Title of Regulation: 6VAC35-30. Regulations for State Reimbursement of Local Juvenile Residential Facility Costs (amending 6VAC35-30-10, 6VAC35-30-20, 6VAC35-30-40, 6VAC35-30-60 through 6VAC35-30-190; adding 6VAC35-30-35, 6VAC35-30-45, 6VAC35-30-65; repealing 6VAC35-30-30, 6VAC35-30-50).

Statutory Authority: §§ 16.1-309.5, 16.1-322.7, and 66-10 of the Code of Virginia.

Public Hearing Information: No public hearings are scheduled.

Public Comment Deadline: November 13, 2009.

Agency Contact: Janet VanCuyk, Regulatory Coordinator, Department of Juvenile Justice, 700 East Franklin Street, 4th Floor, Richmond, VA 23219, telephone (804) 371-4097, FAX (804) 371-0773, or email janet.vancuyk@djj.virginia.gov.

Basis: The Board of Juvenile Justice is entrusted with general authority to promulgate regulations by § 66-10 of the Code of Virginia, which states the board may "promulgate such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this title and other laws of the Commonwealth administered by the Director or the Department."

Additionally, the legal authority of the Board of Juvenile Justice to promulgate regulations governing reimbursement of construction costs for local juvenile residential facilities is found in § 16.1-309.5 C of the Code of Virginia. This section states that "the Board shall promulgate regulations to include criteria to serve as guidelines in evaluating requests for such reimbursements and to ensure the geographically equitable distribution of state funds for such purpose."

Moreover, § 16.1-322.7 of the Code of Virginia requires the Board of Juvenile Justice to promulgate regulations governing the schedule for and manner of state reimbursement to the cities or counties or any combination thereof for costs of construction of local or regional detention homes. It further requires regulations regarding the minimum standards for the construction, equipment, administration, and operation of the facilities.

Purpose: The Regulations Governing State Reimbursement of Local Juvenile Residential Facility Costs, 6VAC35-30, sets forth the process by which the department and the Board of Juvenile Justice will approve the Commonwealth's reimbursement of a portion of a locality's cost of constructing a juvenile residential facility. It establishes the process for evaluating requests from localities for state reimbursement of local juvenile residential facility construction costs, including criteria to assess need, priorities for construction projects, and a methodology for determining appropriate costs. The regulation also provides the basis for the department's "Guidelines for Minimum Standards in Design and Construction of Juvenile Facilities," which addresses technical matters of construction and furnishings.

The last comprehensive review of the Regulations Governing State Reimbursement of Local Juvenile Residential Facility Costs was completed on September 9, 1992. Since that time, there has been a restructuring, both in the Department of Juvenile Justice and in localities. Additionally, many of the terms used in the regulation are outdated. Thus, the regulation was reviewed in light of current practices, and it was determined that a comprehensive review of and substantive changes to the regulation are necessary to streamline the process for localities requesting reimbursement that keeps with the goals of enhancing the clarity of the regulation and achieving improvements that will be reasonable, prudent, and will not impose any unnecessary burden on its regulants or the public.

Substance: The following changes have been proposed for the Regulations Governing State Reimbursement of Local Juvenile Residential Facility Costs:

1. 6VAC35-30-10: Updated referenced statutes, regulations, and documents.

2. 6VAC35-30-20:

a. Updated the definitions section and terms used, including (i) removing unused terms and (ii) clearly defining components of the needs assessment and planning study and detailing what constitutes a substantive change.

b. Removed square footage reference in the definition of area; this is addressed in 6VAC35-30-65.

c. Added definitions for (i) board-approved funding formula; (ii) efficiency ratio; (iii) project; and (iv) sponsor.

3. 6VAC35-30-30: Deleted this section as the statutory references are provided in the regulatory footnotes.

4. 6VAC35-30-35 (new): Added a prescreening step to the process to ensure that all projects subject to the regulation are identified early in the planning process.

5. 6VAC35-30-40: Added language to clarify the distinct phases of the process and the responsibilities of each party during these phases.

6. 6VAC35-30-45 (new): Added a section to clarify the sponsor/locality's responsibilities in the event of a legislative moratorium on construction/reimbursement.

7. 6VAC35-30-50: Deleted this section as it was not in the correct order of the process and was duplicative of other parts of the regulation.

8. 6VAC35-30-60:

a. Moved the board-approved funding formula to its own section.

b. Added an additional component of the board's review - review of efficiency.

c. Added a provision to allow the board to adjust the amount being requested for reimbursement when (i) functional areas are not included or are planned at a nonconforming size; (ii) support service areas are at a nonconforming size; (iii) the efficiency ratio is not appropriate; and (iv) the facility includes areas for extraordinary program activity. This section replaces a statewide average absolute limitation (from footnote i in appendix 2e of the Step-by-Step Procedures for Approval and Reimbursement for Local Facility Construction, Enlargement, and Renovation).

d. Clarified that phased reimbursements may be utilized.

9. 6VAC35-30-65 (new):

a. Moved the funding formula currently in this section from 6VAC35-30-60.

b. Made the following changes from the previous formula:

(1) Removed the requirement to convert the per-bed costs using per-bed area allowances based on the average gross square footage of actual and proposed local facilities in Virginia. The cost per square footage is already regionally accounted for using the R.S. Means location factor, and the proposed language will increase board oversight for efficiency in 6VAC35-30-60.

(2) Changed the contingency percentage from 3.0% to 10%. Since this formula governs the Schematic Design Document, the 10% would impose the same standard used for state construction at this stage of design.

