

"Cape Tune" means that area in the Piankatank River bounded by a line beginning at a point located at Latitude 37° 31.1154576' N., Longitude 76° 20.8133418' W.; thence easterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 31.0500000' N., Longitude 76° 20.6333333' W.; thence southerly to a point located at Latitude 37° 30.8250970' N., Longitude 76° 20.7108568' W.; thence westerly to a point located at Latitude 37° 30.8350000' N., Longitude 76° 20.9683333' W.; thence northerly to a point located at Latitude 37° 31.1154576' N., Longitude 76° 20.8133418' W., which is the point of beginning.

"Piankatank River Hand Tong Area" means that area in the Piankatank River known as Palace Bar bounded by a line beginning at a point located at Latitude 37° 31.6366756' N., Longitude 76° 22.2999953' W.; thence northly to a point located at Latitude 37° 31.7574943' N., Longitude 76° 22.2966779' W.; thence northeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 31.8291757' N., Longitude 76° 22.2483355' W.; thence southeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 31.8166854' N., Longitude 76° 22.1433377' W.; thence southeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 31.7500276' N., Longitude 76° 22.0166809' W.; thence southeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 31.6000121' N., Longitude 76° 21.9166733' W.; thence westerly to a point located at Latitude 37° 31.6199872' N., Longitude 76° 22.1500353' W.; thence westerly to a point located at Latitude 37° 31.6366756' N., Longitude 76° 22.2999953' W., being which is the point of beginning, containing 38.53 acres.

"Pocomoke Sound Area" means that area of Pocomoke Sound inside of Public Ground 11 10 of Accomack County.

Public Ground 11 of Accomack County consists of the area bounded by a line beginning at a point located at Latitude 37° 54.2242247' N., Longitude 75° 46.8458531' W.; thence northeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 54.7717652' N., Longitude 75° 46.2306934' W.; thence southeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 54.7655487' N., Longitude 75° 46.2246266' W.; thence northeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 55.1625018' N., Longitude 75° 45.7462838' W.; thence northwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 55.1713750' N., Longitude 75° 45.7562587' W.; thence northeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 55.4058815' N., Longitude 75° 45.4541658' W.; thence northeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 55.5742129' N., Longitude 75° 44.8291700' W.; thence northeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 55.5923356' N., Longitude 75° 44.7851143' W.; thence northeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 55.6009795' N., Longitude 75° 44.7641422' W.; thence southeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 55.5842236' N., 75° 44.7554991' W.; thence southeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 55.5265366' N., Longitude 75° 44.6897855' W.; thence northeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 55.6926202' N., Longitude 75° 44.3730212' W.; thence northwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 55.7414951' N., Longitude 75° 44.4228784' W.; thence northeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 55.8075338' N., Longitude 75° 44.2624885' W.; thence southernly to a point located at Latitude 37° 55.6345499' N., Longitude 75° 44.2772024 W.; thence southwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 55.5620352' N., Longitude 75° 44.4066645' W.; thence southeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 55.4972479' N., Longitude 75° 44.3397091' W.; thence northeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 55.5576916' N., Longitude 75° 44.2459142' W.; thence southeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 55.4242118' N., Longitude 75° 44.1791595' W.; thence southeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 55.3575442' N., Longitude 75° 43.9958019' W.; thence southwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 54.8742193' N., Longitude 75° 44.7625058' W.; thence southernly to a point located at Latitude 37° 54.4075648' N., Longitude 75° 44.5291567' W.; thence southeasterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 54.0909029' N., Longitude 75° 44.2291560' W.; thence southwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 54.0075735' N., Longitude 75° 44.4791578' W.; thence northwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 54.1075697' N., Longitude 75° 44.5958138' W.; thence westerly to a point located at Latitude 37° 54.0909049' N., Longitude 75° 45.1291836' W.; thence northwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 54.1909062' N., Longitude 75° 45.2291611' W.; thence northwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 54.3242309' N., Longitude 75° 45.6624951' W.; thence southwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 54.3075702' N., Longitude 75° 45.7458522' W.; thence southwesterly to a point located at Latitude 37° 53.8075670' N., Longitude 75° 46.7292265' W.; thence northernly to a point located at Latitude 37° 54.2242247' N., Longitude 75° 46.8458531' W., being the point of beginning, containing 1650.39 acres.

Public Ground 10 of Accomack County is located in the Pocomoke Sound, beginning at a corner on the Maryland-Virginia state line, located in the Pocomoke Sound approximately 2.3 nautical miles westerly of the northern-most point of North End Point, said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 37° 56.4741881' N., Longitude 75° 45.7051676' W. (NAD83); thence east-northeasterly along the Maryland-Virginia state line to Corner 2, Latitude 37° 56.9261140' N., Longitude 75° 43.7679786' W.; thence south-southwesterly to Corner 3, Latitude 37° 56.1241948' N., Longitude 75° 44.3624962' W.; thence west-southwesterly to Corner 4, Latitude 37° 56.0820561' N., Longitude 75° 44.5826292' W.; thence northerly to Corner 5, Latitude 37° 56.1377309' N., Longitude 75° 44.5817745' W.; thence west-southwesterly to Corner 6, Latitude 37° 56.1259751' N., Longitude 75° 44.6226859' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 7, Latitude 37° 56.1039335' N., Longitude 75° 44.6692334' W.; thence southerly to Corner 8, Latitude 37° 56.0643616' N., Longitude 75° 44.6750106' W.; thence west-southwesterly to Corner 9, Latitude 37° 55.9742005' N., Longitude 75° 45.1458109' W.; thence west-northwesterly to Corner 10, Latitude 37° 56.0741973' N., Longitude 75° 45.8958329' W.; thence north-northwesterly to Corner 11, Latitude 37° 56.2565760' N., Longitude 75° 46.0000557' W.; thence northeasterly along the Maryland-Virginia state line to Corner 1, which is the point of beginning.

"Pocomoke Sound Hand Tong Area" means that area of Pocomoke Sound inside of Public Ground 9 and Public Ground 10 of Accomack County.

Public Ground 9 of Accomack County is located in the Pocomoke Sound, beginning at a corner on the Maryland-Virginia state line, located in the Pocomoke Sound approximately 1.06 nautical miles north-northeast of the northern-most point of North End Point, said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 37° 57.2711566' N., Longitude 75° 42.2870790' W. (NAD83); thence east-northeasterly along the Maryland-Virginia state line to Corner 2, Latitude 37° 57.2896577' N., Longitude 75° 41.9790727' W.; thence southerly to Corner 3, Latitude 37° 57.2574850' N., Longitude 75° 41.9790730' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 4, Latitude 37° 57.2288700' N., Longitude 75° 42.0077287' W.; thence west-southwesterly to Corner 5, Latitude 37° 57.2034533' N., Longitude 75° 42.1511250' W.; thence south-southwesterly to Corner 6, Latitude 37° 57.0940590' N., Longitude 75° 42.1935214' W.; thence south-southeasterly to Corner 7, Latitude 37° 57.0551726' N., Longitude 75° 42.1814457' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 8, Latitude 37° 56.9408327' N., Longitude 75° 42.2957912' W.; thence south-southwesterly to Corner 9, Latitude 37° 56.6574947' N., Longitude 75° 42.3790819' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 10, Latitude 37° 56.5790952' N., Longitude 75° 42.5228752' W.; thence west-southwesterly to Corner 11, Latitude 37° 56.5712564' N., Longitude 75° 42.5915437' W.; thence south-southeasterly to Corner 12, Latitude 37° 56.5441067' N., Longitude 75° 42.5869894' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 13, Latitude 37° 56.4575045' N., Longitude 75° 42.7458050' W.; thence west-southwesterly to Corner 14, Latitude 37° 56.2575123' N., Longitude 75° 43.3791097' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 15, Latitude 37° 55.7408688' N., Longitude 75° 43.7957804' W.; thence westerly to Corner 16, Latitude 37° 55.7575327' N., Longitude 75° 43.9458298' W.; thence northwesterly to Corner 17, Latitude 37° 55.8908661' N., Longitude 75° 44.1291309' W.; thence north-northeasterly to Corner 18, Latitude 37° 55.9908639' N., Longitude 75° 44.0791266' W.; thence northeasterly to Corner 19, Latitude 37° 56.1241858' N., Longitude 75° 43.8791328' W.; thence north-northeasterly to Corner 20, Latitude 37° 56.4075136' N., Longitude 75° 43.7291361' W.; thence northeasterly to Corner 21, Latitude 37° 56.8241664' N., Longitude 75° 43.2624601' W.; thence north-northeasterly to Corner 22, Latitude 37° 57.0706006' N., Longitude 75° 43.1480402' W.; thence east-northeasterly along the Maryland-Virginia state line to Corner 1, said corner being which is the point of beginning.

Public Ground 10 of Accomack County is located in the Pocomoke Sound, beginning at a corner on the Maryland-Virginia state line, located in the Pocomoke Sound approximately 2.3 nautical miles westerly of the northern-most point of North End Point, said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 37° 56.4741881' N., Longitude 75° 45.7051676' W. (NAD83); thence east-northeasterly along the Maryland-Virginia state line to Corner 2, Latitude 37° 56.9261140' N., Longitude 75° 43.7679786' W.; thence south-southwesterly to Corner 3, Latitude 37° 56.1241948' N., Longitude 75° 44.3624962' W.; thence west-southwesterly to Corner 4, Latitude 37° 56.0820561' N., Longitude 75° 44.5826292' W.; thence northerly to Corner 5, Latitude 37° 56.1377309' N., Longitude 75° 44.5817745' W.; thence west-southwesterly to Corner 6, Latitude 37° 56.1259751' N., Longitude 75° 44.6226859' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 7, Latitude 37° 56.1039335' N., Longitude 75° 44.6692334' W.; thence southerly to Corner 8, Latitude 37° 56.0643616' N., Longitude 75° 44.6750106' W.; thence west-southwesterly to Corner 9, Latitude 37° 55.9742005' N., Longitude 75° 45.1458109' W.; thence west-northwesterly to Corner 10, Latitude 37° 56.0741973' N., Longitude 75° 45.8958329' W.; thence north-northwesterly to Corner 11, Latitude 37° 56.2565760' N., Longitude 75° 46.0000557' W.; thence northeasterly along the Maryland-Virginia state line to Corner 1, said corner being the point of beginning.

"Pocomoke and Tangier Sounds Management Area" or "PTSMA" means the area as defined in § 28.2-524 of the Code of Virginia.

"Pocomoke and Tangier Sounds Rotation Area 1" means all public grounds and unassigned grounds within an area of the PTSMA in Pocomoke and Tangier Sounds, bounded by a line beginning at a point on the Maryland-Virginia state line, located at Latitude 37° 54.6136000' N., Longitude 75° 53.9739600' W.; thence south to the house on Great Fox Island, Latitude 37° 53.6946500' N., Longitude 75° 53.8898800' W.; thence westerly to a point, Latitude 37° 53.3633500' N., Longitude 75° 56.5589600' W.; thence south to a point, Latitude 37° 48.4429100' N., Longitude 75° 56.4883600' W.; thence easterly to the north end of Watts Island, Latitude 37° 48.7757800' N., Longitude 75° 53.5994100' W.; thence northerly to the house on Great Fox Island, Latitude 37° 53.6946500' N., Longitude 75° 53.8898800' W.; thence southeasterly to Pocomoke Sound Shoal Flashing Light Red "8", Latitude 37° 52.4583300' N., Longitude 75° 49.4000000' W.; thence southeasterly to Messongo Creek Entrance Buoy Green Can "1", Latitude 37° 52.1000000' N., Longitude 75° 47.8083300' W.; thence southeast to Guilford Flats Junction Light Flashing 2+1 Red "GF", Latitude 37° 50.9533300' N., Longitude 75° 46.6416700' W.; thence southerly to a point on a line from Guilford Flats Junction Light to the northern-most point of Russell Island, where said line intersects the PTSMA boundary, Latitude 37° 48.4715943' N., Longitude 75° 46.9955932' W.; thence clockwise following the PTSMA boundary to a point on the Maryland-Virginia state line, said point being which is the point of beginning.

"Pocomoke and Tangier Sounds Rotation Area 2" means all public grounds and unassigned grounds within an area of the PTSMA in Pocomoke and Tangier Sounds, bounded by a line beginning at the house on Great Fox Island, located at Latitude 37° 53.6946500' N., Longitude 75° 53.8898800' W.; thence southerly to the north end of Watts Island, Latitude 37° 48.7757800' N., Longitude 75° 53.5994100' W.; thence westerly to a point, Latitude 37° 48.4429100' N., Longitude 75° 56.4883600' W.; thence northerly to a point, Latitude 37° 53.3633500' N., Longitude 75° 56.5589600' W.; thence easterly to the house on Great Fox Island, said house being the point of beginning. Also, Pocomoke and Tangier Sounds Rotation Area 2 shall include all public grounds and unassigned grounds in the PTSMA in Pocomoke Sound bounded by a line beginning at a point on the Maryland-Virginia state line, Latitude 37° 54.6136000' N., Longitude 75° 53.9739600' W.; thence following the PTSMA boundary clockwise to a point on the line from the northern-most point of Russell Island to Guilford Flats Junction Light Flashing 2+1 Red "GF", where said line intersects the PTSMA boundary, Latitude 37° 48.4715943' N., Longitude 75° 46.9955932' W.; thence northerly to Guilford Flats Junction Light Flashing 2+1 Red "GF", Latitude 37° 50.9533300' N., Longitude 75° 46.6416700' W.; thence northwesterly to Messongo Creek Entrance Buoy Green Can "1", Latitude 37° 52.1000000' N., Longitude 75° 47.8083300' W.; thence northwesterly to Pocomoke Sound Shoal Flashing Light Red "8", Latitude 37° 52.4583300' N., Longitude 75° 49.4000000' W.; thence northwesterly to the house on Great Fox Island, Latitude 37° 53.6946500' N., Longitude 75° 53.8898800' W.; thence northerly to a point on the Maryland-Virginia state line, said point being which is the point of beginning.

"Public oyster ground" means all those grounds defined in § 28.2-551 of the Code of Virginia or by any other acts of the General Assembly pertaining to those grounds, all those grounds set aside by court order, and all those grounds set aside by order of the Marine Resources Commission and may be redefined by any of these legal authorities.

"Rappahannock River Area 7" means all public grounds in that area of the Rappahannock River bounded downstream by a line from Rogue Point, located at Latitude 37° 40.0400000' N., Longitude 76° 32.2530000' W.; thence west-northwesterly to Flashing Red Buoy "8", Latitude 37° 40.1580000' N., Longitude 76° 32.9390000' W.; thence southwesterly to Balls Point, Latitude 37° 39.3550000' N., Longitude 76° 34.4440000' W.; and bounded upstream by a line from Punchbowl Point, Latitude 37° 44.6750000' N., Longitude 76° 37.3250000' W.; thence southeasterly to Monaskon Point, Latitude 37° 44.0630000' N., Longitude 76° 34.1080000' W.

"Rappahannock River Area 8" means all public grounds in that area of the Rappahannock River bounded downstream by a line from Monaskon Point, located at Latitude 37° 44.0630000' N., Longitude 76° 34.1080000' W.; thence northwesterly to Punchbowl Point, Latitude 37° 44.6750000' N., Longitude 76° 37.3250000' W.; and bounded upstream by a line from Jones Point, Latitude 37° 46.7860000' N., Longitude 76° 40.8350000' W.; thence north-northwesterly to Sharps Point, Latitude 37° 49.3640000' N., Longitude 76° 42.0870000' W.

"Rappahannock River Area 9" means all public grounds in that area of the Rappahannock River bounded downstream by a line from Sharps Point, located at Latitude 37° 49.3640000' N., Longitude 76° 42.0870000' W.; thence south-southeasterly to Jones Point, Latitude 37° 46.7860000' N., Longitude 76° 40.8350000' W.; and bounded upstream by the Thomas J. Downing Bridge (U.S. Route 360).

"Rappahannock River Rotation Area 1" means all public grounds in that area of the Rappahannock River and Chesapeake Bay bounded by a line offshore and across the mouth of the Rappahannock River from a point on the mean low water line of Windmill Point, located at Latitude 37° 36.8200000' N., Longitude 76° 16.9460000' W.; thence southeast to Windmill Point Light, Latitude 37° 35.7930000' N., Longitude 76° 14.1800000' W.; thence southwesterly to Stingray Point Light, Latitude 37° 33.6730000' N., Longitude 76° 16.3620000' W.; thence westerly to a point on the mean low water line of Stingray Point, Latitude 37° 33.6920000' N., Longitude 76° 17.9860000' W.; and bounded upstream by a line from the mean low water line west of Broad Creek, Latitude 37° 33.9520000' N., Longitude 76° 19.3090000' W.; thence northeasterly to a VMRC Buoy on the Baylor line, Latitude 37° 34.5310000' N., Longitude 76° 19.1430000' W.; thence northeasterly to a VMRC Buoy, Latitude 37° 34.6830000' N., Longitude 76° 19.1000000' W.; thence northwesterly to a VMRC Buoy, Latitude 37° 35.0170000' N., Longitude 76° 19.4500000' W.; thence northwesterly to Sturgeon Bar Light "7R", Latitude 37° 35.1500000' N., Longitude 76° 19.7330000' W.; thence continuing northwesterly to Mosquito Point Light "8R", Latitude 37° 36.1000000' N., Longitude 76° 21.3000000' W.; thence northwesterly to the southern-most corner of the house on Mosquito Point, Latitude 37° 36.5230000' N., Longitude 76° 21.5950000' W.

"Rappahannock River Rotation Area 2" means all public grounds in that area of the Rappahannock River bounded downstream by a line from the southern-most corner of the house on Mosquito Point, located at Latitude 37° 36.5230000' N., Longitude 76° 21.5950000' W.; thence southeast to Mosquito Point Light "8R", Latitude 37° 36.1000000' N., Longitude 76° 21.3000000' W.; thence continuing southeasterly to Sturgeon Bar Beacon "7R", Latitude 37° 35.1500000' N., Longitude 76° 19.7330000' W.; thence west-southwesterly to a VMRC Buoy, Latitude 37° 34.9330000' N., Longitude 76° 21.0500000' W.; thence southwesterly to a VMRC Buoy, Latitude 37° 34.8830000' N., Longitude 76° 21.1000000' W.; thence southwesterly to a pier west of Hunting Creek at Grinels, Latitude 37° 34.4360000' N., Longitude 76° 26.2880000' W.; and bounded on the upstream by a line from Mill Creek Channel Marker "4", Latitude 37° 35.0830000' N., Longitude 76° 26.9500000' W.; thence northeasterly to Mill Creek Channel Marker "2", Latitude 37° 35.4830000' N., Longitude 76° 24.5670000' W.; thence northeasterly to the southern-most corner of the house on Mosquito Point, Latitude 37° 36.5230000' N., Longitude 76° 21.5950000'0 W.

"Rappahannock River Rotation Area 3" means all public grounds in that area of the Rappahannock River beginning from the north channel fender at the Robert O. Norris, Jr. Bridge, located at Latitude 37° 37.4830000' N., Longitude 76° 25.3450000' W.; thence southeast to the southern-most corner of the house on Mosquito Point, Latitude 37° 36.5230000' N., Longitude 76° 21.5950000' W.; thence southwest to Mill Creek Channel Marker "2", Latitude 37° 35.4830000' N., Longitude 76° 24.5670000' W.; thence southwesterly to Mill Creek Channel Marker "4", Latitude 37° 35.0830000' N., Longitude 76° 24.9500000' W.; thence northeasterly to Parrotts Creek Channel Marker "1", Latitude 37° 36.0330000' N., Longitude 76° 25.4170000' W.; thence northerly to VMRC Buoy, Latitude 37° 36.3330000' N., Longitude 76° 25.2000000' W.; thence northerly to the north channel fender of the Robert O. Norris, Jr. Bridge, said point being which is the point of beginning.

"Rappahannock River Rotation Area 4" means all public grounds in that area of the Rappahannock River, Corrotoman River, and Carter Creek, beginning at the White Stone end of the Robert O. Norris, Jr. Bridge (State Route 3), located at Latitude 37° 38.1290000' N., Longitude 76° 24.7220000' W.; thence along said bridge to the north channel fender, Latitude 37° 37.4830000' N., Longitude 76° 25.3450000' W.; thence westerly to the VMRC Buoy "5-4", Latitude 37° 38.0050000' N., Longitude 76° 30.0280000' W.; thence northerly to Old House Point, Latitude 37° 39.1390000' N., Longitude 76° 29.6850000' W.; thence northeasterly to Ball Point, Latitude 37° 41.6600000' N., Longitude 76° 28.6320000' W.; thence southeasterly to VMRC reef marker "Ferry Bar – North", Latitude 37° 40.3000000' N., Longitude 76° 28.5000000' W.; thence southwesterly to VMRC reef marker "Ferry Bar – South", Latitude 37° 40.1670000' N., Longitude 76° 28.5830000' W.; thence southeasterly to a duck blind west of Corrotoman Point, Latitude 37° 39.8760000' N., Longitude 76° 28.4200000' W.; thence southerly to VMRC Buoy "543", Latitude 37° 39.2670000' N., Longitude 76° 27.8500000' W.; thence southerly to VMRC Buoy "Drumming-West", Latitude 37° 38.8830000' N., Longitude 76° 27.6830000' W.; thence southerly to VMRC Buoy "Drumming-East", Latitude 37° 38.8330000' N., Longitude 76° 27.5670000' W.; thence northeasterly to Orchard Point, Latitude 37° 38.9240000' N., Longitude 76° 27.1260000' W.

"Rappahannock River Rotation Area 5" means all public grounds in that area of the Rappahannock River beginning at the Greys Point end of the Robert O. Norris, Jr. Bridge (State Route 3), located at Latitude 37° 36.8330000' N., Longitude 76° 25.9990000' W.; thence northeasterly along the bridge to the north channel fender, Latitude 37° 37.4830000' N., Longitude 76° 25.3450000' W.; thence west-northwesterly to VMRC Buoy "5-4", Latitude 37° 38.0050000' N., Longitude 76° 30.0280000' W.; thence westerly to Buoy "R6", Latitude 37° 38.0330000' N., Longitude 76° 30.2830000' W.; thence south to the eastern headland of Whiting Creek, Latitude 37° 36.6580000' N., Longitude 76° 30.3120000' W.

"Rappahannock River Rotation Area 6" means all public grounds in that area of the Rappahannock River beginning on the eastern headland of Whiting Creek, located at Latitude 37° 36.6580000' N., Longitude 76° 30.3120000' W.; thence north to Buoy "R6", Latitude 37° 38.0330000' N., Longitude 76° 30.2830000' W.; thence northwesterly to VMRC White House Sanctuary Buoy, Latitude 37° 38.1500000' N., Longitude 76° 30.5330000' W.; thence northwesterly to VMRC Towles Point Area Buoy, Latitude 37° 38.8330000' N., Longitude 76° 31.5360000' W.; thence northwesterly to Flashing Red Buoy "8" off Rogue Point, Latitude 37° 40.1580000' N., Longitude 76° 32.9390000' W.; thence southwesterly to Balls Point, Latitude 37° 39.3550000' N., Longitude 76° 34.4440000' W.

"Seed oyster" means any oyster taken by any person from natural beds, rocks, or shoals that is more than 30 days from harvest for human consumption.

"Thorofare" means that portion of Pocomoke and Tangier Sound Rotation Area 2 in the Tangier Sound north of a line beginning at a point, located at Latitude 37° 51.3670743' N., Longitude 75° 53.7526426' W.; thence westerly to an end at a point at Latitude 37° 51.3505943' N., Longitude 75° 56.5300708' W.

"Unassigned ground" means all grounds not assigned pursuant to §§ 28.2-600 through 28.2-633 of the Code of Virginia, established pursuant to § 28.2-551 of the Code of Virginia, or set aside by court order, or those grounds set aside by declarations or regulation by the Marine Resources Commission, and may be redefined by any of these legal authorities.

"Upper Chesapeake Bay - Blackberry Hangs Area" means all public grounds and unassigned grounds in that area of the Chesapeake Bay bounded by a line, beginning at a point approximately 300 feet east of the mean low water line of the Chesapeake Bay and approximately 1,230 feet southwest of the end of the southern-most stone jetty at the mouth of the Little Wicomico River, said point being Corner 1, Latitude 37° 53.1811193' N., Longitude 76° 14.1740146' W.; thence east-southeasterly to Corner 2, Latitude 37° 52.9050025' N., Longitude 76° 11.9357257' W.; thence easterly to Corner 3, Latitude 37° 52.9076552' N., Longitude 76° 11.6098145' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 4, Latitude 37° 52.8684955' N., Longitude 76° 11.6402444' W.; thence east-southeasterly to Corner 5, Latitude 37° 52.7924853' N., Longitude 76° 11.0253352' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 6, Latitude 37° 49.4327736' N., Longitude 76° 13.2409959' W.; thence northwesterly to Corner 7, Latitude 37° 50.0560555' N., Longitude 76° 15.0023234' W.; thence north-northeasterly to Corner 8, Latitude 37° 50.5581183' N., Longitude 76° 14.8772805' W.; thence north-northeasterly to Corner 9, Latitude 37° 52.0260950' N., Longitude 76° 14.5768550' W.; thence northeasterly to Corner 1, said corner being which is the point of beginning.

"White Shoal" means all public grounds and unassigned grounds in that area of the James River, bounded by a line beginning at a point, Corner 1, located at Latitude 37° 01.2430528' N., Longitude 76° 31.8484099' W.; thence northwesterly to Corner 2, Latitude 37° 01.6296514' N., Longitude 76° 32.3400073' W.; thence northwesterly to Corner 3, Latitude 37° 01.9737472' N., Longitude 76° 33.0234175' W.; thence westerly to Corner 4, Latitude 37° 02.3528838' N., Longitude 76° 32.7785342' W.; thence southeasterly to Corner 5, Latitude 37° 01.7124499' N., Longitude 76° 31.8210668' W.; thence southeasterly to Corner 6, Latitude 37° 01.3285092' N., Longitude 76° 31.0444525' W.; thence westerly to Corner 1, which is the point of beginning.

"Yeocomico River Area" means that area of the North West Yeocomico River, inside Public Ground 8 of Westmoreland County, and those areas of the South Yeocomico River inside Public Grounds 100, 102, 104, 107, and 112 of Northumberland County described as:

Public Ground 8 of Westmoreland County is located in the North West Yeocomico River, beginning at a point approximately 1,455 feet northeast of Crow Bar and 1,850 feet northwest of White Point, said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 38° 02.7468214' N., Longitude 76° 33.0775726' W.; thence southeasterly to Corner 2, Latitude 38° 02.7397202' N., Longitude 76° 33.0186286' W.; thence southerly to Corner 3, Latitude 38° 02.6021644' N., Longitude 76° 33.0234175' W.; thence westerly to Corner 4, Latitude 38° 02.6006669' N., Longitude 76° 33.0824799' W.; thence northerly to Corner 1, said corner being which is the point of beginning.

Public Ground 100 of Northumberland County is located in the South Yeocomico River, beginning at said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 38° 00.2292779' N., Longitude 76° 32.2244222' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 2, Latitude 38° 00.2183904' N., Longitude 76° 32.2488009' W.; thence westerly to Corner 3, Latitude 38° 00.2156893' N., Longitude 76° 32.3156220' W.; thence northwesterly to Corner 4, Latitude 38° 00.4024997' N., Longitude 76° 32.3338888' W.; thence continuing northeasterly to Corner 5, Latitude 38° 00.5806170' N., Longitude 76° 32.1957546' W.; thence continuing easterly to Corner 6, Latitude 38° 00.5798424' N., Longitude 76° 31.9506788' W., thence continuing southeasterly to Corner 7, Latitude 38° 00.5076459' N., Longitude 76° 31.9387425' W.; thence heading along the mean low water southwesterly to Corner 1, said corner being which is the point of beginning.

Public Ground 102 of Northumberland County is located in the South Yeocomico River, beginning at a point approximately 630 feet south of Mundy Point and 1,745 feet southwest of Tom Jones Point, said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 38° 01.2138059' N., Longitude 76° 32.5577201' W.; thence east-northeasterly to Corner 2, Latitude 38° 01.2268644' N., Longitude 76° 32.4497849' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 3, Latitude 38° 01.1091209' N., Longitude 76° 32.5591101' W.; thence northerly to Corner 1, said corner being which is the point of beginning.

Public Ground 104 of Northumberland County is located in the South Yeocomico River, beginning at a point approximately 670 feet north of Walker Point and 1,900 feet northwest of Palmer Point, said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 38° 00.8841841' N., Longitude 76° 32.6106215' W.; thence southeasterly to Corner 2, Latitude 38° 00.8609163' N., Longitude 76° 32.5296302' W.; thence southeasterly to Corner 3, Latitude 38° 00.6693092' N., Longitude 76° 32.4161866' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 4, Latitude 38° 00.6418466' N., Longitude 76° 32.5394849' W.; thence northwesterly to Corner 1, said corner being which is the point of beginning.

Public Ground 107 of Northumberland County is located in the South Yeocomico River, beginning at a point approximately 1,000 feet southwest of Barn Point and 1,300 feet northwest of Tom Jones Point, said point being Corner 1, located at Longitude 38° 01.1389367' N., Latitude 76° 32.3425617' W.; thence east-southeasterly to Corner 2, Latitude 38° 01.4106421' N., Longitude 76° 32.1077962' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 3, Latitude 38° 01.2717197' N., Longitude 76° 32.2917989' W.; thence north-northwesterly to Corner 1, said corner being which is the point of beginning.

Public Ground 112 of Northumberland County is located in the Yeocomico River, beginning at said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 38° 01.8449428' N., Longitude 76° 32.2191877' W.; thence northeasterly to Corner 2, Latitude 38° 01.8783929' N., Longitude 76° 31.9970988' W.; thence southeasterly to Corner 3, Latitude 38° 01.7997003' N., 76° 31.9569302' W.; thence continuing southeasterly to Corner 4, Latitude 38° 01.6848729' N., Longitude 76° 31.5931801' W.; thence southerly to Corner 5, Latitude 38° 01.5760153' N., 76° 31.5931801' W.; thence westerly to Corner 6, Latitude 38° 01.6860521' N., Longitude 76° 32.2820100' W.; thence northerly to Corner 1, said corner being which is the point of beginning.

"York River Hand Tong Area" means that area of the York River consisting of a portion of Public Ground 31 of Gloucester County (Aberdeen Rock), Public Ground 901 of Gloucester, and King and Queen Counties and that portion of Public Ground 4 of King and Queen County that is in waters approved by the Virginia Department of Health for the harvest of Shellfish (Bell Rock) described as:

Public Ground 31 of Gloucester County, known as Aberdeen Rock, is that portion of Public Ground between a line from Upper York River Green Channel Marker 9, Latitude 37° 19.35986' N., Longitude 76° 35.99789' W.; thence northeasterly to Gum Point, Latitude 37° 19.74276' N., Longitude 76° 35.49063' W.; upstream to a line from the Flashing Yellow VIMS Data Buoy "CB," Latitude 37° 20.4670000' N., Longitude 76° 37.4830000' W.; thence northeasterly to the inshore end of the wharf at Clay Bank.

Public Ground 901 of Gloucester and King and Queen Counties is located in the York River at the mouth of the Propotank River, beginning at said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 37° 26.0291178' N., Longitude 76° 42.4769473' W.; thence northwesterly to Corner 2, Latitude 37° 26.1502199' N., Longitude 76° 42.5504403' W.; thence continuing northwesterly to Corner 3, Latitude 37° 26.2593188' N., Longitude 76° 42.5639668' W.; thence southeasterly to Corner 4, Latitude 37° 26.0537949' N., Longitude 76° 42.3217587' W.; thence southwesterly to Corner 5, Latitude 37° 26.0023548' N., Longitude 76° 42.4076221' W.; thence northwesterly to Corner 1, said corner being which is the point of beginning.

Public Ground 4 of King and Queen County, known as Bell Rock, is located in the York River, beginning at said point being Corner 1, located at Latitude 37° 29.1377467' N., Longitude 76° 45.0390139' W.; thence southerly to Corner 2, Latitude 37° 29.0456979' N., Longitude 76° 45.0642131' W.; thence northwesterly to Corner 3, Latitude 37° 29.5582048' N., Longitude 76° 45.8484481' W.; thence continuing northwesterly to Corner 4, Latitude 37° 29.8480848' N., Longitude 76° 46.5362330' W.; thence northeasterly to Corner 5, Latitude 37° 30.0087805' N., Longitude 76° 46.3513889' W.; thence continue southeasterly to Corner 6, Latitude 37° 29.6554103' N., Longitude 76° 45.5620462' W., thence continuing southeasterly to Corner 7, Latitude 37° 29.1838193' N., Longitude 76° 44.8908342' W., thence continue southeasterly to Corner 8, Latitude 37° 29.1094227' N., Longitude 76° 44.7985114' W., thence continue southeasterly to Corner 9, Latitude 37° 28.9796379' N., Longitude 76° 44.6726329' W., thence continue southeasterly to Corner 10, Latitude 37° 28.7771294' N., Longitude 76° 44.5058580' W., thence continue southeasterly to Corner 11, Latitude 37° 28.6286905' N., Longitude 76° 44.4140389' W., thence continue southeasterly to Corner 12, Latitude 37° 28.4745509' N., Longitude 76° 44.3267558' W., thence continue southeasterly to Corner 13, Latitude 37° 28.4379124' N., Longitude 76° 44.2964890' W., thence continue southeasterly to Corner 14, Latitude 37° 28.3255929' N., Longitude 76° 44.2037875' W., thence continue southeasterly to Corner 15, Latitude 37° 28.2389865' N., Longitude 76° 44.1706101' W., thence continue southeasterly to Corner 16, Latitude 37° 28.2157560' N., Longitude 76° 44.1552324' W., thence westerly to Corner 17, Latitude 37° 28.1396622' N., Longitude 76° 44.3698473' W., thence northerly to Corner 18, Latitude 37° 28.7398061' N., Longitude 76° 44.7807027' W., thence continue northerly to Corner 19, Latitude 37° 28.8838652' N., Longitude 76° 44.8818391' W., thence easterly to Corner 20, Latitude 37° 28.9140411' N., Longitude 76° 44.8163514' W. thence northwesterly to Corner 1, said corner being which is the point of beginning.

"York River Rotation Area 1" means all public grounds in the York River, within Gloucester County, between a line from Upper York River Flashing Red Channel Marker "8", Latitude 37° 17.8863666' N., Longitude 76° 34.6534166' W.; thence northeasterly to Red Day Marker "2" at the mouth of Cedar Bush Creek, Latitude 37° 18.6422166' N., Longitude 76° 33.8216000' W.; upstream to a line from the Upper York River Green Channel Marker 9, Latitude 37° 19.35986' N., Longitude 76° 35.99789' W.; thence northeasterly to Gum Point, Latitude 37° 19.7427600' N., Longitude 76° 35.4906300' W.

"York River Rotation Area 2" means all public grounds in the York River, within Gloucester County, from the George P. Coleman Memorial Bridge (U.S. Route 17), upstream to a line from Upper York River Flashing Red Channel Marker "8", Latitude 37° 17.8863666' N., Longitude 76° 34.6534166' W.; thence northeasterly to Red Day Marker "2" at the mouth of Cedar Bush Creek, Latitude 37° 18.6422166' N., Longitude 76° 33.8216000' W.

4VAC20-720-30. Standing stock criteria.

Any public oyster ground or unassigned ground may be closed to harvest by the Commissioner of the Marine Resources Commission, when it is determined by the Oyster Replenishment Department that the standing stock of oysters has been depleted by 50% or more. The initial estimate of standing stock for each area shall be the volume of oysters as of October 1 of the current year as determined by the Oyster Replenishment Department Marine Resources Commission.

4VAC20-720-40. Open oyster harvest season, harvest areas, and harvest limits.

A. It shall be unlawful for any person to harvest oysters from public and unassigned grounds, except within the dates and areas and with the harvest gears set forth in this section.

B. It shall be unlawful to harvest clean cull oysters from the public oyster grounds and unassigned grounds, except within the seasons and areas and with the harvest gears as described in Table 1 in this subsection.

It shall be unlawful to exceed the daily individual bushel harvest limit or the daily vessel bushel limit of clean cull oysters in Table 1 in this subsection.

Table 1

Clean Cull Oyster Harvest Area, Harvest Dates, Harvest Gear, and Daily Bushel Limits

Harvest Area

Harvest Dates

Harvest Gear

Daily Individual Bushel Limit

Daily Vessel Bushel Limit

Great Wicomico River Rotation Area 1

January December 1, 2025, through January December 31, 2025

Hand Scrape

8

16

Great Wicomico River Rotation Area 2

December January 1, 2024 2026, through December January 31, 2024 2026

Hand Scrape

8

16

James River Area Areas 1, 2, and 3

October 16 15, 2024 2025, through March 31, 2025 2026

Hand Scrape

8

16

Middle Ground

March 1, 2025, through March 14, 2025

Hand Scrape

8

16

Mobjack Bay Area

February 1, 2025 2026, through February 28, 2025 March 15, 2026

Hand Scrape

8

16

Piankatank River Area

March 1, 2025 February 1, 2026, through March 14 15, 2025 2026

Hand Scrape

8

16

Pocomoke Sound Area Public Ground 11 10

November 1, 2024, through November 15, 2024 and February 1 16, 2025 2026, through February 14 28, 2025 2026

Hand Scrape

8

16

Rappahannock River Area 7

December 1, 2024 2025, through December 31, 2024 2025

Hand Scrape

8

16

Rappahannock River Area 8

January 1, 2025 2026, through January 31, 2025 2026

Hand Scrape

8

16

Rappahannock River Rotation Area 3 2

February 1, 2025 2026, through March 14 15, 2025 2026

Hand Scrape

8

16

Rappahannock River Rotation Area 5 4

October 16 15, 2024 2025, through November 30, 2024 2025

Hand Scrape

8

16

Upper Chesapeake Bay - Blackberry Hangs Area

February 1, 2025 2026, through March 14 15, 2025 2026

Hand Scrape

8

16

White Shoal

November 1, 2025, through February 28, 2026

Hand Scrape

8

16

York River Rotation Area 1

January 1, 2025, through January 31, 2025

Hand Scrape

8

16

York River Rotation Area 2

February 1, 2025, through March 14, 2025

Hand Scrape

8

16

Coan River Area

October 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024

Hand Tong

14

28

Corrotoman Hand Tong Area

October 1, 2024 2025, through March 31, 2025 2026

Hand Tong

14

28

Indian Creek

October 1, 2024 2025, through March 31, 2025 2026

Hand Tong

14

28

Great Wicomico River Hand Tong Area

October 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024

Hand Tong

14

28

James River Seed Area, including the James River Seed Area, including the Deep Water Shoal State Replenishment Seed Area

October 1, 2024 2025, through May 30 31, 2025 2026

Hand Tong

14

28

James River Areas 1, 2, and 3

October 1, 2025, through October 14, 2025, and April 1, 2026, through May 31, 2026

Hand Tong

14

28

Little Wicomico River

October 1, 2024 2025, through December 31, 2024 2025

Hand Tong

14

28

Milford Haven

December 1, 2024 2025, through February 28, 2025 2026

Hand Tong

14

28

Mobjack Bay Area

October 1, 2025, through January 31, 2026

Hand Tong

14

28

Nomini Creek ­Area

October 1, 2024 2025, through December 31, 2024 2025

Hand Tong

14

28

Piankatank River Hand Tong Area

March October 1, 2025, through March 14, 2025 January 31, 2026

Hand Tong

14

28

Pocomoke Sound Area Public Ground 11 10

November 16, 2024, through January 31, 2025, and February 15, 2025 October 1, 2025, through February 15, 2026, and March 1, 2026, through March 31, 2025 2026

Hand Tong

14

28

Pocomoke Sound Hand Tong Area Public Ground 9 and 10

November October 1, 2024 2025, through March 31, 2025 2026

Hand Tong

14

28

Rappahannock River Area 7

October 1, 2024, through November 30, 2024, and January 1, 2025, through March 31, 2025

Hand Tong

14

28

Rappahannock River Area 8

October 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024, and February 1, 2025, through March 31, 2025

Hand Tong

14

28

Rappahannock River Area 9

October 1, 2024 2025, through March 31, 2025 2026

Hand Tong

14

28

Yeocomico River Area

October 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024

Hand Tong

14

28

White Shoal

October 1, 2025, through October 31, 2025, and March 1, 2026, through May 31, 2026

Hand Tong

14

28

York River Hand Tong Area

October 16 1, 2024 2025, through March 14 15, 2025 2026

Hand Tong

14

28

York River Rotation Area Areas 1 and 2

November 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024, and February October 1, 2025, through March 31 15, 2025 2026

Hand Tong

14

28

York River Rotation Area 2

November 1, 2024, through January 31, 2025

Hand Tong

14

28

Hurleys Rock Area

March 1, 2025, through March 14, 2025

Oyster Dredge

8

16

Pocomoke Sound Rotation Area 2

November 16, 2024, through February 14, 2025

Oyster Dredge

8

16

Pocomoke and Tangier Sound Rotation Area 2 1

December 1, 2024 2025, through February 28, 2025 2026

Oyster Dredge

8

16

Thorofare

November 15, 2025, through November 30, 2025

Oyster Dredge

8

16

Larsons Bay Area

October 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024

Patent Tong

8

16

Deep Rock Area and Chesapeake Bay Patent Tong Area

November 1, 2024 2025, through March 31, 2025 2026

Patent Tong

8

16

Rappahannock River Rotation Area 1

October 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024

Patent Tong

8

16

Seaside Eastern Shore

November 1, 2024 2025, through April 30, 2025 March 31, 2026

By Hand or Hand Tong

14

28

C. It shall be unlawful to harvest seed oysters from the public oyster grounds or unassigned grounds, except within the dates and areas and with the harvest gears described in Table 2 in this subsection.

Table 2.

Seed Oyster Harvest Area, Harvest Dates, and Harvest Gear

Harvest Area

Harvest Dates

Harvest Gear

James River Seed Area, including the Deep Water Shoal State Replenishment Seed Area

October 1, 2024 2025, through May 31, 2025 2026

Hand Tong

D. In the Pocomoke and Tangier Sounds Rotation Areas, it shall be unlawful to possess on board any vessel more than 250 hard clams.

E. It shall be unlawful to possess any blue crabs on board any vessel with an oyster scrape or oyster dredge.

F. It shall be unlawful for any person or vessel to harvest clean cull oysters with more than one gear type in any single day from the public oyster grounds or unassigned grounds in the waters of the Commonwealth of Virginia.

4VAC20-720-60. Day and time limit.

A. It shall be unlawful to take, catch, or possess oysters on Saturday and Sunday from the public oyster grounds or unassigned grounds in the waters of the Commonwealth of Virginia for commercial purposes, except that this provision shall not apply to any person harvesting no more than one bushel per day by hand or ordinary tong for household use only during the season when the public oyster grounds or unassigned grounds are legally open for harvest.

B. It shall be unlawful to do any of the following from the harvest areas described in Table 1 or Table 2 of 4VAC20-720-40:

1. Harvest or attempt to harvest oysters prior to sunrise or after sunset.

2. For any vessel to leave the dock until one hour before sunrise or return to the dock after sunset if the vessel has an oyster dredge or hand scrape aboard.

3. From October 1 through October 31, for any person to harvest or attempt to harvest clean cull oysters after 11 a.m. and from May 1 through May 30, to harvest or attempt to harvest clean cull oysters after 10 a.m.

4. Beginning November 1, for any person to harvest or attempt to harvest clean cull oysters after noon with patent tongs, hand scrapes, or oyster dredges.

5. For any person to harvest or attempt to harvest oysters after 2 p.m. with hand tongs.

In addition, it shall be unlawful for any vessel to leave the dock until one hour before sunrise or return to the dock after sunset if the vessel has an oyster dredge or hand scrape aboard.

4VAC20-720-70. Gear restrictions.

A. It shall be unlawful for any person to harvest oysters in the James River Seed Area, including the Deep Water Shoal State Replenishment Seed Area, except by hand tong. It shall be unlawful for any person to have a hand scrape or oyster dredge on board a boat that is harvesting or attempting to harvest oysters from public grounds by hand tong. When used in catching of seed oysters, hand tongs shall be operated entirely by hand from the surface of the water and have no external or internal power source. When used in catching clean cull oysters, hand tongs may use power to assist lifting the tongs with a single lifting cable or rope attached at only a single point on one shaft of the tongs.

B. It shall be unlawful to harvest oysters by any gear from the seaside of the Eastern Shore except by hand or hand tong. It shall be unlawful to harvest oysters that are not submerged at mean low water by any gear other than by hand.

C. It shall be unlawful for any person to have more than one hand scrape on board his the vessel while he the person is harvesting oysters or attempting to harvest oysters from public grounds. It shall be unlawful for any person to have a hand tong on board his the vessel while he the person is harvesting or attempting to harvest oysters from public grounds by hand scrape.

VA.R. Doc. No. R25-8380; Filed October 28, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Title of Regulation: 8VAC20-23. Licensure Regulations for School Personnel (amending 8VAC20-23-540).

Statutory Authority: §§ 22.1-298.1 and 22.1-299 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Jim Chapman, Director of Board Relations, Department of Education, James Monroe Building, 101 North 14th Street, 25th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 750-8750, or email jim.chapman@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia. Sections 22.1-298.1 and 22.1-299 of the Code of Virginia specifically require the board to promulgate regulations concerning teacher licensure.

Purpose: This action is essential to protect the health, safety, or welfare of citizens because it will open compliance pathways by removing the requirement for coursework earned toward an early childhood special education endorsement to be at the graduate level, which could help fill at least 70 positions in the future, and aligns the requirements with all other special education endorsements.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This action is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because it (i) opens compliance pathways by removing the requirement for coursework earned toward an early childhood special education endorsement to be at the graduate level and (ii) aligns the requirements with all other special education endorsements.

Substance: This action removes the term "graduate" from the requirement that a candidate for the early childhood special education endorsement have earned a baccalaureate degree from an accredited institution and completed a major in early childhood special education or 27 semester hours in early childhood special education.

Issues: The primary advantage to both the Commonwealth and the public is that this action removes an arbitrary graduate-level course requirement for those wishing to add the early childhood special education endorsement to their license outside of an approved program pathway. There are no disadvantages to the Commonwealth or the public.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. The State Board of Education (board) proposes to allow undergraduate level courses to meet the current graduate level course requirement in one of the pathways to obtain the early childhood special education (ECSPED) endorsement for teachers.

Background. Currently, one of the pathways to obtain the ECSPED endorsement is via earning a baccalaureate degree from an accredited institution and completing a major in ECSPED. The regulation also allows substitution of the required major with 27 semester graduate hours in ECSPED. The proposal would strike the word graduate, effectively allowing applicants with 27 hours of undergraduate credit in ECSPED in lieu of a major which would expand the pool of applicants beyond those who have the required graduate level credits.

The proposed change resulted from the Advisory Board on Teacher Education and Licensure (ABTEL), which recommended additional teachers with the ECSPED endorsement.2 The Department of Education (DOE) reports that the ECSPED endorsement is a combination of the two top critical shortage teaching endorsement areas for 2025-2026: Special Education PreK-12 and Elementary Education PreK-6.3 Also, DOE states that the secondary driver for this change is to align the requirements with all other special education endorsements where graduate level credits are not stipulated. Moreover, DOE reports that over the past two years, Virginia has seen a 24% increase in the number of children identified with a disability for ages two to five who attend preschool. DOE notes the need for additional teachers with the ECSPED endorsement has been longstanding, with the percentage of vacancies or individuals teaching out of their endorsed area ranging from 7% to 9% over the past 6 years.

Estimated Benefits and Costs. The main economic impact of the proposal is to address the shortage of teachers with the ECSPED endorsement as a result of rising vacancies and the increase in the number of children identified with a disability for children two to five years of age attending preschool. DOE estimates that this change combined with another ABTEL recommendation, which is not part of this action, could fill at least 70 hard-to-fill positions in the future. Thus, we can infer that the proposal would help fill a portion of the present vacancies. It is also likely that less onerous credit hours may lead to some applicants being able to already meet the proposed requirement while also making it easier for those interested in earning this endorsement in the future. Those who may already have the 27 hours of undergraduate credits would have their job prospects improved and would be able to obtain this endorsement sooner and possibly start earning higher wages. Those who may not have the 27 hours of undergraduate credit at present would also be incentivized to consider obtaining the endorsement as it would be easier to obtain and at a lower cost. The ABTEL recommendation notes that the current path requires a large time commitment and significant financial resources.4 Data from DOE shows that there are 10 colleges or universities that offer the ECSPED endorsement. The cost difference of a credit hour between graduate and undergraduate level in-state students among the 10 colleges varies from $38/credit to $463/credit at the individual level, the average being $164/credit ($600 vs. $436) representing a 27% reduction. Thus, on average, the 27 undergraduate credit hours would lower the tuition costs by $4,428 (27 hours x $164/credit) per student. For 70 vacancies, the statewide cost savings in tuition costs would be $309,960 (70 x $4,428). However, only a portion of this amount would be the result of the proposal in this action as the 70-position estimate includes another proposal that is not part of this action. The likely savings in tuition for students may not necessarily result in a revenue reduction for universities/colleges offering graduate classes toward the ECSPED endorsement. It is because the proposal would also incentivize more individuals obtaining the endorsement through the undergraduate credit route which would add to the school revenues that may more than offset the loss of revenue from graduate credit hours. Relatedly, DOE does not believe that there would be a reduction in demand for graduate degrees in this field. DOE believes that there are many more important factors that affect one's decision to obtain a graduate degree such as planning a career in academia, one's ambition to obtain a graduate degree for various reasons including better job prospects and a genuine interest in a higher level of diploma. Moreover, the school divisions may also see some financial savings as DOE reports that salary scale would be lower for those that earned the endorsement without a graduate degree. Finally, the proposal is not expected to decrease the quality of instruction for children two to five years of age. DOE states that the current graduate level credit requirement is arbitrary and there is no meaningful distinction between the quality of instruction based on one's graduate or undergraduate credit hours. This stems from the fact that instruction of children in the relevant age brackets is seen as basic and thus undergraduate level classes are sufficient.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. Based on ABTEL's analysis and DOE, in the 2021-2022 school year there were 832 ECSPED positions with 70 vacancies, 10 colleges or universities that offered both graduate and undergraduate credit hours, and 13,379 children identified with a disability two to five years of age and in preschool. The proposed change does not appear to have a disproportional impact. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.5 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.6 As noted above, the expected revenue reduction for colleges/universities may be more than offset and no quality impact on teacher instruction is expected. Thus, no adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses7 Affected.8 The proposed amendments do not appear to adversely affect small businesses.

Localities9 Affected.10 The proposal does not introduce costs for localities. To the extent the proposal provides savings for school divisions and provides relief from reduced demand on local funds, it would be beneficial for school divisions throughout the Commonwealth.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposed amendment is expected to help fill a portion of 70 vacancies identified. However, some or all applicants may have other jobs. Thus, the impact on total employment is not known.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. No significant effect on the use and value of private property nor on real estate development costs is expected.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 https://www.doe.virginia.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/61199/638802359734430000.

3 https://www.doe.virginia.gov/teaching-learning-assessment/teaching-in-virginia/education-workforce-data-reports.

4 Ibid, (page 7).

5 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

6 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

7 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

8 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

9 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

10 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

The amendment removes an arbitrary graduate-level course requirement for those wishing to add the early childhood special education endorsement to a license outside of an approved program pathway, which opens compliance pathways and aligns the requirements with all other special education endorsements.

8VAC20-23-540. Special education early childhood (birth-age five years).

Endorsement requirements. The candidate shall have:

1. Earned a baccalaureate degree from an accredited institution and graduated from an approved teacher preparation program in early childhood special education; or

2. Earned a baccalaureate degree from an accredited institution and completed a major in early childhood special education or 27 semester graduate hours in early childhood special education, including at least one course in each of the following:

a. Foundations and legal aspects of special education: three semester hours;

b. Assessment for diagnosis, program planning, and curriculum-based measurement to document progress for young children with typical development, disabling, and at-risk conditions: three semester hours;

c. Curriculum and instructional programming for preschool. Coursework in language development and English-Language Arts must be grounded in science-based reading research and evidence-based literacy instruction: three semester hours;

d. Speech and language development and intervention: three semester hours;

e. Medical aspects: three semester hours;

f. Social and emotional skills and behavior management for early childhood: three semester hours;

g. Consultation, co-teaching, coaching, and mentoring: three semester hours;

h. Family-centered intervention: three semester hours; and

i. Early childhood elective: three semester hours.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-8337; Filed October 23, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Titles of Regulations: 8VAC20-23. Licensure Regulations for School Personnel (amending 8VAC20-23-10).

8VAC20-410. Regulations Governing Allowable Credit for Teaching Experience (repealing 8VAC20-410-10).

Statutory Authority: §§ 22.1-16, 22.1-298.1, and 22.1-299 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Jim Chapman, Director of Board Relations, Department of Education, James Monroe Building, 101 North 14th Street, 25th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 750-8750, or email jim.chapman@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations necessary to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia. Additionally, §§ 22.1-298.1 and 22.1-299 of the Code of Virginia require the board to promulgate regulations concerning teacher licensure.

Purpose: This action is essential to protect the health, safety, and welfare of citizens because it allows the public to have a clear definition of "teaching experience" as it is used in 8VAC20-23.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: The action is expected to be noncontroversial because it does not change underlying board policy, but instead moves the language found under 8VAC20-410 to a definition in 8VAC20-23, where it will better serve stakeholders.

Substance: The amendments (i) repeal Licensure Regulations for School Personnel (8VAC20-410) and (ii) add the language of 8VAC20-410 as a definition of "teaching experience" in 8VAC20-23-10.

Issues: The primary advantage to both the Commonwealth and the public is enhanced clarity and streamlining of the board's regulatory catalogue. There are no disadvantages to the Commonwealth or the public.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. As the result of a 2024 periodic review, the State Board of Education (board) is proposing a fast-track action to repeal the Regulations Governing Allowable Credit for Teaching Experience (8VAC20-410) and amend the Licensure Regulations for School Personnel (8VAC20-23) to include similar text.

Background. Regulations Governing Allowable Credit for Teaching Experience (8VAC20-410) consists of one section, 8VAC20-410-10 that is entitled Teaching experience credit. The regulation lists five types of experiences that can be used to obtain teaching experience credit. The regulation also provides that teachers in the field of vocational education, where the requirement calls for occupational work experience beyond the apprenticeship level, may be allowed credit for one year of teaching experience for each two years of work experience. According to the Department of Education, Regulations Governing Allowable Credit for Teaching Experience (8VAC20-410) merely clarifies requirements in Licensure Regulations for School Personnel (8VAC20-23). Consequently, the board proposes to repeal 8VAC20-410 and place its contents in 8VAC20-23.2

Estimated Benefits and Costs. Moving the contents of 8VAC20-410 into 8VAC20-23 has no impact on requirements. It is potentially moderately beneficial if there are future readers of Licensure Regulations for School Personnel (8VAC20-23) who become aware of the provisions currently within 8 VAC 20-410 who otherwise would not have been aware.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. The requirement pertains to the 131 school divisions in the Commonwealth and their teachers and teacher candidates. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.3 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.4 As the proposal neither increases cost nor reduces benefit, no adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses5 Affected.6 The proposal does not adversely affect small businesses.

Localities7 Affected.8 The proposal neither disproportionally affects particular localities nor affects costs for local governments.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposal does not affect employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposal affects neither the use and value of private property nor costs related to the development of real estate.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 The proposed new text in 8 VAC 20-23 is not completely identical to the text currently in 8VAC20-410, but the meaning is the same..

3 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

4 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

5 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

6 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

7 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

8 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to the Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

The amendments (i) repeal Regulations Governing Allowable Credit for Teaching Experience (8VAC20-410) and (ii) add the language of 8VAC20-410 as a definition of "teaching experience" in 8VAC20-23-10.

8VAC20-23-10. Definitions.

The following words and terms when used in this chapter shall have the meanings indicated unless the context clearly implies otherwise:

"Accredited institution" means an institution of higher education accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education.

"Accredited virtual school or program" means a virtual school or program accredited by one of the accrediting agencies recognized by the Virginia Department of Education. School divisions operating as multi-division online providers may be deemed as meeting accreditation requirements if a majority of schools are fully accredited by the Virginia Board of Education.

"Alternate route to licensure" means a nontraditional route to licensure available to individuals who meet the criteria specified in guidelines developed by the board or 8VAC20-23-90.

"Approved program" means a professional education program recognized as meeting state standards for the content and operation of such programs so that graduates of the program will be eligible for state licensure. The Virginia Board of Education has the authority to approve programs in Virginia.

"Cancellation" means the withdrawal of a license following the voluntary return of the license by the license holder.

"Career and Technical Education License" means a three-year license available to qualified individuals to teach, either full time or part time, high school career and technical education courses in specific subject areas who meet requirements set forth in this chapter. Individuals issued a three-year Career and Technical Education License shall not be eligible for continuing contract status while teaching under such license and shall be subject to the probationary terms of employment specified in § 22.1-303 of the Code of Virginia.

"Certified program provider" means a provider certified by the Virginia Department of Education to provide preparation and training for applicants seeking the Provisional License specified in 8VAC20-23-90.

"Career and Technical Education or Dual Enrollment License" means a three-year license to solely teach career and technical education courses or dual enrollment courses at public high schools in the Commonwealth issued to any individual who (i) is employed as an instructor by an accredited institution, (ii) is teaching in the specific career and technical education or dual enrollment subject area at such institution in which the individual seeks to teach at a public school, and (iii) complies with the requirements set forth in subdivisions D 1 and D 3 of § 22.1-298.1 of the Code of Virginia. The Virginia Board of Education shall require any such instructor to maintain continuous employment in such position at the institution of higher education as a condition of continued license.

"Collegiate Professional License" means a 10-year, renewable teaching license available to an individual who has satisfied all requirements for licensure set forth in this chapter, including an earned baccalaureate degree from an accredited institution and the professional teacher's assessments prescribed by the Virginia Board of Education.

"Denial" means the refusal to grant a license.

"Division Superintendent License" means a 10-year, renewable license available to an individual who has completed an earned master's degree from an accredited institution and meets the requirements specified in 8VAC20-23-630. The individual's name shall be listed on the Virginia Board of Education's list of eligible division superintendents.

"Evidence-based literacy instruction" means the same as that term is defined in § 22.1-1 of the Code of Virginia.

"Experiential learning" means a process of applying for an initial license through the alternate route as prescribed by the Virginia Board of Education and meeting the criteria specified in 8VAC20-23-90 E to be eligible to request experiential learning credits in lieu of the coursework for the endorsement (teaching) content area.

"Industry certification credential" means an active career and technical education credential that is earned by successfully completing a Virginia Board of Education-approved industry certification examination, being issued a professional license in the Commonwealth, or successfully completing an occupational competency examination.

"International Educator License" means a professional teaching license issued for no more than five years to an exchange teacher with citizenship in a nation other than the United States of America who meets requirements by a state-approved, federally designated Exchange Visitor Program and who is employed as a teacher in a Virginia public school or an accredited nonpublic school.

"Licensure by reciprocity" means a process used to issue a license to an individual coming into Virginia from another state when that individual meets certain conditions specified in this chapter.

"Mentor" means a classroom teacher hired by the local school division who has achieved continuing contract status or other instructional personnel including retired teachers who meet local mentor selection criteria. The mentor should work in the same building as the beginning teacher or be instructional personnel who is assigned solely as a mentor. A mentor should be assigned a limited number of teachers at any time. Instructional personnel who are not assigned solely as mentors should not be assigned to more than four teachers at any time. Mentors guide teachers in the program through demonstrations, observations, and consultations.

"One-Year High School License" means a license valid for one year and renewable thereafter in one-year increments to teach in public high schools for individuals who have met requirements for such license as set forth in this chapter.

"Online Teacher License" means a 10-year, renewable license valid only for teaching online courses. Teachers who hold a five-year or 10-year renewable license issued by the Virginia Board of Education may teach online courses for which they are properly endorsed and do not need to seek this license.

"Postgraduate Professional License" means a 10-year, renewable license available to an individual who has qualified for the Collegiate Professional License and who holds an appropriate earned graduate degree from an accredited institution.

"Professional studies" means courses and other learning experiences designed to prepare individuals in the areas of human development and learning, curriculum and instruction, assessment of and for learning, classroom and behavior management, foundations of education and the teaching profession, language and literacy, and supervised clinical experiences.

"Professional teacher assessment" means those tests or other requirements mandated for licensure as prescribed by the Virginia Board of Education.

"Provisional License" means a nonrenewable license valid for a specified period of time not to exceed three years issued to an individual who has allowable deficiencies for full licensure as set forth in this chapter.

"Pupil Personnel Services License" means a 10-year, renewable license available to an individual who has earned an appropriate graduate degree from an accredited institution with an endorsement as a school counselor, school psychologist, school social worker, or vocational evaluator. This license does not require teaching experience unless otherwise outlined under the specific endorsement's requirements.

"Renewable license" means a license issued by the Virginia Board of Education for 10 years, unless otherwise specified, to an individual who meets all requirements specified in this chapter.

"Reprimand" means a written admonishment of a license holder that does not result in the withdrawal of a license.

"Revocation" means the withdrawal of a license.

"School Manager License" means a 10-year, renewable license intended to provide for a differentiation of administrative responsibilities in a school setting. A school manager is licensed to administer noninstructional responsibilities in an educational setting. A school manager is restricted from evaluating teachers, supervising instruction, developing and evaluating curriculum, and serving as a school's student disciplinarian. The license is available to a candidate who holds a baccalaureate degree from an accredited institution; has three years of successful managerial experience; and is recommended for the license by a Virginia school division superintendent.

"Science-based reading research" means the same as that term is defined in § 22.1-1 of the Code of Virginia.

"Suspension" means the temporary withdrawal of a license.

"Technical Professional License" means a 10-year, renewable license available to an individual who has graduated from a public or accredited nonpublic high school (or possesses a Virginia Board of Education-approved high school equivalency credential); has exhibited academic proficiency, technical competency, and successful occupational experience; and meets the requirements specified in 8VAC20-23-50 A 4.

"Teach For America License" means a two-year provisional license available to an individual who is a participant in Teach For America and meets the requirements specified in 8VAC20-23-50.

"Teaching experience" means experience gained teaching (i) in a public school; (ii) in an accredited institution of higher learning; (iii) in a school operated at a military installation supported by federal tax funds for which academic credit is accepted in Virginia; (iv) in public resident schools, such as the Virginia School for the Deaf and the Blind; or (v) in private schools for which teachers receive credit under the provisions of the Virginia Retirement System. In the field of vocational education, where a requirement calls for occupational work beyond the apprenticeship level, two years of work experience may be credited for one year of teaching experience.

"Technical Professional License" means a 10-year, renewable license available to an individual who has graduated from a public or accredited nonpublic high school (or possesses a Virginia Board of Education-approved high school equivalency credential); has exhibited academic proficiency, technical competency, and successful occupational experience; and meets the requirements specified in 8VAC20-23-50 A 4.

"Universal licensure by reciprocity" means the issuance of a license as a teacher in the Commonwealth to any individual who holds a valid out-of-state teaching license with full credentials and without deficiencies that has been in force and in use by the individual as an employed teacher in a nonvirtual classroom setting at a public or private elementary or secondary school for at least three years prior to and is in force at the time the department receives the individual's application for license as a teacher in the Commonwealth.

VA.R. Doc. No. R25-8231; Filed October 23, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Titles of Regulations: 8VAC20-23. Licensure Regulations for School Personnel (amending 8VAC20-23-321, 8VAC20-23-322, 8VAC20-23-323, 8VAC20-23-324)

8VAC20-650. Regulations Governing the Determination of Critical Teacher Shortage Areas (amending 8VAC20-650-30).

Statutory Authority:

8VAC20-23-321, 8VAC20-23-322, 8VAC20-23-323, 8VAC20-23-324: §§ 22.1-298.1 and 22.1-299 of the Code of Virginia.

8VAC20-650-30: §§ 22.1-16 and 22.1-290.01 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Jim Chapman, Director of Board Relations, Department of Education, James Monroe Building, 101 North 14th Street, 25th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 750-8750, or email jim.chapman@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations necessary to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia. Section 253.13:2 of the Code of Virginia specifically requires the board to establish requirements for the licensing of teachers, principals, superintendents, and other professional personnel.

Purpose: This action is essential to protect the health, safety, and welfare of citizens because it ensures that the board's regulations are aligned with federal requirements.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This action is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because the agency is merely performing technical changes in order to align its regulations with federal requirements.

Substance: Effective July 1, 2020, the U.S. Department of Education no longer categorizes accrediting agencies as "regional" or "national" but instead includes them under a combined umbrella identified as "institutional" or "nationally recognized." The board is no longer permitted to distinguish between regional and national accreditation in its requirements for teacher licensure or approval of education programs at Virginia institutions of higher education based on changes to 34 CFR 600. To address this, the amendments replace references to "regionally accredited college or university" with "accredited institution."

Issues: The primary advantage to the public, the Commonwealth, and the regulated community is that the action aligns the board's requirements with applicable federal requirements. There are no disadvantages to the public, the Commonwealth, or the regulated community.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. The State Board of Education (board) proposes to amend Licensure Regulations for School Personnel (8VAC20-23) and Regulations Governing the Determination of Critical Teacher Shortage Areas (8VAC20-650) to align with federal regulation (34 CFR 600)2 concerning post-secondary institution accreditation.

Background. The Licensure Regulations for School Personnel set standards for the licensure of teachers, principals, superintendents, and other professional personnel in Virginia. The Regulations Governing the Determination of Critical Teacher Shortage Areas establish not only the process for making such determinations but also the requirements and selection procedures for the Virginia Teaching Scholarship Loan Program. Both regulations currently refer to regionally accredited colleges and universities. As the result of amendments to 34 CFR 6003 that became effective July 1, 2020, the U.S. Department of Education (USED) no longer categorizes accrediting institutions as either regional or national. The board has already removed the definition of regional accrediting agency and other references to regionally accredited colleges and universities in other sections of 8VAC20-23 and in the Regulations Governing the Review and Approval of Education Programs in Virginia (8VAC20-543.)4 The proposed changes would similarly replace the term regionally accredited colleges and universities with accredited institutions in the remaining sections of 8VAC20-23 and in 8VAC20-650. In a letter notifying state agencies of the amendments, USED explained that because the department holds all accrediting agencies to the same standards, distinctions between regional and national accrediting agencies are unfounded.5 USED provided several explanations as to why this amendment was necessary in the Federal Register,6 including that (i) the existing distinction is largely inapplicable because most regional accreditors operate well outside their historic geographic borders; and (ii) it is designed to counter a detrimental myth that institutions that are regionally accredited are of higher academic quality than institutions that are nationally accredited.7

Estimated Benefits and Costs. The benefits and costs of the proposed changes have previously been discussed in the Economic Impact Analysis for the action that first implemented these changes to 8VAC20-23.8 The proposed amendments may increase the number of individuals eligible for a teaching license in Virginia and therefore available for hire by local school boards. Specifically, individuals who received their training in other states from institutions that were nationally accredited but not regionally accredited, would newly become eligible for licensure in the Commonwealth. Secondly, universities based outside of the Commonwealth that offer accredited education programs in their other locations, but not at their Virginia campuses (due to a lack of regional accreditation), may start offering teacher training at their Virginia branches. The proposed change to 8VAC20-650 would further allow the Virginia Teaching Scholarship Loan Program to be awarded to teacher candidates from Virginia school divisions at any accredited public or private four-year institution of higher education, rather than only regionally accredited programs. Thus, to the extent that the proposed changes lead to the establishment of new teacher training programs, this change would increase eligibility for the loan program, which is intended to address teacher shortages. As demonstrated by a September 2023 Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission study (JLARC study),9 there are shortages of fully qualified teachers for many local school divisions in the Commonwealth, with some being particularly severe. An increase in the supply of fully qualified licensed teachers could thus be substantially beneficial.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. The proposed amendments may affect all 131 local school divisions in Virginia by potentially increasing the supply of fully qualified licensed teachers. If this proposed change leads to an increase in the supply of licensed teachers in the Commonwealth, then those local school divisions with the highest teacher vacancy rates would likely be particularly affected in a positive direction. According to the JLARC study, the following school divisions had vacancy rates above ten percent for the 2023-2024 school year: Caroline County, Charles City County, Cumberland County, Essex County, Hampton City, Lancaster County, Lunenburg County, Norfolk City, Northampton County, Nottoway County, Poquoson City, Suffolk City, and Surry County. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.10 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.11 The proposed amendments do not appear to directly increase costs or reduce benefits. Thus, no adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses12 Affected.13 The proposed amendments do not adversely affect small businesses.