(3) Added an inflation factor into the calculation for consistency with the practices of the Department of Corrections.

(4) Changed the maximum square footage requirement from 600 square feet per bed for all facilities to (i) 700 for facilities up to 35 residents; (ii) 650 for facilities of 36 to 79 residents; and (iii) 550 for facilities with 80 or more residents.

10. 6VAC35-30-70: Removed funding priorities as the Code of Virginia requires priority to multijurisdictional facilities. The current regulation requires a needs assessment, and the proposed regulation allows the board to conduct efficiency analyses.

11. 6VAC35-30-80: Included timeframes for communications.

12. 6VAC35-30-90: Made technical changes to update the references and clarify the steps in the process.

13. 6VAC35-30-100: Made technical changes including clarifying the documents required at this stage.

14. 6VAC35-30-110: Made technical change to the title.

15. 6VAC35-30-120: Amended and provided the timeframes for communications between the department and the sponsor.

Added a provision that the department's failure to respond would serve as acceptance of the recommendation.

16. 6VAC35-30-130: Stated the timeframe for submission of inspection and progress reports.

Added a provision that the department's failure to respond would serve as acceptance of the inspection and progress report.

Added a provision that the sponsor's failure to timely submit the inspection or progress reports may constitute grounds to deny reimbursement.

Added a provision that the sponsor's failure to obtain approval of a substantive change may constitute grounds to deny reimbursement.

17. 6VAC35-30-140: Clarified the required components of the schedule for final inspection.

18. 6VAC35-30-150 through 6VAC35-30-180: Made technical changes.

19. 6VAC35-30-190: Added a provision that a failure to comply with the regulation may result in the failure to obtain board certification or department approval to house juveniles in the facility.

20. Documents Incorporated by Reference: Updated the title of the document.

Issues: The proposed amendments have been vetted through an advisory committee consisting of individuals representing detention homes across the Commonwealth who would be affected by the changes in reimbursement for juvenile residential facilities. Having clear, concise, and consistent requirements for localities seeking reimbursement for construction of local facilities fosters improved communication between the department, the Commonwealth, and localities.

The proposed amendments should pose no disadvantage to the public or the Commonwealth. In fact, providing the board with additional authority to review requests for space efficiency and appropriate use of space will promote improved functionality in future construction projects.

The Department of Planning and Budget's Economic Impact Analysis:

Summary of the Proposed Amendments to Regulation. As a part of a periodic review process, the Board of Juvenile Justice (Board) proposes to amend its Regulations for State Reimbursement of Local Juvenile Facility Costs. Specifically, the Board proposes to:

• Enumerate phases of the reimbursement process and the responsibilities of each party during these phases,

• Clarify communication and submission timeframes for acceptance of bids for construction and add language that stipulates the Department of Juvenile Justice's (DJJ's) failure to respond to bid information will serve as acceptance of the locality's recommendation,

• Specify that failure to submit the inspection or progress reports in a timely fashion or failure to obtain approval of a substantive change could constitute grounds to deny reimbursement,

• Clarify the required components of the final inspection schedule,

• Clarify and add structure to pre-screening step to ensure that all projects subject to the regulation are identified early in the planning process,

• Incorporate a review of efficiency as one component of the reimbursement process and specify that the Board may adjust the costs of construction approved for reimbursement subject to the outcome of that efficiency review and a needs assessment already in current regulations,

• Increase the contingency percentage from 3.0% to 10%,

• Allow for a state-set inflation (deflation) factor to be applied to reimbursements, and

• Replace a 600 square feet per bed reimbursement cap with a three tiered cap.

Result of Analysis. The benefits likely exceed the costs for most proposed changes. There is insufficient evidence to decide whether benefits exceed costs for several other proposed changes.

Estimated Economic Impact. The Board last updated the regulations that govern reimbursement to localities for construction of juvenile facilities in 1992. Pursuant to periodic review requirements, the Board is now proposing many changes to these regulations. Most of these changes are intended to clarify existing regulatory language or recognize Board policy/current practice. Regulated entities are very unlikely to incur any costs on account of proposed changes that fall into this category. Regulated entities will receive a benefit to the extent that these changes allow them to better understand the rules to which they must adhere. The Board also proposes several substantive changes to portions of these regulations that govern inflation and contingency adjustments to reimbursements as well as per bed reimbursement rates.

Current regulations allow the Board to adjust reimbursement payments on a contingency basis by up to 3.0% of the initial estimate of construction costs. This contingency percentage can be added to account for changes in construction cost that occur between the time plans are submitted and the time (sometimes years later) when the planned facility is actually built. The Board is also currently allowed to adjust reimbursements by a "change order" amount at the end of construction.

The Board proposes to increase the contingency percentage to 10% and add a new inflation factor. The inflation factor is set by the state and is "a yearly market inflation rate applied from January 1 of the year of the submitted design through the midpoint of construction, compounded."

These two changes may increase the state's share of construction costs for local juvenile detention facilities while reducing locality expenditures on these projects (since localities currently must cover any increased costs over the current 3.0% contingency amount plus the "change order"). This will likely benefit localities that will have to use fewer local dollars to build required facilities but will also likely cost the state more general revenue dollars. To the extent that DJJ can make these building projects more efficient through their review process, fewer tax dollars overall will likely be spent on these facilities. If, however, localities are already building as efficiently as the state would require, then these regulatory changes will only serve to shift the costs of these facilities from the specific localities where they will be located to state taxpayers who likely will not directly benefit from the building of any given facility because they do not live in the affected locality.

Current regulations impose a 600 square feet per bed reimbursement cap on all planned facility construction no matter how many beds the facility will be built for. This cap does not, however, account for economies of scale that may allow larger facilities to be built more cheaply. A large facility will not, for instance, require twice as many offices or kitchens as a facility half its size.

To account for these economies of scale, the Board proposes to institute a three tiered per bed cap. Facilities that will house 35 or fewer juveniles will have an area allowance cap of 700 square feet per bed. Facilities that will house between 36 and 79 juveniles will have a cap of 650 square feet per bed. Facilities that will house 80 or more juveniles will have a cap of 550 square feet per bed.

This change will increase reimbursement for smaller facilities and decrease reimbursement for larger facilities. Comparing two recently built facilities will give a rough idea of the reimbursement changes. The Piedmont detention facility was built to house 20 juveniles and has 669 square feet per bed. Under the existing allowance, the locality had to cover all costs for the additional 69 feet per bed. Under the new allowance, all square footage would have been subject to the reimbursement formula. The Virginia Beach detention home was built to house 90 juveniles and has 594 square feet per bed. Under the existing allowance, all square footage was subject to the reimbursement formula. Under the new allowance, the cost of 44 square feet per bed would be purely the responsibility of the building locality. DJJ reports, based on bed size of recently built facilities, that total state costs under the proposed formulas would have been reduced by roughly $63,000 for the last seven facilities built. The new maximum allowances are likely more reflective of the actual square footage needs for facilities and may encourage larger facilities to be built with an eye toward greater efficiency.

Businesses and Entities Affected. These proposed regulations will affect localities that intend to build juvenile detention facilities. DJJ reports that there are 24 detention facilities in the state currently. One locality has recently submitted a needs assessment for a new building project.

Localities Particularly Affected. Localities that want to build or expand juvenile detention facilities will be particularly affected by this proposed regulatory action.

Projected Impact on Employment. This regulatory action will likely have no impact on employment in the Commonwealth.

Effects on the Use and Value of Private Property. This regulatory action will likely have no effect on the use or value of private property in the Commonwealth.

Small Businesses: Costs and Other Effects. Small businesses in the Commonwealth are unlikely to incur any costs that are directly attributable to this regulatory action.

Small Businesses: Alternative Method that Minimizes Adverse Impact. Small businesses in the Commonwealth are unlikely to incur any costs that are directly attributable to this regulatory action.

Real Estate Development Costs. This regulatory action will likely have no effect on real estate development costs in the Commonwealth.

Legal Mandate. The Department of Planning and Budget (DPB) has analyzed the economic impact of this proposed regulation in accordance with § 2.2-4007.04 of the Administrative Process Act and Executive Order Number 36 (06). Section 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include, but need not be limited to, the projected number of businesses or other entities to whom the regulation would apply, the identity of any localities and types of businesses or other entities particularly affected, the projected number of persons and employment positions to be affected, the projected costs to affected businesses or entities to implement or comply with the regulation, and the impact on the use and value of private property. Further, if the proposed regulation has adverse effect on small businesses, § 2.2-4007.04 requires that such economic impact analyses include (i) an identification and estimate of the number of small businesses subject to the regulation; (ii) the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for small businesses to comply with the regulation, including the type of professional skills necessary for preparing required reports and other documents; (iii) a statement of the probable effect of the regulation on affected small businesses; and (iv) a description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the regulation. The analysis presented above represents DPB's best estimate of these economic impacts.

Agency's Response to the Department of Planning and Budget's Economic Impact Analysis: The responsible Virginia Board of Juvenile Justice agency representatives have reviewed the Department of Planning and Budget's economic impact analysis of 6VAC35-30, Regulations Governing State Reimbursement of Local Juvenile Residential Facility Costs. The agency has no comment regarding DPB's analysis.

Summary:

The proposed amendments (i) enumerate phases of the reimbursement process and the responsibilities of each party during these phases; (ii) clarify communication and submission timeframes for acceptance of bids for construction and add language that stipulates the Department of Juvenile Justice's failure to respond to bid information will serve as acceptance of the locality's recommendation; (iii) specify that failure to submit the inspection or progress reports in a timely fashion or failure to obtain approval of a substantive change could constitute grounds to deny reimbursement; (iv) clarify the required components of the final inspection schedule; (v) clarify and add structure to the prescreening step to ensure that all projects subject to the regulation are identified early in the planning process; (vi) incorporate a review of efficiency as one component of the reimbursement process and specify that the board may adjust the costs of construction approved for reimbursement subject to the outcome of that efficiency review and a needs assessment already in current regulations; (vii) increase the contingency percentage used to calculate estimated construction costs from 3.0% to 10%; (viii) allow for a state-set inflation (deflation) factor to be applied to reimbursements; and (ix) replace a 600 square feet per bed reimbursement cap with a three-tiered cap based on the number of residents.

CHAPTER 30
REGULATIONS FOR GOVERNING STATE REIMBURSEMENT OF LOCAL JUVENILE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY COSTS

Part I
General Information

6VAC35-30-10. Introduction.

The state Board of Youth and Family Services is charged with the responsibility for approving all requests from localities for financial assistance relative to the development and operation of new programs and services; for purchase of property; and for construction, enlargement, or renovation of detention homes, group homes or other residential care facilities for children; whether publicly or privately constructed.

The Department of Youth and Family Services exercises oversight responsibility in the establishment and maintenance of programs, services and residential care facilities for children.

The Office of Capital Outlay Management within the Department of Youth and Family Services is responsible for architectural and engineering review of residential care facilities which are constructed, enlarged or renovated, and reimbursed with state funds.