Localities14 Affected.15 The proposed amendments may particularly affect those localities with the highest vacancy rates for teachers. Those localities are listed in the Businesses and Other Entities Affected section. The proposal does not appear to increase costs for local governments.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposed amendments may increase employment in that a higher percentage of teacher positions may be filled.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposed amendments do not appear to directly affect the use and value of private property nor real estate development costs.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 See https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-34/subtitle-B/chapter-VI/part-600.

3 See https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-34/subtitle-B/chapter-VI/part-600.

4 See https://townhall.virginia.gov/L/ViewStage.cfm?stageid=9654.

5 See page one of the letter: https://sacscoc.org/app/uploads/2020/03/State-Authorization-Letter-w-Diane-Signature-2.26.19.pdf.

6 See https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-11-01/pdf/2019-23129.pdf.

7 See page one of the letter (https://sacscoc.org/app/uploads/2020/03/State-Authorization-Letter-w-Diane-Signature-2.26.19.pdf) and page 58851: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-11-01/pdf/2019-23129.pdf, respectively.

8 See https://townhall.virginia.gov/L/GetFile.cfm?File=93\5972\9654\EIA_DOE_9654_v1.pdf.

9 See https://jlarc.virginia.gov/pdfs/reports/Rpt576-3.pdf.

10 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

11 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

12 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

13 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

14 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

15 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to the Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

The amendments replace references to "regionally accredited colleges and universities" with "accredited institutions," a change that aligns the regulations with updated federal standards for categorizing accrediting agencies.

8VAC20-23-321. Dual language (English) endorsement preK-6.

A. The dual language (English) endorsement is to teach dual language (English). Individuals who hold a valid Virginia teaching license with an elementary education endorsement may teach in dual language (English) in the corresponding grade levels noted on the license (such as Early/Primary Education PreK-3/Elementary Education PreK-6).

B. The candidate is subject to the elementary education content assessment and the reading for educators assessment prescribed by the State Board of Education for initial licensure. The State Board of Education prescribed reading and writing assessment is not required for an initial license with an endorsement in dual language (English).

C. Endorsement requirements for dual language (English) preK-6. The candidate shall have:

1. Graduated from an approved teacher preparation program in dual language elementary preK-6; or

2. Earned a baccalaureate degree from a regionally an accredited college or university institution and completed the following semester-hour requirements:

a. English (shall include composition, oral communication, and literature): 12 semester hours or complete six semester hours in English and pass a rigorous elementary subject test prescribed by the State Board of Education;

b. Mathematics (shall include algebra, geometry, probability and statistics, and teaching elementary mathematics): 15 semester hours or complete six hours in mathematics, complete a methods course in teaching elementary mathematics course (three semester hours), and pass a rigorous elementary subject test prescribed by the State Board of Education;

c. Laboratory sciences: 15 semester hours in at least three science disciplines and at least a three credit science methods course or complete nine semester hours (in two science disciplines), complete a methods in teaching elementary science course (three semester hours), and pass a rigorous elementary subject test prescribed by the State Board of Education; and

d. History (shall include American history and world history): six semester hours and social science (shall include geography and economics): six semester hours or complete three semester hours in history, complete three semester hours in social science (geography or economics), complete a methods course in teaching elementary history and social sciences course (three semester hours), and pass a rigorous elementary subject test prescribed by the State Board of Education.

8VAC20-23-322. Dual language (English) preK-6 Add-on endorsement.

A. The dual language (English) preK-6 endorsement is to teach dual language (English). Individuals who hold a valid Virginia teaching license with an elementary education endorsement in the corresponding grade levels noted on the license (such as Early/Primary Education PreK-3 or Elementary Education PreK-6) may teach in dual language (English) without the add-on endorsement. However, the dual language (English) preK-6 add-on endorsement recognizes the candidate's additional preparation in dual language (English).

B. Endorsement requirements.

1. The candidate shall have earned a baccalaureate degree from a regionally an accredited college or university institution and hold a license issued by the State Board of Education with a teaching endorsement in elementary education.

2. The candidate shall have completed an approved teacher preparation program in dual language (English) preK-6 add-on endorsement or completed the following:

a. Three semester hours in curriculum for dual language design and assessment; and

b. A 45-clock-hour practicum in dual language (English) from a regionally an accredited college or university institution. One year of successful, full-time teaching experience in a public school or accredited nonpublic school may be accepted in lieu of the practicum. The experience may be completed under a Provisional License.

8VAC20-23-323. Dual language (target language) endorsement preK-6.

A. The dual language (target language) preK-6 endorsement is to teach dual language in a world language other than English. The target language will be noted on the endorsement.

B. The State Board of Education prescribed reading and writing assessment is not required for an initial license with an endorsement in dual language (target language) endorsement preK-6.

C. Endorsement requirements for dual language (target language) endorsement preK-6. The candidate shall have:

1. Earned a baccalaureate degree from a regionally an accredited college or university institution and graduated from an approved teacher preparation program in dual language (target language) endorsement; or

2. Earned a baccalaureate degree from a regionally an accredited college or university institution, and completed the following requirements:

a. A major in the target language: 12 semester hours in the target language above the intermediate level that must include composition, literature, and conversation or a qualifying score on a foreign language assessment in the target language as prescribed by the State Board of Education;

b. Mathematics: nine semester hours in mathematics that must include methods of teaching elementary mathematics;

c. Laboratory sciences (in two science disciplines): nine semester hours that must include methods of teaching elementary science;

d. History and social sciences: three semester hours in United States history; three semester hours in geography, economics, or United States or comparative government; three semester hours in methods of teaching elementary history and social sciences; and

e. Culture and civilization: three semester hours.

8VAC20-23-324. Dual language (target language) preK-6 add-on endorsement.

A. The dual language (target language) preK-6 add-on endorsement is to teach dual language in a world language other than English. The target language will be noted on the endorsement.

B. Endorsement requirements. The candidate shall have:

1. Earned a baccalaureate degree from a regionally an accredited college or university institution and hold a license issued by the State Board of Education with a teaching endorsement in a target language.

2. Completed an approved teacher preparation program in dual language (target language) preK-6 add-on endorsement or completed the following:

a. Three semester hours in curriculum for dual language design and assessment;

b. Passed the rigorous elementary education assessment prescribed by the State Board of Education or completed the following coursework:

(1) Mathematics: nine semester hours in mathematics that must include methods of teaching elementary mathematics;

(2) Laboratory sciences (in two science disciplines): nine semester hours that must include methods of teaching elementary science; and

(3) History and social sciences: three semester hours in United States history; three semester hours in geography, economics, or United States or comparative government; three semester hours in methods of teaching elementary history and social sciences; and

c. A 45-clock-hour practicum in dual language (target language) from a regionally an accredited college or university institution. One year of successful, full-time teaching experience in a public school or accredited nonpublic school in dual language (target language) may be accepted in lieu of the practicum. The experience may be completed under a Provisional License.

8VAC20-650-30. Virginia Teaching Scholarship Loan Program requirements and selection procedures.

A. Annually, the teacher preparation institutions in Virginia that have approved teacher preparation programs shall be invited to nominate individuals to receive loans through the Virginia Teaching Scholarship Loan Program subject to available appropriations.

B. The Virginia Teaching Scholarship Loan Program shall consist of scholarships awarded annually to teacher candidates, including graduate students and paraprofessionals from Virginia school divisions at a regionally an accredited public or private four-year institution of higher education in the Commonwealth, who (i) are enrolled full time or part time in an approved teacher education program or are participants in another approved teacher education program; (ii) have maintained a cumulative grade point average of at least 2.7 on a 4.0 scale or its equivalent; and (iii) are nominated for such scholarship by the institution where they are enrolled. In addition, the candidates must meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) be enrolled in a program leading to an endorsement in a critical shortage area as established by the Board of Education; (b) be a male teacher candidate in an elementary or middle school education program; (c) be a minority teacher candidate enrolled in any teacher endorsement area; or (d) be a student in an approved teacher education program leading to an endorsement in career and technical education.

C. A selection panel appointed by the Superintendent of Public Instruction may be convened if the number of Teacher Education Program recommendations for scholarships exceed the appropriations. The panel shall select recipients for the teaching scholarship loan from the eligible applicants. Efforts should be made to have an appropriate distribution of scholarships among the identified critical teacher shortage areas.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-8328; Filed October 23, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Titles of Regulations: 8VAC20-310. Rules Governing Instructions Concerning Drugs and Substance Abuse (repealing 8VAC20-310-10).

8VAC20-720. Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (adding 8VAC20-720-200).

Statutory Authority: §§ 22.1-16 and 22.1-206 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Jim Chapman, Director of Board Relations, Department of Education, James Monroe Building, 101 North 14th Street, 25th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 750-8750, or email jim.chapman@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations necessary to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia. Section 22.1-206 of the Code of the Virginia requires the board to prescribe the instruction concerning drugs and drug abuse to be provided by the public schools.

Purpose: This action is essential to protect the health, safety, and welfare of citizens because it updates the language to reflect current practice and clarifies the purpose and scope of drug and substance abuse programs in public schools. Additionally, the action places material relevant to local school boards and school divisions in the same chapter, which enhances clarity and ease-of-use.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This action is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because it does not change underlying board policy; it moves provisions from 8VAC20-310 to 8VAC20-720 and updates language to eliminate unnecessary provisions, enhance clarity, and use terminology that is current among practitioners.

Substance: The amendments (i) repeal Rules Governing Instructions Concerning Drugs and Substance Abuse (8VAC20-310) and (ii) move essential provisions into a new section, 8VAC20-720-200.

Issues: The primary advantages to the public are that the action (i) consolidates 8VAC20-310 with 8VAC20-720, which will allow the regulated community, government officials, and the public to identify pertinent and related regulatory matters and (ii) replaces outdated terminology with updated terms and adds language that clarifies the scope and purpose of the text. The primary advantage to the Commonwealth and agency is that the action streamlines and enhances the ease-of-use of the requirements relevant to local school boards and divisions. Additionally, the regulatory change removes potentially confusing language and outdated terminology in favor of current terms used by practitioners. There are no disadvantages.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. As a result of a 2024 periodic review,2 the State Board of Education (board) is proposing to repeal the Rules Governing Instructions Concerning Drugs and Substance Abuse (8VAC20-310) in its entirety and move its contents to the Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (8VAC20-720). Although the language would be amended to enhance clarity and update the terminology, the regulatory requirements would not be changed.

Background. The Rules Governing Instructions Concerning Drugs and Substance Abuse (8VAC20-310) currently consists of one section about one-half page in length, titled Health education program, that has six requirements for public schools of the Commonwealth. These requirements are described in broad terms, rather than naming specific topic areas or establishing a required number of hours of instruction. For example, the requirements include, establish and maintain a realistic, meaningful substance abuse prevention and education program that shall be developed and incorporated in the total education program and create a climate whereby students may seek and receive counseling about substance abuse and related programs without fear of reprisal. The board reports that this regulation has not been amended since it was first promulgated in 1980. The board proposes moving these requirements to a new section in the Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (8VAC20-720). The new section would be titled, Drug and Substance Abuse Program and have five broad requirements. The current requirement that public schools shall, Be concerned with education and prevention in all areas of substance use and abuse was considered vague and unnecessary, and would therefore be removed. All other requirements would be preserved with stylistic changes for greater clarity and updated terminology that reflects current practice. For example, the requirement mentioned previously to, establish and maintain a realistic, meaningful substance abuse prevention and education program would now be expressed as, develop and integrate a practical, impactful substance misuse prevention and education program throughout the health education instruction. It should be noted that the proposed language does not add any specific requirements in terms of topic areas or hours of instruction. The Department of Education has confirmed that the proposed changes would not have any practical impact on instruction or programming in public schools.

Estimated Benefits and Costs. Moving this section to 8VAC20-720 is not expected to have any practical impact on schools, staff, or students and families. Future readers of 8VAC20-720 may benefit if the proposed changes inform them of the requirements for drug and substance abuse programs in public schools to the extent that they would not otherwise have become aware of such requirements.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. The requirement pertains to the 131 school divisions in the Commonwealth. The proposal would not have any disproportional impact on any entity. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.3 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.4 As the proposal neither increases cost nor reduces benefit, no adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses5 Affected.6 The proposal does not adversely affect small businesses.

Localities7 Affected.8 The proposal neither disproportionally affects particular localities nor affects costs for local governments.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposal does not affect employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposal affects neither the use and value of private property nor costs related to the development of real estate.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 See https://townhall.virginia.gov/L/ViewPReview.cfm?PRid=2526..

3 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

4 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

5 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

6 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

7 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

8 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to the Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

The amendments (i) repeal Rules Governing Instructions Concerning Drugs and Substance Abuse (8VAC20-310) and (ii) move essential provisions into a new section, 8VAC20-720-200.

8VAC20-720-200. Drug and substance abuse program.

Public schools of the Commonwealth shall:

1. Develop and integrate a practical, impactful substance misuse prevention and education program throughout the health education instruction.

2. Implement professional development on substance misuse prevention for all staff members.

3. Collaborate with authorized governmental and private organizations dedicated to student health and substance misuse prevention.

4. Foster and support student-led initiatives and groups that promote positive peer influence in substance misuse prevention.

5. Create a positive climate whereby students may seek and receive counseling about substance abuse and related problems.

VA.R. Doc. No. R25-8099; Filed October 23, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Title of Regulation: 8VAC20-340. Regulations Governing Driver Education (amending 8VAC20-340-10).

Statutory Authority: §§ 22.1-16 and 22.1-205 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Jim Chapman, Director of Board Relations, Department of Education, James Monroe Building, 101 North 14th Street, 25th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 750-8750, or email jim.chapman@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations necessary to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia. Section 22.1-205 of the Code of Virginia specifically directs the board to establish a standardized program of driver education in the safe operation of motor vehicles.

Purpose: This action is essential to protect the health, safety, and welfare of citizens because it ensures that the regulations governing driver education conform to the Code of Virginia and are aligned with processes currently in use at the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This action is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because it brings the chapter into conformance with current statutory language and brings the board's regulations into alignment with processes and terminology utilized by DMV.

Substance: The amendments (i) update language to reflect the 180-day temporary driver's license currently issued by DMV to students who successfully complete the standardized end-of-course road skills assessment and (ii) add the 90-minute parent-student driver education component as part of the classroom portion of the driver education curriculum as required by § 22.1-205 of the Code of Virginia.

Issues: The primary advantage to both the public and the Commonwealth is that the section will conform to statute and be consistent with processes at DMV. There are no disadvantages to the public or Commonwealth.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. As a result of a 2024 periodic review2 and changes to the Code of Virginia in 2009 and 2022, the State Board of Education (board) proposes to update the regulatory text to reflect (i) the 90-minute parent-student driver education component as part of the classroom portion of the driver education curriculum as required by § 22.1-205 of the Code of Virginia and (ii) the 180-day temporary driver's license currently issued by schools to students who successfully complete the standardized end-of-course road skills assessment.

Background. Chapter 785 of the 2009 Acts of General Assembly3 required the board to include an additional minimum 90-minute parent-student driver education component as part of the classroom portion of its driver education program in Planning District 8 (Northern Virginia) and later Chapter 708 of the 2022 Acts of General Assembly4 expanded this requirement state wide. However, the current text of the regulation is silent with respect to the mandated 90-minute education component. While this component has been implemented in practice based on the legislative mandates, the text of the regulation does not include it. Additionally, the current text of the regulation incorrectly refers to the 180-day temporary license issued by schools following successful completion of a standardized end-of-course road skills assessment as a 90-day provisional license. In this action, the board proposes to update the regulatory text to conform to the Code of Virginia as amended in 2009 and 2022; and to correctly refer to the 180-day temporary license.

Estimated Benefits and Costs. One of the proposed changes would add the legislatively mandated 90-minute parent-student driver education component and the other change would correct an incorrect reference to the 180-day temporary license issued by schools following successful completion of a standardized end-of-course road skills assessment. Neither one of the proposed changes would have any impact on current DOE or school practices. Thus, no significant economic impact is expected other than eliminating potential confusion for the readers of the regulation.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. According to the Department of Education, 338 high schools or centers and 15 non-public schools are approved by the board to offer driver education. No driver education program appears to be disproportionately affected. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.5 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.6 The proposed changes would update the text of the regulation without changing current practices. Thus, no adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses7 Affected.8 The proposed amendments do not adversely affect small businesses.

Localities9 Affected.10 The proposed amendments do not introduce costs for localities and do not particularly affect any locality more than others.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposed changes to the regulatory text would not affect employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. No effects on the use and value of private property nor on real estate development costs are expected on account of this proposal to update the regulatory text.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 https://townhall.virginia.gov/L/ViewPReview.cfm?PRid=2557.

3 https://legacylis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?091+ful+CHAP0785.

4 https://legacylis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?221+ful+CHAP0708.

5 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

6 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

7 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

8 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

9 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

10 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to the Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

The amendments update language to reflect (i) the 180-day temporary driver's license currently issued by the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles to students who successfully complete the standardized end-of-course road skills assessment and (ii) the 90-minute parent-student driver education component of the classroom portion of the driver education curriculum as required by § 22.1-205 of the Code of Virginia.

8VAC20-340-10. Driver education program.

A. In accordance with provisions of the National Highway Safety Act of 1966 (23 USC § 401 et seq.) and § 46.2-334 of the Code of Virginia, local school boards shall determine whether to offer a driver education program, and, if offered, whether it will be elective or required. School divisions offering programs that comply with the standardized program of study and regulations established by the Board of Education and the provisions of § 22.1-205 of the Code of Virginia are entitled to participate in the distribution of state funds for driver education.

B. A state-approved driver education program consists of a minimum of 36 periods of classroom instruction and 14 periods of in-car instruction and an additional minimum 90-minute parent-student driver education component as part of the classroom portion of the driver education curriculum. The standardized driver education program established by the Board of Education requires that:

1. Classroom and in-car instruction shall follow the standardized program of study.

2. Local programs shall have the option that classroom driver education may be taught in lieu of 36 class periods of health education or as an elective course.

3. Superintendents and heads of private schools must seek program approval from the Department of Education prior to providing instruction and certify that the proposed program meets all state-approved program requirements.

4. The length of a class period must be a minimum of 50 minutes.

5. Students must drive a minimum of 50 miles during the in-car phase of instruction.

6. In-car instruction must be limited to no more than two periods of instruction in any 24-hour period, of which at least one must be actual driving.

7. No more than four periods of actual driving and four periods of observation on a multiple-car-range can count towards the 14-period in-car requirement.

8. Combination, on-street, simulation, and multiple-car-range programs must provide at least six periods of on-street driving and observation, four periods of multiple-car-range driving and observation, and eight periods of simulation.

9. Only fees approved by the Board of Education shall be collected for the laboratory phase of driver education pursuant to the Appropriation Act.

10. Public or private schools must submit each classroom and in-car driver education teachers' driver teacher's driver's license information for driver record monitoring as required by § 46.2-340 of the Code of Virginia.

11. Local school boards must develop written policies concerning initial or continued employment of classroom and in-car teachers who receive excessive demerit points on their driving record.

12. Public and private schools must provide the Department of Education with the previous year's program data to calculate in-car basic aid reimbursement and to monitor program compliance.

13. Classroom and laboratory phases of the program must be offered concurrently at the same school, or allow only a limited amount of time to elapse between classroom completion and laboratory instruction.

14. Students who have not successfully completed the classroom phase at one school cannot begin in-car instruction at another school.

15. Successful completion of a standardized end-of-course road skills assessment must be achieved prior to the school issuing a 90-day provisional 180-day temporary license.

VA.R. Doc. No. R25-8229; Filed October 23, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Title of Regulation: 8VAC20-360. Regulations Governing General Educational Development Certificates (repealing 8VAC20-360-10, 8VAC20-360-20).

Statutory Authority: § 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Jim Chapman, Director of Board Relations, Department of Education, James Monroe Building, 101 North 14th Street, 25th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 750-8750, or email jim.chapman@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations necessary to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia.

Purpose: The regulation is being repealed as it is no longer necessary for the protection of public health, safety, and welfare because it has been replaced by the regular no-cost procurement process.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This rulemaking is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because the repealed provisions have been replaced by the regular no-cost procurement process, which ensures that the approved assessments and testing protocols remain compliant with board guidance and the credential retains its rigorous value.

Substance: The action repeals Regulations Governing General Educational Development Certificates (8VAC20-360), which is obsolete.

Issues: The primary advantage to both the public and the Commonwealth is that unnecessary and outdated regulatory requirements will be removed. There are no disadvantages.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. As a result of a periodic review,2 the State Board of Education (board) proposes to repeal obsolete criteria regarding eligibility and retesting for General Educational Development (GED) certificates.

Background. Chapter 84 of the 2014 Acts of General Assembly3 replaced references in the Code of Virginia to the GED program or test with the phrase, a high school equivalency examination approved by the Board of Education. According to the Department of Education (DOE), the language was changed in recognition of other high school equivalency options that became available and could potentially be approved for administration in Virginia. Further, following the enactment of Chapter 84, DOE has started using a no-cost procurement process (since 2015) to recognize high school equivalency assessments that meet board guidelines and has been following the board approved publisher policies that address the testing parameters and retake policies. In essence, DOE states that the change to the statute and the adoption of the no-cost procurement process have rendered the current regulatory language regarding the criteria on eligibility and retesting for GED certificates obsolete. In this action, the Board proposes to repeal the related language in the text of the regulation.

Estimated Benefits and Costs. The proposal would repeal obsolete language regarding eligibility and retesting for GED certificates without having any impact on current testing practices. Thus, no significant economic impact is expected other than eliminating potential confusion for the readers of the regulation.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. The proposed amendments would not affect any entity other than the readers of the regulation. The proposal would not have any disproportional impact on any entity. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.4 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.5 No adverse impact is indicated as there is no increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity.

Small Businesses6 Affected.7 The proposed amendments do not adversely affect small businesses.

Localities8 Affected.9 The proposed amendments do not introduce costs for localities.

Projected Impact on Employment. No impact on employment is expected.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. No effects on the use and value of private property nor on real estate development costs are expected.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 https://townhall.virginia.gov/L/ViewPReview.cfm?PRid=2528.

3 https://legacylis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?141+ful+CHAP0084.

4 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

5 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

6 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

7 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

8 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

9 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to the Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

The action repeals Regulations Governing General Educational Development Certificates (8VAC20-360), which contains obsolete criteria regarding eligibility and retesting for General Educational Development (GED) certificates.

VA.R. Doc. No. R25-8133; Filed October 23, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Title of Regulation: 8VAC20-390. Rules Governing Division Superintendent of Schools (repealing 8VAC20-390-10).

Statutory Authority: §§ 22.1-59, 22.1-60, and 22.1-70 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Jim Chapman, Director of Board Relations, Department of Education, James Monroe Building, 101 North 14th Street, 25th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 750-8750, or email jim.chapman@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations necessary to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia. Section 22.1-59 of the Code of Virginia requires the board to prescribe by regulation the minimum qualifications for the position of division superintendent of schools. Section 22.1-60 of the Code of Virginia requires, in part, that the division superintendent of schools be appointed by the school board of the division from the entire list of eligible candidates certified by the board. Section 22.1-70 of the Code of Virginia requires the division superintendent to perform such other duties as may be prescribed by law, by the school board, and by the board.

Purpose: The purpose of this action is to remove language in 8VAC20-390 that conflicts with 8VAC20-23. This change is essential to protect the health, safety, and welfare of citizens because it removes conflicting requirements found in 8VAC20-390.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This action is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because it removes incorrect information and resolves the conflict between 8VAC20-390-10 and 8VAC20-23-630 in favor of current, widely used requirements.

Substance: This action repeals 8VAC20-390-10, which conflicts with 8VAC20-23-630, to resolve the conflict between the two regulatory chapters.

Issues: The primary advantage to the public is that the action will remove inaccurate information and resolve conflicting requirements. The primary advantage to the agency and the Commonwealth is that conflicting requirements will be removed, and the accurate requirements will be clear.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. The State Board of Education (board) proposes to repeal Qualifications from the Rules Governing Division Superintendent of Schools (8VAC20-390).

Background. 8VAC20-23-630 includes the requirements to be a division superintendent. 8VAC20-23-630 was first made effective August 23, 2018, and was subsequently amended on July 10, 2019, and October 24, 2024. 8VAC20-23-630 and 8VAC20-390-10 conflict. According to the Department of Education, in practice 8VAC20-23-630 has been used for division superintendent requirements or qualifications. Thus, to resolve the conflict, the board proposes to repeal 8VAC20-390-10.

Estimated Benefits and Costs. Since in practice, 8VAC20-23-630 has been used for division superintendent requirements/qualifications, repealing would have no impact beyond eliminating potential confusion about the requirements that apply.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. The proposal pertains to the 131 school divisions in the Commonwealth and division superintendent candidates. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.2 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.3 As the proposal neither increases cost nor reduces benefit, no adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses4 Affected.5 The proposal does not adversely affect small businesses.

Localities6 Affected.7 The proposal neither disproportionally affects particular localities nor affects costs for local governments.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposal does not affect employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposal affects neither the use and value of private property nor costs related to the development of real estate.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

3 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

4 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

5 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

6 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

7 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to the Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

The action repeals 8VAC20-390-10, which conflicts with 8VAC20-23-630 regarding qualifications of division superintendent candidates.

8VAC20-390-10. Qualifications. (Repealed.)

Division superintendents of county, town, and city school systems are required by law to be appointed from a list of eligible persons approved by the State Board of Education. To be placed on the list of eligibles, applicants must meet the following qualifications:

1. Personal qualities. Eligibility shall be limited to individuals whose records attest to good character and demonstrated ability as an educational administrator.

2. Education. The applicant shall have earned 60 semester hours of graduate work from an institution of higher learning accredited by the state accrediting agency and shall hold the Master's degree or be pursuing a doctoral program approved by any such accredited institution.

The applicant shall have completed graduate work in the following areas: history or philosophy of education, courses designed to develop competence in supervision and curriculum development, administration, finance, law, plant, personnel management or school-community relations, research, or statistical methods.

3. Experience. The applicant shall have had at least five years of satisfactory and full-time experience in administration or supervision, or both, in public schools.* This experience shall have been acquired in the principalships or positions, or both, within the central administrative offices of the school division. A maximum of two years of this requirement may be met through full-time experience in the assistant principalship. Certification as to whether the applicant has served satisfactorily in full-time positions of administration or supervision, or both, must be mailed directly to the Department of Education by the division superintendent.

4. Recency of professional education or experience, or both, and status report. A portion of either professional education or experience, or both, shall have been within a period of four years immediately prior to the application. An individual not serving as a division superintendent is required to complete a status report every four years. The report should include current information about the individual, such as current position, professional growth activities, and other pertinent data. The Department of Education will request the status report early in the school year prior to commencement of the new term for the division superintendents.

5. Conditions. Superintendents in office in Virginia as of November 1, 1967, shall not be required to meet these qualifications as long as they serve continuously in such positions in the state.

Persons on the eligible list as of November 1, 1967, who did not meet the education requirement effective that day shall submit to the department official transcripts of graduate work in support of at least six semester hours beyond the master's degree each two years thereafter until such time as they meet the new academic requirement. Any person who does not comply with this requirement will be removed from the eligible list.

*Comparable experience in accredited private schools or other educational systems may be accepted upon the recommendation of the Superintendent of Public Instruction and the approval of the Board of Education.

VA.R. Doc. No. R25-8230; Filed October 23, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Titles of Regulations: 8VAC20-23. Licensure Regulations for School Personnel (amending 8VAC20-23-10).

8VAC20-410. Regulations Governing Allowable Credit for Teaching Experience (repealing 8VAC20-410-10).

Statutory Authority: §§ 22.1-16, 22.1-298.1, and 22.1-299 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Jim Chapman, Director of Board Relations, Department of Education, James Monroe Building, 101 North 14th Street, 25th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 750-8750, or email jim.chapman@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations necessary to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia. Additionally, §§ 22.1-298.1 and 22.1-299 of the Code of Virginia require the board to promulgate regulations concerning teacher licensure.

Purpose: This action is essential to protect the health, safety, and welfare of citizens because it allows the public to have a clear definition of "teaching experience" as it is used in 8VAC20-23.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: The action is expected to be noncontroversial because it does not change underlying board policy, but instead moves the language found under 8VAC20-410 to a definition in 8VAC20-23, where it will better serve stakeholders.

Substance: The amendments (i) repeal Licensure Regulations for School Personnel (8VAC20-410) and (ii) add the language of 8VAC20-410 as a definition of "teaching experience" in 8VAC20-23-10.

Issues: The primary advantage to both the Commonwealth and the public is enhanced clarity and streamlining of the board's regulatory catalogue. There are no disadvantages to the Commonwealth or the public.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. As the result of a 2024 periodic review, the State Board of Education (board) is proposing a fast-track action to repeal the Regulations Governing Allowable Credit for Teaching Experience (8VAC20-410) and amend the Licensure Regulations for School Personnel (8VAC20-23) to include similar text.

Background. Regulations Governing Allowable Credit for Teaching Experience (8VAC20-410) consists of one section, 8VAC20-410-10 that is entitled Teaching experience credit. The regulation lists five types of experiences that can be used to obtain teaching experience credit. The regulation also provides that teachers in the field of vocational education, where the requirement calls for occupational work experience beyond the apprenticeship level, may be allowed credit for one year of teaching experience for each two years of work experience. According to the Department of Education, Regulations Governing Allowable Credit for Teaching Experience (8VAC20-410) merely clarifies requirements in Licensure Regulations for School Personnel (8VAC20-23). Consequently, the board proposes to repeal 8VAC20-410 and place its contents in 8VAC20-23.2

Estimated Benefits and Costs. Moving the contents of 8VAC20-410 into 8VAC20-23 has no impact on requirements. It is potentially moderately beneficial if there are future readers of Licensure Regulations for School Personnel (8VAC20-23) who become aware of the provisions currently within 8 VAC 20-410 who otherwise would not have been aware.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. The requirement pertains to the 131 school divisions in the Commonwealth and their teachers and teacher candidates. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.3 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.4 As the proposal neither increases cost nor reduces benefit, no adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses5 Affected.6 The proposal does not adversely affect small businesses.

Localities7 Affected.8 The proposal neither disproportionally affects particular localities nor affects costs for local governments.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposal does not affect employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposal affects neither the use and value of private property nor costs related to the development of real estate.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 The proposed new text in 8 VAC 20-23 is not completely identical to the text currently in 8VAC20-410, but the meaning is the same..

3 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

4 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

5 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

6 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

7 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

8 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to the Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

The amendments (i) repeal Regulations Governing Allowable Credit for Teaching Experience (8VAC20-410) and (ii) add the language of 8VAC20-410 as a definition of "teaching experience" in 8VAC20-23-10.

8VAC20-23-10. Definitions.

The following words and terms when used in this chapter shall have the meanings indicated unless the context clearly implies otherwise:

"Accredited institution" means an institution of higher education accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education.

"Accredited virtual school or program" means a virtual school or program accredited by one of the accrediting agencies recognized by the Virginia Department of Education. School divisions operating as multi-division online providers may be deemed as meeting accreditation requirements if a majority of schools are fully accredited by the Virginia Board of Education.

"Alternate route to licensure" means a nontraditional route to licensure available to individuals who meet the criteria specified in guidelines developed by the board or 8VAC20-23-90.

"Approved program" means a professional education program recognized as meeting state standards for the content and operation of such programs so that graduates of the program will be eligible for state licensure. The Virginia Board of Education has the authority to approve programs in Virginia.

"Cancellation" means the withdrawal of a license following the voluntary return of the license by the license holder.

"Career and Technical Education License" means a three-year license available to qualified individuals to teach, either full time or part time, high school career and technical education courses in specific subject areas who meet requirements set forth in this chapter. Individuals issued a three-year Career and Technical Education License shall not be eligible for continuing contract status while teaching under such license and shall be subject to the probationary terms of employment specified in § 22.1-303 of the Code of Virginia.

"Certified program provider" means a provider certified by the Virginia Department of Education to provide preparation and training for applicants seeking the Provisional License specified in 8VAC20-23-90.

"Career and Technical Education or Dual Enrollment License" means a three-year license to solely teach career and technical education courses or dual enrollment courses at public high schools in the Commonwealth issued to any individual who (i) is employed as an instructor by an accredited institution, (ii) is teaching in the specific career and technical education or dual enrollment subject area at such institution in which the individual seeks to teach at a public school, and (iii) complies with the requirements set forth in subdivisions D 1 and D 3 of § 22.1-298.1 of the Code of Virginia. The Virginia Board of Education shall require any such instructor to maintain continuous employment in such position at the institution of higher education as a condition of continued license.

"Collegiate Professional License" means a 10-year, renewable teaching license available to an individual who has satisfied all requirements for licensure set forth in this chapter, including an earned baccalaureate degree from an accredited institution and the professional teacher's assessments prescribed by the Virginia Board of Education.

"Denial" means the refusal to grant a license.

"Division Superintendent License" means a 10-year, renewable license available to an individual who has completed an earned master's degree from an accredited institution and meets the requirements specified in 8VAC20-23-630. The individual's name shall be listed on the Virginia Board of Education's list of eligible division superintendents.

"Evidence-based literacy instruction" means the same as that term is defined in § 22.1-1 of the Code of Virginia.

"Experiential learning" means a process of applying for an initial license through the alternate route as prescribed by the Virginia Board of Education and meeting the criteria specified in 8VAC20-23-90 E to be eligible to request experiential learning credits in lieu of the coursework for the endorsement (teaching) content area.

"Industry certification credential" means an active career and technical education credential that is earned by successfully completing a Virginia Board of Education-approved industry certification examination, being issued a professional license in the Commonwealth, or successfully completing an occupational competency examination.

"International Educator License" means a professional teaching license issued for no more than five years to an exchange teacher with citizenship in a nation other than the United States of America who meets requirements by a state-approved, federally designated Exchange Visitor Program and who is employed as a teacher in a Virginia public school or an accredited nonpublic school.

"Licensure by reciprocity" means a process used to issue a license to an individual coming into Virginia from another state when that individual meets certain conditions specified in this chapter.

"Mentor" means a classroom teacher hired by the local school division who has achieved continuing contract status or other instructional personnel including retired teachers who meet local mentor selection criteria. The mentor should work in the same building as the beginning teacher or be instructional personnel who is assigned solely as a mentor. A mentor should be assigned a limited number of teachers at any time. Instructional personnel who are not assigned solely as mentors should not be assigned to more than four teachers at any time. Mentors guide teachers in the program through demonstrations, observations, and consultations.

"One-Year High School License" means a license valid for one year and renewable thereafter in one-year increments to teach in public high schools for individuals who have met requirements for such license as set forth in this chapter.

"Online Teacher License" means a 10-year, renewable license valid only for teaching online courses. Teachers who hold a five-year or 10-year renewable license issued by the Virginia Board of Education may teach online courses for which they are properly endorsed and do not need to seek this license.

"Postgraduate Professional License" means a 10-year, renewable license available to an individual who has qualified for the Collegiate Professional License and who holds an appropriate earned graduate degree from an accredited institution.

"Professional studies" means courses and other learning experiences designed to prepare individuals in the areas of human development and learning, curriculum and instruction, assessment of and for learning, classroom and behavior management, foundations of education and the teaching profession, language and literacy, and supervised clinical experiences.

"Professional teacher assessment" means those tests or other requirements mandated for licensure as prescribed by the Virginia Board of Education.

"Provisional License" means a nonrenewable license valid for a specified period of time not to exceed three years issued to an individual who has allowable deficiencies for full licensure as set forth in this chapter.

"Pupil Personnel Services License" means a 10-year, renewable license available to an individual who has earned an appropriate graduate degree from an accredited institution with an endorsement as a school counselor, school psychologist, school social worker, or vocational evaluator. This license does not require teaching experience unless otherwise outlined under the specific endorsement's requirements.

"Renewable license" means a license issued by the Virginia Board of Education for 10 years, unless otherwise specified, to an individual who meets all requirements specified in this chapter.

"Reprimand" means a written admonishment of a license holder that does not result in the withdrawal of a license.

"Revocation" means the withdrawal of a license.

"School Manager License" means a 10-year, renewable license intended to provide for a differentiation of administrative responsibilities in a school setting. A school manager is licensed to administer noninstructional responsibilities in an educational setting. A school manager is restricted from evaluating teachers, supervising instruction, developing and evaluating curriculum, and serving as a school's student disciplinarian. The license is available to a candidate who holds a baccalaureate degree from an accredited institution; has three years of successful managerial experience; and is recommended for the license by a Virginia school division superintendent.

"Science-based reading research" means the same as that term is defined in § 22.1-1 of the Code of Virginia.

"Suspension" means the temporary withdrawal of a license.

"Technical Professional License" means a 10-year, renewable license available to an individual who has graduated from a public or accredited nonpublic high school (or possesses a Virginia Board of Education-approved high school equivalency credential); has exhibited academic proficiency, technical competency, and successful occupational experience; and meets the requirements specified in 8VAC20-23-50 A 4.

"Teach For America License" means a two-year provisional license available to an individual who is a participant in Teach For America and meets the requirements specified in 8VAC20-23-50.

"Teaching experience" means experience gained teaching (i) in a public school; (ii) in an accredited institution of higher learning; (iii) in a school operated at a military installation supported by federal tax funds for which academic credit is accepted in Virginia; (iv) in public resident schools, such as the Virginia School for the Deaf and the Blind; or (v) in private schools for which teachers receive credit under the provisions of the Virginia Retirement System. In the field of vocational education, where a requirement calls for occupational work beyond the apprenticeship level, two years of work experience may be credited for one year of teaching experience.

"Technical Professional License" means a 10-year, renewable license available to an individual who has graduated from a public or accredited nonpublic high school (or possesses a Virginia Board of Education-approved high school equivalency credential); has exhibited academic proficiency, technical competency, and successful occupational experience; and meets the requirements specified in 8VAC20-23-50 A 4.

"Universal licensure by reciprocity" means the issuance of a license as a teacher in the Commonwealth to any individual who holds a valid out-of-state teaching license with full credentials and without deficiencies that has been in force and in use by the individual as an employed teacher in a nonvirtual classroom setting at a public or private elementary or secondary school for at least three years prior to and is in force at the time the department receives the individual's application for license as a teacher in the Commonwealth.

VA.R. Doc. No. R25-8231; Filed October 23, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Titles of Regulations: 8VAC20-420. Regulations Governing Personnel in Public School Libraries Operated under Joint Contract under Control of Local School Board or Boards (repealing 8VAC20-420-10).

8VAC20-720. Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (adding 8VAC20-720-210).

Statutory Authority: § 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Jim Chapman, Director of Board Relations, State Board of Education, James Monroe Building, 101 North 14th Street, 25th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 750-8750, or email jim.chapman@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations necessary to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia.

Purpose: The underlying policy is essential to protect the health, safety, and welfare of citizens because it requires all persons employed in any public school library or any library operated under joint contract between a school board and the trustees of a county or regional library system to be under the direction, supervision, and control of the local school board.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This action is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because there is no change in board policy. The substantive requirements currently in 8VAC20-420 will be retained in a new section of 8VAC20-720.

Substance: The amendments (i) repeal Regulations Governing Personnel in Public School Libraries Operated under Joint Contract under Control of Local School Board or Boards (8VAC20-420) and (ii) add the essential provision of 8VAC20-420 as a new section, 8VAC20-720-210.

Issues: The primary advantage to the public is that regulations directed at school divisions will be consolidated into a single chapter. The primary advantage to the Commonwealth is that the action promotes ease-of-use and clarity. There are no disadvantages to the public or the Commonwealth.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. The Board of Education (board) proposes to repeal the Regulations Governing Personnel in Public School Libraries Operated under Joint Contract under Control of Local School Board or Boards (8VAC20-420), which consists of one sentence, and move its content into the Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (8VAC20-720).

Background. Regulations Governing Personnel in Public School Libraries Operated under Joint Contract under Control of Local School Board or Boards (8VAC20-420) in its entirety consists of the following: All such persons employed in any public school library or any library operated under joint contract between a school board or boards and the trustees of a county or regional library system shall be under the direction, supervision, and control of the local school board or boards.

Estimated Benefits and Costs. Moving the sentence has no impact on requirements. It is potentially moderately beneficial if there are future readers of Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (8VAC20-720) who become aware of the requirement with it in 8VAC20-720 who otherwise would not have been aware.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. The requirement pertains to the 131 school divisions in the Commonwealth. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.2 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.3 As the proposal neither increases cost nor reduces benefit, no adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses4 Affected.5 The proposal does not adversely affect small businesses.

Localities6 Affected.7 The proposal neither disproportionally affects particular localities nor affects costs for local governments.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposal does not affect employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposal affects neither the use and value of private property nor costs related to the development of real estate.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

3 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

4 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

5 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

6 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

7 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to the Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

The amendments (i) repeal Regulations Governing Personnel in Public School Libraries Operated under Joint Contract under Control of Local School Board or Boards (8VAC20-420) and (ii) add the essential provision of 8VAC20-420 as a new section, 8VAC20-720-210.

8VAC20-720-210. Library personnel.

All persons employed in any public school library or any library operated under joint contract between a school board and the trustees of a county or regional library system shall be under the direction, supervision, and control of the local school board.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-8149; Filed October 23, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Titles of Regulations: 8VAC20-530. Regulations Governing Criteria to Identify Toxic Art Materials; Labeling; Use in Elementary Grades Prohibited (repealing 8VAC20-530-10 through 8VAC20-530-80).

8VAC20-720. Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (adding 8VAC20-720-190).

Statutory Authority: §§ 22.1-16 and 22.1-274.1 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Jim Chapman, Director of Board Relations, Department of Education, James Monroe Building, 101 North 14th Street, 25th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 750-8750, or email jim.chapman@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations necessary to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia.

Purpose: This action is essential to protect the health, safety, and welfare of citizens because it ensures that the board's policies regarding toxic art materials are aligned to state statute and federal law.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This rulemaking is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because it aligns the chapter with current statutory language, removes incorrect references, and corrects outdated information, while retaining the underlying regulatory requirements of 8VAC20-530 in a new section of 8VAC20-720.

Substance: This action (i) repeals Regulations Governing Criteria to Identify Toxic Art Materials; Labeling; Use in Elementary Grades Prohibited (8VAC20-530) and (ii) moves the underlying requirements of 8VAC20-530 to a new section in Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (8VAC20-720).

Issues: The primary advantage to the public and the Commonwealth is that the regulation will be consistent with the current statutory language and provide accurate information and references. There are no disadvantages.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. As a result of a 2024 periodic review,2 the State Board of Education (board) is proposing to repeal the Regulations Governing Criteria to Identify Toxic Art Materials; Labeling; Use in Elementary Grades Prohibited (8VAC20-530) in its entirety and add a significantly abbreviated version of the regulation's content as a new section in the Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (8VAC20-720). The Department of Education (DOE) has confirmed that the proposed changes are intended to align board policies regarding toxic art materials with state statute and federal law, as well as ensure that regulatory requirements are easier to find.

Background. The Regulations Governing Criteria to Identify Toxic Art Materials; Labeling; Use in Elementary Grades Prohibited (8VAC20-530) are specifically authorized by Section 22.1-274.1 of the Code of Virginia, which requires DOE to develop criteria with the State Department of Health to identify toxic art materials.3 In addition, § 22.1-274.1 specifies that (i) DOE shall require school divisions to evaluate all art materials used in schools and identify those which are toxic and (ii) all materials used in the public schools which meet the criteria as toxic shall be so labeled, and their use shall be prohibited in kindergarten through grade five. Accordingly, the regulation largely relies on two documents incorporated by reference: the labeling standards required by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM D-4236) and a list of carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and the National Toxicology Program. The board proposes moving these requirements to a new section in the Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (8VAC20-720). The new section is titled, Criteria to Identify Toxic Art Materials; Labeling; Use in Elementary Grades Prohibited and refer the reader to definitions and requirements in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).4 Specifically, 16 CFR 1500.14(b)(8) contains the requirements of ASTM D-4236, and 16 CFR 1500.135 contains a summary of guidelines for determining chronic toxicity. DOE reports that it would be more concise to direct regulated stakeholders to these two sections of the CFR rather than require them to reference the eight sections of 8VAC20-530 and crosswalk those requirements from the old ASTM D-4236 requirements with the federal regulatory requirements of 16 CFR 1500.14(b)(8) and 1500.135.

Estimated Benefits and Costs. Moving these requirements to 8VAC20-720 is not expected to have any practical impact on school divisions, school personnel, or students and families. DOE reports that the Virginia Art Education Association and the Virginia Coalition of Fine Arts Education are aware of the proposed regulatory change and have not expressed any concern.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. The requirement pertains to the 131 school divisions in the Commonwealth. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.5 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.6 As the proposal neither increases cost nor reduces benefit, no adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses7 Affected.8 The proposal does not adversely affect small businesses.

Localities9 Affected.10 The proposal neither disproportionally affects particular localities nor affects costs for local governments.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposal does not affect employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposal affects neither the use and value of private property nor costs related to the development of real estate.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 See https://townhall.virginia.gov/L/ViewPReview.cfm?PRid=2529.

3 See VR 270-01-0051. See page 1792 of the Virginia Register of Regulations, Volume 04, Issue 17 at https://register.dls.virginia.gov/vol04/iss17/v04i17.pdf.

4 See https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-II/subchapter-C/part-1500/section-1500.14 and https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-II/subchapter-C/part-1500/section-1500.135.

5 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

6 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

7 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

8 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

9 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

10 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to the Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

The action (i) repeals Regulations Governing Criteria to Identify Toxic Art Materials; Labeling; Use in Elementary Grades Prohibited (8VAC20-530) and (ii) moves the underlying requirements of 8VAC20-530 to a new section in Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (8VAC20-720).

8VAC20-720-190. Criteria to identify toxic art materials; labeling; use in elementary grades prohibited.

A. The definitions and requirements of 16 CFR 1500.14(b)(8) and 16 CFR 1500.135 are incorporated by reference.

B. School divisions shall evaluate all art material used in schools. All art materials used in the public schools that meet the criteria as toxic under 16 CFR 1500.14(b)(8) and 16 CFR 1500.135 shall be so labeled.

C. Use of art materials evaluated to be toxic under 16 CFR 1500.14(b)(8) and 16 CFR 1500.135 shall be prohibited in kindergarten through grade five.

VA.R. Doc. No. R25-8134; Filed October 23, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Titles of Regulations: 8VAC20-23. Licensure Regulations for School Personnel (amending 8VAC20-23-321, 8VAC20-23-322, 8VAC20-23-323, 8VAC20-23-324)

8VAC20-650. Regulations Governing the Determination of Critical Teacher Shortage Areas (amending 8VAC20-650-30).

Statutory Authority:

8VAC20-23-321, 8VAC20-23-322, 8VAC20-23-323, 8VAC20-23-324: §§ 22.1-298.1 and 22.1-299 of the Code of Virginia.

8VAC20-650-30: §§ 22.1-16 and 22.1-290.01 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Jim Chapman, Director of Board Relations, Department of Education, James Monroe Building, 101 North 14th Street, 25th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 750-8750, or email jim.chapman@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations necessary to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia. Section 253.13:2 of the Code of Virginia specifically requires the board to establish requirements for the licensing of teachers, principals, superintendents, and other professional personnel.

Purpose: This action is essential to protect the health, safety, and welfare of citizens because it ensures that the board's regulations are aligned with federal requirements.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This action is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because the agency is merely performing technical changes in order to align its regulations with federal requirements.

Substance: Effective July 1, 2020, the U.S. Department of Education no longer categorizes accrediting agencies as "regional" or "national" but instead includes them under a combined umbrella identified as "institutional" or "nationally recognized." The board is no longer permitted to distinguish between regional and national accreditation in its requirements for teacher licensure or approval of education programs at Virginia institutions of higher education based on changes to 34 CFR 600. To address this, the amendments replace references to "regionally accredited college or university" with "accredited institution."

Issues: The primary advantage to the public, the Commonwealth, and the regulated community is that the action aligns the board's requirements with applicable federal requirements. There are no disadvantages to the public, the Commonwealth, or the regulated community.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. The State Board of Education (board) proposes to amend Licensure Regulations for School Personnel (8VAC20-23) and Regulations Governing the Determination of Critical Teacher Shortage Areas (8VAC20-650) to align with federal regulation (34 CFR 600)2 concerning post-secondary institution accreditation.

Background. The Licensure Regulations for School Personnel set standards for the licensure of teachers, principals, superintendents, and other professional personnel in Virginia. The Regulations Governing the Determination of Critical Teacher Shortage Areas establish not only the process for making such determinations but also the requirements and selection procedures for the Virginia Teaching Scholarship Loan Program. Both regulations currently refer to regionally accredited colleges and universities. As the result of amendments to 34 CFR 6003 that became effective July 1, 2020, the U.S. Department of Education (USED) no longer categorizes accrediting institutions as either regional or national. The board has already removed the definition of regional accrediting agency and other references to regionally accredited colleges and universities in other sections of 8VAC20-23 and in the Regulations Governing the Review and Approval of Education Programs in Virginia (8VAC20-543.)4 The proposed changes would similarly replace the term regionally accredited colleges and universities with accredited institutions in the remaining sections of 8VAC20-23 and in 8VAC20-650. In a letter notifying state agencies of the amendments, USED explained that because the department holds all accrediting agencies to the same standards, distinctions between regional and national accrediting agencies are unfounded.5 USED provided several explanations as to why this amendment was necessary in the Federal Register,6 including that (i) the existing distinction is largely inapplicable because most regional accreditors operate well outside their historic geographic borders; and (ii) it is designed to counter a detrimental myth that institutions that are regionally accredited are of higher academic quality than institutions that are nationally accredited.7

Estimated Benefits and Costs. The benefits and costs of the proposed changes have previously been discussed in the Economic Impact Analysis for the action that first implemented these changes to 8VAC20-23.8 The proposed amendments may increase the number of individuals eligible for a teaching license in Virginia and therefore available for hire by local school boards. Specifically, individuals who received their training in other states from institutions that were nationally accredited but not regionally accredited, would newly become eligible for licensure in the Commonwealth. Secondly, universities based outside of the Commonwealth that offer accredited education programs in their other locations, but not at their Virginia campuses (due to a lack of regional accreditation), may start offering teacher training at their Virginia branches. The proposed change to 8VAC20-650 would further allow the Virginia Teaching Scholarship Loan Program to be awarded to teacher candidates from Virginia school divisions at any accredited public or private four-year institution of higher education, rather than only regionally accredited programs. Thus, to the extent that the proposed changes lead to the establishment of new teacher training programs, this change would increase eligibility for the loan program, which is intended to address teacher shortages. As demonstrated by a September 2023 Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission study (JLARC study),9 there are shortages of fully qualified teachers for many local school divisions in the Commonwealth, with some being particularly severe. An increase in the supply of fully qualified licensed teachers could thus be substantially beneficial.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. The proposed amendments may affect all 131 local school divisions in Virginia by potentially increasing the supply of fully qualified licensed teachers. If this proposed change leads to an increase in the supply of licensed teachers in the Commonwealth, then those local school divisions with the highest teacher vacancy rates would likely be particularly affected in a positive direction. According to the JLARC study, the following school divisions had vacancy rates above ten percent for the 2023-2024 school year: Caroline County, Charles City County, Cumberland County, Essex County, Hampton City, Lancaster County, Lunenburg County, Norfolk City, Northampton County, Nottoway County, Poquoson City, Suffolk City, and Surry County. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.10 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.11 The proposed amendments do not appear to directly increase costs or reduce benefits. Thus, no adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses12 Affected.13 The proposed amendments do not adversely affect small businesses.

Localities14 Affected.15 The proposed amendments may particularly affect those localities with the highest vacancy rates for teachers. Those localities are listed in the Businesses and Other Entities Affected section. The proposal does not appear to increase costs for local governments.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposed amendments may increase employment in that a higher percentage of teacher positions may be filled.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposed amendments do not appear to directly affect the use and value of private property nor real estate development costs.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 See https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-34/subtitle-B/chapter-VI/part-600.

3 See https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-34/subtitle-B/chapter-VI/part-600.

4 See https://townhall.virginia.gov/L/ViewStage.cfm?stageid=9654.

5 See page one of the letter: https://sacscoc.org/app/uploads/2020/03/State-Authorization-Letter-w-Diane-Signature-2.26.19.pdf.

6 See https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-11-01/pdf/2019-23129.pdf.

7 See page one of the letter (https://sacscoc.org/app/uploads/2020/03/State-Authorization-Letter-w-Diane-Signature-2.26.19.pdf) and page 58851: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-11-01/pdf/2019-23129.pdf, respectively.

8 See https://townhall.virginia.gov/L/GetFile.cfm?File=93\5972\9654\EIA_DOE_9654_v1.pdf.

9 See https://jlarc.virginia.gov/pdfs/reports/Rpt576-3.pdf.

10 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

11 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

12 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

13 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

14 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

15 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to the Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

The amendments replace references to "regionally accredited colleges and universities" with "accredited institutions," a change that aligns the regulations with updated federal standards for categorizing accrediting agencies.

8VAC20-23-321. Dual language (English) endorsement preK-6.

A. The dual language (English) endorsement is to teach dual language (English). Individuals who hold a valid Virginia teaching license with an elementary education endorsement may teach in dual language (English) in the corresponding grade levels noted on the license (such as Early/Primary Education PreK-3/Elementary Education PreK-6).

B. The candidate is subject to the elementary education content assessment and the reading for educators assessment prescribed by the State Board of Education for initial licensure. The State Board of Education prescribed reading and writing assessment is not required for an initial license with an endorsement in dual language (English).

C. Endorsement requirements for dual language (English) preK-6. The candidate shall have:

1. Graduated from an approved teacher preparation program in dual language elementary preK-6; or

2. Earned a baccalaureate degree from a regionally an accredited college or university institution and completed the following semester-hour requirements:

a. English (shall include composition, oral communication, and literature): 12 semester hours or complete six semester hours in English and pass a rigorous elementary subject test prescribed by the State Board of Education;

b. Mathematics (shall include algebra, geometry, probability and statistics, and teaching elementary mathematics): 15 semester hours or complete six hours in mathematics, complete a methods course in teaching elementary mathematics course (three semester hours), and pass a rigorous elementary subject test prescribed by the State Board of Education;

c. Laboratory sciences: 15 semester hours in at least three science disciplines and at least a three credit science methods course or complete nine semester hours (in two science disciplines), complete a methods in teaching elementary science course (three semester hours), and pass a rigorous elementary subject test prescribed by the State Board of Education; and

d. History (shall include American history and world history): six semester hours and social science (shall include geography and economics): six semester hours or complete three semester hours in history, complete three semester hours in social science (geography or economics), complete a methods course in teaching elementary history and social sciences course (three semester hours), and pass a rigorous elementary subject test prescribed by the State Board of Education.

8VAC20-23-322. Dual language (English) preK-6 Add-on endorsement.

A. The dual language (English) preK-6 endorsement is to teach dual language (English). Individuals who hold a valid Virginia teaching license with an elementary education endorsement in the corresponding grade levels noted on the license (such as Early/Primary Education PreK-3 or Elementary Education PreK-6) may teach in dual language (English) without the add-on endorsement. However, the dual language (English) preK-6 add-on endorsement recognizes the candidate's additional preparation in dual language (English).

B. Endorsement requirements.

1. The candidate shall have earned a baccalaureate degree from a regionally an accredited college or university institution and hold a license issued by the State Board of Education with a teaching endorsement in elementary education.

2. The candidate shall have completed an approved teacher preparation program in dual language (English) preK-6 add-on endorsement or completed the following:

a. Three semester hours in curriculum for dual language design and assessment; and

b. A 45-clock-hour practicum in dual language (English) from a regionally an accredited college or university institution. One year of successful, full-time teaching experience in a public school or accredited nonpublic school may be accepted in lieu of the practicum. The experience may be completed under a Provisional License.

8VAC20-23-323. Dual language (target language) endorsement preK-6.

A. The dual language (target language) preK-6 endorsement is to teach dual language in a world language other than English. The target language will be noted on the endorsement.

B. The State Board of Education prescribed reading and writing assessment is not required for an initial license with an endorsement in dual language (target language) endorsement preK-6.

C. Endorsement requirements for dual language (target language) endorsement preK-6. The candidate shall have:

1. Earned a baccalaureate degree from a regionally an accredited college or university institution and graduated from an approved teacher preparation program in dual language (target language) endorsement; or

2. Earned a baccalaureate degree from a regionally an accredited college or university institution, and completed the following requirements:

a. A major in the target language: 12 semester hours in the target language above the intermediate level that must include composition, literature, and conversation or a qualifying score on a foreign language assessment in the target language as prescribed by the State Board of Education;

b. Mathematics: nine semester hours in mathematics that must include methods of teaching elementary mathematics;

c. Laboratory sciences (in two science disciplines): nine semester hours that must include methods of teaching elementary science;

d. History and social sciences: three semester hours in United States history; three semester hours in geography, economics, or United States or comparative government; three semester hours in methods of teaching elementary history and social sciences; and

e. Culture and civilization: three semester hours.

8VAC20-23-324. Dual language (target language) preK-6 add-on endorsement.

A. The dual language (target language) preK-6 add-on endorsement is to teach dual language in a world language other than English. The target language will be noted on the endorsement.

B. Endorsement requirements. The candidate shall have:

1. Earned a baccalaureate degree from a regionally an accredited college or university institution and hold a license issued by the State Board of Education with a teaching endorsement in a target language.

2. Completed an approved teacher preparation program in dual language (target language) preK-6 add-on endorsement or completed the following:

a. Three semester hours in curriculum for dual language design and assessment;

b. Passed the rigorous elementary education assessment prescribed by the State Board of Education or completed the following coursework:

(1) Mathematics: nine semester hours in mathematics that must include methods of teaching elementary mathematics;

(2) Laboratory sciences (in two science disciplines): nine semester hours that must include methods of teaching elementary science; and

(3) History and social sciences: three semester hours in United States history; three semester hours in geography, economics, or United States or comparative government; three semester hours in methods of teaching elementary history and social sciences; and

c. A 45-clock-hour practicum in dual language (target language) from a regionally an accredited college or university institution. One year of successful, full-time teaching experience in a public school or accredited nonpublic school in dual language (target language) may be accepted in lieu of the practicum. The experience may be completed under a Provisional License.

8VAC20-650-30. Virginia Teaching Scholarship Loan Program requirements and selection procedures.

A. Annually, the teacher preparation institutions in Virginia that have approved teacher preparation programs shall be invited to nominate individuals to receive loans through the Virginia Teaching Scholarship Loan Program subject to available appropriations.

B. The Virginia Teaching Scholarship Loan Program shall consist of scholarships awarded annually to teacher candidates, including graduate students and paraprofessionals from Virginia school divisions at a regionally an accredited public or private four-year institution of higher education in the Commonwealth, who (i) are enrolled full time or part time in an approved teacher education program or are participants in another approved teacher education program; (ii) have maintained a cumulative grade point average of at least 2.7 on a 4.0 scale or its equivalent; and (iii) are nominated for such scholarship by the institution where they are enrolled. In addition, the candidates must meet one or more of the following criteria: (a) be enrolled in a program leading to an endorsement in a critical shortage area as established by the Board of Education; (b) be a male teacher candidate in an elementary or middle school education program; (c) be a minority teacher candidate enrolled in any teacher endorsement area; or (d) be a student in an approved teacher education program leading to an endorsement in career and technical education.

C. A selection panel appointed by the Superintendent of Public Instruction may be convened if the number of Teacher Education Program recommendations for scholarships exceed the appropriations. The panel shall select recipients for the teaching scholarship loan from the eligible applicants. Efforts should be made to have an appropriate distribution of scholarships among the identified critical teacher shortage areas.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-8328; Filed October 23, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Titles of Regulations: 8VAC20-420. Regulations Governing Personnel in Public School Libraries Operated under Joint Contract under Control of Local School Board or Boards (repealing 8VAC20-420-10).

8VAC20-720. Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (adding 8VAC20-720-210).

Statutory Authority: § 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Jim Chapman, Director of Board Relations, State Board of Education, James Monroe Building, 101 North 14th Street, 25th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 750-8750, or email jim.chapman@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations necessary to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia.

Purpose: The underlying policy is essential to protect the health, safety, and welfare of citizens because it requires all persons employed in any public school library or any library operated under joint contract between a school board and the trustees of a county or regional library system to be under the direction, supervision, and control of the local school board.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This action is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because there is no change in board policy. The substantive requirements currently in 8VAC20-420 will be retained in a new section of 8VAC20-720.

Substance: The amendments (i) repeal Regulations Governing Personnel in Public School Libraries Operated under Joint Contract under Control of Local School Board or Boards (8VAC20-420) and (ii) add the essential provision of 8VAC20-420 as a new section, 8VAC20-720-210.

Issues: The primary advantage to the public is that regulations directed at school divisions will be consolidated into a single chapter. The primary advantage to the Commonwealth is that the action promotes ease-of-use and clarity. There are no disadvantages to the public or the Commonwealth.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. The Board of Education (board) proposes to repeal the Regulations Governing Personnel in Public School Libraries Operated under Joint Contract under Control of Local School Board or Boards (8VAC20-420), which consists of one sentence, and move its content into the Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (8VAC20-720).

Background. Regulations Governing Personnel in Public School Libraries Operated under Joint Contract under Control of Local School Board or Boards (8VAC20-420) in its entirety consists of the following: All such persons employed in any public school library or any library operated under joint contract between a school board or boards and the trustees of a county or regional library system shall be under the direction, supervision, and control of the local school board or boards.

Estimated Benefits and Costs. Moving the sentence has no impact on requirements. It is potentially moderately beneficial if there are future readers of Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (8VAC20-720) who become aware of the requirement with it in 8VAC20-720 who otherwise would not have been aware.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. The requirement pertains to the 131 school divisions in the Commonwealth. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.2 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.3 As the proposal neither increases cost nor reduces benefit, no adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses4 Affected.5 The proposal does not adversely affect small businesses.

Localities6 Affected.7 The proposal neither disproportionally affects particular localities nor affects costs for local governments.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposal does not affect employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposal affects neither the use and value of private property nor costs related to the development of real estate.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

3 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

4 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

5 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

6 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

7 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to the Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

The amendments (i) repeal Regulations Governing Personnel in Public School Libraries Operated under Joint Contract under Control of Local School Board or Boards (8VAC20-420) and (ii) add the essential provision of 8VAC20-420 as a new section, 8VAC20-720-210.

8VAC20-720-210. Library personnel.

All persons employed in any public school library or any library operated under joint contract between a school board and the trustees of a county or regional library system shall be under the direction, supervision, and control of the local school board.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-8149; Filed October 23, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Titles of Regulations: 8VAC20-530. Regulations Governing Criteria to Identify Toxic Art Materials; Labeling; Use in Elementary Grades Prohibited (repealing 8VAC20-530-10 through 8VAC20-530-80).

8VAC20-720. Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (adding 8VAC20-720-190).

Statutory Authority: §§ 22.1-16 and 22.1-274.1 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Jim Chapman, Director of Board Relations, Department of Education, James Monroe Building, 101 North 14th Street, 25th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 750-8750, or email jim.chapman@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations necessary to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia.

Purpose: This action is essential to protect the health, safety, and welfare of citizens because it ensures that the board's policies regarding toxic art materials are aligned to state statute and federal law.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This rulemaking is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because it aligns the chapter with current statutory language, removes incorrect references, and corrects outdated information, while retaining the underlying regulatory requirements of 8VAC20-530 in a new section of 8VAC20-720.

Substance: This action (i) repeals Regulations Governing Criteria to Identify Toxic Art Materials; Labeling; Use in Elementary Grades Prohibited (8VAC20-530) and (ii) moves the underlying requirements of 8VAC20-530 to a new section in Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (8VAC20-720).

Issues: The primary advantage to the public and the Commonwealth is that the regulation will be consistent with the current statutory language and provide accurate information and references. There are no disadvantages.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. As a result of a 2024 periodic review,2 the State Board of Education (board) is proposing to repeal the Regulations Governing Criteria to Identify Toxic Art Materials; Labeling; Use in Elementary Grades Prohibited (8VAC20-530) in its entirety and add a significantly abbreviated version of the regulation's content as a new section in the Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (8VAC20-720). The Department of Education (DOE) has confirmed that the proposed changes are intended to align board policies regarding toxic art materials with state statute and federal law, as well as ensure that regulatory requirements are easier to find.

Background. The Regulations Governing Criteria to Identify Toxic Art Materials; Labeling; Use in Elementary Grades Prohibited (8VAC20-530) are specifically authorized by Section 22.1-274.1 of the Code of Virginia, which requires DOE to develop criteria with the State Department of Health to identify toxic art materials.3 In addition, § 22.1-274.1 specifies that (i) DOE shall require school divisions to evaluate all art materials used in schools and identify those which are toxic and (ii) all materials used in the public schools which meet the criteria as toxic shall be so labeled, and their use shall be prohibited in kindergarten through grade five. Accordingly, the regulation largely relies on two documents incorporated by reference: the labeling standards required by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM D-4236) and a list of carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and the National Toxicology Program. The board proposes moving these requirements to a new section in the Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (8VAC20-720). The new section is titled, Criteria to Identify Toxic Art Materials; Labeling; Use in Elementary Grades Prohibited and refer the reader to definitions and requirements in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).4 Specifically, 16 CFR 1500.14(b)(8) contains the requirements of ASTM D-4236, and 16 CFR 1500.135 contains a summary of guidelines for determining chronic toxicity. DOE reports that it would be more concise to direct regulated stakeholders to these two sections of the CFR rather than require them to reference the eight sections of 8VAC20-530 and crosswalk those requirements from the old ASTM D-4236 requirements with the federal regulatory requirements of 16 CFR 1500.14(b)(8) and 1500.135.

Estimated Benefits and Costs. Moving these requirements to 8VAC20-720 is not expected to have any practical impact on school divisions, school personnel, or students and families. DOE reports that the Virginia Art Education Association and the Virginia Coalition of Fine Arts Education are aware of the proposed regulatory change and have not expressed any concern.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. The requirement pertains to the 131 school divisions in the Commonwealth. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.5 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.6 As the proposal neither increases cost nor reduces benefit, no adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses7 Affected.8 The proposal does not adversely affect small businesses.

Localities9 Affected.10 The proposal neither disproportionally affects particular localities nor affects costs for local governments.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposal does not affect employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposal affects neither the use and value of private property nor costs related to the development of real estate.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 See https://townhall.virginia.gov/L/ViewPReview.cfm?PRid=2529.

3 See VR 270-01-0051. See page 1792 of the Virginia Register of Regulations, Volume 04, Issue 17 at https://register.dls.virginia.gov/vol04/iss17/v04i17.pdf.

4 See https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-II/subchapter-C/part-1500/section-1500.14 and https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-II/subchapter-C/part-1500/section-1500.135.

5 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

6 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

7 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

8 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

9 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

10 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to the Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

The action (i) repeals Regulations Governing Criteria to Identify Toxic Art Materials; Labeling; Use in Elementary Grades Prohibited (8VAC20-530) and (ii) moves the underlying requirements of 8VAC20-530 to a new section in Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (8VAC20-720).

8VAC20-720-190. Criteria to identify toxic art materials; labeling; use in elementary grades prohibited.

A. The definitions and requirements of 16 CFR 1500.14(b)(8) and 16 CFR 1500.135 are incorporated by reference.

B. School divisions shall evaluate all art material used in schools. All art materials used in the public schools that meet the criteria as toxic under 16 CFR 1500.14(b)(8) and 16 CFR 1500.135 shall be so labeled.

C. Use of art materials evaluated to be toxic under 16 CFR 1500.14(b)(8) and 16 CFR 1500.135 shall be prohibited in kindergarten through grade five.

VA.R. Doc. No. R25-8134; Filed October 23, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Titles of Regulations: 8VAC20-310. Rules Governing Instructions Concerning Drugs and Substance Abuse (repealing 8VAC20-310-10).

8VAC20-720. Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (adding 8VAC20-720-200).

Statutory Authority: §§ 22.1-16 and 22.1-206 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Jim Chapman, Director of Board Relations, Department of Education, James Monroe Building, 101 North 14th Street, 25th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 750-8750, or email jim.chapman@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations necessary to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia. Section 22.1-206 of the Code of the Virginia requires the board to prescribe the instruction concerning drugs and drug abuse to be provided by the public schools.

Purpose: This action is essential to protect the health, safety, and welfare of citizens because it updates the language to reflect current practice and clarifies the purpose and scope of drug and substance abuse programs in public schools. Additionally, the action places material relevant to local school boards and school divisions in the same chapter, which enhances clarity and ease-of-use.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This action is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because it does not change underlying board policy; it moves provisions from 8VAC20-310 to 8VAC20-720 and updates language to eliminate unnecessary provisions, enhance clarity, and use terminology that is current among practitioners.

Substance: The amendments (i) repeal Rules Governing Instructions Concerning Drugs and Substance Abuse (8VAC20-310) and (ii) move essential provisions into a new section, 8VAC20-720-200.