Section 16.1-309.5 of the Code of Virginia requires the Board of Juvenile Justice and the Governor to evaluate all plans for, specifications of, and requests for reimbursement from a locality or localities for the construction, enlargement, purchase, or renovation of projects governed by this chapter. No reimbursements for costs and construction for such projects shall be made unless the plans, specifications, and construction are approved by the board and the Governor in accordance with the provisions contained herein.

Section 16.1-309.9 of the Code of Virginia further mandates the board to approve minimum standards for the construction and equipment of detention homes and other facilities governed by this chapter. Any such project shall be subject to this regulation and all applicable statutes, regulations, and guidance documents, including, but not limited to, the following:

1. The Virginia Public Procurement Act, Chapter 43 (§ 2.2-4300 et seq.) of Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia;

2. The Construction and Professional Services Manual (CPSM), October 2004, issued by the Department of General Services, Division of Engineering and Building;

3. The Step-by-Step Procedures for Approval and Reimbursement for Local Facility Construction, Enlargement, and Renovation, March 2001, issued by the Department of Juvenile Justice; and

4. The Agency Procurement and Surplus Property Manual (1VAC30-130), issued by the Department of General Services, Division of Purchases and Supply.

Approval of projects for which state funding is requested is vested by the Governor in the Office of the Secretary of Public Safety. Such projects are best accomplished as a cooperative venture between a locality or localities and the Department of Youth and Family Services Juvenile Justice. Using Board of Youth and Family Services (BYFS) approved and American Correctional Association (ACA) standards regulations promulgated by the board and by working together as partners from project planning to through project construction and program implementation, the locality or localities and the department ensure that an the optimum number of children are provided high quality services at a minimum cost to the locality or localities and to the Commonwealth.

As a basis for this regulation:

1. The Virginia Public Procurement Act applies generally to every public body in the Commonwealth which § 11-37 of the Code of Virginia defines to include any legislative, executive or judicial body, agency, office, department, authority, post, commission, committee, institution, board or political subdivision created by law to exercise some sovereign power or to perform some governmental duty. Therefore, the Commonwealth of Virginia Agency Procurement and Surplus Property Manual, current edition, will apply when construction of juvenile facilities is reimbursed by state funds.

2. The Agency Procurement and Surplus Property manual incorporates the Commonwealth of Virginia Capital Outlay manual for policy and guidelines for Capital Outlay Projects. Generally, construction or renovation of juvenile facilities would constitute Capital Outlay. The Department of Youth and Family Services shall therefore apply the Commonwealth of Virginia Capital Outlay manual, current edition, whenever reimbursement with state funds is requested. Special emphasis on Chapters V, VIII, and X shall be considered whenever reimbursement is requested.

3. The Department of Youth and Family Services does not intend to replace or relieve responsibilities of the architectural and engineering firms and applicable regulatory authorities (i.e., Building Official, State Fire Marshal, etc.).

For the purposes of this chapter and reimbursement recommendations to the Secretary and the Governor, the Department of Youth and Family Services (DYFS) or its designee shall be the reviewing authority.

Part II
Definitions and Legal Basis

6VAC35-30-20. Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

"ACA" means American Correctional Association.

"Area allowance per bed" means the gross square footage of the facility divided by the facility's design capacity as provided herein.

"Architectural/Engineering (A/E) services" means an individual or firm that is licensed by the Virginia Department of Commerce to provide professional services appropriate for the specific project, and is hired by the owner to provide those specific services for the project.

"Board" means the Virginia Board of Youth and Family Services Juvenile Justice.

"Board-approved funding formula" means the method by which construction costs are calculated as provided for in 6VAC35-30-60.

"Board approved standards regulation" means standards a regulation or section or subsections thereof promulgated and approved by the Board of Youth and Family Services board. These standards include:

1. Chapter 50 of Title 6 (6VAC35-50-10 et seq.), Standards for Interdepartmental Regulation of Residential Facilities for Children;

2. Chapter 100 of Title 6 (6VAC35-100-10 et seq.), Standards for Secure Detention; and

3. Chapter 40 of Title 6 (6VAC35-40-10 et seq.), Standards for Predispositional and Post-Dispositional Group Homes.

"Department" or DYFS "DJJ" means the Department of Youth and Family Services Juvenile Justice.

"Efficiency ratio" means the proportion of a building's net usable area to its gross floor area.

"Enlargement" or "Expansion" means to expand an existing local facility by constructing additional areas.

"Furnishings and equipment" means built-in equipment or fixtures normally included in a structure at the time of construction.

"Local facility" means a juvenile residential facility which that is or may be regulated by the board and is owned, maintained, or operated by any political subdivision or combination of political subdivisions of the Commonwealth, or a privately owned or operated juvenile residential facility which that has contracted with any political subdivision or combination of political subdivisions of the Commonwealth and is or may be regulated by the board.

"Locality's representative" means an individual who is licensed by the Virginia Department of Commerce as an architect or engineer.

"Needs assessment" means an evaluation of trends and factors at the local or regional level which that may affect current and future local facility needs, and the assessment of local facilities and nonresidential programs available to meet such needs. The needs assessment for each proposed project shall identify the target population, the specific need of the target population the project is seeking to address, why the specific need cannot be met with existing resources, all alternatives considered to meet identified need, and the reason for rejecting the alternatives.

"New construction" means to erect a new local facility or replace an outdated existing local facility.

"Operating capacity" means operating capacity as established by the Department of Youth and Family Services, based on "per bed area allowances." 6VAC35-30-60 C 2.

"Planning study" means an overall description of a proposed project consisting of new construction, renovation of existing facilities, or both. The planning study shall include a program description and a program design as detailed in approved department procedures, architectural and engineering drawings at the Schematic Design Document level, the relationship of the project to existing facilities or structures, the project's schedule, a detail of the project's total projected design, construction, operation, maintenance costs, and a cost/benefit analysis.

"Procedures" means the Department of Youth and Family Services Procedures for Receiving State Reimbursement for Local Facility Construction, Enlargement, Renovation, and Operating Funds, and for the Development and Operation of New Programs.

"Project" means any proposed or actual new construction, renovation, enlargement, or expansion of a juvenile residential facility that is or will be subject to approval by the department or regulation by the board.

"Renovation" means altering or otherwise modifying an existing local facility or piece of stationary equipment for the purpose of modernizing or changing its use or capability. Renovation does not include routine maintenance. Renovation renders the facility, item or area superior to the original.

"Replacement" means constructing a local facility in place of a like local facility or purchasing equipment to replace stationary equipment which cannot be economically renovated or repaired.

"Reviewing authority" means the department, division or agency to which the Governor has delegated authority to act in his behalf in reviewing local facility construction projects for reimbursement approval.

"Routine maintenance" means the normal and usual type of repair or replacement necessary as the result of periodic maintenance inspections or normal wear and tear of a local facility or equipment.

"Sponsor" means a city, county, commission, or any combination thereof, or any private entity under contract or arrangement with any city, county, commission, or any combination thereof, that is actually or proposing to build, renovate, expand, or operate a local facility.

"Substantive change" means user generated design changes affecting any deviation from an approved plan or design that will affect the operational and functional performance of the facility, that potentially impacts the facility's compliance with any board regulation, that would result in a change in capacity, or that would result in the sponsor seeking additional reimbursement, as detailed in approved department procedures.

6VAC35-30-30. Legal basis. (Repealed.)

A. This chapter has been promulgated by the board to carry out the provisions of §§ 16.1-313 and 16.1-322.5 through 16.1-322.7 of the Code of Virginia. This chapter:

1. Serves as a guideline in evaluating requests for reimbursement of local facility construction costs;

2. Includes criteria to assess need and establish priorities;

3. Ensures the fair and equitable distribution of state funds provided for reimbursing local facility construction costs; and

4. Provides criteria for private construction of detention or other residential facilities.

B. The board is authorized to promulgate regulations pursuant to § 66-10 of the Code of Virginia.

Part III
Procedures

6VAC35-30-35. Prescreening.

A. Any sponsor planning any construction, renovation, enlargement, or expansion of a local facility shall submit an initial writing to the department that shall include a graphic showing any proposed structural changes and a brief description of all operating capacity or programmatic changes to be accommodated by the structure. The department shall review the initial writing and inform the sponsor in writing whether the project is subject to this regulation as soon as practicable but no later than 30 days from the receipt of the initial writing from the sponsor. If the department fails to respond in the required time frame, the sponsor may proceed with the reimbursement request in accordance with this chapter.

B. Any request shall be determined to be in one of the following categories:

1. For any new construction, change, or modification of an existing local facility or piece of stationary equipment, including security related upgrades, that will affect the facility's compliance with a board regulation, result in a change in certification or licensure status, or result in increased square footage, bed space, or capacity shall be subject to this regulation.

2. For any facility enhancements not provided for in subdivision 1 of this subsection for which the sponsor seeks reimbursement, the sponsor shall submit a project overview and cost estimates to the board for approval and shall be subject to the requirements of 6VAC35-30-180. The department and board may require additional documentation.

3. Minor changes, such as routine maintenance, shall not be subject to this regulation and shall be managed informally in accordance with department procedures.

Part III
Reimbursement Request Procedures

6VAC35-30-40. Reimbursement request.

A. Requests for reimbursement shall be submitted as follows: 1. Requests for reimbursement shall be approved by the board by June 1 of each year for inclusion in the department's budget request to the Governor and consideration during the next General Assembly session. Incomplete submissions, or submissions not received by the department prior to or on April 1 will not be submitted to the board for inclusion in the department's budget request. For all projects subject to this regulation, the department shall advise the sponsor of the deadline for submissions necessary to obtain approval, for inclusion in the department's budget request to the Governor, and for consideration during the next General Assembly session.

2. B. Needs assessment. The locality sponsor shall direct a letter to the department requesting the board to recommend to the Governor reimbursement for construction, enlargement or renovation. The letter shall be accompanied by the information required by subsection B., prior to the applicable deadline, submit a needs assessment that shall demonstrate the need for the particular service, program, or facility. The board shall consider the needs assessment at its next regularly scheduled meeting and shall approve, reject, or return the needs assessment.

1. If the needs assessment is approved by the board, the department shall advise the sponsor of the board's decision and of the deadline for submitting the planning study for the project.

2. If the needs assessment is returned to the sponsor, the board shall provide the sponsor with additional factors to be considered prior to resubmission.

3. The department shall advise the sponsor of the board's decision, in writing, within seven business days of the board's decision.

3. C. Planning study. The department shall submit the completed request for reimbursement to the board for review and approval by the second board meeting or within 60 days following submission by the locality sponsor shall, upon approval of the needs assessment by the board and prior to the applicable deadline, submit a complete planning study that shall explain how the proposed project is the most appropriate and cost-effective response to the specific need identified in the needs assessment.

1. The planning study shall be accompanied by an estimate of the total amount of reimbursement to be requested and a resolution from the governing body of the sponsor or sponsors requesting reimbursement.