Issues: The primary advantages to the public are that the action (i) consolidates 8VAC20-310 with 8VAC20-720, which will allow the regulated community, government officials, and the public to identify pertinent and related regulatory matters and (ii) replaces outdated terminology with updated terms and adds language that clarifies the scope and purpose of the text. The primary advantage to the Commonwealth and agency is that the action streamlines and enhances the ease-of-use of the requirements relevant to local school boards and divisions. Additionally, the regulatory change removes potentially confusing language and outdated terminology in favor of current terms used by practitioners. There are no disadvantages.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. As a result of a 2024 periodic review,2 the State Board of Education (board) is proposing to repeal the Rules Governing Instructions Concerning Drugs and Substance Abuse (8VAC20-310) in its entirety and move its contents to the Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (8VAC20-720). Although the language would be amended to enhance clarity and update the terminology, the regulatory requirements would not be changed.

Background. The Rules Governing Instructions Concerning Drugs and Substance Abuse (8VAC20-310) currently consists of one section about one-half page in length, titled Health education program, that has six requirements for public schools of the Commonwealth. These requirements are described in broad terms, rather than naming specific topic areas or establishing a required number of hours of instruction. For example, the requirements include, establish and maintain a realistic, meaningful substance abuse prevention and education program that shall be developed and incorporated in the total education program and create a climate whereby students may seek and receive counseling about substance abuse and related programs without fear of reprisal. The board reports that this regulation has not been amended since it was first promulgated in 1980. The board proposes moving these requirements to a new section in the Regulations Governing Local School Boards and School Divisions (8VAC20-720). The new section would be titled, Drug and Substance Abuse Program and have five broad requirements. The current requirement that public schools shall, Be concerned with education and prevention in all areas of substance use and abuse was considered vague and unnecessary, and would therefore be removed. All other requirements would be preserved with stylistic changes for greater clarity and updated terminology that reflects current practice. For example, the requirement mentioned previously to, establish and maintain a realistic, meaningful substance abuse prevention and education program would now be expressed as, develop and integrate a practical, impactful substance misuse prevention and education program throughout the health education instruction. It should be noted that the proposed language does not add any specific requirements in terms of topic areas or hours of instruction. The Department of Education has confirmed that the proposed changes would not have any practical impact on instruction or programming in public schools.

Estimated Benefits and Costs. Moving this section to 8VAC20-720 is not expected to have any practical impact on schools, staff, or students and families. Future readers of 8VAC20-720 may benefit if the proposed changes inform them of the requirements for drug and substance abuse programs in public schools to the extent that they would not otherwise have become aware of such requirements.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. The requirement pertains to the 131 school divisions in the Commonwealth. The proposal would not have any disproportional impact on any entity. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.3 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.4 As the proposal neither increases cost nor reduces benefit, no adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses5 Affected.6 The proposal does not adversely affect small businesses.

Localities7 Affected.8 The proposal neither disproportionally affects particular localities nor affects costs for local governments.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposal does not affect employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposal affects neither the use and value of private property nor costs related to the development of real estate.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 See https://townhall.virginia.gov/L/ViewPReview.cfm?PRid=2526..

3 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

4 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

5 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

6 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

7 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

8 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to the Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

The amendments (i) repeal Rules Governing Instructions Concerning Drugs and Substance Abuse (8VAC20-310) and (ii) move essential provisions into a new section, 8VAC20-720-200.

8VAC20-720-200. Drug and substance abuse program.

Public schools of the Commonwealth shall:

1. Develop and integrate a practical, impactful substance misuse prevention and education program throughout the health education instruction.

2. Implement professional development on substance misuse prevention for all staff members.

3. Collaborate with authorized governmental and private organizations dedicated to student health and substance misuse prevention.

4. Foster and support student-led initiatives and groups that promote positive peer influence in substance misuse prevention.

5. Create a positive climate whereby students may seek and receive counseling about substance abuse and related problems.

VA.R. Doc. No. R25-8099; Filed October 23, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Title of Regulation: 8VAC20-780. Standards for Licensed Child Day Centers (amending 8VAC20-780-40, 8VAC20-780-245, 8VAC20-780-510).

Statutory Authority: §§ 22.1-16 and 22.1-289.046 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Tatanishia Armstrong, Legislative Consultant, Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety, 101 North 14th Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 382-5047, or email tatanishia.armstrong@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations necessary to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia. Section 22.1-289.046 of the Code of Virginia requires the board to adopt regulations for the activities, services, and facilities to be employed by persons and agencies required to be licensed under Chapter 14.1 (§ 22.1-289.02 et seq.) of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia, which shall be designed to ensure that such activities, services, and facilities are conducive to the welfare of the children under the control of such persons or agencies.

Purpose: This action is essential to enhancing the health, safety, and welfare of children in care because it protects children with undiagnosed allergies in cases where exposure to the allergen may result in anaphylaxis that could be deadly. The action is required to comply with the provisions of Chapters 122 and 123 of the 2023 Acts of Assembly.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This action is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because it is required by Chapters 122 and 123 of the 2023 Acts of Assembly.

Substance: The amendments (i) require each child day center to implement policies for the possession and administration of epinephrine to be administered by any nurse at the center, employee at the center, or employee of a local health department who is authorized by a prescriber and trained in the administration of epinephrine to any child believed to be having an anaphylactic reaction and (ii) require that at least one nurse at each child day center, employee at the center, or employee of a local health department who is authorized by a prescriber and trained in the administration of epinephrine has the means to access, at all times during regular facility hours, any appropriate weight-based dosage of epinephrine that is stored in a locked or otherwise generally inaccessible container or area.

Issues: The advantage of this action to the public and the Commonwealth is that the requirement for stock epinephrine to be available in centers increases protections for children and could potentially save the life of a child who experiences anaphylactic shock as a result of an allergic reaction. There are no disadvantages to this action.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. Pursuant to Chapter 122 and Chapter 123 of the 2023 Acts of Assembly (legislation), which amended § 22.1-289.059 of the Code of Virginia, the Board of Education (board) proposes several amendments to the regulation concerning the possession and administration of epinephrine at child day centers.

Background. Consistent with § 22.1-289.02 of the Code of Virginia, the regulation defines child day center as a child day program2 offered to (i) two or more children younger than 13 years of age in a facility that is not the residence of the provider or of any of the children in care or (ii) 13 or more children at any location. Pursuant to the legislation, the board proposes to require in the regulation that (i) child day centers possess and store weight-based dosages of undesignated or stock epinephrine in a locked or inaccessible container or area in the center; (ii) the undesignated or stock epinephrine is only administered by a nurse at the center, an employee of a local health department who is authorized by a prescriber and trained in the administration of epinephrine, or staff at the center authorized by a prescriber and trained in the administration of epinephrine, and (iii) at least one of the above individuals has the means to access the epinephrine at all times during regular facility hours. If the person administering the epinephrine is neither a nurse nor an employee of a local health department, the Board proposes to require that their training be from (i) a program for this purpose developed by the Board of Nursing and taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine, or pharmacist, (ii) a course on this topic developed or approved by DOE in consultation with the Department of Health (VDH), or (iii) a course taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine, or pharmacist that includes the following: (a) recognizing signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis, (b) emergency procedures for responding to anaphylaxis, and (c) instructions and procedures for administering epinephrine. The proposed regulation expands upon the legislation, which only requires that the employee be trained in the administration of epinephrine.

Estimated Benefits and Costs. Anaphylaxis is a severe, life-threatening allergic reaction. It can happen seconds or minutes after a person has been exposed to an allergen.3 Immediate use of an epinephrine autoinjector can keep anaphylaxis from worsening and can be lifesaving.4 Thus, the proposed requirements that child day centers possess and store appropriate weight-based dosages of undesignated or stock epinephrine, and that at least one person qualified to administer epinephrine has access to the epinephrine at all times during regular facility hours, has the potential to save the lives of children with undiagnosed allergies in cases when exposure to the allergen may result in anaphylaxis. An EpiPen package comes with two auto-injectors of 0.3 mg and is approved for adults and children who weigh 66 lbs or more. The EpiPen JR package comes with two auto-injectors of 0.15 mg and is approved for children who weigh 33 lbs to 66 lbs.5 There are now also Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved epinephrine auto-injectors of 0.1 mg for infants and toddlers.6 Retail prices for a package of two brand name epinephrine auto-injectors range from $650 to $750 without insurance.7 FDA-authorized generic epinephrine is available from CVS at $109.99 per two-pack.8 Epinephrine autoinjectors have a shelf life of 12 to 18 months from the date of manufacture.9 For a child day center with children that fall into all three weight groups, and uses the FDA-authorized generic epinephrine from CVS, it would cost approximately $330 annually to maintain non-expired epinephrine on hand.10 DOE reports that it is already under contract with an outside entity that provides training in medication administration, including epinephrine administration. DOE is proposing a training program for staff at child day centers on the administration of epinephrine by this entity. If the training proposal is approved by VDH, the undesignated or stock epinephrine training would be developed. DOE's plan is for the training to be offered at no cost to the child day centers.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. The proposed amendments would affect the 2,663 licensed child day centers.11 DOE believes all would qualify as small businesses. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.12 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.13 The costs from requiring that child day centers possess and store appropriate weight-based dosages of undesignated or stock epinephrine stem from the legislation. Requiring training for the administration of epinephrine is also in the legislation, but the proposed text on training requires more than the legislation. Nevertheless, it appears that the training may be offered for free to the child day centers. Thus, no adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses14 Affected.15 As noted above, all child day centers appear to be small businesses. The proposed regulation does not appear to introduce costs beyond those already required by the legislation.

Localities16 Affected.17 The proposed amendments neither appear to disproportionally affect particular localities nor affect costs for local governments.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposed amendments do not appear to substantively affect total employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The increase in costs, which are due to the legislation, may moderately reduce the value of some child day programs. The proposed amendments do not affect real estate development costs.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 Child day program is defined in the regulation as a regularly operating service arrangement for children where, during the absence of a parent or guardian, a person or organization has agreed to assume responsibility for the supervision, protection, and well-being of a child younger than 13 years of age for less than a 24-hour period. Child day program does not include programs such as drop-in playgrounds or clubs for children when there is no service arrangement with the child's parent.

3 Source: Mayo Clinic https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/anaphylaxis/symptoms-causes/syc-20351468.

4 Source: Mayo Clinic https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/anaphylaxis/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20351474.

5 See https://www.goodrx.com/epinephrine-epipen/how-to-save-cost.

6 See https://www.fda.gov/media/127806/download.

7 Supra, note 5.

8 See https://www.cvs.com/content/epipen-alternative.

9 See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720482/.

10 Average of $110 per epinephrine auto-injector package, and three separate packages for the three different weight groups.

11 Data source: DOE.

12 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

13 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

14 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

15 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

16 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

17 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to the Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

Pursuant to Chapters 122 and 123 of the 2023 Acts of Assembly, the amendments (i) require each child day center to implement policies for the possession and administration of epinephrine to be administered by certain authorized and trained individuals to any child believed to be having an anaphylactic reaction and (ii) require that at least one authorized and trained individual at each child day center has the means to access at all times during regular facility hours any appropriate weight-based dosage of epinephrine that is stored in a locked or otherwise generally inaccessible container or area.

8VAC20-780-40. Operational responsibilities.

A. Applications for licensure shall conform with Article 3 (§ 22.1-289.010 et seq.) and Article 4 (§ 22.1-289.030 et seq.) of Chapter 14.1, of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia and the regulation entitled General Procedures and Information for Licensure, (8VAC20-820).

B. Pursuant to § 22.1-289.034 of the Code of Virginia and the regulation entitled Background Checks for Child Day Programs and Family Day Systems, (8VAC20-770), the applicant and any agent at the time of application who is or will be involved in the day-to-day operations of the center or who is or will be alone with, in control of, or supervising one or more of the children, shall be of good character and reputation; shall not have been convicted of a barrier crime as defined in § 19.2-392.02 of the Code of Virginia; and is shall not be the subject of a founded complaint of child neglect or abuse within or outside the Commonwealth.

C. The sponsor shall afford the superintendent or his the superintendent's agents the right at all reasonable times to inspect facilities and to interview his the sponsor's agents, employees, and any child or other person within his the sponsor's custody or control, provided that no private interviews may be conducted with any child without prior notice to the parent of such the child.

D. The license shall be posted in a place conspicuous to the public (§ 22.1-289.011 of the Code of Virginia).

E. The operational responsibilities of the licensee shall include ensuring that the center's activities, services, and facilities are maintained in compliance with these standards, the center's own policies and procedures that are required by these standards, and the terms of the current license issued by the department.

F. Every center shall ensure that advertising is not misleading or deceptive as required by § 22.1-289.027 of the Code of Virginia.

G. The center shall meet the proof of child identity and age requirements as stated in § 22.1-289.049 of the Code of Virginia.

H. The sponsor shall maintain public liability insurance for bodily injury for each center site with a minimum limit of at least $500,000 each occurrence and with a minimum limit of $500,000 aggregate.

1. A public sponsor may have equivalent self-insurance that is in compliance with the Code of Virginia.

2. Evidence of insurance coverage shall be made available to the department's representative upon request.

I. The center shall develop written procedures for injury prevention.

J. Injury prevention procedures shall be updated at least annually based on documentation of injuries and a review of the activities and services.

K. The center shall develop written procedures for prevention of shaken baby syndrome or abusive head trauma, including coping with crying babies, safe sleeping practices, and sudden infant death syndrome awareness.

L. The center shall inform all staff who work with children of children's allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions.

M. The center shall maintain, in a way that is accessible to all staff who work with children, a current written list of all children's allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions documented in the allergy plan required in 8VAC20-780-60 A 8. This list shall be dated and kept confidential in each room or area where children are present.

N. The center shall develop written playground safety procedures that shall include:

1. Provision for active supervision by staff to include positioning of staff in strategic locations, scanning play activities, and circulating among children; and

2. Method of maintaining resilient surface.

O. Hospital-operated centers may temporarily exceed their licensed capacity during a natural disaster or other catastrophe or emergency situation and shall develop a written plan for emergency operations, for submission to and approval by the Department of Education.

P. When children 13 years of age or older are enrolled in the program and receive supervision in the licensed program, they those children shall be counted in the number of children receiving care and the center shall comply with the standards for these those children.

Q. The center shall implement policies for the possession and administration of undesignated or stock epinephrine pursuant to § 22.1-289.059 of the Code of Virginia that ensure:

1. Undesignated or stock epinephrine is only administered by a nurse at the center, an employee of a local health department who is authorized by a prescriber and trained in the administration of epinephrine, or staff at the center authorized by a prescriber and trained in the administration of epinephrine pursuant to 8VAC20-780-245 M to a child believed to be having an anaphylactic reaction;

2. At least one nurse at the center or an employee of a local health department who is authorized by a prescriber and trained in the administration of epinephrine, or staff at the center authorized by a prescriber and trained in the administration of epinephrine pursuant to 8VAC20-780-245 M has the means to access at all times during regular facility hours appropriate weight-based dosages of undesignated or stock epinephrine based on the children in care at the center; and

3. Undesignated or stock epinephrine is stored in a locked or inaccessible container or area in the center.

8VAC20-780-245. Ongoing training.

A. Staff shall complete annually a minimum of 16 hours of training appropriate to the age of children in care.

B. Training completed to meet the requirements of this section shall be in addition to completing orientation requirements in 8VAC20-780-240.

C. Staff who do not work with a group of children at the center shall only be required to complete annual training on emergency preparedness and response, child abuse and neglect, and mandated reporter requirements.

D. Staff who work with a group of children at the center and are employed at a short-term program shall only be required to obtain a minimum of 10 hours of staff training per year.

E. In a cooperative preschool center that is organized, administered, and maintained by parents of children in care, parent volunteers, or other persons who participate and volunteer in a cooperative preschool center on behalf of a child attending such cooperative preschool center, including such volunteers who are counted in the staff-to-child ratios required in 8VAC20-780-340, shall complete four hours of training per year and shall be exempt from training requirements applicable to staff of child day programs. This training exemption shall not apply to any parent volunteer or other person as referred to in this subsection if the cooperative preschool center has entered into a contract with the department or a local department to provide child care services funded by the Child Care and Development Block Grant.

F. Volunteers who work more than six hours per week shall be required to complete annual training on the center's emergency procedures.

G. For therapeutic child day programs and special needs child day programs, staff who work directly with children shall annually complete four additional hours of training. At least eight hours of annual training shall be on topics related to the care of children with special needs.

H. Annual training shall be relevant to staff's job responsibilities and the care of children, and include topics such as:

1. Child development, including physical, cognitive, social, and emotional development;

2. Behavior management and positive guidance techniques;

3. Prevention and control of infectious diseases;

4. Prevention of sudden infant death syndrome and use of safe sleep practices;

5. Prevention of and response to emergencies due to food and other allergic reactions, including:

a. Recognizing the symptoms of an allergic reaction;

b. Responding to allergic reactions;

c. Preventing exposure to the specific food and other substances to which the child is allergic; and

d. Preventing cross contamination;

6. The center's policies and procedures on the administration of medication;

7. Building and physical premises safety, including identification of and protection from hazards that can cause bodily injury, such as electrical hazards, bodies of water, and vehicular traffic;

8. Prevention of shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma, including procedures to cope with crying babies or distraught children;

9. Signs and symptoms of child abuse and neglect and requirements for mandated reporters;

10. Emergency preparedness and response planning for emergencies resulting from a natural disaster or a human-caused event such as violence at a child care facility and the center's specific emergency preparedness plan as required 8VAC20-780-550 A through K;

11. Handling and storage of hazardous materials and the appropriate disposal of diapers and other items contaminated by body fluids;

12. CPR and first aid;

13. Precautions in transporting children if applicable; and

14. If applicable, the recommended care requirements related to the care and development of children with special needs.

I. Training on the center's emergency preparedness plan shall be completed annually and each time the plan is updated.

J. Medication administration:

1. To safely perform medication administration practices listed in 8VAC20-780-510, whenever the center has agreed to administer prescribed medications, the administration shall be performed by a staff member or independent contractor who has satisfactorily completed a training program for this purpose approved by the Board of Nursing and taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine, or pharmacist pursuant to § 54.1-3408 of the Code of Virginia; or the administration shall be performed by a staff member or independent contractor who is licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia to administer medications.

a. The approved training curriculum and materials shall be reviewed by the department at least every three years and revised as necessary.

b. Staff required to have the training specified in subdivision 1 of this subsection and subsection M of this section shall be retrained at three-year intervals.

2. To safely perform medication administration practices listed in 8VAC20-780-510, whenever the center has agreed to administer over-the-counter medications other than topical skin gel, cream, or ointment, the administration must be performed by a staff member or independent contractor who has satisfactorily completed a training course developed or approved by the Department of Education in consultation with the Virginia Department of Health and the Board of Nursing and taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine, or pharmacist; or the administration shall be performed by a staff member or independent contractor who is licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia to administer medications.

a. The course, which shall include competency guidelines, shall reflect currently accepted safe medication administration practices, including instruction and practice in topics such as reading and following manufacturer's instructions; observing relevant laws, policies, and regulations; and demonstrating knowledge of safe practices for medication storage and disposal, recording and reporting responsibilities, and side effects and emergency recognition and response.

b. The approved training curriculum and materials shall be reviewed by the department at least every three years and revised as necessary.

c. Staff required to have the training shall be retrained at three-year intervals.

3. Any child for whom emergency medications (such as albuterol, glucagon, and epinephrine auto injector) have been prescribed shall always be in the care of a staff member or independent contractor who meets the requirements in subdivision 1 of this subsection.

K. Daily health observation training shall include the following:

1. Components of daily health check for children;

2. Inclusion and exclusion of the child from the class when the child is exhibiting physical symptoms that indicate possible illness;

3. Descriptions of how diseases are spread and the procedures or methods for reducing the spread of disease;

4. Information concerning the Virginia Department of Health Notification of Reportable Diseases pursuant to 12VAC5-90-80 and 12VAC5-90-90, also available from the local health department and the website of the Virginia Department of Health; and

5. Staff occupational health and safety practices in accordance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration's bloodborne pathogens regulation (29 CFR 1910.1030).

L. There shall always be at least one staff member on duty who has obtained, within the last three years, instruction in performing the daily health observation of children.

M. The administration of undesignated or stock epinephrine shall be performed by:

1. A nurse at the center or employee of a local health department authorized by a prescriber and trained in the administration of epinephrine;

2. A staff member at the center who is authorized by a prescriber and meets the requirements of subsection J of this section;

3. A staff member who has satisfactorily completed a training course developed or approved by the Department of Education in consultation with the Virginia Department of Health; or

4. A staff member who has satisfactorily completed a course taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine, or pharmacist that includes the following:

a. Recognizing signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis.

b. Emergency procedures for responding to anaphylaxis; and

c. Instructions and procedures for administering epinephrine.

N. Documentation of training shall be kept by the center in a manner that allows for identification by individual staff member, is considered part of the staff member's record, and shall include:

1. Name of staff;

2. Training topic;

3. Evidence that training on each topic required in this section has been completed;

4. Training delivery method;

5. The entity or individual providing training;

6. The number of training hours or credit hours received; and

7. The date of training.

N. O. Medication administration training required in subsection J of this section and daily health observation training required in subsection K of this section may count toward the annual training hours required in this section.

8VAC20-780-510. Medication.

A. The decision to administer medicines at a facility may be limited by center policy to administer:

1. Prescribed medications;

2. Over-the-counter or nonprescription medications; or

3. No medications except those required for emergencies or by law.

B. Prescription and nonprescription medication shall be given to a child:

1. According to the center's written medication policies; and

2. Only with written authorization from the parent.

C. Medication shall be administered by a staff member who is 18 years of age or older.

D. Nonprescription medication shall be administered by a staff member or independent contractor who meets the requirements in 8VAC20-780-245 J 1 or J 2.

E. The center's procedures for administering medication shall:

1. Include any general restrictions of the center.

2. For nonprescription medication, be consistent with the manufacturer's instructions for age, duration, and dosage.

3. Include duration of the parent's authorization for medication, provided that it shall expire or be renewed after 10 work days. Long-term prescription drug use and over-the-counter medication may be allowed with written authorization from the child's physician and parent.

4. Include methods to prevent use of outdated medication.

F. The medication authorization shall be available to staff during the entire time it is effective.

G. Medication shall be labeled with the child's name, the name of the medication, the dosage amount, and the time or times to be given. Undesignated or stock epinephrine kept at the center pursuant to § 22.1-289.059 of the Code of Virginia shall be labeled with the name of the medication and the dosage amount.

H. Nonprescription medication shall be in the original container with the direction label attached.

I. The center may administer prescription medication that would normally be administered by a parent or guardian to a child, provided:

1. The medication is administered by a staff member or an independent contractor who meets the requirements in 8VAC20-780-245 J;

2. The center has obtained written authorization from a parent or guardian;

3. The center administers only those drugs that were dispensed from a pharmacy and maintained in the original, labeled container; and

4. The center administers drugs only to the child identified on the prescription label in accordance with the prescriber's instructions pertaining to dosage, frequency, and manner of administration.

J. When needed, medication shall be refrigerated.

K. When medication is stored in a refrigerator used for food, the medications shall be stored together in a container or in a clearly defined area away from food.

L. Medication, except for those prescriptions designated otherwise by written physician's order, including refrigerated medication and staff's personal medication, shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.

M. If a key is used, the key shall not be accessible to the children.

N. Centers shall keep a record of medication given children, which shall include the following:

1. Child to whom the medication was administered;

2. Amount and type of medication administered to the child;

3. The day and time the medication was administered to the child;

4. Staff member administering the medication;

5. Any adverse reactions; and

6. Any medication error.

O. Staff shall inform parents immediately of any adverse reactions to medication administered and any medication error.

P. When an authorization for medication expires, the parent shall be notified that the medication needs to be picked up within 14 days or the parent must renew the authorization. Medications that are not picked up by the parent within 14 days will be disposed of by the center by either dissolving the medication down the sink or flushing it down the toilet.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-7599; Filed October 29, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Title of Regulation: 8VAC20-790. Child Care Program (amending 8VAC20-790-250, 8VAC20-790-350, 8VAC20-790-400, 8VAC20-790-520, 8VAC20-790-600, 8VAC20-790-770).

Statutory Authority: § 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Tatanishia Armstrong, Legislative Consultant, Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety, 101 North 14th Street, 14th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 382-5047, or email tatanishia.armstrong@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations necessary to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia. Section 22.1-289.046 of the Code of Virginia requires the board to adopt regulations for the activities, services, and facilities to be employed by persons and agencies required to be licensed under Chapter 14.1 (§ 22.1-289.02 et seq.) of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia, which shall be designed to ensure that such activities, services, and facilities are conducive to the welfare of the children under the control of such persons or agencies.

Purpose: This action is essential to enhancing the health, safety, and welfare of children in care because it protects children with undiagnosed allergies in cases where exposure to the allergen may result in anaphylaxis that could be deadly. The action is required to comply with the provisions of Chapters 122 and 123 of the 2023 Acts of Assembly.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This action is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because it is required by Chapters 122 and 123 of the 2023 Acts of Assembly.

Substance: The amendments (i) add requirements for training and policies to address the possession and administration of epinephrine at subsidy vendor child day centers; (ii) add requirements for family day home providers to be trained in the administration of epinephrine and provide notification to parents; and (iii) include technical edits.

Issues: The advantage of this action to the public and the Commonwealth is that the requirement for stock epinephrine to be available in centers increases protections for children and could potentially save the life of a child who experiences anaphylactic shock as a result of an allergic reaction. There are no disadvantages to this action.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. Pursuant to Chapter 122 and Chapter 123 of the 2023 Acts of Assembly (legislation), which amended § 22.1-289.059 of the Code of Virginia, the Board of Education (board) proposes several amendments to the regulation concerning the possession and administration of epinephrine at child day programs.

Background. The regulation defines Child Care Subsidy Program as the Department of Education (DOE) program that: assists eligible low-income families with the cost of child care and those activities that assist eligible families in the arrangement for or purchase of child care for children for care that is less than a 24-hour day. It also includes activities that promote parental choice, consumer education to help parents make informed choices about child care, activities to enhance health and safety standards established by the state, and activities that increase and enhance child care and early childhood development resources in the community. The proposed amendments pertain to child day centers and family day homes that participate in the Child Care Subsidy Program.

Child Day Centers. Consistent with § 22.1-289.02 of the Code of Virginia, the regulation defines child day center as a child day program offered to (i) two or more children less than 13 years of age in a facility that is not the residence of the provider or of any of the children in care or (ii) 13 or more children at any location. Pursuant to the legislation, the board proposes to require in the regulation that (i) child day centers possess and store weightbased dosages of undesignated or stock epinephrine in a locked or inaccessible container or area in the center; (ii) the undesignated or stock epinephrine is only administered by a nurse at the center, an employee of a local health department who is authorized by a prescriber and trained in the administration of epinephrine, or staff at the center authorized by a prescriber and trained in the administration of epinephrine, and (iii) at least one of the above individuals has the means to access the epinephrine at all times during regular facility hours. If the person administering the epinephrine is neither a nurse nor an employee of a local health department, the board proposes to require that their training must be from (i) a program for this purpose developed by the Board of Nursing and taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine, or pharmacist, (ii) a course on this topic developed or approved by DOE in consultation with the Department of Health (VDH), or (iii) a course taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine, or pharmacist that includes the following: (a) recognizing signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis, (b) emergency procedures for responding to anaphylaxis, and (c) instructions and procedures for administering epinephrine. The proposed regulation expands upon the legislation, which only requires that the employee be trained in the administration of epinephrine.

Family Day Homes. Consistent with § 22.1-289.02 of the Code of Virginia, the regulation defines family day home as a child day program offered in the residence of the provider or the home of any of the children in care for one through 12 children less than 13 years of age, exclusive of the provider's own children and any children who reside in the home, when at least one child receives care for compensation. The legislation, as codified in § 22.1-289.059 of the Code of Virginia, states that the board shall amend its regulations to require each family day home provider or at least one other caregiver employed by such provider in the family day home to be trained in the administration of epinephrine and to notify the parents of each child who receives care in such family day home whether the provider stores an appropriate weight-based dosage of epinephrine in the residence or home in which the family day home operates. The board proposes to amend the regulation in this manner. The epinephrine training requirements are essentially the same as for child day centers. Unlike child day centers, possession of epinephrine would be optional for family day homes. The family day homes would be required to notify parents in writing whether it stores an appropriate weight-based dosage of undesignated or stock epinephrine in the residence or home in which the family day home operates.

Estimated Benefits and Costs. Anaphylaxis is a severe, life-threatening allergic reaction. It can happen seconds or minutes after a person has been exposed to an allergen.2 Immediate use of an epinephrine autoinjector can keep anaphylaxis from worsening and can be lifesaving.3 Thus, the proposed requirements that child day centers possess and store appropriate weight-based dosages of undesignated or stock epinephrine, and that at least one person qualified to administer epinephrine has access to the epinephrine at all times during regular facility hours, has the potential to save the lives of children with undiagnosed allergies in cases when exposure to the allergen may result in anaphylaxis. An EpiPen package comes with two auto-injectors of 0.3 mg and is approved for adults and children who weigh 66 lbs or more. The EpiPen JR package comes with two auto-injectors of 0.15 mg and is approved for children who weigh 33 lbs to 66 lbs.4 There are now also Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved epinephrine auto-injectors of 0.1 mg for infants and toddlers.5 Retail prices for a package of two brand name epinephrine auto-injectors range from $650 to $750 without insurance.6 FDA authorized generic epinephrine is available from CVS at $109.99 per two-pack.7 Epinephrine autoinjectors have a shelf life of 12 to 18 months from the date of manufacture.8 For a child day center with children that fall into all three weight groups, and uses the FDA-authorized generic epinephrine from CVS, it would cost approximately $330 annually to maintain non-expired epinephrine on hand.9 DOE has indicated that it has no estimate for the costs of training for epinephrine administration. The American Red Cross has an online course called Anaphylaxis and Epinephrine Auto-Injector.10 The following is the course description: This online course will teach you the signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis and how to care for a person having a severe allergic reaction including how to administer epinephrine using an auto-injector device. The course which includes video activities that reinforce key information and a learning assessment will take approximately 30 minutes to complete. The fee is $35, but it does not appear to meet all of the requirements for training as described in the proposed regulation. Accordingly, the potential cost of the required training is not known.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. The proposed amendments would affect the 531 child day programs (includes child day centers and family day homes) that participate in the Child Care Subsidy Program. DOE believes that most would qualify as small businesses. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.11 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.12 The costs from requiring that child day centers possess and store appropriate weight-based dosages of undesignated or stock epinephrine stem from the legislation. Requiring training for the administration of epinephrine is also in the legislation, but the proposed text on training is more restrictive than the legislation. For example, the $35 half hour online course from the American Red Cross would appear to qualify for training as described in the legislation, but appears to not qualify in the proposed regulatory text. DOE does not have estimates for training costs that meet the proposed regulatory options, and the option of completing a training course developed or approved by DOE in consultation with VDH has not been developed, but it seems likely the costs in dollars or time would be higher to meet the regulatory requirements than the statutory requirement. Thus, an adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses13 Affected.14

Types and Estimated Number of Small Businesses Affected: Per DOE, most of the 531 child day programs would qualify as small businesses.

Costs and Other Effects: Requiring that child day centers possess and store appropriate weight-based dosages of undesignated or stock epinephrine increases costs for the small centers as described above. Requiring training for child day centers and family day homes also increases costs.

Alternative Method that Minimizes Adverse Impact: Permitting anaphylaxis and epinephrine auto-injector training via online courses such as that provided by the American Red Cross could potentially reduce adverse impact.

Localities15 Affected.16 The proposed amendments neither appear to disproportionally affect particular localities nor affect costs for local governments.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposed amendments do not appear to substantively affect total employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The increase in costs, which are largely due to the legislation, may moderately reduce the value of some child day programs. The proposed amendments do not affect real estate development costs.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 Source: Mayo Clinic https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/anaphylaxis/symptoms-causes/syc-20351468.

3 Source: Mayo Clinic https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/anaphylaxis/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20351474.

4 See https://www.goodrx.com/epinephrine-epipen/how-to-save-cost.

5 See https://www.fda.gov/media/127806/download.

6 Supra, note 4.

7 See https://www.cvs.com/content/epipen-alternative.

8 See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720482/.

9 Average of $110 per epinephrine auto-injector package, and three separate packages for the three different weight groups.

10 See https://www.redcross.org/take-a-class/classes/anaphylaxis-and-epinephrine-auto-injector---onlinecourse/a6R0V0000015EUe.html.

11 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

12 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

13 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

14 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

15 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

16 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to the Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

Pursuant to Chapters 122 and 123 of the 2023 Acts of Assembly, the amendments (i) require center-based programs that participate in the Child Care Subsidy Program to implement policies for the possession and administration of epinephrine to be administered by certain authorized and trained individuals to any child believed to be having an anaphylactic reaction; (ii) require that at least one authorized and trained individual has the means at all times during regular facility hours to access any such appropriate weight-based dosage of epinephrine that is stored in a locked or otherwise generally inaccessible container or area; and (iii) require each family day home provider or at least one other caregiver employed by such provider in the family day home to be trained in the administration of epinephrine and to notify the parents of each child who receives care in such family day home whether the provider stores an appropriate weight-based dosage of epinephrine in the residence or home in which the family day home operates.

8VAC20-790-250. Caregiver training and development.

A. Prior to approval as a subsidy vendor, the perspective vendor shall complete Virginia Preservice Training for Child Care Staff sponsored by the Department of Education, which shall include the following topics and training modules:

1. Building and physical premises safety;

2. Emergency preparedness and response planning;

3. Prevention of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and safe sleep practices;

4. Administration of medication, consistent with standards of parental consent;

5. Prevention of shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma (AHT);

6. Prevention of and response to emergencies due to food and allergic reactions;

7. Recognizing child abuse and neglect and reporting responsibilities;

8. Preventing the spread of disease, including immunization requirements;

9. Handling and storage of hazardous materials and appropriate disposal of diapers and other items contaminated by body fluids;

10. Transportation;

11. Foundations of child development;

12. Inclusion: Exploring the meaning and the mindset;

13. Oral health; and

14. Introduction to the Child Care Subsidy Program.

B. Within the first 90 days of employment or service, all caregivers shall complete Virginia Preservice Training for Child Care Staff sponsored by the Department of Education, which shall include training on the following topics and training modules:

1. Building and physical premises safety;

2. Emergency preparedness and response planning;

3. Prevention of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and safe sleep practices;

4. Administration of medication, consistent with standards of parental consent;

5. Prevention of shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma (AHT);

6. Prevention of and response to emergencies due to food and allergic reactions;

7. Recognizing child abuse and neglect and reporting responsibilities;

8. Preventing the spread of disease, including immunization requirements;

9. Handling and storage of hazardous materials and appropriate disposal of diapers and other items contaminated by body fluids;

10. Transportation;

11. Foundations of child development;

12. Inclusion: Exploring the meaning and the mindset;

13. Oral health; and

14. Introduction to the Child Care Subsidy Program.

C. Orientation training for caregivers shall be completed on the following specific topics prior to the caregiver working alone with children and within seven days of the date of employment or the date of subsidy vendor approval:

1. Playground safety procedures;

2. Responsibilities for reporting suspected child abuse or neglect;

3. Confidentiality;

4. Supervision of children, including arrival and dismissal procedures;

5. Procedures for action in the case of lost or missing children, ill or injured children, and medical and general emergencies;

6. Medication administration procedures, if applicable;

7. Emergency preparedness plan as required in 8VAC20-790-420 B;

8. Procedures for response to natural and man-made disasters;

9. Prevention of shaken baby syndrome or abusive head trauma, including coping with crying babies and fussy or distraught children;

10. Prevention of sudden infant death syndrome and use of safe sleeping practices;

11. Caregivers who work with children who have food allergies shall receive training in preventing exposure to foods to which the child is allergic, preventing cross contamination, and recognizing and responding to any allergic reactions; and

12. Transportation.

D. All caregivers shall have, within 90 days of employment or 90 days from subsidy vendor approval:

1. Current certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) appropriate to the ages of children in care. The training shall include an in-person competency demonstration; and

2. Current certification in first aid appropriate to the ages of children in care. However, a caregiver who is a registered nurse or licensed practical nurse with a current license from the Board of Nursing shall not be required to obtain first aid certification.

During the 90-day period, there must always be at least one caregiver with current cardiopulmonary and first aid training present during operating hours of the family day home.

E. CPR and first aid training may count toward the annual training hours required in subsection H I of this section if documentation for training as required in subdivision 5 of 8VAC20-790-200 is maintained.

F. Caregivers who work directly with children shall, in addition to preservice and orientation training required in subsections A through D of this section, annually attend at least 16 hours of training, to include the department's health and safety update course. This training shall be related to child safety, child development, health and safety in the family day home environment, and any required department sponsored training.

G. To safely perform medication administration practices, whenever a vendor agrees to administer prescribed medications, the (i) administration shall be performed by a caregiver who (i) has satisfactorily completed a training program for this purpose developed by the Board of Nursing and taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine, or pharmacist or (ii) administration shall be performed by a caregiver who is licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia to administer medications.

The vendor may determine by policy what medications, if any, will be administered at its family day home, including prescription medications or over-the-counter or nonprescription medications.

H. Caregivers The administration of undesignated or stock epinephrine shall be performed by the vendor or a caregiver who:

1. Meets the requirements of subsection G of this section;

2. Has satisfactorily completed a training course developed or approved by the Department of Education in consultation with the Virginia Department of Health; or

3. Has completed a course taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine, or pharmacist that includes the following:

a. Recognizing signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis.

b. Emergency procedures for responding to anaphylaxis; and

c. Instructions and procedures for administering epinephrine.

I. The vendor and caregivers required to have the training required in subsection I subsections G and H of this section shall be retrained at three-year intervals.

J. The vendor, or at least one other caregiver, shall receive training in the administration of epinephrine pursuant to subsections H and I of this section.

8VAC20-790-350. Parental involvement and notifications.

A. The caregiver shall notify the parent immediately if a child is lost, requires emergency medical treatment, sustains a serious injury, or dies.

B. The caregiver shall notify the parent by the end of the day of any known minor injuries.

C. The caregiver shall maintain a written record of children's serious and minor injuries in which entries are made the day of occurrence. The record shall include the following:

1. Date and time of injury;

2. Name of injured child;

3. Type and circumstance of the injury;

4. Caregiver present and treatment;

5. Date and time when parents were notified; and

6. Caregiver and parent signatures.

D. Parents shall be notified immediately of any confirmed or suspected allergic reactions and the ingestion of any food identified in the written care plan required in 8VAC20-790-190 B 12 even if a reaction did not occur.

E. Parents shall be informed of the vendor's emergency preparedness plan.

F. Caregivers shall promptly inform parents when persistent behavioral problems are observed and identified.

G. Caregivers shall provide information weekly to parents about the child's health, development, behavior, adjustment, or needs.

H. Parents shall be informed of the reason for a child's termination from care.

I. A custodial parent shall be admitted to any child day program. Such right of admission shall apply only while the child is in the care of the vendor, pursuant to § 22.1-289.054 of the Code of Virginia.

J. When children at the family day home have been exposed to a communicable disease listed in the Virginia Department of Health's current communicable disease chart, the parents shall be notified within 24 hours or the next business day of the vendor's having been informed unless forbidden by law. Children's exposure to life threatening life-threatening diseases shall be reported to parents immediately.

K. Parents shall be notified in writing of whether the provider stores an appropriate weight-based dosage of undesignated or stock epinephrine in the residence or home in which the family day home operates as required by § 22.1-289.059 of the Code of Virginia.

8VAC20-790-400. General requirements for medication administration.

A. Prescription and nonprescription medications shall be given to a child:

1. According to the home's written medication policies,; and

2. Only with written authorization from the parent.

B. The vendor may administer prescription medication that would normally be administered by a parent or guardian to a child, provided:

1. The medication is administered by a caregiver who meets the requirements of 8VAC20-790-250 I and J G and H;

2. The caregiver administers only those drugs that were dispensed from a pharmacy and maintained in the original, labeled container; and

3. The caregiver administers drugs only to the child identified on the prescription label in accordance with the prescriber's instructions pertaining to dosage, frequency, and manner of administration.

C. The vendor may administer nonprescription medication, provided the medication is:

1. Administered by a caregiver 18 years of age or older;

2. Labeled with the child's name;

3. In the original container with the manufacturer's direction label attached; and

4. Given only at the dose, duration, and method of administration specified on the manufacturer's label for the age or weight of the child needing the medication.

D. Nonprescription medication shall not be used beyond the expiration date of the product.

E. Medications for children in care shall be stored separately from medications for household members and caregivers.

F. When needed, medication shall be refrigerated.

G. When medication is stored in a refrigerator used for food, the medications shall be stored together in a container or in a clearly defined area away from food.

H. Medication, except for those prescriptions designated otherwise by written physician's order, including refrigerated medication and medications for caregivers and household members, shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children. If a key is used, the key shall be inaccessible to the children.

I. The vendor shall keep a record of prescription and nonprescription medication given children, which shall include the following:

1. Name of the child to whom the medication was administered;

2. Amount and type of medication administered to the child;

3. The day and time the medication was administered to the child;

4. Name of the caregiver administering the medication;

5. Any adverse reactions; and

6. Any medication error.

8VAC20-790-520. Operational responsibilities.

A. The vendor shall ensure compliance with the standards in this part, the terms of the vendor agreement, and all relevant federal, state, or local laws and regulations.

B. Pursuant to § 22.1-289.040 of the Code of Virginia, the vendor shall ensure that the applicant and any staff who is or will be involved in the day-to-day operations of the center or is or will be alone with, in control of, or supervising one or more of the children (i) has not been convicted of any barrier crime as defined in § 19.2-392.02 of the Code of Virginia and (ii) is not the subject of a founded complaint of child abuse or neglect within or outside the Commonwealth.

C. The vendor shall ensure that the center does not exceed the capacity of children cared for as allowed by law or regulation.

D. When at least one child receives care for compensation, all children who are in care and supervision count in the capacity of children being cared for. When children 13 years or older are enrolled in the program and receive supervision in the program, they shall be counted in the number of children receiving care, and the vendor shall comply with the standards in this part for these children.

E. The vendor shall inform all staff who work with children of children's allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions.

F. The vendor shall maintain, in a way that is accessible to all staff who work with children, a current written list of all children's allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions. This list shall be dated and kept confidential in each room or area where children are present.

G. Religious exempt child day centers that are exempt from licensure in accordance with § 22.1-289.031 of the Code of Virginia shall be in compliance with all requirements of § 22.1-289.031.

H. The vendor shall implement policies for the possession and administration of undesignated or stock epinephrine pursuant to § 22.1-289.059 of the Code of Virginia that ensure:

1. Undesignated or stock epinephrine is only administered by a nurse at the center, an employee of a local health department who is authorized by a prescriber and trained in the administration of epinephrine, or staff at the center authorized by a prescriber and trained in the administration of epinephrine pursuant to 8VAC20-790-600 J to a child believed to be having an anaphylactic reaction;

2. At least one nurse at the center, an employee of a local health department who is authorized by a prescriber and trained in the administration of epinephrine, or staff at the center authorized by a prescriber and trained in the administration of epinephrine pursuant to 8VAC20-790-600 J has the means to access at all times during regular facility hours appropriate weight-based dosages of undesignated or stock epinephrine based on the children in care at the center; and

3. Undesignated or stock epinephrine is stored in a locked or inaccessible container or area in the center.

8VAC20-790-600. Staff training and development.

A. Prior to approval as a subsidy vendor, the vendor or designee shall complete the Virginia Preservice Training for Child Care Staff, which shall include training on the following topics and training modules:

1. Building and physical premises safety;

2. Emergency preparedness and response planning;

3. Prevention of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and safe sleep practices;

4. Administration of medication, consistent with standards of parental consent;

5. Prevention of shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma (AHT);

6. Prevention of and response to emergencies due to food and allergic reactions;

7. Recognizing child abuse and neglect and reporting responsibilities;

8. Preventing the spread of disease, including immunization requirements;

9. Handling and storage of hazardous materials and appropriate disposal of diapers and other items contaminated by body fluids;

10. Transportation;

11. Foundations of child development;

12. Inclusion: Exploring the meaning and the mindset;

13. Oral health; and

14. Introduction to the Child Care Subsidy Program.

B. Within the first 90 days of employment or subsidy vendor approval, all staff who work directly with children shall complete Virginia Preservice Training for Child Care Staff, which shall include training on the following topics and training modules:

1. Building and physical premises safety;

2. Emergency preparedness and response planning;

3. Prevention of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and safe sleep practices;

4. Administration of medication, consistent with standards of parental consent;

5. Prevention of shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma (AHT);

6. Prevention of and response to emergencies due to food and allergic reactions;

7. Recognizing child abuse and neglect and reporting responsibilities;

8. Preventing the spread of disease, including immunization requirements;

9. Handling and storage of hazardous materials and appropriate disposal of diapers and other items contaminated by body fluids;

10. Transportation;

11. Foundations of child development;

12. Inclusion: Exploring the meaning and mindset;

13. Oral health; and

14. Introduction to the Child Care Subsidy Program.

C. Orientation training for staff shall be completed on the following facility specific facility-specific topics prior to the staff member working alone with children and within seven days of the date of employment or the date of subsidy vendor approval:

1. Playground safety procedures;

2. Responsibilities for reporting suspected child abuse or neglect;

3. Confidentiality;

4. Supervision of children, including arrival and dismissal procedures;

5. Procedures for action in the case of lost or missing children, ill or injured children, and medical and general emergencies;

6. Medication administration procedures, if applicable;

7. Emergency preparedness plan as required in 8VAC20-790-790 B;

8. Prevention of shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma, including coping with crying babies and fussy or distraught children;

9. Prevention of sudden infant death syndrome and use of safe sleeping practices;

10. Staff who work with children that have food allergies shall receive training in preventing exposure to foods to which the child is allergic, preventing cross contamination, and recognizing and responding to any allergic reactions; and

11. Transportation.

D. All staff who work directly with children shall have, within 90 days of the date of employment or 90 days from subsidy vendor approval:

1. Current certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) appropriate to the ages of children in care. The training shall include an in-person competency demonstration; and

2. Current certification in first aid appropriate to the ages of children in care. However, staff who is a registered nurse or licensed practical nurse with a current license from the Board of Nursing shall not be required to obtain first aid certification.

During the 90-day period, there must always be at least one staff with current CPR and first aid training present during operating hours of the center.

E. CPR and First Aid first aid training may count toward the annual training hours required in subsection H of this section if documentation for training as required in subdivision 5 of 8VAC20-790-550 is maintained.

F. Staff who work directly with children shall, in addition to preservice and orientation training required in subsections A through D of this section, annually attend at least 16 hours of training and staff development activities, to include the department's health and safety update course. Training shall be related to child safety, child development, the function of the center, and any required department sponsored training.

G. To safely perform medication administration practices, whenever a vendor agrees to administer prescribed medications, the (i) administration shall be (i) performed by a staff member who has satisfactorily completed a training program for this purpose developed by the Board of Nursing and taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine, or pharmacist; or (ii) administration shall be performed by a staff member who is licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia to administer medications.

The administration of medicines by a vendor may be limited by policy to:

1. Prescription medications;

2. Over-the-counter or nonprescription medications; or

3. No medications.

H. Staff required to have the training specified in subsection subsections G, I, and J of this section shall be retrained at three-year intervals.

I. There shall be at least one staff on duty who has obtained, within the last three years, instruction in performing a daily health observation of children. Daily health observation training shall include:

1. Components of daily health check for children;

2. Inclusion and exclusion of a child when the child is exhibiting symptoms that indicate possible illness;

3. Description of how diseases are spread and procedures and methods for reducing the spread of disease;

4. Information concerning the Virginia Department of Health Notification of Reportable Diseases pursuant to 12VAC5-90-80 and 12VAC5-90-90, also available from the local health department and the website of the Virginia Department of Health; and

5. Staff occupational health and safety practices in accordance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration's bloodborne pathogens regulation (29 CFR 1910.1030).

J. The administration of undesignated or stock epinephrine shall be performed by:

1. A nurse at the center or employee of a local health department authorized by a prescriber and trained in the administration of epinephrine;

2. A staff member at the center who is authorized by a prescriber and meets the requirements of subsection G of this section;

3. A staff member who has satisfactorily completed a training course developed or approved by the Department of Education in consultation with the Virginia Department of Health; or

4. A staff member who has satisfactorily completed a course taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine, or pharmacist that includes the following:

a. Recognizing signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis.

b. Emergency procedures for responding to anaphylaxis; and

c. Instructions and procedures for administering epinephrine.

8VAC20-790-770. Medication.

A. The vendor may administer prescription medication to a child with written permission of the parent, provided:

1. The medication is administered by a staff who meets the requirements of 8VAC20-790-600 I and J G and H;

2. The staff administers only those drugs that were dispensed from a pharmacy and maintained in the original, labeled container; and

3. The staff administers drugs only to the child identified on the prescription label in accordance with the prescriber's instructions pertaining to dosage, frequency, and manner of administration.

B. The vendor may administer over-the-counter or nonprescription medication to a child with written permission from the parent, provided the medication is:

1. Administered by a staff 18 years of age or older;

2. Labeled with the child's name;

3. In the original container with the manufacturer's direction label attached; and

4. Given only at the dose, duration, and method of administration specified on the manufacturer's label for the age or weight of the child needing the medication.

C. When needed, medication shall be refrigerated.

D. Medication, except for those prescriptions designated otherwise by written physician's order, including refrigerated medication and staff's personal medication, shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.

E. The vendor shall keep a record of prescription and nonprescription medication given to children, which shall include the following:

1. Name of the child to whom the medication was administered;

2. Amount and name of medication administered to the child;

3. The day and time the medication was administered to the child;

4. Name of staff administering the medication;

5. Any adverse reaction; and

6. Any medication error.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-7611; Filed October 28, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Title of Regulation: 8VAC20-800. Standards for Licensed Family Day Homes (amending 8VAC20-800-70, 8VAC20-800-220).

Statutory Authority: §§ 22.1-16 and 22.1-289.046 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Alyson Williams, Legislative Consultant, Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety, 101 North 14th Street, 14th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 774-6273, or email alyson.williams@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations necessary to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia. Section 22.1-289.046 of the Code of Virginia requires the board to adopt regulations for the activities, services, and facilities to be employed by persons and agencies required to be licensed under Chapter 14.1 (§ 22.1-289.02 et seq.) of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia, which shall be designed to ensure that such activities, services, and facilities are conducive to the welfare of the children under the control of such persons or agencies.

Purpose: The action is essential to enhancing the health, safety, and welfare of children in care because it protects children with undiagnosed allergies in cases when exposure to the allergen may result in anaphylaxis that could be deadly. The action is required to comply with the provisions of Chapters 122 and 123 of the 2023 Acts of Assembly.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This action is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because it is required by Chapters 122 and 123 of the 2023 Acts of Assembly.

Substance: The amendments require (i) each family day home provider or at least one other caregiver employed by such provider to be trained in epinephrine administration and (ii) each family day home provider to notify the parents of each child who receives care in such family day home whether the provider stores an appropriate weight-based dosage of epinephrine in the residence or home in which the family day home operates. The amendments include technical edits.

Issues: The advantage of this action is that the requirement that each family day home provider or at least one other caregiver employed by such provider to be trained in epinephrine administration increases protections for children by ensuring that caregivers are trained to respond to anaphylaxis and could potentially save the life of a child who experiences anaphylactic shock as a result of an allergic reaction. The requirement that family day homes notify the parents of each child who receives care in such family day home whether the provider stores an appropriate weight-based dosage of epinephrine supports parental choice by allowing parents to make informed decisions related to child care placement based on the availability of undesignated epinephrine in a family day home. There are no disadvantages to this regulatory action.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. Pursuant to Chapter 122 and Chapter 123 of the 2023 Acts of Assembly (mandate), which amended § 22.1-289.059 of the Code of Virginia, the Board of Education (board) proposes amendments to the regulation concerning the possession and administration of epinephrine at family day homes licensed by the Virginia Department of Education.

Background. Consistent with § 22.1-289.02 of the Code of Virginia, the regulation defines family day home as a child day program offered in the residence of the provider or the home of any of the children in care for one through 12 children less than 13 years of age, exclusive of the provider's own children and any children who reside in the home, when at least one child receives care for compensation. The mandate, as codified in § 22.1-289.059 of the Code of Virginia, states that the board shall amend its regulations to require each family day home provider or at least one other caregiver employed by such provider in the family day home to be trained in the administration of epinephrine and to notify the parents of each child who receives care in such family day home whether the provider stores an appropriate weight-based dosage of epinephrine in the residence or home in which the family day home operates. The Board proposes to amend the regulation in this manner. Possession of epinephrine would be optional for family day homes. The family day homes would be required to notify parents in writing whether it stores an appropriate weight-based dosage of undesignated or stock epinephrine in the residence or home in which the family day home operates. The proposed text specifies that the provider or at least one other caregiver shall receive training in the administration of epinephrine, and: The administration of undesignated or stock epinephrine shall be performed by the provider or a caregiver who (i) [has satisfactorily completed a training program for this purpose developed or approved by the Board of Nursing and taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine, or pharmacist], (ii) has satisfactorily completed a training course developed or approved by the Department of Education in consultation with the Department of Health, or (iii) completed a course taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine, or pharmacist that includes the following: 1. Recognizing signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis; 2. Emergency procedures for responding to anaphylaxis; and 3. Instructions and procedures for administering epinephrine. This requirement applies to all family day homes, even those that decide not to possess epinephrine.

Estimated Benefits and Costs. Anaphylaxis is a severe, life-threatening allergic reaction. It can happen seconds or minutes after a person has been exposed to an allergen.2 Immediate use of an epinephrine autoinjector can keep anaphylaxis from worsening and can be lifesaving.3 Thus, if family day homes choose to store undesignated or stock epinephrine, requiring that at least one person is qualified to administer epinephrine has the potential to save the lives of children with undiagnosed allergies in cases when exposure to the allergen may result in anaphylaxis. An EpiPen package comes with two auto-injectors of 0.3 mg and is approved for adults and children who weigh 66 lbs or more. The EpiPen JR package comes with two auto-injectors of 0.15 mg and is approved for children who weigh 33 lbs to 66 lbs.4 There are now also Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved epinephrine auto-injectors of 0.1 mg for infants and toddlers.5 Retail prices for a package of two brand name epinephrine auto-injectors range from $650 to $750 without insurance.6 FDA-authorized generic epinephrine is available from CVS at $109.99 per two-pack.7 Epinephrine autoinjectors have a shelf life of 12 to 18 months from the date of manufacture.8 For a child day center with children that fall into all three weight groups, and uses the FDA-authorized generic epinephrine from CVS, it would cost approximately $330 annually to maintain non-expired epinephrine on hand.9 DOE reports that it is already under contract with an outside entity that provides training in medication administration, including epinephrine administration. DOE is proposing a training program for staff at family day homes on the administration of epinephrine by this entity. If the training proposal is approved by VDH, the undesignated or stock epinephrine training would be developed. DOE's plan is for the training to be offered at no cost to the family day homes.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. The proposed amendments would affect the 1,338 licensed family day homes. DOE believes that all would qualify as small businesses. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.10 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.11 As acquiring and storing epinephrine would be optional, and since it appears that the training may be offered for free to the family day homes, no adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses12 Affected.13 As noted above, all family day homes appear to be small businesses. The proposed regulation does not appear to introduce costs beyond those already required by the legislation.

Localities14 Affected.15 The proposed amendments neither appear to disproportionally affect particular localities nor affect costs for local governments.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposed amendments do not appear to substantively affect total employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposed amendments do not substantively affect the use and use value of private property or real estate development costs.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 Source: Mayo Clinic https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/anaphylaxis/symptoms-causes/syc-20351468.

3 Source: Mayo Clinic https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/anaphylaxis/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20351474.

4 See https://www.goodrx.com/epinephrine-epipen/how-to-save-cost.

5 See https://www.fda.gov/media/127806/download.

6 Supra, note 4.

7 See https://www.cvs.com/content/epipen-alternative.

8 See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720482/.

9 Average of $110 per epinephrine auto-injector package, and three separate packages for the three different weight groups.

10 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

11 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

12 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

13 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

14 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

15 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to the Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

Pursuant to Chapters 122 and 123 of the 2023 Acts of Assembly, the amendments require (i) each family day home provider or at least one other caregiver employed by such provider to be trained in epinephrine administration and (ii) each family day home provider to notify the parents of each child who receives care in such family day home whether the provider stores an appropriate weight-based dosage of epinephrine in the residence or home in which the family day home operates.

8VAC20-800-70. Written information for parents.

A. Before the child's first day of attendance, parents shall be provided, in writing, the following information:

1. Operating information, including the hours and days of operation, holidays, or other times closed, and the telephone number where a message can be left for a caregiver;

2. Schedule of fees and payment plans;

3. Check in Check-in and check out check-out procedures;

4. Policies for the administration of medications;

5. Whether or not there is liability insurance of at least $100,000 per occurrence and $300,000 aggregate in force on the family day home operation as required by § 22.1-289.050 of the Code of Virginia;

6. Requirement for the family day home to notify the parent when the child becomes ill and for the parent to arrange to have the child picked up as soon as possible if so requested by the home;

7. Requirement for the parent to inform the family day home within 24 hours or the next business day after his the child or any member of the immediate household has developed any reportable communicable disease, as defined by the State Board of Health, except for life-threatening diseases, which must be reported immediately;

8. Requirement for the child to be adequately immunized as required by 8VAC20-800-90;

9. Requirement for paid caregivers to report suspected child abuse or neglect according to § 63.2-1509 of the Code of Virginia;

10. Custodial parent's right to be admitted to the family day home any time the child is in care as required by § 22.1-289.054 of the Code of Virginia;

11. General daily schedule that is appropriate for the age of the enrolling child;

12. Policies for the provision of food;

13. Presence of a pet or animal in the home;

14. Discipline policies, including acceptable and unacceptable discipline measures;

15. Amount of time per week that an adult assistant or substitute provider instead of the provider is scheduled to care for the child and the name of the adult assistant or substitute provider;

16. Provisions of the family day home's emergency preparedness and response plan;

17. Parental notifications required in 8VAC20-800-650;

18. Policies for termination of care; and

19. Whether the provider stores an appropriate weight-based dosage of undesignated or stock epinephrine in the residence or home in which the family day home operates as required by § 22.1-289.059 of the Code of Virginia; and

20. Address of the website of the department, with a note that a copy of this chapter and additional information about the family day home may be obtained from the website, including compliance history that includes information after July 1, 2003.

B. The provider shall obtain the parent's written acknowledgement of the receipt of the information in this section.

8VAC20-800-220. Medication administration training.

A. To safely perform medication administration practices listed in 8VAC20-800-710 and 8VAC20-800-720 whenever the family day home has agreed to administer prescription medications or nonprescription medications, the administration shall be performed by a caregiver who:

1. Has satisfactorily completed a training program for this purpose developed or approved by the Board of Nursing and taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine, or pharmacist; or

2. Is licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia to administer medications.

B. Caregivers The administration of undesignated or stock epinephrine shall be performed by the provider or a caregiver who:

1. Meets the requirements of subsection A of this section;

2. Has satisfactorily completed a training course developed or approved by the Department of Education in consultation with the Virginia Department of Health; or

3. Completed a course taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine, or pharmacist that includes the following:

a. Recognizing signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis;

b. Emergency procedures for responding to anaphylaxis; and

c. Instructions and procedures for administering epinephrine.

C. The provider and caregivers required to have the training in subdivision A 1 and subsection B of this section shall be retrained at three-year intervals.

D. The provider or at least one other caregiver shall receive training in the administration of epinephrine pursuant to subsections B and C of this section.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-7612; Filed October 29, 2025
TITLE 8. EDUCATION
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 8. EDUCATION

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Fast-Track Regulation

Title of Regulation: 8VAC20-850. Voluntary Registration of Family Day Homes - Requirements for Providers (amending 8VAC20-850-20, 8VAC20-850-90).

Statutory Authority: §§ 22.1-16 and 22.1-289.015 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Alyson Williams, Legislative Consultant, Department of Education, Office of Child Care Health and Safety, 101 North 14th Street, 14th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 774-6273, or email alyson.williams@doe.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 22.1-16 of the Code of Virginia authorizes the State Board of Education to promulgate regulations necessary to carry out its powers and duties and the provisions of Title 22.1 of the Code of Virginia. Section 22.1-289.015 of the Code of Virginia requires the board to adopt regulations for voluntarily registered family day homes.

Purpose: The action is essential to enhancing the health, safety, and welfare of children in care because it protects children with undiagnosed allergies in cases when exposure to the allergen may result in anaphylaxis that could be deadly. The action is required to comply with the provisions of Chapters 122 and 123 of the 2023 Acts of Assembly.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This action is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because it is required by Chapters 122 and 123 of the 2023 Acts of Assembly.

Substance: The amendments require (i) each voluntarily registered family day home provider or at least one other caregiver employed by such provider to be trained in epinephrine administration and (ii) each voluntarily registered family day home provider to notify the parents of each child who receives care in such family day home whether the provider stores an appropriate weight-based dosage of epinephrine in the residence or home in which the family day home operates. The amendments include technical updates.

Issues: The advantage of this action is that the requirement that each family day home provider or at least one other caregiver employed by such provider to be trained in epinephrine administration increases protections for children by ensuring that caregivers are trained to respond to anaphylaxis and could potentially save the life of a child who experiences anaphylactic shock as a result of an allergic reaction. There are no disadvantages to this regulatory action.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. Pursuant to Chapter 122 and Chapter 123 of the 2023 Acts of Assembly (mandate), which amended § 22.1-289.059 of the Code of Virginia, the State Board of Education (board) proposes amendments to the regulation concerning the possession and administration of epinephrine at family day homes voluntarily registered by the Virginia Department of Education.

Background. Consistent with § 22.1-289.02 of the Code of Virginia, the regulation defines family day home as a child day program offered in the residence of the provider or the home of any of the children in care for one through 12 children less than 13 years of age, exclusive of the provider's own children and any children who reside in the home, when at least one child receives care for compensation. Section 22.1-289.015 of the Code of Virginia states in part, "Any person who maintains a family day home serving fewer than five children, exclusive of the provider's own children and any children who reside in the home, may apply for voluntary registration." The mandate, as codified in § 22.1-289.059 of the Code of Virginia, states that the board shall amend its regulations to require each family day home provider or at least one other caregiver employed by such provider in the family day home to be trained in the administration of epinephrine and to notify the parents of each child who receives care in such family day home whether the provider stores an appropriate weight-based dosage of epinephrine in the residence or home in which the family day home operates. The board proposes to amend the regulation in this manner. Possession of epinephrine would be optional for family day homes. The family day homes would be required to notify parents in writing whether it stores an appropriate weight-based dosage of undesignated or stock epinephrine in the residence or home in which the family day home operates. The proposed text specifies that the provider or at least one other caregiver shall receive training in the administration of epinephrine, and: The administration of undesignated or stock epinephrine shall be performed by the provider or a caregiver who (i) [has current Medication Administration Training certification or is licensed in Virginia to administer prescription medications], (ii) has satisfactorily completed a training course developed or approved by the Department of Education in consultation with the Department of Health, or (iii) completed a course taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine, or pharmacist that includes the following: 1. Recognizing signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis; 2. Emergency procedures for responding to anaphylaxis; and 3. Instructions and procedures for administering epinephrine. This requirement applies to all family day homes, even those that decide not to possess epinephrine.

Estimated Benefits and Costs. Anaphylaxis is a severe, life-threatening allergic reaction. It can happen seconds or minutes after a person has been exposed to an allergen.2 Immediate use of an epinephrine autoinjector can keep anaphylaxis from worsening and can be lifesaving.3 Thus, the proposed requirements that child day centers possess and store appropriate weight-based dosages of undesignated or stock epinephrine, and that at least one person qualified to administer epinephrine has access to the epinephrine at all times during regular facility hours, has the potential to save the lives of children with undiagnosed allergies in cases when exposure to the allergen may result in anaphylaxis. An EpiPen package comes with two auto-injectors of 0.3 mg and is approved for adults and children who weigh 66 lbs. or more. The EpiPen JR package comes with two auto-injectors of 0.15 mg and is approved for children who weigh 33 lbs to 66 lbs.4 There are now also Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved epinephrine auto-injectors of 0.1 mg for infants and toddlers.5 Retail prices for a package of two brand name epinephrine auto-injectors range from $650 to $750 without insurance.6 FDA-authorized generic epinephrine is available from CVS at $109.99 per two-pack.7 Epinephrine autoinjectors have a shelf life of 12 to 18 months from the date of manufacture.8 DOE reports that it is already under contract with an outside entity that provides training in medication administration, including epinephrine administration. DOE is proposing a training program for staff at family day homes on the administration of epinephrine by this entity. If the training proposal is approved by VDH, the undesignated or stock epinephrine training would be developed. DOE's plan is for the training to be offered at no cost to the family day homes.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. The proposed amendments would affect the 209 voluntarily registered family day homes. DOE believes all would qualify as small businesses. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.9 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.10 As acquiring and storing epinephrine would be optional, and since it appears that the training may be offered for free to the family day homes, no adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses11 Affected.12 As noted above, all voluntarily registered family day homes appear to be small businesses. The proposed regulation does not appear to introduce costs beyond those already required by the legislation.

Localities13 Affected.14 The proposed amendments neither appear to disproportionally affect particular localities nor affect costs for local governments.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposed amendments do not appear to substantively affect total employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposed amendments do not substantively affect the use and use value of private property or real estate development costs.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 Source: Mayo Clinic https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/anaphylaxis/symptoms-causes/syc-20351468.

3 Source: Mayo Clinic https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/anaphylaxis/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20351474.

4 See https://www.goodrx.com/epinephrine-epipen/how-to-save-cost.

5 See https://www.fda.gov/media/127806/download.

6 Supra, note 4.

7 See https://www.cvs.com/content/epipen-alternative.

8 See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5720482/.

9 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

10 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

11 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

12 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

13 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

14 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to the Economic Impact Analysis: The State Board of Education thanks the Department of Planning and Budget for its thorough economic impact analysis.

Summary:

Pursuant to Chapters 122 and 123 of the 2023 Acts of Assembly, the amendments require (i) each voluntarily registered family day home provider or at least one other caregiver employed by such provider to be trained in epinephrine administration and (ii) each voluntarily registered family day home provider to notify the parents of each child who receives care in such family day home whether the provider stores an appropriate weight-based dosage of epinephrine in the residence or home in which the family day home operates.

8VAC20-850-20. Provider eligibility.

A. A family day provider and substitute provider shall be 18 years of age or older.

B. A family day assistant shall be 14 years of age or older.

C. A family day provider, assistant or assistants, and substitute provider shall be able to read, write, understand, and carry out the responsibilities in the Requirements for Providers this chapter.

D. A family day provider and substitute provider shall live in a county, city, or town that does not have a local ordinance for the regulation or licensure of family day homes.

E. A family day provider that is voluntarily registered pursuant to § 22.1-289.015 of the Code of Virginia shall not be required by law to be licensed. Family day homes serving five through 12 children younger than the age of 13 years of age or younger, exclusive of the provider's own children and any children who reside in the home, shall be licensed.

F. The administration of undesignated or stock epinephrine may be performed by a caregiver who:

1. Meets the requirements in 8VAC20-850-110 C;

2. Has satisfactorily completed a training course developed or approved by the Department of Education in consultation with the Virginia Department of Health; or

3. Has satisfactorily completed a course taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine, or pharmacist that includes the following:

a. Recognizing signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis;

b. Emergency procedures for responding to anaphylaxis; and

c. Instructions and procedures for the administration of epinephrine.

G. When medication is administered pursuant to § 22.1-289.059 of the Code of Virginia, the requirements in 8VAC20-850-90 C 9 and 8VAC20-850-110 C shall not apply.

H. The provider or at least one other caregiver shall receive training in the administration of epinephrine pursuant to subsection F of this section at three-year intervals.

8VAC20-850-90. Provider record requirements.

A. The provider's records shall be open for inspection by authorized representatives of the contracting organizations and the department.

B. The provider shall maintain on file a signed statement from each parent, affirming receipt of the information to parents statement.