2. The board shall consider the planning study at its next regularly scheduled meeting and shall utilize the criteria outlined in 6VAC35-30-60 when reviewing a sponsor's planning study and accompanying materials. Upon approval of a planning study, the board shall recommend the amount of state reimbursement for the project and shall forward the sponsor's submissions and the board's recommendation to the Governor or the Governor's designee for approval.

B. Requests for reimbursement of local facility construction, enlargement or renovation costs shall be accompanied by:

1. A needs assessment as specified in the procedures;

2. A resolution from the locality or localities requesting reimbursement;

3. An estimate of the reimbursement amount being requested;

4. A planning study as specified in the procedures; and

5. 3. Requests for regional facilities shall also include a copy of the agreement between the participating localities including the allocation of financial and operational responsibilities.

6VAC35-30-45. Effect of legislative moratorium.

A. In such times when the Virginia General Assembly has imposed a moratorium on construction and reimbursement of construction costs, the sponsor shall follow the requirements of this chapter.

B. To obtain any reimbursement thereafter, the sponsor shall:

1. Pursue a legislative exception to the moratorium on construction and reimbursement of construction costs; or

2. Request reimbursement at such time as the Virginia General Assembly authorizes funding for such projects.

6VAC35-30-50. Preliminary review. (Repealed.)

Localities wishing a review of their needs assessment prior to formally submitting a reimbursement request may submit only the needs assessment as specified in 6VAC35-30-40 B. Upon review of the needs assessment, the board will notify the locality or localities as to whether it appears to the board that they are ready to proceed with the formal reimbursement request.

6VAC35-30-60. Criteria for board funding recommendation.

A. Demonstrated need. The board will shall evaluate the need for the project as demonstrated by the information provided in the Needs Assessment and Planning Study.

B. Operational cost efficiency. The board shall take into consideration the operational cost efficiency of the interior design of the facility with special concern for the number of staff required, functional layout, material selection, and energy efficiency, with special emphasis on meeting the needs of youth and the mission of the facility. Design of the program facility shall meet the standards of the board and ACA.

C. Construction cost. All sponsors shall calculate construction costs in accordance with the funding formula provided in 6VAC35-30-65. Construction economy shall be reviewed in relation to the adjusted median cost of local facilities. The adjusted median cost of local facilities will be calculated by the department as a per bed cost using the following procedure:

1. A cost per square foot base figure will be the national median square-foot cost for jails (location factor applied), published in the latest edition of "Means Facilities Cost Data" published by R. S. Means Company, Inc. The "Means Facilities Cost Data" takes into consideration the "location factor" which is the materials and labor cost differential specific to a geographical location;

2. The adjusted square-foot costs will be converted to per-bed costs using per-bed area allowances based on the average gross square footage of actual and proposed local facilities in Virginia; the area allowances must be in accordance with all applicable codes and standards according to the following formula:

National cost per square foot (Means)

X Location Factor (Means)

X Area allowance per bed (maximum 900 sq. ft. per bed)

= Adjusted median construction cost of local facility;

3. The total project cost will include:

a. Construction (subdivision C 2 above);

b. Site and utilities (Means);

c. Architectural and engineering (Virginia Capital Outlay Manual);

d. Furnishings and equipment (as itemized);

e. Project inspection (Virginia Capital Outlay Manual);

f. Contingency (3.0%);

g. Property purchased specifically for this facility; and

h. Other.

D. Board review of construction costs. The economy of construction cost is necessary and shall be reviewed as follows:

1. Review for efficiency.

a. Projects or portions of projects involving renovation of existing facilities shall be reviewed in relation to the efficiency of the renovated spaces, the appropriateness of the proposed changes, and the relationship of the changes to the project of a whole.

b. Projects of new construction shall be reviewed for the building's appropriate efficiency ratio. The board may request further information from the sponsor on projects with a building's efficiency ratio of less than 65%.

2. The board may adjust the amount being requested for reimbursement funding as follows:

a. A reduction in funding when functional areas of the facility, such as the kitchen, recreation area, educational facilities, visiting area, and laundry facilities are not included or are included at a size not in conformance with applicable regulations or normal practice;

b. An increase in funding when support services areas are proposed at sizes larger than necessary in anticipation of future enlargements or expansions of the facility;

c. A decrease in funding when the building's efficiency ratio is less than 65%; and

d. An increase in funding when the facility includes areas for extraordinary program activities.

3. Any adjustments made by the board in funding shall be based upon the gross square footage of the various conditions multiplied by a cost equal to the adjusted median cost or the proposed gross square foot cost of the facility, whichever is less.

D. E. Phased reimbursement of projects. When localities wish A sponsor may request, when submitting the planning study for review, to meet the requirements outlined in the needs assessment receive portions of the total project reimbursement based upon the completion of the project in phases,. In response to such requests, the board may approve reimbursement based on the total estimated cost of the project as if it were to be completed as a single endeavor; however, reimbursement will be in amounts proportional to the phases of construction and payment will be made only as each approved phase is completed and that portion of the building is ready to be placed in service.

6VAC35-30-65. Funding formula.

A. The following funding formula shall be used to calculate estimated construction costs at the Schematic Design Documents level in the planning study phase:

1. A cost per square foot base figure shall be the national median square-foot cost for jails published in the 24th annual edition of R. S. Means Facilities Construction Cost Data 2009 (Means) with consideration taken of the "location factor," which is the materials and labor cost differential specific to the project's geographical location.

2. The cost per square foot, adjusted using the location factor, must be in accordance with all applicable codes and standards and in accordance with the following formula:

National cost per square foot (from Means)

X Location Factor (from Means)

X Area allowance per bed (as provided for in subsection B of this section)

= Adjusted median construction cost of local facility.

3. The total project cost shall include:

a. Construction cost;

b. Site and utilities (from Means);

c. Architectural and Engineering services (services as defined in the Construction and Professional Services Manual (CPSM));

d. Furnishing and equipment (as itemized by the sponsor);

e. Project inspection (services as defined in the CPSM);

f. Contingency (10.0%);

g. Inflation factor (yearly market inflation rate applied from January 1 of the year of the submitted design through the midpoint of construction, compounded;

h. Property purchased specifically for this facility; and

i. Other.

B. The following area allowances per bed shall be used to calculate the adjusted median construction cost of a local facility:

1. A maximum of 700 square feet per bed for facilities up to 35 residents;

2. A maximum of 650 square feet per bed for facilities of 36 to 79 residents; and

3. A maximum of 550 square feet per bed for facilities with 80 or more residents.

6VAC35-30-70. Funding priorities.

A. The following criteria, as determined by the needs assessment shall serve as a guide for determining the level of priority given to requests for reimbursement:

1. New construction or renovation is needed because the existing facility is closed by the court, Board of Youth and Family Services or local governing authority due to its failure to meet state or local operating standards;

2. An unsafe physical plant which fails to meet life, health, safety standards, or a court-ordered renovation, expansion, or new construction;

3. Replacement or renovation of bedspace lost due to fire, earthquake or other disaster;

4. An existing local facility is experiencing overcrowding which is expected to continue based on population forecasts;

5. A locality with no existing local facility;

6. An addition to or renovation of support facilities;

7. Phased projects; and

8. Cost overruns.

B. Regional projects. The board will shall prioritize reimbursement requests in a manner to ensure an equitable distribution of state funds across the Commonwealth; and, absent a health, safety, or welfare risk requiring priority, the board shall ordinarily give preference to requests for reimbursement for regionalized local facilities. Regionalized local facilities shall normally serve three or more localities as determined by the needs assessment.

6VAC35-30-80. Board recommendations to the Governor.

A. The department will direct a letter to the locality notifying the governing body shall notify the sponsor in writing within seven business days of the board's decision to recommend or not to recommend a project for reimbursement, and. If the recommendation is not to recommend reimbursement, the department shall briefly explain the rationale for the decision.

B. The board shall submit to the Governor, or his designee (i) its recommendations with respect to reimbursement requests and the rationale therefor; and (ii) such information as the Governor may require with respect to a request for approval of reimbursements.

C. Final appropriations are subject to the Governor's approval and legislative enactment.

Sections 16.1-313 and 16.1-322.7 of the Code of Virginia establish the rate of reimbursement to localities for construction, enlargement or renovation.

Part IV
Project Development

6VAC35-30-90. Preliminary design.

A. The locality sponsor shall submit preliminary design documents to the department as specified in the defined in the CPSM and required by approved department procedures and the Virginia Capital Outlay manual. The locality may also be required to submit preliminary design documents to other regulatory agencies.

B. Preliminary design documents shall be approved reviewed by the department for compliance with applicable statutes, regulations, and any guidance documents that are incorporated herein.

1. If the department requires changes to the preliminary design documents, all such required changes will shall be communicated in writing to the locality sponsor.

2. The locality's representative, or its A/E, sponsor shall respond in writing to the department to all comments received from the department in the preliminary design review. Necessary revisions to the project documents may be incorporated in the submission of the construction documents (referred to as the "working drawings" in the CPSM); however, all issues in question between the locality's representative, or A/E, and the department detailed in these writings shall be resolved before the project is advanced to the construction document phase is begun (referred to as the "working drawings phase" in the CPSM).

C. When all review comments have been addressed and resolved, the department shall notify the sponsor that the project has progressed to the construction documents phase.

6VAC35-30-100. Construction documents.

A. Localities The sponsor shall submit construction documents to the department as specified in the defined in the CPSM and required by approved department procedures and the Virginia Capital Outlay manual. The locality may also be required to submit construction documents to other regulatory agencies. The fire official of the authority having jurisdiction over the proposed facility shall conduct a plans review and approve the construction. The construction documents shall include 100% complete working drawings, 100% complete specifications, and all required review approvals from local building, health, and fire officials.

B. The department will review construction documents shall be reviewed by the department for compliance with board standards, Code requirements, applicable statutes, regulations, and any guidance documents incorporated herein, and for incorporation of all changes required by the department at the preliminary document review stage. This review in no way releases the A/E sponsor from his other applicable responsibilities and requirements.

1. If the department requires changes to the construction documents, all such required changes will shall be communicated in writing to the locality sponsor.

2. The locality's representative, or its A/E, sponsor shall respond in writing to the department to all comments received from the department in the construction document review. All issues in question between the architect, the locality and the department detailed in these writings shall be resolved before the project is bid advanced to the bidding phase.

C. Upon satisfactory resolution of When all review comments have been addressed and resolved, the department shall approve the construction documents and advise the locality sponsor in writing within 10 working days, as required in approved department procedures, that the project may progress to the bidding phase (referred to as the "bid documents phase" in the CPSM).

6VAC35-30-110. Changes during project development Change order process.

If, during the project development stage, any substantive change in the scope of the project, any increase in the estimated cost of construction, or any change in the operational staff requirements occurs, the review process will be suspended until the project is resubmitted to the board for further review and possible change in the status of reimbursement recommendation.

Part V
Project Construction

6VAC35-30-120. Bids Bidding.