C. The provider shall maintain an individual record for each child enrolled in care. This record shall include:

1. The child's full name (including nicknames, if any), address, and birth date;

2. Name, address, and telephone number of each parent or other responsible person or persons;

3. Name, address, and telephone number of each parent's place of employment and his or her each parent's work hours;

4. Name, address, and telephone number of one or more persons designated by the parent or parents to be called in case of emergency when a parent cannot be reached during the hours the child is in care;

5. Name, address, and telephone number of the child's physician;

6. Any known or suspected allergies and any chronic or recurrent diseases or disabilities;

7. The child's allergies to medication or drugs, if applicable, and directions for providing medicines to the child;

8. The name of the parent's hospitalization plan and number or medical assistance plan, if applicable;

9. The parent's signed authorization for the child's emergency medical treatment and written consent for giving of medications to the child;

10. Whether the provider stores an appropriate weight-based dosage of undesignated or stock epinephrine in the residence or home in which the family day home operates as required by § 22.1-289.059 of the Code of Virginia;

11. The child's date of enrollment in and date of withdrawal from the family day home, when applicable;

11. 12. Results of the health examination and up-to-date immunization records of each child, unless there is record of a medical or religious exemption;

12. 13. Names of persons authorized to visit or call for the child, as well as those who are not to visit or call for the child;

13. 14. A record of any accidents and injuries sustained by a child;

14. 15. The parent's signed authorization to use a substitute provider and his or her the substitute provider's name, address, and phone telephone number;

15. 16. The parent's signed authorization to transport children and to take trips out of the immediate community; and

16. 17. Any written agreement made between the family day provider and the natural parent, guardian, or other responsible person for each child in care. The agreement may cover hours of care per day, week, or month; cost of care per day, week, or month; frequency and amount of payment per day, week, or month; and any special services to be provided by either party to the agreement.

D. The emergency contact information listed in subdivisions C 2 through C 5 of this section shall be made available to a physician, hospital or emergency care unit in the event of a child's illness or injury.

E. Whenever the provider leaves the home with the child or children, the provider shall have the emergency contact information and medical information required by subdivisions C 1 through C 9 of this section in the caregiver's possession.

F. The family day provider shall not disclose or permit the use of information pertaining to an individual child or family unless the parent or parents or guardian or guardians of the child has granted written permission to do so, except in the course of performance of official duties and to employees or representatives of the contracting organization or the department.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-7613; Filed October 29, 2025
TITLE 9. ENVIRONMENT
STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD
Fast-Track

TITLE 9. ENVIRONMENT

STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD

Fast-Track Regulation

Title of Regulation: 9VAC25-151. Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) General Permit Regulation for Discharges of Stormwater Associated with Industrial Activity (amending 9VAC25-151-60, 9VAC25-151-70, 9VAC25-151-400).

Statutory Authority: § 62.1-44.15 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Joseph Bryan, Department of Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 1105, Richmond, VA 23218, telephone (804) 659-2659, or email joseph.bryan@deq.virginia.gov.

Basis: Section 62.1-44.15 of the Code of Virginia requires the State Water Control Board to establish standards of quality and policies for any state waters consistent with the general policy set forth in the State Water Control Law (§ 62.1-44.2 et seq. of the Code of Virginia) and to issue, revoke, or amend certificates and land-disturbance approvals under prescribed conditions for the discharge of sewage, stormwater, industrial wastes, and other wastes into or adjacent to state waters.

Purpose: This action protects water quality in the Commonwealth, which is essential to the health, safety, and welfare of Virginia's citizens, and is needed to establish appropriate and necessary permitting requirements for discharges of stormwater. The goal of this regulatory action is to improve clarity and certainty by making the regulation consistent with recent changes to the Virginia Erosion and Stormwater Management (VESM) Regulation (9VAC25-875).

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This rulemaking is expected to be noncontroversial and therefore appropriate for the fast-track rulemaking process because it improves clarity and certainty for the regulated community and the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) by conforming the regulation with the amendments to the VESM Regulation that became effective July 1, 2025. The amendments also clarify water quality design criteria and sources for information about best management practices (BMPs).

Substance: The amendments (i) reduce the total phosphorus load limits for new development to 0.26 pounds per acre per year; (ii) update references to the Virginia Runoff Reduction Method; and (iii) remove 15 BMPs from the regulation and replace them with references to the Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook, which contains additional BMPs.

Issues: There are no direct impacts on the public as the amendments update existing regulatory requirements. There are no disadvantages to the public. The primary advantage to the Commonwealth is that the amendments will allow DEQ and owners of facilities that have a stormwater discharge associated with industrial activity from that facility's primary industrial activity to utilize regulations that reflect current statutory requirements and improve the understanding of the regulation, which contributes to the efficient and effective functioning of government. There are no disadvantages to the agency or the Commonwealth.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. The State Water Control Board (board) proposes to update the Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) General Permit Regulation for Discharges of Stormwater Associated with Industrial Activity (9VAC25-151) to be consistent with changes made to the Virginia Erosion and Stormwater Management Regulation (VESM regulation, 9VAC25-875) that became effective on July 1, 2025.

Background. The board amended the VESM regulation (9VAC25-875) to update the phosphorus load limits, update references to the Virginia Runoff Reduction Method, and remove 15 best management practices (BMPs) from the regulation and replace them with references to the Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook, which contains additional BMPs. These changes became effective on July 1, 2025.2 The economic impact analysis for that action explains the rationale for the changes and addresses their impact. The proposed changes to the VPDES General Permit regulation (9VAC25-151) are intended to align this regulation with the VESM regulation and thus serve to enhance clarity and ensure that the regulations are consistent. Specifically, the board seeks to: update the total phosphorus load for new development from 0.41 pounds per acre per year to 0.26 pounds per acre per year to be consistent with Section 580 of the VESM regulation.3 Replace references to the Virginia Runoff Reduction Method or another equivalent methodology approved by the department with a reference to the relevant sections (580 and 590) of the VESM regulation, so that this regulation remains consistent with future updates to the methodology in the VESM regulation. Specify that information about design specifications and pollutant removal efficiencies is available through the Virginia Stormwater BMP Clearinghouse and add a link to its website.

Estimated Benefits and Costs. The benefits and costs of the proposed changes have previously been discussed in the Economic Impact Analysis for the action that made these changes to the VESM regulation.4 The proposed amendments would reduce phosphorus nutrient credits and expedite plan review for new construction. The proposed changes in this action are not expected to create any new costs or benefits beyond providing accurate and consistent information to readers of the regulation.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. This regulation applies to industrial facilities that have a VPDES general permit; the proposed changes would update and clarify the requirements for new construction for which approval is sought after July 1, 2025. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.5 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.6 The proposed amendments do not appear to directly increase costs or reduce benefits. Thus, no adverse impact is indicated.

Small Businesses7 Affected.8 The proposed amendments do not adversely affect small businesses.

Localities9 Affected.10 The proposed amendments do not affect any locality in particular and do not appear to increase costs for local governments.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposed amendments are not expected to have an impact on employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposed amendments do not appear to affect the use and value of private property nor directly affect real estate development costs.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 See https://townhall.virginia.gov/L/ViewStage.cfm?stageid=10406.

3 See https://law.lis.virginia.gov/admincode/title9/agency25/chapter875/section580/.

4 See https://townhall.virginia.gov/L/GetFile.cfm?File=103\6522\10406\EIA_DEQ_10406_v1.pdf.

5 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

6 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

7 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

8 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

9 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

10 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to Economic Impact Analysis: The State Water Control Board has reviewed the economic impact analysis prepared by the Department of Planning and Budget and has no comment.

Summary:

The action updates the Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) General Permit Regulation for Discharges of Stormwater Associated with Industrial Activity (9VAC25-151) for consistency with recent amendments to the Virginia Erosion and Stormwater Management Regulation (9VAC25-875). Specifically, the amendments (i) reduce the total phosphorus load limits for new development to 0.26 pounds per acre per year; (ii) update references to the Virginia Runoff Reduction Method; and (iii) remove 15 best management practices (BMPs) from the regulation and replace them with references to the Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook, which contains additional BMPs.

9VAC25-151-60. Registration statement and stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP).

A. An owner seeking coverage under this general permit shall submit a complete VPDES general permit registration statement in accordance with this section, which shall serve as a notice of intent for coverage under the VPDES general permit regulation for discharges of stormwater associated with industrial activity.

Any owner that was authorized to discharge under the industrial stormwater general permit that became effective on July 1, 2019, and that intends to continue coverage under this general permit shall review and update the stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) to meet all provisions of the general permit (9VAC25-151-70 et seq.) within 90 days of the department granting coverage under this permit. Owners of new facilities, facilities previously covered by an expiring individual permit, and existing facilities not currently covered by a VPDES permit that wish to obtain coverage under this general permit shall prepare and implement a written SWPPP for the facility in accordance with the general permit (9VAC25-151-70 et seq.) before submitting the registration statement.

B. Deadlines for submitting registration statements.

1. Existing facilities.

a. Any owner that was authorized to discharge under the industrial stormwater general permit that became effective on July 1, 2019, and that intends to continue coverage under this general permit shall submit a complete registration statement to the department on or before May 1, 2024.

b. Any owner covered by a VPDES individual permit for stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity that is proposing to be covered under this general permit shall submit a complete registration statement at least 240 days before the expiration date of the VPDES individual permit.

c. Any owner of an existing facility with stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity, not currently covered by a VPDES permit, that is proposing to be covered under this general permit shall submit a complete registration statement to the department.

2. New facilities. Any owner proposing a new discharge of stormwater associated with industrial activity shall submit a complete registration statement at least 60 days before the date planned for the beginning of the industrial activity at the facility.

3. New owners of existing facilities. Where the owner of an existing facility that is covered by this permit changes, the new owner of the facility shall submit a complete registration statement within 30 days of the ownership change.

4. Late registration statements. Registration statements for existing facilities covered under subdivision 1 a of this subsection will be accepted after June 30, 2024, but authorization to discharge will not be retroactive.

C. The required registration statement shall contain the following information:

1. Facility name and mailing address, owner name and mailing address, telephone number, and email address;

2. Facility street address (if different from mailing address) or location (if the facility location does not have a mailing address);

3. Facility operator (local contact) name, address, telephone number, and email address (if available) if different than owner;

4. The nature of the business conducted at the facility to be covered under this general permit, including a description of the primary industrial activity and all other industrial activities that take place;

5. The receiving waters of the industrial activity discharges;

6. A determination of whether the facility will discharge to an MS4. If the facility discharges to an MS4, the facility owner must notify the owner of the MS4 of the existence of the discharge information and include that notification with the registration statement. The notice shall include the following information: the name of the facility, a contact person and telephone number, the location of the discharge, the nature of the discharge, and the facility's VPDES general permit number (if assigned by DEQ);

7. The permit number for any existing VPDES permit assigned to the facility;

8. An indication that an SWPPP has been prepared before submitting this registration statement by the owner of a new facility, a facility previously covered by an expiring individual permit, or an existing facility not currently covered by a VPDES permit;

9. For each outfall, identification of up to four four-digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes or two-letter Industrial Activity Codes that best represent the principal products or services rendered by the facility and major colocated industrial activities (two-letter Industrial Activity Codes are: HZ – hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities; LF – landfills and disposal facilities that receive or have received any industrial wastes; SE – steam electric power generating facilities; or TW – treatment works treating domestic sewage);

10. Identification of all applicable industrial sectors in this permit (as designated in Table 50-2) that cover the industrial activities at the facility, and major colocated industrial activities to be covered under this permit, and the stormwater outfalls associated with each industrial sector.

a. If the facility is a landfill (sector L), state the type of landfill (i.e., MSWLF (municipal solid waste landfill), CDD (construction debris and demolition), or other), and which outfalls (if any) receive contaminated stormwater runoff;

b. If the facility is a timber products operation (sector A), state which outfalls (if any) receive discharges from wet decking areas, and which outfalls (if any) collect runoff from areas where mulch dyeing operations (including loading, transporting, and storage) occur;

c. For all facilities, state any outfalls receiving discharges from coal storage piles;

d. If the facility manufactures asphalt paving and roofing materials (sector D), state which outfalls (if any) receive discharges from areas where production of asphalt paving emulsions or roofing emulsions occurs;

e. If the facility manufactures cement (sector E), state which outfalls (if any) receive discharges from material storage piles;

f. If a scrap recycling and waste recycling facility (sector N - SIC 5093) only receives source-separated recyclable materials, state which outfalls (if any) receive discharges from this activity. List the metals (if any) that are received; or

g. For primary airports subject to 40 CFR 449 (1,000 or more annual departures of nonpropeller aircraft), list the average deicing season and state which outfalls (if any) receive discharges from deicing or anti-icing operations;

11. List the following facility area information:

a. The total area of the facility in acres;

b. The total area of industrial activity of the facility in acres;

c. The total impervious surface area of the industrial activity of the facility in acres;

d. The impervious and total areas in acres draining to each industrial activity outfall at the facility. Outfalls shall be numbered using a unique numerical identification code for each outfall. For example: Outfall Number 001 or Outfall Number 002; and

e. The latitude and longitude of each outfall location;

12. A site map depicting the following shall be included with the registration statement:

a. The property boundaries;

b. All industrial activity outfalls labeled with unique numerical identification for each outfall. Outfall numbering shall be the same as that used for the facility area information in subdivision 11 of this subsection; and

c. All water bodies or MS4 conveyances, labeled with names if applicable, receiving stormwater discharges from the site;

13. Virginia's Phase I Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan (November 29, 2010) states that wasteloads for future growth for new facilities in the Chesapeake Bay watershed with industrial stormwater discharges cannot exceed the nutrient and sediment loadings that were discharged before the land was developed for the industrial activity. For purposes of this permit regulation, facilities that begin construction after June 30, 2024, must be consistent with this requirement to be eligible for coverage under this general permit.

If this is a new facility that began construction after June 30, 2024, in the Chesapeake Bay watershed and is applying for first time general permit coverage, attach documentation to the registration statement to demonstrate:

a. That the total phosphorus load does not exceed the greater of (i) the total phosphorus load that was discharged from the industrial area of the property before the land was developed for the new industrial activity or (ii) 0.41 0.26 pounds per acre per year (water quality design criteria, 9VAC25-875-580). The documentation must include the measures and controls that were employed to meet this requirement, along with the supporting calculations. The owner may include additional nonindustrial land on the site as part of any plan to comply with the no net increase requirement. Consistent with the definition of "site," this includes adjacent land used in connection with the facility. Compliance with the water quality design criteria may be determined utilizing the Virginia Runoff Reduction Method or another equivalent methodology approved by the department Article 3 (9VAC25-875-570 et seq.) of Part V (9VAC25-875-470 et seq.) of the Virginia Erosion and Stormwater Management Regulation. Design specifications and pollutant removal efficiencies for specific BMPs can be found on through the Virginia Stormwater BMP Clearinghouse website at http://www.deq.virginia.gov/our-programs/water/stormwater/stormwater-construction/bmp-clearinghouse; or

b. The owner may consider utilization of any pollutant trading or offset program in accordance with §§ 62.1-44.19:20 through 62.1-44.19:23 of the Code of Virginia, governing trading and offsetting, to meet the no net increase requirement;

14. State Corporation Commission entity identification number if the facility is required to obtain an entity identification number by law; and

15. The following certification: "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations."

D. The registration statement shall be signed in accordance with 9VAC25-31-110 A.

E. Where to submit. The registration statement may be delivered to the department by either postal or electronic mail and shall be submitted to the DEQ regional office serving the area where the industrial facility is located. Following notification from the department of the start date for the required electronic submission of Notices of Intent to Discharge forms (i.e., registration statements) as provided for in 9VAC25-31-1020, such forms submitted after that date shall be electronically submitted to the department in compliance with this section and 9VAC25-31-1020. There shall be at least a three-month notice provided between the notification from the department and the date after which such forms must be submitted electronically.

9VAC25-151-70. General permit.

Any owner whose registration statement is accepted by the director will receive the following general permit and shall comply with the requirements therein and be subject to the VPDES Permit Regulation, 9VAC25-31. Facilities with colocated industrial activities shall comply with all applicable monitoring and SWPPP requirements of each industrial activity sector of this chapter in which a colocated industrial activity is described. All pages of 9VAC25-151-70 and 9VAC25-151-80 apply to all stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity covered under this general permit. Not all pages of 9VAC25-151-90 et seq. will apply to every permittee. The determination of which pages apply will be based on an evaluation of the regulated activities located at the facility.

General Permit No.: VAR05

Effective Date: July 1, 2024

Expiration Date: June 30, 2029

VPDES GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY

AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE VIRGINIA POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM AND THE VIRGINIA STATE WATER CONTROL LAW

In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended, and pursuant to the State Water Control Law and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, owners of facilities with stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity are authorized to discharge to surface waters within the boundaries of the Commonwealth of Virginia, except those waters specifically named in board regulation that prohibit such discharges.

The authorized discharge shall be in accordance with this cover page, the registration statement, Part I-Effluent Limitations, Monitoring Requirements and Special Conditions, Part II-Conditions Applicable to All VPDES Permits, Part III-Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, Part IV-Sector-Specific Permit Requirements, and Part V-Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load Compliance as set forth in this general permit.

Part I

Effluent Limitations, Monitoring Requirements and Special Conditions

A. Effluent limitations and monitoring requirements.

There are four individual and separate categories of monitoring requirements that a facility may be subject to under this permit: (i) quarterly visual monitoring; (ii) benchmark monitoring of discharges associated with specific industrial activities; (iii) compliance monitoring for discharges subject to numerical effluent limitations; and (iv) monitoring of discharges to impaired waters, both those with an approved TMDL and those without an approved TMDL. The monitoring requirements and numeric effluent limitations applicable to a facility depend on the types of industrial activities generating stormwater runoff from the facility, and for TMDL monitoring, the location of the facility's discharge. Part IV of the permit identifies monitoring requirements applicable to specific sectors of industrial activity. The permittee shall review Part I A 1 and Part IV of the permit to determine which monitoring requirements and numeric limitations apply to the permittee's facility. Unless otherwise specified, limitations and monitoring requirements under Part I A 1 and Part IV are additive.

Sector-specific monitoring requirements and limitations are applied discharge by discharge at facilities with colocated activities. Where stormwater from the colocated activities is commingled, the monitoring requirements and limitations are additive. Where more than one numeric limitation for a specific parameter applies to a discharge, compliance with the more restrictive limitation is required. Where benchmark, numerical effluent limitations, or TMDL monitoring requirements for a monitoring period overlap, the permittee may use a single sample to satisfy monitoring requirements.

1. Types of monitoring requirements and limitations.

a. Quarterly visual monitoring. The requirements and procedures for quarterly visual monitoring are applicable to all facilities covered under this permit, regardless of the facility's sector of industrial activity.

(1) The permittee shall perform and document a quarterly visual examination of a stormwater discharge associated with industrial activity from each outfall, except discharges exempted in Part I A 3 or A 4. The visual examinations shall be made at least once in each of the following three-month periods: January through March, April through June, July through September, and October through December. The visual examination shall be made during normal working hours, where practicable, and when considerations for safety and feasibility allow. If no storm event resulted in runoff from the facility during a monitoring quarter, the permittee is excused from visual monitoring for that quarter provided that documentation is included with the monitoring records indicating that no runoff occurred.

(2) Samples shall be collected in accordance with Part I A 2. Sample examination shall document observations of color, odor, clarity, floating solids, settled solids, suspended solids, foam, oil sheen, and other obvious indicators of stormwater pollution. The visual examination of the sample shall be conducted in a well-lit area. No analytical tests are required to be performed on the samples.

(3) The visual examination documentation shall be maintained on-site with the SWPPP. The documentation shall include the outfall location, the examination date and time, examination staff, the nature of the discharge (i.e., runoff or snow melt), visual quality of the stormwater discharge (including observations of color, odor, clarity, floating solids, settled solids, suspended solids, foam, oil sheen, and other obvious indicators of stormwater pollution), and probable sources of any observed stormwater contamination.

b. Benchmark monitoring of discharges associated with specific industrial activities.

Table 70-1 identifies the specific industrial sectors subject to the benchmark monitoring requirements of this permit and the industry-specific pollutants of concern. The permittee shall refer to the tables found in the individual sectors in Part IV for benchmark monitoring concentration values. Colocated industrial activities at the facility that are described in more than one sector in Part IV shall comply with all applicable benchmark monitoring requirements from each sector.

The results of benchmark monitoring are primarily for the permittee to use to determine the overall effectiveness of the SWPPP in controlling the discharge of pollutants to receiving waters. Benchmark concentration values, included in Part IV of this permit, are not effluent limitations. Exceedance of a benchmark concentration does not constitute a violation of this permit and does not show that violation of a water quality standard has occurred; however, it does signal that modifications to the SWPPP are necessary, unless justification is provided in a routine facility inspection. In addition, exceedance of benchmark concentrations may identify facilities that would be more appropriately covered under an individual, or alternative general permit where more specific pollution prevention controls could be required.

EDITOR'S NOTE: The Table 70-1 is not being amended; therefore, the table is not set out.

(1) Benchmark monitoring shall be performed for all benchmark parameters specified for the industrial sector applicable to a facility's discharge. Monitoring shall be performed at least once during each of the first four, and potentially all, monitoring periods after coverage under the permit begins. Monitoring begins with the first full monitoring period after the owner is granted coverage under the permit. Monitoring periods are specified in Part I A 2.

(2) Benchmark monitoring waivers for facilities testing below benchmark concentration values. Waivers from benchmark monitoring are available to facilities whose discharges are below benchmark concentration values on an outfall by outfall basis. Sector-specific benchmark monitoring is not required to be conducted in subsequent monitoring periods during the term of this permit provided:

(a) Samples were collected in four consecutive monitoring periods, and the average of the four samples for all parameters at the outfall is below the applicable benchmark concentration value in Part IV. Facilities that were covered under the 2019 industrial stormwater general permit may use sampling data from the last two monitoring periods of that permit and the first two monitoring periods of this permit to satisfy the four consecutive monitoring periods requirement;

(b) The facility is not subject to a numeric effluent limitation established in Part I A 1 c (1) (stormwater effluent limitations), Part I A 1 c (2) (coal pile runoff), or Part IV (Sector Specific Permit Requirements) for any of the parameters at that outfall; and

(c) A waiver request is submitted to and approved by the department. The waiver request shall be sent to the appropriate DEQ regional office, along with the supporting monitoring data for four consecutive monitoring periods, and a certification that, based on current potential pollutant sources and control measures used, discharges from the facility are reasonably expected to be substantially similar or cleaner compared to when the benchmark monitoring for the four consecutive monitoring periods was done.

Waiver requests will be evaluated by the department based on (i) benchmark monitoring results below the benchmark concentration values; (ii) a favorable compliance history (including inspection results); and (iii) no outstanding enforcement actions.

The monitoring waiver may be revoked by the department for cause. The permittee will be notified in writing that the monitoring waiver is revoked, and that the benchmark monitoring requirements are again in force and will remain in effect until the permit's expiration date.

(3) Samples shall be collected and analyzed in accordance with Part I A 2. Monitoring results shall be reported in accordance with Part I A 5 and Part II C and retained in accordance with Part II B.

c. Compliance monitoring for discharges subject to numerical effluent limitations or discharges to impaired waters.

(1) Facilities subject to stormwater effluent limitation guidelines.

(a) Facilities subject to stormwater effluent limitation guidelines (see Table 70-2) are required to monitor the discharges to evaluate compliance with numerical effluent limitations. Industry-specific numerical limitations and compliance monitoring requirements are described in Part IV of the permit. Permittees with colocated industrial activities at the facility that are described in more than one sector in Part IV shall comply on a discharge-by-discharge basis with all applicable effluent limitations from each sector.

(b) Permittees shall monitor the discharges for the presence of the pollutant subject to the effluent limitation at least once during each of the monitoring periods after coverage under the permit begins. Monitoring begins with the first full monitoring period after the owner is granted coverage under the permit. Monitoring periods are specified in Part I A 2. The substantially identical outfall monitoring provisions (Part I A 2 f) are not available for numeric effluent limits monitoring.

(c) Samples shall be collected and analyzed in accordance with Part I A 2. Monitoring results shall be reported in accordance with Part I A 5 and Part II C, and retained in accordance with Part II B.

EDITOR'S NOTE: The Table 70-2 is not being amended; therefore, the table is not set out.

(2) Facilities subject to coal pile runoff monitoring.

(a) Facilities with discharges of stormwater from coal storage piles shall comply with the limitations and monitoring requirements of Table 70-3 for all discharges containing the coal pile runoff, regardless of the facility's sector of industrial activity.

(b) Permittees shall monitor the stormwater discharges at least once during each of the monitoring periods after coverage under the permit begins. Monitoring begins with the first full monitoring period after the owner is granted coverage under the permit. Monitoring periods are specified in Part I A 2. The substantially identical outfall monitoring provisions (Part I A 2 f) are not available for coal pile numeric effluent limits monitoring.

(c) The coal pile runoff shall not be diluted with other stormwater or other flows to meet this limitation.

(d) If a facility is designed, constructed, and operated to treat the volume of coal pile runoff that is associated with a 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event, any untreated overflow of coal pile runoff from the treatment unit is not subject to the 50 mg/L limitation for total suspended solids.

(e) Samples shall be collected and analyzed in accordance with Part I A 2. Monitoring results shall be reported in accordance with Part I A 5 and Part II C, and retained in accordance with Part II B.

EDITOR'S NOTE: The Table 70-3 is not being amended; therefore, the table is not set out.

(3) Facilities discharging to an impaired water with an approved TMDL wasteload allocation. Owners of facilities that are a source of the specified pollutant of concern to waters for which a TMDL wasteload allocation has been approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) before the term of this permit will be notified by the department when they are approved for coverage under the general permit.

(a) Upon written notification from the department, permittees shall monitor the discharges for the pollutant subject to TMDL wasteload allocation once every six months after coverage under the permit begins, unless another sampling frequency is determined by the department for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Monitoring begins with the first full monitoring period after the owner is granted coverage under the permit. Monitoring periods are specified in Part I A 2.

(b) Samples shall be collected and analyzed in accordance with Part I A 2. Monitoring results shall be reported in accordance with Part I A 5 and Part II C, and retained in accordance with Part II B.

(c) If the pollutant subject to the TMDL wasteload allocation is below the quantitation level in all of the samples from the first four monitoring periods, the permittee may request to the department in writing that further sampling be discontinued, unless the TMDL has specific instructions to the contrary (in which case those instructions shall be followed). The laboratory certificate of analysis shall be submitted with the request. If approved, documentation of this shall be kept with the SWPPP.

If the pollutant subject to the TMDL wasteload allocation is above the quantitation level in any of the samples from the first four monitoring periods, the permittee shall continue the scheduled TMDL monitoring throughout the term of the permit. Applicable sampling data collected during the 2019 industrial stormwater general permit term may be used to satisfy all or part of the four monitoring periods requirement.

(d) Upon written notification from the department, facilities exceeding the TMDL wasteload allocation shall prepare and submit a pollutant minimization plan (PMP) designed to investigate the location and potential reduction of sources in the facility's stormwater discharges. The PMP shall be developed and submitted to the department for approval within 180 days of the receipt of notification from the department. The PMP shall include the following items, as appropriate:

(i) Facility contact for the contents of the PMP and any activities associated with the PMP;

(ii) A proposed implementation schedule for minimization activities and prospective milestones;

(iii) Proposed actions for known or probable sources;

(iv) Proposed action to find and control unknown sources;

(v) A summary of any previous minimization activities; and

(vi) Information on continuing assessment of progress, which may include establishment of criteria to evaluate whether the location and potential reduction of sources have been addressed.

(4) Facilities discharging to an impaired water without an approved TMDL wasteload allocation. Owners of facilities that discharge to waters listed as impaired in the 2022 Final 305(b)/303(d) Water Quality Assessment Integrated Report, and for which a TMDL wasteload allocation has not been approved before the term of this permit, will be notified by the department when they are approved for coverage under the general permit.

(a) Upon written notification from the department,

permittees shall monitor the discharges for all pollutants for which the waterbody is impaired, and for which a standard analytical method exists, at least once every six months after coverage under the permit begins, unless otherwise determined by the department for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Monitoring begins with the first full monitoring period after the owner is granted coverage under the permit. Monitoring periods are specified in Part I A 2.

(b) If the pollutant for which the waterbody is impaired is suspended solids, turbidity, or sediment, or sedimentation, monitor for total suspended solids (TSS). If the pollutant for which the waterbody is impaired is expressed in the form of an indicator or surrogate pollutant, monitor for that indicator or surrogate pollutant. No monitoring is required when a waterbody's biological communities are impaired but no pollutant, including indicator or surrogate pollutants, is specified as causing the impairment, or when a waterbody's impairment is related to hydrologic modifications, impaired hydrology, or temperature. Samples shall be collected and analyzed in accordance with Part I A 2. Monitoring results shall be reported in accordance with Part I A 5 and Part II C, and retained in accordance with Part II B.

(c) If the pollutant for which the water is impaired is below the quantitation level in the discharges from the facility, or it is above the quantitation level but its presence is caused solely by natural background sources, the permittee may request to the department in writing that further impaired water monitoring be discontinued. The laboratory certificate of analysis shall be submitted with the request. If approved, documentation of this shall be kept with the SWPPP.

To support a determination that the pollutant's presence is caused solely by natural background sources, the following documentation shall be submitted with the request and kept with the SWPPP: (i) an explanation of why it is believed that the presence of the impairment pollutant in the facility's discharge is not related to the activities at the facility; and (ii) data or studies that tie the presence of the impairment pollutant in the facility's discharge to natural background sources in the watershed. Natural background pollutants include those substances that are naturally occurring in soils or groundwater. Natural background pollutants do not include legacy pollutants from earlier activity at the facility's site or pollutants in run-on from neighboring sources that are not naturally occurring.

2. Monitoring instructions.

a. Collection and analysis of samples. Sampling requirements shall be assessed on an outfall by outfall basis. Samples shall be collected and analyzed in accordance with the requirements of Part II A.

b. When and how to sample. A minimum of one grab sample shall be taken from the discharge associated with industrial activity resulting from a storm event that results in a discharge from the site, providing the interval from the preceding storm event discharge is at least 72 hours. The 72-hour storm interval is waived if the permittee is able to document that less than a 72-hour interval is representative for local storm events during the sampling period. In the case of snowmelt, the monitoring shall be performed at a time when a measurable discharge occurs at the site. For discharges from a stormwater management structure, the monitoring shall be performed at a time when a measurable discharge occurs from the structure.

The grab sample shall be taken during the first 30 minutes of the discharge. If it is not practicable to take the sample during the first 30 minutes, the sample may be taken during the first three hours of the discharge, provided that the permittee explains why a grab sample during the first 30 minutes was impracticable. This information shall be submitted in the department's electronic discharge monitoring report (e-DMR) system, and maintained with the SWPPP. If the sampled discharge commingles with process or nonprocess water, the permittee shall attempt to sample the stormwater discharge before it mixes with the nonstormwater.

c. Storm event data. For each monitoring event (except snowmelt monitoring), along with the monitoring results, the permittee shall identify the date of the storm event sampled; rainfall total (in inches) of the storm event that generated the sampled runoff; and the interval between the storm event sampled and the end of the previous storm event discharge. For snowmelt monitoring, the permittee shall identify the date of the sampling event.

d. Monitoring periods.

(1) Quarterly visual monitoring. The quarterly visual examinations shall be made at least once in each of the following three-month periods each year of permit coverage: January through March, April through June, July through September, and October through December.

(2) Benchmark monitoring, effluent limitation monitoring, and impaired waters monitoring (for waters both with and without an approved TMDL). Monitoring shall be conducted at least once in each of the following semiannual periods each year of permit coverage: January through June, and July through December.

e. Documentation explaining a facility's inability to obtain a sample (including dates and times the outfalls were viewed or sampling was attempted), of no rain event, or of deviation from the 72-hour storm interval shall be submitted with the e-DMR and maintained with the SWPPP. Acceptable documentation includes National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) weather station data, local weather station data, facility rainfall logs, and other appropriate supporting data.

f. Representative outfalls - substantially identical discharges. If the facility has two or more outfalls that discharge substantially identical effluents, based on similarities of the industrial activities, significant materials, size of drainage areas, and stormwater management practices occurring within the drainage areas of the outfalls, frequency of discharges, and stormwater management practices occurring within the drainage areas of the outfalls, the permittee may conduct monitoring on the effluent of just one of the outfalls and report that the observations also apply to the substantially identical outfall. The substantially identical outfall monitoring provisions apply to quarterly visual monitoring, benchmark monitoring, and impaired waters monitoring (both those with and without an approved TMDL). The substantially identical outfall monitoring provisions are not available for numeric effluent limits monitoring. The permittee shall include the following information in the SWPPP:

(1) The locations of the outfalls;

(2) An evaluation, including available monitoring data, indicating the outfalls are expected to discharge substantially identical effluents, including evaluation of monitoring data where available; and

(3) An estimate of the size of each outfall's drainage area in acres.

3. Adverse climatic conditions waiver. When adverse weather conditions prevent the collection of samples, a substitute sample may be taken during a qualifying storm event in the next monitoring period. Adverse weather conditions are those that are dangerous or create inaccessibility for staff and may include local flooding, high winds, electrical storms, or situations that otherwise make sampling impracticable (e.g., drought or extended frozen conditions). Unless specifically stated otherwise, this waiver may be applied to any monitoring required under this permit. Narrative documentation of conditions necessitating the use of the waiver shall be kept with the SWPPP.

4. Inactive and unstaffed sites (including temporarily inactive sites).

a. A waiver of the quarterly visual monitoring, routine facility inspections, and monitoring requirements (including benchmark, effluent limitation, and impaired waters monitoring) may be granted by the department at a facility that is both inactive and unstaffed, as long as the facility remains inactive and unstaffed and there are no industrial materials or activities exposed to stormwater. The owner of the facility is only required to conduct an annual routine site inspection in accordance with the requirements in Part III B 5.

b. An inactive and unstaffed sites waiver request shall be submitted to the department for approval and shall include the name of the facility; the facility's VPDES general permit registration number; a contact person, telephone number, and email address; the reason for the request; and the date the facility became or will become inactive and unstaffed. The waiver request shall be signed and certified in accordance with Part II K. If this waiver is granted, a copy of the request and the department's written approval of the waiver shall be maintained with the SWPPP.

c. If circumstances change and industrial materials or activities become exposed to stormwater or the facility becomes either active or staffed, the permittee shall notify the department within 30 days, and all quarterly visual monitoring, routine facility inspections, and monitoring requirements shall be resumed immediately.

d. The department retains the right to revoke this waiver when it is determined that the discharge is causing, has a reasonable potential to cause, or contributes to a water quality standards violation.

e. Inactive and unstaffed facilities covered under Sector G (Metal Mining) and Sector H (Coal Mines and Coal Mining-Related Facilities) are not required to meet the "no industrial materials or activities exposed to stormwater" standard to be eligible for this waiver, consistent with the conditional exemption requirements established in Part IV Sector G and Part IV Sector H.

5. Reporting monitoring results.

a. Reporting to the department. The permittee shall follow the reporting requirements and deadlines in Table 70-4 for the types of monitoring that apply to the facility:

EDITOR'S NOTE: The Table 70-4 is not being amended; therefore, the table is not set out.

Permittees shall submit results for each outfall associated with industrial activity according to the requirements of Part II C.

b. Significant digits. The permittee shall report at least the same number of significant digits as a numeric effluent limitation or TMDL wasteload allocation for a given parameter; otherwise, at least two significant digits shall be reported for a given parameter. Regardless of the rounding convention used by the permittee (i.e., five always rounding up or to the nearest even number), the permittee shall use the convention consistently and shall ensure that consulting laboratories employed by the permittee use the same convention.

6. Corrective actions.

a. The permittee shall take corrective action whenever:

(1) Routine facility inspections, inspections by local, state or federal officials, or any other process, observation or event result in a determination that modifications to the stormwater control measures are necessary to meet the permit requirements;

(2) There is any exceedance of an effluent limitation (including coal pile runoff), TMDL wasteload allocation, or a reduction required by a local ordinance established by a municipality to meet Chesapeake Bay TMDL requirements;

(3) The department determines, or the permittee becomes aware, that the stormwater control measures are not stringent enough for the discharge to meet applicable water quality standards; or

(4) Benchmark monitoring results exceed the benchmark concentration value for a parameter.

The permittee shall review the SWPPP and modify it as necessary to address any deficiencies. Revisions to the SWPPP shall be completed within 60 days following the discovery of the deficiency. When control measures need to be modified or added (distinct from regular preventive maintenance of existing control measures described in Part III C), implementation shall be completed before the next anticipated storm event if possible, but no later than 60 days after the deficiency is discovered, or as otherwise provided or approved by the department. In cases where construction is necessary to implement control measures, the permittee shall include a schedule in the SWPPP that provides for the completion of the control measures as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than three years after the deficiency is discovered. Where a construction compliance schedule is included in the SWPPP, the SWPPP shall include appropriate nonstructural and temporary controls to be implemented in the affected portion of the facility before completion of the permanent control measure. Any corrective actions taken shall be documented and retained with the SWPPP. Any control measure modifications shall be dated and document the amount of time taken to modify the applicable control measures or implement additional control measures.

b. Natural background pollutant levels. If the concentration of a pollutant exceeds a benchmark concentration value and the permittee determines that exceedance of the benchmark is attributable solely to the presence of that pollutant in the natural background, corrective action is not required provided that:

(1) The concentration of the benchmark monitoring result is less than or equal to the concentration of that pollutant in the natural background;

(2) The permittee documents and maintains with the SWPPP the supporting rationale for concluding that benchmark exceedances are in fact attributable solely to natural background pollutant levels. The supporting rationale shall include any data previously collected by the facility or others (including literature studies) that describe the levels of natural background pollutants in the facility's stormwater discharges; and

(3) The permittee notifies the department on the benchmark monitoring DMR that the benchmark exceedances are attributable solely to natural background pollutant levels. Natural background pollutants include those substances that are naturally occurring in soils or groundwater. Natural background pollutants do not include legacy pollutants from earlier activity on the facility's site, or pollutants in run-on from neighboring sources that are not naturally occurring.

c. Follow-up reporting. If at any time monitoring results show that discharges from the facility exceed an effluent limitation or a TMDL wasteload allocation, or the department determines that discharges from the facility are causing or contributing to an exceedance of a water quality standard, immediate steps shall be taken to eliminate the exceedances in accordance with Part I A 6. Within 30 calendar days of implementing the relevant corrective action, an exceedance report shall be submitted to the department and shall be signed in accordance with Part II K. The following information shall be included in the report:

(1) General permit registration number;

(2) Facility name and address;

(3) Receiving water for each outfall exceeding an effluent limitation of TMDL wasteload allocation;

(4) Monitoring data from the event being reported;

(5) A narrative description of the situation;

(6) A description of actions taken since the event was discovered and steps taken to minimize to the extent feasible pollutants in the discharge; and

(7) A local facility contact name, email address, and phone number.

B. Special conditions.

1. Authorized nonstormwater discharges. Except as provided in this section or in Part IV, all discharges covered by this permit shall be composed entirely of stormwater. The following nonstormwater discharges are authorized by this permit:

a. Discharges from emergency firefighting activities or firefighting training activities managed in a manner to avoid an instream impact in accordance with § 9.1-207.1 of the Code of Virginia;

b. Fire hydrant flushings, managed in a manner to avoid an instream impact;

c. Potable water, including water line flushings, managed in a manner to avoid an instream impact;

d. Uncontaminated condensate from air conditioners, coolers, and other compressors and from the outside storage of refrigerated gases or liquids;

e. Irrigation drainage;

f. Landscape watering provided all pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizer have been applied in accordance with the approved labeling;

g. Routine external building washdown, provided no soaps, solvents, or detergents are used, external building surfaces do not contain hazardous substances, and the washwater is filtered, settled, or similarly treated prior to discharge;

h. Pavement washwaters, provided no soaps, solvents, detergents, or hazardous cleaning products are used, and no spills or leaks of toxic or hazardous materials have occurred (unless all spilled or leaked material is removed prior to washing), and the washwater is filtered, settled, or similarly treated prior to discharge;

i. Uncontaminated groundwater or spring water;

j. Foundation or footing drains where flows are not contaminated with process materials; and

k. Incidental windblown mist from cooling towers that collects on rooftops or adjacent portions of the facility, but not intentional discharges from the cooling tower (e.g., "piped" cooling tower blowdown or drains).

All other nonstormwater discharges are not authorized and shall either be eliminated or covered under a separate VPDES permit.

2. Releases of hazardous substances or oil in excess of reportable quantities. The discharge of hazardous substances or oil in the stormwater discharges from the facility shall be prevented or minimized in accordance with the SWPPP for the facility. This permit does not authorize the discharge of hazardous substances or oil resulting from an on-site spill. This permit does not relieve the permittee of the reporting requirements of 40 CFR Part 110, 40 CFR Part 117, and 40 CFR Part 302 or § 62.1-44.34:19 of the Code of Virginia.

Where a release containing a hazardous substance or oil in an amount equal to or in excess of a reportable quantity established under either 40 CFR Part 110, 40 CFR Part 117, or 40 CFR Part 302 occurs during a 24-hour period:

a. The permittee is required to notify the department in accordance with the requirements of Part II G as soon as he has knowledge of the discharge;

b. Where a release enters an MS4, the permittee shall also notify the owner of the MS4; and

c. The SWPPP required under Part III shall be reviewed to identify measures to prevent the reoccurrence of the releases and to respond to the releases, and the SWPPP shall be modified where appropriate.

3. Colocated industrial activity. If the facility has industrial activities occurring on-site that are described by any of the activities in Part IV of the permit, those industrial activities are considered to be colocated industrial activities. Stormwater discharges from colocated industrial activities are authorized by this permit, provided that the permittee complies with any and all additional SWPPP and monitoring requirements from Part IV applicable to that particular colocated industrial activity. The permittee shall be responsible for additional SWPPP and monitoring requirements applicable to the colocated industrial activity by examining the narrative descriptions of all discharges covered under this section.

4. The stormwater discharges authorized by this permit may be combined with other sources of stormwater that are not required to be covered under a VPDES permit, so long as the combined discharge is in compliance with this permit.

5. There shall be no discharge of waste, garbage, or floating debris in other than trace amounts.

6. Approval for coverage under this general permit does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to comply with any other applicable federal, state, or local statute, ordinance, or regulation.

7. Discharges to waters subject to TMDL wasteload allocations. Owners of facilities that are a source of the specified pollutant of concern to waters for which a TMDL wasteload allocation has been approved by EPA before the term of this permit shall incorporate measures and controls into the SWPPP required by Part III that are consistent with the assumptions and requirements of the TMDL. The department will provide written notification to the owner that a facility is subject to the TMDL requirements. The facility's SWPPP shall specifically address any conditions or requirements included in the TMDL that are applicable to discharges from the facility. If the TMDL establishes a specific numeric wasteload allocation that applies to discharges from the facility, the owner shall perform any required monitoring in accordance with Part I A 1 c (3), and implement control measures designed to meet that allocation.

8. Discharges through a regulated MS4 to waters subject to the Chesapeake Bay TMDL. In addition to the requirements of this permit, any facility with industrial activity stormwater discharges through a regulated MS4 that is notified by the MS4 operator that the locality has adopted ordinances to meet the Chesapeake Bay TMDL shall incorporate measures and controls into its SWPPP to comply with applicable local TMDL ordinance requirements.

9. Expansion of facilities that discharge to waters subject to the Chesapeake Bay TMDL. Virginia's Phase I Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan (November 29, 2010), states that the wasteloads from any expansion of an existing permitted facility discharging stormwater in the Chesapeake Bay watershed cannot exceed the nutrient and sediment loadings that were discharged from the expanded portion of the land prior to the land being developed for the expanded industrial activity.

a. For any industrial activity area expansions (i.e., construction activities, including clearing, grading, and excavation activities) that begin on or after July 1, 2024, the permittee shall document in the SWPPP the information and calculations used to determine the nutrient and sediment loadings discharged from the expanded land area before the land was developed, and the measures and controls that were employed to meet the no net increase of stormwater nutrient and sediment load as a result of the expansion of the industrial activity. Any land disturbance that is exempt from permitting under the VPDES construction stormwater general permit regulation (9VAC25-880) is exempt from this requirement.

b. The permittee may use the water quality design criteria, 9VAC25-875-580, to meet the requirements of Part I B 10 a. Under this criteria, the total phosphorus load shall not exceed the greater of (i) the total phosphorus load that was discharged from the expanded portion of the land before the land being developed for the industrial activity or (ii) 0.41 0.26 pounds per acre per year. Compliance with the water quality design criteria may be determined utilizing the Virginia Runoff Reduction Method or another equivalent methodology approved by the department Article 3 (9VAC25-875-570 et seq.) of Part V (9VAC25-875-470 et seq.) of the Virginia Erosion and Stormwater Management Regulation. Design specifications and pollutant removal efficiencies for specific BMPs can be found on through the Virginia Stormwater BMP Clearinghouse website at http://www.deq.virginia.gov./our-programs/water/stormwater/stormwater-construction/bmp-clearinghouse.

c. The permittee may consider utilization of any pollutant trading or offset program in accordance with §§ 62.1-44.19:20 through 62.1-44.19:23 of the Code of Virginia, governing trading and offsetting, to meet the no net increase requirement.

10. Water quality protection. The discharges authorized by this permit shall be controlled as necessary to meet applicable water quality standards. The department expects that compliance with the conditions in this permit will control discharges as necessary to meet applicable water quality standards.

11. Adding or deleting stormwater outfalls. The permittee may add new or delete existing stormwater outfalls at the facility as necessary and appropriate. The permittee shall update the SWPPP and notify the department of all outfall changes within 30 days of the change. The permittee shall submit a copy of the updated SWPPP site map with this notification.

12. Antidegradation requirements for new or increased discharges to high quality waters. Facilities that add new outfalls, or increase their discharges from existing outfalls that discharge directly to high quality waters designated under Virginia's water quality standards antidegradation policy under 9VAC25-260-30 A 2 may be notified by the department that additional control measures, or other permit conditions are necessary to comply with the applicable antidegradation requirements, or may be notified that an individual permit is required in accordance with 9VAC25-31-170 B 3.

13. Termination of permit coverage.

a. The owner may terminate coverage under this general permit by filing a notice of termination with the department. The notice of termination may be filed after one or more of the following conditions have been met:

(1) Operations have ceased at the facility and there are no longer discharges of stormwater associated with industrial activity from the facility;

(2) A new owner has assumed responsibility for the facility. A notice of termination does not have to be submitted if a VPDES Change of Ownership Agreement Form has been submitted;

(3) All stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity have been covered by an individual VPDES permit; or

(4) Termination of coverage is being requested for another reason, provided the department agrees that coverage under this general permit is no longer needed.

b. The notice of termination shall contain the following information:

(1) Owner's name, mailing address, telephone number, and email address (if available);

(2) Facility name and location;

(3) VPDES industrial stormwater general permit registration number;

(4) The basis for submitting the notice of termination, including:

(a) A statement indicating that a new owner has assumed responsibility for the facility;

(b) A statement indicating that operations have ceased at the facility, and there are no longer discharges of stormwater associated with industrial activity from the facility;

(c) A statement indicating that all stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity have been covered by an individual VPDES permit; or

(d) A statement indicating that termination of coverage is being requested for another reason and a description of the reason; and

(5) The following certification: "I certify under penalty of law that all stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from the identified facility that are authorized by this VPDES general permit have been eliminated, or covered under a VPDES individual permit, or that I am no longer the owner of the industrial activity, or permit coverage should be terminated for another reason listed above. I understand that by submitting this notice of termination, that I am no longer authorized to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activity in accordance with the general permit, and that discharging pollutants in stormwater associated with industrial activity to surface waters is unlawful where the discharge is not authorized by a VPDES permit. I also understand that the submittal of this notice of termination does not release an owner from liability for any violations of this permit or the Clean Water Act."

c. The notice of termination shall be signed in accordance with Part II K.

d. The notice of termination shall be submitted to the DEQ regional office serving the area where the industrial facility is located.

Part II

Conditions Applicable to All VPDES Permits

A. Monitoring.

1. Samples and measurements taken as required by this permit shall be representative of the monitored activity.

2. Monitoring shall be conducted according to procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136 or alternative methods approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, unless other procedures have been specified in this permit.

3. The permittee shall periodically calibrate and perform maintenance procedures on all monitoring and analytical instrumentation at intervals that will ensure accuracy of measurements.

4. Samples taken as required by this permit shall be analyzed in accordance with 1VAC30-45 (Certification for Noncommercial Environmental Laboratories) or 1VAC30-46 (Accreditation for Commercial Environmental Laboratories).

B. Records.

1. Records of monitoring information shall include:

a. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements;

b. The individuals who performed the sampling or measurements;

c. The dates and times analyses were performed;

d. The individuals who performed the analyses;

e. The analytical techniques or methods used; and

f. The results of the analyses.

2. The permittee shall retain copies of the SWPPP, including any modifications made during the term of this permit, records of all monitoring information, including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the registration statement for this permit, for a period of at least three years from the date that coverage under this permit expires or is terminated. This period of retention shall be extended automatically during the course of any unresolved litigation regarding the regulated activity or regarding control standards applicable to the permittee, or as requested by the department.

C. Reporting monitoring results.

1. The permittee shall submit the results of the monitoring required by this permit not later than the 10th day of the month after monitoring takes place, unless another reporting schedule is specified elsewhere in this permit. Monitoring results shall be submitted to the department's regional office.

2. Monitoring results shall be reported in the department's electronic discharge monitoring report (e-DMR) system. All reports and forms submitted in compliance with this permit shall be submitted electronically by the permittee in accordance with 9VAC25-31-1020.

3. If the permittee monitors any pollutant specifically addressed by this permit more frequently than required by this permit using test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136 or using other test procedures approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or using procedures specified in this permit, the results of this monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted in e-DMR or reporting form specified by the department.

4. Calculations for all limitations which require averaging of measurements shall utilize an arithmetic mean unless otherwise specified in this permit.

D. Duty to provide information. The permittee shall furnish to the department, within a reasonable time, any information that the department may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating coverage under this permit or to determine compliance with this permit. The department may require the permittee to furnish on request plans, specifications, and other pertinent information as may be necessary to determine the effect of the wastes from the discharge on the quality of state waters, or other information as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of the State Water Control Law. The permittee shall also furnish to the department on request copies of records required to be kept by this permit.

E. Compliance schedule reports. Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on, interim and final requirements contained in any compliance schedule of this permit shall be submitted no later than 14 days following each schedule date.

F. Unauthorized discharges. Except in compliance with this permit, or another permit issued by the department, it shall be unlawful for any person to:

1. Discharge into state waters sewage, industrial wastes, other wastes, or any noxious or deleterious substances; or

2. Otherwise alter the physical, chemical, or biological properties of state waters and make them detrimental to the public health, or to animal or aquatic life, or to the use of state waters for domestic or industrial consumption, for recreation, or for other uses.

G. Reports of unauthorized discharges. Any permittee who discharges or causes or allows a discharge of sewage, industrial waste, other wastes or any noxious or deleterious substance into or upon state waters in violation of Part II F; or who discharges or causes or allows a discharge that may reasonably be expected to enter state waters in violation of Part II F, shall notify the department of the discharge immediately upon discovery of the discharge, but in no case later than 24 hours after the discovery. A written report of the unauthorized discharge shall be submitted to the department within five days of discovery of the discharge. The written report shall contain:

1. A description of the nature and location of the discharge;

2. The cause of the discharge;

3. The date on which the discharge occurred;

4. The length of time that the discharge continued;

5. The volume of the discharge;

6. If the discharge is continuing, how long it is expected to continue;

7. If the discharge is continuing, what the expected total volume of the discharge will be; and

8. Any steps planned or taken to reduce, eliminate, and prevent a recurrence of the present discharge or any future discharges not authorized by this permit.

Discharges reportable to the department under the immediate reporting requirements of other regulations are exempted from this requirement.

H. Reports of unusual or extraordinary discharges. If any unusual or extraordinary discharge including a bypass or upset should occur from a treatment works and the discharge enters or could be expected to enter state waters, the permittee shall promptly notify, in no case later than 24 hours, the department after the discovery of the discharge. This notification shall provide all available details of the incident, including any adverse effects on aquatic life and the known number of fish killed. The permittee shall reduce the report to writing and shall submit it to the department within five days of discovery of the discharge in accordance with Part II I 1 b. Unusual and extraordinary discharges include any discharge resulting from:

1. Unusual spillage of materials resulting directly or indirectly from processing operations;

2. Breakdown of processing or accessory equipment;

3. Failure or taking out of service some or all of the treatment works; and

4. Flooding or other acts of nature.

I. Reports of noncompliance.

1. The permittee shall report any noncompliance that may adversely affect state waters or may endanger public health.

a. A report shall be provided within 24 hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The following shall be included as information that shall be reported within 24 hours under Part II I:

(1) Any unanticipated bypass; and

(2) Any upset that causes a discharge to surface waters.

b. A written report shall be submitted within five days and shall contain:

(1) A description of the noncompliance and its cause;

(2) The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and

(3) Steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance.

The department may waive the written report on a case-by-case basis for reports of noncompliance under Part II I if the oral report has been received within 24 hours and no adverse impact on state waters has been reported.

2. The permittee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under Part II I 1 in writing at the time the next monitoring reports are submitted. The reports shall contain the information listed in Part II I 1.

3. The immediate (within 24 hours) reports required in Part II G, H and I shall be made to the department's regional office. Reports may be made by telephone or online at https://www.deq.virginia.gov/our-programs/pollution-response. For reports outside normal working hours, the online portal shall be used. For emergencies, call the Virginia Department of Emergency Management's Emergency Operations Center (24-hours) at 1-800-468-8892.

J. Notice of planned changes.

1. The permittee shall give notice to the department as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility. Notice is required only when:

a. The permittee plans alteration or addition to any building, structure, facility, or installation from which there is or may be a discharge of pollutants, the construction of which began:

(1) After promulgation of standards of performance under § 306 of the Clean Water Act which are applicable to the source; or

(2) After proposal of standards of performance in accordance with § 306 of the Clean Water Act that are applicable to the source, but only if the standards are promulgated in accordance with § 306 within 120 days of their proposal;

b. The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants that are subject neither to effluent limitations nor to notification requirements specified elsewhere in this permit; or

c. The alteration or addition results in a significant change in the permittee's sludge use or disposal practices, and the alteration, addition, or change may justify the application of permit conditions that are different from or absent in the existing permit, including notification of additional use or disposal sites not reported during the permit application process or not reported pursuant to an approved land application plan.

2. The permittee shall give advance notice to the department of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity that may result in noncompliance with permit requirements.

K. Signatory requirements.

1. Registration statement. All registration statements shall be signed as follows:

a. For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this section, a responsible corporate officer means (i) a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy-making or decision-making functions for the corporation; or (ii) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, provided the manager is authorized to make management decisions that govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to ensure long-term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for permit registration requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures;

b. For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; or

c. For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. For purposes of this section, a principal executive officer of a public agency includes (i) the chief executive officer of the agency, or (ii) a senior executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency.

2. Reports. All reports required by permits, and other information requested by the department shall be signed by a person described in Part II K 1 or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if:

a. The authorization is made in writing by a person described in Part II K 1;

b. The authorization specifies either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity (e.g., the position of plant manager, operator of a well or a well field, superintendent, position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company). A duly authorized representative may be a named individual or any individual occupying a named position; and

c. The written authorization is submitted to the department.

3. Changes to authorization. If an authorization under Part II K 2 is no longer accurate because a different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of the facility, a new authorization satisfying the requirements of Part II K 2 shall be submitted to the department before or together with any reports, or information to be signed by an authorized representative.

4. Certification. Any person signing a document under Part II K 1 or 2 shall make the following certification:

"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations."

L. Duty to comply. The permittee shall comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the State Water Control Law and the Clean Water Act, except that noncompliance with certain provisions of this permit may constitute a violation of the State Water Control Law but not the Clean Water Act. Permit noncompliance is grounds for enforcement action; for permit coverage termination or denial of a permit coverage renewal.

The permittee shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under § 307(a) of the Clean Water Act for toxic pollutants within the time provided in the regulations that establish these standards even if this permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the requirement.

M. Duty to reapply. If the permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration date of this permit, the permittee shall submit a new registration statement at least 60 days before the expiration date of the existing permit, unless permission for a later date has been granted by the department. The department shall not grant permission for registration statements to be submitted later than the expiration date of the existing permit.

N. Effect of a permit. This permit neither conveys any property rights in either real or personal property or any exclusive privileges nor authorizes any injury to private property or invasion of personal rights, or any infringement of federal, state, or local law or regulations.

O. State law. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action under, or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties established pursuant to any other state law or regulation or under authority preserved by § 510 of the Clean Water Act. Except as provided in permit conditions on bypassing as described in Part II U and upset as described in Part II V, nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee from civil and criminal penalties for noncompliance.

P. Oil and hazardous substance liability. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee is or may be subject under §§ 62.1-44.34:14 through 62.1-44.34:23 of the State Water Control Law.

Q. Proper operation and maintenance. The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) that are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Proper operation and maintenance also includes effective plant performance, adequate funding, adequate staffing, and adequate laboratory and process controls, including appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems that are installed by the permittee only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit.

R. Disposal of solids or sludges. Solids, sludges, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or management of pollutants shall be disposed of in a manner so as to prevent any pollutant from the materials from entering state waters.

S. Duty to mitigate. The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge or sludge use or disposal in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment.

T. Need to halt or reduce activity not a defense. It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit.

U. Bypass.

1. "Bypass" means the intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment facility. The permittee may allow any bypass to occur that does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded, but only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of Part II U 2 and 3.

2. Notice.

a. Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, prior notice shall be submitted, if possible, at least 10 days before the date of the bypass.

b. Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as required in Part II I.

3. Prohibition of bypass.

a. Bypass is prohibited, and the department may take enforcement action against a permittee for bypass, unless:

(1) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage;

(2) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass (e.g., the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime). This condition is not satisfied if adequate back-up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and

(3) The permittee submitted notices as required under Part II U 2.

b. The department may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its adverse effects, if the department determines that it will meet the three conditions listed in Part II U 3 a.

V. Upset.

1. An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with technology based technology-based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of Part II V 2 are met. A determination made during administrative review of claims that noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is not a final administrative action subject to judicial review.

2. A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that:

a. An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the causes of the upset;

b. The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated;

c. The permittee submitted notice of the upset as required in Part II I; and

d. The permittee complied with any remedial measures required under Part II S.

3. In any enforcement proceeding the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof.

W. Inspection and entry. The permittee shall allow the director, or an authorized representative, including an authorized contractor acting as a representative of the administrator, upon presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, to:

1. Enter on the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit;

2. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit;

3. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and

4. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act and the State Water Control Law, any substances or parameters at any location.

For purposes of this section, the time for inspection shall be deemed reasonable during regular business hours, and whenever the facility is discharging. Nothing contained in this general permit shall make an inspection unreasonable during an emergency.

X. Permit actions. Permit coverages may be terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit termination or a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition.

Y. Transfer of permits.

1. Permits are not transferable to any person except after notice to the department.

2. Coverage under this permit may be automatically transferred to a new permittee if:

a. The current permittee notifies the department within 30 days of the transfer of the title to the facility or property, unless permission for a later date has been granted by the department;

b. The notice includes a written agreement between the existing and new permittees containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and liability between them; and

c. The department does not notify the existing permittee and the proposed new permittee of its intent to deny the new permittee coverage under the permit. If this notice is not received, the transfer is effective on the date specified in the agreement mentioned in Part II Y 2 b.

Z. Severability. The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby.

9VAC25-151-400. Chesapeake Bay total maximum daily load compliance.

A. Chesapeake Bay TMDL Compliance. EPA's Chesapeake Bay TMDL (December 29, 2010) includes wasteload allocations for VPDES permitted industrial stormwater facilities as part of the regulated stormwater aggregate load. EPA used data submitted by Virginia with the Phase I Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan, including the number of industrial stormwater permits per county and the number of urban acres regulated by industrial stormwater permits, as part of their development of the aggregate load. Aggregate loads for industrial stormwater facilities were appropriate because actual facility loading data were not available to develop individual facility wasteload allocations.

Virginia estimated the loadings from industrial stormwater facilities using actual and estimated facility acreage information and total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) loading rates from the Northern Virginia Planning District Commission (NVPDC) Guidebook for Screening Urban Nonpoint Pollution Management Strategies (Annandale, VA November 1979), prepared for the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. The loading rates used were as follows:

TP - High (80%) imperviousness industrial; 1.5 lb/ac/yr

TN - High (80%) imperviousness industrial; 12.3 lb/ac/yr

Actual facility area information and TP and TN data collected for facilities subject to Part V of this permit will be used by the department to quantify the nutrient and sediment loads from those VPDES permitted industrial stormwater facilities.

1. Facilities that obtained coverage under the 2019 industrial stormwater general permit that demonstrated compliance with the Chesapeake Bay TMDL loading rates.

Owners shall maintain documentation of their demonstration of compliance with the Chesapeake Bay TMDL loading rates with the SWPPP and shall continue implementing any BMPs that may have been developed as part of that demonstration.

Documentation may include:

a. Calculations submitted to the department indicating that reductions were not necessary;

b. A completed TMDL Action Plan, including a description of the means and methods, such as management practices and retrofit programs that were utilized to meet the required reductions;

c. Other means accepted by the department indicating compliance with the Chesapeake Bay TMDL loading rates.

2. Facilities that obtained coverage under the 2019 industrial stormwater general permit that did not demonstrate compliance with the Chesapeake Bay TMDL loading rates shall submit a demonstration to the department.

a. Owners of facilities that submitted a Chesapeake Bay TMDL action plan during the 2019 industrial stormwater general permit term that did not achieve reductions by the end of the 2019 permit term shall update and resubmit their action plan to the department for approval no later than 60 days following coverage under this general permit. Permittees shall achieve 10% of the remaining reductions by December 31, 2024, and all remaining reductions by December 31, 2025. An annual report shall be submitted to the department by June 30 of each year describing the progress in meeting the interim and final reductions. A final report to demonstrate compliance shall be submitted to the department no later than January 10, 2026. Documentation of compliance with the Chesapeake Bay TMDL loading rates shall be maintained with the SWPPP.

b. Owners of facilities that completed four samples for each outfall for TN and TP during the 2019 industrial stormwater general permit term that did not submit calculations by the end of the 2019 permit term shall utilize the procedures in Part V D to calculate their facility stormwater loads. The permittee shall submit a copy of the calculations, and a Chesapeake Bay TMDL action plan if required under Part V E, no later than 60 days following coverage under this general permit to the DEQ regional office serving the area where the industrial facility is located on a form provided by the department. Reductions, if applicable, shall be achieved by December 31, 2025, and an annual report shall be submitted to the department by June 30 of each year describing the progress in meeting the required reductions until such time that the demonstration is completed. The demonstration shall be submitted to the department no later than January 10, 2026. Documentation of compliance with the Chesapeake Bay TMDL loading rates shall be maintained with the SWPPP.

c. Owners of facilities registered prior to July 1, 2022, that did not complete four samples for each outfall for TN and TP by the end of the 2019 industrial stormwater general permit term shall monitor their discharges for TN and TP to characterize the contributions from their facility's specific industrial sector for these parameters. Total nitrogen is the sum of total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) and nitrite + nitrate and shall be derived from the results of those tests. After the facility is granted coverage under the permit, samples shall be collected during each of the first four quarters of permit coverage. Samples shall be collected and analyzed in accordance with Part V B. Monitoring results shall be reported in accordance with Part V C and Part II C, and retained in accordance with Part II B. Calculations utilizing the procedures in Part V D, and a Chesapeake Bay TMDL action plan if required under Part V E, shall be submitted no later than 60 days following the completion of the fourth quarterly monitoring period to the DEQ regional office serving the area where the industrial facility is located on a form provided by the department. Reductions, if applicable, shall be achieved by December 31, 2025, and an annual report shall be submitted to the department by June 30 of each year describing the progress in meeting the required reductions until such time that the demonstration is completed. The demonstration shall be submitted to the department no later than January 10, 2026. Documentation of compliance with the Chesapeake Bay TMDL loading rates shall be maintained with the SWPPP.

Facilities may use the applicable sampling data collected during the 2019 industrial stormwater general permit term to satisfy all or part of the four monitoring periods requirement in accordance with Part V A 2 c.

d. Owners of facilities registered after June 30, 2022, that did not complete four samples for each outfall for TN and TP by the end of the 2019 industrial stormwater general permit term shall monitor their discharges in accordance with Part V A 3.

Facilities may use the applicable sampling data collected during the 2019 industrial stormwater general permit term to satisfy all or part of the four monitoring periods requirements in accordance with Part V A 3.

3. Facilities that obtain initial coverage under the 2024 industrial stormwater general permit, but are not newly constructed facilities as identified in 9VAC25-151-60 C 13.

Owners of facilities in the Chesapeake Bay watershed that obtain initial coverage under the 2024 industrial stormwater general permit shall monitor their discharges for TN and TP to characterize the contributions from their facility's specific industrial sector for these parameters. Total nitrogen is the sum of total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) and nitrite + nitrate and shall be derived from the results of those tests. After the facility is granted coverage under the permit, samples shall be collected during each of the first four quarters of permit coverage. Samples shall be collected and analyzed in accordance with Part V B. Monitoring results shall be reported in accordance with Part V C and Part II C, and retained in accordance with Part II B. Calculations utilizing the procedures in Part V D and a Chesapeake Bay TMDL action plan if required under Part V E shall be submitted no later than 60 days following the completion of the fourth quarterly monitoring period to the DEQ regional office serving the area where the industrial facility is located on a form provided by the department. Reductions, if applicable, shall be achieved by two years following the end of the fourth quarterly monitoring period, and an annual report shall be submitted to the department by June 30 of each year describing the progress in meeting the required reductions until such time that the demonstration is completed. The demonstration shall be submitted to the department no later than the 10th of the month directly following the two year period. Documentation of compliance with the Chesapeake Bay TMDL loading rates shall be maintained with the SWPPP.

B. Monitoring instructions.

1. Collection and analysis of samples. Sampling requirements shall be assessed on an outfall by outfall basis. Samples shall be collected and analyzed in accordance with the requirements of Part II A.

2. When and how to sample. A minimum of one grab sample shall be taken from the discharge associated with industrial activity resulting from a storm event that results in a discharge from the site providing the interval from the preceding storm event discharge is at least 72 hours. The 72-hour storm interval is waived if the permittee is able to document that less than a 72-hour interval is representative for local storm events during the sampling period. In the case of snowmelt, the monitoring shall be performed at a time when a measurable discharge occurs at the site. For discharges from a stormwater management structure, the monitoring shall be performed at a time when a measurable discharge occurs from the structure.

The grab sample shall be taken during the first 30 minutes of the discharge. If it is not practicable to take the sample during the first 30 minutes, the sample may be taken during the first three hours of the discharge, provided that the permittee explains why a grab sample during the first 30 minutes was impracticable. This information shall be submitted in the department's electronic discharge monitoring report (e-DMR) system and maintained with the SWPPP. If the sampled discharge commingles with process or nonprocess water, the permittee shall attempt to sample the stormwater discharge before it mixes with the nonstormwater.

3. Storm event data. For each monitoring event, except snowmelt monitoring, along with the monitoring results, the permittee shall identify the date of the storm event sampled; rainfall total (in inches) of the storm event that generated the sampled runoff; and the interval between the storm event sampled and the end of the previous storm event discharge. For snowmelt monitoring, the permittee shall identify the date of the sampling event.

4. Monitoring periods. Quarterly monitoring shall be conducted in each of the following three-month periods: January through March, April through June, July through September, and October through December.

5. Documentation explaining a facility's inability to obtain a sample (including dates and times the outfalls were viewed or sampling was attempted), of no rain event, or of deviation from the 72-hour storm interval shall be submitted with the e-DMR and maintained with the SWPPP. Acceptable documentation includes National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) weather station data, local weather station data, facility rainfall logs, and other appropriate supporting data.

6. Representative outfalls may be used in accordance with Part I A 2 f.

C. Reporting monitoring results.

1. Reporting to the department. The permittee shall follow the reporting requirements and deadlines in Table 400-1 if required by Part V A 2 or A 3:

Table 400-1

Monitoring Reporting Requirements

Quarterly Chesapeake Bay TMDL Monitoring Submit the results by January 10, April 10, July 10, and October 10

2. Permittees shall submit results for each outfall associated with industrial activity according to the requirements of Part II C.

3. Significant digits. The permittee shall report at least the same number of significant digits as a numeric effluent limitation or TMDL wasteload allocation for a given parameter; otherwise, at least two significant digits shall be reported for a given parameter. Regardless of the rounding convention used by the permittee (i.e., five always rounding up or to the nearest even number), the permittee shall use the convention consistently and shall ensure that consulting laboratories employed by the permittee use the same convention.

D. Calculation of facility loads.

Permittees required to collect nutrient and sediment data in accordance with Part V A 2 or A 3 shall analyze the data collected to determine if pollution reductions are required. The permittee shall average the data collected at the facility for each of the pollutants of concern (POC) (e.g., TP and TN) and compare the results to the loading rates for TP and TN presented in Part V A.

The following formula may be used to determine the loading rate:

L = 0.226 x P x Pj x (0.05 + (0.9 x Ia)) x C

where:

L = the POC loading rate (lb/acre/year)

P = the annual rainfall (inches/year) - The permittee may use either actual annual average rainfall data for the facility location (in inches/year), the Virginia annual average rainfall of 44.3 inches/year, or another method approved by the department.

Pj = the fraction of annual events that produce runoff - The permittee shall use 0.9 unless the department approves another rate.