After bids for construction have been received and opened, and the locality sponsor has determined to proceed with the project, the locality sponsor shall require its A/E to submit to the department a bid tabulation, analysis, and recommendation as to the award of the contract. Any comments by the department shall be forwarded to the locality sponsor within 10 working days five business days of receipt; and the sponsor shall respond to the comments in writing within 10 business days of receipt of the department's comments. The department's failure to respond in the required timeframe shall serve as acceptance of the sponsor's recommendation as to the award of the contract.

6VAC35-30-130. Construction.

A. During the construction of all projects, the locality sponsor shall require its architect to submit monthly inspection or progress reports to the department. The sponsor shall submit the reports to the department no later than the 15th day of the month following the inspection or when the progress report became due. The department must respond shall notify the sponsor in writing within 10 working business days after receipt if there are of any issues or problems with the project or the reports. Failure to do so serves The department's failure to respond in the required timeframe shall serve as acceptance of the inspection and progress report. Any failure to timely submit the monthly inspection or progress reports may constitute grounds to deny the requested reimbursement, in whole or in part.

B. Any substantive changes, single change orders of $10,000 or more, and accumulative change orders exceeding the project contingency change during the construction phase shall be submitted in writing to the department for review and approval before any such change is executed. Only those changes that are approved through this the approved department procedure shall be eligible for reimbursement. Any failure to seek and obtain approval of a substantive change may constitute grounds to deny the requested reimbursement, in whole or in part.

C. A representative of the department may visit the project site during the construction period to observe the work in progress. Any observed deviations from approved documents having the effect of voiding or reducing compliance with board standards or Code requirements shall be reported in writing to the locality within 10 working days and shall be corrected.

6VAC35-30-140. Final inspection.

A. Upon construction completion, the locality's representative, or the A/E, sponsor shall establish a schedule for final inspection of the project as follows. This schedule shall include: 1. The locality shall notify (i) notification to the department and all regulatory agencies which that reviewed preliminary design or construction documents of the schedule for final inspection. The fire official of the authority having jurisdiction shall conduct a plan review and approve the construction; 2. The locality shall (ii) a request to the personnel or agencies involved in the final inspection to submit comments or recommendations in writing to the locality sponsor and forward copies to the department.; 3. The locality shall require its architect to take necessary corrective action on (iii) documentation of the correction of all deficiencies noted in the comments; and submit (iv) the submission of a report of completed actions to the appropriate reviewing agencies and forward a copy of the report to the department.

B. Upon completion of the final inspection and corrective actions as required, the locality sponsor shall provide to the department copies of all required regulatory agency letters verifying approval of the completed project. The A/E and shall certify to the department the completion of the project.

6VAC35-30-150. Record documents.

The locality sponsor shall require its architect to modify original drawings and specifications to reflect the condition of the project as actually constructed, and such documents shall be marked "Record." The record documents shall be prepared as defined in the CPSM and in accordance with approved department procedures.

Part VI
Private Construction of Juvenile Facilities

6VAC35-30-160. Legal basis Private construction of juvenile facilities.

Section 16.1-322.5 of the Code of Virginia provides for allows the Board of Youth and Family Services board to authorize a county or city or any combination of counties, cities, or towns established pursuant to § 16.1-315 of the Code of Virginia to contract with a private entity for the financing, site selection, acquisition, or design and construction of a local or regional detention home or other secure facility. Localities authorized to contract for private construction of a juvenile detention facility shall receive state reimbursement authorized by § 16.1-313, 16.1-309.5 of the Code of Virginia, in accordance with Parts I through VI of this chapter.

6VAC35-30-170. Contract Requirements for contract authorization.

Prior to receiving the Board of Youth and Family Services board's authorization to enter into a contract for private construction, localities sponsors shall certify and submit documentation demonstrating that all requirements mandated by § 16.1-322.5 of the Code of Virginia have been met by both the locality sponsor and the contractor.

Part VII
Final Reimbursement

6VAC35-30-180. Request for final reimbursement for all projects.

A. Upon completion of the project, the locality sponsor shall submit the documentation specified by the approved department procedures to the department.

B. If the final amount of reimbursement requested is no more not greater than the reimbursement amount initially recommended, including the contingency, the department will shall authorize reimbursement within 90 days of receiving a complete reimbursement request. The reimbursement request shall be in the form specified by the department.

C. If the final amount of reimbursement requested is more greater than the reimbursement amount initially recommended, the sponsor shall justify the cost increase shall be justified by the locality and resubmitted submit the adjusted reimbursement request to the board and the Governor, or his designee, for approval.

6VAC35-30-190. Compliance.

Failure to comply with these regulations will delay the review process and recommendation for disbursement of funds, and may result in the denial of reimbursement, and may result in the failure to obtain board certification or department approval to house juveniles in the facility as provided for in 6VAC35-20-69.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (6VAC35-30)

Procedures for Receiving State Reimbursement for Local Facility Construction, Enlargement, Renovation, and Operating Funds, and for the Development and Operation of New Programs.

The Step-by-Step Procedures for Approval and Reimbursement for Local Facility Construction, Enlargement, and Renovation, revised March 2001, Department of Juvenile Justice.

Construction and Professional Services Manual, revision 1, October 2004, Department of General Services, Division of Engineering and Buildings (http://www.dgs.virginia.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=kn4ZKoyodZc%3d&tabid=404&mid=1128).

R.S. Means Facilities Construction Cost Data 2009, 24th Annual Edition, R.S. Means-Reed Construction Data (http://rsmeans.reedconstructiondata.com)