Ia = the impervious fraction of the facility impervious area of industrial activity to the facility industrial activity area.

C = the POC average concentration of all facility samples (mg/L) - Facilities with multiple outfalls shall calculate a weighted average concentration for each outfall using the drainage area of each outfall.

For total phosphorus, all daily concentration data below the quantitation level (QL) for the analytical method used shall be treated as half the QL. All daily concentration data equal to or above the QL for the analytical method used shall be treated as it is reported.

For total nitrogen, if none of the daily concentration data for the respective species (i.e., TKN, nitrate, or nitrite) are equal to or above the QL for the respective analytical methods used, the daily TN concentration value reported shall equal one half of the largest QL used for the respective species. If one of the data is equal to or above the QL, the daily TN concentration value shall be treated as that data point is reported. If more than one of the data is above the QL, the daily TN concentration value shall equal the sum of the data points as reported.

Calculations shall be submitted to the department within 60 days from the end of the last monitoring period that satisfies the monitoring requirements in Part V A 2 or A 3. Calculations shall be submitted to the DEQ regional office serving the area where the industrial facility is located, on a form provided by the department, and maintained with the facility's SWPPP.

Alternative calculations may be accepted on a case by case basis by the department to accommodate facilities with outfalls that rarely discharge.

E. Chesapeake Bay TMDL action plan requirements. For permittees required to submit calculations in accordance with Part V D, if the calculated facility loading rate for TP or TN is above the loading rates for TP or TN presented in Part V A, then the permittee shall develop and submit a Chesapeake Bay TMDL action plan to the department.

The Chesapeake Bay TMDL action plan shall be submitted on a form provided by the department to the regional office serving the area where the industrial facility is located within 60 days following the completion of the fourth quarterly monitoring period. A copy of the current Chesapeake Bay TMDL action plan and all facility loading rate calculations shall be maintained with the facility's SWPPP. The Chesapeake Bay TMDL action plan shall include:

1. A determination of the total pollutant load reductions for TP and TN (as appropriate) necessary to reduce the annual loads from industrial activities. This shall be determined by multiplying the industrial average times the difference between the TMDL loading rates listed in Part V A and the actual facility loading rates calculated in accordance with Part V D. The reduction applies to the total difference calculated for each pollutant of concern; and

2. The means and methods, such as management practices and retrofit programs that will be utilized to meet the required reductions determined in Part V E 1 and a schedule to achieve those reductions by the applicable deadline set in Part V A 2 or A 3. Pollutant reductions may be achieved using a combination of the following alternatives:

a. Reductions provided by one or more of the BMPs from found through the Virginia Stormwater BMP Clearinghouse listed in 9VAC25-875-590, approved BMPs found on the Virginia Stormwater Clearinghouse website at http://www.deq.virginia.gov/our-programs/water/stormwater/stormwater-construction/bmp-clearinghouse, or BMPs approved by the Chesapeake Bay Program. Any BMPs implemented to provide the required pollutant reductions shall be incorporated in the SWPPP and be permanently maintained by the permittee;

b. Implementation of site-specific BMPs followed by a minimum of four stormwater samples collected in accordance with sampling requirements in Part V B that demonstrate pollutant loadings have been reduced below those calculated under Part V D. Any BMPs implemented to provide the required pollutant reductions shall be incorporated in the SWPPP and be permanently maintained by the permittee; or

c. Acquisition of nonpoint source credits certified by the board as perpetual in accordance with § 62.1-44.19:20 of the Code of Virginia.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-8352; Filed October 15, 2025
TITLE 14. INSURANCE
STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION, BUREAU OF INSURANCE
Final

TITLE 14. INSURANCE

STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION

Final Regulation

REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The State Corporation Commission is claiming an exemption from the Administrative Process Act in accordance with § 2.2-4002 A 2 of the Code of Virginia, which exempts courts, any agency of the Supreme Court, and any agency that by the Constitution is expressly granted any of the powers of a court of record.

Title of Regulation: 14VAC5-341. Rules Governing Standards for the Content of Dwelling Property Insurance Policies (amending 14VAC5-341-40).

Statutory Authority: §§ 12.1-13, 38.2-223, and 38.2-2108 of the Code of Virginia.

Effective Date: December 1, 2025.

Agency Contact: Katie Johnson, Insurance Policy Advisor, Bureau of Insurance, State Corporation Commission, P.O. Box 1157, Richmond, VA 23218, telephone (804) 371-9688, or email katie.johnson@scc.virginia.gov.

Summary:

The amendment allows dwelling property insurers to provide, at the request of the named insured, any limit of liability for other structures of not less than 5.0% of the dwelling limit of liability.

14VAC5-341-40. Mandatory property coverages.

A. Insurers shall provide coverage for the dwelling on the residence premises, including fixtures.

1. Insurers shall also provide coverage for materials and supplies while located on the residence premises and intended for use in construction, alteration, or repair of the dwelling or other structures.

2. For a dwelling that is a condominium unit, insurers shall provide a limit of liability of at least $5,000 for the dwelling and fixtures that are the responsibility of the condominium unit owner.

B. Insurers shall provide coverage for other structures and the fixtures of other structures on the residence premises.

1. Insurers shall provide a limit of liability of at least 10% of the dwelling limit of liability. Upon request of the named insured, an insurer may provide any other limit of liability for other structures coverage that is not less than 5.0% of the dwelling limit of liability.

2. Insurers may exclude coverage for other structures that are used for business or rented or held for rental, unless the structure is (i) rented to roomers, boarders, or tenants of the dwelling or (ii) rented for use solely as a private garage.

3. For condominium units, insurers shall provide coverage for other structures and fixtures of other structures that are the responsibility of the condominium unit owner.

C. Insurers shall provide coverage for (i) breakage of glass or safety glazing material that is part of a dwelling or other structure and (ii) damage to covered property by glass that is part of a dwelling or other structure. This coverage does not increase the limit of liability that applies to the damaged covered property. Insurers may exclude loss if the dwelling was vacant.

D. Insurers shall provide coverage for the expenses incurred for the removal of debris of covered property damaged by a covered cause of loss and the expense for the removal of fallen trees that damage covered property. Expenses for debris removal are included within the limit of liability applicable to the damaged property.

E. Insurers shall provide coverage for contractual fire department service charges and volunteer fire department service charges as follows:

1. Contractual fire department service charges where the fire department is called to save or protect insured property from a covered cause of loss. Insurers may limit this coverage to a residence premises not located within the limits of a city, municipality, or fire protection district furnishing fire department services.

2. Fire department service charges made by volunteer fire departments pursuant to § 38.2-2130 of the Code of Virginia.

3. Insurers shall provide at least $250 of coverage for each type of fire department service charges.

4. Insurers may not apply a deductible to the coverages in subdivisions 1 and 2 of this subsection.

F. Insurers shall offer ordinance or law coverage, subject to the exclusions or limitations within this chapter, pursuant to § 38.2-2124 of the Code of Virginia at the dwelling limit of liability within the policy or as an endorsement. This limit of liability is in addition to the limit of liability applicable to the dwelling. Insurers may make other limits of liability available for insureds to purchase. When ordinance or law coverage is provided within the policy or as an endorsement, subdivision A 3 of 14VAC5-341-70 A 3 does not apply.

G. Insurers shall provide coverage of at least 10% of the dwelling limit of liability for the increase in necessary living expenses when the dwelling is uninhabitable due to a covered cause of loss. Insurers shall provide coverage of at least 20% of the household and personal property limit of liability for condominium units.

1. Insurers shall provide this coverage for the time reasonably required to return the dwelling to a habitable condition or for the insured's household to become settled in any permanent quarters.

2. Insurers shall provide additional living expense coverage for at least two weeks while a civil authority limits access to the residence premises as a result of damage to neighboring premises by a covered cause of loss.

3. Insurers may exclude living expenses that do not continue.

4. This coverage is not limited by the expiration date of the policy.

5. Insurers may not apply a deductible to this coverage.

H. Insurers shall provide coverage of at least 10% of the dwelling limit of liability for the fair rental value of any part of the dwelling or other structure. Insurers shall provide coverage of at least 20% of the household and personal property limit of liability for condominium units.

1. Insurers shall provide this coverage for the time reasonably required to restore the dwelling or other structures to a tenantable condition following damage caused by a covered cause of loss.

2. Insurers shall provide fair rental value coverage for at least two weeks while a civil authority limits access to the residence premises as a result of damage to neighboring premises by a covered cause of loss.

3. Insurers may exclude expenses that do not continue.

4. Insurers may exclude coverage for loss or expense due to cancellation of a lease or agreement.

5. This coverage is not limited by the expiration date of the policy.

6. Insurers may not apply a deductible to this coverage.

I. Insurers shall provide coverage for damage to trees, shrubs, plants, or lawns caused by fire, lightning, explosion, riot, civil commotion, aircraft, or vehicles not owned or operated by a resident of the residence premises. When expanded or open causes of loss are provided by the policy, insurers shall also include coverage for damage to trees, shrubs, plants, or lawns caused by vandalism and malicious mischief, and actual or attempted burglary.

1. Insurers shall provide a limit of liability for this coverage of at least 5.0% of the dwelling limit of liability.

2. Insurers may limit the amount of coverage to no more than $250 for each tree, shrub, or plant on the residence premises. The limit of coverage includes debris removal coverage when the tree, plant, or shrub does not cause damage to covered property.

J. Insurers shall provide coverage for loss or damage to property while removed or being removed from the residence premises because the property is endangered by a covered cause of loss.

1. Coverage is provided for damage from any cause subject to the exclusions and limitations permitted in this chapter.

2. Insurers shall provide this coverage for at least 30 days for each removal.

3. This coverage is not limited by the expiration date of the policy.

4. This coverage does not increase the limit of liability that applies to the damaged covered property.

K. Insurers shall provide coverage for the cost of making reasonable repairs to protect covered property from further damage when the repairs are directly attributable to damage caused by a covered cause of loss. The repairs are included as part of the amount of the loss.

L. If expanded or open causes of loss are provided by the policy, insurers shall pay the cost incurred to tear out and replace the part of the dwelling or other structure necessary to gain access to the system or appliance from which the water or steam escaped if a loss to the dwelling or other structures is caused by water or steam escaping from a system or appliance. Insurers may exclude loss to the system or appliance from which the water or steam escapes.

M. Insurers shall provide coverage for direct physical loss to the dwelling, other structures, and household and personal property involving collapse of a dwelling or other structure or any part of a dwelling or other structure:

1. Caused by one or more of the following:

a. The causes of loss in subsection C of 14VAC5-341-60 C;

b. Hidden decay;

c. Hidden insect or vermin damage;

d. Weight of contents, equipment, animals, or people;

e. Weight of rain that collects on a roof; or

f. Use of defective materials or methods in construction, remodeling, or renovation if the collapse occurs during the construction, remodeling, or renovation.

2. Loss to an awning, fence, patio, pavement, swimming pool, underground pipe, flue, drain, cesspool, septic tank, foundation, retaining wall, bulkhead, pier, wharf, or dock is not included under subdivisions 1 b through 1 f of this subsection unless the loss is a direct result of the collapse of a building.

3. Collapse does not include settling, cracking, shrinking, bulging, or expansion. A building that is in danger of falling down or caving in is not in a state of collapse.

4. This coverage does not increase the limit of liability applicable to the damaged covered property.

5. Insurers may exclude collapse when providing only basic causes of loss set forth in subsection B of 14VAC5-341-60 B.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-8415; Filed October 17, 2025
TITLE 18. PROFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING
BOARD FOR BRANCH PILOTS
Final

TITLE 18. PROFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING

BOARD FOR BRANCH PILOTS

Final Regulation

Title of Regulation: 18VAC45-20. Board for Branch Pilots Regulations (amending 18VAC45-20-10 through 18VAC45-20-50).

Statutory Authority: § 54.1-902 of the Code of Virginia.

Effective Date: December 17, 2025.

Agency Contact: Kathleen R. Nosbisch, Executive Director, Board for Branch Pilots, 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 400, Richmond, VA 23233, telephone (804) 367-8514, fax (804) 527-4294, or email branchpilots@dpor.virginia.gov.

Summary:

The amendments (i) eliminate the requirement that applicants for a full branch pilot license provide evidence of a satisfactory physical examination, to include chemical tests; (ii) add a provision that would allow branch pilots who have a full branch pilot license for the branch of Sea to Wolf Trap to qualify for an extension of route for the waters of the Chesapeake Bay from Wolf Trap to Smith Point, without requiring a Federal First Class Pilot endorsement for the extended route; and (iii) specify that the licensee shall ensure that the medical review officer performs various duties.

Changes to the proposed regulation (i) streamline the language of provisions pertaining to payment of fees for licensure or license renewal and (ii) conform the regulation to Chapter 505 of the 2025 Acts of Assembly, which prohibits a regulatory board from the use of vague or arbitrary terms to deny a license, certification, or registration.

Summary of Public Comments and Agency's Response: No public comments were received by the promulgating agency.

18VAC45-20-10. Initial licensing.

A. Any person wishing to obtain a license as a limited branch pilot shall meet the following qualifications:

1. Satisfactorily complete a two-year apprenticeship in a program approved by the board;

2. Satisfactorily complete a comprehensive examination which that shall be approved by the board and administered by the examining committee of the board. The examination shall be in two parts:

a. Written; and

b. Practical oral examination;

3. Comply with the board's regulations and Chapter 9 (§ 54.1-900 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia;

4. Furnish to the board evidence of a satisfactory physical examination conducted within the immediately preceding 60 days. This examination shall include the chemical tests referred to in 18VAC45-20-5;

5. Notify the board of any chronic or acute physical or mental condition; and

6. Pay a [ nonrefundable ] licensing fee of $60 [ to the Treasurer of Virginia ]. [ Each check or money order shall be made payable to the Treasurer of Virginia. All fees shall be nonrefundable. ]

B. Any limited branch pilot wishing to obtain a full branch pilot license shall meet the following qualifications:

1. Satisfactorily complete a five-year apprenticeship in a program approved by the board;

2. Hold a limited branch pilot license in good standing;

3. Pass a practical examination approved by the board and administered by the board's examining committee;

4. Possess a valid unlimited Federal Inland Masters License credential with First Class Pilot endorsement issued by the United States U.S. Coast Guard, which shall include radar observer endorsement, for the same waters as his branch of the Commonwealth. Any such federal license acquired after January 1994 shall include an Automated Radar Plotting Aids (ARPA) radar certificate. A copy of this license credential shall be filed with the clerk of submitted to the board immediately;

5. Furnish to the board evidence of a satisfactory physical examination conducted within the immediately preceding 60 days. This examination shall include the chemical tests referred to in 18VAC45-20-50;

6. 5. Qualify in accordance with § 54.1-905 of the Code of Virginia; and

7. 6. Pay a [ nonrefundable ] licensing fee of $60 [ to the Treasurer of Virginia ]. [ Each check or money order is to be made payable to the Treasurer of Virginia. All fees shall be nonrefundable. ]

18VAC45-20-20. License renewal.

A. Each branch pilot seeking renewal of his license renewal shall complete a renewal application, comply with the provisions of this section, and appear before the board or its License Renewal Committee the board's license renewal committee, which shall determine if he the branch pilot possesses the qualifications to be renewed.

B. Any limited branch pilot seeking to renew his license renewal shall meet the following standards:

1. Furnish to the board evidence of a satisfactory physical examination conducted within the immediately preceding 60 days. If the branch pilot has not been subject to random chemical testing during the preceding 24 months, then this examination shall include the chemical tests referred to in 18VAC45-20-50;

2. Furnish to the board evidence that he the branch pilot has transited the waters embraced by his the branch pilot's license during the preceding 12 months;

3. After three years of licensure as a limited branch pilot, possess a valid First Class Pilot License endorsement, with radar observer endorsement, issued by the United States U.S. Coast Guard for the same waters as his limited branch. Any such federal license acquired after January 1994 shall include an Automated Radar Plotting Aids (ARPA) radar certificate of the Commonwealth; and

4. Pay a [ nonrefundable ] license renewal fee of $60 [ to the Treasurer of Virginia ]. [ Each check or money order is to be made payable to the Treasurer of Virginia. All fees shall be nonrefundable. ]

C. Any full branch pilot seeking to renew his license renewal shall meet the following standards:

1. Possess a valid unlimited Federal Inland Masters License credential with First Class Pilot endorsement, with radar observer endorsement, issued by the United States U.S. Coast Guard for the same waters as his branch; any such federal license renewed or acquired after January 1994 shall include an Automated Radar Plotting Aids (ARPA) radar certificate of the Commonwealth;

2. Furnish to the board evidence of a satisfactory physical examination conducted within the immediately preceding 60 days. If the branch pilot has not been subject to random chemical testing during the preceding 24 months, then this examination shall include the chemical tests referred to in 18VAC45-20-50;

3. Furnish to the board evidence that he the branch pilot has transited the waters embraced by his the branch pilot's license during the preceding 12 months, and that he the branch pilot has piloted 12 or more ships during that time, at least six trips as a pilot within the first six months of the calendar year and six trips as a pilot within the last six months of the calendar year. Upon the showing of good cause, the board may waive the requirements of this subdivision when, in its judgment, the pilot is otherwise qualified;

4. Qualify in accordance with § 54.1-906 of the Code of Virginia; and

5. Pay a [ nonrefundable ] license renewal fee of $60 [ to the Treasurer of Virginia ]. [ Each check or money order is to be made payable to the Treasurer of Virginia. All fees shall be nonrefundable. ]

18VAC45-20-30. Change of license.

In order to extend a license, an applicant shall satisfactorily complete 12 or more round trips with a currently licensed pilot of the branch for which the applicant seeks licensure, receive a First Class Pilot License endorsement issued by the United States U.S. Coast Guard, if applicable, for that additional area, and pass a practical examination approved by the board and administered by the board's Examination Committee examination committee.

Branch pilots who have a full branch license from Sea to Wolf Trap qualify to sit for a practical examination approved by the board and administered by the board's examination committee for the waters of Chesapeake Bay from Wolf Trap to Smith Point. Upon successful completion of the examination, the branch pilot obtains a full branch license from Wolf Trap to Smith Point and no additional Federal First Class Pilot endorsement is required.

18VAC45-20-40. Grounds for denial of licensure, denial of renewal, or discipline.

The board shall have the authority to deny initial licensure, deny an extension of license, or deny renewal as well as to discipline existing licensees, whether limited or not, for the following reasons:

1. a. Having been convicted or found guilty, regardless of adjudication, in any jurisdiction of the United States of any felony or a misdemeanor involving [ moral turpitude fraudulent or dishonest acts ] or any alcohol-related or drug-related offense, there being no appeal pending therefrom or the time for appeal having elapsed.

b. Having been convicted or found guilty regardless of adjudication in any jurisdiction of the United States of any felony or a misdemeanor resulting from an arrest for any alcohol-related or drug-related offense, there being no appeal pending therefrom or the time for appeal having elapsed.

Any plea of nolo contendere shall be considered a conviction for the purposes of this subdivision. The record of a conviction certified or authenticated in such form as to be admissible in evidence of the laws of the jurisdiction where convicted shall be admissible as prima facie evidence of such conviction;.

2. Failing to inform the board in writing within seven calendar days of pleading guilty or nolo contendere or being convicted or found guilty of any felony or of a misdemeanor involving [ moral turpitude fraudulent or dishonest acts ] or any alcohol-related or drug-related offense;.

3. Failing to report to the board in writing any reports of the National Transportation Safety Board involving the licensee, or the results of any disciplinary action taken by the United States U.S. Coast Guard against the licensee within seven calendar days of that report or action;.

4. Refusing or in any other way failing to carry out an order from the pilot officers for reasons other than the public's public health, safety, or welfare;.

5. Negligence or misconduct in the performance of duties;.

6. Violating or cooperating with others in violating any provision of Chapter 9 (§ 54.1-900 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia or any regulation of the board;.

7. Failing to, as soon as possible under the circumstances, report to the pilot officers the licensee's finishing time and other required information relating to the particulars of the ship;

8. 7. Failing to file immediately file with the president or vice president of the board, with a copy to the board administrator, a complete written account of any violation of the statutes of Virginia or of the United States relating to pilotage or failing to report in writing to the president or vice president of the board, with a copy to the board administrator, an account of all collisions, groundings, or other maritime mishaps of any description that may occur during the discharge of the pilot's duties. This report shall be received no later than seven days after such an incident;.

9. 8. Failing to report to the board any physical or mental condition that may affect the licensee's ability to perform the duties of a pilot. Such reports shall be provided within seven calendar days of the onset of the condition;.

10. 9. Refusing to comply with the board's requirement for a chemical test. Such test is required immediately:

a. Immediately and no later than 12 hours after involvement in a collision, grounding, or other incident resulting in personal injury, death, environmental hazard, or property damage in excess of $100,000.;

b. In any instance in which the board has reasonable cause to believe there is evidence of impaired performance and a test is necessary to protect the public health, safety, or welfare; or

c. Under the provisions of 18VAC45-20-50.

Refusing to comply with this requirement of subdivisions 9 a or 9 b of this section may result in summary suspension of the pilot's license in accordance with § 54.1-902 of the Code of Virginia.

11. Refusing to comply with any board requirement for chemical tests in any instance in which the board has cause to believe a test is necessary to protect the public health, safety, or welfare. Refusing to comply with this requirement may result in summary suspension of the pilot's license in accordance with § 54.1-902 of the Code of Virginia;

12. 10. Failing to send proof of any test required by subdivision 10 or 11 9 of this section to the president or vice president of the board, with a copy to the board administrator, within 48 hours of the administration of the test;.

13. A positive finding as a result of, or on, any substance abuse or chemical test as a result of which 11. Reasonable cause by the board believes to believe there is a threat to the public health, safety, or welfare based on evidence of impaired performance or substance abuse or a positive chemical test. Such a finding may result in summary suspension of the pilot's license in accordance with § 54.1-902 of the Code of Virginia;.

14. Evidence of impaired performance in any instance in which the board believes there is a threat to the public health, safety, or welfare. Such a finding may result in summary suspension of the pilot's license in accordance with § 54.1-902 of the Code of Virginia;

15. 12. Performing or attempting to perform any of the duties of the licensee's office or job while under:

a. Under the influence of illegal drugs; 16. Performing or attempting to perform any of the duties of the licensee's office or job while under or

b. Under the influence of alcohol, marijuana, or any medication (controlled substance or otherwise) to the extent that the licensee was unfit for the performance of the duties or the licensee's office or job; and.

17. 13. Failing to comply with any of the provisions of 18VAC45-20-50.

18VAC45-20-50. Random chemical testing.

A. All Virginia licensed branch pilots shall be subject to the random chemical testing as set forth in this chapter. Random chemical testing shall be conducted at an annual selection rate of not less than 30% and not more than 100% of total licensees. Licensees shall be responsible for all costs associated with random chemical testing. The chemical test shall be a comprehensive drug screen acceptable to the board that includes testing for controlled substances in Schedules I through V of Chapter 34 (§ 54.1-3400 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia.

Only licensees on duty may be selected for random testing. A licensee selected for random chemical testing shall report for testing within two hours of notification. Failure to take a random chemical test is considered refusal to take the test.

B. Duties of licensee.

1. All licensees of this the board shall enroll and participate in a random chemical testing program that meets the criteria of this chapter.

2. An on-duty licensee selected for random chemical testing shall report for testing within two hours of notification that the licensee has been selected.

3. Licensees who receive a prescription for any medication from any health care provider shall have the following duties:

a. Give the health care provider a copy of the licensee's job description as a Virginia pilot;

b. Give the health care provider a complete list of medications used within the 30 days preceding the current visit;

c. Obtain a written statement from the health care provider stating if the new prescription is for a controlled substance (Schedules II through V of the Drug Control Act (§ 54.1-3400 of the Code of Virginia)) and obtain a written statement from the health care provider as to the licensee's fitness to safely perform the duties found in the job description; and

d. If prescribed any medication containing a Schedules II through V controlled substance that is to be used within 12 hours of being on duty, make certain the MRO received by hand delivery, email, or telefax each prescription written by any health care provider at the time such prescription is written along with a complete list of medications used by the licensee within the preceding 30 days.

C. The medical review officer licensee shall ensure that the MRO shall:

1. Be completely familiar with all duties of a Virginia pilot.

2. Receive, evaluate, and maintain records of all medications given to him the MRO by or on behalf of each Virginia pilot.

3. Receive, evaluate, and maintain a record of each random chemical test taken by a Virginia pilot.

4. Any time the MRO finds the presence of a drug, alcohol, or marijuana that may impair the safe discharge of any duty of a Virginia pilot such that the licensee is unfit to perform those duties, report the MRO's written findings to the licensee and president or vice president of the board and to the board's administrator.

5. Report in writing to the licensee, president or vice-president of the board, and the board's administrator of any delay or refusal by a licensee in reporting to testing or being tested.

6. To the extent consistent with state and federal law, protect the confidentiality of all licensee records.

7. Judge fitness to safely perform duties in the context of the licensee's prescription medications and the licensee's available medical history. Any time the MRO finds evidence that the Virginia pilot may be impaired in the safe discharge of any of the pilot's duties such that the pilot may be unfit to perform those duties, the MRO's written finding shall be reported to the licensee and president or vice president of the board and to the board's administrator.

VA.R. Doc. No. R24-7632; Filed October 20, 2025
TITLE 18. PROFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING
BOARD FOR HEARING AID SPECIALISTS AND OPTICIANS
Final

TITLE 18. PROFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING

BOARD FOR HEARING AID SPECIALISTS AND OPTICIANS

Final Regulation

Title of Regulation: 18VAC80-20. Hearing Aid Specialists Regulations (amending 18VAC80-20-10, 18VAC80-20-30, 18VAC80-20-40, 18VAC80-20-50, 18VAC80-20-80, 18VAC80-20-90, 18VAC80-20-140, 18VAC80-20-180, 18VAC80-20-220 through 18VAC80-20-250, 18VAC80-20-270, 18VAC80-20-9998; repealing 18VAC80-20-20, 18VAC80-20-100, 18VAC80-20-110, 18VAC80-20-120, 18VAC80-20-130, 18VAC80-20-150, 18VAC80-20-160, 18VAC80-20-210).

Statutory Authority: § 54.1-201 of the Code of Virginia.

Effective Date: December 29, 2025.

Agency Contact: Kelley Smith, Executive Director, Board for Hearing Aid Specialists and Opticians, 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 400, Richmond, VA 23233, telephone (804) 367-8590, fax (866) 245-9693, or email hasopt@dpor.virginia.gov.

Summary:

The amendments (i) update and revise definitions, (ii) update entry requirements, (iii) reduce the stringency of licensure by endorsement for those who have been active in the profession during the past five years, (iv) revise renewal and reinstatement provisions, (v) update standards of practice and conduct, (vi) change the expiration date of licenses to two years after the effective date, (vii) afford one more chance to temporary permit holders to pass any part of the license examination, (viii) reduce the stringency of disclosure of criminal convictions, and (ix) allow a post office box as a secondary address.

The following changes were made to the proposed regulation: (i) entry requirements for the licensure of hearing aid specialists and for issuing of temporary permits are revised to add a provision requiring applicants to provide an email address in order to allow for additional methods to receive correspondence from the board; licensees are required to notify the board of changes of email address; (ii) provisions for renewal of licenses and certificates are revised to allow for a paperless licensing process; (iii) a provision stipulating that license fees be made payable to the Treasurer of Virginia is removed; (iv) examination provisions for temporary permit holders are relaxed; (v) 18VAC80-20-240, which was repealed at proposed stage, is restored; and (vi) standards for testing procedures for hearing aid fitting are revised to remove references to the American National Standards Institute standards.

Summary of Public Comments and Agency's Response: A summary of comments made by the public and the agency's response may be obtained from the promulgating agency or viewed at the office of the Registrar of Regulations.

18VAC80-20-10. Definitions.

A. The following words and terms when used in this chapter [ shall ] have the meanings ascribed to them in § 54.1-1500 of the Code of Virginia:

"Audiologist"

"Board"

"Hearing aid"

"Licensed hearing aid specialist"

"Licensed physician"

"Practice of audiology"

"Practice of fitting or dealing in hearing aids"

"Prescription hearing aid"

"Sell" or "sale"

"Temporary permit"

B. The following words and terms when used in this chapter [ shall ] have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

"Audiologist" means any person who engages in the practice of audiology as defined by § 54.1-2600 of the Code of Virginia.

"Board" means Board for Hearing Aid Specialists and Opticians.

[ "ANSI" means the American National Standards Institute. ]

"Department" means the Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation.

"Endorsement" means a method of obtaining a license by a person who is currently licensed in another state.

"Hearing aid specialist" means a person who engages in the practice of fitting or dealing in hearing aids or who advertises or displays a sign or represents himself as a person who practices the fitting or dealing in hearing aids.

"Licensed sponsor" means a licensed hearing aid specialist who is responsible for training one or more individuals holding a temporary permit.

"Licensee" means any person holding a valid license issued by the Board for Hearing Aid Specialists and Opticians for the practice of fitting or dealing in hearing aids, as defined in § 54.1-1500 of the Code of Virginia.

"Otolaryngologist" means a licensed physician specializing in ear, nose, and throat disorders.

"Reciprocity" means an agreement between two or more states to recognize and accept one another's regulations and laws.

"Reinstatement" means having a license restored to effectiveness after the expiration date has passed.

"Renewal" means continuing the effectiveness of a license for another period of time.

"Temporary permit holder" means any person who holds a valid temporary permit under this chapter.

18VAC80-20-20. Explanation of terms. (Repealed.)

Each reference in this chapter to a person shall be deemed to refer, as appropriate, to the masculine and the feminine, to the singular and the plural, and to the natural persons and organizations.

18VAC80-20-30. Basic qualifications for licensure.

A. Every applicant for a license shall must provide information on an application establishing that:

1. The applicant is at least 18 years of age.

2. The applicant has successfully completed high school or a high school equivalency course.

3. The applicant has training and experience that covers the following subjects as they the subjects pertain to hearing aid fitting and the sale of hearing aids, accessories, and services:

a. Basic physics of sound;

b. Basic maintenance and repair of hearing aids;

c. The anatomy and physiology of the ear;

d. Introduction to psychological aspects of hearing loss;

e. d. The function of hearing aids and amplification;

f. e. Visible disorders of the ear requiring medical referrals;

g. f. Practical tests utilized for selection or modification of hearing aids;

h. Pure g. Audiometric testing, including pure tone audiometry, including air conduction, and bone conduction, and related tests speech reception threshold testing, and speech discrimination testing;

i. Live voice or recorded voice speech audiometry, including speech reception threshold testing and speech discrimination testing;

j. h. Masking when indicated;

k. i. Recording and evaluating audiograms and speech audiometry to determine the proper selection and adaptation of hearing aids;

l. j. Taking earmold impressions;

m. k. Proper earmold selection;

n. l. Adequate instruction in proper hearing aid orientation;

o. m. Necessity of proper procedures in after-fitting checkup; and

p. n. Availability of social service resources and other special resources for the hearing impaired.

4. The applicant has provided one of the following as verification of completion of training and experience as described in subdivision 3 of this subsection:

a. A statement on a form provided by the board signed by the licensed sponsor certifying that the requirements have been met and that the applicant has completed at least six months of experience under the temporary permit;

b. A certified true copy of a transcript of courses completed at an accredited college or university, or other notarized documentation of completion of the required experience and training; or

c. An apprenticeship completion form from the Virginia Department of Workforce Development and Advancement reflecting completion of a registered apprenticeship, including all required related instruction, or an equivalent out-of-state registered apprenticeship.

5. The applicant has not been convicted or found guilty of any crime directly related to the practice of fitting or dealing in hearing aids, regardless of the manner of adjudication, in any jurisdiction of the United States. Except for misdemeanor marijuana convictions and misdemeanor convictions that occurred five or more years prior to the date of application, with no subsequent convictions, all criminal convictions shall be considered as part of the totality of the circumstances of each applicant. The applicant review of prior convictions shall be subject to the requirements of In accordance with § 54.1-204 of the Code of Virginia. Any plea of nolo contendere shall be considered a conviction for purposes of this subdivision.,each applicant must disclose the following information regarding criminal convictions in Virginia and all other jurisdictions:

a. Misdemeanor convictions that occurred within three years of the date of application involving sexual offense or physical injury; and

b. Felony convictions involving sexual offense, physical injury, or drug distribution or felony convictions involving the practice of fitting or dealing in hearing aids.

The record of a conviction authenticated in such form as to be admissible in evidence under the laws of the jurisdiction where convicted [ shall will ] be admissible as prima facie evidence of such conviction or guilt. The board has the authority to determine, based upon all the information available, including the applicant's record of prior convictions, if the applicant is unfit or unsuited to engage in the hearing aid specialist profession.

6. The applicant is in good standing as a licensed hearing aid specialist in every jurisdiction where licensed. The applicant must disclose if the applicant has had a license as a hearing aid specialist that was suspended, revoked, or surrendered in connection with a disciplinary action or that has been the subject of discipline in any jurisdiction prior to applying for licensure in Virginia. At the time of application for licensure, the applicant must also disclose any disciplinary action taken in another jurisdiction in connection with the applicant's practice as a hearing aid specialist. The applicant must also disclose whether the applicant has been previously licensed in Virginia as a hearing aid specialist.

7. The applicant has disclosed the applicant's physical address [ and email address ]. A post office box is not acceptable may be provided as a secondary address.

8. The nonresident applicant for a license has filed and maintained with the department an irrevocable consent for the department to serve as service agent for all actions filed in any court in Virginia.

9. The applicant has submitted the required application with the proper fee as referenced in 18VAC80-20-70 and signed, as part of the application, a statement that the applicant has read and understands Chapter 15 (§ 54.1-1500 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia and this chapter.

B. The board may make further inquiries and investigations with respect to the qualifications of the applicant or require a personal interview or both. The board may refuse initial licensure due to the applicant's failure to comply with entry requirements. The licensee is entitled to a review of such action. Appeals from such actions shall, which will be in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Process Act, Chapter 40 (§ 2.2-4000 et seq.) of Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia).

18VAC80-20-40. Temporary permit.

A. Any individual may apply for a temporary permit, which is to be used solely for the purpose of gaining the training and experience required to become a licensed hearing aid specialist in Virginia. The licensed sponsor shall must be identified on the application for a temporary permit, and the licensed sponsor shall must comply strictly with the provisions of subdivisions D 1 and D 2 of this section.

1. A temporary permit shall will be issued for a period of 18 months. After a period of 18 months, the former temporary permit holder shall must sit for the examination in accordance with this section.

2. The board may, at its discretion, extend the temporary permit for a temporary permit holder who suffers serious personal illness or injury, a death in the temporary permit holder's immediate family, for obligation of military service or service in the Peace Corps, or for other good cause of similar magnitude approved by the board. Documentation of these circumstances must be received by the board no later than 12 months after the date of the expiration of the temporary permit or within six months of the completion of military or Peace Corps service, whichever is later.

B. A registered apprenticeship under the Virginia Department of Workforce Development and Advancement is held to be a board-approved temporary permit.

C. Every applicant for a temporary permit shall must provide information upon application establishing that:

1. The applicant for a temporary permit is at least 18 years of age.

2. The applicant for a temporary permit has successfully completed high school or a high school equivalency course.

3. The applicant has not been convicted or found guilty of any crime directly related to the practice of fitting or dealing in hearing aids, regardless of the manner of adjudication, in any jurisdiction of the United States. Except for misdemeanor marijuana convictions and misdemeanor convictions that occurred five or more years prior to the date of application, with no subsequent convictions, all criminal convictions shall be considered as part of the totality of the circumstances of each applicant. Review of prior convictions shall be subject to the requirements of In accordance with § 54.1-204 of the Code of Virginia. Any plea of nolo contendere shall be considered a conviction for purposes of this subdivision., each applicant for a temporary permit must disclose the following information regarding criminal convictions in Virginia and all other jurisdictions:

a. Misdemeanor convictions that occurred within three years of the date of application involving sexual offense or physical injury; and

b. Felony convictions involving sexual offense, physical injury, or drug distribution or felony convictions involving the practice of fitting or dealing in hearing aids.

The record of a conviction authenticated in such form as to be admissible in evidence under the laws of the jurisdiction where convicted [ shall will ] be admissible as prima facie evidence of such conviction or guilt. The board has the authority to determine, based upon all the information available, including the applicant's record of prior convictions, if the applicant is unfit or unsuited to engage in the hearing aid specialist profession.

4. The applicant for a temporary permit is in good standing as a licensed hearing aid specialist in every jurisdiction where licensed. The applicant for a temporary permit must disclose if the applicant has had a license as a hearing aid specialist that was suspended, revoked, or surrendered in connection with a disciplinary action or that has been the subject of discipline in any jurisdiction prior to applying for licensure in Virginia. At the time of application, the applicant for a temporary permit must also disclose any disciplinary action taken in another jurisdiction in connection with the applicant's practice as a hearing aid specialist. The applicant for a temporary permit must also disclose whether the applicant has been licensed previously in Virginia as a hearing aid specialist.

5. The applicant for a temporary permit has disclosed the applicant's physical address [ and email address ]. A post office box is not acceptable may be provided as a secondary address.

6. The applicant for a temporary permit has submitted the required application with the proper fee referenced in 18VAC80-20-70 and has signed, as part of the application, a statement that the applicant has read and understands Chapter 15 (§ 54.1-1500 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia and this chapter.

D. The licensed hearing aid specialist who agrees to sponsor the applicant for a temporary permit shall must certify on the application that as sponsor, the licensed hearing aid specialist:

1. Assumes full responsibility for the competence and proper conduct of the temporary permit holder with regard to all acts performed pursuant to the acquisition of training and experience in the fitting or dealing of hearing aids;

2. Will not assign the temporary permit holder to carry out independent field work without on-site direct supervision by the sponsor until the temporary permit holder is adequately trained for such activity;

3. Will personally provide and make available documentation, upon request by the board or its representative, showing the number of hours that direct supervision has occurred throughout the period of the temporary permit;

4. Will return the temporary permit to the department should the training program be discontinued for any reason; and

5. Will not refer the temporary permit holder for testing until the permit holder has completed at least six months of training under the permit.

E. The licensed sponsor shall must provide training and shall must ensure that the temporary permit holder under the licensed sponsor's supervision gains experience that covers the following subjects as they pertain to hearing aid fitting and the sale of hearing aids, accessories, and services:

1. Basic physics of sound;

2. Basic maintenance and repair of hearing aids;

3. The anatomy and physiology of the ear;

4. Introduction to psychological aspects of hearing loss;

5. 4. The function of hearing aids and amplification;

6. 5. Visible disorders of the ear requiring medical referrals;

7. 6. Practical tests utilized for selection or modification of hearing aids;

8. Pure 7. Audiometric testing, including pure tone audiometry, including air conduction, and bone conduction, speech reception threshold testing, and related tests speech discrimination testing;

9. Live voice or recorded voice speech audiometry, including speech reception threshold testing and speech discrimination testing;

10. 8. Masking when indicated;

11. 9. Recording and evaluating audiograms and speech audiometry to determine the proper selection and adaptation of hearing aids;

12. 10. Taking earmold impressions;

13. 11. Proper earmold selection;

14. 12. Adequate instruction in proper hearing aid orientation;

15. 13. Necessity of proper procedures in after-fitting checkup; and

16. 14. Availability of social service resources and other special resources for the hearing impaired.

F. The board may make further inquiries and investigations with respect to the qualifications of the applicant for a temporary permit or require a personal interview, or both.

G. All correspondence from the board to the temporary permit holder not otherwise exempt from disclosure, shall must be addressed to both the temporary permit holder and the licensed sponsor and shall must be sent to the business address of the licensed sponsor.

18VAC80-20-50. Qualifications for licensure by reciprocity endorsement.

A. Every applicant for Virginia licensure through reciprocity endorsement who is currently licensed as a hearing aid specialist in good standing in another jurisdiction shall must provide information upon application establishing that the requirements and standards under which the license was issued are substantially equivalent to and not conflicting with the provisions of this chapter. The applicant shall must file the application for reciprocity endorsement with, and pay a fee to, the board, and must successfully complete the specified sections of the examination.

B. Every applicant for Virginia licensure through endorsement that can demonstrate active engagement in the profession for the preceding five years will only be required to take the rules and regulations [ portion of the ] examination.

18VAC80-20-80. Examinations.

A. All examinations required for licensure shall must be approved by the board and administered by the board, a testing service acting on behalf of the board, or another governmental agency or organization.

B. The candidate for examination shall must follow all rules established by the board with regard to conduct at the examination. Such rules shall include any written instructions communicated prior to the examination date and any instructions communicated at the site, either written or oral, on the date of the examination. Failure to comply with all rules established by the board with regard to conduct at the examination shall will be grounds for denial of the application.

C. Applicants for licensure shall must pass [ a all ] two part examination, of which Part I is a [ examinations, including the ] written examination and Part II is a, [ a the ] rules and regulations examination, and [ all portions of ] the practical [ examination exam ].

1. The applicant shall must pass each section of the [ written and ] practical examination administered by the board. Candidates failing one or more sections of the [ written or ] practical examination will be required to retake only those sections failed.

2. Any candidate failing to achieve a passing score on all [ sections in examinations within ] two years from the [ initial test ] date [ the board finds the candidate eligible for examination ] must reapply as a new applicant for licensure and repeat all [ sections of the ] written and practical examination examinations.

[ 3. If the temporary permit holder fails to achieve a passing score on any section of the examination in ] three [ four successive scheduled examinations, the temporary permit ] shall [ will expire upon receipt of the examination failure letter resulting from the third fourth attempt. ]

18VAC80-20-90. License renewal required.

A. Licenses issued under this chapter shall will expire on December 31 of each even-numbered year as indicated on the license two years from the license effective date.

B. The board will [ mail or email send ] a renewal notice to the licensee [ at the last known address ]. Failure to receive this notice does not relieve the licensee of the obligation to renew. Prior to the expiration date shown on the license, each licensee desiring to renew a license must return to the board [ all required forms and ] the appropriate fee as outlined in 18VAC80-20-70.

C. [ Licensees will be required to renew a license by submitting the proper fee made payable to the Treasurer of Virginia. ] Any licensee who fails to renew within 30 days after the license expires will be required to apply for reinstatement.

D. The board may deny renewal of a license for the same reasons as the board may refuse initial licensure as set forth in Part II (18VAC80-20-30 et seq.) of this chapter or discipline a licensee as set forth in Part V (18VAC80-20-180 et seq.) of this chapter. The licensee is entitled to a review of such action. Review of such actions will be in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Process Act (§ 2.2-4000 et seq. of the Code of Virginia).

18VAC80-20-100. Procedures for renewal. (Repealed.)

The board will mail a renewal application form to the licensee at the last known address. Failure to receive this notice shall not relieve the licensee of the obligation to renew. Prior to the expiration date shown on the license, each licensee desiring to renew his license must return to the board all required forms and the appropriate fee as outlined in 18VAC80-20-70 of this chapter.

18VAC80-20-110. Fees for renewal. (Repealed.)

Licensees shall be required to renew their license by submitting the proper fee made payable to the Treasurer of Virginia. Any licensee who fails to renew within 30 days after the license expires shall be required to apply for reinstatement.

18VAC80-20-120. Board discretion to deny renewal. (Repealed.)

The board may deny renewal of a license for the same reasons as it may refuse initial licensure as set forth in Part II or discipline a licensee as set forth in Part V of this chapter. The licensee is entitled to a review of such action. Appeals from such actions shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Process Act, Chapter 40 (§ 2.2-4000 et seq.) of Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia.

18VAC80-20-130. Qualifications for renewal. (Repealed.)

Applicants for renewal of a license shall continue to meet the standards of entry as set forth in 18VAC80-20-30 A 2, 18VAC80-20-30 A 3 and, 18VAC80-20-30 A 5 through 18VAC80-20-30 A 9.

18VAC80-20-140. Reinstatement required.

A. If a licensee fails to meet the requirements for renewal and submit the renewal fee within 30 days after the expiration date on the license, the licensee must apply for reinstatement on a form provided by the board.

1. Applicants for reinstatement shall continue to meet the standards of entry in 18VAC80-20-30 A 2, 18VAC80-20-30 A 3 and 18VAC80-20-30 A 5 through 18VAC80-20-30 A 9.

2. 1. Applicants for reinstatement shall must submit the required fee referenced in 18VAC80-20-70.

3. 2. Two years after the expiration date on the license, reinstatement is no longer possible. To resume practice as a hearing aid specialist, the former licensee must apply as a new applicant for licensure, meeting all educational, examination, and experience requirements as listed in the regulations current at the time of reapplication.

4. Any hearing aid specialist activity conducted subsequent to the expiration date of the license may constitute unlicensed activity and may be subject to prosecution by the Commonwealth under §§ 54.1-111 and 54.1-202 of the Code of Virginia.

B. The board may deny reinstatement of a license for the same reasons as it may refuse initial licensure or discipline a licensee. The licensee is entitled to a review of such action, which will be in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Process Act (§ 2.2-4000 et seq. of the Code of Virginia).

C. When a license is reinstated, the license will continue to have the same license number and will be assigned an expiration date two years from the previous expiration date of the license, which is the expiration date assigned to all licenses at the time of reinstatement.

D. A licensee who reinstates a license will be regarded as having been continually licensed without interruption. Therefore, the licensee [ shall will ] remain under the disciplinary authority of the board during the entire period and may be held accountable for activities during this period. Nothing in this chapter will divest the board of authority to discipline a licensee for a violation of the law or regulations during the period of licensure.

18VAC80-20-150. Board discretion to deny reinstatement. (Repealed.)

The board may deny reinstatement of a license for the same reasons as it may refuse initial licensure or discipline a licensee. The licensee is entitled to a review of such action. Appeals from such actions shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Process Act, Chapter 40 (§ 2.2-4000 et seq.) of Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia.

18VAC80-20-160. Status of license during the period prior to reinstatement. (Repealed.)

A. When a licensee is reinstated, the license shall continue to have the same license number and shall be assigned an expiration date two years from the previous expiration date of the license, which is the expiration date assigned to all licenses at the time the license is reinstated.

B. A licensee who reinstates his license shall be regarded as having been continually licensed without interruption. Therefore, the licensee shall remain under the disciplinary authority of the board during the entire period and may be held accountable for his activities during this period. Nothing in this chapter shall divest the board of its authority to discipline a licensee for a violation of the law or regulations during the period of licensure.

[ 18VAC80-20-180. Maintenance of licenses.

A. Notice in writing shall must be given to the board in the event of any change of business or individual name, or address, or email address. Such notice shall must be mailed sent to the board within 30 days of the change of the name or, location, or email address. The board shall will not be responsible for the licensee's failure to receive notices, communications and correspondence caused by the licensee's failure to promptly notify the board in writing of any change of name or address.

B. All licensees shall must operate under the name in which the license is issued.

C. All licenses issued by the board must be visibly displayed at each physical site of employment in such a manner that the public can easily read the name of the licensee. If the individual practices at more than one site, a photocopy of the license is acceptable. ]

18VAC80-20-210. Measures to take when first contact is established with any purchaser or prospective purchaser. (Repealed.)

A. When first contact is established with any purchaser or prospective purchaser outside the hearing aid specialist's principal place of business, the licensee shall provide a disclosure form prescribed by the board containing information that the purchaser or prospective purchaser will need to obtain service/maintenance. The disclosure form shall include:

1. Address and telephone number where the hearing aid specialist can be reached.

2. Days and hours contact can be made;

3. Whether service/maintenance will be provided in the office or in the home of the purchaser or prospective purchaser; and

4. If the hearing aid specialist has no principal place of business in Virginia, a clear statement that there is no principal place of business in Virginia.

B. When first contact is established with any purchaser or prospective purchaser the licensee shall:

1. Advise the purchaser or prospective purchaser that hearing aid specialists are not licensed to practice medicine; and

2. Advise the purchaser or prospective purchaser that no examination or representation made by the specialist should be regarded as a medical examination, opinion, or advice.

a. A statement that this initial advice was given to the purchaser or prospective purchaser shall be entered on the purchase agreement in print as large as the other printed matter on the receipt.

b. Exemption: Hearing aid specialists who are physicians licensed to practice medicine in Virginia are exempt from the requirements of this subsection.

18VAC80-20-220. Purchase agreement.

A. Each hearing aid shall must be sold through a purchase agreement that shall must:

1. Show the licensee's business address, license number, business telephone number, and signature;

2. Comply with federal and Virginia laws and regulations, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, the Virginia Home Solicitation Sales Act (Chapter 2.1 (§ 59.1-21.1 et seq.) of Title 59.1 of the Code of Virginia), and the Virginia Consumer Protection Act (Chapter 17 (§ 59.1-196 et seq.) of Title 59.1 of the Code of Virginia);

3. 2. Clearly state, if the hearing aid is not new and is sold or rented, that it is "used" or "reconditioned," whichever is applicable, including the terms of warranty, if any. The hearing aid container shall be clearly marked with the same information contained in the purchase agreement;

4. 3. Identify the brand names and model of the hearing aid being sold, and the serial number of the hearing aid shall must be provided, in writing, to the purchaser or prospective purchaser at the time of delivery of the hearing aid;

5. 4. Disclose the full purchase price;

6. 5. Disclose the down payment and periodic payment terms in cases where the purchase price is not paid in full at delivery;

7. 6. Disclose any nonrefundable fees established in accordance with § 54.1-1505 of the Code of Virginia. Nonrefundable fees shall not be a percentage of the purchase price of the hearing aid;

8. Disclose any warranty;

9. 7. Explain the provisions of § 54.1-1505 of the Code of Virginia, which entitles the purchaser to return the hearing aid, in 10-point bold face type that is bolder than the type in the remainder of the purchase agreement; and

10. 8. Disclose that the licensee or temporary permit holder is not a physician licensed to practice medicine in Virginia and that no examination or representation made shall will be regarded as a medical examination, opinion, or advice.

B. Subdivision A 10 8 of this section shall will not apply to sales made by a licensed hearing aid specialist who is a physician licensed to practice medicine in Virginia.

18VAC80-20-230. Fitting or sale of hearing aids for children.

A. Any person engaging in the fitting or sale of hearing aids for a child under 18 years of age shall ascertain whether such child has been examined by an otolaryngologist or licensed physician within six months prior to fitting.

B. A. No child under younger than 18 years of age shall will be initially fitted with a hearing aid or hearing aids unless the licensed hearing aid specialist has been presented with a written statement signed by an otolaryngologist stating the child's hearing loss has been medically evaluated and the child may be considered a candidate for a hearing aid. The medical evaluation must have taken place within the preceding six months.

C. B. No child under younger than 18 years of age shall will be subsequently fitted with a hearing aid or hearing aids unless the licensed hearing aid specialist has been presented with a written statement signed by a licensed physician stating the child's hearing loss has been medically evaluated and the child may be considered a candidate for a hearing aid. The medical evaluation must have taken place within the preceding six months.

18VAC80-20-240. [ Physician statement regarding adult client's medical evaluation of hearing loss (Repealed).

A. Each licensee or holder of a temporary permit, in counseling and instructing adult clients and prospective adult clients related to the testing, fitting, and sale of hearing aids, ] shall be [ is required to recommend that the client obtain a written statement signed by a licensed physician stating that the patient's hearing loss has been medically evaluated within the preceding six months and that the patient may be a candidate for a hearing aid.

B. Should the client decline the recommendation, a statement of such declination ] shall [ must be obtained from the client over his signature. Medical waivers that are a part of purchase agreements ] shall [ must be in a separate section, which ] shall [ must be signed by the client indicating ] his [ the client's understanding of the medical waiver. A separate, additional client signature space ] shall [ must be provided in all purchase agreements for the client to sign acknowledging ] his [ the client's understanding of the purchase terms and conditions established by 18VAC80-20-200.

1. Fully informed adult patients (18 years of age or older) may waive the medical evaluation.

2. The hearing aid specialist is prohibited from actively encouraging a prospective user to waive a medical examination.

C. The information provided in subsection A of this section must be made a part of the client's record kept by the hearing aid specialist. ]

18VAC80-20-250. Testing procedures.

It shall be is the duty of each licensee and holder of a temporary permit engaged in the fitting and sale of hearing aids to use appropriate testing procedures for each hearing aid fitting. All tests and case history information must be retained in the records of the specialist. The established requirements shall be are:

1. Air Conduction Tests A.N.S.I. conduction tests are to be made on every client using [ ANSI ] standard frequencies of 500-1000-2000-4000-6000-8000 Hertz. Intermediate frequencies shall must be tested if the threshold difference between octaves exceeds 15dB. Appropriate masking must be used if the difference between the two ears is 40 dB or more at any one frequency.

2. Bone Conduction Tests conduction tests are to be made on every client--A.N.S.I. using [ ANSI standards standard frequencies ] at 500-1000-2000-4000 Hertz. Proper masking is to be applied if the air conduction and bone conduction readings for the test ear at any one frequency differ by 15 dB or if lateralization occurs.

3. Speech testings shall must be made before fittings and shall must be recorded with the type of test, method of presentation, and the test results.

4. The specialist shall must check for the following conditions and, if they are found to exist, shall must refer the client to a licensed physician unless the client can show that his the client's present condition is under treatment or has been treated:

a. Visible congenital or traumatic deformity of the ear.

b. History of active drainage from the ear within the previous 90 days.

c. History of sudden or rapidly progressive hearing loss within the previous 90 days.

d. Acute or chronic dizziness.

e. Unilateral hearing loss.

f. Audiometric air bone gap equal to or greater than 15 dB at 500 Hertz, 1000 Hertz, and 2000 Hertz.

g. Visible evidence or significant cerumen accumulation or a foreign body in the ear canal.

h. Tinnitus as a primary symptom.

i. Pain or discomfort in the ear.

5. All tests shall must have been conducted no more than six months prior to the fitting.

6. Post-fitting testing shall must be made and recorded with type of test, method of presentation and the test results.

18VAC80-20-270. Grounds for discipline.

The board may, in considering the totality of the circumstances, fine any temporary permit holder or licensee, and or suspend, place on probation, or revoke, or refuse to renew any temporary permit or license or deny any application issued under the provisions of Chapter 15 (§ 54.1-1500 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia and this chapter. Disciplinary procedures are governed by the Administrative Process Act, Chapter 40 (§ 2.2-4000 et seq.) of Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia). In exercising its disciplinary function, the board will consider the totality of the circumstances of each case. Any licensee is subject to board discipline for any of the following:

1. Improper conduct, including:

a. Obtaining, renewing, or attempting to obtain a license by false or fraudulent representation;

b. Obtaining any fee or making any sale by fraud or misrepresentation;

c. Employing to fit or sell hearing aids a person who does not hold a valid license or a temporary permit, or whose license or temporary permit is suspended;

d. Using, causing, or promoting the use of any misleading, deceptive, or untruthful advertising matter, promotional literature, testimonial, guarantee, warranty, label, brand, insignia, or any other representation, whether disseminated orally or published;

e. Advertising a particular model or type of hearing aid for sale when purchasers or prospective purchasers responding to the advertisement cannot purchase the advertised model or type;

f. e. Representing that the service or advice of a person licensed to practice medicine or audiology will be used in the selection, fitting, adjustment, maintenance, or repair of hearing aids when that is not true, or using the words "physician," "audiologist," "clinic," "hearing service," "hearing center," or similar description of the services and products provided when such use is not accurate;

g. f. Directly or indirectly giving or offering to give favors, paid referrals, or anything of value to any person who in his professional capacity uses his position to influence third parties to purchase products offered for sale by a hearing aid specialist; or

h. g. Failing to provide expedient, reliable, or dependable services when requested by a client or client's guardian.

2. Failure to include on the purchase agreement a statement regarding home solicitation when required by federal and state law.

3. Incompetence or negligence, as those terms are generally understood in the profession, in fitting or selling hearing aids.

4. Failure to provide required or appropriate training resulting in incompetence or negligence, as those terms are generally understood in the profession, by a temporary permit holder under the licensee's sponsorship.

5. Violating or cooperating with others in violating any provisions of Chapters Chapter 1 (§ 54.1-100 et seq.), 2 (§ 54.1-200 et seq.), 3 (§ 54.1-300 et seq.), and or 15 (§ 54.1-1500 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia or this chapter.

6. The licensee, temporary permit holder, or applicant has been convicted or found guilty of any crime directly related to the practice of fitting or dealing in hearing aids, regardless of the manner of adjudication, in any jurisdiction of the United States. Except for misdemeanor marijuana convictions and misdemeanor convictions involving sexual offense or physical injury that occurred five three or more years prior to the date of application, with no subsequent convictions, and all felony convictions involving sexual offense, physical injury, or drug distribution that occurred 10 or more years prior to the date of application with no subsequent convictions, all criminal convictions shall will be considered as part of the totality of the circumstances of each applicant. Review of prior convictions shall will be subject to the requirements of § 54.1-204 of the Code of Virginia. Any pleas of nolo contendere shall will be considered a conviction for the purpose of this subdivision. The record of a conviction authenticated in such form as to be admissible in evidence of the law of the jurisdiction where convicted shall will be admissible as prima facie evidence of such conviction or guilt.

NOTICE: The following forms used in administering the regulation have been filed by the agency. Amended or added forms are reflected in the listing and are published following the listing. Online users of this issue of the Virginia Register of Regulations may also click on the name to access a form. The forms are also available from the agency contact or may be viewed at the Office of Registrar of Regulations, General Assembly Building, 201 North Ninth Street, Fourth Floor, Richmond, Virginia 23219.

[ FORMS (18VAC80-20)

Hearing Aid Specialist License Application, A440-2101LIC-v11 (rev. 4/2025)

Hearing Aid Specialist Temporary Permit Application, A440-2102TP_PKG-v10 (rev. 4/2025)

Hearing Aid Specialist License Reinstatement Application, A440-2101REI-v3 (rev. 2/2017)

Hearing Aid Specialist Re-examination Application, A440-2101REEX-v2 (rev. 9/2013)

Hearing Aid Specialist Training and Experience Form, A440-21TREXP-v2 (eff. 9/2013)

Hearing Aid Specialist License Application, A440-2101LIC-v13 (rev. 12/2025)

Hearing Aid Specialist Temporary Permit Application, A440-2102TP_PKG-v11 (rev. 12/2025)

Hearing Aid Specialist License Reinstatement Application, A440-2101REI-v6 (rev. 12/2025)

Hearing Aid Specialist Training and Experience Form, A440-21TREXP-v3 (rev. 12/2025)

Hearing Aid Specialist Universal License Application, A440-2101ULR-v2 (rev. 12/2025) ]

VA.R. Doc. No. R24-7493; Filed October 29, 2025
TITLE 18. PROFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING
BOARD FOR WATERWORKS AND WASTEWATER WORKS OPERATORS AND ONSITE SEWAGE SYSTEM PROFESSIONALS
Final

TITLE 18. PROFESSIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING

BOARD FOR WATERWORKS AND WASTEWATER WORKS OPERATORS AND ONSITE SEWAGE SYSTEM PROFESSIONALS

Final Regulation

Title of Regulation: 18VAC160-40. Onsite Sewage System Professionals Licensing Regulations (amending 18VAC160-40-10 through 18VAC160-40-100, 18VAC160-40-110, 18VAC160-40-120 through 18VAC160-40-170, 18VAC160-40-180 through 18VAC160-40-230, 18VAC160-40-240 through 18VAC160-40-270, 18VAC160-40-280, 18VAC160-40-290, 18VAC160-40-300 through 18VAC160-40-360, 18VAC160-40-370, 18VAC160-40-380, 18VAC160-40-390, 18VAC160-40-410, 18VAC160-40-420, 18VAC160-40-430 through 18VAC160-40-510; adding 18VAC160-40-115, 18VAC160-40-175, 18VAC160-40-235, 18VAC160-40-295, 18VAC160-40-365, 18VAC160-40-385, 18VAC160-40-405, 18VAC160-40-415, 18VAC160-40-425, 18VAC160-40-515, 18VAC160-40-520; repealing 18VAC160-40-105, 18VAC160-40-275, 18VAC160-40-400).

Statutory Authority: §§ 54.1-201 and 54.1-2301 of the Code of Virginia.

Effective Date: December 17, 2025.

Agency Contact: Cameron Parris, Regulatory Operations Administrator, Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation, 9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 400, Richmond, VA 23233, telephone (804) 367-9183, fax (866) 350-5354, or email cameron.parris@dpor.virginia.gov.

Summary:

The amendments (i) significantly reduce entry qualifications for all licenses, (ii) reduce continuing education hours for most occupations, (iii) require training course providers to provide each course participant with a certificate of completion or other documentation, (iv) increase the timeframe for applicants to pass a board-approved exam after application approval to 24 months and allow passing license examination scores to remain valid for a period of 10 years from the date of examination, (v) revise license reinstatement requirements, (vi) make criminal conviction disclosures to enter an occupation less stringent while making reporting of such offenses after the initial licensure more stringent, and (vii) expand the type of operators who can work on large alternative onsite sewage systems.

Changes to the proposed regulation (i) revise applicant address requirements to allow for a paperless licensing system, (ii) remove a specific instruction that checks or money orders be made payable to the Treasurer of Virginia, (iii) provide for license renewal procedures that reflect current agency practice, and (iv) specify that board-approved training courses may be delivered in person.

Summary of Public Comments and Agency's Response: A summary of comments made by the public and the agency's response may be obtained from the promulgating agency or viewed at the office of the Registrar of Regulations.

18VAC160-40-10. Definitions.

A. Section 54.1-2300 of the Code of Virginia provides definitions of the following terms and phrases as used in this chapter:

"Board"

"Onsite sewage system"

"Operator"

"Wastewater works"

B. The following words, terms, and phrases when used in this chapter shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

"Address of record" means the [ mailing ] address designated by the licensee to receive notices and correspondence from the board.

"Alternative onsite sewage system" means a treatment works that is not a conventional onsite sewage system and does not result in a point source discharge.

"Alternative onsite sewage system installer" means an individual licensed by the board to construct, install, and repair conventional and alternative onsite sewage systems.

"Alternative onsite sewage system operator" means an individual licensed by the board to operate and maintain conventional and alternative onsite sewage systems.

"Alternative onsite soil evaluator" means an individual licensed by the board to evaluate soils and soil properties in relationship to the effect of these properties on the use and management of these soils as the locations for conventional and alternative onsite sewage systems, to certify in accordance with applicable state regulations and local ordinances that sites are suitable for conventional and alternative onsite sewage systems, and to design conventional and alternative onsite sewage systems suitable for the soils.

"Applicant" means an individual who submits has submitted an application with the appropriate fee and other required documentation for licensure.

"Application" means a completed, board-prescribed form submitted with the appropriate fee and other required documentation.

"Authorized onsite soil evaluator" means an individual holding an authorized onsite soil evaluator certification issued by the Virginia Department of Health that was valid on June 30, 2009.

"Category" means journeyman or master as applicable to the professionals under the board's purview.

"Class" means conventional or alternative as applicable to the professionals under the board's purview.

"CPE" means continuing professional education.

"Contact hour" means 50 minutes of participation in a structured training activity.

"Conventional onsite sewage system" means a treatment works consisting of one or more septic tanks with gravity, pumped, or siphoned conveyance to a gravity distributed subsurface drainfield.

"Conventional onsite sewage system installer" means an individual licensed by the board to construct, install, and repair conventional onsite sewage systems.

"Conventional onsite sewage system operator" means an individual licensed by the board to operate and maintain conventional onsite sewage systems.

"Conventional onsite soil evaluator" means an individual licensed by the board to evaluate soils and soil properties in relationship to the effects of these properties on the use and management of these soils as the locations for conventional and alternative onsite sewage systems, to certify in accordance with applicable state regulations and local ordinances that sites are suitable for conventional and alternative onsite sewage systems, and to design conventional onsite sewage systems suitable for the soils.

"Department" means the Virginia Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation.

"DEQ" means the Department of Environmental Quality.

"Direct supervision" means being immediately available and fully responsible for the provision of onsite sewage system services regulated pursuant to Chapter 23 (§ 54.1-2300 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia and this chapter.

"Interim license" refers to the initial issuance of professional licenses during the implementation of the onsite sewage system professionals licensure program. Such licenses were limited to four years and not renewable.

"Journeyman" means an individual who possesses the minimum skills and competency to install or maintain onsite sewage systems or assist in the evaluation of soil sites as suitable for conventional and alternative onsite sewage systems and to design onsite sewage systems, all while under the direct supervision of a master licensee.

"Licensee" means an individual holding a valid license issued by the board.

"Licensure" means a method of regulation whereby the Commonwealth, through the issuance of a license, authorizes a person possessing the character and minimum skills to engage in the practice of a profession or occupation that is unlawful to practice without such license.

"Maintenance" or "maintain" means, unless otherwise provided in local ordinance, (i) performing adjustments to equipment and controls or (ii) in-kind replacement of normal wear and tear parts that do not require a construction permit for adjustment or replacement of the component, such as light bulbs, fuses, filters, pumps, motors, sewer lines, conveyance lines, distribution boxes, header lines, or other like similar components. Maintenance includes pumping the tanks or cleaning the building sewer on a periodic basis. Notwithstanding any local ordinance, "maintenance" does not include replacement of tanks, drainfield piping, subsurface drainfields, or work requiring a construction permit and a licensed onsite sewage system installer. Unless otherwise prohibited by local ordinance, a conventional onsite sewage system installer or an alternative onsite sewage system installer may perform maintenance work limited to in-kind replacement of light bulbs, fuses, filters, pumps, sewer lines, conveyance lines, distribution boxes, and header lines.

"Master" means an individual who possesses the minimum skills and competency to install or maintain onsite sewage systems or evaluate soil sites as suitable for conventional and alternative onsite sewage systems and to design conventional and alternative onsite sewage systems.

"Operate" means the act of (i) placing into or taking out of service a unit process or (ii) making or causing adjustments in the operation of a unit process at a treatment works.

"Profession" means the practice of onsite soil evaluation, onsite sewage system installation, and onsite sewage system operation and maintenance.

"Professional" means an onsite sewage system installer, onsite sewage system operator, or onsite soil evaluator who is licensed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter and is in good standing with the board to practice his the profession in this the Commonwealth.

"Renewal" means the process and requirements for periodically approving the continuance of a license.

"Sewage" means water-carried and nonwater-carried human excrement or kitchen, laundry, shower, bath, or lavatory wastes separately or together with such underground, surface, storm, or other water and liquid industrial wastes as may be present from residences, buildings, vehicles, industrial establishments, or other places.

"Training credit" means a unit of board-approved training or formal education completed by an individual that may be used to substitute for experience when applying for a license.

"Treatment works" means any device or system used in the storage, treatment, disposal, or reclamation of sewage or combinations of sewage and industrial wastes, including pumping, power, and other equipment and appurtenances, septic tanks and any works, including land, that are or will be (i) an integral part of the treatment processes or (ii) used for ultimate disposal or of residues or effluent resulting from such treatment.

"VDH" means the Virginia Department of Health.

18VAC160-40-20. Application procedures.

A. All applicants seeking licensure shall must submit an application with the appropriate fee in 18VAC160-40-40. Applications shall will be made on forms provided by the board or the board's agent.

1. By submitting the application form and fee to the department, the applicant certifies that the applicant has read and understands the applicable statutes and the board's regulations.

2. The receipt of an application and the deposit of fees by the board does not indicate approval of the application by the board.

B. The board may make further inquiries and investigations with respect to the applicant's qualifications to confirm or amplify information supplied. All applications shall must be completed in accordance with the instructions contained in this chapter section and on the application. Applications will not be considered complete until all required documents are received by the board. If an examination is required for licensure, the applicant will not be permitted to sit for the applicable board-approved examination until the application is complete and approved.

C. The applicant will be notified within 30 days of the board's receipt of an initial application if the application is incomplete. An individual who fails to complete the process within 12 months of receipt of the application in the board's office must submit a new application. If applicable, the applicant has 12 24 months from approval of the application to pass the board-approved examination. Failure to pass the board-approved examination within 12 24 months of approval will result in the applicant being required to submit a new application to be considered for licensure.

D. The applicant shall must immediately report all changes in information supplied with the application, if applicable, prior to the issuance of the license or expiration of the application or examination period.

18VAC160-40-30. General fee requirements.

All fees are nonrefundable and shall will not be prorated. The date on which the fee is received by the department or its the department's agent will determine whether the fee is on time. [ Checks or money orders ] shall [ must be made payable to the Treasurer of Virginia. ]

18VAC160-40-40. Fee schedule.

Fees for an onsite sewage system professional license are as provided in this section.

Fee Type

Fee Amount

When Due

Initial application (for each profession, class, and category of license)

$100

With application

Renewal (for each profession, class, and category of license)

$80

With renewal application

Reinstatement (for each profession, class, and category of license)

$105 (renewal fee + $25 reinstatement fee)

With reinstatement application

For licenses expiring on or after January 31, 2018, and before January 31, 2020, the renewal fee shall be $50. For reinstatement applications received after January 31, 2018, and on or before January 31, 2020, the total reinstatement fee shall be $75.

18VAC160-40-50. Examination fee.

The fee fees for examination or reexamination is all examinations are subject to charges to the department by an outside vendor based on a contract entered into in compliance with the Virginia Public Procurement Act (§ 2.2-4300 et seq. of the Code of Virginia). Fees may be adjusted and charged to the candidate in accordance with this contract.

18VAC160-40-60. General requirements for licensure.

A. In addition to the specific qualifications for each profession, class, and category of licensure, each applicant for licensure shall must meet the requirements provided in this section: 1..

B. The applicant shall must be at least 18 years old.

2. C. The applicant shall disclose his must provide [ a mailing an ] address, which will serve as the address of record. A post office box is only acceptable as a mailing the address of record when a physical address is also provided.

3. D. In accordance with § 54.1-204 of the Code of Virginia, each applicant shall must disclose the following information:

a. 1. All felony convictions that occurred within 20 years of the date of application.

b. 2. All misdemeanor convictions, except marijuana convictions, involving lying, cheating, or stealing that occurred within three years of the date of application.

Any plea of nolo contendere or finding of guilt regardless of adjudication or deferred adjudication shall be considered a conviction for the purposes of this section. The record of conviction certified or authenticated in such form as to be admissible in evidence under the laws of the jurisdiction where convicted shall be admissible as prima facie evidence of such guilt.

B. The board, at in its discretion, may deny licensure to any applicant in accordance with § 54.1-204 of the Code of Virginia. C. The applicant has the right to request further review of any such action by the board under the Administrative Process Act (§ 2.2-4000 et seq. of the Code of Virginia).

E. The applicant shall must report any suspension, revocation, or surrender of a license, certification, or registration in connection with a disciplinary action taken by any board or that has been subject of discipline in any jurisdiction prior to applying for licensure administrative body in any jurisdiction against a professional or occupational license, certification, or registration issued to the applicant, to include any suspension, revocation, or surrender of a license, certification, or registration, imposition of a monetary penalty, or requirement to take remedial education or other corrective action. The board at in its discretion may deny licensure to any applicant based on for any prior suspensions, revocations, or surrenders of licenses based on disciplinary action taken by any board or administrative body in any jurisdiction. The applicant has the right to request further review of any such action by the board under the Administrative Process Act (§ 2.2-4000 et seq. of the Code of Virginia).

F. The applicant for licensure must be in compliance with the standards of conduct and practice set forth in Part IX (18VAC160-40-440 et seq.) of this chapter at the time of application, while the application is under review by the board, and at all times when the license is in effect.

18VAC160-40-70. Education and training for experience.

A. Each individual applying for a license may receive credit for up to half of the required experience for:

1. Satisfactory completion of postsecondary courses in wastewater, biology, chemistry, geology, hydraulics, hydrogeology, engineering, environmental science, agronomy, earth science, environmental health, or soil science at the rate of one month per semester hour or two-thirds of a month per quarter hour; or

2. Satisfactory completion of board-approved onsite sewage system installer or, onsite sewage system operator, or onsite soil evaluation training courses, as applicable to the license sought, at the rate of one month for each training credit earned. Up to one training credit is will be awarded for each 10 hours of classroom contact time or for each 20 hours of laboratory exercises and field trip contact time. Training credit is will not be earned for breaks, meals, or receptions, and time other than classroom, laboratory, and field trip contact time. A training credit awarded is equivalent to one month of experience.

B. Education used to meet the education requirements to qualify for licensure may not be substituted for experience.

18VAC160-40-80. Examination procedures and conduct.

A. Upon approval of the application In those instances where an applicant is required to take an examination for licensure, the board will notify the applicant of his the applicant's eligibility to take the applicable examination upon approval of the application. The license will not be issued prior to the receipt of a passing score for the applicable examination.

B. An applicant who does not receive a passing score within one year 12 months after the date of approval of the application by the board to sit for the examination must submit a new application and meet entry requirements in effect at the time of the submittal of the new application.

C. In those instances where the applicant is required to take an examination for licensure, the The applicant shall must follow all rules established by the board with regard to conduct at the examination. Such rules shall will include written instructions communicated prior to the examination date and instructions communicated at the site, either written or oral, on the date of the examination. Failure to comply with all rules established by the board and the testing organization with regard to conduct at the examination shall will be grounds for denial of the application, voiding of examination scores, or any combination thereof.

D. A passing examination score received by an applicant is valid for a period of 10 years from the date of the examination.

18VAC160-40-90. Individuals certified or licensed in another jurisdiction.

Any applicant holding a valid an active, current license or certificate in another jurisdiction shall must meet the requirements of this chapter, including having equivalent experience and education. The applicant shall must pass the appropriate board-approved examination to become licensed in those instances where an examination for licensure is required.

18VAC160-40-100. Full-time experience or equivalent.

For the purpose of this part chapter, experience requirements are expressed in terms of calendar periods of full-time employment as an operator, installer, or onsite soil evaluator in the same class for which licensure is sought.

1. A year of full-time employment is defined as a minimum of 1,760 hours during a 12-month period or a minimum of 220 workdays in a 12-month period. A workday is defined as performing or assisting in the duties of an installer, operator, or onsite soil evaluator to the extent required for the proper installation or maintenance of onsite sewage systems or the evaluation of soil and soil properties for suitability as locations for onsite sewage systems. More than 1,760 hours or 220 workdays during a 12-month period will not be considered as more than one year of full-time employment.

2. Partial credit may be given for actual hours of work experience if the applicant works less than full time.

18VAC160-40-105. Master licenses; conversion of licenses on April 1, 2017. (Repealed.)

A. An individual holding a current license issued by the board that was valid on March 31, 2017, will be issued a master license in the same class and category of license, and with the same expiration date.

1. A conventional onsite sewage system installer license that is current on March 31, 2017, will be converted to a master conventional onsite sewage system installer license.

2. An alternative onsite sewage system installer license that is current on March 31, 2017, will be converted to a master alternative onsite sewage system installer license.

3. A conventional onsite sewage system operator license that is current on March 31, 2017, will be converted to a master conventional onsite sewage system operator license.

4. An alternative onsite sewage system operator license that is current on March 31, 2017, will be converted to a master alternative onsite sewage system operator license.

5. A conventional onsite soil evaluator license that is current on March 31, 2017, will be converted to a master conventional onsite soil evaluator license.

6. An alternative onsite soil evaluator license that is current on March 31, 2017, will be converted to a master alternative onsite soil evaluator license.

B. Any license issued pursuant to this section may be subject to disciplinary action in accordance with this chapter for any violation of the regulations that occurred under the license held prior to conversion in accordance with this section.

18VAC160-40-110. License required.

A. No individual shall may install a conventional or alternative onsite sewage system without a valid onsite sewage system installer license issued by the board in the appropriate class.

B. An individual cannot simultaneously hold valid master and journeyman onsite sewage system installer licenses in the same class. Issuance of a master onsite sewage system installer license in a specific class shall void the journeyman onsite sewage system installer license in the same class.

C. An individual cannot simultaneously hold valid conventional and alternative master onsite sewage system installer licenses or conventional and alternative journeyman onsite sewage system installer licenses. Issuance of a master alternative onsite sewage system installer license shall void the conventional onsite sewage system installer license.

D. B. A journeyman onsite sewage system installer must work under the direct supervision of a licensed master onsite sewage system installer with the appropriate class of license. A master onsite sewage system installer is responsible for supervising the provision of onsite sewage system installations by any journeyman onsite sewage system installers under his the master onsite sewage system installer's direct supervision. A master alternative onsite sewage system installer licensee may supervise a journeyman conventional onsite sewage system installer licensee.

E. [ C. Experience used to qualify for licensure cannot be verified by a journeyman onsite sewage system installer. ]

18VAC160-40-115. Documented qualifying experience for onsite sewage system installers.

[ A. ] All qualifying experience submitted by an applicant in accordance with this part must be verified by one or more of the following:

1. Master conventional or alternative onsite soil evaluator;

2. Master conventional or alternative onsite sewage system installer;

3. Master conventional or alternative onsite sewage system operator;

4. Professional engineer;

5. VDH permitting or inspection official;

6. Professional geologist;

7. DEQ wastewater official; or

8. For experience gained outside of Virginia, an equivalent credential to these licenses.

[ B. Experience used to qualify for licensure cannot be verified by a journeyman onsite sewage system installer. ]

18VAC160-40-120. Qualifications for journeyman conventional onsite sewage system installer licenses.

An applicant for licensure as a journeyman conventional onsite sewage system installer shall must furnish acceptable documentation that one of the following qualifications has been met:

Prerequisites

Exam Required

Education Required

Documented Qualifying Experience

1.

Employee, owner, director, or officer of a properly licensed contractor with a conventional sewage disposal system contracting (SDS CDS) or alternative sewage disposal system contracting (ADS) specialty issued by the Virginia Board for Contractors

No

No

Six months of full-time experience assisting with the installation of conventional or alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an onsite soil evaluator, an onsite sewage system installer, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

2.

Master conventional or alternative onsite sewage system operator license or journeyman conventional or alternative onsite sewage system operator license

No

Three months of full-time experience operating conventional or alternative onsite sewage systems

3.

None

No

No

One year of full-time experience assisting with the installation of conventional or alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an onsite soil evaluator, an onsite sewage system installer, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

18VAC160-40-130. Qualifications for master conventional onsite sewage system installer licenses.

An applicant for licensure as a master conventional onsite sewage system installer shall must furnish acceptable documentation that one of the following qualifications has been met:

Prerequisites

Exam Required

Education Required

Documented Qualifying Experience

1.

Employee, owner, director, or officer of a properly licensed contractor with a conventional sewage disposal system contracting (SDS CDS) or alternative sewage disposal system contracting (ADS) specialty issued by the Virginia Board for Contractors

Yes

20 hours of training approved by the board covering basic installation of conventional or alternative onsite sewage systems

One year Six months of full-time experience installing conventional or alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an onsite soil evaluator, an onsite sewage system installer, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

2.

Employee, owner, director, or officer of a properly licensed contractor with a conventional sewage disposal system contracting (SDS CDS) or alternative sewage disposal system contracting (ADS) specialty issued by the Virginia Board for Contractors

Yes

No

Two years One year of full-time experience installing conventional or alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an onsite soil evaluator, an onsite sewage system installer, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

3.

Interim conventional onsite sewage system installer or journeyman Journeyman conventional or alternative onsite sewage system installer license

Yes

20 hours of training approved by the board covering basic installation of conventional or alternative onsite sewage systems

Two years Three months of full-time experience installing conventional or alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an onsite soil evaluator, an onsite sewage system installer, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

4.

Interim conventional onsite sewage system installer journeyman Journeyman conventional or alternative onsite sewage system installer license

Yes

No

Three years Six months of full-time experience installing conventional or alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an onsite soil evaluator, an onsite sewage system installer, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

5.

Master conventional or alternative onsite sewage system operator license

Yes

No

Three months of full-time experience installing conventional or alternative onsite sewage systems

6.

None

Yes

No

Two years of full-time experience installing conventional or alternative onsite sewage systems

18VAC160-40-140. (Reserved) Qualification for exemption from examination for master conventional onsite sewage system installer applicants.

A. Applicants seeking licensure as a master conventional onsite sewage system installer may be exempt from the examination, provided that the applicant meets the requirements of 18VAC160-40-60 and provides documentation acceptable to the board of one of the following:

1. The applicant has completed a minimum of 40 hours of board-approved training and has been actively engaged in performing the duties of a conventional onsite sewage system installer for at least six years immediately preceding application; or

2. The applicant has been actively engaged in performing the duties of a conventional onsite sewage system installer for at least 10 years immediately preceding application.

B. Documentation of qualifying experience may be verified by a master conventional or alternative onsite soil evaluator, a master conventional or alternative onsite sewage system installer, a master conventional or alternative onsite sewage system operator, a professional engineer, an authorized onsite soil evaluator, VDH permitting or inspection official, professional geologist, DEQ wastewater official, or, for experience gained outside of Virginia, an equivalent credential to these licenses.

18VAC160-40-150. Qualifications for journeyman alternative onsite sewage system installer licenses.

An applicant for licensure as a journeyman alternative onsite sewage system installer shall must furnish acceptable documentation that one of the following qualifications has been met:

Prerequisites

Exam Required

Education Required

Documented Qualifying Experience

1.

Employee, owner, director, or officer of a properly licensed contractor with a an alternative sewage disposal system contracting (SDS ADS) specialty issued by the Virginia Board for Contractors

No

No

One year of full-time experience assisting with the installation of alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an alternative onsite soil evaluator, an alternative onsite sewage system installer, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

2.

Master alternative onsite sewage system operator license or journeyman alternative onsite sewage system operator license

No

Three months of full-time experience assisting with the installation of alternative onsite sewage systems

3.

None

No

No

Two years 18 months of full-time experience assisting with the installation of alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an alternative onsite soil evaluator, an alternative onsite sewage system installer, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

18VAC160-40-160. Qualifications for master alternative onsite sewage system installer licenses.

An applicant for licensure as a master alternative onsite sewage system installer shall must furnish acceptable documentation that one of the following qualifications has been met:

Prerequisites

Exam Required

Education Required

Documented Qualifying Experience

1.

Employee, owner, director, or officer of a properly licensed contractor with a an alternative sewage disposal system contracting (SDS ADS) specialty issued by the Virginia Board for Contractors

Yes

No

Two years of full-time experience installing alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an alternative onsite soil evaluator, an alternative onsite sewage system installer, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

2.

Employee, owner, director, or officer of a properly licensed contractor with a an alternative sewage disposal system contracting (SDS ADS) specialty issued by the Virginia Board for Contractors

Yes

20 hours of training approved by the board covering the basic installation of alternative onsite sewage systems

18 months of full-time experience installing alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an alternative onsite soil evaluator, an alternative onsite sewage system installer, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

3.

No

Yes

20 hours of training approved by the board covering basic installation of alternative onsite sewage systems

Three years 30 months of full-time experience installing alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an alternative onsite soil evaluator, an alternative onsite sewage system installer, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

4.

Interim alternative onsite sewage system installer or Master conventional onsite sewage system installer or journeyman alternative onsite sewage system installer license

Yes

No

18 months One year of full-time experience installing alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an alternative onsite soil evaluator, an alternative onsite sewage system installer, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

5.

Master alternative onsite sewage system operator license

Yes

No

Three months of full-time experience installing alternative onsite sewage systems

6.

None

Yes

No

Three years of full-time experience installing alternative onsite sewage systems

18VAC160-40-170. License required.

A. No individual shall may operate or maintain a conventional or alternative onsite sewage system without a valid onsite sewage system operator license issued by the board in the appropriate class.

B. An individual cannot simultaneously hold valid master and journeyman onsite sewage system operator licenses in the same class. Issuance of a master onsite sewage system operator license in a specific class shall void the journeyman onsite sewage system operator license in the same class.

C. An individual cannot simultaneously hold valid conventional and alternative master onsite sewage system operator licenses or conventional and alternative journeyman onsite sewage system operator licenses. Issuance of a master alternative onsite sewage system operator license shall void the conventional onsite sewage system operator license.

D. B. A journeyman onsite sewage system operator must work under the direct supervision of a licensed master onsite sewage system operator with the appropriate class of license. A master onsite sewage system operator is responsible for supervising the operation and maintenance of the onsite sewage system by any journeyman onsite sewage system operator under his the master onsite sewage system operator's responsibility. A master alternative onsite sewage system operator licensee may supervise a journeyman conventional onsite sewage system operator licensee.

E. [ C. Experience used to qualify for licensure cannot be verified by a journeyman onsite sewage system operator. ]

F. No individual shall act as an [ D. C. ] An alternative onsite sewage system operator of an alternative onsite sewage system that exceeds 10,000 gallons per day design flow without possessing must have operations and maintenance performed by either (i) an individual who is licensed as both an alternative onsite sewage system operator and a Class 4 or higher wastewater works operator license in addition to an alternative onsite sewage system operator license or (ii) an individual who is licensed as an alternative onsite sewage system operator and an individual who is licensed as a Class 4 or higher wastewater works operator who are working together pursuant to an employment relationship, contract, or other written agreement.

18VAC160-40-175. Documented qualifying experience for onsite sewage system operators.

[ A. ] All qualifying experience submitted by an applicant in accordance with this part must be verified by one or more of the following:

1. Master conventional or alternative onsite soil evaluator;

2. Master conventional or alternative onsite sewage system operator;

3. Master conventional or alternative onsite sewage system installer;

4. Professional engineer;

5. VDH permitting or inspection official;

6. Professional geologist;

7. DEQ wastewater official; or

8. For experience gained outside of Virginia, an equivalent credential to these licenses.

[ B. Experience used to qualify for licensure cannot be verified by a journeyman onsite sewage system operator. ]

18VAC160-40-180. Qualifications for journeyman conventional onsite sewage system operator licenses.

An applicant for licensure as a journeyman conventional onsite sewage system operator shall must furnish acceptable documentation that the following qualification has been met:

Prerequisites

Exam Required

Education Required

Documented Qualifying Experience

None

No

No

Six months of full-time experience assisting with the operation and maintenance of conventional or alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an onsite soil evaluator, an onsite sewage system operator, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

18VAC160-40-190. Qualifications for master conventional onsite sewage system operator licenses.

An applicant for licensure as a master conventional onsite sewage system operator shall must furnish acceptable documentation that one of the following qualifications has been met:

Prerequisites

Exam Required

Education Required

Documented Qualifying Experience

1.

Wastewater works operator license

Yes

No

None

2.

No

Yes

10 hours of education approved by the board covering the basics of operation and maintenance of conventional onsite sewage systems

Six months of full-time experience in the operation and maintenance of conventional or alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an onsite soil evaluator, an onsite sewage system operator, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

3.

Master conventional onsite sewage system installer or journeyman alternative onsite sewage system operator license

Yes

No

Six months of full-time experience in the operation and maintenance of conventional or alternative onsite sewage systems

4.

No

Yes

No

One year Nine months of full-time experience in the operation and maintenance of conventional or alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an onsite soil evaluator, an onsite sewage system operator, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

18VAC160-40-200. Qualification for exemption from examination for master conventional onsite sewage system operator applicants.

Applicants seeking licensure as a master conventional onsite sewage system operator may be exempt from the examination provided the applicant:

1. Is able to satisfactorily demonstrate that he the applicant has been actively engaged in performing the duties of a conventional onsite sewage system operator for at least four years immediately preceding application. Documentation of qualifying experience may be verified by a master conventional or alternative onsite soil evaluator, a master conventional or alternative onsite sewage system operator, a master conventional or alternative onsite sewage system installer, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator, a VDH permitting or inspection official, a professional geologist, a DEQ wastewater official, or, for experience gained outside of Virginia, an equivalent credential to these licenses; and

2. Meets the requirements of 18VAC160-40-60.

18VAC160-40-210. Qualifications for journeyman alternative onsite sewage system operator licenses.

An applicant for licensure as a journeyman alternative onsite sewage operator shall must furnish acceptable documentation that one of the following qualifications has been met:

Prerequisites

Exam Required

Education Required

Documented Qualifying Experience

1.

None

No

20 hours of education approved by the board covering the basics of operation and maintenance of alternative onsite sewage systems

One year Nine months of full-time experience assisting with the operation and maintenance of alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an alternative onsite soil evaluator, an alternative sewage system operator, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

2.

None

No

None

Two years 18 months of full-time experience assisting with the operation and maintenance of alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an alternative onsite soil evaluator, an alternative sewage system operator, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

18VAC160-40-220. Qualifications for master alternative onsite sewage system operator licenses.

An applicant for licensure as a master alternative onsite sewage system operator shall must furnish acceptable documentation that one of the following has been met:

Prerequisites

Exam Required

Education Required

Documented Qualifying Experience

1.

Held or holds a master conventional onsite sewage system operator license

Yes

10 Eight hours of training approved by the board covering the basics of operation and maintenance of alternative onsite sewage systems

One year of full-time experience in the operation and maintenance of alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an alternative onsite soil evaluator, an alternative onsite sewage system operator, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

2.

Held or holds a master or journeyman conventional onsite sewage system operator license

Yes

No

18 months of full-time experience in the operation and maintenance of alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an alternative onsite soil evaluator, an alternative onsite sewage system operator, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

3.

None

Yes

20 16 hours of training approved by the board covering the basics of operation and maintenance of alternative onsite sewage systems

Two years of full-time experience in the operation and maintenance of alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an alternative onsite soil evaluator, an alternative onsite sewage system operator, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

4.

Wastewater works operator license

Yes

No

Six months of full-time experience in the operation and maintenance of alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an alternative onsite soil evaluator, an alternative onsite sewage system operator, a professional engineer, or an authorized onsite soil evaluator

5.

Wastewater works operator license

Yes

20 16 hours of training approved by the board in basics of operation and maintenance of alternative onsite sewage systems

No

18VAC160-40-230. License required.

A. Notwithstanding the provisions of Chapter 4 (§ 54.1-400 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia, no individual shall may perform the duties of an onsite soil evaluator without possessing a valid license issued by the board.

B. An individual cannot simultaneously hold master and journeyman onsite soil evaluator licenses in the same class. Issuance of a master onsite soil evaluator license in a specific class shall void the journeyman onsite soil evaluator license in the same class.

C. An individual cannot simultaneously hold valid conventional and alternative master onsite soil evaluator licenses or conventional and alternative journeyman onsite soil evaluator licenses. Issuance of an alternative master onsite soil evaluator license shall void the conventional onsite soil evaluator license.

D. B. A journeyman onsite soil evaluator must work under the direct supervision of a master onsite soil evaluator with the appropriate class of license. A master onsite soil evaluator of an equal or greater class is responsible for supervising the provision of onsite soil evaluations and designs by any journeyman onsite soil evaluator under his the master onsite soil evaluator's responsibility.

E. [ C. Experience to qualify for licensure cannot be verified by a journeyman onsite soil evaluator. ]

18VAC160-40-235. Documented qualifying experience for onsite soil evaluators.

[ A. ] All qualifying experience submitted by an applicant in accordance with this part must be verified by one or more of the following:

1. Master conventional or alternative onsite soil evaluator;

2. Master conventional or alternative onsite sewage system installer;

3. Master conventional or alternative onsite sewage system operator;

4. Professional engineer;

5. VDH permitting or inspection official;

6. Professional geologist;

7. DEQ wastewater official; or

8. For experience gained outside of Virginia, an equivalent credential to these licenses.

[ B. Experience used to qualify for licensure cannot be verified by a journeyman onsite soil evaluator. ]

18VAC160-40-240. Qualifications for journeyman conventional onsite soil evaluator licenses.

An applicant for licensure as a journeyman conventional onsite soil evaluator shall must furnish acceptable documentation that one of the following has been met:

Prerequisites

Exam Required

Education Required

Documented Qualifying Experience

1.

Virginia professional Professional soil scientist license

No

No

No

2.

No

No

No

One and one-half years 18 months of full-time experience assisting in the evaluation of site and soil conditions and design of conventional onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an authorized soil evaluator, a professional engineer, or an onsite soil evaluator

3.

No

No

VDH onsite sewage system training program

One year of full-time experience assisting in the evaluation of site and soil conditions and design of conventional onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an authorized soil evaluator, a professional engineer, or an onsite soil evaluator

18VAC160-40-250. Qualifications for master conventional onsite soil evaluator licenses.

An applicant for licensure as a master conventional onsite soil evaluator shall must furnish acceptable documentation that one of the following qualifications has been met:

Prerequisites

Exam Required

Education Required

Documented Qualifying Experience

1.

No

Yes

Master's or bachelor's degree

Two years of full-time experience evaluating site and soil conditions and designing conventional onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an authorized onsite soil evaluator, a professional engineer, or an onsite soil evaluator

2.

No

Yes

Associate's degree

Three years 30 months of full-time experience evaluating site and soil conditions and designing conventional onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an authorized onsite soil evaluator, a professional engineer, or an onsite soil evaluator

3.

No

Yes

VDH onsite sewage system training program

Two years of full-time experience evaluating site and soil conditions and designing conventional onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an authorized onsite soil evaluator, a professional engineer, or an onsite soil evaluator

4.

Journeyman or interim conventional onsite soil evaluator

Yes

No

Three Two years of full-time experience evaluating site and soil conditions and designing conventional onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an authorized onsite soil evaluator, a professional engineer, or an onsite soil evaluator

5.

Virginia professional Professional soil scientist license

Yes

No

One year of full-time experience evaluating site and soil conditions and designing conventional onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an authorized onsite soil evaluator, a professional engineer, or an onsite soil evaluator.

18VAC160-40-260. Qualifications for journeyman alternative onsite soil evaluator licenses.

An applicant for licensure as a journeyman alternative onsite soil evaluator shall must furnish acceptable documentation that one of the following qualifications has been met:

Prerequisites

Exam Required

Education Required

Documented Qualifying Experience

1.

Virginia professional Professional soil scientist license

No

No

One year of full-time experience assisting in the evaluation of site and soil conditions and design of alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an authorized onsite soil evaluator , a professional engineer, or an alternative soil evaluator

2.

Possess or held either a valid interim alternative onsite soil evaluator license or a conventional onsite soil evaluator license

No

No

One year of full-time experience assisting in the evaluation of site and soil conditions and design of alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an authorized onsite soil evaluator a professional engineer, or an alternative soil evaluator

3.

An authorized onsite soil evaluator No

No

No VDH onsite sewage system training program

One year of full-time experience assisting in the evaluation of site and soil conditions and design of alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an authorized onsite soil evaluator, a professional engineer, or an alternative soil evaluator

4.

No

No

No

Two years of full-time experience assisting in the evaluation of site and soil conditions and design of alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an authorized onsite soil evaluator, a professional engineer, or an alternative soil evaluator

18VAC160-40-270. Qualifications for master alternative onsite soil evaluator licenses.

An applicant for licensure as a master alternative onsite soil evaluator shall must furnish acceptable documentation that one of the following qualifications has been met:

Prerequisites

Exam Required

Education Required

Documented Qualifying Experience

1.

No

Yes

Master's or bachelor's degree

Two years of full-time experience evaluating site and soil conditions and designing alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an authorized onsite soil evaluator, a professional engineer, or an alternative onsite soil evaluator

2.

No

Yes

Associate's degree

Three years 30 months of full-time experience evaluating site and soil conditions and designing alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an authorized onsite soil evaluator, a professional engineer, or an alternative onsite soil evaluator

3.

No

Yes

VDH onsite sewage system training program

Two years of full-time experience evaluating site and soil conditions and designing alternative onsite sewage systems

4.

Held or holds a master conventional onsite soil evaluator license, interim alternative onsite soil evaluator license, or a journeyman alternative onsite soil evaluator license, or authorized onsite soil evaluator license

Yes

No

Two years 18 months of full-time experience evaluating site and soil conditions and designing alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an authorized onsite soil evaluator, a professional engineer, or an alternative onsite soil evaluator

4. 5.

No

Yes

No

Four Three years of full-time experience evaluating site and soil conditions and designing alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an authorized onsite soil evaluator, a professional engineer, or an alternative onsite soil evaluator

5. 6.

Virginia licensed professional Professional soil scientist license

Yes

No

Two years of full-time experience evaluating site and soil conditions and designing alternative onsite sewage systems verified by one or more of the following: an authorized onsite soil evaluator, a professional engineer, or an alternative onsite soil evaluator

18VAC160-40-275. Verification of experience by authorized onsite soil evaluators. (Repealed.)

An authorized onsite soil evaluator who is verifying experience pursuant to Part II of this chapter and who holds no other license listed as qualified to verify experience may only verify experience obtained before July 1, 2009.

18VAC160-40-280. Acceptable degree programs and verification procedures.

A. Applicants seeking to qualify for licensure based on completion of an associate's, bachelor's, or master's degree shall must submit an official transcript from the school where the applicable degree was obtained. Only degrees a degree from an accredited college or university that is approved or accredited by the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, a regional or national accreditation association, or by an accrediting agency that is recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education will be considered. The following degrees shall will be considered to qualify in accordance with 18VAC160-40-250 and 18VAC160-40-270:

1. Bachelor's or, master's, or associate's degree in soil science, biology, chemistry, engineering, engineering technology, environmental science, geology, agronomy, earth science, or environmental health, wastewater works, or applied sciences.

2. Associate's degree in wastewater works, environmental science, or engineering technology.

3. 2. Bachelor's degree in a related physical, biological, environmental, or chemical science that includes a minimum of 40 semester credit hours in any combination of science and math.

B. Any applicant who has earned a degree from an institution outside of the United States shall must have the degree authenticated and evaluated by an education credential evaluation services. The board reserves the right to reject any evaluation submitted by the applicant.

18VAC160-40-290. Expiration and renewal Renewal required.

A. A license shall will expire two years from the last day of the month in which it was issued.

B. Prior to the expiration date shown on the license, the board shall mail a renewal notice to the licensee's address of record. The licensee shall return a renewal notice and the applicable renewal fee. Failure to receive a renewal notice from the board does not relieve the licensee of the obligation to renew. If the licensee fails to receive the renewal notice, a copy of the license may be submitted with the required fee as an application for renewal.

C. By submitting the renewal fee, the licensee is certifying his continued compliance with the Standards of Practice and Conduct (Part IX (18VAC160-40-440 et seq.) of this chapter) as established by the board. In addition, by submitting the renewal fee, licensees are certifying compliance with the continuing professional education requirements of this chapter.

18VAC160-40-295. Procedures for renewal.

A. Prior to the expiration date shown on the license, the board will send a renewal notice to the licensee's address of record.

B. Prior to the expiration date shown on the license, a licensee desiring to renew a license must return to the board a renewal notice and the applicable renewal fee specified in 18VAC160-40-40.

C. Failure to receive a renewal notice from the board does not relieve the licensee of the obligation to renew. [ If the licensee fails to receive the renewal notice, a copy of the license may be submitted with the required fee as an application for renewal. ]

D. By submitting the renewal fee, the licensee is affirming that the continuing professional education requirements of 18VAC160-40-330 have been met and that the licensee is in continued compliance with this chapter.

18VAC160-40-300. Reinstatement.

A. If all the requirements for renewal of the license as specified provided in 18VAC160-40-290 are not completed by the licensee within 30 days of after the license expiration date on the license, a reinstatement fee shall of the license will be required as established in 18VAC160-40-40.

B. A license may be reinstated for up to one year 24 months following the expiration date of the license upon submittal of the reinstatement application consisting of (i) payment of the reinstatement fee specified in 18VAC160-40-40 and (ii) proof of CPE in accordance with 18VAC160-40-330. Any licensee who fails to reinstate After 24 months, the license within 12 months after the expiration date shall apply for a new license and meet entry requirements in effect at the time of submittal of the new application. The will not be reinstated under any circumstances, and the individual shall be deemed to be eligible to sit for the examination for the same profession, class, and category of license as the expired license, if an examination is applicable must apply as a new applicant and meet entry requirements current at the time of submittal of the new application.

C. By submitting the reinstatement fee application, the licensee individual is certifying his affirming that the individual is in continued compliance with the Standards of Practice and Conduct (Part IX (18VAC160-40-440 et seq.) of this chapter) as established by the board. In addition, by submitting the reinstatement fee, licensees are certifying compliance with the continued professional education requirements of this chapter.

D. Any regulated activity conducted subsequent to the license expiration date may constitute unlicensed activity and be subject to prosecution under Chapter 1 (§ 54.1-100 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia.

18VAC160-40-310. Status of license during period prior to reinstatement.

A. A licensee who applies for reinstatement of the reinstates a license shall will be subject to all laws and regulations as if the regulant had regarded as having been continuously licensed without interruption. The licensee shall will remain under and be subject to the disciplinary authority of the board during the entire period.

B. Any regulated activity conducted subsequent to the license expiration date may constitute unlicensed activity and be subject to prosecution under Chapter 1 (§ 54.1-100 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia.

18VAC160-40-320. Board discretion to deny renewal or reinstatement.

A. The board may deny renewal or reinstatement of license for the same reasons as the board may refuse initial licensure or discipline a licensee. The licensee has the right to request further review of any such action by the board under the Administrative Process Act (§ 2.2-4000 et seq. of the Code of Virginia).

B. The board may deny renewal or reinstatement of a licensee if the licensee has been subject to a disciplinary proceeding by the board and has not met the terms of an agreement for licensure, has not satisfied all sanctions, or has not fully paid monetary penalties and costs imposed by the board.

18VAC160-40-330. Continuing professional education.

A. Each licensee shall have completed must complete the following number of continuing professional education (CPE) contact hours during each renewal cycle. CPE provisions do not apply to for the renewal of licenses that were held for less than two years on the date of expiration.

License Type

CPE Contact Hours Required

1. Master alternative onsite soil evaluator

16 14

2. Master alternative onsite sewage system installer

16 14

3. Master alternative onsite sewage system operator

16 14

4. Master conventional onsite soil evaluator

12 10

5. Master conventional onsite sewage system installer

12 10

6. Master conventional onsite sewage system operator

8 6

7. Journeyman alternative onsite soil evaluator

8 6

8. Journeyman alternative onsite sewage system installer

8 6

9. Journeyman alternative onsite sewage system operator

8 6

10. Journeyman conventional onsite soil evaluator

4

11. Journeyman conventional onsite sewage system installer

4

12. Journeyman conventional onsite sewage system operator

4

B. The licensee may request additional time to meet the CPE courses completed during the license period immediately prior to the expiration date of the license shall be acceptable in order to renew the license requirement. However, CPE courses completed during a current license renewal cycle to satisfy the CPE requirements of the preceding licensing renewal cycle shall will be valid only for that preceding license renewal cycle and shall will not be accepted for subsequent renewal cycles. The grant of any request for additional time to meet the CPE requirement is at the discretion of the board.

C. The licensee will not receive credit for completing the same CPE course with the same content more than once during a license period renewal cycle.

D. A licensee may receive CPE credit for teaching a course that otherwise meets the requirements of this chapter; however, additional credit shall will not be given for subsequent offering of a course or activity with the same content within the same licensing renewal cycle. In addition, a licensee may receive two hours of CPE no more than once during a single licensing renewal cycle for the initial development or substantial updating of a CPE course.

E. For all licenses, safety subjects shall will not count for more than one half one-fourth of the total required CPE hours.

18VAC160-40-340. CPE subject matter for onsite sewage system installers.

The following course topics will be accepted for CPE credit for onsite sewage system installers:

1. Sewage system installation;

2. Operating and maintaining equipment;

3. Security and safety procedures;

4. General science and, mathematical, and electrical principles;

5. Administrative knowledge and procedures applicable to the profession;

6. Laws and regulations applicable to the profession; and

7. Monitoring, evaluating and adjusting treatment processes (alternative onsite sewage system installers only); and 8. Management and supervision principles (master onsite sewage system installers only; maximum of four contact hours).

18VAC160-40-350. CPE subject matter for onsite sewage system operators.

The following course topics will be accepted for CPE credit for onsite sewage system operators:

1. Onsite system operations;

2. Monitoring, evaluating, and adjusting treatment processes;

3. Operating and maintaining equipment;

4. Security and safety procedures;

5. General science and, mathematical, and electrical principles;

6. Administrative knowledge applicable to the profession; and

7. Laws and regulations applicable to the profession; and 8. Management and supervision principles (applicable to master onsite sewage system operators only; maximum of four contact hours).

18VAC160-40-360. CPE subject matter for onsite soil evaluators.

The following course topics will be accepted for CPE credit for onsite soil evaluators:

1. Site and soil evaluations;

2. Security and safety procedures;

3. Mapping, cartography, and geographic information systems;

4. System design;

5. Inspections;

6. General science and mathematical principles;

7. Administrative knowledge and procedures applicable to the profession; and

8. Laws and regulations applicable to the profession; and 9. Management and supervision principles (applicable to master onsite soil evaluators only; maximum of four contact hours).

18VAC160-40-365. CPE courses on management and supervision principles.

In addition to the topics provided in 18VAC160-40-340, 18VAC160-40-350, and 18VAC160-40-360, a master licensee may receive a maximum of four contact hours of CPE credit for completion of training in management and supervision principles.

18VAC160-40-370. Use of training credits and formal education for CPE credit.

Any course approved by the board for substitution as training credits or formal education semester hours, as provided for in 18VAC160-40-70 or 18VAC160-40-280, shall will also be acceptable on an hour-for-hour basis for CPE contact hours. One semester hour of college credit shall will equal 15 CPE contact hours, and one-quarter hour of college credit shall will equal 10 CPE contact hours. The training credits or formal education must be applicable to the license for which CPE credit is sought.

18VAC160-40-380. Maintenance of CPE.

A. For Each licensee must maintain evidence of the satisfactory completion of CPE for a period of at least two years following the end of the license renewal cycle for which the CPE was taken, the. Such documentation must be provided to the board or its duly authorized agents upon request. The following evidence shall will be maintained to document completion of the required CPE.:

1. Evidence of completion of a structured training activity, which shall consist of that contains the name, address, and telephone number of the sponsor;

2. The dates the licensee participated in the training;

3. Description of the subject matter presented; and

4. A statement from the sponsor verifying the number of CPE contact hours completed.

B. The board may conduct an audit of its licensees to ensure compliance with the applicable CPE requirements. Licensees who are selected for audit shall must provide the necessary documentation stipulated in this section.

18VAC160-40-385. Training courses, generally.

In accordance with 18VAC160-40-70 A 2, training courses approved by the board may be substituted for experience. All training courses must be approved by the board in accordance with the provisions of this part. Training courses may be delivered [ in person or ] using distance, virtual, or online education technology. Training courses may be approved retroactively; however, no applicant will receive credit for the training course until such approval is granted by the board. Training courses that meet the requirements of 18VAC160-40-430 may be accepted for substitution of experience without approval by the board.

18VAC160-40-390. Approval of training courses.

A. Training courses may be substituted for experience pursuant to the provisions of 18VAC160-40-70. With the exception of training courses provided pursuant to 18VAC160-40-430, training courses that may be substituted for required experience must be approved by the board prior to commencing in accordance with the provisions of this section.

B. Each A training provider seeking course approval shall of a training course must submit an application for training course approval on a form provided by the board. Only classroom, laboratory, and field trip contact time will be used to compute training credits. No credit will be given for breaks, meals, or receptions. The application must include:

1. Organization. The board will only approve The name of the training offered by a provider that is an identifiable organization with a mission statement outlining its functions, structure, process, and philosophy and that has a staff of one or more persons with the authority to administer and coordinate the training course.;

2. Training course records. The board will only approve training offered by a provider that maintains records for all participants for a minimum of seven years and that has a written policy on retention and release of records. Provider contact person, address, [ email address, ] and [ telephone number contact information ];

3. Instructors. The board will only approve training conducted by personnel who have demonstrated competency in the subject being taught, an understanding of the learning objective, and knowledge of the learning process to be used. Training course title;

4. Objectives. The board will only approve courses that have a series of stated objectives that are pertinent to the tasks performed by the licensee. The training course content must be consistent with those objectives. Identification of the profession, category, and class of license to which the course is applicable;

5. Course completion requirements. For successful completion of a training course, participants must attend 90% or more of the class contact time and must demonstrate their learning through written examinations, completion of a project, oral examination, or other similar assessment techniques. Method of delivery;

6. Detailed course schedule, including begin and end times, and a list of planned breaks;

7. Instructor qualifications, including name, license number, if applicable, and a list of trade-appropriate designations, as well as a professional resume with a summary of teaching experience and subject matter knowledge and qualifications acceptable to the board;

8. Training course syllabus or outline;

9. Materials to be provided to participants; and

10. A description of the means that will be used to assess the learning of each participant to determine successful completion of the training course, such as examinations, projects, personal evaluations by the instructor, or other recognized evaluation techniques.

18VAC160-40-400. Application for training course approval. (Repealed.)

A. The board shall consider the following information, to be submitted by the course provider or instructor on forms provided by the board:

1. Course information.

a. Course title;

b. Planned audience;

c. Name of provider;

d. Name, physical address, email address, and phone number of contact person;

e. Scheduled presentation dates;

f. Detailed course schedule, hour by hour including begin and end times;

g. List of planned breaks;

h. Scheduled presentation location; and

i. Identification of the profession, category, and class of license to which the course is applicable and relevancy to the identified license type.

2. Instructor qualifications.

a. Name of instructor;

b. Title;

c. Employer;

d. Board license number or numbers, if applicable; and

e. Summary of qualifications to teach the course.

3. Training materials.

a. Course objectives. A listing of the course objectives stated in terms of the skills and knowledge the participant will be able to demonstrate as a result of the training.

b. Course outline. A detailed outline showing the planned activities that will occur during the training course, including major topics, planned presentation sequence, laboratory and field activities, audiovisual presentations, and other major activities.

c. Course reference materials. A list of the name, publisher, and publication date for commercially available publications. For reference materials developed by the course provider or available exclusively through the course, a copy of the reference.

d. Audiovisual support materials. A listing of any commercially available audiovisual support material that will be used in the program. A brief description of any provider or instructor generated audiovisual material that will be used.

e. Handouts. Identification of all commercially available handout materials that will be used, as well as copies of other planned handouts.

4. Determination of successful completion. A description of the means that will be used to assess the learning of each participant to determine successful completion of training program, such as examinations, projects, personal evaluations by the instructor, or other recognized evaluation techniques. Correspondence and other distance learning courses must include appropriate testing procedures to verify completion of the course.

B. Recurring training programs. If there are plans to present the same course of instruction routinely at multiple locations with only minor modifications and changes, the board may approve the overall program rather than individual presentations if so requested by the provider.

1. The board shall consider all of the information listed in subsection A of this section except those items related to specific offerings of the course.

2. Board approval will apply only to those specific offerings certified by the provider as having been conducted by instructors meeting the established criteria and in accordance with the board-approved course outlines and objectives.

[ 18VAC160-40-405. Documentation of training course completion required.

All training course providers must provide each participant with a certificate of training course completion or other documentation that the participant may use as proof of training course completion. Such documentation must contain the hours completed, the date of training, and the training course identification number assigned by the board. ]

18VAC160-40-410. Maintenance of training course approval records.

A. At times established by the board, the board may require that course providers that have previously obtained course approval provide the board with evidence, in a form set forth by the board, that the provider continues to comply with the requirements of this chapter. Failure to continue to comply with the board's requirements or respond to such a request may result in the board withdrawing its approval.

B. Substantial modifications or changes to the information provided in 18VAC160-40-390 and 18VAC160-40-400 must be reported to the board within 30 days of the change. Failure to report the changes as required may result in the withdrawal of approval by the board.

C. Any change of address of the training provider shall be reported in writing within 30 days of the change.

D. The board may conduct an audit of the training provider to ensure continued compliance with this chapter.

All providers of approved training courses must establish and maintain a record for each participant. The record must include the participant's name and address, the course name and hours attended, the course syllabus or outline, the names of the instructors, the date of successful completion, and the board's approved training course identification number. Records must be available for inspection during normal business hours by authorized representatives of the board. Providers must maintain these records for a minimum of five years.

18VAC160-40-415. Reporting of changes.

Any change in the information provided in 18VAC160-40-390 must be reported to the board within 90 days of the change. Any change in information submitted will be reviewed to ensure compliance with the provisions of this chapter.

18VAC160-40-420. Withdrawal of approval.

The board may withdraw approval of any provider a training course for the following reasons:

1. The course or courses being offered no longer meet meets the standards established by the board.

2. The provider, through an agent or otherwise, advertises its services in a fraudulent or deceptive way.

3. The provider, instructor, contact person, or designee of the provider falsifies any information relating to the application for approval, course information, or student participant records.

4. [ The training course provider fails to provide the participant with documentation of course completion showing the hours completed, the date of training, and the training course identification number assigned by the board.

5. ] There is a change in the information regarding the training course, if the change results in noncompliance with this part.

[ 5. 6. ] The provider fails to comply with 18VAC160-40-415.

[ 6. 7. ] The provider fails to respond to the board or any of its agents.

18VAC160-40-425. Board authority to audit approved training courses.

The board may conduct an audit of any board-approved training course provider to ensure continued compliance with this chapter.

18VAC160-40-430. Training Acceptance of training courses offered by certain entities, board approval not required.

A. Training courses provided by (i) federal, state, or local government agencies; (ii) accredited colleges or universities approved or accredited by the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools; (iii) a regional or national accreditation association; or (iv) an accrediting agency that is recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education do not require board approval to be used will be accepted for experience substitution, provided the training course information submitted to the board includes the following:

1. The course must include the continuing education hours awarded by the entity.

2. The course must be related to the profession, category, or class, if applicable, for which experience substitution is sought.

B. The board may require additional information from the provider as necessary to ensure compliance with this section. If such assurance cannot be made by the board, the training course may not be used for experience substitution, or the provider may pursue board approval pursuant to this chapter.

18VAC160-40-440. Grounds for disciplinary action.

The board may place a licensee on probation; impose a monetary penalty in accordance in § 54.1-202 A of the Code of Virginia; or revoke, suspend, or refuse to renew any license; or place a licensee on probation in accordance with § 54.1-201 A 7 of the Code of Virginia when the licensee has been found to have violated or cooperated with others in violating any provision of the regulations of the board or Chapter 23 (§ 54.1-2300 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia.

18VAC160-40-450. Maintenance of license.

A. No license issued by the board shall may be assigned or otherwise transferred.

B. A licensee shall must report to the board, in writing, all changes any change of the address of record and name to the board within 30 days of the change and shall return the license to the board. In addition to the address of record, a physical address is required for each license. If the licensee holds more than one license, the licensee shall inform the board of all licenses, certificates, and registrations affected by the name or address change. The board shall not be responsible for the licensee's failure to receive notices or correspondence due to the licensee's failure to report a change of name or address. following:

1. The licensee's legal name. Such report must be accompanied by documentation acceptable to the board that verifies the name change.

2. The licensee's address, to include the physical address when applicable.

C. Any A change in any of the requirements and qualifications for licensure found in Part II (18VAC160-40-20 et seq.), III (18VAC160-40-110 et seq.), or IV (18VAC160-40-170 et seq.) of this chapter shall name or address must be reported to the board within 30 60 days of the change. The board is not responsible for the licensee's failure to receive notices, communications, or correspondence caused by the licensee's failure to report to the board any change of address.

18VAC160-40-460. Notice of adverse action.

A. Licensees shall A licensee must notify the board of the following actions against the licensee.

1. Any disciplinary action taken by any jurisdiction, board, or administrative body of competent jurisdiction, including any reprimand, license or certificate revocation, suspension or denial of a license, certificate, or registration, imposition of a monetary penalty, requirement for to take remedial education, or other corrective action.

2. Any voluntary surrendering of a related license, certificate, or registration done in connection with a disciplinary action in another taken by any jurisdiction, board, or administrative body.

3. Any conviction, finding of guilt, or plea of guilty, regardless of adjudication or deferred adjudication, in any jurisdiction of the United States of any misdemeanor involving lying, cheating, stealing, sexual offense, non-marijuana drug distribution, physical injury, or relating to the practice of the profession, except marijuana convictions, or of any felony, there being no appeal pending therefrom or the time for appeal having lapsed. Review of convictions shall will be subject to the requirements of § 54.1-204 of the Code of Virginia. Any plea of nolo contendere shall be considered a conviction for the purpose of this section.

B. Notices to The notice must be given to the board must be made, in writing, within 30 days of the action. A copy of the order or other supporting documentation must accompany the notice. The record of conviction finding or case decision shall be considered prima facie evidence of a conviction or finding of guilt.

18VAC160-40-470. Prohibited acts.

The following acts are prohibited and any violation may result in disciplinary action by the board:

1. Violating, inducing another to violate, cooperating with another to violate, or combining or conspiring with or acting as agent, partner, or associate for another to violate any of the provisions of Chapter 1 (§ 54.1-100 et seq.), 2 (§ 54.1-200 et seq.), 3 (§ 54.1-300 et seq.), or 23 (§ 54.1-2300 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia, or any of the regulations of the board.

2. Allowing a license issued by the board to be used by another.

3. 2. Obtaining or attempting to obtain a license by false or fraudulent representation, or maintaining or, renewing, or reinstating a license by false or fraudulent representation.

3. Failure to report a change pursuant to 18VAC160-40-450.

4. A licensee having been convicted, or found guilty, in any jurisdiction or having been disciplined by any jurisdiction, board, or administrative body in any jurisdiction of any offense or violation enumerated in 18VAC160-40-460. Review of convictions shall will be subject to the requirements of § 54.1-204 of the Code of Virginia.

5. Failing to inform the board in writing within 30 days that the licensee was convicted or found guilty in any jurisdiction or disciplined in by any jurisdiction, board, or administrative body of any offense or violation enumerated in 18VAC160-40-460.

6. Not demonstrating reasonable care, judgment, or application of the required knowledge, skill, and ability in the performance of the licensee's duties.

7. Having undertaken to perform or performed a professional assignment that the licensee is not qualified to perform by education, experience, training, appropriate class or category of licensure, or any combination thereof.

8. Failing to report a change as required by 18VAC160-40-450 6. Failure to comply with the requirements of 18VAC160-40-480.

9. Negligence 7. Actions constituting negligence, misconduct, or incompetence in the practice of the profession 10. Making any misrepresentation or engaging in acts of fraud or deceit in advertising, soliciting, or in providing professional services. 11. Failing to adequately supervise and review work performed by unlicensed employees or journeyman licensees under the direct supervision of the master licensee. 12., including:

a. Having undertaken to perform or performed a professional assignment that the licensee is not qualified to perform by education, experience, training, or appropriate class or category of licensure.

b. Not demonstrating reasonable care, judgment, or application of the required knowledge, skill, and ability in the performance of the licensee's duties.

c. Failure to adequately supervise and review work performed by unlicensed employees or journeyman licensees under the direct supervision of a master licensee.

d. Failure to obtain any permit, approval, or other document required by VDH or an independent local health department related to the design, installation, repair, or operation of an onsite sewage system. 13. Knowingly signing plans, drawings, reports, specifications, maps, or other documents related to an onsite sewage system not prepared or reviewed and approved by the licensee. 14. Knowingly misrepresenting factual information in expressing a professional opinion. 15. Failing

e. Failure to act in when providing professional services in a manner that safeguards the interests of the public.

8. Actions constituting engaging in improper, fraudulent, or dishonest conduct, including:

a. Making any misrepresentation or engaging in acts of fraud or deceit in advertising, soliciting, or in providing professional services.

b. Knowingly signing plans, drawings, reports, specifications, maps, or other documents related to an onsite sewage system that are not prepared or reviewed and approved by the licensee.

c. Knowingly misrepresenting factual information when expressing a professional opinion.

d. Allowing a license issued by the board to be used by another.

9. Failure to comply with the requirements of 18VAC160-40-500.

18VAC160-40-480. Conflicts of interest.

The licensee shall must:

1. Promptly and fully inform an employer or client of any interest, circumstance, or business association that may influence the licensee's judgment of or the quality of service.

2. Not accept compensation, financial or otherwise, from more than one party for services on or pertaining to the same project, unless the circumstances are fully disclosed to, and agreed to by, all interested parties in writing.

3. Neither solicit nor accept financial or other valuable consideration from material or equipment suppliers for specifying their products or services, unless the circumstances are fully disclosed to and agreed to by all interested parties in writing.

4. Not solicit or accept gratuities, directly or indirectly, from contractors or their, contractor agents, or other parties dealing with a client or employer in connection with work for which the licensee is responsible, unless the circumstances are fully disclosed to and agreed to by all interested parties in writing.

18VAC160-40-490. Licensee responsibility.

A. The primary obligation of the licensee is to the public. If the licensee's judgment is overruled and not adhered to when advising appropriate parties of circumstances of a substantial threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, the licensee shall must inform the employer and client, as applicable, of the possible consequences and notify appropriate authorities.

B. The licensee shall must sign, date, and include his the licensee's license number on all final work products prepared or reviewed and approved by the licensee. For work products performed by a journeyman licensee, the master licensee providing direct supervision shall sign, date, and include his the licensee's license number, along with the journeyman's signature, date, and license number on the final work product. A journeyman licensee shall will not submit a work project as final without the applicable master licensee's signature, date, and license number.

C. The licensee shall will not knowingly associate in a business venture with, or permit the use of the licensee's name by, any person or firm where there is reason to believe that person or firm is engaging in activity of a fraudulent or dishonest nature or is violating any law or regulation of the board.

D. A licensee who has direct knowledge that another individual or firm may be violating any of the provisions of this chapter or the provisions of Chapter 23 (§ 54.1-2300 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia shall must immediately inform the board in writing and shall cooperate in furnishing any further information or assistance that may be required.

E. Except as provided in subsection F of this section, a licensee shall will not utilize the evaluations, design, drawings, or work of another licensee without the knowledge and written consent of the licensee or organization of ownership that originated the design, drawings, or work.

F. A licensee who relies on information in VDH files or has received permission to modify or otherwise utilize the evaluation, design, drawings, or work of another licensee pursuant to subsection E of this section or this subsection may certify that work only after a thorough review of the evaluation, design, drawings or work and after he the licensee determines that he the licensee is willing to assume full responsibility for all design, drawings, or work on which he the licensee relies for his the licensee's opinion.

18VAC160-40-500. Response to inquiry and provision of records.

A. A licensee must respond within 10 days to a request by the board or any of its the board's agents regarding any complaint filed with the department.

B. Unless otherwise specified by the board, a licensee of the board shall must produce to the board or any of its the [ board board's ] agents within 10 days of the request any document, book, or record concerning any transaction pertaining to a complaint filed in which the licensee was involved, or for which the licensee is required to maintain records. The board may extend such timeframe upon a showing of extenuating circumstances prohibiting delivery within such 10-day period.

C. A licensee shall will not provide a false, misleading, or incomplete response to the board or any of its agents seeking information in the investigation of a complaint filed with the board.

D. With the exception of the requirements of subsection A or B of this section, a licensee must respond to an inquiry by the board or its the board's agent within 21 days.

18VAC160-40-510. Master licensee's professional responsibilities.

A. Any work performed by a journeyman regulated pursuant to Chapter 23 (§ 54.1-2300 et seq.) of Title 54.1 of the Code of Virginia and this chapter shall must be under the direct supervision of the master. Such master and journeyman shall must have an employment or written contractual relationship.

B. Each master shall must maintain documentation of the employment or contractual relationship with each journeyman under the master's direct supervision. Such documentation shall must be kept for a minimum of five years and shall must include, at a minimum, the beginning and ending dates of the employment or contractual relationship.

18VAC160-40-515. Licensee responsible for regulated activities performed on site.

A. For the installation of onsite sewage systems, the decision-maker and the individual executing the installation of approved permits must be licensed as a journeyman or master onsite sewage system installer in the appropriate class of license. In addition, a journeyman or master onsite sewage system installer in the appropriate class of license must be on site.

B. For operation and maintenance of onsite sewage systems, the decision-maker must be licensed as a journeyman or master onsite sewage system operator in the appropriate class of license. In addition, a journeyman or master onsite sewage system operator in the appropriate class of license must be on site where regulated activities are being performed.

C. For soil evaluation and design, the decision-maker must be licensed as a journeyman or master onsite soil evaluator in the appropriate class of license. In addition, a journeyman or master onsite soil evaluator in the appropriate class of license must be on site where regulated activities are being performed.

18VAC160-40-520. Pumping of alternative onsite sewage systems by conventional onsite sewage system operators.

A conventional onsite sewage system operator with the appropriate sewage handling permit issued by VDH or a local independent health department may pump an alternative onsite sewage system without the alternative onsite sewage system operator present, provided that the conventional onsite sewage system operator performs the pumping at the request and direction of the alternative onsite sewage system operator. The conventional onsite sewage system operator is only permitted to pump the tank and is not authorized to perform any other functions associated with the operation and maintenance of the alternative onsite sewage system.

NOTICE: The following forms used in administering the regulation have been filed by the agency. Amended or added forms are reflected in the listing and are published following the listing. Online users of this issue of the Virginia Register of Regulations may also click on the name to access a form. The forms are also available from the agency contact or may be viewed at the Office of Registrar of Regulations, General Assembly Building, 201 North Ninth Street, Fourth Floor, Richmond, Virginia 23219.

[ FORMS (18VAC160-40)

Conventional Onsite Soil Evaluator License Application, A465-1940CONLIC-v2 (eff. 12/2021)

Alternative Onsite Soil Evaluator License Application, A465-1940ALTLIC-v2 (eff. 12/2021)

Onsite Soil Evaluator Experience Verification Application, A436-1940EXP-v1 (eff. 11/2021)

Conventional Onsite Sewage System Installer License Application, A465-1944CONLIC-v2 (eff. 12/2021)

Alternative Onsite Sewage System Installer License Application, A465-1944ALTLIC-v2 (eff. 12/2021)

Conventional Onsite Sewage System Operator License Application, A465-1942CONLIC-v2 (eff. 12/2021)

Alternative Onsite Sewage System Operator License Application, A465-1942ALTLIC-v3 (eff. 12/2021)

Waiver of Examination - Master Conventional Onsite Sewage System Operator License Application, A436-1942WAIV-v3 (eff. 12/2021)

Onsite Sewage System Operator/Installer Experience Verification Application, A436-1942_44EXP-v1 (eff. 11/2021)

Conventional Onsite Soil Evaluator License Application, A465-1940CONLIC-v3 (eff. 12/2025)

Alternative Onsite Soil Evaluator License Application, A465-1940ALTLIC-v3 (eff. 12/2025)

Onsite Soil Evaluator Experience Verification Application, A436-1940EXP-v2 (eff. 12/2025)

Conventional Onsite Sewage System Installer License Application, A465-1944CONLIC-v3 (eff. 12/2025)

Alternative Onsite Sewage System Installer License Application, A465-1944ALTLIC-v3 (eff. 12/2025)

Conventional Onsite Sewage System Operator License Application, A465-1942CONLIC-v3 (eff. 12/2025)

Alternative Onsite Sewage System Operator License Application, A465-1942ALTLIC-v4 (eff. 12/2025)

Waiver of Examination - Master Conventional Onsite Sewage System Operator License Application, A436-1942WAIV-v4 (eff. 12/2025)

Onsite Sewage System Operator/Installer Experience Verification Application, A436-1942_44EXP-v2 (eff. 12/2025)

Continuing Professional Education (CPE) Application - Certificate of Completion, A436-19CPE-v3 (eff. 10/2015)

Training Course Approval Application, A465-19CRS-v5 (eff. 2/2020)

Training Course Approval Application, A465-19CRS-v6 (eff. 12/2025)

Education and Training Substitution Form, A436-19EDTRv4 (eff. 4/2017)

Waiver of Examination - Master Conventional Onsite Sewage System Installer License Application, A436-1944WAIV-v4 (eff. 12/2025)

Onsite Soil Evaluator - Universal License Recognition (ULR) Application, A436-1940EVAL_ULR-v2 (eff. 12/2025)

Onsite Sewage System Operator - Universal License Recognition (ULR) Application, A436-1942OPR_ULR-v3 (eff. 12/2025)

Onsite Sewage System Installer - Universal License Recognition (ULR) Application, A436-1944INSTL_ULR-v3 (eff. 12/2025) ]

VA.R. Doc. No. R23-7122; Filed October 22, 2025
TITLE 22. SOCIAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Final

TITLE 22. SOCIAL SERVICES

STATE BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES

Final Regulation

REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The State Board of Social Services is claiming an exemption from the Administrative Process Act in accordance with Chapter 568 of the 2025 Acts of Assembly, which exempts the actions of the board relating to the adoption of regulations necessary to implement the provisions of the act; however, the board is required to provide an opportunity for public comment on any such regulations prior to their adoption.

Title of Regulation: 22VAC40-201. Permanency Services - Prevention, Foster Care, Adoption and Independent Living (amending 22VAC40-201-120).

Statutory Authority: §§ 63.2-217 and 63.2-319 of the Code of Virginia.

Effective Date: December 17, 2025.

Agency Contact: Em Parente, Department of Social Services, 801 East Main Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 726-7895, fax (804) 726-7538, or email em.parente@dss.virginia.gov.

Summary:

Pursuant to Chapter 568 of the 2025 Acts of Assembly, the amendments (i) require local boards of social services to apply for federal benefits on behalf of children in foster care for which the child in foster care may be eligible; (ii) prohibit the use of military survivor benefits to pay the care and support of children in foster care; and (iii) require local departments of social services that are representative payees for children in foster care to conserve such military survivor benefits in an appropriate trust instrument or protected account that is exempt from federal asset and resource limits.

22VAC40-201-120. Funding.

A. The local department is responsible for establishing required to establish a foster child's eligibility for federal, state, or other funding sources and making required payments from such sources. This includes applying for all federal benefits for which a foster child may be eligible. Local departments shall seek state pool funds for a child's maintenance and service needs when other funding sources are not available.

B. The assessment and provision of services to the child and birth parents or prior custodians shall be made without regard to the funding source.

C. The child's eligibility for Title IV-E funding shall be redetermined upon a change in situation and in accordance with federal Title IV-E eligibility requirements.

D. The service worker is responsible for providing the eligibility worker information required for the annual redetermination of Medicaid eligibility and information related to changes in the child's situation.

E. If the child in foster care is eligible for military survivor benefits and the local board serves as the representative payee of the benefits, the following requirements apply:

1. The local board is prohibited from using the military survivor benefits to pay for the care and support of the child in foster care.

2. The local board shall conserve the child's military survivor benefits in an appropriate trust instrument or protected account that is exempt from federal asset and resource limits.

3. Upon exiting foster care, the funds shall be provided to the child's legal guardian or to the child if the child reaches 18 years of age while in foster care.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-8357; Filed October 29, 2025
TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Fast-Track

TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES

COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD

Fast-Track Regulation

Title of Regulation: 24VAC30-91. Subdivision Street Requirements (amending 24VAC30-91-160).

Statutory Authority: §§ 33.2-210 and 33.2-326 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearing is currently scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: December 17, 2025.

Effective Date: January 1, 2026.

Agency Contact: Steven Jack, Regulatory Manager, Department of Transportation, 1221 East Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 786-3885, or email steven.jack@vdot.virginia.gov.

Basis: The Commonwealth Transportation Board's general authority to adopt regulations is provided in § 33.2-210 of the Code of Virginia. Section 33.2-326 of the Code of Virginia vests in the Virginia Department of Transportation the control, supervision, management, and jurisdiction over the secondary system of highways.

Purpose: The proposed amendment is essential to protecting public health, safety, and welfare because it ensures regulants are able to better understand and comply with the appropriate standards for the construction of subdivision streets intended to be accepted into the secondary system of state highways. The proposed change removes an obsolete requirement and adds clarity.

Rationale for Using Fast-Track Rulemaking Process: This rulemaking is expected to be noncontroversial because it removes an unnecessary document incorporated by reference (DIBR) from 24VAC30-91.

Substance: The Subdivision Street Requirements (24VAC30-91) will be amended to remove an unnecessary DIBR listed in 24VAC30-91-160.

Issues: The primary advantage to the public and the agency is the increased clarity of the regulatory text. There are no disadvantages to the public or the Commonwealth from this regulatory action.

Department of Planning and Budget Economic Impact Analysis:

The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia and Executive Order 19. The analysis presented represents DPB's best estimate of the potential economic impacts as of the date of this analysis.1

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. The Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) proposes to remove a document incorporated by reference (DIBR) from the Subdivision Street Requirements (24VAC30-91) because it is no longer referenced in the body of the regulatory text.

Background. Executive Directive 1 (2022) directs executive branch entities under the authority of the Governor to initiate regulatory processes to reduce by at least 25% the number of regulations not mandated by federal or state statute, in consultation with the Office of the Attorney General, and in a manner consistent with the laws of the Commonwealth.2 Accordingly, the CTB reviewed existing regulations and found that this regulation includes a DIBR, the Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, effective 1996 issued by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, which is no longer referenced in the regulatory text and is thus obsolete. Per the regulations of the Virginia Code Commission, the material in a DIBR becomes the text of the regulation and an enforceable part of the regulation (1VAC7-10-140). Accordingly, the CTB seeks to remove this obsolete document from the list of DIBRs for this regulation.

Estimated Benefits and Costs. The proposed change would benefit readers of the regulation by updating the list of DIBRs; the proposed change would not create any new costs.

Businesses and Other Entities Affected. This regulation governs subdivision street development and the criteria for acceptance of these streets by the Virginia Department of Transportation for subsequent maintenance. The documents in the DIBR list pertain to and govern the design and construction features of subdivision street development. Thus, removing an obsolete DIBR would benefit land developers and individuals in local governments who may refer to this regulation in the course of preparing or reviewing plans that include the construction of subdivision streets. The Code of Virginia requires DPB to assess whether an adverse impact may result from the proposed regulation.3 An adverse impact is indicated if there is any increase in net cost or reduction in net benefit for any entity, even if the benefits exceed the costs for all entities combined.4 Since the proposed amendments would not increase any costs or reduce benefits, an adverse impact is not indicated.

Small Businesses5 Affected.6 The proposed amendments do not adversely affect small businesses.

Localities7 Affected.8 The proposed amendments do not affect any locality in particular and would not increase costs for local governments.

Projected Impact on Employment. The proposed amendments are not expected to have an impact on employment.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. The proposed amendments do not appear to substantively affect the use and value of private property nor real estate development costs.

_____________________________

1 Section 2.2-4007.04 of the Code of Virginia requires that such economic impact analyses determine the public benefits and costs of the proposed amendments. Further the analysis should include but not be limited to: (1) the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the proposed regulatory action would apply, (2) the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, (3) the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, (4) the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and (5) the impact on the use and value of private property.

2 See https://www.governor.virginia.gov/media/governorvirginiagov/governor-of-virginia/pdf/ed/ED-1-Regulatory-Reduction.pdf.

3 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04 D: In the event this economic impact analysis reveals that the proposed regulation would have an adverse economic impact on businesses or would impose a significant adverse economic impact on a locality, business, or entity particularly affected, the Department of Planning and Budget shall advise the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules, the House Committee on Appropriations, and the Senate Committee on Finance. Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation.

4 Statute does not define "adverse impact," state whether only Virginia entities should be considered, nor indicate whether an adverse impact results from regulatory requirements mandated by legislation. As a result, DPB has adopted a definition of adverse impact that assesses changes in net costs and benefits for each affected Virginia entity that directly results from discretionary changes to the regulation.

5 Pursuant to § 2.2-4007.04, small business is defined as "a business entity, including its affiliates, that (i) is independently owned and operated and (ii) employs fewer than 500 full-time employees or has gross annual sales of less than $6 million."

6 If the proposed regulatory action may have an adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include: (1) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the proposed regulation, (2) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents, (3) a statement of the probable effect of the proposed regulation on affected small businesses, and (4) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the proposed regulation. Additionally, pursuant to § 2.2-4007.1 of the Code of Virginia, if there is a finding that a proposed regulation may have an adverse impact on small business, the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules shall be notified.

7 "Locality" can refer to either local governments or the locations in the Commonwealth where the activities relevant to the regulatory change are most likely to occur.

8 Section 2.2-4007.04 defines "particularly affected" as bearing disproportionate material impact.

Agency Response to Economic Impact Analysis: The Department of Transportation accepts the economic impact analysis prepared by the Department of Planning and Budget.

Summary:

The amendment removes an unused document that was incorporated by reference into Subdivision Street Requirements (24VAC30-91).

24VAC30-91-160. Listing of documents (publications) incorporated by reference.

Information pertaining to the availability and cost of any of these publications should be directed to the address indicated below the specific document. Requests for documents available from the department may be submitted to VDOT; however, department documents may be available over the Internet at www.vdot.virginia.gov.

1. Drainage Manual, effective April 2002.

VDOT

1401 E. Broad Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

2. Land Use Permit Regulations, 24VAC30-151, effective March 17, 2010.

VDOT

1401 E. Broad Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

3. Pavement Design Guide for Subdivision and Secondary Roads in Virginia, effective August 1, 2000.

VDOT

1401 E. Broad Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

4. Road and Bridge Specifications, effective 2002.

VDOT

1401 E. Broad Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

5. Road Design Manual, effective January 1, 2005.

VDOT

1401 E. Broad Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

6. Subdivision Street Design Guide (Appendix B: Road Design Manual, effective January 1, 2005)

VDOT

1401 E. Broad Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

7. Road and Bridge Standards, effective February 1, 2001.

VDOT

1401 E. Broad Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

8. Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, effective 1996.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

North Capital Street, Suite 225

Washington, DC 20001

VDOT Modifications to document above

VDOT

1401 E. Broad Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

9. 8 . Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, effective 1992.

Division of Soil and Water Conservation with The Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Law and Regulations

Division of Soil and Water Conservation

Governor Street, Suite 206

Richmond, Virginia 23219

10. 9 . Highway Capacity Manual, effective 2000.

Transportation Research Board

Keck Center of the National Academies

Transportation Research Board

500 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20001

Attn: TRB Publications Sales & Affiliate Services

11. 10 . VDOT Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater Management Program Specifications Manual (effective March 1, 2004).

VDOT

1401 E. Broad Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

12. 11 . Policy for Integrating Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations—Commonwealth Transportation Board (effective March 18, 2004.) Note: This policy reference is included in the regulation only for informational purposes and is not considered a regulatory provision. Applicable elements of this policy are stated in the regulation itself.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-8474; Filed October 29, 2025
TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Final

TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES

COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD

Final Regulation

REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The Commonwealth Transportation Board is claiming an exemption from the Administrative Process Act in accordance with § 2.2-4002 B 3 of the Code of Virginia, which exempts regulations relating to the location, design, specifications or construction of public buildings or other facilities and § 2.2-4002 B 11 of the Code of Virginia, which exempts regulations relating to traffic signs, markers, or control devices.

Titles of Regulations: 24VAC30-155. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (amending 24VAC30-155-60).

24VAC30-315. Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (amending 24VAC30-315-10).

24VAC30-325. Urban Maintenance and Construction Policy (amending 24VAC30-325-10; repealing 24VAC30-325-20).

24VAC30-630. Rules Governing Person with Disability Traffic Signs (amending 24VAC30-630-10, 24VAC30-630-20).

Statutory Authority:

24VAC30-155-60: § 51.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia.

24VAC30-315-10: §§ 33.2-210 and 46.2-830 of the Code of Virginia; 23 CFR 655.603.

24VAC30-325-10, 24VAC30-325-20: § 33.2-210 of the Code of Virginia.

24VAC30-630-10, 24VAC30-630-20: § 46.2-830 of the Code of Virginia.

Effective Date: December 17, 2025.

Agency Contact: Steven Jack, Regulatory Manager, Department of Transportation, 1221 East Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 786-3885, or email steven.jack@vdot.virginia.gov.

Background: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) issued an updated Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), dated December 2023, which contains the national standards for traffic control devices and is adopted at 23 CFR 655.603. State adoption of the federal MUTCD is required and must be completed by January 2026 through one of the following methods: (i) adopt the federal MUTCD as it stands; (ii) adopt the federal MUTCD with a state-specific supplement; or (iii) develop a state MUTCD incorporating national and state-specific content. All Virginia-specific adaptations to the federal MUTCD must remain in substantial conformance with the federal standards. In response, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) developed the Virginia MUTCD, version 11.0, effective January 1, 2026, which incorporates the national standards and sets state-specific requirements in substantial conformance with the federal MUTCD. The Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) approved this document as the standard for all traffic control devices on highways under the jurisdiction of VDOT.

Summary:

The amendments (i) incorporate the Virginia MUTCD into the Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315), which completes formal adoption in accordance with the federal requirements; (ii) remove the MUTCD incorporated by reference in Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (24VAC30-155) and Urban Maintenance and Construction Policy (24VAC30-325); and (iii) update the cross-references in regulatory text to point to 24VAC30-315 instead of the MUTCD document.

24VAC30-155-60. VDOT traffic impact statement.

A. A VDOT traffic impact statement (VTIS) assesses the impact of a proposed development on the transportation system and recommends improvements to lessen or negate those impacts. It shall (i) identify any traffic issues associated with access from the site to the existing transportation network, (ii) outline solutions to potential problems, (iii) address the sufficiency of the future transportation network, and (iv) present improvements to be incorporated into the proposed development.

If a VTIS is required, data collection shall be by the locality, developer, or owner, as determined by the locality and the locality shall prepare or have the developer or owner prepare the VTIS. If the locality prepares the VTIS, it shall provide a copy of the complete VTIS to the applicant when one is provided to VDOT. The completed VTIS shall be submitted to VDOT.

The data and analysis contained in the VTIS shall be organized and presented in a manner acceptable to VDOT and consistent with this regulation.

B. Scope of work meeting.

1. For proposals that generate less than 1,000 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator, representatives of the locality, the applicant, or the locality and the applicant may request a scope of work meeting with VDOT to discuss the required elements of a VTIS for any project and VDOT shall reply to such request within 30 days of its receipt of such a request and provide a date that is no more than 60 days from such receipt, time, and location for such a scope of work meeting to both the locality and the applicant, if applicable.

2. For proposals that generate 1,000 or more vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator, representatives of the locality and applicant, if applicable, shall hold a scope of work meeting with VDOT to discuss the required elements of a VTIS. Once a locality or applicant has contacted VDOT regarding the scheduling of a scope of work meeting, VDOT shall reply to both the locality and the applicant, if applicable, within 30 days of such contact and provide a date that is no more than 60 days from such contact, time and location for such a meeting.

At a scope of work meeting pursuant to this section, the locality, the applicant, and VDOT shall review the elements, methodology, and assumptions to be used in the preparation of the VTIS, and identify any other related local requirements adopted pursuant to law. The results of the initial scoping meeting may be adjusted in accordance with sound professional judgment and the requirements of this regulation if agreed upon by VDOT, the locality, and applicant, if applicable.

C. Required elements. The required elements and scope of a VTIS are dependent upon the scale and potential impact of the specific development proposal being addressed by the VTIS as determined by VDOT in its sole discretion.

1. At a minimum, the VTIS shall include the elements shown in the table below. The site generated peak hour trips in the table below shall be based upon the gross vehicle trip generation of the site less internal capture and mode split reductions, if applicable. When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike, or transit trips either on-site or off-site, the VTIS shall estimate multimodal trips. All distances in the table below shall be measured along roads or streets.

Item

Less than 500

500 to 999

1,000 or more

Background information

List of all nonexistent transportation improvements assumed in the analysis

Required

Required

Required

Map of site location, description of the parcel, general terrain features, and location within the jurisdiction and region.

Required

Required

Required

Description of geographic scope/ limits of study area.

Within 2,000 feet of site and any roadway on which 50 or more of the new peak hour vehicle trips generated by the proposal are distributed – not to exceed one mile

Within 2,000 feet of site and any roadway on which 10% or more of the new vehicle trips generated by the proposal are distributed – not to exceed two miles

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Plan at an engineering scale of the existing and proposed site uses.

Required

Required

Required

Description and map or diagram of nearby uses, including parcel zoning.

Required

Required

Required

Description and map or diagram of existing roadways.

Required

Required

Required

Description and map or diagram of programmed improvements to roadways, intersections, and other transportation facilities within the study area.

Required

Required

Required

Analysis of Existing Conditions

Collected daily and peak hour of the generator traffic volumes, tabulated and presented on diagrams with counts provided in an appendix.

Required

Required

Required

Analyses for intersections and roadways identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS is presented on diagrams for each lane group.

Required

Required

Required

When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments, tabulated and presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist

Within 2,000 feet of site

Within 2,000 feet of site

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Speed Study

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

Crash history near site

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

Sight distance

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

Analysis of Future Conditions without Development

Description of and justification for the method and assumptions used to forecast future traffic volumes.

Required

Required

Required

Analyses for intersections and roadways as identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS is presented on diagrams for each lane group.

Required

Required

Required

When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike, or transit trips either on - site or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned.

Within 2,000 feet of site

Within 2,000 feet of site

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality at the scope of work meeting

Trip Generation

Site trip generation, with tabulated data, broken out by analysis year for multi-phase developments, and including justification for deviations from ITE rates, if appropriate.

Required

Required

Required

Description and justification of internal capture reductions for mixed use developments and pass-by trip reductions, if appropriate, including table of calculations used.

Required

Required

Required

Site Traffic Distribution and Assignment

Description of methodology used to distribute trips, with supporting data.

Required

Required

Required

Description of the direction of approach for site generated traffic and diagrams showing the traffic assignment to the road network serving the site for the appropriate time periods.

Required

Required

Required

Analysis of Future Conditions With Development

Forecast daily and peak hour of the generator traffic volumes on the highway network in the study area, site entrances and internal roadways, tabulated and presented on diagrams.

Future background + site generated traffic, at each expected phase and at build - out or six years after start, whichever is later

Future background + site generated traffic, at each expected phase, at build - out, and six years after build - out, which may be extended or reduced by VDOT in consultation with the locality

At a minimum the future background + site generated traffic, at each expected phase, at build - out, and six years after build - out; may be extended by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Analyses for intersections and roadways identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS presented on diagrams for each lane group.

Required

Required

Required

When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike, or transit trips either on - site or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned.

Within 2,000 feet of site

Within 2,000 feet of site

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Recommended Improvements

Description and diagram of the location, nature, and extent of proposed improvements, with preliminary cost estimates as available from VDOT.

Required

Required

Required

Description of methodology used to calculate the effects of travel demand management (TDM) measures, if proposed, with supporting data.

Required if TDM proposed

Required if TDM proposed

Required if TDM proposed

Analyses for all proposed and modified intersections in the study area under the forecast and site traffic. Delay, and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS presented on diagrams for each lane group. For intersections expected to be signalized, MUTCD Signal Warrant analysis or ITE Manual for Traffic Signal Design, as determined by VDOT, presented in tabular form.

Required

Required

Required

When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike, or transit trips either on - site or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned.

Within 2,000 feet of site

Within 2,000 feet of site

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Conclusions

Clear, concise description of the study findings.

Required

Required

Required

Notwithstanding the geographic scope noted above, the geographic scope of the study noted above may be reduced or enlarged based upon layout of the local transportation network, the geographical size of the development, and the traffic volume on the existing network, as determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality and the applicant, if applicable. Typically, analysis will be conducted for any roadway on which the additional trips generated by the proposal have a materially detrimental impact on traffic conditions. The analysis presented in the VTIS need not include all roadway and roadway segments located within the geographic scope of the study as determined by VDOT.

2. A VTIS for a development proposal that only meets the low volume road submission criterion (24VAC30-155-40 A 3) shall, at a minimum, consist of the following elements, unless otherwise directed by VDOT.

a. All elements contained in the Background Information portion of the above table in subsection C of this section, except the geographic scope/limits of study area is limited to the highway fronting the proposed development and the closest intersection, in each direction if applicable, of that highway with a highway that has an average daily traffic volume higher than the fronting highway.

b. A roadway safety inventory study of the roadway segment or segments between the site entrance to the nearest intersections with the higher traffic volume highways, to include such elements as, but not limited to, speed limit, existing warning signs, pavement and shoulder type, pavement and shoulder width, intersection sight distances, and safe horizontal curve speeds.

c. Daily and peak hour traffic volumes presented on diagrams, with counts provided in an appendix, for the fronting highway at the site, at the highway's intersections with the higher volume highway, and for the higher volume highways at their intersection with the fronting highway.

d. All relevant elements contained in the Trip Generation portion of the above table in subsection C of this section.

e. Projected daily and peak hour of the generator traffic volumes assuming build-out of the proposal, presented on diagrams for the receiving highway at the site, at the highway's intersection with the higher volume highways, and for the higher volume highways at their intersections with the receiving highway.

f. Delay and level of service analysis for the intersections of the receiving highway with the higher volume highways.

g. A comparison of the existing geometrics of the fronting highway under proposed build-out traffic conditions with the geometric standards, based upon functional classification and volume, contained in the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT).

3. A VTIS for a rezoning proposal may be prepared in accordance with the "Less than 500 Site Generated Peak Hour Trips" category in the table in subsection C of this section, regardless of actual projected trip generation, provided that:

a. The rezoning proposal is in conformance with a locality's adopted comprehensive plan that was reviewed in accordance with 24VAC30-155-30; and

b. The review of the comprehensive plan included the submission to VDOT of a technical evaluation of the traffic impacts for anticipated development based on the future land use policies and map.

D. Methodology and standard assumptions. A VTIS shall be prepared based upon methodology and assumptions noted below or as may be agreed upon by VDOT based upon the results of a scope of work meeting held by VDOT pursuant to this section.

1. Data collection. Preparers shall collect traffic data in accordance with the identified study area. The count data shall include, at a minimum, weekday 24-hour counts, and directional turning movement counts during AM and PM peak times of the day. The 24-hour counts shall include vehicle classification counts. With approval of VDOT, data collected by the transportation professional preparer within the last 24 months may be used, likewise for data from the VDOT count program.

The preparer shall monitor traffic operations during data collection to ensure extraneous events such as vehicle crashes or special event traffic do not affect integrity of count data. Preparers collecting data for utilization in traffic impact studies shall normally avoid data collection during the following instances:

a. Holidays or times of the year when the traffic patterns are deemed to be unrepresentative of typical conditions, unless required by VDOT or the locality, or both.

b. Summer months if school or schools in proximity.

c. Fridays and weekends unless required by VDOT or the locality, or both.

d. Other times of the year contingent upon existing adjacent land use activities.

e. During times of inclement weather.

2. Trip generation. Estimates of trip generation by a proposed development shall be prepared using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008, unless VDOT agrees to allow the use of alternate trip generation rates based upon alternate published guides or local trip generation studies. VDOT shall at all times after July 1, 2011, have at least one non-ITE trip generation methodology or alternative rate approved for the use in preparation of small area plan traffic impact statements pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C that recognizes the benefits of reduced vehicle trip generation and vehicle miles traveled from developments that meet the criteria for a small area plan pursuant to this regulation. Such alternate methodology or rate can be modified based upon local factors if agreed to at a scoping meeting. Rezoning proposals shall assume the highest vehicle trip generating use allowable under the proposed zoning classification. In determining which trip generation process (equation or rate) may be used, the preparer shall follow the guidance presented in the Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004, which is summarized here in this subdivision, except rates may be utilized if the criteria for the use of regression equations are not met. Regression equations to calculate trips as a result of development shall be utilized, provided the following is true:

a. Independent variable falls within range of data; and

b. Either the data plot has at least 20 points; or

c. R2 is greater than 0.75, equation falls within data cluster in plot and standard deviation greater than 110% of weighted average rate.

If the above criteria are not met, then the preparer can use average trip rates, though if the following do not apply a rate based upon the study of similar local sites should be considered:

d. At least three data points exist;

e. Standard deviation less than 110% of weighted average rate; and

f. Weighted average rate falls within data cluster in plot.

3. Internal capture and pass-by trips.

a. Internal capture rates consider site trips "captured" within a mixed use development, recognizing that trips from one land use can access another land use within a development without having to access the adjacent street system. Mixed use developments include a combination of residential and nonresidential uses or a combination of nonresidential uses only. Internal capture allows reduction of site trips from adjacent intersections and roadways. For traffic impact statements prepared for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C, the internal capture rate or rates may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved by VDOT. For ITE-based methodologies, unless otherwise approved by VDOT, the following internal capture rates should be used if appropriate:

(1) Residential with a mix of nonresidential components – use the smaller of 15% of residential or 15% nonresidential trips generated.

(2) Residential with office use – use the smaller of 5.0% of residential or 5.0% of office trips generated.

(3) Residential with retail use – for AM peak hour, use the smaller of 5.0% residential or 5.0% retail trips generated; for PM peak hour, use the smaller of 10% residential or 10% retail trips generated; for 24-hour traffic, use the smaller of 15% residential or 15% retail trips generated.

(4) Hotel/motel with office use – use 15% of hotel/motel trips, unless the overall volume of the office traffic is more than the overall volume of hotel/motel traffic use in which case use the smaller of 10% of the hotel/motel traffic or the office traffic.

(5) Multiuse development with more than five million square feet of office and retail – internal capture rate should be determined in consultation with and approval of VDOT.

(6) Office with retail use – use the smaller of 5.0% office or retail trips generated.

(7) Some combination of the above, if approved by VDOT.

b. Pass-by trip reductions consider site trips drawn from the existing traffic stream on an adjacent street, recognizing that trips drawn to a site would otherwise already traverse the adjacent street regardless of existence of the site. Pass-by trip reductions allow a percentage reduction in the forecast of trips otherwise added to the adjacent street from the proposed development. The reduction applies only to volumes on adjacent streets, not to ingress or egress volumes at entrances serving the proposed site. Unless otherwise approved by VDOT, the pass-by rates utilized shall be those reported in Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004. For traffic impact statements prepared for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C, the pass-by trip reductions may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved by VDOT.

4. Trip distribution. In the absence of more detailed information, trip distribution shall be in accordance with logical regional travel patterns as suggested by existing highway directional split and intersection movements or population and destination site distribution and shall recognize the effects of increased street connectivity if such streets meet the requirements of the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (24VAC30-92). If more detailed information is available from trip origin/destination studies, marketing studies, or regional planning models, this may be used to distribute trips upon approval of VDOT.

5. Planning horizon. In general, the analysis years shall be related to (i) the opening date of the proposed development, (ii) build-out of major phases of a multiyear development, (iii) long-range transportation plans, and (iv) other significant transportation network changes. The preparer should establish the planning horizon in consultation with and subject to the acceptance of VDOT.

6. Background traffic growth. Unless directed by VDOT, geometric growth (or compound growth), based upon historical growth rates, shall generally be used for determining future background traffic levels where extensive traffic-count history is available and capacity constraint is not appropriate. This growth rate replicates "natural growth" and is typical for projecting urban growth. Natural growth of traffic can be adjusted consistent with traffic forecasts associated with previously submitted local land development projects within the study area.

7. Future conditions. For the purpose of the VTIS, future conditions shall include background traffic and additional vehicle trips anticipated to be generated by approved but not yet constructed or improved projects.

8. Level of service calculation. Level of service (LOS) analysis for highways shall utilize the techniques described in the Highway Capacity Manual, 2010 (TRB). Neither the intersection capacity utilization method nor the percentile delay method may be used in the traffic impact calculations of delay and level of service. Preparers shall consult with VDOT on which traffic analysis software package is to be used to conduct the LOS calculations. The results shall be tabulated and displayed graphically, with levels of service provided for each lane group for each peak period. All data used in the calculations must be provided along with the results of the capacity analysis. Any assumptions made that deviate from the programmed defaults must be documented and an explanation provided as to why there was a deviation. Electronic files used for the analysis shall be provided to VDOT as a digital submission (e.g., .hcs, .sy6, .inp, .trf files), along with the printed report. If intersections analyzed are in close proximity to each other so that queuing may be a factor, VDOT may require the inclusion of an analysis with a micro simulation model. Unless actual on-ground conditions dictate otherwise, preparers should use the following defaults when utilizing the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) or other approved programs when evaluating roadway components:

a. Terrain – choose the appropriate terrain type. Most of the state will be level or rolling, but some areas may qualify for consideration as mountainous.

b. Twelve-foot wide lanes.

c. No parking or bus activity unless field conditions include such parking or bus activity or unless the locality has provided VDOT with a written statement of intent for the services to be provided.

d. Peak hour factor by approach – calculate from collected traffic counts (requires at least a peak hour count in 15-minute increments). However, the use of peak hour factors lower than 0.85 shall only be allowed if based upon the average of more than three peak hour counts. For future conditions analysis, unless specific site conditions can be expected to create extreme peak hour factors, default peak hour factors between 0.92 and 1.00 should be used.

e. Heavy vehicle factor – calculate from collected traffic (classification) counts or obtain from VDOT count publications. For future conditions analysis with development traffic, the existing heavy vehicle factor should be adjusted based upon the nature of the traffic being generated by the development.

f. Area type – noncenter of business district.

The VTIS shall identify any existing or proposed bicycle and pedestrian accommodation that would be affected by the proposal. For the purposes of this subsection, a bicycle accommodation is defined as on-street bike lanes, paved shoulders of roadways that are not part of the designated traveled way for vehicles, or exclusive and shared off-street bicycle paths.

For the purposes of this subsection, a pedestrian accommodation is defined as sidewalks, intersection treatments, and exclusive or shared off-street trails or paths. If significant potential for bicycle or pedestrian trips exists, the VTIS shall include current and future service level analyses at build-out for existing or proposed bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. When the proposal requires or includes improvements or modifications to the roadway, bicycle, or pedestrian accommodations, the VTIS shall analyze the impacts of such improvements and modifications on bicycle and pedestrian accommodations and service levels, and provide recommendations for mitigation of adverse impacts.

The VTIS shall provide analysis for all bus service with routes that have, or will have a station or stop within 2,000 feet of the proposal. The VTIS shall evaluate and discuss potential for increased demand for bus use due to the proposal, addressing whether such increases will result in longer dwell time at stops or increase the need for buses on a route. The quality of service analysis for bus service shall be determined in accordance with the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition, 2003 (TRB). The VTIS shall provide both route and segment quality of service. The VTIS may consider the benefits of dedicated bus lanes for more frequent and rapid service. The VTIS shall provide recommendations for mitigation of adverse impacts where adverse impacts are expected to the quality of service to bus service. If an analysis of pedestrian quality or level of service is required for calculation of the bus quality of service, the preparer shall use a methodology approved by VDOT.

9. Trip reduction, and pedestrian and bicycle accommodations. When a proposal meets the criteria listed below, the preparer of the VTIS may reduce the number of vehicle trips generated by the proposal in the VTIS analysis in accordance with this subsection. Notwithstanding the percentages below, the total number of reductions used by a preparer in accordance with this subsection shall not exceed 500 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator unless otherwise approved by VDOT. The trip reductions for traffic impact statements prepared for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved by VDOT and are not subject to limitations or requirements of this subdivision.

a. Pedestrian accommodations. For the purposes of this subsection, a pedestrian accommodation is defined as a sidewalk, pedestrian path, or multiuse trail. Where a pedestrian service level of A exists, vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by 4.0% for those portions of the development within a 2,000-foot radius of the connections between the proposed development and the adjoining network. Where a pedestrian service level of B exists, vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by 3.0%; where a pedestrian service level of C exists, vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by 1.5% for the portion of the development noted above. These reductions may only be taken if:

(1) Pedestrian facility coverage in a 2,000-foot radius of the connections to the proposed development is on or along at least 80% of the road network;

(2) The pedestrian facilities inside and outside the development provide reasonably direct access to traffic generators; and

(3) There are at least two of the 10 major land use classifications, as defined in ITE Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008, within the 2,000-foot radius.

b. Bicycle accommodations. For the purposes of this subsection, a bicycle accommodation is defined as a street with a design speed of 25 MPH mph or less that carries 400 vehicles per day or less, on-street bike lanes, a pedestrian accommodation, paved shoulders of roadways that are not part of the designated traveled way for vehicles and are at least two feet wide, or exclusive and shared off-street bicycle paths. Where a bicycle service level of A exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by 3.0%. Where a bicycle service level of B exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by 2.0%. Where a bicycle service level of C exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by 1.0%. These reductions may only be taken if:

(1) Bicycle accommodations within a 2,000-foot radius of the connections to the proposed development exist on or along at least 80% of the road network;

(2) The bicycle accommodations inside and outside the development provide reasonably direct access to traffic generators; and

(3) There are at least two of the 10 major land use classifications as defined in ITE Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008, within the 2,000-foot radius.

10. Modal split and trip reduction. All vehicle trip reductions used in the VTIS pursuant to this subsection are subject to the approval of VDOT.

a. If a proposal is located within 1/2 mile along roadways, pedestrian or bicycle accommodations of a transit station, excluding bus stops and stations, reasonable vehicle trip reductions of vehicle trips generated by the proposal may be made with approval of VDOT. The preparer shall submit documentation to justify any such vehicle trip reductions used with the VTIS. When a proposal is located more than 1/2 mile but less than two miles from a transit stop, excluding bus stops and stations, with bicycle parking accommodations additional bicycle modal split reductions may be utilized. The analysis of capacity of the parking accommodations shall be included in the VTIS when such trip reductions are used.

b. If a proposal is located within 1/4 mile along roadways, pedestrian or bicycle accommodations of a bus stop or station where the segment and route service levels are C or higher, reasonable vehicle trip reductions of vehicle trips generated by the proposal may be made with the approval of VDOT. The preparer shall submit documentation to justify any such vehicle trip reductions used with the VTIS.

c. Transit and bus modal split data from similar developments within the geographic scope of the VTIS or one mile of the proposal, whichever is greater, shall be collected if the VTIS vehicle trip reductions are used pursuant to this subsection and similar developments exist within the geographic scope of the VTIS or one mile of the proposal, whichever is greater.

11. Signal warrant analysis. Traffic signal warrant analysis shall be performed in accordance with the procedures set out in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2003, revised 2007 Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315), or ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design, 1998, as determined by VDOT.

12. Recommended improvements. Recommendations made in the VTIS for improvements to transportation facilities shall be in accordance with the geometric standards contained within the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT).

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-155)

Requests for information pertaining to the availability and cost of any of these publications should be directed to the address indicated for the specific document. Requests for documents available from VDOT may be obtained from VDOT's division and representative indicated; however, VDOT documents may be available over the Internet at www.vdot.virginia.gov.

Highway Capacity Manual, 2010, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street NW, Washington, DC 20001.

ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design (1998), Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006.

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, effective 2003, revised 2007, Federal Highway Administration, Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250.

Road Design Manual, 2011, VDOT, 1401 E. East Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.

Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition, 2003; Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Keck Center of the National Academies, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001.

Trip Generation, 8th Ed. Edition, 2008, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006.

Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006.

24VAC30-315-10. General provisions.

A. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2009 Edition (2009 MUTCD), is incorporated by reference in the Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR Part 655 Subpart F), and is accessible from http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/. 23 CFR 655.603 (December 19, 2023) adopts the National Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (National MUTCD) as the national standard for any street, highway, or bicycle trail open to public travel in accordance with the United States Code (23 USC §§ 109 (d) and 402 (a)), and the National MUTCD shall apply to all such locations in Virginia except those specified in subsection B of this section.

B. The 2009 MUTCD dated December 2009 shall be the standard for all highways under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation, with the following exceptions: (i) the Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD (2011 Edition) contains standards and guidance that exceed minimum federal requirements concerning traffic control devices and presents additional pertinent traffic control parameters not addressed by the 2009 MUTCD and (ii) the Virginia Department of Transportation uses the Virginia Work Area Protection Manual (WAPM) (2011 Edition), which is a part of the Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD (2011 Edition), instead of the 2009 MUTCD Part 6, Temporary Traffic Control The Virginia Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, which includes the Virginia Work Area Protection Manual (Virginia MUTCD), version 11.0 (2025), shall be the standard for all traffic control devices on streets, highways, and bicycle facilities under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation. All signs, signals, pavement markings, and other traffic control devices under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation or on streets, highways, and bicycle facilities under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation shall conform accordingly.

C. Where (i) state standards exceed the minimum federal requirements; (ii) the 2009 MUTCD does not cover some design, installation, and operation details; or (iii) additional guidance on traffic control devices is needed, the Commissioner of Highways or a designee is authorized to establish and distribute appropriate documentation including, but not limited to, standards, specifications, and instructional memoranda. The Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD (2011 Edition) and the WAPM (2011 Edition) shall be applicable for all highways under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation. If there is a conflict between the 2009 MUTCD and the Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD (2011 Edition), the Virginia Supplement shall govern.

D. The Commissioner of Highways or a designee is authorized to make revisions to the Virginia Supplement to the MUTCD (2011 Edition) or the WAPM (2011 Edition), or both, to reflect changes to the Code of Virginia or to the 2009 MUTCD as incorporated into the Code of Federal Regulations and to be consistent with the Code of Virginia where discretion is allowed.

E. In addition to the authority referenced in subsection C of this section, the C. The Commissioner of Highways is authorized to act for and on behalf of the Commonwealth Transportation Board in matters relating to classifying, designating, regulating, and marking state highways and the installation of signals, signs, and markings to regulate, control, and manage traffic movement.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-315)

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2009 edition, December 2009, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E., Washington, DC 20590, telephone (202) 366-1993. The text is also available from the Federal Highway Administration's website at http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov and by individual parts and chapters below:

Cover, Table of Contents, and Introduction

Part 1 - General

Part 2 - Signs

Chapter 2A - General

Chapter 2B - Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates

Chapter 2C - Warning Signs and Object Markers

Chapter 2D - Guide Signs - Conventional Roads

Chapter 2E - Guide Signs - Freeways and Expressways

Chapter 2F - Toll Road Signs

Chapters 2G-2H - Preferential and Managed Lane Signs and General Information Signs

Chapters 2I-2N - General Service Signs, Specific Service Signs, Tourist-Oriented Directional Signs, Changeable Message Signs, Recreational and Cultural Interest Area Signs, and Emergency Management Signing

Part 3 - Markings

Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals

Part 5 - Traffic Control Devices for Low-Volume Roads

Part 7 - Traffic Controls for School Areas

Part 8 - Traffic Control for Railroad and Light Rail Transit Grade Crossings

Part 9 - Traffic Control for Bicycle Facilities

Appendices A1 and A2 - Congressional Legislation and Metric Conversions

Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD, 2011 Edition, Virginia Department of Transportation, 1401 E. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219:

Cover and Introduction

1. General

2. Signs

3. Markings

4. Signals

7. Schools

8. Railroads

9. Bicycles

Appendix A

Virginia Work Area Protection Manual (WAPM), 2011 Edition, Virginia Department of Transportation, 1401 E. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 ( https://www.vdot.virginia.gov/doing-business/technical-guidance-and-support/technical-guidance-documents/work-area-protection-manual-and-pocket-guide/).

Virginia Standard Highway Signs, 2011 Edition, Virginia Department of Transportation, 1401 E. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 ( https://www.vdot.virginia.gov/doing-business/technical-guidance-and-support/technical-guidance-documents/virginia-standard-highway-signs/).

Virginia Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, January 2026, Version 11.0 (eff. 1/2026)

Virginia Work Area Protection Manual, January 2026, Version 11.0 (eff. 1/2026)

24VAC30-325-10. Eligibility criteria and conditions governing receipt and use of urban maintenance funds.

A. In addition to the eligibility requirements identified in § 33.2-319 of the Code of Virginia, the road and street eligibility criteria for urban maintenance payments shall also include the following:

1. The basic right-of-way width for cul-de-sacs eligible for payment will be 40 feet, with consideration of requests for pavement widths less than 30 feet. For the purpose of making this assessment, a cul-de-sac will be defined as a dead-end street, open only at one end.

2. If a municipality has jurisdiction over and operates a toll facility, such facility is eligible for street payments.

3. Local one-way streets, loop roads, and school bus entrances will be eligible for payment provided that they are constructed to a width of 16 feet with a right-of-way width of not less than 40 feet. This includes service and frontage roads where contiguous to an interstate, primary, or urban system route.

4. VDOT can consider a waiver of standards on a site-specific basis with appropriate supporting information. Each case will be considered on its own merits.

B. In determining lane mileage eligibility, the following conditions will apply:

1. Turning lanes and ramps will not be considered for street payments. This includes center turn lanes unless they serve as moving through lanes during peak hours.

2. Parking must be restricted and enforced by towing during peak traffic periods.

3. Each road or street with more than two moving lanes must have pavement markings in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2003 Edition, including Revision 1 dated November 2004, published by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315).

4. Pavement widths of less than 14 feet qualify for only one moving lane even if it carries traffic in two directions.

5. Nonhard surfaced streets do not qualify for street payments.

C. Mileage adjustments, including the results of annexations, mergers, or incorporations, will be made on an annual basis as part of the board's approval of the annual maintenance payments. All adjustments submitted to the department by February 1 will be eligible for payment effective July 1 of the following fiscal year.

D. For the purpose of calculating maintenance payments, streets will be functionally classified based on the Federal Functional Classification system, except where the federal system is not parallel with the state system.

E. Bridge safety and regular inspection is of utmost importance. The Federal Highway Administration and the department require strict compliance with the National Bridge Inspection Standards (23 CFR Part 650) regarding the frequency of inspection and load posting requirements. The Commissioner of Highways may elect to withhold street payments from a municipality for delinquent or inadequate bridge inspection reports.

F. The Commissioner of Highways is directed to establish administrative procedures to assure ensure the provisions of this chapter and legislative directives are adhered to and complied with.

24VAC30-325-20. Document incorporated by reference. (Repealed.)

Information pertaining to the availability and cost of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), 2003 Edition with Revision No. 1 Incorporated, dated November 2004, should be directed to Federal Highway Administration, Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954. The MUTCD is also available from the following website: http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/index.htm.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-325)(Repealed)

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), 2003 Edition with Revision 1 Incorporated November 2004, Federal Highway Administration.

24VAC30-630-10. Requests for signs.

A. Any person who is deaf, blind, or deaf-blind; any person with autism or an intellectual or developmental disability as defined in § 37.2-100 of the Code of Virginia; or the agent of any such person may submit a request to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) by filling out a Request for Person with Disability Sign Form and submitting the completed form to the local VDOT office in the area where the sign is requested. The submitted form must include (i) medical certification that such person meets the disability requirement and (ii) the location of the requested sign.

B. Signs shall conform to the edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD) and the Virginia Supplement to the MUTCD in 24VAC30-315-10 Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315) .

C. The requestor shall notify the VDOT office to which the original request was made of any change in circumstances such that the sign is no longer necessary (e.g., when the person with a disability relocates).

24VAC30-630-20. Signs; type, size, color, location, and installation.

A. Signs warning drivers to be aware of persons with disabilities must be posted on a non-limited access highway maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and shall be installed in advance of the location where a person with a disability may be on or near the roadway, such that motorists may effectively perceive and respond to the signs.

B. The type, size, color, installation, and specific location of signs shall be determined at VDOT's discretion using engineering judgment in accordance with related VDOT procedures and regulations (, including the MUTCD and the Virginia Supplement to the MUTCD as referenced in 24VAC30-630-10 Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315).

C. Signs warning drivers to be aware of persons with disabilities may not be posted:

1. Where any pedestrian activity is highly discouraged due to safety concerns.

2. Where they may conflict with, are redundant to, or in combination (e.g., on the same pole) with any other regulatory or warning signs.

3. Closer than 200 feet to any existing regulatory or warning signs.

4. At signalized locations such as crosswalks at intersections or pedestrian hybrid beacons. Requests concerning a person with a visual disability and the absence of accessible pedestrian signals at a particular traffic signal will be addressed separately.

5. At a crossing with an existing rectangular rapid flashing beacon. Requests concerning a person with a visual disability and the absence of audible information devices will be addressed separately.

6. At any location in which the presence of the sign would otherwise create a safety concern, in the discretion of VDOT.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-8339; Filed October 21, 2025
TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Final

TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES

COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD

Final Regulation

REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The Commonwealth Transportation Board is claiming an exemption from the Administrative Process Act in accordance with § 2.2-4002 B 3 of the Code of Virginia, which exempts regulations relating to the location, design, specifications or construction of public buildings or other facilities and § 2.2-4002 B 11 of the Code of Virginia, which exempts regulations relating to traffic signs, markers, or control devices.

Titles of Regulations: 24VAC30-155. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (amending 24VAC30-155-60).

24VAC30-315. Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (amending 24VAC30-315-10).

24VAC30-325. Urban Maintenance and Construction Policy (amending 24VAC30-325-10; repealing 24VAC30-325-20).

24VAC30-630. Rules Governing Person with Disability Traffic Signs (amending 24VAC30-630-10, 24VAC30-630-20).

Statutory Authority:

24VAC30-155-60: § 51.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia.

24VAC30-315-10: §§ 33.2-210 and 46.2-830 of the Code of Virginia; 23 CFR 655.603.

24VAC30-325-10, 24VAC30-325-20: § 33.2-210 of the Code of Virginia.

24VAC30-630-10, 24VAC30-630-20: § 46.2-830 of the Code of Virginia.

Effective Date: December 17, 2025.

Agency Contact: Steven Jack, Regulatory Manager, Department of Transportation, 1221 East Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 786-3885, or email steven.jack@vdot.virginia.gov.

Background: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) issued an updated Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), dated December 2023, which contains the national standards for traffic control devices and is adopted at 23 CFR 655.603. State adoption of the federal MUTCD is required and must be completed by January 2026 through one of the following methods: (i) adopt the federal MUTCD as it stands; (ii) adopt the federal MUTCD with a state-specific supplement; or (iii) develop a state MUTCD incorporating national and state-specific content. All Virginia-specific adaptations to the federal MUTCD must remain in substantial conformance with the federal standards. In response, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) developed the Virginia MUTCD, version 11.0, effective January 1, 2026, which incorporates the national standards and sets state-specific requirements in substantial conformance with the federal MUTCD. The Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) approved this document as the standard for all traffic control devices on highways under the jurisdiction of VDOT.

Summary:

The amendments (i) incorporate the Virginia MUTCD into the Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315), which completes formal adoption in accordance with the federal requirements; (ii) remove the MUTCD incorporated by reference in Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (24VAC30-155) and Urban Maintenance and Construction Policy (24VAC30-325); and (iii) update the cross-references in regulatory text to point to 24VAC30-315 instead of the MUTCD document.

24VAC30-155-60. VDOT traffic impact statement.

A. A VDOT traffic impact statement (VTIS) assesses the impact of a proposed development on the transportation system and recommends improvements to lessen or negate those impacts. It shall (i) identify any traffic issues associated with access from the site to the existing transportation network, (ii) outline solutions to potential problems, (iii) address the sufficiency of the future transportation network, and (iv) present improvements to be incorporated into the proposed development.

If a VTIS is required, data collection shall be by the locality, developer, or owner, as determined by the locality and the locality shall prepare or have the developer or owner prepare the VTIS. If the locality prepares the VTIS, it shall provide a copy of the complete VTIS to the applicant when one is provided to VDOT. The completed VTIS shall be submitted to VDOT.

The data and analysis contained in the VTIS shall be organized and presented in a manner acceptable to VDOT and consistent with this regulation.

B. Scope of work meeting.

1. For proposals that generate less than 1,000 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator, representatives of the locality, the applicant, or the locality and the applicant may request a scope of work meeting with VDOT to discuss the required elements of a VTIS for any project and VDOT shall reply to such request within 30 days of its receipt of such a request and provide a date that is no more than 60 days from such receipt, time, and location for such a scope of work meeting to both the locality and the applicant, if applicable.

2. For proposals that generate 1,000 or more vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator, representatives of the locality and applicant, if applicable, shall hold a scope of work meeting with VDOT to discuss the required elements of a VTIS. Once a locality or applicant has contacted VDOT regarding the scheduling of a scope of work meeting, VDOT shall reply to both the locality and the applicant, if applicable, within 30 days of such contact and provide a date that is no more than 60 days from such contact, time and location for such a meeting.

At a scope of work meeting pursuant to this section, the locality, the applicant, and VDOT shall review the elements, methodology, and assumptions to be used in the preparation of the VTIS, and identify any other related local requirements adopted pursuant to law. The results of the initial scoping meeting may be adjusted in accordance with sound professional judgment and the requirements of this regulation if agreed upon by VDOT, the locality, and applicant, if applicable.

C. Required elements. The required elements and scope of a VTIS are dependent upon the scale and potential impact of the specific development proposal being addressed by the VTIS as determined by VDOT in its sole discretion.

1. At a minimum, the VTIS shall include the elements shown in the table below. The site generated peak hour trips in the table below shall be based upon the gross vehicle trip generation of the site less internal capture and mode split reductions, if applicable. When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike, or transit trips either on-site or off-site, the VTIS shall estimate multimodal trips. All distances in the table below shall be measured along roads or streets.

Item

Less than 500

500 to 999

1,000 or more

Background information

List of all nonexistent transportation improvements assumed in the analysis

Required

Required

Required

Map of site location, description of the parcel, general terrain features, and location within the jurisdiction and region.

Required

Required

Required

Description of geographic scope/ limits of study area.

Within 2,000 feet of site and any roadway on which 50 or more of the new peak hour vehicle trips generated by the proposal are distributed – not to exceed one mile

Within 2,000 feet of site and any roadway on which 10% or more of the new vehicle trips generated by the proposal are distributed – not to exceed two miles

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Plan at an engineering scale of the existing and proposed site uses.

Required

Required

Required

Description and map or diagram of nearby uses, including parcel zoning.

Required

Required

Required

Description and map or diagram of existing roadways.

Required

Required

Required

Description and map or diagram of programmed improvements to roadways, intersections, and other transportation facilities within the study area.

Required

Required

Required

Analysis of Existing Conditions

Collected daily and peak hour of the generator traffic volumes, tabulated and presented on diagrams with counts provided in an appendix.

Required

Required

Required

Analyses for intersections and roadways identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS is presented on diagrams for each lane group.

Required

Required

Required

When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments, tabulated and presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist

Within 2,000 feet of site

Within 2,000 feet of site

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Speed Study

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

Crash history near site

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

Sight distance

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

Analysis of Future Conditions without Development

Description of and justification for the method and assumptions used to forecast future traffic volumes.

Required

Required

Required

Analyses for intersections and roadways as identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS is presented on diagrams for each lane group.

Required

Required

Required

When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike, or transit trips either on - site or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned.

Within 2,000 feet of site

Within 2,000 feet of site

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality at the scope of work meeting

Trip Generation

Site trip generation, with tabulated data, broken out by analysis year for multi-phase developments, and including justification for deviations from ITE rates, if appropriate.

Required

Required

Required

Description and justification of internal capture reductions for mixed use developments and pass-by trip reductions, if appropriate, including table of calculations used.

Required

Required

Required

Site Traffic Distribution and Assignment

Description of methodology used to distribute trips, with supporting data.

Required

Required

Required

Description of the direction of approach for site generated traffic and diagrams showing the traffic assignment to the road network serving the site for the appropriate time periods.

Required

Required

Required

Analysis of Future Conditions With Development

Forecast daily and peak hour of the generator traffic volumes on the highway network in the study area, site entrances and internal roadways, tabulated and presented on diagrams.

Future background + site generated traffic, at each expected phase and at build - out or six years after start, whichever is later

Future background + site generated traffic, at each expected phase, at build - out, and six years after build - out, which may be extended or reduced by VDOT in consultation with the locality

At a minimum the future background + site generated traffic, at each expected phase, at build - out, and six years after build - out; may be extended by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Analyses for intersections and roadways identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS presented on diagrams for each lane group.

Required

Required

Required

When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike, or transit trips either on - site or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned.

Within 2,000 feet of site

Within 2,000 feet of site

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Recommended Improvements

Description and diagram of the location, nature, and extent of proposed improvements, with preliminary cost estimates as available from VDOT.

Required

Required

Required

Description of methodology used to calculate the effects of travel demand management (TDM) measures, if proposed, with supporting data.

Required if TDM proposed

Required if TDM proposed

Required if TDM proposed

Analyses for all proposed and modified intersections in the study area under the forecast and site traffic. Delay, and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS presented on diagrams for each lane group. For intersections expected to be signalized, MUTCD Signal Warrant analysis or ITE Manual for Traffic Signal Design, as determined by VDOT, presented in tabular form.

Required

Required

Required

When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike, or transit trips either on - site or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned.

Within 2,000 feet of site

Within 2,000 feet of site

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Conclusions

Clear, concise description of the study findings.

Required

Required

Required

Notwithstanding the geographic scope noted above, the geographic scope of the study noted above may be reduced or enlarged based upon layout of the local transportation network, the geographical size of the development, and the traffic volume on the existing network, as determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality and the applicant, if applicable. Typically, analysis will be conducted for any roadway on which the additional trips generated by the proposal have a materially detrimental impact on traffic conditions. The analysis presented in the VTIS need not include all roadway and roadway segments located within the geographic scope of the study as determined by VDOT.

2. A VTIS for a development proposal that only meets the low volume road submission criterion (24VAC30-155-40 A 3) shall, at a minimum, consist of the following elements, unless otherwise directed by VDOT.

a. All elements contained in the Background Information portion of the above table in subsection C of this section, except the geographic scope/limits of study area is limited to the highway fronting the proposed development and the closest intersection, in each direction if applicable, of that highway with a highway that has an average daily traffic volume higher than the fronting highway.

b. A roadway safety inventory study of the roadway segment or segments between the site entrance to the nearest intersections with the higher traffic volume highways, to include such elements as, but not limited to, speed limit, existing warning signs, pavement and shoulder type, pavement and shoulder width, intersection sight distances, and safe horizontal curve speeds.

c. Daily and peak hour traffic volumes presented on diagrams, with counts provided in an appendix, for the fronting highway at the site, at the highway's intersections with the higher volume highway, and for the higher volume highways at their intersection with the fronting highway.

d. All relevant elements contained in the Trip Generation portion of the above table in subsection C of this section.

e. Projected daily and peak hour of the generator traffic volumes assuming build-out of the proposal, presented on diagrams for the receiving highway at the site, at the highway's intersection with the higher volume highways, and for the higher volume highways at their intersections with the receiving highway.

f. Delay and level of service analysis for the intersections of the receiving highway with the higher volume highways.

g. A comparison of the existing geometrics of the fronting highway under proposed build-out traffic conditions with the geometric standards, based upon functional classification and volume, contained in the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT).

3. A VTIS for a rezoning proposal may be prepared in accordance with the "Less than 500 Site Generated Peak Hour Trips" category in the table in subsection C of this section, regardless of actual projected trip generation, provided that:

a. The rezoning proposal is in conformance with a locality's adopted comprehensive plan that was reviewed in accordance with 24VAC30-155-30; and

b. The review of the comprehensive plan included the submission to VDOT of a technical evaluation of the traffic impacts for anticipated development based on the future land use policies and map.

D. Methodology and standard assumptions. A VTIS shall be prepared based upon methodology and assumptions noted below or as may be agreed upon by VDOT based upon the results of a scope of work meeting held by VDOT pursuant to this section.

1. Data collection. Preparers shall collect traffic data in accordance with the identified study area. The count data shall include, at a minimum, weekday 24-hour counts, and directional turning movement counts during AM and PM peak times of the day. The 24-hour counts shall include vehicle classification counts. With approval of VDOT, data collected by the transportation professional preparer within the last 24 months may be used, likewise for data from the VDOT count program.

The preparer shall monitor traffic operations during data collection to ensure extraneous events such as vehicle crashes or special event traffic do not affect integrity of count data. Preparers collecting data for utilization in traffic impact studies shall normally avoid data collection during the following instances:

a. Holidays or times of the year when the traffic patterns are deemed to be unrepresentative of typical conditions, unless required by VDOT or the locality, or both.

b. Summer months if school or schools in proximity.

c. Fridays and weekends unless required by VDOT or the locality, or both.

d. Other times of the year contingent upon existing adjacent land use activities.

e. During times of inclement weather.

2. Trip generation. Estimates of trip generation by a proposed development shall be prepared using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008, unless VDOT agrees to allow the use of alternate trip generation rates based upon alternate published guides or local trip generation studies. VDOT shall at all times after July 1, 2011, have at least one non-ITE trip generation methodology or alternative rate approved for the use in preparation of small area plan traffic impact statements pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C that recognizes the benefits of reduced vehicle trip generation and vehicle miles traveled from developments that meet the criteria for a small area plan pursuant to this regulation. Such alternate methodology or rate can be modified based upon local factors if agreed to at a scoping meeting. Rezoning proposals shall assume the highest vehicle trip generating use allowable under the proposed zoning classification. In determining which trip generation process (equation or rate) may be used, the preparer shall follow the guidance presented in the Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004, which is summarized here in this subdivision, except rates may be utilized if the criteria for the use of regression equations are not met. Regression equations to calculate trips as a result of development shall be utilized, provided the following is true:

a. Independent variable falls within range of data; and

b. Either the data plot has at least 20 points; or

c. R2 is greater than 0.75, equation falls within data cluster in plot and standard deviation greater than 110% of weighted average rate.

If the above criteria are not met, then the preparer can use average trip rates, though if the following do not apply a rate based upon the study of similar local sites should be considered:

d. At least three data points exist;

e. Standard deviation less than 110% of weighted average rate; and

f. Weighted average rate falls within data cluster in plot.

3. Internal capture and pass-by trips.

a. Internal capture rates consider site trips "captured" within a mixed use development, recognizing that trips from one land use can access another land use within a development without having to access the adjacent street system. Mixed use developments include a combination of residential and nonresidential uses or a combination of nonresidential uses only. Internal capture allows reduction of site trips from adjacent intersections and roadways. For traffic impact statements prepared for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C, the internal capture rate or rates may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved by VDOT. For ITE-based methodologies, unless otherwise approved by VDOT, the following internal capture rates should be used if appropriate:

(1) Residential with a mix of nonresidential components – use the smaller of 15% of residential or 15% nonresidential trips generated.

(2) Residential with office use – use the smaller of 5.0% of residential or 5.0% of office trips generated.

(3) Residential with retail use – for AM peak hour, use the smaller of 5.0% residential or 5.0% retail trips generated; for PM peak hour, use the smaller of 10% residential or 10% retail trips generated; for 24-hour traffic, use the smaller of 15% residential or 15% retail trips generated.

(4) Hotel/motel with office use – use 15% of hotel/motel trips, unless the overall volume of the office traffic is more than the overall volume of hotel/motel traffic use in which case use the smaller of 10% of the hotel/motel traffic or the office traffic.

(5) Multiuse development with more than five million square feet of office and retail – internal capture rate should be determined in consultation with and approval of VDOT.

(6) Office with retail use – use the smaller of 5.0% office or retail trips generated.

(7) Some combination of the above, if approved by VDOT.

b. Pass-by trip reductions consider site trips drawn from the existing traffic stream on an adjacent street, recognizing that trips drawn to a site would otherwise already traverse the adjacent street regardless of existence of the site. Pass-by trip reductions allow a percentage reduction in the forecast of trips otherwise added to the adjacent street from the proposed development. The reduction applies only to volumes on adjacent streets, not to ingress or egress volumes at entrances serving the proposed site. Unless otherwise approved by VDOT, the pass-by rates utilized shall be those reported in Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004. For traffic impact statements prepared for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C, the pass-by trip reductions may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved by VDOT.

4. Trip distribution. In the absence of more detailed information, trip distribution shall be in accordance with logical regional travel patterns as suggested by existing highway directional split and intersection movements or population and destination site distribution and shall recognize the effects of increased street connectivity if such streets meet the requirements of the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (24VAC30-92). If more detailed information is available from trip origin/destination studies, marketing studies, or regional planning models, this may be used to distribute trips upon approval of VDOT.

5. Planning horizon. In general, the analysis years shall be related to (i) the opening date of the proposed development, (ii) build-out of major phases of a multiyear development, (iii) long-range transportation plans, and (iv) other significant transportation network changes. The preparer should establish the planning horizon in consultation with and subject to the acceptance of VDOT.

6. Background traffic growth. Unless directed by VDOT, geometric growth (or compound growth), based upon historical growth rates, shall generally be used for determining future background traffic levels where extensive traffic-count history is available and capacity constraint is not appropriate. This growth rate replicates "natural growth" and is typical for projecting urban growth. Natural growth of traffic can be adjusted consistent with traffic forecasts associated with previously submitted local land development projects within the study area.

7. Future conditions. For the purpose of the VTIS, future conditions shall include background traffic and additional vehicle trips anticipated to be generated by approved but not yet constructed or improved projects.

8. Level of service calculation. Level of service (LOS) analysis for highways shall utilize the techniques described in the Highway Capacity Manual, 2010 (TRB). Neither the intersection capacity utilization method nor the percentile delay method may be used in the traffic impact calculations of delay and level of service. Preparers shall consult with VDOT on which traffic analysis software package is to be used to conduct the LOS calculations. The results shall be tabulated and displayed graphically, with levels of service provided for each lane group for each peak period. All data used in the calculations must be provided along with the results of the capacity analysis. Any assumptions made that deviate from the programmed defaults must be documented and an explanation provided as to why there was a deviation. Electronic files used for the analysis shall be provided to VDOT as a digital submission (e.g., .hcs, .sy6, .inp, .trf files), along with the printed report. If intersections analyzed are in close proximity to each other so that queuing may be a factor, VDOT may require the inclusion of an analysis with a micro simulation model. Unless actual on-ground conditions dictate otherwise, preparers should use the following defaults when utilizing the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) or other approved programs when evaluating roadway components:

a. Terrain – choose the appropriate terrain type. Most of the state will be level or rolling, but some areas may qualify for consideration as mountainous.

b. Twelve-foot wide lanes.

c. No parking or bus activity unless field conditions include such parking or bus activity or unless the locality has provided VDOT with a written statement of intent for the services to be provided.

d. Peak hour factor by approach – calculate from collected traffic counts (requires at least a peak hour count in 15-minute increments). However, the use of peak hour factors lower than 0.85 shall only be allowed if based upon the average of more than three peak hour counts. For future conditions analysis, unless specific site conditions can be expected to create extreme peak hour factors, default peak hour factors between 0.92 and 1.00 should be used.

e. Heavy vehicle factor – calculate from collected traffic (classification) counts or obtain from VDOT count publications. For future conditions analysis with development traffic, the existing heavy vehicle factor should be adjusted based upon the nature of the traffic being generated by the development.

f. Area type – noncenter of business district.

The VTIS shall identify any existing or proposed bicycle and pedestrian accommodation that would be affected by the proposal. For the purposes of this subsection, a bicycle accommodation is defined as on-street bike lanes, paved shoulders of roadways that are not part of the designated traveled way for vehicles, or exclusive and shared off-street bicycle paths.

For the purposes of this subsection, a pedestrian accommodation is defined as sidewalks, intersection treatments, and exclusive or shared off-street trails or paths. If significant potential for bicycle or pedestrian trips exists, the VTIS shall include current and future service level analyses at build-out for existing or proposed bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. When the proposal requires or includes improvements or modifications to the roadway, bicycle, or pedestrian accommodations, the VTIS shall analyze the impacts of such improvements and modifications on bicycle and pedestrian accommodations and service levels, and provide recommendations for mitigation of adverse impacts.

The VTIS shall provide analysis for all bus service with routes that have, or will have a station or stop within 2,000 feet of the proposal. The VTIS shall evaluate and discuss potential for increased demand for bus use due to the proposal, addressing whether such increases will result in longer dwell time at stops or increase the need for buses on a route. The quality of service analysis for bus service shall be determined in accordance with the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition, 2003 (TRB). The VTIS shall provide both route and segment quality of service. The VTIS may consider the benefits of dedicated bus lanes for more frequent and rapid service. The VTIS shall provide recommendations for mitigation of adverse impacts where adverse impacts are expected to the quality of service to bus service. If an analysis of pedestrian quality or level of service is required for calculation of the bus quality of service, the preparer shall use a methodology approved by VDOT.

9. Trip reduction, and pedestrian and bicycle accommodations. When a proposal meets the criteria listed below, the preparer of the VTIS may reduce the number of vehicle trips generated by the proposal in the VTIS analysis in accordance with this subsection. Notwithstanding the percentages below, the total number of reductions used by a preparer in accordance with this subsection shall not exceed 500 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator unless otherwise approved by VDOT. The trip reductions for traffic impact statements prepared for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved by VDOT and are not subject to limitations or requirements of this subdivision.

a. Pedestrian accommodations. For the purposes of this subsection, a pedestrian accommodation is defined as a sidewalk, pedestrian path, or multiuse trail. Where a pedestrian service level of A exists, vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by 4.0% for those portions of the development within a 2,000-foot radius of the connections between the proposed development and the adjoining network. Where a pedestrian service level of B exists, vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by 3.0%; where a pedestrian service level of C exists, vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by 1.5% for the portion of the development noted above. These reductions may only be taken if:

(1) Pedestrian facility coverage in a 2,000-foot radius of the connections to the proposed development is on or along at least 80% of the road network;

(2) The pedestrian facilities inside and outside the development provide reasonably direct access to traffic generators; and

(3) There are at least two of the 10 major land use classifications, as defined in ITE Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008, within the 2,000-foot radius.

b. Bicycle accommodations. For the purposes of this subsection, a bicycle accommodation is defined as a street with a design speed of 25 MPH mph or less that carries 400 vehicles per day or less, on-street bike lanes, a pedestrian accommodation, paved shoulders of roadways that are not part of the designated traveled way for vehicles and are at least two feet wide, or exclusive and shared off-street bicycle paths. Where a bicycle service level of A exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by 3.0%. Where a bicycle service level of B exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by 2.0%. Where a bicycle service level of C exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by 1.0%. These reductions may only be taken if:

(1) Bicycle accommodations within a 2,000-foot radius of the connections to the proposed development exist on or along at least 80% of the road network;

(2) The bicycle accommodations inside and outside the development provide reasonably direct access to traffic generators; and

(3) There are at least two of the 10 major land use classifications as defined in ITE Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008, within the 2,000-foot radius.

10. Modal split and trip reduction. All vehicle trip reductions used in the VTIS pursuant to this subsection are subject to the approval of VDOT.

a. If a proposal is located within 1/2 mile along roadways, pedestrian or bicycle accommodations of a transit station, excluding bus stops and stations, reasonable vehicle trip reductions of vehicle trips generated by the proposal may be made with approval of VDOT. The preparer shall submit documentation to justify any such vehicle trip reductions used with the VTIS. When a proposal is located more than 1/2 mile but less than two miles from a transit stop, excluding bus stops and stations, with bicycle parking accommodations additional bicycle modal split reductions may be utilized. The analysis of capacity of the parking accommodations shall be included in the VTIS when such trip reductions are used.

b. If a proposal is located within 1/4 mile along roadways, pedestrian or bicycle accommodations of a bus stop or station where the segment and route service levels are C or higher, reasonable vehicle trip reductions of vehicle trips generated by the proposal may be made with the approval of VDOT. The preparer shall submit documentation to justify any such vehicle trip reductions used with the VTIS.

c. Transit and bus modal split data from similar developments within the geographic scope of the VTIS or one mile of the proposal, whichever is greater, shall be collected if the VTIS vehicle trip reductions are used pursuant to this subsection and similar developments exist within the geographic scope of the VTIS or one mile of the proposal, whichever is greater.

11. Signal warrant analysis. Traffic signal warrant analysis shall be performed in accordance with the procedures set out in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2003, revised 2007 Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315), or ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design, 1998, as determined by VDOT.

12. Recommended improvements. Recommendations made in the VTIS for improvements to transportation facilities shall be in accordance with the geometric standards contained within the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT).

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-155)

Requests for information pertaining to the availability and cost of any of these publications should be directed to the address indicated for the specific document. Requests for documents available from VDOT may be obtained from VDOT's division and representative indicated; however, VDOT documents may be available over the Internet at www.vdot.virginia.gov.

Highway Capacity Manual, 2010, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street NW, Washington, DC 20001.

ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design (1998), Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006.

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, effective 2003, revised 2007, Federal Highway Administration, Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250.

Road Design Manual, 2011, VDOT, 1401 E. East Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.

Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition, 2003; Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Keck Center of the National Academies, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001.

Trip Generation, 8th Ed. Edition, 2008, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006.

Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006.

24VAC30-315-10. General provisions.

A. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2009 Edition (2009 MUTCD), is incorporated by reference in the Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR Part 655 Subpart F), and is accessible from http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/. 23 CFR 655.603 (December 19, 2023) adopts the National Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (National MUTCD) as the national standard for any street, highway, or bicycle trail open to public travel in accordance with the United States Code (23 USC §§ 109 (d) and 402 (a)), and the National MUTCD shall apply to all such locations in Virginia except those specified in subsection B of this section.

B. The 2009 MUTCD dated December 2009 shall be the standard for all highways under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation, with the following exceptions: (i) the Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD (2011 Edition) contains standards and guidance that exceed minimum federal requirements concerning traffic control devices and presents additional pertinent traffic control parameters not addressed by the 2009 MUTCD and (ii) the Virginia Department of Transportation uses the Virginia Work Area Protection Manual (WAPM) (2011 Edition), which is a part of the Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD (2011 Edition), instead of the 2009 MUTCD Part 6, Temporary Traffic Control The Virginia Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, which includes the Virginia Work Area Protection Manual (Virginia MUTCD), version 11.0 (2025), shall be the standard for all traffic control devices on streets, highways, and bicycle facilities under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation. All signs, signals, pavement markings, and other traffic control devices under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation or on streets, highways, and bicycle facilities under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation shall conform accordingly.

C. Where (i) state standards exceed the minimum federal requirements; (ii) the 2009 MUTCD does not cover some design, installation, and operation details; or (iii) additional guidance on traffic control devices is needed, the Commissioner of Highways or a designee is authorized to establish and distribute appropriate documentation including, but not limited to, standards, specifications, and instructional memoranda. The Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD (2011 Edition) and the WAPM (2011 Edition) shall be applicable for all highways under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation. If there is a conflict between the 2009 MUTCD and the Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD (2011 Edition), the Virginia Supplement shall govern.

D. The Commissioner of Highways or a designee is authorized to make revisions to the Virginia Supplement to the MUTCD (2011 Edition) or the WAPM (2011 Edition), or both, to reflect changes to the Code of Virginia or to the 2009 MUTCD as incorporated into the Code of Federal Regulations and to be consistent with the Code of Virginia where discretion is allowed.

E. In addition to the authority referenced in subsection C of this section, the C. The Commissioner of Highways is authorized to act for and on behalf of the Commonwealth Transportation Board in matters relating to classifying, designating, regulating, and marking state highways and the installation of signals, signs, and markings to regulate, control, and manage traffic movement.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-315)

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2009 edition, December 2009, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E., Washington, DC 20590, telephone (202) 366-1993. The text is also available from the Federal Highway Administration's website at http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov and by individual parts and chapters below:

Cover, Table of Contents, and Introduction

Part 1 - General

Part 2 - Signs

Chapter 2A - General

Chapter 2B - Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates

Chapter 2C - Warning Signs and Object Markers

Chapter 2D - Guide Signs - Conventional Roads

Chapter 2E - Guide Signs - Freeways and Expressways

Chapter 2F - Toll Road Signs

Chapters 2G-2H - Preferential and Managed Lane Signs and General Information Signs

Chapters 2I-2N - General Service Signs, Specific Service Signs, Tourist-Oriented Directional Signs, Changeable Message Signs, Recreational and Cultural Interest Area Signs, and Emergency Management Signing

Part 3 - Markings

Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals

Part 5 - Traffic Control Devices for Low-Volume Roads

Part 7 - Traffic Controls for School Areas

Part 8 - Traffic Control for Railroad and Light Rail Transit Grade Crossings

Part 9 - Traffic Control for Bicycle Facilities

Appendices A1 and A2 - Congressional Legislation and Metric Conversions

Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD, 2011 Edition, Virginia Department of Transportation, 1401 E. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219:

Cover and Introduction

1. General

2. Signs

3. Markings

4. Signals

7. Schools

8. Railroads

9. Bicycles

Appendix A

Virginia Work Area Protection Manual (WAPM), 2011 Edition, Virginia Department of Transportation, 1401 E. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 ( https://www.vdot.virginia.gov/doing-business/technical-guidance-and-support/technical-guidance-documents/work-area-protection-manual-and-pocket-guide/).

Virginia Standard Highway Signs, 2011 Edition, Virginia Department of Transportation, 1401 E. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 ( https://www.vdot.virginia.gov/doing-business/technical-guidance-and-support/technical-guidance-documents/virginia-standard-highway-signs/).

Virginia Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, January 2026, Version 11.0 (eff. 1/2026)

Virginia Work Area Protection Manual, January 2026, Version 11.0 (eff. 1/2026)

24VAC30-325-10. Eligibility criteria and conditions governing receipt and use of urban maintenance funds.

A. In addition to the eligibility requirements identified in § 33.2-319 of the Code of Virginia, the road and street eligibility criteria for urban maintenance payments shall also include the following:

1. The basic right-of-way width for cul-de-sacs eligible for payment will be 40 feet, with consideration of requests for pavement widths less than 30 feet. For the purpose of making this assessment, a cul-de-sac will be defined as a dead-end street, open only at one end.

2. If a municipality has jurisdiction over and operates a toll facility, such facility is eligible for street payments.

3. Local one-way streets, loop roads, and school bus entrances will be eligible for payment provided that they are constructed to a width of 16 feet with a right-of-way width of not less than 40 feet. This includes service and frontage roads where contiguous to an interstate, primary, or urban system route.

4. VDOT can consider a waiver of standards on a site-specific basis with appropriate supporting information. Each case will be considered on its own merits.

B. In determining lane mileage eligibility, the following conditions will apply:

1. Turning lanes and ramps will not be considered for street payments. This includes center turn lanes unless they serve as moving through lanes during peak hours.

2. Parking must be restricted and enforced by towing during peak traffic periods.

3. Each road or street with more than two moving lanes must have pavement markings in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2003 Edition, including Revision 1 dated November 2004, published by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315).

4. Pavement widths of less than 14 feet qualify for only one moving lane even if it carries traffic in two directions.

5. Nonhard surfaced streets do not qualify for street payments.

C. Mileage adjustments, including the results of annexations, mergers, or incorporations, will be made on an annual basis as part of the board's approval of the annual maintenance payments. All adjustments submitted to the department by February 1 will be eligible for payment effective July 1 of the following fiscal year.

D. For the purpose of calculating maintenance payments, streets will be functionally classified based on the Federal Functional Classification system, except where the federal system is not parallel with the state system.

E. Bridge safety and regular inspection is of utmost importance. The Federal Highway Administration and the department require strict compliance with the National Bridge Inspection Standards (23 CFR Part 650) regarding the frequency of inspection and load posting requirements. The Commissioner of Highways may elect to withhold street payments from a municipality for delinquent or inadequate bridge inspection reports.

F. The Commissioner of Highways is directed to establish administrative procedures to assure ensure the provisions of this chapter and legislative directives are adhered to and complied with.

24VAC30-325-20. Document incorporated by reference. (Repealed.)

Information pertaining to the availability and cost of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), 2003 Edition with Revision No. 1 Incorporated, dated November 2004, should be directed to Federal Highway Administration, Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954. The MUTCD is also available from the following website: http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/index.htm.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-325)(Repealed)

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), 2003 Edition with Revision 1 Incorporated November 2004, Federal Highway Administration.

24VAC30-630-10. Requests for signs.

A. Any person who is deaf, blind, or deaf-blind; any person with autism or an intellectual or developmental disability as defined in § 37.2-100 of the Code of Virginia; or the agent of any such person may submit a request to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) by filling out a Request for Person with Disability Sign Form and submitting the completed form to the local VDOT office in the area where the sign is requested. The submitted form must include (i) medical certification that such person meets the disability requirement and (ii) the location of the requested sign.

B. Signs shall conform to the edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD) and the Virginia Supplement to the MUTCD in 24VAC30-315-10 Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315) .

C. The requestor shall notify the VDOT office to which the original request was made of any change in circumstances such that the sign is no longer necessary (e.g., when the person with a disability relocates).

24VAC30-630-20. Signs; type, size, color, location, and installation.

A. Signs warning drivers to be aware of persons with disabilities must be posted on a non-limited access highway maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and shall be installed in advance of the location where a person with a disability may be on or near the roadway, such that motorists may effectively perceive and respond to the signs.

B. The type, size, color, installation, and specific location of signs shall be determined at VDOT's discretion using engineering judgment in accordance with related VDOT procedures and regulations (, including the MUTCD and the Virginia Supplement to the MUTCD as referenced in 24VAC30-630-10 Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315).

C. Signs warning drivers to be aware of persons with disabilities may not be posted:

1. Where any pedestrian activity is highly discouraged due to safety concerns.

2. Where they may conflict with, are redundant to, or in combination (e.g., on the same pole) with any other regulatory or warning signs.

3. Closer than 200 feet to any existing regulatory or warning signs.

4. At signalized locations such as crosswalks at intersections or pedestrian hybrid beacons. Requests concerning a person with a visual disability and the absence of accessible pedestrian signals at a particular traffic signal will be addressed separately.

5. At a crossing with an existing rectangular rapid flashing beacon. Requests concerning a person with a visual disability and the absence of audible information devices will be addressed separately.

6. At any location in which the presence of the sign would otherwise create a safety concern, in the discretion of VDOT.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-8339; Filed October 21, 2025
TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Final

TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES

COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD

Final Regulation

REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The Commonwealth Transportation Board is claiming an exemption from the Administrative Process Act in accordance with § 2.2-4002 B 3 of the Code of Virginia, which exempts regulations relating to the location, design, specifications or construction of public buildings or other facilities and § 2.2-4002 B 11 of the Code of Virginia, which exempts regulations relating to traffic signs, markers, or control devices.

Titles of Regulations: 24VAC30-155. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (amending 24VAC30-155-60).

24VAC30-315. Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (amending 24VAC30-315-10).

24VAC30-325. Urban Maintenance and Construction Policy (amending 24VAC30-325-10; repealing 24VAC30-325-20).

24VAC30-630. Rules Governing Person with Disability Traffic Signs (amending 24VAC30-630-10, 24VAC30-630-20).

Statutory Authority:

24VAC30-155-60: § 51.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia.

24VAC30-315-10: §§ 33.2-210 and 46.2-830 of the Code of Virginia; 23 CFR 655.603.

24VAC30-325-10, 24VAC30-325-20: § 33.2-210 of the Code of Virginia.

24VAC30-630-10, 24VAC30-630-20: § 46.2-830 of the Code of Virginia.

Effective Date: December 17, 2025.

Agency Contact: Steven Jack, Regulatory Manager, Department of Transportation, 1221 East Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 786-3885, or email steven.jack@vdot.virginia.gov.

Background: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) issued an updated Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), dated December 2023, which contains the national standards for traffic control devices and is adopted at 23 CFR 655.603. State adoption of the federal MUTCD is required and must be completed by January 2026 through one of the following methods: (i) adopt the federal MUTCD as it stands; (ii) adopt the federal MUTCD with a state-specific supplement; or (iii) develop a state MUTCD incorporating national and state-specific content. All Virginia-specific adaptations to the federal MUTCD must remain in substantial conformance with the federal standards. In response, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) developed the Virginia MUTCD, version 11.0, effective January 1, 2026, which incorporates the national standards and sets state-specific requirements in substantial conformance with the federal MUTCD. The Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) approved this document as the standard for all traffic control devices on highways under the jurisdiction of VDOT.

Summary:

The amendments (i) incorporate the Virginia MUTCD into the Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315), which completes formal adoption in accordance with the federal requirements; (ii) remove the MUTCD incorporated by reference in Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (24VAC30-155) and Urban Maintenance and Construction Policy (24VAC30-325); and (iii) update the cross-references in regulatory text to point to 24VAC30-315 instead of the MUTCD document.

24VAC30-155-60. VDOT traffic impact statement.

A. A VDOT traffic impact statement (VTIS) assesses the impact of a proposed development on the transportation system and recommends improvements to lessen or negate those impacts. It shall (i) identify any traffic issues associated with access from the site to the existing transportation network, (ii) outline solutions to potential problems, (iii) address the sufficiency of the future transportation network, and (iv) present improvements to be incorporated into the proposed development.

If a VTIS is required, data collection shall be by the locality, developer, or owner, as determined by the locality and the locality shall prepare or have the developer or owner prepare the VTIS. If the locality prepares the VTIS, it shall provide a copy of the complete VTIS to the applicant when one is provided to VDOT. The completed VTIS shall be submitted to VDOT.

The data and analysis contained in the VTIS shall be organized and presented in a manner acceptable to VDOT and consistent with this regulation.

B. Scope of work meeting.

1. For proposals that generate less than 1,000 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator, representatives of the locality, the applicant, or the locality and the applicant may request a scope of work meeting with VDOT to discuss the required elements of a VTIS for any project and VDOT shall reply to such request within 30 days of its receipt of such a request and provide a date that is no more than 60 days from such receipt, time, and location for such a scope of work meeting to both the locality and the applicant, if applicable.

2. For proposals that generate 1,000 or more vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator, representatives of the locality and applicant, if applicable, shall hold a scope of work meeting with VDOT to discuss the required elements of a VTIS. Once a locality or applicant has contacted VDOT regarding the scheduling of a scope of work meeting, VDOT shall reply to both the locality and the applicant, if applicable, within 30 days of such contact and provide a date that is no more than 60 days from such contact, time and location for such a meeting.

At a scope of work meeting pursuant to this section, the locality, the applicant, and VDOT shall review the elements, methodology, and assumptions to be used in the preparation of the VTIS, and identify any other related local requirements adopted pursuant to law. The results of the initial scoping meeting may be adjusted in accordance with sound professional judgment and the requirements of this regulation if agreed upon by VDOT, the locality, and applicant, if applicable.

C. Required elements. The required elements and scope of a VTIS are dependent upon the scale and potential impact of the specific development proposal being addressed by the VTIS as determined by VDOT in its sole discretion.

1. At a minimum, the VTIS shall include the elements shown in the table below. The site generated peak hour trips in the table below shall be based upon the gross vehicle trip generation of the site less internal capture and mode split reductions, if applicable. When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike, or transit trips either on-site or off-site, the VTIS shall estimate multimodal trips. All distances in the table below shall be measured along roads or streets.

Item

Less than 500

500 to 999

1,000 or more

Background information

List of all nonexistent transportation improvements assumed in the analysis

Required

Required

Required

Map of site location, description of the parcel, general terrain features, and location within the jurisdiction and region.

Required

Required

Required

Description of geographic scope/ limits of study area.

Within 2,000 feet of site and any roadway on which 50 or more of the new peak hour vehicle trips generated by the proposal are distributed – not to exceed one mile

Within 2,000 feet of site and any roadway on which 10% or more of the new vehicle trips generated by the proposal are distributed – not to exceed two miles

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Plan at an engineering scale of the existing and proposed site uses.

Required

Required

Required

Description and map or diagram of nearby uses, including parcel zoning.

Required

Required

Required

Description and map or diagram of existing roadways.

Required

Required

Required

Description and map or diagram of programmed improvements to roadways, intersections, and other transportation facilities within the study area.

Required

Required

Required

Analysis of Existing Conditions

Collected daily and peak hour of the generator traffic volumes, tabulated and presented on diagrams with counts provided in an appendix.

Required

Required

Required

Analyses for intersections and roadways identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS is presented on diagrams for each lane group.

Required

Required

Required

When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments, tabulated and presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist

Within 2,000 feet of site

Within 2,000 feet of site

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Speed Study

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

Crash history near site

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

Sight distance

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

Analysis of Future Conditions without Development

Description of and justification for the method and assumptions used to forecast future traffic volumes.

Required

Required

Required

Analyses for intersections and roadways as identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS is presented on diagrams for each lane group.

Required

Required

Required

When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike, or transit trips either on - site or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned.

Within 2,000 feet of site

Within 2,000 feet of site

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality at the scope of work meeting

Trip Generation

Site trip generation, with tabulated data, broken out by analysis year for multi-phase developments, and including justification for deviations from ITE rates, if appropriate.

Required

Required

Required

Description and justification of internal capture reductions for mixed use developments and pass-by trip reductions, if appropriate, including table of calculations used.

Required

Required

Required

Site Traffic Distribution and Assignment

Description of methodology used to distribute trips, with supporting data.

Required

Required

Required

Description of the direction of approach for site generated traffic and diagrams showing the traffic assignment to the road network serving the site for the appropriate time periods.

Required

Required

Required

Analysis of Future Conditions With Development

Forecast daily and peak hour of the generator traffic volumes on the highway network in the study area, site entrances and internal roadways, tabulated and presented on diagrams.

Future background + site generated traffic, at each expected phase and at build - out or six years after start, whichever is later

Future background + site generated traffic, at each expected phase, at build - out, and six years after build - out, which may be extended or reduced by VDOT in consultation with the locality

At a minimum the future background + site generated traffic, at each expected phase, at build - out, and six years after build - out; may be extended by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Analyses for intersections and roadways identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS presented on diagrams for each lane group.

Required

Required

Required

When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike, or transit trips either on - site or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned.

Within 2,000 feet of site

Within 2,000 feet of site

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Recommended Improvements

Description and diagram of the location, nature, and extent of proposed improvements, with preliminary cost estimates as available from VDOT.

Required

Required

Required

Description of methodology used to calculate the effects of travel demand management (TDM) measures, if proposed, with supporting data.

Required if TDM proposed

Required if TDM proposed

Required if TDM proposed

Analyses for all proposed and modified intersections in the study area under the forecast and site traffic. Delay, and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS presented on diagrams for each lane group. For intersections expected to be signalized, MUTCD Signal Warrant analysis or ITE Manual for Traffic Signal Design, as determined by VDOT, presented in tabular form.

Required

Required

Required

When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike, or transit trips either on - site or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned.

Within 2,000 feet of site

Within 2,000 feet of site

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Conclusions

Clear, concise description of the study findings.

Required

Required

Required

Notwithstanding the geographic scope noted above, the geographic scope of the study noted above may be reduced or enlarged based upon layout of the local transportation network, the geographical size of the development, and the traffic volume on the existing network, as determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality and the applicant, if applicable. Typically, analysis will be conducted for any roadway on which the additional trips generated by the proposal have a materially detrimental impact on traffic conditions. The analysis presented in the VTIS need not include all roadway and roadway segments located within the geographic scope of the study as determined by VDOT.

2. A VTIS for a development proposal that only meets the low volume road submission criterion (24VAC30-155-40 A 3) shall, at a minimum, consist of the following elements, unless otherwise directed by VDOT.

a. All elements contained in the Background Information portion of the above table in subsection C of this section, except the geographic scope/limits of study area is limited to the highway fronting the proposed development and the closest intersection, in each direction if applicable, of that highway with a highway that has an average daily traffic volume higher than the fronting highway.

b. A roadway safety inventory study of the roadway segment or segments between the site entrance to the nearest intersections with the higher traffic volume highways, to include such elements as, but not limited to, speed limit, existing warning signs, pavement and shoulder type, pavement and shoulder width, intersection sight distances, and safe horizontal curve speeds.

c. Daily and peak hour traffic volumes presented on diagrams, with counts provided in an appendix, for the fronting highway at the site, at the highway's intersections with the higher volume highway, and for the higher volume highways at their intersection with the fronting highway.

d. All relevant elements contained in the Trip Generation portion of the above table in subsection C of this section.

e. Projected daily and peak hour of the generator traffic volumes assuming build-out of the proposal, presented on diagrams for the receiving highway at the site, at the highway's intersection with the higher volume highways, and for the higher volume highways at their intersections with the receiving highway.

f. Delay and level of service analysis for the intersections of the receiving highway with the higher volume highways.

g. A comparison of the existing geometrics of the fronting highway under proposed build-out traffic conditions with the geometric standards, based upon functional classification and volume, contained in the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT).

3. A VTIS for a rezoning proposal may be prepared in accordance with the "Less than 500 Site Generated Peak Hour Trips" category in the table in subsection C of this section, regardless of actual projected trip generation, provided that:

a. The rezoning proposal is in conformance with a locality's adopted comprehensive plan that was reviewed in accordance with 24VAC30-155-30; and

b. The review of the comprehensive plan included the submission to VDOT of a technical evaluation of the traffic impacts for anticipated development based on the future land use policies and map.

D. Methodology and standard assumptions. A VTIS shall be prepared based upon methodology and assumptions noted below or as may be agreed upon by VDOT based upon the results of a scope of work meeting held by VDOT pursuant to this section.

1. Data collection. Preparers shall collect traffic data in accordance with the identified study area. The count data shall include, at a minimum, weekday 24-hour counts, and directional turning movement counts during AM and PM peak times of the day. The 24-hour counts shall include vehicle classification counts. With approval of VDOT, data collected by the transportation professional preparer within the last 24 months may be used, likewise for data from the VDOT count program.

The preparer shall monitor traffic operations during data collection to ensure extraneous events such as vehicle crashes or special event traffic do not affect integrity of count data. Preparers collecting data for utilization in traffic impact studies shall normally avoid data collection during the following instances:

a. Holidays or times of the year when the traffic patterns are deemed to be unrepresentative of typical conditions, unless required by VDOT or the locality, or both.

b. Summer months if school or schools in proximity.

c. Fridays and weekends unless required by VDOT or the locality, or both.

d. Other times of the year contingent upon existing adjacent land use activities.

e. During times of inclement weather.

2. Trip generation. Estimates of trip generation by a proposed development shall be prepared using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008, unless VDOT agrees to allow the use of alternate trip generation rates based upon alternate published guides or local trip generation studies. VDOT shall at all times after July 1, 2011, have at least one non-ITE trip generation methodology or alternative rate approved for the use in preparation of small area plan traffic impact statements pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C that recognizes the benefits of reduced vehicle trip generation and vehicle miles traveled from developments that meet the criteria for a small area plan pursuant to this regulation. Such alternate methodology or rate can be modified based upon local factors if agreed to at a scoping meeting. Rezoning proposals shall assume the highest vehicle trip generating use allowable under the proposed zoning classification. In determining which trip generation process (equation or rate) may be used, the preparer shall follow the guidance presented in the Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004, which is summarized here in this subdivision, except rates may be utilized if the criteria for the use of regression equations are not met. Regression equations to calculate trips as a result of development shall be utilized, provided the following is true:

a. Independent variable falls within range of data; and

b. Either the data plot has at least 20 points; or

c. R2 is greater than 0.75, equation falls within data cluster in plot and standard deviation greater than 110% of weighted average rate.

If the above criteria are not met, then the preparer can use average trip rates, though if the following do not apply a rate based upon the study of similar local sites should be considered:

d. At least three data points exist;

e. Standard deviation less than 110% of weighted average rate; and

f. Weighted average rate falls within data cluster in plot.

3. Internal capture and pass-by trips.

a. Internal capture rates consider site trips "captured" within a mixed use development, recognizing that trips from one land use can access another land use within a development without having to access the adjacent street system. Mixed use developments include a combination of residential and nonresidential uses or a combination of nonresidential uses only. Internal capture allows reduction of site trips from adjacent intersections and roadways. For traffic impact statements prepared for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C, the internal capture rate or rates may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved by VDOT. For ITE-based methodologies, unless otherwise approved by VDOT, the following internal capture rates should be used if appropriate:

(1) Residential with a mix of nonresidential components – use the smaller of 15% of residential or 15% nonresidential trips generated.

(2) Residential with office use – use the smaller of 5.0% of residential or 5.0% of office trips generated.

(3) Residential with retail use – for AM peak hour, use the smaller of 5.0% residential or 5.0% retail trips generated; for PM peak hour, use the smaller of 10% residential or 10% retail trips generated; for 24-hour traffic, use the smaller of 15% residential or 15% retail trips generated.

(4) Hotel/motel with office use – use 15% of hotel/motel trips, unless the overall volume of the office traffic is more than the overall volume of hotel/motel traffic use in which case use the smaller of 10% of the hotel/motel traffic or the office traffic.

(5) Multiuse development with more than five million square feet of office and retail – internal capture rate should be determined in consultation with and approval of VDOT.

(6) Office with retail use – use the smaller of 5.0% office or retail trips generated.

(7) Some combination of the above, if approved by VDOT.

b. Pass-by trip reductions consider site trips drawn from the existing traffic stream on an adjacent street, recognizing that trips drawn to a site would otherwise already traverse the adjacent street regardless of existence of the site. Pass-by trip reductions allow a percentage reduction in the forecast of trips otherwise added to the adjacent street from the proposed development. The reduction applies only to volumes on adjacent streets, not to ingress or egress volumes at entrances serving the proposed site. Unless otherwise approved by VDOT, the pass-by rates utilized shall be those reported in Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004. For traffic impact statements prepared for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C, the pass-by trip reductions may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved by VDOT.

4. Trip distribution. In the absence of more detailed information, trip distribution shall be in accordance with logical regional travel patterns as suggested by existing highway directional split and intersection movements or population and destination site distribution and shall recognize the effects of increased street connectivity if such streets meet the requirements of the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (24VAC30-92). If more detailed information is available from trip origin/destination studies, marketing studies, or regional planning models, this may be used to distribute trips upon approval of VDOT.

5. Planning horizon. In general, the analysis years shall be related to (i) the opening date of the proposed development, (ii) build-out of major phases of a multiyear development, (iii) long-range transportation plans, and (iv) other significant transportation network changes. The preparer should establish the planning horizon in consultation with and subject to the acceptance of VDOT.

6. Background traffic growth. Unless directed by VDOT, geometric growth (or compound growth), based upon historical growth rates, shall generally be used for determining future background traffic levels where extensive traffic-count history is available and capacity constraint is not appropriate. This growth rate replicates "natural growth" and is typical for projecting urban growth. Natural growth of traffic can be adjusted consistent with traffic forecasts associated with previously submitted local land development projects within the study area.

7. Future conditions. For the purpose of the VTIS, future conditions shall include background traffic and additional vehicle trips anticipated to be generated by approved but not yet constructed or improved projects.

8. Level of service calculation. Level of service (LOS) analysis for highways shall utilize the techniques described in the Highway Capacity Manual, 2010 (TRB). Neither the intersection capacity utilization method nor the percentile delay method may be used in the traffic impact calculations of delay and level of service. Preparers shall consult with VDOT on which traffic analysis software package is to be used to conduct the LOS calculations. The results shall be tabulated and displayed graphically, with levels of service provided for each lane group for each peak period. All data used in the calculations must be provided along with the results of the capacity analysis. Any assumptions made that deviate from the programmed defaults must be documented and an explanation provided as to why there was a deviation. Electronic files used for the analysis shall be provided to VDOT as a digital submission (e.g., .hcs, .sy6, .inp, .trf files), along with the printed report. If intersections analyzed are in close proximity to each other so that queuing may be a factor, VDOT may require the inclusion of an analysis with a micro simulation model. Unless actual on-ground conditions dictate otherwise, preparers should use the following defaults when utilizing the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) or other approved programs when evaluating roadway components:

a. Terrain – choose the appropriate terrain type. Most of the state will be level or rolling, but some areas may qualify for consideration as mountainous.

b. Twelve-foot wide lanes.

c. No parking or bus activity unless field conditions include such parking or bus activity or unless the locality has provided VDOT with a written statement of intent for the services to be provided.

d. Peak hour factor by approach – calculate from collected traffic counts (requires at least a peak hour count in 15-minute increments). However, the use of peak hour factors lower than 0.85 shall only be allowed if based upon the average of more than three peak hour counts. For future conditions analysis, unless specific site conditions can be expected to create extreme peak hour factors, default peak hour factors between 0.92 and 1.00 should be used.

e. Heavy vehicle factor – calculate from collected traffic (classification) counts or obtain from VDOT count publications. For future conditions analysis with development traffic, the existing heavy vehicle factor should be adjusted based upon the nature of the traffic being generated by the development.

f. Area type – noncenter of business district.

The VTIS shall identify any existing or proposed bicycle and pedestrian accommodation that would be affected by the proposal. For the purposes of this subsection, a bicycle accommodation is defined as on-street bike lanes, paved shoulders of roadways that are not part of the designated traveled way for vehicles, or exclusive and shared off-street bicycle paths.

For the purposes of this subsection, a pedestrian accommodation is defined as sidewalks, intersection treatments, and exclusive or shared off-street trails or paths. If significant potential for bicycle or pedestrian trips exists, the VTIS shall include current and future service level analyses at build-out for existing or proposed bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. When the proposal requires or includes improvements or modifications to the roadway, bicycle, or pedestrian accommodations, the VTIS shall analyze the impacts of such improvements and modifications on bicycle and pedestrian accommodations and service levels, and provide recommendations for mitigation of adverse impacts.

The VTIS shall provide analysis for all bus service with routes that have, or will have a station or stop within 2,000 feet of the proposal. The VTIS shall evaluate and discuss potential for increased demand for bus use due to the proposal, addressing whether such increases will result in longer dwell time at stops or increase the need for buses on a route. The quality of service analysis for bus service shall be determined in accordance with the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition, 2003 (TRB). The VTIS shall provide both route and segment quality of service. The VTIS may consider the benefits of dedicated bus lanes for more frequent and rapid service. The VTIS shall provide recommendations for mitigation of adverse impacts where adverse impacts are expected to the quality of service to bus service. If an analysis of pedestrian quality or level of service is required for calculation of the bus quality of service, the preparer shall use a methodology approved by VDOT.

9. Trip reduction, and pedestrian and bicycle accommodations. When a proposal meets the criteria listed below, the preparer of the VTIS may reduce the number of vehicle trips generated by the proposal in the VTIS analysis in accordance with this subsection. Notwithstanding the percentages below, the total number of reductions used by a preparer in accordance with this subsection shall not exceed 500 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator unless otherwise approved by VDOT. The trip reductions for traffic impact statements prepared for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved by VDOT and are not subject to limitations or requirements of this subdivision.

a. Pedestrian accommodations. For the purposes of this subsection, a pedestrian accommodation is defined as a sidewalk, pedestrian path, or multiuse trail. Where a pedestrian service level of A exists, vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by 4.0% for those portions of the development within a 2,000-foot radius of the connections between the proposed development and the adjoining network. Where a pedestrian service level of B exists, vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by 3.0%; where a pedestrian service level of C exists, vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by 1.5% for the portion of the development noted above. These reductions may only be taken if:

(1) Pedestrian facility coverage in a 2,000-foot radius of the connections to the proposed development is on or along at least 80% of the road network;

(2) The pedestrian facilities inside and outside the development provide reasonably direct access to traffic generators; and

(3) There are at least two of the 10 major land use classifications, as defined in ITE Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008, within the 2,000-foot radius.

b. Bicycle accommodations. For the purposes of this subsection, a bicycle accommodation is defined as a street with a design speed of 25 MPH mph or less that carries 400 vehicles per day or less, on-street bike lanes, a pedestrian accommodation, paved shoulders of roadways that are not part of the designated traveled way for vehicles and are at least two feet wide, or exclusive and shared off-street bicycle paths. Where a bicycle service level of A exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by 3.0%. Where a bicycle service level of B exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by 2.0%. Where a bicycle service level of C exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by 1.0%. These reductions may only be taken if:

(1) Bicycle accommodations within a 2,000-foot radius of the connections to the proposed development exist on or along at least 80% of the road network;

(2) The bicycle accommodations inside and outside the development provide reasonably direct access to traffic generators; and

(3) There are at least two of the 10 major land use classifications as defined in ITE Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008, within the 2,000-foot radius.

10. Modal split and trip reduction. All vehicle trip reductions used in the VTIS pursuant to this subsection are subject to the approval of VDOT.

a. If a proposal is located within 1/2 mile along roadways, pedestrian or bicycle accommodations of a transit station, excluding bus stops and stations, reasonable vehicle trip reductions of vehicle trips generated by the proposal may be made with approval of VDOT. The preparer shall submit documentation to justify any such vehicle trip reductions used with the VTIS. When a proposal is located more than 1/2 mile but less than two miles from a transit stop, excluding bus stops and stations, with bicycle parking accommodations additional bicycle modal split reductions may be utilized. The analysis of capacity of the parking accommodations shall be included in the VTIS when such trip reductions are used.

b. If a proposal is located within 1/4 mile along roadways, pedestrian or bicycle accommodations of a bus stop or station where the segment and route service levels are C or higher, reasonable vehicle trip reductions of vehicle trips generated by the proposal may be made with the approval of VDOT. The preparer shall submit documentation to justify any such vehicle trip reductions used with the VTIS.

c. Transit and bus modal split data from similar developments within the geographic scope of the VTIS or one mile of the proposal, whichever is greater, shall be collected if the VTIS vehicle trip reductions are used pursuant to this subsection and similar developments exist within the geographic scope of the VTIS or one mile of the proposal, whichever is greater.

11. Signal warrant analysis. Traffic signal warrant analysis shall be performed in accordance with the procedures set out in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2003, revised 2007 Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315), or ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design, 1998, as determined by VDOT.

12. Recommended improvements. Recommendations made in the VTIS for improvements to transportation facilities shall be in accordance with the geometric standards contained within the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT).

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-155)

Requests for information pertaining to the availability and cost of any of these publications should be directed to the address indicated for the specific document. Requests for documents available from VDOT may be obtained from VDOT's division and representative indicated; however, VDOT documents may be available over the Internet at www.vdot.virginia.gov.

Highway Capacity Manual, 2010, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street NW, Washington, DC 20001.

ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design (1998), Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006.

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, effective 2003, revised 2007, Federal Highway Administration, Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250.

Road Design Manual, 2011, VDOT, 1401 E. East Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.

Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition, 2003; Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Keck Center of the National Academies, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001.

Trip Generation, 8th Ed. Edition, 2008, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006.

Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006.

24VAC30-315-10. General provisions.

A. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2009 Edition (2009 MUTCD), is incorporated by reference in the Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR Part 655 Subpart F), and is accessible from http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/. 23 CFR 655.603 (December 19, 2023) adopts the National Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (National MUTCD) as the national standard for any street, highway, or bicycle trail open to public travel in accordance with the United States Code (23 USC §§ 109 (d) and 402 (a)), and the National MUTCD shall apply to all such locations in Virginia except those specified in subsection B of this section.

B. The 2009 MUTCD dated December 2009 shall be the standard for all highways under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation, with the following exceptions: (i) the Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD (2011 Edition) contains standards and guidance that exceed minimum federal requirements concerning traffic control devices and presents additional pertinent traffic control parameters not addressed by the 2009 MUTCD and (ii) the Virginia Department of Transportation uses the Virginia Work Area Protection Manual (WAPM) (2011 Edition), which is a part of the Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD (2011 Edition), instead of the 2009 MUTCD Part 6, Temporary Traffic Control The Virginia Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, which includes the Virginia Work Area Protection Manual (Virginia MUTCD), version 11.0 (2025), shall be the standard for all traffic control devices on streets, highways, and bicycle facilities under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation. All signs, signals, pavement markings, and other traffic control devices under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation or on streets, highways, and bicycle facilities under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation shall conform accordingly.

C. Where (i) state standards exceed the minimum federal requirements; (ii) the 2009 MUTCD does not cover some design, installation, and operation details; or (iii) additional guidance on traffic control devices is needed, the Commissioner of Highways or a designee is authorized to establish and distribute appropriate documentation including, but not limited to, standards, specifications, and instructional memoranda. The Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD (2011 Edition) and the WAPM (2011 Edition) shall be applicable for all highways under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation. If there is a conflict between the 2009 MUTCD and the Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD (2011 Edition), the Virginia Supplement shall govern.

D. The Commissioner of Highways or a designee is authorized to make revisions to the Virginia Supplement to the MUTCD (2011 Edition) or the WAPM (2011 Edition), or both, to reflect changes to the Code of Virginia or to the 2009 MUTCD as incorporated into the Code of Federal Regulations and to be consistent with the Code of Virginia where discretion is allowed.

E. In addition to the authority referenced in subsection C of this section, the C. The Commissioner of Highways is authorized to act for and on behalf of the Commonwealth Transportation Board in matters relating to classifying, designating, regulating, and marking state highways and the installation of signals, signs, and markings to regulate, control, and manage traffic movement.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-315)

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2009 edition, December 2009, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E., Washington, DC 20590, telephone (202) 366-1993. The text is also available from the Federal Highway Administration's website at http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov and by individual parts and chapters below:

Cover, Table of Contents, and Introduction

Part 1 - General

Part 2 - Signs

Chapter 2A - General

Chapter 2B - Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates

Chapter 2C - Warning Signs and Object Markers

Chapter 2D - Guide Signs - Conventional Roads

Chapter 2E - Guide Signs - Freeways and Expressways

Chapter 2F - Toll Road Signs

Chapters 2G-2H - Preferential and Managed Lane Signs and General Information Signs

Chapters 2I-2N - General Service Signs, Specific Service Signs, Tourist-Oriented Directional Signs, Changeable Message Signs, Recreational and Cultural Interest Area Signs, and Emergency Management Signing

Part 3 - Markings

Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals

Part 5 - Traffic Control Devices for Low-Volume Roads

Part 7 - Traffic Controls for School Areas

Part 8 - Traffic Control for Railroad and Light Rail Transit Grade Crossings

Part 9 - Traffic Control for Bicycle Facilities

Appendices A1 and A2 - Congressional Legislation and Metric Conversions

Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD, 2011 Edition, Virginia Department of Transportation, 1401 E. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219:

Cover and Introduction

1. General

2. Signs

3. Markings

4. Signals

7. Schools

8. Railroads

9. Bicycles

Appendix A

Virginia Work Area Protection Manual (WAPM), 2011 Edition, Virginia Department of Transportation, 1401 E. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 ( https://www.vdot.virginia.gov/doing-business/technical-guidance-and-support/technical-guidance-documents/work-area-protection-manual-and-pocket-guide/).

Virginia Standard Highway Signs, 2011 Edition, Virginia Department of Transportation, 1401 E. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 ( https://www.vdot.virginia.gov/doing-business/technical-guidance-and-support/technical-guidance-documents/virginia-standard-highway-signs/).

Virginia Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, January 2026, Version 11.0 (eff. 1/2026)

Virginia Work Area Protection Manual, January 2026, Version 11.0 (eff. 1/2026)

24VAC30-325-10. Eligibility criteria and conditions governing receipt and use of urban maintenance funds.

A. In addition to the eligibility requirements identified in § 33.2-319 of the Code of Virginia, the road and street eligibility criteria for urban maintenance payments shall also include the following:

1. The basic right-of-way width for cul-de-sacs eligible for payment will be 40 feet, with consideration of requests for pavement widths less than 30 feet. For the purpose of making this assessment, a cul-de-sac will be defined as a dead-end street, open only at one end.

2. If a municipality has jurisdiction over and operates a toll facility, such facility is eligible for street payments.

3. Local one-way streets, loop roads, and school bus entrances will be eligible for payment provided that they are constructed to a width of 16 feet with a right-of-way width of not less than 40 feet. This includes service and frontage roads where contiguous to an interstate, primary, or urban system route.

4. VDOT can consider a waiver of standards on a site-specific basis with appropriate supporting information. Each case will be considered on its own merits.

B. In determining lane mileage eligibility, the following conditions will apply:

1. Turning lanes and ramps will not be considered for street payments. This includes center turn lanes unless they serve as moving through lanes during peak hours.

2. Parking must be restricted and enforced by towing during peak traffic periods.

3. Each road or street with more than two moving lanes must have pavement markings in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2003 Edition, including Revision 1 dated November 2004, published by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315).

4. Pavement widths of less than 14 feet qualify for only one moving lane even if it carries traffic in two directions.

5. Nonhard surfaced streets do not qualify for street payments.

C. Mileage adjustments, including the results of annexations, mergers, or incorporations, will be made on an annual basis as part of the board's approval of the annual maintenance payments. All adjustments submitted to the department by February 1 will be eligible for payment effective July 1 of the following fiscal year.

D. For the purpose of calculating maintenance payments, streets will be functionally classified based on the Federal Functional Classification system, except where the federal system is not parallel with the state system.

E. Bridge safety and regular inspection is of utmost importance. The Federal Highway Administration and the department require strict compliance with the National Bridge Inspection Standards (23 CFR Part 650) regarding the frequency of inspection and load posting requirements. The Commissioner of Highways may elect to withhold street payments from a municipality for delinquent or inadequate bridge inspection reports.

F. The Commissioner of Highways is directed to establish administrative procedures to assure ensure the provisions of this chapter and legislative directives are adhered to and complied with.

24VAC30-325-20. Document incorporated by reference. (Repealed.)

Information pertaining to the availability and cost of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), 2003 Edition with Revision No. 1 Incorporated, dated November 2004, should be directed to Federal Highway Administration, Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954. The MUTCD is also available from the following website: http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/index.htm.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-325)(Repealed)

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), 2003 Edition with Revision 1 Incorporated November 2004, Federal Highway Administration.

24VAC30-630-10. Requests for signs.

A. Any person who is deaf, blind, or deaf-blind; any person with autism or an intellectual or developmental disability as defined in § 37.2-100 of the Code of Virginia; or the agent of any such person may submit a request to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) by filling out a Request for Person with Disability Sign Form and submitting the completed form to the local VDOT office in the area where the sign is requested. The submitted form must include (i) medical certification that such person meets the disability requirement and (ii) the location of the requested sign.

B. Signs shall conform to the edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD) and the Virginia Supplement to the MUTCD in 24VAC30-315-10 Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315) .

C. The requestor shall notify the VDOT office to which the original request was made of any change in circumstances such that the sign is no longer necessary (e.g., when the person with a disability relocates).

24VAC30-630-20. Signs; type, size, color, location, and installation.

A. Signs warning drivers to be aware of persons with disabilities must be posted on a non-limited access highway maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and shall be installed in advance of the location where a person with a disability may be on or near the roadway, such that motorists may effectively perceive and respond to the signs.

B. The type, size, color, installation, and specific location of signs shall be determined at VDOT's discretion using engineering judgment in accordance with related VDOT procedures and regulations (, including the MUTCD and the Virginia Supplement to the MUTCD as referenced in 24VAC30-630-10 Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315).

C. Signs warning drivers to be aware of persons with disabilities may not be posted:

1. Where any pedestrian activity is highly discouraged due to safety concerns.

2. Where they may conflict with, are redundant to, or in combination (e.g., on the same pole) with any other regulatory or warning signs.

3. Closer than 200 feet to any existing regulatory or warning signs.

4. At signalized locations such as crosswalks at intersections or pedestrian hybrid beacons. Requests concerning a person with a visual disability and the absence of accessible pedestrian signals at a particular traffic signal will be addressed separately.

5. At a crossing with an existing rectangular rapid flashing beacon. Requests concerning a person with a visual disability and the absence of audible information devices will be addressed separately.

6. At any location in which the presence of the sign would otherwise create a safety concern, in the discretion of VDOT.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-8339; Filed October 21, 2025
TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Final

TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES

COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD

Final Regulation

REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The Commonwealth Transportation Board is claiming an exemption from Article 2 of the Administrative Process Act in accordance with § 2.2-4006 A 1 of the Code of Virginia, which excludes agency orders or regulations fixing rates or prices. The Commonwealth Transportation Board will receive, consider, and respond to petitions by any interested person at any time with respect to reconsideration or revision.

Title of Regulation: 24VAC30-620. Rules, Regulations, and Rates Concerning Toll and Bridge Facilities (amending 24VAC30-620-30).

Statutory Authority: §§ 33.2-210, 33.2-611, and 33.2-1701 of the Code of Virginia.

Effective Date: December 17, 2025.

Agency Contact: Steven Jack, Regulatory Manager, Virginia Department of Transportation, 1221 East Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 786-3885, or email steven.jack@vdot.virginia.gov.

Summary:

Pursuant to Item 441 D 1 of Chapter 725 of the 2025 Acts of Assembly, which terminated toll collection for use of the George P. Coleman Bridge, the amendment removes the toll rate schedules for the George P. Coleman Bridge.

24VAC30-620-30. Rates.

A. The following are the toll rate schedules for the Powhite Parkway Extension Toll Road.

POWHITE PARKWAY EXTENSION TOLL ROAD MAXIMUM RATE STRUCTURE

VEHICLE CLASS

MAIN LINE PLAZA

MAIN LINE PLAZA - EAST & WEST RAMP

RAMP - ROUTE 60

RAMP - COURTHOUSE ROAD

Two axle vehicles1

$0.75

$0.25

$0.25

$0.50

Three axle vehicles

$1.00

$0.35

$0.35

$0.60

Four axle vehicles

$1.25

$0.45

$0.45

$0.70

Five axle vehicles

$1.50

$0.55

$0.55

$0.80

Six axle vehicles

$1.50

$0.55

$0.55

$0.80

1Includes passenger cars, motorcycles, motorcycles equipped with a sidecar, towing a trailer or equipped with a sidecar and towing a trailer, and 2-axle trucks (4 and 6 tires).

B. The following are the toll rate schedules for the George P. Coleman Bridge.

GEORGE P. COLEMAN BRIDGE TOLL RATE STRUCTURE

VEHICLE CLASS1

ONE-WAY RATE

Motorcycles, pedestrians and bicyclists2

$0.85

Commuter ETC cars, vans, pick-ups

$0.85

Commuter ETC two-axle commercial vans/trucks

$0.85

Cars, vans, pick-ups

$2.00

Two-axle, six-tire trucks and buses

$2.00

Three-axle vehicles and buses

$3.00

Four or more-axle vehicles

$4.00

1Commuter toll rates will be available only via the E-ZPass electronic toll collection (ETC) system to two-axle vehicles making northbound crossings on the George P. Coleman Bridge.

2Includes motorcycles equipped with a sidecar, towing a trailer, or equipped with a sidecar and towing a trailer. Motorcyclists requesting this rate must use the manual toll collection lanes because the Automatic Vehicle Identification system cannot accommodate the $0.85 rate.

C. B. For all designated high-occupancy toll facilities, the toll rates shall vary as necessary to manage the demand to use the facility in accordance with 23 USC § 166.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-8420; Filed October 29, 2025
TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Final

TITLE 24. TRANSPORTATION AND MOTOR VEHICLES

COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD

Final Regulation

REGISTRAR'S NOTICE: The Commonwealth Transportation Board is claiming an exemption from the Administrative Process Act in accordance with § 2.2-4002 B 3 of the Code of Virginia, which exempts regulations relating to the location, design, specifications or construction of public buildings or other facilities and § 2.2-4002 B 11 of the Code of Virginia, which exempts regulations relating to traffic signs, markers, or control devices.

Titles of Regulations: 24VAC30-155. Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (amending 24VAC30-155-60).

24VAC30-315. Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (amending 24VAC30-315-10).

24VAC30-325. Urban Maintenance and Construction Policy (amending 24VAC30-325-10; repealing 24VAC30-325-20).

24VAC30-630. Rules Governing Person with Disability Traffic Signs (amending 24VAC30-630-10, 24VAC30-630-20).

Statutory Authority:

24VAC30-155-60: § 51.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia.

24VAC30-315-10: §§ 33.2-210 and 46.2-830 of the Code of Virginia; 23 CFR 655.603.

24VAC30-325-10, 24VAC30-325-20: § 33.2-210 of the Code of Virginia.

24VAC30-630-10, 24VAC30-630-20: § 46.2-830 of the Code of Virginia.

Effective Date: December 17, 2025.

Agency Contact: Steven Jack, Regulatory Manager, Department of Transportation, 1221 East Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 786-3885, or email steven.jack@vdot.virginia.gov.

Background: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) issued an updated Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), dated December 2023, which contains the national standards for traffic control devices and is adopted at 23 CFR 655.603. State adoption of the federal MUTCD is required and must be completed by January 2026 through one of the following methods: (i) adopt the federal MUTCD as it stands; (ii) adopt the federal MUTCD with a state-specific supplement; or (iii) develop a state MUTCD incorporating national and state-specific content. All Virginia-specific adaptations to the federal MUTCD must remain in substantial conformance with the federal standards. In response, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) developed the Virginia MUTCD, version 11.0, effective January 1, 2026, which incorporates the national standards and sets state-specific requirements in substantial conformance with the federal MUTCD. The Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) approved this document as the standard for all traffic control devices on highways under the jurisdiction of VDOT.

Summary:

The amendments (i) incorporate the Virginia MUTCD into the Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315), which completes formal adoption in accordance with the federal requirements; (ii) remove the MUTCD incorporated by reference in Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (24VAC30-155) and Urban Maintenance and Construction Policy (24VAC30-325); and (iii) update the cross-references in regulatory text to point to 24VAC30-315 instead of the MUTCD document.

24VAC30-155-60. VDOT traffic impact statement.

A. A VDOT traffic impact statement (VTIS) assesses the impact of a proposed development on the transportation system and recommends improvements to lessen or negate those impacts. It shall (i) identify any traffic issues associated with access from the site to the existing transportation network, (ii) outline solutions to potential problems, (iii) address the sufficiency of the future transportation network, and (iv) present improvements to be incorporated into the proposed development.

If a VTIS is required, data collection shall be by the locality, developer, or owner, as determined by the locality and the locality shall prepare or have the developer or owner prepare the VTIS. If the locality prepares the VTIS, it shall provide a copy of the complete VTIS to the applicant when one is provided to VDOT. The completed VTIS shall be submitted to VDOT.

The data and analysis contained in the VTIS shall be organized and presented in a manner acceptable to VDOT and consistent with this regulation.

B. Scope of work meeting.

1. For proposals that generate less than 1,000 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator, representatives of the locality, the applicant, or the locality and the applicant may request a scope of work meeting with VDOT to discuss the required elements of a VTIS for any project and VDOT shall reply to such request within 30 days of its receipt of such a request and provide a date that is no more than 60 days from such receipt, time, and location for such a scope of work meeting to both the locality and the applicant, if applicable.

2. For proposals that generate 1,000 or more vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator, representatives of the locality and applicant, if applicable, shall hold a scope of work meeting with VDOT to discuss the required elements of a VTIS. Once a locality or applicant has contacted VDOT regarding the scheduling of a scope of work meeting, VDOT shall reply to both the locality and the applicant, if applicable, within 30 days of such contact and provide a date that is no more than 60 days from such contact, time and location for such a meeting.

At a scope of work meeting pursuant to this section, the locality, the applicant, and VDOT shall review the elements, methodology, and assumptions to be used in the preparation of the VTIS, and identify any other related local requirements adopted pursuant to law. The results of the initial scoping meeting may be adjusted in accordance with sound professional judgment and the requirements of this regulation if agreed upon by VDOT, the locality, and applicant, if applicable.

C. Required elements. The required elements and scope of a VTIS are dependent upon the scale and potential impact of the specific development proposal being addressed by the VTIS as determined by VDOT in its sole discretion.

1. At a minimum, the VTIS shall include the elements shown in the table below. The site generated peak hour trips in the table below shall be based upon the gross vehicle trip generation of the site less internal capture and mode split reductions, if applicable. When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike, or transit trips either on-site or off-site, the VTIS shall estimate multimodal trips. All distances in the table below shall be measured along roads or streets.

Item

Less than 500

500 to 999

1,000 or more

Background information

List of all nonexistent transportation improvements assumed in the analysis

Required

Required

Required

Map of site location, description of the parcel, general terrain features, and location within the jurisdiction and region.

Required

Required

Required

Description of geographic scope/ limits of study area.

Within 2,000 feet of site and any roadway on which 50 or more of the new peak hour vehicle trips generated by the proposal are distributed – not to exceed one mile

Within 2,000 feet of site and any roadway on which 10% or more of the new vehicle trips generated by the proposal are distributed – not to exceed two miles

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Plan at an engineering scale of the existing and proposed site uses.

Required

Required

Required

Description and map or diagram of nearby uses, including parcel zoning.

Required

Required

Required

Description and map or diagram of existing roadways.

Required

Required

Required

Description and map or diagram of programmed improvements to roadways, intersections, and other transportation facilities within the study area.

Required

Required

Required

Analysis of Existing Conditions

Collected daily and peak hour of the generator traffic volumes, tabulated and presented on diagrams with counts provided in an appendix.

Required

Required

Required

Analyses for intersections and roadways identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS is presented on diagrams for each lane group.

Required

Required

Required

When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike or transit trips either on - or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments, tabulated and presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist

Within 2,000 feet of site

Within 2,000 feet of site

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Speed Study

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

Crash history near site

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

Sight distance

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

If requested by VDOT

Analysis of Future Conditions without Development

Description of and justification for the method and assumptions used to forecast future traffic volumes.

Required

Required

Required

Analyses for intersections and roadways as identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS is presented on diagrams for each lane group.

Required

Required

Required

When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike, or transit trips either on - site or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned.

Within 2,000 feet of site

Within 2,000 feet of site

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality at the scope of work meeting

Trip Generation

Site trip generation, with tabulated data, broken out by analysis year for multi-phase developments, and including justification for deviations from ITE rates, if appropriate.

Required

Required

Required

Description and justification of internal capture reductions for mixed use developments and pass-by trip reductions, if appropriate, including table of calculations used.

Required

Required

Required

Site Traffic Distribution and Assignment

Description of methodology used to distribute trips, with supporting data.

Required

Required

Required

Description of the direction of approach for site generated traffic and diagrams showing the traffic assignment to the road network serving the site for the appropriate time periods.

Required

Required

Required

Analysis of Future Conditions With Development

Forecast daily and peak hour of the generator traffic volumes on the highway network in the study area, site entrances and internal roadways, tabulated and presented on diagrams.

Future background + site generated traffic, at each expected phase and at build - out or six years after start, whichever is later

Future background + site generated traffic, at each expected phase, at build - out, and six years after build - out, which may be extended or reduced by VDOT in consultation with the locality

At a minimum the future background + site generated traffic, at each expected phase, at build - out, and six years after build - out; may be extended by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Analyses for intersections and roadways identified by VDOT. Delay and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS presented on diagrams for each lane group.

Required

Required

Required

When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike, or transit trips either on - site or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned.

Within 2,000 feet of site

Within 2,000 feet of site

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Recommended Improvements

Description and diagram of the location, nature, and extent of proposed improvements, with preliminary cost estimates as available from VDOT.

Required

Required

Required

Description of methodology used to calculate the effects of travel demand management (TDM) measures, if proposed, with supporting data.

Required if TDM proposed

Required if TDM proposed

Required if TDM proposed

Analyses for all proposed and modified intersections in the study area under the forecast and site traffic. Delay, and Level of Service (LOS) are tabulated and LOS presented on diagrams for each lane group. For intersections expected to be signalized, MUTCD Signal Warrant analysis or ITE Manual for Traffic Signal Design, as determined by VDOT, presented in tabular form.

Required

Required

Required

When the type of development proposed would indicate significant potential for walking, bike, or transit trips either on - site or off - site, analyses of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and bus route or routes and segment or segments tabulated and presented on diagrams, if facilities or routes exist or are planned.

Within 2,000 feet of site

Within 2,000 feet of site

To be determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality

Conclusions

Clear, concise description of the study findings.

Required

Required

Required

Notwithstanding the geographic scope noted above, the geographic scope of the study noted above may be reduced or enlarged based upon layout of the local transportation network, the geographical size of the development, and the traffic volume on the existing network, as determined by VDOT in consultation with the locality and the applicant, if applicable. Typically, analysis will be conducted for any roadway on which the additional trips generated by the proposal have a materially detrimental impact on traffic conditions. The analysis presented in the VTIS need not include all roadway and roadway segments located within the geographic scope of the study as determined by VDOT.

2. A VTIS for a development proposal that only meets the low volume road submission criterion (24VAC30-155-40 A 3) shall, at a minimum, consist of the following elements, unless otherwise directed by VDOT.

a. All elements contained in the Background Information portion of the above table in subsection C of this section, except the geographic scope/limits of study area is limited to the highway fronting the proposed development and the closest intersection, in each direction if applicable, of that highway with a highway that has an average daily traffic volume higher than the fronting highway.

b. A roadway safety inventory study of the roadway segment or segments between the site entrance to the nearest intersections with the higher traffic volume highways, to include such elements as, but not limited to, speed limit, existing warning signs, pavement and shoulder type, pavement and shoulder width, intersection sight distances, and safe horizontal curve speeds.

c. Daily and peak hour traffic volumes presented on diagrams, with counts provided in an appendix, for the fronting highway at the site, at the highway's intersections with the higher volume highway, and for the higher volume highways at their intersection with the fronting highway.

d. All relevant elements contained in the Trip Generation portion of the above table in subsection C of this section.

e. Projected daily and peak hour of the generator traffic volumes assuming build-out of the proposal, presented on diagrams for the receiving highway at the site, at the highway's intersection with the higher volume highways, and for the higher volume highways at their intersections with the receiving highway.

f. Delay and level of service analysis for the intersections of the receiving highway with the higher volume highways.

g. A comparison of the existing geometrics of the fronting highway under proposed build-out traffic conditions with the geometric standards, based upon functional classification and volume, contained in the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT).

3. A VTIS for a rezoning proposal may be prepared in accordance with the "Less than 500 Site Generated Peak Hour Trips" category in the table in subsection C of this section, regardless of actual projected trip generation, provided that:

a. The rezoning proposal is in conformance with a locality's adopted comprehensive plan that was reviewed in accordance with 24VAC30-155-30; and

b. The review of the comprehensive plan included the submission to VDOT of a technical evaluation of the traffic impacts for anticipated development based on the future land use policies and map.

D. Methodology and standard assumptions. A VTIS shall be prepared based upon methodology and assumptions noted below or as may be agreed upon by VDOT based upon the results of a scope of work meeting held by VDOT pursuant to this section.

1. Data collection. Preparers shall collect traffic data in accordance with the identified study area. The count data shall include, at a minimum, weekday 24-hour counts, and directional turning movement counts during AM and PM peak times of the day. The 24-hour counts shall include vehicle classification counts. With approval of VDOT, data collected by the transportation professional preparer within the last 24 months may be used, likewise for data from the VDOT count program.

The preparer shall monitor traffic operations during data collection to ensure extraneous events such as vehicle crashes or special event traffic do not affect integrity of count data. Preparers collecting data for utilization in traffic impact studies shall normally avoid data collection during the following instances:

a. Holidays or times of the year when the traffic patterns are deemed to be unrepresentative of typical conditions, unless required by VDOT or the locality, or both.

b. Summer months if school or schools in proximity.

c. Fridays and weekends unless required by VDOT or the locality, or both.

d. Other times of the year contingent upon existing adjacent land use activities.

e. During times of inclement weather.

2. Trip generation. Estimates of trip generation by a proposed development shall be prepared using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008, unless VDOT agrees to allow the use of alternate trip generation rates based upon alternate published guides or local trip generation studies. VDOT shall at all times after July 1, 2011, have at least one non-ITE trip generation methodology or alternative rate approved for the use in preparation of small area plan traffic impact statements pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C that recognizes the benefits of reduced vehicle trip generation and vehicle miles traveled from developments that meet the criteria for a small area plan pursuant to this regulation. Such alternate methodology or rate can be modified based upon local factors if agreed to at a scoping meeting. Rezoning proposals shall assume the highest vehicle trip generating use allowable under the proposed zoning classification. In determining which trip generation process (equation or rate) may be used, the preparer shall follow the guidance presented in the Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004, which is summarized here in this subdivision, except rates may be utilized if the criteria for the use of regression equations are not met. Regression equations to calculate trips as a result of development shall be utilized, provided the following is true:

a. Independent variable falls within range of data; and

b. Either the data plot has at least 20 points; or

c. R2 is greater than 0.75, equation falls within data cluster in plot and standard deviation greater than 110% of weighted average rate.

If the above criteria are not met, then the preparer can use average trip rates, though if the following do not apply a rate based upon the study of similar local sites should be considered:

d. At least three data points exist;

e. Standard deviation less than 110% of weighted average rate; and

f. Weighted average rate falls within data cluster in plot.

3. Internal capture and pass-by trips.

a. Internal capture rates consider site trips "captured" within a mixed use development, recognizing that trips from one land use can access another land use within a development without having to access the adjacent street system. Mixed use developments include a combination of residential and nonresidential uses or a combination of nonresidential uses only. Internal capture allows reduction of site trips from adjacent intersections and roadways. For traffic impact statements prepared for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C, the internal capture rate or rates may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved by VDOT. For ITE-based methodologies, unless otherwise approved by VDOT, the following internal capture rates should be used if appropriate:

(1) Residential with a mix of nonresidential components – use the smaller of 15% of residential or 15% nonresidential trips generated.

(2) Residential with office use – use the smaller of 5.0% of residential or 5.0% of office trips generated.

(3) Residential with retail use – for AM peak hour, use the smaller of 5.0% residential or 5.0% retail trips generated; for PM peak hour, use the smaller of 10% residential or 10% retail trips generated; for 24-hour traffic, use the smaller of 15% residential or 15% retail trips generated.

(4) Hotel/motel with office use – use 15% of hotel/motel trips, unless the overall volume of the office traffic is more than the overall volume of hotel/motel traffic use in which case use the smaller of 10% of the hotel/motel traffic or the office traffic.

(5) Multiuse development with more than five million square feet of office and retail – internal capture rate should be determined in consultation with and approval of VDOT.

(6) Office with retail use – use the smaller of 5.0% office or retail trips generated.

(7) Some combination of the above, if approved by VDOT.

b. Pass-by trip reductions consider site trips drawn from the existing traffic stream on an adjacent street, recognizing that trips drawn to a site would otherwise already traverse the adjacent street regardless of existence of the site. Pass-by trip reductions allow a percentage reduction in the forecast of trips otherwise added to the adjacent street from the proposed development. The reduction applies only to volumes on adjacent streets, not to ingress or egress volumes at entrances serving the proposed site. Unless otherwise approved by VDOT, the pass-by rates utilized shall be those reported in Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004. For traffic impact statements prepared for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C, the pass-by trip reductions may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved by VDOT.

4. Trip distribution. In the absence of more detailed information, trip distribution shall be in accordance with logical regional travel patterns as suggested by existing highway directional split and intersection movements or population and destination site distribution and shall recognize the effects of increased street connectivity if such streets meet the requirements of the Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements (24VAC30-92). If more detailed information is available from trip origin/destination studies, marketing studies, or regional planning models, this may be used to distribute trips upon approval of VDOT.

5. Planning horizon. In general, the analysis years shall be related to (i) the opening date of the proposed development, (ii) build-out of major phases of a multiyear development, (iii) long-range transportation plans, and (iv) other significant transportation network changes. The preparer should establish the planning horizon in consultation with and subject to the acceptance of VDOT.

6. Background traffic growth. Unless directed by VDOT, geometric growth (or compound growth), based upon historical growth rates, shall generally be used for determining future background traffic levels where extensive traffic-count history is available and capacity constraint is not appropriate. This growth rate replicates "natural growth" and is typical for projecting urban growth. Natural growth of traffic can be adjusted consistent with traffic forecasts associated with previously submitted local land development projects within the study area.

7. Future conditions. For the purpose of the VTIS, future conditions shall include background traffic and additional vehicle trips anticipated to be generated by approved but not yet constructed or improved projects.

8. Level of service calculation. Level of service (LOS) analysis for highways shall utilize the techniques described in the Highway Capacity Manual, 2010 (TRB). Neither the intersection capacity utilization method nor the percentile delay method may be used in the traffic impact calculations of delay and level of service. Preparers shall consult with VDOT on which traffic analysis software package is to be used to conduct the LOS calculations. The results shall be tabulated and displayed graphically, with levels of service provided for each lane group for each peak period. All data used in the calculations must be provided along with the results of the capacity analysis. Any assumptions made that deviate from the programmed defaults must be documented and an explanation provided as to why there was a deviation. Electronic files used for the analysis shall be provided to VDOT as a digital submission (e.g., .hcs, .sy6, .inp, .trf files), along with the printed report. If intersections analyzed are in close proximity to each other so that queuing may be a factor, VDOT may require the inclusion of an analysis with a micro simulation model. Unless actual on-ground conditions dictate otherwise, preparers should use the following defaults when utilizing the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) or other approved programs when evaluating roadway components:

a. Terrain – choose the appropriate terrain type. Most of the state will be level or rolling, but some areas may qualify for consideration as mountainous.

b. Twelve-foot wide lanes.

c. No parking or bus activity unless field conditions include such parking or bus activity or unless the locality has provided VDOT with a written statement of intent for the services to be provided.

d. Peak hour factor by approach – calculate from collected traffic counts (requires at least a peak hour count in 15-minute increments). However, the use of peak hour factors lower than 0.85 shall only be allowed if based upon the average of more than three peak hour counts. For future conditions analysis, unless specific site conditions can be expected to create extreme peak hour factors, default peak hour factors between 0.92 and 1.00 should be used.

e. Heavy vehicle factor – calculate from collected traffic (classification) counts or obtain from VDOT count publications. For future conditions analysis with development traffic, the existing heavy vehicle factor should be adjusted based upon the nature of the traffic being generated by the development.

f. Area type – noncenter of business district.

The VTIS shall identify any existing or proposed bicycle and pedestrian accommodation that would be affected by the proposal. For the purposes of this subsection, a bicycle accommodation is defined as on-street bike lanes, paved shoulders of roadways that are not part of the designated traveled way for vehicles, or exclusive and shared off-street bicycle paths.

For the purposes of this subsection, a pedestrian accommodation is defined as sidewalks, intersection treatments, and exclusive or shared off-street trails or paths. If significant potential for bicycle or pedestrian trips exists, the VTIS shall include current and future service level analyses at build-out for existing or proposed bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. When the proposal requires or includes improvements or modifications to the roadway, bicycle, or pedestrian accommodations, the VTIS shall analyze the impacts of such improvements and modifications on bicycle and pedestrian accommodations and service levels, and provide recommendations for mitigation of adverse impacts.

The VTIS shall provide analysis for all bus service with routes that have, or will have a station or stop within 2,000 feet of the proposal. The VTIS shall evaluate and discuss potential for increased demand for bus use due to the proposal, addressing whether such increases will result in longer dwell time at stops or increase the need for buses on a route. The quality of service analysis for bus service shall be determined in accordance with the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition, 2003 (TRB). The VTIS shall provide both route and segment quality of service. The VTIS may consider the benefits of dedicated bus lanes for more frequent and rapid service. The VTIS shall provide recommendations for mitigation of adverse impacts where adverse impacts are expected to the quality of service to bus service. If an analysis of pedestrian quality or level of service is required for calculation of the bus quality of service, the preparer shall use a methodology approved by VDOT.

9. Trip reduction, and pedestrian and bicycle accommodations. When a proposal meets the criteria listed below, the preparer of the VTIS may reduce the number of vehicle trips generated by the proposal in the VTIS analysis in accordance with this subsection. Notwithstanding the percentages below, the total number of reductions used by a preparer in accordance with this subsection shall not exceed 500 vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator unless otherwise approved by VDOT. The trip reductions for traffic impact statements prepared for small area plans pursuant to 24VAC30-155-30 C may be based on the non-ITE trip generation methodology approved by VDOT and are not subject to limitations or requirements of this subdivision.

a. Pedestrian accommodations. For the purposes of this subsection, a pedestrian accommodation is defined as a sidewalk, pedestrian path, or multiuse trail. Where a pedestrian service level of A exists, vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by 4.0% for those portions of the development within a 2,000-foot radius of the connections between the proposed development and the adjoining network. Where a pedestrian service level of B exists, vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by 3.0%; where a pedestrian service level of C exists, vehicle trips per peak hour of the generator may be reduced by 1.5% for the portion of the development noted above. These reductions may only be taken if:

(1) Pedestrian facility coverage in a 2,000-foot radius of the connections to the proposed development is on or along at least 80% of the road network;

(2) The pedestrian facilities inside and outside the development provide reasonably direct access to traffic generators; and

(3) There are at least two of the 10 major land use classifications, as defined in ITE Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008, within the 2,000-foot radius.

b. Bicycle accommodations. For the purposes of this subsection, a bicycle accommodation is defined as a street with a design speed of 25 MPH mph or less that carries 400 vehicles per day or less, on-street bike lanes, a pedestrian accommodation, paved shoulders of roadways that are not part of the designated traveled way for vehicles and are at least two feet wide, or exclusive and shared off-street bicycle paths. Where a bicycle service level of A exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by 3.0%. Where a bicycle service level of B exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by 2.0%. Where a bicycle service level of C exists, vehicle trips per day may be reduced by 1.0%. These reductions may only be taken if:

(1) Bicycle accommodations within a 2,000-foot radius of the connections to the proposed development exist on or along at least 80% of the road network;

(2) The bicycle accommodations inside and outside the development provide reasonably direct access to traffic generators; and

(3) There are at least two of the 10 major land use classifications as defined in ITE Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008, within the 2,000-foot radius.

10. Modal split and trip reduction. All vehicle trip reductions used in the VTIS pursuant to this subsection are subject to the approval of VDOT.

a. If a proposal is located within 1/2 mile along roadways, pedestrian or bicycle accommodations of a transit station, excluding bus stops and stations, reasonable vehicle trip reductions of vehicle trips generated by the proposal may be made with approval of VDOT. The preparer shall submit documentation to justify any such vehicle trip reductions used with the VTIS. When a proposal is located more than 1/2 mile but less than two miles from a transit stop, excluding bus stops and stations, with bicycle parking accommodations additional bicycle modal split reductions may be utilized. The analysis of capacity of the parking accommodations shall be included in the VTIS when such trip reductions are used.

b. If a proposal is located within 1/4 mile along roadways, pedestrian or bicycle accommodations of a bus stop or station where the segment and route service levels are C or higher, reasonable vehicle trip reductions of vehicle trips generated by the proposal may be made with the approval of VDOT. The preparer shall submit documentation to justify any such vehicle trip reductions used with the VTIS.

c. Transit and bus modal split data from similar developments within the geographic scope of the VTIS or one mile of the proposal, whichever is greater, shall be collected if the VTIS vehicle trip reductions are used pursuant to this subsection and similar developments exist within the geographic scope of the VTIS or one mile of the proposal, whichever is greater.

11. Signal warrant analysis. Traffic signal warrant analysis shall be performed in accordance with the procedures set out in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2003, revised 2007 Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315), or ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design, 1998, as determined by VDOT.

12. Recommended improvements. Recommendations made in the VTIS for improvements to transportation facilities shall be in accordance with the geometric standards contained within the Road Design Manual, 2011 (VDOT).

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-155)

Requests for information pertaining to the availability and cost of any of these publications should be directed to the address indicated for the specific document. Requests for documents available from VDOT may be obtained from VDOT's division and representative indicated; however, VDOT documents may be available over the Internet at www.vdot.virginia.gov.

Highway Capacity Manual, 2010, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street NW, Washington, DC 20001.

ITE Manual of Traffic Signal Design (1998), Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006.

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, effective 2003, revised 2007, Federal Highway Administration, Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15250.

Road Design Manual, 2011, VDOT, 1401 E. East Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.

Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition, 2003; Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Keck Center of the National Academies, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001.

Trip Generation, 8th Ed. Edition, 2008, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006.

Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition – an ITE Recommended Practice, 2004, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1627 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006.

24VAC30-315-10. General provisions.

A. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2009 Edition (2009 MUTCD), is incorporated by reference in the Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR Part 655 Subpart F), and is accessible from http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/. 23 CFR 655.603 (December 19, 2023) adopts the National Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (National MUTCD) as the national standard for any street, highway, or bicycle trail open to public travel in accordance with the United States Code (23 USC §§ 109 (d) and 402 (a)), and the National MUTCD shall apply to all such locations in Virginia except those specified in subsection B of this section.

B. The 2009 MUTCD dated December 2009 shall be the standard for all highways under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation, with the following exceptions: (i) the Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD (2011 Edition) contains standards and guidance that exceed minimum federal requirements concerning traffic control devices and presents additional pertinent traffic control parameters not addressed by the 2009 MUTCD and (ii) the Virginia Department of Transportation uses the Virginia Work Area Protection Manual (WAPM) (2011 Edition), which is a part of the Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD (2011 Edition), instead of the 2009 MUTCD Part 6, Temporary Traffic Control The Virginia Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, which includes the Virginia Work Area Protection Manual (Virginia MUTCD), version 11.0 (2025), shall be the standard for all traffic control devices on streets, highways, and bicycle facilities under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation. All signs, signals, pavement markings, and other traffic control devices under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation or on streets, highways, and bicycle facilities under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation shall conform accordingly.

C. Where (i) state standards exceed the minimum federal requirements; (ii) the 2009 MUTCD does not cover some design, installation, and operation details; or (iii) additional guidance on traffic control devices is needed, the Commissioner of Highways or a designee is authorized to establish and distribute appropriate documentation including, but not limited to, standards, specifications, and instructional memoranda. The Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD (2011 Edition) and the WAPM (2011 Edition) shall be applicable for all highways under the jurisdiction of the Virginia Department of Transportation. If there is a conflict between the 2009 MUTCD and the Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD (2011 Edition), the Virginia Supplement shall govern.

D. The Commissioner of Highways or a designee is authorized to make revisions to the Virginia Supplement to the MUTCD (2011 Edition) or the WAPM (2011 Edition), or both, to reflect changes to the Code of Virginia or to the 2009 MUTCD as incorporated into the Code of Federal Regulations and to be consistent with the Code of Virginia where discretion is allowed.

E. In addition to the authority referenced in subsection C of this section, the C. The Commissioner of Highways is authorized to act for and on behalf of the Commonwealth Transportation Board in matters relating to classifying, designating, regulating, and marking state highways and the installation of signals, signs, and markings to regulate, control, and manage traffic movement.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-315)

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2009 edition, December 2009, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E., Washington, DC 20590, telephone (202) 366-1993. The text is also available from the Federal Highway Administration's website at http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov and by individual parts and chapters below:

Cover, Table of Contents, and Introduction

Part 1 - General

Part 2 - Signs

Chapter 2A - General

Chapter 2B - Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates

Chapter 2C - Warning Signs and Object Markers

Chapter 2D - Guide Signs - Conventional Roads

Chapter 2E - Guide Signs - Freeways and Expressways

Chapter 2F - Toll Road Signs

Chapters 2G-2H - Preferential and Managed Lane Signs and General Information Signs

Chapters 2I-2N - General Service Signs, Specific Service Signs, Tourist-Oriented Directional Signs, Changeable Message Signs, Recreational and Cultural Interest Area Signs, and Emergency Management Signing

Part 3 - Markings

Part 4 - Highway Traffic Signals

Part 5 - Traffic Control Devices for Low-Volume Roads

Part 7 - Traffic Controls for School Areas

Part 8 - Traffic Control for Railroad and Light Rail Transit Grade Crossings

Part 9 - Traffic Control for Bicycle Facilities

Appendices A1 and A2 - Congressional Legislation and Metric Conversions

Virginia Supplement to the 2009 MUTCD, 2011 Edition, Virginia Department of Transportation, 1401 E. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219:

Cover and Introduction

1. General

2. Signs

3. Markings

4. Signals

7. Schools

8. Railroads

9. Bicycles

Appendix A

Virginia Work Area Protection Manual (WAPM), 2011 Edition, Virginia Department of Transportation, 1401 E. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 ( https://www.vdot.virginia.gov/doing-business/technical-guidance-and-support/technical-guidance-documents/work-area-protection-manual-and-pocket-guide/).

Virginia Standard Highway Signs, 2011 Edition, Virginia Department of Transportation, 1401 E. Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 ( https://www.vdot.virginia.gov/doing-business/technical-guidance-and-support/technical-guidance-documents/virginia-standard-highway-signs/).

Virginia Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, January 2026, Version 11.0 (eff. 1/2026)

Virginia Work Area Protection Manual, January 2026, Version 11.0 (eff. 1/2026)

24VAC30-325-10. Eligibility criteria and conditions governing receipt and use of urban maintenance funds.

A. In addition to the eligibility requirements identified in § 33.2-319 of the Code of Virginia, the road and street eligibility criteria for urban maintenance payments shall also include the following:

1. The basic right-of-way width for cul-de-sacs eligible for payment will be 40 feet, with consideration of requests for pavement widths less than 30 feet. For the purpose of making this assessment, a cul-de-sac will be defined as a dead-end street, open only at one end.

2. If a municipality has jurisdiction over and operates a toll facility, such facility is eligible for street payments.

3. Local one-way streets, loop roads, and school bus entrances will be eligible for payment provided that they are constructed to a width of 16 feet with a right-of-way width of not less than 40 feet. This includes service and frontage roads where contiguous to an interstate, primary, or urban system route.

4. VDOT can consider a waiver of standards on a site-specific basis with appropriate supporting information. Each case will be considered on its own merits.

B. In determining lane mileage eligibility, the following conditions will apply:

1. Turning lanes and ramps will not be considered for street payments. This includes center turn lanes unless they serve as moving through lanes during peak hours.

2. Parking must be restricted and enforced by towing during peak traffic periods.

3. Each road or street with more than two moving lanes must have pavement markings in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2003 Edition, including Revision 1 dated November 2004, published by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315).

4. Pavement widths of less than 14 feet qualify for only one moving lane even if it carries traffic in two directions.

5. Nonhard surfaced streets do not qualify for street payments.

C. Mileage adjustments, including the results of annexations, mergers, or incorporations, will be made on an annual basis as part of the board's approval of the annual maintenance payments. All adjustments submitted to the department by February 1 will be eligible for payment effective July 1 of the following fiscal year.

D. For the purpose of calculating maintenance payments, streets will be functionally classified based on the Federal Functional Classification system, except where the federal system is not parallel with the state system.

E. Bridge safety and regular inspection is of utmost importance. The Federal Highway Administration and the department require strict compliance with the National Bridge Inspection Standards (23 CFR Part 650) regarding the frequency of inspection and load posting requirements. The Commissioner of Highways may elect to withhold street payments from a municipality for delinquent or inadequate bridge inspection reports.

F. The Commissioner of Highways is directed to establish administrative procedures to assure ensure the provisions of this chapter and legislative directives are adhered to and complied with.

24VAC30-325-20. Document incorporated by reference. (Repealed.)

Information pertaining to the availability and cost of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), 2003 Edition with Revision No. 1 Incorporated, dated November 2004, should be directed to Federal Highway Administration, Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954. The MUTCD is also available from the following website: http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/index.htm.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (24VAC30-325)(Repealed)

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), 2003 Edition with Revision 1 Incorporated November 2004, Federal Highway Administration.

24VAC30-630-10. Requests for signs.

A. Any person who is deaf, blind, or deaf-blind; any person with autism or an intellectual or developmental disability as defined in § 37.2-100 of the Code of Virginia; or the agent of any such person may submit a request to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) by filling out a Request for Person with Disability Sign Form and submitting the completed form to the local VDOT office in the area where the sign is requested. The submitted form must include (i) medical certification that such person meets the disability requirement and (ii) the location of the requested sign.

B. Signs shall conform to the edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD) and the Virginia Supplement to the MUTCD in 24VAC30-315-10 Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315) .

C. The requestor shall notify the VDOT office to which the original request was made of any change in circumstances such that the sign is no longer necessary (e.g., when the person with a disability relocates).

24VAC30-630-20. Signs; type, size, color, location, and installation.

A. Signs warning drivers to be aware of persons with disabilities must be posted on a non-limited access highway maintained by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and shall be installed in advance of the location where a person with a disability may be on or near the roadway, such that motorists may effectively perceive and respond to the signs.

B. The type, size, color, installation, and specific location of signs shall be determined at VDOT's discretion using engineering judgment in accordance with related VDOT procedures and regulations (, including the MUTCD and the Virginia Supplement to the MUTCD as referenced in 24VAC30-630-10 Standards for Use of Traffic Control Devices to Classify, Designate, Regulate, and Mark State Highways (24VAC30-315).

C. Signs warning drivers to be aware of persons with disabilities may not be posted:

1. Where any pedestrian activity is highly discouraged due to safety concerns.

2. Where they may conflict with, are redundant to, or in combination (e.g., on the same pole) with any other regulatory or warning signs.

3. Closer than 200 feet to any existing regulatory or warning signs.

4. At signalized locations such as crosswalks at intersections or pedestrian hybrid beacons. Requests concerning a person with a visual disability and the absence of accessible pedestrian signals at a particular traffic signal will be addressed separately.

5. At a crossing with an existing rectangular rapid flashing beacon. Requests concerning a person with a visual disability and the absence of audible information devices will be addressed separately.

6. At any location in which the presence of the sign would otherwise create a safety concern, in the discretion of VDOT.

VA.R. Doc. No. R26-8339; Filed October 21, 2025